Home Physical Sciences A widespread study of discrete entropic model and its distribution along with fluctuations of energy
Article Open Access

A widespread study of discrete entropic model and its distribution along with fluctuations of energy

  • Vikramjeet Singh ORCID logo , Sunil Kumar Sharma ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Om Parkash and Mona Bin-Asfour ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 15, 2025

Abstract

The growing use of entropy in statistical mechanics has been paralleled by theoretical advancements. The energy transfer inside thermal structures occurs due to many interacting molecules, providing ample locations for energy allocation. As a result of molecular interaction, energy is dispersed universally. Aggregating entropy signifies that energy tends to disperse and accumulate more uniformly. Furthermore, the accumulation of entropy signifies a loss of knowledge on the location of energy. In the gathered papers, there are remarkable inquiries into information entropy across many branches of mathematics. In this communication, we have developed an innovative entropic model for certain probability distributions and provided transactions with essential and expected criteria for their validity. Furthermore, we have conducted research into energy fluctuations and the relative variability of energy within the canonical ensemble for the proposed entropic model by using the optimum Lagrange multiplier (OLM) approach. The manifestations of energy fluctuations for parametric entropy correspond closely to the prevalent configurations of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics.

1 Introduction

Entropy, originally introduced in thermodynamics as a measure of disorder and energy unavailability, has evolved into a fundamental concept with applications far beyond its classical roots. In statistical mechanics, entropy characterizes the number of microstates compatible with a macroscopic system, while in information theory, Shannon’s seminal work [1] linked entropy to the measure of uncertainty in communication systems. Since then, entropy has been widely adopted in diverse scientific fields, including physics, mathematics, quantum information, and complex systems analysis.

Classical entropy measures – notably those by Shannon, Rényi, and Tsallis – have greatly enhanced our understanding of uncertainty and statistical distributions. Shannon [1] defined a probabilistic structure for entropy based on simple axiomatic assumptions, which became foundational in information theory. Rényi [2] generalized Shannon’s formulation with a parameter that modulates sensitivity to the tail behaviour of distributions. Tsallis [3] further extended entropy into the non-extensive regime, suitable for systems exhibiting long-range interactions or correlations. These pioneering works opened pathways for a vast array of generalized entropic models.

Building on these ideas, numerous researchers have proposed further parametric generalizations:

  1. Havrda and Charvat [4] developed an alternative entropy formulation broadening statistical applications.

  2. Kapur [5], [6], [7] explored multi-parametric frameworks to model complex distributions in information systems.

  3. Deng entropy, introduced by Gao and Deng [8], highlighted structural applications in data analysis.

  4. Zhou and Zheng [9] demonstrated strong connections between observational entropy and Rényi’s model in quantum statistical mechanics.

  5. Stoyanov et al. [10] analysed the maximum entropy criterion for the moment indeterminacy of probability densities, advancing theoretical understanding.

  6. Elgawad et al. [11] studied information measures for generalized order statistics, providing deeper insight into entropy under bivariate distributions.

  7. Rastegin [12] examined entropy inequalities and uncertainty relations for structured probability measures.

Recent research continues to emphasize entropy’s importance not only in thermodynamics but also in quantum information theory, complex networks, and signal processing. For example, Cincotta and Giordano [13] analysed phase correlations in chaotic dynamical systems, while Jamaati and Mehri [14] applied Tsallis entropy to natural language processing tasks, highlighting its versatility beyond physics. Moreover, Wang et al. [15] proposed entropy-based uncertainty measures for rough set theory, and Sholehkerdar et al. [16] applied entropy metrics to objective image fusion. These studies collectively demonstrate the adaptability of entropy across multiple scientific disciplines.

Despite this extensive body of work, most existing entropy models remain limited by single-parameter formulations or restrictive assumptions on additivity and concavity. Such constraints reduce their flexibility in modelling systems with diverse probabilistic structures, correlations, or constraints. To address these gaps, researchers have increasingly turned to multi-parametric entropies that provide finer control over statistical sensitivity and deformation properties.

1.1 Motivation and contribution of this work

In response to these challenges, the present study introduces a two-parameter generalized entropy model specifically designed for discrete probability distributions. Unlike single-parameter models (e.g., Tsallis or Rényi), the proposed formulation allows independent tuning of two aspects:

  1. One parameter controls the sensitivity to probability magnitudes (nonlinearity),

  2. The other parameter modulates the scaling and deformation properties of the entropy function.

This dual-parametric structure enhances modelling flexibility and extends the theoretical scope of entropy analysis. Furthermore, the proposed entropy is applied to investigate energy fluctuations in canonical ensembles, offering new insights into statistical mechanics beyond the traditional Boltzmann–Gibbs framework.

The main objectives of this paper are:

  1. To define and analyse the properties of the proposed two-parameter entropy, showing its reduction to Shannon, Rényi, and Tsallis entropies as special cases.

  2. To derive probability distributions using the Optimal Lagrange Multiplier (OLM) method and examine how the dual parameters influence these distributions.

  3. To explore the energy fluctuation behaviour in canonical ensembles under the generalized entropy model and compare it with classical fluctuation results.

Structure of the paper

  1. Section 2 introduces the proposed entropy model and its core mathematical properties.

  2. Section 3 discusses the derived probability distributions and their implications.

  3. Section 4 presents the energy fluctuation results and their physical interpretation.

  4. Section 5 concludes with the key findings, originality, limitations, and possible applications of the proposed model in thermodynamics, statistical physics, and information theory.

Through this approach, we aim to extend the framework of entropy-based analysis by providing a flexible two-parameter formulation that bridges classical and modern entropy models while offering potential applications in both theoretical and applied domains.

2 An innovative comprehensive two-parametric entropy model

In this section, we introduce a new two-parameter entropy model for discrete probability distributions and discuss its mathematical structure, special cases, and essential properties.

2.1 Definition of the model

Let P = p 1 , p 2 , , p n with i = 1 n p i = 1 be a discrete probability distribution.

We define the two-parameter entropy as

(2.1) H α , β P = 1 β α i = 1 n p i α β + 1 1 , α β , β < α + 1 , < α <

Here,

  1. α and β are real-valued parameters with α ≠ β

  2. the constraint β < α + 1 ensures valid scaling,

  3. the term α − β + 1 determines how nonlinearity and deformation are applied to the probabilities.

This formulation decouples the two effects:

  1. α controls nonlinear sensitivity to probability magnitudes,

  2. β modulates scaling and deformation.

Thus, H α , β P provides two degrees of freedom, unlike classical single-parameter entropies.

2.2 Special cases

This generalized entropy recovers well-known models under limiting conditions:

  1. Shannon entropy: Taking the simultaneous limit α → 1, β → 1 yields

    lim α , β 1 H α , β P = i = 1 n p i ln p i

  2. Tsallis entropy: When β = 1 Eq. (2.1) simplifies to

    H α , 1 P = i = 1 n p i α 1 1 α

    which matches the Tsallis form.

  3. Rényi-like forms:

    Under specific parameter relationships (β = α + q − 1), the entropy closely relates to Rényi’s entropy.

Hence, the proposed formulation serves as a unified two-parameter framework, naturally reducing to Shannon, Tsallis, or Rényi entropies.

This dual-parametric flexibility allows the model to address scenarios where standard single-parameter entropies face limitations. For example, in complex network systems with both high-degree hubs and sparse nodes, α can control the sensitivity to rare events, while β modulates the overall scaling deformation of the distribution. Similarly, in anomalous diffusion processes or long-range correlated systems, Tsallis entropy captures non-extensively but lacks the ability to simultaneously tune scaling properties – this gap is bridged by the dual-parameter formulation. In discrete probability settings, such as socio-economic distributions or natural language processing tasks, the two-parameter model offers finer adaptability to empirical heavy-tailed data compared to the single-parameter Rényi and Tsallis forms.

2.3 Fundamental properties

The entropy H α , β P satisfies essential axioms:

  1. Permutation symmetry: invariant under reordering of probabilities.

  2. Continuity: smoothly varies for all p i in [0, 1]

  3. Non-negativity: H α , β P 0 for all valid distributions.

  4. Null event invariance: adding a zero-probability outcome does not affect entropy.

  5. Degenerate case: for deterministic P = (1, 0, …, 0), H α , β P = 0

  6. Concavity: achieves a maximum for the uniform distribution.

  7. Maximum value increases with n – For equal probabilities 1/n, the entropy grows with the number of states.

  8. Generalized non-additivity: for independent subsystems A and B,

    H α , β A U B H α , β A + H α , β B

    except for special parameter cases where additivity holds.

These properties confirm that H α , β P is a valid generalized entropy measure.

2.4 Numerical illustration

To illustrate the behaviour of this entropy, we consider a simple binomial distribution

P = { 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.25 } .

Using Eq. (2.1), we compute the entropy for different (α, β) pairs:

Parameters (α, β) Case type Entropy value
(1.0, 1.0) Shannon entropy 1.0397
(1.2, 1.0) Tsallis-like deformation 0.9350
(0.8, 1.2) Deformed scaling 0.9500
(1.5, 1.5) Strongly nonlinear case 0.8702

2.4.1 Discussion of results

  1. Shannon baseline: For (α, β) = (1, 1), we recover the standard Shannon value 1.0397.

  2. Effect of α:

Increasing α > 1 (keeping β = 1) reduces entropy, emphasizing dominant outcomes while down-weighting rare events.

  1. Effect of β:

Adjusting β > 1 (with α < 1) slightly increases entropy, showing how β rescales probability deformation.

  1. Strong deformation:

When both α, β > 1, entropy decreases further (0.8702), highlighting nonlinear concentration on high-probability events.

This example shows how α and β work independently yet complementarily, allowing interpolation between Shannon, Tsallis, Rényi-like behaviours or entirely new intermediate forms.

2.5 Link to applications

This illustration highlights the computability and adaptability of the proposed entropy.

  1. In statistical mechanics, such flexibility is vital for modelling non-extensive canonical ensembles, where classical Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy fails.

  2. The dual-parameter control makes it suitable for studying energy fluctuations and nonlinear scaling behaviours, as discussed in Section 4.

  3. Beyond physics, the model could be extended to information theory, machine learning, and complex networks, where distributions deviate from simple power laws.

Thus, even a simple example confirms the generality and broader applicability of H α , β P .

We defined a new two-parameter entropy model H α , β P demonstrated that it satisfies key entropy properties, reduces to well-known forms as special cases, and showed its flexibility through a clear numerical example.

3 Introduction of the distribution function in generalized entropy

This section aims to explore the statistical structure and implications of the proposed entropy model through the derivation of associated probability distributions and key fluctuation metrics using the Optimal Lagrange Multiplier method. These results extend classical statistical mechanics formulations by incorporating dual-parametric entropy effects.

In this subdivision, we familiarize ourselves with some of the universal formulas for the probability distribution function of the parametric entropy (2.1). Maximizing (2.1) is subject to the standardization situation described by

(3.1) i = 1 W p i 1 = 0

and the energy constraint specified by

(3.2) i = 1 W p i α β + 1 E i i = 1 W p i α β + 1 U α , β = 0

Which means that we weigh the energy E i with the probability distribution f α β + 1 / i = 1 W f i α β + 1 (occasionally mentions to as escort probabilities Beck and Schlogl [1]) where U α,β is the mean energy.

The Lagrange function

(3.3) L 1 β α i = 1 W p i α β + 1 1 λ i = 1 W p i 1 μ i = 1 W p i α β + 1 E i i = 1 W p i α β + 1 U α , β = 0

This Lagrangian upon differentiation delivers the subsequent manifestation:

(3.4) p i E i = 1 Z α , β 1 β α μ c α , β E i U α , β 1 β α

where

(3.5) Z α , β = i = 1 W 1 β α μ c α , β E i U α , β 1 β α

with

(3.6) c α , β = i = 1 W p i α β + 1 = 1 + β α S α , β

Usually, μ′ is recognized through converse temperature, associated with the successive appearance:

k μ = S α , β / U α , β .

If one invests in a new-fangled structure μ α , β to represent

(3.7) μ α , β = μ c α , β

The probability distribution function proceeds with the successive arrangement:

(3.8) p i E i = 1 Z α , β 1 β α μ α , β E i U α , β 1 β α

and the partition function continues with the succeeding prearrangement:

(3.9) Z α , β = i = 1 W 1 β α μ α , β E i U α , β 1 β α

The above derivation shows that by maximizing the proposed two-parameter entropy under the usual normalization and energy constraints, we obtain a generalized probability distribution function. This distribution encompasses classical Boltzmann–Gibbs and Tsallis forms as special cases. The parameter α modulates the sensitivity to rare or frequent events, while β controls the deformation and scaling of the distribution. Hence, the proposed model allows a richer class of equilibrium distributions beyond conventional single-parameter entropy approaches.

The famed statistic that collecting entropy suggests that energy has a propensity to blow blow-out about and pool regularly, but developing entropy implies that we are shedding knowledge about where energy is. This basic notion stems from the understanding that more entropy corresponds to more microstates and more behaviour in the energy may be spread. But if energy is pooled homogeneously, then there is an identical quantity of energy in every degree of freedom. That would suggest toward that at equilibrium, we would understand precisely where the energy was. For the reason that the system is recurrently intermingling and tossing energy everywhere, sometimes one gets more energy than the usual in a degree of freedom, and occasionally a lower quantity.

Since variations might be amplified owing to interior interfaces under some situations, the equal probability does not hold. Interior exchanges, which express the irrelevance of the statistical independence, possibly, create decreases of entropy in an isolated structure. The conversion probability from molecular chaotic motion to the ordered motion of a macroscopic entity is precisely negligible. But this effect potentially will not arise if communications occur in the inside of a system. According to the Boltzmann and Einstein fluctuation philosophies, all possible microscopic states of a structure are equally likely in thermodynamic equilibrium, and the entropy has a tendency to approach a maximum value finally.

4 The manifestation of energy dissemination and the energy oscillation

In B-G statistics, there exist two techniques to determine the energy variation. The first technique is to practice the subsequent formulation:

(4.1) E 2 E 2 = U μ = k T 2 C V

and then to acquire the succeeding expression:

(4.2) E 2 E 2 U = k T 2 C V U

The subsequent procedure intensifies the energy dispersion at a location of internal energy to commence the absolute oscillation. Here we watch the subsequent procedure to determine the relative fluctuation.

In entropy, the expectancy of physical magnitude M can be demarcated as:

(4.3) M α , β = i = 1 W p i α β + 1 E i M i = 1 W p i α β + 1 E i

where p i E i is the state distribution function. At every energy level, there may be numerous micro-states and accordingly, we acquire

(4.4) p E i = ω 1 α β + 1 E i p i E i

where ω E i is the micro-state numbers. Exhausting (3.8) into (4.4), we acquire the subsequent manifestation:

(4.5) p E i ω 1 α β + 1 E i 1 β α μ α , β E i U α , β 1 β α

Without any damage of simplification, E i can be interchanged by E in equation (4.5) and then the energy dissemination can be communicated as

p E ω 1 α β + 1 E 1 β α μ α , β E U α , β 1 β α

which proceeds with the succeeding arrangement:

(4.6) p E exp α , β ln α , β ω 1 α β + 1 E exp α , β μ α , β E U α , β

Consequently, we acquire the succeeding logarithmic and exponential manifestations:

(4.7) ln α , β x = x β α 1 β α

and

(4.8) exp α , β x = 1 + β α x 1 β α

If the representation R α,β symbolises

(4.9) R α , β E = ln α , β ω 1 α β + 1 E

Then, (4.6) is redrafted as

(4.10) p E exp α , β R α , β E exp α , β μ α , β E U α , β

By means of the association in Eq. (4.10), we contract the succeeding appearance:

(4.11) p E exp α , β R α , β E μ α , β E U α , β × 1 + β α R α , β E

and the relation between R α,β and S α,β is established by the entropy of the micro-canonical form of S α , β E = ln α , β ω E to be

(4.12) R α , β E = 1 β α 1 + β α S α , β E 1 α β + 1 1

We denote the function in the α, β-exponential of equation (4.11) by I E , specified by

(4.13) I E = R α , β E μ α , β E U α , β 1 + β α R α , β E

Now

(4.14) I E E = R α , β E E 1 μ α , β β α E U α , β μ α , β 1 + β α R α , β E

And

(4.15) R α , β E E = 1 α β + 1 1 + β α R α , β E × 1 c α , β S α , β E E

Using Eq. (4.15) in Eq. (4.14), we develop

(4.16) I E E = 1 + β α R α , β E × 1 α β + 1 c α , β S α , β E E 1 μ α , β β α E U α , β μ α , β

If we symbolize

(4.17) b α , β E = 1 + β α R α , β E

and

(4.18) β ̃ α , β E = 1 c α , β S α , β E E

Then, the (4.16) becomes

(4.19) I E E = b α , β E 1 α β + 1 β ̃ α , β E 1 β α μ α , β E U α , β μ α , β

and consequently, we acquire

(4.20) I E E E = E m = b α , β E m 1 α β + 1 β ̃ α , β E m 1 β α × μ α , β E m U α , β μ α , β

with

(4.21) b α , β E m = 1 + β α R α , β E m

and

(4.22) β ̃ α , β E m = 1 c α , β S α , β E E E = E m

Now, at maximum I, (4.22) delivers the succeeding appearance:

(4.23) b α , β E m 1 α β + 1 β ̃ α , β E m 1 β α μ α , β E m U α , β μ α , β = 0

The fluctuation analysis derived above generalizes the well-known Boltzmann–Einstein fluctuation theory. In particular, the two parameters α and β introduce additional flexibility in characterizing the spread of energy fluctuations in the canonical ensemble. When α, β → 1, we recover the classical result where fluctuations are proportional to the heat capacity. However, for α ≠ β, the fluctuation intensity can be enhanced or suppressed, offering potential insights into systems with long-range correlations or non-extensive interactions.

Consequently, at E m (4.11) may acquire its maxima. Now the function I E can be expanded as a series about E m . The first order term vanishes and then

(4.24) I E = I E m + 1 2 2 I E E 2 E = E m E E m 2 +

Overlooking higher order terms, it converts to (see Appendix A)

(4.25) I E = I E m 1 2 β ̃ α , β E m μ α , β b α , β E m × k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 E E m 2

Employing (4.13) and (4.23), we acquire:

(4.26) I E = 1 β α + α β + 1 μ α , β b α , β E m β α β ̃ α , β E m × 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 E m 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 E E m 2

Substituting the value of I E from Eq. (4.26) into Eq. (4.11), we contract the successive relation:

(4.27) p E 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 E m 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 E E m 2 1 β α

Exhausting (4.27), we can determine α, β-average of the energy (see Appendix B) E α , β = E m . Since in the entropy, it has been demarcated E α , β = U α , β , we acquire E m  = U α,β and consequently, (4.23) stretches the succeeding relation between β ̃ α , β and μ α , β :

(4.28) β ̃ α , β U α , β = α β + 1 μ α , β

Consequently, (4.26) turn into:

(4.29) p E 1 β α μ α , β 2 2 k C V + β α E U α , β 2 1 β α

with C V = C ̃ V / α β + 1 and

(4.30) C V = μ α , β 2 E μ α , β

Noting that p E is an energy distribution and it should reach a maximum at E = E m and consequently at E = U α,β , we acquire:

2 p E E 2 E = U α , β = μ α , β 2 k C V + β α < 0

Accordingly, we find

(4.31) β > α + k C V

At the moment, we determine the absolute changeability of energy by employing the (4.29). The outcome (see Appendix C) is

(4.32) E U α , β 2 α , β U α , β = 1 μ α , β U α , β 2 β α + 2 C V β α C V + k , for α β < 2

In summary, this formulation demonstrates that the generalized entropy modifies both the equilibrium distribution and the corresponding fluctuation behaviour. This could be particularly useful for modelling systems where microscopic interactions lead to deviations from standard Gibbsian statistics, such as complex networks, anomalous diffusion systems, or strongly correlated particle ensembles.

5 Conclusions

The well-acknowledged information that an ensemble just embodies an assemblage of moving constituent parts and can be conjectured from the perspective that canonical might be outstanding to the practice of canonical coordinates in the dissemination implies that in statistical mechanics, a canonical collaborative signifies the statistical ensemble that characterizes conceivable situations of a mechanical structure. The structures may give the change of energy utilizing a heat bath so that conditions of structure will vary in aggregate energy. The impression of energy fluctuation derives from the understanding that higher entropy correlates to more microstates, extra ways in which the energy might be dispersed. But if energy is collectively uniform, then there is a same magnitude of energy in each degree of freedom. That would imply that in equilibrium, we would know correctly where the energy was. For the reason that the system is continually interrelating and tossing energy about, sometimes one gains more energy than the usual in a degree of freedom, and sometimes less. Keeping in mind the cumulative practice of entropy models in statistical mechanics, we have considered a pioneering entropic model for discrete probability fields. We have articulated the appearance of the relative fluctuation of energy in the canonical ensemble for this entropic model. With equivalent viewpoints, one might furnish the solicitations of entropy models either by exhausting supplemental typical entropy models or by mounting new-fangled entropic models for their presents to the arena of statistical mechanics.

Nomenclature

Symbol

Definition

p i

probability of the ith microstate or event

H(P)

entropy function for a given probability distribution P = p 1 , p 2 p n

α

entropy parameter controlling the order of generalization; must satisfy given bounds

β

entropy parameter related to non-additivity or escort probabilities

n

number of microstates or discrete events in the probability distribution

i, j

indices representing individual microstates or components

E i

energy corresponding to the ith microstate

w(E i )

number of microstates associated with energy level E i

U

mean energy

C V

heat capacity at constant volume

T

temperature

k

Boltzmann constant

Z

partition function

μ

modified Lagrange multiplier interpreted as inverse temperature

S α,β

entropy function under generalized (parametric) form

R α,β (E)

Rényi-like function associated with entropy and energy fluctuation

b α,β (E)

derivative term appearing in fluctuation formulations

C V ̄

adjusted or generalized heat capacity under (α, β)- entropy model

ΔE

absolute fluctuation in energy

Δ E U

relative fluctuation in energy

λ, η

Lagrange multipliers used in constrained optimization problems

M

Lagrangian function constructed to optimize entropy under constraints

W

total number of accessible states or microstates

I(E)

energy-based information function derived in fluctuation analysis


Corresponding authors: Sunil Kumar Sharma, Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia, E-mail: ; and Mona Bin-Asfour, Deparment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, E-mail:

  1. Funding information: This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2502).

  2. Author contribution: Vikramjeet Singh: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Sunil Kumar Sharma: data curation, validation, visualization, writing – review and editing. Om Parkash: resources, methodology, writing – review and editing. Mona Bin-Asfour: supervision, methodology, writing – review and editing. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Appendix A: We procure the following communication

(A.1) 2 I E E 2 = b α , β E E 1 α β + 1 β ̃ α , β E × 1 β α μ α , β E U α , β μ α , β + b α , β E α β + 1 β ̃ α , β E β α μ α , β + β ̃ α , β E E 1 β α μ α , β E U α , β

Also

(A.2) b α , β E E = β α R α , β E E

Using equation (4.15), (A.2) becomes

(A.3) b α , β E E = β α α β + 1 b α , β E β ̃ α , β E

Thus, we acquire:

(A.4) 2 I E E 2 E = E m = β ̃ α , β E m μ α , β b α , β E m × k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1

where the quantity C ̃ V is

(A.5) C ̃ V = k β ̃ α , β E m E β ̃ α , β E E = E m

Appendix B: Calculation for E α , β

Two cases arise here:

Case I. For α > β

E α , β = 0 p E α β + 1 E d E 0 p E α β + 1 d E = 0 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 E E m 2 α β + 1 β α E d E 0 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 E E m 2 α β + 1 β α d E 5

Let x = EE m , it becomes

E α , β = E m 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α x + E m d x E m 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α d x

Consequently, we acquire:

E α , β = 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α x + E m d x 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α d x = E m

Case II. For α < β

By means of equivalent approach, we procure:

E α , β = a a 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α x + E m d x a a 1 β α β ̃ α , β 2 2 α β + 1 k C ̃ V + β α α β + 1 x 2 α β + 1 β α d x with

a = 2 α β + 1 2 β α β ̃ α , β 2 C ̃ V β α C ̃ V + k α β + 1

where exp α , β x = 1 + β α x 1 β α , for 1 + β α x > 0 0 , otherwise

Accordingly, we achieve the α, β-average value of energy, E α , β = E m .

Appendix C: Calculation for E U α , β 2 α , β

Again two cases arise here:

Case I. For α > β

E U α , β 2 α , β = 0 1 β α μ α , β 2 2 k C V + β α E U α , β 2 α β + 1 β α E U α , β 2 d E 0 1 β α μ α , β 2 2 k C V + β α E U α , β 2 α β + 1 β α d E

Let x = EU α,β and t = β α μ α , β 2 2 k C V + β α , then we contract, only for 0 < αβ < 2 (condition for the integral to be convergent),

E U α , β 2 α , β = 1 + t x 2 α β + 1 β α x 2 d x 1 + t x 2 α β + 1 β α d x = 0 1 + t x 2 α β + 1 β α x 2 d x 0 1 + t x 2 α β + 1 β α d x = 1 t B 3 2 , 3 2 + α β + 1 β α B 1 2 , 1 2 + α β + 1 β α = α β t β α + 2

where B p , q = 0 y p 1 1 + y p + q d y = Γ p Γ q Γ p + q

Thus, we acquire the consequent communication:

E U α , β 2 α , β = 2 β α + 2 μ α , β 2 C V k + β α C V for 0 < α β < 2

Case I. For α < β

Let x = E − U α,β and t = β α μ α , β 2 2 k C V + β α , we procure the subsequent statement:

E U α , β 2 α , β = a a 1 t x 2 α β + 1 β α x 2 d x a a 1 t x 2 α β + 1 β α d x = 1 t B 3 2 , 1 + α β + 1 β α B 1 2 , 1 + α β + 1 β α = β α t β α + 2 = 2 β α + 2 μ α , β 2 C V k + β α C V

References

1. Shannon, CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379–423, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.Search in Google Scholar

2. Rényi, A. On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961, vol 1:547–61 pp.Search in Google Scholar

3. Tsallis, C. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J Stat Phys 1988;52:479–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01016429.Search in Google Scholar

4. Havrda, JH, Charvat, F. Quantification methods of classification process: concept of structural α-entropy. Kybernetika 1967;3:30–5.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kapur, JN. Generalized entropy of order α and type β. Math Seminar 1967;4:79–84.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kapur, JN. Four families of measures of entropy. Indian J Pure Appl Math 1986;17:429–49.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kapur, JN. Measures of information and their applications. New York: Wiley Eastern; 1994.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gao, X, Deng, Y. The pseudo-Pascal triangle of maximum Deng entropy. Int J Comput Commun Control 2020;15:1–10. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2020.1.3735.Search in Google Scholar

9. Zhou, X, Zheng, ZJ. Relations between the observational entropy and Rényi information measures. Quantum Inf Process 2022;21:228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-022-03570-1.Search in Google Scholar

10. Stoyanov, JM, Tagliani, A, Inverardi, PLN. Maximum entropy criterion for moment indeterminacy of probability densities. Entropy 2024;26:121. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26020121.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Elgawad, MAA, Barakat, HM, Xiong, S, Alyami, SA. Information measures for generalized order statistics and their concomitants under a general framework from Huang-Kotz FGM bivariate distribution. Entropy 2021;23:335. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030335.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Rastegin, A. Estimating the Shannon entropy and uncertainty relations for design-structured POVMs. SIAM J Appl Math 2022;82:1001–19. https://doi.org/10.1137/21m1408105.Search in Google Scholar

13. Cincotta, PM, Giordano, CM. Phase correlations in chaotic dynamics: a Shannon entropy measure. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 2018;130:74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9871-3.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jamaati, M, Mehri, A. Text mining by Tsallis entropy. Physica A 2018;490:1368–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.020.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wang, Z, Yue, H, Deng, J. An uncertainty measure based on lower and upper approximations for generalized rough set models. Fundam Inf 2019;166:273–96. https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2019-1803.Search in Google Scholar

16. Sholehkerdar, A, Tavakoli, J, Liu, Z. Theoretical analysis of Tsallis entropy-based quality measure for weighted averaging image fusion. Inf Fusion 2020;58:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.010.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-05-16
Accepted: 2025-07-31
Published Online: 2025-12-15

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Single-step fabrication of Ag2S/poly-2-mercaptoaniline nanoribbon photocathodes for green hydrogen generation from artificial and natural red-sea water
  3. Abundant new interaction solutions and nonlinear dynamics for the (3+1)-dimensional Hirota–Satsuma–Ito-like equation
  4. A novel gold and SiO2 material based planar 5-element high HPBW end-fire antenna array for 300 GHz applications
  5. Explicit exact solutions and bifurcation analysis for the mZK equation with truncated M-fractional derivatives utilizing two reliable methods
  6. Optical and laser damage resistance: Role of periodic cylindrical surfaces
  7. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the air-side metal foam partially filled channels of panel-type radiator under forced convection
  8. Water-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing CNT nanoparticles over an extending surface with velocity slips, thermal convective, and zero-mass flux conditions
  9. Dynamical wave structures for some diffusion--reaction equations with quadratic and quartic nonlinearities
  10. Solving an isotropic grey matter tumour model via a heat transfer equation
  11. Study on the penetration protection of a fiber-reinforced composite structure with CNTs/GFP clip STF/3DKevlar
  12. Influence of Hall current and acoustic pressure on nanostructured DPL thermoelastic plates under ramp heating in a double-temperature model
  13. Applications of the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction–diffusion system: Analytical and numerical approaches
  14. AC electroosmotic flow of Maxwell fluid in a pH-regulated parallel-plate silica nanochannel
  15. Interpreting optical effects with relativistic transformations adopting one-way synchronization to conserve simultaneity and space–time continuity
  16. Modeling and analysis of quantum communication channel in airborne platforms with boundary layer effects
  17. Theoretical and numerical investigation of a memristor system with a piecewise memductance under fractal–fractional derivatives
  18. Tuning the structure and electro-optical properties of α-Cr2O3 films by heat treatment/La doping for optoelectronic applications
  19. High-speed multi-spectral explosion temperature measurement using golden-section accelerated Pearson correlation algorithm
  20. Dynamic behavior and modulation instability of the generalized coupled fractional nonlinear Helmholtz equation with cubic–quintic term
  21. Study on the duration of laser-induced air plasma flash near thin film surface
  22. Exploring the dynamics of fractional-order nonlinear dispersive wave system through homotopy technique
  23. The mechanism of carbon monoxide fluorescence inside a femtosecond laser-induced plasma
  24. Numerical solution of a nonconstant coefficient advection diffusion equation in an irregular domain and analyses of numerical dispersion and dissipation
  25. Numerical examination of the chemically reactive MHD flow of hybrid nanofluids over a two-dimensional stretching surface with the Cattaneo–Christov model and slip conditions
  26. Impacts of sinusoidal heat flux and embraced heated rectangular cavity on natural convection within a square enclosure partially filled with porous medium and Casson-hybrid nanofluid
  27. Stability analysis of unsteady ternary nanofluid flow past a stretching/shrinking wedge
  28. Solitonic wave solutions of a Hamiltonian nonlinear atom chain model through the Hirota bilinear transformation method
  29. Bilinear form and soltion solutions for (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV-CBS equation
  30. Solitary chirp pulses and soliton control for variable coefficients cubic–quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in nonuniform management system
  31. Influence of decaying heat source and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity on photo-hydro-elasto semiconductor media
  32. Dissipative disorder optimization in the radiative thin film flow of partially ionized non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid with second-order slip condition
  33. Bifurcation, chaotic behavior, and traveling wave solutions for the fractional (4+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson–Kadomtsev–Petviashvili model
  34. New investigation on soliton solutions of two nonlinear PDEs in mathematical physics with a dynamical property: Bifurcation analysis
  35. Mathematical analysis of nanoparticle type and volume fraction on heat transfer efficiency of nanofluids
  36. Creation of single-wing Lorenz-like attractors via a ten-ninths-degree term
  37. Optical soliton solutions, bifurcation analysis, chaotic behaviors of nonlinear Schrödinger equation and modulation instability in optical fiber
  38. Chaotic dynamics and some solutions for the (n + 1)-dimensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in plasma physics
  39. Fractal formation and chaotic soliton phenomena in nonlinear conformable Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation
  40. Single-step fabrication of Mn(iv) oxide-Mn(ii) sulfide/poly-2-mercaptoaniline porous network nanocomposite for pseudo-supercapacitors and charge storage
  41. Novel constructed dynamical analytical solutions and conserved quantities of the new (2+1)-dimensional KdV model describing acoustic wave propagation
  42. Tavis–Cummings model in the presence of a deformed field and time-dependent coupling
  43. Spinning dynamics of stress-dependent viscosity of generalized Cross-nonlinear materials affected by gravitationally swirling disk
  44. Design and prediction of high optical density photovoltaic polymers using machine learning-DFT studies
  45. Robust control and preservation of quantum steering, nonlocality, and coherence in open atomic systems
  46. Coating thickness and process efficiency of reverse roll coating using a magnetized hybrid nanomaterial flow
  47. Dynamic analysis, circuit realization, and its synchronization of a new chaotic hyperjerk system
  48. Decoherence of steerability and coherence dynamics induced by nonlinear qubit–cavity interactions
  49. Finite element analysis of turbulent thermal enhancement in grooved channels with flat- and plus-shaped fins
  50. Modulational instability and associated ion-acoustic modulated envelope solitons in a quantum plasma having ion beams
  51. Statistical inference of constant-stress partially accelerated life tests under type II generalized hybrid censored data from Burr III distribution
  52. On solutions of the Dirac equation for 1D hydrogenic atoms or ions
  53. Entropy optimization for chemically reactive magnetized unsteady thin film hybrid nanofluid flow on inclined surface subject to nonlinear mixed convection and variable temperature
  54. Stability analysis, circuit simulation, and color image encryption of a novel four-dimensional hyperchaotic model with hidden and self-excited attractors
  55. A high-accuracy exponential time integration scheme for the Darcy–Forchheimer Williamson fluid flow with temperature-dependent conductivity
  56. Novel analysis of fractional regularized long-wave equation in plasma dynamics
  57. Development of a photoelectrode based on a bismuth(iii) oxyiodide/intercalated iodide-poly(1H-pyrrole) rough spherical nanocomposite for green hydrogen generation
  58. Investigation of solar radiation effects on the energy performance of the (Al2O3–CuO–Cu)/H2O ternary nanofluidic system through a convectively heated cylinder
  59. Quantum resources for a system of two atoms interacting with a deformed field in the presence of intensity-dependent coupling
  60. Studying bifurcations and chaotic dynamics in the generalized hyperelastic-rod wave equation through Hamiltonian mechanics
  61. A new numerical technique for the solution of time-fractional nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation involving Atangana–Baleanu derivative using cubic B-spline functions
  62. Interaction solutions of high-order breathers and lumps for a (3+1)-dimensional conformable fractional potential-YTSF-like model
  63. Hydraulic fracturing radioactive source tracing technology based on hydraulic fracturing tracing mechanics model
  64. Numerical solution and stability analysis of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow subject to exponential heat source/sink over a Riga sheet
  65. Numerical investigation of mixed convection and viscous dissipation in couple stress nanofluid flow: A merged Adomian decomposition method and Mohand transform
  66. Effectual quintic B-spline functions for solving the time fractional coupled Boussinesq–Burgers equation arising in shallow water waves
  67. Analysis of MHD hybrid nanofluid flow over cone and wedge with exponential and thermal heat source and activation energy
  68. Solitons and travelling waves structure for M-fractional Kairat-II equation using three explicit methods
  69. Impact of nanoparticle shapes on the heat transfer properties of Cu and CuO nanofluids flowing over a stretching surface with slip effects: A computational study
  70. Computational simulation of heat transfer and nanofluid flow for two-sided lid-driven square cavity under the influence of magnetic field
  71. Irreversibility analysis of a bioconvective two-phase nanofluid in a Maxwell (non-Newtonian) flow induced by a rotating disk with thermal radiation
  72. Hydrodynamic and sensitivity analysis of a polymeric calendering process for non-Newtonian fluids with temperature-dependent viscosity
  73. Exploring the peakon solitons molecules and solitary wave structure to the nonlinear damped Kortewege–de Vries equation through efficient technique
  74. Modeling and heat transfer analysis of magnetized hybrid micropolar blood-based nanofluid flow in Darcy–Forchheimer porous stenosis narrow arteries
  75. Activation energy and cross-diffusion effects on 3D rotating nanofluid flow in a Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium with radiation and convective heating
  76. Insights into chemical reactions occurring in generalized nanomaterials due to spinning surface with melting constraints
  77. Influence of a magnetic field on double-porosity photo-thermoelastic materials under Lord–Shulman theory
  78. Soliton-like solutions for a nonlinear doubly dispersive equation in an elastic Murnaghan's rod via Hirota's bilinear method
  79. Analytical and numerical investigation of exact wave patterns and chaotic dynamics in the extended improved Boussinesq equation
  80. Nonclassical correlation dynamics of Heisenberg XYZ states with (x, y)-spin--orbit interaction, x-magnetic field, and intrinsic decoherence effects
  81. Exact traveling wave and soliton solutions for chemotaxis model and (3+1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Manna–Pempinelli equation
  82. Unveiling the transformative role of samarium in ZnO: Exploring structural and optical modifications for advanced functional applications
  83. On the derivation of solitary wave solutions for the time-fractional Rosenau equation through two analytical techniques
  84. Analyzing the role of length and radius of MWCNTs in a nanofluid flow influenced by variable thermal conductivity and viscosity considering Marangoni convection
  85. Advanced mathematical analysis of heat and mass transfer in oscillatory micropolar bio-nanofluid flows via peristaltic waves and electroosmotic effects
  86. Exact bound state solutions of the radial Schrödinger equation for the Coulomb potential by conformable Nikiforov–Uvarov approach
  87. Some anisotropic and perfect fluid plane symmetric solutions of Einstein's field equations using killing symmetries
  88. Nonlinear dynamics of the dissipative ion-acoustic solitary waves in anisotropic rotating magnetoplasmas
  89. Curves in multiplicative equiaffine plane
  90. Exact solution of the three-dimensional (3D) Z2 lattice gauge theory
  91. Propagation properties of Airyprime pulses in relaxing nonlinear media
  92. Symbolic computation: Analytical solutions and dynamics of a shallow water wave equation in coastal engineering
  93. Wave propagation in nonlocal piezo-photo-hygrothermoelastic semiconductors subjected to heat and moisture flux
  94. Comparative reaction dynamics in rotating nanofluid systems: Quartic and cubic kinetics under MHD influence
  95. Laplace transform technique and probabilistic analysis-based hypothesis testing in medical and engineering applications
  96. Physical properties of ternary chloro-perovskites KTCl3 (T = Ge, Al) for optoelectronic applications
  97. Gravitational length stretching: Curvature-induced modulation of quantum probability densities
  98. The search for the cosmological cold dark matter axion – A new refined narrow mass window and detection scheme
  99. A comparative study of quantum resources in bipartite Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model under DM interaction and Zeeman splitting
  100. PbO-doped K2O–BaO–Al2O3–B2O3–TeO2-glasses: Mechanical and shielding efficacy
  101. Nanospherical arsenic(iii) oxoiodide/iodide-intercalated poly(N-methylpyrrole) composite synthesis for broad-spectrum optical detection
  102. Sine power Burr X distribution with estimation and applications in physics and other fields
  103. Numerical modeling of enhanced reactive oxygen plasma in pulsed laser deposition of metal oxide thin films
  104. Dynamical analyses and dispersive soliton solutions to the nonlinear fractional model in stratified fluids
  105. Computation of exact analytical soliton solutions and their dynamics in advanced optical system
  106. An innovative approximation concerning the diffusion and electrical conductivity tensor at critical altitudes within the F-region of ionospheric plasma at low latitudes
  107. An analytical investigation to the (3+1)-dimensional Yu–Toda–Sassa–Fukuyama equation with dynamical analysis: Bifurcation
  108. Swirling-annular-flow-induced instability of a micro shell considering Knudsen number and viscosity effects
  109. Numerical analysis of non-similar convection flows of a two-phase nanofluid past a semi-infinite vertical plate with thermal radiation
  110. MgO NPs reinforced PCL/PVC nanocomposite films with enhanced UV shielding and thermal stability for packaging applications
  111. Optimal conditions for indoor air purification using non-thermal Corona discharge electrostatic precipitator
  112. Investigation of thermal conductivity and Raman spectra for HfAlB, TaAlB, and WAlB based on first-principles calculations
  113. Tunable double plasmon-induced transparency based on monolayer patterned graphene metamaterial
  114. DSC: depth data quality optimization framework for RGBD camouflaged object detection
  115. A new family of Poisson-exponential distributions with applications to cancer data and glass fiber reliability
  116. Numerical investigation of couple stress under slip conditions via modified Adomian decomposition method
  117. Monitoring plateau lake area changes in Yunnan province, southwestern China using medium-resolution remote sensing imagery: applicability of water indices and environmental dependencies
  118. Heterodyne interferometric fiber-optic gyroscope
  119. Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations via homothetic symmetries of non-static plane symmetric spacetime
  120. A widespread study of discrete entropic model and its distribution along with fluctuations of energy
  121. Empirical model integration for accurate charge carrier mobility simulation in silicon MOSFETs
  122. The influence of scattering correction effect based on optical path distribution on CO2 retrieval
  123. Anisotropic dissociation and spectral response of 1-Bromo-4-chlorobenzene under static directional electric fields
  124. Role of tungsten oxide (WO3) on thermal and optical properties of smart polymer composites
  125. Analysis of iterative deblurring: no explicit noise
  126. Review Article
  127. Examination of the gamma radiation shielding properties of different clay and sand materials in the Adrar region
  128. Erratum
  129. Erratum to “On Soliton structures in optical fiber communications with Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar model (Open Physics 2021;19:679–682)”
  130. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part II
  131. Possible explanation for the neutron lifetime puzzle
  132. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part III
  133. Numerical investigation on fluid-thermal-electric performance of a thermoelectric-integrated helically coiled tube heat exchanger for coal mine air cooling
  134. Special Issue on Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos in Physical Systems
  135. Analysis of the fractional relativistic isothermal gas sphere with application to neutron stars
  136. Abundant wave symmetries in the (3+1)-dimensional Chafee–Infante equation through the Hirota bilinear transformation technique
  137. Successive midpoint method for fractional differential equations with nonlocal kernels: Error analysis, stability, and applications
  138. Novel exact solitons to the fractional modified mixed-Korteweg--de Vries model with a stability analysis
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2025-0231/html
Scroll to top button