Home Synthesis of amides and esters containing furan rings under microwave-assisted conditions
Article Open Access

Synthesis of amides and esters containing furan rings under microwave-assisted conditions

  • Łukasz Janczewski EMAIL logo , Dariusz Zieliński and Beata Kolesińska
Published/Copyright: March 5, 2021

Abstract

In this work, we present a novel method for the synthesis of ester and amide derivatives containing furan rings (furfural derivatives) under mild synthetic conditions supported by microwave radiation. N-(Furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide and furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate were produced using 2-furoic acid, furfurylamine, and furfuryl alcohol. The reactions were carried out in a microwave reactor in the presence of effective coupling reagents: DMT/NMM/TsO or EDC. The reaction time, the solvent, and the amounts of the substrates were optimized. After crystallization or flash chromatography, the final compounds were isolated with good or very good yields. Our method allows for the synthesis of N-blocked amides using N-blocked amino acids (Boc, Cbz, Fmoc) and amine. As well as compounds with a monoamide and ester moiety, products with diamides and diester bonds (N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide, bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate, and furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene) bis(furan-2-carboxylate)) were synthesized with moderate yields in the presence of DMT/NMM/TsO or EDC, using 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan as substrates.

1 Introduction

The production of chemicals from biomass offers both economic and ecological benefits, according to the principles of the circular economy. Bioproducts are chemicals that add value to biorefinery processes or materials derived from renewable resources, such as commodity sugars, lignocellulosic biomass, or algae. Ready-to-use bio-compounds (e.g., solvents) or semifinished products used as raw materials in further processes are especially valuable [1,2,3]. The broad range of uses and wide variety of bio-based products requires individual case studies of each product. Among the many compounds that make up biomass, more than 30 chemicals have been highlighted as having valuable applications [4,5,6,7]. These compounds include acetic acid, acetone, acrylonitrile, acrylic acid, adipic acid, benzene, butanediol (1,4-), butadiene (1,3-), epichlorohydrin, ethyl acetate, ethyl lactate, ethylene, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, FDCA, furfural, glycerol, 3-HPA, isoprene, lactic acid, levulinic acid, lipids, oxo chemicals, phenol, propanediol, propylene glycol, sorbitol, succinic acid, THF, xylene (para), PHA, and xylitol.

Furfural is one of the 30 compounds produced by bio-refining biomass [8,9]. Furfural can be transformed by selective hydrogenation, oxidation, hydrogenolysis, and decarboxylation processes [10,11,12,13,14] into a number of C4 and C5 compounds, which are important raw materials for the production of hydrocarbon fuels and fuel additives, as well as for the synthesis of valuable chemicals [15,16,17,18]. For the production of biofuels and fuel additives, furfural is most often selectively hydrogenated to form 2-methylfuran (2-MF) and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MTHF) [19,20]. Furfural can also be used as a substrate for the production of various valuable C4 and C5 chemicals, the most interesting of which are valerolactone, pentanediols, cyclopentanone, dicarboxylic acids, butanediol, and butyrolactone. Most of the C5 chemicals derived from furfural are obtained by selective hydrogenation and/or hydrogenolysis. The C4 chemicals are mainly synthesized by selective oxidation. Valuable chemicals derived from furfural thus include fuel components, C5 chemicals, and C4 chemicals [4,2125].

Furfural and 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural (HMF) are also raw materials for the preparation of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) [2628]. FDCAs are of great interest, due to their similarity to terephthalic acid (PTA), which is a precursor to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [29,30]. Due to its many excellent properties, PET is the main material used in packaging. However, due to the poor biodegradability of PET, there is great interest in finding new biodegradable polyester materials. Furan-based polymers could meet these requirements and thus reduce the environmental impact of non-renewable packaging materials [3134]. An additional advantage of FDCA-based polyesters is that renewable biomass can be used to obtain raw materials for their production. Numerous studies have described the production and properties of a series of FDCA-based polyesters: poly(ethylenefuranoate) (PEF) [3537], poly(propylene furanoate) (PPF) [38], and poly(butylene furanoate) (PBF) [39]. The gas permeability of these polymers exceeds that of PET. It has been reported that 2,2′-bifuran-5,5′-dicarboxylic acid (BFDCA) can be used as a precursor for novel bio-based polyamides and polyesters [4042]. Derived from furfural, BFDCA is a C10 biheteroaryl monomer useful in the synthesis of new polymers [4346].

Classic methods of achieving polyamides and polyesters, including those derived from furan derivatives, require extreme conditions (high temperatures, pressures) or the use of sophisticated catalysts [4751]. Therefore, new, gentler, and more environmentally-friendly methods of obtaining polyamides and polyesters are being sought. Here, we investigate the microwave-assisted synthesis of amide and ester derivatives containing a furan ring. These derivatives could extend the pool of valuable compounds derived from furfural, one of the products of biorefinery transformations. The aim was to produce derivatives derived from furfural containing one functional group (2-furoic acid (1), furfurylamine (2), furfuryl alcohol (3)), as well as disubstituted furan derivatives (2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4), and 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (5)) (Figure 1). This method would enable the synthesis of peptides using Cbz-, Boc-, and Fmoc-protected substrates as well as unnatural amino acids.

Figure 1 
               Structures of substrates 1–5 and coupling reagents 6–7.
Figure 1

Structures of substrates 15 and coupling reagents 67.

We planned to use these derivatives in the synthesis of compounds with amide and bis-amide moieties, as well as ester and diester moieties containing a furan ring. It was assumed that the selected starting substrates would be obtained directly from furfural, confirming the potential application of this molecule. The extremely mild coupling conditions of microwave-assisted synthesis with condensing reagents would not require high temperatures, long reaction times, and acid catalysts used in classical methods of ester synthesis. As coupling reagents, we selected 4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium toluene-4-sulfonate (DMT/NMM/TsO, 6) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC, 7). Both DMT/NMM/TsO [52,53] and EDC [5456] are effective, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly coupling reagents for the synthesis of amides, esters, and peptides both in solution and in solid phases.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials and methods

NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance DPX spectrometer (250.13 MHz for 1H NMR) and Bruker Avance II Plus spectrometer (700 MHz for 1H NMR and 176 MHz for 13C NMR) in CDCl3 solution. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were referenced according to the residual peak of the solvent, based on literature data. The chemical shift (δ) was reported in ppm and coupling constant (J) in Hz. 13C NMR spectra were proton-decoupled. A monomode microwave reactor (CEM Discover) equipped with an IntelliVent pressure control system was used. The standard method was applied, and the maximum pressure was set to 250 psi. The temperatures of the reaction mixtures were measured with an external infrared sensor. Flash chromatography was performed in a glass column packed with Baker silica gel (30–60 μm). For TLC, silica gel was used on TLC Al foils (Sigma-Aldrich) with an indicator of 254 nm. All reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poland) and used as obtained. GC-MS spectra were measured on a GC-Perkin Elmer Clarus 580, MS-Perkin Elmer Clarus SQ8S. Melting points were determined using a Büchi SMP-20 apparatus. Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a Bruker microOTOF-QIII (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) supplied with electrospray ionization mode and time of flight detector (TOF). IR spectra were measured on an FT-IR Alpha Bruker (ATR) instrument and were reported in cm−1. The furfuryl alcohol and 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan were commercially available (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.2 General procedure for the synthesis of amides 15, 17ab, and 18

In a 10 mL pressure vial equipped with a magnetic bar, acid 1, 13, or 16ab (2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (1.076 g, 2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), and NMM (0.09 mL, 0.78 mmol, 0.3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL). Next, amine 2 or 14 (2 mmol 1 equiv.) was added dropwise, and the reaction was performed under MW conditions (standard mode, 10 min, 90°C). After this time, the reaction mixture was diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), and H2O (5 mL), and then dried under anhydrous MgSO4. The crude products were purified by crystallization (ethyl acetate/hexane).

2.2.1 N-Benzyl-p-chlorobenzamide (15)

White solid, mp 163–164°C (lit. 161–163°C). Yield 88% (0.433 g). 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72 (d, J HH = 8.7 Hz, 2H, CH Ar), 7.39 (d, J HH = 8.7 Hz, 2H, CH Ar), 7.36–7.30 (m, 5H, CH Ar), 6.46 (bs, 1H, NH), 4.62 (d, J HH = 5.7 Hz, 2H, CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.4 (1C, CO), 138.1 (1C, C Ar), 137.9 (1C, C Ar), 132.8 (1C, C Ar), 128.9 (4C, 4 × C ArH), 128.5 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 128.1 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 127.8 (1C, C ArH), 44.3 (1C, CH2). IR (ATR): 1,638 (CO), 1,592, 1,550, 1,482, 710 (Ar), 668 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 244.9791, ([M]+, C14H12ClNO+; calc. 245.0607). The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [57].

2.2.2 (S)-N-Boc-phenylalanine benzylamide (17a)

White solid, mp 132–133°C (lit. 134°C). Yield 83% (0.585 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.30–7.11 (m, 10H, CH Ar), 6.26 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.16 (bs, 1H, NH), 4.40–4.33 (m, 3H, PhCH 2CH), 3.13–3.07 (m, 2H, CH 2Ph), 1.41 (s, 9H, 3 × (CH)3). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.2, 155.8, 137.8, 136.8, 129.4, 128.8, 128.7, 127.7, 127.5, 127.0, 80.3, 56.1, 43.5, 38.7, 28.3. IR (ATR): 1,657 (CO), 1,521 (CO), 1,294 (NH), 1,233 (NH), 1,169 (NH), 694 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 354.1907, ([M]+, C21H26N2O3 +; calc. 354.1943). The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [58].

2.2.3 (S)-N-Cbz-phenylalanine benzylamide (17b)

White solid, mp 140–141°C (lit. 142–144°C). Yield 88% (0.679 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.37–7.34 (m, 3H, CH Ar), 7.31–7.24 (m, 8H, CH Ar), 7.19–7.18 (m, 2H, CH Ar), 7.09–7.08 (m, 2H, CH Ar), 6.24 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.52 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.06–5.01 (m, 2H, OCH 2Ph), 4.49–4.48 (bs, 1H, CH), 4.39–4.30 (m, 2H, PhCH 2CH), 3.16–3.06 (m, 2H, NHCH 2Ph). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.8, 156.1, 137.6, 136.5, 136.2, 129.4, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 127.8, 127.6, 127.1, 67.1, 56.5, 43.6, 38.9. IR (ATR): 1,685, 1,644 (CO), 1,529, 1,236 (NH), 741 (Ar), 694 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 389.1815, ([M + H]+, C24H25N2O3 +; calc. 389.1860). The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [59].

2.2.4 N-(Furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (18)

White solid, 79–80°C. Yield 84% (0.32 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.41 (dd, J HH = 1.7 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 7.35 (dd, J HH = 1.8 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 7.12 (dd, J HH = 3.5 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.7 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.47 (dd, J HH = 3.5 Hz, J HH = 1.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.32 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 1.9 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.27 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 0.7 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 4.59 (d, J HH = 5.7 Hz, 2H, CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.1 (1C, CO), 151.1 (1C, OC Ar), 147.8 (1C, OC Ar), 144.0 (1C, OC ArH), 142.4 (1C, OC ArH), 114.5 (1C, C ArH), 112.2 (1C, C ArH), 110.5 (1C, C ArH), 107.7 (1C, C ArH), 36.1 (1C, CH2). IR (ATR): 1,700 (CO), 1,642 (CO), 1,590, 1,239 (NH), 1,007, 746 (Ar), 699 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 191.0380, ([M+, C10H9NO3 +; calc. 191.0582). New compound.

2.3 Procedure for the synthesis of (S)-N-Fmoc-phenylalanine benzylamide (17c)

In a 10-mL pressure vial equipped with a magnetic bar, N-Fmoc-phenylalanine 16c (0.503 g, 1.3 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (0.538 g, 1.3 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), and NMM (0.45 mL, 0.39 mmol, 0.3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL). Next, benzylamine (14) (1 mmol 1 equiv.) was added dropwise, and the reaction was carried under MW conditions (standard mode, 40 min, 90°C). Next, the reaction mixture was diluted with DCM (30 mL) washed successively using H2O (3 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 3 mL), H2O (3 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 3 mL), and H2O (3 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. The crude products were purified by crystallization (ethyl acetate/hexane). White solid, mp 193–195°C. Yield 73% (0.347 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.76 (d, J HH = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH Ar), 7.53 (t, J HH = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH Ar), 7.40 (t, J HH = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH Ar), 7.32–7.24 (m, 8H, CH Ar), 7.17 (bs, 2H, CH Ar), 7.06 (bs, 2H, CH Ar), 5.93 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.39 (bs, 1H, NH), 4.41–4.34 (m, 5H, CH 2CH, OCH 2), 4.17 (t, J HH = 6.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.14–3.05 (m, 2H, NHCH 2Ph). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.6, 143.8, 141.4, 137.6, 129.4, 128.9, 128.7, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.2, 125.1, 120.1, 67.1, 56.6, 47.3, 43.7, 38.9. IR (ATR): 1,686, 1,651 (CO), 1,531, 1,258 (NH), 1,231 (NH), 738 (Ar), 697 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 476.2089, ([M]+, C31H28N2O3 +; calc. 476.2100). New compound.

2.4 Procedure for the synthesis of furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19) using DMT/NMM/TsO

2-Furoic acid (1) (0.291 g, 2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (1.076 g, 2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv.), and NMM (0.09 mL, 0.78 mmol, 0.3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL) using a 10-mL pressure vial. Next, furfuryl alcohol (3) (0.17 mL, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added and the reaction was carried out under MW conditions (standard mode, 30 min, 90°C). The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. Product 19 was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 10:1) and obtained as yellow oil with 49% yield (0.188 g).

2.5 Procedure for the synthesis of furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19) using EDC

2-Furoic acid (1) (0.672 g, 6 mmol, 3 equiv.) and EDC (7) (1.06 mL, 6 mmol, 3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL) using a 10-mL pressure vial. Next, furfuryl alcohol (3) (0.17 mL, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added, and the reaction was carried out under MW conditions (standard mode, 30 min, 90°C). The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), and H2O (5 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. Product 19 was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 10:1) and obtained as yellow oil with 71% yield (0.272 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.56 (dd, J HH = 1.7 Hz, J HH = 0.9 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 7.43 (dd, J HH = 1.8 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 7.19 (dd, J HH = 3.5 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.49–6.48 (m, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.37 (dd, J HH = 3.3 Hz, J HH = 1.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 5.28 (s, 2H, CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4 (1C, CO), 149.2 (1C, C ArO), 146.6 (1C, C ArH), 144.4 (1C, C ArO), 143.5 (1C, C ArH), 118.5 (1C, C ArH), 111.9 (1C, C ArH), 111.2 (1C, C ArH), 110.7 (1C, C ArH), 58.4 (1C, CH2). IR (ATR): 1,712 (CO), 1,289, 1,171, 1,104, 744 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 192.0460, ([M]+, C10H8O4 +; calc. 192.0423). The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [60].

2.6 Procedure for the synthesis of N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20)

2,5-Furandicarboxylic acid (4) (0.468 g, 3 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (1.242 g, 3 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), and NMM (0.1 mL, 0.9 mmol, 0.3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL) in a 10-mL pressure vial. After that, furfurylamine (2) (0.18 mL, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added dropwise, and the reaction was carried out under MW conditions (standard mode, 30 min, 90°C). The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), and H2O (5 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. The product was isolated after crystallization (ethyl acetate/hexane) with a yield of 37% (0.233 g). White solid, mp 163–164°C. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.95 (t, J HH = 5.9 Hz, 2H, 2 × NH), 7.60 (dd, J HH = 1.8 Hz, J HH = 0.9 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 7.18 (s, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.41 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 1.9 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.32 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 4.49 (d, J HH = 5.9 Hz, 4 H 2 × CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 157.4 (2C, 2 × CO), 152.1 (2C, 2 × C ArO), 148.3 (2C, 2 × C ArO), 142.8 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 115.3 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 111.0 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 107.8 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 35.6 (2C, 2 × CH2). IR (ATR): 1,732 (CO), 1,596, 1,570, 1,279, 738 cm−1. HRMS: 315.0944, ([M + H]+, C16H15N2O5 +; calc. 315.0975). New compound.

2.6.1 N-(Furan-2-ylmethyl)-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine (21)

Yield 23%. White solid, mp 105–106°C. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.33 (t, J HH = 6.0 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.55 (dd, J HH = 1.8 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.37 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 1.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.25 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 4.47 (d, J HH = 6.0 Hz, 2H, CH 2), 3.84 (s, 3H, CH 3), 3.81 (s, 3H, CH 3). 13C NMR (176 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 172.4 (1C, C ArOMe), 172.2 (1C, C ArOMe), 168.1 (1C, C ArNH), 152.6 (1C, C ArO), 142.4 (1C, C ArH), 110.9 (1C, C ArH), 107.4 (1C, C ArH), 54.6 (1C, CH3O), 54.6 (1C, CH3O), 37.6 (1C, CH2). IR (ATR): 1,619, 1,570, 1,459, 1,360, 1,341, 1,105, 1,071, 1,049, 812 cm−1. HRMS: 236.1292, ([M]+, C10H12N4O3 +; calc. 236.0909). New compound.

2.7 Procedure for the synthesis of bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22)

In a 10-mL pressure vial, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) (0.468 g, 3 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and EDC (7) (1.06 mL, 6 mmol, 3 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL). Furfuryl alcohol (3) (0.17 mL, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.) was then added. The reaction was carried out under MW conditions (standard mode, 30 min, 90°C). The reaction mixture was then diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), and H2O (5 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. The product was isolated as a yellow oil after flash chromatography (hexane:ethyl acetate 3:1) with a of yield 7% (0.04 g). 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.43 (dd, J HH = 1.9 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 7.20 (s, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.48 (dd, J HH = 3.3 Hz, J HH = 0.6 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.36 (dd, J HH = 3.3 Hz, J HH = 1.8 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 5.30 (s, 4H, 2 × CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.3 (2C, 2 × CO), 148.6 (2C, 2 × C ArO), 146.2 (2C, 2 × C ArO), 143.4 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 118.7 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 111.4 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 110.6 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 58.6 (2C, 2 × CH2). HRMS: 317.0658; ([M + H]+, C16H13O7 +; calc. 317.0656). New compound.

2.8 Procedure for the synthesis of furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene) bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23)

In a 10-mL pressure vial, 2-furoic acid (1) (0.224 g, 2 mmol, 2 equiv.) and EDC (7) (0.35 mL, 2 mmol, 2 equiv.) were dissolved in DCM (3 mL), to which 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (5) (0.1 mL, 1 mmol, 1 equiv.) was then added. The reaction was carried out under MW conditions (standard mode, 30 min, 90°C). The reaction mixture was next diluted with DCM (50 mL), washed successively using H2O (5 mL), 1 N HCl (2 × 5 mL), H2O (5 mL), 1 M NaOH (2 × 5 mL), and H2O (5 mL), and dried under anhydrous MgSO4. The product was isolated as a yellow oil after flash chromatography (hexane:ethyl acetate 5:1) and PTLC (hexane:acetone 3:1) with 9% (0.09 g) of yield. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.55 (s, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 7.53 (s, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 7.14 (d, J HH = 3.5 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 6.46 (dd, J HH = 3.5 Hz, J HH = 1.7 Hz, 2H, 2 × CH Ar), 5.29 (s, 4H, 2 × CH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.5 (2C, 2 × CO), 146.5 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 144.5 (2C, 2 × C ArO), 143.2 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 119.8 (2C, 2 × C Ar), 118.3 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 111.9 (2C, 2 × C ArH), 56.8 (2C, 2 × CH2). IR (ATR): 1,729 (CO), 1,706 (CO), 1,469, 1,306, 1,181, 1,112, 760 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 317.0659; ([M + H]+, C16H13O7 +; calc. 317.0656). New compound.

2.8.1 (4-(Hydroxymethyl)furan-3-yl)methyl furan-2-carboxylate (24)

Yield (35%), white solid, mp 89–90°C. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.56 (s, 1H, CH Ar), 7.51 (s, 1H, CH Ar), 7.42 (s, 1H, CH Ar), 7.20 (d, J HH = 3.5 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.50 (dd, J HH = 3.5 Hz, J HH = 1.7 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 5.28 (s, 2H, CH 2), 4.60 (s, 2H, CH 2OH), 2.28 (bs, 1H, OH). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.5 (1C, CO), 146.6 (1C, C ArH), 144.4 (1C, C ArO), 143.2 (1C, C ArH), 141.5 (1C, C ArH), 124.7 (1C, C ArH), 119.4 (1C, C ArH), 118.6 (1C, C ArH), 112.1 (1C, C ArH), 57.2 (1C, CH2), 55.2 (1C, CH2). IR (ATR): 1,720 (CO), 1,564, 1,295, 1,178, 1,112, 1,013, 823, 729 (Ar) cm−1. HRMS: 222.0760, ([M]+, C11H10O5 +; calc. 222.0528). New compound.

2.9 Synthesis of furoic acid (1)

2.9.1 Synthesis of furoic acid (1) using H2O2 and CuCl as a catalyst

Freshly distilled furfural (4.15 mL, 50 mmol), CuCl (0.247 g, 2.5 mmol), and acetonitrile (100 mL) were placed in a 250-mL round-bottom flask, and 30% H2O2 (10.2 mL, 100 mmol) was slowly added to the mixture dropwise for 30 min. The reaction was carried out at room temperature. An additional portion of 30% H2O2 (2.55 mL, 25 mmol) was added after 2 h. After 4 h, the substrate was found to be present, so another portion of 30% H2O2 (2.55 mL, 25 mmol) was added. Stirring was continued for 20 h at room temperature. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure, and H2O (40 mL) and saturated NaHCO3 solution were added to the residue to obtain pH 8.5. The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 30 mL). The aqueous layer was acidified to pH 2 with 2 N HCl, then extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give 1.87 g (38%) of the product as a yellow solid. The structure of the obtained product was confirmed based on NMR analysis of the crude product.

Yellow solid, mp 129–130 °C (lit. [61] 130–132°C). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz): δ 12.0 (bs, 1H, OH), 7.64 (s, 1H, CH Ar), 7.33 (d, 1H, J HH = 3.4 Hz, CH Ar), 6.55 (dd, 1H, J HH = 3.4 Hz, J HH = 1.6 Hz, CH Ar). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 176 MHz): δ 163.9 (1C, CO), 147.5 (1C, C ArH), 143.9 (1C, C Ar), 120.3 (1C, C ArH), 112.4 (1C, C ArH). HRMS: 112.0181 ([M]+, C5H4O3 +; calc. 112.0160.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [61].

2.9.2 Synthesis of furoic acid (1) using t-BuOOH and CuBr2 as a catalyst

Freshly distilled furfural (0.83 mL 10 mmol), CuBr2 (111.6 mg, 0.5 mmol), and acetonitrile (20 mL) were placed in a 100-mL round-bottom flask equipped with a septum. The reaction was carried out under nitrogen at room temperature. To the mixture, 70% t-BuOOH in H2O (1.3 mL, 10 mmol) was added dropwise for 10 min. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After 30 min, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue was dissolved in a saturated NaHCO3 solution (30 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 30 mL). The aqueous phase was acidified to pH 2 using 1 M NaHSO4. The acidified solution was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The crude product was crystallized from ethyl acetate–hexane. A yellow product was obtained with a yield of 0.43 g (38%).

Yellow solid, mp 129–130°C (lit. [61] 130–132 °C). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz): δ 12.0 (bs, 1H, OH), 7.64 (s, 1H, CH Ar), 7.33 (d, 1H, J HH = 3.4 Hz, CH Ar), 6.55 (dd, 1H, J HH = 3.4 Hz, J HH = 1.6 Hz, CH Ar). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 176 MHz): δ 163.9 (1C, CO), 147.5 (1C, C ArH), 143.9 (1C, C Ar), 120.3 (1C, C ArH), 112.4 (1C, C ArH). HRMS: 112.0181 ([M]+, C5H4O3 +; calc. 112.0160.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [61].

2.10 Synthesis of furfurylamine (2)

2.10.1 Synthesis according to the original procedure

Furfural (5 mL, 60 mmol), NH2OH (5.04 g, 72.4 mmol), and H2O (10 mL) were placed in a 250-mL three-necked flask. To the mixture, 15 mL of 2.4 M Na2CO3 solution was added, and the solution was heated to 60°C. Next, H2O (16.5 mL), zinc dust (27.6 g, 422.5 mmol), NH4Cl (16.1 g, 309 mmol), and ZnCl2 (0.82 g, 6.0 mmol) were added. Stirring was continued for 15 min. All insoluble compounds were filtered off under reduced pressure, and 6 M NaOH (100 mL) solution was added to the filtrate. The aqueous phase was extracted using n-heptane (3 × 200 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Furfurylamine (2) (0.92 g, 16%) was obtained as a light yellow liquid.

1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27 (dd, J HH = 1.8 Hz, J HH = 0.9 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.23 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 1.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 6.05 (dd, J HH = 3.2 Hz, J HH = 0.8 Hz, 1H, CH Ar), 3.73 (s, 2H, CH 2), 1.35 (bs, 2H, NH 2). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.7 (1C, C ArH), 141.4 (1C, C Ar), 110.0 (1C, C ArH), 104.8 (1C, C ArH), 39.2 (1C, CH2). HRMS: 98.0452 ([M + H]+, C5H8NO+; calc. 98.0600.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [62].

2.10.2 Optimization experiment I

The reaction was performed according to the general procedure with the following changes: time of the second step of the reaction, 20 min; extraction solvent, MTBE. Product: furfurylamine (2), 3.66 g (63%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described earlier.

2.10.3 Optimization experiment II

The reaction was performed according to the general procedure with the following changes: time of the second step of the reaction, 30 min; extraction solvent, MTBE. Product: furfurylamine (2), 4.40 g (76%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described earlier.

2.10.4 Optimization experiment III

The reaction was performed according to the general procedure with the following changes: time of the second step of the reaction, 60 min; extraction solvent, MTBE. Product: furfurylamine (2), 4.40 g (76%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described earlier.

2.11 Synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4)

2.11.1 Synthesis of 2-(2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (11) – general procedure

Catalytic amounts of Dowex® cationic ion exchange resin, furfural (8.3 mL, 100 mmol), ethylene glycol (6.15 mL, 110 mmol), and solvent (50 mL) were placed in a 100-mL round-bottom flask equipped with an azeotropic distillation adapter and reflux condenser. The reaction was carried out at the reflux temperature of the solvent. After the evolution of water, the catalyst was filtered off, and then the organic phase was washed with water (2 × 70 mL) and dried over anhydrous K2CO3. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude product was distilled under reduced pressure.

2.11.2 Optimization experiment I

The reaction was carried out according to the general procedure using toluene as the solvent. Reaction time: 4 h. 2-(2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane was obtained with a yield of 62% (8.68 g). The structure of the expected product 11 was confirmed based on analysis of NMR and GC-MS spectra.

1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.00 (ddd, 2H, J 1 = 6.2 Hz, J 2 = 4.0 Hz, J 3 = 6.5 Hz), 4.13 (ddd, 2H, J 1 = 6.2, Hz, J 2 = 4.0 Hz, J 3 = 6.0 Hz), 5.93 (s, 1H), 6.36 (dd, 1H, J 1 = 3.3 Hz, J 2 = 1.8 Hz), 6.45 (dd, 1H, J 1 = 3.3 Hz, J 2 = 0.8 Hz,), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J 2 = 0.8 Hz). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3) δ 65.1, 97.7, 108.7, 110.1, 143.12, 151.1. m/z: 140.076.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [63].

2.11.3 Optimization experiment II

The reaction was carried out according to the general procedure using toluene as the solvent. Reaction time: 8 h. Product: 10.08 g (72%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described above.

2.11.4 Optimization experiment III

The reaction was carried out according to the general procedure using 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent. Reaction time: 6 h. Product: 9.94 g (71%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described earlier.

2.11.5 Optimization experiment IV

The reaction was carried out according to the general procedure using 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent. Reaction time: 8 h. Product: 11.48 g (82%). The product was spectroscopically identical to that described earlier.

2.11.6 Synthesis of 2-(5-formyl-2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (12)

Diisopropylamine (11.25 mL, 80 mmol) was placed in a 500-mL three-necked flask and cooled to −20°C. Then, 2.5 M butyllithium in hexane was added (30 mL, 75 mmol) keeping the temperature at −20°C, and stirring was continued for 15 min. Next, THF (60 mL) was added, and the solution was cooled to −80°C. In the next step, a solution of 2-(2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (7.51 g, 53.6 mmol) in THF (25 mL) was added, and stirring was continued for 30 min while the temperature was maintained at −80°C. After this time, DMF (50 mL) was added, and stirring was continued for 14 h, allowing it to rise slowly to room temperature. Diethyl ether (200 mL) was added to the mixture, and the solution was washed with water (4 × 150 mL). The aqueous layers were extracted again with diethyl ether (2 × 200 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and the solvent was evaporated off under reduced pressure to give 4.33 g (48%) of the expected product.

1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.09–3.97 (m, 4 H), 5.92 (s, 1 H), 6.55 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 9.60 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3) δ 65.4, 97.26, 110.6, 119.15, 152.9, 157.27, 178.1.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [63].

2.11.7 Synthesis of furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9)

2-(5-Formyl-2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (0.84 g, 5 mmol), acetone (150 mL), and 6 N HCl (10 mL) were placed in a 250-mL round-bottom flask. The solution was heated to reflux for 1 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and CH2Cl2 (150 mL) was added to the residue. The organic phase was washed with 15% K2CO3 (3 × 100 mL) and H2O (100 mL) and dried over Na2CO3. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was crystallized from a mixture of diethyl ether and n-heptane. Furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9) was obtained with 95% (0.59 g) of yield.

1H NMR (750 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35 (s, 2H), 9.79 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3) δ 119.2, 154.3, 179.2.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [63].

2.11.8 Synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4)

Synthesis was carried out according to the procedure for the preparation of furoic acid (1), using t-BuOOH and CuBr2 as catalyst. Starting materials: furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9) (1.241 g, 10 mmol), CuBr2 (111.6 mg, 0.5 mmol), 70% t-BuOOH in H2O (3.2 mL, 25 mmol). Product: 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4), 0.812 g (52%), mp = 341–343°C, lit. mp = 340–345°C [65]. 1H NMR (700 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 13.52 (bs, 2H, OH), 7.28 (s, 2H, CH Ar). 13C NMR (176 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 159,3, 147.5, 118.8. HRMS: 156.0055 ([M]+, C6H4O5 +; calc. 156.0056.

The analytical data are in agreement with those reported previously in the literature [64].

  1. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

3 Result and discussion

In the first stage of the research, furfural was used to obtain selected furfural derivatives: furoic acid (1), furfurylamine (2), and 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4). The syntheses of these compounds were made based on known methods, changing the key parameters so that the developed methods were easier to use on a larger scale (parameters more friendly to production on an industrial scale). In all cases, the raw material was furfural, which is a product of acid-catalyzed xylose dehydration, making it one of the raw materials of biorefinery transformations. Furoic acid (1) was synthesized using the previously described methodology [65] based on the oxidation of furfural (8). Using 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide solution instead of tert-butyl hydrogen peroxide in the presence of copper(i) chloride as a catalyst resulted in 38% of yield (see ESI, Scheme S1, panel a). Replacement of the catalyst and using copper(ii) bromide instead of copper(i) chloride and tert-butyl hydroperoxide [66] (see ESI, Scheme S1, panel b) resulted in the same yield (38%) as previously. The furfurylamine (2) was obtained in the described one-pot two-step reductive amination procedure [62] (see ESI, Scheme S2), using furfural (8) and hydroxylammonium chloride in the presence of Na2CO3 in an aqueous medium. In the second stage, furfuryloxime 10 was reduced to furfurylamine (2), with zinc dust, NH4Cl, and ZnCl2 as reducing agents at 60 min with 76% of yield (optimization see ESI, Table S1). The last stage of our work on the synthesis of furfural derivatives focused on 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4). The key intermediate in this synthesis was furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9) [63]. This compound was obtained in a three-step synthesis process (see ESI, Scheme S3), where in the first stage, 2-(2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (11) was obtained after short optimization with 82% of yield (optimization see ESI, Table S2). The use of solvents with lower boiling points than toluene reduces the extent of furfural polymerization and thus increases the efficiency of the reaction. Then, the lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) was prepared by treating n-butyllithium with diisopropylamine in tetrahydrofuran (THF) was using. Given in the publication temp. −80°C has been changed to −30°C (easier to implement in industrial conditions), which increased the yield from 48 to 61%. The final step was the reaction of 2-(5-formyl-2-furanyl)-1,3-dioxolane (12) with a mixture of acetone and 6 N HCl. The furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9) was obtained with a 95% of yield.

Furan-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde (9) was used as a substrate to obtain a 52% yield 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) by oxidation, with tert-butyl hydroperoxide and copper(ii) bromide which was used as a catalyst (see ESI, Scheme S1, panel c).

Prior to commencing experiments using the compounds derived from furfural, we optimized the synthesis of model N-benzyl-p-chlorobenzamide (15) formed from 4-chlorobenzoic acid (13) and benzylamine (14). Optimization conditions were performed using a triazine coupling DMT/NMM/TsO (6) and a catalytic amount of N-methylmorpholine (NMM). NMM is used as a catalyst to convert carboxylic acid to salt. The presence of the carboxylic anion significantly accelerates the triazine ester formation compared to the reaction of the carboxylic acid with DMT/NMM/TsO. However, it is not advisable to use a stoichiometric amount or excess of NMM, as the formation of carboxylic acid anhydrides is observed, which in turn reduces the efficiency of the condensation reaction (lower yield of the products). Therefore, it is crucial to use such an amount of NMM to maximize the rate of triazine ester formation while eliminating the formation of anhydrides [67]. The MW conditions (time of reaction), solvents, and amounts of reagent were variable parameters. All experiments are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Optimization of the synthesis of N-benzyl-p-chlorobenzamide (15)a

Entry MW conditionsb Solventc Coupling reagent Ratio of substrates [equiv.] Yield of 15 [%]d
Time [min] Temp [°C] 13:14:6 (or 7)
1 5 90 DCM 6 1:1:1 66
2 10 90 DCM 6 1:1:1 73
3 30 90 DCM 6 1:1:1 65
4 10 90 ACN 6 1:1:1 72
5 10 90 EtOAc 6 1:1:1 69
6 10 90 THF 6 1:1:1 67
7 10 90 Toluene 6 1:1:1 55
8 10 90 6 1:1:1 44
9e 10 90 DCM 6 1:1.5:1 61
10 10 90 DCM 6 1.3:1:1.3 88
11 10 90 DCM 1.3:1:0 0
12 10 90 DCM 7 1.3:1:1.3 54
  1. a

    10 mL pressure vial, amount of compound 14 (2 mmol), NMM (0.3 equiv.) relative to compound 6.

  2. b

    Standard mode – 200 W.

  3. c

    Amount of solvent (3 mL).

  4. d

    Yield after crystallization (ethyl acetate/hexane).

  5. e

    Amount of compound 14 (3 mmol).

All reactions were performed in a microwave reactor (standard mode, initial 200 W power). In the first stage, the reaction time was optimized. It was found that performing the reaction within 5 min at 90°C resulted in a 66% yield of product 15 (Table 1, Entry 1), using 4-chlorobenzoic acid (13) and benzylamine (14) as the substrates and DMT/NMM/TsO (6) in a ratio of 1:1:1, with methylene chloride (DCM) as a solvent. Increasing the time to 10 min increased the yield up to 73% (Table 1, Entry 2). However, further extension of the time to 30 min led to a decrease in the yield to 65% (Table 1, Entry 3). Thus, time 10 min was considered the most optimal. Next, we examined the influence of the solvent on the reaction yield. The replacement of DCM with acetonitrile (ACN) slightly decreased the yield to 72% (Table 1, Entry 4). The use of ethyl acetate (EtOAc), tetrahydrofuran (THF), or toluene enabled the synthesis of final compound 15 with satisfactory but lower yields (69–55%) (Table 1, Entries 5–7). Reaction without solvent gave amide 15 with 44% yield (Table 1, Entry 8). It was decided that DCM would be used in further studies. Increasing the amount of benzylamine (14) to 1.5 equiv. decreased the yield to 61% (Table 1, Entry 9). In contrast, increasing the amounts of 4-chlorobenzoic acid (13) and DMT/NMM/TsO (6) to 1.3 equiv. increased the yield of product 15 to 88% (Table 1, Entry 10). Further increasing the amount of carboxylic acid 13 and coupling reagent 6 to 1.5 and 2.0 equiv. did not improve the reaction yield. As would be expected, performing the reaction without coupling reagent resulted in a lack of amide 15 (Table 1, Entry 11). EDC was also used as a coupling reagent. Replacing DMT/NMM/TsO (6) with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC, 7) resulted in a lower yield of 54% (Table 1, Entry 12). Thus, DMT/NMM/TsO (6) appears to be a much more effective reagent for the preparation of amide than EDC under microwave-assisted conditions.

Before the synthesis of the target amides and esters derived from furfural, we used the optimized conditions to synthesize amides protected with N-Boc-, N-Cbz-, and N-Fmoc-l-phenylalanine (16ac) (Table 2), as well as benzylamine (14). In all experiments, the ratio of N-protected amino acids 16ac to amine 14 and coupling agent 6 was 1.3:1:1.3 equiv. After crystallization, the final amides 17ab were synthesized smoothly with yields of 83% and 88%, respectively (Table 2, Entries 1 and 2). The application of optimal conditions for the synthesis of amide 17c resulted in a low yield of 35% (Table 2, Entry 3). The low yield of amide 17c may have resulted from the lower solubility of 16c, as well as from greater steric hindrance due to the presence of the fluorene moiety in the Fmoc group, which impeded access by the coupling reagent. Lengthening the reaction time to 30 min or 40 min resulted in increased yields after crystallization to 65% and 73%, respectively (Table 2, Entries 4 and 5).

Table 2

Synthesis of N-protected amides 17ac

Entry MW conditionsa Substrate/PG Yield of 17 [%]b
Time [min] Temp [°C]
1c 10 90 16a/Boc 17a/83
2c 10 90 16b/Cbz 17b/88
3d 10 90 16c/Fmoc 17c/35
4d 30 90 16c/Fmoc 17c/65
5d 40 90 16c/Fmoc 17c/73
  1. a

    Standard mode – 200 W.

  2. b

    Yield after crystallization (ethyl acetate/hexane).

  3. c

    10 mL pressure vial, conditions: N-protected amino acids 16ab (2.6 mmol), benzylamine (14) (0.22 mL, 2 mmol), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (1.076 g, 2.6 mmol), NMM (0.09 mL, 0.78 mmol).

  4. d

    10 mL pressure vial, conditions: N-protected amino acid 16c (1.3 mmol), benzylamine (14) (0.11 mL, 1 mmol), DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (0.538 g, 1.3 mmol), NMM (0.045 mL, 0.39 mmol).

Having found that DMT/NMM/TsO (6) is also an effective reagent for the synthesis of amides derived from N-protected phenylalanine under microwave-assisted conditions, we began research into the synthesis of amide and ester derivatives containing a furan ring. Initially, the optimal conditions were used to synthesize amide 18 using 2-furoic acid (1) and furfurylamine (2). The reaction was carried out under MW conditions (10 min, 90°C) in a 10-mL pressure vial in DCM with DMT/NMM/TsO (6) as the coupling reagent. The ratio of the equiv. of acid 1 to amine 2 and coupling reagent 6 was 1.3:1:1.3. N-(Furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (18) was obtained after crystallization, with 84% yields (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1 
               Synthesis of N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (18).
Scheme 1

Synthesis of N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (18).

In the next stage, 2-furoic acid (1), furfuryl alcohol (3), and DMT/NMM/TsO (6) were used to form the ester bond. Application of the optimal conditions (Table 1, Entry 10) resulted in the expected 1H NMR spectrum signals from the final compound 19 as well as unreacted alcohol 3 in a ratio of 1.0:1.4 (Table 3, Entry 1).

Table 3

Optimization of the synthesis of furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19)a

Entry MW conditionsb Ratio of substrates [equiv.] Coupling reagent [equiv.] Ratio of compounds in crude productc Yield of 19 [%]h
Time [min] Temp [°C] 1:3 19:3
1d 10 90 1.3:1 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [1.3 equiv.] 1.0:1.4 i
2d,e 30 90 1.3:1 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [1.3 equiv.] 1.0:0.7 49
3d 30 90 1.3:1 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [1.6 equiv.] 1.0:0.8 i
4 30 90 1.3:1 EDC (7) [1.3 equiv.] 1.0:0.7 i
5 30 90 2:1 EDC (7) [2 equiv.] 1.0:0.4 i
6f 30 90 3:1 EDC (7) [3 equiv.] 1.0:0.0 71
7d,g 30 90 3:1 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [3 equiv.] 1.0:2.4 i
  1. a

    10 mL pressure vial, amount of compound 3 (2 mmol), DCM (3 mL).

  2. b

    Standard mode – 200 W.

  3. c

    Based on 1H NMR.

  4. d

    Catalytic amount of NMM (0.3 equiv.) relative to compound 6.

  5. e

    Yield of product 19 after flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 10:1) – 49%.

  6. f

    Yield of product 19 after flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 10:1) – 71%.

  7. g

    Amount of compound 3 (0.5 mmol).

  8. h

    Yield after flash chromatography.

  9. i

    Reaction not purified by flash chromatography.

In addition to signals from 19 and 3, signals from unreacted DMT/NMM/TsO (6) were also observed on the 1H NMR spectrum. Elongation of the reaction time to 30 min led to increased conversion of ester 19 and a reduction in the ratio of unreacted alcohol 3 from 1.0:1.4 to 1.0:0.7 (Table 3, Entry 2). The mixture of ester 19 and substrate 3 was purified by flash chromatography, and the final product furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19) was isolated with 49% yield (Table 3, Entry 2, footnote e). Performing the synthesis of ester 19 for 30 min at 90°C with an excess of 2-furoic acid (1) (1.3 equiv.) and DMT/NMM/TsO (6) (1.6 equiv.) did not improve the conversion of ester 19 (Table 3, Entry 3). To improve the conversion of product 19, it was decided to replace DMT/NMM/TsO (6) with EDC (7). Although EDC was not as effective as DMT/NMM/TsO in terms of amide bond formation, it was definitely more effective for the formation of ester bonds. Application of the optimal conditions (1.3 equiv. of 2-furoic acid (1), 1 equiv. of furfuryl alcohol (3), 1.3 equiv. of EDC for 30 min at 90°C) resulted in a ratio of product 19 to unreacted furfuryl alcohol (3) of 1.0:0.7 (Table 3, Entry 4). Increasing the amount of 2-furoic acid (1) and EDC to 2 equiv. caused a reduction in the amount of unreacted alcohol (Table 3, Entry 5), whereas using 3 equiv. of carboxylic acid 1 and EDC (7) resulted in a lack of furfuryl alcohol (3) on the 1H NMR spectrum (Table 3, Entry 6). Furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19) was isolated by flash chromatography with a 71% yield (Table 3, Entry 6, footnote f). Replacement of EDC with DMT/NMM/TsO and use of the best conditions (Table 3, Entry 6) resulted in the worse conversion of product 19 and an increased amount of unreacted alcohol (Table 3, Entry 7).

Compounds with diamides and diester bonds are another interesting group of furan derivatives. We first synthesized N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20) using furfurylamine (2) and 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4). Reactions were carried out in a microwave reactor in the presence of DMT/NMM/TsO (6) and NMM. The optimized conditions for these reactions are presented in Table 4.

Table 4

Optimization of the synthesis of N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20)a

Entry Ratio of substrates [equiv.] MW conditionsb Ratio of compounds [%]c Yield of 20 [%]d
4:2:6 Time [min] Temp [°C] 20:21
1 0.5:1:1 10 90 52:48 20e
2 1:1:1 10 90 82:18 20
3 1.5:1:1.5 10 90 94:6 37
4 1.5:1:1.5 30 90 86:14 31
5f 1.5:1:1.5 10 90 100:0 19
6g 1.5:1:1.5 10 90 100:0 22
7 0.65:1:0.65 10 90 34:66 8
  1. a

    10 mL pressure vial, amount of compound 2 (2 mmol), DCM (3 mL), catalytic amount of NMM (0.3 equiv.) relative to compound 6.

  2. b

    Standard mode – 200 W.

  3. c

    Based on 1H NMR.

  4. d

    Yield after crystallization (hexane/ethyl acetate).

  5. e

    Product 20 contaminated by side-product 21 (25% of 21 based on 1H NMR).

  6. f

    DCM replacement by ACN.

  7. g

    DCM replacement by DMF.

Application of a double excess of furfurylamine (2) and coupling reagent 6 relative to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) (1 mmol) for 10 min at 90°C resulted in a mixture of product 20 and an unidentified compound visible on the 1H NMR spectrum. The ratio of the product and side product in the crude mixture was 52%:48% based on 1H NMR. Purification by flash chromatography resulted in the isolation of pure product 20 with a 20% yield and of the side product N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine (21) with a yield of 25% (Table 4, Entry 1). Purification by crystallization (in a repeated reaction) resulted in the same yield of product 20. However, the product was contaminated by the by-product. The ratio of compounds 20:21 was 75:25% based on 1H NMR (Table 4, Entry 1, footnote e). Further optimization was performed to improve the yield of product 20 and reduce the amount of side product 21. Using equimolar amounts of amine 2, dicarboxylic acid 4, and coupling agent 6 under the same MW conditions resulted in a lower amount of side product 21. The ratio of compounds 20:21 in the crude mixture was 82%:18% based on 1H NMR. The yield of N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20) after crystallization was 20%, and the product was clean (Table 4, Entry 2). Increasing the amounts of DMT/NMM/TsO (6) and 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) to 1.5 equiv. resulted in the presence of almost no side product 21. The yield of diamide 20 after crystallization was 37% (Table 4, Entry 3). Further increasing the amounts of compounds 4 and 6 did not improve the yield of product 20. When the reaction time was increased to 30 min with the application of 1 equiv. of amine 2, 1.5 equiv. of dicarboxylic acid 4, and reagent 6, the amount of side product 21 in the crude mixture increased and the yield of product 20 decreased to 31% (Table 4, Entry 4). Replacing DCM with ACN or DMF (Table 4, Entries 5 and 6) resulted in the presence of no side product 21 in the crude mixture. However, the yields of N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20) were lower (19 and 22%, respectively). Application of the conditions used for the synthesis of the monoamide 18 resulted to obtain a mixture of product 20 and side product 21 in a ratio of 34:66% based on 1H NMR. After crystallization, the final product 20 was isolated with a low yield (8%) (Table 4, Entry 7).

The synthesis of compounds with diesters bonds – bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22) and furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene) bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23) – was more problematic. First, we performed the synthesis of bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22). Under the optimal conditions applied for the synthesis of N,N-bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20) (Table 4, Entry 3), using 1 equiv. of furfuryl alcohol (3) and 1.5 equiv. of both 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) and DMT/NMM/TsO (6) for 30 min at 90°C resulted in 1H NMR spectrum signals from final compound 22, as well as unreacted alcohol 3 in a ratio of 1.0:3.7. However, the attempt to isolate product 22 using flash chromatography failed (Table 5, Entry 1). Because EDC was more effective for forming ester bonds than DMT/NMM/TsO (see Table 3), subsequent experiments were conducted using EDC. Using a double excess of alcohol 3 and EDC relative to dicarboxylic acid 4 (1 mmol) resulted that the ratio of product 22 to unreacted alcohol was 1.0:4.0 (Table 5, Entry 2). Increasing the amount of dicarboxylic acid 4 to 1 equiv. or 1.5 equiv., with 2 equiv. or 3 equiv. of EDC, respectively, resulted in a decrease in the amount of unreacted alcohol 3 on the 1H NMR spectrum (Table 5, Entries 3 and 4). Because further attempts to increase the amount of acid 4 did not contribute to reducing the amount of unreacted alcohol 3, bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22) was isolated by flash chromatography with a low yield (Table 5, Entry 4, footnote e). The low yield of product 22 was also due to the presence of many unidentified compounds. Application of the optimal conditions (Table 5, Entry 4) and the replacement EDC with DMT/NMM/TsOincreased the amount of unreacted alcohol. The ratio of product 22 to unreacted alcohol 3 was 1.0 to 1.4 (Table 5, Entry 5). Applying the conditions used to synthesis of monoester 19 did not improve the ratio of product 22 to unreacted alcohol (Table 5, Entry 6).

Table 5

Optimization of the synthesis of bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22)a

Entry Ratio of substrates [equiv.] MW conditionsb Coupling reagent [equiv.] Ratio of compounds in crude productc Yield of 22 [%]f
4:3 Time [min] Temp [°C] 22:3
1d 1.5:1 30 90 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [1.5 equiv.] 1.0:3.7 g
2 0.5:1 30 90 EDC (7) [1 equiv.] 1.0:4.0 g
3 1:1 30 90 EDC (7) [2 equiv.] 1.0:1.6 g
4e 1.5:1 30 90 EDC (7) [3 equiv.] 1.0:0.8 7
5d 1.5:1 30 90 DMT/NMM/TsO (6) [3 equiv.] 1.0:1.4 g
6 1.5:1 30 90 EDC (7) [1.5 equiv.] 1.0:2.1
  1. a

    10 mL pressure vial, amount of compound 3 (1 mmol), DCM (3 mL).

  2. b

    Standard mode – 200 W.

  3. c

    Based on 1H NMR.

  4. d

    Compound 3 (1 mmol), catalytic amount of NMM (0.3 equiv.) relative to compound 6.

  5. e

    Yield of product 22 after flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 3:1) – 7%.

  6. f

    Yield after flash chromatography.

  7. g

    Reaction not purified by flash chromatography.

The second compound with two ester bonds, furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene) bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23), was synthesized using 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (5). Given that EDC was responsible for better conversion of product 22, EDC was also used for the synthesis of diester 23 (Scheme 2). Performing the reaction with 2 equiv. of 2-furoic acid (1), 1 equiv. of 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (1 mmol) (5), and 2 equiv. of coupling reagent EDC (7) for 30 min at 90°C resulted in an excess of monoester (4-(hydroxymethyl)furan-3-yl)methyl furan-2-carboxylate (24), which was isolated by flash chromatography with 35% yield.

Scheme 2 
               Synthesis of furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene)bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23).
Scheme 2

Synthesis of furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene)bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23).

Final product 23 was isolated after flash chromatography and preparative thin-layer chromatography (PTLC) with 9% yield (Scheme 2).

4 Conclusion

In summary, this study shows that furfural derivatives containing one functional group – 2-furoic acid (1), furfurylamine (2), furfuryl alcohol (3), as well as the disubstituted furan derivatives 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4) and 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (5) – can be used as starting materials for the synthesis of new amides and esters using classical coupling reagents under mild conditions, supported by microwave radiation. Five final compounds containing furan rings were synthesized using a microwave reactor in the presence of DMT/NMM/TsO (6) or EDC (7) as a coupling agent. Two compounds with single amide and ester bonds, N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (18) and furan-2-ylmethyl furan-2-carboxylate (19), were obtained with yields of 84% and 49%, respectively, using DMT/NMM/TsO. Additionally, ester 19 was obtained with 71% yield in the presence of EDC. Three compounds with two amide and ester bonds were also synthesized. N,N-Bis(furan-2-ylmethyl)furan-2,5-dicarboxamide (20) with two amide bonds was obtained with 37% yield using DMT/NMM/TsO. Bis(furan-2-ylmethyl) furan-2,5-dicarboxylate (22) and furan-3,4-diylbis(methylene) bis(furan-2-carboxylate) (23), both with two esters bonds, were obtained in the presence of EDC with only 7% and 9% yields, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that both coupling agents (DMT/NMM/TsO and EDC) are efficient for the synthesis of amide and ester derivatives containing a furan ring. DMT/NMM/TsO is more effective than EDC for obtaining an amide bond. However, EDC allows higher yields of ester than DMT/NMM/TsO.

The synthesis of compounds with an amide bond occurred under milder conditions than the synthesis of compounds with an ester bond. During the synthesis of compounds with an ester bond, larger amounts of reagents (carboxylic acid and coupling reagent) and longer reaction times were required, which may have been due to the weaker nucleophilic character of alcohol compared to an amine. The synthesis of compounds with diamide and diester bonds was more difficult. Final compounds were synthesized with moderate or low yields, which may be explained by the lower solubility of substrate 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (4), the greater steric hindrance of dicarboxylic acid 4 and 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (5), and by competitive reactions leading to the synthesis of the side products N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine (21) and 4-(hydroxymethyl)furan-3-yl)methyl furan-2-carboxylate (24). Both side products were isolated and characterized. Whereas diamide 20 was synthesized in the presence of DMT/NMM/TsO, the synthesis of both diesters 22 and 23 required the use of EDC. Further research is underway to develop reaction conditions for the formation of polyesters and polymers using diacids, diamines, and dialcohols derived from furfural.

  1. Funding information: This research was funded by the National Centre for Research and Development under Project BIOSTRATEG2/296369/5/NCBR/2016.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  3. Author contributions: Ł. J. – formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing – original draft; D. Z. – investigation; B. K. – conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing – review and editing.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

[1] Shylesh S, Gokhale AA, Ho CR, Bell AT. Novel strategies for the production of fuels, lubricants, and chemicals from biomass. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:2589–97.10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00354Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Kohli K, Prajapati R, Sharma BK. Bio-based chemicals from renewable biomass for integrated biorefineries. Energies. 2019;12:233.10.3390/en12020233Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rosales-Calderon O, Arantes V. A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:240.10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA. Catalytic routes for the conversion of biomass into liquid hydrocarbon transportation fuels. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:83–99.10.1201/b18526-11Search in Google Scholar

[5] Tuck CO, Pérez E, Hotváth IT, Sheldon RA, Polikoff M. Valorization of biomass: deriving more value from waste. Science. 2012;337:695–9.10.1126/science.1218930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Vispute TP, Zhang H, Sanna A, Xiao R, Huber GW. Renewable chemical commodity feedstocks from integrated catalytic processing of pyrolysis oils. Science. 2010;330:1222–7.10.1126/science.1194218Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Kozlowski JT, Davis RJ. Heterogeneous catalysts for the guerbet coupling of alcohols. ACS Catal. 2013;3:1588–600.10.1021/cs400292fSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Li X, Jia P, Wang T. Furfural: a promising platform compound for sustainable production of C4 and C5 chemicals. ACS Catal. 2016;6:7621–40.10.1021/acscatal.6b01838Search in Google Scholar

[9] Machado G, Leon S, Santos F, Lourega R, Dullius J, Mollmann ME, et al. Literature review on furfural production from lignocellulosic biomass. Natural Resour. 2016;7:115–29.10.4236/nr.2016.73012Search in Google Scholar

[10] Serrano-Ruiz JC, Luque R, Sepúlveda-Escribano A. Transformations of biomass-derived platform molecules: from high added-value chemicals to fuels via aqueous-phase processing. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5266–81.10.1039/c1cs15131bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Climent MJ, Corma A, Iborra S. Conversion of biomass platform molecules into fuel additives and liquid hydrocarbon fuels. Green Chem. 2014;16:516–47.10.1039/c3gc41492bSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Dawes GJS, Scott EL, Le Nôtre J, Sanders JPM, Bitter JH. Deoxygenation of biobased molecules by decarboxylation and decarbonylation – a review on the role of heterogeneous, homogeneous and bio-catalysis. Green Chem. 2015;17:3231–50.10.1039/C5GC00023HSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Lee J, Kim YT, Huber GW. Aqueous-phase hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation of biomass-derived oxygenates with bimetallic catalysts. Green Chem. 2014;16:708–18.10.1039/c3gc41071dSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Yan K, Wu G, Lafleur T, Jarvis C. Production, properties and catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to fuel additives and value-added chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;38:663–76.10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[15] Alonso DM, Bond JQ, Dumesic JA. Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem. 2010;12:1493–513.10.1039/c004654jSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Mariscal R, Maireles-Torres P, Ojeda M, Sádaba I, López Granados M. Furfural: a renewable and versatile platform molecule for the synthesis of chemicals and fuels. Energy Environ Sci. 2016;9:1144–89.10.1039/C5EE02666KSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Lange J-P, van der Heide E, van Buijtenen J, Price R. Furfural – a promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem. 2012;5:150–66.10.1002/cssc.201100648Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Eseyin AE, Steele PH. An overview of the applications of furfural and its derivatives. Int J Adv Chem. 2015;3:42–7.10.14419/ijac.v3i2.5048Search in Google Scholar

[19] Huber GW, Chheda JN, Barrett CJ, Dumesic JA. Production of liquid alkanes by aqueous-phase processing of biomass-derived carbohydrates. Science. 2005;308:1446–50.10.1126/science.1111166Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Chheda JN, Huber GW, Dumesic JA. Liquid-phase catalytic processing of biomass-derived oxygenated hydrocarbons to fuels and chemicals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:7164–83.10.1002/anie.200604274Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass:  chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem Rev. 2006;106:4044–98.10.1021/cr068360dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energ Convers Manage. 2009;50:14–34.10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1570–80.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Demirbas MF. Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: a critical review. Appl Energy. 2009;86:S151–61.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.043Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mandalika A, Qin L, Sato TK, Runge T. Integrated biorefinery model based on production of furans using open-ended high yield processes. Green Chem. 2014;16:2480–9.10.1039/C3GC42424CSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Sajid M, Zhao X, Liu D. Production of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) from 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): recent progress focusing on the chemical-catalytic routes. Green Chem. 2018;20:5427–53.10.1039/C8GC02680GSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Pan T, Deng J, Xu Q, ZuoY, Guo Q-X, Fu Y. Catalytic conversion of furfural into a 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid-based polyester with total carbon utilization. ChemSusChem. 2013;6:47–50.10.1002/cssc.201200652Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Zhang S, Lan J, Chen Z, Yin G, Li G. Catalytic synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid from furoic acid: transformation from C5 platform to C6 derivatives in biomass utilizations. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:9360–9.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02396Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhang Z, Deng K. Recent advances in the catalytic synthesis of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and its derivatives. ACS Catal. 2015;5:6529–44.10.1021/acscatal.5b01491Search in Google Scholar

[30] Papageorgiou GZ, Papageorgiou DG, Terzopoulou Z, Bikiaris DN. Production of bio-based 2,5-furan dicarboxylate polyesters: recent progress and critical aspects in their synthesis and thermal properties. Eur Polym J. 2016;83:202–29.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rabnawaz M, Wyman I, Auras R, Cheng S. A roadmap towards green packaging: the current status and future outlook for polyesters in the packaging industry. Green Chem. 2017;19:4737–53.10.1039/C7GC02521ASearch in Google Scholar

[32] Lakhawat SS, Singh DD, Kumar S, Kumar V. Bioplastic feasibility: plastic waste disaster management. J Crit Rev. 2020;7:260–4.10.31838/jcr.07.05.46Search in Google Scholar

[33] Tsang YF, Kumar V, Samadar P, Yang Y, Lee J, Ok YS, et al. Production of bioplastic through food waste valorization. Environ Int. 2019;127:625–44.10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.076Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Vilela C, Sousa AF, Fonseca AC, Serra AC, Coelho JFJ, Freire CSR, et al. The quest for sustainable polyesters – insights into the future. Polym Chem. 2014;5:3119–41.10.1039/C3PY01213ASearch in Google Scholar

[35] Burgess SK, Leisen JE, Kraftschik BE, Mubarak CR, Kriegel RM, Koros WJ. Chain mobility, thermal, and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene furanoate) compared to poly(ethylene terephthalate). Macromolecules. 2014;47:1383–91.10.1021/ma5000199Search in Google Scholar

[36] Burgess SK, Kriegel RM, Koros WJ. Carbon dioxide sorption and transport in amorphous poly(ethylene furanoate). Macromolecules. 2015;48:2184–93.10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00333Search in Google Scholar

[37] Araujo CF, Nolasco MM, Ribeiro-Claro PJA, Rudić S, Silvestre AJD, Vaz PD, et al. Inside PEF: chain conformation and dynamics in crystalline and amorphous domains. Macromolecules. 2018;51:3515–26.10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00192Search in Google Scholar

[38] Vannini M, Marchese P, Celli A, Lorenzetti C. Fully biobased poly(propylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) for packaging applications: excellent barrier properties as a function of crystallinity. Green Chem. 2015;17:4162–6.10.1039/C5GC00991JSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Wang J, Liu X, Zhu J, Jiang Y. Copolyesters based on 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA): effect of 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol units on their properties. Polymers. 2017;9:305.10.3390/polym9090305Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Miyagawa N, Ogura T, Okano K, Matsumoto T, Nishino T, Mori A. Preparation of furan dimer-based biopolyester showing high melting points. Chem Lett. 2017;46:1535–8.10.1246/cl.170647Search in Google Scholar

[41] Kainulainen TP, Sirviö JA, Sethi J, Hukka TI, Heiskanen JP. UV-blocking synthetic biopolymer from biomass-based bifuran diester and ethylene glycol. Macromolecules. 2018;51:1822–9.10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02457Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] Miyagawa N, Suzuki T, Okano K, Matsumoto T, Nishino T, Mori A. Synthesis of furan dimer-based polyamides with a high melting point. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem. 2018;56:1516–9.10.1002/pola.29031Search in Google Scholar

[43] Yoon WJ, Hwang SY, Koo JM, Lee YJ, Lee SU, Im SS. Synthesis and characteristics of a biobased high-Tg terpolyester of isosorbide, ethylene glycol, and 1,4-cyclohexane dimethanol: effect of ethylene glycol as a chain linker on polymerization. Macromolecules. 2013;46:7219–31.10.1021/ma4015092Search in Google Scholar

[44] Wu J, Eduard P, Jasinska-Walc L, Rozanski A, Noordover BAJ, van Es DS, et al. Fully isohexide-based polyesters: synthesis, characterization, and structure–properties relations. Macromolecules. 2013;46:384–94.10.1021/ma302209fSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Mankar SV, Gonzalez MNG, Warlin N, Valsange N, Rehnberg N, Lundmark S, et al. Synthesis, life cycle assessment, and polymerization of a vanillin-based spirocyclic diol toward polyesters with increased glass-transition temperature. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:19090–103.10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04930Search in Google Scholar

[46] Wang P, Arza CR, Zhang B. Indole as a new sustainable aromatic unit for high quality biopolyesters. Polym Chem. 2018;9:4706–10.10.1039/C8PY00962GSearch in Google Scholar

[47] Nakamura T, Nagahata R, Takeuchi K. Microwave-assisted polyester and polyamide synthesis. Mini Rev Org Chem. 2011;8:306–14.10.2174/157019311796197454Search in Google Scholar

[48] Gruter G-JM, Sipos L, Dam MA. Accelerating research into bio-based FDCA-polyesters by using small scale parallel film reactors. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2012;15:180–8.10.2174/138620712798868374Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Grigore ME, Grigorescu RM, Iancu L, Ion R-M, Zaharia C, Andrei ER. Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates: a review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;30:695–712.10.1080/09205063.2019.1605866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Cheng S, Khan B, Khan F, Rabnawaz M. Synthesis of high molecular weight polyester using in situ drying method and assessment of water vapor and oxygen barrier properties. Polymers. 2018;10:1113.10.3390/polym10101113Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Kainulainen TP, Hukka TI, Özeren HD, Sirviö JA, Hedenqvist MS, Heiskanen JP. Utilizing furfural-based bifuran diester as monomer and comonomer for high-performance bioplastics: properties of poly(butylene furanoate), poly(butylene bifuranoate), and their copolyesters. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21:743–52.10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01447Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Fraczyk J, Kaminski ZJ, Katarzynska J, Kolesinska B. 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium toluene-4-sulfonate (DMT/NMM/TsO−) universal coupling reagent for synthesis in solution. Helv Chim Acta. 2018;101:e1700187.10.1002/hlca.201700187Search in Google Scholar

[53] Kolesinska B, Rozniakowski KK, Fraczyk J, Relich I, Papini AM, Kaminski ZJ. The effect of counterion and tertiary amine on the efficiency of N-triazinylammonium sulfonates in solution and solid-phase peptide synthesis. Eur J Org Chem. 2015;2015:401–8.10.1002/ejoc.201402862Search in Google Scholar

[54] Al-Warhi TI, Al-Hazimi HMA, El-Faham A. Recent development in peptide coupling reagents. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2012;16:97–116.10.1016/j.jscs.2010.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[55] Badland M, Crook R, Delayre B, Fussell SJ, Gladwell I, Hawksworth M, et al. A comparative study of amide-bond forming reagents in aqueous media – substrate scope and reagent compatibility. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:4391–4.10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.10.014Search in Google Scholar

[56] Verma SK, Ghorpade R, Pratap A, Kaushik MP. Solvent free, N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) mediated amidation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:2373–6.10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.01.125Search in Google Scholar

[57] Green RA, Pletcher D, Leach SG, Brown RCD. N-Heterocyclic carbene-mediated microfluidic oxidative electrosynthesis of amides from aldehydes. Org Lett. 2016;18:1198–201.10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00339Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Nadimpally KC, Thalluri K, Palakurthy NB, Saha A, Mandal B. Catalyst and solvent-free amidation of inactive esters N-protected amino acids. Tetraheron Lett. 2011;52:2579–82.10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.03.039Search in Google Scholar

[59] Kolesińska B, Kamiński ZJDesign. synthesis, and application of enantioselective coupling reagent a traceless chiral auxiliary. Org Lett. 2009;11:765–8.10.1021/ol802691xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Curran SP, Connon SJ. Selenide ions as catalysts for homo- and crossed-Tishchenko reactions of expanded scope. Org Lett. 2012;14:1074–7.10.1021/ol203439gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Janczewski Ł, Walczak M, Frączyk J, Kamiński ZJ, Kolesińska B. Microwave-assisted Cannizzaro reaction – optimisation of reaction conditions. Synth Commun. 2019;49:3290–300.10.1080/00397911.2019.1657459Search in Google Scholar

[62] Ayedi MA, ves Le Bigot Y, Ammar H, Abid S, El Gharbi R, Delmas M. Simple, novel synthesis of furfurylamine from furfural by one-pot reductive amination in water using zinc metal. J Soc Chim Tunisie. 2012;14:109–16.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Feringa BL, Hulst R, Rikers R, Brandsma L. Dimetalation of furans and thiophenes. One-pot procedures for furan-2,5- and thiophene-2,5-dicarboxaldehyde. Synthesis. 1988;4:316–8.10.1055/s-1988-27553Search in Google Scholar

[64] Ahmed MS, Mannel DS, Root TW, Stahl SS. Aerobic oxidation of diverse primary alcohols to carboxylic acids with a heterogeneous Pd–Bi–Te/C (PBT/C) catalyst. Org Process Res Dev. 2017;21:1388–93.10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00223Search in Google Scholar

[65] Mannam S, Sekar G. CuCl catalyzed oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids with aqueous tert-butyl hydroperoxide under mild conditions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:1083–6.10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.11.198Search in Google Scholar

[66] Das R, Chakraborty D. Cu(ii) bromide catalyzed oxidation of aldehydes and alcohols. Appl Organomet Chem. 2011;25:437–42.10.1002/aoc.1783Search in Google Scholar

[67] Kamiński ZJ, Kolesińska B, Marcinkowska M. Mild and efficient synthesis of carboxylic acid anhydrides from carboxylic acids and triazine coupling reagents. Synth Commun. 2004;34:3349–58.10.1081/SCC-200030581Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-25
Revised: 2021-01-18
Accepted: 2021-02-08
Published Online: 2021-03-05

© 2021 Łukasz Janczewski et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Qualitative and semi-quantitative assessment of anthocyanins in Tibetan hulless barley from different geographical locations by UPLC-QTOF-MS and their antioxidant capacities
  3. Effect of sodium chloride on the expression of genes involved in the salt tolerance of Bacillus sp. strain “SX4” isolated from salinized greenhouse soil
  4. GC-MS analysis of mango stem bark extracts (Mangifera indica L.), Haden variety. Possible contribution of volatile compounds to its health effects
  5. Influence of nanoscale-modified apatite-type calcium phosphates on the biofilm formation by pathogenic microorganisms
  6. Removal of paracetamol from aqueous solution by containment composites
  7. Investigating a human pesticide intoxication incident: The importance of robust analytical approaches
  8. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by chloroform fraction of Juniperus phoenicea and chemical constituents analysis
  9. Recovery of γ-Fe2O3 from copper ore tailings by magnetization roasting and magnetic separation
  10. Effects of different extraction methods on antioxidant properties of blueberry anthocyanins
  11. Modeling the removal of methylene blue dye using a graphene oxide/TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposite under sunlight irradiation by intelligent system
  12. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Cinnamomum cassia essential oil and its application in food preservation
  13. Full spectrum and genetic algorithm-selected spectrum-based chemometric methods for simultaneous determination of azilsartan medoxomil, chlorthalidone, and azilsartan: Development, validation, and application on commercial dosage form
  14. Evaluation of the performance of immunoblot and immunodot techniques used to identify autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune diseases
  15. Computational studies by molecular docking of some antiviral drugs with COVID-19 receptors are an approach to medication for COVID-19
  16. Synthesis of amides and esters containing furan rings under microwave-assisted conditions
  17. Simultaneous removal efficiency of H2S and CO2 by high-gravity rotating packed bed: Experiments and simulation
  18. Design, synthesis, and biological activities of novel thiophene, pyrimidine, pyrazole, pyridine, coumarin and isoxazole: Dydrogesterone derivatives as antitumor agents
  19. Content and composition analysis of polysaccharides from Blaps rynchopetera and its macrophage phagocytic activity
  20. A new series of 2,4-thiazolidinediones endowed with potent aldose reductase inhibitory activity
  21. Assessing encapsulation of curcumin in cocoliposome: In vitro study
  22. Rare norisodinosterol derivatives from Xenia umbellata: Isolation and anti-proliferative activity
  23. Comparative study of antioxidant and anticancer activities and HPTLC quantification of rutin in white radish (Raphanus sativus L.) leaves and root extracts grown in Saudi Arabia
  24. Comparison of adsorption properties of commercial silica and rice husk ash (RHA) silica: A study by NIR spectroscopy
  25. Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) as a high-capacity material for next-generation sodium-ion capacitors
  26. Aroma components of tobacco powder from different producing areas based on gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometry
  27. The effects of salinity on changes in characteristics of soils collected in a saline region of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam
  28. Synthesis, properties, and activity of MoVTeNbO catalysts modified by zirconia-pillared clays in oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane
  29. Synthesis and crystal structure of N,N′-bis(4-chlorophenyl)thiourea N,N-dimethylformamide
  30. Quantitative analysis of volatile compounds of four Chinese traditional liquors by SPME-GC-MS and determination of total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities
  31. A novel separation method of the valuable components for activated clay production wastewater
  32. On ve-degree- and ev-degree-based topological properties of crystallographic structure of cuprite Cu2O
  33. Antihyperglycemic effect and phytochemical investigation of Rubia cordifolia (Indian Madder) leaves extract
  34. Microsphere molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction for diazepam analysis using itaconic acid as a monomer in propanol
  35. A nitric oxide-releasing prodrug promotes apoptosis in human renal carcinoma cells: Involvement of reactive oxygen species
  36. Machine vision-based driving and feedback scheme for digital microfluidics system
  37. Study on the application of a steam-foam drive profile modification technology for heavy oil reservoir development
  38. Ni–Ru-containing mixed oxide-based composites as precursors for ethanol steam reforming catalysts: Effect of the synthesis methods on the structural and catalytic properties
  39. Preparation of composite soybean straw-based materials by LDHs modifying as a solid sorbent for removal of Pb(ii) from water samples
  40. Synthesis and spectral characterizations of vanadyl(ii) and chromium(iii) mixed ligand complexes containing metformin drug and glycine amino acid
  41. In vitro evaluation of lactic acid bacteria with probiotic activity isolated from local pickled leaf mustard from Wuwei in Anhui as substitutes for chemical synthetic additives
  42. Utilization and simulation of innovative new binuclear Co(ii), Ni(ii), Cu(ii), and Zn(ii) diimine Schiff base complexes in sterilization and coronavirus resistance (Covid-19)
  43. Phosphorylation of Pit-1 by cyclin-dependent kinase 5 at serine 126 is associated with cell proliferation and poor prognosis in prolactinomas
  44. Molecularly imprinted membrane for transport of urea, creatinine, and vitamin B12 as a hemodialysis candidate membrane
  45. Optimization of Murrayafoline A ethanol extraction process from the roots of Glycosmis stenocarpa, and evaluation of its Tumorigenesis inhibition activity on Hep-G2 cells
  46. Highly sensitive determination of α-lipoic acid in pharmaceuticals on a boron-doped diamond electrode
  47. Synthesis, chemo-informatics, and anticancer evaluation of fluorophenyl-isoxazole derivatives
  48. In vitro and in vivo investigation of polypharmacology of propolis extract as anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and chemical properties
  49. Topological indices of bipolar fuzzy incidence graph
  50. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2–ZnO catalyst and its catalytic synthesis of rosin glycol ester
  51. Construction of a new luminescent Cd(ii) compound for the detection of Fe3+ and treatment of Hepatitis B
  52. Investigation of bovine serum albumin aggregation upon exposure to silver(i) and copper(ii) metal ions using Zetasizer
  53. Discoloration of methylene blue at neutral pH by heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like reactions using crystalline and amorphous iron oxides
  54. Optimized extraction of polyphenols from leaves of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) grown in Lam Dong province, Vietnam, and evaluation of their antioxidant capacity
  55. Synthesis of novel thiourea-/urea-benzimidazole derivatives as anticancer agents
  56. Potency and selectivity indices of Myristica fragrans Houtt. mace chloroform extract against non-clinical and clinical human pathogens
  57. Simple modifications of nicotinic, isonicotinic, and 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acids toward new weapons against plant diseases
  58. Synthesis, optical and structural characterisation of ZnS nanoparticles derived from Zn(ii) dithiocarbamate complexes
  59. Presence of short and cyclic peptides in Acacia and Ziziphus honeys may potentiate their medicinal values
  60. The role of vitamin D deficiency and elevated inflammatory biomarkers as risk factors for the progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  61. Quantitative structure–activity relationship study on prolonged anticonvulsant activity of terpene derivatives in pentylenetetrazole test
  62. GADD45B induced the enhancing of cell viability and proliferation in radiotherapy and increased the radioresistance of HONE1 cells
  63. Cannabis sativa L. chemical compositions as potential plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase-thymidinesynthase enzyme inhibitors: An in silico study for drug development
  64. Dynamics of λ-cyhalothrin disappearance and expression of selected P450 genes in bees depending on the ambient temperature
  65. Identification of synthetic cannabinoid methyl 2-{[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl] formamido}-3-methylbutanoate using modern mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance techniques
  66. Study on the speciation of arsenic in the genuine medicinal material honeysuckle
  67. Two Cu(ii)-based coordination polymers: Crystal structures and treatment activity on periodontitis
  68. Conversion of furfuryl alcohol to ethyl levulinate in the presence of mesoporous aluminosilicate catalyst
  69. Review Articles
  70. Hsien Wu and his major contributions to the chemical era of immunology
  71. Overview of the major classes of new psychoactive substances, psychoactive effects, analytical determination and conformational analysis of selected illegal drugs
  72. An overview of persistent organic pollutants along the coastal environment of Kuwait
  73. Mechanism underlying sevoflurane-induced protection in cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury
  74. COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2: Everything we know so far – A comprehensive review
  75. Challenge of diabetes mellitus and researchers’ contributions to its control
  76. Advances in the design and application of transition metal oxide-based supercapacitors
  77. Color and composition of beauty products formulated with lemongrass essential oil: Cosmetics formulation with lemongrass essential oil
  78. The structural chemistry of zinc(ii) and nickel(ii) dithiocarbamate complexes
  79. Bioprospecting for antituberculosis natural products – A review
  80. Recent progress in direct urea fuel cell
  81. Rapid Communications
  82. A comparative morphological study of titanium dioxide surface layer dental implants
  83. Changes in the antioxidative properties of honeys during their fermentation
  84. Erratum
  85. Erratum to “Corrosion study of copper in aqueous sulfuric acid solution in the presence of (2E,5E)-2,5-dibenzylidenecyclopentanone and (2E,5E)-bis[(4-dimethylamino)benzylidene]cyclopentanone: Experimental and theoretical study”
  86. Erratum to “Modified TDAE petroleum plasticiser”
  87. Corrigendum
  88. Corrigendum to “A nitric oxide-releasing prodrug promotes apoptosis in human renal carcinoma cells: Involvement of reactive oxygen species”
  89. Special Issue on 3rd IC3PE 2020
  90. Visible light-responsive photocatalyst of SnO2/rGO prepared using Pometia pinnata leaf extract
  91. Antihyperglycemic activity of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. leaf ethanol extract SNEDDS in zebrafish (Danio rerio)
  92. Selection of oil extraction process from Chlorella species of microalgae by using multi-criteria decision analysis technique for biodiesel production
  93. Special Issue on the 14th Joint Conference of Chemistry (14JCC)
  94. Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of isatin-pyrrole derivatives against HepG2 cell line
  95. CO2 gas separation using mixed matrix membranes based on polyethersulfone/MIL-100(Al)
  96. Effect of synthesis and activation methods on the character of CoMo/ultrastable Y-zeolite catalysts
  97. Special Issue on Electrochemical Amplified Sensors
  98. Enhancement of graphene oxide through β-cyclodextrin composite to sensitive analysis of an antidepressant: Sulpiride
  99. Investigation of the spectroelectrochemical behavior of quercetin isolated from Zanthoxylum bungeanum
  100. An electrochemical sensor for high sensitive determination of lysozyme based on the aptamer competition approach
  101. An improved non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor amplified with CuO nanostructures for sensitive determination of uric acid
  102. Special Issue on Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2020
  103. Fast discrimination of avocado oil for different extracted methods using headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectroscopy with PCA based on volatile organic compounds
  104. Effect of alkali bases on the synthesis of ZnO quantum dots
  105. Quality evaluation of Cabernet Sauvignon wines in different vintages by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics
  106. Special Issue on the Joint Science Congress of Materials and Polymers (ISCMP 2019)
  107. Diatomaceous Earth: Characterization, thermal modification, and application
  108. Electrochemical determination of atenolol and propranolol using a carbon paste sensor modified with natural ilmenite
  109. Special Issue on the Conference of Energy, Fuels, Environment 2020
  110. Assessment of the mercury contamination of landfilled and recovered foundry waste – a case study
  111. Primary energy consumption in selected EU Countries compared to global trends
  112. Modified TDAE petroleum plasticiser
  113. Use of glycerol waste in lactic acid bacteria metabolism for the production of lactic acid: State of the art in Poland
  114. Topical Issue on Applications of Mathematics in Chemistry
  115. Theoretical study of energy, inertia and nullity of phenylene and anthracene
  116. Banhatti, revan and hyper-indices of silicon carbide Si2C3-III[n,m]
  117. Topical Issue on Agriculture
  118. Occurrence of mycotoxins in selected agricultural and commercial products available in eastern Poland
  119. Special Issue on Ethnobotanical, Phytochemical and Biological Investigation of Medicinal Plants
  120. Acute and repeated dose 60-day oral toxicity assessment of chemically characterized Berberis hispanica Boiss. and Reut in Wistar rats
  121. Phytochemical profile, in vitro antioxidant, and anti-protein denaturation activities of Curcuma longa L. rhizome and leaves
  122. Antiplasmodial potential of Eucalyptus obliqua leaf methanolic extract against Plasmodium vivax: An in vitro study
  123. Prunus padus L. bark as a functional promoting component in functional herbal infusions – cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial effects
  124. Molecular and docking studies of tetramethoxy hydroxyflavone compound from Artemisia absinthium against carcinogens found in cigarette smoke
  125. Special Issue on the Joint Science Congress of Materials and Polymers (ISCMP 2020)
  126. Preparation of cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) essential oil loaded poly(lactic acid) nanofibers
  127. Influence of mica mineral on flame retardancy and mechanical properties of intumescent flame retardant polypropylene composites
  128. Production and characterization of thermoplastic elastomer foams based on the styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) rubber and thermoplastic material
  129. Special Issue on Applied Chemistry in Agriculture and Food Science
  130. Impact of essential oils on the development of pathogens of the Fusarium genus and germination parameters of selected crops
  131. Yield, volume, quality, and reduction of biotic stress influenced by titanium application in oilseed rape, winter wheat, and maize cultivations
  132. Influence of potato variety on polyphenol profile composition and glycoalcaloid contents of potato juice
  133. Carryover effect of direct-fed microbial supplementation and early weaning on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing Najdi lambs
  134. Special Issue on Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (ABB 2021)
  135. The electrochemical redox mechanism and antioxidant activity of polyphenolic compounds based on inlaid multi-walled carbon nanotubes-modified graphite electrode
  136. Study of an adsorption method for trace mercury based on Bacillus subtilis
  137. Special Issue on The 1st Malaysia International Conference on Nanotechnology & Catalysis (MICNC2021)
  138. Mitigating membrane biofouling in biofuel cell system – A review
  139. Mechanical properties of polymeric biomaterials: Modified ePTFE using gamma irradiation
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2021-0034/html
Scroll to top button