Home Center group actions and related concepts
Article Open Access

Center group actions and related concepts

  • Eman Yahea Habeeb EMAIL logo and Sattar Hameed Hamzah
Published/Copyright: March 2, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In order to examine the characteristics of center group spaces, center orbits, center stabilizers, and center kernels, the major purpose of this work is to introduce the definition of center group actions. We review the definition and proposition of the center limit set, as well as the center thin sets (briefly C -thin) and the center Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces (briefly C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces).

1 Introduction

Many other types of “fuzzy sets,” “intuitionist fuzzy sets,” “vague sets,” “soft sets,” [1] and “fuzzy soft sets” have been developed by mathematicians as tools for tackling ambiguity. Proximity spaces was initially proposed by Efremovic. To offer a subjective topology on the hidden set, Leader and Lodato [2] used more explicit proverbs than those found in the surrounding area of Efremovic. Image analysis [3] and facial recognition [4] are two examples of challenges that benefit from human observation, and proximity is a key factor to keep in mind while working with these types of situations. Several results, such as in the study by Gupta and Patnaik [5], have been produced in support of the fixed point hypothesis, with cyclic compression and the best proximity point being two of the most relevant topics. Recently, A. Kandil et al. [6] developed a new method of proximity structures [7] that is grounded in the ideas of ideal and soft sets. Using the advantages of nearby locations, center sets were first introduced in the study by Abdulsada et al. [8]. One of the most important concepts in geometrical topology is the concept of group actions.

The purpose of this study is to introduce the definition of center group actions and examine the characteristics of center group spaces, center orbits, center stabilizers, and center kernels, as well as the center thin sets (briefly C-thin) and the center Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces (briefly C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces).

1.1 Basic definitions and notations

Definition 1.1. [2,9]. Let X be a nonempty set and δP(X) × P(X) a binary relation, then (X, δ) is proximity space iff for each A ′, A ″, A ‴ ⊆ X,

  1. A δ A ″ iff A δ A ′,

  2. A δ( A ″ ∪ A ‴) iff A δ A ″ or A δ A ‴,

  3. X δ ̅ ,

  4. {x}δ{x} for each x X,

  5. A δ ̅ A ″ implies there is an EX such that A δ ̅ E and (XE) δ ̅ A ″,

where A δ ̅ A ″ means it is not true that A δ A ″.

Definition 1.2. [4] Let (X, δ) be a proximity space and A X. A center set C A = { A , A A δ A }.

Definition 1.3. [4]. Let (X, δ) be a proximity space and {x}, BX such that {x}δB.

Then, x B = {〈{x}, B〉} is called the a center point in X, and we denote the set of all center points in X by Cp ( X ) .

Definition 1.4. [10] Let (X, δ) be a proximity space and τ cent ( X ) P C (X), then τ cent ( X ) is said to be a C -toplogy if

  1. C , C X τ cent ( X ) ,

  2. { C A i : i I } τ cent ( X ) C { C A i : i I } τ cent ( X ) ,

  3. C A 1 , C A 2 τ cent ( X ) C A 1 C C A 2 τ cent ( X ) .

The triplet (X, δ X , and τ cent ( X ) ) is called a C -topological space, and the members of τ cent ( X ) are said to be C -open. τ cent ( X ) is called indiscrete C -toplogy if τ cent ( X ) = { C X , C } and called discrete C -toplogy if τ cent ( X ) P C (X).

Definition 1.5. [10] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space. A center set C B over (X, δ X ) is said to be C -closed set, if there exists C -open C A such that cop. ( C A ) = C B . Since cop. ( C A ) ⊆ C X for each AX, then we denote C -closed set by C XA .

Definition 1.6. [10] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space and C B be a center set. Then, the C -closure of C B , denoted by C B ̅ C = C { C XA : C XA C -closed and C B C C XA } .

Definition 1.7. [10] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space, C A be a center set, and x B be a center point. Then, C A is said to be a C -neighborhood of x B , if there exists a C -open set C A' such that x B C A' C C A .

Proposition 1.8

[10] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space. Then, each center point x B has a C -neighborhood. If C A and C A' are C -neighborhoods of some x B , then C A C C A' is also a C -neighborhood of x B . If C A is C -neighborhood of x B and C A C C A , then C A' is also C -neighborhood of x B .

Definition 1.9. [11] Let ( X , δ X ) and ( Y , δ Y ) be two proximity spaces and A X , B Y , and let C A and C B be two center sets. The center product of these center sets is defined by:

C A X C C B = { A × B , C × D : A , C C A and B , D C B }

Definition 1.10. [11] The function cent ( f ) : ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) ( Y , δ Y , τ cent ( Y ) ) is said to be center continuous function if ( cent ( f ) ) −1 ( C A ) is C -open set in X for every C -open set C A in Y.

Theorem 1.11

[12] Let ( G , μ , τ ) be a topological group. Then, there exists a proximity relation δ such that ( G , δ ) is a proximity space.

Definition 1.12. [12] Let ( G , μ , τ ) be a topological group and ( G , δ ) be the proximity space, which is defined in (Theorem 1.11) and let μ and v be a proximity map, then the fourfold ( G , μ , τ cent ( G ) , δ ) is center topological group if:

  1. The center function cent ( μ ) : Cp ( G ) X c Cp ( G ) Cp ( G ) is center continuous.

  2. The center inverse function cent ( v ) : Cp ( G ) Cp ( G ) is center continuous.

Definition 1.13. [13] A center net is a function S of directed set D to the set of all center points Cp ( X ) that is S : D Cp ( X ) , and the center point S ( d ) is denoted by χ B d = χ d B .

Theorem 1.14

[13] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) and (Y, δ Y , τ cent ( Y ) ) be center topological spaces. And let f :(X, δ X ) → (Y, δ Y ) be a proximity mapping a center function cent ( f ) : (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) → (Y, δ Y , τ cent ( Y ) ) is continuous if and only if whenever ( χ d B ) dD is a center net in (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) such that χ d B c x B o , then cent ( f ) ( χ d B ) c cent ( f ) ( x B o ).

Theorem 1.15

[13] Let (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a center topological space and C A C C X .

Then, x B o C A ̅ C if and only if there is a center net ( χ d B ) d D in C A such that χ d B c x B o .

Theorem 1.16

[13] Let ( χ d B ) dD be a center net in a center topological space (X, δ X , τ cent ( X ) ), and for each d oD, C A do = { χ d B : dd o }, x B o C X is the center cluster point of ( χ d B ) dD if and only if x B o C A d o ̅ C for each d oD.

2 Center compact space and center subnet

Definition 2.1. Let H = { C A i : i I } be the collection of non-empty center sets defined on ( X , δ ) is called is C -cover of the center set C X . If C X = C i I C A i and this collection is called finite C -cover if I is finite set.

Also, it is called C -cover of the non-empty center set C A if C A C C i I C A i . And the mention said to the family H is C -open cover, if each member is C -open. In other words, if C A i is C -open set for all i , then the { C A i : i I } is said to be C -open cover.

Definition 2.2. Let ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space, the universal set C X (a non-empty center set C A ) is called C -compact space if each C -open cover { C A i : i I } of C X ( C A ) has finite subset of I , i.e., if C X = C i I C A i ( C A C C i I C A i ) , then there exist i = 1,…., n such that C X = n C i I C A i ( C A C n C i = 1 C A i ) .

Definition 2.3. A collection F C of center sets is said to have the center finite intersection property ( C FIP ) iff the center intersection of each finite subcollection of F C is center nonempty.

Theorem 2.4

A C -topological space ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) is C -compact iff every collection of C -closed center subset with the C FIP .

Proof: It is clear.

Definition 2.5. A center net ( t β A ) β E in ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) is called a center subnet of a center net ( x α B ) α D iff there is a mapping g : E D such that t A = x B o g , i.e., for each i E , t i A = x g ( i ) B ; for each α D , there exists some m E , such that if m p E , g ( p ) α .

Definition 2.6. [14] Let ( A , ) and ( B , * ) be two directed sets. Then, a mapping ω : B A is said to be isotone iff x y ω ( x ) * ω ( y ) for each x , y B .

Definition 2.7. [14] Let ( A , ) be a directed set and let B A . If for every a A , there exist an element b B such that b a , then B is called the cofinal subset of A .

Theorem 2.8

Let ω be an isotone map of directed set ( B , * ) into directed set ( A , ) such that ω ( B ) is cofinal in A. Let ( χ a H ) a A be a center net. Then, χ H o ω is the center subnet of ( χ a H ) a A .

Proof

It is clear.

Theorem 2.9

Let ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space and let ( χ d B ) d D be a center net in X . Let H C be the collection of center subnet of X satisfying the following two conditions:

  1. ( χ d B ) d D is center frequently in each member of H C .

  2. If C S , C T H C , then there exists C U H C such that C U C C S C C T . Then, there exists a center subnet of ( χ d B ) d D , which is eventually in each member of H C .

Proof

It is evident from (ii) that H C directed set by the center inclusion relation C . Now, consider F C of the center Cartesian product D × H C defined by F C = { ( d , C U ) : d D , C U H C and χ d B C U } . We define a binary relation in F C as follows:

Let ( d , C S ) and ( b , C T ) be any two members of F C . Then, ( d , C S ) ( b , C T ) iff d b and C S C C T . We now show that F C is directed by .

Let ( d , C S ) and ( b , C T ) be any two members of F C . Then, by (ii), there exists C U in H C such that C U C C S C C T so that C U C C S and C U C C T . Again by (i) and by the definition of , there exist an element a in D such that a d and a b and χ a B C U . Then, ( a , C U ) F C and is such that ( a , C U ) ( d , C S ) and ( a , C U ) ( b , C T ) . Define a mapping ω : F C D : ω ( ( d , C S ) ) = d , ( d , C S ) F C . Since ( d , C S ) ( b , C T ) d b it follows that ( d , C S ) ( b , C T ) ω ( d , C S ) ω ( b , C T ) . Hence, ω is an isotone mapping. Furthermore, ω ( F C ) is cofinal in D . [For let d be any element of D . Then, d d . But ω ( d , C S ) = d for all C S H C . Hence, ω ( d , C S ) d . Thus, for every element, d D . There exists an element ω ( a , C S ) of ω ( F C ) such that ω ( a , C S ) d ]. It follows by Theorem 2.8. that the mapping φ B 1 = χ B o ω : F C Cp ( X ) is a center subnet of χ d B .

We now show that this center subnet is eventually in each member of H C . Let C U o be any member of H C . By (i), there exists a member d o of D such that χ d o B C U o . Hence, by definition of F C , b o = ( d o , C U o ) is a member of F C . Now, let b = ( a , C U ) be any element of F C such that b b o . Then, a d o and C U C C U o . We then have φ B 1 ( b ) = ( χ B o ω ) ( b ) = χ B ( ω ( b ) ) = χ B ( ω ( a , C U ) ) = χ a B C U C C U o .

Thus, there exists an element b 1 F C such that for every b F C , b b 1 ω ( b ) C U o . Hence, ω is eventually in C U o .

Theorem 2.10

Let ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a C -topological space. A center point x B o is a center cluster point of a center net ( χ d B ) d D iff there exists a center subnet ( y α A ) α β , which center converges to x B o .

Proof

Assume that ( χ d B ) d D has a center subnet ( y α A ) α β , which center converges to x B o . To prove that x B o is a center cluster point of a center net ( χ d B ) d D . Let C N be a center neighborhood of x B o , and let a o be any element of D . Since ( y α A ) α β is a center subnet of ( χ d B ) d D , there exists a mapping ω : β D such that:

  1. y A = χ B o ω ,

  2. For each d D , there exists an element c in β such that ω ( c ) d for each c * b in β . Hence, by (ii) corresponding to a o D , there exists an element b o β such that ω ( c ) a o for every c * b o since ( y α A ) α β center converges to x B o . Now, let ω ( p ) = q . Then, q D and q a o . Also, χ B ( q ) = χ B ( ω ( p ) ) = ( χ B o ω ) ( p ) = y A ( p ) C N . Thus, we have shown that for each element a o in D , there exists an element q a o in D such that χ B ( q ) C N . Hence, ( χ d B ) d D is center frequently in C N .

It follows that x B o is a center cluster point of ( χ d B ) d D .

Conversely, let x B o be a center cluster point of ( χ d B ) d D , and let N C ( x B o ) be the collection of all center neighborhoods of x B o . If C L and C M are any two center members of N C ( x B o ) , then C L C C M is also a center member of N C ( x B o ) . Also, since is a center cluster point of ( χ d B ) d D . ( χ d B ) d D is center frequently in each member of N C ( x B o ) . Hence, by Theorem 2.9, there exists a subnet ( y α A ) α β of ( χ d B ) d D , which is center eventually in each member of N C ( x B o ) . This implies that ( y α A ) α β center converges to x B o .

Theorem 2.11

C -topological space ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) is C -compact iff each center net in X has a center cluster point.

Proof

Let every center net in X be a center cluster point, and let F C be a collection of C -closed subset in X with C FIP . Let K C = { C A : C A be the center intersection of a finite subcollection of F C } . Since the center intersection of every two center members of K C is a member of K C , it is evident that K C is directed by the center inclusion relation C . Since each C A is non-empty center set, by the axiom of choice, we may choose a center point x B ( C A ) in C A . Now, consider the mapping f : K C Cp ( X ) : f ( C A ) = x B ( C A ) C A K C . Then, f is a center net in X . By hypothesis, f must have a center cluster point, say x B o . Let C E be any member of K C . Then, for every C A C E (i.e., C A C C E ) in K C , we have f ( C A ) = x B ( C A ) C A C C E . Hence, f is center eventually in the C -closed set C E . It follows from Theorem 1.16 that x B o C E . We have x B o K C F C (since F C K C ). Hence, C F C C , and consequently, X is C -compact by Theorem 2.4.

Conversely, let ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be C -compact and let ( χ d B ) d D be a center net in X . For each d in D , let C M d = { χ h B : h d in D } . Since D is directed by , the collection { C M d : d D } has the C FIP . Hence, { C M d ̅ C : d D } also has the C FIP : it follows from Theorem 2.4 that C { C M d ̅ C : d D } C . Let p Y C { C M d ̅ C : d D } . Then, p Y C M d ̅ C d D . Hence, by Theorem 1.16, p Y is a center cluster point of ( χ d B ) d D .

Corollary 2.12

A C -topological space ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) is C -compact iff each center net in X has a center subnet which has center convergence to some center point in X .

Proof

It is an immediate consequence of Theorems 2.10 and 2.11.

3 Center group actions

Definition 3.1. [15] Let G be a topological group and X be a topological space. A left action of G on X is a continuous function φ : G × X X such that:

  1. φ ( e , x ) = x , for all x X , where e is the identity element in G .

  2. φ ( μ ( g 1 , g 2 ) , x ) = φ ( g 1 , φ ( g 2 , x ) ) , for all x X , and μ is the law of multiplication of G . The space X together with action is called group space (for brief G -space) (or more precisely left G -space). In a similar way, one can define a right G -space. We denoted it by φ ( g , x ) = gx .

Now, we introduce the following definition.

Definition 3.2. Let ( G , μ , τ cent ( G ) , δ ) be a center topological group and ( X , δ X , τ cent ( X ) ) be a center topological space. A left center action of Cp ( G ) on Cp ( X ) is a center continuous map cent( φ ): Cp ( G ) X c Cp ( X ) Cp ( X ) such that:

  1. cent( φ ) ( e B o , x B ) = x B , for all x B Cp ( X ) , where e B o is the center identity in Cp ( G ) .

  2. cent ( φ ) ( cent ( μ ) ( g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 ) , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g 2 C 2 , x B ) ) for all x B Cp ( X ) and g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 Cp ( G ) , and cent ( μ ) is the law of center multiplication of Cp ( G ) .

We call the triple ( Cp ( G ) , Cp ( X ) , cent ( φ ) ) a center topological transformation group (center group space), and we also express this same thing by simple saying that Cp ( X ) is Cp ( G ) -space, more precisely (left Cp ( G ) -space). In a similar way, one can define a right Cp ( G ) -space. We denoted it by cent( φ ) ( g C , x B ) = g C x B .

Example 3.3. Let G be a center topological group, then Cp ( G ) is Cp ( G ) -space by center multiplication

cent ( φ ) = cent ( μ ) : Cp ( G ) X c Cp ( G ) Cp ( G ) . ( g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 ) g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 .

Example 3.4. Let G be a center topological group, then Cp ( G ) is Cp ( G ) -space by center conjugation.

cent ( φ ) : Cp ( G ) X c Cp ( G ) Cp ( G ) . ( g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 ) g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 . C g 1 1 C 1 1 , cent ( φ ) is center continuous since cent ( φ ) = cent ( r g 1 1 ) o cent ( μ ) and:

(i) cent ( φ ) ( e B o , g C ) = e B o . C g C . C e 1 B o 1 = g C for all g C Cp ( G ) .

( ii ) cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g 2 C 2 , g 3 C 3 ) )

= cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 . C g 3 C 3 . C g 2 1 C 2 1 ) = g 1 C 1 . C ( g 2 C 2 . C g 3 C 3 . C g 2 1 C 2 1 ) . C g 1 1 C 1 1 = ( g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 ) . C g 3 C 3 . C ( g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 ) 1

= cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 , g 3 C 3 ), for all g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 , g 3 C 3 Cp ( G ) .

Definition 3.5. Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then:

  1. The center orbit of x B is defined to be the center set C G x B = { cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) : g C Cp ( G ) } , the set of all center orbits denoted by Cp ( X ) / Cp ( G ) and called it center orbit space.

  2. The center stabilizer of x B Cp ( X ) is defined to be the center set.

    C S x B = { g C Cp ( G ) : cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) = x B } .

  3. The center kernel of the center action is defined to be the center set.

C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) = { g C Cp ( G ) : cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) = x B , x B Cp ( X ) } .

Proposition 3.6

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space, then:

  1. C S x B is a center subgroup of G .

  2. C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) = C x B Cp ( X ) C S x B .

  3. C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) is a center normal subgroup of G .

Proof

  1. Let g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 C S x B then cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 2 C 2 , x B ) = x B .

    cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( cent ( μ ) ( g 1 C 1 , g 2 C 2 ) , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g 2 C 2 , x B ) ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , x B ) = x B .

    Hence, g 1 C 1 . C g 2 C 2 C S x B . Now, let g C C S x B then cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) = x B .

    cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) )

    = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 . C g C , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( e B o , x B ) = x B .

    Hence, cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , x B ) = x B . Therefore, g 1 C 1 C S x B .

    So C S x B is a center subgroup of G .

  2. Let g C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) iff cent ( φ ) ( ( g C , x B ) = x B for all x B Cp ( X ) . Iff g C C S x B for all x B Cp ( X ) .

    Iff g C C x B Cp ( X ) C S x B . Then, C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) = C x B Cp ( X ) C S x B .

  3. From (ii), C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) is a center subgroup of G .

Let g C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) , then cent ( φ ) ( ( g C , x B ) = x B for all x B Cp ( X ) and cent ( φ ) ( h C 1 . C g C . C h 1 C 1 1 , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( h C 1 , cent ( φ )

( g C . C h 1 C 1 1 , x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( h C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g C , cent ( φ ) ( h 1 C 1 1 , x B ) )

= cent ( φ ) ( ( h C 1 , cent ( φ ) ( h 1 C 1 1 , x B ) ) = cent ( φ ) ( h C 1 . C h 1 C 1 1 , x B )

= cent ( φ ) ( e B o , x B ) = x B . Hence, cent ( φ ) ( h C 1 . C g C . C h 1 C 1 1 , x B )

= x B for all x B Cp ( X ) .

Hence, h C 1 . C g C . C h 1 C 1 1 C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) ; therefore, h C 1 . C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) . C h 1 C 1 1 C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) for all x B Cp ( X ) . Since C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) C h C 1 . C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) . C h 1 C 1 1 . Thus, h C 1 . C C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) . C h 1 C 1 1 = C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) . Therefore, C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) is a center normal subgroup of G .

Definition 3.7. Let Cp ( X ) be Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . A center action of Cp ( G ) on Cp ( X ) with C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) is said to be:

  1. C -Transitive if C G x B = Cp ( X ) for all x B Cp ( X ) .

  2. C -Effective if C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) = e B o .

  3. C -Free if C S x B = e B o for all x B Cp ( X ) .

  4. C -Trivial if C -ker ( cent ( φ ) ) = Cp ( G ) .

Theorem 3.8

Let Cp ( X ) be Cp ( G ) -space, then:

  1. The center function cent ( φ g C ) : Cp ( X ) Cp ( X ) defined by cent ( φ g C ) ( x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) , x B Cp ( X ) is a center homeomorphism g C Cp ( G ) .

  2. The center function cent ( φ x B ) : Cp ( G ) Cp ( X ) defined by cent ( φ x B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g C , x B ) , g C Cp ( G ) is a center continuous x B Cp ( X ) .

Proof

  1. Clear.

  2. Clear.

Theorem 3.9

Let Cp ( X ) be a center Hausdorff Cp ( G ) -space and G is a center compact. Then, the center action cent ( φ ) : Cp ( G ) X c Cp ( X ) Cp ( X ) is a center closed function.

Proof

Let C A C C G X c C X be a center closed set in C G X c C X .

Let y B 1 cent ( φ ) ( C A ) ̅ C , then there exists a center net ( y d B ) d D cent ( φ ) ( C A ) such that y d B c y B o (Theorem 1.15). This implies that there exist ( g d A , x d B ) d D C A such that cent ( φ ) ( g d A , x d B ) = y d B .

Since G is a center compact, then the center net ( g d A ) d D has center convergent subnet ( g nd A ) such that g nd A c g C and y nd B y B 1 . Now,

x nd B = cent ( φ ) ( e B o , x nd B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 nd A 1 . C g nd A , x nd B )

= cent ( φ ) ( g 1 nd A 1 , cent ( φ ) ( g nd A , x nd B ) = cent ( φ ) ( g 1 nd A 1 , y nd B ) .

And then, x nd B c cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , y B 1 ) . Therefore, ( g nd A , x nd B ) c ( g C , cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , y B 1 ) , and since C A is center closed, then ( g C , cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , y B 1 ) C A . Thus, cent ( φ ) ( ( g C , cent ( φ ) ( g 1 C 1 , y B 1 ) ) = cent ( φ ) ( g C . C g 1 C 1 , y B 1 ) = cent ( φ ) ( e B o , y B 1 ) = y B 1 cent ( φ ) ( C A ) . Therefore, cent ( φ ) ( C A ) = cent ( φ ) ( C A ) ̅ C , and then, cent ( φ ) ( C A ) is center closed.

4 Center Cartan Cp ( G ) -space

Definition 4.1. [16] Let X be an G -space, and a subset A of X is said to be thin relative to a subset B of X if the set (( A , B )) = { g G : gA B } has neighborhood whose closure is compact in G . If A is thin relative to itself, then it is called thin.

Definition 4.2. Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space, and a center subset C A of cent ( X ) is said to be center thin relative to a center subset C B of X if the set (( C A , C B )) = { g C Cp ( G ) : g C C A C C B C } has a center neighborhood whose center closure is a center compact in G . If C A is a C -thin relative to itself, then it is called C -thin.

Theorem 4.3

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and C K 1 and C K 2 be a center compact subset of X . Then:

  1. (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) is a center closed subset.

  2. (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) is a center compact when C K 1 and C K 2 are relatively C -thin.

Proof

  1. Let g C . Then, by Theorem 1.15, there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) such that g d A c g C . Since g d A (( C K 1 , C K 2 )), then there is a center net ( k 1 d C 1 ) d D in C K 1 , which is a center compact, such that g d A k 1 d C 1 C K 2 . Since C K 2 is a center compact, then there exists a center subnet ( g dm A k 1 dm C 1 ) of ( g d A k 1 d C 1 ) such that g dm A k 1 dm C 1 c k o 2 B , where k o 2 B C K 2 , but ( k 1 dm C 1 ) in C K 1 and C K 1 is center compact; thus, there is a center point k o 1 B 1 C K 2 and a center subnet of k 1 dm C 1 say itself such that k 1 dm C 1 c k o 1 B 1 , then by Theorem 1.14, g dm A k 1 dm C 1 c g C k o 1 B 1 , which means that g C (( C K 1 , C K 2 )); therefore, (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) is a center closed.

  2. Let C K 1 and C K 2 be the center compact subsets of center G -space X such that C K 1 and C K 2 are center relatively thin, then (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) has a center neighborhood whose center closure is a center compact, since C K 1 and C K 2 are center compact by (i), (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) is a center closed, and thus, (( C K 1 , C K 2 )) is a center compact.

Recall that a G -space X is called Cartan G -space if every point in X has a thin neighborhood [17].

Definition 4.4. A Cp ( G ) -space Cp ( X ) is said to be a center cartan Cp ( G ) -space (briefly C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces) if every center point in Cp ( X ) has a C -thin center neighborhood.

Example 4.5. A Cp ( G ) -space Cp ( X ) is a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space if G is a center compact.

Theorem 4.6

Let Cp ( X ) be a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, then each C G x B is center closed, and C S x B is a center compact.

Proof

Let y B o C G x B ̅ C . Then, there is a center net ( y d B ) d D in C G x B such that y d B c y B o . Since X is a C -Cartan center G-space, then y B o has C -thin center neighborhood C U . Since y d B C G x B , then there exists a center net ( g d A ) d D in G such that y d B = g d A x B for each d D . Fixed d o , a center net ( g d A . C g 1 d o A 1 ) ( g d o A x C ) = g d A x B So g d A . C g 1 d o A 1 (( C U , C U )) and g d A . C g 1 d o A 1 has a center cluster point g A .

Then, by Corollary 2.12, there exists a center subnet of g d A . C g 1 d o A 1 , say itself, such that g d A . C g 1 d o A 1 c g A , then g d A c g d A . C g d o A x B and y B o = g d A . C g d o A x C , so y B o C G x B . Thus, C G x B is a center closed.

Now, let x B o Cp ( X ) , then there exists a C -thin center neighborhood C V of x B o . Then, (( C V , C V )) has a center neighborhood whose center closure is a center compact since the center stabilizer C S x B o group of G is a center closed and C S x B o (( C V , C V )). Hence, C S x B o is a center compact.

Dydo in the study by Al-Srrai [16] developed the concept of the sets Λ ( x ) and J ( x ) in any space and used only J ( x ) as a characterization of Cartan G -space as follows:

For any point x in a G -space.

J ( x ) = { y X : there is a net ( g d ) d D in G and there is a net ( x d ) d D in X with g d and x d x such that g d x d y }.

Λ ( x ) = { y X : there is a net ( g d ) d D in G with g d such that g d x d y }. Also, it is clear that the set Λ ( x ) is a subset of J ( x ) .

Now, we introduce the following definition and prove some results.

Definition 4.7. Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then:

  1. C Λ ( x B ) = { y C : there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c such that g d A x d E c y C } is called the center limit set of x B .

  2. C J ( x B ) = { y C : there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G and there is a center net ( x d E ) d D in X with g d A c and x d E c x B such that g d A x d E c y C } is called the center first prolongation limit set.

It is clear that the set C Λ ( x B ) is a center subset of C J ( x B ) .

Definition 4.8. Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and C A C C X . Then, C A is called the center invariant under G if C G C A = C A .

Theorem 4.9

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then:

  1. C Λ ( x B ) and C J ( x B ) are the center invariant sets under Cp ( G ) .

  2. The center orbit C G x B is center closed if and only if C Λ ( x B ) C C G x B .

  3. If x B C Λ ( x B ) , then the center stabilizer subgroup C S x B of G is a center compact.

  4. C G x B ̅ C = C G x B C C Λ ( x B ) .

  5. g C C Λ ( x B ) = C Λ ( g C x B ) = C Λ ( x B ) for each g C Cp ( G ) .

Proof

  1. Let y C C Λ ( x B ) and g A o Cp ( G ) . Then, there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c and g d A x d E c y C , and it is clear that ( g A o g d A ) d D is a center net in G with g A o g d A c . Since the center action is center continuous, then g A o g d A x B c g A o y C , which implies that g A o y C C Λ ( x B ) , and hence, C Λ ( x B ) is center invariant.

    The proof of C J ( x B ) is similar.

  2. Let C G x B be a center closed and let y C C Λ ( x B ) , then there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G such that g d A c and g d A x d E c y C . Since g d A x d E C G x B and ( g d A ) d D is a center net in C G x B , then by Theorem 1.15, y C C G x B ̅ C = C G x B . Therefore, a center net in C Λ ( x B ) C C G x B .

    Conversely:

    Let y C C G x B ̅ C , then by Theorem 1.15, there is a center net ( y d F ) d D is a center net in C G x B such that y d F c y C , then d D , there is g d A G such that y d F = g d A x B .

    Then, ( g d A ) d D is a center net in G and g d A x B c y C . Now either g d A c g A o or g d A c . If g d A c g A o , then g d A x B c g d A x B = y C , which implies that y C C G x B . If g d A c , then y C C Λ ( x B ) C C G x B ; thus, C G x B is a center closed.

  3. Let x B C Λ ( x B ) and suppose that C S x B is not center compact. Then, there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G such that g d A c . Since g d A C S x B , then g d A x B = x B , i.e., g d A x B c x B . Then, x B C Λ ( x B ) , which is a contradiction; thus, C S x B is a center compact.

  4. If C G x B is a center closed, then C G x B = C G x B ̅ C from (ii), C G x B = C G x B C C Λ ( x B ) .

    Let y C C G x B and y C C Λ ( x B ) , then there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c such that g d A x d E c y C since ( h H g d A ) d D is a center net in G with h H g d A c . So, h H g d A x d E c h H y C , which implies that h H y C C Λ ( x B ) , but h H y C C G x B and then C Λ ( x B ) C C G x B ; therefore by (ii), C G x B is center closed; hence, C G x B ̅ C = C G x B C C Λ ( x B ) .

  5. Clear.

Theorem 4.10

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then:

(i) y C C J ( x B ) if and only if x B C J ( y C ) .

(ii) g A o C J ( x B ) = C J ( g A o x B ) = C J ( x B ) for each g A o Cp ( G ) .

Proof

(i) Let y C C J ( x B ) , then there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c , and there is a center net ( x d E ) d D in X with x d E c x B such that g d A x d E c y C . Put γ d H = g d A x d E c y C . Then, g 1 d A 1 c y C , and g 1 d A 1 γ d H = g 1 d A 1 g d A x d E = x d E c x B . Thus, x B C J ( y C ) .

The converse is similar.

  1. Clear.

Theorem 4.11

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then:

  1. If x B C J ( x B ) , then for each y C C G x B , y C C J ( y C )

  2. If y C C Λ ( x B ) for some y C Cp ( X ) , then y C C J ( y C ) .

  3. If x B C J ( y C ) for each x B Cp ( X ) , then C Λ ( x B ) = C .

Proof

(i) Let x B C J ( x B ) and y C C G x B . Since C J ( x B ) is a center invariant, then x B C J ( x B ) for each y C C G x B : by Theorem 4.10. (i), x B C J ( x B ) . But C J ( x B ) is a center invariant; thus, y C C J ( y C ) .

(ii) Let y C C J ( x B ) , then there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c , such that g d A x d E c y C , and put γ d H = g d A x d E c y C . Then, it is clear that g 1 d A 1 c and g 1 d A 1 ( γ d H ) = g 1 d A 1 . C g d A x d E = x d E c x B ; thus, x B C J ( y C ) , which is center closed and center invariant, then we have g d A x d E C J ( y C ) . Since g d A x d E y C , then y C C J ( y C ) .

  1. Let x B C J ( y C ) for each x B Cp ( X ) . To prove C Λ ( x B ) = C . If y C C J ( x B ) , then from (ii) y C C J ( y C ) , it is a contradiction; thus, C Λ ( x B ) = C for each x B Cp ( X ) .

Theorem 4.12

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space. If Cp ( X ) is C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, then x B C J ( x B ) for each x B Cp ( X ) .

Proof

If Cp ( X ) is a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, let x B C J ( x B ) , then there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c and there is a center net ( x d E ) d D in X with x d E c x B such that g d A x d E c x B . Since x B Cp ( X ) and X is a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, then x B has a center open neighborhood C U such that (( C U , C U )) is a center relative thin. Then, (( C U , C U )) is a center relative compact. Thus, there is d D , and x d E and g d A x d E are in C U so that g d A is in (( C U , C U )). Then, ( g d A ) d D contains a convergent subnet, which is a contradiction.

Theorem 4.13

Let Cp ( X ) be a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, then C Λ ( x B ) = C for each x B Cp ( X ) .

Proof

Suppose that there is a center point y C Cp ( X ) such that y C C Λ ( x B ) ; then, there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c such that g d A x d E c y C . Let C U y C be a C -thin center neighborhood of y C . Then, there is d o D such that g d A x d E C U y C for each d d o , we get center net g d A . C g 1 d 1 A 1 1 . C g d 1 A 1 x d E = g d A x d E C U y C ; thus, g d A . C g 1 d 1 A 1 1 (( C U y C , C U y C )), which has center compact closure. Hence, the center net g d A . C g 1 d 1 A 1 1 has center convergent subnet, say itself, i.e, there is g o A o Cp ( G ) such that g d A . C g 1 d 1 A 1 1 c g o A o , then g d A c g o A o . C g d 1 A 1 , which is a contradiction; therefore, y C C Λ ( x B ) . Since y C is arbitrary, then C Λ ( x B ) = C .

Theorem 4.14

Let Cp ( X ) be a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . If x B C J ( x B ) , then x B has no C -thin center neighborhood.

Proof

Let x B C J ( x B ) and suppose that x B has C -thin center neighborhood, then there is a center neighborhood C U of x B such that the center set (( C U , C U )) has center compact closure. By hypothesis x B C J ( x B ) , there is a center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c and there is a center net ( x d E ) d D in X with x d E c x B such that g d A x d E c x B ; since C U is a center neighborhood of x B , there is d o D such that g d A x d E C U for all d d o , which is center compact closure, so the center net ( g d A ) d D has center convergent subnet. This is a contradiction.

Definition 4.15. Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space and x B Cp ( X ) . Then, the center point x B is said to be the fixed center point if C G x B = x B .

Theorem 4.16

Let Cp ( X ) be a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, and then, there is no fixed center point.

Proof

Let Cp ( X ) be a C -Cartan Cp ( G ) -space, x B Cp ( X ) and x B be fixed center point. Then, for each center net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c , g d A x B = x B c x B , i.e., x B C Λ ( x B ) , which is a contradiction to C Λ ( x B ) = C . Therefore, x B is not fixed center point.

Theorem 4.17

Let Cp ( X ) be a Cp ( G ) -space if C Λ ( x B ) = C , for each x B Cp ( X ) . Then, the center orbit C G x B is not center compact.

Proof

Suppose that C G x B is a center compact. Since C Λ ( x B ) = C , then there is net ( g d A ) d D in G with g d A c ; since ( g d A x B ) d D is a center net in C G x B , then g d A x B c y C , for some y C Cp ( X ) . Hence, y C C Λ ( x B ) , which is a contradiction with C Λ ( x B ) = C for each x B Cp ( X ) .

5 Conclusion

One of the most important concepts in geometrical topology is the concept of group actions. In this study, we introduce the concept of center group space and review the definition and proposition of the center limit set, as well as the center thin sets and the center Cartan Cp ( G ) -spaces.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  2. Data availability statement: The most datasets generated and/or analysed in this study are comprised in this submitted manuscript. The other datasets are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author with the attached information.

References

[1] Kandil A, Tantawy OA, El-Sheikh SA, Zakaria A. I-proximity spaces. Jokull J. 2013;63:237–45.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kandil A, Tantawy OA, El-Sheikh SA, Zakaria A. New structures of proximity spaces. Inf Sci Lett. 2014;3:85–9.10.12785/isl/030207Search in Google Scholar

[3] Grzegrzolka P, Siegert J. Coarse proximity and proximity at infinity. Topol Appl. 2019;251:18–46.10.1016/j.topol.2018.10.009Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hassanien AE, Abraham A, Peters JF, Schaefer G, Henry C. Rough sets and near sets in medical imaging: A review. IEEE Trans Info Tech Biomed. 2009;13:955–68.10.1109/TITB.2009.2017017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Gupta S, Patnaik K. Enhancing performance of face recognition systems by using near set approach for selecting facial features. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2008;4:433–41.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Abd El-Monsef ME, Abu-Donia HM, Abd-Rabou K. Common fixed point theorems of single and set-valued mappings on 2- metric spaces. Appl Math Inf Sci. 2007;2:185–94.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Abdulsada DA, Al-Swidi LAA. Separation axioms of center topological space. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst. 2020;12(5):187.10.5373/JARDCS/V12I5/20201703Search in Google Scholar

[8] Abdulsada DA, Al-Swidi LAA. Center set theory of proximity space. Journal of Physics.: Conference Series. Vol. 1804; 2021. p. 012130.10.1088/1742-6596/1804/1/012130Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kula, M, Ozkan, S. Pre-Hausdorff and Hausdorff proximity spaces. Filomat. 2017;12:3837–46. Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics.10.2298/FIL1712837KSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Abdulsada DA, Al-Swidi LAA. Some properties of C– toplogical space. First International Conference of Computer and Applied Sciences; 978-1-7281, 2019.10.1109/CAS47993.2019.9075795Search in Google Scholar

[11] Eman YH, Hamzah SH. On central product space of center topological spaces math. Model Anal. 2023;28(S1):161–8.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Eman YH, Hamzah SH. Quotient and product of center topological groups. Math Model Eng Probl. 2023;10:2291–6.10.18280/mmep.100645Search in Google Scholar

[13] Eman YH, Hamzah SH. Mathematical statistician and engineering applications. 2023;42(S1):164–72.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Nicolas B. General topology, element of mathematics, At the University Rome; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Higgins PJ. Introduction to topological groups. Cambridge: University Press; 1974.10.1017/CBO9781107359918Search in Google Scholar

[16] Al-Srrai SJS. On strongly proper action. M.Sc. thesis. University of Al-Mustansiriyah; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Palais RS. On the existence of slices for actions of non-compact lie groups. Ann Math. 1961;73(2):295–323.10.2307/1970335Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-29
Revised: 2023-08-02
Accepted: 2023-08-08
Published Online: 2024-03-02

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Methodology of automated quality management
  3. Influence of vibratory conveyor design parameters on the trough motion and the self-synchronization of inertial vibrators
  4. Application of finite element method in industrial design, example of an electric motorcycle design project
  5. Correlative evaluation of the corrosion resilience and passivation properties of zinc and aluminum alloys in neutral chloride and acid-chloride solutions
  6. Will COVID “encourage” B2B and data exchange engineering in logistic firms?
  7. Influence of unsupported sleepers on flange climb derailment of two freight wagons
  8. A hybrid detection algorithm for 5G OTFS waveform for 64 and 256 QAM with Rayleigh and Rician channels
  9. Effect of short heat treatment on mechanical properties and shape memory properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy
  10. Exploring the potential of ammonia and hydrogen as alternative fuels for transportation
  11. Impact of insulation on energy consumption and CO2 emissions in high-rise commercial buildings at various climate zones
  12. Advanced autopilot design with extremum-seeking control for aircraft control
  13. Adaptive multidimensional trust-based recommendation model for peer to peer applications
  14. Effects of CFRP sheets on the flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beam
  15. Enhancing urban sustainability through industrial synergy: A multidisciplinary framework for integrating sustainable industrial practices within urban settings – The case of Hamadan industrial city
  16. Advanced vibrant controller results of an energetic framework structure
  17. Application of the Taguchi method and RSM for process parameter optimization in AWSJ machining of CFRP composite-based orthopedic implants
  18. Improved correlation of soil modulus with SPT N values
  19. Technologies for high-temperature batch annealing of grain-oriented electrical steel: An overview
  20. Assessing the need for the adoption of digitalization in Indian small and medium enterprises
  21. A non-ideal hybridization issue for vertical TFET-based dielectric-modulated biosensor
  22. Optimizing data retrieval for enhanced data integrity verification in cloud environments
  23. Performance analysis of nonlinear crosstalk of WDM systems using modulation schemes criteria
  24. Nonlinear finite-element analysis of RC beams with various opening near supports
  25. Thermal analysis of Fe3O4–Cu/water over a cone: a fractional Maxwell model
  26. Radial–axial runner blade design using the coordinate slice technique
  27. Theoretical and experimental comparison between straight and curved continuous box girders
  28. Effect of the reinforcement ratio on the mechanical behaviour of textile-reinforced concrete composite: Experiment and numerical modeling
  29. Experimental and numerical investigation on composite beam–column joint connection behavior using different types of connection schemes
  30. Enhanced performance and robustness in anti-lock brake systems using barrier function-based integral sliding mode control
  31. Evaluation of the creep strength of samples produced by fused deposition modeling
  32. A combined feedforward-feedback controller design for nonlinear systems
  33. Effect of adjacent structures on footing settlement for different multi-building arrangements
  34. Analyzing the impact of curved tracks on wheel flange thickness reduction in railway systems
  35. Review Articles
  36. Mechanical and smart properties of cement nanocomposites containing nanomaterials: A brief review
  37. Applications of nanotechnology and nanoproduction techniques
  38. Relationship between indoor environmental quality and guests’ comfort and satisfaction at green hotels: A comprehensive review
  39. Communication
  40. Techniques to mitigate the admission of radon inside buildings
  41. Erratum
  42. Erratum to “Effect of short heat treatment on mechanical properties and shape memory properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy”
  43. Special Issue: AESMT-3 - Part II
  44. Integrated fuzzy logic and multicriteria decision model methods for selecting suitable sites for wastewater treatment plant: A case study in the center of Basrah, Iraq
  45. Physical and mechanical response of porous metals composites with nano-natural additives
  46. Special Issue: AESMT-4 - Part II
  47. New recycling method of lubricant oil and the effect on the viscosity and viscous shear as an environmentally friendly
  48. Identify the effect of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of aluminum matrix composite produced by powder metallurgy technique
  49. Static behavior of piled raft foundation in clay
  50. Ultra-low-power CMOS ring oscillator with minimum power consumption of 2.9 pW using low-voltage biasing technique
  51. Using ANN for well type identifying and increasing production from Sa’di formation of Halfaya oil field – Iraq
  52. Optimizing the performance of concrete tiles using nano-papyrus and carbon fibers
  53. Special Issue: AESMT-5 - Part II
  54. Comparative the effect of distribution transformer coil shape on electromagnetic forces and their distribution using the FEM
  55. The complex of Weyl module in free characteristic in the event of a partition (7,5,3)
  56. Restrained captive domination number
  57. Experimental study of improving hot mix asphalt reinforced with carbon fibers
  58. Asphalt binder modified with recycled tyre rubber
  59. Thermal performance of radiant floor cooling with phase change material for energy-efficient buildings
  60. Surveying the prediction of risks in cryptocurrency investments using recurrent neural networks
  61. A deep reinforcement learning framework to modify LQR for an active vibration control applied to 2D building models
  62. Evaluation of mechanically stabilized earth retaining walls for different soil–structure interaction methods: A review
  63. Assessment of heat transfer in a triangular duct with different configurations of ribs using computational fluid dynamics
  64. Sulfate removal from wastewater by using waste material as an adsorbent
  65. Experimental investigation on strengthening lap joints subjected to bending in glulam timber beams using CFRP sheets
  66. A study of the vibrations of a rotor bearing suspended by a hybrid spring system of shape memory alloys
  67. Stability analysis of Hub dam under rapid drawdown
  68. Developing ANFIS-FMEA model for assessment and prioritization of potential trouble factors in Iraqi building projects
  69. Numerical and experimental comparison study of piled raft foundation
  70. Effect of asphalt modified with waste engine oil on the durability properties of hot asphalt mixtures with reclaimed asphalt pavement
  71. Hydraulic model for flood inundation in Diyala River Basin using HEC-RAS, PMP, and neural network
  72. Numerical study on discharge capacity of piano key side weir with various ratios of the crest length to the width
  73. The optimal allocation of thyristor-controlled series compensators for enhancement HVAC transmission lines Iraqi super grid by using seeker optimization algorithm
  74. Numerical and experimental study of the impact on aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA0012 airfoil
  75. Effect of nano-TiO2 on physical and rheological properties of asphalt cement
  76. Performance evolution of novel palm leaf powder used for enhancing hot mix asphalt
  77. Performance analysis, evaluation, and improvement of selected unsignalized intersection using SIDRA software – Case study
  78. Flexural behavior of RC beams externally reinforced with CFRP composites using various strategies
  79. Influence of fiber types on the properties of the artificial cold-bonded lightweight aggregates
  80. Experimental investigation of RC beams strengthened with externally bonded BFRP composites
  81. Generalized RKM methods for solving fifth-order quasi-linear fractional partial differential equation
  82. An experimental and numerical study investigating sediment transport position in the bed of sewer pipes in Karbala
  83. Role of individual component failure in the performance of a 1-out-of-3 cold standby system: A Markov model approach
  84. Implementation for the cases (5, 4) and (5, 4)/(2, 0)
  85. Center group actions and related concepts
  86. Experimental investigation of the effect of horizontal construction joints on the behavior of deep beams
  87. Deletion of a vertex in even sum domination
  88. Deep learning techniques in concrete powder mix designing
  89. Effect of loading type in concrete deep beam with strut reinforcement
  90. Studying the effect of using CFRP warping on strength of husk rice concrete columns
  91. Parametric analysis of the influence of climatic factors on the formation of traditional buildings in the city of Al Najaf
  92. Suitability location for landfill using a fuzzy-GIS model: A case study in Hillah, Iraq
  93. Hybrid approach for cost estimation of sustainable building projects using artificial neural networks
  94. Assessment of indirect tensile stress and tensile–strength ratio and creep compliance in HMA mixes with micro-silica and PMB
  95. Density functional theory to study stopping power of proton in water, lung, bladder, and intestine
  96. A review of single flow, flow boiling, and coating microchannel studies
  97. Effect of GFRP bar length on the flexural behavior of hybrid concrete beams strengthened with NSM bars
  98. Exploring the impact of parameters on flow boiling heat transfer in microchannels and coated microtubes: A comprehensive review
  99. Crumb rubber modification for enhanced rutting resistance in asphalt mixtures
  100. Special Issue: AESMT-6
  101. Design of a new sorting colors system based on PLC, TIA portal, and factory I/O programs
  102. Forecasting empirical formula for suspended sediment load prediction at upstream of Al-Kufa barrage, Kufa City, Iraq
  103. Optimization and characterization of sustainable geopolymer mortars based on palygorskite clay, water glass, and sodium hydroxide
  104. Sediment transport modelling upstream of Al Kufa Barrage
  105. Study of energy loss, range, and stopping time for proton in germanium and copper materials
  106. Effect of internal and external recycle ratios on the nutrient removal efficiency of anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (VIP) wastewater treatment plant
  107. Enhancing structural behaviour of polypropylene fibre concrete columns longitudinally reinforced with fibreglass bars
  108. Sustainable road paving: Enhancing concrete paver blocks with zeolite-enhanced cement
  109. Evaluation of the operational performance of Karbala waste water treatment plant under variable flow using GPS-X model
  110. Design and simulation of photonic crystal fiber for highly sensitive chemical sensing applications
  111. Optimization and design of a new column sequencing for crude oil distillation at Basrah refinery
  112. Inductive 3D numerical modelling of the tibia bone using MRI to examine von Mises stress and overall deformation
  113. An image encryption method based on modified elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol and Hill Cipher
  114. Experimental investigation of generating superheated steam using a parabolic dish with a cylindrical cavity receiver: A case study
  115. Effect of surface roughness on the interface behavior of clayey soils
  116. Investigated of the optical properties for SiO2 by using Lorentz model
  117. Measurements of induced vibrations due to steel pipe pile driving in Al-Fao soil: Effect of partial end closure
  118. Experimental and numerical studies of ballistic resistance of hybrid sandwich composite body armor
  119. Evaluation of clay layer presence on shallow foundation settlement in dry sand under an earthquake
  120. Optimal design of mechanical performances of asphalt mixtures comprising nano-clay additives
  121. Advancing seismic performance: Isolators, TMDs, and multi-level strategies in reinforced concrete buildings
  122. Predicted evaporation in Basrah using artificial neural networks
  123. Energy management system for a small town to enhance quality of life
  124. Numerical study on entropy minimization in pipes with helical airfoil and CuO nanoparticle integration
  125. Equations and methodologies of inlet drainage system discharge coefficients: A review
  126. Thermal buckling analysis for hybrid and composite laminated plate by using new displacement function
  127. Investigation into the mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight mortar using commercial beads or recycled expanded polystyrene
  128. Experimental and theoretical analysis of single-jet column and concrete column using double-jet grouting technique applied at Al-Rashdia site
  129. The impact of incorporating waste materials on the mechanical and physical characteristics of tile adhesive materials
  130. Seismic resilience: Innovations in structural engineering for earthquake-prone areas
  131. Automatic human identification using fingerprint images based on Gabor filter and SIFT features fusion
  132. Performance of GRKM-method for solving classes of ordinary and partial differential equations of sixth-orders
  133. Visible light-boosted photodegradation activity of Ag–AgVO3/Zn0.5Mn0.5Fe2O4 supported heterojunctions for effective degradation of organic contaminates
  134. Production of sustainable concrete with treated cement kiln dust and iron slag waste aggregate
  135. Key effects on the structural behavior of fiber-reinforced lightweight concrete-ribbed slabs: A review
  136. A comparative analysis of the energy dissipation efficiency of various piano key weir types
  137. Special Issue: Transport 2022 - Part II
  138. Variability in road surface temperature in urban road network – A case study making use of mobile measurements
  139. Special Issue: BCEE5-2023
  140. Evaluation of reclaimed asphalt mixtures rejuvenated with waste engine oil to resist rutting deformation
  141. Assessment of potential resistance to moisture damage and fatigue cracks of asphalt mixture modified with ground granulated blast furnace slag
  142. Investigating seismic response in adjacent structures: A study on the impact of buildings’ orientation and distance considering soil–structure interaction
  143. Improvement of porosity of mortar using polyethylene glycol pre-polymer-impregnated mortar
  144. Three-dimensional analysis of steel beam-column bolted connections
  145. Assessment of agricultural drought in Iraq employing Landsat and MODIS imagery
  146. Performance evaluation of grouted porous asphalt concrete
  147. Optimization of local modified metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete by Taguchi method
  148. Effect of waste tire products on some characteristics of roller-compacted concrete
  149. Studying the lateral displacement of retaining wall supporting sandy soil under dynamic loads
  150. Seismic performance evaluation of concrete buttress dram (Dynamic linear analysis)
  151. Behavior of soil reinforced with micropiles
  152. Possibility of production high strength lightweight concrete containing organic waste aggregate and recycled steel fibers
  153. An investigation of self-sensing and mechanical properties of smart engineered cementitious composites reinforced with functional materials
  154. Forecasting changes in precipitation and temperatures of a regional watershed in Northern Iraq using LARS-WG model
  155. Experimental investigation of dynamic soil properties for modeling energy-absorbing layers
  156. Numerical investigation of the effect of longitudinal steel reinforcement ratio on the ductility of concrete beams
  157. An experimental study on the tensile properties of reinforced asphalt pavement
  158. Self-sensing behavior of hot asphalt mixture with steel fiber-based additive
  159. Behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete deep beams reinforced by basalt fibers
  160. Optimizing asphalt binder performance with various PET types
  161. Investigation of the hydraulic characteristics and homogeneity of the microstructure of the air voids in the sustainable rigid pavement
  162. Enhanced biogas production from municipal solid waste via digestion with cow manure: A case study
  163. Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part I
  164. Preparation and investigation of cobalt nanoparticles by laser ablation: Structure, linear, and nonlinear optical properties
  165. Seismic analysis of RC building with plan irregularity in Baghdad/Iraq to obtain the optimal behavior
  166. The effect of urban environment on large-scale path loss model’s main parameters for mmWave 5G mobile network in Iraq
  167. Formatting a questionnaire for the quality control of river bank roads
  168. Vibration suppression of smart composite beam using model predictive controller
  169. Machine learning-based compressive strength estimation in nanomaterial-modified lightweight concrete
  170. In-depth analysis of critical factors affecting Iraqi construction projects performance
  171. Behavior of container berth structure under the influence of environmental and operational loads
  172. Energy absorption and impact response of ballistic resistance laminate
  173. Effect of water-absorbent polymer balls in internal curing on punching shear behavior of bubble slabs
  174. Effect of surface roughness on interface shear strength parameters of sandy soils
  175. Evaluating the interaction for embedded H-steel section in normal concrete under monotonic and repeated loads
  176. Estimation of the settlement of pile head using ANN and multivariate linear regression based on the results of load transfer method
  177. Enhancing communication: Deep learning for Arabic sign language translation
  178. A review of recent studies of both heat pipe and evaporative cooling in passive heat recovery
  179. Effect of nano-silica on the mechanical properties of LWC
  180. An experimental study of some mechanical properties and absorption for polymer-modified cement mortar modified with superplasticizer
  181. Digital beamforming enhancement with LSTM-based deep learning for millimeter wave transmission
  182. Developing an efficient planning process for heritage buildings maintenance in Iraq
  183. Design and optimization of two-stage controller for three-phase multi-converter/multi-machine electric vehicle
  184. Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al1050/Al2O3/Gr composite processed by forming operation ECAP
  185. Calculations of mass stopping power and range of protons in organic compounds (CH3OH, CH2O, and CO2) at energy range of 0.01–1,000 MeV
  186. Investigation of in vitro behavior of composite coating hydroxyapatite-nano silver on 316L stainless steel substrate by electrophoretic technic for biomedical tools
  187. A review: Enhancing tribological properties of journal bearings composite materials
  188. Improvements in the randomness and security of digital currency using the photon sponge hash function through Maiorana–McFarland S-box replacement
  189. Design a new scheme for image security using a deep learning technique of hierarchical parameters
  190. Special Issue: ICES 2023
  191. Comparative geotechnical analysis for ultimate bearing capacity of precast concrete piles using cone resistance measurements
  192. Visualizing sustainable rainwater harvesting: A case study of Karbala Province
  193. Geogrid reinforcement for improving bearing capacity and stability of square foundations
  194. Evaluation of the effluent concentrations of Karbala wastewater treatment plant using reliability analysis
  195. Adsorbent made with inexpensive, local resources
  196. Effect of drain pipes on seepage and slope stability through a zoned earth dam
  197. Sediment accumulation in an 8 inch sewer pipe for a sample of various particles obtained from the streets of Karbala city, Iraq
  198. Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part I
  199. Analyzing the impact of transfer learning on explanation accuracy in deep learning-based ECG recognition systems
  200. Effect of scale factor on the dynamic response of frame foundations
  201. Improving multi-object detection and tracking with deep learning, DeepSORT, and frame cancellation techniques
  202. The impact of using prestressed CFRP bars on the development of flexural strength
  203. Assessment of surface hardness and impact strength of denture base resins reinforced with silver–titanium dioxide and silver–zirconium dioxide nanoparticles: In vitro study
  204. A data augmentation approach to enhance breast cancer detection using generative adversarial and artificial neural networks
  205. Modification of the 5D Lorenz chaotic map with fuzzy numbers for video encryption in cloud computing
  206. Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part I
  207. Evaluation of static bending caused damage of glass-fiber composite structure using terahertz inspection
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2022-0512/html
Scroll to top button