Home Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and the role of nanomaterial-based theragnosis in combating the pandemic
Article Open Access

Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and the role of nanomaterial-based theragnosis in combating the pandemic

  • Beibei Zhang , Qiulan Wu , Liping Yin , Jialiu Zhang , Wei Gao , Hao Chen and Haibin Ni EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 31, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

COVID-19 was the most devastating pandemic since the Spanish Flu of 1918, affecting 700 million individuals and causing 6.8 million fatalities globally. COVID-19 vaccines are currently in the research and development phase. There is a need to investigate strategies pertaining to expanding the testing capacity, developing effective medicines, and creating safer vaccinations for long-lasting protection. Nanoparticles are frequently employed in a variety of medicine-oriented applications. The employment of nanotechnology in the development of novel medications has improved the treatment outcomes for several illnesses. The discovery of novel nanomaterials and the elucidation of their physicochemical features in connection to their cellular destiny and the relevant biological activities have received considerable attention. Hence, this review gives an updated analysis and data on clinical trials that are currently on-going for the development of drugs and the existing ones that are in use to combat the COVID-19 virus. This article also discusses the clinical management of COVID-19 at this juncture and highlights the influence of nanotechnology on the improvement of conventional COVID-19 treatments in the way of diagnosis and integrated therapy with pharmacology and advanced science. This review also brings to light on the limitations of nanotechnological strategies in combating viral diseases.

1 Introduction

1.1 Origin, epidemiology, and global current status of COVID-19

One of the most devastating pandemics since the flu of 1918 [1,2], with its local center in Wuhan, China, was caused by coronavirus in 2019 and designated COVID-19 [3,4]. As per the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) declaration on February 3, 2023, the disease was responsible for causing illnesses in approximately 700 million individuals and leading to 6.8 million fatalities globally. In December of 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases of mysterious origin was observed in Wuhan, China. Later on January 12, 2020, the sequencing of a novel coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) found from clustered cases of respiratory contagion was announced and publicized as the etiological agent for an unknown Pneumonia [5]. Due to the lack of rigorous epidemiological investigations, evaluating the risk of this occurrence was apprehensive with great uncertainty, despite a common link to a wet market in Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was reported [6]. As a result of the increasing number of fatalities, irrespective of age and the uncertainty encompassing the antidote discovery, the WHO labeled the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of worldwide alarm on January 30, 2020, and a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [7].

The high pathogenicity of human coronavirus (HCoV) has put forward this specific respiratory infection causing pathogen to the spotlight of research community[8]. Pertaining to this concern, coronaviruses are positive-sense, single-stranded, enclosed RNA viruses of 60–140 nm in diameter [9]. Among the six human betacoronaviruses species, four species including HCoV-229E, OC43, NL63, and HKU1 can cause upper respiratory tract infections like the common cold similar to the symptoms caused by rhinoviruses [10]. Other two coronaviruses species include severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), with fatality rates 9.6 and 35%, respectively [11]. Among the outbreaks of these two viruses, SARS-CoV outbreak of 2002–2004 was believed to have its primary host as bat, mutating to infect the transitional host Civet cats, and finally spreading to humans [12]. The pathogenesis was better understood through host-pathogen interaction, in which case the virus was found to infect and cause a range of respiratory ailments eventually leading to death [13]. Originating in the primary reservoir (horse shoe bats), the virus typically transmitted to humans. Furthermore, it did spread among humans, through infected body fluids including respiratory droplets (saliva, breathing, coughing, sneezing, and talking) [14,15,16].

Benign coronavirus has been reported to be harmless, being the reason for common cold alone. But the species that mutated and transitioned from their natural reservoirs have been declared virulent, inflicting excessive infection and mortality in the affected individuals [17]. Despite the majority of cases being asymptomatic or self-recovering, the disease’s clinical spectrum includes chronic pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a deadly illness which demands mechanical ventilation and treatment with critical care [18]. This has caused a severe impact on the human population with severe mortality around the globe. The lack of specific regimen for this disease has provoked or steered the research and medical community toward a necessity in identifying solutions that can be taken to stay healthy [18,19]. Real-time mapping has demonstrated that differential transmission prototypes and infectivity are related to alteration in lineages, clades, and strains of COVID-19 virus. This is despite the fact that the community spread studies of SARS-COV-2 exposed implausible transmission patterns between places which are not even connected geographically [13,20].

According to the WHO’s Weekly Epidemiological Update on the survey of COVID-19 pathogenicity, along with other relevant infectious disease information, over 4.8 million fresh cases and 39,000 deaths were announced globally over the duration of January and February months of the year 2023. This has demonstrated a reduction in the number of reported new cases and deaths (at 76% of new cases and 66% of deaths, respectively) compared to the preceding 28 days. At the end of February 2023, a total of approximately 758 million confirmed infections and 6.8 million fatalities had been documented throughout the world [21]. A glimpse at the global status of SARS-COV-2 infection among the affected countries governed by WHO, as on March 22, 2023, Europe had 274,391,717 confirmed cases, 282,646 new cases, and 2,203,052 fatalities. Western Pacific was reported to be affected with statistics showing 201,913,013 confirmed cases, 165,547 new cases, and 408,070 fatalities. Whereas, in Americas, 191,185,511 confirmed cases, 189,265 new cases, and 2,939,388 fatalities have been reported. In this regard, Southeast Asia reported 60,784,561 confirmed cases, 8,336 new cases, and 803,971 fatalities. As the continent considered to be least affected, Africa did report 9,509,869 confirmed cases, 114 new cases, and 175,315 fatalities. The worst affected countries include the United States, China, and India as per the number of cases affected. In the United States alone, 103,436,829 confirmed cases and 1,127,152 deaths were reported on September 21, 2023. As on the same date in China, 99,309,232 confirmed cases and 121,679 fatalities were reported, whereas 44,998,162 confirmed cases and 532,030 deaths were reported in India. As per the number of deaths, Brazil ranks the second with 704,659 deaths after the United States, whereas India ranks the third [22].

Even though personal cleanliness, maintaining social distance, regular hand washing, and avoiding contact with infected individuals are recommended practices, there are evidences suggesting that adequate food, nutrition, and other lifestyle factors increase the immune strength and minimize susceptibility to infectious illnesses. Hence, this review provides detailed insights into the medical management of COVID-19 and the role of nanotechnology in improving conventional treatment modalities for the disease. It also emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying health conditions (comorbidities) in the context of COVID-19 and the role of biomarkers in disease management. Additionally, it discusses the extensive research and clinical trials aimed at finding effective treatments for COVID-19, which range from antiviral medications to therapies that modulate the immune system, as well as the development of vaccines. Moreover, updated information of currently employed vaccines has been listed. Moreover, the review highlights the diagnostic advancements made possible by nanotechnology in the fight against COVID-19. These innovations include NanoBeads, Protein Aptamer Sensors, and magnetic levitation, which can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of COVID-19 diagnosis. It also explores therapeutic approaches that employ nanotechnology-based drugs to treat COVID-19.

1.2 Comorbid conditions and their relation with COVID-19

Comorbidity is defined as the epidemiologic phenomenon of a population or an individual exhibiting the simultaneous occurrence of two or more disorders or conditions [23]. Understanding the co-occurrence is critical and beneficial in developing effective treatment protocols. The COVID-19 pathogen, the SARS-CoV-2, has rapidly expanded and infected over 180 countries [3]. As the novel coronavirus continually develops, it is only possible to hypothesize as to who will become infected. COVID-19 is a relatively newer and understudied disease, limiting the availability of such data on infection symptoms [24]. Studies have demonstrated that the general symptoms vary from acute common cold [25] to chronic lung infections such as bronchitis, acute respiratory syndrome, and pneumonia, as well as various organ failures, systemic dysfunctions, and eventual death [26,27].

According to the current statistics and clinical expertise, irrespective of age, individuals with substantial pre-existing clinical disorders are at a significant risk of contracting COVID-19, particularly those obtaining long-term medical treatment [3]. However, a meta-analysis of middle-aged and elderly COVID-infected individuals revealed that the geriatric population is more susceptible and pose a significant death rate. This could be attributed to the alterations in the structure and muscular atrophy of the lungs, which can result in changes and a reduction in physiological processes such as lung reserve, airway clearance, and immune barrier functions [28].

In a retrospective review of 1590 laboratory-confirmed Chinese hospitalized patients, 25% were found to have at least one comorbid condition. This statistical information was derived by evaluating the number of documented co-morbidities in connection to composite outcomes such as Intensive Care Units, ventilation, and mortality. Included among these conditions were hypertension and diabetes. The most prevalent comorbidity found was that of hypertension with a percentage of around 17. Additionally, smoking, diabetes, and cancer were found to increase the probability toward a life-threatening stage. The number of comorbidities was found to be directly proportional in reaching the composite endpoints [29]. In yet another research done in India on COVID patients, the same prevalence of hypertension was seen, followed by diabetes, bronchial asthma, renal, and heart illnesses, in the order as so mentioned. Additionally, it was noticed that males were more prone in comparison to females in acquiring symptomatology complexes. Males have a higher prevalence of hypertension than females, which could explain why this pattern of death happened across gender [30].

Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus were the most frequent comorbidities among COVID-19 patients with fatal endpoints, according to another meta-analysis study on the connection between comorbidities and fatal endpoints among 14 countries around the globe. Even though cancer, chronic renal disease, and chronic heart failure were independently related to death in these individuals, obesity was not reported as a factor in the associated mortality [31]. However, the precise processes through which pre-existing diseases influence the vulnerability of the illness and its severity are unknown. Inflammatory and hormonal pathways, and also social variables such as living in a populated or regimented environment, are hypothesized to have a role [32].

2 Combating SARS-COV-2

2.1 Biomarkers of COVID-19

A biomarker is a trait which is used to track changes in regular or dysfunctional biological processes, or in pharmacological responses to a treatment which provide objective values during the progression or course of a disease [33,34]. Depending on the severity of a disorder, the symptoms or clinical presentation can provide clinicians with a method for precise categorizing of patients as mild, severe, and being critical, thereby predicting the outcome and mortality on the basis of spectrum of the ailment. This can enable early treatment [35]. In addition, this can assist in identification of populations at high risk, justifying therapeutics, assessing treatment response, developing criteria for hospital ICU admission, and discharge [36].

Most of these biomarkers fall into four main groups: immunological and inflammatory host immune response indicators, hematological markers/coagulation factors, organ damage markers (cardiac enzymes, liver markers, and renal function markers), and general response markers (electrolytes). The commonly employed biomarkers for COVID-19 with its identification levels in human body are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

List of biomarkers for screening COVID-19

Biochemical component Biomarkers Changes in COVID-19 patients Ref.
Blood
Hematological Hemoglobin Reduced [37]
Ferritin Elevated [38]
Lymphocytes Reduced [37]
Neutrophil: RETN, LCN2, HGF, IL-8, G-CSF Elevated [39]
CD4+ and CD8+ Reduced [40,41]
Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio Elevated [42]
Platelets Reduced [37]
B cells, natural killer cells Reduced [37]
Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin Reduced [43]
Coagulation D-dimer levels Elevated [44]
Fibrinogen Elevated [45]
Fibrin degradation products Elevated [46]
Prothrombin time Elevated [44]
Activated partial thromboplastin time Elevated [44]
Inflammatory markers
Inflammation Cytokines: IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, IL-33, TNF-α, and TGF-β Elevated [33]
Chemokines: CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CXCL6, CCL7, CCL8, CCL11, CCL17, CCL20, CCL24, CCL27, and CXCL11 [47] Elevated [48]
Growth factors Reduced [49]
C reactive protein Elevated [33]
Procalcitonin Elevated [37]
Lactate dehydrogenase Elevated [33]
Immunity markers
Antigen Spike protein Elevated [50]
Nucleocapsid protein Elevated [51]
Receptor-binding protein Elevated [37]
Antibody IgG Elevated [52,53]
IgM
SigA
Receptor ACE2 Elevated [54]
IL2R Elevated [55]
Organs failure markers
Cardiac Cardiac troponin brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/NT-proBNP myoglobin Elevated [56]
Hepatic Aspartate aminotransferase Elevated [57]
Alanine aminotransferase Elevated [57]
Bilirubin Elevated [58]
Albumin Elevated [59]
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase Elevated [60]
Muscle Creatine-kinase-myocardial band Myoglobin Elevated [61]
Renal Serum creatinine Elevated [59]
Urea Elevated
Cystatin C Elevated [50]
General response
Electrolytes Sodium Reduced Na [62]
Potassium Reduced K
Calcium Reduced Ca

2.2 Clinical management of COVID-19

In the months following the emergence of the new coronavirus, pharmaceutical corporations and researchers of all sizes endeavoured to combat the pandemic. This comprised of innovative regimens and medicaments to treat COVID-19, such as vaccines based on existing antiviral medications, expediting development of new drug, plasma treatment, and cell-based and monoclonal antibody convalescent therapeutics [63]. During the epidemic, the FDA’s programs enabling doctor’s access to experimental treatments were indispensable. The expanded access and emergency use authorization (EUA) initiatives enabled quick implementation of prospective experimental medicines and investigational drugs with growing evidence [64].

However, considering the current global health emergency, the absence of verified clinical data on COVID-19 therapeutic agents, as well as the time, expense, and high attrition rate associated with drug development indicate that it is high time to identify a promising medicine. Due to the fact that drug research is costly, time-consuming, and has a high failure rate, time remains critical and of ultimate importance. Significant interest in improvising the existing medications and accelerating the production of vaccines can enable the quick identification of therapeutic candidates. More than 30 categories of substances, coming under conventional pharmaceuticals, environmental and traditional remedies, have been deemed via research to date as being potentially effective against COVID-19 where several of these agents have undergone rapid clinical testing and have proven tentative effectiveness against COVID-19 [65]. As of February 2023, there were 8,921 on-going clinical trials, 714 mapped medicines, 3,329 finished studies, and 199 completed vaccination studies [66].

As the introduction of mutant SARS-CoV-2 strains rendered certain vaccinations less-effective and also limited the worldwide availability of COVID-19 vaccines, it supported the rationale for exuberating efforts to discover potential therapeutic approaches; this includes antivirals such as remdesivir, chloroquine (CQ), Kaletra, favipiravir, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) along with immunosuppressive drugs such as tocilizumab, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as mastinib. These drugs have been used to treat hepatitis C and malaria and were used as monoclonal antibodies for rheumatoid arthritis, HIV treatment, and kinase inhibitors for mast cell tumors in animals [67,68].

2.2.1 Antivirals

Remdesivir, a monophosphate prodrug of an adenosine analogue, has been initially used to counter the 2014 Ebola epidemic and was suggested as a possible COVID-19 antiviral drug (EC50 = 0.77 M) [69,70]. It possessed a strong selectivity for viral polymerases, reducing the likelihood that it would induce toxicity in humans; a significant obstacle which can induce genetic resistance (obstructing mutation generation) and a substantial half-life. Even though preliminary findings from a short observational trial revealed that 68% of the hospitalized patients experienced clinical improvement, the small number of case studies, and deficit of control group restrict the applicability of remdesivir administration. The US National Institutes of Health on April 29 reported 31% quicker recovery of disease-affected individuals administered with remdesivir than other infected people. Additionally, the governments of the United States, Japan, Australia, Singapore, and Europe have approved it as the novel therapeutic practice for COVID-19 patient’s caretaking. In a recent review of the Phase 3 trial as well as a prospective observational analysis of chronic COVID-19-infected individuals, remdesivir indicated a 62% decrease in fatality probability as well as an increase in medical rehabilitation. In Phase-1 investigation study, the medicine was examined as an inhaled, nebulized version on outpatients [71,72].

The anti-HCV medicine sofosbuvir (SFV) is another most popularly employed antiviral drug which has shown to be effective against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Approximately 12 clinical trials are currently recruiting and evaluating the efficacy of this medication in combination therapy. Six total investigations, on Phases 2, 3, and 4, have been completed. SFV originally inhibits the HCV NS5B protein, which is homological to NSP12 RNA polymerases of SARS-CoV-2. NSPs 1–14 are structural proteins that aid in RNA binding, replication, protein phosphorylation, and inhibition of the virus’ interferon pathway. Hence, antivirals can serve as prospective pharmacological therapeutics for COVID-19 [73]. A Phase 2 multicenter prospective trial for evaluating the effectiveness of coupled SFV/daclatasvir (400 mg/60 mg) in the therapy of COVID-19 subjects with pneumonia is now complete. The primary endpoint shows a reduction of staying admitted in hospital with faster negative PCR [74]. Nevertheless, SFV/ledipasvir, which has passed Phase 4, has been found to be less efficacious in chronic COVID-19 individuals than in those with mild COVID-19 [75].

Similarly, ribavarin, a guanosine analog first used to treat hemorrhagic fever and respiratory syncytial virus, inhibited viral RNA polymerase, and messenger RNA (mRNA) capping. However, due to its lack of in vitro activity against SARS, it was discovered to be substantially less effective against SARS-CoV-2 compared to other antivirals. Nevertheless, it has been connected to the beneficial effects in managing of hemolytic anemia, when supplied to co-morbid patients who are reported to suffer from side effects related to heart disease and infertility [76].

2.2.2 Protein inhibitors

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) was the initially coupled protease inhibitors employed for combating HIV. As lopinavir’s oral bioavailability is poor (it is rapidly metabolized by the Cytochrome P450 enzyme system), ritonavir (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) is administered to increase its plasma half-life. In vitro, it was shown to be much less powerful than remdesivir and CQ. In a randomized, open-label trial with 199 COVID-19 patients, LPV/r failed to lower both overall mortality and viral load. This raises the question of whether LPV/r may have a function in the treatment of COVID-19, resulting in the drug’s removal from the treatment arm due to its inability to demonstrate a beneficial effect on clinical recovery and mortality reduction [77,78]

Another medication initially used during the onset of epidemic to treat flu-like symptoms in COVID-19 patients was oseltamivir. It is a neuraminidase inhibitor and is commonly administered to treat influenza. However, due to the absence of neuraminidase in coronaviruses, oseltamivir did not show any in vitro action against SARS-CoV-2 [79] and was found to be a failure through a retrospective and in vitro assessment [29].

Another effective protease inhibitor for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection with a 60% survival rate is camostat mesylate. Inhibiting the host cell serine protease TMPRSS2, which in turn prepares the viral S protein for entrance into human cells, was the main application of this medication for chronic pancreatitis. In vitro testing has revealed viral blockage, and eight COVID-19 studies are now being conducted across the globe [79].

2.2.3 Anti-parasitic drugs

The drugs HCQ and CQ are another set of drugs, believed to be antimalarial drugs with antiviral activity, as they demonstrated potent in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 with an EC50 of 6.14 and 23.90 M, respectively. However, these drugs were also not devoid of side effects, as they have impaired fatality and adverse effects in the patients who have been administered with these drugs. Furthermore, the viral load was not found to have decreased, prompting the authors to rule out the use of CQ at high doses [65,80,81].

Ivermectin is yet another medicine used to treat SARS-CoV-2. This anti-parasitic medication is suggested for the treatment of intestinal strongyloidiasis, onchocerciasis, lymphatic filariasis, scabies, pediculosis, rosacea, and other neglected tropical illnesses [82]. Despite the fact that several meta-analyses have shown that ivermectin reduces COVID-19 symptoms and the associated death, the trials were not reliable. As the efficacy of therapy remains ambiguous, with both positive and negative findings, the WHO recommended on March 31, 2021, that ivermectin can be used exclusively in clinical studies. The manufacturer (Merck) then made a statement on the resistance of the coronavirus to this anti-infective treatment. In spite of this, ivermectin is still commonly utilized in several South American nations [83].

2.2.4 Monoclonal antibodies

In addition to these medications, supplementary pharmacological interventions, including immunomodulatory therapies involving monoclonal antibodies, are being utilized for the successful treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Tocilizumab and sarilumab are common examples among these, which are currently available. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 receptors and is used to treat immunological response in patients with cytokine-release diseases, which are linked to IL-6 [84]. People with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are particularly sensitive to the possible side effects of this medicine, including hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal perforation [85]. At present, there are currently 62 registered studies examining the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients [86].

Despite evidence from recent studies demonstrating tocilizumab’s efficacy on the improved survival rate and clinical markers in cytokine release syndrome patients, a retrospective cohort study revealed that tocilizumab did not demonstrate a statistically significant advantage over standard care in terms of clinical progression or mortality [87]. Sarilumab, as an IL-6 receptor-inhibiting monoclonal antibody, which was originally used to treat rheumatoid arthritis [88,89], is presently being evaluated in more than 15 registered clinical studies against SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, a recent Phase 3 research revealed that the drug is ineffective for COVID-19 patients requiring ventilation, since it did not reach the study’s goals [63]. In addition, FX-1 is a chimeric monoclonal IgG4 antibody that binds to the soluble form of human complement protein-C5a with great affinity. Currently, the intravenous administration of IFX-1 (vilobelimab) to adults with severe COVID-19 is in effect. Its primary functions are the inhibition of anaphylatoxin and C5a. C5a inhibition with IFX-1 appeared to be safe for chronic COVID-19 suspects in a phase two study. Apart from this, the fact that the secondary outcome data favoring IFX-1 are preliminary since the study was not randomized on these endpoints, they encourage the investigation of inhibitory activity of IFx-1 in a 28-day mortality checkpoint on Phase 3 trials [90].

However, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were given lopinavir and interferon regimens alongside HCQ in a big multi-center WHO Soliditary study recently saw their death rates remain unchanged. The limited benefits of remdesivir and the need for injectable administration make it all the more appealing to find new or complementary medication that can bring about comparable or even higher therapeutic advantage and could be provided outdoors of a hospital environment (i.e., orally) [91].

2.2.5 Anticancer drugs

The oral phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) inhibitor duvelisib (anti- cancer drug) is used for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma [92,93]. In patients experiencing these diseases, duvelisib has been found to dramatically downregulate the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines like G-CSF, GM-CSF, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 α and β, according to Phase II and III trials. According to the researchers, duvelisib was found to reduce COVID-19-associated pneumonia and ARDS by polarizing the macrophages to M1 phenotype, decreasing cytokine signalling/production, and eliminating viral persistence [94]. In this connection, PI3K enzymes were originally found to regulate the cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, angiogenesis, senescence, and cell metabolism [95]. Therefore, it was evident that duvelisib is applicable to COVID-19 patients due to its immune system-associated activity but not of its anticancer efficacy. The effectiveness of duvelisib as monotherapeutic agent in COVID-19 patients has been evaluated, and the trial is now complete (NCT04372602) [96].

Zanubrutinib and opaganib are the other two anti-cancer drugs used for treating COVID-19 [97,98], where the former is a Bruton tyrosin kinase inhibitor (BTK) used to treat mantle cell lymphoma and the latter is a selective sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2) inhibitor used to treat advanced cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer [99]. Opaganib is a SK2 inhibitor for advanced cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer [96]. Zanubrutinib was initially developed as a BTK inhibitor to treat mantle cell lymphoma [100]. As of March 2022, a Phase II research (NCT04382586) assessing the effectiveness of zanubrutinib in enhancing the survival rate by avoiding respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and pulmonary distress has concluded (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04382586) [101]. Acalabrutinib (NCT04497948), a second-generation BTK inhibitor, has had its phase II trials discontinued because the patients did not get fulfilled of their key effectiveness goals [102]. However, opaganib has been discovered to suppress viral replication, diminish the hyperimmune inflammatory response, and lessen ARDS-related thrombosis. By suppressing viral replication in human lung tissue, opaganib has demonstrated strong antiviral effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 in preclinical studies in vivo [96]. A Phase 2 clinical research has been completed to evaluate the adverse effects and efficacy of opaganib in COVID-19 patients (NCT04414618) [103].

2.2.6 Corticosteroids

Methylprednisolone and dexamethasone are the two most often used corticosteroids as anti-covid medications [104]. For methylprednisolone, as of November 2023, among the 65 ongoing clinical trials against COVID-19, 35 have been completed and 6 are under recruitment [105]. Methylprednisolone is a corticosteroid with significant anti-inflammatory characteristics that is used for the treatment of arthritis [106] and pneumonia [107]. Post-COVID-19 syndrome patients receiving 20 mg/5 mg of prednisolone are now being enrolled in a Phase III clinical research examining the feasibility of randomized controlled trial in primary care and the efficacy of therapy with prednisolone and/or vitamin B1/6/12. The research also included neurotropic vitamins, including vitamins B1, B6, and B12, to determine the effectiveness of the combination therapy (NCT05638633). This trial is still under recruitment and not yet completed.

2.2.7 Vaccines

Added to conventional drugs, COVID-19 regimens also include vaccines and miscellaneous drugs. Throughout the evolution of vaccinations, the production of COVID-19 vaccines has progressed at an unprecedented rate. Presently, 199 vaccine candidates are in preclinical development and 180 are in clinical development [108].

As of November 2023, a total of 50 vaccines have been approved, and 12 vaccines have been granted emergency use listing (EUL) status by the WHO, which falls under the category of whole virus vaccines and component viral vaccines [109]. The EUL-approved 11 COVID-19 vaccines majorly fall under the sub-divisions of being inactivated, protein subunit, RNA, and non-replicating viral vector-based ones. Yet, the authorized vaccination list also includes DNA-based and virus-like particle-based vaccines [110]. A list of approved vaccines for the three most severely affected countries, including China, the United States, and India, along with their respective dosage schedules, is provided in Table 2.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration agency has approved five COVID-19 vaccines for emergency use. These include Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines, Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, the Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine, and Spikevax COVID-19 Vaccine. The first COVID-19 vaccine, licensed by the FDA, is Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, which was approved on August 2021 and marketed as comirnaty for individuals aged 16 and older [111]. The vaccine is also still available under EUA, including for individuals aged 12–15 and the administration of a third dose to certain immunocompromised patients. The FDA has recently revised the EUAs for the upgraded (bivalent) Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines to permit their use in infants as young as 6 months and also authorized the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine, as adjuvants, as the first booster dose to adults of 18 years of age and older for whom an FDA-authorized mRNA bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine is not accessible or clinically appropriate [112114]. List of FDA-approved vaccines and key clinical trials undergoing are listed in Table 3.

Table 2

List of vaccines approved by WHO for use in combating COVID-19 in China, USA and India

Country name Vaccine WHO EUL approved Vaccine type Number of doses Route of administration and schedule Number of countries approved Number of trials around the world
China approved: 8; clinical trial: 35 Zifivax/receptor-binding domain (RBD) Dimer/ZF2001 Yes Protein subunit 3 IM/Day 0 + 28 + 6 month 4 21
V-01 No Protein subunit 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 1 3
Convidecia Yes NRV 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 10 14
Convidecia Air No NRV 1 Nebulizer/Day 0 2 5
KCONVAC No Inactivated 2 IM/Day 0 + 14/28 2 7
Covilo Yes Inactivated 3 IM/Day 0 + 28 + 28 93 39
Inactivated (Vero cells) No Inactivated 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 2 9
CoronaVac Yes Inactivated 2 IM/Day 0 + 14 56 10
USA approved: 6; clinical trial: 52 Nuvaxovid/Novavax Yes Protein subunit 2 IM/Day 0 + 32 40 22
Spikevax No RNA 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 88 70
Spikevax bivalent original/omicron BA.4/BA.5 No RNA 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 33 2
Comirnaty Yes RNA 2 IM/Day 0 + 21 ± 7 days 149 100
Comirnaty bivalent original/omicron BA.4/BA.5 No RNA 1 IM/Day 0 after Primary vaccination 33 4
Jcovden Yes NRV 1 IM/Day 0 113 26
India approved: 12; clinical trial: 16 COVOVAX (Novavax formulation) Yes Protein subunit 2 IM/Day 0 + 21 6 7
Corbevax No Protein subunit 2 I0 + 28 M/Day 2 7
ZyCoV-D No DNA 3 IM/Day 0 + 28 + 28 1 6
GEMCOVAC-19 No RNA 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 1 2
Spikevax Yes RNA 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 88 70
iNCOVACC No NRV 2 IN/Day 0 + 28 1 4
Sputnik Light No NRV 1 IM/Day 0 26 7
Sputnik V No NRV 2 IM/Day 0 + 21 74 25
Jcovden Yes NRV 1 IM/Day 0 113 26
Vaxzevria Yes NRV 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 149 73
Covishield Yes NRV 2 IM/Day 0 + 84 49 6
Covaxin Yes Inactivated 2 IM/Day 0 + 28 14 16

IM: intra-muscular; IN: intra-nasal; NRV: non-replicating viral vector, RNA: ribonucleic Acid, DNA: deoxy ribonucleic acid. Data retrieved [109].

Table 3

Landscape of FDA approved COVID-19 drugs/vaccines

Drug/vaccine Type Status Year Clinical trials
Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine FDA approved (First authorized COVID-19 vaccine) 2020 Multiple trials [115]
Moderna mRNA vaccine FDA approved 2020 Multiple trials [115]
Johnson & Johnson Viral vector vaccine FDA approved 2021 Multiple trials [115]
AstraZeneca Viral vector vaccine FDA approved 2020 Multiple trials [115]
Remdesivir Antiviral FDA approved 2020 Multiple trials, including ACTT trials [116]
Dexamethasone Corticosteroid FDA approved 2020 RECOVERY trial [117]
Regeneron’s (REGN-COV-2) Monoclonal antibody FDA approved 2020 Multiple trials [115]
Sotrovimab Monoclonal antibody Phase III (NCT04545060) 2020 COMET-ICE trial and others [118]
Molnupiravir Antiviral (Phase III) 2021 MOVe-OUT [119]
Paxlovid (Pfizer) Antiviral (Phase III) 2021 EPIC-HR [120]
Novavax Protein subunit vaccine (Phase III) 2021 PREVENT-19 [121]

3 Diagnosing with nanotechnology

Nanotechnology is gaining ground against SARS-COV-2 through infection prevention, diagnosis, and therapy [122]. It is a revolutionary drug delivery technique that allows for the identification and neutralization of the pathogen utilizing imperative nanoparticles (NPs), which has several favourable effects such as enhancing the treatment’s effectiveness, early diagnosis, and improving safety [123,124]. Diagnosis and neutralization of the COVID-19 virus by nanomedicine is essential, given that SARS-COV-2 is transmitted via minute droplets that are expelled during respiration, speaking, sneezing, and coughing. Consequently, these NPs can be engineered to combat causative microorganisms and eliminate viruses prior to their host entry [125]. The preponderance of viral RNA testing techniques are centered on the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) due to its simplicity, high sensitivity, and high accuracy as a result of the exponential increase in RNA produced during the process [126]. Even though RT-PCR methods are widely recognized as conventional techniques for coronavirus detection, there are constraints that must be addressed, such as low extraction efficiency, long drawn out procedures, and contamination-induced false positives [127]. Since vaccine research for SARS shares major similarities with cancer research [128], neither the therapeutic innovations nor the problems associated with SARS-COV-2 infections should be considered separately [129]. Thus, it is crucial to re-evaluate the innovative application of nanotechnology in combating COVID-19.

Metal NPs, magnetic NPs (MNPs), and quantum dots (QDs) have been predominantly used to diagnose coronaviruses. Other NPs, like aptamers, silica NPs (SiNPs), and polymeric NPs, have also been studied for virus detection [130] (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               Various nanomaterial-based methodologies employed for diagnosis of COVID-19.
Figure 1

Various nanomaterial-based methodologies employed for diagnosis of COVID-19.

3.1 Metal NPs

Unique optical and electrical features (localized surface plasmon resonance [LSPR]) of metals, particularly noble metals such as gold, silver, and copper, have been considered in the development of metal NPs [131] to detect viral cells in biosensing applications including disease marker detection, photocousting imaging, and near-infrared thermal ablation [132]. This is due to the LSPR property for tunable electromangnetic light absorption and scattering wavelength in the visible region [133], in which the change in the LSPR extinction maxima of metal NPs is dependent directly on the refractive index of encircling media and the range of NP aggregation, both of which are crucial for NPs to be used in biological applications [134].

Gold NPs (AuNPs) are the most common NPs used in coronavirus diagnosis or detection due to their unique optical properties, stability, and biocompatible properties [135,136]. Kim et al. created and utilized a simple colorimetric hybridization technique to detect SARS-CoV, which was based on the synthesis of dsDNA from viral ssRNA by the interaction of viral ssRNA with citrate-coated AuNPs, therefore stabilizing the particle [137]. AuNPs with modified surface properties by functionalizing with biomolecules are used for effective detection of COVID-19 variants without cross reactivity including MERS-CoV, HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-HKU4, SARS-CoV, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-OC43. AuNPs conjugated with streptavidin were used for an RT-LAMP (Reverse Transcriptase Loop-mediated isothermal amplification) assay which in turn was then combined with a vertical flow visualization strip (RT-LAMPVF), for detecting the nucleic acid of COVID-19 variant (MERS-COV). Later, the viral RNA made by RT LAMP was labeled with biotin and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) to make the labeled amplicons, which could bind to streptavidin-functionalized AuNPs to make a complex that changed color when an anti-FITC antibody coated on the detection strip demonstrated it. Within 35 min, the creation of the complex on the strip was obvious to the naked eye. This technique was found to produce a high specificity and effective detection limit of 10 copies of viral RNA/μL. Similarly, a study on using Plasmonic NP study SARS-CoV-2’s N gene (nucleocapsid phosphoprotein) was colorimetrically identified by Thiol modified antisense oligonucleotides functionalized AuNPs [138].

3.2 MNPs

For the specific identifications of SARS-COV-2, the principle of magnetic efficiency of nanometals is currently being employed to prepare super-paramagnetic NPs (SMNPs) conjugated with amplified viral DNAs and to identify them with silica-coated fluorescent NP-based signalling probes via hybridization assay. Recently, scientists have used silica-coated SMNPs in PCR-based assays in order to increase the specific selection of the target cDNA of SARS-COV during the process, thereby allowing the identification of the target cDNA with a limit of detection (LOD) of around 2 × 103 copies in a time span of 6 h [139].

Nanotechnological approaches, such as protein corona detector panels and magnetic levitation, have also been highlighted by Mahmoudi in his study as having great promise for identifying chronic patients during the early phases of the COVID-19 infection [140]. According to the study, a biomolecular corona is generated in which the introduction of NPs happens in a human environment (e.g., blood plasma) and can lead to instantaneous association with numerous biomolecules, such as proteins, which in turn forms an outer covering of NPs. This can assist in distinguishing the protein corona biomolecule from the others. As a result of the increased affinity of other proteins and the recruitment of additional particles onto the NPs that have previously been included, this method is still susceptible to a number of lacks in correlation. As a consequence, disease-specific protein corona biomolecules were created, the molecules in which the protein corona sensor array technology can define the plasma protein and biomolecule patterns that indicate catastrophic COVID-19 infection at its earliest stages [140]. And also colorimetric nanotechnologies, such as optoelectronic nose [141] and plasmonic NP (AuNPs) technologies [142], can be enhanced or updated for identification of the virus in susceptible individuals at an earliest time point, based on the fingerprint protein corona biomolecular pattern.

A typical MagLev device consists of a pair of permanent magnets with identical poles positioned opposite to one another along the gravity vector. Serving this purpose better, superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs were able to circumvent the instability of proteins in the paramagnetic solution and thereby levitate plasma proteins [140]. A heterogeneity mapping study revealed that the MagLev system cannot only separate corona-coated NPs but also examine the homogeneity/heterogeneity of the protein corona and aid in rapid screening of the homogeneity of corona-coated NPs prior to quantitative analysis of the disease [143].

3.3 QDs

Conventional luminous NPs known as QDs are gaining popularity because of their unique photonic and electrical properties. These properties include a substantial quantum yield, anti-photo bleaching action, broad absorbance range, tunable emission wave length, and excellent stability. In addition, it is projected that these QDs will contribute to the advancement of virus detectors and antiviral medications through their enhanced broad-spectrum action, point-of-care (POC) diagnostics, and profitable manufacturing [144146].

3.4 Electrochemical aptamer sensors

A QD-conjugated RNA aptamer particular to the SARS-COV N protein has revealed greater sensitivity for coronavirus detection. In the respective study, authors employed QD-605 with maximum emission at 605 nm to achieve an exceptional detection limit of 0.1 pg/mL SARS-COV N protein mounted on a glass chip. The authors suggest that an optical QDs-based RNA aptamer chip may be able to get around the limitations of other techniques because it is sensitive, specific, easy to use, and can monitor one spot [147]. In another study for detecting N‐gene of SARS‐COV‐2, a surface plasmon resonance aptasensor was constructed where N‐gene‐targeted aptamer was attached on thiol‐altered niobium carbide MXene QD bioplatform. This aptasensor thereby exhibited an LOD of 4.9 pg/mL for N gene through a concentration range of 0.05–100 ng/mL [148]. In addition, photoelectric aptasensors were developed for quantifiable detection of RBD SARS-COV-2. The design included a modified ITO electrode with chitosan/cadmium sulfide (CdS)–graphitic carbon nitride (gC3N4) nanocomposite (gC3N4 and CdS) with immobilized amine-terminal aptamer probes. Results indicated that the aptasensor may be utilized to quantify Sars-Cov-2 RBD concentrations between 0.5 and 32.0 nM, with 0.12 nM LOD [149].

3.5 QD-conjugated chiral plasmonic NPs

Another nanohybrid structure with optical resonances that have crucial role in viral detection is chiral plasmonic NPs integrated with QDs. This include far-field coupling and near-field processes, as well as enhanced chiroptical characteristics [150]. In nanostructures, cumulative oscillations of free electrons produce plasmonic phenomena that enable the nanoscale confinement of light, which in turn can enhance the chiroptical interactions [151]. A sensitive chiro-immunosensor, conjugated QDs with chiral gold (Au) nanohybrids, was developed on the view of achieving low values of LOD. Based on self-assembly techniques, an asymmetric plasmonic chiral nanostructure hybrid will broaden the spectrum of circular dichroism reaction to achieve an exclusive plasmonic resonant association with the energized state of QD for LOD. The developed probe was originally utilized for the highly sensitive picomolar level detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. Thus, the applicability of this sensing system was also examined on other viral cultures, including avian influenza A (H4N6), poultry adenovirus, and also coronavirus in respective blood/serum samples [150].

Chiral zirconium NPs assembled with l(+)‐ascorbic acid are another example for conjugated plasmonic NPs which is predominantly employed for SARS-COV with LOD of 79.15 EID/50 μL. In this technique, in addition to self-assembly and circular dichroism, these QDs might be conjugated with COV antibodies like bronchitis virus (IBV) to generate an immune link in the vicinity of anti-IBV antibody coupled magneto-plasmonic NPs and a tagged analyte. This in turn produced high sensitivity optical detection for COVs with LOD about 79.15 EID/50 μL [152]. As it has been demonstrated that exciton–plasmon interactions may influence chirality, employing integrated nanostructures as an approach for improving the responsiveness of optical (nano)sensors seems to be a promising idea.

3.6 QDs‐based Förster resonance energy transfer

A recent study explores a highly sensitive biosensing approach using QD-Förster resonance energy transfer, relying on the resonance energy transfer patterns between distinct partners to pick out the inhibitors of SARS-COV-2. The study focuses on the development of a versatile imaging probe involving the spike receptor binding domain of SARS-COV-2 conjugated to fluorescent QDs. This probe is designed to monitor the binding of the spike protein to the host cell’s ACE2 receptor, which is the initial step in SARS-COV-2 infection. The probe can undergo energy transfer quenching while interacting with ACE2-conjugated AuNPs, allowing for the real-time monitoring of this binding event in solution. The study demonstrates that neutralizing antibodies and recombinant human ACE2 effectively block this quenching, indicating a specific binding interaction [153]. For the identification of SARS-COV-2 RNA, a ligand exchange-based CdTe QDs–DNA (Cadmium telluride QDs) nanobiosensor was developed. This nanosensor might be utilized for the quick detection of RNA from SARS-COV-2 in actual samples with results equivalent to RT-PCR with high selectivity and sensitivity of LOD with 2.52 × 10−9 mol L−1 [154].

3.7 QD nanobeads (QBs)

A portable smartphone imaging stage that automates quantitative QD barcode immunoassay and interacts utilizing an internally developed data dashboard was developed for the quantitative assay of SARS-COV-2. Here, a database and dashboard were used to illustrate real-time reporting of test results. The principle of the technique comprises (a) previously coded QD microbeads to identify target antibodies in human blood serum, so as to identify distinct antibody targets; several colors of QD barcoded microbeads were constructed; (b) hand-held instrument to stimulate and photograph the fluorescent microbead; and (c) an application that transmits the data to a controlling facility. The technology was certainly found to be highly sensitive and specific in being reported with an LOD of 1.99 pM for nucleocapsid coated microbeads and 0.11 pM for S1-RBD coated microbeads [155]. Also, lateral flow immuno assay (LFIA) with POC treatment is gaining popularity attributed to its simplicity, ease, speed, plus economic convenience for qualitative analysis [156]. Particularly, detecting SARS-COV-2 infection using colloidal gold NP-based LFIA (AuNP-LFIA) has undergone rapid advancement. In a recent study, a QB-based LFIA (QB-LFIA) for detecting total SARS-COV-2 antibodies in human serum was created. The QB-LFIA makes use of immunoassay construction including two antigens. During the assay process, SARS-COV-2 spike protein conjugated with QB is employed as a detecting probe to bind with specific antibodies in virtue of determining their serum levels. After being prepared, QB-LFIA was approximately an order of magnitude more sensitive than AuNP-LFIA [157].

4 Usage of NP regimen for COVID-19

4.1 Inhibition of viral attachment and entry into cell

A powerful approach for medication development and therapy is by preventing the process through which the virus attaches to the ACE2 receptor or restrict endocytosis [158]. CQ is one of the medications that are regularly evaluated for this purpose [159]. CQ has been initially found to hinder the NP endocytosis. As structurally SARS-COV-2 is comparable to certain NPs, it has been reported that CQ can prevent the endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles [160].

This occurs in the following manner:

  1. CQ-induced inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein (PICALM), which in turn prevents endocytosis-mediated absorption of NPs. Generally, in the endocytosis pathway, PICALM is an accessory protein that, together with clarithrin, facilitates endocytosis.

  2. encasing the molecule inside polymeric NPs like the often used poly lactic acid [161].

The ability of 1.6 nm cationic carbon dots (CDs) produced from curcumin to prevent the invasion of a coronavirus model, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), has been reported in a recent study [162]. At 125 μg/mL, the inhibition efficiency was over 50%, preventing viral entrance at an early stage. The blockage is probably thought to be brought about by electrostatic reactions among the anionic PEDV and the cationic CDs, which negate the effective charge on the virus particles and produced viral aggregation, together with this, the CDs also prevented the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and thereby minimized cell death [162,163]. In cases of respiratory viruses, curcumin-conjugated AgNPs have been reported to possess the ability of viral inhibition and entry [163].

AuNPs have been found to be directly linked with the blockage of cell entry apart from the viral aggregation function. When considering NPs, AuNPs are less toxic than AgNPs. Huang et al., demonstrated the inhibitory activity of AuNPs in his recent study, in which he found a homologous protein that mimics the structural identity with one of the viral protein that is essential for cell fusion and invasion [164]. Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), a peptide that mimics the structure of HR2, was discovered by him. Hence, this peptide can interact with HR1 of virus and prevent the creation of 6HB (six-helix bundle), which is supposed to draw the viral encapsulation within the cell. Through preventing 6HB, the process of cell fusion and subsequent infection are effectively inhibited. Gold nanorods coated with PIH displayed 10 times more suppressive activity at the optimum dose, completely blocking cell fusion [164].

In addition to AuNPs, other biocompatible and less toxic NPs with antiviral action such as SiNPs and selenium NPs (SeNPs) are effectively utilized. Engineered NPs including porous SiNPs break down to form non-toxic silicic acid and are favoured for their antiviral impacts due to their extraordinary biocompatibility and biodegradability properties. These particles, when functionalized separately or conjugated to different moieties (mesoporous SiNPs), act as scavengers of enveloped infection particles and prevent cellular invasion [165,166]. SeNPs remain prominent example for biocompatible NPs against SARS-COV-2 with antiviral efficiency by blocking viral entry when administrated [167]. In a recent study using the anti-inflammatory drug Ebselen, an organic Se species, it was found that the drug can block coronavirus by covalently binding to the virion through cell membranes, when administrated at a concentration of 10 μm. However, when administrated at high concentrations, it was found to be toxic; therefore, nanoselenium or low toxicity selenium for their biocompatibility are considered for their antiviral efficacy in the fight against viral infections [167].

Previous investigations have showed that natural compounds like green tea catechins inhibit encapsulated viruses. Its hydroxyl, galloyl, and pyrogallol groups on B-ring can alter viral antigen expression or genome replication at various phases of viral entry. Green tea polyphenols, like epicatechin gallates, have been identified as powerful viral entry inhibitors efficient of inhibiting the host’s glycoprotein CD4 interaction with glycoprotein gp120 of HIV-1, thereby preventing viral infections [168]. Similarly, curcumin, a polyphenol isolated from the plant Curcuma longa, has been shown to have antiviral action due to the presence of phenolic hydroxyl groups. Also, ionic gelation was used to encapsulate curcumin in chitosan NPs, which increased its bioavailability after oral administration along with it is in vitro antiviral efficacy in feline immunodeficiency virus-infected cats [162]. High-efficiency (homogeneous and stable with polar groups) anti-PEDV coronavirus delivery systems, consisting of glutathione-capped Ag2S nanoclusters and glutathione-modified zinc-sulfide NPs, were produced via the curcumin pyrolysis procedure [169,170]. When tested against PEDV, natural compounds like curcumin and glycyrrhizin were found to have multisite inhibition mechanisms, including: (a) blocking the entry of virus by altering the viral surface protein morphology, preventing pathogen’s genomic RNA production and replication; (b) reducing ROS production; and (c) stimulating IFN-stimulant genes and downstream of pro-inflammatory cytokines to lower the multiplication of virus. Similarly, the strong interaction of griffithsin (antiviral lectin) with the MERS-COV and SARS-COV-2 glycoprotein regions has also been hypothesized to prevent the cellular entry of viral particles [171,172].

4.2 Blocking the viral replication and proliferation

Rectifiers that slow down the rate at which viral particles reproduce or reduce their infectiousness are at consummate significance, as this will prevent the proliferation of these infectious particles and thereby provide time for response of body’s first-line immune system to function effectively in combating the virus. This will also prevent the infectious particles from generating mutated versions as their replication is blocked. Several viruses with positive-sense ssRNA genetic material, phospholipid envelopes, and proteins resemble SARS-CoV-2. Recent coronavirus research has employed several of these viruses as models, and NP efficacy on these viruses may be important for therapeutic development toward SARS-CoV-2 [160].

A recent study has shown that the transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), one member among the coronavirus family, is much less infectious in the presence of AgNPs and silver nanowires at a concentration below the toxicity limit. In addition to this, AgNPs have been found to limit apoptosis induced by viral inhabitation. This happens when Ag NPs suppress TGEV-induced Pi-p38 protein production to control p38-MAPK-p53 mitochondrial signalling, which in turn regulates TGEV-induced cell death [173]. Furthermore, Du et al. have reported that AgNP-modified graphene oxide suppresses porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), a model virus utilized in coronavirus research, with 59.2% inhibitory efficacy. To add, GO-AgNPs nanocomposite treatment was found to boost IFN-α and ISG production, which directly restricted viral growth [174]. In another investigation, Tong et al., synthesized a glycyrrhizic-acid-based CDs with multisite PRRSV suppression of up to five orders of virus titers. The multiple inhibitory mechanisms include viral invasion and replication inhibition, cell IFN stimulation, and ROS generation inhibition [175]. The work has exemplified the undefined potential of CDs in viral inhibition, which could help in the development of novel strategies of NPs conjugated antiviral therapies.

Haam et al. employed porous AuNPs to aim the heme agglutinin (HA) protein on several influenza viruses by exploiting effective goldthiol interconnection (PoGNPs) as it has been one of the most intensively researched viruses due to many worldwide pandemics over the past decades. Because of recurring mutations and growing treatment resistance, influenza A viruses are considered the focus of numerous NP-based medicinal research initiatives. In that particular study, Haam found that PoGNPs suppress the viral infectivity and increased host cell viability to 96.8% from 33.8%. In addition, viruses like H1N1, H3N2, and H9N2 were used to demonstrate the approach’s universal effectiveness [176]. In a recent study, Haag et al. employed electron microscope imaging to visually demonstrate that AuNPs functionalized with sialic acid-terminated glycerol dendrons effectively and inhibited viral multiplication by targeting the viral HA protein [177]. A benzoxamine-monomer-derived CDs have been found to reduce Zika virus, the causative of a 2015 pandemic in South and North America which in turn shares structural similarity with coronavirus [178]. The CDs have been also found inhibitory to other viruses that are structurally similar to coronavirus, dengue, and Japanese encephalitis virus. Also, they have been found to inhibit adeno-associated virus and porcine parvovirus, non-enveloped viruses, which in turn emphasizes the spectrum of antiviral potential of NPs [178]. Alphaviruses, a similar genus of RNA viruses to coronaviruses, were substantially repressed in Vero (B) cells by cellulose nanocrystals treated with tyrosine sulfate mimetic ligands, whereas human cells were found to be unaffected [179].

4.3 Viricidal NPs

Another method of preventing viral infections in addition to blocking the host cell contact, genetic material replication and proliferation of virus is inactivating or destroying the virus directly. In a sophisticated reversible viral investigation, AuNPs coated with 3-mercaptoethylsulfate (MES) produced an inhibitory concentration at EC90 (nanomolar range). This in turn is identical to the outcome of heparin, a popular antiviral substance that inhibits pathogen and host contact. However, the authors also discovered that replacement of MES with a 2:1 combination of undecanesulfonic acid (MUS) and 1-octanethiol (OT) could elicit permanent/irreversible viral inactivation of several viruses that specifically target humans, including herpes simplex virus, respiratory synctial virus, dengue virus, as well as human papiloma virus, and lentivirus [180]. As the study reported no cytotoxicity during ex vivo and in vivo studies on mice and humans, respectively, and as the broad-spectrum model viruses employed in the study shared structural and functional similarities with the coronavirus, this study emphasizes the potential use of MUS:OTAuNPs in SARS-Cov-2 treatment [160].

In a recent study, it was demonstrated that a functionalized mock virus receptor nanodisc, a self-assembled discoidal membrane covered in an amphipathic membrane scaffold protein, can neutralize the infected influenza virus (H1N1) by specific inhibition of viral surface proteins and thereby produce permanent damage to the viral envelope. As a result of various associations with viral target proteins, conjugating sialic acid onto nanodiscs enhanced their antiviral efficacy. It was reported that the functionalized nanodiscs also prompted the virus’s fusion machinery to self-disrupt its envelope. This approach is promising for in vivo studies due to the biocompatibility of the NPs and the decoy molecules [181]. Gao and colleagues reported the existence of iron oxide NPs with broad-spectrum antiviral activity against flu viruses (H1N1, H5N1, and H7N9). Using the catalytic, enzyme-like, and peroxidase-catalyzing properties of ferromagnetic NP with an average diameter of 200 nm, it was possible to cause lipid peroxidation of the viral envelope, therefore eliminating the viral surface protein. Interestingly when put on facemasks, these iron oxide nanozymes demonstrated broad spectrum antiviral efficacy [182]. The site of activation of various nanoformulated drugs employed for combating COVID-19 has been illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
                  Site of activation of nanoformulated drugs at different stages of viral life cycle.
Figure 2

Site of activation of nanoformulated drugs at different stages of viral life cycle.

Recently, lipid NP (LNP)-based mRNA vaccines are being considered for clinical management for COVID-19. mRNA is a promising therapeutic tool for COVID-19, requiring safe, stable, and targeted delivery systems together with endosomal escape for in vivo use. In this way, LNPs, especially in combination with mRNA vaccines, have made clinical strides, notably in combating COVID-19, marking a milestone for mRNA therapeutics. When comparing with cationic lipids and ionizable lipid conjugated vaccines, LNP-mRNAs excel in the safe delivery of mRNA molecules without degradation and effective facilitation of cellular uptake by cell membrane and functional immune response [183]. Two successful vaccines viz: Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty) vaccine (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) COVID-19 vaccine are examples of LNP-mRNA vaccines [184]. In a recent study focused on the development of LNP-mRNA vaccine through in vivo studies in mice, researchers were successful in developing an adjuvant lipidoid for LNP-mRNA-based vaccines that could enhance the adjuvanticity of mRNA molecules. This innovation proved effective in improving the safe delivery of mRNA and simultaneous activation of toll-like receptor 7/8-agonistic properties, thereby enhancing the innate immune response [185].

5 Limitations of applying nanomedicine in battling SARS-COV-2

Despite the fact that the use of nanomedicine can demonstrate a wide variety of applicability and has received attention from research organizations around the globe, there is nevertheless an obstacle between superior scientific breakthroughs and the sustainable implementation of nanotechnology-based therapeutics. Issues have been raised about their applicability in several physicochemical contexts. Moreover, the surface of nanomaterials can be modified with moieties that might alter their behavior and characteristics, further complicating the issue of their safety. Until recently, several start-ups were responsible for driving the commercialization of nanotechnology-based medicines. Even now, major drug makers are not showing much enthusiasm for funding the cutting-edge nanotechnology-based therapies. Finding funding to assist the research and development of these novel medications is challenging for small enterprises. Additionally, businesses making nanomedicine-based items are likely to incur significantly higher per-unit expenses [186]. Together with cost, reliability in terms of toxicity and surface functionalization [187] can arise as significant limitations in the use of nanomedicine for the management of COVID-19. Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize illness treatment, but like all drugs, nanomaterials must be tested and regulated for safe human usage. This is because, nanomedicine-based reformulation of current medications or usage of inorganic materials that are safe in micron size may have unexpected unfavourable and toxicological consequences due to particles’ unique characteristics at the nanoscale. Epidemiological studies that looked at the connection between adverse health outcomes and ambient particulate air pollution were largely responsible for raising public alarm about the usage of NPs in consumer items [187]. Significantly, fine particulate analysis conducted by Samet et al. reported that an increase of 10 g/m3 in the concentration of PM10 (particulate matter with a diameter of less than 10 μm) was linked to a 0.68 percentage point rise seen in deaths caused by cardiac and respiratory illness in 20 cities across the United States [188].

Ominously, nanowires and nanotubes have promising applications in medication delivery and therapies. However, their structural similarities to asbestos raise safety concerns that they might cause fibrosis and mesothelioma when they are not degraded and cleared from the body after extended contact. In an in vivo investigation in which carbon nanotubes were directly applied to the pleural and peritoneal mesothelium, results indicated the formation of fibrosis and granulomas in mice [189]. In a similar study conducted by Sakamoto et al., development of peritoneal mesothelioma in rats following the carbon nanotube intrascrotal injection was observed [190]. Several researches have demonstrated that extended and frequent inhalation of carbon nanotubes results in same toxicological outcomes as mentioned before. Like, 3 months of administration of polydispersed multiwalled CNTs (0.1–10 m) did cause pleural inflammation and granuloma development in rats [191]. Nevertheless, other research have shown that this is the result of clumped and poorly scattered CNT bundles rather than to any intrinsic poisonous characteristic of the bundles assumed to be precisely specified previously [192].

6 Outlook beyond COVID-19: diagnostics and pandemic response

The COVID-19 pandemic has yielded valuable insights into pandemic readiness, public health, and healthcare systems, offering guidance for addressing future acute pandemics. Key considerations include the advancement of diagnostic technologies for rapid and accurate testing, the proliferation of accessible POC testing devices, and the integration of digital health tools for real-time monitoring and contact tracing. In vaccine development, the success of mRNA vaccines has set the stage for expedited vaccine creation against various infectious diseases and the exploration of universal vaccine concepts. Collaboration on a global scale and equitable vaccine distribution are crucial for swift access. Antiviral therapies will advance through drug discovery and prophylactic treatments. Being prepared for a pandemic entails improved global surveillance, stockpiling of medical essentials, and strengthened public health infrastructure. Behavioral changes may include enduring hygiene practices, sustained remote work and education options, and adaptable travel and social norms. International cooperation and data sharing will be essential, reflecting a proactive and collaborative approach to future pandemics, with investment in research, healthcare infrastructure, and global unity at its core.

7 Conclusions

Each year, infectious diseases cause a staggering number of fatalities. Diversification has resulted in the emergence of numerous new diseases, including bacterial and the majority of them being viral. However, respiratory ailments caused by viruses are one of the key contributors to the rising mortality rate globally. It is essential to remind readers that novel materials are constantly being added on clinical characteristics, analyses, treatment options, and outcomes for COVID-19. Nonetheless, increased steady consideration remains the cornerstone of therapy, and the practical viability of the outcomes is still being evaluated or tested in clinical studies. Nanotechnology has shown to be of great relevance and shown great potential in the realms of antiviral activity and treatment. In modern materials science, nanotechnology is a prominent domain of study. NPs display entirely unique or exceptional properties due to their physical characteristics and morphology. Crystal NPs have been shown to have amazing uses in areas such as high-sensitivity bio-molecular detection, disease and biochemical diagnostics, and antimicrobial and pharmaceutical chemicals. Thus, nanotechnology has shown both prophylactic and curative efficacy against several different viruses. NP vaccination has the potential to improve healthcare worldwide, and nanotechnology may lead to new approaches in the treatment of clinical patients. NP-based vaccinations can elicit superior protective immune responses than traditional antigen-based immunizations. In addition, studies have shown that nanosized particle based diagnostics can help in the quicker identification of viral infestation in its initial phase, as they offer higher sensitivity and specificity than the currently existing approaches.


# These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered first co-authors.

tel: +86-025-85637880

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. 1918 Influenza: the mother of all pandemics. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:15–22.10.3201/eid1209.05-0979Search in Google Scholar

[2] Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. A centenary tale of two pandemics: The 1918 influenza pandemic and COVID-19, Part I. Am J Public Health. 2021;111:1086–94.10.2105/AJPH.2021.306310Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Marinkovic A, Patidar R, Younis K, Desai P, et al. Comorbidity and its Impact on Patients with COVID-19. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2:1069–76.10.1007/s42399-020-00363-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Ruan Y, Wen H, Hou M, Zhai W, Xu S, Lu X. On the epicenter of COVID-19 and the origin of the pandemic strain. Natl Sci Rev. 2023;10:nwac286.10.1093/nsr/nwac286Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Spiteri G, Fielding J, Diercke M, Campese C, Enouf V, Gaymard A, et al. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the WHO European Region, 24 January to 21 February 2020. Eurosurveillance. 2020;25:2000178.10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000178Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Chowell G. Effect of a wet market on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission dynamics in China, 2019–2020. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:96–101.10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.091Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Zibaseresht R. How to respond to the ongoing pandemic outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Eur J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2020;7:1–6.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lim YX, Ng YL, Tam JP, Liu DX. Human coronaviruses: a review of virus–host interactions. Diseases. 2016;4:26.10.3390/diseases4030026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Mittal A, Manjunath K, Ranjan RK, Kaushik S, Kumar S, Verma V. COVID-19 pandemic: Insights into structure, function, and hACE2 receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008762.10.1371/journal.ppat.1008762Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Malik YA. Properties of Coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2. Malays J Pathol. 2020;42:3–11.10.33204/mucosa.706906Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hu T, Liu Y, Zhao M, Zhuang Q, Xu L, He Q. A comparison of COVID-19, SARS and MERS. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9725.10.7717/peerj.9725Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Dhama K, Patel SK, Sharun K, Pathak M, Tiwari R, Yatoo MI, et al. SARS-CoV-2 jumping the species barrier: Zoonotic lessons from SARS, MERS and recent advances to combat this pandemic virus. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;37:101830.10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101830Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Olwenyi OA, Dyavar SR, Acharya A, Podany AT, Fletcher CV, Ng CL, et al. Immuno-epidemiology and pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Mol Med. 2020;98:1369–83.10.1007/s00109-020-01961-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Cheng J, Huang C, Zhang G, Liu D, Li P, Lu C, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Henan. Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi. 2020;43:327–31.Search in Google Scholar

[15] da Silva SJR, do Nascimento JCF, Germano Mendes RP, Guarines KM, Targino Alves da Silva C, da Silva PG, et al. Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned. ACS Infect Dis. 2022;8:1758–814.10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00204Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Fallahi HR, Keyhan SO, Zandian D, Kim S-G, Cheshmi B. Being a front-line dentist during the Covid-19 pandemic: a literature review. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;42:1–9.10.1186/s40902-020-00256-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Greenberg SB. Update on Human Rhinovirus and Coronavirus Infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;37:555–71.10.1055/s-0036-1584797Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Meini S, Pagotto A, Longo B, Vendramin I, Pecori D, Tascini C. Role of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in the treatment of Covid-19: a review of current evidence, guideline recommendations, and perspectives. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2050.10.3390/jcm9072050Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Laurencin CT, McClinton A. The COVID-19 pandemic: a call to action to identify and address racial and ethnic disparities. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020;7:398–402.10.1007/s40615-020-00756-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Romero García C, Iftimi A, Briz-Redón Á, Zanin M, Otero M, Ballester M, et al. Trends in Incidence and Transmission Patterns of COVID-19 in Valencia, Spain. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2113818.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13818Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Nazmunnahar, Ahamed B, Haque MA, Tanbir M, Roknuzzaman ASM, Sarker R, et al. COVID-19 vaccination success in Bangladesh: Key strategies were prompt response, early drives for vaccines, and effective awareness campaigns. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6:e1281.10.1002/hsr2.1281Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] The World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19whoint/. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Family Med. 2009;7:357–63.10.1370/afm.983Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Singh AK, Gupta R, Ghosh A, Misra A. Diabetes in COVID-19: Prevalence, pathophysiology, prognosis and practical considerations. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14:303–10.10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. Coronavirus infections—more than just the common cold. JAMA. 2020;323:707–8.10.1001/jama.2020.0757Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Sahu T. People with chronic bronchitis are at more risk of getting COVID-19. ECS Trans. 2022;107:16359.10.1149/10701.16359ecstSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Zaim S, Chong JH, Sankaranarayanan V, Harky A. COVID-19 and multiorgan response. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45:100618.10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100618Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect. 2020;80:e14–8.10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:1–14.10.1183/13993003.01227-2020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Bhandari S, Singh A, Sharma R, Rankawat G, Banerjee S, Gupta V, et al. Characteristics, treatment outcomes and role of hydroxychloroquine among 522 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in Jaipur City: An Epidemio-Clinical Study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2020;68:13–9.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Young C, Wood HM, Seshadri RA, Van Nang P, Vaccaro C, Melendez LC, et al. The colorectal cancer-associated faecal microbiome of developing countries resembles that of developed countries. Genome Med. 2021;13:27.10.1186/s13073-021-00844-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Adab P, Haroon S, O’Hara ME, Jordan RE. Comorbidities and covid-19. BMJ. 2022;377:o1431.10.1136/bmj.o1431Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Kermali M, Khalsa RK, Pillai K, Ismail Z, Harky A. The role of biomarkers in diagnosis of COVID-19 - A systematic review. Life Sci. 2020;254:117788.10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117788Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Group BDW. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89–95.10.1067/mcp.2001.113989Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Mayeux R. Biomarkers: potential uses and limitations. NeuroRx J Am Soc Exp NeuroTher. 2004;1:182–8.10.1602/neurorx.1.2.182Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Samprathi M, Jayashree M. Biomarkers in COVID-19: An up-to-date review. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:607647.10.3389/fped.2020.607647Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Ponti G, Maccaferri M, Ruini C, Tomasi A, Ozben T. Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020;57:389–99.10.1080/10408363.2020.1770685Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Vargas-Vargas M, Cortés-Rojo C. Ferritin levels and COVID-19. Rev Panamericana de Salud Publica = Pan Am J Public Health. 2020;44:e72.10.26633/RPSP.2020.72Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Meizlish ML, Pine AB, Bishai JD, Goshua G, Nadelmann ER, Simonov M, et al. A neutrophil activation signature predicts critical illness and mortality in COVID-19. Blood Adv. 2021;5:1164–77.10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003568Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Ganji A, Farahani I, Khansarinejad B, Ghazavi A, Mosayebi G. Increased expression of CD8 marker on T-cells in COVID-19 patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2020;83:102437.10.1016/j.bcmd.2020.102437Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Tavakolpour S, Rakhshandehroo T, Wei EX, Rashidian M. Lymphopenia during the COVID-19 infection: What it shows and what can be learned. Immunol Lett. 2020;225:31.10.1016/j.imlet.2020.06.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] McKenna E, Wubben R, Isaza-Correa JM, Melo AM, Mhaonaigh AU, Conlon N, et al. Neutrophils in COVID-19: Not Innocent Bystanders. Front Immunol. 2022;13:864387.10.3389/fimmu.2022.864387Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Dosanjh A. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and respiratory tract infection and inflammation: implications for COVID-19 management. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020;40:443–5.10.1089/jir.2020.0066Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Long H, Nie L, Xiang X, Li H, Zhang X, Fu X, et al. D-dimer and prothrombin time are the significant indicators of severe COVID-19 and poor prognosis. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:6159720.10.1155/2020/6159720Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[45] Sui J, Noubouossie DF, Gandotra S, Cao L. Elevated plasma fibrinogen is associated with excessive inflammation and disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:734005.10.3389/fcimb.2021.734005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Kangro K, Wolberg AS, Flick MJ. Fibrinogen, Fibrin, and Fibrin Degradation Products in COVID-19. Curr Drug Targets. 2022;23:1593–602.10.2174/1389450123666220826162900Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Majumdar S, Murphy PM. Chemokine regulation during epidemic coronavirus infection. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:600369.10.3389/fphar.2020.600369Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Croce L, Magri F, Rotondi M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020;53:25–32.10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.05.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Baykan EK, Baykan AR, Utlu M, Deve E, Yildiz F, Birdal C, et al. Growth hormone level in COVID-19 patients. North Clin Istanb. 2022;9:470–5.Search in Google Scholar

[50] George S, Pal AC, Gagnon J, Timalsina S, Singh P, Vydyam P, et al. Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the urine of COVID-19 patients. Kidney360. 2021;2:924–36.10.34067/KID.0002172021Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Zhang Y, Ong CM, Yun C, Mo W, Whitman JD, Lynch KL, et al. Diagnostic value of nucleocapsid protein in blood for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem. 2022;68:240–8.10.1093/clinchem/hvab148Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Thomas L. Antibodies and inflammatory markers may help identify COVID-19 cases and predict severity. News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210126/Antibodies-and-inflammatory-markers-may-help-identify-COVID-19-cases-and-predict-severity.aspx. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Kostinov M, Svitich O, Chuchalin A, Abramova N, Osiptsov V, Khromova E, et al. Changes in nasal, pharyngeal and salivary secretory IgA levels in patients with COVID-19 and the possibility of correction of their secretion using combined intranasal and oral administration of a pharmaceutical containing antigens of opportunistic microorganisms. Drugs Context. 2023;12:202210–4.10.7573/dic.2022-10-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Ni W, Yang X, Yang D, Bao J, Li R, Xiao Y, et al. Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24:422.10.1186/s13054-020-03120-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Hou H, Zhang B, Huang H, Luo Y, Wu S, Tang G, et al. Using IL-2R/lymphocytes for predicting the clinical progression of patients with COVID-19. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;201:76–84.10.1111/cei.13450Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Yu J-S, Pan N-N, Chen R-D, Zeng L-C, Yang H-K, Li H. Cardiac biomarker levels and their prognostic values in COVID-19 patients with or without concomitant cardiac disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;7:599096.10.3389/fcvm.2020.599096Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[57] Moon AM, Barritt AS. Elevated liver enzymes in patients with COVID-19: look, but not too hard. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66:1767–9.10.1007/s10620-020-06585-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Liu Z, Li J, Long W, Zeng W, Gao R, Zeng G, et al. Bilirubin levels as potential indicators of disease severity in coronavirus disease patients: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med. 2020;7:598870.10.3389/fmed.2020.598870Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] Xu Y, Yang H, Wang J, Li X, Xue C, Niu C, et al. Serum albumin levels are a predictor of COVID-19 patient prognosis: Evidence from a single cohort in Chongqing, China. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:2785–97.10.2147/IJGM.S312521Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Fan H, Cai J, Tian A, Li Y, Yuan H, Jiang Z, et al. Comparison of liver biomarkers in 288 COVID-19 Patients: A mono-centric study in the early phase of pandemic. Front Med. 2020;7:584888.10.3389/fmed.2020.584888Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[61] Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Fois AG, Mangoni AA. Serum CK-MB, COVID-19 severity and mortality: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Adv Med Sci. 2021;66:304–14.10.1016/j.advms.2021.07.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[62] Pourfridoni M, Abbasnia SM, Shafaei F, Razaviyan J, Heidari-Soureshjani R. Fluid and Electrolyte Disturbances in COVID-19 and Their Complications. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:6667047.10.1155/2021/6667047Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Chakraborty R, Parvez S. COVID-19: An overview of the current pharmacological interventions, vaccines, and clinical trials. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;180:114184.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Bergman S, Cennimo DJ, Miller MM, Olsen KM. COVID-19 treatment: investigational drugs and other therapies. Medscape. 2021;1–49.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Dong L, Hu S, Gao J. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drug Discov Ther. 2020;14:58–60.10.5582/ddt.2020.01012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/covid_view; 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Rodrigues L, Bento Cunha R, Vassilevskaia T, Viveiros M, Cunha C. Drug repurposing for COVID-19: A review and a novel strategy to identify new targets and potential drug candidates. Molecules. 2022;27:2723.10.3390/molecules27092723Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[68] De Wit E, Feldmann F, Cronin J, Jordan R, Okumura A, Thomas T, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir (GS-5734) treatment in the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:6771–6.10.1073/pnas.1922083117Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Lin HXJ, Cho S, Meyyur Aravamudan V, Sanda HY, Palraj R, Molton JS, et al. Remdesivir in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment: a review of evidence. Infection. 2021;49:401–10.10.1007/s15010-020-01557-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020;30:269–71.10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Lamb YN. Remdesivir: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:1355–63.10.1007/s40265-020-01378-wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Pimentel J, Laurie C, Cockcroft A, Andersson N. Clinical studies assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of remdesivir in management of COVID‐19: A scoping review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87:2663–84.10.1111/bcp.14677Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[73] Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:327–47.10.1038/nrd.2015.37Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[74] El-Bendary M, Abd-Elsalam S, Elbaz T, El-Akel W, Cordie A, Elhadidy T, et al. Efficacy of combined Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia: a multicenter Egyptian study. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2022;20:291–5.10.1080/14787210.2021.1950532Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Elgohary MA, Hasan EM, Ibrahim AA, Abdelsalam MFA, Abdel-Rahman RZ, Zaki AI, et al. Efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Ledipasvir in Egyptian patients with COVID-19 compared to standard treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Med life. 2022;15:350–8.10.1101/2021.05.19.21257429Search in Google Scholar

[76] Tan EL, Ooi EE, Lin C-Y, Tan HC, Ling AE, Lim B, et al. Inhibition of SARS coronavirus infection in vitro with clinically approved antiviral drugs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:581.10.3201/eid1004.030458Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] De Wilde AH, Jochmans D, Posthuma CC, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, Van Nieuwkoop S, Bestebroer TM, et al. Screening of an FDA-approved compound library identifies four small-molecule inhibitors of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication in cell culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:4875–84.10.1128/AAC.03011-14Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[78] Chakraborty R, Parvez S. COVID-19: An overview of the current pharmacological interventions, vaccines, and clinical trials. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;180:114184.10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114184Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[79] Sonawane K, Barale SS, Dhanavade MJ, Waghmare SR, Nadaf NH, Kamble SA, et al. Homology modeling and docking studies of TMPRSS2 with experimentally known inhibitors camostat mesylate, nafamostat and bromhexine hydrochloride to control SARS-Coronavirus-2. Preprint: ChemRxiv. Cambridge: Cambridge Open Engage; 2020.10.26434/chemrxiv.12162360Search in Google Scholar

[80] Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, Cui C, Huang B, Niu P, et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:732–9.10.1093/cid/ciaa237Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:105949.10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[82] Temple C, Hoang R, Hendrickson RG. Toxic effects from ivermectin use associated with prevention and treatment of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2197–8.10.1056/NEJMc2114907Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[83] Alvarez-Moreno C, Cassell JA, Donkor CM, Head MG, Middleton J, Pomat W, et al. Long-term consequences of the misuse of ivermectin data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:1624–6.10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00630-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Sun H, Zhao X, Zhou Y, Wang J, Ma R, Ren X, et al. Characterization of oral microbiome and exploration of potential biomarkers in patients with pancreatic cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–11.10.1155/2020/4712498Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[85] Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[86] Price CC, Altice FL, Shyr Y, Koff A, Pischel L, Goshua G, et al. Tocilizumab treatment for cytokine release syndrome in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Survival and clinical outcomes. Chest. 2020;158:1397–408.10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[87] Campochiaro C, Della-Torre E, Cavalli G, De Luca G, Ripa M, Boffini N, et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 patients: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Eur J Intern Med. 2020;76:43–9.10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[88] Yip RML, Yim CW. Role of interleukin 6 inhibitors in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol Pract Rep Rheumatic Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;27:e516–24.10.1097/RHU.0000000000001293Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[89] Atal S, Fatima Z. IL-6 inhibitors in the treatment of serious COVID-19: a promising therapy. Pharm Med. 2020;34:223–31.10.1007/s40290-020-00342-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[90] Vlaar APJ, de Bruin S, Busch M, Timmermans S, van Zeggeren IE, Koning R, et al. Anti-C5a antibody IFX-1 (vilobelimab) treatment versus best supportive care for patients with severe COVID-19 (PANAMO): an exploratory, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e764–73.10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30341-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[91] Pan H, Peto R, Karim QA, Alejandria MM, Henao-Restrepo AM, Hernández-García C, et al. WHO solidarity trial consortium, remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity randomised trial and updated meta-analyses. Lancet (London, Engl). 2022;399:1941–53.10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00519-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[92] Yang J, Nie J, Ma X, Wei Y, Peng Y, Wei X. Targeting PI3K in cancer: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:26.10.1186/s12943-019-0954-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[93] Vangapandu HV, Jain N, Gandhi V. Duvelisib: a phosphoinositide-3 kinase δ/γ inhibitor for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26:625–32.10.1080/13543784.2017.1312338Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[94] Goldsmith SR, Covut F, Fiala M, Xiang Z, Iqbal Z, Moore N, et al. Duvelisib for critically Ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: An investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10:ofad518.10.1093/ofid/ofad518Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[95] Anastasia A, Rossi G. Novel drugs in follicular Lymphoma. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2016;8:e2016061.10.4084/mjhid.2016.061Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[96] Dowarah J, Marak BN, Yadav UCS, Singh VP. Potential drug development and therapeutic approaches for clinical intervention in COVID-19. Bioorg Chem. 2021;114:105016.10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105016Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Smith CD, Maines LW, Keller SN, Katz Ben-Yair V, Fathi R, Plasse TF, et al. Recent Progress in the Development of Opaganib for the Treatment of Covid-19. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2022;16:2199–211.10.2147/DDDT.S367612Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[98] Costa B, Vale N. A review of repurposed cancer drugs in clinical trials for potential treatment of COVID-19. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:815.10.3390/pharmaceutics13060815Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[99] Kifle ZD. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for COVID-19: A review. Metab Open. 2021;11:100116.10.1016/j.metop.2021.100116Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[100] Song Y, Zhou K, Zou D, Zhou J, Hu J, Yang H, et al. Zanubrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: long-term efficacy and safety results from a phase 2 study. Blood. 2022;139:3148–58.10.1182/blood.2021014162Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[101] BeiGene. Covid-19 Infection and Pulmonary Distress Treatment With Zanubrutinib in Hospitalized Participants. https://clinicaltrialsgov/study/NCT04382586. 2022.Search in Google Scholar

[102] Acerta Pharma BV Acalabrutinib Study With Best Supportive Care in Participants Hospitalized With COVID-19. https://clinicaltrialsgov/study/NCT04497948. 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Winthrop KL, Skolnick AW, Rafiq AM, Beegle SH, Suszanski J, Koehne G, et al. Opaganib in coronavirus disease 2019 Pneumonia: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2a trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9:ofac232.10.1093/ofid/ofac232Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[104] Stockman LJ, Bellamy R, Garner P. SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e343.10.1371/journal.pmed.0030343Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[105] ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search? cond = Covid19&intr = Methylprednisolone. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[106] Hansen TM, Kryger P, Elling H, Haar D, Kreutzfeldt M, Ingeman-Nielsen MW, et al. Double blind placebo controlled trial of pulse treatment with methylprednisolone combined with disease modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1990;301:268–70.10.1136/bmj.301.6746.268Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[107] Meduri GU, Shih MC, Bridges L, Martin TJ, El-Solh A, Seam N, et al. Low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:1009–23.10.1007/s00134-022-06684-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[108] Yadav T, Kumar S, Mishra G, Saxena SK. Tracking the COVID-19 vaccines: The global landscape. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2023;19:2191577.10.1080/21645515.2023.2191577Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[109] COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. https://covid19trackvaccinesorg/. 2022.Search in Google Scholar

[110] Ndwandwe D, Wiysonge CS. COVID-19 vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol. 2021;71:111–6.10.1016/j.coi.2021.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[111] The United States Food and Drug Administration. COVID-19 Vaccines for 2023-2024. https://wwwfdagov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-2023-2024. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Wodi AP, Ault K, Hunter P, McNally V, Szilagyi PG, Bernstein H. Advisory committee on immunization practices recommended immunization schedule for children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger - United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:189–92.10.15585/mmwr.mm7006a1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[113] Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, et al. Safety monitoring of bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine booster doses among persons aged ≥ 12 Years - United States, August 31-October 23, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:1401–6.10.15585/mmwr.mm7144a3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[114] The United States Food and Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Changes to Simplify Use of Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines. https://wwwfdagov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-changes-simplify-use-bivalent-mrna-covid-19-vaccines. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[115] ClinicalTrials.gov. Views of COVID-19 Studies Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (Beta). https://classicclinicaltrialsgov/ct2/covid_view. 2023.Search in Google Scholar

[116] Eastman RT, Roth JS, Brimacombe KR, Simeonov A, Shen M, Patnaik S, et al. Remdesivir: A review of its discovery and development leading to emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6:672–83.10.1021/acscentsci.0c00489Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[117] Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:693–704.10.1056/NEJMoa2021436Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[118] Gupta A, Gonzalez-Rojas Y, Juarez E, Crespo Casal M, Moya J, Falci DR, et al. Early Treatment for Covid-19 with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody sotrovimab. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1941–50.10.1056/NEJMoa2107934Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Jayk Bernal A, Gomes da Silva MM, Musungaie DB, Kovalchuk E, Gonzalez A, Delos Reyes V, et al. Molnupiravir for oral treatment of Covid-19 in nonhospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:509–20.10.1056/NEJMoa2116044Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[120] Niraj N, Mahajan SS, Prakash A, Sarma P, Medhi B. Paxlovid: A promising drug for the challenging treatment of SARS-COV-2 in the pandemic era. Indian J Pharmacol. 2022;54:452–8.10.4103/ijp.ijp_291_22Search in Google Scholar

[121] Áñez G, Dunkle LM, Gay CL, Kotloff KL, Adelglass JM, Essink B, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the NVX-COV-2373 COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e239135.10.1101/2022.09.20.22279903Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[122] Rasmi Y, Saloua KS, Nemati M, Choi JR. Recent progress in nanotechnology for COVID-19 prevention, diagnostics and treatment. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1788.10.3390/nano11071788Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[123] Chowdhury NK, Choudhury R, Sonawane GA, Mavinamar S, Lyu X, Pandey RP, et al. Nanoparticles as an effective drug delivery system in COVID-19. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;143:112162.10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112162Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[124] Dheyab MA, Khaniabadi PM, Aziz AA, Jameel MS, Mehrdel B, Oglat AA, et al. Focused role of nanoparticles against COVID-19: Diagnosis and treatment. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;34:102287.10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102287Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[125] Dheyab MA, Aziz AA, Jameel MS, Noqta OA, Khaniabadi PM, Mehrdel B. Excellent relaxivity and X-ray attenuation combo properties of Fe3O4@Au CSNPs produced via Rapid sonochemical synthesis for MRI and CT imaging. Mater Today Commun. 2020;25:101368.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101368Search in Google Scholar

[126] Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance. 2020;25:2000045.10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[127] Emery SL, Erdman DD, Bowen MD, Newton BR, Winchell JM, Meyer RF, et al. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for SARS-associated coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10;311–6.10.3201/eid1002.030759Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[128] Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, Lee S, Kim HS, Myoung J, et al. Current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;30:313–24.10.4014/jmb.2003.03011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[129] Lurie N, Saville M, Hatchett R, Halton J. Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. The. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1969–73.10.1056/NEJMp2005630Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Mokhtarzadeh A, Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Pashazadeh P, Hejazi M, Gharaatifar N, Hasanzadeh M, et al. Nanomaterial-based biosensors for detection of pathogenic virus. Trends Anal Chem TRAC. 2017;97:445–57.10.1016/j.trac.2017.10.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[131] Unser S, Bruzas I, He J, Sagle L. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing: Current Challenges and Approaches. Sensors (Basel, Switz). 2015;15:15684–716.10.3390/s150715684Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[132] Ai K, Huang J, Xiao Z, Yang Y, Bai Y, Peng J. Localized surface plasmon resonance properties and biomedical applications of copper selenide nanomaterials. Mater Today Chem. 2021;20:100402.10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100402Search in Google Scholar

[133] Sui M, Kunwar S, Pandey P, Lee J. Strongly confined localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) bands of Pt, AgPt, AgAuPt nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16582.10.1038/s41598-019-53292-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[134] Loiseau A, Asila V, Boitel-Aullen G, Lam M, Salmain M, Boujday S. Silver-based plasmonic nanoparticles for and their use in biosensing. Biosensors. 2019;9:78.10.3390/bios9020078Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[135] Li W, Cao Z, Liu R, Liu L, Li H, Li X, et al. AuNPs as an important inorganic nanoparticle applied in drug carrier systems. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:4222–33.10.1080/21691401.2019.1687501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Wang J, Drelich AJ, Hopkins CM, Mecozzi S, Li L, Kwon G, et al. Gold nanoparticles in virus detection: Recent advances and potential considerations for SARS‐COV‐2 testing development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2022;14:e1754.10.1002/wnan.1754Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[137] Kim H, Park M, Hwang J, Kim JH, Chung D-R, Lee K-S, et al. Development of label-free colorimetric assay for MERS-CoV using gold nanoparticles. ACS Sens. 2019;4:1306–12.10.1021/acssensors.9b00175Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Moitra P, Alafeef M, Dighe K, Frieman MB, Pan D. Selective naked-eye detection of SARS-CoV-2 mediated by N gene targeted antisense oligonucleotide capped plasmonic nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2020;14:7617–27.10.1021/acsnano.0c03822Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[139] Gong P, He X, Wang K, Tan W, Xie W, Wu P, et al. Combination of functionalized nanoparticles and polymerase chain reaction-based method for SARS-CoV gene detection. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2008;8:293–300.10.1166/jnn.2008.18130Search in Google Scholar

[140] Mahmoudi M. Emerging Biomolecular Testing to Assess the Risk of Mortality from COVID-19 Infection. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2021;18:476–82.10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00371Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[141] Li Z, Askim JR, Suslick KS. The optoelectronic nose: Colorimetric and fluorometric sensor arrays. Chem Rev. 2019;119:231–92.10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00226Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[142] Saha K, Agasti SS, Kim C, Li X, Rotello VM. Gold nanoparticles in chemical and biological sensing. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2739–79.10.1021/cr2001178Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[143] Ashkarran AA, Dararatana N, Crespy D, Caracciolo G, Mahmoudi M. Mapping the heterogeneity of protein corona by ex vivo magnetic levitation. Nanoscale. 2020;12:2374–83.10.1039/C9NR10367HSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[144] Maddali H, Miles CE, Kohn J, O’Carroll DM. Optical biosensors for virus detection: prospects for SARS‐COV‐2/COVID‐19. ChemBioChem. 2021;22:1176–89.10.1002/cbic.202000744Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[145] Shi JC. Application of nanomaterials-based optical sensors for virus detections. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2021;1906:012028.10.1088/1742-6596/1906/1/012028Search in Google Scholar

[146] Liang Y, Mao G, Dai J, Ma Y. Biofunctionalized semiconductor quantum dots for virus detection. J Semicond. 2023;44:023101.10.1088/1674-4926/44/2/023101Search in Google Scholar

[147] Roh C, Jo SK. Quantitative and sensitive detection of SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein using quantum dots‐conjugated RNA aptamer on chip. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2011;86:1475–9.10.1002/jctb.2721Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[148] Chen R, Kan L, Duan F, He L, Wang M, Cui J, et al. Surface plasmon resonance aptasensor based on niobium carbide MXene quantum dots for nucleocapsid of SARS-CoV-2 detection. Microchim Acta. 2021;188:316.10.1007/s00604-021-04974-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[149] Tabrizi MA, Nazari L, Acedo P. A photo-electrochemical aptasensor for the determination of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 receptor-binding domain by using graphitic carbon nitride-cadmium sulfide quantum dots nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2021;345:130377.10.1016/j.snb.2021.130377Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[150] Ahmed SR, Nagy É, Neethirajan S. Self-assembled star-shaped chiroplasmonic gold nanoparticles for an ultrasensitive chiro-immunosensor for viruses. RSC Adv. 2017;7:40849–57.10.1039/C7RA07175BSearch in Google Scholar

[151] Shetty MG, Melanthota SK, Daimari NK, Biswas R, Mazumder N, Babitha KS. Synthesis, conjugation, and applications of chiral nanoparticles as plasmonic probes. Recent Advances in Plasmonic Probes: Theory and Practice. Vol. 33. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 365–87.10.1007/978-3-030-99491-4_14Search in Google Scholar

[152] Ahmed SR, Kang SW, Oh S, Lee J, Neethirajan S. Chiral zirconium quantum dots: A new class of nanocrystals for optical detection of coronavirus. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00766.10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00766Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[153] Gorshkov K, Susumu K, Chen J, Xu M, Pradhan M, Zhu W, et al. Quantum dot-conjugated SARS-CoV-2 Spike Pseudo-virions enable tracking of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 binding and endocytosis. ACS Nano. 2020;14:12234–47.10.1021/acsnano.0c05975Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[154] Bardajee GR, Zamani M, Sharifi M. Efficient and versatile application of fluorescence DNA-conjugated CdTe quantum dots nanoprobe for detection of a specific target DNA of SARS Cov-2 virus. Langmuir. 2021;37:10223–32.10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01687Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Zhang Y, Malekjahani A, Udugama BN, Kadhiresan P, Chen H, Osborne M, et al. Surveilling and tracking COVID-19 patients using a portable quantum dot smartphone device. Nano Lett. 2021;21:5209–16.10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01280Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[156] Chen X, Leng Y, Hao L, Duan H, Yuan J, Zhang W, et al. Self-assembled colloidal gold superparticles to enhance the sensitivity of lateral flow immunoassays with sandwich format. Theranostics. 2020;10:3737–48.10.7150/thno.42364Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[157] Zhou Y, Chen Y, Liu W, Fang H, Li X, Hou L, et al. Development of a rapid and sensitive quantum dot nanobead-based double-antigen sandwich lateral flow immunoassay and its clinical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 2021;343:130139.10.1016/j.snb.2021.130139Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[158] Chitsike L, Duerksen-Hughes P. Keep out! SARS-CoV-2 entry inhibitors: their role and utility as COVID-19 therapeutics. Virol J. 2021;18:1–17.10.1186/s12985-021-01624-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[159] Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, et al. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J. 2005;2:1–10.10.1186/1743-422X-2-69Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[160] Medhi R, Srinoi P, Ngo N, Tran H-V, Lee TR. Nanoparticle-Based Strategies to Combat COVID-19. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3:8557–80.10.1021/acsanm.0c01978Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[161] Lima TL, Feitosa RD, Santos-Silva D, Santos-Silva D, Maria A, Siqueira EM, et al. Improving encapsulation of hydrophilic chloroquine diphosphate into biodegradable nanoparticles: a promising approach against herpes virus simplex-1 infection. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:255.10.3390/pharmaceutics10040255Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[162] Ting D, Dong N, Fang L, Lu J, Bi J, Xiao S, et al. Multisite inhibitors for enteric coronavirus: antiviral cationic carbon dots based on curcumin. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:5451–9.10.1021/acsanm.8b00779Search in Google Scholar

[163] Yang XX, Li CM, Huang CZ. Curcumin modified silver nanoparticles for highly efficient inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Nanoscale. 2016;8:3040–8.10.1039/C5NR07918GSearch in Google Scholar

[164] Huang X, Li M, Xu Y, Zhang J, Meng X, An X, et al. Novel gold nanorod-based HR1 peptide inhibitor for middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:19799–807.10.1021/acsami.9b04240Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[165] de Souza e Silva, Hanchuk JM, Santos TDM, Kobarg Jr MI, Bajgelman MC, Cardoso MB. Viral inhibition mechanism mediated by surface-modified silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:16564–72.10.1021/acsami.6b03342Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[166] Osminkina L, Timoshenko VY, Shilovsky I, Kornilaeva G, Shevchenko S, Gongalsky M, et al. Porous silicon nanoparticles as scavengers of hazardous viruses. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16:1–10.10.1007/s11051-014-2430-2Search in Google Scholar

[167] He L, Zhao J, Wang L, Liu Q, Fan Y, Li B, et al. Using nano-selenium to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Nano Today. 2021;36:101037.10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101037Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[168] Hamza A, Zhan CG. How can (-)-epigallocatechin gallate from green tea prevent HIV-1 infection? Mechanistic insights from computational modeling and the implication for rational design of anti-HIV-1 entry inhibitors. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:2910–7.10.1021/jp0550762Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[169] Tong T, Hu H, Zhou J, Deng S, Zhang X, Tang W, et al. Glycyrrhizic‐acid‐based carbon dots with high antiviral activity by multisite inhibition mechanisms. Small. 2020;16:1906206.10.1002/smll.201906206Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[170] van der Meel R, Sulheim E, Shi Y, Kiessling F, Mulder WJM, Lammers T. Smart cancer nanomedicine. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:1007–17.10.1038/s41565-019-0567-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[171] O’Keefe BR, Giomarelli B, Barnard DL, Shenoy SR, Chan PK, McMahon JB, et al. Broad-spectrum in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of the antiviral protein griffithsin against emerging viruses of the family Coronaviridae. J Virol. 2010;84:2511–21.10.1128/JVI.02322-09Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[172] Millet JK, Séron K, Labitt RN, Danneels A, Palmer KE, Whittaker GR, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection is inhibited by griffithsin. Antivir Res. 2016;133:1–8.10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[173] Lv X, Wang P, Bai R, Cong Y, Suo S, Ren X, et al. Inhibitory effect of silver nanomaterials on transmissible virus-induced host cell infections. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4195–203.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[174] Du T, Lu J, Liu L, Dong N, Fang L, Xiao S, et al. Antiviral activity of graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites by preventing viral entry and activation of the antiviral innate immune response. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1:1286–93.10.1021/acsabm.8b00154Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[175] Du T, Liang J, Dong N, Liu L, Fang L, Xiao S, et al. Carbon dots as inhibitors of virus by activation of type I interferon response. Carbon. 2016;110:278–85.10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.032Search in Google Scholar

[176] Kim J, Yeom M, Lee T, Kim H-O, Na W, Kang A, et al. Porous gold nanoparticles for attenuating infectivity of influenza A virus. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18:54.10.1186/s12951-020-00611-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[177] Papp I, Sieben C, Ludwig K, Roskamp M, Böttcher C, Schlecht S, et al. Inhibition of influenza virus infection by multivalent sialic‐acid‐functionalized gold nanoparticles. Small. 2010;6:2900–6.10.1002/smll.201001349Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[178] Huang S, Gu J, Ye J, Fang B, Wan S, Wang C, et al. Benzoxazine monomer derived carbon dots as a broad-spectrum agent to block viral infectivity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;542:198–206.10.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[179] Zoppe JO, Ruottinen V, Ruotsalainen J, Rönkkö S, Johansson LS, Hinkkanen A, et al. Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystals carrying tyrosine sulfate mimetic ligands and inhibition of alphavirus infection. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:1534–42.10.1021/bm500229dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[180] Cagno V, Andreozzi P, D’Alicarnasso M, Jacob Silva P, Mueller M, Galloux M, et al. Broad-spectrum non-toxic antiviral nanoparticles with a virucidal inhibition mechanism. Nat Mater. 2018;17:195–203.10.1038/nmat5053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[181] Kong B, Moon S, Kim Y, Heo P, Jung Y, Yu S-H, et al. Virucidal nano-perforator of viral membrane trapping viral RNAs in the endosome. Nat Commun. 2019;10:185.10.1038/s41467-018-08138-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[182] Qin T, Ma R, Yin Y, Miao X, Chen S, Fan K, et al. Catalytic inactivation of influenza virus by iron oxide nanozyme. Theranostics. 2019;9:6920–35.10.7150/thno.35826Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[183] Hou X, Zaks T, Langer R, Dong Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6:1078–94.10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[184] Wilson B, Geetha KM. Lipid nanoparticles in the development of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;74:103553.10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103553Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[185] Han X, Alameh M-G, Butowska K, Knox JJ, Lundgreen K, Ghattas M, et al. Adjuvant lipidoid-substituted lipid nanoparticles augment the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Nat Nanotechnol. 2023;18:1105–14.10.1038/s41565-023-01404-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[186] Bosetti R. Cost-effectiveness of nanomedicine: the path to a future successful and dominant market? Nanomed (London, Engl). 2015;10:1851–3.10.2217/nnm.15.74Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[187] Thorley AJ, Tetley TD. New perspectives in nanomedicine. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;140:176–85.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.06.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[188] Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, Coursac I, Zeger SL. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1742–9.10.1056/NEJM200012143432401Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[189] Poland C, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace W, Seaton A, et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3:423–8.10.1038/nnano.2008.111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[190] Sakamoto Y, Nakae D, Fukumori N, Tayama K, Maekawa A, Imai K, et al. Induction of mesothelioma by a single intrascrotal administration of multi-wall carbon nanotube in intact male Fischer 344 rats. J Toxicol Sci. 2009;34:65–76.10.2131/jts.34.65Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[191] Ma-Hock L, Treumann S, Strauss V, Brill S, Luizi F, Mertler M, et al. Inhalation toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes in rats exposed for 3 months. Toxicol Sci. 2009;112:468–81.10.1093/toxsci/kfp146Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[192] Pauluhn J. Subchronic 13-week inhalation exposure of rats to multiwalled carbon nanotubes: toxic effects are determined by density of agglomerate structures, not fibrillar structures. Toxicol Sci. 2010;113:226–42.10.1093/toxsci/kfp247Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-06-20
Revised: 2023-09-30
Accepted: 2023-11-01
Published Online: 2023-12-31

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Preparation of CdS–Ag2S nanocomposites by ultrasound-assisted UV photolysis treatment and its visible light photocatalysis activity
  3. Significance of nanoparticle radius and inter-particle spacing toward the radiative water-based alumina nanofluid flow over a rotating disk
  4. Aptamer-based detection of serotonin based on the rapid in situ synthesis of colorimetric gold nanoparticles
  5. Investigation of the nucleation and growth behavior of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC nano-precipitates in TiAl alloys
  6. Dynamic recrystallization behavior and nucleation mechanism of dual-scale SiCp/A356 composites processed by P/M method
  7. High mechanical performance of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane/epoxy cured in a sandwich construction of 3D carbon felts foam and woven basalt fibers
  8. Applying solution of spray polyurea elastomer in asphalt binder: Feasibility analysis and DSR study based on the MSCR and LAS tests
  9. Study on the chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of iron-based bioabsorbable stents
  10. Influence of microalloying with B on the microstructure and properties of brazed joints with Ag–Cu–Zn–Sn filler metal
  11. Thermohydraulic performance of thermal system integrated with twisted turbulator inserts using ternary hybrid nanofluids
  12. Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/graphene and epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites
  13. Effects of CaO addition on the CuW composite containing micro- and nano-sized tungsten particles synthesized via aluminothermic coupling with silicothermic reduction
  14. Cu and Al2O3-based hybrid nanofluid flow through a porous cavity
  15. Design of functional vancomycin-embedded bio-derived extracellular matrix hydrogels for repairing infectious bone defects
  16. Study on nanocrystalline coating prepared by electro-spraying 316L metal wire and its corrosion performance
  17. Axial compression performance of CFST columns reinforced by ultra-high-performance nano-concrete under long-term loading
  18. Tungsten trioxide nanocomposite for conventional soliton and noise-like pulse generation in anomalous dispersion laser cavity
  19. Microstructure and electrical contact behavior of the nano-yttria-modified Cu-Al2O3/30Mo/3SiC composite
  20. Melting rheology in thermally stratified graphene-mineral oil reservoir (third-grade nanofluid) with slip condition
  21. Re-examination of nonlinear vibration and nonlinear bending of porous sandwich cylindrical panels reinforced by graphene platelets
  22. Parametric simulation of hybrid nanofluid flow consisting of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with second-order slip and variable viscosity over an extending surface
  23. Chitosan-capped silver nanoparticles with potent and selective intrinsic activity against the breast cancer cells
  24. Multi-core/shell SiO2@Al2O3 nanostructures deposited on Ti3AlC2 to enhance high-temperature stability and microwave absorption properties
  25. Solution-processed Bi2S3/BiVO4/TiO2 ternary heterojunction photoanode with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance
  26. Electroporation effect of ZnO nanoarrays under low voltage for water disinfection
  27. NIR-II window absorbing graphene oxide-coated gold nanorods and graphene quantum dot-coupled gold nanorods for photothermal cancer therapy
  28. Nonlinear three-dimensional stability characteristics of geometrically imperfect nanoshells under axial compression and surface residual stress
  29. Investigation of different nanoparticles properties on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulation
  30. Optimized Cu2O-{100} facet for generation of different reactive oxidative species via peroxymonosulfate activation at specific pH values to efficient acetaminophen removal
  31. Brownian and thermal diffusivity impact due to the Maxwell nanofluid (graphene/engine oil) flow with motile microorganisms and Joule heating
  32. Appraising the dielectric properties and the effectiveness of electromagnetic shielding of graphene reinforced silicone rubber nanocomposite
  33. Synthesis of Ag and Cu nanoparticles by plasma discharge in inorganic salt solutions
  34. Low-cost and large-scale preparation of ultrafine TiO2@C hybrids for high-performance degradation of methyl orange and formaldehyde under visible light
  35. Utilization of waste glass with natural pozzolan in the production of self-glazed glass-ceramic materials
  36. Mechanical performance of date palm fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nano-activated carbon
  37. Melting point of dried gold nanoparticles prepared with ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and lyophilisation
  38. Graphene nanofibers: A modern approach towards tailored gypsum composites
  39. Role of localized magnetic field in vortex generation in tri-hybrid nanofluid flow: A numerical approach
  40. Intelligent computing for the double-diffusive peristaltic rheology of magneto couple stress nanomaterials
  41. Bioconvection transport of upper convected Maxwell nanoliquid with gyrotactic microorganism, nonlinear thermal radiation, and chemical reaction
  42. 3D printing of porous Ti6Al4V bone tissue engineering scaffold and surface anodization preparation of nanotubes to enhance its biological property
  43. Bioinspired ferromagnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles: Potential pharmaceutical and medical applications
  44. Significance of gyrotactic microorganisms on the MHD tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow across an elastic slender surface: Numerical analysis
  45. Performance of polycarboxylate superplasticisers in seawater-blended cement: Effect from chemical structure and nano modification
  46. Entropy minimization of GO–Ag/KO cross-hybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated surface
  47. Oxygen plasma assisted room temperature bonding for manufacturing SU-8 polymer micro/nanoscale nozzle
  48. Performance and mechanism of CO2 reduction by DBD-coupled mesoporous SiO2
  49. Polyarylene ether nitrile dielectric films modified by HNTs@PDA hybrids for high-temperature resistant organic electronics field
  50. Exploration of generalized two-phase free convection magnetohydrodynamic flow of dusty tetra-hybrid Casson nanofluid between parallel microplates
  51. Hygrothermal bending analysis of sandwich nanoplates with FG porous core and piezomagnetic faces via nonlocal strain gradient theory
  52. Design and optimization of a TiO2/RGO-supported epoxy multilayer microwave absorber by the modified local best particle swarm optimization algorithm
  53. Mechanical properties and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete modified by nano-SiO2
  54. Self-template synthesis of hollow flower-like NiCo2O4 nanoparticles as an efficient bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in alkaline media
  55. High-performance wearable flexible strain sensors based on an AgNWs/rGO/TPU electrospun nanofiber film for monitoring human activities
  56. High-performance lithium–selenium batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped porous carbon from peanut meal
  57. Investigating effects of Lorentz forces and convective heating on ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface using homotopy analysis method
  58. Exploring the potential of biogenic magnesium oxide nanoparticles for cytotoxicity: In vitro and in silico studies on HCT116 and HT29 cells and DPPH radical scavenging
  59. Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by heteroatom-doped nickel tungstate nanoparticles
  60. A facile method to synthesize nZVI-doped polypyrrole-based carbon nanotube for Ag(i) removal
  61. Improved osseointegration of dental titanium implants by TiO2 nanotube arrays with self-assembled recombinant IGF-1 in type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model
  62. Functionalized SWCNTs@Ag–TiO2 nanocomposites induce ROS-mediated apoptosis and autophagy in liver cancer cells
  63. Triboelectric nanogenerator based on a water droplet spring with a concave spherical surface for harvesting wave energy and detecting pressure
  64. A mathematical approach for modeling the blood flow containing nanoparticles by employing the Buongiorno’s model
  65. Molecular dynamics study on dynamic interlayer friction of graphene and its strain effect
  66. Induction of apoptosis and autophagy via regulation of AKT and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in breast cancer cell lines exposed to gold nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α and combined with doxorubicin
  67. Effect of PVA fibers on durability of nano-SiO2-reinforced cement-based composites subjected to wet-thermal and chloride salt-coupled environment
  68. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol fibers on mechanical properties of nano-SiO2-reinforced geopolymer composites under a complex environment
  69. In vitro studies of titanium dioxide nanoparticles modified with glutathione as a potential drug delivery system
  70. Comparative investigations of Ag/H2O nanofluid and Ag-CuO/H2O hybrid nanofluid with Darcy-Forchheimer flow over a curved surface
  71. Study on deformation characteristics of multi-pass continuous drawing of micro copper wire based on crystal plasticity finite element method
  72. Properties of ultra-high-performance self-compacting fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nanomaterials
  73. Prediction of lap shear strength of GNP and TiO2/epoxy nanocomposite adhesives
  74. A novel exploration of how localized magnetic field affects vortex generation of trihybrid nanofluids
  75. Fabrication and physicochemical characterization of copper oxide–pyrrhotite nanocomposites for the cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells and the mechanism
  76. Thermal radiative flow of cross nanofluid due to a stretched cylinder containing microorganisms
  77. In vitro study of the biphasic calcium phosphate/chitosan hybrid biomaterial scaffold fabricated via solvent casting and evaporation technique for bone regeneration
  78. Insights into the thermal characteristics and dynamics of stagnant blood conveying titanium oxide, alumina, and silver nanoparticles subject to Lorentz force and internal heating over a curved surface
  79. Effects of nano-SiO2 additives on carbon fiber-reinforced fly ash–slag geopolymer composites performance: Workability, mechanical properties, and microstructure
  80. Energy bandgap and thermal characteristics of non-Darcian MHD rotating hybridity nanofluid thin film flow: Nanotechnology application
  81. Green synthesis and characterization of ginger-extract-based oxali-palladium nanoparticles for colorectal cancer: Downregulation of REG4 and apoptosis induction
  82. Abnormal evolution of resistivity and microstructure of annealed Ag nanoparticles/Ag–Mo films
  83. Preparation of water-based dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic fluid for magnetic hyperthermia
  84. Statistical investigations and morphological aspects of cross-rheological material suspended in transportation of alumina, silica, titanium, and ethylene glycol via the Galerkin algorithm
  85. Effect of CNT film interleaves on the flexural properties and strength after impact of CFRP composites
  86. Self-assembled nanoscale entities: Preparative process optimization, payload release, and enhanced bioavailability of thymoquinone natural product
  87. Structure–mechanical property relationships of 3D-printed porous polydimethylsiloxane films
  88. Nonlinear thermal radiation and the slip effect on a 3D bioconvection flow of the Casson nanofluid in a rotating frame via a homotopy analysis mechanism
  89. Residual mechanical properties of concrete incorporated with nano supplementary cementitious materials exposed to elevated temperature
  90. Time-independent three-dimensional flow of a water-based hybrid nanofluid past a Riga plate with slips and convective conditions: A homotopic solution
  91. Lightweight and high-strength polyarylene ether nitrile-based composites for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding
  92. Review Articles
  93. Recycling waste sources into nanocomposites of graphene materials: Overview from an energy-focused perspective
  94. Hybrid nanofiller reinforcement in thermoset and biothermoset applications: A review
  95. Current state-of-the-art review of nanotechnology-based therapeutics for viral pandemics: Special attention to COVID-19
  96. Solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted natural and synthetic drugs delivery in high-incidence cancers, and other diseases: Roles of preparation methods, lipid composition, transitional stability, and release profiles in nanocarriers’ development
  97. Critical review on experimental and theoretical studies of elastic properties of wurtzite-structured ZnO nanowires
  98. Polyurea micro-/nano-capsule applications in construction industry: A review
  99. A comprehensive review and clinical guide to molecular and serological diagnostic tests and future development: In vitro diagnostic testing for COVID-19
  100. Recent advances in electrocatalytic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid: Mechanism, catalyst, coupling system
  101. Research progress and prospect of silica-based polymer nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery
  102. Review of the pharmacokinetics of nanodrugs
  103. Engineered nanoflowers, nanotrees, nanostars, nanodendrites, and nanoleaves for biomedical applications
  104. Research progress of biopolymers combined with stem cells in the repair of intrauterine adhesions
  105. Progress in FEM modeling on mechanical and electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube cement-based composites
  106. Antifouling induced by surface wettability of poly(dimethyl siloxane) and its nanocomposites
  107. TiO2 aerogel composite high-efficiency photocatalysts for environmental treatment and hydrogen energy production
  108. Structural properties of alumina surfaces and their roles in the synthesis of environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs)
  109. Nanoparticles for the potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A physiopathological approach
  110. Current status of synthesis and consolidation strategies for thermo-resistant nanoalloys and their general applications
  111. Recent research progress on the stimuli-responsive smart membrane: A review
  112. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous cementitious materials: A review
  113. Applications of DNA tetrahedron nanostructure in cancer diagnosis and anticancer drugs delivery
  114. Magnetic nanoparticles in 3D-printed scaffolds for biomedical applications
  115. An overview of the synthesis of silicon carbide–boron carbide composite powders
  116. Organolead halide perovskites: Synthetic routes, structural features, and their potential in the development of photovoltaic
  117. Recent advancements in nanotechnology application on wood and bamboo materials: A review
  118. Application of aptamer-functionalized nanomaterials in molecular imaging of tumors
  119. Recent progress on corrosion mechanisms of graphene-reinforced metal matrix composites
  120. Research progress on preparation, modification, and application of phenolic aerogel
  121. Application of nanomaterials in early diagnosis of cancer
  122. Plant mediated-green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An insight into biomedical applications
  123. Recent developments in terahertz quantum cascade lasers for practical applications
  124. Recent progress in dielectric/metal/dielectric electrodes for foldable light-emitting devices
  125. Nanocoatings for ballistic applications: A review
  126. A mini-review on MoS2 membrane for water desalination: Recent development and challenges
  127. Recent updates in nanotechnological advances for wound healing: A narrative review
  128. Recent advances in DNA nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and treatment
  129. Electrochemical micro- and nanobiosensors for in vivo reactive oxygen/nitrogen species measurement in the brain
  130. Advances in organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy
  131. Advancements in aluminum matrix composites reinforced with carbides and graphene: A comprehensive review
  132. Modification effects of nanosilica on asphalt binders: A review
  133. Decellularized extracellular matrix as a promising biomaterial for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration
  134. Review of the sol–gel method in preparing nano TiO2 for advanced oxidation process
  135. Micro/nano manufacturing aircraft surface with anti-icing and deicing performances: An overview
  136. Cell type-targeting nanoparticles in treating central nervous system diseases: Challenges and hopes
  137. An overview of hydrogen production from Al-based materials
  138. A review of application, modification, and prospect of melamine foam
  139. A review of the performance of fibre-reinforced composite laminates with carbon nanotubes
  140. Research on AFM tip-related nanofabrication of two-dimensional materials
  141. Advances in phase change building materials: An overview
  142. Development of graphene and graphene quantum dots toward biomedical engineering applications: A review
  143. Nanoremediation approaches for the mitigation of heavy metal contamination in vegetables: An overview
  144. Photodynamic therapy empowered by nanotechnology for oral and dental science: Progress and perspectives
  145. Biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles: Bioreduction and biomineralization
  146. Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and the role of nanomaterial-based theragnosis in combating the pandemic
  147. Application of two-dimensional black phosphorus material in wound healing
  148. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials and Composites for Energy Conversion and Storage - Part I
  149. Helical fluorinated carbon nanotubes/iron(iii) fluoride hybrid with multilevel transportation channels and rich active sites for lithium/fluorinated carbon primary battery
  150. The progress of cathode materials in aqueous zinc-ion batteries
  151. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part I
  152. Effect of polypropylene fiber and nano-silica on the compressive strength and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete
  153. Mechanochemical design of nanomaterials for catalytic applications with a benign-by-design focus
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2023-0155/html
Scroll to top button