Home Role of localized magnetic field in vortex generation in tri-hybrid nanofluid flow: A numerical approach
Article Open Access

Role of localized magnetic field in vortex generation in tri-hybrid nanofluid flow: A numerical approach

  • Shabbir Ahmad EMAIL logo , Hidemasa Takana , Kashif Ali , Yasmeen Akhtar , Ahmed M. Hassan and Adham E. Ragab
Published/Copyright: July 11, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Tri-hybrid nanofluid (THNF) can achieve a higher heat transfer rate than conventional hybrid nanofluid by combining three different nanoparticles with synergistic effects. It can have more diverse physical and thermal properties by choosing different combinations of nanoparticles. That is why it has more potential applications in various fields such as solar thermal, biomedical, and industrial processes. On the other hand, vortices are circular motions of liquid or gas that occur when there is a velocity difference. They are important for understanding how fluids mix and transport mass. They can be found in nature, such as in tornadoes and hurricanes. The aim of the current study is to mainly investigate the complex interaction of Lorentz force with the tri-hybrid nanoparticles inside a lid-driven square cavity. It can be seen that the magnetic field has caused the evolution of new vortices (which are very important while analyzing any flow model due to their importance in interpreting fluid mixing and mass transport phenomena) in the flow field, thus adding much more significance to our work. Most of the scientific literature is enriched with investigations dealing with the problems assuming a uniform magnetic field occupying the flow field, but in this research, a vertical strip of magnetism within the flow field will be introduced. It may be the first effort to interpret the role of the applied magnetic field in the formation of the new vortices in the flow field. A single-phase model is utilized to describe THNF whereas a numerical solution to the governing differential equations has been obtained by employing an algorithm based on the central difference discretization and the alternating direction implicit method. The analysis reveals that the magnetic field intensity may result in up to 13 and 119% increase in the skin friction and Nusselt number, respectively. Similarly, a remarkable change in the Nusselt number and the skin friction is also observed by raising the Reynolds number Re. Moreover, the localization or confinement of the magnetic field does not always increase or decrease the Nusselt number. Thus, it is concluded that there will be a certain width of the magnetic corridor for which the Nusselt number would be optimal. Further, the THNF containing Al2O3, Ag, and TiO2 outperforms in terms of enhancing the average Nusselt number, compared to the simple nanofluid containing the abovementioned particles.

Nomenclature

Ec

Eckert number

H ˜ ( x , y )

magnetic field intensity of a dipole

K

pyro magnetic factor

M ˜

magnetization property

Mn

magnetic number

Pr

Prandtl number

Re

Reynolds number

T ¯ c

Curie temperature

V 0

constant velocity

H ˜ / x

magnetic force components along the X-axis

H ˜ / y

magnetic force components along the Y-axis

Greek symbols

γ

magnetic field strength

μ hnf

viscosity of hybrid nanofluid

σ hnf

electrical conductivity of hybrid nanofluid

φ 1

volume fraction of iron oxide

ρ nf

density of nanofluid

φ

nanoparticle volume fraction

ε

dimensionless number

μ ¯ 0

dynamic viscosity

k hnf

thermal conductivity

φ 2

volume fraction of copper

ρ hnf

density of nanofluid of hybrid nanofluid

1 Introduction

The study of vortex generation in lid-driven cavities by localized magnetic field is useful for understanding the fluid dynamics of biological fluids under the influence of high magnetic fields and its possible medical applications, such as cell separation, magnetic tracers, and magnetic drug targeting [1]. It is also useful for exploring the size-dependent effects of fluid flows at small scales, which can be relevant for liquid crystals, lubrication, and microelectromechanical devices [2]. Moreover, it can provide insights into the topology and stability of corner vortices in the lid-driven cavity flow, which is a benchmark problem for testing numerical methods and studying fundamental aspects of incompressible flows in confined volumes [3]. A localized magnetic field is a vector field that varies in space due to the presence of magnetic materials or electric currents. Some real-world applications of localized magnetic fields are indoor localization, magnetic anomaly detection, magnetoencephalography, and quantum physics. Magnetic fields can be used to estimate the position and orientation of a device inside a building by measuring the distortions of the earth’s magnetic field caused by ferromagnetic objects [4,5].

Amalgamation of the nanoparticles that are exhibiting magnetic features may produce magnetic nanofluids which are rather different from ordinary nanofluids. Since ferromagnetic materials such as ferrites, mercury, and nickel are likely more striking towards the influence of the external magnetic fields, these nanomaterials disseminate the fluid throughout the enclosure by altering the flow regime. In a magnetic field setup, the flow of viscous and conductive fluids (e.g., Brine, nano lubricants, plasma, electrolytes, liquid metals, etc.) has a variety of applications in the manufacturing of medical apparatuses, control networks in industries, propulsion systems in submarine and spacecraft, wastewater treatment, liquid metal fast reactor, power generation, etc. In recent times, many researchers have focused on magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows through different geometries. Recently, the heat and mass transfer of a micro-rotating fluid between two plates was explored by Jalili et al. [6] by using both electric and magnetic fields. They computed the nonlinear and coupled equations and evaluated how the Nusselt number, Sherwood number, and skin friction influence the fluid’s temperature, concentration, and velocity. MHD convection and the development of entropy of Cu–Al2O3/water nanofluid in a porous square cavity are numerically investigated with sinusoidal boundary temperatures by Abdel-Nour et al. [7]. The isotherms vary with Rayleigh number and Hartmann number (Ha). A high Ha increases conduction transfer. MHD mixed convection in Al2O3–Cu nanostructures in the water nanofluid in an L-shaped cavity with two heat sources at bottom corners and cold ends is proposed by Armaghani et al. [8]. The size of the enclosure and heat source location affect the heat transfer and flow. The numerical study of unsteady hybrid nanofluid (Fe3O4 and carbon nanotubes in water) flow with heat source/sink effects between two sheets with variable thermal conductivity and magnetic field has been conducted by Dinarvand et al. [9]. The heat transfer decreases with an oblique magnetic field and also temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. The spherical particles have a particularly high temperature with horizontal magnetic field.

Convective flows through enclosures and cavities have captivated the attention of scientists due to their increasingly versatile applications in several industries which include chemical and food processing industries, paints and molten polymer processing units, microelectronics, HVAC systems of buildings and mechanical complexes, nuclear power stations, solar collectors, etc. [10,11,12]. Natural convection flow problems are mainly concerned with the heat transfer performance of the working fluids. Fluid flow and heat transfer in a square cavity with varying wall temperatures and Cu–Al2O3water nanofluid is numerically investigated by Gorla et al. [13]. A higher Ha lowers fluid velocity and a higher nanoparticle volume fraction boosts the heat transfer rate. The heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid in a triangular cavity with a magnetic field and a heat source at the bottom is studied by Rashad et al. [14]. The slanted side is cold and the other sides are insulated. The heat transfer is affected by the nanofluid volume fraction when convection is very low. A hybrid nanofluid with an equal nanostructure of copper (Cu) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) in water does not improve the mean Nusselt number more than a regular nanofluid. Excellent research on the thermophysical characteristics of various nanofluids in fascinating problems was also conducted by Ahmad et al. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Liu et al. [23] examined the magnetic flow of Fe3O4 nanoparticles inside a porous cavity with the latest numerical technique taking impacts of various combinations of Rayleigh numbers, the volume fraction of nanocomposites, porosity parameter, and magnetic parameters on the thermal distributions of the nano liquid. Nepal [24] calculated a numerical solution of MHD flow through an enclosure with numerous heat sources of variable breadth at the bottom most layer of the enclosure. The author employed a powerful numerical technique, the successive over-relaxation method, entrenched with relevant finite differences of differential equations.

The advantage of tri-hybrid nanofluids (THNFs) over hybrid nanofluids is that they have higher thermal conductivity and heat transfer properties than hybrid nanofluids and simple nanofluids [25,26]. This means that THNFs can enhance the cooling performance and energy efficiency of various applications, such as microfluidic devices, electric ovens, nuclear reactors, etc. However, the effectiveness of THNFs depends on several factors, such as the types, sizes, shapes, and mixture ratios of nanoparticles, as well as the base fluids [27]. Jakeer et al. [28] studied the magneto copper based nanofluid flow in a non-Darcy porous square enclosure by using the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. The heat transfer and flow depend on the heated obstacle. Higher Ha reduces the local Nusselt number, whereas hybrid nanofluid enhances heat transfer more than nanofluids. The thermal diffusivity profile in oblique stenosis artery with Al2O3–Cu based hybrid nanofluid was designed by Jalili et al. [29] by taking care of several numerical methods (AGM, FEM, and Runge–Kutta). They scrutinized the influence of heat source parameters and volume fraction on the temperature evolution and reported that increasing the nanoparticles volume fraction decreases the maximum temperature profile and rising the heat source increases the maximum heat temperature. They also discovered that Al2O3 has more impact on reducing the temperature profile than Cu. The best cooling of the fluid was accomplished by Abdollahi et al. [30] by perusing the thermal and fluid parameters of copper/water hybrid solution, such as Darcy number and Nusselt number. They also fitted a piece of fin on the wall of the heat sink to surge the coefficient of displacement heat transfer and conductive heat transfer with the surrounding air-fluid and the effectiveness of the system. Tawade et al. [31] examined the steady laminar flow on a two-dimensional boundary layer with heat transfer of Casson over a linearly stretching sheet. The governing partial differential equations (PDEs) were changed into nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) by means of similarity transformation. For more related information, please refer to refs [32,33]. Hameed et al. [34] studied the two-dimension flow of Casson hybrid nanofluid on a nonlinear extending surface with a magnetic field, absorption, heat generation, and viscous dissipation. The main aim is to enhance the heat transfer relationship between the engineering industries and manufacturing.

In most recent times, various nanoparticles such as alumina, titanium, spinel ferrites, nickel, copper, silver, graphite, etc., are used in the working host fluids to produce thermally vigorous fluids usually termed nanofluids [35,36,37,38]. The study of a micro-polar nanofluid in a rotating system with electric and magnetic fields between two plates was conducted by Jalili et al. [39]. They considered a steady-state fluid flow and integrated the coupled and nonlinear equations with appropriate similar variables, and employed new semi-analytical and numerical methods to define the accuracy of the results. They reported that concentration value decays by increasing the thermophoretic parameter and Reynolds number. Heat transfer and entropy generation in a square enclosure with aluminum and copper based nanofluid at different wall temperatures associated with imposed magnetic field are studied by Mansour et al. [40]. A new semi-analytical technique was used by Jalili et al. [41] to crack the heat and mass transfer problem. They considered a viscous, laminar axisymmetric, and incompressible flow of a micropolar fluid under the effect of a magnetic field between two stretchable disks. They presented the impact of different parameters such as radiation parameter, Eckert number, magnetic field, Reynolds number, Prandtl number, and Schmidt number on the profiles of microrotation, temperature, velocity, and concentration with the corresponding graphs. Saeed et al. [42] explored the complex dynamics of nanofluid flow between two parallel plates that squeeze and rotate with various physical properties. They used the Navier–Stokes equation, energy equation, and concentration equation to model the unsteady behavior of the fluid and its thermal and mass transport characteristics. The problem of variable viscosity and inclined Lorentz force influences on Williamson nanofluid on a stretching plate was unraveled by Jalili et al. [43] by considering a semi-analytical approach. The variable viscosity was chosen to change with temperature as a linear function. The system of PDEs was transformed into ODEs using suitable transformations. The outcomes demonstrated that the heat transfer rate reduced by increasing the Prandtl number and the temperature decreased by rising the thermophoresis parameter.

One of the imperative problems of heat transfer through bounded surfaces is natural convection, in which the governing equations are highly nonlinear and coupled in nature, and require advanced computational fluid dynamics tools to obtain their numerical solutions. Yuan et al. [44] numerically solved the hydromagnetic flow of nano liquid inside a U-shaped cavity. In order to prevent the bafflement on the fluid movement inside the enclosure, clockwise and anti-clockwise vortices are observed at greater scales of Rayleigh number. The convection heat transfer in a turbulent flow in a countercurrent double-tube heat exchanger with various fins was investigated by Jalili et al. [45]. The double-pipe heat exchanger was studied for the real cooling or heating process of fluids. Water–titanium dioxide and water–aluminum oxide nanofluids at quatern concentrations (0.4, 2, 4, and 6%) were considered as the cold fluid in the innermost tube, and water as the hot fluid in the annular space. The findings indicated that the Al2O3 + H2O nanofluid had an improved convection heat transfer coefficient than TiO2 + H2O and pure water. A numerical model of a shell and tube heat exchanger associated with non-continuous helical baffles (NCHB-STHX) was investigated by Jalili et al. [46]. This heat exchanger has miscellaneous applications in different arenas of science and industry. They subjugated the ratio of heat transfer coefficient to pressure drop (HTC/ΔP) from various angles and intensities. Dharmaiah et al. [47] analyzed the behavior of nanofluid flows through a sinusoidally varying circular cylinder numerically by applying the similarity transformations which reduce the governing equations to nonlinear ODEs. Sherwood number, Skin friction, and Nusselt number are also evaluated with the use of bvp4c. Dharmaiah et al. [48] considered an incompressible non-Newtonian nanofluid in a two-dimensional transitory boundary layer through a cone. The radiation absorption and Arrhenius activation energy are taken into account by the non-Newtonian nanofluid model. The nonlinear equations are numerically solved using ODE45 MATLAB bvp4c and the Runge–Kutta integration method. Skin friction is reduced when the activation energy parameter is higher, while Nusselt and Sherwood values are increased.

The novelty or originality of the study lies in the combination of lid-driven cavity flow, localized magnetic field, and THNFs, which introduce additional boundary conditions. A vertical strip of magnetism will be introduced within the flow field and its impact on the flow characteristics will be observed. The work under consideration may be the first effort to interpret the role of the applied magnetic field in the formation of the new vortices in the flow field. The work mainly aims to investigate the complex interaction of Lorentz force with the tri-hybrid nanoparticles inside a lid-driven square cavity. Lorentz force causes the spinning of the nano-sized hybrid particles and thus generates a complicated structure of vortices.

2 Problem description

The schematic representation of the two-dimensional square enclosure taken into consideration is depicted in Figure 1. The physical domain of a square with side L. A localized magnetic field is constantly embedded in the lower horizontal wall. A single-phase model is being used to build the governing equations for a two-dimensional enclosure.

Figure 1 
               Schematic illustration of the problem.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the problem.

2.1 Basic assumptions

  • A magnetic source creates the magnetic field with intensity H, as given by

    H ˜ ( x , y ) = H 0 { tanh A 1 ( x x 1 ) tanh A 2 ( x x 2 ) } , in the strip defined by x 1 x x 2 , and 0 y L .

  • Both vertical walls are insulated, whereas the enclosure’s top and bottom horizontal walls are kept at a constant temperature.

  • Lower and upper horizontal walls slide uniformly from left to rightward with a constant velocity V 0 .

  • Newtonian, incompressible, and laminar nanofluids are assumed in the current analysis.

  • The solid nanoparticles (silver; Ag, aluminum oxide; Al2O3, and titanium dioxide; TiO2), and the base fluid (water) are in thermal equilibrium.

  • The thermo-physical parameters of the nanofluid are taken to be constant.

3 Governing equations and dimensionless variables

The basic laws, assumptions, and derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations are based on the following principles:

  • The fluid is a continuum, i.e., it is treated as a continuous substance rather than discrete particles.

  • The fluid is incompressible, i.e., its density is constant and independent of pressure [49].

  • The fluid is Newtonian, i.e., its stress is proportional to its strain rate [49].

  • The fluid obeys the conservation of mass, i.e., the mass of a fluid element does not change as it moves.

  • The fluid obeys the conservation of momentum, i.e., the net force acting on a fluid element is equal to its rate of change of momentum.

  • The fluid obeys the conservation of energy, i.e., the net work done on a fluid element is equal to its rate of change of energy

The dimensional form of these equations is as follows [50]:

Continuity equation

(1) U ˜ x + V ˜ y = 0 ,

Momentum equation

(2) U ˜ t + V ˜ U ˜ y + U ˜ U ˜ x = 1 ρ thnf P x + υ thnf 2 U ˜ y 2 + 2 U ˜ x 2 + μ ¯ o M ˜ ρ thnf H ˜ x ,

(3) V ˜ t + U ˜ V ˜ x + V ˜ V ˜ y = 1 ρ thnf P y + υ thnf 2 V ˜ x 2 + 2 V ˜ y 2 + μ ¯ o M ˜ ρ thnf H ˜ y ,

Energy equation

(4) ( ρ c p ) thnf k thnf U ˜ T x + V ˜ T y + μ ¯ o k thnf T M ˜ T V ˜ H ˜ y + U ˜ H ˜ x = 2 T + μ ˜ thnf k thnf 2 U ˜ x 2 + V ˜ x + U ˜ y 2 + 2 V ˜ y 2 .

It is to point out that the energy equation is based on the following energy balance:

The time rate of change of energy in a system at time t = [The net rate of heat transfer into a system at time t] – [The net rate of work out of a system at time t].

In the above equations,

μ ¯ 0 M ˜ H ˜ x Magnetic force component along the X-axis μ ¯ 0 M ˜ H ˜ y Magnetic force component along the Y-axis
μ ¯ 0 T M ˜ T U ˜ H ˜ x + V ˜ H ˜ y Magneto-caloric phenomenon γ Magnetic field strength
M ˜ = K H ˜ ( T ¯ c T ) Magnetization property T ¯ c Curie temperature [51]
U ˜ t + V ˜ U ˜ y + U ˜ U ˜ x Convection terms 2 U ˜ y 2 + 2 U ˜ x 2 Diffusion terms
V ˜ t + U ˜ V ˜ x + V ˜ V ˜ y Convection terms 2 U ˜ y 2 + 2 U ˜ x 2 Diffusion terms

It is important to keep in mind that the subscript (hnf) is used to indicate the physical properties of a THNF.

It is important to keep in mind that convection terms refer to the terms in the equations on the left side of the momentum equations. Convection is a physical phenomenon that takes place in a gas flow in which the ordered movement of the flow transports some property. The diffusion terms are those on the right-hand side of the momentum equations which are multiplied by the inverse Reynolds number. Diffusion is a physical process that occurs in a flow of gas and involves the random motion of the gas molecules transporting some property. The stress tensor and the viscosity of the gas are related to diffusion. Diffusion in the flow causes turbulence and the formation of boundary layers.

Eliminating the pressure term results in

(5) t U ˜ y V ˜ x + V y U ˜ y V ˜ x + U ˜ x U ˜ y V ˜ x = υ thnf 2 x 2 + 2 y 2 U ˜ y V ˜ x + μ ¯ 0 M ˜ ρ thnf H ˜ x y μ ¯ 0 M ˜ ρ thnf H ˜ y x .

3.1 Boundary conditions

The current problem’s dimensional boundary conditions are interpreted as follows:

Left and right walls (Adiabatic)

(6a) T x x = 0 = 0 , T x x = L = 0 , U ˜ ( 0 , y ) = V ˜ ( 0 , y ) = U ˜ ( L , y ) = V ˜ ( L , y ) = 0 , 0 < y < L ,

Top wall

(6b) U ˜ ( x , L ) = V , V ˜ ( x , L ) = 0 , T ( x , L ) = T c ; 0 < x < L ,

Bottom wall

(6c) U ˜ ( x , 0 ) = V , V ˜ ( x , 0 ) = 0 , T ( x , 0 ) = T h ; 0 < x < L .

3.2 Thermophysical characteristics of THNFs

To look into the features of THNFs’ heat transport, a particular combination of thermophysical parameters for Al2O3–Ag–TiO2 tri-hybrid nanoparticles is taken into account. These thermophysical characteristics were derived and validated from the published literature [52]. Below is a description of each symbol that appears in Table 1.

For THNFs For hybrid nanofluids For nanofluids For base fluids (water) For solid
Aluminum oxide ( s 1 ) Silver ( s 2 ) Titanium dioxide ( s 3 )
Viscosity μ thnf μ hnf μ nf μ f
Density ρ thnf ρ f ρ s 1 ρ s 2 ρ s 3
Electrical conductivity σ thnf σ hnf σ nf σ f σ s 1 σ s 2 σ s 3
Thermal conductivity k thnf k hnf k nf k f k s 1 k s 2 k s 3
Nanoparticles’ volume fraction φ 1 φ 2 φ 3
Table 1

Thermophysical characteristics of THNF and pure nanofluids

Properties THNF
Density ρ thnf = ( 1 φ 3 ) [ ( 1 φ 1 ) { ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 } + φ 2 ρ s 2 ] + φ 3 ρ s 3
Heat capacity ( ρ cp ) thnf = ( 1 φ 3 ) [ ( 1 φ 2 ) { ( 1 φ 1 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 } + φ 2 ρ s 2 ] + φ 3 ρ s 3
Viscosity μ thnf = μ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5
Thermal conductivity k thnf k hnf = k s 3 + ( n 1 ) ( k hnf ( n 1 ) φ s 3 ) ( k hnf k s 3 ) k s 3 + ( n 1 ) k hnf + φ s 3 ( k hnf k s 3 ) ,
where k hnf k nf = k s 2 ( n 1 ) φ 2 ( k nf k s 3 ) + ( n 1 ) k nf k s 2 + φ s 2 ( k nf k s 3 ) + ( n 1 ) k nf
and k nf k f = k s 1 ( n 1 ) φ 1 ( k f k s 1 ) + ( n 1 ) k f k s 1 + φ 1 ( k f k s 1 ) + ( n 1 ) k f
Electric conductivity σ thnf σ nf = σ s 3 2 φ 3 ( σ nf σ s 3 ) + 2 σ nf σ s 3 + φ 3 ( σ nf σ s 3 ) + 2 σ nf ,
where σ hnf σ nf = σ s 2 2 φ 2 ( σ nf σ s 2 ) + 2 σ nf σ s 2 + φ 2 ( σ nf σ s 2 ) + 2 σ nf
and σ nf σ f = σ s 1 2 φ 1 ( σ f σ s 1 ) + 2 σ f σ s 1 + φ 1 ( σ f σ s 1 ) + 2 σ f

The formulas suggested in the literature can be used to analyze the thermophysical characteristics of a THNF.

The following set of dimensionless variables should be used right now:

(7) ξ = x L , y = y L , u = U ˜ v 0 , v = V ˜ v 0 , θ = T T c Δ T , H = H ˜ H 0 , t = v 0 L t .

Now equations (4) and (5) imply that

(8) J t + u J ξ + v J η = ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 1 Re 2 J + Mn ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f H H η . θ ξ H ξ . θ η ,

(9a) 2 θ = Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f × Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f θ ξ ψ ˜ η θ η ψ ˜ ξ + Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f Mn ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f EcH ( ε ψ ˜ ) H ξ ψ ˜ η H η ψ ˜ ξ + Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f Ec 2 ψ ˜ η 2 2 ψ ˜ ξ 2 2 + 4 2 ψ ˜ ξ η 2 ,

where

(9b) H ( ξ , η ) = H 0 { tanh A 1 ( ξ ξ 1 ) tanh A 2 ( ξ ξ 2 ) } ,

in the strips defined by ξ 1 ξ ξ 2 , 0 η 1 .

The aforementioned equations represent the stream-vorticity formulation, which is a modified form of equations (1)–(4) with

(10) u = ψ ˜ η , v = ψ ˜ ξ and u η v ξ = ω or 2 ψ ˜ ξ 2 + 2 ψ ˜ η 2 = ω .

In a similar manner, the dimensionless boundary conditions are interpreted as follows:

Left and right walls (Adiabatic)

(11a) θ ξ ξ = 0 = 0 , θ ξ ξ = 1 = 0 , u ( 0 , η ) = v ( 0 , η ) = u ( 1 , η ) = v ( 1 , η ) = 0 , 0 < η < 1

Top wall

(11b) u ( ξ , 1 ) = 1 , v ( ξ , 1 ) = 0 , θ ( ξ , 1 ) = 1 , 0 < ξ < 1

Bottom wall

(11c) u ( ξ , 0 ) = 1 , v ( ξ , 0 ) = 0 , θ ( ξ , 0 ) = 1 , 0 < ξ < 1 .

Now the Nusselt number and the skin friction are the basic quantities of our interests, which are given by

N u = q L k thnf Δ T and C f = 2 τ ρ thnf v 0 2 ,

where

q = k thnf T η η = 0 , L Heat flux τ = μ ˜ thnf U η η = 0 , L Shear stress

Using the dimensionless variables gives

C f Re = 2 ( 306 φ 2 0.19 φ + 1 ) 1 φ + φ ρ s ρ f u y , and Nu = θ y .

4 Computational methodology

The combined system of non-dimensional Navier–Stokes, and energy equations (4)–(6) may be numerically solved using an Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) methodology combined with central difference approximations for the derivatives. A finite difference method is generally the most straightforward numerical technique to perceive and apply when handling differential equations that have structured discretization assumptions. Finite differences can also be helpful in other areas when someone needs to approximate derivatives. In a nutshell, the method is easy to achieve high-order approximations and needs a structured grid.

The details of the scheme in moving from n to (n + 1) time level are given below:

(12) w i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) w i , j ( n ) δ t 2 = Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s 2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s 3 ρ f × w i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 w i , j n + 1 2 + w i + 1 , j n + 1 2 h 2 + w i , j 1 ( n ) 2 w i , j ( n ) + w i , j + 1 ( n ) k 2 + Mn ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s 2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s 3 ρ f × H i , j H i , j + 1 H i , j 1 2 k θ i + 1 , j ( n ) θ i 1 , j ( n ) 2 h H i + 1 , j H i 1 , j 2 h θ i , j + 1 ( n ) θ i , j 1 ( n ) 2 k u i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) w i + 1 , j ( n + 1 ) w i 1 , j ( n + 1 ) 2 h v i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) w i , j + 1 ( n ) w i , j 1 ( n ) 2 k ,

(13) θ i , j n + 1 2 θ i , j ( n ) δ t 2 = θ i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 θ i , j n + 1 2 + θ i + 1 , j n + 1 2 h 2 + θ i , j 1 ( n ) + θ i , j + 1 ( n ) 2 θ i , j ( n ) k 2 + Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f Mn ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 1 φ 1 + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f H i , j ( ψ ˜ i , j ε ) u i , j n + 1 2 H i , j + 1 H i , j 1 2 k + v i , j n + 1 2 H i + 1 , j H i 1 , j 2 h u i , j n + 1 2 θ i + 1 , j n + 1 2 θ i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h v i , j n + 1 2 θ i , j + 1 ( n ) θ i , j 1 ( n ) 2 k Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f Ec u i , j + 1 n + 1 2 u i , j 1 n + 1 2 2 k + v i + 1 , j n + 1 2 v i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h 2 + 4 u i + 1 , j n + 1 2 u i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h 2 ,

(14) ψ ˜ i 1 , j ( n + 1 ) + ψ ˜ i + 1 , j ( n + 1 ) 2 ψ ˜ i , j ( n + 1 ) h 2 + ψ ˜ i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) + ψ ˜ i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 ψ ˜ i , j ( n + 1 ) k 2 = w i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) ,

(15) u i , j ( n + 1 ) = ψ ˜ i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) + ψ ˜ i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 k ,

(16) v i , j ( n + 1 ) = ψ ˜ i + 1 , j ( n + 1 ) ψ ˜ i 1 , j ( n + 1 ) 2 h ,

(17) w i , j ( n + 1 ) w i , j n + 1 2 δ t 2 = Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × w i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 w i , j n + 1 2 + w i + 1 , j n + 1 2 h 2 + w i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 w i , j ( n + 1 ) + w i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) k 2 + M n ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × H i , j H i , j + 1 H i , j 1 2 k θ i + 1 , j ( n + 1 ) θ i 1 , j ( n + 1 ) 2 h H i + 1 , j H i 1 , j 2 h θ i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) θ i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 k u i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) w i + 1 , j ( n + 1 ) w i 1 , j ( n + 1 ) 2 h v i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) w i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) w i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 k ,

(18) θ i , j ( n + 1 ) θ i , j n + 1 2 δ t 2 = θ i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 θ i , j n + 1 2 + θ i + 1 , j n + 1 2 h 2 + θ i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) + θ i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 θ i , j ( n + 1 ) k 2 + Pr ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s 2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f Mn ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f × Re ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 ρ s3 ρ f H i , j ( ψ ˜ i , j ε ) u i , j n + 1 2 H i , j + 1 H i , j 1 2 k + v i , j n + 1 2 H i + 1 , j H i 1 , j 2 h u i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) θ i + 1 , j n + 1 2 θ i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h v i , j ( n + 1 / 2 ) θ i , j + 1 ( n + 1 ) θ i , j 1 ( n + 1 ) 2 k Pr ( 1 φ 2 ) 1 φ 1 + φ 1 ρ s 1 ρ f + φ 2 ρ s2 ρ f ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 3 ) ( 1 φ 1 ) ( 1 φ 2 ) ρ f + φ 1 c p S1 ρ s1 ρ f + φ 2 c p S2 ρ s2 ρ f + φ 3 c p S3 ρ s3 ρ f Ec u i , j + 1 n + 1 2 u i , j 1 n + 1 2 2 k + v i + 1 , j n + 1 2 v i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h 2 + 4 u i + 1 , j n + 1 2 u i 1 , j n + 1 2 2 h 2 .

The iterative process is finally stopped once the criterion

max { abs ( ψ ˜ i , j ( n + 1 ) ψ ˜ i , j ( n ) ) , abs ( w i , j ( n + 1 ) w i , j ( n ) ) , abs ( θ i , j ( n + 1 ) θ i , j ( n ) ) } < TOL

is reached, which identifies that the steady-state solution has arrived. For the purpose of this study, the present problem assumes TOL < 10 6 . Figure 2 depicts the flow diagram for the pseudo-transient technique.

Figure 2 
               A flow chart of pseudo-transient approach.
Figure 2

A flow chart of pseudo-transient approach.

5 Validation of the numerical technique

In order to confirm the accuracy of our numerical procedure, the numerical results for the horizontal velocity profiles (for the limiting case when φ 1 = φ 2 = 0 , Mn = 0 , and the flow is driven by only one moving lid), along the three different horizontal lines (y = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75), are compared with ones presented by Yasmin et al. [53] (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
               Numerical results in regard with Shih and Tan’s analytical solution [54].
Figure 3

Numerical results in regard with Shih and Tan’s analytical solution [54].

To validate the code further, the well-known problem of convection-driven flow in a cavity studied by Chen et al. [55] and Davis [56] is used as a benchmark. The Lattice Boltzmann method and the finite difference method are employed by these studies, respectively.

Table 2 shows that the computational approach used in this study, which yields a Nusselt number that is very consistent with the values reported by the abovementioned studies.

Table 2

Comparison of obtained results with literature

Re Average Nusselt number along the heated wall
Lattice Boltzmann method [55] Finite difference method (Davis [56]) Our approach
10 3 1.1192 1.1181 1.1182
10 4 2.2531 2.2432 2.2481

We will explore how governing parameters such as the nanoparticle volume fraction ( 0 φ 1 , φ 2 , φ 3 0.20 ) , magnetic field localized in the strip ( 0.4 ξ 0.6 , and 0 η 1 ) , Reynolds number ( 1 Re 200 ) , and magnetic number ( 0 Mn 200 ) affect the cavity flow. Water is regarded as the base fluid whereas Ag, Al2O3, and TiO2 (as a mixture) are used as the nanoparticles. Additionally, ε = 0 . 02 in our simulations, and the actual properties of water correspond to Pr = 6.2 . Due to the comparably lower Reynolds number, it is assumed that the Eckert number is very small. (e.g., 10−5). Further, the physical properties of the nanoparticles and the base fluid used in the present work can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3

Thermophysical characteristics of water and nanoparticles (Ag–Al2O3–TiO2)

C p ( J kg 1 K 1 ) βK‒1 ρ ( k gm 3 ) σ ( S × m 1 ) k ( W m 1 K 1 )
Water 4,179 21 × 10 5 997.1 0.05 0.613
Silver (Ag) 235 1.89 × 10 5 8,933 3.6 × 10 7 429
Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) 765 0.85 × 10 5 3,970 1 × 10 1 40
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) 686 0.90 × 10 5 5,200 1 × 10 12 8.95

On other hand, the convergence of our numerical results with the step size may be seen in Figure 4 which not only shows the stability of our numerical scheme but also depicts the independence of the results from the grid size.

Figure 4 
               Grid independence analysis.
Figure 4

Grid independence analysis.

6 Results and discussion

This section is devoted to the understanding of results presented in the form of different figures (which include the streamlines, and isotherm) and tables (showing the skin friction and Nusselt number along the lower and upper horizontal walls of the cavity) for the case when a flow is mainly driven by both horizontal lids of the square cavity moving along the direction of the +ve x-axis. Further, the localized magnetic field is also affecting the flow field in the form of a single vertical strip of width 2 units. Finally, the impact of the tri-hybrid nature of the fluid, as well as the intensity of the confined magnetic fields on the Nusselt number and the skin friction factor, will also be discussed.

It is to note that because of having two simultaneous forces, acting in the flow field, such as (i) the inertial force developed by the mechanical effect of the moving lid and (ii) secondly the Lorentz force due to the presence of a magnetic source just outside the cavity near the middle of the left vertical wall, the fluid motion becomes more complex and interesting. Further, the low-density fluid generated due to thermal buoyancy force tries to move from heated walls towards the upward direction whereas such movement is opposed by the high-density fluid originating from the strong magnetic force. Our objective, in this section, is to thoroughly investigate how the two forces affect the flow and heat transfer characteristics of the problem.

6.1 Impact of the magnetic parameter

The impact of the intensity of the magnetic field (characterized as a single vertical strip defined in the regions ( 0.4 < ξ < 0.6 and 0 < η < 1 ) on the flow can be seen in Figure 5. In the absence of a magnetic field, two almost symmetric vortices are observed in the flow field. However, the intensity of the magnetic sources elongates the existing vortices which eventually break down to create two new smaller and weaker vortices rotating in clockwise or counter-clockwise directions. It is noted that the direction of the rotation of vortices is determined by the direction in which the top and bottom lids of the cavity are moving due to some externally imposed mechanical arrangement. In addition, the localized magnetic fields generate a set of counter-rotating vortices (shown in the lighter blue or reddish colors in the streamlines) in the flow which has been created as a result of the break-up of primary vortices. Finally, the elongated vortices in the flow field tend to occupy a major portion of the cavity.

Figure 5 
                  Streamlines representing the flow for various magnetic numbers (Mn).
Figure 5

Streamlines representing the flow for various magnetic numbers (Mn).

Now, Figure 6 shows how the parameter (Mn) influences the thermal signature across the flow field. In the absence of any magnetic force, it can be seen that the major part of the isotherms is red-colored in the flow field, which predicts a relatively higher temperature. Further, a concentration of isotherms is also noted near the top wall of the cavity. The magnetic force, on the other hand, eliminates any linear temperature distribution in any part of the cavity. Additionally, it is possible to detect a decrease in the thermal gradient near the lower horizontal wall of the enclosure.

Figure 6 
                  Isotherms for the flow against various magnetic numbers (Mn).
Figure 6

Isotherms for the flow against various magnetic numbers (Mn).

6.2 Impact of the Reynolds number

The effect of the Reynolds number on the flow may be seen in Figure 7. It is to note that if the dimension of the cavity and the properties of the fluid are constant, an increase in the Reynolds number would simply mean an enhancement in the velocity with which the lids are moving. So, in this way, the Reynolds number may be connected with the lid velocity. At smaller Re, an increase in the parameter results in the elongation of two primary vortices, thus giving rise to new vortices occupying the flow field.

Figure 7 
                  Streamlines representing the flow for various Reynolds numbers (Re).
Figure 7

Streamlines representing the flow for various Reynolds numbers (Re).

The effect of the Reynolds number on the thermal distribution can be seen in Figure 8. As discussed earlier, an increase in the Reynolds number translates into a rise in the velocity of the moving lids, subject to the condition that the fluid properties and the size of the cavity are fined. The faster moving lids will cause a more rigorous mixing of the layer of fluid at different temperatures. This will obviously distort any uniformity in the pattern of the isotherms. Finally, similar to the magnetic parameter, a concentration of isotherms near the upper horizontal wall of the enclosure has been identified.

Figure 8 
                  Isotherms for the flow against various Reynolds numbers (Re).
Figure 8

Isotherms for the flow against various Reynolds numbers (Re).

6.3 Impact of localization

An obvious point to ponder may be the role of the width of the magnetic field in the present problem. To understand this, a single strip defined by ( 0.4 L ) < ξ < ( 0.6 + L ) , and 0 < η < 1 ) , within the flow field has been considered. It is clear from Figure 9 that the parameter L determines the width of the strip, obviously, L = 0.4, corresponds to the case when the magnetic field is occupying the whole cavity whereas L = 0.0 is the case when the magnetic field is confined to the strip ( 0.4 < ξ < 0.6 , and 0 < η < 1 ) . It is to point out that the confinement of the magnetic field intensity gives rise to new vortices while elongating the primary vortices. The isotherms, on the other hand, are squeezed towards the upper horizontal lid thus giving rise to higher temperature gradients in this region (Figure 10).

Figure 9 
                  Streamlines for various values of the magnetic strip length (L).
Figure 9

Streamlines for various values of the magnetic strip length (L).

Figure 10 
                  Isotherms for various values of the magnetic strip length (L).
Figure 10

Isotherms for various values of the magnetic strip length (L).

6.4 Nusselt number and skin friction dependence on different parameters

Let us now go over how the Nusselt number (Nu) and the skin friction factor (CfRe) vary with the governing parameter Mn and Re for the same range of two parameters. The Nu and CfRe profiles as shown in Figures 11 and 12 are drawn. It is clear that the magnetic parameter significantly enhances heat transfer. On the other hand, the Reynolds number causes a significant rise in the Nusselt number. However, this rise is much more in magnitude than for the magnetic number (for the same range of the two parameters). Finally, as for the skin friction factor CfRe is concerned, it shows that the two parameters influence the CfRe in the same qualitative sense. The quantitative impact may, however, be a little bit different as expected, the particle volume fraction φ 1 , φ 2 and φ 3 cause a notable rise in the Nusselt number with a comparatively lower impact on the skin friction (CfRe). However, compared to φ 2 and φ 3 , the Nusselt number depends more strongly on φ 1 due to the inherent physical properties of the nanoparticles. It has also been noted that the localization or confinement of the magnetic field does not always increase or decrease the Nusselt number. Thus, it is concluded that there will be a certain width of the magnetic corridor for which the Nusselt number would be optimal. However, this may be the topic of a subsequent study.

Figure 11 
                  Dependence of skin friction on different parameters.
Figure 11

Dependence of skin friction on different parameters.

Figure 12 
                  Dependence of Nusselt number on different parameters.
Figure 12

Dependence of Nusselt number on different parameters.

6.5 Impact of the solid volume-fraction (Ag, Al2O3, and TiO2)

The following analysis focuses on how a magnetic field, Reynolds Number, the nanoparticle volume fractions, Nusselt number, and skin friction interact with each other. Unless otherwise stated, we have fixed Mn = 5, Re = 5, φ 1 = 0.05 , φ 2 = 0.02 , and φ 3 = 0.02 . Table 4 shows that the magnetic field intensity may result in up to 13 and 119% increase in the skin friction and Nusselt number, respectively. On the other hand, a remarkable change in the Nusselt number and the skin friction is also observed by raising the Reynolds number Re (Table 5).

Table 4

Variation in Nu and C f with Mn

Mn Nu C f Re
00 0.7699 46.7320
50 0.7319 48.8759
100 1.0854 50.4625
150 1.4127 51.7376
200 1.6864 52.8780
Table 5

Variation in Nu and C f with Re

Re Nu C f Re
01 0.6724 46.6926
50 3.0374 56.1526
100 6.1516 64.0634
150 8.7981 69.1599
200 10.8247 73.0435

It is evident from Tables 68 that the Nusselt number (Nu) increased by 62% for φ 1 , while decreased by almost 25% for φ 2 and φ 3 . Moreover, there is a significant decrease (113%) in skin friction for φ 1 , while, on the other hand, there is a similar amount of (but reverse) change for φ 2 and φ 3 . This means that φ 1 is more impactful on skin friction in comparison to φ 2 and φ 3 when there is 20% rise for nanostructures in the base fluid.

Table 6

Variation in Nu and C f with ( φ 1 ) for Re = 20 and Mn = 20

φ 1 Nu C f Re
0.00 1.8494 46.8612
0.05 2.1034 55.9203
0.10 2.3784 67.2506
0.15 2.6792 81.5945
0.20 3.0115 99.9932
Table 7

Variation in Nu and C f with ( φ 2 )

φ 2 Nu C f Re
0.00 2.2016 56.8119
0.05 1.9618 55.0545
0.10 1.7590 54.7303
0.15 1.6392 55.6909
0.20 1.6473 57.9029
Table 8

Variation in Nu and C f with ( φ 3 )

φ 3 Nu C f Re
0.00 2.2153 57.1067
0.05 1.9449 54.6858
0.10 1.7212 53.8729
0.15 1.5858 54.4275
0.20 1.5780 56.2618

With the understanding that the parameter L actually determines one of the geometric dimensions of the rectangle in which the magnetic field is localized, it can be concluded (from Table 9) that the occupation of the magnetic field in a wider part of the domain results in a serious decline in both the Nusselt number and the skin friction factor.

Table 9

Variation in Nu and C f with L

L Nu C f
00 2.1034 55.9203
0.10 1.9053 57.0784
0.20 1.2740 53.4481
0.30 1.2361 46.2474
0.35 1.6694 46.7971

6.6 Comparison of thermal performance of the nanoparticles

There are two things that may be inferred from Figure 13: one there is almost a linear relationship between the average Nusselt number (along the vertical wall adjacent to the magnetic source) and the nanoparticle volume fraction, second, the THNF containing Ag, Al2O3, and TiO2 outperforms in terms of enhancing the average Nusselt number, compared to the simple nanofluid with Ag, Al2O3, or TiO2 particles.

Figure 13 
                  Comparison of concerned nanoparticles with THNF.
Figure 13

Comparison of concerned nanoparticles with THNF.

6.7 Impact of magnetic field intensity

It is to point that ξ 1 , ξ 2 , ξ 3 , and ξ 4 appearing in equation (9b) define the two magnetic fields, confined in the form of two vertical strips, as ξ 1 ξ ξ 2 , ξ 3 ξ ξ 4 and 0 η 1 . Further, the parameter A 1 and A 2 determine the amplitude of the magnetic field. Now the impact of the parameter A 1 and A 2 on the average Nusselt number is shown in Figure 14. It is obvious that the Nusselt number depends more on A 1 and A 2 at their smaller values.

Figure 14 
                  Impact of the parameter A
                     1 and A
                     2 on average Nusselt number.
Figure 14

Impact of the parameter A 1 and A 2 on average Nusselt number.

6.8 Impact of the localization of magnetic field

The magnetic strip is defined as follows: 0.4 L x 0.6 + L , 0 η 1 . This means that the case L = 0 indicates that the strip has a fixed width of 0.2 units. As L is increased (that is, when the strip is widened), it is noted that the Nusselt number first decreases and then increases. Further, the Nusselt number is more sensitive to the nanoparticle concentration at the larger value of φ 1 , φ 2 , and φ 3 (Figure 15).

Figure 15 
                  Impact of the magnetic strip width on the average Nusselt number.
Figure 15

Impact of the magnetic strip width on the average Nusselt number.

7 Concluding remarks

The novelty or originality of the study lies in the combination of lid-driven cavity flow, localized magnetic field, and THNFs, which introduce additional boundary conditions. Most of the scientific literature is enriched with investigations dealing with problems assuming a uniform magnetic field occupying the flow field. But in this investigation, a vertical strip of magnetism within the flow field has been introduced. It may be the first effort to interpret the role of the applied magnetic field in the formation of the new vortices in the flow field. The following conclusions may be drawn.

Without any magnetic field, the flow field shows a couple of primary vortices. But when the magnetic sources are turned on, they stretched and tore apart the vortices, creating two new weaker ones that spin in opposite directions. The magnetic fields have a significant impact on the flow field, as it breaks up the primary vortices into a collection of counter-rotating vortices. This results in a complex pattern of many vortices that have different sizes and shapes. One notable feature of this pattern is that the elongated vortices tend to occupy a large portion of the cavity, making them more visible and dominant than the others. The isotherms have a relatively higher temperature without the magnetic force. The magnetic field also makes the isotherms more concentrated near the upper wall of the enclosure, where the temperature gradient is higher. The magnetic force also affects the temperature distribution in the enclosure, as it disrupts the uniform temperature distribution in the cavity, creating a more varied pattern. It also lowers the temperature difference near the bottom wall of the cavity, making it less hot than before. When the fluid properties and cavity size are carefully tuned, the velocity of the moving lids increases with the Reynolds number. The faster moving lids mixed the fluid layers at different temperatures, disrupting the uniform pattern of the isotherms. Moreover, like a magnetic parameter, the isotherms clustering near the upper horizontal wall of the enclosure have also been observed. The primary vortices stretch and split into new ones when the magnetic field intensity is confined. Meanwhile, the isotherms squeeze towards the top horizontal lid, creating higher temperature gradients in that area. The magnetic field and Reynolds number affect the skin friction factor in the same way, but not by the same amount. The particle volume fraction boosts the Nusselt number more than the skin fraction. The Nusselt number also depends more on aluminum oxide, because of its physical properties. The Nusselt number can go up or down depending on how the magnetic field is confined or localized. This means that there is an optimal magnetic corridor width for the Nusselt number. The magnetic field intensity has a strong influence on the Nusselt number and skin friction, as it can make them increase by up to 119 and 13%, respectively. Similarly, the Reynolds number also has a remarkable impact on the Nusselt number and skin friction, as it changes the velocity of the moving lids. The average Nusselt number increases almost linearly with the nanoparticle volume fraction. Moreover, the THNF with Ag, Al2O3, and TiO2 boosts the average Nusselt number more than the conventional nanofluids such as Ag, Al2O3, or TiO2. The Nusselt number drops first and then rises. It is more sensitive to the high nanoparticle concentration, as it affects the heat transfer rate.

An interesting future direction emerging from the current study may be the consideration of multiple magnetic sources producing fields of different intensities within the flow regime in the form of localized strips, which may result in multiple vortices of different strengths.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to King Saud University for funding this work through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R711), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  1. Funding information: The Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R711), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Abdullah N, Ismail Z, Halifi AS, Che Ayob AR, Kasiman EH, Saidina Amin N. Numerical computations of biomagnetic fluid flow in a lid driven cavity. CFD Lett. 2020;12(4):43–53.10.37934/cfdl.12.4.4353Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hajesfandiari A, Dargush GF, Hadjesfandiari AR. Size-dependent fluid dynamics with application to lid-driven cavity flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2015;223:98–115.10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.05.008Search in Google Scholar

[3] Biswas S, Kalita JC. Topology of corner vortices in the lid-driven cavity flow: 2D vis a vis 3D. Arch Appl Mech. 2020;90:2201–16.10.1007/s00419-020-01716-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ouyang G, Abed-Meraim K. A Survey of Magnetic-Field-Based Indoor Localization. Electronics. 2022;11(6):864.10.3390/electronics11060864Search in Google Scholar

[5] Siebler B, Sand S, Hanebeck UD. Localization with magnetic field distortions and simultaneous magnetometer calibration. IEEE Sens J. 2020;21(3):3388–97.10.1109/JSEN.2020.3024073Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jalili P, Narimisa H, Jalili B, Ganji DD. Micro-polar nanofluid in the presence of thermophoresis, Hall current, and Brownian motion in a rotating system. Mod Phys Lett B. 2023;37:2250197.10.1142/S0217984922501974Search in Google Scholar

[7] Abdel-Nour Z, Aissa A, Mebarek-Oudina F, Rashad AM, Ali HM, Sahnoun M, et al. Magnetohydrodynamic natural convection of hybrid nanofluid in a porous enclosure: numerical analysis of the entropy generation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;141:1981–92.10.1007/s10973-020-09690-zSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Armaghani T, Sadeghi MS, Rashad AM, Mansour MA, Chamkha AJ, Dogonchi AS, et al. MHD mixed convection of localized heat source/sink in an Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in L-shaped cavity. Alex Eng J. 2021;60(3):2947–62.10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.031Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dinarvand S, Berrehal H, Tamim H, Sowmya G, Noeiaghdam S, Abdollahzadeh M. Squeezing flow of aqueous CNTs-Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluid through mass-based approach: Effect of heat source/sink, nanoparticle shape, and an oblique magnetic field. Results Eng. 2023;17:100976.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100976Search in Google Scholar

[10] Rahimi A, Kasaeipoor A, Amiri A, Doranehgard MH, Malekshah EH, Kolsi L. Lattice Boltzmann method based on Dual-MRT model for three-dimensional natural convection and entropy generation in CuO–water nanofluid filled cuboid enclosure included with discrete active walls. Comput Math Appl. 2018;75(5):1795–813.10.1016/j.camwa.2017.11.037Search in Google Scholar

[11] Salari M, Malekshah EH, Malekshah MH. Hydrothermal analysis of transient natural convection in a finned cavity filled with sulfuric acid-water (25–75%) for applications in high-performance lead-acid batteries–Numerical study. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2017;4:241–51.10.1016/j.tsep.2017.10.013Search in Google Scholar

[12] Salari M, Rashidi MM, Hasani ME, Hasani MM. Numerical analysis of turbulent/transitional natural convection in trapezoidal enclosures. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2017;27(12):2902–23.10.1108/HFF-03-2017-0097Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gorla RSR, Siddiqa S, Mansour MA, Rashad AM, Salah T. Heat source/sink effects on a hybrid nanofluid-filled porous cavity. J Thermophys Heat Transf. 2017;31(4):847–57.10.2514/1.T5085Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rashad AM, Chamkha AJ, Ismael MA, Salah T. Magnetohydrodynamics natural convection in a triangular cavity filled with a Cu-Al2O3/water hybrid nanofluid with localized heating from below and internal heat generation. J Heat Transf. 2018;140(7):072502.10.1115/1.4039213Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ali K, Ahmad S, Ahmad S, Ashraf M, Asif M. On the interaction between the external magnetic field and nanofluid inside a vertical square duct. AIP Adv. 2015;5(10):107120.10.1063/1.4934484Search in Google Scholar

[16] Basri EI, Sultan M, Basri AA, Mustapha F, Ahmad KA. Numerical study of Lorentz force interaction with micro structure in channel flow. Energies. 2021;14(14):4286.10.3390/en14144286Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ahmad S, Cai J, Ali K. Prediction of new vortices in single-phase nanofluid due to dipole interaction. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;140:1–15.10.1007/s10973-020-10237-5Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ali K, Ahmad S, Ahmad S, Jamshed W, Hussain SM, Tag El Din ESM. Molecular interaction and magnetic dipole effects on fully developed nanofluid flowing via a vertical duct applying finite volume methodology. Symmetry. 2022;14(10):2007.10.3390/sym14102007Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kai Y, Ahmad S, Takana H, Ali K, Jamshed W, Eid MR, et al. Thermal case study and generated vortices by dipole magnetic field in hybridized nanofluid flowing: Alternating direction implicit solution. Results Phys. 2023;49:106464.10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106464Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ali K, Ahmad S, Ahmad S, Tayebi T. Impact of magnetic field localization on the vortex generation in hybrid nanofluid flow. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023;148:6283–300.10.1007/s10973-023-12104-5Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kai Y, Ali K, Ahmad S, Ahmad S, Jamshed W, Raizah Z, et al. A case study of different magnetic strength fields and thermal energy effects in vortex generation of Ag-TiO2 hybrid nanofluid flow. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2023;47:103115.10.1016/j.csite.2023.103115Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ayub R, Ahmad S, Ahmad S, Akhtar Y, Alam MM, Mahmoud O. Numerical assessment of dipole interaction with the single-phase nanofluid flow in an enclosure: A pseudo-transient approach. Materials. 2022;15(8):2761.10.3390/ma15082761Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Liu C, Farouk N, Ayed H, Aouaini F, Bouzgarrou SM, Mouldi A, et al. Simulation of MHD free convection inside a square enclosure filled porous foam. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;32:101901.10.1016/j.csite.2022.101901Search in Google Scholar

[24] Roy NC. MHD natural convection of a hybrid nanofluid in an enclosure with multiple heat sources. Alex Eng J. 2022;61(2):1679–94.10.1016/j.aej.2021.06.076Search in Google Scholar

[25] Algehyne EA, Alrihieli HF, Bilal M, Saeed A, Weera W. Numerical approach toward ternary hybrid nanofluid flow using variable diffusion and non-Fourier’s concept. ACS Omega. 2022;7(33):29380–90.10.1021/acsomega.2c03634Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Adun H, Kavaz D, Dagbasi M. Review of ternary hybrid nanofluid: Synthesis, stability, thermophysical properties, heat transfer applications, and environmental effects. J Clean Prod. 2021;328:129525.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129525Search in Google Scholar

[27] Shah TR, Koten H, Ali HM. Chapter 5 – Performance effecting parameters of hybrid nanofluids. In: Ali HM, editor. Hybrid nanofluids for convection heat transfer. Academic Press; 2020. p. 179–213. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819280-1.00005-7.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Jakeer S, BalaAnki Reddy P, Rashad AM, Nabwey HA. Impact of heated obstacle position on magneto-hybrid nanofluid flow in a lid-driven porous cavity with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux pattern. Alex Eng J. 2021;60(1):821–35.10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.011Search in Google Scholar

[29] Jalili P, Sadeghi Ghahare A, Jalili B, Domiri Ganji D. Analytical and numerical investigation of thermal distribution for hybrid nanofluid through an oblique artery with mild stenosis. SN Appl Sci. 2023;5(4):95.10.1007/s42452-023-05312-zSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Abdollahi SA, Jalili P, Jalili B, Nourozpour H, Safari Y, Pasha P, et al. Computer simulation of Cu: AlOOH/water in a microchannel heat sink using a porous media technique and solved by numerical analysis AGM and FEM. Theor Appl Mech Lett. 2023;13:100432.10.1016/j.taml.2023.100432Search in Google Scholar

[31] Tawade JV, Guled CN, Noeiaghdam S, Fernandez-Gamiz U, Govindan V, Balamuralitharan S. Effects of thermophoresis and Brownian motion for thermal and chemically reacting Casson nanofluid flow over a linearly stretching sheet. Results Eng. 2022;15:100448.10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100448Search in Google Scholar

[32] Skoryna J, Wachowiak M, Marczyńska A, Rogowska A, Majchrzycki Ł, Koczorowski W, et al. Correlation between interlayer exchange coupling and hydrogen absorption in V-Fe layered structures. Surf Coat Technol. 2016;303:119–24.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.051Search in Google Scholar

[33] Skoryna J, Marczyńska A, Smardz L. XPS studies of nanocrystalline La–Ni and LaNi5− xAlx (x = 0.2, 0.5, 1) alloy thin films. J Alloy Compd. 2015;645:S384–7.10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.104Search in Google Scholar

[34] Hameed N, Noeiaghdam S, Khan W, Pimpunchat B, Fernandez-Gamiz U, Khan MS, et al. Analytical analysis of the magnetic field, heat generation and absorption, viscous dissipation on couple stress casson hybrid nano fluid over a nonlinear stretching surface. Results Eng. 2022;16:100601.10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100601Search in Google Scholar

[35] Xiong Q, Altnji S, Tayebi T, Izadi M, Hajjar A, Sundén B, et al. A comprehensive review on the application of hybrid nanofluids in solar energy collectors. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2021;47:101341.10.1016/j.seta.2021.101341Search in Google Scholar

[36] Rahimi A, Sepehr M, Lariche MJ, Mesbah M, Kasaeipoor A, Malekshah EH. Analysis of natural convection in nanofluid-filled H-shaped cavity by entropy generation and heatline visualization using lattice Boltzmann method. Phys E: Low-Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2018;97:347–62.10.1016/j.physe.2017.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[37] Ho CJ, Liu WK, Chang YS, Lin CC. Natural convection heat transfer of alumina-water nanofluid in vertical square enclosures: An experimental study. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;49(8):1345–53.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[38] Turcu R, Darabont AL, Nan A, Aldea N, Macovei D, Bica D, et al. New polypyrrole-multiwall carbon nanotubes hybrid materials. J Optoelectron Adv Mater. 2006;8(2):643–7.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Jalili P, Narimisa H, Jalili B, Shateri A, Ganji DD. A novel analytical approach to micro-polar nanofluid thermal analysis in the presence of thermophoresis, Brownian motion and Hall currents. Soft Comput. 2023;27(2):677–89.10.1007/s00500-022-07643-2Search in Google Scholar

[40] Mansour MA, Siddiqa S, Gorla RSR, Rashad AM. Effects of heat source and sink on entropy generation and MHD natural convection of Al2O3-Cu/water hybrid nanofluid filled with square porous cavity. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2018;6:57–71.10.1016/j.tsep.2017.10.014Search in Google Scholar

[41] Jalili P, Ahmadi Azar A, Jalili B, Asadi Z, Domiri Ganji D. Heat transfer analysis in cylindrical polar system with magnetic field: A novel Hybrid Analytical and Numerical Technique. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;40:102524.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102524Search in Google Scholar

[42] Saeed A, Shah RA, Khan MS, Fernandez-Gamiz U, Bani-Fwaz MZ, Noeiaghdam S, et al. Theoretical analysis of unsteady squeezing nanofluid flow with physical properties. Math Biosci Eng. 2022;19(10):10176–91.10.3934/mbe.2022477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Jalili B, Ganji AD, Jalili P, Salman Nourazar S, Ganji DD. Thermal analysis of Williamson fluid flow with Lorentz force on the stretching plate. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;39:102374.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102374Search in Google Scholar

[44] Ma Y, Mohebbi R, Rashidi MM, Yang Z, Sheremet MA. Numerical study of MHD nanofluid natural convection in a baffled U-shaped enclosure. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;130:123–34.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.072Search in Google Scholar

[45] Jalili B, Aghaee N, Jalili P, Domiri Ganji D. Novel usage of the curved rectangular fin on the heat transfer of a double-pipe heat exchanger with a nanofluid. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;35:102086.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102086Search in Google Scholar

[46] Jalili P, Kazerani K, Jalili B, Ganji DD. Investigation of thermal analysis and pressure drop in non-continuous helical baffle with different helix angles and hybrid nano-particles. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;36:102209.10.1016/j.csite.2022.102209Search in Google Scholar

[47] Dharmaiah G, Dinarvand S, Rama Prasad JL, Noeiaghdam S, Abdollahzadeh M. Non-homogeneous two-component buongiorno model for nanofluid flow toward Howarth’s wavy cylinder with activation energy. Results Eng. 2023;17:100879.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100879Search in Google Scholar

[48] Dharmaiah G, Dinarvand S, Durgaprasad P, Noeiaghdam S. Arrhenius activation energy of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid over a cone with radiation absorption. Results Eng. 2022;16:100745.10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100745Search in Google Scholar

[49] Hosch WL. Navier-stokes equation. URL: https://www.britannica.com/science/Navier-Stokes-equation. (accessed: 20.04. 2018). 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Talebi F, Mahmoudi AH, Shahi M. Numerical study of mixed convection flows in a square lid-driven cavity utilizing nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37(1):79–90.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.08.013Search in Google Scholar

[51] Loukopoulos VC, Tzirtzilakis EE. Biomagnetic channel flow in spatially varying magnetic field. Int J Eng Sci. 2004;42(5-6):571–90.10.1016/j.ijengsci.2003.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[52] Sundar LS, Chandra Mouli KVV, Said Z, Sousa ACM. Heat transfer and second law analysis of ethylene glycol-based ternary hybrid nanofluid under laminar flow. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2021;13(5):051021.10.1115/1.4050228Search in Google Scholar

[53] Yasmin A, Ali K, Ashraf M. MHD Casson nanofluid flow in a square enclosure with non-uniform heating using the Brinkman model. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021;136(2):1–14.10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01093-9Search in Google Scholar

[54] Shih T, Tan C, Hwang B. Effects of grid staggering on numerical schemes. Int J Numer Methods fluids. 1989;9(2):193–212.10.1002/fld.1650090206Search in Google Scholar

[55] Chen CL, Chang SC, Chen CK, Chang CK. Lattice Boltzmann simulation for mixed convection of nanofluids in a square enclosure. Appl Math Model. 2015;39(8):2436–51.10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.049Search in Google Scholar

[56] Davis GD. Natural-convection of air in a square cavity - a bench-mark numerical-solution. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 1983;3(3):249–64.10.1002/fld.1650030305Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-03-19
Revised: 2023-05-12
Accepted: 2023-05-19
Published Online: 2023-07-11

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Preparation of CdS–Ag2S nanocomposites by ultrasound-assisted UV photolysis treatment and its visible light photocatalysis activity
  3. Significance of nanoparticle radius and inter-particle spacing toward the radiative water-based alumina nanofluid flow over a rotating disk
  4. Aptamer-based detection of serotonin based on the rapid in situ synthesis of colorimetric gold nanoparticles
  5. Investigation of the nucleation and growth behavior of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC nano-precipitates in TiAl alloys
  6. Dynamic recrystallization behavior and nucleation mechanism of dual-scale SiCp/A356 composites processed by P/M method
  7. High mechanical performance of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane/epoxy cured in a sandwich construction of 3D carbon felts foam and woven basalt fibers
  8. Applying solution of spray polyurea elastomer in asphalt binder: Feasibility analysis and DSR study based on the MSCR and LAS tests
  9. Study on the chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of iron-based bioabsorbable stents
  10. Influence of microalloying with B on the microstructure and properties of brazed joints with Ag–Cu–Zn–Sn filler metal
  11. Thermohydraulic performance of thermal system integrated with twisted turbulator inserts using ternary hybrid nanofluids
  12. Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/graphene and epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites
  13. Effects of CaO addition on the CuW composite containing micro- and nano-sized tungsten particles synthesized via aluminothermic coupling with silicothermic reduction
  14. Cu and Al2O3-based hybrid nanofluid flow through a porous cavity
  15. Design of functional vancomycin-embedded bio-derived extracellular matrix hydrogels for repairing infectious bone defects
  16. Study on nanocrystalline coating prepared by electro-spraying 316L metal wire and its corrosion performance
  17. Axial compression performance of CFST columns reinforced by ultra-high-performance nano-concrete under long-term loading
  18. Tungsten trioxide nanocomposite for conventional soliton and noise-like pulse generation in anomalous dispersion laser cavity
  19. Microstructure and electrical contact behavior of the nano-yttria-modified Cu-Al2O3/30Mo/3SiC composite
  20. Melting rheology in thermally stratified graphene-mineral oil reservoir (third-grade nanofluid) with slip condition
  21. Re-examination of nonlinear vibration and nonlinear bending of porous sandwich cylindrical panels reinforced by graphene platelets
  22. Parametric simulation of hybrid nanofluid flow consisting of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with second-order slip and variable viscosity over an extending surface
  23. Chitosan-capped silver nanoparticles with potent and selective intrinsic activity against the breast cancer cells
  24. Multi-core/shell SiO2@Al2O3 nanostructures deposited on Ti3AlC2 to enhance high-temperature stability and microwave absorption properties
  25. Solution-processed Bi2S3/BiVO4/TiO2 ternary heterojunction photoanode with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance
  26. Electroporation effect of ZnO nanoarrays under low voltage for water disinfection
  27. NIR-II window absorbing graphene oxide-coated gold nanorods and graphene quantum dot-coupled gold nanorods for photothermal cancer therapy
  28. Nonlinear three-dimensional stability characteristics of geometrically imperfect nanoshells under axial compression and surface residual stress
  29. Investigation of different nanoparticles properties on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulation
  30. Optimized Cu2O-{100} facet for generation of different reactive oxidative species via peroxymonosulfate activation at specific pH values to efficient acetaminophen removal
  31. Brownian and thermal diffusivity impact due to the Maxwell nanofluid (graphene/engine oil) flow with motile microorganisms and Joule heating
  32. Appraising the dielectric properties and the effectiveness of electromagnetic shielding of graphene reinforced silicone rubber nanocomposite
  33. Synthesis of Ag and Cu nanoparticles by plasma discharge in inorganic salt solutions
  34. Low-cost and large-scale preparation of ultrafine TiO2@C hybrids for high-performance degradation of methyl orange and formaldehyde under visible light
  35. Utilization of waste glass with natural pozzolan in the production of self-glazed glass-ceramic materials
  36. Mechanical performance of date palm fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nano-activated carbon
  37. Melting point of dried gold nanoparticles prepared with ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and lyophilisation
  38. Graphene nanofibers: A modern approach towards tailored gypsum composites
  39. Role of localized magnetic field in vortex generation in tri-hybrid nanofluid flow: A numerical approach
  40. Intelligent computing for the double-diffusive peristaltic rheology of magneto couple stress nanomaterials
  41. Bioconvection transport of upper convected Maxwell nanoliquid with gyrotactic microorganism, nonlinear thermal radiation, and chemical reaction
  42. 3D printing of porous Ti6Al4V bone tissue engineering scaffold and surface anodization preparation of nanotubes to enhance its biological property
  43. Bioinspired ferromagnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles: Potential pharmaceutical and medical applications
  44. Significance of gyrotactic microorganisms on the MHD tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow across an elastic slender surface: Numerical analysis
  45. Performance of polycarboxylate superplasticisers in seawater-blended cement: Effect from chemical structure and nano modification
  46. Entropy minimization of GO–Ag/KO cross-hybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated surface
  47. Oxygen plasma assisted room temperature bonding for manufacturing SU-8 polymer micro/nanoscale nozzle
  48. Performance and mechanism of CO2 reduction by DBD-coupled mesoporous SiO2
  49. Polyarylene ether nitrile dielectric films modified by HNTs@PDA hybrids for high-temperature resistant organic electronics field
  50. Exploration of generalized two-phase free convection magnetohydrodynamic flow of dusty tetra-hybrid Casson nanofluid between parallel microplates
  51. Hygrothermal bending analysis of sandwich nanoplates with FG porous core and piezomagnetic faces via nonlocal strain gradient theory
  52. Design and optimization of a TiO2/RGO-supported epoxy multilayer microwave absorber by the modified local best particle swarm optimization algorithm
  53. Mechanical properties and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete modified by nano-SiO2
  54. Self-template synthesis of hollow flower-like NiCo2O4 nanoparticles as an efficient bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in alkaline media
  55. High-performance wearable flexible strain sensors based on an AgNWs/rGO/TPU electrospun nanofiber film for monitoring human activities
  56. High-performance lithium–selenium batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped porous carbon from peanut meal
  57. Investigating effects of Lorentz forces and convective heating on ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface using homotopy analysis method
  58. Exploring the potential of biogenic magnesium oxide nanoparticles for cytotoxicity: In vitro and in silico studies on HCT116 and HT29 cells and DPPH radical scavenging
  59. Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by heteroatom-doped nickel tungstate nanoparticles
  60. A facile method to synthesize nZVI-doped polypyrrole-based carbon nanotube for Ag(i) removal
  61. Improved osseointegration of dental titanium implants by TiO2 nanotube arrays with self-assembled recombinant IGF-1 in type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model
  62. Functionalized SWCNTs@Ag–TiO2 nanocomposites induce ROS-mediated apoptosis and autophagy in liver cancer cells
  63. Triboelectric nanogenerator based on a water droplet spring with a concave spherical surface for harvesting wave energy and detecting pressure
  64. A mathematical approach for modeling the blood flow containing nanoparticles by employing the Buongiorno’s model
  65. Molecular dynamics study on dynamic interlayer friction of graphene and its strain effect
  66. Induction of apoptosis and autophagy via regulation of AKT and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in breast cancer cell lines exposed to gold nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α and combined with doxorubicin
  67. Effect of PVA fibers on durability of nano-SiO2-reinforced cement-based composites subjected to wet-thermal and chloride salt-coupled environment
  68. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol fibers on mechanical properties of nano-SiO2-reinforced geopolymer composites under a complex environment
  69. In vitro studies of titanium dioxide nanoparticles modified with glutathione as a potential drug delivery system
  70. Comparative investigations of Ag/H2O nanofluid and Ag-CuO/H2O hybrid nanofluid with Darcy-Forchheimer flow over a curved surface
  71. Study on deformation characteristics of multi-pass continuous drawing of micro copper wire based on crystal plasticity finite element method
  72. Properties of ultra-high-performance self-compacting fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nanomaterials
  73. Prediction of lap shear strength of GNP and TiO2/epoxy nanocomposite adhesives
  74. A novel exploration of how localized magnetic field affects vortex generation of trihybrid nanofluids
  75. Fabrication and physicochemical characterization of copper oxide–pyrrhotite nanocomposites for the cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells and the mechanism
  76. Thermal radiative flow of cross nanofluid due to a stretched cylinder containing microorganisms
  77. In vitro study of the biphasic calcium phosphate/chitosan hybrid biomaterial scaffold fabricated via solvent casting and evaporation technique for bone regeneration
  78. Insights into the thermal characteristics and dynamics of stagnant blood conveying titanium oxide, alumina, and silver nanoparticles subject to Lorentz force and internal heating over a curved surface
  79. Effects of nano-SiO2 additives on carbon fiber-reinforced fly ash–slag geopolymer composites performance: Workability, mechanical properties, and microstructure
  80. Energy bandgap and thermal characteristics of non-Darcian MHD rotating hybridity nanofluid thin film flow: Nanotechnology application
  81. Green synthesis and characterization of ginger-extract-based oxali-palladium nanoparticles for colorectal cancer: Downregulation of REG4 and apoptosis induction
  82. Abnormal evolution of resistivity and microstructure of annealed Ag nanoparticles/Ag–Mo films
  83. Preparation of water-based dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic fluid for magnetic hyperthermia
  84. Statistical investigations and morphological aspects of cross-rheological material suspended in transportation of alumina, silica, titanium, and ethylene glycol via the Galerkin algorithm
  85. Effect of CNT film interleaves on the flexural properties and strength after impact of CFRP composites
  86. Self-assembled nanoscale entities: Preparative process optimization, payload release, and enhanced bioavailability of thymoquinone natural product
  87. Structure–mechanical property relationships of 3D-printed porous polydimethylsiloxane films
  88. Nonlinear thermal radiation and the slip effect on a 3D bioconvection flow of the Casson nanofluid in a rotating frame via a homotopy analysis mechanism
  89. Residual mechanical properties of concrete incorporated with nano supplementary cementitious materials exposed to elevated temperature
  90. Time-independent three-dimensional flow of a water-based hybrid nanofluid past a Riga plate with slips and convective conditions: A homotopic solution
  91. Lightweight and high-strength polyarylene ether nitrile-based composites for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding
  92. Review Articles
  93. Recycling waste sources into nanocomposites of graphene materials: Overview from an energy-focused perspective
  94. Hybrid nanofiller reinforcement in thermoset and biothermoset applications: A review
  95. Current state-of-the-art review of nanotechnology-based therapeutics for viral pandemics: Special attention to COVID-19
  96. Solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted natural and synthetic drugs delivery in high-incidence cancers, and other diseases: Roles of preparation methods, lipid composition, transitional stability, and release profiles in nanocarriers’ development
  97. Critical review on experimental and theoretical studies of elastic properties of wurtzite-structured ZnO nanowires
  98. Polyurea micro-/nano-capsule applications in construction industry: A review
  99. A comprehensive review and clinical guide to molecular and serological diagnostic tests and future development: In vitro diagnostic testing for COVID-19
  100. Recent advances in electrocatalytic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid: Mechanism, catalyst, coupling system
  101. Research progress and prospect of silica-based polymer nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery
  102. Review of the pharmacokinetics of nanodrugs
  103. Engineered nanoflowers, nanotrees, nanostars, nanodendrites, and nanoleaves for biomedical applications
  104. Research progress of biopolymers combined with stem cells in the repair of intrauterine adhesions
  105. Progress in FEM modeling on mechanical and electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube cement-based composites
  106. Antifouling induced by surface wettability of poly(dimethyl siloxane) and its nanocomposites
  107. TiO2 aerogel composite high-efficiency photocatalysts for environmental treatment and hydrogen energy production
  108. Structural properties of alumina surfaces and their roles in the synthesis of environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs)
  109. Nanoparticles for the potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A physiopathological approach
  110. Current status of synthesis and consolidation strategies for thermo-resistant nanoalloys and their general applications
  111. Recent research progress on the stimuli-responsive smart membrane: A review
  112. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous cementitious materials: A review
  113. Applications of DNA tetrahedron nanostructure in cancer diagnosis and anticancer drugs delivery
  114. Magnetic nanoparticles in 3D-printed scaffolds for biomedical applications
  115. An overview of the synthesis of silicon carbide–boron carbide composite powders
  116. Organolead halide perovskites: Synthetic routes, structural features, and their potential in the development of photovoltaic
  117. Recent advancements in nanotechnology application on wood and bamboo materials: A review
  118. Application of aptamer-functionalized nanomaterials in molecular imaging of tumors
  119. Recent progress on corrosion mechanisms of graphene-reinforced metal matrix composites
  120. Research progress on preparation, modification, and application of phenolic aerogel
  121. Application of nanomaterials in early diagnosis of cancer
  122. Plant mediated-green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An insight into biomedical applications
  123. Recent developments in terahertz quantum cascade lasers for practical applications
  124. Recent progress in dielectric/metal/dielectric electrodes for foldable light-emitting devices
  125. Nanocoatings for ballistic applications: A review
  126. A mini-review on MoS2 membrane for water desalination: Recent development and challenges
  127. Recent updates in nanotechnological advances for wound healing: A narrative review
  128. Recent advances in DNA nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and treatment
  129. Electrochemical micro- and nanobiosensors for in vivo reactive oxygen/nitrogen species measurement in the brain
  130. Advances in organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy
  131. Advancements in aluminum matrix composites reinforced with carbides and graphene: A comprehensive review
  132. Modification effects of nanosilica on asphalt binders: A review
  133. Decellularized extracellular matrix as a promising biomaterial for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration
  134. Review of the sol–gel method in preparing nano TiO2 for advanced oxidation process
  135. Micro/nano manufacturing aircraft surface with anti-icing and deicing performances: An overview
  136. Cell type-targeting nanoparticles in treating central nervous system diseases: Challenges and hopes
  137. An overview of hydrogen production from Al-based materials
  138. A review of application, modification, and prospect of melamine foam
  139. A review of the performance of fibre-reinforced composite laminates with carbon nanotubes
  140. Research on AFM tip-related nanofabrication of two-dimensional materials
  141. Advances in phase change building materials: An overview
  142. Development of graphene and graphene quantum dots toward biomedical engineering applications: A review
  143. Nanoremediation approaches for the mitigation of heavy metal contamination in vegetables: An overview
  144. Photodynamic therapy empowered by nanotechnology for oral and dental science: Progress and perspectives
  145. Biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles: Bioreduction and biomineralization
  146. Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and the role of nanomaterial-based theragnosis in combating the pandemic
  147. Application of two-dimensional black phosphorus material in wound healing
  148. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials and Composites for Energy Conversion and Storage - Part I
  149. Helical fluorinated carbon nanotubes/iron(iii) fluoride hybrid with multilevel transportation channels and rich active sites for lithium/fluorinated carbon primary battery
  150. The progress of cathode materials in aqueous zinc-ion batteries
  151. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part I
  152. Effect of polypropylene fiber and nano-silica on the compressive strength and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete
  153. Mechanochemical design of nanomaterials for catalytic applications with a benign-by-design focus
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0561/html
Scroll to top button