Home Performance of GRKM-method for solving classes of ordinary and partial differential equations of sixth-orders
Article Open Access

Performance of GRKM-method for solving classes of ordinary and partial differential equations of sixth-orders

  • Mohammed S. Mechee , Murtadha A. Kadhim EMAIL logo and AllahBakhsh Yazdani Cherati
Published/Copyright: July 2, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A general quasilinear sixth-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) is an important class of ODEs. The primary objective of this study is to establish a numerical method for solving a general class of quasilinear sixth-order partial differential equations (PDEs) and ODEs. However, the Runge–Kutta method (RKM) approach for solving special classes of ODEs has been generalized as an effort to solve the general class of ODEs. Nonlinear algebraic order condition (OCs) equations have been obtained up to the tenth order using the Taylor-series expansion methodology which is used to derive the novel generalized Runge–Kutta method (GRKM). In this study, a GRKM integrator has been derived for solving a general class of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs and then this method is modified subsequently to solve a class of PDEs. Accordingly, the proposed GRKM is modified to solve a quasilinear sixth-order PDE by converting it to a system of sixth-ODEs using the method of lines. Nine problems have been implemented to prove the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. Simulation results of these problems showed that the proposed numerical GRKM is an accurate and efficient method. In contrast, by comparing the proposed GRKM numerical approach with the classical RK method, the numerical results demonstrate that the direct integrator outperforms the indirect classical RK method in terms of algorithm complexity and function evaluations, proving that the numerical GRKM is efficient.

1 Introduction

Differential equations (DEs) are essential for science and engineering mathematical models. The mathematical modeling of real-life have some applications of DEs, particularly different-orders of partially differential equations (PDEs) [1,2]. As for the overview of DEs’ applications, DEs are utilized in a variety of engineering domains, including electronics, mechanics, control engineering, and quantum chemistry. However, real-world applications of fourth-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) have been studied using various models in domains such as beam theory [3], fluid dynamics [4,5], ship dynamics [6], and neural networks [7]. The sudden movement of a flat surface, a subfield of engineering and physics, made use of a number of sixth-order (PDEs). The aim of the literature study is to identify analytical solutions or numerical approximations for the mathematical model that involves sixth-order ODEs with boundary value problems, as documented in previous studies [8,9]. Various numerical and analytical strategies have been explored in the literature for solving DEs of different orders. Twizell [10] developed a numerical technique to solve sixth-order ODEs and subsequently, employed finite-difference methods of orders 2, 4, 6, and 8 to solve these types of problems [11]. Previously, researchers employed approximation and computational methods to solve DEs. The numerical and analytical approaches for solving DEs of various orders sometimes struggle to directly or indirectly determine solutions for many types of equations. The researchers are driven to devise additional numerical methodologies to solve different categories of DEs due to the necessity of addressing diverse types of them. A group of academics developed various categories of numerical techniques of Runge–Kutta RK type for solving ODEs of different orders. For example, Cong [12] has devised numerical approaches for solving second-order ODEs that employ variable step-sizes, while other researchers [13,14] introduced the direct RKT method and the direct Runge–Kutta (RKD) method for finding the numerical solutions of third-order ODEs. These approaches utilize direct numerical techniques with a constant step-size. Moreover, Senu et al. [15] constructed three orders of non-constant step-size for direct integrators: 4(3), 5(4), and 6(5). For this purpose, many researchers have implemented one-step numerical integrators for solving IVPs of orders lower than ten with a constant step size in order to solve various classes of higher-order ODEs [13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Finally, Ram and Davim [34] presented and demonstrated the various mathematical uses, techniques, strategies and techniques in engineering applications and the importance of practical applications of mathematics in engineering sciences. In order to derive or modify the numerical methods and then to improve the accuracy of the numerical methods, it is useful to construct more numerical methods for solving ODEs or PDEs.

The aim of this article is to achieve some goals, first, we seek to establish a direct generalized Runge–Kutta method (GRKM) integrator for solving the general class of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs. For this purpose, we have generalized the integrator of RKM which is used for solving a special class of sixth-order ODEs. Second, we have constructed the proposed method by combining GRKM with the method of lines (MOLs) to be consistent for solving classes of sixth-order PDEs.

2 Preliminary

In this section, some of concepts and definitions for a general quasilinear sixth-order ODEs and PDEs have been introduced as follows.

2.1 Quasilinear sixth-order ODEs

The general class of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs can be defined as follows:

(1) w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = ϕ ( ξ , w ( ξ ) , w ( ξ ) , w ( ξ ) , w ( ξ ) , w ( 4 ) ( ξ ) , w ( 5 ) ( ξ ) ) ; ξ ξ 0 .

The class one of general quasilinear ODEs of 6th-order with no explicit dependence of the derivatives w ( i ) ( ξ ) , for i 5 of second, third, fourth, and fifth orders has the following definition.

Definition 2.1

(Class one of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs) The formula of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs of class one is:

(2) w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = ϕ ( ξ , w ( ξ ) , w ( ξ ) ) ; ξ ξ 0 ,

with the initial conditions (ICs)

(3) w ( i ) ( ξ 0 ) = α i ,

where α i = [ α 1 i , α 2 i , , α N i ] for i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , ϕ : R × R N R N ,

w ( ξ ) = [ w 1 ( ξ ) , w 2 ( ξ ) , , w N ( ξ ) ]

and

ϕ ( ξ , w ( ξ ) , w ( ξ ) ) = [ ϕ 1 ( ξ , w 1 ( ξ ) , w 1 ( ξ ) ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ , w 2 ( ξ ) , w 2 ( ξ ) ) , , ϕ N ( ξ , w N ( ξ ) , w N ( ξ ) ) ] .

In this article, we have constructed numerical GRKM integrator for solving Equation (2) with ICs (3).

2.2 Quasilinear sixth-order PDEs

The quasilinear PDEs of sixth-order in the domain with two variables ζ , ς defined generally as follows:

(4) ϕ ζ , ς , w ( ζ , ς ) , w ( ζ , ς ) ς , w ( ζ , ς ) ς , 2 w ( ζ , ς ) ζ 2 , 2 w ( ζ , ς ) ς ζ , 2 w ( ζ , ς ) ς 2 3 w ( ζ , ς ) ζ 3 , 3 w ( ζ , ς ) ζ 2 ς , 3 w ( ζ , ς ) t ς 2 , 3 w ( ζ , ς ) ς 3 , , 6 w ( ζ , ς ) ς 6 = 0 .

The sixth-order PDE in domain with n -variables s 1 , s 2 , , s n , is defined generally as follows.

Definition 2.2

Linear sixth-order PDE: The general linear sixth-order PDE has the following formula:

(5) i = 1 n f i ( ζ ) w ( ζ ) ς i + i 1 i 2 = 1 n g i 1 , i 2 ( ζ ) 2 w ( ζ ) ς i 1 ς i 2 + + i 1 i 2 i 6 = 1 n h i 1 , i 2 , i 3 ( ζ ) 6 w ( ζ ) ς i 1 ς i 2 ς i 3 , , ς i 6 = f ( ζ ) ,

where ς = ς 1 , ς 2 , , ς n

The general formula of quasilinear PDE of 6th-order in n -independent variables is given in the following definition:

Definition 2.3

The quasilinear sixth-order in n -independent variables

(6) i = 1 n f i ( η , w ) w ( η ) η i + i 1 i 2 = 1 n g i 1 , i 2 ( η , w ) 2 w ( η ) η i 1 η i 2 + + i 1 i 2 i 6 = 1 n h i 1 , i 2 , i 3 ( η , w ) 6 w ( η ) η i 1 η i 2 η i 3 , , η i 6 = f ( η ) .

The following categories are used to classify the quasilinear PDEs of sixth-order.

Definition 2.4

The quasilinear PDE of classes 1,2,3,4,5, and 6: The quasilinear PDE in n-independent-variables is defined in the following:

(7) w η i i 1 , η i j 2 , , η i j m 1 , η i j m = i = 1 n f i ( η , w ) w ( η ) η i + i 1 i 2 = 1 n g i 1 , i 2 ( η , w ) 2 w ( η ) η i 1 η i 2 + + i 1 i 2 i 3 i 4 i 5 i 6 = 1 & i j n h i 1 , i 2 , i 3 , i 4 , i 5 , i 6 ( η , w ) × 6 w ( η ) x i 1 η i 2 η i 3 η i 4 s i 5 η i 6 f ( η , w ) ,

for i 1 , i 2 , , i 6 , i j 1 , i j 2 , , i j m = 1 , 2 , , n . We say that Equation (7) of classes 1–5 for m = 1 , 2 , , 6 resp.

The general formula of PDE of sixth-order of class one in two-variables ( ζ , η ) is given as follows:

(8) w ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) = f ( ζ , η , w ( ζ , η ) , w η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ( ζ , η ) , w η η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ η ( ζ , η ) , w η η ζ ( ζ , η ) , w η η η ( ζ , η ) , , w η η η η η ( ζ , η ) ) ,

or

(9) w η η η η η ( ζ , η ) = f ( ζ , η , w ( ζ , η ) , w η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ( ζ , η ) , w η η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ η ( ζ , η ) w η η ζ ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) , , w ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) ) .

Nowadays, the various numerical methods are used to solve some types of PDEs in various-fields of applied mathematics, engineering, and physics. However, the solutions of these PDEs could approximate by these numerical integrators. However, using modified RKD method combining with MOL, Mechee et al. [20] solved the third-order quasilinear PDEs of class one.

In this article, the sixth-order PDE of class one is converted to a system of sixth-order ODEs and then, using the proposed GRKM integrator combining with MOL, we solved this system of ODEs. Based on the constructed GRKM, the numerical solutions of the implementations of sixth-order PDEs are compared with the exact solutions of these test problems; the comparisons show that the constructed integrator is highly accurate and efficient.

3 Analysis of constructed GRKM

The GRKM method is analyzed in this section for solving quasilinear sixth-order ODEs and PDEs.

3.1 Proposed GRKM for solving ODEs

The following is the form of the proposed GRKM integrator with s-stages for solving the class one of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs in Equation (2) with ICs (3):

(10) z n + 1 = z n + h z n + h 2 2 ! z n + h 3 3 ! z n ( 3 ) + h 4 4 ! z n ( 4 ) + h 5 5 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 6 j = 1 ş b j k i ,

(11) z n + 1 = z n + h z n + h 2 2 ! z n ( 3 ) + h 3 3 ! z n ( 4 ) + h 4 4 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 5 j = 1 ş b j k i ,

(12) z n + 1 = z n + h z n ( 3 ) + h 2 2 ! z n ( 4 ) + h 3 3 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 4 j = 1 ş b j k i ,

(13) z n + 1 ( 3 ) = z n ( 3 ) + h z n ( 4 ) + h 2 2 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 3 j = 1 ş b j ( 3 ) k i ,

(14) z n + 1 ( 4 ) = z n ( 4 ) + h z n ( 5 ) + h 2 j = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) k j ,

(15) z n + 1 ( 5 ) = z n ( 5 ) + h j = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) k j ,

where

(16) k 1 = f ( x n , z n ) ,

and

(17) k j = f x n + c j h 1 z n + c j h z n + c j 2 h 2 2 ! z n + c g 3 h 3 3 ! z n ( 3 ) + c j 4 h 4 4 ! z n ( 4 ) + c j 5 h 5 5 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 6 m = 1 j 1 a 1 , jm k m , z n + c n h z n + c n 2 h 2 2 ! z n ( 3 ) + c j 3 h 3 3 ! z n ( 4 ) + c j 4 h 4 4 ! z n ( 5 ) + h 5 l = 1 j 1 a 2 , jm k m ,

for j = 2 , 3 , 4 , , ş . The coefficients of GRKM are listed as follows: b i ( l ) and c i , a 1 , i , j , a 2 , i , j for i , j 8 and l = 0 , 1 , 2 , , 5 . GRKM is explicit-method if a 1 , i , j = a 2 , i , j = 0 , for i j , else GRKM is implicit-method. The coefficients of GRKM are expressed as in Table 1 using Butcher notation.

c A 1
A 2
b T
b T
b T
b ( 3 ) T
b ( 4 ) T
b ( 5 ) T

Table 1

Butcher tableau of GRKM6 method

1 2 + 15 10 0
1 2 15 10 1 2 0
1 2 1 2 1 2 0
1 2 0 0
1 2 259 320
11 17 , 280 + 71 15 432 , 000 11 17 , 280 71 15 432 , 000 1 8 , 640
31 8 , 640 + 15 1 , 080 31 172 , 808 , 640 15 1 , 080 1 864
7 432 + 15 240 7 432 15 240 1 108
1 18 + 15 72 1 18 15 72 1 18
5 15 15 36 5 36 15 36 2 9
5 18 5 18 4 9

3.1.1 Derivation of the order conditions (OCs) of GRKM

As shown by Equations (10)–(17), we have determined the OCs and then the coefficients of the proposed GRKM numerical integrator in this subsection. The Taylor-series expansion method is used to expand these equations. Implementing some algebraic adaptations, Taylor-expansions are then equivalent to the solutions suggested by the Taylor-serious expansion with the same local truncation error. We have generated the general OCs for the GRKM technique using the method for deriving OCs for the RK method which was described in [33]. We have obtained the OCs of the suggested GRKM technique as follows using Maple software:

OCs for ỿ :

(18) i = 1 ş b i = 1 720 , i = 1 ş b i c i = 1 5,040 , i = 1 ş b i c i 2 = 1 20,160 , i = 1 ş b i c i 3 = 1 60,480 , i = 1 ş b i c i 4 = 1 151,200 .

OCs for ỿ :

(19) i = 1 ş b i = 1 120 , i = 1 ş b i c i = 1 720 , i = 1 ş b i c i 2 = 1 2,520 , i = 1 ş b i c i 3 = 1 6,720 , i = 1 ş b i c i 4 = 1 15,120 , i = 1 ş b i c i 5 = 1 30,240 .

OCs for ỿ :

(20) i = 1 ş b i = 1 2 2 , i = 1 ş b i c i = 1 120 , i = 1 ş b i c i 2 = 1 3,660 , i = 1 ş b i c i 3 = 1 840 , i = 1 ş b i c i 4 = 1 1,680 , i = 1 ş b i c i 5 = 1 3,024 , i = 1 ş b i c i 6 = 1 5,040 .

OCs for ỿ ( 3 ) :

(21) i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) = 1 6 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i = 1 2 π , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 2 = 1 60 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 3 = 1 120 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 4 = 1 210 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 5 = 1 336 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 6 = 1 504 , i = 1 ş b i ( 3 ) c i 7 = 1 720 .

OCs for ỿ ( 4 ) :

(22) i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) = 1 2 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i = 1 6 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 2 = 1 12 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 3 = 1 20 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 4 = 1 30 ,   i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 5 = 1 42 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 6 = 1 56 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 7 = 1 72 , i = 1 ş b i ( 4 ) c i 8 = 1 90 .

OCs for ỿ ( 5 ) :

(23) i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) = 1 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i = 1 2 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 2 = 1 3 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 3 = 1 4 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 4 = 1 5 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 5 = 1 6 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 6 = 1 7 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 7 = 1 8 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i 8 = 1 9 , i = 1 ş b i ( 5 ) c i = 1 10 , i = 1 ş ɉ < i ş b i ( 5 ) a 2 i ɉ = 1 720 .

3.1.2 The proposed method’s derivation

The coefficients of the proposed GRKM integrator, which are defined in the Equations (10)–(17) for solving ODE in Equation (1) with ICs (3), are obtained using Maple program for solving the OCs in Equations (18)–(23), Table 1.

3.2 Modified GRKM-method for solving PDEs

Consider the following form of quasilinear sixth-order PDEs of class one: ζ , η to

(24) w η η η η η η ( ζ , η ) = f ( ζ , η , w ( ζ , η ) , w η ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) , w ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) , , w ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , η ) ) ; a < ζ < b ; 0 < η T ,

with ICs

(25) w ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , 0 ) = f 6 ( ζ ) , w ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , 0 ) = f 5 ( ζ ) , w ζ ζ ζ ( ζ , 0 ) = f 4 ( ζ ) w ζ ζ ( ζ , 0 ) = f 3 ( ζ ) , w ζ ( ζ , 0 ) = f 2 ( ζ ) , w ( ζ , 0 ) = f 1 ( ζ ) , a ζ b ,

with the boundary conditions (BCs),

(26) w ( a , η ) = g 1 ( η ) , w ( b , η ) = g 2 ( η ) ; η > 0 .

We present an established approach for solving class one PDEs using the GRKM and MOL that is consistent with the following algorithm.

3.3 Algorithm of modified GRKM

Consider two intervals of the domain definition in two directions of ζ and η , which are named as [ a , b ] and [ 0 , T ] with the norms of the subintervals are h = b a n and k = T m respectively. Here, n and m are the number of partitions of intervals in the directions of ζ , η respectively, where zet a i = a + ih , and η j = jk , for j = 1 , 2 , , m . and i = 1 , 2 , , n 1 . We can combine GRKM with MOL method to solve Equation (24) with ICs in Equation (25) and BCs in Equation (26) according the following-steps:

  1. Apply the steps (2)–(6) while 1 k mm

  2. Fix ζ = ζ l at the point ( ζ , η ) of the PDE in Equation (24) in which convert to the following system of (DEs):

    (27) w l ( 6 ) ( η ) = f ζ , η , w ( η ) , w ( ζ , η ) , w ( ζ , η ) s , 2 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 2 , 3 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 3 , 4 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 4 , 5 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 5 , 6 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 6 ζ = ζ l .

  3. Substituting the formulas of central finite-difference in the derivative function w ( ζ , η ) in the right-hand side of Equation (27) up to order six as follows:

    w ( ζ , η ) ζ ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 1 , j w l 1 , j 2 h , 2 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 2 ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 1 , j 2 w l , j + w l 1 , j h 2 , 3 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 3 ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 2 , j 2 w l + 1 , j + 2 w l 1 , j w l 2 , j h 3 ,

    4 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 4 ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 2 , j 4 w l + 1 , j + 6 w i , j 4 w i 1 , j + w i 2 , j 2 h 3 , 5 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 5 ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 3 , j 4 w i + 2 , j + 5 w l + 1 , j 5 w l 1 , j + 4 w l 2 , j w l + 3 , j 2 h 5 , 6 w ( ζ , η ) ζ 6 ( ζ , η ) = ( ζ i , η j ) w l + 3 , j 6 w l + 2 , j + 15 w l + 1 , j 20 w l , j + 15 w l 1 , j 6 w l 2 , j + w l + 3 , j h 6 .

    Hence, we obtain a system of sixth -order ODEs as follows:

    (28) ψ l ( 6 ) ( t ) = f ( η l , η , ψ i 3 ( η ) , ψ l 2 ( η ) , ψ l 1 ( η ) , ψ l ( η ) , ψ l ( η ) , ψ l + 1 ( η ) , ψ l + 2 ( η ) , ψ l + 3 ( η ) ) ,

    for l = 1 , 2 , , n 1 .

  4. If j = 1 then, ICs have the formula:

    (29) w i ( k ) ( 0 ) = f k + 1 ( ζ i ) .

    For 2 = < j < = m , the ICs are,

    (30) w i ( k ) ( η j 1 ) = d k w ( ζ , η j 1 ) d ζ k ζ = ζ i = f k ( ζ i ) ,

    for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .

  5. Put the BCs using the following notation,

    (31) w 0 , j = w ( a , η j ) = g 1 ( η j ) , w n , j = w ( b , η j ) = g 2 ( η j ) .

  6. Finally, the system of ODEs in Equation (27) at the line η = η j with ICs (28) and (29) and BCs (30) can be solved using the GRKM, Figure 1, The class one of quasilinear sixth-order PDE in Equation (24) with the ICs in Equation (25) and the BCs in Equation (26) in the region of definition, which are shown in Figure 1, could be solved using this algorithm.

Figure 1 
                  The domain of PDE of class one.
Figure 1

The domain of PDE of class one.

4 Implementations

We can examine the constructed method for solving some ODEs and PDEs problems in this section.

4.1 Implementation of ODEs

This subsection investigates the proposed GRKM by studying the numerical solutions of several problems and then, their numerical results are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
                  The efficiency curves of GRKM and their comparisons for graphs of Log10(Absolute Errors) against Log(Computational Time) of numerical solutions for Examples 4.1–4.6.
Figure 2

The efficiency curves of GRKM and their comparisons for graphs of Log10(Absolute Errors) against Log(Computational Time) of numerical solutions for Examples 4.1–4.6.

Example 4.1

Homogenous in ODE

w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = w ( ξ ) ; 0 < ξ b .

ICs

w ( 0 ) = 0 , w ( 0 ) = 1 , w ( 0 ) = 0 , w ( 3 ) ( 0 ) = 1 , w ( 4 ) ( 0 ) = 0 , w ( 5 ) ( 0 ) = 1 .

The exact solution is w ( ξ ) = sin ( ξ ) , b = 1 .

Example 4.2

Linear ODE

w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = w ( ξ ) + 2 w ( ξ ) , 0 < ξ b .

ICs

w ( j ) ( 0 ) = ( 1 ) j ; i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .

The exact solution is w ( ξ ) = e ξ , b = 1 .

Example 4.3

Non-homogenous ODE

w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = ( 120 + 720 ξ 2 480 ξ 4 + 64 ξ 6 ) w ( ξ ) ,

0 < ξ b .

ICs

w ( i ) ( 0 ) = 0 ; i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ; w ( 0 ) = 1 .

The exact solution is w ( ξ ) = e ξ 2 , b = 1 .

Example 4.4

Homogenous ODE

w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = w ( ξ ) + w ( ξ ) cos ( ξ ) ; , 0 < ξ b .

ICs

w ( 2 j ) ( 0 ) = 0 ; w ( 2 j 1 ) ( 0 ) = ( 1 ) j .

The exact solution is w ( ξ ) = sin ( ξ ) , b = π .

Example 4.5

Nonlinear ODE

w ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = w 3 ( ξ ) 121 w 6 ( ξ ) , 0 < ξ b .

ICs

w ( j ) ( 0 ) = ( 1 ) j ! ; j = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .

The exact solution is w ( ξ ) = 1 1 + ξ , b = 1 .

Example 4.6

Linear system ODEs

w 1 ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = 666 w 1 ( ξ ) + 602 w 2 ( ξ ) + 665 w 3 ( ξ ) , w 2 ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = 665 w 1 ( ξ ) 601 w 2 ( ξ ) 665 w 3 ( ξ ) , w 3 ( 6 ) ( ξ ) = 728 w 1 ( ξ ) + 728 w 2 ( ξ ) + 729 w 3 ( ξ ) .

ICs

w 1 ( 0 ) = 1 , w 1 ( 0 ) = 2 , w 1 ( 0 ) = 6 , w 1 ( 0 ) = 20 , w 1 ( 4 ) ( 0 ) = 66 , w 1 ( 5 ) ( 0 ) = 274 , w 2 ( 0 ) = 0 , w 2 ( 0 ) = 1 , w 2 ( 0 ) = 5 , w 2 ( 0 ) = 19 , w 2 ( 4 ) ( 0 ) = 65 , w 2 ( 5 ) ( 0 ) = 211 , w 3 ( 0 ) = 0 , w 3 ( 0 ) = 2 , w 3 ( 0 ) = 8 , w 3 ( 0 ) = 26 , w 3 ( 4 ) ( 0 ) = 80 , w 3 ( 5 ) ( 0 ) = 242 .

The exact solution for this system in [0, 1] is:

w 1 ( s ) = e 3 ξ e 2 ξ + e ξ , w 2 ( s ) = e 3 ξ + e 2 ξ , w 3 ( s ) = e 3 ξ e ξ .

4.2 Implementation of PDEs

In this subsection, the developed method is evaluated by using MATLAB to solve several examples of type I, quasilinear, and sixth-order PDEs. We performed a simulated comparison between the exact and numerical solutions of the implementations in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3

Comparison between numerical and exact solutions of GRKM6 method for example 4.8 , a = 0 , b = 1

Time ( t j ) x 1 Numerical solution Absolute error
1 0 3 0.2 0.810584245970172 0.000000000000015
0.4 0.663650250136179 0.000000000000140
0.6 0.543350869073371 0.000000000001128
0.8 0.444858066211603 0.000000000011338
2 × 10 3 0.2 0.802518797862978 0.000000000099500
0.4 0.657046819346977 0.000000000468080
0.6 0.537943574317410 0.000000863277265
0.8 0.440428525520124 0.000003128983875
3 × 10 3 0.2 0.794533579412687 0.000000023090647
0.4 0.650508584521286 0.000000510202030
0.6 0.532589799908525 0.000002001098373
0.8 0.436037992442788 0.000011293878747
4 × 10 3 0.2 0.786627629842670 0.000000231223884
0.4 0.644031320063111 0.000005101020030
0.6 0.527263950569386 0.000028473473663
0.8 0.431598124040692 0.000112399388387
Table 4

Numerical comparison between numerical and exact solutions of GRKM6 method for example 4.9, a = 0 , b = 1

Time ( t j ) x i Numerical-Solution Absolute-Error
10 3 0.2 0.931060827337037 0.000000000000022
0.4 0.706706542681192 0.000000000000243
0.6 0.372357587809712 0.000000000002122
0.8 ‒0.019199688978460 0.000000000011454
2 × 10 3 0.2 0.941059660596718 0.000000000083636
0.4 0.716705375572418 0.000000000456757
0.6 0.382355557892742 0.000000737663737
0.8 ‒0.009203984591831 0.000003128983875
3 × 10 3 0.2 0.951056471114733 0.00000003424355
0.4 0.726701699347631 0.000000637272788
0.6 0.392351253580796 0.000003545315661
0.8 0.000784684022459 0.000034255616111
4 × 10 3 0.2 0.961050096965635 0.000000534636277
0.4 0.736690942513769 0.000002553564477
0.6 0.402318615189645 0.000012662663778
0.8 0.010677412496958 0.000212178237873

Example 4.7

Homogenous

Consider

ƒ t t t t t t ( x , t ) + ƒ xx ( x , t ) + 32 ƒ t ( x , t ) + ƒ ( x , t ) = 0 , a x b , t > 0 .

ICs

ƒ ( x , 0 ) = cos x , ƒ x ( x , 0 ) = sin x , ƒ xx ( x , 0 ) = cos x ,

ƒ xxx ( x , 0 ) = sin x , ƒ xxxx ( x , 0 ) = cos x , ƒ xxxxx ( x , 0 ) = sin x .

BCs

ƒ ( a , t ) = e 2 t cos a , ƒ ( b , t ) = e 2 t cos b .

The exact solution is ƒ ( x , t ) = e 2 π cos x , a = 0 , b = 1 , (Table 2).

Table 2

Numerical comparison between numerical and exact solutions of GRKM6 method for example 4.7. a = 0 , b = 1

Time ( t j ) x i Numerical solution Absolute error
10 3 0.2 0.960659959352262 0.000000000000011
0.4 0.902822764356089 0.000000000000123
0.6 0.808992874766153 0.000000000000322
0.8 0.682910992174669 0.000000000027171
2 × 10 3 0.2 0.941637617556523 0.000000000064710
0.4 0.884945675385033 0.000000000563747
0.6 0.792972879284243 0.000000637728737
0.8 0.669385319543449 0.000001274783921
3 × 10 3 0.2 0.922991920471520 0.000000046727811
0.4 0.867422067217741 0.000000385885201
0.6 0.777269809327510 0.000002000023101
0.8 0.656122375294602 0.000046772782891
4 × 10 3 0.2 0.904715247328577 0.000000534772782
0.4 0.850241358563156 0.000001020101012
0.6 0.761852323904527 0.000012948457387
0.8 0.643028952647224 0.000846278289912

Example 4.8

Homogenous

Consider

ƒ t t t t t t ( x , t ) + ƒ xxxxx ( x , t ) + ƒ xxxx ( x , t ) + ƒ xxx ( x , t ) + ƒ xx ( x , t )

+ ƒ x ( x , t ) + ƒ t ( x , t ) + ƒ ( x , t ) = 0 , a x b , t > 0 .

ICs

ƒ ( x , 0 ) = e x , ƒ x ( x , 0 ) = e x , ƒ xx ( x , 0 ) = e x , ƒ xxx ( x , 0 ) = e x ,

ƒ xxxx ( x , 0 ) = e x , ƒ xxxxx ( x , 0 ) = e x .

BCs,

ƒ ( a , t ) = e a e t ,   ƒ ( b , t ) = e b e t .

The exact solution is ƒ ( x , t ) = e t e x , a = 0 , b = 1 , (Table 3).

Example 4.9

Non-homogenous

Consider

ƒ t t t t t t ( x , t ) + ƒ xxxxxx ( x , t ) 16 ƒ xx ( x , t ) + ƒ t ( x , t ) + ƒ ( x , t ) = cos ( 2 x ) + cos ( t ) ,

a x b , t > 0 .

ICs

ƒ ( x , 0 ) = cos ( 2 x ) , ƒ x ( x , 0 ) = 2 sin ( 2 x ) , ƒ xx ( x , 0 ) = 4 cos ( 2 x ) ,

ƒ xxx ( x , 0 ) = 8 sin ( 2 x ) , ƒ xxxx ( x , 0 ) = 16 cos ( 2 x ) , ƒ xxxxx ( x , 0 ) = 32 sin ( 2 x ) .

BCs

ƒ ( a , t ) = cos ( 2 a ) + sin ( 2 t ) , ƒ ( b , t ) = cos ( 2 b ) + sin ( 2 t ) .

The exact solution is ƒ ( x , t ) = cos ( 2 x ) + sin ( 2 t ) . a = 0 , b = 1 , ( Table 4 ) .

5 Discussion and conclusion

In this study, we have derived a direct numerical approach GRKM for solving the general class of quasilinear sixth-order ODEs. The aims of this article are first, to establish a direct explicit integrator for solving this general class of sixth-order ODEs and second, to combine the proposed method with the MOL method to be consistent with solving a class of quasilinear, sixth-order PDEs. Also, we have studied the efficiency of the proposed GRKM by using different examples of quasilinear, sixth-order ODEs in addition to the PDEs of the same order. The numerical results of ODEs and PDEs which are introduced in Tables 24 and Figure 2 proved that the solutions of the proposed method are identical to the analytical solutions. However, from the numerical results, which were obtained by the GRKM, we can conclude that GRKM is more efficient than the classical method in terms of computational time and absolute error. Numerical results obtained using the constructed GRKM have been compared with the numerical solutions of the classical RK method for solving ODEs problems in like manner, as well as they have been compared with analytical solutions of PDEs problems. As a result, the proposed method is more efficient and accurate than the indirect methods, due to the numerical results of the implementation requiring fewer function evaluations and function calls. Finally, the constructed GRKM is more cost-effective in terms of computational time, than the existing methods.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for very helpful comments that have led to an improvement of the article.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript. MSM, MAK, and AYC contributed equally to the work, everything related to this research, from the idea to discussing the results, programming the proposed methods, making modifications, etc., until this research was completed.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The most datasets generated and/or analysed in this study are comprised in this submitted manuscript. The other datasets are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author with the attached information.

References

[1] Chang K-C. Variational methods for non-differentiable functionals and their applications to partial differential equations. J Math Anal Appl. 1981;80(1):102–29.10.1016/0022-247X(81)90095-0Search in Google Scholar

[2] Tartar L. Compensated compactness and applications to partial differential equations. In Nonlinear analysis and mechanics, Heriot-Watt symposium. Vol. 4, Pitman; 1979. p. 13.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Jator SN. Numerical integrators for fourth order initial and boundary value problems. Int J Pure Appl Math. 2008;47(4):563–76.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Alomari A, Anakira NR, Bataineh AS, Hashim I. Approximate solution of nonlinear system of bvp arising in fluid flow problem. Math Probl Eng. 2013;2013(1):136043.10.1155/2013/136043Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kelesoglu O. The solution of fourth-order boundary value problem arising out of the beam-column theory using adomian decomposition method. Math Probl Eng. 2014;2014(1):649471.10.1155/2014/649471Search in Google Scholar

[6] Wu XJ, Wang Y, Price W. Multiple resonances, responses, and parametric instabilities in offshore structures. J Ship Res. 1988;32(4):285–96.10.5957/jsr.1988.32.4.285Search in Google Scholar

[7] Malek A, Beidokhti RS. Numerical solution for high order differential equations using a hybrid neural network-optimization method. Appl Math Computation. 2006;183(1):260–71.10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.068Search in Google Scholar

[8] Toomre J, Zahn J-P, Latour J, Spiegel E. Stellar convection theory. ii-singlemode study of the second convection zone in an a-type star. Astrophysical J. 1976;207:545–63.10.1086/154522Search in Google Scholar

[9] Boutayeb A, Twizell E. Numerical methods for the solution of special sixth-order boundary-value problems. Int J Comput Math. 1992;45:3–4:207–23.10.1080/00207169208804130Search in Google Scholar

[10] Twizell E. Numerical methods for sixth-order boundary value problems. In Numerical Mathematics Singapore 1988. Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Mathematics held at the National University of Singapore; 1988. p. 495–506.10.1007/978-3-0348-6303-2_40Search in Google Scholar

[11] Twizell E, Boutayeb A. Numerical methods for the solution of special and general sixth-order boundary-value problems, with applications to bénard layer eigenvalue problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Vol. 431, Issue 1883; 1990. p. 433–50.10.1098/rspa.1990.0142Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cong NH. Explicit pseudo two-step RKN methods with stepsize control. Appl Numer Mathematics. 2001;38(1–2):135–44.10.1016/S0168-9274(01)00031-9Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mechee M, Senu N, Ismail F, Nikouravan B, Siri Z. A three-stage fifth-order Runge-Kutta method for directly solving special third-order differential equation with application to thin film flow problem. Math Probl Eng. 2013;2013(1):795397.10.1155/2013/795397Search in Google Scholar

[14] You X, Chen Z. Direct integrators of Runge-Kutta type for special third-order ordinary differential equations. Appl Numer Mathematics. 2013;74:128–50.10.1016/j.apnum.2013.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[15] Senu N, Mechee M, Ismail F, Siri Z. Embedded explicit Runge-Kutta type methods for directly solving special third order differential equations y''' = f(x,y). Appl Math Comput. 2014;240:281–93.10.1016/j.amc.2014.04.094Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mechee M, Kadhim M. Direct explicit integrators of RK type for solving special fourth-order ordinary differential equations with an application. Glob J Pure Appl Mathematics. 2016;12(6):4687–715.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mechee MS, Kadhim MA. Explicit direct integrators of RK type for solving special fifth-order ordinary differential equations. Am J Appl Sci. 2016;13:1452–60.10.3844/ajassp.2016.1452.1460Search in Google Scholar

[18] Mechee MS, Mshachal JK. Derivation of embedded explicit RK type methods for directly solving class of seventh-order ordinary differential equations. J Interdiscip Math. 2019;22(8):1451–6.10.1080/09720502.2019.1700936Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mechee M, Ismail F, Senu N, Siri Z. Directly solving special second order delay differential equations using Runge-Kutta-Nyström method. Math Probl Eng. 2013;2013(1):830317.10.1155/2013/830317Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mechee M, Ismail F, Hussain ZM, Siri Z. Direct numerical methods for solving a class of third-order partial differential equations. Appl Math Comput. 2013;2013(1):830317.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Mechee M, Ismail F, Siri Z, Senu N, Serdang S. A four stage sixth-order RKD method for directly solving special third order ordinary differential equations. Life Sci J. 2014;11(3):399–404.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Mechee MS. Direct integrators of Runge-Kutta type for special third-order differential equations with their applications, Thesis, ISM, University of Malaya, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mechee M, Ismail F, Senu N, Siri Z. A third-order direct integrators of Runge-Kutta type for special third-order ordinary and delay differential equations. J Appl Sci. 2014;2(6).Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mechee MS, Hussain ZM, Mohammed HR. On the reliability and stability of direct explicit Runge-Kutta integrators. Glob J Pure Appl Math. 2016;12(4):3959–75.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mechee MS, Rajihy Y. Generalized RK integrators for solving ordinary differential equations: A survey & comparison study. Glob J Pure Appl Math. 2017;13(7):2923–49.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Mechee MS, Al-Juaifri GA, Joohy AK. Modified homotopy perturbation method for solving generalized linear complex differential equations. Appl Math Sci. 2017;11(51):2527–40.10.12988/ams.2017.78264Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mechee MS, Mshachal JK. Derivation of direct explicit integrators of RK type for solving class of seventh-order ordinary differential equations. Karbala Int J Mod Sci. 2019;5(3):8.10.33640/2405-609X.1156Search in Google Scholar

[28] Mechee MS. Generalized RK integrators for solving class of sixth-order ordinary differential equations. J Interdiscip Math. 2019;22(8):1457–61.10.1080/09720502.2019.1705502Search in Google Scholar

[29] Mechee MS, Al-Shaher OI, Al-Juaifri GA. Haar wavelet technique for solving fractional differential equations with an application. J Al-Qadisiyah Comput Sci Math. 2019;11(1):70.10.29304/jqcm.2019.11.1.461Search in Google Scholar

[30] Mechee MS, Wali HM, Mussa KB. Developed RKM method for solving ninth-order ordinary differential equations with applications. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1664, Issue 1, IOP Publishing; 2020. p. 012102.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mechee MS, Mussa KB. Generalization of RKM integrators for solving a class of eighth-order ordinary differential equations with applications. Aduanced Math Model & Appl. 2020;5(1):111–20.10.1088/1742-6596/1664/1/012102Search in Google Scholar

[32] Mechee MS, Senu N. A new numerical multistep method for solution of second order of ordinary differential equations. Asian Trans Sci Technol. 2012;2(2):18–22.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Dormand J, El-Mikkawy M, Prince P. Families of Runge-Kutta-Nyström formulae. IMA J Numer Anal. 1987;7(2):235–50.10.1093/imanum/7.2.235Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ram M, Davim JP, (eds.) Advanced mathematical techniques in engineering sciences. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.10.1201/b22440Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-02
Revised: 2024-04-05
Accepted: 2024-04-18
Published Online: 2024-07-02

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Methodology of automated quality management
  3. Influence of vibratory conveyor design parameters on the trough motion and the self-synchronization of inertial vibrators
  4. Application of finite element method in industrial design, example of an electric motorcycle design project
  5. Correlative evaluation of the corrosion resilience and passivation properties of zinc and aluminum alloys in neutral chloride and acid-chloride solutions
  6. Will COVID “encourage” B2B and data exchange engineering in logistic firms?
  7. Influence of unsupported sleepers on flange climb derailment of two freight wagons
  8. A hybrid detection algorithm for 5G OTFS waveform for 64 and 256 QAM with Rayleigh and Rician channels
  9. Effect of short heat treatment on mechanical properties and shape memory properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy
  10. Exploring the potential of ammonia and hydrogen as alternative fuels for transportation
  11. Impact of insulation on energy consumption and CO2 emissions in high-rise commercial buildings at various climate zones
  12. Advanced autopilot design with extremum-seeking control for aircraft control
  13. Adaptive multidimensional trust-based recommendation model for peer to peer applications
  14. Effects of CFRP sheets on the flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beam
  15. Enhancing urban sustainability through industrial synergy: A multidisciplinary framework for integrating sustainable industrial practices within urban settings – The case of Hamadan industrial city
  16. Advanced vibrant controller results of an energetic framework structure
  17. Application of the Taguchi method and RSM for process parameter optimization in AWSJ machining of CFRP composite-based orthopedic implants
  18. Improved correlation of soil modulus with SPT N values
  19. Technologies for high-temperature batch annealing of grain-oriented electrical steel: An overview
  20. Assessing the need for the adoption of digitalization in Indian small and medium enterprises
  21. A non-ideal hybridization issue for vertical TFET-based dielectric-modulated biosensor
  22. Optimizing data retrieval for enhanced data integrity verification in cloud environments
  23. Performance analysis of nonlinear crosstalk of WDM systems using modulation schemes criteria
  24. Nonlinear finite-element analysis of RC beams with various opening near supports
  25. Thermal analysis of Fe3O4–Cu/water over a cone: a fractional Maxwell model
  26. Radial–axial runner blade design using the coordinate slice technique
  27. Theoretical and experimental comparison between straight and curved continuous box girders
  28. Effect of the reinforcement ratio on the mechanical behaviour of textile-reinforced concrete composite: Experiment and numerical modeling
  29. Experimental and numerical investigation on composite beam–column joint connection behavior using different types of connection schemes
  30. Enhanced performance and robustness in anti-lock brake systems using barrier function-based integral sliding mode control
  31. Evaluation of the creep strength of samples produced by fused deposition modeling
  32. A combined feedforward-feedback controller design for nonlinear systems
  33. Effect of adjacent structures on footing settlement for different multi-building arrangements
  34. Analyzing the impact of curved tracks on wheel flange thickness reduction in railway systems
  35. Review Articles
  36. Mechanical and smart properties of cement nanocomposites containing nanomaterials: A brief review
  37. Applications of nanotechnology and nanoproduction techniques
  38. Relationship between indoor environmental quality and guests’ comfort and satisfaction at green hotels: A comprehensive review
  39. Communication
  40. Techniques to mitigate the admission of radon inside buildings
  41. Erratum
  42. Erratum to “Effect of short heat treatment on mechanical properties and shape memory properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy”
  43. Special Issue: AESMT-3 - Part II
  44. Integrated fuzzy logic and multicriteria decision model methods for selecting suitable sites for wastewater treatment plant: A case study in the center of Basrah, Iraq
  45. Physical and mechanical response of porous metals composites with nano-natural additives
  46. Special Issue: AESMT-4 - Part II
  47. New recycling method of lubricant oil and the effect on the viscosity and viscous shear as an environmentally friendly
  48. Identify the effect of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of aluminum matrix composite produced by powder metallurgy technique
  49. Static behavior of piled raft foundation in clay
  50. Ultra-low-power CMOS ring oscillator with minimum power consumption of 2.9 pW using low-voltage biasing technique
  51. Using ANN for well type identifying and increasing production from Sa’di formation of Halfaya oil field – Iraq
  52. Optimizing the performance of concrete tiles using nano-papyrus and carbon fibers
  53. Special Issue: AESMT-5 - Part II
  54. Comparative the effect of distribution transformer coil shape on electromagnetic forces and their distribution using the FEM
  55. The complex of Weyl module in free characteristic in the event of a partition (7,5,3)
  56. Restrained captive domination number
  57. Experimental study of improving hot mix asphalt reinforced with carbon fibers
  58. Asphalt binder modified with recycled tyre rubber
  59. Thermal performance of radiant floor cooling with phase change material for energy-efficient buildings
  60. Surveying the prediction of risks in cryptocurrency investments using recurrent neural networks
  61. A deep reinforcement learning framework to modify LQR for an active vibration control applied to 2D building models
  62. Evaluation of mechanically stabilized earth retaining walls for different soil–structure interaction methods: A review
  63. Assessment of heat transfer in a triangular duct with different configurations of ribs using computational fluid dynamics
  64. Sulfate removal from wastewater by using waste material as an adsorbent
  65. Experimental investigation on strengthening lap joints subjected to bending in glulam timber beams using CFRP sheets
  66. A study of the vibrations of a rotor bearing suspended by a hybrid spring system of shape memory alloys
  67. Stability analysis of Hub dam under rapid drawdown
  68. Developing ANFIS-FMEA model for assessment and prioritization of potential trouble factors in Iraqi building projects
  69. Numerical and experimental comparison study of piled raft foundation
  70. Effect of asphalt modified with waste engine oil on the durability properties of hot asphalt mixtures with reclaimed asphalt pavement
  71. Hydraulic model for flood inundation in Diyala River Basin using HEC-RAS, PMP, and neural network
  72. Numerical study on discharge capacity of piano key side weir with various ratios of the crest length to the width
  73. The optimal allocation of thyristor-controlled series compensators for enhancement HVAC transmission lines Iraqi super grid by using seeker optimization algorithm
  74. Numerical and experimental study of the impact on aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA0012 airfoil
  75. Effect of nano-TiO2 on physical and rheological properties of asphalt cement
  76. Performance evolution of novel palm leaf powder used for enhancing hot mix asphalt
  77. Performance analysis, evaluation, and improvement of selected unsignalized intersection using SIDRA software – Case study
  78. Flexural behavior of RC beams externally reinforced with CFRP composites using various strategies
  79. Influence of fiber types on the properties of the artificial cold-bonded lightweight aggregates
  80. Experimental investigation of RC beams strengthened with externally bonded BFRP composites
  81. Generalized RKM methods for solving fifth-order quasi-linear fractional partial differential equation
  82. An experimental and numerical study investigating sediment transport position in the bed of sewer pipes in Karbala
  83. Role of individual component failure in the performance of a 1-out-of-3 cold standby system: A Markov model approach
  84. Implementation for the cases (5, 4) and (5, 4)/(2, 0)
  85. Center group actions and related concepts
  86. Experimental investigation of the effect of horizontal construction joints on the behavior of deep beams
  87. Deletion of a vertex in even sum domination
  88. Deep learning techniques in concrete powder mix designing
  89. Effect of loading type in concrete deep beam with strut reinforcement
  90. Studying the effect of using CFRP warping on strength of husk rice concrete columns
  91. Parametric analysis of the influence of climatic factors on the formation of traditional buildings in the city of Al Najaf
  92. Suitability location for landfill using a fuzzy-GIS model: A case study in Hillah, Iraq
  93. Hybrid approach for cost estimation of sustainable building projects using artificial neural networks
  94. Assessment of indirect tensile stress and tensile–strength ratio and creep compliance in HMA mixes with micro-silica and PMB
  95. Density functional theory to study stopping power of proton in water, lung, bladder, and intestine
  96. A review of single flow, flow boiling, and coating microchannel studies
  97. Effect of GFRP bar length on the flexural behavior of hybrid concrete beams strengthened with NSM bars
  98. Exploring the impact of parameters on flow boiling heat transfer in microchannels and coated microtubes: A comprehensive review
  99. Crumb rubber modification for enhanced rutting resistance in asphalt mixtures
  100. Special Issue: AESMT-6
  101. Design of a new sorting colors system based on PLC, TIA portal, and factory I/O programs
  102. Forecasting empirical formula for suspended sediment load prediction at upstream of Al-Kufa barrage, Kufa City, Iraq
  103. Optimization and characterization of sustainable geopolymer mortars based on palygorskite clay, water glass, and sodium hydroxide
  104. Sediment transport modelling upstream of Al Kufa Barrage
  105. Study of energy loss, range, and stopping time for proton in germanium and copper materials
  106. Effect of internal and external recycle ratios on the nutrient removal efficiency of anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (VIP) wastewater treatment plant
  107. Enhancing structural behaviour of polypropylene fibre concrete columns longitudinally reinforced with fibreglass bars
  108. Sustainable road paving: Enhancing concrete paver blocks with zeolite-enhanced cement
  109. Evaluation of the operational performance of Karbala waste water treatment plant under variable flow using GPS-X model
  110. Design and simulation of photonic crystal fiber for highly sensitive chemical sensing applications
  111. Optimization and design of a new column sequencing for crude oil distillation at Basrah refinery
  112. Inductive 3D numerical modelling of the tibia bone using MRI to examine von Mises stress and overall deformation
  113. An image encryption method based on modified elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol and Hill Cipher
  114. Experimental investigation of generating superheated steam using a parabolic dish with a cylindrical cavity receiver: A case study
  115. Effect of surface roughness on the interface behavior of clayey soils
  116. Investigated of the optical properties for SiO2 by using Lorentz model
  117. Measurements of induced vibrations due to steel pipe pile driving in Al-Fao soil: Effect of partial end closure
  118. Experimental and numerical studies of ballistic resistance of hybrid sandwich composite body armor
  119. Evaluation of clay layer presence on shallow foundation settlement in dry sand under an earthquake
  120. Optimal design of mechanical performances of asphalt mixtures comprising nano-clay additives
  121. Advancing seismic performance: Isolators, TMDs, and multi-level strategies in reinforced concrete buildings
  122. Predicted evaporation in Basrah using artificial neural networks
  123. Energy management system for a small town to enhance quality of life
  124. Numerical study on entropy minimization in pipes with helical airfoil and CuO nanoparticle integration
  125. Equations and methodologies of inlet drainage system discharge coefficients: A review
  126. Thermal buckling analysis for hybrid and composite laminated plate by using new displacement function
  127. Investigation into the mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight mortar using commercial beads or recycled expanded polystyrene
  128. Experimental and theoretical analysis of single-jet column and concrete column using double-jet grouting technique applied at Al-Rashdia site
  129. The impact of incorporating waste materials on the mechanical and physical characteristics of tile adhesive materials
  130. Seismic resilience: Innovations in structural engineering for earthquake-prone areas
  131. Automatic human identification using fingerprint images based on Gabor filter and SIFT features fusion
  132. Performance of GRKM-method for solving classes of ordinary and partial differential equations of sixth-orders
  133. Visible light-boosted photodegradation activity of Ag–AgVO3/Zn0.5Mn0.5Fe2O4 supported heterojunctions for effective degradation of organic contaminates
  134. Production of sustainable concrete with treated cement kiln dust and iron slag waste aggregate
  135. Key effects on the structural behavior of fiber-reinforced lightweight concrete-ribbed slabs: A review
  136. A comparative analysis of the energy dissipation efficiency of various piano key weir types
  137. Special Issue: Transport 2022 - Part II
  138. Variability in road surface temperature in urban road network – A case study making use of mobile measurements
  139. Special Issue: BCEE5-2023
  140. Evaluation of reclaimed asphalt mixtures rejuvenated with waste engine oil to resist rutting deformation
  141. Assessment of potential resistance to moisture damage and fatigue cracks of asphalt mixture modified with ground granulated blast furnace slag
  142. Investigating seismic response in adjacent structures: A study on the impact of buildings’ orientation and distance considering soil–structure interaction
  143. Improvement of porosity of mortar using polyethylene glycol pre-polymer-impregnated mortar
  144. Three-dimensional analysis of steel beam-column bolted connections
  145. Assessment of agricultural drought in Iraq employing Landsat and MODIS imagery
  146. Performance evaluation of grouted porous asphalt concrete
  147. Optimization of local modified metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete by Taguchi method
  148. Effect of waste tire products on some characteristics of roller-compacted concrete
  149. Studying the lateral displacement of retaining wall supporting sandy soil under dynamic loads
  150. Seismic performance evaluation of concrete buttress dram (Dynamic linear analysis)
  151. Behavior of soil reinforced with micropiles
  152. Possibility of production high strength lightweight concrete containing organic waste aggregate and recycled steel fibers
  153. An investigation of self-sensing and mechanical properties of smart engineered cementitious composites reinforced with functional materials
  154. Forecasting changes in precipitation and temperatures of a regional watershed in Northern Iraq using LARS-WG model
  155. Experimental investigation of dynamic soil properties for modeling energy-absorbing layers
  156. Numerical investigation of the effect of longitudinal steel reinforcement ratio on the ductility of concrete beams
  157. An experimental study on the tensile properties of reinforced asphalt pavement
  158. Self-sensing behavior of hot asphalt mixture with steel fiber-based additive
  159. Behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete deep beams reinforced by basalt fibers
  160. Optimizing asphalt binder performance with various PET types
  161. Investigation of the hydraulic characteristics and homogeneity of the microstructure of the air voids in the sustainable rigid pavement
  162. Enhanced biogas production from municipal solid waste via digestion with cow manure: A case study
  163. Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part I
  164. Preparation and investigation of cobalt nanoparticles by laser ablation: Structure, linear, and nonlinear optical properties
  165. Seismic analysis of RC building with plan irregularity in Baghdad/Iraq to obtain the optimal behavior
  166. The effect of urban environment on large-scale path loss model’s main parameters for mmWave 5G mobile network in Iraq
  167. Formatting a questionnaire for the quality control of river bank roads
  168. Vibration suppression of smart composite beam using model predictive controller
  169. Machine learning-based compressive strength estimation in nanomaterial-modified lightweight concrete
  170. In-depth analysis of critical factors affecting Iraqi construction projects performance
  171. Behavior of container berth structure under the influence of environmental and operational loads
  172. Energy absorption and impact response of ballistic resistance laminate
  173. Effect of water-absorbent polymer balls in internal curing on punching shear behavior of bubble slabs
  174. Effect of surface roughness on interface shear strength parameters of sandy soils
  175. Evaluating the interaction for embedded H-steel section in normal concrete under monotonic and repeated loads
  176. Estimation of the settlement of pile head using ANN and multivariate linear regression based on the results of load transfer method
  177. Enhancing communication: Deep learning for Arabic sign language translation
  178. A review of recent studies of both heat pipe and evaporative cooling in passive heat recovery
  179. Effect of nano-silica on the mechanical properties of LWC
  180. An experimental study of some mechanical properties and absorption for polymer-modified cement mortar modified with superplasticizer
  181. Digital beamforming enhancement with LSTM-based deep learning for millimeter wave transmission
  182. Developing an efficient planning process for heritage buildings maintenance in Iraq
  183. Design and optimization of two-stage controller for three-phase multi-converter/multi-machine electric vehicle
  184. Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al1050/Al2O3/Gr composite processed by forming operation ECAP
  185. Calculations of mass stopping power and range of protons in organic compounds (CH3OH, CH2O, and CO2) at energy range of 0.01–1,000 MeV
  186. Investigation of in vitro behavior of composite coating hydroxyapatite-nano silver on 316L stainless steel substrate by electrophoretic technic for biomedical tools
  187. A review: Enhancing tribological properties of journal bearings composite materials
  188. Improvements in the randomness and security of digital currency using the photon sponge hash function through Maiorana–McFarland S-box replacement
  189. Design a new scheme for image security using a deep learning technique of hierarchical parameters
  190. Special Issue: ICES 2023
  191. Comparative geotechnical analysis for ultimate bearing capacity of precast concrete piles using cone resistance measurements
  192. Visualizing sustainable rainwater harvesting: A case study of Karbala Province
  193. Geogrid reinforcement for improving bearing capacity and stability of square foundations
  194. Evaluation of the effluent concentrations of Karbala wastewater treatment plant using reliability analysis
  195. Adsorbent made with inexpensive, local resources
  196. Effect of drain pipes on seepage and slope stability through a zoned earth dam
  197. Sediment accumulation in an 8 inch sewer pipe for a sample of various particles obtained from the streets of Karbala city, Iraq
  198. Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part I
  199. Analyzing the impact of transfer learning on explanation accuracy in deep learning-based ECG recognition systems
  200. Effect of scale factor on the dynamic response of frame foundations
  201. Improving multi-object detection and tracking with deep learning, DeepSORT, and frame cancellation techniques
  202. The impact of using prestressed CFRP bars on the development of flexural strength
  203. Assessment of surface hardness and impact strength of denture base resins reinforced with silver–titanium dioxide and silver–zirconium dioxide nanoparticles: In vitro study
  204. A data augmentation approach to enhance breast cancer detection using generative adversarial and artificial neural networks
  205. Modification of the 5D Lorenz chaotic map with fuzzy numbers for video encryption in cloud computing
  206. Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part I
  207. Evaluation of static bending caused damage of glass-fiber composite structure using terahertz inspection
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0030/html
Scroll to top button