Home Study on sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation in Da 17 well area of Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin
Article Open Access

Study on sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation in Da 17 well area of Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin

  • Chenyu Yang , Hang Yu EMAIL logo , Hui Xie , Shunfeng Peng , Jiangfei Tian , Zhiwu Gao and Tian Luo
Published/Copyright: December 27, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin is a significant area for developing tight sandstone gas reservoirs in China. This study focuses on the Permian Shanxi and Lower Shihezi formations in the Da 17 well area, analyzing sedimentary model through petrological characteristics, physical properties, pore characteristics, and lithofacies characteristics. Findings reveal that the Shanxi Formation belongs to the deltaic plain sedimentary environment, which is divided into distributary channel and inter-channel, and identifies the microfacies of the main distributary channel and the sub-distributary channel. The Lower Shihezi Formation exhibits braided channel sediments, dividing them into channel bar sediments and flood plain sediments, and identifying isolated channel microfacies and superimposed channel microfacies. Analysis shows that sedimentation has an impact on reservoir properties through particle size, lithological characteristics, and sedimentary microfacies. The main distributary channel and superimposed sandbars are favorable microfacies for the formation of gas reservoirs. The porosity of the main diversion channel ranges from 8 to 13%, and the permeability ranges from 0.3 to 0.6 × 10−3 m2. The porosity of the superimposed sandbar ranges from 8 to 15%, with a permeability of 0.3–2.2 × 10−3 m2. This study provides a theoretical foundation advancing tight sandstone gas development in the Daniudi gas field.

1 Introduction

By the end of 2022, cumulative proven geological oil reserves in China reached 10.52 billion tones, while natural gas reserves totaled 6.86 trillion cubic meters [1]. Tight sandstone gas is one of the important types of unconventional oil and gas resources. Numerous successful examples of commercial tight gas exploration highly have relied on the discovery of high-quality sandstone reservoirs [1,2]. Sedimentary facies, sequence and architecture of sandstone, and diagenetic alterations significantly control reservoir quality. Among these, sedimentary facies are closely linked to sediment characteristics, including mineral composition, grain size, and initial water properties [310]. Thus, analyzing the sedimentary model and evolution of tight sandstone, and discussing the influence of sedimentary conditions and lithology on reservoirs is essential for a deeper understanding of the formation and storage potential of tight sandstone reservoirs [1118].

The Ordos Basin, located in the North China Plate (Figure 1a), is a major oil and gas basin in western China, with particularly rich oil and gas resources in tight sandstones [1925]. In recent years, multiple gas-bearing series have been discovered in the Paleozoic strata of the Daniudi gas field in the northern Ordos Basin, leading to the formation of substantial lithologic reservoirs in river channels, distributary channels, and sand bars. These oil and gas reservoirs are characterized by low porosity, low permeability, and low abundance [2632]. The coal-bearing tight sandstone strata developed in a marine-continental transition environment and represented by the Permian Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation, have achieved significant breakthroughs, particularly with the 1HF well. In the past, scholars have conducted a lot of research on the formation and distribution of tight sandstones in the Shanxi and Lower Shihezi Formations, but the genetic analysis of sedimentary sand bodies remains insufficiently detailed [3337]. As a river type with high sand content [38], braided rivers play a crucial role in oil and gas enrichment. Scholars have conducted systematic studies on the depositional processes of braided rivers using braided river modeling [3941], flume experiments [42,43], and computer simulations [44], especially the fine identification of the mechanism and type of the channel bar sedimentary microfacies [4547]. However, research on channel bar sedimentary microfacies in the study area is still insufficient [45,4851], especially for the microfacies delineation in braided river and braided river delta depositional environments is not precise enough, and there is still a need to further differentiate the sedimentary microphases of different types of channel bar and diversion channels. This article takes the Da 17 well area of the Daniudi gas field as an example, analyzing the sedimentary processes in the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation and the Shanxi Formation, and focuses on the formation of different types of channel bars and distributary channels, providing a basis for the understanding of the formation and distribution of tight sandstone, enriching the theory of tight sandstone gas accumulation in the Ordos Basin, and contributing a feasible means for the realization of the strategic goal of “stabilizing oil and increasing gas” in the oilfield.

Figure 1 
               (a) Regional structural map of the Ordos Basin. (b) Structural location of Daniudi gas field. (c) Contour thickness map of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the Daniudi well area. (d) Comprehensive stratigraphic column chart of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.
Figure 1

(a) Regional structural map of the Ordos Basin. (b) Structural location of Daniudi gas field. (c) Contour thickness map of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the Daniudi well area. (d) Comprehensive stratigraphic column chart of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.

2 Geological setting

The Ordos Basin covers an area of about 370,000 km2, located in the western part of the North China Craton, is a typical multi-rotational superposition basin [52]. According to the characteristics of stratigraphic development and the tectonic morphology of the basal top surface, it can be divided into tectonic units such as the western marginal thrust belt, the Yishan slope, the Jinxi flexural fold belt, the Weibei uplift, and the Yimeng uplift [52,53]. The present Ordos Basin is a tectonic basin composed of a large syncline, which is deep in the west and shallow in the east, low in the south and high in the north.

The Daniudi gas field is located in the basin’s northeastern region, tectonically part of the Yishan slope (Figure 1b). The whole field is a gentle monocline, dipping to the southwest at less than 1°, with higher elevations in the northeast. The average thickness of the formation exposed by drilling wells is 3,000 m. The Da 17 well area is located in the southeast of the Daniudi gas field, with an area of 226 km2. Multiple gas reservoirs are developed in the Carboniferous Taiyuan Formation and the Permian Shanxi Formation, exemplifying the “three lows” of tight sandstone gas reservoirs: low pressure, low permeability, and low abundance [5254]. Large-scale development of the gas field began in 2005, and more than 1,700 gas wells have been put into production, with cumulative output reaching 7.88 billion m3. This study focuses on the Permian Shanxi Formation and the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation. The Shanxi Formation is a set of coal-bearing strata [55], mainly deposited in the delta plain. It can be divided into Shanxi Formation first and second member according to the lithological combination. The first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation is mainly braided river deposits, which is characterized by a large number of conglomerates. The lower coal seam of the Shanxi Formation and the sand layer at the bottom of the Lower Shihezi Formation are used as stratigraphic markers (Figure 1c), which can be well used for regional stratigraphic division and comparison (Figure 1d). The lower coal seam of the Shanxi Formation is located in the middle of the first member of the Shanxi Formation, with a thickness of 3–12 m, often sandwiched with carbonaceous mudstone. The corresponding logging curve is characterized by low gamma, low density, high resistance, high acoustic wave, and high neutron (showing the characteristics of “two lows and three highs”). The sand layer at the bottom of the Lower Shihezi Formation is the bottom boundary of the Shihezi first member, with the lithology of light gray gravelly coarse sandstone and medium coarse sandstone, with a thickness of 15–32 m [40,55], which is in contact with the underlying mudstone mutation. The logging curve is characterized by low gamma and negative natural potential anomaly, presenting a clear lithologic contrast on the stratigraphic profile.

3 Sampling and methods

This study selected 30 key wells in the Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation of the Da 17 well area of the Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin, for observation, description, and analysis.

3.1 Lithofacies analysis

Based on the analysis of rock structure, lithological characteristics, sedimentary structure, and sedimentary environment, nine lithofacies types were identified and their formation mechanisms analyzed.

3.2 Thin section analysis

A total of 120 rock samples were prepared as 0.03 mm-thick slices. The pores were filled with red and blue epoxy resin to facilitate observation of pore characteristics. The instrument was a Nikon Eclipse LV100N POL polarizing microscope.

3.3 X-ray diffraction analysis

Twenty-six core samples were analyzed to determine their mineral composition using a DX-2700 X-ray diffractometer at the State Key Laboratory of Reservoir Geology and Development Engineering (Chengdu University of Technology), following the JY/009-1996 standard.

3.4 Porosity and permeability testing

A total of 246 samples were selected and made into cylinders (2.5 cm in diameter, 5 cm in length), and the porosity and permeability test characteristics of the cover layer were tested by physical methods. AutoPore V mercury porosimeter was used for mercury porosity determination.

3.5 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Eleven core samples were selected and analyzed by the Quanta250 FEG SEM to identify the morphology of minerals and pores, located at the State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology.

4 Results

4.1 Petrology characteristics

4.1.1 Macropetrological characteristics

The Shanxi Formation and first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area are mainly terrigenous clastic rock deposits. The Shanxi Formation is mostly dark-colored mudstone, showing rich organic matter content, and the sandstone is mainly gray. It reflects that the climate is humid and the sedimentary environment is a weak reduction-reductive. In the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation, the climatic characteristics show a gradual aridity, and the sandstone color lithology changes to brown and yellow. The rock types include conglomerate (Figure 2a), conglomerate-grained coarse sandstone (Figure 2b and c), coarse sandstone (Figure 2d and e), medium-fine sandstone, mudstone, and coal seam (Figure 2f) . Typical sedimentary structures include scour surface, grain sequence bedding, parallel bedding, plate bedding, sand grain bedding, lenticular bedding, plant fossils, plant fragments, etc. (Figure 3).

Figure 2 
                     Rock characteristics of the Shanxi Formation and the Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area. (a) Conglomerate, Da 85 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2543.5 m. (b) Middle conglomerate, Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member 1, 2543.5 m. (c) Gravelly coarse sandstone, Da 64 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2647.82 m. (d) Coarse sandstone, Da 84 well, Shanxi Formation, 2588.92 m. (e) Coarse sandstone, Da 20 well, Shanxi Formation, 2709.60 m. (f) Coal, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 2560.30 m.
Figure 2

Rock characteristics of the Shanxi Formation and the Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area. (a) Conglomerate, Da 85 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2543.5 m. (b) Middle conglomerate, Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member 1, 2543.5 m. (c) Gravelly coarse sandstone, Da 64 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2647.82 m. (d) Coarse sandstone, Da 84 well, Shanxi Formation, 2588.92 m. (e) Coarse sandstone, Da 20 well, Shanxi Formation, 2709.60 m. (f) Coal, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 2560.30 m.

Figure 3 
                     Sedimentary structure characteristics of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area. (a) Scouring surface, Da 49 well, Shanxi Formation, 2-59-05-06. (b) Positive grain sequence, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 3-115-79. (c) Parallel bedding, Da 49 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 1-94-60-61. (d) Plate oblique bedding, Da 49 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 1-94-06. (e) Sand grain bedding, Da 26 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 4-92-17. (f) Lenticular bedding, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 4-143-42. (g) Fossil plants, Da 64 well, Shanxi Formation, 2659.27 m. (h) Plant stem fragments, Da 100 well, Shanxi Formation, 2492.83 m.
Figure 3

Sedimentary structure characteristics of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area. (a) Scouring surface, Da 49 well, Shanxi Formation, 2-59-05-06. (b) Positive grain sequence, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 3-115-79. (c) Parallel bedding, Da 49 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 1-94-60-61. (d) Plate oblique bedding, Da 49 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 1-94-06. (e) Sand grain bedding, Da 26 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 4-92-17. (f) Lenticular bedding, Da 42 well, Shanxi Formation, 4-143-42. (g) Fossil plants, Da 64 well, Shanxi Formation, 2659.27 m. (h) Plant stem fragments, Da 100 well, Shanxi Formation, 2492.83 m.

4.1.2 Rock and mineral characteristics

In the study area, 265 samples were selected for whole rock analysis. The lithology of the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation is mainly lithic quartz sandstone and lithic sandstone, and very few samples are feldspar lithic sandstone (Figure 4). In contrast, the Shanxi Formation consists mainly of lithic quartz sandstone, lithic sandstone, quartz sandstone, and a small amount of feldspar lithic sandstone. Compared to the first member of the Shihezi Formation, the Shanxi Formation is generally less clastic and richer in quartz content. The detritus in the Shanxi Formation is dominated by metamorphic quartz, phyllite, and kaolinite (Figure 5). The sorting of debris is medium deviation, the roundness is general, and the main shape is sub-angular. The debris particles are mainly phyllite and metamorphic quartz, with occasional mica. Due to compaction, the banded mica is generally bent. The detritus in the Lower Shihezi first member exhibit poor to moderate sorting, with average particle roundness and mostly sub-angular. The reservoir rock interstitial material content ranges from 6 to 28%, mainly including kaolinite, illite, chlorite, authigenic clay film, calcite, and siliceous.

Figure 4 
                     Ternary map of clastic rock content in the study area (ternary diagram based on the studies of Folk [56]).
Figure 4

Ternary map of clastic rock content in the study area (ternary diagram based on the studies of Folk [56]).

Figure 5 
                     Microscopic characteristics of clastic rock content reservoir in the study area. (a) Quartz sandstone, Da 70 well, Shanxi Formation, 2433.19 m. (b) Lithic quartz sandstone, calcareous cementation development, Da 70 well, Shanxi formation, 2433.19 m. (c) Filamentous and hairy illites filled in intergranular pores, Da 77 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2526.97 m. (d) The rock structure is loose, and the kaolinite aggregate and filamentous illite are filled in the intergranular pores and between grains Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2374.53 m. (e) Sheet mica dissolution, alteration Da 83 well, Shanxi Formation, 2506.42 m. (f) Booklet-like kaolinite aggregates filled in intergranular pores, intergranular pores developed, Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2374.53 m.
Figure 5

Microscopic characteristics of clastic rock content reservoir in the study area. (a) Quartz sandstone, Da 70 well, Shanxi Formation, 2433.19 m. (b) Lithic quartz sandstone, calcareous cementation development, Da 70 well, Shanxi formation, 2433.19 m. (c) Filamentous and hairy illites filled in intergranular pores, Da 77 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2526.97 m. (d) The rock structure is loose, and the kaolinite aggregate and filamentous illite are filled in the intergranular pores and between grains Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2374.53 m. (e) Sheet mica dissolution, alteration Da 83 well, Shanxi Formation, 2506.42 m. (f) Booklet-like kaolinite aggregates filled in intergranular pores, intergranular pores developed, Da 70 well, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 2374.53 m.

4.2 Reservoir physical properties

4.2.1 Pore space characterization

The primary pore types in the study area are intergranular dissolved pores, intragranular dissolved pores, and microcracks (Figure 6). Intergranular dissolved pores are the most important pore type in the study area. Chlorite, quartz secondary enlargement and clay minerals can fill primary pores. Generally, the pores formed by chlorite and quartz secondary enlargement usually exceed 0.01 mm, and the pores filled by clay minerals are under 0.01 mm. The pores formed by dissolution of the interstitial material during diagenetic evolution are called secondary intergranular pores. Secondary intergranular pores formed by dissolution of iron – argillaceous matrix and argillaceous matrix can be seen in the study area. Intragranular dissolved pores develop within the grains (containing heavy minerals) after being dissolved to varying degrees and are called intragranular dissolution pores. These can be classified as follows: (i) dissolved pores in feldspar grains; (ii)intragranular dissolved pores of rock debris; (iii) flaky intragranular pores: refers to the mica fragments or mica flakes and the mica flakes is formed by dissolution, the pore morphology is often leaf-like, parallel to the mica cleavage seams; and (iv) intragranular micropores: micropores between clay minerals formed within particles after the aluminosilicate rock fragments in sandstone are altered into kaolinite and montmorillonite.

Figure 6 
                     Characteristics of pore development in clastic rocks in the study area. (a) Intergranular dissolved pore and intergranular dissolved pore development, coarse lithic quartz sandstone, Da 70 well, 2490.18 m, Shanxi Formation, 4 × 10 (–). (b) Intergranular dissolved pore and intergranular dissolved pore development, coarse lithic quartz sandstone, Da 71 well, Shanxi formation 2480.18 m, 4 × 10 (–). (c) Intragranular dissolved pores and a small amount of intergranular dissolved pores are developed, and lithic quartz sandstone, Da 107 well, 2357.17 m, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 10 × 4 (–) (d). Development characteristics of dissolution fractures, intragranular and intergranular dissolution pores, fine-grained lithic sandstone, Da 56 well, Shanxi Formation, 2679.91 m, 10 × 10 (–). Intra-P: intragranular dissolved pore; Inter- P: intergranular pore.
Figure 6

Characteristics of pore development in clastic rocks in the study area. (a) Intergranular dissolved pore and intergranular dissolved pore development, coarse lithic quartz sandstone, Da 70 well, 2490.18 m, Shanxi Formation, 4 × 10 (–). (b) Intergranular dissolved pore and intergranular dissolved pore development, coarse lithic quartz sandstone, Da 71 well, Shanxi formation 2480.18 m, 4 × 10 (–). (c) Intragranular dissolved pores and a small amount of intergranular dissolved pores are developed, and lithic quartz sandstone, Da 107 well, 2357.17 m, Lower Shihezi Formation first member, 10 × 4 (–) (d). Development characteristics of dissolution fractures, intragranular and intergranular dissolution pores, fine-grained lithic sandstone, Da 56 well, Shanxi Formation, 2679.91 m, 10 × 10 (–). Intra-P: intragranular dissolved pore; Inter- P: intergranular pore.

4.2.2 Porosity and permeability

4.2.2.1 Physical characteristics of Shanxi Formation

The analysis of porosity and permeability of the Shanxi Formation in the study area (Figure 7) shows that the porosity distribution ranges from 0.1 to 13.9%, the average porosity is 6%, and the peak value is 5–7%. The samples with porosity greater than 7% account for 54% of the total samples. The permeability distribution range is 0.001–10.1 × 10−3 μm2, the average permeability is 0.262 × 10−3 μm2, showing an obvious unimodal distribution with a peak value of 0.1–1 × 10−3 μm2, accounting for 61% of the total sample.

Figure 7 
                        Distribution of porosity and permeability of Shanxi Formation in the study area.
Figure 7

Distribution of porosity and permeability of Shanxi Formation in the study area.

4.2.2.2 Physical characteristics of section first of Lower Shihezi Formation

The analysis of porosity and permeability of first member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area shows that the porosity distribution range from 0.2 to 15.4%, the average porosity is 7.28%, and the peak value is 7–9%, of which the samples with a porosity greater than 7% account for 53% of the total number of samples (Figure 8). The permeability ranged from 0.001 to 9.21 × 10−3 μm2, and the average permeability was 0.86 × 10−3 μm2, showing an obvious single-peak distribution, with peaks in the range of 0.1–1 × 10−3 μm2, accounting for 68% of the total number of samples.

Figure 8 
                        Distribution of porosity and permeability in the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area.
Figure 8

Distribution of porosity and permeability in the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area.

4.3 Sedimentary systems

4.3.1 Types and characteristics of lithofacies

Based on core observation, ten lithofacies types were identified by lithology, sedimentary structure, and environment (Figure 9 and Table 1).

  1. Massive bedding conglomerate facies: thick and massive, the gravel content is greater than 30%, the gravel is well rounded, and the gravel diameter is 3–6 cm, which belongs to the retention deposit at the bottom of the river.

  2. Gravel-bearing coarse sandstone facies: the rock strata are middle-thick layers, mainly coarse sandstone, containing a small amount of gravel, with a content of less than 10%. It is a delta distributary channel deposit with strong hydrodynamic conditions, usually developed in the middle and lower parts of the channel.

  3. Trough cross-bedding sandstone facies: the rock strata are dominated by medium-layered medium sandstone and a small amount of coarse sandstone. It is a typical channel filling deposit and developed in the middle and lower parts of the channel.

  4. Tabular cross-bedding sandstone facies: the rock strata are mainly thin-bedded fine sandstone, with a small amount of medium sandstone, which is a typical underwater-classified river channel deposit.

  5. Parallel bedding sandstone facies: the rock stratum is dominated by thin-layered fine sandstone, with a small amount of medium sandstone, which is a river sedimentary product under strong hydrodynamic conditions.

  6. Deformed stratified sandstone facies: the rock layer is dominated by thin-bedded fine sandstone, siltstone, and a small amount of mudstone, which is the product of rapid sedimentation.

  7. Wave bedding sandstone facies: the strata are mainly thin-bedded fine sandstone, siltstone, and a small amount of mudstone.

  8. Sand grained bedding siltstone facies: the rock stratum is dominated by thin-bedded fine sandstone, siltstone, and a small amount of mudstone.

  9. Horizontal bedding siltstone facies: the rock layers are composed of thin siltstone and mudstone, formed in a weak hydrodynamic environment, and is the main sedimentary product in the inter-distributary depression and inter-classified bays.

  10. Dark mudstone facies: mainly former delta mud deposits, rich in organic matter.

Figure 9 
                     Sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area.
Figure 9

Sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation and Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area.

Table 1

Lithofacies division and genetic interpretation of Shanxi Formation–Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area

Lithofacies types Main lithologic type Sedimentary tectonics Genetic interpretation Lithofacies types Main lithologic type Sedimentary tectonics Genetic interpret
Massive bedding conglomerate facies Conglomerate
River bed detention Gravel-bearing coarse sandstone facies Gravel coarse sandstone
Distributary channel
Barrier sand dam
Trough cross-bedding sandstone facies Medium-coarse sandstone
Channel filling Tabular cross-bedding sandstone facies Medium-fine sandstone
Underwater classified river channel
Parallel bedding sandstone facies Fine sandstone
High flow water, shallow rapids Deformed stratified sandstone facies Powder-fine sandstone
Estuary dam
Wave bedding sandstone facies Fine-siltstone
Flow operation Sand grained bedding siltstone facies Fine sandstone
Tidal flat deposit
Horizontal bedding siltstone facies Siltstone
Floodplains, natural levees Dark mudstone facies Dark mudstone Former delta mud
Light-colored mudstone facies Light colored mudstone Swamp sediment
Coal and carbonaceous mudstone phases Coal, carbonaceous mudstone Swamp sediment

4.3.2 Types of sedimentary facies

In the study area, the sedimentary facies of the first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation primarily consist of braided channel deposits, with further subdivision into channel bars and flood plains. In contrast, the Shanxi Formation is composed mainly of braided channel deltaic plain deposits, with distinct diverging channels and inter-channel deposits identified within these environments.

4.3.2.1 Braided channel
4.3.2.1.1 Channel bar

Channel bars represent the most typical sedimentary feature in braided river channels, formed under strong hydrodynamic conditions. In addition, under the influence of strong hydrodynamic conditions, the channel bar sand body usually has the characteristics of coarser grain size. In the field profile observation, it can be found that the fine-grained sediments at the top of the braided river channel bar are often eroded by the later developed channel bar, forming a phenomenon of multiple channel bar superposition, which is closely related to the frequent diversion of the braided channel [57,58]. At the bottom of the channel bar, large trough cross-bedding and a small amount of ripple cross-bedding are developed. At the same time, the close distance to the source area and the short transportation distance result in a lower maturity of sand body composition and structure.

4.3.2.1.2 Flood plain

The flood plain is mainly formed outside the braided river channels. The lithology is mudstone, siltstone, and a small amount of fine sandstone, and a large number of plants grow in the low-lying terrain, which is a powerful sedimentary environment for the formation of coal seams.

4.3.2.2 Braided river delta
4.3.2.2.1 Delta plain distributary channel

In the delta plain, distributary channels form the primary depositional environment, characterized by coarse-grained sedimentation. After long-distance transportation, the sediments are well sorted and rounded, and the bottom of the sediment develops a scour filling structure. Distributary channel deposits have channel sedimentary characteristics, usually developed at the bottom of the large trough-shaped cross-bedding, and the channel sedimentary sequence is obvious.

4.3.2.2.2 Interchannel deposition

Depression is the main sedimentary type of interchannel deposition, in a relatively low-lying area, developed between distributary channels. The sediments are mainly mudstone, in which horizontal bedding is occasionally seen. When a river channel breaks, a small amount of siltstone and fine sandstone are deposited in the depression. Swamps can be formed in depressions. The swamps are heavily vegetated, poorly drained, stagnant reductive environments, and are characterized by well-preserved plant fragments and abundant authigenic minerals such as pyrite.

5 Discussion

5.1 Sedimentation model

5.1.1 Distributary channel development model

Based on the scale, lithological characteristics, and development location of the distributary channel, the main distributary channel and the secondary distributary channel are divided. The main distributary channel is characterized by multiple sets of gravelly coarse sandstone and coarse sandstone combinations on the profile. The sand bodies are coarse-grained and well connected in the lateral and vertical directions, and the lithofacies is mainly (gravelly) coarse sandstone. The sub-distributary river section shows a complete channel sedimentary sequence, and there is a mudstone interval between the upper and lower channel sand bodies.

The main distributary channel usually develops in the center of the river channel or at the intersection of distributary channels. Its development is affected by the accommodation space of the lake basin. When the level of the lake basin decreases, the accommodation space in the basin increases, and the sand body expands to the lake basin on a large scale, which promotes the extensive development of the distributary channels. In the area of intensive development of distributary channels, overlap phenomenon usually occurs between distributary channels, forming main distributary channels. In the area with less distributary channel development, the developed mudstone deposits between distributary channels to form sub-distributary channel deposits.

5.1.2 Channel bar development model

The channel bar is divided into high-energy channel bar sand body and low-energy channel bar. The high-energy channel bar is mainly composed of (gravelly) coarse sandstone lithofacies. The lithofacies of low energy channel bar is medium-coarse sandstone or medium-fine sandstone. Due to the short transportation distance, the particle sorting and roundness of these sand bodies are usually poor. The high-energy channel bar is characterized by multiple sets of sand bodies superimposed, the sedimentary sequence is incomplete, and the top fine-grained sediment is often replaced by coarse gravel sandstone at the bottom, and the sand body granularity is coarser. The low-energy channel bar is composed of a single sand body, its sedimentary sequence is complete, and the grain size gradually becomes finer upward. The high-energy channel bar is usually developed near the central axis of the channel sand body belt and in the local height difference area, and is distributed lenticular or banded.

5.2 Impacts on the reservoir

The influence of sedimentation on the reservoir can be observed in three aspects: clastic particle composition, lithology change, and sedimentary microfacies.

5.2.1 Influence of clastic particle composition on the reservoir

The clastic particles are composed of quartz, feldspar, and debris. By analyzing the particle content and porosity data of typical wells in the study area, we found a negative correlation between quartz content and porosity of the reservoir (Figure 10a). Quartz particles are relatively stable, and a small amount of quartz particles is conducive to reducing compaction, which is beneficial to the reservoir [59]. However, when the quartz content is too high, it leads to a decrease in the content of feldspar and debris, which is not conducive to the dissolution of these particles in the later stage. Feldspar content is also negatively correlated with porosity (Figure 10b). The dissolution of feldspar particles can form intragranular and intergranular pores, which is beneficial to the reservoir. Thin section observation shows that the samples with more feldspar particles dissolved usually have higher porosity, while the large number of intact feldspar particles without corrosion indicates insufficient corrosion. There is a positive correlation between debris content and porosity (Figure 10c). The debris particles are of different sizes and complex in composition, and can form large number of intergranular dissolved pores, which have a positive impact on the reservoir.

Figure 10 
                     Relationship between particle content and porosity of clastic reservoir in the study area: (a) relationship between quartz content and porosity, (b) relationship between debris content and porosity, and (c) relationship between feldspar content and porosity.
Figure 10

Relationship between particle content and porosity of clastic reservoir in the study area: (a) relationship between quartz content and porosity, (b) relationship between debris content and porosity, and (c) relationship between feldspar content and porosity.

5.2.2 Influence of lithology on reservoir

By comparing the porosity of different rock types in the study area (Figure 11), we found that changes in gravel content have no significant effect on porosity of the reservoir. Whether it is gravelly coarse sandstone, coarse sandstone, gravelly medium sandstone, and medium sandstone, the porosity does not change much. The average porosity of pebbly fine sandstone (6.8%) is lower than that of fine sandstone (8.2%). According to the location of the well section selected for the sample, although the gravel-bearing part developed at the bottom of the river channel has a coarser grain size, due to insufficient thickness and large changes in lithology, the porosity of the reservoir changes greatly and the average porosity is not high. It is worth noting that the fine sandstone and a small amount of medium sandstone developed in the middle of the river channel, although the plate bedding, trough bedding, and parallel bedding were developed and the thickness was large, the average porosity did not increase significantly. In general, the lithology of the reservoir in the study area changes frequently, and the impact on porosity is not significant.

Figure 11 
                     Porosity distribution of different rock types in Shanxi Formation–Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.
Figure 11

Porosity distribution of different rock types in Shanxi Formation–Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.

5.2.3 Influence of sedimentary microfacies on reservoirs

In the braided river sedimentary environment, we compared the isolated and superimposed channel bars (Figure 12). It is found that the porosity and permeability of the superimposed channel bar are significantly higher than that of the isolated channel bar, with the porosity range of superimposed channel bar being 8–15% and the permeability being 0.3–2.2 × 10−3 m2. The porosity of the isolated channel bar is 7–9%, and the permeability is 0.4–1.2 × 10−3 m2. In the delta plain, we compared the main distributary channel with the secondary distributary channel and found that the porosity of the main distributary channel is 8–13%, and the permeability is 0.3– 0.6 × 10−3 m2, while the porosity of the secondary distributary channel is 7–11%, and the permeability is 0.2–0.5 × 10−3 m2. In summary, we believe that the porosity and permeability of the channel bar microfacies are generally better than those of the distributary channel microfacies, which may be closely related to the hydrodynamic conditions in the sedimentary environment.

Figure 12 
                     The physical characteristics of different sedimentary facies in Shanxi Formation–Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.
Figure 12

The physical characteristics of different sedimentary facies in Shanxi Formation–Lower Shihezi Formation first member in the study area.

In addition, in the braided river environment, the channel bar usually has an inconspicuous “binary structure” of sandstone and mudstone due to its overall coarse grain size, the development of conglomerate deposits at the bottom, and the inconspicuous fine-grained deposits at the top. The distributary channel deposits usually have a complete sedimentary sequence, and the grain size in the upper part gradually becomes finer, transitioning to the natural levee and floodplain sedimentary environment dominated by mudstone. It is worth noting that although the sedimentary sequence of the reconstructed overlapped channel bar and channel is incomplete, they lack fine sediment at the top, but possess good porosity and permeability, and large-scale sand bodies are conducive to the formation of high-quality reservoirs in the study area.

5.3 Sedimentary models favorable for oil and gas enrichment

Based on our comprehensive analysis, the main distributary channel in the delta sedimentary environment and the high-energy channel bar in the braided river are two sedimentary models that are conducive to oil and gas enrichment, both formed under relatively high hydrodynamic conditions. The main distributary channel is usually developed in the center of the river or at the confluence of the diversion channels, and is mostly superposed, with porosity of 8–13% and permeability of 0.3–0.6 md. The high-energy channel bar is characterized by the superposition of multiple sets of sand bodies. The sedimentary sequence is not complete, with fine-grained sediments at the top usually replaced by pebbly coarse sandstone. The sand body has a coarse particle size, with porosity of 8–15% and permeability of 0.3–2.2 md. Therefore, we speculate that these two sedimentary models may be the focus of future oil and gas exploration and provide significant reference value for similar areas.

6 Conclusion

  1. The first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation in the study area is mainly composed of lithic quartz sandstone and lithic sandstone, and only a few samples are classified as feldspar lithic sandstone. The Shanxi Formation is mainly composed of lithic quartz sandstone, lithic sandstone, quartz sandstone, and a small amount of feldspar lithic sandstone.

  2. The pore types of clastic rocks in the study area mainly include intergranular dissolved pores, intragranular dissolved pores, and microfractures. The average porosity of the first member of Lower Shihezi Formation is 7.28%, and the average permeability is 0.86 × 10−3 m2. The average porosity of Shanxi Formation is 6%, and the average permeability is 0.262 × 10−3 m2.

  3. The Shanxi Formation belongs to delta plain sediments, including distributary channel and interchannel deposits, which are divided into main distributary channel and secondary distributary channel microfacies. The first member of the Lower Shihezi Formation is a braided river deposit, including channel bar deposits and flood plain deposits, and isolated channel bar and superimposed channel bar microfacies are identified.

  4. Sample analysis shows that sedimentation significantly affects reservoir physical properties through particle, lithology, and sedimentary microfacies characteristics. The main distributary channel and superimposed channel bar are favorable sedimentary microfacies for the formation of gas reservoirs. The porosity of the main distributary channel is 8–13%, and the permeability is 0.3–0.6 × 10−3 m2; the porosity of the superimposed channel bar is 8–15%, and the permeability is 0.3–2.2 × 10−3 m2. This study provides a theoretical basis for the development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Daniudi gas field.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge two anonymous reviewers and Analogue Modelling of Zunyi Normal College for their insightful suggestions.

  1. Funding information: This work is funded by the Science and Technology innovation team of colleges and universities of Guizhou Education Department project “Research on Evaluation Methods of Shale gas blocks in Zunyi Area” (project number: [2024]207).

  2. Author contributions: Chenyu Yang: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, visualization, writing – original draft; Hang Yu: resources, investigation, validation, writing – review & editing; Hui Xie: conceptualization, supervision, validation, writing – review & editing; Shunfeng Peng: investigation, methodology, resources, writing – review & editing; Jiangfei Tian: methodology, validation, visualization, writing – review & editing; Zhiwu Gao: writing – review & editing; Chenyu Yang: writing – review & editing; Tian Luo: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, resources, validation, visualization, writing – review & editing.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Tylor TR, Giles MR, Hathon LA, Diggs TN, Braunsdorf NR, Birbiglia GV, et al. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: models, myths, and reality. AAPG Bull. 2010;94(8):1093–132.10.1306/04211009123Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bjørlykke K. Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment Geol. 2014;301:1–14.10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ketzer JM, Holz M, Morad S, Al-Aasm IS. Sequence stratigraphic distribution of diagenetic alterations in coal-bearing, paralic sandstones: evidence from the Rio Bonito Formation (early Permian), southern Brazil. Sedimentology. 2003;50(5):855–77.10.1046/j.1365-3091.2003.00586.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Kordi M, Turner B, Salem AMK. Linking diagenesis to sequence stratigraphy in fluvial and shallow marine sandstones: evidence from the Cambrian–Ordovician lower sandstone unit in southwestern Sinai, Egypt. Mar Pet Geol. 2011;28(8):1554–71.10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lai J, Wang GW, Ran Y, Zhou ZL. Predictive distribution of high-quality reservoirs of tight gas sandstones by linking diagenesis to depositional facies: evidence from Xu-2 sandstones in the Penglai area of the central Sichuan basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015;23:97–111.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[6] Morad S, Al-Ramadan K, Ketzer JM, Ros LF. The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs: a review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy. AAPG Bull. 2010;94(8):1267–309.10.1306/04211009178Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rahman MJJ, Worden RH. Diagenesis and its impact on the reservoir quality of Miocene sandstones (Surma Group) from the Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. Mar Pet Geol. 2016;77:898–915.10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.07.027Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lai J, Wang GW, Fan ZY, Chen J, Wang SC, Zhou ZL, et al. Insight into the pore structure of tight sandstones using NMR and HPMI measurements. Energy Fuels. 2016;30:10200–14.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01982Search in Google Scholar

[9] Yu Y, Lin LB, Zhai CB, Chen HD, Wang YN, Li YH, et al. Impacts of lithologic characteristics and diagenesis on reservoir quality of the 4th member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation tight gas sandstones in the western Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Mar Pet Geol. 2019;107:1–19.10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.04.040Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lin LB, Yu Y, Nan HL, Chen H. Petrologic and geochemical characteristics of carbonate cements in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation tight gas sandstone, western Sichuan Basin, China. AAPG Bull. 2022;106(2):461–90.10.1306/10042119129Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dai JX, Ni YY, Wu XQ. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation. Pet Explor Dev. 2012;39(3):57–264. 10.11698/PED.2012.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zhu XM, Pan R, Zhu SF, Wei W, Ye L. Research progress and core issues in tight reservoir exploration. Earth Sci Front. 2018;25(2):141–6 (in Chinese with English abstract). 10.11698/DXQY.2018.02.019.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Zou CN, Yang Z, He DB, Wei YS, Li J, Jia AL, et al. Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas. Pet Explor Dev. 2018;45(4):575–87.10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30066-1Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wei GQ, Zhang FD, Li J, Yang S, Huang CY, She YQ, et al. New progress of tight sand gas accumulation theory and favorable exploration zones in China. Nat Gas Geosci. 2016;27(2):199–210. 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.02.0199.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sun LD, Zou CN, Jia AL, Wei YS, Zhu RK, Wu SK, et al. Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China. Pet Explor Dev. 2019;46(6):1015–26. 10.11698/PED.2019.06.01.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zou CN, Yang Z, Zhu RK, Zhang GS, Hou LH, Wu ST, et al. Progress in China’s unconventional oil & gas exploration and development and theoretical technologies. Acta Geol Sin. 2015;89(6):979–1007. 10.11698/DZXE.2015.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Jia AL, Wei YS, Guo Z, Wang GT, Meng DW, Huang SQ. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China. Nat Gas Ind. 2022;42(1):83–92.10.1016/j.ngib.2022.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wei XS, Hu AP, Zhao HT, Kang R, Shi XY, Liu XP. New geological understanding of tight sandstone gas. Lithologic Reserv. 2017;29(1):11–20. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Zou CN, Tao SZ, Hou LH. Unconventional oil and gas geology. Beijing: Geological Publishing House; 2011. p. 1–92.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zou CN, Zhang GS, Yang Z, Tao SZ, Hou LZ, Zhu RK, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: on unconventional petroleum geology. Pet Explor Dev. 2013;40(4):385–99. 10.11698/PED.2013.04.01.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hao SM, Chen ZY, Li L. The accumulation theory and practice of tight sandstone gas in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Wan YL, Li ZD, Peng C, Kong W, Xie YX, Zheng T. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation of low porosity and permeability sandstone of member of Shanxi Formation in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Mineral Petrol. 2016;36(3):106–14. 10.19719/j.cnki.1001-6872.2016.03.01.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Qiu LW, Mu XJ, Li H, Zhang J, Ge J, Xu S, et al. Characteristics of detritus development in the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation in Hangjinqi area and its influence on reservoir physical properties. Oil Gas Geol. 2019;40(1):24–33. 10.11743/ogg20190103.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Li YL, Jia AL, He DB. Control factors on the formation of effective reservoirs in tight sands: examples from Guang’an and Sulige gas fields. Acta Petrolei Sin. 2013;34(1):71–82. 10.7623/syxb201301008.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Yu XH, Li SL, Yang ZH. Discussion on deposition-diagenesis genetic mechanism and hot issues of tight sandstone gas reservoir. Lithologic Reserv. 2015;27(1):1–13. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2015-01-002.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tian JC, Liang QS, Wang F, Yu W. Genesis and development model of tight oil reservoir sand body in continental lacustrine basin: a case study on the Upper Triassic Chang 6 pay zone, Ordos Basin. Oil Gas Geol. 2022;43(4):877–88. 10.11743/ogg20220411.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sun X, Wang J, Tao C, Zhang Y, Jia HC, Jiang HJ, et al. Evaluation of geochemical characteristics and source of natural gas in Lower Paleozoic, Daniudi area, Ordos Basin. Pet Geol Exp. 2021;43(2):307–14. 10.11781/sysydz202102307.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Liu SL, Li H, Zhou XY. Relationship between sedimentary microfacies and reservoir productivity in Da12-Da66 well block, Daniudi gas field. Oil Gas Geol. 2012;33(1):45–9.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Dongshan YU, Guoqiang LI, Guichu MO. Evaluation of the Upper Paleozoic source rocks in the Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin. J Yangtze Univ (Nat Sci Ed) Sci Eng. 2012;9(11):84–7. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409(N).2012.11.028.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Liu Q, Jin Z, Meng Q, Wu X, Jia H. Genetic types of natural gas and filling patterns in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin, China. J Asian Earth Sci. 2015;107:1–11.10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[31] Yang Z, He S, Zou CN, Li QY, Chen ZY. Coupling relationship between reservoir diagenesis and natural gas accumulation of Daniudi gas field in north Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sin. 2010;31(3):373–8. 10.7623/syxb201003004.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Zheng WB, Hu XY, Chen SW, Liu JD, Jia C. Characteristics of sedimentary evolution in the Upper Paleozoic, Daniudi Gasfield, Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2015;33(2):306–13. 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2015.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Xu NN, Zhang SP, Wang YS, Qiu LW. Diagenesis and pore formation of the Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone in the northern area of the Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2022;40(2):422–34. 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.027.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lei T, Wang Q, Ren GL, Zhu CB, Wang RY, Wang J, et al. Component characteristics of Shanxi Formation tight sandstone and their implications for the reservoirs in Ordos Basin: taking the A block of Daniudi Gas Field as an example. Nat Gas Geosci. 2023;34(3):418–30. 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.12.012.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Luo JL, Liu XS, Fu XY, Li M, Kang R, Jia YN. Impact of petrologic components and their diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir quality and gas yield: a case study from He 8 gas bearing reservoir of Upper Paleozoic in northern Ordos Basin. Earth Sci: J China Univ Geosci. 2014;39(5):537–45. 10.3799/dqkx.2014.051.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Li S, Liu L, Wu J, Wang LL, Zhang ZL. Diagenetic evolution of tight sandstone of Shanxi-Lower Shihezi Formations in the southern Ordos Basin. Nat Gas Geosci. 2021;32(1):47–56. 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Xu NN, Wang YS, Zhang SP, Qiu LW, Zhang XJ, Lin R. Reservoir characteristics and diagenetic traps of the first member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reserv. 2021;33(4):52–62. 10.12108/yxyqc.20210406.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Gibling MR. Width and thickness of fluvial channel bodies and valley fills in the geological record: a literature compilation and clas sification. J Sediment Res. 2006;76:731–70. 10.2110/jsr.2006.060.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Tan CP, Yu XH, Li SL, Li SL, Chen BT, Shan X, et al. Discussion on the model of braided river transform to meandering river: as an example of Toutunhe formation in southern Junggar Basin. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2014;32(3):450–8. 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2014.03.009.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Jin ZK, Yang YX, Shang JL, Wang LS. Sandbody architecture and quantitative parameters of single channel sandbodies of braided river: cases from outcrops of braided river in Fukang, Liulin and Yanan area. Nat Gas Geosci. 2014;25(3):311–7. 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.03.0311.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Li SL, Yu XH, Chen BT, Li SL. Quantitative characterization of architecture elements and their response to base-level change in a sandy braided fluvial system at a mountain front. J Sediment Res. 2015;85(10):1258–74. 10.2110/jsr.2015.82.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Li SL, Yu XH, Jiang T, Liang XR, Su DX. Meander-braided transition features and abandoned channel patterns in fluvial environment. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2017;35(1):1–9. 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2017.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Wang M, Mu LX, Zhao GL, Wang YX. Architecture analysis of eservoirs in branching-and wandering-based braided rivers: taking FN field, Sudan as an example. Earth Sci Front. 2017;24(2):246–56. 10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-12-26.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Best JL, Ashworth PJ, Bristow CS, Roden J. Three-dimensional sedimentary architecture of a large, mid-channel sand braid bar, Jamuna River, Bangladesh. J Sediment Res. 2003;73(4):516–30. 10.1306/010603730516.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Yu XH, Ma XX, Mu LX, Jia AL. Geological model and hierarchical interface analysis of braided river reservoir. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press; 2004. p. 1–207.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Li W, Yue DL, Li J, Liu RJ, Guo CC, Wang WF, et al. Variable architecture models of fluvial reservoir controlled by base-level cycle: a case study of Jurassic outcrop in Datong basin. Earth Sci. 2022;47(11):3977–88. 10.3799/dqkx.2022.132.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Li SL, Ma SP, Zhou LW, Huang XD, Han B, Li H. Main influencing factors of braided-meander transition and coexistence characteristics and implications of ancient fluvial sedimentary environment reconstruction. Earth Sci. 2022;47(11):3960–76. 10.3799/dqkx.2022.013.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Li ZH, Huang WH. Lithofacies characteristics and sedimentary model of braided delta: a case study of He 8 member in the southern Sulige, Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reserv. 2017;29(1):43–50. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2017.01.006.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Xu Z, Shen CS, Chen YK, Kang K, Luo XB, He XR, et al. Architecture characterization for sandy braided river reservoir and controlling factors of remaining oil distribution: a case study of Poilfield (Neogene), Bohai offshore, China. Acta Sedimentol Sin. 2016;34(2):375–85. 10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Liu YM, Hou JG, Song BQ, Zhou XM, Chen HK, Zhang LM. Characterization of interlayers within braided-river thick sandstones: a case study on the Lamadian Oilfield in Daqing. Acta Petrolei Sin. 2011;32(5):836–41. 10.7623/syxb201105015.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Sun TJ, Mu LX, Wu XH, Zhao GL, Xu F, Wang ZJ, et al. A quantitative method for architectural characterization of sandy braided-river reservoirs: taking Hegli oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example. Acta Petrolei Sin. 2014;35(4):715–24. 10.7623/syxb201404012.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zhong DK. Micro-petrology, pore throat characteristics and genetic mechanism of tight oil reservoirs: a case from the 6th and 7th members of Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin. Oil Gas Geol. 2017;38(1):49–61. 10.11743/ogg20170106.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Hao SM, Hui KY, Li L. Reservoiring features of Daniudi low-permeability gas field in Ordos Basin and its exploration and development technologies. Oil Gas Geol. 2006;27(6):762–8. 10.11743/ogg20060606.Search in Google Scholar

[54] He FQ, Qi R, Wang FB, Deng J, Cheng L, Hu TL. Tectonic genesis of Triassic Yanchang Formation valley systems, southern Ordos Basin. Oil Gas Geol. 2021;42(5):1056–62. 10.11743/ogg20210504.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Ma DY, Chen YH, Zhao JZ, Wu WT, Song P, Chen MN. Architectural elements of fluvial sand bodies of the eighth member of Permian Xiashihezi Formation in eastern Ordos Basin. Lithologic Reserv. 2023;5(1):63–73. 10.12108/yxyqc.20230106.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Folk RL. Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Austin, TX: Hemphill; 1968. p. 107.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Qu XJ, Li JQ, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qi ZL, Luo C. Quantitative characterization of reservoir architecture units of braided river tight sandstone reservoirs. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2018;48(5):1342–52. 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170155.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Yu CL, Li ZP, Xiong YB, Wu S, Zeng P. Analysis on internal architecture of batture bar reservoir. J Southwest Pet Univ (Sci Technol Ed). 2012;34(3):19–23. 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2012.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Yang XP, Zhao WZ, Zou CN, Chen MJ, Guo YR. Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir. Acta Petrolei Sin. 2007;28(4):57–61. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2007.04.011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-13
Revised: 2024-11-08
Accepted: 2024-12-02
Published Online: 2024-12-27

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Theoretical magnetotelluric response of stratiform earth consisting of alternative homogeneous and transitional layers
  3. The research of common drought indexes for the application to the drought monitoring in the region of Jin Sha river
  4. Evolutionary game analysis of government, businesses, and consumers in high-standard farmland low-carbon construction
  5. On the use of low-frequency passive seismic as a direct hydrocarbon indicator: A case study at Banyubang oil field, Indonesia
  6. Water transportation planning in connection with extreme weather conditions; case study – Port of Novi Sad, Serbia
  7. Zircon U–Pb ages of the Paleozoic volcaniclastic strata in the Junggar Basin, NW China
  8. Monitoring of mangrove forests vegetation based on optical versus microwave data: A case study western coast of Saudi Arabia
  9. Microfacies analysis of marine shale: A case study of the shales of the Wufeng–Longmaxi formation in the western Chongqing, Sichuan Basin, China
  10. Multisource remote sensing image fusion processing in plateau seismic region feature information extraction and application analysis – An example of the Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake on January 8, 2022
  11. Identification of magnetic mineralogy and paleo-flow direction of the Miocene-quaternary volcanic products in the north of Lake Van, Eastern Turkey
  12. Impact of fully rotating steel casing bored pile on adjacent tunnels
  13. Adolescents’ consumption intentions toward leisure tourism in high-risk leisure environments in riverine areas
  14. Petrogenesis of Jurassic granitic rocks in South China Block: Implications for events related to subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate
  15. Differences in urban daytime and night block vitality based on mobile phone signaling data: A case study of Kunming’s urban district
  16. Random forest and artificial neural network-based tsunami forests classification using data fusion of Sentinel-2 and Airbus Vision-1 satellites: A case study of Garhi Chandan, Pakistan
  17. Integrated geophysical approach for detection and size-geometry characterization of a multiscale karst system in carbonate units, semiarid Brazil
  18. Spatial and temporal changes in ecosystem services value and analysis of driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta Region
  19. Deep fault sliding rates for Ka-Ping block of Xinjiang based on repeating earthquakes
  20. Improved deep learning segmentation of outdoor point clouds with different sampling strategies and using intensities
  21. Platform margin belt structure and sedimentation characteristics of Changxing Formation reefs on both sides of the Kaijiang-Liangping trough, eastern Sichuan Basin, China
  22. Enhancing attapulgite and cement-modified loess for effective landfill lining: A study on seepage prevention and Cu/Pb ion adsorption
  23. Flood risk assessment, a case study in an arid environment of Southeast Morocco
  24. Lower limits of physical properties and classification evaluation criteria of the tight reservoir in the Ahe Formation in the Dibei Area of the Kuqa depression
  25. Evaluation of Viaducts’ contribution to road network accessibility in the Yunnan–Guizhou area based on the node deletion method
  26. Permian tectonic switch of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Constraints from magmatism in the southern Alxa region, NW China
  27. Element geochemical differences in lower Cambrian black shales with hydrothermal sedimentation in the Yangtze block, South China
  28. Three-dimensional finite-memory quasi-Newton inversion of the magnetotelluric based on unstructured grids
  29. Obliquity-paced summer monsoon from the Shilou red clay section on the eastern Chinese Loess Plateau
  30. Classification and logging identification of reservoir space near the upper Ordovician pinch-out line in Tahe Oilfield
  31. Ultra-deep channel sand body target recognition method based on improved deep learning under UAV cluster
  32. New formula to determine flyrock distance on sedimentary rocks with low strength
  33. Assessing the ecological security of tourism in Northeast China
  34. Effective reservoir identification and sweet spot prediction in Chang 8 Member tight oil reservoirs in Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin
  35. Detecting heterogeneity of spatial accessibility to sports facilities for adolescents at fine scale: A case study in Changsha, China
  36. Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on soil nutrients by soft rock and sand remodeling
  37. Vibration prediction with a method based on the absorption property of blast-induced seismic waves: A case study
  38. A new look at the geodynamic development of the Ediacaran–early Cambrian forearc basalts of the Tannuola-Khamsara Island Arc (Central Asia, Russia): Conclusions from geological, geochemical, and Nd-isotope data
  39. Spatio-temporal analysis of the driving factors of urban land use expansion in China: A study of the Yangtze River Delta region
  40. Selection of Euler deconvolution solutions using the enhanced horizontal gradient and stable vertical differentiation
  41. Phase change of the Ordovician hydrocarbon in the Tarim Basin: A case study from the Halahatang–Shunbei area
  42. Using interpretative structure model and analytical network process for optimum site selection of airport locations in Delta Egypt
  43. Geochemistry of magnetite from Fe-skarn deposits along the central Loei Fold Belt, Thailand
  44. Functional typology of settlements in the Srem region, Serbia
  45. Hunger Games Search for the elucidation of gravity anomalies with application to geothermal energy investigations and volcanic activity studies
  46. Addressing incomplete tile phenomena in image tiling: Introducing the grid six-intersection model
  47. Evaluation and control model for resilience of water resource building system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and its application
  48. MIF and AHP methods for delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Tirunelveli, Tenkasi District, India
  49. New database for the estimation of dynamic coefficient of friction of snow
  50. Measuring urban growth dynamics: A study in Hue city, Vietnam
  51. Comparative models of support-vector machine, multilayer perceptron, and decision tree ‎predication approaches for landslide ‎susceptibility analysis
  52. Experimental study on the influence of clay content on the shear strength of silty soil and mechanism analysis
  53. Geosite assessment as a contribution to the sustainable development of Babušnica, Serbia
  54. Using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for road transportation services management based on remote sensing and GIS technology
  55. Accumulation mechanism of multi-type unconventional oil and gas reservoirs in Northern China: Taking Hari Sag of the Yin’e Basin as an example
  56. TOC prediction of source rocks based on the convolutional neural network and logging curves – A case study of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag
  57. A method for fast detection of wind farms from remote sensing images using deep learning and geospatial analysis
  58. Spatial distribution and driving factors of karst rocky desertification in Southwest China based on GIS and geodetector
  59. Physicochemical and mineralogical composition studies of clays from Share and Tshonga areas, Northern Bida Basin, Nigeria: Implications for Geophagia
  60. Geochemical sedimentary records of eutrophication and environmental change in Chaohu Lake, East China
  61. Research progress of freeze–thaw rock using bibliometric analysis
  62. Mixed irrigation affects the composition and diversity of the soil bacterial community
  63. Examining the swelling potential of cohesive soils with high plasticity according to their index properties using GIS
  64. Geological genesis and identification of high-porosity and low-permeability sandstones in the Cretaceous Bashkirchik Formation, northern Tarim Basin
  65. Usability of PPGIS tools exemplified by geodiscussion – a tool for public participation in shaping public space
  66. Efficient development technology of Upper Paleozoic Lower Shihezi tight sandstone gas reservoir in northeastern Ordos Basin
  67. Assessment of soil resources of agricultural landscapes in Turkestan region of the Republic of Kazakhstan based on agrochemical indexes
  68. Evaluating the impact of DEM interpolation algorithms on relief index for soil resource management
  69. Petrogenetic relationship between plutonic and subvolcanic rocks in the Jurassic Shuikoushan complex, South China
  70. A novel workflow for shale lithology identification – A case study in the Gulong Depression, Songliao Basin, China
  71. Characteristics and main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs in Fei-3 Member of Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic, Puguang area
  72. Impact of high-speed railway network on county-level accessibility and economic linkage in Jiangxi Province, China: A spatio-temporal data analysis
  73. Estimation model of wild fractional vegetation cover based on RGB vegetation index and its application
  74. Lithofacies, petrography, and geochemistry of the Lamphun oceanic plate stratigraphy: As a record of the subduction history of Paleo-Tethys in Chiang Mai-Chiang Rai Suture Zone of Thailand
  75. Structural features and tectonic activity of the Weihe Fault, central China
  76. Application of the wavelet transform and Hilbert–Huang transform in stratigraphic sequence division of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Southwest Sichuan Basin
  77. Structural detachment influences the shale gas preservation in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Northern Guizhou Province
  78. Distribution law of Chang 7 Member tight oil in the western Ordos Basin based on geological, logging and numerical simulation techniques
  79. Evaluation of alteration in the geothermal province west of Cappadocia, Türkiye: Mineralogical, petrographical, geochemical, and remote sensing data
  80. Numerical modeling of site response at large strains with simplified nonlinear models: Application to Lotung seismic array
  81. Quantitative characterization of granite failure intensity under dynamic disturbance from energy standpoint
  82. Characteristics of debris flow dynamics and prediction of the hazardous area in Bangou Village, Yanqing District, Beijing, China
  83. Rockfall mapping and susceptibility evaluation based on UAV high-resolution imagery and support vector machine method
  84. Statistical comparison analysis of different real-time kinematic methods for the development of photogrammetric products: CORS-RTK, CORS-RTK + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP
  85. Hydrogeological mapping of fracture networks using earth observation data to improve rainfall–runoff modeling in arid mountains, Saudi Arabia
  86. Petrography and geochemistry of pegmatite and leucogranite of Ntega-Marangara area, Burundi, in relation to rare metal mineralisation
  87. Prediction of formation fracture pressure based on reinforcement learning and XGBoost
  88. Hazard zonation for potential earthquake-induced landslide in the eastern East Kunlun fault zone
  89. Monitoring water infiltration in multiple layers of sandstone coal mining model with cracks using ERT
  90. Study of the patterns of ice lake variation and the factors influencing these changes in the western Nyingchi area
  91. Productive conservation at the landslide prone area under the threat of rapid land cover changes
  92. Sedimentary processes and patterns in deposits corresponding to freshwater lake-facies of hyperpycnal flow – An experimental study based on flume depositional simulations
  93. Study on time-dependent injectability evaluation of mudstone considering the self-healing effect
  94. Detection of objects with diverse geometric shapes in GPR images using deep-learning methods
  95. Behavior of trace metals in sedimentary cores from marine and lacustrine environments in Algeria
  96. Spatiotemporal variation pattern and spatial coupling relationship between NDVI and LST in Mu Us Sandy Land
  97. Formation mechanism and oil-bearing properties of gravity flow sand body of Chang 63 sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin
  98. Diagenesis of marine-continental transitional shale from the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in southern Sichuan Basin, China
  99. Vertical high-velocity structures and seismic activity in western Shandong Rise, China: Case study inspired by double-difference seismic tomography
  100. Spatial coupling relationship between metamorphic core complex and gold deposits: Constraints from geophysical electromagnetics
  101. Disparities in the geospatial allocation of public facilities from the perspective of living circles
  102. Research on spatial correlation structure of war heritage based on field theory. A case study of Jinzhai County, China
  103. Formation mechanisms of Qiaoba-Zhongdu Danxia landforms in southwestern Sichuan Province, China
  104. Magnetic data interpretation: Implication for structure and hydrocarbon potentiality at Delta Wadi Diit, Southeastern Egypt
  105. Deeply buried clastic rock diagenesis evolution mechanism of Dongdaohaizi sag in the center of Junggar fault basin, Northwest China
  106. Application of LS-RAPID to simulate the motion of two contrasting landslides triggered by earthquakes
  107. The new insight of tectonic setting in Sunda–Banda transition zone using tomography seismic. Case study: 7.1 M deep earthquake 29 August 2023
  108. The critical role of c and φ in ensuring stability: A study on rockfill dams
  109. Evidence of late quaternary activity of the Weining-Shuicheng Fault in Guizhou, China
  110. Extreme hydroclimatic events and response of vegetation in the eastern QTP since 10 ka
  111. Spatial–temporal effect of sea–land gradient on landscape pattern and ecological risk in the coastal zone: A case study of Dalian City
  112. Study on the influence mechanism of land use on carbon storage under multiple scenarios: A case study of Wenzhou
  113. A new method for identifying reservoir fluid properties based on well logging data: A case study from PL block of Bohai Bay Basin, North China
  114. Comparison between thermal models across the Middle Magdalena Valley, Eastern Cordillera, and Eastern Llanos basins in Colombia
  115. Mineralogical and elemental analysis of Kazakh coals from three mines: Preliminary insights from mode of occurrence to environmental impacts
  116. Chlorite-induced porosity evolution in multi-source tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Shaximiao Formation in western Sichuan Basin
  117. Predicting stability factors for rotational failures in earth slopes and embankments using artificial intelligence techniques
  118. Origin of Late Cretaceous A-type granitoids in South China: Response to the rollback and retreat of the Paleo-Pacific plate
  119. Modification of dolomitization on reservoir spaces in reef–shoal complex: A case study of Permian Changxing Formation, Sichuan Basin, SW China
  120. Geological characteristics of the Daduhe gold belt, western Sichuan, China: Implications for exploration
  121. Rock physics model for deep coal-bed methane reservoir based on equivalent medium theory: A case study of Carboniferous-Permian in Eastern Ordos Basin
  122. Enhancing the total-field magnetic anomaly using the normalized source strength
  123. Shear wave velocity profiling of Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, utilizing the multi-channel analysis of surface waves method
  124. Effect of coal facies on pore structure heterogeneity of coal measures: Quantitative characterization and comparative study
  125. Inversion method of organic matter content of different types of soils in black soil area based on hyperspectral indices
  126. Detection of seepage zones in artificial levees: A case study at the Körös River, Hungary
  127. Tight sandstone fluid detection technology based on multi-wave seismic data
  128. Characteristics and control techniques of soft rock tunnel lining cracks in high geo-stress environments: Case study of Wushaoling tunnel group
  129. Influence of pore structure characteristics on the Permian Shan-1 reservoir in Longdong, Southwest Ordos Basin, China
  130. Study on sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation in Da 17 well area of Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin
  131. Multi-scenario territorial spatial simulation and dynamic changes: A case study of Jilin Province in China from 1985 to 2030
  132. Review Articles
  133. Major ascidian species with negative impacts on bivalve aquaculture: Current knowledge and future research aims
  134. Prediction and assessment of meteorological drought in southwest China using long short-term memory model
  135. Communication
  136. Essential questions in earth and geosciences according to large language models
  137. Erratum
  138. Erratum to “Random forest and artificial neural network-based tsunami forests classification using data fusion of Sentinel-2 and Airbus Vision-1 satellites: A case study of Garhi Chandan, Pakistan”
  139. Special Issue: Natural Resources and Environmental Risks: Towards a Sustainable Future - Part I
  140. Spatial-temporal and trend analysis of traffic accidents in AP Vojvodina (North Serbia)
  141. Exploring environmental awareness, knowledge, and safety: A comparative study among students in Montenegro and North Macedonia
  142. Determinants influencing tourists’ willingness to visit Türkiye – Impact of earthquake hazards on Serbian visitors’ preferences
  143. Application of remote sensing in monitoring land degradation: A case study of Stanari municipality (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  144. Optimizing agricultural land use: A GIS-based assessment of suitability in the Sana River Basin, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  145. Assessing risk-prone areas in the Kratovska Reka catchment (North Macedonia) by integrating advanced geospatial analytics and flash flood potential index
  146. Analysis of the intensity of erosive processes and state of vegetation cover in the zone of influence of the Kolubara Mining Basin
  147. GIS-based spatial modeling of landslide susceptibility using BWM-LSI: A case study – city of Smederevo (Serbia)
  148. Geospatial modeling of wildfire susceptibility on a national scale in Montenegro: A comparative evaluation of F-AHP and FR methodologies
  149. Geosite assessment as the first step for the development of canyoning activities in North Montenegro
  150. Urban geoheritage and degradation risk assessment of the Sokograd fortress (Sokobanja, Eastern Serbia)
  151. Multi-hazard modeling of erosion and landslide susceptibility at the national scale in the example of North Macedonia
  152. Understanding seismic hazard resilience in Montenegro: A qualitative analysis of community preparedness and response capabilities
  153. Forest soil CO2 emission in Quercus robur level II monitoring site
  154. Characterization of glomalin proteins in soil: A potential indicator of erosion intensity
  155. Power of Terroir: Case study of Grašac at the Fruška Gora wine region (North Serbia)
  156. Special Issue: Geospatial and Environmental Dynamics - Part I
  157. Qualitative insights into cultural heritage protection in Serbia: Addressing legal and institutional gaps for disaster risk resilience
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2022-0752/html
Scroll to top button