Home The mechanism of carbon monoxide fluorescence inside a femtosecond laser-induced plasma
Article Open Access

The mechanism of carbon monoxide fluorescence inside a femtosecond laser-induced plasma

  • Junfeng Zhang EMAIL logo , Dandan Shi , Qinxin Wang and Hang Lv
Published/Copyright: April 22, 2025

Abstract

The fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules in intense femtosecond laser fields was studied experimentally. Distinct spectral lines from excited atoms and molecules were identified. Different dependencies on gas pressure were observed for atomic and molecular spectral lines. Analysis indicated that these atomic spectral lines were induced by the TBR process, and those molecular spectral lines were induced by collision-induced excitation with tunneling electrons. This study paves the way for a better understanding of complex plasma processes.

1 Introduction

As the second most abundant interstellar molecule after hydrogen, carbon monoxide plays very important roles in relevant fields, such as plasma physics, combustion science, and astrophysics [1]. Beyond the Earth, the CO molecules have also been observed in comets, planetary atmospheres, interstellar medium, and the photospheres of the Sun and cooler stars, and usually are employed as probes for atmospheric structure and dynamics [2]. The detection of CO molecules is involved in transition spectroscopy; thus, the fluorescence of CO molecules has been intensively studied both theoretically and experimentally. Most previous studies were performed on spectroscopy and molecular properties [3]; however, plasma still lacks research.

With the development of laser technology, femtosecond laser is found to be an ideal tool for generating plasma, and the dynamic processes become a hot topic for molecules in such intense laser fields. Because there are many possible excitation pathways in laser-induced plasma, the formation mechanism of excited atoms and molecules remains controversial. In a single atom/molecule case, the electrons could be excited by resonance, absorbing single or several photons and populated into excited states [4]. Even under non-resonant conditions, electrons could also be excited into atomic and molecular Rydberg states through frustrated tunneling ionization or multi-photon resonance excitation in intense laser fields [5,6,7]. Collisions prevail in the laser-induced plasma at high gas pressure. Then, the formation mechanism for the fluorescence of atoms and molecules becomes more complex. Several mechanisms, such as radiative recombination [8], dielectronic recombination, three-body recombination (TBR) [9], and impact excitation by ions or electrons [10], have all been observed in laser-induced plasma. Thus, it is very difficult to identify the formation mechanism of fluorescence in laser-induced plasma.

In this study, we measured the fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules in intense femtosecond laser fields. Numerous spectral lines were observed in the laser-induced plasma. These spectral lines were clearly identified and classified into emission from excited neutral atoms and molecules. By measuring the dependence of fluorescence intensity on gas pressure and laser intensity, combined with the plasma parameters, we studied the formation mechanism of CO molecule fluorescence in laser-induced plasma. Our research indicates that the different excitation mechanisms exist simultaneously, and the identification of the fluorescence mechanism paves the way for further understanding of the dynamic processes in plasma.

2 Experiment setup

The experimental setup used for fluorescence spectrum in femtosecond laser fields is similar to those described in our previous studies [11]. The fluorescence spectrum was measured in a 20 cm-long air-tight cell. An oil-free mechanical pump was used to pump the reaction region, providing a base pressure of 0.01 Pa. CO gas was leaked into the cell through an effusive valve. The operating pressure was in the range of 0.1–1,000 Pa, which was carefully controlled by a flowmeter. The femtosecond laser pulses (50 fs, 800 nm, 1 kHz, linearly polarized) from a commercial Ti:sapphire laser system (Libra, Coherent) were introduced into the reaction region by a 25 cm focus lens. At the focus, a neutral density filter was inserted into the laser beam to vary the laser intensity continuously. The fluorescence emitted from these excited atoms and molecules was collected and introduced into an optical fiber laterally. Two kinds of detectors were used to measure the fluorescence at the end of the optical fiber. A whole frequency spectrum of the fluorescence in the range of 350–1,100 nm was recorded using a spectrometer (Ocean Optics, QE Pro). To achieve the decay dynamics of these spectral lines, a monochromator (Zolix, grating: 1,200 grooves/mm) was used in front of the photomultiplier (PMT, Zolix), and the time domain curves were recorded by a data acquisition card (NI 5162). The fluorescence lifetime was obtained by fitting the falling edge of the time domain curve with an exponential function.

3 Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules at 1,000 Pa with a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2. Numerous atomic spectral lines were observed and numbered in order of the wavenumber. By comparing with the NIST database, these atomic spectral lines are assigned to the radiative transition of neutral carbon and oxygen atoms, as listed in Table 1. Due to the small base pressure, it is certain that the background fluorescence signal from air molecules (O2) was completely reduced. Besides, a series of equally spaced spectral lines with broad line profiles are also identified and assigned to be the emission of neutral excited CO molecules. The heads of several progressions for d3Δ state (v′ = 5, 6, 7) and e3Σ state (v′ = 3, 4) [12], coincident with the observed spectral lines, are calculated according to the molecular parameters of these electronic states. The major subdivisions of these neutral molecular spectral lines result from the spin-orbit splitting.

Figure 1 
               The fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules at 1,000 Pa with a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2. These atomic spectral lines are numbered in order. The heads of several molecular spectral lines of CO molecules are indicated.
Figure 1

The fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules at 1,000 Pa with a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2. These atomic spectral lines are numbered in order. The heads of several molecular spectral lines of CO molecules are indicated.

Table 1

Identification of neutral atomic spectral lines

Line no. Wavelength (nm) Atomic species Transition
1 965.84 C 2s22p3s——2s22p3p
2 940.57 C 2s22p3s——2s22p3p
3 926.08 O 2s22p3(4S0)3s——2s22p3(4S0)3d
4 909.15 C 2s22p3s——2s22p3p
5 844.64 O 2s22p3(4S0)3s——2s22p3(4S0)3p
6 833.51 C 2s22p3s——2s22p3p
7 777.19 O 2s22p3(4S0)3s——2s22p3(4S0)3p
8 724.13 C 2s22p3s——2s22p6s
9 658.76 C 2s22p3s——2s22p4d
10 615.60 O 2s22p3(4S0)3p——2s22p3(4S0)4d
11 467.67 C 2s22p3s——2s22p4p
C 2s22p3p——2s22p 15s/14s/13d
12 437.14 C 2s22p3s——2s22p5p
436.82 O 2s22p3(4S0)3s——2s22p3(4S0)4p
13 426.90 C 2s22p3s——2s22p5p

To study the fluorescence mechanism of CO molecules, we measured the intensity of these spectral lines as a function of gas pressure. Two different kinds of dependences are observed as the gas pressure increases, indicating that these fluorescence are produced by different mechanisms. Thus, these spectral lines are divided into two parts accordingly. For the first part, some atomic spectral lines (lines nos. 3–5, 7–10, and 13) become visible when the gas pressure is greater than 20 Pa. As an example, the results of C I 658.76 nm (line no. 9) spectral line are shown in Figure 2(a). As shown in the figure, the fluorescence intensity increases with gas pressure, reaches the maxima around 300 Pa of gas pressure, and becomes a constant intensity after that. For the second part, i.e., molecular spectral lines, the results of 542.45 nm (e3Σ state of the CO molecule, labeled with red asterisk in Figure 1) are shown in Figure 2(b) as an example. As can be seen, this spectral line emerges until 100 Pa and increases with the gas pressure as a quadratic function, which is different from the abovementioned atomic spectral lines. On the contrary, other atomic spectral lines (line nos 1, 2, 6, 11, and 12) have the same dependence with these molecular spectral lines. Thus, it is supposed that a portion of these excited molecules are not stable, and excited atoms are produced by the neutral dissociation of highly excited molecules [13,14], which then leads to the formation of these atomic spectral lines. Therefore, these atomic spectral lines (line nos 1, 2, 6, 11, and 12) are also viewed as molecular spectral lines in the following part. The lifetimes of atomic (658.76 nm) and molecular (542.45 nm) spectral lines were measured, as shown in Figure 2(c) and (d), respectively. Both of them decrease exponentially with the gas pressure, indicating that the collisions should be considered in this range of gas pressure. The different formation mechanisms of these atomic and molecular spectral lines are discussed in the following section.

Figure 2 
               The normalized fluorescence intensity (a) and lifetime (c) as a function of gas pressure for atomic spectral line (658.76 nm) with a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2. The same as (a) and (c) but for molecular spectral line (542.45 nm) are shown in (b) and (d). The solid lines in (a) and (b) are the TBR rate and collision-induced excitation rate as a function of gas pressure (see text).
Figure 2

The normalized fluorescence intensity (a) and lifetime (c) as a function of gas pressure for atomic spectral line (658.76 nm) with a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2. The same as (a) and (c) but for molecular spectral line (542.45 nm) are shown in (b) and (d). The solid lines in (a) and (b) are the TBR rate and collision-induced excitation rate as a function of gas pressure (see text).

In plasma, neutral excited atoms are usually produced by the recombination of electrons with the corresponding ions. There are three recombination processes: radiative recombination, dielectronic recombination, and three-body recombination (TBR). In this experiment, the emissions of radiative recombination (i.e., continuous spectrum) and dielectronic recombination (i.e., spectral lines from excited atomic ions) were not observed in Figure 1, and hence, these two mechanisms were excluded. Therefore, the TBR process, whose rate is two orders of magnitude larger than the radiative recombination, is the possible mechanism for the formation of these atomic spectral lines [15,16].

This TBR process could be expressed as

(1) A + + e + M A + M ,

where ion A+ (C+/O+) would capture an electron and turn into an excited atom A* (C*/O*), and the energy released in the recombination process is obtained by another bystander M. In this experiment, the most possible bystander M is a neutral molecule.

According to Formula (1), the atomic fluorescence intensity is proportional to the TBR rate k TBR, which can be written as

(2) k TBR N A + × N e × N M × σ TBR ,

where N A + , N e, and N M are the number density of ions, electrons, and bystanders, respectively. In plasma, the number density of ions N A + is proportional to the density of electrons N e, and the number density of bystander N M linearly depends on the gas pressure. σ TBR is the cross section of the TBR process, which is proportional to T e 9 / 2 , where T e is the plasma temperature [17,18]. Therefore, the electron density N e and the plasma temperature T e are needed for the estimation of the TBR rate k TBR.

In the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) condition, the electron density N e and plasma temperature T e could be determined according to the measured fluorescence spectrum; the method is described in the papers [19,20], and the results are shown as a function of gas pressure in Figure 3. In general, both the electron density N e and plasma temperature T e linearly increase with gas pressure and reach a maximum of 100 Pa. Actually, there are two production mechanisms for the free electrons in the laser-induced plasma, i.e., strong field tunneling ionization and collision ionization. In the beginning, electrons are produced through tunneling ionization of CO molecules in intense laser fields. Then, the energetic electrons could induce another ionization and produce secondary electrons in the next collision process. This collision ionization would repeat until the laser pulse ends. Compared with the low rate of tunneling ionization (0.1%), almost 40% of CO molecules are ionized at 100 Pa (the electrons density is 1 × 1016 cm−3, and the initial number density of CO molecules at 100 Pa is about 2.5 × 1016 cm−3), which indicates that most electrons are produced by collision ionization. When the plasma is in the case of LTE, the average kinetic energy is only about 0.4 eV for the secondary electrons with the temperature T e = 4,500 K [19]. Compared with the tunneling electrons, these secondary electrons with small kinetic energy are easier to capture by atomic ions; therefore, we believe that the electrons in the TBR process were produced through collision ionization.

Figure 3 
               The plasma temperature T
                  e and electron density N
                  e as a function of gas pressure at a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2.
Figure 3

The plasma temperature T e and electron density N e as a function of gas pressure at a laser intensity of 2 × 1014 W/cm2.

In order to confirm the TBR mechanism of these atomic spectral lines, we divide Figure 2(a) into three regions for a detailed discussion. In region I (20–100 Pa), both the electron density N e and plasma temperature T e linearly increase with the gas pressure (Figure 3). Then, the dependence of TBR rate k TBR on gas pressure p could be expressed as p 3 T e 9 / 2 , according to Formula (2). The variation tendency of k TBR is shown in Figure 2(a) with red lines by multiplying a coefficient. A good fitting was observed between this variation tendency and the experimental measurements. In Region II (100–300 Pa), both the electron density Ne and plasma temperature T e change slightly with the gas pressure (Figure 3); the same applies to the number density of atomic ions N A + . The TBR cross section σ TBR, which is proportional to T e 9 / 2 , is also irrelevant to the gas pressure in this region. Therefore, the TBR rate k TBR is in direct proportion to the gas pressure in this region according to Formula (2), owing to the number density increment of the bystander N M, and the variation tendency of k TBR in this region is shown in Figure 2(a) with blue lines, which is in line with the experimental observation. As the gas pressure increased, the mean free path in plasma became smaller, and the rate k TBR of the TBR process consumed the free electrons and continued to increase and finally surpassed the collision ionization rate. Finally, an equilibrium is established between the ionization and TBR processes in plasma when the gas pressure is beyond 300 Pa. Therefore, the TBR rate k TBR, as well as the atomic spectral intensity, does not increase further in region III, as shown in Figure 2(a). The full agreement between this TBR rate with the measured atomic fluorescence intensity indicates that the production mechanism of these atomic spectral lines is indeed the TBR process.

As mentioned above, the production mechanism of molecular spectral lines is different from that of atomic spectral lines. Similar to the excited nitrogen molecules N2(C3Πu) inside the laser filaments, there are three possible mechanisms to populate these neutral excited CO(e3Σ) molecules: collision-assisted inter-system crossing [CO + mhv → CO*; CO*(ISC) → CO(e3Σ)], dissociative recombination [21] [CO++ CO → (CO)2 +; (CO)2 ++ e → CO(e3Σ) + CO], and collision-induced excitation [21,22] [CO(X1Σ+) + e → CO(e3Σ) + e]. In order to study the mechanism of molecular fluorescence, we present the fluorescence intensity dependence of atomic (658.76 nm) and molecular (542.45 nm) spectral lines on laser intensity at 1,000 Pa in Figure 4. The saturation laser intensity of the atomic spectral line is estimated to be 1 × 1014 W/cm2, which is similar to that of tunneling ionization of CO molecules [23]. This is because all these complicated processes for TBR in plasma start with tunneling ionization. Clearly, the molecular spectral line has the same saturation laser intensity as that of the atomic spectral line. Compared with the TBR process in which CO molecules are ionized, less energy (∼8 eV) is needed for the collision-assisted inter-system crossing, in which the electron is excited into an electric state near the CO(e3Σ) state. Therefore, if these neutral excited CO molecules are produced through collision-assisted inter-system crossing, a small saturation laser intensity would be expected, which disagrees with the observation in Figure 4. As a result, we exclude this collision-assisted inter-system crossing for the formation mechanism of molecular spectral lines.

Figure 4 
               The normalized fluorescence intensities of atomic (658.76 nm) and molecular (542.45 nm) spectral lines as a function of laser intensity.
Figure 4

The normalized fluorescence intensities of atomic (658.76 nm) and molecular (542.45 nm) spectral lines as a function of laser intensity.

Next, we consider the possibility of molecular excitation by dissociative recombination. It should be pointed out that the dissociative recombination was observed at a rather high gas pressure in previous studies (a few thousands of pascal to atmospheric pressure) [21]. While at such a low gas pressure (∼100 Pa), the probability of collision between molecules and ions is very low. Furthermore, when the gas pressure is greater than 100 Pa, the number density of CO+ ion N CO + and low energy electron N e (secondary electron produced by collision ionization) are independent of the gas pressure (Figure 3). Only the number density of neutral CO molecules linearly increases with the gas pressure. Therefore, a linear dependence of the dissociative recombination rate on gas pressure is expected, which is inconsistent with the observation in Figure 2(b). Thus, the molecular spectral lines produced through this dissociation recombination should be ruled out in our experiment.

As a consequence, the formation of neutral excited CO molecules in plasma is attributed to the collision-induced excitation. The molecular fluorescence intensity is proportional to the electron impact excitation rate k CIE, which can be written as

(3) k CIE N CO × N e × σ CIE ,

where N CO and N e are the number density of the ground state molecules and energetic electrons, respectively. σ CIE is the electron collision excitation cross section of CO molecules, which only depend on the kinetic energy of electrons, independent of the gas pressure. As the gas pressure increased, N CO linearly increased accordingly.

Energetic electrons are essential for the collision-induced excitation of CO molecules. Thus, the contribution of secondary electrons to this collision-induced excitation process is quite small. This is because the secondary electrons with a temperature T e = 4,500 K only have an average kinetic energy of about 0.4 eV. The electron with such small kinetic energy does not cannot excite the CO molecules.

Energetic electrons could be produced in tunneling ionization if the rescattering process is included. Both the number density of neutral molecules N CO and tunneled electrons N e linearly depend on the gas pressure. The electron impact excitation cross section σ CIE is independent of the gas pressure because the kinetic energy of electrons in tunneling ionization is irrelevant to the gas pressure. According to Formula (3), the fluorescence intensity induced by the collision of tunneled electrons should depend quadratically on the gas pressure, and the variation tendency is shown in Figure 2(b) (red line), which is in line with the observed molecular spectral line. This proves that these molecular spectral lines are produced through collision-induced excitation by energetic tunneling electrons. Due to the small tunneling ionization rate (∼0.1%), the number density of tunneling electrons is rather small, leading to a relatively small electron impact excitation rate k CIE; therefore, these molecular spectral lines become visible until the gas pressure is larger than 100 Pa.

4 Determination of the electron density and plasma temperature

Because of the dominance of the collision processes, the plasma should be in local thermal equilibrium (LTE). The criteria of LTE reads N e N cr = 1.6 × 10 12 T ( Δ E ) 3 where T (in K) is the plasma temperature, ΔE (in eV) is the energy difference for levels in the transition, and N cr is the critical density for thermal equilibrium. For the spectral line of CI 658.76 nm, inserting ΔE ≈ 1.88 eV and a reasonable upper limit estimation of T ≈ 10,000 K, the critical density N cr is calculated to be less than 1015 cm−3. This value is much less than the plasma density obtained in Figure 3 (∼1016 cm−3). This justifies the formation of plasma and the condition of LTE. In thermodynamic equilibrium, the plasma can be fully described by partition functions independent of the excitation mechanism (e.g., by arc, shock tube, plasma jet, or laser).

The electron density and plasma temperature are the two independent parameters that describe the plasma and could be deduced from the fluorescence spectrum. The plasma temperature could be determined by the well-known Boltzmann method from the relative spectral line intensity, provided that the transition probabilities A mn from a given excited state are known. The populations of the excited states follow a Boltzmann distribution, and their relative emissivity ε mn can be given by

ln λ ε mn g m A mn = ln N ( T ) U ( T ) E m k T e ,

where λ, A mn, and g m are the wavelength, the transition probability, and the statistical weight for the upper level, respectively; E m is the excited level energy; T e is the plasma temperature; k is the Boltzmann constant; U(T) is the partition function, and N(T) is the atomic density. To construct the Boltzmann plot, three atomic lines of O I (line no. 3, 5, 7) are selected, because they are well isolated, having a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, the energy difference of their upper levels is large enough to provide reasonable accuracy. Accordingly, the plasma temperature is determined from the slope of the Boltzmann plot. By repeating this procedure, the plasma temperature is computed as a function of gas pressure, and the results are shown in Figure 3.

The measured line profile originates from different line shifts and broadening mechanisms that can be divided into stark broadening, Doppler broadening, and resonant pressure broadening. Here, the stark broadening prevails, which results from the perturbation of the excited levels of the radiating atoms due to collisions mainly with the plasma electrons, whereas other broadening mechanisms are negligible [24]. In quasi-static approximation, the plasma density, associated with electron impact, is proportional to the FWHM of the stark broadening line width Δ λ = 2 ω N e 10 16 , where N e is the plasma density and ω is the electron collision parameter. In general, the electron parameter is weakly dependent on the electron temperature; therefore, ω = 1.16 nm for C I 658.76 nm emission was used in the whole range.

The line profile of CI 658.76 nm was measured as a function of gas pressure. The instrumental revolution for the monochromator with the 1,200 grooves/mm grating was estimated to be Δλ = 0.23 nm (slit width is 100 μm), which is only a few percent of the CI 658.76 nm line width. Thus, the Stark broadening was corrected by subtracting the Δλ from the FWHM of the atomic spectral line, which is obtained by fitting the experimental spectral profile with a Lorenz function. Having both the ω and Δλ, the plasma density in the laser-induced plasma could be calculated accordingly, and the results as a function of gas pressure are shown in Figure 3.

5 Conclusion

In summary, the fluorescence spectrum of CO molecules in intense femtosecond laser fields was studied experimentally. Distinct spectral lines from excited atoms and molecules were identified. Different dependencies on gas pressure were observed for atomic and molecular spectral lines. Analysis indicated that these atomic spectral lines were induced by the TBR process, and the molecular spectral lines were induced by collision-induced excitation with tunneling electrons. This study clearly distinguished the different production mechanisms for the fluorescence of CO molecules in laser-induced plasma and paved the way for further understanding of the complicated processes in plasma, such as the air laser and laser filament.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education (Grant No. JJKH20240226KJ) and the Jilin Engineering Normal University Scientific Research Project (Grant Nos BSGC202004 and BSKJ201839).

  2. Author contributions: Junfeng Zhang: experimental design, data analysis, and writing; Qinxin Wang and Dandan Shi: assisting Junfeng Zhang with data analysis; Hang Lv: assisting Junfeng Zhang with experimental design and validation of data analysis. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Estekia K, Predoi-Cross A, Povey C, Ivanov S, Ghoufi A, Thibault F. Room temperature self- and H2-broadened line parameters of carbon monoxide in the first overtone band: Theoretical and revised experimental results. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. 2017;203:309–24.10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[2] Reed ZD, Hodges JT. Line shape parameters of helium-broadened 12C16O transitions in the 3  →  0 overtone band near 1.57 µm. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat. 2017;203:300–8.10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.034Search in Google Scholar

[3] Madhu Trivikram T, Hakalla R, Heays AN, Niu ML, Scheidegger S, Salumbides EJ. Perturbations in the A1Π, v = 0 state of 12C18O investigated via complementary spectroscopic techniques. Mol Phys. 2017;115:3178–91.10.1080/00268976.2017.1356477Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bruzzese R, Sasso A, Solimeno S. Multiphoton excitation and ionization of atoms and molecules. La Riv del Nuovo Cimento. 1989;12:1–105.10.1007/BF02743063Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hu S, Hao X, Lv H, Liu M, Yang T, Xu H. Quantum dynamics of atomic Rydberg excitation in strong laser fields. Opt Express. 2019;27:31629–43.10.1364/OE.27.031629Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Shvetsov-Shilovskia NI, Goreslavskia SP, Popruzhenkoa SV, Beckerb W. Capture into rydberg states and momentum distributions of ionized electrons. Laser Phys. 2009;19:1550.10.1134/S1054660X09150377Search in Google Scholar

[7] Nubbemeyer T, Gorling K, Saenz A, Eichmann U, Sandner AW. Strong-field tunneling without ionization. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101:233001.10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Seaton MJ. Radiative recombination of hydrogenic ions. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 1959;119:81–9.10.1093/mnras/119.2.81Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ticknor C, Rittenhouse ST. Three body recombination of ultracold dipoles to weakly bound dimers. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105:13201.10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013201Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Bartschat K. Electron collisions-experiment, theory, and applications. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys. 2018;51:132001.10.1088/1361-6455/aac5aaSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Zuo W, Ben S, Lv H, Zhao L, Guo J. Experimental and theoretical study on nonsequential double ionization of carbon disulfide in strong near-IR laser fields. Phys Rev A. 2016;93:53402.10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053402Search in Google Scholar

[12] Slanger TG, Black G. Relative electronic transition moments for the triplet system (d3 Δ to a3Π) of CO. J Phys B, At Mol Phys. 1972;5:1988.10.1088/0022-3700/5/10/029Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ehresmann A, Demekhin PV, Kielich W, Haar I, Uter MAS. Predominant dissociation of the CO*(D2Π)n(d/s)σ Rydberg states into atomic excited Rydberg fragments with the same effective principal quantum number. J Phys B-At Mol Opt. 2009;42:165103.10.1088/0953-4075/42/16/165103Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liebel H, Lauer S, Vollweiler F, Muller-Albrecht R, Ehresmann A. Neutral photodissociation of O2 Rydberg states accompanied by changes of the Rydberg electron’s quantum numbers n and l. Phys Lett A. 2000;267:357–69.10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00138-9Search in Google Scholar

[15] Forrey CR. Rate of formation of hydrogen molecules by three-body recombination during primordial star formation. Astrophys J. 2013;773:L25.10.1088/2041-8205/773/2/L25Search in Google Scholar

[16] D’Angelo N. Recombination of ions and electrons. Phys Rev. 1961;121:505.10.1103/PhysRev.121.505Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mansbach P, Keck J. Monte Carlo trajectory calculations of atomic excitation and ionization by thermal electrons. Phys Rev. 1969;181:275.10.1103/PhysRev.181.275Search in Google Scholar

[18] Vriens L, Smeets M. Cross-section and rate formulas for electron-impact ionization, excitation, deexcitation, and total depopulation of excited atoms. Phys Rev A. 1980;22:940.10.1103/PhysRevA.22.940Search in Google Scholar

[19] Bernhardt J, Liu W, Théberge F, Xu HL, Daigle JF. Spectroscopic analysis of femtosecond laser plasma filament in air. Opt Commun. 2008;281:1268–74.10.1016/j.optcom.2007.10.100Search in Google Scholar

[20] Liu W, Bernhardt J, Théberge F, Chin SL, Châteauneuf M, Dubois J. Spectroscopic characterization of femtosecond laser filament in argon gas. J Appl Phys. 2007;102:33111.10.1063/1.2759887Search in Google Scholar

[21] Mitryukovskiy S, Liu Y, Ding P, Houard A, Couairon A, Mysyrowicz A. Plasma luminescence from femtosecond filaments in air: Evidence for impact excitation with circularly polarized light pulses. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;114:63003.10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.063003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Itikawa Y. Cross sections for electron collisions with nitrogen molecules. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 2006;35:31.10.1063/1.1937426Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhao L, Wang R, Zhang S, Yang T, Lian Y. Ionization suppression of heteronuclear diatomic and triatomic molecules in strong infrared laser fields. Chin J Chem Phys. 2017;30:631–6.10.1063/1674-0068/30/cjcp1711209Search in Google Scholar

[24] Pellerin S, Musiol K, Pokrzywka B, Chapelle J. Stark width of the 696.5 nm argon I line. J Phys B-At Mol Opt. 1996;29:3911.10.1088/0953-4075/29/17/014Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-02
Revised: 2024-11-25
Accepted: 2025-01-03
Published Online: 2025-04-22

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Single-step fabrication of Ag2S/poly-2-mercaptoaniline nanoribbon photocathodes for green hydrogen generation from artificial and natural red-sea water
  3. Abundant new interaction solutions and nonlinear dynamics for the (3+1)-dimensional Hirota–Satsuma–Ito-like equation
  4. A novel gold and SiO2 material based planar 5-element high HPBW end-fire antenna array for 300 GHz applications
  5. Explicit exact solutions and bifurcation analysis for the mZK equation with truncated M-fractional derivatives utilizing two reliable methods
  6. Optical and laser damage resistance: Role of periodic cylindrical surfaces
  7. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the air-side metal foam partially filled channels of panel-type radiator under forced convection
  8. Water-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing CNT nanoparticles over an extending surface with velocity slips, thermal convective, and zero-mass flux conditions
  9. Dynamical wave structures for some diffusion--reaction equations with quadratic and quartic nonlinearities
  10. Solving an isotropic grey matter tumour model via a heat transfer equation
  11. Study on the penetration protection of a fiber-reinforced composite structure with CNTs/GFP clip STF/3DKevlar
  12. Influence of Hall current and acoustic pressure on nanostructured DPL thermoelastic plates under ramp heating in a double-temperature model
  13. Applications of the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction–diffusion system: Analytical and numerical approaches
  14. AC electroosmotic flow of Maxwell fluid in a pH-regulated parallel-plate silica nanochannel
  15. Interpreting optical effects with relativistic transformations adopting one-way synchronization to conserve simultaneity and space–time continuity
  16. Modeling and analysis of quantum communication channel in airborne platforms with boundary layer effects
  17. Theoretical and numerical investigation of a memristor system with a piecewise memductance under fractal–fractional derivatives
  18. Tuning the structure and electro-optical properties of α-Cr2O3 films by heat treatment/La doping for optoelectronic applications
  19. High-speed multi-spectral explosion temperature measurement using golden-section accelerated Pearson correlation algorithm
  20. Dynamic behavior and modulation instability of the generalized coupled fractional nonlinear Helmholtz equation with cubic–quintic term
  21. Study on the duration of laser-induced air plasma flash near thin film surface
  22. Exploring the dynamics of fractional-order nonlinear dispersive wave system through homotopy technique
  23. The mechanism of carbon monoxide fluorescence inside a femtosecond laser-induced plasma
  24. Numerical solution of a nonconstant coefficient advection diffusion equation in an irregular domain and analyses of numerical dispersion and dissipation
  25. Numerical examination of the chemically reactive MHD flow of hybrid nanofluids over a two-dimensional stretching surface with the Cattaneo–Christov model and slip conditions
  26. Impacts of sinusoidal heat flux and embraced heated rectangular cavity on natural convection within a square enclosure partially filled with porous medium and Casson-hybrid nanofluid
  27. Stability analysis of unsteady ternary nanofluid flow past a stretching/shrinking wedge
  28. Solitonic wave solutions of a Hamiltonian nonlinear atom chain model through the Hirota bilinear transformation method
  29. Bilinear form and soltion solutions for (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV-CBS equation
  30. Solitary chirp pulses and soliton control for variable coefficients cubic–quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in nonuniform management system
  31. Influence of decaying heat source and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity on photo-hydro-elasto semiconductor media
  32. Dissipative disorder optimization in the radiative thin film flow of partially ionized non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid with second-order slip condition
  33. Bifurcation, chaotic behavior, and traveling wave solutions for the fractional (4+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson–Kadomtsev–Petviashvili model
  34. New investigation on soliton solutions of two nonlinear PDEs in mathematical physics with a dynamical property: Bifurcation analysis
  35. Mathematical analysis of nanoparticle type and volume fraction on heat transfer efficiency of nanofluids
  36. Creation of single-wing Lorenz-like attractors via a ten-ninths-degree term
  37. Optical soliton solutions, bifurcation analysis, chaotic behaviors of nonlinear Schrödinger equation and modulation instability in optical fiber
  38. Chaotic dynamics and some solutions for the (n + 1)-dimensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in plasma physics
  39. Fractal formation and chaotic soliton phenomena in nonlinear conformable Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation
  40. Single-step fabrication of Mn(iv) oxide-Mn(ii) sulfide/poly-2-mercaptoaniline porous network nanocomposite for pseudo-supercapacitors and charge storage
  41. Novel constructed dynamical analytical solutions and conserved quantities of the new (2+1)-dimensional KdV model describing acoustic wave propagation
  42. Tavis–Cummings model in the presence of a deformed field and time-dependent coupling
  43. Spinning dynamics of stress-dependent viscosity of generalized Cross-nonlinear materials affected by gravitationally swirling disk
  44. Design and prediction of high optical density photovoltaic polymers using machine learning-DFT studies
  45. Robust control and preservation of quantum steering, nonlocality, and coherence in open atomic systems
  46. Coating thickness and process efficiency of reverse roll coating using a magnetized hybrid nanomaterial flow
  47. Dynamic analysis, circuit realization, and its synchronization of a new chaotic hyperjerk system
  48. Decoherence of steerability and coherence dynamics induced by nonlinear qubit–cavity interactions
  49. Finite element analysis of turbulent thermal enhancement in grooved channels with flat- and plus-shaped fins
  50. Modulational instability and associated ion-acoustic modulated envelope solitons in a quantum plasma having ion beams
  51. Statistical inference of constant-stress partially accelerated life tests under type II generalized hybrid censored data from Burr III distribution
  52. On solutions of the Dirac equation for 1D hydrogenic atoms or ions
  53. Entropy optimization for chemically reactive magnetized unsteady thin film hybrid nanofluid flow on inclined surface subject to nonlinear mixed convection and variable temperature
  54. Stability analysis, circuit simulation, and color image encryption of a novel four-dimensional hyperchaotic model with hidden and self-excited attractors
  55. A high-accuracy exponential time integration scheme for the Darcy–Forchheimer Williamson fluid flow with temperature-dependent conductivity
  56. Novel analysis of fractional regularized long-wave equation in plasma dynamics
  57. Development of a photoelectrode based on a bismuth(iii) oxyiodide/intercalated iodide-poly(1H-pyrrole) rough spherical nanocomposite for green hydrogen generation
  58. Investigation of solar radiation effects on the energy performance of the (Al2O3–CuO–Cu)/H2O ternary nanofluidic system through a convectively heated cylinder
  59. Quantum resources for a system of two atoms interacting with a deformed field in the presence of intensity-dependent coupling
  60. Studying bifurcations and chaotic dynamics in the generalized hyperelastic-rod wave equation through Hamiltonian mechanics
  61. A new numerical technique for the solution of time-fractional nonlinear Klein–Gordon equation involving Atangana–Baleanu derivative using cubic B-spline functions
  62. Interaction solutions of high-order breathers and lumps for a (3+1)-dimensional conformable fractional potential-YTSF-like model
  63. Hydraulic fracturing radioactive source tracing technology based on hydraulic fracturing tracing mechanics model
  64. Numerical solution and stability analysis of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow subject to exponential heat source/sink over a Riga sheet
  65. Numerical investigation of mixed convection and viscous dissipation in couple stress nanofluid flow: A merged Adomian decomposition method and Mohand transform
  66. Effectual quintic B-spline functions for solving the time fractional coupled Boussinesq–Burgers equation arising in shallow water waves
  67. Analysis of MHD hybrid nanofluid flow over cone and wedge with exponential and thermal heat source and activation energy
  68. Solitons and travelling waves structure for M-fractional Kairat-II equation using three explicit methods
  69. Impact of nanoparticle shapes on the heat transfer properties of Cu and CuO nanofluids flowing over a stretching surface with slip effects: A computational study
  70. Computational simulation of heat transfer and nanofluid flow for two-sided lid-driven square cavity under the influence of magnetic field
  71. Irreversibility analysis of a bioconvective two-phase nanofluid in a Maxwell (non-Newtonian) flow induced by a rotating disk with thermal radiation
  72. Hydrodynamic and sensitivity analysis of a polymeric calendering process for non-Newtonian fluids with temperature-dependent viscosity
  73. Exploring the peakon solitons molecules and solitary wave structure to the nonlinear damped Kortewege–de Vries equation through efficient technique
  74. Modeling and heat transfer analysis of magnetized hybrid micropolar blood-based nanofluid flow in Darcy–Forchheimer porous stenosis narrow arteries
  75. Activation energy and cross-diffusion effects on 3D rotating nanofluid flow in a Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium with radiation and convective heating
  76. Insights into chemical reactions occurring in generalized nanomaterials due to spinning surface with melting constraints
  77. Review Article
  78. Examination of the gamma radiation shielding properties of different clay and sand materials in the Adrar region
  79. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part II
  80. Possible explanation for the neutron lifetime puzzle
  81. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part III
  82. Numerical investigation on fluid-thermal-electric performance of a thermoelectric-integrated helically coiled tube heat exchanger for coal mine air cooling
  83. Special Issue on Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos in Physical Systems
  84. Analysis of the fractional relativistic isothermal gas sphere with application to neutron stars
  85. Abundant wave symmetries in the (3+1)-dimensional Chafee–Infante equation through the Hirota bilinear transformation technique
  86. Successive midpoint method for fractional differential equations with nonlocal kernels: Error analysis, stability, and applications
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2025-0135/html
Scroll to top button