Home Impact of “3414” fertilization on the yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes
Article Open Access

Impact of “3414” fertilization on the yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes

  • Chunyan Wu , Xiaoyi Han , Yan Cheng , Xueke Wang and Wei Wang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 28, 2024

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the yield and nutritional quality of greenhouse tomatoes under a water and fertilizer integration model. Greenhouse tomatoes were used as the research object, and the “3414” fertilizer trial design was employed to assess tomato growth, yield, quality, and soil indicators across various treatment combinations. The goal was to determine the optimal fertilization scheme and recommend appropriate fertilizer quantities for tomato cultivation and production. The results revealed that different fertilizer ratios significantly affected both the quality and yield of tomatoes. Overall, the tomato yield tended to increase with higher fertilization amounts, with potassium exhibiting the most pronounced effect on yield increase, followed by phosphorus and nitrogen. The comprehensive analysis of principal components indicated that the N2P2K1 treatment yielded the highest nutritional quality and yield. Therefore, the best fertilization combination identified in this study consisted of nitrogen fertilizer at 197.28 kg hm−2, phosphorus fertilizer at 88.75 kg hm−2, and potassium fertilizer at 229.80 kg hm−2. These findings provided the scientific basis for optimizing fertilization practices in greenhouse tomato cultivation and production in the Jilin Province.

1 Introduction

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is an annual or perennial herbaceous plant belonging to the Solanaceae family. It is extensively cultivated in both northern and southern regions of China. It ranks among the most commonly grown greenhouse vegetables globally [1]. Tomatoes are characterized by their vibrant colors, distinctive flavor, and high contents of nutrients, such as carotene, lycopene, and vitamins C and B. Besides their nutritional value, tomatoes possess high medicinal value, aiding digestion, detoxification, and preventing cardiovascular diseases [2,3]. Given their high water and nutrient requirements, greenhouse tomato cultivation has gained widespread adoption, ensuring a steady supply of fresh produce. Integrated water and fertilizer technologies represent advanced fertilizer management techniques that enhance water and nutrient utilization efficiency, ultimately maximizing economic returns [4,5]. Fertilization is a pivotal technique in tomato cultivation and production, playing a crucial role in improving soil fertility, facilitating tomato growth and development, and increasing yield and quality [6,7]. However, the indiscriminate use of fertilizers can have negative consequences [8,9]. Therefore, appropriate fertilization practices are essential for promoting agricultural productivity and achieving superior crop quality and yield.

Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are essential elements for the normal growth and development of plants. Improper combinations of these three elements can lead to crop nutrient imbalances, increased fruit nitrate content, decreased quality, low yield, and imbalanced soil nutrient supply [10,11,12]. Studies on the impact of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on tomatoes exist [13,14]. However, previous studies have examined only a limited range of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios, neglecting the interactive effects and influence of multiple levels. In addition, the variations in soil fertility, crop residues, and cultivated varieties can alter the optimal fertilization scheme for crops. The “3414” experimental design plays a significant role in national soil testing and formula fertilization efforts. It can determine the appropriate application amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium based on soil fertility, crop fertilization requirements, and fertilizer response functions. This experimental plan is extensively used for studying fertilizer efficiency both domestically and internationally [15]. The high-quality and efficient cultivation of greenhouse tomatoes in the Jilin Province holds significant economic importance for greenhouse film industries. This study was based on the integrated water and fertilizer technology for tomatoes and aimed to strengthen the research on rational fertilization techniques for greenhouse tomatoes. Employing the “3414” experimental design, we investigated the combined effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium application on the growth and quality of tomatoes in greenhouse facilities. The goal was to determine the optimal fertilization ratio to improve the tomato yield and quality, providing a theoretical basis for scientifically sound fertilization practices in high-quality tomato production and cultivation.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study location and materials

The study was conducted at the teaching and research base of Jilin Agricultural University, situated at 125°41′ East longitude and 43°82′ North latitude. The area experiences a temperate continental semi-humid monsoon climate characterized by an average annual sunshine duration of 2544.8 h, an effective accumulated temperature of 2,850℃, a frost-free period of 145 days, an average annual temperature of 5.8℃, and an average annual precipitation of 558 mm. The soil used in the study was black soil, possessing the following basic physical and chemical properties: bulk density of 0.97 g cm−3, total porosity of 59.66%, soil pH of 6.7, organic matter content of 34.39 g kg−1, alkali nitrogen content of 161 mg kg−1, available phosphorus content of 50.91 mg kg−1, and available potassium content of 190.04 mg kg−1. The tomato variety selected for the experiment was “Shidun 197,” characterized by an indeterminate growth type with medium early maturity. The fertilizers used included urea (N: 46%), calcium superphosphate (P2O5: 12%), and potassium sulfate (K2O: 50%).

2.2 Study design

The tomato seeds were sown in March 2023, using pot planting experiments, and later transplanted on May 6, with 5 plants per treatment and 3 repetitions, totaling 210 plants. During the growth period, single-stem pruning was conducted, with five fruit clusters retained per plant. The harvesting started on July 15, 2023. The study employed the “3414” fertilizer trial plan, with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium serving as the 3 elements, each at 0, 1, 2, and 3 levels, resulting in 14 treatments. The experimental factors and levels are detailed in Table 1, and the experimental treatments and corresponding fertilization amounts are provided in Table 2. Fertilization started 10 days after planting, facilitated by a fertigation system for integrated irrigation and fertilization management. The fertilizer application adhered to the critical growth periods of tomatoes, with 15% of the total supply administered during the planting-to-flowering phase and 85% during the fruiting period. Additionally, the water supply was adjusted following tomato growth and prevailing weather conditions.

Table 1

Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization levels

Fertilizer level code N (kg hm−2) P2O5 (kg hm−2) K2O (kg hm−2)
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 98.64 44.38 229.80
2 197.28 88.75 459.60
3 295.92 133.13 689.40
Table 2

Experimental treatments and fertilizer application amount

Treatment Fertilizer application amount (kg hm−2)
N P2O5 K2O
N0P0K0 0.00 0.00 0.00
N0P2K2 0.00 88.75 459.60
N1P2K2 98.64 88.75 459.60
N2P0K2 197.28 0.00 459.60
N2P1K2 197.28 44.38 459.60
N2P2K2 197.28 88.75 459.60
N2P3K2 197.28 133.13 459.60
N2P2K0 197.28 88.75 0.00
N2P2K1 197.28 88.75 229.80
N2P2K3 197.28 88.75 689.40
N3P2K2 295.92 88.75 459.60
N1P1K2 98.64 44.38 459.60
N1P2K1 98.64 88.75 229.80
N2P1K1 197.28 44.38 229.80

Note: The N0P0K0 treatment in the table serves as the control treatment (CK).

2.3 Measurement indicators and methods

The soil pH value was measured using the potentiometric method with a pHS-3E acidity meter (Shanghai Yoke Instrument Co., Ltd.). The electrical conductivity (EC) value was determined using the conductivity method with a DDS-11A electromagnetic conductivity meter (Shanghai Yoke Instrument Co., Ltd.). The alkali nitrogen content was determined using the NaOH alkali diffusion–absorption method. The available phosphorus content was determined using the NaHCO3 extraction–molybdenum antimony colorimetric method. The available potassium content was determined using the NH4OAC extraction-flame photometry method [16].

The plant height was measured using a tape measure from the first leaf to the top growth point. The stem thickness was measured using a Vernier caliper at the midpoint between the first and second leaves. The tomato leaf area was obtained using the weighing method. Starting from the tomato harvest period, the yield for each experimental treatment was determined, and the yield per plant was recorded.

The soluble sugar content of tomato fruit was measured using the anthrone method. The soluble protein content was determined using the Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 staining method. The soluble solid contents were measured using a refractometer. The organic acid contents were determined using acid–base titration. The vitamin C content was determined using the molybdenum blue colorimetric method. The nitrate and lycopene contents were determined using ultraviolet spectrophotometry [17,18].

2.4 Statistical analysis

The experimental data were organized using Microsoft Excel 2021. Significance testing and principal component analysis were conducted using SPSS version 26 statistical analysis software.

3 Results

3.1 Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the physical and chemical properties of soil for tomato cultivation

The physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil under different fertilization treatments are presented in Table 3. The soil pH under the CK treatment was the highest (7.39), significantly surpassing that under other treatments. Conversely, the pH of the N3P2K2 treatment was the lowest (6.32), indicating that the high-nitrogen fertilizer treatment resulted in decreased pH levels. This decline in soil pH could be attributed to long-term excessive fertilization. The EC value was the highest under the N3P2K2 treatment (1145.33 µs cm−1), significantly exceeding that under other treatments. Conversely, the N0P2K2 treatment exhibited the lowest EC value (317.23 µs cm−1), indicating that the application of higher amounts of fertilizer led to increased soil EC values. This elevation implied a higher salt content in the soil, potentially impeding plant growth and development. The highest alkali nitrogen content was recorded under the N3P2K2 treatment (172.67 mg kg−1), followed by that under the N2P2K3 and N2P2K2 treatments (169.17 and 166.83 mg kg−1), respectively.

Table 3

Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the physicochemical properties of soil for tomato cultivation

Treatment pH EC (µs cm−1) Alkaline nitrogen (mg kg−1) Available phosphorus (mg kg−1) Available potassium (mg kg−1)
N0P0K0 7.39 ± 0.01a 436.00 ± 3.06f 114.33 ± 1.17g 35.82 ± 0.25f 160.11 ± 0.86fg
N0P2K2 7.20 ± 0.01b 317.23 ± 0.84h 121.33 ± 3.09f 40.36 ± 0.67def 208.85 ± 1.71c
N1P2K2 7.01 ± 0.01d 579.33 ± 41.70d 128.33 ± 2.33ef 44.34 ± 0.67cd 211.42 ± 0.86c
N2P0K2 6.93 ± 0.01e 342.80 ± 1.65h 135.33 ± 1.17de 38.54 ± 1.75ef 219.11 ± 2.26b
N2P1K2 7.10 ± 0.01c 732.00 ± 4.16c 151.67 ± 1.17b 39.80 ± 1.56def 195.17 ± 1.48d
N2P2K2 7.00 ± 0.01d 458.33 ± 8.88f 166.83 ± 4.67a 46.51 ± 0.71bc 183.20 ± 1.71e
N2P3K2 6.72 ± 0.03f 813.33 ± 6.74b 156.33 ± 2.33b 54.13 ± 1.68a 182.35 ± 2.96e
N2P2K0 7.12 ± 0.02c 451.67 ± 8.65f 138.83 ± 1.17cd 41.06 ± 1.65de 158.40 ± 0.86g
N2P2K1 6.66 ± 0.02f 378.17 ± 7.19g 138.83 ± 3.07cd 44.48 ± 0.92 cd 164.39 ± 2.57fg
N2P2K3 6.65 ± 0.01f 589.67 ± 2.03d 169.17 ± 1.17a 52.31 ± 1.78a 230.23 ± 0.86a
N3P2K2 6.32 ± 0.03g 1145.33 ± 3.93a 172.67 ± 1.17a 50.00 ± 2.58ab 190.90 ± 1.71d
N1P1K2 7.10 ± 0.01c 523.67 ± 2.19e 128.33 ± 1.17ef 49.38 ± 1.21ab 222.53 ± 3.08b
N1P2K1 6.92 ± 0.03e 452.33 ± 2.33f 128.33 ± 3.07ef 51.05 ± 2.47ab 165.24 ± 3.08f
N2P1K1 6.88 ± 0.06e 398.03 ± 4.01g 143.50 ± 2.02c 39.10 ± 0.53ef 195.17 ± 2.57d

Note: The data in the table represent mean ± standard deviation. Different letters following the numbers in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.

The lowest alkali nitrogen content was recorded under the CK treatment (114.33 mg kg−1), indicating that applying nitrogen fertilizers increases the alkali nitrogen content in the soil. The available phosphorus content was the highest under the N2P2K3 treatment (54.13 mg kg−1), followed by that under the N2P2K3 treatment (52.31 mg kg−1), with no significant difference compared with that under N1P2K1, N3P2K2, and N1P1K2 treatments but with significant difference compared with that under other treatments. Conversely, the available phosphorus content was the highest under the CK treatment (35.82 mg kg−1), indicating that soil without phosphorus fertilizers had a lower available phosphorus content. Moreover, the available potassium content was the highest under the N2P2K3 treatment (230.23 mg kg−1), which was significantly higher than that under other treatments. Conversely, the available potassium content was the lowest under the N2P2K0 treatment (158.40 mg kg−1), indicating that applying potassium fertilizers significantly increases the available potassium content in the soil.

3.2 Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the growth indicators of tomato plants

As depicted in Table 4, the tallest plant was observed under the N0P2K2 treatment (133.23 cm), followed by 132.10 cm under the CK treatment. Conversely, the plant heights under N2P2K2, N1P2K1, N1P2K2, and N1P1K2 treatments were significantly lower than those under N0P2K2 and CK treatments. The plants were the shortest under the N1P1K2 treatment (94.30 cm). The CK treatment, with no fertilizer, led to better plant growth, indicating that the soil fertilizers used during the experiment ensured the normal growth of tomatoes in the early stage. Additionally, using equivalent nitrogen fertilizer amounts, the combined application of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers positively impacted the plant growth.

Table 4

Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on tomato growth indexes

Treatment Plant height (cm) Stem diameter (mm) Leaf area (cm2) Dry matter accumulation (g/plant)
N0P0K0 132.10 ± 0.25a 11.51 ± 0.28abc 72.07 ± 1.65abcde 194.47 ± 2.02d
N0P2K2 133.23 ± 5.75a 11.96 ± 0.94ab 74.44 ± 1.40abcd 240.10 ± 0.63c
N1P2K2 95.13 ± 10.49b 10.06 ± 1.01bcd 63.53 ± 1.80e 244.83 ± 7.68c
N2P0K2 117.60 ± 3.40ab 11.15 ± 0.64abcd 79.73 ± 2.27a 237.51 ± 12.13c
N2P1K2 118.93 ± 12.79ab 11.38 ± 0.38abc 65.51 ± 4.84de 247.90 ± 7.32c
N2P2K2 95.97 ± 6.87b 9.34 ± 0.31d 70.22 ± 2.49abcde 281.12 ± 2.37b
N2P3K2 109.57 ± 6.18ab 9.24 ± 0.20d 71.24 ± 2.33abcde 198.83 ± 5.26d
N2P2K0 114.57 ± 11.31ab 10.76 ± 0.43abcd 64.92 ± 1.42de 208.10 ± 2.17d
N2P2K1 106.13 ± 12.37ab 11.79 ± 0.87ab 70.99 ± 6.48abcde 298.89 ± 3.12a
N2P2K3 101.87 ± 10.69ab 10.15 ± 0.23bcd 77.04 ± 3.06ab 232.50 ± 3.07c
N3P2K2 121.07 ± 9.76ab 11.30 ± 0.65abc 67.52 ± 1.81bcde 199.03 ± 6.10d
N1P1K2 94.30 ± 8.99b 10.87 ± 0.35abcd 67.16 ± 2.32cde 206.41 ± 5.88d
N1P2K1 95.60 ± 4.57b 9.63 ± 0.74 cd 66.12 ± 1.48de 195.62 ± 3.30d
N2P1K1 112.40 ± 15.20ab 12.13 ± 0.10a 76.59 ± 1.63abc 310.29 ± 5.94a

Note: The data in the table represent mean ± standard deviation. Different letters following the numbers in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.

The stem thickness was the highest under the N2P1K1 treatment (12.13 mm), significantly differing from that under N2P2K3, N1P2K2, N1P2K1, N2P2K2, and N2P3K2 treatments. This represented a 5.39% increase compared with the CK treatment. Conversely, the stem thickness was the lowest under the N2P3K2 treatment (9.24 mm), significantly differing from that under N3P2K2, N2P1K2, CK, N2P2K1, N0P2K2, and N2P1K1 treatments. These findings suggested that the application of appropriate phosphorus and potassium amounts could enhance tomato stem thickening within a certain range.

The leaf area was the largest under the N2P1K1 treatment (79.72 cm²), followed by 77.04 and 76.59 cm² under the N2P2K3 and N2P1K1 treatments, respectively. These represented increases of 10.61, 6.70, and 6.27%, respectively, compared with the CK treatment. Conversely, the leaf area was the smallest under the N1P2K2 treatment (63.53 cm). However, the leaf area under the N2P2K3 and N2P2K0 treatments did not significantly differ, with the former showing an 18.67% increase, indicating that potassium fertilizer application at the same nitrogen and phosphorus levels was beneficial for increasing tomato leaf area.

Dry matter accumulation in tomato plants was the highest under the N2P1K1 treatment (310.29 g/plant), followed by 298.89 g/plant under the N2P2K1 treatment. Both values significantly exceeded those observed under other treatments, with increases of 59.56 and 53.68%, respectively, compared with that under the CK treatment, which had the lowest accumulation at 194.47 g/plant. Additionally, dry matter accumulation in tomatoes exhibited a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing with an increase in the amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers.

3.3 Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the tomato yield

As depicted in Table 5, the average weight of a single tomato fruit was the highest under the N2P1K1 treatment (167.42 g), followed by 161.23 g under the N2P2K1 treatment. It was significantly higher than that under the CK, N2P2K0, and N1P2K1 treatments, representing increases by 26.15 and 21.49%, respectively, compared with that under the CK treatment.

Table 5

Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the tomato yield

Treatment Weight of a single fruit (g) Yield per plant (kg/plant) Plot yield (kg) Total yield (kg hm−2)
N0P0K0 132.71 ± 4.39e 2.03 ± 0.03c 30.48 ± 0.42c 76204.00 ± 1050.74c
N0P2K2 150.27 ± 3.15bcd 2.45 ± 0.03abc 36.79 ± 0.52abc 91980.75 ± 1294.39abc
N1P2K2 149.01 ± 2.32bcd 2.63 ± 0.16ab 39.40 ± 2.43ab 98491.56 ± 6084.07ab
N2P0K2 147.83 ± 4.98bcd 2.37 ± 0.14abc 35.52 ± 2.04abc 88788.25 ± 5105.23abc
N2P1K2 153.28 ± 4.15bc 2.65 ± 0.22ab 39.70 ± 3.37ab 99241.25 ± 8432.10ab
N2P2K2 154.28 ± 6.50abc 2.78 ± 0.12a 41.66 ± 1.76a 104139.00 ± 4387.71a
N2P3K2 147.79 ± 3.30bcd 2.31 ± 0.02abc 34.70 ± 0.33abc 86.753.25 ± 818.68abc
N2P2K0 136.92 ± 4.10de 2.10 ± 0.11bc 31.53 ± 1.59bc 78.817.25 ± 3962.77bc
N2P2K1 161.23 ± 4.08ab 2.74 ± 0.16a 41.17 ± 2.37a 10.2934.88 ± 5916.02a
N2P2K3 146.67 ± 5.57bcd 2.53 ± 0.05abc 37.99 ± 0.76abc 94.978.75 ± 1907.91abc
N3P2K2 149.54 ± 6.55bcd 2.29 ± 0.05abc 34.33 ± 0.82abc 85.825.88 ± 2052.83abc
N1P1K2 156.65 ± 3.76abc 2.55 ± 0.14abc 38.23 ± 2.16abc 95.581.00 ± 5401.13abc
N1P2K1 142.12 ± 2.74cde 2.18 ± 0.15bc 32.72 ± 2.25bc 81.795.38 ± 5635.16bc
N2P1K1 167.42 ± 1.60a 2.85 ± 0.43a 42.72 ± 6.46a 106.803.63 ± 16,147.20a

Note: The data in the table represent mean ± standard deviation. Different letters following the numbers in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.

The total yield of tomatoes under different fertilization treatments indicated that the yield was higher under fertilizer treatments than under non-fertilizer treatments. Among these, the highest yield was observed under the N2P1K1 treatment (106803.63 kg hm−2), followed by 104139.00 and 102934.88 kg hm−2 under the N2P2K2 and N2P2K1 treatments, respectively. These represented increases of 40.15, 36.66, and 35.08% compared with the non-fertilizer treatment. The interaction effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium was the strongest, followed by the interaction effects of phosphorus and potassium, and those of nitrogen and potassium, with yield increases of 20.70 and 16.51%, respectively (Table 6). The interaction effect of nitrogen and phosphorus was the weakest, with a yield increase of only 3.43%. The relative yield in the nitrogen-deficient areas was 88.32%, with a nitrogen dependence of 11.68%. The relative yield in phosphorus-deficient areas was 85.26%, with a phosphorus dependence of 14.74%. The relative yield in potassium-deficient areas was 75.68%, with a potassium dependence of 24.32%. Therefore, the order of dependence was as follows: nitrogen dependence < phosphorus dependence < potassium dependence, indicating that potassium fertilizer had a significant impact in terms of increasing yield compared with phosphorus fertilizer, whereas the effect of nitrogen fertilizer was smaller. Additionally, applying nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium together was more conducive to increasing tomato yield.

Table 6

Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium interaction on the tomato yield

Code Treatment Yield (kg hm−2) Increased production (%) Relative yield (%)
CK N0P0K0 76.204 73.18%
PK N0P2K2 91.980.75 20.70% 88.32%
NK N2P0K2 88.788.25 16.51% 85.26%
NP N2P2K0 78.817.25 3.43% 75.68%
NPK N2P2K2 104,139 36.66%

3.4 Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on the quality of tomato fruits

As depicted in Table 7, different ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer treatments significantly impacted the quality of tomato fruits. Among these, the N2P1K1 treatment exhibited the highest soluble protein content (3.86 mg g−1), followed by 3.54 mg g−1 under the N2P2K1 treatment. The soluble protein content under the N2P1K1 and N2P2K1 treatments was significantly higher than that under the no-fertilizer treatment, increasing by 69.30 and 55.26%, respectively.

Table 7

Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium ratios on tomato fruit quality

Treatment Soluble protein (mg g−1) Soluble sugar (%) Soluble solid (%) Vitamin C (mg 100 g−1) Organic acid (%) Nitrate (mg kg−1) Lycopene (mg kg−1)
N0P0K0 2.28 ± 0.10cd 3.05 ± 0.09c 4.17 ± 0.19cde 25.82 ± 1.31f 0.23 ± 0.05b 124.21 ± 0.89bcd 12.35 ± 0.42def
N0P2K2 2.32 ± 0.09cd 2.66 ± 0.04de 4.20 ± 0.06cde 31.03 ± 1.04ab 0.37 ± 0.12ab 110.09 ± 3.89d 10.98 ± 0.81f
N1P2K2 2.09 ± 0.32d 2.53 ± 0.15e 4.30 ± 0.10abcde 29.25 ± 0.49bcd 0.47 ± 0.12a 165.88 ± 33.20a 14.90 ± 1.18cde
N2P0K2 3.17 ± 0.04abcd 2.99 ± 0.22c 4.23 ± 0.09bcde 32.26 ± 0.63a 0.28 ± 0.08ab 119.96 ± 0.05bcd 11.44 ± 0.09ef
N2P1K2 2.41 ± 0.16cd 1.79 ± 0.06g 3.73 ± 0.17f 28.97 ± 0.41bcde 0.37 ± 0.05ab 171.78 ± 5.79a 12.87 ± 0.06def
N2P2K2 2.87 ± 0.58abcd 3.74 ± 0.05b 4.50 ± 0.06abc 31.30 ± 0.14ab 0.33 ± 0.02ab 118.64 ± 5.74bcd 15.56 ± 0.02bcd
N2P3K2 2.56 ± 0.49bcd 2.15 ± 0.03f 4.13 ± 0.03de 30.07 ± 0.96abc 0.26 ± 0.08ab 157.34 ± 1.68a 17.08 ± 1.11bc
N2P2K0 3.25 ± 0.32abc 3.62 ± 0.07b 4.43 ± 0.07abcd 28.15 ± 0.24cdef 0.33 ± 0.05ab 125.20 ± 1.14bcd 13.83 ± 1.06cdef
N2P2K1 3.54 ± 0.43ab 4.36 ± 0.11a 4.60 ± 0.15a 29.52 ± 0.58bcd 0.28 ± 0.08ab 112.41 ± 1.42cd 22.44 ± 2.04a
N2P2K3 2.38 ± 0.01cd 2.57 ± 0.19de 3.97 ± 0.09ef 30.07 ± 0.76abc 0.28 ± 0.00ab 162.63 ± 3.94a 15.16 ± 1.87cde
N3P2K2 2.54 ± 0.39bcd 2.45 ± 0.07ef 4.20 ± 0.06cde 27.19 ± 0.99def 0.37 ± 0.05ab 148.65 ± 0.86ab 14.33 ± 1.93cdef
N1P1K2 2.84 ± 0.22abcd 2.60 ± 0.03de 4.57 ± 0.07ab 27.60 ± 0.36cdef 0.33 ± 0.05ab 142.24 ± 1.60abc 18.98 ± 1.53b
N1P2K1 2.95 ± 0.54abcd 2.90 ± 0.03cd 4.20 ± 0.15cde 26.50 ± 1.19ef 0.37 ± 0.05ab 146.28 ± 1.02ab 12.32 ± 0.15def
N2P1K1 3.86 ± 0.41a 3.16 ± 0.12c 4.40 ± 0.06abcd 26.23 ± 0.99f 0.28 ± 0.00ab 166.87 ± 1.41a 16.68 ± 0.08bc

Note: The data in the table represent mean ± standard deviation. Different letters following the numbers in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.

Significant differences were found in the soluble sugar content of tomato fruits under different treatments. At the same nitrogen and phosphorus levels, the soluble sugar content increased first and then decreased with increasing potassium fertilizer application. Among these, the N2P2K1 treatment exhibited the highest soluble sugar content (4.36%), followed by the N2P2K2 and N2P2K0 treatments, which were significantly higher than that under the CK treatment, with increases of 42.95, 22.62, and 18.69%, respectively. Conversely, the soluble sugar content was the lowest under the N2P1K2 treatment (1.79%).

The N2P2K1 treatment yielded the highest soluble solid content in tomato fruits, exhibiting significant differences compared with the N1P1K2 and CK treatments, with increases of 10.31 and 9.59%, respectively. Conversely, the lowest soluble solid content was recorded under the N2P1K2 treatment (3.73%), representing a decrease of 10.55% compared with that under the CK treatment. In addition, no significant differences were observed in the contents under the CK and other treatments.

The highest vitamin C content in tomato fruits was recorded under the N2P0K2 treatment (32.26 mg 100 g−1), compared with that under the CK treatment, with a 24.90% increase. Vitamin C content under the N2P2K0, N2P2K1, N2P2K2, and N2P2K3 treatments was 28.15, 29.52, 31.30, and 30.07 mg 100 g−1, respectively. The vitamin C content in tomatoes increased first and then decreased with the increase in potassium fertilizer application at the same nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer levels. This suggested that, although increasing the potassium fertilizer amount increased the vitamin C content in fruits, excessive application should be avoided.

The organic acid content of tomatoes treated with N1P2K2 was the highest (0.47%), whereas the content of tomatoes treated with CK was the lowest (0.23%). A significant difference in content was observed between these two treatments. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the content between the N1P2K2 treatment and other treatments.

The nitrate content in tomato fruits was the highest under the N2P1K2 treatment (171.78 mg kg−1) compared with that under the CK treatment, with an increase of 38.30%. Conversely, the content was the lowest under the N0P2K2 treatment (110.09 mg kg−1), marking a decrease of 11.37% compared with that under the CK treatment. Under N1P2K2, N2P2K2, and N3P2K2 treatments, the nitrate content was 165.88, 118.64, and 148.65 mg kg−1, respectively, demonstrating increases of 50.68, 7.77, and 35.03%, respectively, compared with that under the N0P2K2 treatment, implying that additional nitrogen fertilizer application increased the nitrate content.

The combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers increased the lycopene content in fruits. The highest content was observed under the N2P2K1 treatment (22.44 mg kg−1), significantly surpassing that under other treatments. This represented an 81.70% increase compared with that under the non-fertilizer treatment. Moreover, at the same nitrogen and potassium fertilizer levels, the lycopene content increased with the increase in phosphorus fertilizer amount, peaking at 17.08 mg kg−1 under the N2P3K2 treatment, marking a 38.30% increase compared with that under the non-fertilizer treatment.

3.5 Fertilizer model and comprehensive evaluation analysis

3.5.1 Comprehensive analysis of the synergistic effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers

Based on the “3414” field fertilizer experimental design, regression analysis was conducted on the interaction effects between nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium using the fertilization and yield data from the 14 treatment groups. Then, a ternary fertilizer effect function equation was fitted.

Y = 0.543 N ² 2.843 P ² 0.094 K ² + 385.613 N 270.732 P + 40.725 K 0.214 N P 0.460 N K + 1.526 P K + 75411.899 .

According to the ternary fertilizer effect equation, the maximum application amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium was 140.49, 73.33, and 472.26 kg hm−2, respectively. The calculated theoretical maximum yield was 102118.84 kg hm−2. When the levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were all 0, the constant term (theoretical blank area yield) was 75411.899 kg hm−2, which closely matched the actual yield of 76204.00 kg hm−2. This indicated that the fitting of the fertilizer effect function equation was relatively consistent with production reality, providing an objective reflection of the impact of combined fertilizer application on yield and fertilizer effects.

3.5.2 Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of tomato quality and yield

A relatively optimal fertilizer ratio was selected using principal component analysis for comprehensive analysis. The soluble sugar content, soluble protein content, soluble solid content, organic acid content, sugar acid ratio, vitamin C content, nitrate content, tomato lycopene content, and total yield of 14 tomato treatment groups were comprehensively evaluated to select a fertilizer ratio that would produce high-quality and high-yield tomatoes. First, the original data were standardized, and then the standardized values were analyzed to obtain the eigenvalues and contribution rates of the correlation matrix (Table 8). According to the principle that eigenvalues greater than 1 can be extracted, four principal components were identified with eigenvalues of 3.54, 1.85, 1.33, and 1.15 and variance contribution rates of 39.33, 20.53, 14.76, and 12.81%, respectively.

Table 8

Eigenvalues and variance contribution rates of principal component analysis

Component Total Initial eigenvalues Total Sum of squared loads
Percent variance Accumulation (%) Percent variance Accumulation (%)
1 3.54 39.33 39.33 3.54 39.33 39.33
2 1.85 20.53 59.85 1.85 20.53 59.85
3 1.33 14.76 74.61 1.33 14.76 74.61
4 1.15 12.81 87.42 1.15 12.81 87.42
5 0.57 6.28 93.70
6 0.23 2.54 96.24
7 0.17 1.88 98.12
8 0.09 0.99 99.11
9 0.08 0.89 100.00

F 1F 4 represent the scores of the four principal components, and the score coefficient equations for the four principal components are as follows:

F 1 = 0.4661 X 1 + 0.3922 X 2 + 0.4235 X 3 0.2976 X 4 + 0.3661 X 5 + 0.0409 X 6 0.3353 X 7 + 0.3189 X 8 + 0.1058 X 9 ,

F 2 = 0.0375 X 1 + 0.1905 X 2 + 0.217 X 3 + 0.3788 X 4 0.3964 X 5 0.0427 X 6 + 0.3376 X 7 + 0.3994 X 8 + 0.5825 X 9 ,

F 3 = 0.1336 X 1 0.2134 X 2 + 0.0833 X 3 + 0.3522 X 4 0.105 X 5 + 0.7244 X 6 0.4399 X 7 0.2091 X 8 + 0.1805 X 9 ,

F 4 = 0.2785 X 1 0.0699 X 2 0.3502 X 3 0.4201 X 4 + 0.353 X 5 + 0.4546 X 6 + 0.2599 X 7 + 0.2431 X 8 + 0.4006 X 9 .

The comprehensive score for each treatment was calculated based on the values of F 1, F 2, F 3, and F 4, as well as the weights of the contributions of each principal component.

F = 0.4498 F 1 + 0.2348 F 2 + 0.1689 F 3 + 0.1465 F 4 .

The nutritional quality and yield of 14 tomato treatments were comprehensively evaluated based on the F value. As shown in Table 9, the treatment with the highest comprehensive score was N2P2K1, followed by N2P2K2.

Table 9

Comprehensive score table of tomato nutrition quality and yield with different NPK ratios

Treatment F 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 F Ranking
N0P0K0 0.32 –3.03 –1.43 –0.47 –0.88 12
N0P2K2 –0.69 –1.12 2.09 –0.18 –0.25 8
N1P2K2 –2.28 1.98 0.98 –0.64 –0.49 10
N2P0K2 0.90 –1.65 1.36 0.74 0.35 5
N2P1K2 –3.46 0.79 –0.17 1.06 –1.24 14
N2P2K2 1.58 0.90 1.86 -0.04 1.23 2
N2P3K2 –0.20 –1.05 –0.78 1.93 –0.18 7
N2P2K0 1.03 –0.70 –0.05 –1.81 0.03 6
N2P2K1 4.43 1.01 0.21 0.46 2.33 1
N2P2K3 –1.23 –0.12 –0.20 1.56 –0.39 9
N3P2K2 –1.52 0.19 –0.51 –0.98 –0.87 11
N1P1K2 0.74 1.18 –0.64 –0.26 0.47 4
N1P2K1 –1.09 –0.19 –0.74 –1.74 –0.92 13
N2P1K1 1.47 1.81 –2.00 0.38 0.80 3

4 Discussion

Soil serves as the essential substrate for crop survival, with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium elements providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth and development. The physical and chemical properties of soil serve as crucial indicators for evaluating soil quality, directly reflecting its vitality and the status of nutrient supply. Excessive fertilization can decrease soil pH and increase EC values under experimental conditions, leading to soil acidification and increased soil salinity. This situation is not conducive to plant growth and development. The contents of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium increase with the application of increased amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers. This may be attributed to the incomplete absorption of fertilizers by plants. This not only hampers the tomato fruit yield and quality but also contributes to soil salinization and fertilizer wastage, consistent with the findings of previous studies [19].

Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium are essential for plant growth. Plant height and stem thickness serve as crucial indicators of tomato nutrition and growth. In this study, plants treated with N0P2K2 exhibited the largest plant height, whereas those treated with N2P0K2 had the largest leaf area. This suggested that the coordination between phosphorus and potassium led to taller plants without nitrogen fertilizer, and the coordination between nitrogen and potassium resulted in larger leaf areas without phosphorus fertilizer. This could be due to sufficient nitrogen in the soil, supporting the early growth of tomato plants. Plants treated with N2P1K1 displayed the largest stem thickness, whereas those treated with N2P3K2 had the smallest stem thickness. This indicated that excessive phosphorus fertilizer might not be conducive to the increase in stem thickness of tomatoes. Within a certain range, the application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers could promote plant growth. However, excessive amounts of any nutrient led to nutrient imbalance, resulting in no growth-promoting effect or even growth inhibition [20]. Studies showed that an appropriate combination of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers enhanced dry matter accumulation in potato tubers [21]. Similarly, this study revealed that plants treated with N2P1K1 exhibited the highest dry matter accumulation, and the interaction between nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium significantly affected dry matter accumulation in tomatoes.

The soluble protein, soluble sugar, soluble solids, organic acids, vitamin C, and lycopene in tomato fruits are vital quality indicators that directly influence the nutritional value, taste, and commercial value of tomatoes [22,23]. The quality of tomato fruits is influenced by various ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, and an optimal ratio can significantly improve it [24,25,26]. This study showed that an appropriate combination of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium effectively improved the nutritional quality of tomato fruits. Additionally, potassium fertilizer application increased the contents of soluble sugar, soluble solids, soluble protein, and lycopene in tomato fruits to varying degrees. These contents first increased and then decreased with the increase in potassium application, which was consistent with previous research findings [27]. Additionally, excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer and prolonged application significantly elevated the nitrate content in tomato fruits, exceeding the standard limit and posing health risks to consumers.

Fertilization plays a crucial role in boosting the tomato yield. Proper fertilization practices are essential for vegetable crops to achieve high yields and maintain quality standards [28]. In the experimental setup, the N2P1K1 treatment led to the highest yield, with the amount of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers being below the optimal level. The impact of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on the tomato yield follows the following order: nitrogen < phosphorus < potassium, suggesting that increasing potassium fertilizer application could effectively increase the tomato yield.

Some studies showed that the pumpkin yield increased first and then decreased with the increase in the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers, with recommended dosages of 390.5 kg for nitrogen fertilizer, 213.8 kg for phosphorus fertilizer, and 371.3 kg for potassium fertilizer per hectare for “Jianbao” pumpkin [29]. Similarly, studies on Angelica sinensis suggested the optimal fertilizer application amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers to be 81.15, 80.67, and 29.78 kg hm−2, respectively, resulting in a maximum seedling transplanting yield of 1932.52 kg hm−2 [15]. The ternary quadratic fertilizer function equation fitted in this “3414” fertilizer experiment expressed the relationship between the total tomato yield and the application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers. Based on this equation, the calculated application rate was 140.49 kg hm−2 for nitrogen fertilizer, 73.33 kg hm−2 for phosphorus fertilizer, and 472.26 kg hm−2 for potassium fertilizer, with a fertilizer ratio of 1:0.50:3.05. The highest expected yield was projected to be 102118.84 kg hm−2.

5 Conclusions

Fertilization significantly impacts both the quality and yield of tomatoes. Applying nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers in various proportions can enhance soil fertility, stimulate tomato plant growth, and augment both the quality and yield of tomatoes. A comprehensive analysis revealed that the most suitable fertilization treatment under the experimental environment and planting conditions was N2P2K1. Therefore, N2P2K1 was recommended as the optimal fertilization formula for producing high-quality and high-yield tomatoes in the experimental area, with the amount of nitrogen fertilizer being 197.28 kg hm−2, phosphorus fertilizer being 88.75 kg hm−2, and potassium fertilizer being 229.80 kg hm−2. This approach was conducive to achieving efficient and high-quality tomato production. However, the yield and quality of tomatoes were affected by various factors besides fertilization, necessitating further studies on other aspects.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project (20210202123NC).

  1. Funding information: This study was supported by the Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project (20210202123NC).

  2. Author contributions: C.W.: experimental design, execution, and writing first draft. X.H.: experimental design, execution, and data analysis. Y.C.: experimental design, data analysis, and manuscript writing and revision. X.W.: experimental design and data analysis. W.W.: experimental design and manuscript writing and revision.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Zhang PA, Li M, Fu Q, Singh VP, Du CZ, Liu D, et al. Dynamic regulation of the irrigation-nitrogen-biochar nexus for the synergy of yield, quality, carbon emission and resource use efficiency in tomato. J Integr Agric. 2024;23(2):680–97 (in Chinese).10.1016/j.jia.2023.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[2] Henrique PG, Rios GLD, Oliveira DMLP, Daleck KS, Marcos DAL, Cláudia AP. Increasing plant performance, fruit production and nutritional value of tomato through foliar applied rutin. Sci Hortic. 2022;294:110755.10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110755Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zhu JJ, Xu N, Siddiqu KHM, Zhang ZH, Niu WQ. Aerated drip irrigation improves water and nitrogen uptake efficiencies of tomato roots with associated changes in the antioxidant system. Sci Hortic. 2022;306:111471.10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111471Search in Google Scholar

[4] Meng QQ, Wu FL, Song JL, Wei M, Meng L, Li J, et al. Effects of drip irrigation frequency on the yield and nutrient utilization efficiency of tomato under long-season cultivation in solar greenhouse. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = J Appl Ecol. 2023;34(5):1297–304.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Han AH, Huang J, Wang X, Zhu ZY. Efficient water-saving irrigation, space efficiency and agricultural development – study based on spatial stochastic frontier model. J Syst Sci Complex. 2023;36(6):2559–79 (in Chinese).10.1007/s11424-023-1383-xSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Sunera A, Saddam S, Siraj U, Wajid Z, Fazal U, Asma A, et al. Characterization and phytostimulatory activity of bacteria isolated from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) rhizosphere. Microb Pathog. 2020;140:103966.10.1016/j.micpath.2020.103966Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Naeem M, Shahzad K, Saqib S, Shahzad A, Nasrullah, Younas M, et al. The Solanum melongena COP1LIKE manipulates fruit ripening and flowering time in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant Growth Regul. 2022;96:369–82.10.1007/s10725-021-00785-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chafai W, Haddioui K, Caid SH, Labazi HN, AlZain M, Noman O, et al. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal strains isolated from soil on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomato plants under different fertilization regimens. Horticulturae. 2023;9(9):973.10.3390/horticulturae9090973Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hubetr DM, Schneider RW. Suppressive soiles and plant disease. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society; 1982. p. 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Pan HY, Fisher KJ, Nichols MA. Fruit yield and maturity characteristics of processing tomatoes in response to drip irrigation. J Veg Crop Prod. 1999;5(1):13–29.10.1300/J068v05n01_03Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tang S, Zhou JJ, Pan WK, Sun T, Liu MJ, Tang R, et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers on tea (Camellia sinensis) growth and fungal community. Appl Soil Ecol. 2023;181:104661.10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104661Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ullah F, Saqib S, Khan W, Ayaz A, Batool A, Wang WY, et al. The multifaceted role of sodium nitroprusside in plants: crosstalk with phytohormones under normal and stressful conditions. Plant Growth Regul. 2024:1–18.10.1007/s10725-024-01128-ySearch in Google Scholar

[13] He DW, Li R, Feng ZQ, Li DY, Yang TG, Chen JR, et al. Effects of combined nitrogen and potassium application on cherry tomato production efficiency under deficit irrigation. Sci Hortic. 2024;328:112958.10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112958Search in Google Scholar

[14] Tariq L, Mohamed A, Younes A, Mehdi K, Abdelilah M, Mohamed M. Innovative formulations of phosphate glasses as controlled-release fertilizers to improve tomato crop growth, yield and fruit quality. Molecules (Basel, Switz). 2021;26(13):3928.10.3390/molecules26133928Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Cai ZP, Chen Y, Wang HX, Wang GX. The impact of the fertilization formula “3414“on the quality and product after planting of the greenhouse. J Residuals Sci Technol. 2016;13(8).Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bao SD. Soil analysis. 3rd edn. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang ZA, Chen ZY. Experimental techniques of plant physiology. Jilin, China: Jilin University Press; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zhang LF, Ding XL. Establishment of a new lycopene determination method. Food Ferment Ind. 2001;27(3):51–5 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ma DC, Teng WC, Mo YT, Yi B, Chen WL, Pang YP, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization on plant growth, element levels in plants and soil, and the relationships among nutrient concentrations, plant yield, and nutrient status in; Erythropalum scandens; (Blume). J Plant Nutr. 2024;47(1):82–96.10.1080/01904167.2023.2262504Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ma XM, Huang DC, Huang C, Tong YH, Yuan FY, Ma XX, et al. The Application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium regulate the growth and morphological development of torreya grandis (Taxaceae) Saplings. Horticulturae. 2023;9(11):1203.10.3390/horticulturae9111203Search in Google Scholar

[21] Li H, Yang XY, Kang YC, Li WL, Li HJ, Qin SH. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium combined fertilisation on the dry matter accumulation, distribution and yield of potato under ridge and furrow film mulch cropping. Potato Res. 2022;66(3):851–71.10.1007/s11540-022-09596-3Search in Google Scholar

[22] Fan YT, Li CY, Zhu J, Sun L, Huang R, Guo M, et al. Organic acids metabolism and GABA shunt involved in maintaining quality of Malus domestica by methyl jasmonate treatment. Food Res Int. 2022;160:111741.10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111741Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Xu WN, Wang PJ, Yuan LQ, Chen X, Hu XH. Effects of application methods of boron on tomato growth, fruit quality and flavor. Horticulturae. 2021;7(8):223–4.10.3390/horticulturae7080223Search in Google Scholar

[24] Woldemariam SH, Lal S, Zelelew DZ, Solomon MT. Effect of potassium levels on productivity and fruit quality of tomato (lycopersicon esculentum L.). J Agric Stud. 2018;6(1):102–15.10.5296/jas.v6i1.12262Search in Google Scholar

[25] Rahi AA, Anjum MA, Mirza JI. Integrated impact of micronutrients and potassium humate applications on growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato. Soil Environ. 2016;35(2):187–93.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Cosme CR, da Silva Dias N, Silva KM, Silva CV, de Queiroz ÍS, Rebougas TC, et al. Yield and quality of ‘gália’ melon grown in coconut fiber under different concentrations of macronutrients in the nutrient solution. Idesia. 2017;35(4):119–28.10.4067/S0718-34292017000400119Search in Google Scholar

[27] Li SX, Li SX, Zhang ZH, Zhang ZH, Zhang JQ, Zheng XQ, et al. Using mathematical models to study the influences of different ratios of chemical nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on the content of soluble protein, vitamin C, and soluble sugar in melon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(1):283.10.3390/ijerph20010283Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Holland KH, Schepers JS. Derivation of a variable rate nitrogen application model for in-season fertilization of corn. Agron J. 2010;102(5):1415–24.10.2134/agronj2010.0015Search in Google Scholar

[29] Chen Y, Zhou XZ, Lin YS, Ma LN. Pumpkin yield affected by soil nutrients and the interactions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers. HortScience. 2019;54(10):1831–5.10.21273/HORTSCI14152-19Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-19
Revised: 2024-05-10
Accepted: 2024-05-17
Published Online: 2024-06-28

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Biomedical Sciences
  2. Constitutive and evoked release of ATP in adult mouse olfactory epithelium
  3. LARP1 knockdown inhibits cultured gastric carcinoma cell cycle progression and metastatic behavior
  4. PEGylated porcine–human recombinant uricase: A novel fusion protein with improved efficacy and safety for the treatment of hyperuricemia and renal complications
  5. Research progress on ocular complications caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus and the function of tears and blepharons
  6. The role and mechanism of esketamine in preventing and treating remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia based on the NMDA receptor–CaMKII pathway
  7. Brucella infection combined with Nocardia infection: A case report and literature review
  8. Detection of serum interleukin-18 level and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and its clinical significance
  9. Ang-1, Ang-2, and Tie2 are diagnostic biomarkers for Henoch-Schönlein purpura and pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematous
  10. PTTG1 induces pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and promotes aerobic glycolysis by regulating c-myc
  11. Role of serum B-cell-activating factor and interleukin-17 as biomarkers in the classification of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features
  12. Effectiveness and safety of a mumps containing vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed mumps cases from 2002 to 2017: A meta-analysis
  13. Low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin predict an increased breast cancer risk and its underlying molecular mechanisms
  14. A case of Trousseau syndrome: Screening, detection and complication
  15. Application of the integrated airway humidification device enhances the humidification effect of the rabbit tracheotomy model
  16. Preparation of Cu2+/TA/HAP composite coating with anti-bacterial and osteogenic potential on 3D-printed porous Ti alloy scaffolds for orthopedic applications
  17. Aquaporin-8 promotes human dermal fibroblasts to counteract hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative damage: A novel target for management of skin aging
  18. Current research and evidence gaps on placental development in iron deficiency anemia
  19. Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2910829 in PDE4D is related to stroke susceptibility in Chinese populations: The results of a meta-analysis
  20. Pheochromocytoma-induced myocardial infarction: A case report
  21. Kaempferol regulates apoptosis and migration of neural stem cells to attenuate cerebral infarction by O‐GlcNAcylation of β-catenin
  22. Sirtuin 5 regulates acute myeloid leukemia cell viability and apoptosis by succinylation modification of glycine decarboxylase
  23. Apigenin 7-glucoside impedes hypoxia-induced malignant phenotypes of cervical cancer cells in a p16-dependent manner
  24. KAT2A changes the function of endometrial stromal cells via regulating the succinylation of ENO1
  25. Current state of research on copper complexes in the treatment of breast cancer
  26. Exploring antioxidant strategies in the pathogenesis of ALS
  27. Helicobacter pylori causes gastric dysbacteriosis in chronic gastritis patients
  28. IL-33/soluble ST2 axis is associated with radiation-induced cardiac injury
  29. The predictive value of serum NLR, SII, and OPNI for lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with internal mammary lymph nodes after thoracoscopic surgery
  30. Carrying SNP rs17506395 (T > G) in TP63 gene and CCR5Δ32 mutation associated with the occurrence of breast cancer in Burkina Faso
  31. P2X7 receptor: A receptor closely linked with sepsis-associated encephalopathy
  32. Probiotics for inflammatory bowel disease: Is there sufficient evidence?
  33. Identification of KDM4C as a gene conferring drug resistance in multiple myeloma
  34. Microbial perspective on the skin–gut axis and atopic dermatitis
  35. Thymosin α1 combined with XELOX improves immune function and reduces serum tumor markers in colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery
  36. Highly specific vaginal microbiome signature for gynecological cancers
  37. Sample size estimation for AQP4-IgG seropositive optic neuritis: Retinal damage detection by optical coherence tomography
  38. The effects of SDF-1 combined application with VEGF on femoral distraction osteogenesis in rats
  39. Fabrication and characterization of gold nanoparticles using alginate: In vitro and in vivo assessment of its administration effects with swimming exercise on diabetic rats
  40. Mitigating digestive disorders: Action mechanisms of Mediterranean herbal active compounds
  41. Distribution of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in Han and Uygur populations with breast cancer in Xinjiang, China
  42. VSP-2 attenuates secretion of inflammatory cytokines induced by LPS in BV2 cells by mediating the PPARγ/NF-κB signaling pathway
  43. Factors influencing spontaneous hypothermia after emergency trauma and the construction of a predictive model
  44. Long-term administration of morphine specifically alters the level of protein expression in different brain regions and affects the redox state
  45. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in the etiological diagnosis of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis
  46. Clinical diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of neurodyspepsia syndrome using intelligent medicine
  47. Case report: Successful bronchoscopic interventional treatment of endobronchial leiomyomas
  48. Preliminary investigation into the genetic etiology of short stature in children through whole exon sequencing of the core family
  49. Cystic adenomyoma of the uterus: Case report and literature review
  50. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a drug delivery mechanism
  51. Dynamic changes in autophagy activity in different degrees of pulmonary fibrosis in mice
  52. Vitamin D deficiency and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes: Big data insights
  53. Lactate-induced IGF1R protein lactylation promotes proliferation and metabolic reprogramming of lung cancer cells
  54. Meta-analysis on the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to treat malignant lymphoma
  55. Mitochondrial DNA drives neuroinflammation through the cGAS-IFN signaling pathway in the spinal cord of neuropathic pain mice
  56. Application value of artificial intelligence algorithm-based magnetic resonance multi-sequence imaging in staging diagnosis of cervical cancer
  57. Embedded monitoring system and teaching of artificial intelligence online drug component recognition
  58. Investigation into the association of FNDC1 and ADAMTS12 gene expression with plumage coloration in Muscovy ducks
  59. Yak meat content in feed and its impact on the growth of rats
  60. A rare case of Richter transformation with breast involvement: A case report and literature review
  61. First report of Nocardia wallacei infection in an immunocompetent patient in Zhejiang province
  62. Rhodococcus equi and Brucella pulmonary mass in immunocompetent: A case report and literature review
  63. Downregulation of RIP3 ameliorates the left ventricular mechanics and function after myocardial infarction via modulating NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway
  64. Evaluation of the role of some non-enzymatic antioxidants among Iraqi patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
  65. The role of Phafin proteins in cell signaling pathways and diseases
  66. Ten-year anemia as initial manifestation of Castleman disease in the abdominal cavity: A case report
  67. Coexistence of hereditary spherocytosis with SPTB P.Trp1150 gene variant and Gilbert syndrome: A case report and literature review
  68. Utilization of convolutional neural networks to analyze microscopic images for high-throughput screening of mesenchymal stem cells
  69. Exploratory evaluation supported by experimental and modeling approaches of Inula viscosa root extract as a potent corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in a 1 M HCl solution
  70. Imaging manifestations of ductal adenoma of the breast: A case report
  71. Gut microbiota and sleep: Interaction mechanisms and therapeutic prospects
  72. Isomangiferin promotes the migration and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
  73. Prognostic value and microenvironmental crosstalk of exosome-related signatures in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer
  74. Circular RNAs as potential biomarkers for male severe sepsis
  75. Knockdown of Stanniocalcin-1 inhibits growth and glycolysis in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells
  76. The expression and biological role of complement C1s in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  77. A novel GNAS mutation in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a with articular flexion deformity: A case report
  78. Predictive value of serum magnesium levels for prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing EGFR-TKI therapy
  79. HSPB1 alleviates acute-on-chronic liver failure via the P53/Bax pathway
  80. IgG4-related disease complicated by PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy: A case report
  81. Baculovirus-mediated endostatin and angiostatin activation of autophagy through the AMPK/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibits angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma
  82. Metformin mitigates osteoarthritis progression by modulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and enhancing chondrocyte autophagy
  83. Evaluation of the activity of antimicrobial peptides against bacterial vaginosis
  84. Atypical presentation of γ/δ mycosis fungoides with an unusual phenotype and SOCS1 mutation
  85. Analysis of the microecological mechanism of diabetic kidney disease based on the theory of “gut–kidney axis”: A systematic review
  86. Omega-3 fatty acids prevent gestational diabetes mellitus via modulation of lipid metabolism
  87. Refractory hypertension complicated with Turner syndrome: A case report
  88. Interaction of ncRNAs and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway: Implications for osteosarcoma
  89. Association of low attenuation area scores with pulmonary function and clinical prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  90. Long non-coding RNAs in bone formation: Key regulators and therapeutic prospects
  91. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP35 regulates the stability of NRF2 protein
  92. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential diagnostic markers for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding
  93. G protein-coupled receptor 1 participating in the mechanism of mediating gestational diabetes mellitus by phosphorylating the AKT pathway
  94. LL37-mtDNA regulates viability, apoptosis, inflammation, and autophagy in lipopolysaccharide-treated RLE-6TN cells by targeting Hsp90aa1
  95. The analgesic effect of paeoniflorin: A focused review
  96. Chemical composition’s effect on Solanum nigrum Linn.’s antioxidant capacity and erythrocyte protection: Bioactive components and molecular docking analysis
  97. Knockdown of HCK promotes HREC cell viability and inner blood–retinal barrier integrity by regulating the AMPK signaling pathway
  98. The role of rapamycin in the PINK1/Parkin signaling pathway in mitophagy in podocytes
  99. Laryngeal non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Report of four cases and review of the literature
  100. Clinical value of macrogenome next-generation sequencing on infections
  101. Overview of dendritic cells and related pathways in autoimmune uveitis
  102. TAK-242 alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy via inhibiting pyroptosis and TLR4/CaMKII/NLRP3 pathway
  103. Hypomethylation in promoters of PGC-1α involved in exercise-driven skeletal muscular alterations in old age
  104. Profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from effluents of Kolladiba and Debark hospitals
  105. The expression and clinical significance of syncytin-1 in serum exosomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients
  106. A histomorphometric study to evaluate the therapeutic effects of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles on the kidneys infected with Plasmodium chabaudi
  107. PGRMC1 and PAQR4 are promising molecular targets for a rare subtype of ovarian cancer
  108. Analysis of MDA, SOD, TAOC, MNCV, SNCV, and TSS scores in patients with diabetes peripheral neuropathy
  109. SLIT3 deficiency promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by modulating UBE2C/WNT signaling
  110. The relationship between TMCO1 and CALR in the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer and its effect on the metastasis of prostate cancer cells
  111. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K is a potential target for enhancing the chemosensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  112. PHB2 alleviates retinal pigment epithelium cell fibrosis by suppressing the AGE–RAGE pathway
  113. Anti-γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor autoimmune encephalitis with syncope as the initial symptom: Case report and literature review
  114. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome of Lonicera japonica cv. Damaohua
  115. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells regulate glutathione metabolism depending on the ERK–Nrf2–HO-1 signal pathway to repair phosphoramide mustard-induced ovarian cancer cells
  116. Electroacupuncture on GB acupoints improves osteoporosis via the estradiol–PI3K–Akt signaling pathway
  117. Renalase protects against podocyte injury by inhibiting oxidative stress and apoptosis in diabetic nephropathy
  118. Review: Dicranostigma leptopodum: A peculiar plant of Papaveraceae
  119. Combination effect of flavonoids attenuates lung cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting the STAT3 and FAK signaling pathway
  120. Renal microangiopathy and immune complex glomerulonephritis induced by anti-tumour agents: A case report
  121. Correlation analysis of AVPR1a and AVPR2 with abnormal water and sodium and potassium metabolism in rats
  122. Gastrointestinal health anti-diarrheal mixture relieves spleen deficiency-induced diarrhea through regulating gut microbiota
  123. Myriad factors and pathways influencing tumor radiotherapy resistance
  124. Exploring the effects of culture conditions on Yapsin (YPS) gene expression in Nakaseomyces glabratus
  125. Screening of prognostic core genes based on cell–cell interaction in the peripheral blood of patients with sepsis
  126. Coagulation factor II thrombin receptor as a promising biomarker in breast cancer management
  127. Ileocecal mucinous carcinoma misdiagnosed as incarcerated hernia: A case report
  128. Methyltransferase like 13 promotes malignant behaviors of bladder cancer cells through targeting PI3K/ATK signaling pathway
  129. The debate between electricity and heat, efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of liver cancer: A meta-analysis
  130. ZAG promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition by promoting lipid synthesis
  131. Baicalein inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation and mitigates placental inflammation and oxidative stress in gestational diabetes mellitus
  132. Impact of SWCNT-conjugated senna leaf extract on breast cancer cells: A potential apoptotic therapeutic strategy
  133. MFAP5 inhibits the malignant progression of endometrial cancer cells in vitro
  134. Major ozonated autohemotherapy promoted functional recovery following spinal cord injury in adult rats via the inhibition of oxidative stress and inflammation
  135. Axodendritic targeting of TAU and MAP2 and microtubule polarization in iPSC-derived versus SH-SY5Y-derived human neurons
  136. Differential expression of phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B and Toll-like receptor/nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathways in experimental obesity Wistar rat model
  137. The therapeutic potential of targeting Oncostatin M and the interleukin-6 family in retinal diseases: A comprehensive review
  138. BA inhibits LPS-stimulated inflammatory response and apoptosis in human middle ear epithelial cells by regulating the Nf-Kb/Iκbα axis
  139. Role of circRMRP and circRPL27 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  140. Investigating the role of hyperexpressed HCN1 in inducing myocardial infarction through activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway
  141. Characterization of phenolic compounds and evaluation of anti-diabetic potential in Cannabis sativa L. seeds: In vivo, in vitro, and in silico studies
  142. Quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis of breast Ki67 based on artificial intelligence
  143. Ecology and Environmental Science
  144. Screening of different growth conditions of Bacillus subtilis isolated from membrane-less microbial fuel cell toward antimicrobial activity profiling
  145. Degradation of a mixture of 13 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by commercial effective microorganisms
  146. Evaluation of the impact of two citrus plants on the variation of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) and beneficial phytoseiid mites
  147. Prediction of present and future distribution areas of Juniperus drupacea Labill and determination of ethnobotany properties in Antalya Province, Türkiye
  148. Population genetics of Todarodes pacificus (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the northwest Pacific Ocean via GBS sequencing
  149. A comparative analysis of dendrometric, macromorphological, and micromorphological characteristics of Pistacia atlantica subsp. atlantica and Pistacia terebinthus in the middle Atlas region of Morocco
  150. Macrofungal sporocarp community in the lichen Scots pine forests
  151. Assessing the proximate compositions of indigenous forage species in Yemen’s pastoral rangelands
  152. Food Science
  153. Gut microbiota changes associated with low-carbohydrate diet intervention for obesity
  154. Reexamination of Aspergillus cristatus phylogeny in dark tea: Characteristics of the mitochondrial genome
  155. Differences in the flavonoid composition of the leaves, fruits, and branches of mulberry are distinguished based on a plant metabolomics approach
  156. Investigating the impact of wet rendering (solventless method) on PUFA-rich oil from catfish (Clarias magur) viscera
  157. Non-linear associations between cardiovascular metabolic indices and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study in the US population (2017–2020)
  158. Knockdown of USP7 alleviates atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice by regulating EZH2 expression
  159. Utility of dairy microbiome as a tool for authentication and traceability
  160. Agriculture
  161. Enhancing faba bean (Vicia faba L.) productivity through establishing the area-specific fertilizer rate recommendation in southwest Ethiopia
  162. Impact of novel herbicide based on synthetic auxins and ALS inhibitor on weed control
  163. Perspectives of pteridophytes microbiome for bioremediation in agricultural applications
  164. Fertilizer application parameters for drip-irrigated peanut based on the fertilizer effect function established from a “3414” field trial
  165. Improving the productivity and profitability of maize (Zea mays L.) using optimum blended inorganic fertilization
  166. Application of leaf multispectral analyzer in comparison to hyperspectral device to assess the diversity of spectral reflectance indices in wheat genotypes
  167. Animal Sciences
  168. Knockdown of ANP32E inhibits colorectal cancer cell growth and glycolysis by regulating the AKT/mTOR pathway
  169. Development of a detection chip for major pathogenic drug-resistant genes and drug targets in bovine respiratory system diseases
  170. Exploration of the genetic influence of MYOT and MB genes on the plumage coloration of Muscovy ducks
  171. Transcriptome analysis of adipose tissue in grazing cattle: Identifying key regulators of fat metabolism
  172. Comparison of nutritional value of the wild and cultivated spiny loaches at three growth stages
  173. Transcriptomic analysis of liver immune response in Chinese spiny frog (Quasipaa spinosa) infected with Proteus mirabilis
  174. Disruption of BCAA degradation is a critical characteristic of diabetic cardiomyopathy revealed by integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis
  175. Plant Sciences
  176. Effect of long-term in-row branch covering on soil microorganisms in pear orchards
  177. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics, growth performance, and element concentrations reveal the calcicole–calcifuge behaviors of three Camellia species
  178. Transcriptome analysis reveals the mechanism of NaHCO3 promoting tobacco leaf maturation
  179. Bioinformatics, expression analysis, and functional verification of allene oxide synthase gene HvnAOS1 and HvnAOS2 in qingke
  180. Water, nitrogen, and phosphorus coupling improves gray jujube fruit quality and yield
  181. Improving grape fruit quality through soil conditioner: Insights from RNA-seq analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon roots
  182. Role of Embinin in the reabsorption of nucleus pulposus in lumbar disc herniation: Promotion of nucleus pulposus neovascularization and apoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells
  183. Revealing the effects of amino acid, organic acid, and phytohormones on the germination of tomato seeds under salinity stress
  184. Combined effects of nitrogen fertilizer and biochar on the growth, yield, and quality of pepper
  185. Comprehensive phytochemical and toxicological analysis of Chenopodium ambrosioides (L.) fractions
  186. Impact of “3414” fertilization on the yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes
  187. Exploring the coupling mode of water and fertilizer for improving growth, fruit quality, and yield of the pear in the arid region
  188. Metagenomic analysis of endophytic bacteria in seed potato (Solanum tuberosum)
  189. Antibacterial, antifungal, and phytochemical properties of Salsola kali ethanolic extract
  190. Exploring the hepatoprotective properties of citronellol: In vitro and in silico studies on ethanol-induced damage in HepG2 cells
  191. Enhanced osmotic dehydration of watermelon rind using honey–sucrose solutions: A study on pre-treatment efficacy and mass transfer kinetics
  192. Effects of exogenous 2,4-epibrassinolide on photosynthetic traits of 53 cowpea varieties under NaCl stress
  193. Comparative transcriptome analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings in response to copper stress
  194. An optimization method for measuring the stomata in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) under multiple abiotic stresses
  195. Fosinopril inhibits Ang II-induced VSMC proliferation, phenotype transformation, migration, and oxidative stress through the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway
  196. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Salsola imbricata methanolic extract and its phytochemical characterization
  197. Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  198. Absorbable calcium and phosphorus bioactive membranes promote bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation for bone regeneration
  199. New advances in protein engineering for industrial applications: Key takeaways
  200. An overview of the production and use of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin
  201. Research progress of nanoparticles in diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
  202. Bioelectrochemical biosensors for water quality assessment and wastewater monitoring
  203. PEI/MMNs@LNA-542 nanoparticles alleviate ICU-acquired weakness through targeted autophagy inhibition and mitochondrial protection
  204. Unleashing of cytotoxic effects of thymoquinone-bovine serum albumin nanoparticles on A549 lung cancer cells
  205. Erratum
  206. Erratum to “Investigating the association between dietary patterns and glycemic control among children and adolescents with T1DM”
  207. Erratum to “Activation of hypermethylated P2RY1 mitigates gastric cancer by promoting apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation”
  208. Retraction
  209. Retraction to “MiR-223-3p regulates cell viability, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting RHOB”
  210. Retraction to “A data mining technique for detecting malignant mesothelioma cancer using multiple regression analysis”
  211. Special Issue on Advances in Neurodegenerative Disease Research and Treatment
  212. Transplantation of human neural stem cell prevents symptomatic motor behavior disability in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease
  213. Special Issue on Multi-omics
  214. Inflammasome complex genes with clinical relevance suggest potential as therapeutic targets for anti-tumor drugs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  215. Gastroesophageal varices in primary biliary cholangitis with anti-centromere antibody positivity: Early onset?
Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2022-0893/html
Scroll to top button