Home Petrogenesis of Jurassic granitic rocks in South China Block: Implications for events related to subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate
Article Open Access

Petrogenesis of Jurassic granitic rocks in South China Block: Implications for events related to subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate

  • Meng-Yu Tian and Yong-Jun Di EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 22, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Frequent magmatic intrusion and eruption during the early Yanshanian in South China formed a unique and diverse igneous rock assemblage, mainly comprising granite, rhyolite, and some basic rocks. Nevertheless, the tectonic regime responsible for the formation of these granitic rocks remains controversial. The comprehensive available data suggest that the Jurassic granitic rocks formed during the period from 180 to 145 Ma, with an age peak at ca. 160 Ma. Jurassic rocks are predominantly concentrated in Wuyi, southern Hunan, northeast Guangdong, and southern Jiangxi, followed by the eastern Guangxi-western Guangdong areas, mainly including I-, S-, and A-type granites, and a few I–S transformation-type granites. These granitic rocks invariably exhibit enrichment in Rb, Th, U, and Pb, while Ba, Nb, Sr, P, and Ti are depleted, and variable Eu/Eu* ratios. The whole-rock Sr–Nd isotopic and zircon Hf isotopic compositions show that the Jurassic granitic rocks are mainly recirculation products of Paleo-Mesoproterozoic rocks, as well as the mantle-derived magma, which played a major role in the formation process. Among them, the granites in eastern Guangxi-western Guangdong and Northeast Guangdong areas display higher ε Nd(t) and ε Hf(t) values, suggesting a relatively larger contribution from mantle-derived materials. Based on the comprehensive regional geological data, we interpret that these Jurassic granitic rocks as a product of lithosphere extensional-thinning, tectonic-magmatic interaction formed during the process of flat-slab subduction.

Abbreviations

SCB

South China Block

WY

Wuyi

SH

Southern Hunan

NEG

Northeastern Guangdong

SJ

Southern Jiangxi

EGWG

Eastern Guangxi-western Guangdong

REE

Total rare-earth elements

LREE

Light rare earth elements

HREE

Heavy rare earth elements

LILEs

Large ion lithophile elements

HFSEs

Depletion of high field strength elements

1 Introduction

The South China Block (SCB) is a special area where the Tethys and Pacific tectonic domains intersect, and its tectonic framework and magmatic evolution are very complex [15]. During the Mesozoic period, large-scale magmatism and regional metamorphism occurred in the SCB, resulting in granitic intrusion with an exposed area of over 200,000 km2 and volcanic basins [610]. These granites provide favorable geologic setting for mineralization, thus making South China a world-renowned polymetallic mineralized area for Cu–Mo–Pb–Zn–Au–Ag, etc. [1115].

The tectonic settings for the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China have been studied for decades. However, controversy continues regarding the following issues related to the geodynamic background [1,12,1622]. Some scholars believe that the tectonic background of the early Yanshanian in South China is related to intracontinental extension-rifting events [6,2226]. Differently, others believe that it was influenced by the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate [10,20,2729]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the Yanshanian magmatism was mainly controlled by the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate beneath the SCB. Subsequently, scholars have proposed several different models, including a normal subduction model [20,21,30], a flat-slab subduction model [1,29,31], a multi-angle subduction model [22,32,33], and “ridge subduction and slab window” model [17,34].

For the purpose of validating various models, this article presents a combined study of zircon geochronology, petrogeochemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic data of early Yanshanian granitic rocks, which we use to discuss the petrogenetic and geotectonic contexts. Our comprehensive analysis suggests that the proposed flat-slab subduction tectonic-magmatic model in this article will be able to explain the Jurassic magmatic activity in SCB.

2 Geological background

The SCB, composed of the Yangtze Craton and Cathaysia Block at approximately 0.9 Ga, is the major tectonic unit in East Asia (Figure 1) [28,36]. With the formation of the SCB, continental rifts developed in the Neoproterozoic of the SCB and gave rise to the production of a large number of mafic rocks [37,38]. From the Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic, the disappearance of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean and the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate had a major impact on the SCB [7,3942]. During the Indosinian, the SCB and the Indochina block amalgamated along the Jinshajiang-Ailaoshan-Song Ma suture zone and was accompanied by extensive magmatic intrusion [32,39]. The SCB collided with the North China block to form the metamorphic Qinling-Dabie orogeny [43,44]. As a result, the SCB has promoted strong fold belts, nappe structures, and thrust faults [45,46]. The Mesozoic geology of South China is characterized by widespread tectonothermal events [4752]. These events led to widespread strong extrusive uplift in South China, producing generalized stratigraphic unconformity, metamorphic deformation, and thrust tectonics [53,54]. Many rift basins and extensional dome structures formed in the Late Cretaceous ([53] and references therein), which induced strong intrusion and volcanism [5557]. The tectono-magmatic events of the Cretaceous may be related to the roll-back of the subducted Paleo-Pacific plate [13,31].

Figure 1 
               Simplified map of the distribution of early Yanshannian granitoids in SCB (modified according to refs. [28,35]). Fuchsia dashed line indicates the provincial boundaries.
Figure 1

Simplified map of the distribution of early Yanshannian granitoids in SCB (modified according to refs. [28,35]). Fuchsia dashed line indicates the provincial boundaries.

In the Jurassic, magmatic intrusion and eruption led to the formation of diverse types of intermediate-acidic igneous rocks, together with subordinate mafic rocks in South China [18,21,22,34,35,40,45]. At present, more than 150 Jurassic granite bodies have been found, mainly in Wuyi (WY), southern Hunan (SH), northeastern Guangdong (NEG), and southern Jiangxi (SJ), followed by the eastern Guangxi-western Guangdong (EGWG), with sporadic distribution in other areas (Figure 1). The rocks are mainly composed of I-, S-, and A-type granites, and a few I–S transformation-type granites (Tables S1 and S2). They consist of biotite monzogranite, biotite granite, biotite syenogranite, etc. ([58,59] and references therein). The research shows that continuous Jurassic magmatism in South China occurred between 180 and 145 Ma, with a peak age at ca. 160 Ma (Table S1 and Figure 2). The peak magmatism mainly occurred in the Nanling area [6,6072], and the Huanshan, Guposhan, Gudoushan, Wuguishan, Huashan, and Baer plutons in the EGWG area [28,7376]. In addition, the early Yanshanian volcanic rocks are mainly distributed in the WY and Zhuguangshan areas, mainly including basalt, andesite, dacite, and rhyolite [54,57,76,77].

Figure 2 
               Zircon U–Pb ages histogram of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. Data sources are listed in Table S1.
Figure 2

Zircon U–Pb ages histogram of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. Data sources are listed in Table S1.

3 Petrogeochemical characteristics

The petrogeochemical characteristics of Jurassic granitic rocks from these five areas (WY, SH, NEG, SJ, and EGWG), including whole-rock major-trace elements, zircon Hf isotopes, and Sr–Nd isotopes, will be shown in detail below. Brief information of these granites is listed in Tables S2–S4. Since ferrous iron and ferric have not always been given together, the major oxides of the rocks were recalculated to 100%.

3.1 Whole-rock geochemistry

All the Jurassic granitic rocks show SiO2 = 58.90–80.78%, Al2O3 = 11.06–17.28%, MgO = 0.02–3.22%, CaO = 0.05–4.98%, and K2O = 0.93–8.29% (Table S2). The granite is comparatively high in total alkalis (3.34–10.24%), showing a range from subalkaline granite and granodiorite (Figure 3a; [78]). All granitic rocks exhibit a shoshonite series to high-K calc-alkaline affinity (Figure 3b; [79]), and aluminum saturation index (molar A/CNK) values mainly focused between 0.86 and 3.18 (Figure 3c; [80]). In Harker diagrams, all the rocks display intensively negative correlations in the plots of TiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, P2O5, MgO, CaO, Sr, and Ba vs SiO2 contents (Figure 4; [8082]). It is to be noted that there is a trend of gradual decrease between SiO2 and Na2O in EGWG and SH areas. On the contrary, SiO2 vs Na2O showed a positive correlation tendency in WY, SJ, and NEG areas (Figure 4g).

Figure 3 
                  TAS, K2O vs SiO2, and A/NK vs A/CNK diagrams for the Jurassic granitic rocks (according to refs. [78–80]). Data sources are listed in Table S2.
Figure 3

TAS, K2O vs SiO2, and A/NK vs A/CNK diagrams for the Jurassic granitic rocks (according to refs. [7880]). Data sources are listed in Table S2.

Figure 4 
                  Harker plots and discrimination illustrations of the Jurassic granitic rocks (according to refs. [80–82]). FG – fractionated felsic granite; OGT – unfractionated granite. Data sources are listed in Table S2.
Figure 4

Harker plots and discrimination illustrations of the Jurassic granitic rocks (according to refs. [8082]). FG – fractionated felsic granite; OGT – unfractionated granite. Data sources are listed in Table S2.

In the primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams (Figure 5a–e; [83]), these granitic rocks from EGWG, WY, SH, SJ, and NEG invariably exhibit enrichment in Rb, Th, U, and Pb, while Ba, Nb, Sr, P, and Ti are depleted. All these rocks show total rare-earth elements (REE) contents ranging from 38.99 to 489.73 ppm (Table S2), with variable LREE/HREE ratios (0.43 and 24.69; LREE: light rare earth elements [from La to Eu]; HREE: heavy rare earth elements[from Gd to Lu]). The chondrite-normalized REE diagrams (Figure 5f–j) show REE fractionation patterns ([La/Yb]N = 0.15–66.31; [La/Sm]N = 0.33–11.23; [Gd/Yb]N = 0.41–5.88) and variable Eu/Eu* ratios (0.003–1.423; Figure 5f–j). Therein, the REE distribution in SH, SJ, and NEG shows stronger negative Eu anomalies and higher HREE (HREE: from Gd to Lu) contents (Figure 5h–j). In contrast, the REE distribution in EGWG and WY shows medium-weak negative Eu anomalies and lower HREE (HREE: from Gd to Lu) contents (Figure 5f and g). In Figure 4J, Eu/Eu* values usually vary within a higher constant range (Eu/Eu* > 0.3) when the SiO2 contents are below ca. 72% but appear in a rapid decrease when the SiO2 exceeds ca. 72% (Eu/Eu* ≤ 0.3). In addition, almost all samples in the SH, SJ, and NEG show intensely negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* ≤ 0.3) fall in the fractionated felsic granite zone (Figure 4k and l, FG), while the granitic rocks from the EGWG and WY are mainly plotted in the unfractionated granite zone (Figure 4k and l, OGT).

Figure 5 
                  Rock/primitive mantle-normalized trace elements in diagrams and chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for the Jurassic granitic rocks. Normalizing data are from [83]. Data sources are listed in Table S2.
Figure 5

Rock/primitive mantle-normalized trace elements in diagrams and chondrite-normalized REE diagrams for the Jurassic granitic rocks. Normalizing data are from [83]. Data sources are listed in Table S2.

3.2 Sr–Nd isotopes

The granite samples from EGWG, WY, and NEG display a wide range of (87Sr/86Sr)i values (Figure 6a), and ε Nd(t) values ranging from −12.2 to +0.9 (Figure 6b and Table S3). However, the granitic rocks in NEG have the most variable ε Nd(t) and (87Sr/86Sr)i values, from −12.2 to +0.3 and 0.7044 to 0.7136, respectively. The two-stage model ages (T DM2) of the rocks in these three areas are 2.26–0.76 Ga (Figure 7a, b, and e and Table S3). The rocks from the SJ and SH areas show similar Sr–Nd isotopic features. They have been widely varying (87Sr/86Sr)i values of 0.7024–0.7246, ε Nd(t) values from −13.0 to −5.1, and T DM2 from 2.00 to 1.33 Ga (Figure 7c and d and Table S3). In particular, the granites of the SJ probably all originated from partial melting of Proterozoic crustal materials in South China (Figure 6b; [13,35,71]).

Figure 6 
                  Zircon U–Pb ages vs ε
                     Nd(t), (87Sr/86Sr)i vs ε
                     Nd(t), and Zircon U–Pb ages vs ε
                     Hf(t) illustrations of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. DM = Depleted Mantle; CHUR = Chondritic Uniform Reservoir. Data sources are listed in Tables S3 and S4.
Figure 6

Zircon U–Pb ages vs ε Nd(t), (87Sr/86Sr)i vs ε Nd(t), and Zircon U–Pb ages vs ε Hf(t) illustrations of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. DM = Depleted Mantle; CHUR = Chondritic Uniform Reservoir. Data sources are listed in Tables S3 and S4.

Figure 7 
                  Spectrums of the whole-rock Nd isotopic and zircon Hf isotopic two-stage model ages for each area of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. Data sources are listed in Tables S3 and S4.
Figure 7

Spectrums of the whole-rock Nd isotopic and zircon Hf isotopic two-stage model ages for each area of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China. Data sources are listed in Tables S3 and S4.

3.3 Zircon Hf isotopes

In the SH, NEG, and EGWG areas, the zircon Hf isotopes of the Jurassic plutons are largely variable, with zircon ε Hf(t) values from −23.6 to +7.9, −19.4 to +8.3, and −11.4 to +7.4, respectively (Figure 6c and Table S4), indicating addition of juvenile mantle-derived materials. Zircon Hf isotope two-stage model ages (T DM2) value for granitic rocks from these three areas ranges from 2.68 to 0.61 Ga (Figure 7f, h, and j). Among them, the T DM2 peaks of rocks in the EGWG are ca. 1.6–1.2 Ga (Figure 7f). For rocks in the SH and NEG areas, the major T DM2 peaks of rocks are all at ca. 1.6–1.4 Ga, with a minor peak at ca. 1.8–1.6 Ga (Figure 7h and j), indicating a partial melting of magmatic material mainly from the Mesoproterozoic crust. Jurassic granitic rocks from the WY and SJ areas share similar zircon Hf isotopic characteristics, with ε Hf(t) values from −16.1 to −2.9 and −20.3 to −4.8. The T DM2 of the rock ranges from 2.63 to 1.24 Ga, with a peak of about 1.8 Ga (Figure 7g and i), indicating that the partial melting of magmatic material is sourced from the Meso-Proterozoic crust.

4 Discussion

4.1 Petrogenesis of the Jurassic granitic rocks

4.1.1 Magma sources

The trace elements of the Jurassic granitic rocks show enrichment of large ion lithophile elements (LILEs) and depletion of high field strength elements (HFSEs), Ba, and Sr, suggesting that the magmatic materials may mainly originate from the crust [24,28,8486]. REE distribution diagrams show relatively steeper curves for LREE and gentle curves for some HREE, with variable Eu/Eu* ratios, showing the characteristics of crust–mantle mixing [8789].

The comprehensive Sr–Nd–Hf isotope analysis indicates that the Jurassic granitic rocks are mainly recirculation products of Paleo-Mesoproterozoic rocks (Figure 6; [42,55,60]). Whole-rock Sr–Nd isotopes indicate that during the formation of Jurassic Granites, they might have been affected by the mantle-derived components or juvenile crustal materials (Figure 6a and b). In Figure 6a, these granites are also mainly distributed on the crust-mantle mixing evolutionary line. The common feature of zircon Hf isotopic compositions is that they generally have negative ε Hf(t) values, but they have positive ε Hf(t) values in EGWG, NEG, and SH, showing a larger range of variability. In the major elements illustration, the Jurassic granitic rocks show a clear trend of magma mixing (Figure 8a; [90]), and the magma source may be mixed with a definite proportion of basaltic magma (Figure 8b; [91]). It is noteworthy that many mafic microgranular enclaves occur in the Jurassic granitic rocks, such as the western Guangdong Baer [76], northeast Guangxi Huashan-Guposhan [73,74,93], northeast Guangdong Qinghu [47], southern Hunan Xitian [94], Xintianling [95], and Koushuishan granitic pluton [2]. These evidences indicate that these granitic rocks may have originated from different magmatic sources (Figure 4; [16,76,94]). There are many Jurassic basic rocks occurring in the studied area, i.e., Chenglong gabbro in southern Jiangxi (ca. 178 Ma; [96]); Wushijiao gabbro in northeast Guangdong (162 Ma; [13]), Guluo-Wangjiangchong gabbro in southeast Guangxi (158–163 Ma; [52]), Mashan peridotite-gabbro in eastern Guangxi (153 Ma; [25]), Daoxian high-Mg basaltic rocks in southern Hunan (ca. 150 Ma; [97]), and Xiangjia basalt in southern Jiangxi (162 Ma; [98]). They originated from partial melting of the asthenospheric or the lithospheric mantle, which may provide heat or material to the magma source of the granitic rocks (e.g., [13,25,96,99]).

Figure 8 
                     MgO vs FeO*, Al2O3/TiO2 vs CaO/NaO2, and M vs Zr diagrams of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China (according to refs. [90–92]). M = (Na + K + 2Ca)/(Al × Si). Data sources are listed in Table S2.
Figure 8

MgO vs FeO*, Al2O3/TiO2 vs CaO/NaO2, and M vs Zr diagrams of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China (according to refs. [9092]). M = (Na + K + 2Ca)/(Al × Si). Data sources are listed in Table S2.

Experimental studies have shown that magma temperature is one of the important parameters affecting the petrogenesis and it can serve as an effective tracer for detecting heat, melting, and emplacement condition [100]. Built on the zircon saturation temperature, we roughly estimate the melt temperature of the Jurassic granitic rocks [101]. In Figure 8c, the analyses from the EGWG and NEG are more variable in the ca. 700–850°C, and the analyses in the WY, SH, and SJ areas center at 750–800°C [92]. In the case of the Guangdong and Guangxi areas, the presence of amounts of basalts indicates a hot, and the larger temperature variations in the formation of these granites may be the result of different degrees of magma underplating.

In summary, we believe that mantle-derived magma played an important role in the formation of granitic rocks. The mantle-derived magma not only provides the heat needed for partial melting of basement rocks but also may supply the mantle-derived material.

4.1.2 Crystal differentiation processes

In Harker diagrams, the negative correlation between TiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO, CaO, and SiO2 demonstrates that the granitic rocks may be the product of fractional crystallization during magmatic evolution (Figure 4). During crystallization, the reduction of Fe2O3 and MgO during magmatic evolution suggests the separation of mafic minerals, i.e., hornblende, biotite, and minor Ti–Fe minerals (Figure 4c and e; [16,93,102]). The decrease in P2O5 and TiO2 with increasing SiO2 indicates the crystallization of apatite and sphene (Figure 4a and d; [13,16,35]). The process of crystal fractionation is confirmed by the variations of La vs La/Sm, Yb vs Th/Yb, Rb vs Ba, Sr vs Rb/Sr, Sr vs Ba, La vs (La/ Yb)N, and SiO2 vs ε Nd(t) and the negative correlations among Eu/Eu* vs Ba and Sr (Figure 9; [22,31,35]).

Figure 9 
                     Characteristics of the Jurassic granitic rocks resulting from fractional crystallization. PM: partial melting; FC: fractional crystallization; AFC: assimilation and fractional crystallization. Data sources are listed in Table S2. (Pl: plagioclase. Kf: K-feldspar. Bi: biotite. Opx: orthopyroxene. Cpx: clinopyroxene. Aln: allanite. Ap: apatite. Mnz: monazite. Zr: zircon).
Figure 9

Characteristics of the Jurassic granitic rocks resulting from fractional crystallization. PM: partial melting; FC: fractional crystallization; AFC: assimilation and fractional crystallization. Data sources are listed in Table S2. (Pl: plagioclase. Kf: K-feldspar. Bi: biotite. Opx: orthopyroxene. Cpx: clinopyroxene. Aln: allanite. Ap: apatite. Mnz: monazite. Zr: zircon).

The pronounced depletion of Sr, Nb, Ti, and P (Figure 5a–e) further demonstrates that fractional crystallization occurred during the formation of granitic rocks [13,67]. Eu/Eu* vs Ba and Sr are positively correlated, but Ba vs Rb is negatively correlated (Figure 9d), showing that these elements are largely influenced by the separation of K-feldspar and plagioclase from the fractionating melt [22,93]. In the Sr vs Ba and Sr vs Rb/Sr diagrams (Figure 9e and h), the separation of K-feldspar is clearly present [16,31]. The separation of Ti-rich minerals (e.g., ilmenite, sphene, and rutile) and apatite leads to the depletion of Ta, Nb, Ti, and P [13,16,22]. Crystal fractionation of monazite and/or allanite controls the variation from La and Yb contents (Figure 9i). Also, the SiO2 vs ε Nd(t) diagram shows that the FC or AFC process is clear during the magmatic crystallization process (Figure 9a–c; [35,103]).

Usually, the LILEs or HFSEs trace element ratios (e.g., Sm/Nd, Rb/Sr, Ba/Rb, and Th/U) are used to represent the strength of magma fractionation [13,88,104]. With magmatic evolution Sm/Nd and Rb/Sr values will increase, while Ba/Rb and Th/U values decrease [35,47]. Sm/Nd values of EGWG, WY, SH, SJ, and NEG areas are 0.15–0.33, 0.15–0.41, 0.14–0.49, 0.08–0.69, and 0.08–0.49; Rb/Sr values are 0.29–14.75, 0.17–52.84, 0.21–229.26, 0.21–123.69, and 0.25–100.00; Ba/Rb values are 0.14–7.72, 0.06–23.86, 0.01–6.03, 0.01–4.94, and 0.01–7.65; and Th/U values are 0.84–6.84, 0.99–13.64, 0.31–7.60, 0.55–8.29, and 0.42–11.81, respectively. In conclusion, Jurassic granitic rocks underwent fractional crystallization, and the magma evolution and differentiation in SH, SJ, and NEG were relatively stronger than those in WY and EGWG (Figure 9j–l; [13,35,93]).

4.2 Tectonic setting

The composition and spatial-temporal distribution of the Yanshanian igneous rocks provide important constraints on the geodynamic evolutionary processes [105108]. The Yanshanian granitic intrusive rocks are clearly controlled spatially by regional fault zones and can be divided into three main intrusive phases according to time (170–150, 140–125, 110–80 Ma; [21,26,34,109]). The age of magmatic activity has a certain regularity, i.e., there is a tendency for the age to become progressively younger from inland to coastal areas of South China [54,67,104]. This trend is shown by subduction [31,32,34]. A large number of zircon U–Pb ages show that the Jurassic granitic rocks formed mainly between 180 and 145 Ma, with the strongest magmatic intrusion taking place at ca. 160 Ma (Figure 2; Table S1). These rocks show clear similarities in trace elements (Figure 5) and display arc-related affinities [110112]. In geochemical tectonic discrimination diagrams of this study, the formation environment of these granites indicates extension-tensioning associated with orogeny (Figure 10; [113115]). In recent years, with the in-depth study of the early Yanshanian igneous rocks in South China, more and more scholars believe that the tectonic background may be mainly related to lithosphere extensional thinning [16,52,75,86,116118], such as southern Jiangxi Quannan syenite (161 Ma; [119]), Hunan Qitianling granite (161 Ma; [6]), southern Guangdong Changsheshan granite (163 Ma; [120]), northern Guangdong Nankunshan granite (158 Ma; [31]), Guangxi Hengxian monzodiorite (154 Ma; [25]), and Hainan Limao gabbro (167 Ma; [121]). To sum up, the extensional thinning of the lithosphere may be the major tectonic dynamics mechanism in South China (170–150 Ma).

Figure 10 
                  Illustration of the tectonic discrimination of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China (according to refs. [80,113–115]). RRG = rift-related granitoids, IAG = island arc granitoids, CAG = continental arc granitoids, CCG = continental collision granitoids, POG = postorogenic granitoids, CEUG = continental epeirogenic uplift granitoids, VAG = volcanic arc granite, Syn-COLG = syn-collision granite, Post-COLG = post-collision granite, WPG = within plate granite, ORG = oceanic ridge granite. Data sources are listed in Table S2.
Figure 10

Illustration of the tectonic discrimination of the Jurassic granitic rocks in South China (according to refs. [80,113115]). RRG = rift-related granitoids, IAG = island arc granitoids, CAG = continental arc granitoids, CCG = continental collision granitoids, POG = postorogenic granitoids, CEUG = continental epeirogenic uplift granitoids, VAG = volcanic arc granite, Syn-COLG = syn-collision granite, Post-COLG = post-collision granite, WPG = within plate granite, ORG = oceanic ridge granite. Data sources are listed in Table S2.

Regional geological data indicate that the gradual transition of the SCB from the Paleo-Tethys tectonic domain to the Paleo-Pacific tectonic domain probably occurred at ca. 180 Ma [75,122,123]. Therefore, the Yanshanian magmatism is related to the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate and its effects (back-arc extension, slab break-off, subsidence, etc.) [28,67,123125]. During the Early-Middle Jurassic (190–170 Ma), the discovery of A-type granites and gabbro- and OIB-type basalts in the Nanling area and southwest Fujian marked the beginning of subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate beneath the SCB [19,31,126,127]. In the Middle-Late Jurassic (170–150 Ma), the lithosphere of the SCB was in a comprehensive “extension-thinning” context due to the influence of the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate [35,57,128]. Research suggests that the most distant subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate may have arrived at the famous Qin-Hang belt [14,27,126,129131]. Interestingly, the Paleo-Pacific plate did not successively subduct to the northwest but rolled back in the Late Jurassic plate [21,126,132,133]. It has been shown that the early Yanshanian basalts in South China are interpreted as a result of delamination of a flat-subducted Paleo-Pacific plate [1,7], as well as post-orogenic extension of the collision [134136]. The latest numerical modelings show that the Yanshanian (Mesozoic) was subjected to the dynamical evolution of flat-slab subduction/slab-foundering of the Paleo-Pacific Plate [29]. Based on the comprehensive consideration of previous research data and geotectonic factors, we suggest that the flat-slab subduction tectonic-magmatic model can more reasonably explain the early Yanshanian magmatic activity, in which the foundering and delamination of the flat-slab resulted in a large number of high-K granites and basaltic underplating in an extensional environment.

Taken together, ca. 190 Ma, the Paleo-Pacific plate enters beneath the SCB by flat-slab subduction [31,98]. During ca. 170 Ma, the subduction plate may have begun to break up, resulting in the production of small amounts of bimodal igneous rocks and basaltic in South China [1,35,137]. The subsidence and foundering of the plate may have occurred ca. 160 Ma, which induced the upwelling of asthenosphere mantle and the underplating of mantle-derived magma, resulting in the occurrence of tectonothermal events in South China and the formation of different types of granites ([28,31]; Figure 11).

Figure 11 
                  Tectonic-magmatic model of the early Yanshanian (ca. 160 Ma) in South China (modified after [28,31,134]).
Figure 11

Tectonic-magmatic model of the early Yanshanian (ca. 160 Ma) in South China (modified after [28,31,134]).

5 Conclusion

From the comprehensive study and analysis of Jurassic granitic rocks, we came to the following conclusions:

  1. The granitic rocks are formed during the period from 180 to 145 Ma, with an age peak at ca. 160 Ma.

  2. These rocks invariably exhibit enrichment in Rb, Th, U, and Pb, while Ba, Nb, Sr, P, and Ti are depleted, and variable Eu/Eu* ratios. Whole-rock Sr–Nd isotopic and zircon Hf isotopic compositions show that the Jurassic granitic rocks are mainly recirculation products of Paleo-Mesoproterozoic rocks, as well as the mantle-derived magma, which played a major role in the formation process.

  3. Based on the comprehensive regional geological data, we interpret these Jurassic granitic rocks as the product of lithosphere extensional-thinning, tectonic-magmatic interaction formed during the process of flat-slab subduction.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the China Geophysical Fields and Metallogenic Relationships (KD-[2020]-XZ-044). We would like to thank Ms. Shuangrong Zhang from the Beijing GeoAnalysis CO., Ltd, for her help in the zircon U–Pb age and Hf isotope analyses. We thank Ms. Baoling Huang from the Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Peking University (China), for their assistance in Whole-rock analysis.

  1. Funding information: This study is partly supported by the China Geophysical Fields and Metallogenic Relationships (KD-[2020]-XZ-044).

  2. Author contributions: M.T., and Y.D. conceived and planned all the workflow of the article. M.T. carried out the fieldwork, sampling, and data collection. Y.D. contributed to the interpretation of the results. M.T. and Y.D. took the lead in writing the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The data involved during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1] Li ZX, Li XH. Formation of the 1300-km-wide intracontinental orogen and postorogenic magmatic province in Mesozoic South China: A flat-slab subduction model. Geology. 2007;35(2):179–82. 10.1130/G23193A.1.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Huang XF, He X, Xie YC, Liang W, Shang JL, Long G. Diagenetic epoch and genesis of Guangdong Heitoushan granite. South China Geol. 2015;35(1):26–35 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[3] Deng J, Feng Y, Di Y, Liu C, Xiao Q, Su S, et al. The intrusive spatial temporal evolutional framework in the Southeast China. Geol Rev. 2016;62(1):3–16 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[4] Li J, Dong S, Cawood PA, Zhao G, Johnston ST, Zhang Y, et al. An Andean-type retro-arc foreland system beneath northwest South China revealed by SINOPROBE profiling. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2018;490:170–9. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Sun HR, Li ZC, Han ZR, Du ZZ, Zhang XM, Wang H. Genesis and geological significance of Late Jurassic high-B ore-bearing A-type granite in the Dayishan tin deposit, Hunan Province. Acta Petrol Sin. 2021;37(6):1749–64 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bai DY, Chen JC, Ma TQ, Wang XH. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic setting of Qitianling A-type granitic pluton in southeast Hunan. Acta Petrol Mineral. 2005;24(4):255–72 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[7] Shu LS, Zhou XM, Deng P, Wang B, Jiang SY, Yu JH, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Southeast China Block: New insights from basin analysis. J Asian Earth Sci. 2009;34(3):376–91. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Huang H, Ma DS, Lu JJ, Cai Y, Xie X. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry characteristics of Dengfuxian two-mica granite, eastern Hunan Province, China. Acta Mineral Sin. 2013;33(2):245–55 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lin X, Li H, Huang J, Lou F. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating of Shibei pluton at Dading iron mine area in Lianping, Guangdong and its geological significance. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni. 2016;55(1):131–6 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ouyang XC, Di YJ, Zhang D, Xu Y, Yang Q, Wang SY, et al. Geochemical features and LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages of the granite porphyry in the Dongxiang copper deposit of Jiangxi Province and their geological significance. Geol Bull China. 2016;35(11):1869–83 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sun WD, Yang XY, Fan WM, Wu FY. Mesozoic large scale magmatism and mineralization in South China: Preface. Lithos. 2012;150:1–5. 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.028.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Mao J, Cheng Y, Chen M, Pirajno F. Major types and time–space distribution of Mesozoic ore deposits in South China and their geodynamic settings. Miner Deposita. 2013;48:267–94. 10.1007/s00126-012-0446-z.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Tao J, Li W, Li X, Cen T. Petrogenesis of early Yanshanian highly evolved granites in the Longyuanba area, southern Jiangxi Province: Evidence from zircon U-Pb dating, Hf-O isotope and whole-rock geochemistry. Sci China Earth Sci. 2013;56:922–39 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[14] He XL, Zhang D, Chen GH, Di YJ, Huo HL, Li N, et al. Genesis of Zhuxi copper-tungsten deposit in Jiangxi Province: Insights from mineralogy and chronology. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2018;48(4):1050–70 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[15] He X, Zhang D, Di Y, Wu G, Hu B, Huo H, et al. Evolution of the magmatic–hydrothermal system and formation of the giant Zhuxi W–Cu deposit in South China. Geosci Front. 2022;13(1):101278. 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101278.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gu SY, Hua RM, Qi HW. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Yanshnian Huashan-Guposhan granites in Guangxi. Acta Petrol Mineral. 2006;25(2):97–109 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ling MX, Wang FY, Ding X, Zhou JB, Sun W. Different origins of adakites from the Dabie Mountains and the Lower Yangtze River Belt, eastern China: geochemical constraints. Int Geol Rev. 2011;53(5–6):727–40. 10.1080/00206814.2010.482349.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Di YJ, Xu YG, Wu GG, Zhang D, Xiao MZ, Lai SH et al. The formation era of nappe structure in Lengshuikeng Ag-Pb-Zn ore field, Jiangxi: constraints from geochronology. Earth Sci Front. , 2013;20(4):340–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sun MD, Xu YG, Wilde SA, Chen HL, Yang SF. The Permian Dongfanghong island-arc gabbro of the Wandashan Orogen, NE China: implications for Paleo-Pacific subduction. Tectonophysics. 2015;659:122–36. 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.07.034.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Xu C, Shi H, Barnes CG, Zhou Z. Tracing a late Mesozoic magmatic arc along the Southeast Asian margin from the granitoids drilled from the northern South China Sea. Int Geol Rev. 2016;58(1):71–94. 10.1080/00206814.2015.1056256.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Cao J, Yang X, Du J, Wu Q, Kong H, Li H, et al. Formation and geodynamic implication of the Early Yanshanian granites associated with W–Sn mineralization in the Nanling range, South China: An overview. Int Geol Rev. 2018;60(11–14):1744–71. 10.1080/00206814.2018.1466370.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Xiao Z, Wang S, Qi S, Kuang J, Zhang M, Tian F, et al. Petrogenesis, tectonic evolution and geothermal implications of Mesozoic granites in the Huangshadong Geothermal Field, South China. J Earth Sci-China. 2020;31:141–58. 10.1007/s12583-019-1242-9.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Chen XY, Wang YJ, Zhang YZ, Zhang AM, Cao YJ. Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of the Nandu syenite in SE Guangxi and its implications. Geotecton Metallog. 2013;37(2):284–93 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[24] Yao Y, Chen J, Lu JJ, Zhang RQ. Geochronology, Hf isotopic compositions and geochemical characteristics of Xitian A-type granite and its geological significance. Miner Depos. 2013;32(3):467–88 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lao MJ, Zou HP, Du XD, Ding RX. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Mashan Late Jurassic shoshonitic intrusives in Hengxian, Guangxi: With a discussion on Yanshanian tectonic settings of the southwestern segment of Qinzhou–Hangzhou metallogenic belt. Earth Sci Front. 2015;22(2):95–107 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[26] Song H, Zhou Y, Fu W, Cai Y, Du Y. Petrogenesis of Late Jurassic Xitian granite, Hunan Province and its geological implications. Chin J Geol. 2022;57(2):545–63 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[27] Jiang SY, Zhao KD, Jiang YH, Dai BZ. Characteristics and genesis of Mesozoic A-type granites and associated mineral deposits in the southern Hunan and northern Guangxi provinces along the Shi-Hang belt, South China. Geol J China Univ. 2008;14(4):496–509 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Huang HQ, Li XH, Li ZX, Li WX. Intraplate crustal remelting as the genesis of Jurassic high-K granites in the coastal region of the Guangdong Province, SE China. J Asian Earth Sci. 2013;74:280–302. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.09.009.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhou J, Jin C, Suo Y, Li S, Zhang L, Liu Y, et al. The Yanshanian (Mesozoic) metallogenesis in China linked to crust-mantle interaction in the western Pacific margin: An overview from the Zhejiang Province. Gondwana Res. 2022;102:95–132. 10.1016/j.gr.2020.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

[30] John BM, Zhou XH, Li JL. Formation and tectonic evolution of southeastern China and Taiwan: isotopic and geochemical constraints. Tectonophysics. 1990;183(1–4):145–60. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90413-3.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Li XH, Li ZX, Li WX, Liu Y, Yuan C, Wei G, et al. U–Pb zircon, geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of Jurassic I-and A-type granites from central Guangdong, SE China: A major igneous event in response to foundering of a subducted flat-slab? Lithos. 2007;96(1–2):186–204. 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.09.018.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Zhou XM, Li WX. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas. Tectonophysics. 2000;326(3–4):269–87. 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00120-7.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Jiang XY, Luo JC, Guo J, Wu K, Zhang ZK, Sun WD, et al. Geochemistry of I-and A-type granites of the Qingyang–Jiuhuashan complex, eastern China: Insights into early cretaceous multistage magmatism. Lithos. 2018;316:278–94. 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.07.025.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Mao JW, Xie GQ, Guo CL, Yuan SD, Cheng YB, Chen YC. Spatial-temporal distribution of Mesozoic ore deposits in South China and their metallogenic settings. Geol J China Univ. 2008;14(4):510–26 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[35] Guo C, Chen Y, Zeng Z, Lou F. Petrogenesis of the Xihuashan granites in southeastern China: Constraints from geochemistry and in-situ analyses of zircon U-Pb-Hf-O isotopes. Lithos. 2012;148:209–27. 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.014.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Huang DL, Wang XL. Reviews of geochronology, geochemistry, and geodynamic processes of Ordovician-Devonian granitic rocks in southeast China. J Asian Earth Sci. 2019;184:104001. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104001.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Wang XC, Li XH, Li WX, Li ZX. Variable involvements of mantle plumes in the genesis of mid-Neoproterozoic basaltic rocks in South China: A review. Gondwana Res. 2009;15(3–4):381–95. 10.1016/j.gr.2008.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wang J, Li ZX. History of Neoproterozoic rift basins in South China: implications for Rodinia break-up. Precambrian Res. 2003;122(1–4):141–58. 10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00209-7.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Wang JH, Wang ZQ, Chen B. Geochronology, petrology, geochemistry and Nd isotopic constraints on the origin of the Sanchachong tungsten-related pluton, Guangxi, South China. Geochimica. 2014;43(6):549–73 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[40] Wang LL. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of early Paleozoic-Mesozoic granites in Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province, South China Block. PhD thesis. China: China University of Geosciences (Beijing); 2015 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Huang K, Guo M, Lin JC, Hu QF, Wang QC, Tang K, et al. Geochemistry and geochronology of highly fractionated I-type fine grain granite in Late Jurassic from Baisha area of northern Guangdong Province and its significance. Miner Depos. 2020;39(5):926–44 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[42] Su Y, Li GL, Tang A, Li CX, Wei XL, Yin XY. Zircon U-Pb age, petrochemistry, Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic features and genesis of granite porphyry from Juyuan tungsten deposit in central Jiangxi Province. Geotecton Metallog. 2020;44(5):971–85 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[43] Hacker BR, Ratschbacher L, Webb L, Ireland T, Walker D, Shuwen D. U-Pb zircon ages constrain the architecture of the ultrahigh-pressure Qinling-Dabie Orogen, China. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1998;161(1–4):215–30. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00152-6.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Wu YB, Zheng YF. Tectonic evolution of a composite collision orogen: an overview on the Qinling-Tongbai-Hong'an-Dabie-Sulu orogenic belt in central China. Gondwana Res. 2013;23(4):1402–28. 10.1016/j.gr.2012.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Sun H, Zhao Z, Yan G, Lü Z, Huang Z, Yu X. Geological and geochronological constraints on the formation of the Jurassic Maozaishan Sn deposit, Dayishan orefield, South China. Ore Geol Rev. 2018;94:212–24. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.033.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Guo JH, Zou HY. Zircon U-Pb age, principal and trace elements in the whole rock of granodiorite associated with Yagongtang iron-copper deposit and its geological significance. South Met. 2019;229:20–5 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Li X, Li W, Wang X, Li Q, Liu Y, Tang G. Role of mantle-derived magma in genesis of early Yanshanian granites in the Nanling Range, South China: in situ zircon Hf-O isotopic constraints. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci. 2009;52(9):1262–78 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[48] Cui YY. Geochronology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of the granitoids in the Sanming-Ganzhou Area, South China. Master’s thesis. China: China University of Geosciences (Beijing); 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Niu R, Liu Q, Hou QL, Sun JF, Wu SC, Zhang HY, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology of Xitian granitic pluton in Hunan Province and its constraints on the metallogenic ages of the tungsten-tin deposit. Acta Petrol Sin. 2015;31(9):2620–32 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[50] Liu P, Cheng YB, Wang XY, Zhang X, Tang L, Gao FY. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and characteristics of Hf isotope from Taoziwo Sn deposit in eastern Guangdong Province and its significance. Acta Petrol Mineral. 2015;34:620–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[51] He GW, Lu SM, Peng LL, Yu CQ, Li W, Liu CH. Geochemistry, geochronology and genesis of granites in Shihuoshan Pyrite Polymetallic Ore Area, South Jiangxi Province. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2020;50(5):1491–504 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[52] Nong J, Guo S, Sun M, Tang J, Qin R, Zhou Q. Petrogenesis of the Guluo and Wangjiangchong Shoshonite-gabbro in Southeastern Guangxi Province: Constraints from Petrochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Age and Hf Isotope. Geoscience. 2020;34(05):1001–14 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[53] Yao B, Zhang L, Wei Z, Yi H, Lin Z, Wan L, et al. The Mesozoic tectonic characteristics and sedimentary basins in the eastern margin of South China. Mar Geol Quat Geol. 2011;31(3):47–60 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[54] Yu M, Hong W, Yang Z, Duan Z, Chu P, Chen R, et al. Classification of Yanshanian volcanic cycle and the related mineralization in the coast area of southeastern China. Geol Bull China. 2021;40(6):845–63 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[55] Ai H. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions of ore-related granites from Huangshaping polymetallic deposit of Hunan Province. Miner Depos. 2013;32(3):545–63 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[56] Yao JM, Hua RM, Lin JF. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics of Huangshaping granite in southeast Hunan province, China. Acta Petrol Sin. 2005;21(3):688–96 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[57] Zhou HF. Geochronology and geochemistry of Late Mesozic granitoids in Longyan-Quanzhou Area, Fujian province. Master's thesis. China: China University of Geosciences (Beijing); 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Wang Y, Fan W, Peng T, Guo F. Elemental and Sr-Nd isotopic systematics of the early Mesozoic volcanic sequence in southern Jiangxi Province, South China: Petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Int J Earth Sci. 2005;94:53–65. 10.1007/s00531-004-0441-4.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Qiu J, Hu J, Wang X, Jiang S, Wang R, Xu X. The Baishigang pluton in Heyuan, Guangdong Province: A highly fractionated I-type granite. Acta Geol Sin. 2005;79(4):503–14 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[60] Yuan YB, Yuan SD, Chen CJ, Huo R. Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the granitoids in the Huangshaping mining area and their geological significance. Acta Petrol Sin. 2014;30(1):64–78 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[61] Deng P, Ling HF, Shen WZ, Sun LQ, Zhu B, Huang GL, et al. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics of Reshui granitic batholith, northern Guangdong. Acta Geol Sin. 2011;85:1274–83 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[62] Deng P, Ren JS, Ling HF, Shen WZ, Sun LQ, Zhu B, et al. Yanshanian granite batholiths of Southern Zhuguang Mountian: SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb dating and tectonic implications. Geol Rev. 2011;57(6):881–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[63] Guo BR, Liu SW, Yang PT, Wang ZQ, Luo P, Wang YQ, et al. Petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of Wolonggu granites and Tongchang granodioritic porphyries: Constraints on copper metallogenic geological settings in northeastern Jiangxi Province. Geol Bull China. 2013;32(7):1035–46 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[64] Quan TJ, Kong H, Wang G, Fei LD, Guo BY, Zhao ZQ. Petrogenesis of the granites in the Huangshaping area: Constraints from petrochemistry, zircon U-Pb chronology and Hf isotope. Geotecton Metallog. 2012;36(4):597–606 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[65] Shan ZB, Li K, Ling HF, Shen WZ, Huang GL, Zhu B. Zircon U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of the Taocunba granite, northern Guangdong Province. Geol J China Univ. 2014;20:341–52 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[66] Wang X, Mao J, Cheng Y, Liu P, Zhang X. Zircon U-Pb age, geochemistry and Hf isotopic compositions of quartz diorite from the Xinliaodong Cu polymetallic deposit in eastern Guangdong Province. Geol Bull China. 2016;35(8):1357–75 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[67] Zhou Z, Ma C, Xie C, Wang L, Liu Y, Liu W. Genesis of highly fractionated I-type granites from Fengshun complex: implications to tectonic evolutions of South China. J Earth Sci. 2016;27:444–60. 10.1007/s12583-016-0677-3.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Yan QH, Li SS, Qiu ZW, Wang H, Wei XP, Dong R, et al. Geochronology, geochemistry and Sr–Nd–Hf–S–Pb isotopes of the early cretaceous Taoxihu Sn deposit and related granitoids, SE China. Ore Geol Rev. 2017;89:350–68. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.05.026.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Che XD, Wang RC, Wu FY, Zhu ZY, Zhang WL, Hu H, et al. Episodic Nb–Ta mineralisation in South China: Constraints from in situ LA–ICP–MS columbite-tantalite U–Pb dating. Ore Geol Rev. 2019;105:71–85. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.11.023.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Guo M, Huang KW. Geochemistry, chronology and geological significance of medium grain porphyritic granite in the fogang intrusion, Northern Guangdong. Geol Miner Resour South China. 2019;35(2):158–70 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[71] Zhang L, Chen Z, Li S, Santosh M, Huang G, Tian Z. Isotope geochronology, geochemistry, and mineral chemistry of the U-bearing and barren granites from the Zhuguangshan complex, South China: Implications for petrogenesis and uranium mineralization. Ore Geol Rev. 2017;91:1040–65. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.07.017.Search in Google Scholar

[72] Zhang L, Chen Z, Li X, Li S, Santosh M, Huang G. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry of granites in the Zhuguangshan complex, South China: Implications for uranium mineralization. Lithos. 2018;308:19–33. 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.02.029.Search in Google Scholar

[73] Zhu JC, Xie CF, Zhang PH, Yang C, Gu CY. Niumiao and Tong'an intrusive bodies of NE Guangxi: Petrology, zircon SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry. Acta Petrol Sin. 2005;21(3):665–76 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[74] Zhu JC, Zhang PH, Xie CF, Zhang H, Yang C. The Hua shan-guposhan A-type Granitoid belt in the Western part of the Nanling mountains: Petrology, geochemistry and genetic interpretations. Acta Geol Sin. 2006;22:2270–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[75] Cai YF, Ma YC, Zhou Y, Su XQ, Feng ZH, Ma LH, et al. Characteristics of mineralogy, geochronology and geochemistry of the granite in Huashan, Guangxi and its tectonic implication. Geol Explor. 2018;54(5):0940–56 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[76] Liu Z, Zhang YZ, Cui X, Gan CS, Wang YJ. Petrogenesis and implications of the late Jurassic granitoid and its mafic microgranular enclaves in West Guangdong Province: constraints from geochronological, mineralogical and geochemical evidence. Earth Sci. 2020;45(4):1243–65 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[77] Yao ZH, Xiao HL, Fan FP, Chen LZ, Bao XM, Zhou Y, et al. Formation age, geochemistry and petrogenesis of Nanshan granite body, Guangdong Province. East China Geol. 2011;1:66–78 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[78] Irvine TN, Baragar WRA. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks. Can J Earth Sci. 1971;8(5):523–48. 10.1139/e71-055.Search in Google Scholar

[79] Peccerillo A, Taylor SR. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 1976;58:63–81. 10.1007/BF00384745.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Maniar PD, Piccoli PM. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1989;101(5):635–43. 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0635:TDOG>2.3.CO;2.Search in Google Scholar

[81] Drummond MS, Defant MJ. A model for trondhjemite-tonalite-dacite genesis and crustal growth via slab melting: Archean to modern comparisons. J Geophys Res-Sol Earth. 1990;95(B13):21503–21. 10.1029/JB095iB13p21503.Search in Google Scholar

[82] Whalen JB, Currie KL, Chappell BW. A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 1987;95:407–19. 10.1007/BF00402202.Search in Google Scholar

[83] Sun SS, McDonough WF. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. Geol Soc London Spec Publ. 1989;42(1):313–45. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Zhang J, Gao C. Geochronology, geochemistry and zircon Hf isotopes of the Wangxianling granitic intrusion in South Hunan Province and its geological significance. Acta Petrol Sin. 2012;28(1):75–90 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[85] Pan DP, Wang D, Wang XL. Petrogenesis of granites in Shimensi in northwestern Jiangxi Province and its implications for tungsten deposits. Geol China. 2017;44(1):118–35 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[86] Cai YF, Liu FL, Feng ZH, Zhou Y, Zeng CY. Mineral compositional and chronological characteristics of guposhan pluton in Guangxi and its petrogenetic and metallogenic significance. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2020;50:842–56 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[87] Hu SQ, Zhu Q, Zhang XJ, Yi SH, Peng SB, Zhou GF, et al. Geochronology, geochemistry and zircon Hf isotope of granite porphyry in Yuanzhuding Cu-Mo deposit, Guangdong Province. Miner Depos. 2013;32(6):1139–58 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[88] Wang LX, Ma CQ, Zhang C, Zhu YX, Marks MA. Halogen geochemistry of I-and A-type granites from Jiuhuashan region (South China): Insights into the elevated fluorine in A-type granite. Chem Geol. 2018;478:164–82. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.09.033.Search in Google Scholar

[89] Fan X, Mavrogenes J, Hou Z, Zhang Z, Wu X, Dai J. Petrogenesis and metallogenic significance of multistage granites in Shimensi tungsten polymetallic deposit, Dahutang giant ore field, South China. Lithos. 2019;336:326–44. 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

[90] Zorpi MJ, Coulon C, Orsini JB, Cocirta C. Magma mingling, zoning and emplacement in calc-alkaline granitoid plutons. Tectonophysics. 1989;157(4):315–29. 10.1016/0040-1951(89)90147-9.Search in Google Scholar

[91] Sylvester PJ. Post-collisional strongly peraluminous granites. Lithos. 1998;45(1–4):29–44. 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00024-3.Search in Google Scholar

[92] Boehnke P, Watson EB, Trail D, Harrison TM, Schmitt AK. Zircon saturation re-revisited. Chem Geol. 2013;351:324–34. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.028.Search in Google Scholar

[93] Zhao K, Jiang S, Zhu J, Li L, Dai B, Jiang Y, et al. Hf isotopic composition of zircons from the Huashan-Guposhan intrusive complex and their mafic enclaves in northeastern Guangxi: Implication for petrogenesis. Chin Sci Bull. 2010;55(6):509–19 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[94] Chen D, Chen Y, Ma A, Liu W, Liu Y, Ni Y. Magma mixing in the Xitian pluton of Hunan Province: Evidence from petrography, geochemistry and zircon U-Pb age. Geol China. 2014;41(1):61–78 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[95] Zhang RQ. Petrogenesis and metallogeny of the W-and Sn-bearing granites in southern Hunan province: Case study from Wangxianling and Xintianling. PhD thesis. China: Nanjing University; 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract.Search in Google Scholar

[96] He ZY, Xu XS, Niu Y. Petrogenesis and tectonic significance of a Mesozoic granite–syenite–gabbro association from inland South China. Lithos. 2010;119(3–4):621–41. 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.08.016.Search in Google Scholar

[97] Wang Y, Fan W, Cawood PA, Li S. Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic constraints on multiple mantle domains for Mesozoic mafic rocks beneath the South China Block hinterland. Lithos. 2008;106(3–4):297–308. 10.1016/j.lithos.2008.07.019.Search in Google Scholar

[98] Meng L, Li ZX, Chen H, Li XH, Wang XC. Geochronological and geochemical results from Mesozoic basalts in southern South China Block support the flat-slab subduction model. Lithos. 2012;132:127–40. 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.11.022.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Li XH, Chung SL, Zhou H, Lo CH, Liu Y, Chen CH. Jurassic intraplate magmatism in southern Hunan-eastern Guangxi: 40Ar/39Ar dating, geochemistry, Sr-Nd isotopes and implications for the tectonic evolution of SE China. Geol Soc London Spec Publ. 2004;226(1):193–215. 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.226.01.11.Search in Google Scholar

[100] Miller CF, McDowell SM, Mapes RW. Hot and cold granites? Implications of zircon saturation temperatures and preservation of inheritance. Geology. 2003;31(6):529–32. 10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0529:HACGIO>2.0.CO;2.Search in Google Scholar

[101] Watson EB, Harrison TM. Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1983;64(2):295–304. 10.1016/0012-821X(83)90211-X.Search in Google Scholar

[102] Zhang Y, Yang JH, Sun JF, Zhang JH, Chen JY, Li XH. Petrogenesis of Jurassic fractionated I-type granites in Southeast China: Constraints from whole-rock geochemical and zircon U–Pb and Hf–O isotopes. J Asian Earth Sci. 2015;111:268–83. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Faure G. Origin of Igneous Rocks. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p. 1–117.Search in Google Scholar

[104] Qiu JS, Xiao E, Hu J, Xu XS, Jiang SY, Li Z. Petrogenesis of highly fractionated I-type granites in the coastal area of northeastern Fujian Province: Constraints from zircon U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and Nd-Hf isotopes. Acta Petrol Sin. 2008;24(11):2468–84 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[105] Huang XL, Wang RC, Chen XM, Hu H, Liu CS. Vertical variations in the mineralogy of the Yichun topaz–lepidolite granite, Jiangxi Province, southern China. Can Mineral. 2002;40(4):1047–68. 10.2113/gscanmin.40.4.1047.Search in Google Scholar

[106] Wang XB, Wu J, Cai MH, Chen HW, Xie DF, Liu X. Geochemical characteristics and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic composition of the Yanshanian granite porphyries in the Hehuaping area of Southern Hunan and their geological significance. Geol Explor. 2013;49(2):300–12 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[107] Sun MD, Xu YG, Wilde SA, Chen HL, Yang SF. The Permian Dongfanghong island-arc gabbro of the Wandashan Orogen, NE China: Implications for Paleo-Pacific subduction. Tectonophysics. 2013;659:122–36. 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.07.034.Search in Google Scholar

[108] Jia L, Mao J, Liu P, Yu M. Crust–mantle interaction during subduction zone processes: Insight from late Mesozoic I-type granites in eastern Guangdong, SE China. J Asian Earth Sci. 2020;192:104284. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104284.Search in Google Scholar

[109] Yang Q, Guo F, Yu Y, Zhang X, Hua C. Genesis of alkali-feldspar granite at dawangshan tungsten polymetallic ore concentration area in Central Jiangxi Province: Constraints from LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb chronology and geochemistry. Geol J China Univ. 2018;24(6):856–71 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[110] Hu P, Chen NS, Xu XB, Zhang L, Ba J, Li Y. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of Mesozoic granitic plutons and its geological significance in Wuyuan region, the southern border between the Jiangxi and Anhui Provinces. Geol Sci Technol Inf. 2014;33(4):24–30 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[111] Shen MT, Zhou Y, Zhang XD, Wu B. LA-CP-MS U-Pb dating of the zircon from Xikou composite intrusives in Shanghang area, Southwestern Fujian, and its geological significance. Geol Rev. 2015;61(4):913–24 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[112] Xie QF, Cai YF, Dong YP, Li DP, Lin RF. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions of yanshanian granites in the Shanghang area, Fujian Province. Acta Geol Sin. 2017;91(10):2212–30 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[113] Gottini V. Serial character of the volcanic rocks of Pantelleria. Bull Volcanol. 1969;33:818–27. 10.1007/BF02596751.Search in Google Scholar

[114] Brown GC. Calc-alkaline intrusive rocks; their diversity, evolution, and relation to volcanic arcs. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1982. p. 437–64.Search in Google Scholar

[115] Pearce JA, Harris NB, Tindle AG. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. J Petrol. 1984;25(4):956–83. 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956.Search in Google Scholar

[116] Zhen SM, Zhu XY, Li YS, Du ZZ, Gong FY, Gong XD, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions of the monzonite, related to the xianrenyan gold deposit in Hunan Province and its geological significances. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed). 2012;42(6):1740–50 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[117] Shi LC, Xie CF, Guo FS, Zhou WP, Zhang SM, Jiang YB, et al. Geological, geochemical characteristics and LA-ICP-MS dating of the Shanxin plutons related to Tungsten-Tin-Polymetallic mineralization, Le'an Central Jiangxi and its Mineralization significance. Acta Geol Sin. 2015;89(6):1070–84 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[118] Li YN, Xing GF, Zhou TF, Chen SZ, Chen ZH, Duan Z, et al. Isochronology study on the Tongpenan Pluton in the Zhenghe region of Fujian Province and its geological significance. J Mineral Petrol. 2015;35(1):73–81 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[119] Chen Z, Li X, Li W, Liu D. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age of the Quannan syenite, southern Jiangxi: Constraints on the early Yanshanian tectonic setting of SE China. Geochimica. 2003;32(3):223–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[120] Meng D, Jia X, Xie G, Wu J, Bu J, Zeng H. Petrogenesis and its geological implications of the changsheshan fractionated type granites in the coastal area, Southern Guangdong. Geol Sci Technol Inf. 2019;38(4):193–204 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[121] Huang F. Geochemical characteristics and tectonic significance of Jurassic gabbro-syenite in Hainan Island. Master's thesis. China: East China University of Technology; 2017 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[122] Bai ZJ, Zhu WG, Zhong H, Li C, Liao JQ, Sun HS. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the early Jurassic Fe-Ti oxide-bearing Xialan mafic intrusion in SE China: Constraints from zircon Hf-O isotopes, mineral compositions and whole-rock geochemistry. Lithos. 2015;212:59–73. 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.09.032.Search in Google Scholar

[123] Shu LS. An analysis of principal features of tectonic evolution in South China Block. Geol Bull China. 2012;31(7):1035–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[124] Zhao XL, Mao JR, Chen R, Xu NZ, Zeng QT, Ye HM. Zircon SHRIMP age and geochemical characteristics of the Caixi pluton in southwestern Fujian Province. Acta Petrol Mineral. 2007;26(3):223–31 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[125] Liu K. Geochemical characteristics and the age of diagenesis and mineralization of granite in Yangchun Basin, Western Guangdong. Master's thesis. China: Chengdu University of Technology; 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[126] Liu B, Wu Q, Kong H, Xi X, Jiang J, Li H, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of granites in Xitian ore field in Hunan and its tungsten-tin mineralization: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics. Earth Sci. 2022;47(1):240–58 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[127] Jiang YH, Jiang SY, Dai BZ, Liao SY, Zhao KD, Ling HF. Middle to late Jurassic felsic and mafic magmatism in southern Hunan province, southeast China: Implications for a continental arc to rifting. Lithos. 2009;107(3–4):185–204. 10.1016/j.lithos.2008.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

[128] Zhu WG, Zhong H, Li XH, He DF, Song XY, Ren T, et al. The early Jurassic mafic–ultramafic intrusion and A-type granite from northeastern Guangdong, SE China: age, origin, and tectonic significance. Lithos. 2010;119(3–4):313–29. 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

[129] Li YS, Zhen SM, Yu XF, Gong FY, Du ZZ. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions of igneous rocks from the Shuikoushan Pb-Zn deposit, Hunan Province, and their geological significance. Earth Sci Front. 2020;27(2):332–52 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[130] Yang F, Feng ZH, Wang YL, Kang ZQ, Bai YP, Zhang CL. LAICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronology of Taibao granite in northwestern Guangdong. J Guilin Univ Technol. 2016;36(1):160–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[131] Lu YY, Fu JM, Tan SM, Cheng SB, Guo ZY, Qin ZW, et al. Zircon U-Pb Dating, Hf isotopic compositions and their prospecting signification of the granodiorite porphyry from Dafang Au-Ag-Pb-Zn deposit, Southern Hunan province. Geol Miner Resour South China. 2017;33(3):262–74 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[132] Sun LQ. Petrogenesis of the Mesozoic granites in the Zhuguangshan area in the Nanling region and their implications for the uranium mineralization. PhD thesis. China: Nanjing University; 2018 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[133] Wang DX, Gao WL, Li CL, Wang ZX, Zhao ZD. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb geochronology, petrochemistry of the Late Jurassic granite porphyry in central Zhejiang Province and their geological significance. Geol China. 2015;42(6):1684 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[134] Chen CH, Lee CY, Shinjo R. Was there Jurassic paleo-Pacific subduction in South China?: Constraints from 40Ar/39Ar dating, elemental and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry of the Mesozoic basalts. Lithos. 2008;106(1–2):83–92. 10.1016/j.lithos.2008.06.009.Search in Google Scholar

[135] Zhao KD, Jiang SY, Yang SY, Dai BZ, Lu JJ. Mineral chemistry, trace elements and Sr–Nd–Hf isotope geochemistry and petrogenesis of Cailing and Furong granites and mafic enclaves from the Qitianling batholith in the Shi-Hang zone, South China. Gondwana Res. 2012;22(1):310–24. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

[136] Jiang T. Chronology and geochemistry of Weipu, Hufang, Guiyantou and Gutian plutons in the southwestern Fujian Province. Master’s thesis. China: China University of Geosciences (Beijing); 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).Search in Google Scholar

[137] Su H, Mao J, He X, Lu R. Timing of the formation of the Tianhuashan Basin in northern Wuyi as constrained by geochronology of volcanic and plutonic rocks. Sci China Earth Sci. 2013;56:940–55. 10.1007/s11430-013-4610-9.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-01
Revised: 2023-11-30
Accepted: 2023-12-18
Published Online: 2024-02-22

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Theoretical magnetotelluric response of stratiform earth consisting of alternative homogeneous and transitional layers
  3. The research of common drought indexes for the application to the drought monitoring in the region of Jin Sha river
  4. Evolutionary game analysis of government, businesses, and consumers in high-standard farmland low-carbon construction
  5. On the use of low-frequency passive seismic as a direct hydrocarbon indicator: A case study at Banyubang oil field, Indonesia
  6. Water transportation planning in connection with extreme weather conditions; case study – Port of Novi Sad, Serbia
  7. Zircon U–Pb ages of the Paleozoic volcaniclastic strata in the Junggar Basin, NW China
  8. Monitoring of mangrove forests vegetation based on optical versus microwave data: A case study western coast of Saudi Arabia
  9. Microfacies analysis of marine shale: A case study of the shales of the Wufeng–Longmaxi formation in the western Chongqing, Sichuan Basin, China
  10. Multisource remote sensing image fusion processing in plateau seismic region feature information extraction and application analysis – An example of the Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake on January 8, 2022
  11. Identification of magnetic mineralogy and paleo-flow direction of the Miocene-quaternary volcanic products in the north of Lake Van, Eastern Turkey
  12. Impact of fully rotating steel casing bored pile on adjacent tunnels
  13. Adolescents’ consumption intentions toward leisure tourism in high-risk leisure environments in riverine areas
  14. Petrogenesis of Jurassic granitic rocks in South China Block: Implications for events related to subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate
  15. Differences in urban daytime and night block vitality based on mobile phone signaling data: A case study of Kunming’s urban district
  16. Random forest and artificial neural network-based tsunami forests classification using data fusion of Sentinel-2 and Airbus Vision-1 satellites: A case study of Garhi Chandan, Pakistan
  17. Integrated geophysical approach for detection and size-geometry characterization of a multiscale karst system in carbonate units, semiarid Brazil
  18. Spatial and temporal changes in ecosystem services value and analysis of driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta Region
  19. Deep fault sliding rates for Ka-Ping block of Xinjiang based on repeating earthquakes
  20. Improved deep learning segmentation of outdoor point clouds with different sampling strategies and using intensities
  21. Platform margin belt structure and sedimentation characteristics of Changxing Formation reefs on both sides of the Kaijiang-Liangping trough, eastern Sichuan Basin, China
  22. Enhancing attapulgite and cement-modified loess for effective landfill lining: A study on seepage prevention and Cu/Pb ion adsorption
  23. Flood risk assessment, a case study in an arid environment of Southeast Morocco
  24. Lower limits of physical properties and classification evaluation criteria of the tight reservoir in the Ahe Formation in the Dibei Area of the Kuqa depression
  25. Evaluation of Viaducts’ contribution to road network accessibility in the Yunnan–Guizhou area based on the node deletion method
  26. Permian tectonic switch of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Constraints from magmatism in the southern Alxa region, NW China
  27. Element geochemical differences in lower Cambrian black shales with hydrothermal sedimentation in the Yangtze block, South China
  28. Three-dimensional finite-memory quasi-Newton inversion of the magnetotelluric based on unstructured grids
  29. Obliquity-paced summer monsoon from the Shilou red clay section on the eastern Chinese Loess Plateau
  30. Classification and logging identification of reservoir space near the upper Ordovician pinch-out line in Tahe Oilfield
  31. Ultra-deep channel sand body target recognition method based on improved deep learning under UAV cluster
  32. New formula to determine flyrock distance on sedimentary rocks with low strength
  33. Assessing the ecological security of tourism in Northeast China
  34. Effective reservoir identification and sweet spot prediction in Chang 8 Member tight oil reservoirs in Huanjiang area, Ordos Basin
  35. Detecting heterogeneity of spatial accessibility to sports facilities for adolescents at fine scale: A case study in Changsha, China
  36. Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on soil nutrients by soft rock and sand remodeling
  37. Vibration prediction with a method based on the absorption property of blast-induced seismic waves: A case study
  38. A new look at the geodynamic development of the Ediacaran–early Cambrian forearc basalts of the Tannuola-Khamsara Island Arc (Central Asia, Russia): Conclusions from geological, geochemical, and Nd-isotope data
  39. Spatio-temporal analysis of the driving factors of urban land use expansion in China: A study of the Yangtze River Delta region
  40. Selection of Euler deconvolution solutions using the enhanced horizontal gradient and stable vertical differentiation
  41. Phase change of the Ordovician hydrocarbon in the Tarim Basin: A case study from the Halahatang–Shunbei area
  42. Using interpretative structure model and analytical network process for optimum site selection of airport locations in Delta Egypt
  43. Geochemistry of magnetite from Fe-skarn deposits along the central Loei Fold Belt, Thailand
  44. Functional typology of settlements in the Srem region, Serbia
  45. Hunger Games Search for the elucidation of gravity anomalies with application to geothermal energy investigations and volcanic activity studies
  46. Addressing incomplete tile phenomena in image tiling: Introducing the grid six-intersection model
  47. Evaluation and control model for resilience of water resource building system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and its application
  48. MIF and AHP methods for delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS techniques in Tirunelveli, Tenkasi District, India
  49. New database for the estimation of dynamic coefficient of friction of snow
  50. Measuring urban growth dynamics: A study in Hue city, Vietnam
  51. Comparative models of support-vector machine, multilayer perceptron, and decision tree ‎predication approaches for landslide ‎susceptibility analysis
  52. Experimental study on the influence of clay content on the shear strength of silty soil and mechanism analysis
  53. Geosite assessment as a contribution to the sustainable development of Babušnica, Serbia
  54. Using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for road transportation services management based on remote sensing and GIS technology
  55. Accumulation mechanism of multi-type unconventional oil and gas reservoirs in Northern China: Taking Hari Sag of the Yin’e Basin as an example
  56. TOC prediction of source rocks based on the convolutional neural network and logging curves – A case study of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Sag
  57. A method for fast detection of wind farms from remote sensing images using deep learning and geospatial analysis
  58. Spatial distribution and driving factors of karst rocky desertification in Southwest China based on GIS and geodetector
  59. Physicochemical and mineralogical composition studies of clays from Share and Tshonga areas, Northern Bida Basin, Nigeria: Implications for Geophagia
  60. Geochemical sedimentary records of eutrophication and environmental change in Chaohu Lake, East China
  61. Research progress of freeze–thaw rock using bibliometric analysis
  62. Mixed irrigation affects the composition and diversity of the soil bacterial community
  63. Examining the swelling potential of cohesive soils with high plasticity according to their index properties using GIS
  64. Geological genesis and identification of high-porosity and low-permeability sandstones in the Cretaceous Bashkirchik Formation, northern Tarim Basin
  65. Usability of PPGIS tools exemplified by geodiscussion – a tool for public participation in shaping public space
  66. Efficient development technology of Upper Paleozoic Lower Shihezi tight sandstone gas reservoir in northeastern Ordos Basin
  67. Assessment of soil resources of agricultural landscapes in Turkestan region of the Republic of Kazakhstan based on agrochemical indexes
  68. Evaluating the impact of DEM interpolation algorithms on relief index for soil resource management
  69. Petrogenetic relationship between plutonic and subvolcanic rocks in the Jurassic Shuikoushan complex, South China
  70. A novel workflow for shale lithology identification – A case study in the Gulong Depression, Songliao Basin, China
  71. Characteristics and main controlling factors of dolomite reservoirs in Fei-3 Member of Feixianguan Formation of Lower Triassic, Puguang area
  72. Impact of high-speed railway network on county-level accessibility and economic linkage in Jiangxi Province, China: A spatio-temporal data analysis
  73. Estimation model of wild fractional vegetation cover based on RGB vegetation index and its application
  74. Lithofacies, petrography, and geochemistry of the Lamphun oceanic plate stratigraphy: As a record of the subduction history of Paleo-Tethys in Chiang Mai-Chiang Rai Suture Zone of Thailand
  75. Structural features and tectonic activity of the Weihe Fault, central China
  76. Application of the wavelet transform and Hilbert–Huang transform in stratigraphic sequence division of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in Southwest Sichuan Basin
  77. Structural detachment influences the shale gas preservation in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Northern Guizhou Province
  78. Distribution law of Chang 7 Member tight oil in the western Ordos Basin based on geological, logging and numerical simulation techniques
  79. Evaluation of alteration in the geothermal province west of Cappadocia, Türkiye: Mineralogical, petrographical, geochemical, and remote sensing data
  80. Numerical modeling of site response at large strains with simplified nonlinear models: Application to Lotung seismic array
  81. Quantitative characterization of granite failure intensity under dynamic disturbance from energy standpoint
  82. Characteristics of debris flow dynamics and prediction of the hazardous area in Bangou Village, Yanqing District, Beijing, China
  83. Rockfall mapping and susceptibility evaluation based on UAV high-resolution imagery and support vector machine method
  84. Statistical comparison analysis of different real-time kinematic methods for the development of photogrammetric products: CORS-RTK, CORS-RTK + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP
  85. Hydrogeological mapping of fracture networks using earth observation data to improve rainfall–runoff modeling in arid mountains, Saudi Arabia
  86. Petrography and geochemistry of pegmatite and leucogranite of Ntega-Marangara area, Burundi, in relation to rare metal mineralisation
  87. Prediction of formation fracture pressure based on reinforcement learning and XGBoost
  88. Hazard zonation for potential earthquake-induced landslide in the eastern East Kunlun fault zone
  89. Monitoring water infiltration in multiple layers of sandstone coal mining model with cracks using ERT
  90. Study of the patterns of ice lake variation and the factors influencing these changes in the western Nyingchi area
  91. Productive conservation at the landslide prone area under the threat of rapid land cover changes
  92. Sedimentary processes and patterns in deposits corresponding to freshwater lake-facies of hyperpycnal flow – An experimental study based on flume depositional simulations
  93. Study on time-dependent injectability evaluation of mudstone considering the self-healing effect
  94. Detection of objects with diverse geometric shapes in GPR images using deep-learning methods
  95. Behavior of trace metals in sedimentary cores from marine and lacustrine environments in Algeria
  96. Spatiotemporal variation pattern and spatial coupling relationship between NDVI and LST in Mu Us Sandy Land
  97. Formation mechanism and oil-bearing properties of gravity flow sand body of Chang 63 sub-member of Yanchang Formation in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin
  98. Diagenesis of marine-continental transitional shale from the Upper Permian Longtan Formation in southern Sichuan Basin, China
  99. Vertical high-velocity structures and seismic activity in western Shandong Rise, China: Case study inspired by double-difference seismic tomography
  100. Spatial coupling relationship between metamorphic core complex and gold deposits: Constraints from geophysical electromagnetics
  101. Disparities in the geospatial allocation of public facilities from the perspective of living circles
  102. Research on spatial correlation structure of war heritage based on field theory. A case study of Jinzhai County, China
  103. Formation mechanisms of Qiaoba-Zhongdu Danxia landforms in southwestern Sichuan Province, China
  104. Magnetic data interpretation: Implication for structure and hydrocarbon potentiality at Delta Wadi Diit, Southeastern Egypt
  105. Deeply buried clastic rock diagenesis evolution mechanism of Dongdaohaizi sag in the center of Junggar fault basin, Northwest China
  106. Application of LS-RAPID to simulate the motion of two contrasting landslides triggered by earthquakes
  107. The new insight of tectonic setting in Sunda–Banda transition zone using tomography seismic. Case study: 7.1 M deep earthquake 29 August 2023
  108. The critical role of c and φ in ensuring stability: A study on rockfill dams
  109. Evidence of late quaternary activity of the Weining-Shuicheng Fault in Guizhou, China
  110. Extreme hydroclimatic events and response of vegetation in the eastern QTP since 10 ka
  111. Spatial–temporal effect of sea–land gradient on landscape pattern and ecological risk in the coastal zone: A case study of Dalian City
  112. Study on the influence mechanism of land use on carbon storage under multiple scenarios: A case study of Wenzhou
  113. A new method for identifying reservoir fluid properties based on well logging data: A case study from PL block of Bohai Bay Basin, North China
  114. Comparison between thermal models across the Middle Magdalena Valley, Eastern Cordillera, and Eastern Llanos basins in Colombia
  115. Mineralogical and elemental analysis of Kazakh coals from three mines: Preliminary insights from mode of occurrence to environmental impacts
  116. Chlorite-induced porosity evolution in multi-source tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Shaximiao Formation in western Sichuan Basin
  117. Predicting stability factors for rotational failures in earth slopes and embankments using artificial intelligence techniques
  118. Origin of Late Cretaceous A-type granitoids in South China: Response to the rollback and retreat of the Paleo-Pacific plate
  119. Modification of dolomitization on reservoir spaces in reef–shoal complex: A case study of Permian Changxing Formation, Sichuan Basin, SW China
  120. Geological characteristics of the Daduhe gold belt, western Sichuan, China: Implications for exploration
  121. Rock physics model for deep coal-bed methane reservoir based on equivalent medium theory: A case study of Carboniferous-Permian in Eastern Ordos Basin
  122. Enhancing the total-field magnetic anomaly using the normalized source strength
  123. Shear wave velocity profiling of Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, utilizing the multi-channel analysis of surface waves method
  124. Effect of coal facies on pore structure heterogeneity of coal measures: Quantitative characterization and comparative study
  125. Inversion method of organic matter content of different types of soils in black soil area based on hyperspectral indices
  126. Detection of seepage zones in artificial levees: A case study at the Körös River, Hungary
  127. Tight sandstone fluid detection technology based on multi-wave seismic data
  128. Characteristics and control techniques of soft rock tunnel lining cracks in high geo-stress environments: Case study of Wushaoling tunnel group
  129. Influence of pore structure characteristics on the Permian Shan-1 reservoir in Longdong, Southwest Ordos Basin, China
  130. Study on sedimentary model of Shanxi Formation – Lower Shihezi Formation in Da 17 well area of Daniudi gas field, Ordos Basin
  131. Multi-scenario territorial spatial simulation and dynamic changes: A case study of Jilin Province in China from 1985 to 2030
  132. Review Articles
  133. Major ascidian species with negative impacts on bivalve aquaculture: Current knowledge and future research aims
  134. Prediction and assessment of meteorological drought in southwest China using long short-term memory model
  135. Communication
  136. Essential questions in earth and geosciences according to large language models
  137. Erratum
  138. Erratum to “Random forest and artificial neural network-based tsunami forests classification using data fusion of Sentinel-2 and Airbus Vision-1 satellites: A case study of Garhi Chandan, Pakistan”
  139. Special Issue: Natural Resources and Environmental Risks: Towards a Sustainable Future - Part I
  140. Spatial-temporal and trend analysis of traffic accidents in AP Vojvodina (North Serbia)
  141. Exploring environmental awareness, knowledge, and safety: A comparative study among students in Montenegro and North Macedonia
  142. Determinants influencing tourists’ willingness to visit Türkiye – Impact of earthquake hazards on Serbian visitors’ preferences
  143. Application of remote sensing in monitoring land degradation: A case study of Stanari municipality (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  144. Optimizing agricultural land use: A GIS-based assessment of suitability in the Sana River Basin, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  145. Assessing risk-prone areas in the Kratovska Reka catchment (North Macedonia) by integrating advanced geospatial analytics and flash flood potential index
  146. Analysis of the intensity of erosive processes and state of vegetation cover in the zone of influence of the Kolubara Mining Basin
  147. GIS-based spatial modeling of landslide susceptibility using BWM-LSI: A case study – city of Smederevo (Serbia)
  148. Geospatial modeling of wildfire susceptibility on a national scale in Montenegro: A comparative evaluation of F-AHP and FR methodologies
  149. Geosite assessment as the first step for the development of canyoning activities in North Montenegro
  150. Urban geoheritage and degradation risk assessment of the Sokograd fortress (Sokobanja, Eastern Serbia)
  151. Multi-hazard modeling of erosion and landslide susceptibility at the national scale in the example of North Macedonia
  152. Understanding seismic hazard resilience in Montenegro: A qualitative analysis of community preparedness and response capabilities
  153. Forest soil CO2 emission in Quercus robur level II monitoring site
  154. Characterization of glomalin proteins in soil: A potential indicator of erosion intensity
  155. Power of Terroir: Case study of Grašac at the Fruška Gora wine region (North Serbia)
  156. Special Issue: Geospatial and Environmental Dynamics - Part I
  157. Qualitative insights into cultural heritage protection in Serbia: Addressing legal and institutional gaps for disaster risk resilience
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2022-0601/html
Scroll to top button