Home Advances in organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy
Article Open Access

Advances in organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy

  • Wenhui Xie , Yanli Liu EMAIL logo and Juntang Lin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 25, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

“All in one” organic–inorganic nanocomposites with high biocompatibility and excellent physicochemical properties have recently attracted special attention in cancer imaging and therapy. Combination of organic and inorganic materials confers the nanocomposites with superior biocompatibility and biodegradability of organic materials, as well as magnetic, mechanical, and optical properties of inorganic materials. Increased endeavors have been made to produce diverse organic–inorganic nanocomposites and investigate their potential applications in cancer treatment. Thus, a systematic review of research progresses of diverse organic–inorganic nanocomposites in cancer imaging and therapy is indispensable. Following a brief overview of nanocomposites synthesis, classification, and functionalization, the current review is focused on comprehensively summarizing representatives of both organic–inorganic nanoscale nanocomposites (including organic-silica, organic-carbon, organic-quantum dots, organic-platinum family metals, organic-gold, organic metal oxides, and other nanocomposites) and organic–inorganic molecular nanocomposites (including metal-organic frameworks, organosilica nanoparticles, and amorphous metal coordination polymer particles), and further analyzing their working mechanism in cancer imaging and therapy. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of organic–inorganic nanocomposites are addressed for promoting their developments and clinical application in cancer treatment.

Abbreviations

ACPPs

amorphous metal coordination polymer particles

ADA

adamantane

Ald

alendronate

AIPH

alkyl radical generator

AQ4N

banoxantrone dihydrochloride

ATP

aminothiophenol

BBDC

5-boronobenzene-1,3-dicarboxylic

BPO

benzoyl peroxide

BPQDs

black phosphorus quantum dots

BSA

bovine serum albumin

CDs

carbon dots

CDT

chemodynamic therapy

CPT

camptothecin

CS

chitosan

CT

computed tomography

CuCo(O)

copper cobalt oxide

Cys

cysteine

DOX

doxorubicin

FA

folic acid

FL

fluorescence

Fu

fluorouracil

GCNCs

graphene carbon nanocages

GNR

gold nanorods

Gox

glucose oxidase

GSH

glutathione

GT

golden triangle

HA

hyaluronic acid

HMONs

hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles

Hyase

hyaluronidase

IDO

immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxy-genase

IND

indoximod

IND-NV

phospholipid-conjugated IND nanovesicles

MB

methylene blue

MDR

multidrug resistance

MR

magnetic resonance

MSNPs

mesoporous silica nanoparticles

MWCNTs

multiwalled carbon nanotubes

NIR II

second near-infrared

nMOFs

nano metal-organic frameworks

OH

hydroxyl radical

OX

oxaliplatin

PA

photoacoustic

PDA

polydopamine

PDT

photodynamic therapy

PEG

polyethylene glycol

PEO

polyethylene oxide

PET

positron emission tomography

PEL

porphyrin-grafted lipid

PLL

poly-l-lysine

PPDI

poly(perylene diimide)

PPY

polypyrrole

PQDs

polymer-encapsulated PbS/CdS quantum dots

PT-OCT

photothermal-optical coherence tomography

PTT

photothermal therapy

PTX

paclitaxel

2-MIM

2-methylimidazole

QDs

quantum dots

RBT

Ru complex

RDT

radiodynamic therapy

Res

resveratrol

RGO

reduced graphene oxide

RLN

regional lymph node

ROS

reactive oxygen species

RT

radio therapy

SLN

sentinel lymph node

SPECT

single photon emission computed tomography

TCPP(Fe)

iron(iii) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphine chloride

TPGS

d-a-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate

TPyP

5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-pyridyl)-21H,23H-porphine

TPZ

tirapazamine

U/DCNPs

up-down conversion nanoparticles

US

ultrasound

YSN

yolk shell structure

ZIF-8/ZIF-67

Zn-MOF

1 Introduction

Because of the high incidence and mortality rate, cancer has always been a severe hazard to human health. Although the mortality rate of cancer patients has a significant decrease in recent years, due to the early diagnosis and medical advancement, it remains one of the diseases seriously affecting the life quality of patients, which is urgent for the effective and accurate cancer treatment [1]. Currently, the primary clinical treatment for cancer is surgery, supplemented by chemoradiotherapy. Although surgery is effective for removing malignant solid tumors, especially for early tumor treatment, it is almost impossible to entirely eradicate cancer cells, resulting in the tumor recurrence [2], while the traditional chemoradiotherapy can not only destroy cancer cells but also exhibit serious toxicity on normal cells [3]. Therefore, it is urgent for the effective and precise cancer treatment in order to both reduce cancer mortality and improve the life quality of cancer patients.

In latest generations, nanoscale materials are gradually being emphasized and applied in various fields including environment, energy, aerospace and military, biology, and medicine by the virtue of the tremendous advancement in nanotechnology. Nanomaterials have also received special attention in the study of cancer imaging and therapy due to their unique size effect and surface characteristics [4]. Nano-based therapeutics exhibit favorable bioavailability, superior targeting capacity, and fewer side effects than conventional therapies, contributing to their combined utilization with traditional therapies or alone in cancer imaging and therapy [5]. Organic nanomaterials, such as dendrimers, solid lipid nanoparticles, liposomes, polymeric micelles, and polymeric nanoparticles are extensively studied in cancer therapy, and their excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability ensure the biosafety of organic nanomaterials in vivo [6,7], while several liposomes and polymer-based delivery systems have also been used in clinical trials [8]. Simultaneously, a large number of inorganic nanomaterials with mechanical, magnetic, optical, or thermal properties, such as silica nanoparticles, carbon series nanomaterials, quantum dots (QDs), gold, platinum family metals, and metal oxide nanoparticles have already been studied for their potential biomedical applications [6,8]. Furthermore, inorganic nanomaterials are characterized by controllable structure and tunable surface physicochemical properties, which is beneficial to cancer therapy, and the fine inorganic nanomaterials have been produced and employed in tumor theranostics [9].

Despite having made partial progress in cancer imaging and therapy based on the inorganic or organic nanomaterials, a substantial number of obstacles still exist. Generally, nanodrugs are administered intravenously or orally, and before reaching to tumor sites, they have to cross multiple lines of defense, including vascular barrier, macrophage system, renal filtration, tumor microenvironment, and cellular barriers. Under normal circumstances, these defensive barriers are critical for pathogen resistance, but they also prevent the nanodrugs from reaching the tumor sites [2]. Simultaneously, the antitumor effect of nanodrugs must be strictly and comprehensively evaluated, particularly the efficiency of killing tumor cells, and also the biocompatibility and biodegradability of nanodrugs, as well as the toxicity to organisms [10]. Obviously, successful cancer treatment requires a number of considerations to design nanomaterials and drugs, it is necessary to develop multi-attribute and multifunctional nanomaterials, single inorganic or organic nanomaterials are hard to satisfy these multifunctional requirements due to its single function, and developing multifunctional nanocomposites by combining various organic and inorganic components is indispensable [8]. Actually, the combination of different types of organic and inorganic materials will enrich the function of newly prepared nanomaterials, such as silica, carbon, QDs, platinum family metals, and gold nanoparticles are combined with dendrimers, polymers, lipids, and cell membranes. These organic–inorganic nanocomposites maintain the physicochemical properties of organic and inorganic component, improve the biocompatibility of nanocomposites, and confer the nanocomposites with photic, electric, acoustic, magnetic, and thermal properties. Additionally, organic–inorganic nanocomposites also exhibit unique characteristics, such as enhancing the biocompatibility and safety of therapeutic drugs, improving the water solubility of hydrophobic drugs, maintaining the colloidal stability in biological environment and extending the circulation time of loading drugs in vivo [11].

In the past decade, numerous researchers have spent a great amount of time and effort developing and promoting nanocomposites for their application in cancer imaging and therapy, and several excellent reviews have been published on summarizing the progresses of organic–inorganic nanocomposites on cancer treatment [6,11,12,13]. For example, Chen et al. focused their review on the preparation, functions, and applications of nanocomposites in cancer theranostics [11]; Li emphasized the cancer diagnosis and therapy of aggregation-induced emission luminogen functionalized organic–inorganic nanocomposites in their review [13]. Distinguished from these published reviews without detailed classification of various types of organic–inorganic nanocomposites, this review provides a comprehensive summary of organic–inorganic nanocomposites applied cancer imaging and therapy and divides the nanocomposites into two categories: organic–inorganic nanoscale nanocomposites (including organic-silica, carbon, QDs, platinum family metals, gold, metal oxides, and other organic-metal based nanocomposites) and organic–inorganic molecular nanocomposites (including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), organosilica nanoparticles, and amorphous metal coordination polymer particles (ACPPs)) (Figure 1). Consequently, after providing a brief overview of nanocomposites synthesis, classification, and functionalization of organic–inorganic nanocomposites, the current review focused on comprehensively summarizing representatives of these two types of nanocomposites, and further analyzing their working mechanism in cancer imaging and therapy. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of organic–inorganic nanocomposites are addressed for promoting their developments and clinical application in cancer imaging and therapy.

Figure 1 
               Various nano-scale and molecular-scale organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy are depicted schematically. MWCNTs-Gd@PDA and MR imaging are adapted with permission from ref. [48], Copyright, 2016, Elsevier Ltd. SiO2@PAD-TPGS is adapted with permission from ref. [22], Copyright, 2017, WILEY-VCH. Ag2S@PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [57], 2017, Copyright, WILEY-VCH. Pd@Pt@HA and PA imaging is adapted with permission from ref. [74], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. Ru-CeO2@DPEG is adapted with permission from ref. [79], Copyright, 2020, Elsevier Ltd. Au@PDA-PEGm is adapted with permission from ref. [84], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society. Pt@CeO2@MnO2-PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [80], Copyright, 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. Fe3O4@PGL is adapted with permission from ref. [109], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. HMON@PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [170], Copyright, 2017, Elsevier Ltd. HMON@MOF@PDA-PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [162], Copyright, 2019, Acta Materialia Inc. HMONs@Zn/Cu-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [158], Copyright, 2022, Wiley-VCH. MIL-101 is adapted with permission from ref. [163], 2021, Wiley-VCH. Cu-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [139], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. Zn-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [154], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. Fe-MOF@HA is adapted with permission from ref. [141], 2017, American Chemical Society. Fe-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [161], Copyright, 2020, Yuan Ding et al. FL image is adapted with permission from ref. [68], Copyright, 2020, Haolin Chen et al. US image is adapted with permission from ref. [144], Copyright, 2020, WILEY-VCH. PET image is adapted with permission from ref. [142], Copyright, 2017, American Chemical Society. Raman image is adapted with permission from ref. [94], Copyright, 2020, WILEY-VCH. SPECT image is adapted with permission from ref. [43], Copyright, 2014, Elsevier Ltd. CT image is adapted with permission from ref. [124], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society.
Figure 1

Various nano-scale and molecular-scale organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy are depicted schematically. MWCNTs-Gd@PDA and MR imaging are adapted with permission from ref. [48], Copyright, 2016, Elsevier Ltd. SiO2@PAD-TPGS is adapted with permission from ref. [22], Copyright, 2017, WILEY-VCH. Ag2S@PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [57], 2017, Copyright, WILEY-VCH. Pd@Pt@HA and PA imaging is adapted with permission from ref. [74], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. Ru-CeO2@DPEG is adapted with permission from ref. [79], Copyright, 2020, Elsevier Ltd. Au@PDA-PEGm is adapted with permission from ref. [84], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society. Pt@CeO2@MnO2-PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [80], Copyright, 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. Fe3O4@PGL is adapted with permission from ref. [109], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. HMON@PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [170], Copyright, 2017, Elsevier Ltd. HMON@MOF@PDA-PEG is adapted with permission from ref. [162], Copyright, 2019, Acta Materialia Inc. HMONs@Zn/Cu-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [158], Copyright, 2022, Wiley-VCH. MIL-101 is adapted with permission from ref. [163], 2021, Wiley-VCH. Cu-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [139], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. Zn-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [154], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. Fe-MOF@HA is adapted with permission from ref. [141], 2017, American Chemical Society. Fe-MOF is adapted with permission from ref. [161], Copyright, 2020, Yuan Ding et al. FL image is adapted with permission from ref. [68], Copyright, 2020, Haolin Chen et al. US image is adapted with permission from ref. [144], Copyright, 2020, WILEY-VCH. PET image is adapted with permission from ref. [142], Copyright, 2017, American Chemical Society. Raman image is adapted with permission from ref. [94], Copyright, 2020, WILEY-VCH. SPECT image is adapted with permission from ref. [43], Copyright, 2014, Elsevier Ltd. CT image is adapted with permission from ref. [124], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society.

2 Synthesis and functionalization of organic–inorganic nanocomposites

organic–inorganic nanocomposites can be classified into two types: nano-scale nanocomposites (Table 1) and molecular-scale nanocomposites (Table 2). Nano-scale nanocomposites are generally prepared by the organic and inorganic components being doped at the nanometer level, such as organically modified inorganic nanomaterials and the interaction connecting both organic and inorganic components, which includes electrostatic interaction, dispersion interaction, hydrogen bonding, covalent bonding, and coordinate bonding. The most frequently used synthetic methods include covalent conjugation, nano-precipitation, in situ growth, host-guest supramolecular self-assembly, microfluidics, and lipid/cell membrane coating, which have been described in detail in previous reviews [11]. Simultaneously, molecular-scale nanocomposites, known as hybrid nanomaterials, are assembled by both organic molecules and inorganic molecules or assembled by a single molecule containing both organic and inorganic moiety. The organic and inorganic components in molecular-scale nanocomposites are mainly integrated by covalent bonds and metal-organic ligand coordination bonds, and the representatives include nano metal-organic frameworks (nMOFs), organosilica nanoparticles, and ACPPs, which are mainly prepared by sol-gel method and in situ polymerization [14,15,16]. As a hybrid material, nMOFs are generally prepared by solvothermal synthesis, ionothermal synthesis, diffusion synthesis, mechanochemistry synthesis, microemulsion synthesis, electrochemical synthesis, microwave, and ultrasonic assisted synthesis, which exhibit both advantages and disadvantages. For instance, the microwave-assisted method is not appropriate for commercial synthesis under harsh synthetic circumstances, but can be used to synthesize nanocomposites in a brief amount of time with uniform particle size, which indicate that the optimal synthetic strategy of nanocomposites should be comprehensively considered for the specific requirement in cancer imaging and therapy [17].

Table 1

List of nano-scale nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy

Category Inorganic components Organic components Therapy Imaging Ref.
Silica Mesoporous silica Lipid bilayer Immune IVIS/immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) [20]
Silica & U/DCNPs Azobenzene-functionalized polymers Chemo Downconversion luminescence [24]
Fe3O4-Au@Mesoporous silica Alginate/CS PDT/chemo/gene MR/CT [26]
GNR@SiO2 mPEG-SH PTT/PDT Raman [27]
Carbon CDs Polyacrylic acid Chemo FL [30]
Graphene oxide nanoribbons Phospholipid-PEG PTT/chemo Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT [43]
RGO Cholesteryl-HA Chemo FL [34]
Gd-MWCNT PDA-PEG PTT MR/Dye tracing [48]
QDs Ag2S QDs Polypeptide/cell membrane PTT/chemo NIR-II FL [66]
BPQDs Lipid-PEG/cys-8E polymer PTT/chemo PT-OCT/FL [68]
BPQDs PEG PTT/PDT FL [64]
PbS/CdS core/shell QDs Polymer Imaging-guide surgery Multiplexed-NIR-II FL [67]
Pt-family metals Porous hollow Pd NPs Thermosensitive polymer PTT/RT/chemo SPECT/CT/PA [70]
Pd@Pt PEG/HA CDT/starvation PA [74]
Au@Pt PEG PTT/RT CT [75]
Ru@CeO2 Double-layer PEG PTT/Dual-chemo FL/Bioluminescence [79]
Au Au nanoparticle (NP) PDA-ss-PEGm PTT PA [84]
Mesoporous Au nanoframeworks HA PTT/chemo PA/Raman [94]
GNRs CS/PEG PTT/gene PA/FL [95]
Gold nanostar @Graphene Lipid PTT/gene PA/photothermal [100]
Metal oxide Fe3O4 Porphyrin grafted lipid PDT/CDT MR/FL [109]
Mesoporous TiO2 PPy PTT/SDT/chemo PA/US [113]
MnO2 yolk−shells PEG PDT/chemo PA/MR/FL [119]
Pt@CeO2@MnO2 PEG PTT/PDT/chemo PA [80]
Table 2

List of molecular-scale nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy

Category Materials Hybrid mode Therapy Imaging Ref.
MOFs 2D Cu-bipyridine MOF nanosheet Cu (CF3SO3)2 unit is coordinated by four 4,4-bipyridine groups PTT/CDT PA [137]
Mn(iii)-TCPP MOFs Mn(iii) coordinate with the carboxyl group of TCPP PDT MR/FL [136]
MOF(Fe) Fe3+ coordinated with terephthalic acid PTT/CDT FL [143]
(Fe/Cu-SS) MOF@PDA−PEG Cu2+, Fe3+ coordinated with disulfide-modified phloroglucinol PTT/CDT MR/US [144]
Fe MOF Fe atom coordinated with TPyP H2-assisted chemo FL [148]
Gd/Yb-MOF Gd3+/Yb3+ coordinated with BBDC Chemo MR/CT/FL [151]
ZIF-8@CaCO3@ CD63-aptamer Zn2+ connected by 2-methylimidazole Immune FL [156]
Cu-TCPP(Fe) MOF@Au Cu2+ coordinated with TCPP(Fe) CDT FL [101]
Fe MOF@Au Zr cluster coordinated with TCPP(Fe) CDT/chemo FL [161]
Organosilica HMONs@CuS@BSA –s–s– was incorporated into silica framework PTT/chemo PA [168]
Mn2(CO)10@HMONs Disulfide, phenylene group was incorporated into silica framework PTT/GAS PA [165]
HMONS@MOF(Cu/Zn) –s–s– was incorporated into silica framework/Zn2+, Cu2+ coordinated with 2-MIM CDT/Chemo FL [158]
PEG-HMONs Thioether/phenylene/ethane/ethylene was incorporated into silica framework RDT/Gas MR/PET/FL [166]
ACPPs 2D-Gold-based porphyrinic coordination polymer Au0 coordinated with TPyP PTT/Gas PA/FL [172]
Pd-single atom coordinate porphyrin polymer Pd-single atom coordinate with porphyrin and tri(pyridine-4-yl) amine PDT/SDT/CDT US [173]
Self-assembled coordination polymer based on Fe and methotrexate Fe3+ coordinate with methotrexate Immune FL [176]
DNA-based nanoarchitectures Fe2+ coordinate with DNA molecules FL [179]

Despite these two types of nanocomposites exhibiting both organic and inorganic properties, surface functionalization is required, which is critical for improving their application in cancer imaging and therapy. The organic moiety in nano-scale nanocomposites is equivalent to surface functionalization of inorganic components, contributing to their excellent biocompatibility and colloidal stability. Actually, functional components such as folic acid (FA), hyaluronic acid (HA), nucleic acids, peptides, proteins, and homotypic cell membrane are frequently incorporated to the surface of the nanocomposites via coordination bonds for targeting tumor cells, biological imaging, and improving cargos delivery capability. For molecular-scale nanocomposites, the aforementioned functional components can be incorporated to organic ligands or metal nodes via covalent bonds or strong coordination, contributing to improve their biocompatibility and stability [17].

2.1 Organic–inorganic nanoscale nanocomposites

Organic–inorganic nanocomposites primarily consist of organic-silica, organic-carbon, organic-QDs, organic-platinum family metals, organic-gold, organic metal oxides, and other nanocomposites, of which the first two have attracted more attention for being used as cargo carriers (drugs, contrast agents, proteins, and nucleic acids) in cancer imaging and therapy due to their superior specific surface area and biocompatibility. Moreover, both organic-metal and organic-metal oxide nanocomposites have also sparked substantial attention in cancer treatment due to their excellent physicochemical properties of optics and catalysis. Thereafter, the generation of fluorescence (FL), magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), and photoacoustic (PA) signal could be used for imaging and guiding photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), sonodynamic therapy (SDT), and chemodynamic therapy (CDT) for cancer treatment. A detailed summary of organic–inorganic nanoscale nanocomposites applied in cancer imaging and therapy is listed below.

2.1.1 Organic-silica nanocomposites

Although most of the silica-based nanomaterials exhibit no diagnostic or therapeutic role, silica nanoparticles have shown great biocompatibility and biosafety, as well as no obvious toxicity to organisms. Therefore, silica nanoparticles can be loaded with various cargos to target tumors for cancer imaging and therapy through combining with organic materials or modifying surface [4,18]. Shi et al. reviewed a multifunctional theranostic nanoplatform: silica/organosilica cross-linked block copolymer micelles, in which different block copolymers, organosilanes, and cargos were incorporated to prepare diverse crosslinked block copolymer micelles with different properties and functions [19]. For example, conjugated fluorescent copolymers and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles were co-loaded inside silicas crosslinked F127 polyethylene oxide106 (PEO106)-b-polypropylene oxide70-b-PEO106 micelles to prepare a FL/T2-weighted MR dual-mode imaging nanocomposite, which can effectively target tumor cells under the influence of an external magnetic field, and significantly improve the efficacy of FL/MR imaging. Furthermore, these organic-silica nanocomposites have also exhibited several advantages over the typical silica-based nanoparticles, including targeted drug delivery, microenvironmental stability, and preferable bio-imaging capabilities. However, the usage of non-biodegradable PEO and poly(acrylic acid)-based block copolymer as construction blocks limits the further application of these organic-silica nanocomposites, thus novel biodegradable block copolymers should be designed and prepared to improve their performance.

Simultaneously, Lu et al. designed an OX/IND-MSNPs nanosystem for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, in which IDO (immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxy-genase) inhibitor indoximod (IND) was coupled with phospholipid to encapsulate oxaliplatin (OX) loaded in mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs) (Figure 2a). The dual delivery system of OX and IND induces immunogenic cell death of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via an OX chemotherapy regimen, cooperating with IND interference on the IDO pathway to enhance immunogenic cell death. Through linking with a single chain phospholipid, the problem of poor water solubility and rapid blood elimination of IND were improved, as well as the biological distribution, retention, and pharmacokinetics of IND in tumor sites were enhanced (Figure 2b–d) [20]. Obviously, surface-functionalized silica can be taken as an excellent cargo carrier for cancer imaging and therapy.

Figure 2 
                     Organic-silica nanocomposites for cancer treatment. (a) Schematic of mesoporous silica drug delivery system, which is encapsulated by a lipid containing a phospholipid-conjugated IND prodrug. (b) Biodistribution of optical imaging in vivo and in vitro. (c) Comparison of the cellular drug uptake between phospholipid-conjugated IND nanovesicles (IND-NV) and free IND. (d) Pharmacokinetic evaluation of OX/IND-MSNPs in situ of tumor-bearing mice. Free OX was the control. Adapted with permission from ref. [20], Copyright, 2017, Lu et al. (e) Diagram of the construction of Janus Gold Triangle-Mesoporous Silica (Janus MSNPs) and Schematic illustration of tumor therapy. (f) Tumor images. (g) Tumor growth curves. (h) Release behavior of TPZ from Janus NPs at pH 5.5 and pH 7.4. Adapted with permission from ref. [29], Copyright, 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2

Organic-silica nanocomposites for cancer treatment. (a) Schematic of mesoporous silica drug delivery system, which is encapsulated by a lipid containing a phospholipid-conjugated IND prodrug. (b) Biodistribution of optical imaging in vivo and in vitro. (c) Comparison of the cellular drug uptake between phospholipid-conjugated IND nanovesicles (IND-NV) and free IND. (d) Pharmacokinetic evaluation of OX/IND-MSNPs in situ of tumor-bearing mice. Free OX was the control. Adapted with permission from ref. [20], Copyright, 2017, Lu et al. (e) Diagram of the construction of Janus Gold Triangle-Mesoporous Silica (Janus MSNPs) and Schematic illustration of tumor therapy. (f) Tumor images. (g) Tumor growth curves. (h) Release behavior of TPZ from Janus NPs at pH 5.5 and pH 7.4. Adapted with permission from ref. [29], Copyright, 2019, American Chemical Society.

Moreover, silica coated with organic materials has also been prepared for targeting tumor and controlled release of cargos to realize cancer imaging and therapy. Fu et al. designed chitosan (CS) encapsulated hollow MSNPs, which is able to release benzoyl peroxide (BPO) in response to pH, and the released BPO could produce free radicals to regulate tumor cell apoptosis in tumor microenvironment, whereas only a few BPO is released into normal cells [21]. Similarly, Cheng and coworkers prepared a pH-responsive nanocarrier (MSNPs@PDA-TPGS) for releasing doxorubicin (DOX) through modifying polydopamine (PDA)-encapsulated MSNPs with d-a-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) to produce this nanocarrier, which can enhance the chemotherapeutic effect of lung cancer with multidrug resistance (MDR). Theoretically, PDA was dissolved in tumor acidic microenvironment for DOX release, and the addition of TPGS suppressed the activities of P-glycoprotein, thus inhibiting P-glycoprotein mediated MDR in tumor cells, and further enhanced the cytotoxicity of DOX to tumor cells. Thereafter, the in vivo and ex vivo analyses further revealed that this nanocarrier exhibited excellent therapeutic effect on lung cancer with MDR, providing a referable strategy for treatment of tumor with MDR [22].

In addition to pH-responsive drug-controlled release nanocomposites, other organic materials (liposomes, dendrimer, and polymer) encapsulated porous silica-based nanoparticles are employed for controlled release of drugs in magnetothermal, photothermal, and near infrared response [23,24]. Exogenous response systems, such as near-infrared (NIR) and magnetocaloric response, are easier to control drug release than endogenous response systems, such as pH response. For instance, Zhao et al. designed polymer nanocapsules that can be degraded to release drugs in response to NIR light, and the capsules are composed of spherical silica micelles and a polymer that is electrostatically formed layer by layer on the micelle surface. During the preparation of polymer, up-down conversion nanoparticles (U/DCNPs) were introduced and Tm3+ was further doped into U/DCNPs, which can convert NIR photons into ultraviolet/visible photons. Subsequently, ultraviolet/visible sensitive azobenzene functional groups were introduced into the polymer to achieve near infrared photodegradation, which can be quickly removed from tumor tissue and the contained chemotherapy drugs were released within 1 h after degradation [24]. Simultaneously, Kong et al. combined with porous silica nanoparticles with giant liposomes to produce a biodegradable nano-in-micro platform that could be used in conjunction with DNA nanostructures, iron oxide nanoparticles, and gold nanorods (GNR) to accomplish magnetothermal and photothermal responsive release of drugs [23]. Because liposome encapsulation enhanced the cytocompatibility of the nanoplatform, which can easily enter the tumor cells and release DOX and other drugs under magnetothermal or photothermal response. Furthermore, the combination of DNA nanostructures and drugs exhibit stronger cytotoxicity on DOX-resistant tumor cells than drugs used alone, which demonstrated that DNA nanostructures might improve the cytotoxicity of DOX on DOX-resistant MCF-7 cells through inhibiting lysosomal acidification, resulting in the aggregation of the drug in tumor sites. Conclusively, these silica-based organic nanocomposites exhibit excellent biocompatibility and drug loading capacity, suggesting a potential strategy for controlled drug release used in cancer treatment.

Based on published reports, besides combining with organic nanomaterials for drug delivery, silica nanoparticles can also be combined with other nanomaterials for conferring the newly prepared nanocomposites with physical properties, such as magnetic, optical, and thermal properties that could be employed in cancer imaging and therapy [25,26,27,28,29]. Wang et al. designed and constructed a Janus golden triangle mesoporous silica nano-multifunctional platform for the liver cancer synergistic treatment with hypoxia activated chemotherapy, radiation, and PTT. This nanoplatform combined the surface of Janus golden triangle mesoporous silica nanoparticles (GT-MSNPs) with polyethylene glycol (PEG) coupled with FA, and the anoxic activated tirapazamine (TPZ) prodrug was loaded into mesoporous silica pores to produce an FA-GT-MSNPs@TPZ nanocomposite (Figure 2e) [29]. The subsequent results demonstrated that the PEG on the surface of the nanocomposites can be dissolved in the tumor acidic environment and a considerable quantity of TPZ were released after FA-mediated endocytosis (Figure 2h), and DNA-damaging free radicals were produced in an anoxic environment. Furthermore, the existence of the golden triangle endows the nanocomposite with photothermal property and radiosensitivity, contributing to TPZ-induced chemotherapy and enhanced cytotoxicity of nanoplatform to hepatoma cells (Figure 2f and g).

Additionally, Seo and coworkers successfully prepared silica encapsulated GNR loaded with methylene blue (MB) core-shell nanoparticles (MB-GNR@SiO2), which can be employed for tumor imaging and photothermal, photodynamic dual-mode tumor therapy [27]. Then, they PEGylated GNR@SiO2 nanoparticles using poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol to improve the nanoparticle’s stability. Because of the excellent plasmonic properties of GNR at NIR light, the embedded MB molecules can exhibit NIR-induced surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) properties, and are capable of detecting both single and aggregated cancer cells at cellular level, which provide support for early diagnosis of cancer. And the nanocomposite has a photothermal and photodynamic dual mode cancer synergistic treatment generated by NIR light. This empirical evidence suggests that MB-GNR@SiO2 nanoparticles have promising potential in cancer theranostics.

As a drug carrier, MSNPs exhibit high stability and drug loading capacity, as well as uniform structure. The further modification with tumor recognition molecules and gatekeeper molecules could remarkably improve the efficacy of tumor therapy and amelioration of the damage to normal tissue. Distinguished from other types of metal and non-metal carriers with cytotoxicity, MSNPs are generally considered to be relatively safe by Food and Drug Administration and is recognized as a more ideal therapeutic nanoplatform. MSNPs show their potential in clinical applications, but comprehensive and precise mechanism studies on the degradation and pharmacokinetics of MSNPs are still required. Promisingly, the introduction of biodegradable groups (such as thioether) into the MSNPs framework to prepare biodegradable organosilica nanoparticles have attracted attention of a large number of researchers at present, promoting the clinical application of MSNPs.

2.1.2 Organic-carbon nanomaterials

Carbon nanomaterials are multiple types of nanomaterials based on carbon elemental, such as graphene, fullerenes, CNTs and carbon QDs, and various carbon nanomaterials and their derived complexes have been widely studied and applied in cancer imaging and therapy [2]. These carbon nanomaterials exhibit excellent biocompatibility after covalent and non-covalent modifications. Covalent modification is mainly to anchor the functional groups to its surface, such as hydroxyl groups, carboxyl groups, and amino groups, which further conjugate with biopolymers. The non-covalent modification is mainly to bind the amphiphilic molecules similar to phospholipids on carbon nanomaterials. Moreover, because of its high specific surface area, huge attention has been paid on taking carbon nanomaterials as the carriers of imaging probes and antitumor drugs for cancer imaging and treatment [7,30,31,32,33,34,35]. For example, Zheng et al. prepared a nanocarrier (anti-HER2-RGO-PLL), which is a poly-l-lysine (PLL)-modified reduced graphene oxide (RGO) coupled with an anti-HER2 antibody, and this nanocarrier is capable of efficiently delivering DOX into the nuclei of HER2-overexpressed tumor cells [36]. PLL, a cationic polymer that makes the nanocarrier positively charged for enhancing their interaction between the nanocarrier and the negatively charged cell membrane, further promotes the efficient endocytosis of nanocarriers in tumor cells. While the conjugated anti-HER2 antibody can improve the endocytosis of nanocarriers by HER2-overexpressed tumor cells, the anti-tumor effect of anti-HER2-RGO-PLL/DOX nanocarriers was seven times more than that of RGO-PLL/DOX nanocarriers, which is likely to be contributed by the increased concentration of DOX in the tumor cells after enhancing anti-HER2 antibody mediated endocytosis.

Furthermore, Miao and coworkers prepared cholesterol-hyaluronic acid encapsulated RGO (CHA-RGO) nanocarriers for targeting delivery of anticancer drugs [34]. The subsequent results demonstrated that under physiological conditions, CHA-RGO exhibited superior colloidal stability and biosafety when compared with RGO alone. Further, CHA encapsulation dramatically increased the DOX-loading capacity of RGO, and promoted the aggregation of DOX at tumors, contributing to the enhanced endocytosis of DOX by CD44 overexpressed kb cells and improved anti-tumor effects in vivo.

Distinguished from silica-based nanomaterials, carbon-based nanomaterials exhibit unique optical and thermal properties beside of excellent biocompatibility and drugs-loading capacity. Therefore, carbon nanomaterials can be employed not only as carrier of drugs and imaging probes, but also for cancer PTT and PDT [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. For instance, Guo and coworkers prepared CS coated graphene carbon nanocages (GCNCs) loaded with 5-fluorouracil (Fu) (CS-GCNCs/5-Fu), which is used for the photothermal-chemical synergistic treatment of tumors with 808 nm laser and microwave co-radiation releasing 5-Fu [42] (Figure 3a). The subsequent results revealed that after being encapsulated into CS, the carbon nano-cages-induced cell cycle defects were reduced, contributing to the minimization of nano-cages-induced cytotoxicity (Figure 3d and e). Simultaneously, as a result of the CS encapsulation, the release of 5-Fu from the nanomaterials was significantly decelerated but accelerated at 808 nm laser and microwave co-radiation (Figure 3b and c). Furthermore, the CS-GCNCs/5-Fu exhibits severe toxicity on tumor cells due to the enhanced thermal therapy of GCNC triggered by microwave, laser irradiation, and the synergistic chemotherapy of 5-Fu. Consequently, this study paved the way for the application of GCNC-based biological nanomaterials in photothermal-chemical synergistic cancer treatment with microwave radiation.

Figure 3 
                     Organic-carbon nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic of CS-coated GCNCs for cancer treatment. (b) Comparison of the release rates of 5Fu from different nanoparticles. (c) Both laser and microwave promote the release of 5Fu. (d) The effect of nanomaterials on cell cycle distribution. (e) Cell viability examination after co-incubation with different groups. Adapted with permission from ref. [42], Copyright, 2019, Acta Materialia Inc. (f) Synthetic method of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG and its imaging-guided therapy for metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). (g) Dual-mode imaging of regional LNs. MR imaging of popliteal, sciatic, and iliac common LNs in control group (1–3) and 2 h after MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG injection (4–6), images of popliteal, sciatic, and iliac common LNs without injection of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG (10–12), and 2 h after injection of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG (7–9). (h) The mice photographs after the tumor PTT. (A and B were treated with MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG with and without NIR light, respectively; C and D were treated with normal saline (NS) with or without NIR light). (i) Relative tumor volume curves after different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [48], Copyright, 2016, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 3

Organic-carbon nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic of CS-coated GCNCs for cancer treatment. (b) Comparison of the release rates of 5Fu from different nanoparticles. (c) Both laser and microwave promote the release of 5Fu. (d) The effect of nanomaterials on cell cycle distribution. (e) Cell viability examination after co-incubation with different groups. Adapted with permission from ref. [42], Copyright, 2019, Acta Materialia Inc. (f) Synthetic method of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG and its imaging-guided therapy for metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). (g) Dual-mode imaging of regional LNs. MR imaging of popliteal, sciatic, and iliac common LNs in control group (1–3) and 2 h after MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG injection (4–6), images of popliteal, sciatic, and iliac common LNs without injection of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG (10–12), and 2 h after injection of MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG (7–9). (h) The mice photographs after the tumor PTT. (A and B were treated with MWCNT-Gd@PDA-PEG with and without NIR light, respectively; C and D were treated with normal saline (NS) with or without NIR light). (i) Relative tumor volume curves after different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [48], Copyright, 2016, Elsevier Ltd.

By encapsulating cucurbit[7]uril conjugated graphene oxide with adamantane-labeled HA (ADA-HA), Ding et al. prepared supramolecular nanomaterials for OX, banoxantrone dihydrochloride (AQ4N, a hypoxia-responsive prodrug), chlorin e6 co-loaded tumor-targeted delivery, and multimodal cancer therapy [37]. The encapsulation of ADA-HA increased the stability and biocompatibility of the nanomaterials, being capable of delivering medicines to CD44 overexpressed cancer cells. When the nanomaterials were targeted to tumors, the heat generated by the photothermal action of nano graphene oxide under NIR irradiation might not only kill the tumor cells but also trigger the release of OX for chemotherapy. Similarly, chlorin e6-induced photodynamic effect consumes oxygen and exacerbates hypoxia in the tumor, converting non-toxic AQ4N into toxic AQ4 and further killing tumor cells. Furthermore, in vivo and ex vivo analysis have also confirmed the photothermal, photodynamic, and synergistic chemotherapeutic effects of the nanomaterials in cancer therapy, providing a novel organic–inorganic nanocomposite for multiple cancer therapies.

Furthermore, nanocomposites prepared from organic-carbon nanomaterials with other nanomaterials have also been investigated and employed in cancer imaging and therapy [44,45,46,47,48]. Fu group prepared PEG and PDA encapsulated gadolinium (Gd)-loaded MWCNTs (MWCNTs-Gd@PDA-PEG) for MR and color imaging guided PTT, contributing to eliminate the primary tumor and tumor cells in metastatic regional lymph node (RLN) (Figure 3f) [48]. PDA and PEG encapsulation significantly prevented Gd from leaking from MWCNTs, enhancing the biocompatibility of the nanocomposites. The subsequent analysis in vitro and in vivo indicated that the nanocomposite can be used to trace the tumor cells in RLN via T1-weighted MR imaging and dye dual-mode (Figure 3g), as well as guide NIR PTT to eradicate the tumor cells in primary and metastatic RLN (Figure 3h and i). Simultaneously, MWCNTs-Gd@PDA-PEG exhibit severe toxicity on tumor cells, which is superior to surgery in terms of speed and effectiveness. However, no in-depth study and data on the toxicity and biosafety of this nanocomposite in vivo are reported, which play an indispensable role for their clinical application.

Additionally, Wang et al. prepared porous carbon hybrid nanozyme (CuCo(O)/GOx@PCNs) doped with copper cobalt oxide (CuCo(O)) based on double ZIF-8/ZIF67, and loaded glucose oxidase (GOx) for immunotherapy/enhanced starvation/PTT of cancer [49]. In another interesting study, Yan and coworkers prepared novel iron oxychloride nanosheets (FeOCl@PEG@CDs) coated with PEG and inorganic CDs for CDT/PTT antibacterial therapy [50]. The subsequent analysis demonstrated that FeOCl@PEG@CDs could catalyze H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radical (˙OH) and trigger bacterial mortality, and NIR irradiation induces a substantial photothermal effect (local temperature can reach to 52°C), significantly boosting their antibacterial activity. Based on the performance of FeOCl@PEG@CDs in antibacterial therapy, it is reasonable to postulate that this nanocomposite is promising to be applied in cancer therapy. On the one hand, tumor cells contain H2O2, which can be catalyzed by the nanocomposite to produce ˙OH for tumor CDT, on the other hand, the heat generated by photothermal effect of the nanocomposite under NIR is beneficial to pyrolyze the tumor cells. However, the safety of carbon nanomaterials is a major obstacle to their clinical application, such as high liver uptake and low body clearance, which are the critical problems that need to be addressed. Therefore, the development of functionalized carbon nanomaterials with excellent tumor targeting capacity and in vivo degradability may be the further research focus.

2.1.3 Organic-QDs nanocomposites

QDs are likely the most ideal fluorescent imaging material due to their superior optical characteristics and small particle size. To satisfy the requirements of clinical tumor treatment and achieve the optimal imaging results, QDs must be water soluble and biocompatible, as well as exhibit high quantum yield and adjustable emission wavelength. However, the hydrophobic surface of QDs results in low water solubility, limiting its direct application in biological environments [51]. Therefore, the researchers modified the surface of QDs with hydrophilic organic compounds to increase the hydrophilicity of QDs, conferring the organic-modified QDs with excellent water solubility, FL intensity, and stability, attracting extensive attention in cancer imaging [52,53,54,55]. For example, Pang group designed a second near-infrared (NIR II) fluorescent probe, a mixture of Ag2Te QDs and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) encapsulated in cell membrane of 4T1 cells for in vivo imaging, and the subsequent analysis demonstrated that the probe greatly improved their FL intensity (about 60 times that of free Ag2Te QDs) and FL stability (about 97% after 1 h of laser irradiation) [52]. Simultaneously, the cell membrane of 4T1 cells enables the fluorescent probe to target the tumors, and promote the probe to effectively aggregate in tumor tissues ((31 ± 2)% of the injected dose per gram of tumor), exhibiting a high tumor to normal tissue aggregation ratio (13.3 ± 0.7).

Moreover, Jeong et al. synthesized polymer encapsulated size-controllable PbS/CdS core-shell QDs (PQDs) for in vivo FL imaging under NIR II, and the synthesized PQDs exhibit a variety of emission wavelengths through regulating the size of the PbS core and the thickness of the CdS shell [56]. This PQDs not only possess high FL stability by emitting stable FL for one week in biological environment, but also exhibits low cytotoxicity (cell viability >90% after co-incubation) by coupling FA to PQDs to form FA-PQDs, which can improve the aggregation of PQDs in tumors by actively targeting folate receptor overexpressed tumor cells.

Besides attracting increasing attention in tumor imaging, organically modified QDs have also been applied in cancer therapy, and the preparation of QDs with both imaging and therapeutic functions exhibit promising applicable potential, mainly including imaging-guided drug delivery [57,58,59,60], phototherapy [61,62,63,64,65,66], and surgery therapy [67]. For drug delivery, Wang group prepared the Ald/DOX@PEG-Ag2S nanosystem for osteolysis inhibition and chemotherapy in an orthotopic bone tumor model (Figure 4a) [57]. Alendronate (Ald) is attached to the surface of the PEG-Ag2S QD to prevent osteolysis through effectively promoting the targeted aggregation of Ald/DOX@PEG-Ag2S in bone tissues (Figure 4b and d). Further, the nanosystem exhibits a longer circulation time and avoids phagocytosis by macrophages after surface functionalization with PEG, increasing targeted efficiency. Meanwhile, targeted release of DOX in the tumor acidic environment for bone tumor chemotherapy can reduce toxicity to normal bone tissues (Figure 4c).

Figure 4 
                     Organic-QDs nanocomposites and their therapeutic applications. (a) Diagram of Ag2S QDs nanocomposites for bone cancer treatment. (b) NIR-II FL images of mice at 12 h post-injection with different treatments. (c) Cumulative release of DOX from Ald/DOX@Ag2S under different pH values. (d) Staining of the dissected tibias of tumor-bearing mice after treatment. Necrotic debris from tumor cells is indicated by the black arrows. Apoptotic tumor cells are indicated by red arrows. Adapted with permission from ref. [57], Copyright, 2017, WILEY-VCH. (e) Diagram of BPQDs for cancer therapy. (f) The top views of 3D PT-OCT images of tumor regions after intravenous injection with BPQD/Cys-8E nanoparticles for 0, 8, 24, and 48 h were reconstructed from 500 sequential B-scans (scale bars: 1 mm). (g) Cumulative release of PTX from BPQD/Cys-8E/PTX quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. (h) Photographs of the tumors after 18 days with different treatments. (Group I: control, II: control + laser, III: PTX, IV: BPQDs, V: BPQD/Cys-8E + laser, VI: BPQD/Cys-8E/PTX + laser). Adapted with permission from ref. [68], Copyright, 2020, Haolin Chen et al.
Figure 4

Organic-QDs nanocomposites and their therapeutic applications. (a) Diagram of Ag2S QDs nanocomposites for bone cancer treatment. (b) NIR-II FL images of mice at 12 h post-injection with different treatments. (c) Cumulative release of DOX from Ald/DOX@Ag2S under different pH values. (d) Staining of the dissected tibias of tumor-bearing mice after treatment. Necrotic debris from tumor cells is indicated by the black arrows. Apoptotic tumor cells are indicated by red arrows. Adapted with permission from ref. [57], Copyright, 2017, WILEY-VCH. (e) Diagram of BPQDs for cancer therapy. (f) The top views of 3D PT-OCT images of tumor regions after intravenous injection with BPQD/Cys-8E nanoparticles for 0, 8, 24, and 48 h were reconstructed from 500 sequential B-scans (scale bars: 1 mm). (g) Cumulative release of PTX from BPQD/Cys-8E/PTX quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. (h) Photographs of the tumors after 18 days with different treatments. (Group I: control, II: control + laser, III: PTX, IV: BPQDs, V: BPQD/Cys-8E + laser, VI: BPQD/Cys-8E/PTX + laser). Adapted with permission from ref. [68], Copyright, 2020, Haolin Chen et al.

Furthermore, Chen et al. synthesized a cysteine (Cys)-based poly-(disulfide amide) polymer and encapsulated the chemotherapy drug-paclitaxel (PTX) and black phosphorus QDs (BPQDs) into its inner space [68], and further modified with lipid-PEG to prepare biodegradable PTX/BPQD@Cys-8E nanoparticles (Figure 4g), which can be applied in photothermal optical coherence tomography (PT-OCT) guided PTT combined with PTX mediated chemotherapy for cancer treatment (Figure 4e and f). Simultaneously, the protective effect of Cys-8E polymer in outer layer significantly improved the stability and the photothermal performance of BPQDs and enhanced its effect in high-resolution PT-OCT (Figure 4h).

Generally, phototherapy mainly includes PTT and PDT, which can be applied to accurately kill tumor cells while causing minimal damage to normal tissues due to the controllable excitation light and irradiation position [51]. For example, Li et al. synthesized PEG modified two-photon black phosphorus QDs with photothermal and photodynamic effects that can be used in PTT/PDT-mediated cancer therapy [64]. PEG modification significantly improved the biocompatibility, water solubility, and stability of BPQDs, whereas the cytotoxicity was negligible. Consistently, Tao and coworkers prepared PEG coated two-dimensional antimonene QDs (PEG-AMQDs) by liquid stripping method [69]. The biocompatibility and stability of AMQDs were significantly improved due to the encapsulation of PEG, and the NIR-induced photothermal conversion efficiency of PEG-AMQDs also reached to 45.5%, exhibiting superior antitumor effect. Meanwhile, PEG-AMQDs can be rapidly degraded under NIR light with negligible cytotoxicity.

Recently, NIR II QD imaging plays a promising role in imaging-mediated surgical treatment of cancer due to its high temporal and spatial resolution [51]. For instance, Tian and coworkers prepared a two-channel NIR II imaging nanocomposite through combining donor–acceptor–donor dye (IR-FD) (1,100–1,300 nm window) and polymer-coated PbS/CdS core/shell QDs (>1,500 nm window), which can be used for synergetic imaging of tumors (IR-FD and QDs labeling) and tumor-invaded sentinel lymph node (SLN, QDs labeling) in primary/metastatic tumor treatment and SLN excision [67]. Simultaneously, polymer-coated QDs exhibit high FL intensity and stability (no noticeable bleaching after 5 h of continuous laser irradiation) and only picomolar dosages of nanocomposites is required to detect SLNs. Therefore, this study not only provides solid support for multi-channel FL imaging in visualizing different parts of complex diseases but also indicates that organic QDs NIR II imaging exhibit promising clinical applications for cancer resection. QDs NIR II imaging exhibits deeper tissue penetration and higher imaging resolution than visible and NIR I imaging, and have gathered wide attention in cancer imaging and treatment. At present, QDs are main semiconductor materials containing heavy metal elements, which seriously limit the clinical application of QDs from the perspective of biocompatibility and biotoxicity. Promisingly, both the construction of core-shell structures that can avoid leakage of heavy metal ions and QDs that do not contain heavy metal ions (such as carbon and Ag2S QDs) may accelerate the clinical transformation of QDs.

2.1.4 Organic-platinum family metals nanocomposites

Platinum family metal nanomaterials, such as platinum, palladium, and ruthenium, exhibit excellent optical properties and catalytic activity, contributing to their application in cancer treatment, drug delivery, and catalysis [70,71,72]. Song and coworkers prepared porous hollow palladium nanoparticles modified with thermosensitive polymer for co-loading radioisotopes 131I and DOX, which can precisely control the drug release through repetitive laser irradiation and tumor microenvironment [70]. Moreover, 131I can be retained in the tumor exceeding 24 h without damaging normal tissue due to the unique interactions of palladium and iodine, which can effectively realize synergy of the photothermal, chemical, and radiation therapy in cancer treatment.

Simultaneously, Liang et al. synthesized F-127 modified vanadium tetrasulfide (VS4) by solvothermal method, and further improved their sonosensitive properties by combining co-catalyst platinum nanoparticles with glutathione (GSH) for enhancing SDT in hypoxic tumors [72]. Platinum nanoparticles and GSH, as co-catalysts, can efficiently promote the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by capturing US-triggered electron-hole pairs to extend lifetime of the charge. Moreover, platinum nanoparticles can also catalyze hydrogen peroxide to produce oxygen, and then overcome tumor hypoxia and boost SDT to produce 1O2. Additionally, platinum-VS4 can consume intratumoral GSH while being activated by US, resulting in the upregulation of ROS level for enhancing antitumor effect.

Furthermore, organically modified multiple platinum family metal nanomaterials have attracted the concern of researchers in cancer imaging and therapy [73,74]. For example, Ming et al. established a multifunctional nanoenzyme using HA encapsulated GOx-loaded Pd@Pt nanosheets for cancer starving enhanced CDT (Figure 5a) [74]. The encapsulation of HA enables the nanozyme to actively target CD44 overexpressed tumor cells while avoiding GOx-induced cytotoxicity to normal tissues, which are confirmed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and PA imaging (Figure 5b and e). After entering into the tumor cells, the HA localized at the outer layer of Pd@Pt GOx/HA was degraded by hyaluronidase (Hyase) to expose the GOx, which consumed oxygen to oxidize glucose for starvation therapy, and accompanied with H2O2 production and pH decrease in the tumor microenvironment, while Pd@Pt can decompose endogenous H2O2 to produce oxygen for promoting glucose oxidation and enhancing starvation therapy (Figure 5d). Moreover, Pd@Pt exhibited pH-responsive peroxidase activity and can catalyze H2O2 to generate a great deal of toxic ˙OH (Figure 5c), which is synergistic with GOx-mediated starvation therapy for cancer.

Figure 5 
                     Organic-platinum family metal nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Diagram of the fabrication procedure of the Pd@Pt GOx/HA nanoreactors and its theranostic application. (b) In vivo tumor PA imaging images before and after injection. (c) Toxic ˙OH detection images. (d) GOx and catalase-like activities of different groups. (e) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry investigation of several cell types treated with Pd@Pt-GOx/HA. Adapted with permission from ref. [74], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. (f) Schematic illustration of the preparation about Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG dual drug nanosystem. (g) Operative procedure and macroscopic orthotopic tumor by autopsy. (h) In vivo bioluminescence imaging of the orthotopic colorectal tumor of various groups at different days. (i) Synergistic therapy inhibits metastasis of colorectal cancer. After the treatments with saline and Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG + NIR (40 days), in vitro bioluminescence imaging was performed to assess the micro-metastasis in the primary organs and tissues. (intestine, heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney). Adapted with permission from ref. [79], Copyright, 2020, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 5

Organic-platinum family metal nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Diagram of the fabrication procedure of the Pd@Pt GOx/HA nanoreactors and its theranostic application. (b) In vivo tumor PA imaging images before and after injection. (c) Toxic ˙OH detection images. (d) GOx and catalase-like activities of different groups. (e) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry investigation of several cell types treated with Pd@Pt-GOx/HA. Adapted with permission from ref. [74], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society. (f) Schematic illustration of the preparation about Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG dual drug nanosystem. (g) Operative procedure and macroscopic orthotopic tumor by autopsy. (h) In vivo bioluminescence imaging of the orthotopic colorectal tumor of various groups at different days. (i) Synergistic therapy inhibits metastasis of colorectal cancer. After the treatments with saline and Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG + NIR (40 days), in vitro bioluminescence imaging was performed to assess the micro-metastasis in the primary organs and tissues. (intestine, heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney). Adapted with permission from ref. [79], Copyright, 2020, Elsevier Ltd.

Additionally, Au-platinum family metal nanocomposites have also been applied in cancer imaging and therapy [75,76,77,78]. Liu et al. prepared PEGylated Au@Pt nanodendrites by growing platinum nanobranches on gold nanoparticle for CT imaging and photothermal/radiation synergistic antitumor treatment [75]. PEGylation enhances the stability, dispersibility, and biocompatibility of Au@Pt nanodendrites. Both gold and platinum can enhance the radiation sensitivity and effectively kill tumor cells with PTT under low x-ray dosage and excitation power conditions. Simultaneously, superior CT signal of Au@Pt nanodendrites was confirmed in CT imaging studies, which can be used to precisely localize tumor cells and guide PTT/radio therapy for cancer imaging and therapy.

In addition to the organically modified Au-platinum family metal nanocomposites, nanocomposites made of platinum family metal and certain oxides have also been reported [79,80]. Zhu and coworkers synthesized bilayer PEG-coated Ru@CeO2 yolk shell structure nanozyme (Ru@CeO2 YSN), Co-loading Ru complex (RBT) and resveratrol (Res) to prepare a controlled release dual drugs delivery system (Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG) for colorectal cancer PTT and dual chemotherapy (Figure 5f) [79]. The results demonstrated that the double-layer PEG extended the blood circulation time and improved biocompatibility of the nanozyme, which could be effectively aggregated in the tumors. Moreover, Ru@CeO2-RBT/Res-DPEG could catalyze H2O2 to produce oxygen, enhancing its own chemical and photothermal therapeutic effects. And the findings of bioluminescent imaging anti-metastasis assessment demonstrated that the nanozyme not only exhibited significant antitumor effects (Figure 5g and h) but also effectively inhibited the metastasis and recurrence of colorectal cancer (Figure 5i), which provides a new nanosystem for cancer imaging and therapy, as well as cancer metastasis inhibition. Although platinum-family metals and their organic nanocomposites play essential roles in cancer treatment, in consistent with other types of heavy metals, the cytotoxicity of platinum-family metals limit their applications as biomedicine, especially the high doses of them can cause mineral imbalances and serious illnesses in vivo, which should be further investigated [81]. Generally, the toxicity of this heavy metal is unavoidable, even after degradation, its toxicity still exists. However, the metal elements that are less toxic and necessary for organisms can be selected, such as Mg and Fe, and suitable modification strategies could be performed to improve their degradability, contributing to quick degradation into ions and further being discharged from the body after performing their functions. And even if there is residue in vivo, its toxicity to the organism can be tolerable, because the residual ions (Mg2+ and Fe3+) are also indispensable for organism.

2.1.5 Organic-Au nanocomposites

Au nanoparticles have received substantial attention in cancer imaging and therapy due to their remarkable optical characteristics, biocompatibility, and ease of modification [6], and Au nanoparticles coupled with organic materials have also been extensively studied in cancer treatment [82,83,84]. Recently, Zhang and coworkers prepared PEG and PDA encapsulated hybrid gold nanoparticles (Au@PDA-ss-PEGm) for tumors PA imaging and PTT activated by high concentrations of GSH (Figure 6a and c) [84]. The disulfide bonds on the surface of the hybrid nanoparticles can be ruptured under the higher concentration of GSH in tumor cells, and the outer PEG can fall off, resulting in a large number of clusters agglomerated due to the surface charge imbalance of Au@PDA, and further exhibiting the plasma-coupled enhanced photothermal effect and PA imaging (Figure 6c and d). The subsequent analysis indicated that Au@PDA-ss-PEGm exhibit outstanding biocompatibility and pharmacokinetic properties, and the photothermal conversion efficiency reached 46.5% when exposed to 808 nm excitation light, which can effectively kill tumor cells and suppress tumor recurrence (Figure 6b and e).

Figure 6 
                     Organic-Au nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic illustration of synthesis procedure of Au@PDA-ss-PEGm and its theranostic application. (b) Images of tumor from the mice post-different treatments. (c) In vivo tumor PA imaging at different times after injection. (i: Au@PDA-ss-PEGm, ii: Au@PDA-PEGm, iii: PBS). (d) The PA intensity of tumor at different times. (e) Relative tumor volume change curve with time after PTT. (i: laser irradiation after excising 1/3 of tumor, ii: without laser irradiation after excising 2/3 of tumor, iii: laser irradiation after excising 2/3 of tumor). Adapted with permission from ref. [84], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society. (f) Diagram of the rGADA/KrasI preparation and its application for cancer treatments. (g) In vivo PA imaging of tumor locations obtained at specific time points after intravenous injection. (h) Histopathological analysis of tumors and livers at the end of treatment in different groups. (1: H&E, 2: immune-stained K-Ras, 3: Ki-67, 4: H&E, black arrows indicate the metastatic lesions, 5: yellow dotted lines circle the emphasized metastatic lesions from liver H&E staining, 6: black dotted lines circle the cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive lesions, and the insert displays the CK7 staining in pancreatic cancer). L means laser. Adapted with permission from ref. [100], Copyright, 2020, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 6

Organic-Au nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic illustration of synthesis procedure of Au@PDA-ss-PEGm and its theranostic application. (b) Images of tumor from the mice post-different treatments. (c) In vivo tumor PA imaging at different times after injection. (i: Au@PDA-ss-PEGm, ii: Au@PDA-PEGm, iii: PBS). (d) The PA intensity of tumor at different times. (e) Relative tumor volume change curve with time after PTT. (i: laser irradiation after excising 1/3 of tumor, ii: without laser irradiation after excising 2/3 of tumor, iii: laser irradiation after excising 2/3 of tumor). Adapted with permission from ref. [84], Copyright, 2022, American Chemical Society. (f) Diagram of the rGADA/KrasI preparation and its application for cancer treatments. (g) In vivo PA imaging of tumor locations obtained at specific time points after intravenous injection. (h) Histopathological analysis of tumors and livers at the end of treatment in different groups. (1: H&E, 2: immune-stained K-Ras, 3: Ki-67, 4: H&E, black arrows indicate the metastatic lesions, 5: yellow dotted lines circle the emphasized metastatic lesions from liver H&E staining, 6: black dotted lines circle the cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive lesions, and the insert displays the CK7 staining in pancreatic cancer). L means laser. Adapted with permission from ref. [100], Copyright, 2020, Wiley-VCH.

Simultaneously, Yang et al. prepared a gold nanoparticle semiconductor polymer hybrid nanocapsule to enhance its optical property for tumor PTT and PA imaging [85]. The nanocapsule was prepared by self-assembling gold nanoparticles tethered by semiconductor poly(perylene diimide) (PPDI) and PEG, which can promote the aggregation of nanocapsule in tumor tissue by passive target. Moreover, the magnetic field can improve the optical absorption of PPDI due to a strong electromagnetic field existing between the two gold nanoparticles, resulting in the enhancement of the nanocapsule’s PA signal and photothermal effect, which can effectively pyrolyze tumor cells.

Additionally, organic (polymer, lipid, dendrimers, organic acids, etc.)-gold nanocomposites [86,87,88,89] are also employed for tumor targeting delivery of drugs and genes to achieve cancer imaging and synergistic therapy [90,91,92,93,94]. Wang et al. synthesized a 40 nm macroporous gold nanoframeworks (HA-4-ATP-AuNFs) encapsulated with 4-ATP-coupled HA [94], which can be employed for Raman imaging and SERS fingerprinting due to the coupling of Raman reporter 4-ATP (4-aminothiophenol). The nanostructure exhibited high absorption in the NIR-II, providing an optical foundation for deep tumor PA imaging and PTT. Simultaneously, photothermal-chemo synergistic tumor therapy can be achieved by excitation of light irradiation at NIR-II through actively targeting CD44 overexpressed tumor cells of HA-encapsulated DOX-loaded macroporous gold nanoparticles. The subsequent results further indicated that dual-mode imaging guided NIR-II photochemical therapy with the nanostructure can almost fully eliminate the tumor.

For gene delivery, Dai et al. prepared a Janus CS/PEGylated GNR complex (J-Au-CS) with variable crosslinking and GNR length breadth ratio, on the basis of J-Au-CS, and cationic polymer CD-PGEA (cyclodextrin-two-armed ethanolamine-functionalized PGMA (poly(glycidyl methacrylate)) was connected to the surface of CS to construct J-ACP [95]. Thereafter, the antioncogene P53 was loaded on J-ACP surface for achieving PA imaging-guided PTT, resulting in significant enhancement of gene delivery for synergistic cancer treatment. Furthermore, they reasonably postulated that PEG encapsulation would improve the biocompatibility and prolong the circulation time of GNRs in vivo, promoting J-ACP/P53 accumulation in tumors. Therefore, both in vivo and ex vivo analysis indicated that J-ACP/P53 exhibited severe toxicity on cancer cells under NIR light, which provides a novel nanosystem for imaging guided effective cancer synergistic treatment.

Simultaneously, the combination of other nanomaterials with gold-organic nanomaterials for cancer imaging and therapy are also being studied [96,97,98,99,100]. For example, Jia et al. prepared rGADA (Figure 6f), a lipid bilayer encapsulated RGO@gold nanostar that can be loaded with mutant anticancer gene plasmid, KrasI, and realize PTT of pancreatic cancer guided by photothermal PA imaging (Figure 6g) under NIR [100]. FA conjugated with liposomes on rGADA surface can specifically bind to the folate receptor expressed on the surface of tumor cells, significantly enhancing the tumor targeting and the endocytosis of the nanomaterials. Furthermore, both in vivo and in vitro analysis indicated that the rGADA/KrasI not only exhibited superior therapeutic effects on pancreatic cancer but could also effectively inhibit pancreatic cancer metastasis (Figure 6h) with negligible toxicity to organism.

Recently, the nanocomposites of gold doped with MOF containing other materials have also been applied in cancer imaging and therapy [101,102,103,104,105,106]. Liang and coworkers prepared a nanocluster structure for early cancer diagnosis and treatment [106], in which Zr-MOF@Au was constructed by immobilizing gold nanoclusters on the Zr-MOF, and the surface of Zr-MOF@Au was modified with Quasar and Cy5.5 labeled DNA strands. The probe’s surface-mounted DNA strand and two types of fluorescent dyes conferred the nanocomposite sensitively detecting the microRNAs closely related with cell cancerization in vivo. Moreover, the nanoprobe exhibited high photothermal conversion efficiency and could accurately identify tumors at a safe power dose, which is extremely important for early cancer diagnosis and removal. Until now, although researchers have reported a variety of gold based therapeutic nanoplatforms, most of them are only evaluated in animal models, and few have exhibited potential for clinical application. Besides the high cost of nanoplatforms production, the main problems hindering the clinical application of gold-based nanotherapeutic platforms are still biocompatibility and cytotoxicity, which can be affected by various factors such as size, surface modification, and cell type. Therefore, the collaboration of scientists from various fields is crucial for the preparation of gold-based nanoplatforms with appropriate properties for clinical application.

2.1.6 Organic-metal oxide nanocomposites

A great number of metal oxides (such as TiO2, CeO2, MnO2, Fe3O4, and Fe2O3) combined with organic materials have been employed in cancer imaging and therapy. While magnetic nanoparticles with unique physical feature (magnetic and optical properties), such as Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 can be applied in MR imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, PTT, and PDT for cancer [107,108,109,110,111,112]. For instance, Li and coworkers demonstrated that mannose modified porous hollow iron oxide nanoparticles loaded with 3-methyladenine (a small molecule inhibitor of P13K γ) and can target tumor-associated macrophages with high expression of mannose receptors [112]. The combination of the iron oxide nanoparticle and 3-methyladenine inhibited the expression of P13K γ, promoted the expression of transcriptional factor NF-κB p65, and further induced tumor-associated macrophages to transform into pro-inflammatory M1 type macrophages, which can effectively activate the immune response to suppress tumor growth.

Moreover, Liang et al. prepared Fe3O4@PEL (porphyrin-grafted lipid) core-shell nanoparticle for FL and MR dual-mode imaging-guided ferroptosis enhanced PDT (Figure 7a) [109]. The Fe3O4@PEL exhibited negligible cytotoxicity and no significant histological damage or inflammation (Figure 7d), which is likely contributed by the enhanced biocompatibility of the nanoparticles with PEL encapsulated on the Fe3O4 surface. Moreover, the self-assembly of PEL nanoparticles on the Fe3O4 surface contributed to increase the loading capacity of porphyrins, and the mass ratio of the PEL in Fe3O4@PEL could reach to 50%. Furthermore, in vivo analysis have indicated that, in the presence of laser irradiation, MR and FL imaging guided ferroptosis enhanced PDT and exhibited superior inhibition on tumor growth (Figure 7e), while Fe3O4@PEL can also accelerate the Fenton reaction in the presence of RAW 264.7 macrophages to produce ˙OH for tumor treatment (Figure 7b and c).

Figure 7 
                     Organic-metal oxide nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic of Fe3O4@PGL nanoparticles for therapeutic application. (b) Comparison of ROS production in two groups with and without the existence of ROS scavengers, HT-29 cell group serve as a control. (c) Fluorescent images without and with the existence of ROS scavengers and quantification of ROS production. (d) Histological study of major organs at different times after injection of Fe3O4@PGL. (e) Change curves of tumor volume with different treatment. Adapted with permission from ref. [109], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. (f) The degradation procedure of y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanocomposites in cancer cells. (g) Drugs loading and preparation of y-UCM-PEG YSNs. (h) NIR-II FL bioimaging images of tumor (up) and abdomen (down) post-administration with y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanoparticles. (i) Relative tumor volume change of different groups after treatment. (j) Comparison of in vivo tumor PA imaging before and after y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanocomposites administration. Adapted with permission from ref. [119], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 7

Organic-metal oxide nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Schematic of Fe3O4@PGL nanoparticles for therapeutic application. (b) Comparison of ROS production in two groups with and without the existence of ROS scavengers, HT-29 cell group serve as a control. (c) Fluorescent images without and with the existence of ROS scavengers and quantification of ROS production. (d) Histological study of major organs at different times after injection of Fe3O4@PGL. (e) Change curves of tumor volume with different treatment. Adapted with permission from ref. [109], Copyright, 2021, American Chemical Society. (f) The degradation procedure of y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanocomposites in cancer cells. (g) Drugs loading and preparation of y-UCM-PEG YSNs. (h) NIR-II FL bioimaging images of tumor (up) and abdomen (down) post-administration with y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanoparticles. (i) Relative tumor volume change of different groups after treatment. (j) Comparison of in vivo tumor PA imaging before and after y-UCM/M&D-PEG nanocomposites administration. Adapted with permission from ref. [119], Copyright, 2020, American Chemical Society.

Recently, nano-TiO2 has gradually became the representative of the ideal sonosensitizers, and its organic nanocomposites have been extensively studied in multi-mode cancer therapy, such as SDT [113,114,115,116]. Zhang group prepared a photothermal material, polypyrrole (PPy) encapsulated mesoporous TiO2 nanocomposites (mTiO2@PPys) [113], which can not only generate ROS under US for SDT of tumor but also be employed as a carrier to load honokiol for chemotherapy, and the rates of drug loading reached to 6.5 ± 0.3%. mTiO2@PPys can also be used as photothermal agent due to the existence of PPy, and exhibited a photothermal conversion efficiency of approximately 35.3%. Furthermore, in vivo US and PA imaging analysis indicated that a certain concentration of mTiO2@PPys can produce robust US and PA signals. Consequently, mTiO2@PPys will be promisingly employed for US/PA imaging-guided chemical, photothermal, sonodynamic three-mode synergistic cancer treatment.

Interestingly, a pH-responsive polymer-porous CeO2 nanorod (PN-CeO2-PSS) was prepared for catalyzing intratumor oxygen to produce highly toxic superoxide anion ( O 2 ˙ ) for tumor CDT [117]. In acidic tumor microenvironment, the hybrid material exhibited high oxidative activity, trapped oxygen and biological substrates inside, and catalyzed the conversion of oxygen to O 2 ˙ by charge transfer, while this oxidative activity can be inhibited in a neutral environment, avoiding damage to normal cells. However, in the absence of an outer layer of polymer-sodium polystyrene sulfonate, the oxidative activity of PN-CeO2 is very low under any pH conditions, which may be attributed to polymer loss resulting in its inability to capture oxygen and biological substrates for catalytic reactions. Despite its poor oxidative activity, PN-CeO2 exhibited considerable antitumor effect, which could be attributed to its catalase activity by converting H2O2 into toxic ˙OH in tumor microenvironment.

Furthermore, organic MnO2 nanocomposites have also been studied for image-guided tumor therapy by virtue of its tumor microenvironmental response and MR imaging capabilities [118,119,120,121,122]. For instance, Zhuang et al. prepared a YSN consisting of an up/down conversion nanoparticle (UCNP) core and a mesoporous manganese dioxide (MnO2) shell for multimodal imaging-guided cancer PDT and chemotherapy [119], and then the PEG modified YSN can be loaded with photosensitizer MB (loading efficiency is 30%) and antitumor agent DOX (loading efficiency is 60%) (Figure 7g). Theoretically, the PEG modification improves the solubility and stability of the YSN, and the outer MnO2 shell will be degraded to release the drugs after entering into the tumor cells, then Mn2+ is generated for tumor-specific MR imaging, and oxygen is generated to relieve tumor hypoxia for enhancing the efficiency of PDT (Figure 7f). Furthermore, PA imaging of MB and NIR-II FL imaging of UCNP (Figure 7h and j) can accurately guide cancer photodynamic/chemical therapy through detecting the distribution of materials within tumors (Figure 7i).

Additionally, nanocomposites containing metal oxides and other nanomaterials have also received considerable attention in cancer imaging and therapy [79,80,123,124]. PEG-coated Ru@CeO2 yolk shell structure was prepared for chemical and photothermal treatment of colorectal cancer [79]. Simultaneously, Xu et al. also prepared PEG modified porous platinum@CeO2@MnO2 core-shell nanocomposites (Pt@CeO2@MnO2), and the composite can be loaded with DOX for PA imaging mediated chemical/photodynamic/photothermal tri-mode cancer treatment [80]. Although there are only few metal oxides or their organic nanocomposites reported that can be used in clinical cancer treatment, it is believed that they will be promisingly applied in cancer imaging and therapy when we can accurately control all the properties of metal oxides, particularly their biocompatibility and biosafety.

2.1.7 Other organic-metal based nanocomposites

Besides the organic-metal nanocomposites discussed previously, there are still other types of organic-metal based nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy, such as organic-metal sulfides [125,126,127,128], metal selenides [129,130], and organically modified UCNPs doped with Lanthanides. HA coupling with two-dimensional molybdenum sulfide (HA-MoS2) synthesized by Shin and coworkers can promote the accumulation of HA-MoS2 in tumors and improve the endocytosis of MoS2 by tumor cells via specific binding to HA receptors [128]. Further, FL and PA imaging can accurately detect the distribution of HA-MoS2 in vivo and guide PTT under NIR irradiation. Simultaneously, Liu group prepared hollow Bi2Se3 nanoparticles via cation exchange and Kirkendall effect in one pot, and then the nanoparticles were encapsulated with PEG and perfluorocarbon (PFC) (dissolved oxygen as oxygen carrier) was loaded into the hollow interior of the nanoparticles [130]. The PEG-Bi2Se3@PFC@O2 can enhance tumor oxygenation through oxygen release under NIR irradiation and overcome tumor hypoxia radioresistance, and thereby enhance the tumor radiotherapy effect.

Because of the luminescent property under continuous-wave NIR light, lanthanide-doped UCNPs are considered to be excellent light imaging contrast agents [131], and can be further coupled with other functional components to establish multifunctional nanoplatforms for imaging-guided cancer therapy [73,132,133]. Kuang et al. prepared polyethyleneimine-coated co-doped Yb3+, Tm3+, Gd3+ upconversion nanoparticles (PUCNPs) to co-load photoactivated polymerized Pt prodrug and SiRNA (targeting Polo-like kinase 1; Plk1) [73]. PUCNPs@Pt@siPlk1 can convert NIR light into ultraviolet and visible light for upconversion luminescence imaging, and the transformed light can further activate polymerized Pt prodrugs for releasing toxic Pt(ii) and siPlk1 for tumor synergistic treatment in chemotherapy and RNA interference gene therapy, while the doping of Yb3+, Tm3+, and Gd3+ also confers UCNPs with the ability of CT and MR imaging. Consequently, the lanthanide-doped UCNPs exhibit great potential for multimodal imaging mediated light-controlled drug/gene delivery in cancer imaging and therapy.

2.2 Organic–inorganic molecular scale nanocomposites

This classification of nanomaterials, also known as hybrid nanomaterials, mainly include MOFs, organosilica nanoparticles and ACPPs. These nanocomposites not only exhibit favorable biodegradability due to the existence of intermolecular covalent bonds and weak coordination bonds in the nanocomposites but also possess superior biocompatibility and rapid blood clearance rate, which has attracted more attention applied in drugs delivery and tumor treatment based on these nanocomposites. And the detailed properties of these nanocomposites and their potential application in cancer imaging and therapy are discussed below.

2.2.1 MOFs

MOF, also known as porous coordination polymers, are characterized by flexible or rigid porous structures, which are constructed by the coordination bonding of metal ions and organic ligands [134]. Since the discovery of MOFs in the 1990s, they have attracted substantial attention due to their diverse combination types, large surface area and adjustable biocompatibility [17]. Moreover, nMOFs are smaller in size than MOFs and display a wider application potential, particularly in the field of biomedicine. Simultaneously, nMOFs possess both the physical and chemical properties of organic ligands (biocompatibility and biodegradability) and metal ions (optical, magnetic, and catalytic properties), collectively contributing to their potential application in cancer imaging and therapy [135,136,137,138,139]. For example, Yang and coworkers prepared iron-containing metal-organic frameworks (MOF (Fe)) by combining Fe3+ with organic ligands [138], MOF (Fe) can not only be used as a catalase analog to convert H2O2 into highly toxic ˙OH but also under the synergistic action with the autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine (inhibit autophagosome by deacidifying lysosomes to cut off the protective pathway of severe oxidative stress in tumors), the combined treatment can perform the superior antitumor effect. Simultaneously, a defect rich Ti-based metal-organic framework (D-MOF (Ti)) was applied as sonosensitizers to produce high levels of ROS under US (Figure 8a), and exhibited Fenton-like effect when combined with SDT due to the existence of Ti3+ (Figure 8b and c) [135]. It is also worth mentioning that after performing its function, D-MOF (Ti) could be degraded into small fragments in vivo and excreted in urine, which effectively avoids the potential off-target toxicity (Figure 8d).

Figure 8 
                     MOFs for tumor therapy. (a) Diagram of preparation and cancer treatment of D-MOF(Ti). (b) Images of ROS production in different groups. (c) Cell viabilities of 4T1 cells in groups received different treatments. (d) Quantification of Ti in excrement at different times post-injection of D-MOF (Ti) (dose: 15 mg/kg). Adapted with permission from ref. [135], Copyright, 2021, Wiley-VCH. (e) Schematic of acid-triggered H2/DOX release from DOX@Fe-MOF nanocrystals for overcoming cancer resistance/metastasis. (f) H2 releasing behaviors under different pH values. (g) Intra-tumoral expression of MMP-2 (metastasis-related matrix metalloproteinase-2) examined by western blotting where glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) serve as internal parameters. (h) Tumor photographs and tumor weight statistics after treatment in different groups. (i) Body weight change curves of tumor-bearing mice during treatment. Adapted with permission from ref. [148], Copyright, 2022, Yao et al.
Figure 8

MOFs for tumor therapy. (a) Diagram of preparation and cancer treatment of D-MOF(Ti). (b) Images of ROS production in different groups. (c) Cell viabilities of 4T1 cells in groups received different treatments. (d) Quantification of Ti in excrement at different times post-injection of D-MOF (Ti) (dose: 15 mg/kg). Adapted with permission from ref. [135], Copyright, 2021, Wiley-VCH. (e) Schematic of acid-triggered H2/DOX release from DOX@Fe-MOF nanocrystals for overcoming cancer resistance/metastasis. (f) H2 releasing behaviors under different pH values. (g) Intra-tumoral expression of MMP-2 (metastasis-related matrix metalloproteinase-2) examined by western blotting where glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) serve as internal parameters. (h) Tumor photographs and tumor weight statistics after treatment in different groups. (i) Body weight change curves of tumor-bearing mice during treatment. Adapted with permission from ref. [148], Copyright, 2022, Yao et al.

In addition to metal ions, organic ligands in nanocomposites can also play a therapeutic role in the cancer therapy. For instance, Wang et al. combined organic porphyrins with metal ions to construct nano-porphyrin MOF, and then prepared ultra-small porphyrin MOF QDs by liquid phase stripping [140]. For tumor PDT, porphyrin can be taken as an excellent photosensitizer converting oxygen into toxic singlet oxygen, and the ROS production induced by ultra-small MOF QDs is twice that of the normal porphyrin MOF or PEG-porphyrin MOF under the same illumination condition.

Moreover, besides the direct antitumor effect, nMOFs with porous structure and large specific surface area are ideal cargos for drug delivery (Such as drugs, proteins, nucleic acids, and dyes) [141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156]. Compared with traditional inorganic and organic nanocarriers, nMOFs exhibit superior capacity of drug loading (due to its high specific surface area and large pore size) and controllable drug release, biodegradability (due to metal ion and organic ligand linked by weak coordination bond), and the capacity of accommodating cargo molecules with different physicochemical properties (due to the diversity of MOF structure and adjustable size) [11]. For instance, Kim et al. synthesized a HA-coated nano-Zr-based porphyrin MOF, named HA-PCN-224, which was used as a nano-carrier for loading DOX [145]. HA-PCN-DOX could target tumor cells with CD44 overexpression, after being absorbed by tumor cells, HA is digested by HA enzyme and the loading DOX is released for performing chemotherapy, which synergistically acts with PDT to improve antitumor effect.

Simultaneously, Yao and coworkers recently synthesized a novel acid-degraded Fe-porphyrin metal-organic framework (Fe-MOF) by coordinating Fe atom and porphyrin, Fe-MOF can load drugs and provide H2 (Figure 8f) for H2-assisted chemotherapy contributing to overcome MDR and inhibit tumor metastasis (Figure 8e) [148]. Interestingly, H2 could not only inhibit the expression of tumor-related proteins and tumor metastasis, and enhance the sensitization of tumor cells to DOX chemotherapy (Figure 8g and h) but also ameliorate the toxicity of DOX on normal cells (Figure 8i). Importantly, Fe and porphyrin have been licensed for clinical application, which provide safety guarantee of MOF applied in clinic. Furthermore, Zhang et al. designed a dual-sonosensitizer nanosystem loaded with alkyl radical generator (AIPH) for tumor SDT [157]. Under US treatment, AIPH can produce toxic alkyl radicals and nitrogen, which could strengthen both the effects of SDT and the penetration effect of Zr-MOF@AIPHS in tumor therapy. Additionally, based on the porphyrin structure and the resulting nitrogen gas, Zr-MOF@AIPH can also be applied for PA, FL, and US imaging to guide its own delivery and determine the ideal treatment duration for enhancing tumor SDT.

Furthermore, the combination of MOF with other types of nanomaterials have also been applied in cancer imaging and therapy [101,106,158,159,160,161,162,163,164]. Huang et al. synthesized a bovine serum albumin (BSA)-MnO2 coated MOF, which was loaded with siRNA to inhibit the expression of pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme M2(PKM2), a key enzyme in glycolysis [164]. And BSA-MnO2 can act as catalase in tumor acidic environment for catalyzing H2O2 to produce oxygen, which could relieve the hypoxia in tumor microenvironment, inhibit the overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1, and enhance the antitumor effect. Simultaneously, Mn2+ can be used for real-time MR imaging to monitor drug release and evaluate the final therapeutic effect. Accordingly, Ding and coworkers prepared a nanocomposite by growing gold nanoparticles on a Fe-containing metal-organic framework (Fe-MOF), and PEG encapsulated Au/Fe-MOF was loaded with camptothecin (CPT) for tumor CDT and chemotherapy [161]. Under the condition of high concentration phosphate in tumor microenvironment, this nanocomposite can be dissolved and CPT was released for chemotherapy, as well as gold nanoparticles can oxidize glucose to generate H2O2 in tumor tissues and supply substrate for iron(iii) meso-tetra (4-carboxyphenyl) porphine chloride (TCPP (Fe))-mediated Fenton reaction. The abovementioned results indicate that combining chemotherapy with CDT exhibit an obvious inhibition on tumor growth.

Recently, substantial achievements in preliminary studies have been made in nMOFs by virtue of their advantages in variability, large specific surface area, diverse functionalities, and high stability. And the selection of metal ions (Ca, Mg, and Fe) with high biocompatibility to coordinate with endogenous or bioactive molecules will be the future research direction of nMOFs applied in clinic. However, there are still quite a few obstacles in the application of nMOFs in cancer imaging and therapy, especially the most serious of which being their toxicity. The toxicity of nMOFs not only results from themselves but also is dependent on the tolerance of living bodies. Unfortunately, the recent toxicity assessments of nMOFs are mainly limited to acute toxicity detection, and the crucial chronic toxicity evaluation is rare, resulting in the uncertainty of long-term safety of nMOFs in clinic. Consequently, long-term monitoring of the metabolism and accumulation of nMOFs in vivo play important roles in promoting the development of nMOFs, and more attention should be paid on these core tissues.

2.2.2 Organosilica nanoparticles

MSNPs have attracted extensive attention in drugs delivery due to its favorable specific surface area, biocompatibility, and stability. However, the inert Si-O-Si framework of silica results in poor biodegradability, thereby partly restricting their clinical applications [165]. To address the deficiency of poor biodegradability, new biodegradable organic–inorganic hybrid nanomaterials-hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles (HMONs) were produced by directly doping organic functional groups into the framework of silica nanoparticles [165,166,167,168,169,170], such as GSH-responsive degradable HMONs produced by directly doping disulfide bonds into the silica frameworks. As a nanocarrier, HMONs will perform better than MSNPs because of its excellent biodegradability. It has been reported that PEGylated hollow mesoporous organosilica nanocapsules (HMONs@PEG) could realize the target biodegradation and DOX release in tumor cells to strengthen the chemotherapeutic effect, because physiologically active disulfide groups (–s–s–) are directly incorporated into the silica framework (Figure 9a). This disulfide bonds can be broken by GSH in the tumor cells (Figure 9b), and then the nanocapsule slowly degrades for controlled release of DOX maintaining the long-term effect of chemotherapy (Figure 9c and d) [170].

Figure 9 
                     Organosilica nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Diagram of fabrication of HMONs and its GSH reducing response degradation mechanism. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of HMONs@PEG after 48 h in different conditions. (c) DOX-releasing percentage change in different conditions. (d) Tumor volume change curves during different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [170]. Copyright, 2017, Elsevier Ltd. (e) Scheme for the synthesis of small-sized HMONs, schematic illustration for Pt@HMONs without ZC-MOF gating and Pt@HMONs with ZC-MOF gating in neutral and acidic environment. (f) In vivo FL images of tumor-bearing mice at different times and ex vivo FL images of major organs and tumors after injection for 48 h. (g and h) Pt release profiles of Pt@HMONs and Pt@HMONs@ZC under different pH values. (i) Copper ion release profiles of Pt@HMONs@ZC under different pH values. (j) Relative tumor volume change curves during different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [158], Copyright, 2022, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 9

Organosilica nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. (a) Diagram of fabrication of HMONs and its GSH reducing response degradation mechanism. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of HMONs@PEG after 48 h in different conditions. (c) DOX-releasing percentage change in different conditions. (d) Tumor volume change curves during different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [170]. Copyright, 2017, Elsevier Ltd. (e) Scheme for the synthesis of small-sized HMONs, schematic illustration for Pt@HMONs without ZC-MOF gating and Pt@HMONs with ZC-MOF gating in neutral and acidic environment. (f) In vivo FL images of tumor-bearing mice at different times and ex vivo FL images of major organs and tumors after injection for 48 h. (g and h) Pt release profiles of Pt@HMONs and Pt@HMONs@ZC under different pH values. (i) Copper ion release profiles of Pt@HMONs@ZC under different pH values. (j) Relative tumor volume change curves during different treatments. Adapted with permission from ref. [158], Copyright, 2022, Wiley-VCH.

Simultaneously, Tang et al. also produced thioether/phenylene dual-hybridized HMONs by ammonia-assisted hot water etching, which will be slowly degraded in the presence of GSH and exhibit very low hemolysis due to the incorporation of thioether and phenylene [165]. Generally, modification of HMONs with Mo(vi)-based polyoxometalate after loading Mn2(CO)10 confers them to self-assemble under the tumorous mild acidic environment and boost the aggregation of HMONs at the tumor. Further, intra-tumoral GSH-responsive Mo(vi)-Mo(v) transition and HMONs degradation not only enable intra-tumoral PA imaging and PTT, but also activate Mn2(CO)10 to effectively release CO for PTT-enhanced CO gas therapy for cancer therapy.

Additionally, although the naked HMONs have a large drug-loading space, it also faces the problem of drug leakage in advance. Therefore, encapsulating mesoporous organosilica with suitable materials plays critical role in improving drug loading and target release of drug in tumor. Based on the superior biodegradability of the MOF in tumor microenvironment, the HMONs encapsulated by MOF exhibit both high drug loading capacity and target release of drug in tumor; meanwhile, the metal ions generated after MOF biodegradation can also be used for cancer imaging and therapy [158,162]. For instance, Ma et al. loaded cisplatin into Zn/Cu co-doped MOF (ZC-MOF) encapsulated HMONs for tumor chemo-CDT (Figure 9e) [158]. In the tumor’s slightly acidic environment, MOF can be dissolved and cisplatin was released for tumor chemotherapy (Figure 9g and h), simultaneously, the release of Cu2+ catalyzes intra-tumoral H2O2 to produce toxic ˙OH for CDT of tumors (Figure 9i), which can also consume intra-tumoral GSH to enhance the therapeutic effect of CDT and cisplatin (Figure 9f and j). Another study found that the MOF (Fe) can be successfully combined with PDA-modified HMONs to construct organic–inorganic hybrid nanoparticles (HMONs-PMOF), and DOX and indocyanine green were, respectively, incorporated into the inner and outer space of MOF porous structures [162]. This nanoparticle can achieve pH/NIR dual response release of DOX for MR and PA imaging-guided PTT/chemotherapy, and exhibit outstanding synergistic antitumor effects. Conclusively, the organic–inorganic hybrid nanostructures produced by combining HMONs and MOFs are novel and promising multifunctional nanocomposites for cancer therapy.

MONs not only inherit the advantages of high specific surface area, excellent stability, and easy modification of MSNPs but also overcome the disadvantages of MSNPs’ difficulty to degrade in vivo. MONs can respond to specific biological stimuli and degrade, such as MONs introducing disulfide bond will gradually degrade under the action of GSH. Simultaneously, MONs have a low hemolysis rate and high biocompatibility, which contribute to the great potential of MONs in clinical applications. However, the controlled synthesis and biological evaluation of MONs is still in the initial stage, and after systematic biosafety evaluation, we believe that MONs is highly likely to achieve clinical transformation and application in cancer therapy in the near future.

2.2.3 ACPPs

Being similar to nMOFs, ACPPs are also a type of nanoscale metal coordination polymers, which are constructed from metal ions and organic ligands, and will be degraded into metal ions and small organic ligands in vivo for being excreted from the body. However, the structural crystallinity of ACPPs is quite different from nMOFs with highly ordered crystalline structure, while ACPPs have very low crystallinity and no framework structures [16]. Precisely because of this amorphous feature that the organic ligands in ACPPs are no longer limited to the framework building blocks, and any organic ligands with suitable chelating points are available, indicating that there are wider range of organic ligands and metal ions that can be used to prepare ACPPs. For example, photosensitizers [171174] and chemical drugs [175178] used as organic ligands are combined with metal ions (such as Fe3+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Gd3+, etc.) to produce multifunctional ACPPs, and the generated ACPPs are likely to exhibit higher drug loading capacity than traditional drug carriers when chemical drugs are served as organic ligands. Furthermore, the preparation method of ACPPs is relatively simple and independent of rigorous reaction conditions, which can be generally produced by mixing organic ligands and metal ions under mild conditions. Chen et al. prepared FA-modified ACPPs using Gd3+ and cypate with carboxyl group, which can be loaded with curcumin for imaging guided chemotherapy and PTT of tumors [171]. In the generated ACPPs, cypate, a photosensitizer with NIR absorption/emission properties, was utilized as PA imaging contrast agent and photothermal agent, while Gd3+ was used as T1-weighted MR imaging contrast agent for tumor MR imaging. Simultaneously, FA can effectively accumulate the ACPPs in tumor cells with FA receptor overexpression, and enhance the uptake efficiency through FA-mediated endocytosis. After entering into the tumor cells by endocytosis, curcumins are rapidly released under the dual stimulation of acidic microenvironment and photothermal treatment, which significantly enhance the anti-tumor effect of chemotherapy and PTT.

As mentioned above, besides the photosensitizers, chemical drugs can also be used as organic ligands to prepare ACPPs for cancer therapy. For example, Zhang and coworkers produced ACPPs by the integration of gallic acid and Fe3+ for MRI-guided chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy [178]. Simultaneously, the surface of this ACPPs was functionalized with PEG modified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) to enhance its physiological stability and biocompatibility, which could avoid recognition and phagocytosis by the reticuloendothelial system, prolong the circulation time of the ACPPs in vivo, and contribute to the enrichment of ACPPs at tumor tissues through the enhanced permeability and retention effect. Further, with the accumulation of ACPPs at the tumor tissues, the MR imaging signal at the tumor is gradually enhanced, which can be used for MR imaging to provide real-time and accurate guidance for PTT and chemotherapy. Once entering into cancer cells by endocytosis, the ACPPs will be gradually biodegraded and gallic acid will be released in lysosomes, and the combination of gallic acid-induced chemical effect with PTT can effectively kill cancer cells. Moreover, Li et al. synthesized a series of DNA-based ACPPs by self-assembling DNA and Fe3+, and the size of prepared ACPPs can be regulated by controlling the ratio and concentration of Fe3+ and DNA, it is worth mentioning that the loading rate of DNA in the prepared ACPPs was 50–73.8% [179]. Additionally, taking Cu2+ or Fe3+ as metal ion sources and 3,3′-dithiobis (propionohydrazide) as organic ligand, Xu et al. prepared a hollow ACPPs that can load DOX for synergistic cuproptosis/ferroptosis/apoptosis during anti-tumor therapy [180]. Actually, in the past decades, these ACPPs have exhibited various advantages, such as easy degradation and excretion, high drug loading efficiency, simple preparation process, and diverse structure, which attract more attention and make great progress in cancer imaging and therapy.

3 Challenges and perspectives

As mentioned above, organic–inorganic nanocomposites combined the advantages of each component and perform synergistic effects, contributing to overcome the shortcomings of single-component systems, and researchers have prepared numerous nanocomposites to satisfy the imaging and therapeutic requirements for various cancers. However, opportunities come with challenges, although the nanocomposites exhibit superior advantages in cancer imaging and therapy and have achieved significant advancement in the preliminary studies, their clinical applications still face serious challenges.

Currently, the complexity and uncertainty of nanocomposites are still existing, because it is constructed from two or more materials, which require a variety of synthetic technologies. Obviously, the more the variables, the more difficult it is to control the synthesis process, which directly increases the difficulty of achieving uniformity, reproducibility, and large-scale preparation of nanocomposites. Importantly, the biotoxicity of nanocomposites is an issue that has to be discussed. Currently, a great number of toxicological studies have focused on the biodistribution of nanocomposites in the serum and main organs, as well as the short-term/acute toxicity assessments through conventional histological examination and routine serological test. Unfortunately, the long-term/chronic toxicity studies that could provide solid support for the clinical application of nanocomposites in cancer therapy have been poorly investigated, which still require more rigorous in vivo studies as well as long-term accumulation and metabolism monitoring of nanocomposites. Furthermore, the physicochemical properties of the prepared nanocomposites should be modified to improve their functions including endocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and excretion. Additionally, the combination of biocompatible inorganic materials (iron oxide, silica, and calcium carbonate) with organic components (liposomes and proteins) are promising to ameliorate the toxicity of synthesized nanocomposites. Furthermore, although there were numerous studies concerned on multimodal imaging of organic–inorganic nanocomposites that can monitor the whole metabolic process of nanocomposites from entering into the body until being excreted outside the body, the detailed mechanism of absorption-distribution-degradation-metabolism-excretion in vivo still remains unknown. Therefore, the long-term in vivo monitoring is required to provide comprehensive and solid support for the dynamic change in organic–inorganic nanocomposites. Moreover, long-term accumulation of nanocomposites in the body and their degraded byproducts, such as the generated metal ions during the biodegradation of nanocomposites, should also be considered for their potential hazard to organisms.

Additionally, the biocompatibility and biosafety of nanocomposites still require more investigation. Generally, it is critical to investigate the acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, growth and development toxicity, genetic and reproductive toxicity, and vascular irritation of nanocomposites in order to obtain a comprehensive biosafety assessment. Simultaneously, whether the nanocomposites are applied as cargo carriers or therapeutic agents, the degradation and metabolism of nanocomposites in vivo after performing their functions are also the critical issues that must be considered during the design of nanocomposites. In our opinion, nanoparticles such as iron oxides exhibit greater application potential because their degraded products are indispensable composition of the human body, significantly reducing their toxicity. Apart from the nanocomposites whose degraded products can be easily used by living organisms, the nanocomposites with rapid degradation and rapid excretion (such as silica) also exhibit promising application potential in clinic. Therefore, the synthesized nanocomposites composed of the elements already existing in the human body and rapidly degradable and excretable components are likely to be the future research focus on preparing nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy.

4 Conclusion

In summary, organic–inorganic nanocomposites hold tremendous potential for cancer treatment. In this review, we have discussed in-depth the latest research progress of organic–inorganic nanoscale and molecular nanocomposites in cancer imaging and therapy. Although the clinical application of these nanocomposites in cancer imaging and therapy is still facing long-term challenges, several nanocomposites have exhibited promising reference data for their furfure application in cancer treatment research. However, satisfying the requirements of cancer treatment in clinic is the ultimate goal, thus it should not be limited to the conventional organic–inorganic nanocomposites, and when we introduce the distinct nanomaterial with unique characteristics and advantages, the newly synthesized multi-functional nanocomposites would effectively ameliorate, even eliminate the drawbacks of the nanocomposites in their biological applications. Additionally, targeted design of nanocomposites with specific properties according to the characteristics of various cancers should still be carefully considered to achieve the precise cancer imaging and therapy.

  1. Funding information: The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Science and Technology Tackling Key Project of Henan Province (222102310103) and the Research Project of Xinxiang Medical University (XYBSKYZZ202104).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Gheorghe G, Bungau S, Ilie M, Behl T, Vesa CM, Brisc C, et al. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: the key for survival. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11):869.10.3390/diagnostics10110869Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Cheng Z, Li M, Dey R, Chen Y. Nanomaterials for cancer therapy: current progress and perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):85.10.1186/s13045-021-01096-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Sivasankarapillai VS, Madhu Kumar Nair R, Rahdar A, Bungau S, Zaha DC, Aleya L, et al. Overview of the anticancer activity of withaferin A, an active constituent of the Indian ginseng Withania somnifera. Env Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(21):26025–35.10.1007/s11356-020-09028-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Wang J, Zhang B, Sun J, Hu W, Wang H. Recent advances in porous nanostructures for cancer theranostics. Nano Today. 2021;38:101146.10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101146Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Quader S, Kataoka K. Nanomaterial-enabled cancer therapy. Mol Ther. 2017;25(7):1501–13.10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.04.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Kumar S, Singhal A, Narang U, Mishra S, Kumari P. Recent progresses in Organic-Inorganic Nano technological platforms for cancer therapeutics. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(35):6015–56.10.2174/0929867326666181224143734Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Zhou Q, Zhang L, Wu H. Nanomaterials for cancer therapies. Nanotechnol Rev. 2017;6(5):473–96.10.1515/ntrev-2016-0102Search in Google Scholar

[8] Park W, Shin H, Choi B, Rhim WK, Na K, Keun Han D. Advanced hybrid nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;114:100686.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100686Search in Google Scholar

[9] Navya PN, Kaphle A, Srinivas SP, Bhargava SK, Rotello VM, Daima HK. Current trends and challenges in cancer management and therapy using designer nanomaterials. Nano Converg. 2019;6(1):23.10.1186/s40580-019-0193-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Li Y, Zheng X, Chu Q. Bio-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy. Nano Today. 2021;38:101134.10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101134Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen G, Qian Y, Zhang H, Ullah A, He X, Zhou Z, et al. Advances in cancer theranostics using organic-inorganic hybrid nanotechnology. Appl Mater Today. 2021;23:101003.10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101003Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hao M, Chen B, Zhao X, Zhao N, Xu FJ. Organic/inorganic nanocomposites for cancer immunotherapy. Mater Chem Front. 2020;4(9):2571–609.10.1039/D0QM00323ASearch in Google Scholar

[13] Li D. AIEgen functionalized inorganic–organic hybrid nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Inorg Chem Front. 2019;6(7):1613–22.10.1039/C9QI00411DSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Gon M, Tanaka K, Chujo Y. Creative synthesis of organic–inorganic molecular hybrid materials. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2017;90(5):463–74.10.1246/bcsj.20170005Search in Google Scholar

[15] Teng Z, Li W, Tang Y, Elzatahry A, Lu G, Zhao D. Mesoporous organosilica hollow nanoparticles: synthesis and applications. Adv Mater. 2019;31(38):e1707612.10.1002/adma.201707612Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Liu Y, Lv S, Liu D, Song F. Recent development of amorphous metal coordination polymers for cancer therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;116:16–31.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Yang J, Yang YW. Metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Small. 2020;16(10):e1906846.10.1002/smll.201906846Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Gao F, Li L, Fu C, Nie L, Chen D, Tang F. LHRH-PE40 fusion protein tethered silica nanorattles for imaging-guided tumor-specific drug delivery and bimodal therapy. Adv Mater. 2013;25(38):5508–13.10.1002/adma.201301217Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Niu D, Li Y, Shi J. Silica/organosilica cross-linked block copolymer micelles: a versatile theranostic platform. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(3):569–85.10.1039/C6CS00495DSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Lu J, Liu X, Liao YP, Salazar F, Sun B, Jiang W, et al. Nano-enabled pancreas cancer immunotherapy using immunogenic cell death and reversing immunosuppression. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1811.10.1038/s41467-017-01651-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Fu J, Zhu Y, Zhao Y. Controlled free radical generation against tumor cells by pH-responsive mesoporous silica nanocomposite. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(22):3538–48.10.1039/c4tb00387jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Cheng W, Liang C, Xu L, Liu G, Gao N, Tao W, et al. TPGS-functionalized polydopamine-modified mesoporous silica as drug nanocarriers for enhanced lung cancer chemotherapy against multidrug resistance. Small. 2017;13(29):1700623.10.1002/smll.201700623Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Kong F, Zhang X, Zhang H, Qu X, Chen D, Servos M, et al. Inhibition of multidrug resistance of cancer cells by Co-delivery of DNA nanostructures and drugs using porous silicon nanoparticles@giant liposomes. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(22):3330–40.10.1002/adfm.201500594Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zhao T, Wang P, Li Q, Al-Khalaf AA, Hozzein WN, Zhang F, et al. Near-infrared triggered decomposition of nanocapsules with high tumor accumulation and stimuli responsive fast elimination. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(10):2611–5.10.1002/anie.201711354Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Xuan M, Shao J, Gao C, Wang W, Dai L, He Q. Self-propelled nanomotors for thermomechanically percolating cell membranes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(38):12463–7.10.1002/anie.201806759Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Yang H, Chen Y, Chen Z, Geng Y, Xie X, Shen X, et al. Chemo-photodynamic combined gene therapy and dual-modal cancer imaging achieved by pH-responsive alginate/chitosan multilayer-modified magnetic mesoporous silica nanocomposites. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(5):1001–13.10.1039/C7BM00043JSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Seo SH, Kim BM, Joe A, Han HW, Chen X, Cheng Z, et al. NIR-light-induced surface-enhanced Raman scattering for detection and photothermal/photodynamic therapy of cancer cells using methylene blue-embedded gold nanorod@SiO2 nanocomposites. Biomaterials. 2014;35(10):3309–18.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.066Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Zhao D, Chen Q, Song H, Luo S, Ge P, Wang Y, et al. Theranostic micelles combined with multiple strategies to effectively overcome multidrug resistance. Nanomedicine. 2018;13(13):1517–33.10.2217/nnm-2017-0393Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Wang Z, Chang ZM, Shao D, Zhang F, Chen F, Li L, et al. Janus gold triangle-mesoporous silica nanoplatforms for hypoxia-activated radio-chemo-photothermal therapy of liver cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(38):34755–65.10.1021/acsami.9b12879Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Deng T, Zhang R, Wang J, Song X, Bao F, Gu Y, et al. Carbon dots-cluster-DOX nanocomposites fabricated by a co-self-assembly strategy for tumor-targeted bioimaging and therapy. Part Part Syst Charact. 2018;35(9):1800190.10.1002/ppsc.201800190Search in Google Scholar

[31] Karimi S, Namazi H. Simple preparation of maltose-functionalized dendrimer/graphene quantum dots as a pH-sensitive biocompatible carrier for targeted delivery of doxorubicin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;156:648–59.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Kaufmann A, Kunhardt D, Cirillo G, Hampel S, Schwenzer B. Functionalized carbon nanotubes as transporters for antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(40):7000–8.10.1039/C4TB00915KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Liu Z, Chen K, Davis C, Sherlock S, Cao Q, Chen X, et al. Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2008;68(16):6652–60.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1468Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Miao W, Shim G, Kang CM, Lee S, Choe YS, Choi HG, et al. Cholesteryl hyaluronic acid-coated, reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for anti-cancer drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34(37):9638–47.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Fadel TR, Sharp FA, Vudattu N, Ragheb R, Garyu J, Kim D, et al. A carbon nanotube-polymer composite for T-cell therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2014;9(8):639–47.10.1038/nnano.2014.154Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Zheng XT, Ma XQ, Li CM. Highly efficient nuclear delivery of anti-cancer drugs using a bio-functionalized reduced graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;467:35–42.10.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Ding YF, Kwong CHT, Li S, Pan YT, Wei J, Wang LH, et al. Supramolecular nanomedicine derived from cucurbit[7]uril-conjugated nano-graphene oxide for multi-modality cancer therapy. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(10):3804–13.10.1039/D1BM00426CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Kim SH, Lee JE, Sharker SM, Jeong JH, In I, Park SY. In vitro and in vivo tumor targeted photothermal cancer therapy using functionalized graphene nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(11):3519–29.10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00944Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Sundaram P, Abrahamse H. Effective photodynamic therapy for colon cancer cells using chlorin e6 coated hyaluronic acid-based carbon nanotubes. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(13):4745.10.3390/ijms21134745Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Tran TH, Nguyen HT, Pham TT, Choi JY, Choi HG, Yong CS, et al. Development of a graphene oxide nanocarrier for dual-drug chemo-phototherapy to overcome drug resistance in cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(51):28647–55.10.1021/acsami.5b10426Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Weng Y, Guan S, Lu H, Meng X, Kaassis AY, Ren X, et al. Confinement of carbon dots localizing to the ultrathin layered double hydroxides toward simultaneous triple-mode bioimaging and photothermal therapy. Talanta. 2018;184:50–7.10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.093Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Guo Y, Chen Y, Han P, Liu Y, Li W, Zhu F, et al. Biocompatible chitosan-carbon nanocage hybrids for sustained drug release and highly efficient laser and microwave co-irradiation induced cancer therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;103:237–46.10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Lu Y-J, Lin C-W, Yang H-W, Lin K-J, Wey S-P, Sun C-L, et al. Biodistribution of PEGylated graphene oxide nanoribbons and their application in cancer chemo-photothermal therapy. Carbon. 2014;74:83–95.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[44] Khandare JJ, Jalota-Badhwar A, Satavalekar SD, Bhansali SG, Aher ND, Kharas F, et al. PEG-conjugated highly dispersive multifunctional magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes for cellular imaging. Nanoscale. 2012;4(3):837–44.10.1039/C1NR11540ESearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Neelgund GM, Okolie MC, Williams FK, Oki A. Ag2S nanocrystallites deposited over polyamidoamine grafted carbon nanotubes: An efficient NIR active photothermal agent. Mater Chem Phys. 2019;234:32–7.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Wang S, Zhang Q, Yang P, Yu X, Huang LY, Shen S, et al. Manganese oxide-coated carbon nanotubes as dual-modality lymph mapping agents for photothermal therapy of tumor metastasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(6):3736–43.10.1021/acsami.5b08087Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Zhao L, Chai MH, Yao HF, Huang YP, Liu ZS. Molecularly imprinted polymers doped with carbon nanotube with aid of metal-organic gel for drug delivery systems. Pharm Res. 2020;37(10):193.10.1007/s11095-020-02902-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Wang S, Lin Q, Chen J, Gao H, Fu D, Shen S. Biocompatible polydopamine-encapsulated gadolinium-loaded carbon nanotubes for MRI and color mapping guided photothermal dissection of tumor metastasis. Carbon. 2017;112:53–62.10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.096Search in Google Scholar

[49] Wang Q, Niu D, Shi J, Wang L. A three-in-one ZIFs-derived CuCo(O)/GOx@PCNs hybrid cascade nanozyme for immunotherapy/enhanced starvation/photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(10):11683–95.10.1021/acsami.1c01006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Yan X, Yang J, Wu J, Su H, Sun G, Ni Y, et al. Antibacterial carbon dots/iron oxychloride nanoplatform for chemodynamic and photothermal therapy. Colloid Interface Sci Commun. 2021;45:100552.10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100552Search in Google Scholar

[51] Chen LL, Zhao L, Wang ZG, Liu SL, Pang DW. Near-infrared-II quantum dots for in vivo imaging and cancer therapy. Small. 2022;18(8):e2104567.10.1002/smll.202104567Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Zhang JJ, Lin Y, Zhou H, He H, Ma JJ, Luo MY, et al. Cell membrane-camouflaged NIR II fluorescent Ag2Te quantum dots-based nanobioprobes for enhanced in vivo homotypic tumor imaging. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(14):e1900341.10.1002/adhm.201900341Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Awasthi P, An X, Xiang J, Kalva N, Shen Y, Li C. Facile synthesis of noncytotoxic PEGylated dendrimer encapsulated silver sulfide quantum dots for NIR-II biological imaging. Nanoscale. 2020;12(9):5678–84.10.1039/C9NR10918HSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Hong G, He W, Zhou K, Yang K, et al. Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and toxicology of Ag2S near-infrared quantum dots in mice. Biomaterials. 2013;34(14):3639–46.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Kong Y, Chen J, Fang H, Heath G, Wo Y, Wang W, et al. Highly fluorescent ribonuclease-A-encapsulated lead sulfide quantum dots for ultrasensitive fluorescence in vivo imaging in the second near-infrared window. Chem Mater. 2016;28(9):3041–50.10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00208Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Jeong S, Jung Y, Bok S, Ryu YM, Lee S, Kim YE, et al. Multiplexed in vivo imaging using size-controlled quantum dots in the second near-infrared window. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(24):e1800695.10.1002/adhm.201800695Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Li C, Zhang Y, Chen G, Hu F, Zhao K, Wang Q. Engineered multifunctional nanomedicine for simultaneous stereotactic chemotherapy and inhibited osteolysis in an orthotopic model of bone metastasis. Adv Mater. 2017;29(13):1605754.10.1002/adma.201605754Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Hao X, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang H, Chen G, Wang M, et al. Programmable chemotherapy and immunotherapy against breast cancer guided by multiplexed fluorescence imaging in the second near-infrared window. Adv Mater. 2018;30(51):e1804437.10.1002/adma.201804437Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Song C, Zhang Y, Li C, Chen G, Kang X, Wang Q. Enhanced nanodrug delivery to solid tumors based on a tumor vasculature-targeted strategy. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26(23):4192–200.10.1002/adfm.201600417Search in Google Scholar

[60] Hu F, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang M, Wu D, Wang Q. Real-time in vivo visualization of tumor therapy by a near-infrared-II Ag2S quantum dot-based theranostic nanoplatform. Nano Res. 2015;8(5):1637–47.10.1007/s12274-014-0653-2Search in Google Scholar

[61] Ortega GA, Del Sol-Fernandez S, Portilla Y, Cedeno E, Reguera E, Srinivasan S, et al. Rodlike particles of polydopamine-CdTe quantum dots: an actuator as a photothermal agent and reactive oxygen species-generating nanoplatform for cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(36):42357–69.10.1021/acsami.1c08676Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Hashemkhani M, Demirci G, Bayir A, Muti A, Sennaroglu A, Mohammad Hadi L, et al. Cetuximab-Ag2S quantum dots for fluorescence imaging and highly effective combination of ALA-based photodynamic/chemo-therapy of colorectal cancer cells. Nanoscale. 2021;13(35):14879–99.10.1039/D1NR03507JSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Ouyang J, Feng C, Ji X, Li L, Gutti HK, Kim NY, et al. 2D monoelemental germanene quantum dots: synthesis as robust photothermal agents for photonic cancer nanomedicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019;58(38):13405–10.10.1002/anie.201908377Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Li Y, Liu Z, Hou Y, Yang G, Fei X, Zhao H, et al. Multifunctional nanoplatform based on black phosphorus quantum dots for bioimaging and photodynamic/photothermal synergistic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(30):25098–106.10.1021/acsami.7b05824Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Liu J, Yi K, Zhang Q, Xu H, Zhang X, He D, et al. Strong penetration-induced effective photothermal therapy by exosome-mediated black phosphorus quantum dots. Small. 2021;17(49):e2104585.10.1002/smll.202104585Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] Li CQ, Ma MW, Zhang B, Chen W, Yin ZY, Xie XT, et al. A self-assembled nanoplatform based on Ag2S quantum dots and tellurium nanorods for combined chemo-photothermal therapy guided by H2O2-activated near-infrared-II fluorescence imaging. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:547–60.10.1016/j.actbio.2021.12.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Tian R, Ma H, Zhu S, Lau J, Ma R, Liu Y, et al. Multiplexed NIR-II probes for lymph node-invaded cancer detection and imaging-guided surgery. Adv Mater. 2020;32(11):e1907365.10.1002/adma.201907365Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Chen H, Liu Z, Wei B, Huang J, You X, Zhang J, et al. Redox responsive nanoparticle encapsulating black phosphorus quantum dots for cancer theranostics. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(3):655–65.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Tao W, Ji X, Xu X, Islam MA, Li Z, Chen S, et al. Antimonene quantum dots: synthesis and application as near-infrared photothermal agents for effective cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(39):11896–900.10.1002/anie.201703657Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Song M, Liu N, He L, Liu G, Ling D, Su X, et al. Porous hollow palladium nanoplatform for imaging-guided trimodal chemo-, photothermal-, and radiotherapy. Nano Res. 2018;11(5):2796–808.10.1007/s12274-017-1910-ySearch in Google Scholar

[71] Sun T, Cui W, Yan M, Qin G, Guo W, Gu H, et al. Target delivery of a novel antitumor organoplatinum(iv)-substituted polyoxometalate complex for safer and more effective colorectal cancer therapy in vivo. Adv Mater. 2016;28(34):7397–404.10.1002/adma.201601778Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Liang S, Liu B, Xiao X, Yuan M, Yang L, Ma P, et al. A robust narrow bandgap vanadium tetrasulfide sonosensitizer optimized by charge separation engineering for enhanced sonodynamic cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(36):e2101467.10.1002/adma.202101467Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Kuang G, Lu H, He S, Xiong H, Yu J, Zhang Q, et al. Near-infrared light-triggered polyprodrug/siRNA loaded upconversion nanoparticles for multi-modality imaging and synergistic cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(20):e2100938.10.1002/adhm.202100938Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Ming J, Zhu T, Yang W, Shi Y, Huang D, Li J, et al. Pd@Pt-GOx/HA as a novel enzymatic cascade nanoreactor for high-efficiency starving-enhanced chemodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(46):51249–62.10.1021/acsami.0c15211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Liu X, Zhang X, Zhu M, Lin G, Liu J, Zhou Z, et al. PEGylated Au@Pt nanodendrites as novel theranostic agents for computed tomography imaging and photothermal/radiation synergistic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(1):279–85.10.1021/acsami.6b15183Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Tang J, Jiang X, Wang L, Zhang H, Hu Z, Liu Y, et al. Au@Pt nanostructures: a novel photothermal conversion agent for cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2014;6(7):3670–8.10.1039/c3nr06841bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Wang J, Sun J, Hu W, Wang Y, Chou T, Zhang B, et al. A porous Au@Rh bimetallic core-shell nanostructure as an H2O2-driven oxygenerator to alleviate tumor hypoxia for simultaneous bimodal imaging and enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater. 2020;32(22):e2001862.10.1002/adma.202001862Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[78] Yang Q, Peng J, Xiao Y, Li W, Tan L, Xu X, et al. Porous Au@Pt nanoparticles: therapeutic platform for tumor chemo-photothermal co-therapy and alleviating doxorubicin-induced oxidative damage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(1):150–64.10.1021/acsami.7b14705Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Zhu X, Gong Y, Liu Y, Yang C, Wu S, Yuan G, et al. Ru@CeO2 yolk shell nanozymes: Oxygen supply in situ enhanced dual chemotherapy combined with photothermal therapy for orthotopic/subcutaneous colorectal cancer. Biomaterials. 2020;242:119923.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119923Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Xu Q, Li D, Zhou H, Chen B, Wang J, Wang SB, et al. MnO2-coated porous Pt@CeO2 core-shell nanostructures for photoacoustic imaging-guided tri-modal cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2021;13(39):16499–508.10.1039/D1NR03246ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Filipoiu DC, Bungau SG, Endres L, Negru PA, Bungau AF, Pasca B, et al. Characterization of the toxicological impact of heavy metals on human health in conjunction with modern analytical methods. Toxics. 2022;10(12):716.10.3390/toxics10120716Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[82] Kavosi B, Salimi A, Hallaj R, Moradi F. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for PSA biomarker detection in prostate cancer cells using gold nanoparticles/PAMAM dendrimer loaded with enzyme linked aptamer as integrated triple signal amplification strategy. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:915–23.10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Daza EA, Schwartz-Duval AS, Volkman K, Pan D. Facile chemical strategy to hydrophobically modify solid nanoparticles using inverted micelle-based multicapsule for efficient intracellular delivery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(4):1357–67.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00061Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Zhang L, Zhuang W, Yuan Y, Shen J, Shi W, Liu G, et al. Novel glutathione activated smart probe for photoacoustic imaging, photothermal therapy, and safe postsurgery treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(21):24174–86.10.1021/acsami.2c04470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Yang Z, Song J, Dai Y, Chen J, Wang F, Lin L, et al. Self-assembly of semiconducting-plasmonic gold nanoparticles with enhanced optical property for photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. Theranostics. 2017;7(8):2177–85.10.7150/thno.20545Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[86] Chauhan DS, Prasad R, Devrukhkar J, Selvaraj K, Srivastava R. Disintegrable NIR light triggered gold nanorods supported liposomal nanohybrids for cancer theranostics. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29(5):1510–8.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00801Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Figueroa ER, Lin AY, Yan J, Luo L, Foster AE, Drezek RA. Optimization of PAMAM-gold nanoparticle conjugation for gene therapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35(5):1725–34.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[88] Kong L, Alves CS, Hou W, Qiu J, Mohwald H, Tomas H, et al. RGD peptide-modified dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles enable highly efficient and specific gene delivery to stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(8):4833–43.10.1021/am508760wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[89] Yavuz MS, Cheng Y, Chen J, Cobley CM, Zhang Q, Rycenga M, et al. Gold nanocages covered by smart polymers for controlled release with near-infrared light. Nat Mater. 2009;8(12):935–9.10.1038/nmat2564Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[90] Duan S, Yang Y, Zhang C, Zhao N, Xu FJ. NIR-responsive polycationic gatekeeper-cloaked hetero-nanoparticles for multimodal imaging-guided triple-combination therapy of cancer. Small. 2017;13(9):1603133.10.1002/smll.201603133Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Kim ST, Chompoosor A, Yeh YC, Agasti SS, Solfiell DJ, Rotello VM. Dendronized gold nanoparticles for siRNA delivery. Small. 2012;8(21):3253–6.10.1002/smll.201201141Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[92] Wang Q, Zhang X, Sun Y, Wang L, Ding L, Zhu WH, et al. Gold-caged copolymer nanoparticles as multimodal synergistic photodynamic/photothermal/chemotherapy platform against lethality androgen-resistant prostate cancer. Biomaterials. 2019;212:73–86.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[93] Zhang H, Gao Z, Li X, Li L, Ye S, Tang B. Multiple-mRNA-controlled and heat-driven drug release from gold nanocages in targeted chemo-photothermal therapy for tumors. Chem Sci. 2021;12(37):12429–36.10.1039/D1SC02017JSearch in Google Scholar

[94] Wang J, Sun J, Wang Y, Chou T, Zhang Q, Zhang B, et al. Gold nanoframeworks with mesopores for Raman-photoacoustic imaging and photo-chemo tumor therapy in the second near-infrared biowindow. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(9):1908825.10.1002/adfm.201908825Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[95] Dai X, Zhao X, Liu Y, Chen B, Ding X, Zhao N, et al. Controlled synthesis and surface engineering of Janus chitosan-gold nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging-guided synergistic gene/photothermal therapy. Small. 2021;17(11):e2006004.10.1002/smll.202006004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[96] Choe HS, Shin MJ, Kwon SG, Lee H, Kim DK, Choi KU, et al. Yolk-shell-type gold nanoaggregates for chemo- and photothermal combination therapy for drug-resistant cancers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(45):53519–29.10.1021/acsami.1c10036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[97] He J, Dong J, Hu Y, Li G, Hu Y. Design of Raman tag-bridged core-shell Au@Cu3(BTC)2 nanoparticles for Raman imaging and synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2019;11(13):6089–100.10.1039/C9NR00041KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Hu Y, Zhou Y, Zhao N, Liu F, Xu FJ. Multifunctional pDNA-conjugated polycationic Au nanorod-coated Fe3O4 hierarchical nanocomposites for trimodal imaging and combined photothermal/gene therapy. Small. 2016;12(18):2459–68.10.1002/smll.201600271Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[99] Lei M, Ma M, Pang X, Tan F, Li N. A dual pH/thermal responsive nanocarrier for combined chemo-thermotherapy based on a copper-doxorubicin complex and gold nanorods. Nanoscale. 2015;7(38):15999–6011.10.1039/C5NR04353KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Jia X, Xu W, Ye Z, Wang Y, Dong Q, Wang E, et al. Functionalized graphene@gold nanostar/lipid for pancreatic cancer gene and photothermal synergistic therapy under photoacoustic/photothermal imaging dual-modal guidance. Small. 2020;16(39):e2003707.10.1002/smll.202003707Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[101] Li K, Lin C, Li M, Xu K, He Y, Mao Y, et al. Multienzyme-like reactivity cooperatively impairs glutathione peroxidase 4 and ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 pathways in triple-negative breast cancer for sensitized ferroptosis therapy. ACS Nano. 2022;16(2):2381–98.10.1021/acsnano.1c08664Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Ma Y, Chen L, Li X, Hu A, Wang H, Zhou H, et al. Rationally integrating peptide-induced targeting and multimodal therapies in a dual-shell theranostic platform for orthotopic metastatic spinal tumors. Biomaterials. 2021;275:120917.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120917Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] He L, Ni Q, Mu J, Fan W, Liu L, Wang Z, et al. Solvent-assisted self-assembly of a metal-organic framework based biocatalyst for cascade reaction driven photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(14):6822–32.10.1021/jacs.0c02497Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Mu J, He L, Fan W, Tang W, Wang Z, Jiang C, et al. Cascade reactions catalyzed by planar metal-organic framework hybrid architecture for combined cancer therapy. Small. 2020;16(42):e2004016.10.1002/smll.202004016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Zhao X, Yang T, Wang D, Zhang N, Yang H, Jing X, et al. Gold nanorods/metal-organic framework hybrids: photo-enhanced peroxidase-like activity and SERS performance for organic dyestuff degradation and detection. Anal Chem. 2022;94(10):4484–94.10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Liang Z, Hao C, Chen C, Ma W, Sun M, Xu L, et al. Ratiometric FRET encoded hierarchical ZrMOF@Au cluster for ultrasensitive quantifying MicroRNA in vivo. Adv Mater. 2022;34(1):e2107449.10.1002/adma.202107449Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Hervault A, Dunn AE, Lim M, Boyer C, Mott D, Maenosono S, et al. Doxorubicin loaded dual pH- and thermo-responsive magnetic nanocarrier for combined magnetic hyperthermia and targeted controlled drug delivery applications. Nanoscale. 2016;8(24):12152–61.10.1039/C5NR07773GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Hou X, Zhou H, Wang L, Tang J, Chen C, Jiang G, et al. Multifunctional near-infrared dye-magnetic nanoparticles for bioimaging and cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2017;390:168–75.10.1016/j.canlet.2016.12.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[109] Liang X, Chen M, Bhattarai P, Hameed S, Tang Y, Dai Z. Complementing cancer photodynamic therapy with ferroptosis through iron oxide loaded porphyrin-grafted lipid nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2021;15(12):20164–80.10.1021/acsnano.1c08108Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Ray S, Li Z, Hsu CH, Hwang LP, Lin YC, Chou PT, et al. Dendrimer- and copolymer-based nanoparticles for magnetic resonance cancer theranostics. Theranostics. 2018;8(22):6322–49.10.7150/thno.27828Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[111] Sadhukha T, Wiedmann TS, Panyam J. Inhalable magnetic nanoparticles for targeted hyperthermia in lung cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34(21):5163–71.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.061Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[112] Li K, Lu L, Xue C, Liu J, He Y, Zhou J, et al. Polarization of tumor-associated macrophage phenotype via porous hollow iron nanoparticles for tumor immunotherapy in vivo. Nanoscale. 2020;12(1):130–44.10.1039/C9NR06505ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] He Y, Wan J, Yang Y, Yuan P, Yang C, Wang Z, et al. Multifunctional polypyrrole-coated mesoporous TiO2 nanocomposites for photothermal, sonodynamic, and chemotherapeutic treatments and dual-modal ultrasound/photoacoustic imaging of tumors. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(9):e1801254.10.1002/adhm.201801254Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Bai S, Yang N, Wang X, Gong F, Dong Z, Gong Y, et al. Ultrasmall iron-doped titanium oxide nanodots for enhanced sonodynamic and chemodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2020;14(11):15119–30.10.1021/acsnano.0c05235Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Feng Q, Li Y, Yang X, Zhang W, Hao Y, Zhang H, et al. Hypoxia-specific therapeutic agents delivery nanotheranostics: A sequential strategy for ultrasound mediated on-demand tritherapies and imaging of cancer. J Control Rel. 2018;275:192–200.10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.02.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Guo X, Wen C, Xu Q, Ruan C, Shen XC, Liang H. A full-spectrum responsive B-TiO2@SiO2-HA nanotheranostic system for NIR-II photoacoustic imaging-guided cancer phototherapy. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(8):2042–53.10.1039/D0TB02952ASearch in Google Scholar

[117] Tian Z, Liu H, Guo Z, Gou W, Liang Z, Qu Y, et al. A pH-responsive polymer-CeO2 hybrid to catalytically generate oxidative stress for tumor therapy. Small. 2020;16(47):e2004654.10.1002/smll.202004654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[118] Song M, Liu T, Shi C, Zhang X, Chen X. Bioconjugated manganese dioxide nanoparticles enhance chemotherapy response by priming tumor-associated macrophages toward M1-like phenotype and attenuating tumor hypoxia. ACS Nano. 2016;10(1):633–47.10.1021/acsnano.5b06779Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[119] Zhuang H, Zhao M, Ding S, Liu L, Yuan W, Jiang L, et al. Multifunctional smart yolk-shell nanostructure with mesoporous MnO2 shell for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(35):38906–17.10.1021/acsami.0c08389Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Xu J, Han W, Yang P, Jia T, Dong S, Bi H, et al. Tumor microenvironment-responsive mesoporous MnO2-coated upconversion nanoplatform for self-enhanced tumor theranostics. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(36):1803804.10.1002/adfm.201803804Search in Google Scholar

[121] Yang G, Xu L, Chao Y, Xu J, Sun X, Wu Y, et al. Hollow MnO2 as a tumor-microenvironment-responsive biodegradable nano-platform for combination therapy favoring antitumor immune responses. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):902.10.1038/s41467-017-01050-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[122] Wang H, Bremner DH, Wu K, Gong X, Fan Q, Xie X, et al. Platelet membrane biomimetic bufalin-loaded hollow MnO2 nanoparticles for MRI-guided chemo-chemodynamic combined therapy of cancer. Chem Eng J. 2020;382:122848.10.1016/j.cej.2019.122848Search in Google Scholar

[123] Zhu X, Liu Y, Yuan G, Guo X, Cen J, Gong Y, et al. In situ fabrication of MS@MnO2 hybrid as nanozymes for enhancing ROS-mediated breast cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2020;12(43):22317–29.10.1039/D0NR03931DSearch in Google Scholar

[124] Liu B, Bian Y, Liang S, Yuan M, Dong S, He F, et al. One-step integration of tumor microenvironment-responsive calcium and copper peroxides nanocomposite for enhanced chemodynamic/ion-interference therapy. ACS Nano. 2022;16(1):617–30.10.1021/acsnano.1c07893Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Zhu X, Ji X, Kong N, Chen Y, Mahmoudi M, Xu X, et al. Intracellular mechanistic understanding of 2D MoS2 nanosheets for anti-exocytosis-enhanced synergistic cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(3):2922–38.10.1021/acsnano.8b00516Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[126] Dong X, Yin W, Zhang X, Zhu S, He X, Yu J, et al. Intelligent MoS2 nanotheranostic for targeted and enzyme-/pH-/NIR-responsive drug delivery to overcome cancer chemotherapy resistance guided by PET imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(4):4271–84.10.1021/acsami.7b17506Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[127] Yang J, Dai D, Lou X, Ma L, Wang B, Yang YW. Supramolecular nanomaterials based on hollow mesoporous drug carriers and macrocycle-capped CuS nanogates for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy. Theranostics. 2020;10(2):615–29.10.7150/thno.40066Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[128] Shin MH, Park EY, Han S, Jung HS, Keum DH, Lee GH, et al. Multimodal cancer theranosis using hyaluronate-conjugated molybdenum disulfide. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(1):e1801036.10.1002/adhm.201801036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[129] Wang Y, Liu X, Deng G, Sun J, Yuan H, Li Q, et al. Se@SiO2-FA-CuS nanocomposites for targeted delivery of DOX and nano selenium in synergistic combination of chemo-photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2018;10(6):2866–75.10.1039/C7NR09237GSearch in Google Scholar

[130] Song G, Liang C, Yi X, Zhao Q, Cheng L, Yang K, et al. Perfluorocarbon-loaded hollow Bi2Se3 nanoparticles for timely supply of oxygen under near-infrared light to enhance the radiotherapy of cancer. Adv Mater. 2016;28(14):2716–23.10.1002/adma.201504617Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[131] Tian G, Zhang X, Gu Z, Zhao Y. Recent advances in upconversion nanoparticles-based multifunctional nanocomposites for combined cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2015;27(47):7692–712.10.1002/adma.201503280Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[132] Yu S, Jang D, Yuan H, Huang WT, Kim M, Marques Mota F, et al. Plasmon-triggered upconversion emissions and hot carrier injection for combinatorial photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(49):58422–33.10.1021/acsami.1c21949Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[133] Zheng B, Wang H, Pan H, Liang C, Ji W, Zhao L, et al. Near-infrared light triggered upconversion optogenetic nanosystem for cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2017;11(12):11898–907.10.1021/acsnano.7b06395Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Haider J, Shahzadi A, Akbar MU, Hafeez I, Shahzadi I, Khalid A, et al. A review of synthesis, fabrication, and emerging biomedical applications of metal-organic frameworks. Biomater Adv. 2022;140:213049.10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Liang S, Xiao X, Bai L, Liu B, Yuan M, Ma P, et al. Conferring Ti-based MOFs with defects for enhanced sonodynamic cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(18):e2100333.10.1002/adma.202100333Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Wan SS, Cheng Q, Zeng X, Zhang XZ. A Mn(iii)-sealed metal-organic framework nanosystem for redox-unlocked tumor theranostics. ACS Nano. 2019;13(6):6561–71.10.1021/acsnano.9b00300Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Wang C, Xue F, Wang M, An L, Wu D, Tian Q. 2D Cu-bipyridine MOF nanosheet as an agent for colon cancer therapy: a three-in-one approach for enhancing chemodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(34):38604–16.10.1021/acsami.2c11999Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Yang B, Ding L, Yao H, Chen Y, Shi J. A metal-organic framework (MOF) fenton nanoagent-enabled nanocatalytic cancer therapy in synergy with autophagy inhibition. Adv Mater. 2020;32(12):e1907152.10.1002/adma.201907152Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[139] Li Y, Zhou J, Wang L, Xie Z. Endogenous hydrogen sulfide-triggered MOF-based nanoenzyme for synergic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(27):30213–20.10.1021/acsami.0c08659Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[140] Wang H, Yu D, Fang J, Cao C, Liu Z, Ren J, et al. Renal-clearable porphyrinic metal-organic framework nanodots for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(8):9206–17.10.1021/acsnano.9b03531Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[141] Cai W, Gao H, Chu C, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang P, et al. Engineering phototheranostic nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(3):2040–51.10.1021/acsami.6b11579Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[142] Chen D, Yang D, Dougherty CA, Lu W, Wu H, He X, et al. In vivo targeting and positron emission tomography imaging of tumor with intrinsically radioactive metal-organic frameworks nanomaterials. ACS Nano. 2017;11(4):4315–27.10.1021/acsnano.7b01530Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[143] Deng H, Zhang J, Yang Y, Yang J, Wei Y, Ma S, et al. Chemodynamic and photothermal combination therapy based on dual-modified metal-organic framework for inducing tumor ferroptosis/pyroptosis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(21):24089–101.10.1021/acsami.2c00574Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[144] He H, Du L, Guo H, An Y, Lu L, Chen Y, et al. Redox responsive metal organic framework nanoparticles induce ferroptosis for cancer therapy. Small. 2020;16(33):e2001251.10.1002/smll.202001251Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] Kim K, Lee S, Jin E, Palanikumar L, Lee JH, Kim JC, et al. MOF x biopolymer: collaborative combination of metal-organic framework and biopolymer for advanced anticancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(31):27512–20.10.1021/acsami.9b05736Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[146] Ma T, Liu Y, Wu Q, Luo L, Cui Y, Wang X, et al. Quercetin-modified metal-organic frameworks for dual sensitization of radiotherapy in tumor tissues by inhibiting the carbonic anhydrase IX. ACS Nano. 2019;13(4):4209–19.10.1021/acsnano.8b09221Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[147] Wan X, Song L, Pan W, Zhong H, Li N, Tang B. Tumor-targeted cascade nanoreactor based on metal-organic frameworks for synergistic ferroptosis-starvation anticancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):11017–28.10.1021/acsnano.9b07789Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[148] Yao X, Chen D, Zhao B, Yang B, Jin Z, Fan M, et al. Acid-degradable hydrogen-generating metal-organic framework for overcoming cancer resistance/metastasis and off-target side effects. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(10):e2101965.10.1002/advs.202101965Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[149] Zeng Y, Zhang C, Du D, Li Y, Sun L, Han Y, et al. Metal-organic framework-based hydrogel with structurally dynamic properties as a stimuli-responsive localized drug delivery system for cancer therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022;145:43–51.10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Yu J, Wei Z, Li Q, Wan F, Chao Z, Zhang X, et al. Advanced cancer starvation therapy by simultaneous deprivation of lactate and glucose using a MOF nanoplatform. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(19):e2101467.10.1002/advs.202101467Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[151] Zhang H, Shang Y, Li YH, Sun SK, Yin XB. Smart metal-organic framework-based nanoplatforms for imaging-guided precise chemotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(2):1886–95.10.1021/acsami.8b19048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Zhang K, Meng X, Yang Z, Dong H, Zhang X. Enhanced cancer therapy by hypoxia-responsive copper metal-organic frameworks nanosystem. Biomaterials. 2020;258:120278.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120278Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] Zhang W, Li B, Duan W, Yao X, Lu X, Li S, et al. Confined in situ polymerization in a nanoscale porphyrinic metal–organic framework for fluorescence imaging-guided synergistic phototherapy. Inorg Chem Front. 2022;9(4):670–7.10.1039/D1QI01384JSearch in Google Scholar

[154] Zhao H, Li T, Yao C, Gu Z, Liu C, Li J, et al. Dual roles of metal-organic frameworks as nanocarriers for miRNA delivery and adjuvants for chemodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(5):6034–42.10.1021/acsami.0c21006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Zhou J, Wang K, Ding S, Zeng L, Miao J, Cao Y, et al. Anti-VEGFR2-labeled enzyme-immobilized metal-organic frameworks for tumor vasculature targeted catalytic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022;141:364–73.10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[156] Zhao Q, Gong Z, Li Z, Wang J, Zhang J, Zhao Z, et al. Target reprogramming lysosomes of CD8 + T cells by a mineralized metal-organic framework for cancer immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(17):e2100616.10.1002/adma.202100616Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[157] Zhang C, Xin L, Li J, Cao J, Sun Y, Wang X, et al. Metal-organic framework (MOF)-based ultrasound-responsive dual-sonosensitizer nanoplatform for hypoxic cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(2):e2101946.10.1002/adhm.202101946Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[158] Ma Y, Su Z, Zhou L, He L, Hou Z, Zou J, et al. Biodegradable metal-organic-framework-gated organosilica for tumor-microenvironment-unlocked glutathione-depletion-enhanced synergistic therapy. Adv Mater. 2022;34(12):e2107560.10.1002/adma.202107560Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[159] Zhu Y, Huang Y, Yan TH, Li J, Li Y, Drake HF, et al. Metal-organic framework-based nanoheater with photo-triggered cascade effects for on-demand suppression of cellular thermoresistance and synergistic cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(13):e2200004.10.1002/adhm.202200004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[160] Guo J, Du X, Huang J, Liu C, Zhou Y, Li Y, et al. Robust dual enzyme cascade-catalytic cholesterol depletion for reverse tumor multidrug resistance. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11:e2200859.10.1002/adhm.202200859Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[161] Ding Y, Xu H, Xu C, Tong Z, Zhang S, Bai Y, et al. A nanomedicine fabricated from gold nanoparticles-decorated metal-organic framework for cascade chemo/chemodynamic cancer therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(17):2001060.10.1002/advs.202001060Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[162] Chen L, Zhang J, Zhou X, Yang S, Zhang Q, Wang W, et al. Merging metal organic framework with hollow organosilica nanoparticles as a versatile nanoplatform for cancer theranostics. Acta Biomater. 2019;86:406–15.10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[163] Yang P, Tao J, Chen F, Chen Y, He J, Shen K, et al. Multienzyme-mimic ultrafine alloyed nanoparticles in metal organic frameworks for enhanced chemodynamic therapy. Small. 2021;17(7):e2005865.10.1002/smll.202005865Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[164] Huang S, Zhu W, Zhang F, Chen G, Kou X, Yang X, et al. Silencing of pyruvate kinase M2 via a metal-organic framework based theranostic gene nanomedicine for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(48):56972–87.10.1021/acsami.1c18053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[165] Tang W, Fan W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Zhou S, Liu Y, et al. Acidity/reducibility dual-responsive hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoplatforms for tumor-specific self-assembly and synergistic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(12):12269–83.10.1021/acsnano.8b06058Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[166] Fan W, Lu N, Shen Z, Tang W, Shen B, Cui Z, et al. Generic synthesis of small-sized hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles for oxygen-independent X-ray-activated synergistic therapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1241.10.1038/s41467-019-09158-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[167] Gao F, Wu J, Niu S, Sun T, Li F, Bai Y, et al. Biodegradable, pH-sensitive hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticle (HMON) with controlled release of pirfenidone and ultrasound-target-microbubble-destruction (UTMD) for pancreatic cancer treatment. Theranostics. 2019;9(20):6002–18.10.7150/thno.36135Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[168] Li D, Zhang T, Min C, Huang H, Tan D, Gu W. Biodegradable theranostic nanoplatforms of albumin-biomineralized nanocomposites modified hollow mesoporous organosilica for photoacoustic imaging guided tumor synergistic therapy. Chem Eng J. 2020;388:124253.10.1016/j.cej.2020.124253Search in Google Scholar

[169] Wu J, Bremner DH, Niu S, Shi M, Wang H, Tang R, et al. Chemodrug-gated biodegradable hollow mesoporous organosilica nanotheranostics for multimodal imaging-guided low-temperature photothermal therapy/chemotherapy of cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(49):42115–26.10.1021/acsami.8b16448Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[170] Huang P, Chen Y, Lin H, Yu L, Zhang L, Wang L, et al. Molecularly organic/inorganic hybrid hollow mesoporous organosilica nanocapsules with tumor-specific biodegradability and enhanced chemotherapeutic functionality. Biomaterials. 2017;125:23–37.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[171] Chen M, Li R, Liu Y, Song X, Tian J, Fu Y, et al. Near infrared and pH dual-activated coordination polymer nanosystem for imaging-guided chemo-photothermal therapy. Chem Eng J. 2021;406:126745.10.1016/j.cej.2020.126745Search in Google Scholar

[172] Zhou G, Chen Y, Chen W, Wu H, Yu Y, Sun C, et al. Renal clearable catalytic 2D Au-porphyrin coordination polymer augmented photothermal-gas synergistic cancer therapy. Small. 2023;19(14):e2206749.10.1002/smll.202206749Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[173] Du F, Liu L, Wu Z, Zhao Z, Geng W, Zhu B, et al. Pd-single-atom coordinated biocatalysts for chem-/sono-/photo-trimodal tumor therapies. Adv Mater. 2021;33(29):e2101095.10.1002/adma.202101095Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[174] Wang YM, Liu W, Yin XB. Multifunctional mixed-metal nanoscale coordination polymers for triple-modality imaging-guided photodynamic therapy. Chem Sci. 2017;8(5):3891–7.10.1039/C6SC05616DSearch in Google Scholar

[175] Liu J, Wu M, Pan Y, Duan Y, Dong Z, Chao Y, et al. Biodegradable nanoscale coordination polymers for targeted tumor combination therapy with oxidative stress amplification. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(13):1908865.10.1002/adfm.201908865Search in Google Scholar

[176] Yu Y, Huang Z, Chen Q, Zhang Z, Jiang H, Gu R, et al. Iron-based nanoscale coordination polymers synergistically induce immunogenic ferroptosis by blocking dihydrofolate reductase for cancer immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2022;288:121724.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[177] Xu W, Wang T, Qian J, Wang J, Hou G, Wang Y, et al. Fe(ii)-hydrazide coordinated all-active metal organic framework for photothermally enhanced tumor penetration and ferroptosis-apoptosis synergistic therapy. Chem Eng J. 2022;437:135311.10.1016/j.cej.2022.135311Search in Google Scholar

[178] Zhang C, Li J, Yang C, Gong S, Jiang H, Sun M, et al. A pH-sensitive coordination polymer network-based nanoplatform for magnetic resonance imaging-guided cancer chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy. Nanomedicine. 2020;23:102071.10.1016/j.nano.2019.102071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[179] Li M, Wang C, Di Z, Li H, Zhang J, Xue W, et al. Engineering multifunctional DNA hybrid nanospheres through coordination-driven self-assembly. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019;58(5):1350–4.10.1002/anie.201810735Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[180] Xu W, Qian J, Hou G, Wang T, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. A hollow amorphous bimetal organic framework for synergistic cuproptosis/ferroptosis/apoptosis anticancer therapy via disrupting intracellular redox homeostasis and copper/iron metabolisms. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32(40):2205013.10.1002/adfm.202205013Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-12-29
Revised: 2023-09-19
Accepted: 2023-09-20
Published Online: 2023-10-25

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Preparation of CdS–Ag2S nanocomposites by ultrasound-assisted UV photolysis treatment and its visible light photocatalysis activity
  3. Significance of nanoparticle radius and inter-particle spacing toward the radiative water-based alumina nanofluid flow over a rotating disk
  4. Aptamer-based detection of serotonin based on the rapid in situ synthesis of colorimetric gold nanoparticles
  5. Investigation of the nucleation and growth behavior of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC nano-precipitates in TiAl alloys
  6. Dynamic recrystallization behavior and nucleation mechanism of dual-scale SiCp/A356 composites processed by P/M method
  7. High mechanical performance of 3-aminopropyl triethoxy silane/epoxy cured in a sandwich construction of 3D carbon felts foam and woven basalt fibers
  8. Applying solution of spray polyurea elastomer in asphalt binder: Feasibility analysis and DSR study based on the MSCR and LAS tests
  9. Study on the chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of iron-based bioabsorbable stents
  10. Influence of microalloying with B on the microstructure and properties of brazed joints with Ag–Cu–Zn–Sn filler metal
  11. Thermohydraulic performance of thermal system integrated with twisted turbulator inserts using ternary hybrid nanofluids
  12. Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/graphene and epoxy/halloysite nanocomposites
  13. Effects of CaO addition on the CuW composite containing micro- and nano-sized tungsten particles synthesized via aluminothermic coupling with silicothermic reduction
  14. Cu and Al2O3-based hybrid nanofluid flow through a porous cavity
  15. Design of functional vancomycin-embedded bio-derived extracellular matrix hydrogels for repairing infectious bone defects
  16. Study on nanocrystalline coating prepared by electro-spraying 316L metal wire and its corrosion performance
  17. Axial compression performance of CFST columns reinforced by ultra-high-performance nano-concrete under long-term loading
  18. Tungsten trioxide nanocomposite for conventional soliton and noise-like pulse generation in anomalous dispersion laser cavity
  19. Microstructure and electrical contact behavior of the nano-yttria-modified Cu-Al2O3/30Mo/3SiC composite
  20. Melting rheology in thermally stratified graphene-mineral oil reservoir (third-grade nanofluid) with slip condition
  21. Re-examination of nonlinear vibration and nonlinear bending of porous sandwich cylindrical panels reinforced by graphene platelets
  22. Parametric simulation of hybrid nanofluid flow consisting of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with second-order slip and variable viscosity over an extending surface
  23. Chitosan-capped silver nanoparticles with potent and selective intrinsic activity against the breast cancer cells
  24. Multi-core/shell SiO2@Al2O3 nanostructures deposited on Ti3AlC2 to enhance high-temperature stability and microwave absorption properties
  25. Solution-processed Bi2S3/BiVO4/TiO2 ternary heterojunction photoanode with enhanced photoelectrochemical performance
  26. Electroporation effect of ZnO nanoarrays under low voltage for water disinfection
  27. NIR-II window absorbing graphene oxide-coated gold nanorods and graphene quantum dot-coupled gold nanorods for photothermal cancer therapy
  28. Nonlinear three-dimensional stability characteristics of geometrically imperfect nanoshells under axial compression and surface residual stress
  29. Investigation of different nanoparticles properties on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids by molecular dynamics simulation
  30. Optimized Cu2O-{100} facet for generation of different reactive oxidative species via peroxymonosulfate activation at specific pH values to efficient acetaminophen removal
  31. Brownian and thermal diffusivity impact due to the Maxwell nanofluid (graphene/engine oil) flow with motile microorganisms and Joule heating
  32. Appraising the dielectric properties and the effectiveness of electromagnetic shielding of graphene reinforced silicone rubber nanocomposite
  33. Synthesis of Ag and Cu nanoparticles by plasma discharge in inorganic salt solutions
  34. Low-cost and large-scale preparation of ultrafine TiO2@C hybrids for high-performance degradation of methyl orange and formaldehyde under visible light
  35. Utilization of waste glass with natural pozzolan in the production of self-glazed glass-ceramic materials
  36. Mechanical performance of date palm fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nano-activated carbon
  37. Melting point of dried gold nanoparticles prepared with ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and lyophilisation
  38. Graphene nanofibers: A modern approach towards tailored gypsum composites
  39. Role of localized magnetic field in vortex generation in tri-hybrid nanofluid flow: A numerical approach
  40. Intelligent computing for the double-diffusive peristaltic rheology of magneto couple stress nanomaterials
  41. Bioconvection transport of upper convected Maxwell nanoliquid with gyrotactic microorganism, nonlinear thermal radiation, and chemical reaction
  42. 3D printing of porous Ti6Al4V bone tissue engineering scaffold and surface anodization preparation of nanotubes to enhance its biological property
  43. Bioinspired ferromagnetic CoFe2O4 nanoparticles: Potential pharmaceutical and medical applications
  44. Significance of gyrotactic microorganisms on the MHD tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow across an elastic slender surface: Numerical analysis
  45. Performance of polycarboxylate superplasticisers in seawater-blended cement: Effect from chemical structure and nano modification
  46. Entropy minimization of GO–Ag/KO cross-hybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated surface
  47. Oxygen plasma assisted room temperature bonding for manufacturing SU-8 polymer micro/nanoscale nozzle
  48. Performance and mechanism of CO2 reduction by DBD-coupled mesoporous SiO2
  49. Polyarylene ether nitrile dielectric films modified by HNTs@PDA hybrids for high-temperature resistant organic electronics field
  50. Exploration of generalized two-phase free convection magnetohydrodynamic flow of dusty tetra-hybrid Casson nanofluid between parallel microplates
  51. Hygrothermal bending analysis of sandwich nanoplates with FG porous core and piezomagnetic faces via nonlocal strain gradient theory
  52. Design and optimization of a TiO2/RGO-supported epoxy multilayer microwave absorber by the modified local best particle swarm optimization algorithm
  53. Mechanical properties and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete modified by nano-SiO2
  54. Self-template synthesis of hollow flower-like NiCo2O4 nanoparticles as an efficient bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in alkaline media
  55. High-performance wearable flexible strain sensors based on an AgNWs/rGO/TPU electrospun nanofiber film for monitoring human activities
  56. High-performance lithium–selenium batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped porous carbon from peanut meal
  57. Investigating effects of Lorentz forces and convective heating on ternary hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface using homotopy analysis method
  58. Exploring the potential of biogenic magnesium oxide nanoparticles for cytotoxicity: In vitro and in silico studies on HCT116 and HT29 cells and DPPH radical scavenging
  59. Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by heteroatom-doped nickel tungstate nanoparticles
  60. A facile method to synthesize nZVI-doped polypyrrole-based carbon nanotube for Ag(i) removal
  61. Improved osseointegration of dental titanium implants by TiO2 nanotube arrays with self-assembled recombinant IGF-1 in type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model
  62. Functionalized SWCNTs@Ag–TiO2 nanocomposites induce ROS-mediated apoptosis and autophagy in liver cancer cells
  63. Triboelectric nanogenerator based on a water droplet spring with a concave spherical surface for harvesting wave energy and detecting pressure
  64. A mathematical approach for modeling the blood flow containing nanoparticles by employing the Buongiorno’s model
  65. Molecular dynamics study on dynamic interlayer friction of graphene and its strain effect
  66. Induction of apoptosis and autophagy via regulation of AKT and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in breast cancer cell lines exposed to gold nanoparticles loaded with TNF-α and combined with doxorubicin
  67. Effect of PVA fibers on durability of nano-SiO2-reinforced cement-based composites subjected to wet-thermal and chloride salt-coupled environment
  68. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol fibers on mechanical properties of nano-SiO2-reinforced geopolymer composites under a complex environment
  69. In vitro studies of titanium dioxide nanoparticles modified with glutathione as a potential drug delivery system
  70. Comparative investigations of Ag/H2O nanofluid and Ag-CuO/H2O hybrid nanofluid with Darcy-Forchheimer flow over a curved surface
  71. Study on deformation characteristics of multi-pass continuous drawing of micro copper wire based on crystal plasticity finite element method
  72. Properties of ultra-high-performance self-compacting fiber-reinforced concrete modified with nanomaterials
  73. Prediction of lap shear strength of GNP and TiO2/epoxy nanocomposite adhesives
  74. A novel exploration of how localized magnetic field affects vortex generation of trihybrid nanofluids
  75. Fabrication and physicochemical characterization of copper oxide–pyrrhotite nanocomposites for the cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells and the mechanism
  76. Thermal radiative flow of cross nanofluid due to a stretched cylinder containing microorganisms
  77. In vitro study of the biphasic calcium phosphate/chitosan hybrid biomaterial scaffold fabricated via solvent casting and evaporation technique for bone regeneration
  78. Insights into the thermal characteristics and dynamics of stagnant blood conveying titanium oxide, alumina, and silver nanoparticles subject to Lorentz force and internal heating over a curved surface
  79. Effects of nano-SiO2 additives on carbon fiber-reinforced fly ash–slag geopolymer composites performance: Workability, mechanical properties, and microstructure
  80. Energy bandgap and thermal characteristics of non-Darcian MHD rotating hybridity nanofluid thin film flow: Nanotechnology application
  81. Green synthesis and characterization of ginger-extract-based oxali-palladium nanoparticles for colorectal cancer: Downregulation of REG4 and apoptosis induction
  82. Abnormal evolution of resistivity and microstructure of annealed Ag nanoparticles/Ag–Mo films
  83. Preparation of water-based dextran-coated Fe3O4 magnetic fluid for magnetic hyperthermia
  84. Statistical investigations and morphological aspects of cross-rheological material suspended in transportation of alumina, silica, titanium, and ethylene glycol via the Galerkin algorithm
  85. Effect of CNT film interleaves on the flexural properties and strength after impact of CFRP composites
  86. Self-assembled nanoscale entities: Preparative process optimization, payload release, and enhanced bioavailability of thymoquinone natural product
  87. Structure–mechanical property relationships of 3D-printed porous polydimethylsiloxane films
  88. Nonlinear thermal radiation and the slip effect on a 3D bioconvection flow of the Casson nanofluid in a rotating frame via a homotopy analysis mechanism
  89. Residual mechanical properties of concrete incorporated with nano supplementary cementitious materials exposed to elevated temperature
  90. Time-independent three-dimensional flow of a water-based hybrid nanofluid past a Riga plate with slips and convective conditions: A homotopic solution
  91. Lightweight and high-strength polyarylene ether nitrile-based composites for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding
  92. Review Articles
  93. Recycling waste sources into nanocomposites of graphene materials: Overview from an energy-focused perspective
  94. Hybrid nanofiller reinforcement in thermoset and biothermoset applications: A review
  95. Current state-of-the-art review of nanotechnology-based therapeutics for viral pandemics: Special attention to COVID-19
  96. Solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted natural and synthetic drugs delivery in high-incidence cancers, and other diseases: Roles of preparation methods, lipid composition, transitional stability, and release profiles in nanocarriers’ development
  97. Critical review on experimental and theoretical studies of elastic properties of wurtzite-structured ZnO nanowires
  98. Polyurea micro-/nano-capsule applications in construction industry: A review
  99. A comprehensive review and clinical guide to molecular and serological diagnostic tests and future development: In vitro diagnostic testing for COVID-19
  100. Recent advances in electrocatalytic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid: Mechanism, catalyst, coupling system
  101. Research progress and prospect of silica-based polymer nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery
  102. Review of the pharmacokinetics of nanodrugs
  103. Engineered nanoflowers, nanotrees, nanostars, nanodendrites, and nanoleaves for biomedical applications
  104. Research progress of biopolymers combined with stem cells in the repair of intrauterine adhesions
  105. Progress in FEM modeling on mechanical and electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube cement-based composites
  106. Antifouling induced by surface wettability of poly(dimethyl siloxane) and its nanocomposites
  107. TiO2 aerogel composite high-efficiency photocatalysts for environmental treatment and hydrogen energy production
  108. Structural properties of alumina surfaces and their roles in the synthesis of environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs)
  109. Nanoparticles for the potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A physiopathological approach
  110. Current status of synthesis and consolidation strategies for thermo-resistant nanoalloys and their general applications
  111. Recent research progress on the stimuli-responsive smart membrane: A review
  112. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous cementitious materials: A review
  113. Applications of DNA tetrahedron nanostructure in cancer diagnosis and anticancer drugs delivery
  114. Magnetic nanoparticles in 3D-printed scaffolds for biomedical applications
  115. An overview of the synthesis of silicon carbide–boron carbide composite powders
  116. Organolead halide perovskites: Synthetic routes, structural features, and their potential in the development of photovoltaic
  117. Recent advancements in nanotechnology application on wood and bamboo materials: A review
  118. Application of aptamer-functionalized nanomaterials in molecular imaging of tumors
  119. Recent progress on corrosion mechanisms of graphene-reinforced metal matrix composites
  120. Research progress on preparation, modification, and application of phenolic aerogel
  121. Application of nanomaterials in early diagnosis of cancer
  122. Plant mediated-green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An insight into biomedical applications
  123. Recent developments in terahertz quantum cascade lasers for practical applications
  124. Recent progress in dielectric/metal/dielectric electrodes for foldable light-emitting devices
  125. Nanocoatings for ballistic applications: A review
  126. A mini-review on MoS2 membrane for water desalination: Recent development and challenges
  127. Recent updates in nanotechnological advances for wound healing: A narrative review
  128. Recent advances in DNA nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and treatment
  129. Electrochemical micro- and nanobiosensors for in vivo reactive oxygen/nitrogen species measurement in the brain
  130. Advances in organic–inorganic nanocomposites for cancer imaging and therapy
  131. Advancements in aluminum matrix composites reinforced with carbides and graphene: A comprehensive review
  132. Modification effects of nanosilica on asphalt binders: A review
  133. Decellularized extracellular matrix as a promising biomaterial for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration
  134. Review of the sol–gel method in preparing nano TiO2 for advanced oxidation process
  135. Micro/nano manufacturing aircraft surface with anti-icing and deicing performances: An overview
  136. Cell type-targeting nanoparticles in treating central nervous system diseases: Challenges and hopes
  137. An overview of hydrogen production from Al-based materials
  138. A review of application, modification, and prospect of melamine foam
  139. A review of the performance of fibre-reinforced composite laminates with carbon nanotubes
  140. Research on AFM tip-related nanofabrication of two-dimensional materials
  141. Advances in phase change building materials: An overview
  142. Development of graphene and graphene quantum dots toward biomedical engineering applications: A review
  143. Nanoremediation approaches for the mitigation of heavy metal contamination in vegetables: An overview
  144. Photodynamic therapy empowered by nanotechnology for oral and dental science: Progress and perspectives
  145. Biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles: Bioreduction and biomineralization
  146. Current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and the role of nanomaterial-based theragnosis in combating the pandemic
  147. Application of two-dimensional black phosphorus material in wound healing
  148. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials and Composites for Energy Conversion and Storage - Part I
  149. Helical fluorinated carbon nanotubes/iron(iii) fluoride hybrid with multilevel transportation channels and rich active sites for lithium/fluorinated carbon primary battery
  150. The progress of cathode materials in aqueous zinc-ion batteries
  151. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part I
  152. Effect of polypropylene fiber and nano-silica on the compressive strength and frost resistance of recycled brick aggregate concrete
  153. Mechanochemical design of nanomaterials for catalytic applications with a benign-by-design focus
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2023-0133/html
Scroll to top button