Startseite Exploring the dynamics of fractional-order nonlinear dispersive wave system through homotopy technique
Artikel Open Access

Exploring the dynamics of fractional-order nonlinear dispersive wave system through homotopy technique

  • Chiranahalli Vijaya Darshan Kumar , Doddabhadrappla Gowda Prakasha EMAIL logo und Nasser Bin Turki
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. April 2025

Abstract

In this article, we study the time-dependent two-dimensional system of Wu–Zhang equations of fractional order in terms of the Caputo operator, which describes long dispersive waves that minimize and analyze the damaging effects caused by these waves. This article centers on finding soliton solutions of a non-linear ( 2 + 1 )-dimensional time-fractional Wu–Zhang system, which has become a significant point of interest for its ability to describe the dynamics of long dispersive gravity water waves. The semi-analytical method called the q -homotopy analysis method in amalgamation with the Laplace transform is applied to uncover an analytical solution for this system of equations. The outcomes obtained through the considered method are in the form of a series solution, and they converge swiftly. The results coincide with the exact solution are portrayed through graphs and carried out numerical simulations which shows minimum residual error. This analysis shows that the technique used here is a reliable and well organized, which enhances in analyzing the higher-dimensional non-linear fractional differential equations in various sectors of science and engineering.

1 Introduction

Nonlinear differential equations play a significant role in understanding and modeling of complex real-world phenomena. Recent studies have focused on obtaining accurate numerical solutions for nonlinear partial differential equations, which is crucial in various science and engineering disciplines. The differential equations with fractional order are called fractional differential equations (FDEs). The fractional calculus theory has been developed as a vast and continuously evolving subject. Many researchers assumed that it is a well-developed topic in mathematics and have been working on it till now. Due to the ideas of German mathematician Leibniz and L-Hospital, the theory of fractional calculus came into existence about 300 years ago [14]. The main benefit of studying FDE is that it gives solutions between intervals, which aids us in examining the results more understandably. The primary significance of FDEs is analyzing the behavior of complex systems with memory effects and genetic characteristics that also possess uncertainty properties. Hence, FDEs are more utilized in modeling the natural and complex phenomena in the real world such as thermodynamics [5], fluid dynamics [6], chaos behavior [7], biology [8], chemical kinetics [9], cosmology [10], financial models [11], epidemiology [12], shallow water waves [13], and many others [1422]. Recently, there have been several modified fractional derivatives such as Riemann–Liouville (RL), Caputo, Caputo–Fabrizio, Hilfer derivative, and Ataugana–Baleanu derivative [23]. Here, we have utilized the Caputo derivative as it offers many advantages, such as it is non-local in behavior and well suitable for initial value problems. It is bounded and provides smoother behavior compared to other fractional operators. These characteristics of the Caputo operator make it easier to model systems with initial conditions. Moreover, solving non-linear FDEs is challenging and requires some computational work. As a result, many researchers have employed diverse methods to solve FDEs that arise in various phenomena. Gao et al. [24] represented the one-dimensional Cauchy problem using the Atangana–Baleanu operator and presented the numerical solutions of a nonlinear system that arose in thermoelasticity. Alwehebi et al. [25] solved the time-fractional Burger’s equation using the variational iteration method (VIM) with the aid of Maple software. Ali abd Maneea [26] investigated ( 1 + 1 )-dimensional time-fractional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations to obtain approximate solitary and periodic wave solutions using the optimal homotopy analysis method (OHAM). Also, many authors have studied various FDEs using different numerical and analytical methods [2735].

Recently, researchers have progressively focused on nonlinear wave equations due to their wide-ranging applications across various scientific fields. The classical Wu–Zhang (WZ) system is a significant nonlinear partial differential equation with more significance in obtaining soliton solutions. Soliton theory relies more on searching for accurate and numerical solutions to nonlinear equations, particularly for traveling waves. Wu and Zhang developed a trio of equations for simulating nonlinear and dispersive long gravity waves propagating in two distinct horizontal directions in shallow waters available in oceans of equal depth [36]. In this system of equations, the first equation depicts a ( 2 + 1 ) -multidimensional dispersive longitudinal wave. The other non-linear equations are crucial for marine and engineering professionals to represent in harbor and coastal development projects. The equations are presented as follows:

(1) u ( ζ , ω , t ) t + u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ = 0 , v ( ζ , ω , t ) t + u ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ω = 0 , w ( ζ , ω , t ) t + ( u ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ζ + ( v ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ω + 1 3 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 + 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 = 0 .

Here, the system under consideration comprises three parameters, namely, u represents the surface velocity of water in the ζ -direction, v represents surface velocity in the direction of ω -axis, and w represents the water’s elevation. 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 , 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 , 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω , and 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 are the dissipation terms that provide damping and the other nonlinear terms in Eq. (1) that acts as a stabilising agent in the propagation of dispersive long waves. The explicit solutions of this system have been beneficial for coastal and civil engineers working in the harbor and coastal design projects. Moreover, the explicit solutions along with the numerical results of this system are of fundamental interest in fluid dynamics. Several researchers studied this classical WZ system using different methods, which include reduced differential transform method [37], modified Adomian decomposition method [38], modified VIM [39], homotopy perturbation method [40], and others [41,42].

In this article, we are examining a time-dependent ( 2 + 1 )-dimensional non-linear WZ system of equation of fractional order γ [43,45], which is given by

(2) D t γ u ( ζ , ω , t ) + u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ = 0 , D t γ v ( ζ , ω , t ) + u ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ω = 0 , D t γ w ( ζ , ω , t ) + ( u ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ζ + ( v ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ω + 1 3 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 + 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 = 0 ,

with initial conditions

(3) u ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = d + a c b + 2 3 3 b tanh ( b ζ + c ω ) , v ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = a + 2 3 3 c tanh ( b ζ + c ω ) , w ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = 2 3 ( b 2 + c 2 ) sech 2 ( b ζ + c ω ) ,

defined on Ω = { ( ζ , ω , t ) ( ζ , ω ) R n , 0 t T } , where D t γ denotes the Caputo fractional derivative with regard to time t and γ (0, 1] be the fractional order of system; a , b , c , and d are non-zero arbitrary constants. To better understand the behavior of the system, we translated the classical WZ equation into a fractional-order equation. Many scholars have explored several analytical and numerical approaches to study WZ systems by highlighting their significance. To find the exact solution to this WZ system, the exponential rational function method was employed with the help of the RL fractional derivative by Kaur and Gupta [43]. Khater et al. [44] examined the WZ system using three techniques: Adomian decomposition, quintic, and septic spline techniques. Yasmin et al. [45] proposed an effective iterative method using the Caputo operator to solve this non-linear WZ system. Tariq et al. [46] constructed traveling wave solutions to the conformable time-fractional WZ system via extended fan sub-equation method, and distinct types of graphs are presented to show the physical behavior of the solutions.

In 1992, the homotopy analysis method (HAM) was introduced by a well-known mathematician from China, namely, Liao Shijun [47], for solving linear and non-linear differential equations. A straightforward method is proposed for handling the characteristics of linear and non-linear equations without perturbation and linearization properties. Moreover, this method requires a lot of time to perform computational work. To overcome these limitations, a novel scheme was proposed by Singh et al. [48] called q -homotopy analysis transform method ( q -HATM), which is the amalgamation q -HAM along with the Laplace transform (LT) scheme. The benefit of this technique is that it does not require properties such as linearization, extraction of any polynomial, perturbation, or inclusion of any rigid assumptions, unlike other methods. It systematically and precisely analyzes the results obtained, attracting many researchers who have implemented it in their research work. Namely, Veeresha et al. [49] studied the modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations of fractional order using the Caputo fractional operator that describes the properties of shallow water waves through distinct dispersion relation with the aid of q -HATM. The fractional model of the regularized long-wave equation, which explains ion acoustic waves and the shallow water waves in plasma, has been examined using this method by Kumar et al. [50]. Prakasha et al. [51] applied this efficient technique to solve the time-fractional Kaup–Kupershmidt equation, which plays a vital role in studying nonlinear dispersive waves. In this article, we study the highly-dimensional WZ system with the help of the semi-analytic technique called q -HATM. The novelty of this method lies in obtaining the solution in series form, which uses a simple algorithm to evaluate the results of this system of equations that propagates solitary wave solutions as it is a localized wave with no change in velocity and shape. With the help of auxiliary and homotopy parameters that act as a controlling parameters, the proposed method provides a swift convergence region and preserves greater accuracy, which makes it more trustworthy and efficient. parameter used in this semi-analytical method aids to control the convergence region. Moreover, they offer a robust and flexible approach for finding approximating solutions and are in good agreement with the precise solution, which minimizes the residual error. To illustrate the effect of fractional order, the variations of solutions with regard to and time t are shown in graphs for diverse fractional order. To our best knowledge, the proposed system is not solved using q -HATM so far.

This article has been comprised of the numerous sections that make up a clear presentation of the research as follows: Section 2 provides the basic terms and definitions related to the LT and fractional calculus. In Section 3, we proposed the q -HATM algorithm with the help of the Caputo operator. The suggested method has been implemented for the considered system, and their graphical representation and numerical simulation of the system are compared with the exact solutions of the WZ system, which is presented in Section 4. The behavior of the obtained results that portrayed in graphs and numerical evaluation were discussed in Section 5. Finally, the conclusions of our work that broadens the discussion by strengthening the technique’s relevance are illustrated in Section 6.

2 Preliminaries

This section gives a summary of information about the basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus (FC) and LT. Additionally, we discuss some theorems related to the suggested method of considered system.

Definition 2.1

The RL fractional integral J γ of order γ for the function f ( τ ) C μ ( μ 1 ) , [1,2] is stated as

J γ f ( τ ) = 1 Γ ( γ ) 0 τ ( τ ϑ ) γ 1 f ( ϑ ) d ϑ ,

where Γ denotes the Gamma function.

Definition 2.2

For the function f ( τ ) C 1 r , the Caputo fractional derivative [3] is defined as

D τ γ 0 f ( τ ) = d r f ( τ ) d τ r , γ = r N , 1 Γ ( r γ ) 0 τ ( τ θ ) r γ 1 f ( r ) ( θ ) d θ , γ ( r 1 , r ) , r N .

The notation N represents the set of natural numbers.

Definition 2.3

The LT of the function f ( τ ) is given by L [ f ( τ ) ] = 0 e s τ f ( τ ) d τ . Then, the LT of f ( τ ) in terms of Caputo derivative [2,3] is defined as

L [ D τ γ f ( τ ) ] = s γ F ( s ) r 1 k = 0 s γ k 1 f ( k ) ( 0 + ) , r 1 < γ r ,

where F ( s ) is the LT of f ( t ) .

Theorem 2.1

(Uniqueness theorem [49]) The solution for the considered fractional partial differential equation Eq. (2) obtained by q -HATM is unique, for every λ ( 0 , 1 ) , where λ = ( K m + ) + ( δ + ε ) T .

Proof

The solution of considered Eq. (2) is

(4) u ( ζ , ω , t ) = m = 0 u m ( ζ , ω , t ) ,

where u m is the approximate solution obtained using q -HATM. Now, suppose that u and u * are two solutions of considered equation, then we have to show that u = u * to prove this theorem, then

(5) u u * = ( K m + ) ( u u * ) + L 1 1 s γ L [ ( N ( u u * ) ) + ( R ( u u * ) ) ] ,

where N and R are the nonlinear and linear operators, respectively. By employing the convolution theorem of Laplace on Eq. (5), we have

(6) u u * = ( K m + ) u u * + 0 t ( N ( u u * ) + R ( u u * ) ) ( t ξ ) γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) d ξ ( K m + ) u u * + 0 t ( δ u u * + ε u u * ) ( t ξ ) γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) d ξ .

Applying the mean value theorem of integrals on Eq. (6), we obtain

u u * ( K m + ) u u * + ( δ 2 u u * + θ 2 u u * + ε u u * ) T ,

u u * k u u * ,

( 1 k ) u u * 0 .

Since 0 < k < 1 , u u * = 0 u = u * .

Theorem 2.2

(Convergence theorem [49]) Let K be a Banach space and F : K K be a non-linear mapping, then assume that

F ( v ) F ( w ) δ v w , v , w K , δ ( 0 , 1 ) .

With the help of fixed point theory of Banach, there exists one fixed point in F and the corresponding sequence generated by the solution that has been acquired using the suggested approach that coincides with the point in F with arbitarily selecting v 0 , w 0 K and

w m w n δ n 1 δ w 1 w 0 .

Theorem 2.3

(Error analysis [49]) If we can determine a real number 0 < δ < 1 that fulfills v i + 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) , for all i. Moreover, if the series, we obtain i = 0 m v i ( ζ , ω , t ) is the q -HATM series solution of Eq. (2), then the maximum absolute error was obtained

v ( ζ , ω , t ) i = 0 m v i ( ζ , ω , t ) δ m 1 δ v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) .

3 Methodology of q -HATM

This section provides the steps involved in solving the non-linear fractional partial differential equation using the q -HATM [48,49]. Let us consider the general form of non-linear non-homogeneous partial differential equation of fractional order, which is given by

(7) D t γ u ( ζ , ω , t ) + R u ( ζ , ω , t ) + N v ( ζ , ω , t ) = f ( ζ , ω , t ) , 0 < γ 1 ,

where D t γ v ( ζ , ω , t ) indicates the fractional derivative of the function v ( ζ , ω , t ) in terms of Caputo operator, f ( ζ , ω , t ) denotes the source term, and R and N are the operators that symbolize the linear and non-linear terms, respectively. Using LT for Eq. (7),

(8) s γ L [ v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] k = 0 r 1 s γ k 1 v ( k ) ( ζ , ω , 0 ) + L [ R v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] + L [ N v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = L [ f ( ζ , ω , t ) ] .

Reducing Eq. (8), we have

L [ v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 s γ k = 0 r 1 s γ k 1 v k ( ζ , ω , 0 ) + 1 s γ { L [ R v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] + L [ N v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] L [ f ( ζ , ω , t ) ] } = 0 .

The non-linear operator N is exemplified as follows:

N [ φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] = L [ φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] 1 s γ k = 0 r 1 s γ k 1 φ ( k ) ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ( 0 + ) + 1 s γ × { L [ R φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] + L [ N φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] L [ f ( ζ , ω , t ) ] } .

The deformation equation at ( ζ , ω , t ) = 1 is stated as

(9) ( 1 r q ) L [ φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = q ( ζ , ω , t ) N [ φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] ,

where φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) is a real unknown function and v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) the starting solution, the embedding parameter is denoted by q , which falls between the interval 0 , 1 r , L symbolizes the LT, and the auxiliary parameter is given by 0 . The terms lies in the following hold for q = 0 as well as q = 1 r , respectively:

φ ( ζ , ω , t ; 0 ) = v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) , φ ζ , ω , t ; 1 r = v ( ζ , ω , t ) .

Hence, by moving the value of q in between the intervals 0 , 1 r , the function φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) has solution changes from v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) to the actual solution v ( ζ , ω , t ) . Then, using the Taylor theorem throughout q , we expand the function φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) as

(10) φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) = v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + m = 1 v m ( ζ , ω , t ) q m ,

with

v m ( ζ , ω , t ) = 1 m ! m φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) q m q = 0 .

By taking the values of , r , v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) , and ( ζ , ω , t ) , then at q = 1 r , Eq. (10) leads to the given non-linear equation, which has the results as follows:

v ( ζ , ω , t ) = v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + m = 1 v m ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 r m .

Now, m -times differentiating Eq. (9) with reference to q and also dividing it by m ! and for q = 0 , we can define the mth-order deformation equation as

(11) L [ v m ( ζ , ω , t ) K m v m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = ( ζ , ω , t ) R m ( v m 1 ) ,

where

K m = 0 , m 1 , r , otherwise ,

and

R m ( v m 1 ) = 1 ( m 1 ) ! m 1 N [ φ ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] q m 1 q = 0 ,

and the vectors are given in the form

v m = { v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) , v 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) , , v m ( ζ , ω , t ) } .

Now, employing the inverse Laplace transform to Eq. (11) and for the considered non-linear differential equation, we express the recursive equation as

(12) v m ( ζ , ω , t ) = K m v m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) + L 1 [ ( ζ , ω , t ) R m ( v m 1 ) ] .

At last, we obtained the component-wise approximated solution for q -HATM series using Eq. (12), and we define the series as

(13) v ( ζ , ω , t ) = m = 0 v m ( ζ , ω , t ) .

4 Solution using q-HATM

We consider the ( 2 + 1 )-dimensional non-linear time-fractional Wu–Zhang system [45] to evaluate the precision of the proposed method using the Caputo fractional derivative.

(14) D t γ u ( ζ , ω , t ) + u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ = 0 , D t γ v ( ζ , ω , t ) + u ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ω = 0 , D t γ w ( ζ , ω , t ) + ( u ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ζ + ( v ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ω + 1 3 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 + 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 = 0 ,

subjected to initial conditions

(15) u ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = d + a c b + 2 3 3 b tanh ( b ζ + c ω ) , v ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = a + 2 3 3 c tanh ( b ζ + c ω ) , w ( ζ , ω , 0 ) = 2 3 ( b 2 + c 2 ) sech 2 ( b ζ + c ω ) .

With the help of LT on Eq. (14) along with the starting solutions in Eq. (15), we have

L [ u ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 s u 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + 1 s γ L × u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ = 0 , L [ v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 s v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + 1 s γ L × u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ω = 0 , L [ w ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 s w 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + 1 s γ L × ( u ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ζ + ( v ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ω + 1 3 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 + 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 = 0 .

The non-linear operator N can be defined as

N 1 [ φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] = L [ φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] 1 s φ 1 ( ζ , ω , 0 ) 1 s γ L φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ + φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ω + φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ , N 2 [ φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] = L [ φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] 1 s φ 2 ( ζ , ω , 0 ) 1 s γ L φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ + φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ω + φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ω , N 3 [ φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] = L [ φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ] 1 s φ 3 ( ζ , ω , 0 ) 1 s γ L ( φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ) ζ + ( φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ) ω + 1 3 3 φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ 3 + 3 φ 1 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ ω 2 + 3 φ 2 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ζ 2 ω + 3 φ 3 ( ζ , ω , t ; q ) ω 3 .

With the help of the proposed algorithm, the deformation equation is defined as

(16) L [ u m ( ζ , ω , t ) K m u m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = R 1 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] , L [ v m ( ζ , ω , t ) K m v m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = R 2 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] , L [ w m ( ζ , ω , t ) K m w m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) ] = R 3 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] ,

where

R 1 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] = L [ u ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 K m r 1 s u 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 s γ L u ( ζ , ω , t ) u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) × u ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ , R 2 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] = L [ v ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 K m r 1 s v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 s γ L u ( ζ , ω , t ) v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ + v ( ζ , ω , t ) × v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω + w ( ζ , ω , t ) ω , R 3 , m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] = L [ w ( ζ , ω , t ) ] 1 s w 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + 1 s γ L ( u ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ζ + ( v ( ζ , ω , t ) w ( ζ , ω , t ) ) ω + 1 3 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 3 + 3 u ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ ω 2 + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ζ 2 ω + 3 v ( ζ , ω , t ) ω 3 .

Using the inverse Laplace transformation on Eq. (16), we obtain

(17) u m ( ζ , ω , t ) = K m u m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) + L 1 { R m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] } , v m ( ζ , ω , t ) = K m v m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) + L 1 { R m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] } , w m ( ζ , ω , t ) = K m w m 1 ( ζ , ω , t ) + L 1 { R m [ u m 1 , v m 1 , w m 1 ] } .

On simplifying Eq. (17), systematically using the given initial conditions, we obtain the following:

u ( ζ , ω , t ) = u 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + m = 1 u m ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 r m , v ( ζ , ω , t ) = v 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + m = 1 v m ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 r m , w ( ζ , ω , t ) = w 0 ( ζ , ω , t ) + m = 1 w m ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 r m .

By putting values of γ = 1 , = 1 and r = 1 , we have the solution m = 1 N v m ( ζ , ω , t ) 1 r m , which converges with exact solutions

u ( ζ , ω , t ) = d + a c b + 2 3 3 b tanh ( b ζ + c ω + d t ) , v ( ζ , ω , t ) = a + 2 3 3 c tanh ( b ζ + c ω + d t ) , w ( ζ , ω , t ) = 2 3 ( b 2 + c 2 ) sech 2 ( b ζ + c ω + d t ) ,

which is of the classical Wu–Zhang system as N .

5 Results and discussion

In the present framework, we mainly focused on solutions obtained by the highly-dimensional fractional Wu–Zhang system that exhibits long dispersive wave phenomenon and explored the dynamics of various fractional order. We have utilized a more reliable method called q -HATM, to ensure the accuracy of our analysis and examined the solution using Caputo fractional derivative. In our analysis, we illustrated the approximation solutions of Eq. (14) in Figure 1, which helps in assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of the suggested approach. Figure 2 provides a comprehensive explanation of the behavior of precise solution of considered fractional WZ system in the 3D plots. Absolute error between q -HATM series solution and exact solution is portrayed in Figure 3. The nature of variation of water particle velocity u ( ζ , ω , t ) and v ( ζ , ω , t ) and elevation w ( ζ , ω , t ) with reference to t is displayed in Figure 4. As time increases, the surface velocity of water u ( ζ , ω , t ) and v ( ζ , ω , t ) increases and water’s elevation w ( ζ , ω , t ) decreases. In Figures 5 and 6, we depicted the 2D plots of -curves when r = 1 and r = 2 , respectively and that exhibits the behavior of Eq. (14) for distinct values of γ , which clearly demonstrates the suggested method’s convergence ability. Moreover, this parameter used in this semi-analytical method specifies and controls the convergence region. The numerical simulation of q -HATM solution in comparison with modified VIM and exact solution of Eq. (14) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , t = 5 , ζ = 20 , ω = 20 has been demonstrated for u ( ζ , ω , t ) , v ( ζ , ω , t ) , and w ( ζ , ω , t ) along with absolute error in Tables 1, 2, and 3 respectively. All these graphical representations and numerical solutions are achieved with the assistance of Mathematica software. Notably, the outcomes obtained are more consistent and agrees with the exact solution, which preserves the efficiency of the technique used. This shows that the proposed approach can be applied to vast areas of FDEs, mainly which have initial conditions in various divisions of science and technology. This method is quite trustworthy, most dependable, and suitable for various research studies that deal with complex FDEs.

Figure 1 
               Nature of achieved surfaces of 
                     
                        
                        
                           q
                        
                        q
                     
                  -HATM series solution of (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           u
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                           ,
                        
                        u\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t),
                     
                   (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           v
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        v\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                   and (c) 
                     
                        
                        
                           w
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        w\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                   at 
                     
                        
                        
                           a
                           =
                           b
                           =
                           0.1
                        
                        a=b=0.1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           c
                           =
                           d
                           =
                           0.01
                        
                        c=d=0.01
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           t
                           =
                           1
                        
                        t=1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           r
                           =
                           1
                        
                        r=1
                     
                  , and 
                     
                        
                        
                           ℏ
                           =
                           −
                           1
                        
                        \hslash =-1
                     
                  .
Figure 1

Nature of achieved surfaces of q -HATM series solution of (a) u ( ζ , ω , t ) , (b) v ( ζ , ω , t ) and (c) w ( ζ , ω , t ) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , t = 1 , r = 1 , and = 1 .

Figure 2 
               3D plots of exact solution of (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           u
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                           ,
                        
                        u\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t),
                     
                   (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           v
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        v\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                   and (c) 
                     
                        
                        
                           w
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        w\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                   for Eq. (14) at 
                     
                        
                        
                           a
                           =
                           b
                           =
                           0.1
                        
                        a=b=0.1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           c
                           =
                           d
                           =
                           0.01
                        
                        c=d=0.01
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           t
                           =
                           1
                        
                        t=1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           r
                           =
                           1
                        
                        r=1
                     
                  , and 
                     
                        
                        
                           ℏ
                           =
                           −
                           1
                        
                        \hslash =-1
                     
                  .
Figure 2

3D plots of exact solution of (a) u ( ζ , ω , t ) , (b) v ( ζ , ω , t ) and (c) w ( ζ , ω , t ) for Eq. (14) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , t = 1 , r = 1 , and = 1 .

Figure 3 
               Nature of absolute error for Eq. (14) of (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           u
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        u\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                  , (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           v
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        v\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                  , and (c) 
                     
                        
                        
                           w
                           
                              (
                              
                                 ζ
                                 ,
                                 ω
                                 ,
                                 t
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        w\left(\zeta ,\omega ,t)
                     
                  , respectively.
Figure 3

Nature of absolute error for Eq. (14) of (a) u ( ζ , ω , t ) , (b) v ( ζ , ω , t ) , and (c) w ( ζ , ω , t ) , respectively.

Figure 4 
               Nature of approximate solution with respect to 
                     
                        
                        
                           t
                        
                        t
                     
                   for Eq. (14) of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, with distinct 
                     
                        
                        
                           γ
                        
                        \gamma 
                     
                   values at 
                     
                        
                        
                           r
                           =
                           1
                        
                        r=1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           ℏ
                           =
                           −
                           1
                        
                        \hslash =-1
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           ζ
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \zeta =20
                     
                  , and 
                     
                        
                        
                           ω
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \omega =20
                     
                  .
Figure 4

Nature of approximate solution with respect to t for Eq. (14) of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, with distinct γ values at r = 1 , = 1 , ζ = 20 , and ω = 20 .

Figure 5 
               Nature of response of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ℏ
                        
                        \hslash 
                     
                  -curves of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, for Eq. (14) when 
                     
                        
                        
                           r
                           =
                           1
                        
                        r=1
                     
                   at 
                     
                        
                        
                           ζ
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \zeta =20
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           t
                           =
                           0.01
                        
                        t=0.01
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           ω
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \omega =20
                     
                   for distinct fractional order 
                     
                        
                        
                           γ
                        
                        \gamma 
                     
                  .
Figure 5

Nature of response of -curves of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, for Eq. (14) when r = 1 at ζ = 20 , t = 0.01 , ω = 20 for distinct fractional order γ .

Figure 6 
               Nature of response of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ℏ
                        
                        \hslash 
                     
                  -curves of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, for Eq. (14) for 
                     
                        
                        
                           r
                           =
                           2
                        
                        r=2
                     
                   at 
                     
                        
                        
                           ζ
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \zeta =20
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           t
                           =
                           0.01
                        
                        t=0.01
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           ω
                           =
                           20
                        
                        \omega =20
                     
                  , for distinct values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           γ
                        
                        \gamma 
                     
                  .
Figure 6

Nature of response of -curves of (a) u(ζ, ω, t), (b) v(ζ, ω, t), and (c) w(ζ, ω, t), respectively, for Eq. (14) for r = 2 at ζ = 20 , t = 0.01 , ω = 20 , for distinct values of γ .

Table 1

q -HATM, MVIM results, exact solution, and absolute error of surface velocity of water u ( ζ , ω , t ) for Eq. (14) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , ω = 20 , t = 5 , n = 1 , = 1 , and α = 1

ζ Exact solution ( w exact ) MVIM solution ( w MV IM ) [39] q -HATM solution ( w q -HATM ) Absolute error w exact w MV IM [39] Absolute error w exact w q -HATM
50 2.25453 × 10 1 2.25453 × 10 1 2.25453 × 10 1 1.6451825 × 10 6 5.14451 × 10 9
40 2.25342 × 10 1 2.25342 × 10 1 2.25342 × 10 1 1.2148126 × 10 5 3.78834 × 10 8
30 2.2453 × 10 1 2.2453 × 10 1 2.2453 × 10 1 8.9315718 × 10 5 2.72929 × 10 7
20 2.18701 × 10 1 2.18702 × 10 1 2.18699 × 10 1 6.3605735 × 10 4 1.66699 × 10 6
10 1.83341 × 10 1 1.83356 × 10 1 1.83339 × 10 1 3.6024380 × 10 3 1.79946 × 10 6
00 8.17192 × 10 2 8.17021 × 10 2 8.17275 × 10 2 6.4447985 × 10 3 8.256 × 10 6
10 1.20486 × 10 2 1.20416 × 10 2 1.20455 × 10 2 1.9107842 × 10 4 3.19039 × 10 6
20 2.93273 × 10 3 2.93247 × 10 3 2.93359 × 10 3 2.9196656 × 10 4 8.65501 × 10 7
30 5.12337 × 10 3 5.12331 × 10 3 5.1235 × 10 3 4.0172038 × 10 5 1.27743 × 10 7
40 5.42307 × 10 3 5.42307 × 10 3 5.42309 × 10 3 5.44887493 × 10 6 1.74906 × 10 8
50 5.46369 × 10 3 5.46369 × 10 3 5.4637 × 10 3 7.37648418 × 10 7 2.37082 × 10 9
Table 2

q -HATM, MVIM results, exact solution, and absolute error of surface velocity of water v ( ζ , ω , t ) for Eq. (14) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , ω = 20 , t = 5 , n = 1 , = 1 , and α = 1

ζ Exact solution ( w exact ) MVIM solution ( w MV IM ) [39] q -HATM solution ( w q -HATM ) Absolute error w exact w MV IM [39] Absolute error w exact w q -HATM
50 0.0884547 0.0884547 0.0884547 8.08571164 × 10 9 2.67189 × 10 10
40 0.0884658 0.0884657 0.0884658 5.96388798 × 10 8 1.96727 × 10 9
30 0.088547 0.0885466 0.088547 4.34887678 × 10 7 1.41588 × 10 8
20 0.0891299 0.089127 0.0891298 2.91626141 × 10 6 8.58106 × 10 8
10 0.0926659 0.0926551 0.0926659 1.07971370 × 10 5 8.0558 × 10 8
00 0.102828 0.102834 0.102828 5.87519681 × 10 6 3.99429 × 10 7
10 0.109795 0.109802 0.109795 7.18185473 × 10 6 1.58615 × 10 7
20 0.111293 0.111295 0.111293 1.30807366 × 10 6 4.18528 × 10 8
30 0.111512 0.111513 0.111512 1.84431598 × 10 7 6.15812 × 10 9
40 0.111542 0.111542 0.111542 2.50992772 × 10 8 8.42821 × 10 10
50 0.111546 0.111546 0.111546 3.39937593 × 10 9 1.14237 × 10 10
Table 3

q -HATM, MVIM results, exact solution, and absolute error of elevation of water w ( ζ , ω , t ) , for Eq. (14) at a = b = 0.1 , c = d = 0.01 , ω = 20 , t = 5 , n = 1 , = 1 , and α = 1

ζ Exact solution ( w exact ) MVIM solution ( w MV IM ) [39] q -HATM solution ( w q -HATM ) Absolute error w exact w MV IM [39] Absolute error w exact w q -HATM
50 2.015707 × 10 6 1.6451825 × 10 6 2.0154 × 10 6 3.705249242 × 10 7 3.11436 × 10 10
40 0.000014879 0.0000121481 0.0000148777 2.731814611 × 10 6 2.2849 × 10 9
30 0.000109176 0.0000893157 0.00010916 1.986047907 × 10 5 1.60091 × 10 8
20 0.000766334 0.0006360573 0.000766258 1.302774181 × 10 4 7.6713 × 10 8
10 0.004017011 0.0036024380 0.00401731 4.145730832 × 10 4 2.95485 × 10 7
00 0.006329433 0.0061447985 0.00632901 1.153652836 × 10 4 4.19451 × 10 7
10 0.001888126 0.0019107842 0.00188816 2.265746793 × 10 5 2.9078 × 10 8
20 0.000292663 0.0002919665 0.000292708 6.972254850 × 10 7 4.40576 × 10 8
30 0.000040371 0.0000401720 0.0000403782 1.991078199 × 10 7 7.08854 × 10 9
40 5.477852 × 10 6 4.488749 × 10 6 5.47883 × 10 6 2.87710754 × 10 8 9.81212 × 10 10
50 7.416075 × 10 7 7.3764841 × 10 7 7.41741 × 10 7 3.95110044 × 10 9 1.33197 × 10 10

6 Conclusion

We have discussed ( 2 + 1 ) -dimensional non-linear time-fractional Wu–Zhang system of equations using a semi-analytical technique called q -HATM. The suggested approach is a powerful method for solving time-fractional WZ system, and Mathematica software is used effectively to implement this method. We derived the series solution of high-dimensional non-linear WZ system and demonstrated the graphical analysis of surfaces, which elucidates the characteristics of the system. This study had provided more valuable insights into the dynamics of the dispersive water waves and depicted a crucial merging region, which determines the effectiveness of the method. The results demonstrated using q -HATM have exceptional accuracy and consistency, which converge quickly. The system’s action is also dependent on both time instant and time history, which can be easily analysed by the fractional calculus concept. Moreover, our analysis confirms that the proposed method is exceptionally effective, resilient, and successfully resolves non-linear partial differential equations encountered in science and engineering.



  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable for this manuscript as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] Miller KS, Ross B. An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1993. Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Podlubny I. Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. San Diego, California, USA: Elsevier; 1998. Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Caputo M. Elasticita e Dissipazione. Zanichelli, Bologa, Italy, Links. 1969. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Ross B. The development of fractional calculus 1695–1900. Historia Math. 1977;4(1):75–89. 10.1016/0315-0860(77)90039-8Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Singh J, Kumar D, Kumar S. A new fractional model of nonlinear shock wave equation arising in flow of gases. Nonl Eng. 2014;3(1):43–50. 10.1515/nleng-2013-0022Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Seadawy A. R. Stability analysis for Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of weakly nonlinear ion-acoustic waves in a plasma. Comput Math Appl. 2014;67(1):172–80. 10.1016/j.camwa.2013.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Saadeh R, Abbes A, Al-Husban A, Ouannas A, Grassi G. The fractional discrete predator-prey model: chaos, control and synchronization. Fract Fract. 2023;7(2):120. 10.3390/fractalfract7020120Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Nisar KS, Ciancio A, Ali KK, Osman MS, Cattani C, Baleanu D, et al. On beta-time-fractional biological population model with abundant solitary wave structures. Alexandr Eng J 2022;61(3):1996–2008. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Singh J, Kumar D, Baleanu D. On the analysis of chemical kinetics system pertaining to a fractional derivative with Mittag-Leffler type kernel. Chaos Interdiscipl J Nonl Sci. 2017;27:10. 10.1063/1.4995032. Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Shchigolev VK. Fractional-order derivatives in cosmological models of accelerated expansion. Modern Phys Lett A 2021;36, (14):2130014. 10.1142/S0217732321300147Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Chauhan RP, Kumar S, Alkahtani BST, Alzaid SS. A study on fractional order financial model by using Caputo–Fabrizio derivative. Results Phys. 2024;57:107335. 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107335Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Nisar KS, Farman M, Abdel-Aty M, Ravichandran C. A review of fractional order epidemic models for life sciences problems: past, present and future. Alexandr Eng J. 2024;95:283–305. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.059Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Alderremy AA, Khan H, Shah R, Aly S, Baleanu D. The analytical analysis of time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equations. Mathematics. 2020;8(6):987. 10.3390/math8060987Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Baleanu D, Wu GC, Zeng SD. Chaos analysis and asymptotic stability of generalized Caputo fractional differential equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2017;102:99–105. 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.02.007Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Kapoor M, Kour S. An analytical approach for Yang transform on fractional-order heat and wave equation. Phys Scr. 2024;99(3):035222. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad24abSuche in Google Scholar

[16] Archana DK, Prakasha DG, Veeresha P, Nisar KS. An efficient technique for one-dimensional fractional diffusion equation model for cancer tumor. Comput Model Eng Sci 2024;141(2):1347–63. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2024.053916. Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Shah NA, Hamed YS, Abualnaja KM, Chung JD, Shah R, Khan AA. Comparative analysis of fractional-order Kaup–Kupershmidt equation within different operators. Symmetry. 2022;14(5):986. 10.3390/sym14050986Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Alshammari S, Al-Sawalha MM, Shah R. Approximate analytical methods for a fractional-order nonlinear system of Jaulent-Miodek equation with energy-dependent Schrodinger potential. Fract Fract. 2023;7(2):140. 10.3390/fractalfract7020140Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Baleanu D, Caponetto R, Machado JT. Challenges in fractional dynamics and control theory. J Vibrat Control. 2016;22(9):2151–2. 10.1177/1077546315609262Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Darshan Kumar CV, Prakasha DG, Veeresha P, Kapoor M. A homotopy-based computational scheme for two-dimensional fractional cable equation. Modern Phys Lett B. 2024;38(32):2450292. 10.1142/S0217984924502920. Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Sun H, Zhang Y, Baleanu D, Chen W, Chen Y. A new collection of real world applications of fractional calculus in science and engineering. Commun Nonl Sci Numer Simul. 2018;64:213–31. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.04.019Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Alshehry AS, Yasmin H, Shah R, Ullah R, Khan A. Fractional-order modeling: Analysis of foam drainage and Fisher’s equations. Open Phys. 2023;21(1):20230115. 10.1515/phys-2023-0115Suche in Google Scholar

[23] De Oliveira EC, Tenreiro Machado JA. A review of definitions for fractional derivatives and integral. Math Problems Eng. 2014;2014:1–17. 10.1155/2014/238459Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Gao W, Veeresha P, Prakasha DG, Senel B, Baskonus HM. Iterative method applied to the fractional nonlinear systems arising in thermoelasticity with Mittag-Leffler kernel. Fractals. 2020;28(8):2040040. 10.1142/S0218348X2040040XSuche in Google Scholar

[25] Alwehebi F, Hobiny A, Maturi D. Variational iteration method for solving time-fractional burgers equation using Maple. Appl Math. 2023;14(5):336–48. 10.4236/am.2023.145021Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Ali KK, Maneea M. Optical solitons using optimal homotopy analysis method for time-fractional (1+1)-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equations. Optik. 2023;283:170907. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170907Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Ali HM, Nisar KS, Alharbi WR, Zakarya M. Efficient approximate analytical technique to solve nonlinear coupled Jaulent-Miodek system within a time-fractional order. AIMS Math. 2024;9(3):5671–85. 10.3934/math.2024274Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Iqbal A, Nawaz R, Ashraf R, Fewster-Young N. Extension of optimal auxiliary function method to nonlinear Sin Gordon partial differential equations. Partial Differ Equ Appl Math. 2024;10:100735. 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100735Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Shah R, Khan H, Farooq U, Baleanu D, Kumam P, Arif M. A new analytical technique to solve system of fractional-order partial differential equations. IEEE Access. 2019;7:150037–50. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946946Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Kumar P, Gao W, Veeresha P, Erturk VS, Prakasha DG, Baskonus HM. Solution of a dengue fever model via fractional natural decomposition and modified predictor-corrector methods. Int J Model Simul Scientif Comput. 2024;15(1):2450007. 10.1142/S1793962324500077Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Ashraf R, Nawaz R, Alabdali O, Fewster-Young N, Ali AH, Ghanim F, et al. A new hybrid optimal auxiliary function method for approximate solutions of non-linear fractional partial differential equations. Fract Fract. 2023;7(9):673. 10.3390/fractalfract7090673Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Alderremy AA, Gomez-Aguilar JF, Sabir Z, Raja MAZ, Aly S. Numerical investigations of the fractional order derivative-based accelerating universe in the modified gravity. Modern Phys Lett A. 2024;39(1):2350180. 10.1142/S0217732323501808. Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Chethan HB, Saadeh R, Prakasha DG, Malagi NS, Qazza A, Nagaraja M, et al. An efficient approximate analytical technique for the fractional model describing the solid tumour invasion. Front Phys. 2024;12:1294506. 10.3389/fphy.2024.1294506Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Ahmad H, Farooq M, Khan I, Nawaz R, Fewster-Young N, Askar S. Analysis of nonlinear fractional-order Fisher equation using two reliable techniques. Open Phys. 2024;22(1):20230185. 10.1515/phys-2023-0185Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Nisar KS, Ciancio A, Ali KK, Osman MS, Cattani C, Baleanu D, et al. On beta-time-fractional biological population model with abundant solitary wave structures. Alexandr Eng J. 2022;61(3):1996–2008. 10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.106Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Wu TY, Zhang JE. On modeling nonlinear long waves. in:Mathematics is for solving problems. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1996. p. 233. Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Taghizadeh N, Akbari M, Shahidi M Application of reduced differential transform method to the Wu-Zhang equation. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5(5):565–71. Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Qasim AF, Ali ZY. Application of modified Adomian decomposition method to (2+1)-dimensional non-linear Wu-Zhang system. J Al-Qadisiyah Comput Sci Math. 2018;10(1):40. 10.29304/jqcm.2018.10.1.340Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Zayed EM, Rahman HA. On solving the KdV-Burger’s equation and the Wu-Zhang equations using the modified variational iteration method. Int J Nonl Sci Numer Simul. 2009;10(9):1093–104. 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.9.1093Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Maaaa ZY. Homotopy perturbation method for the Wu-Zhang equation in fluid dynamics. J Phys Confer Ser IOP Publish. 2008;96(1):012182. 10.1088/1742-6596/96/1/012182Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Yang X. Exact solutions of Wu-Zhang equation via complete discrimination system for polynomial method. Modern Phys Lett A. 2023;38(18–19):2350087. 10.1142/S0217732323500876Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Awan AU, Tahir M, Rehman HU. On traveling wave solutions: The Wu-Zhang system describing dispersive long waves. Modern Phys Lett B. 2019;33(6):1950059. 10.1142/S0217984919500593Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Kaur B, Gupta RK. Time fractional (2+1)-dimensional Wu-Zhang system: Dispersion analysis, similarity reductions, conservation laws, and exact solutions. Comput Math Appl. 2020;79(4):1031–48. 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.08.014Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Khater MM, Attia RA, Lu D. Numerical solutions of nonlinear fractional Wu-Zhang system for water surface versus three approximate schemes. J Ocean Eng Sci. 2019;4(2):144–8. 10.1016/j.joes.2019.03.002Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Yasmin H, Alderremy AA, Shah R, Hamid Ganie A, Aly S. Iterative solution of the fractional Wu-Zhang equation under Caputo derivative operator. Front Phys. 2024;12:1333990. 10.3389/fphy.2024.1333990Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Tariq KU, Khater MM, Younis M. Explicit, periodic and dispersive soliton solutions to the conformable time-fractional Wu-Zhang system. Modern Phys Lett B. 2021;35(24):2150417. 10.1142/S0217984921504170Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Shijun L. Homotopy analysis method: a new analytic method for nonlinear problems. Applied Math Mech. 1998;19:957–62. 10.1007/BF02457955Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Singh J, Kumar D, Swroop R. Numerical solution of time-and space-fractional coupled Burgers’ equations via homotopy algorithm. Alexandr Eng J. 2016;55(2):1753–63. 10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.028Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Veeresha P, Prakasha DG, Qurashi MA, Baleanu D. A reliable technique for fractional modified Boussinesq and approximate long wave equations. Adv Differ Equ. 2019;2019(1):1–23. 10.1186/s13662-019-2185-2Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Kumar D, Singh J, Baleanu D. A new analysis for fractional model of regularized long-wave equation arising in ion acoustic plasma waves. Math Meth Appl Sci. 2017;40(15):5642–53. 10.1002/mma.4414Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Prakasha DG, Malagi NS, Veeresha P, Prasannakumara BC. An efficient computational technique for time-fractional Kaup–Kupershmidt equation. Numer Meth Partial Differ Equ. 2021;37(2):1299–316. 10.1002/num.22580Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-18
Revised: 2024-09-23
Accepted: 2024-11-04
Published Online: 2025-04-21

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Single-step fabrication of Ag2S/poly-2-mercaptoaniline nanoribbon photocathodes for green hydrogen generation from artificial and natural red-sea water
  3. Abundant new interaction solutions and nonlinear dynamics for the (3+1)-dimensional Hirota–Satsuma–Ito-like equation
  4. A novel gold and SiO2 material based planar 5-element high HPBW end-fire antenna array for 300 GHz applications
  5. Explicit exact solutions and bifurcation analysis for the mZK equation with truncated M-fractional derivatives utilizing two reliable methods
  6. Optical and laser damage resistance: Role of periodic cylindrical surfaces
  7. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the air-side metal foam partially filled channels of panel-type radiator under forced convection
  8. Water-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing CNT nanoparticles over an extending surface with velocity slips, thermal convective, and zero-mass flux conditions
  9. Dynamical wave structures for some diffusion--reaction equations with quadratic and quartic nonlinearities
  10. Solving an isotropic grey matter tumour model via a heat transfer equation
  11. Study on the penetration protection of a fiber-reinforced composite structure with CNTs/GFP clip STF/3DKevlar
  12. Influence of Hall current and acoustic pressure on nanostructured DPL thermoelastic plates under ramp heating in a double-temperature model
  13. Applications of the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction–diffusion system: Analytical and numerical approaches
  14. AC electroosmotic flow of Maxwell fluid in a pH-regulated parallel-plate silica nanochannel
  15. Interpreting optical effects with relativistic transformations adopting one-way synchronization to conserve simultaneity and space–time continuity
  16. Modeling and analysis of quantum communication channel in airborne platforms with boundary layer effects
  17. Theoretical and numerical investigation of a memristor system with a piecewise memductance under fractal–fractional derivatives
  18. Tuning the structure and electro-optical properties of α-Cr2O3 films by heat treatment/La doping for optoelectronic applications
  19. High-speed multi-spectral explosion temperature measurement using golden-section accelerated Pearson correlation algorithm
  20. Dynamic behavior and modulation instability of the generalized coupled fractional nonlinear Helmholtz equation with cubic–quintic term
  21. Study on the duration of laser-induced air plasma flash near thin film surface
  22. Exploring the dynamics of fractional-order nonlinear dispersive wave system through homotopy technique
  23. The mechanism of carbon monoxide fluorescence inside a femtosecond laser-induced plasma
  24. Numerical solution of a nonconstant coefficient advection diffusion equation in an irregular domain and analyses of numerical dispersion and dissipation
  25. Numerical examination of the chemically reactive MHD flow of hybrid nanofluids over a two-dimensional stretching surface with the Cattaneo–Christov model and slip conditions
  26. Impacts of sinusoidal heat flux and embraced heated rectangular cavity on natural convection within a square enclosure partially filled with porous medium and Casson-hybrid nanofluid
  27. Stability analysis of unsteady ternary nanofluid flow past a stretching/shrinking wedge
  28. Solitonic wave solutions of a Hamiltonian nonlinear atom chain model through the Hirota bilinear transformation method
  29. Bilinear form and soltion solutions for (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV-CBS equation
  30. Solitary chirp pulses and soliton control for variable coefficients cubic–quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in nonuniform management system
  31. Influence of decaying heat source and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity on photo-hydro-elasto semiconductor media
  32. Dissipative disorder optimization in the radiative thin film flow of partially ionized non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid with second-order slip condition
  33. Bifurcation, chaotic behavior, and traveling wave solutions for the fractional (4+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson–Kadomtsev–Petviashvili model
  34. New investigation on soliton solutions of two nonlinear PDEs in mathematical physics with a dynamical property: Bifurcation analysis
  35. Mathematical analysis of nanoparticle type and volume fraction on heat transfer efficiency of nanofluids
  36. Creation of single-wing Lorenz-like attractors via a ten-ninths-degree term
  37. Optical soliton solutions, bifurcation analysis, chaotic behaviors of nonlinear Schrödinger equation and modulation instability in optical fiber
  38. Chaotic dynamics and some solutions for the (n + 1)-dimensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in plasma physics
  39. Fractal formation and chaotic soliton phenomena in nonlinear conformable Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation
  40. Single-step fabrication of Mn(iv) oxide-Mn(ii) sulfide/poly-2-mercaptoaniline porous network nanocomposite for pseudo-supercapacitors and charge storage
  41. Novel constructed dynamical analytical solutions and conserved quantities of the new (2+1)-dimensional KdV model describing acoustic wave propagation
  42. Tavis–Cummings model in the presence of a deformed field and time-dependent coupling
  43. Spinning dynamics of stress-dependent viscosity of generalized Cross-nonlinear materials affected by gravitationally swirling disk
  44. Design and prediction of high optical density photovoltaic polymers using machine learning-DFT studies
  45. Robust control and preservation of quantum steering, nonlocality, and coherence in open atomic systems
  46. Coating thickness and process efficiency of reverse roll coating using a magnetized hybrid nanomaterial flow
  47. Dynamic analysis, circuit realization, and its synchronization of a new chaotic hyperjerk system
  48. Decoherence of steerability and coherence dynamics induced by nonlinear qubit–cavity interactions
  49. Finite element analysis of turbulent thermal enhancement in grooved channels with flat- and plus-shaped fins
  50. Modulational instability and associated ion-acoustic modulated envelope solitons in a quantum plasma having ion beams
  51. Statistical inference of constant-stress partially accelerated life tests under type II generalized hybrid censored data from Burr III distribution
  52. On solutions of the Dirac equation for 1D hydrogenic atoms or ions
  53. Entropy optimization for chemically reactive magnetized unsteady thin film hybrid nanofluid flow on inclined surface subject to nonlinear mixed convection and variable temperature
  54. Stability analysis, circuit simulation, and color image encryption of a novel four-dimensional hyperchaotic model with hidden and self-excited attractors
  55. A high-accuracy exponential time integration scheme for the Darcy–Forchheimer Williamson fluid flow with temperature-dependent conductivity
  56. Novel analysis of fractional regularized long-wave equation in plasma dynamics
  57. Development of a photoelectrode based on a bismuth(iii) oxyiodide/intercalated iodide-poly(1H-pyrrole) rough spherical nanocomposite for green hydrogen generation
  58. Investigation of solar radiation effects on the energy performance of the (Al2O3–CuO–Cu)/H2O ternary nanofluidic system through a convectively heated cylinder
  59. Quantum resources for a system of two atoms interacting with a deformed field in the presence of intensity-dependent coupling
  60. Studying bifurcations and chaotic dynamics in the generalized hyperelastic-rod wave equation through Hamiltonian mechanics
  61. A new numerical technique for the solution of time-fractional nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation involving Atangana–Baleanu derivative using cubic B-spline functions
  62. Interaction solutions of high-order breathers and lumps for a (3+1)-dimensional conformable fractional potential-YTSF-like model
  63. Hydraulic fracturing radioactive source tracing technology based on hydraulic fracturing tracing mechanics model
  64. Numerical solution and stability analysis of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow subject to exponential heat source/sink over a Riga sheet
  65. Numerical investigation of mixed convection and viscous dissipation in couple stress nanofluid flow: A merged Adomian decomposition method and Mohand transform
  66. Effectual quintic B-spline functions for solving the time fractional coupled Boussinesq–Burgers equation arising in shallow water waves
  67. Analysis of MHD hybrid nanofluid flow over cone and wedge with exponential and thermal heat source and activation energy
  68. Solitons and travelling waves structure for M-fractional Kairat-II equation using three explicit methods
  69. Impact of nanoparticle shapes on the heat transfer properties of Cu and CuO nanofluids flowing over a stretching surface with slip effects: A computational study
  70. Computational simulation of heat transfer and nanofluid flow for two-sided lid-driven square cavity under the influence of magnetic field
  71. Irreversibility analysis of a bioconvective two-phase nanofluid in a Maxwell (non-Newtonian) flow induced by a rotating disk with thermal radiation
  72. Hydrodynamic and sensitivity analysis of a polymeric calendering process for non-Newtonian fluids with temperature-dependent viscosity
  73. Exploring the peakon solitons molecules and solitary wave structure to the nonlinear damped Kortewege–de Vries equation through efficient technique
  74. Modeling and heat transfer analysis of magnetized hybrid micropolar blood-based nanofluid flow in Darcy–Forchheimer porous stenosis narrow arteries
  75. Activation energy and cross-diffusion effects on 3D rotating nanofluid flow in a Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium with radiation and convective heating
  76. Insights into chemical reactions occurring in generalized nanomaterials due to spinning surface with melting constraints
  77. Review Article
  78. Examination of the gamma radiation shielding properties of different clay and sand materials in the Adrar region
  79. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part II
  80. Possible explanation for the neutron lifetime puzzle
  81. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part III
  82. Numerical investigation on fluid-thermal-electric performance of a thermoelectric-integrated helically coiled tube heat exchanger for coal mine air cooling
  83. Special Issue on Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos in Physical Systems
  84. Analysis of the fractional relativistic isothermal gas sphere with application to neutron stars
  85. Abundant wave symmetries in the (3+1)-dimensional Chafee–Infante equation through the Hirota bilinear transformation technique
  86. Successive midpoint method for fractional differential equations with nonlocal kernels: Error analysis, stability, and applications
Heruntergeladen am 15.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2025-0128/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen