Startseite An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial
Artikel Open Access

An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial

  • Fuzhang Wang , Muhammad Sohail EMAIL logo , Umar Nazir EMAIL logo , Essam R. El-Zahar , Choonkil Park EMAIL logo und Noman Jabbar
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. April 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the enhancement of thermal transportation in Carreau Yasuda liquid passed over a vertical surface in the presence of magnetic dipole. A mixture of tri-hybrid nanoparticles (Al 2 O 3 , MoS 3 , TiO 3 ) is inserted into the Carreau Yasuda liquid. The transport phenomenon of heat is derived in the presence of heat source/sink contribution. The concept boundary layer theory is engaged to derive the mathematical expression for momentum and energy in the form of coupled partial differential equations. The derivations are transformed into a set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with the help of suitable similarity transformation. These converted ODEs have been handled numerically via finite element method. The grid-independent analysis is established for 300 elements. The impact of numerous involved parameters on temperature and velocity solution is plotted and their contribution is recorded. Temperature profile is inclined versus the higher values of heat generation and viscous dissipation numbers while thermal layers are also increasing the behavior. A vital role of magnetic dipole is examined to raise the production of thermal layers but declination is noticed in flow profile.

Nomenclature

v , u

velocity components

ρ

fluid density

μ 0

magnetic permeability

H

magnetic field

Λ

Carreau Yasuda number

C p

specific heat

Q 0

heat source number

T

fluid temperature

u e

free stream velocity

β

ferrohydrodynamic interaction number

π

Pi

H b

component of magnetic field

We

Weissenberg number

λ

viscous dissipation number

φ 3 , φ 1 , φ 3

volume fractions

σ

electrical conductivity

Re

Reynolds number

a , b

space coordinates

P

pressure

M

magnetization

γ

strength of the magnetic dipole

d

fluid number

k

thermal conductivity

S 1

stretching ratio number

T w

wall temperature

ψ

trial shape function

H a

component of magnetic field

Thnf , f , bf

ternary hybrid nanofluid, fluid and base fluid

m

power law number

Pr

Prandtl number

ϵ

ratio parameter

H t

heat source number

Nu

Nusselt number

w 3 , w 2 , w 1

weight functions

1 Introduction

Numerous research works have been carried out on nanomaterials due to their wider applications in medicine, energy system and different industrial mechanisms. The involvement of nanoparticles has also been tested for the treatment of cancer. Researchers used these nanoparticle mixtures in different liquids to study the thermal performance. For instance, Shah et al. [1] worked on ecosystem by studying the inclusion of titanium dioxide particles. Khan et al. [2] examined the contribution of slip effects on Eyring–Powell liquid with heat transport in which graphene particles are mixed. The phenomenon of thin film is further discussed under time-dependent magnetic field. The flow-governing equations have been solved analytically via homotopic solution scheme. They noted the decline in temperature field against Prandtl number. Rehman et al. [3] numerically solved the magnetized non-Newtonian Casson model passed over a radial rotating stretching sheet. They handled the derived boundary layer transformed nonlinear set of differential equations via shooting scheme. They observed the decline in fluid velocity by mounting the values of slip parameter, Casson fluid parameter and magnetic parameter. Alobaid et al. [4] presented the experimental study of carbon-based nanoparticles to examine the degraded soil properties. Ali et al. [5] presented the involvement of thermal radiation and heat generation for the stagnation point flow of viscous liquid past over a stretching cylinder by including the involvement of Brownian motion and thermophoresis. They used shooting scheme to solve the coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in unbounded domain. They recorded the decline in velocity against the mounting values of curvature parameter and also the decrease in temperature field is monitored against Prandtl number and radiation parameter. Boarescu et al. [6] scrutinized the involvement of nanomaterials in making the different medicines and drugs. Pop et al. [7] presented the experimental survey by considering the involvement of nanoparticles in nerve injury treatment. Iacoviță et al. [8] examined the involvement of silica nanoparticles to study the cancer cells in human body. Swain et al. [9] studied MWCNT/Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluid past over an exponentially stretched porous sheet under slip boundary conditions and chemical reaction. They considered the influence of radiation and heat generations in energy equation. They solved the system of nonlinear transformed ODEs via BVP4C procedure in MATLAB computational package. They noticed the decrease in velocity, temperature and concentration fields against slip parameter. Furthermore, they monitored the enhancement in heat transfer rate against Prandtl number. Gul and Firdous [10] presented the experimental, theoretical and analytical investigation to discuss the comportment of graphene nanoparticles in water and the flow is produced due to the rotation of disks. They presented the convergence and error analysis. They have shown the rise in fluid velocity against Reynolds number. Tassaddiq et al. [11] studied the hybrid nanofluid flow between rotating disks and established the analytical solution. They have considered the involvement of viscous dissipation in energy equation. They noticed the decline in velocity for magnetic parameter. Also, they observed that against volume fraction, temperature field increases but concentration profile decreases. Shafiq et al. [12] studied bio-convective and buoyancy-driven flow phenomena for second-grade liquid with chemical reaction. They solved the resulting equations numerically. They noticed the enhancement in motile density profile against thermophoresis parameter, whereas reverse behavior is recorded for Pecklet number. Nisar et al. [13] studied the inclusion of gold nanoparticles in micro-polar liquid past over a stretched sheet. They computed the numerical solution for coupled nonlinear transformed ODEs. Khan et al. [14] examined the involvement of nanoparticles in bio-convective flow of modified second-grade liquid. They used shooting approach to solve the transformed modeled ODEs. They found the decrease in motile density profile against Lewis number. Waqas et al. [15] studied numerically the flow of nanoparticles past over a slandering surface under radiation effect. Some important contributions are reported in refs [16,17,18,19] and references therein. Sadat et al. [20] performed the model based on 3D Euler equations using invariant solution and lie symmetry study in view of incompressible flow via cylindrical coordinates. Mousa et al. [21] investigated MHD convection in square cavities using localized heating approach. Ali et al. [22] used a new wavelet approach to solve boundary value problems based on adiabatic tubular chemical reactor theory. Sabir et al. [23] simulated fourth-order nonlinear system using Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation approach. Baleanu et al. [24] studied the role of nanoparticles containing carbon nanotubes in base fluid called engine oil toward a rotating disc. Khan et al. [25] captured the features of activation energy in non-Newtonian liquid considering nanoparticles in the presence of chemical reaction. Khan et al. [26] discussed the thermal performance of heat energy using non-Fourier’s theory in Williamson liquid containing nanoparticles in the presence of slip conditions toward a porous medium. Khan et al. [27] simulated numerical consequences of ferro-fluid using slip conditions in the presence of Darcy–Forchheimer law over a porous surface. Khan et al. [28] derived a mathematical model in terms of hyperbolic tangent liquid involving consequences of heat energy and mass diffusion via chemical reaction. Hayat et al. [29] investigated energy transfer model using the role of thermal radiation in heated cylinder. They simulated a numerical study of various parameters on heat energy and flow. Khan et al. [30] discussed consequences of heat energy in second-grade liquid using activation energy in heated channel. Wang et al. [31] studied the numerical aspects of energy in Oldroyd-B liquid under action of thermal radiation involving homogeneous–heterogeneous considering heat generation. Qayyum et al. [32] developed a model related to five nanoparticles into base fluid using Joule heating considering slip conditions in heated disc. Hayat et al. [33] studied consequences based on ferromagnetic-containing nanoparticles in Maxwell fluid. Bhatti et al. [34] derived consequences of fluid particle motion and energy transfer in heated asymmetric tapered channel. Bhatti and Abdelsalam [35] captured the features of thermodynamic entropy analysis in Ree–Eyring liquid using irreversibility process. Elkoumy et al. [36] studied the aspects of magnetic field in Maxwell fluid in the presence of Hall effects over a porous surface. Abdelsalam et al. [37] studied the role of electro-magnetivity in swimming sperms using cervical canal. Eldesoky et al. [38] investigated thermal performance in conjunction using slip conditions via catheterized pipe. Bhatti et al. [39] derived consequences of hybrid nanoparticles to enhance thermal energy effect under the action of magnetic field. Mekheimer et al. [40] investigated the thermal performance of nanoparticles in drug delivery and blood hemodynamics. Kalaivanan et al. [41] derived the thermal aspects of activation energy and elastic deformation in second-grade liquid inserting nanoparticles. Ganesh et al. [42] simulated numerical consequences of energy transfer in Newtonian liquid using conditions of thermal slip in porous surface. Ganesh et al. [43] performed model of Casson liquid containing carbon nanotube nanofluid in heated wavy enclosure involving thermal radiations. Ganesh et al. [44] studied the performance of nanofluid in Casson material in the presence of Buoyancy-driven convection in parallel hot/cold fins. Ganesh et al. [45] investigated the impacts of second-grade liquid inserting nanoparticles in the occurrence of activation energy in a catalytic surface.

An extensive research has been conducted on nanoparticles so far due to their wider applications and utilization. This research is conducted in the presence of magnetic dipole for the inclusion of ternary hybrid nanoparticle mixture in Carreau Yasuda liquid, and numerical computation is performed by using finite element method (FEM) tool in MAPLE18.0 package. The influence of different emerging parameters has been displayed and discussed.

2 Mathematical analysis

A 2D heat transfer model is carried out in Carreau Yasuda liquid past a stretching surface. A Carreau Yasuda liquid is immersed along with base fluid based on engine oil. Three kinds of nanoparticles (aluminum oxide, MoS2 and TiO2) are inserted into base liquid as shown in Figure 1. A wall is considered as stretchable to bring motion into fluid particles. A magnetic dipole is considered while the center related to magnetic dipole is placed at the horizontal direction. The flow development is assumed by Figure 2. Transfer of heat energy is considered as absorption and generation into fluid particles. A set of partial differential equations [46,47] is modeled using considerations.

(1) u a + v b = 0 ,

(2) ρ Thnf u u a + v u b = P a + μ 0 M H a + ν hnf 2 u b 2 + ( Λ ) d m 1 d ( d + 1 ) 2 u b 2 u b d ,

(3) ( ρ C p ) Thnf u T a + v T b + u H a + v H b μ 0 T M T = K Thnf 2 T b 2 + Q 0 ( T T ) .

Figure 1 
               Mixture of nanoparticles resulting in tri-hybrid nanoparticles.
Figure 1

Mixture of nanoparticles resulting in tri-hybrid nanoparticles.

Figure 2 
               Geometry of developed model.
Figure 2

Geometry of developed model.

Figure 2 captures the behavior of developed model. It is mentioned that horizontal surface is assumed where a -axis is taken along the horizontal direction and b -axis is considered along the vertical direction. The motion into fluidic particles is produced using movement of wall. Moreover, direction of magnetic dipole is visualized along a -axis due to an implication of magnetic dipole. Boundary conditions [46,47] are

(4) u = s a , v = 0 , T = T w , u = 0 , T T .

Required scalar potential via magnetic field [46,47] is given as

(5) β = δ 2 π a a 2 + ( b + d ) 2 .

Components of magnetic inductions are

(6) H a = δ a = δ 2 π a ( b + d ) 2 { a 2 + ( b + d ) 2 } 2 ,

(7) H b = δ b = δ 2 π 2 a ( b + d ) { a 2 + ( b + d ) 2 } 2 .

Magnitude of magnetic induction is

(8) H = δ b 2 + δ a 2 12 .

Using Binomial series and expanding it up to a 2 ,

(9) H b = δ b 2 ( b + d ) 3 + 4 a 2 ( b + d ) 5 , H a = δ b 2 a ( b + d ) 4 .

Transformations [46,47] are defined as

(10) u = s a f ' , v = ( s ν f ) 1 2 f , θ = T T T T w , η = b s b 1 2 .

A set of dimensionless ODEs with boundary conditions [46,47] is derived as (Table 1)

(11) f ' ' ' + ( We ) d ( m 1 ) ( d + 1 ) d f ' ' ' ( f ' ' ) d ν Thnf ν f f ' f ' f f ' ' + θ ρ f 2 β ( η + γ ) 4 f ' ( 0 ) = 1 , f ' ( ) = 0 , f ( 0 ) = 0 , ,

(12) θ ' ' + ( ρ C p ) Thnf k f ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf Pr [ f θ ' 2 f ' θ ] + ( ρ C p ) Thnf k f ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf λ 2 β f ( θ ϵ ) ( η + γ ) 3 k f k Thnf 4 λ ( 1 ϕ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 3 ) 2.5 ( f ' ' ) 2 + k f k Thnf Pr H t θ = 0 , θ ( 0 ) = 1 , θ ( ) = 0 .

Table 1

Thermal properties of hybrid nanoparticles with base fluid [48,49]

k σ ρ
Engine oil 0.144 0.125 × 10 11 884
Aluminum oxide 32.9 5.96 × 10 7 6,310
Titanium dioxide 8.953 2.4 × 10 6 4,250
Silicon dioxide 1.4013 3.5 × 10 6 2,270

It is noticed that Eqs. (11)–(12) are known as non-Newtonian model in the presence of occurrence of Carreau Yasuda liquid. The present non-Newtonian study is reduced into a case of Newtonian model considering We = 0 and β = 0 .

The correlations for ternary hybrid nanoparticles [48 and 49] are

(13) ρ Thnf = ( 1 φ 1 ) { ( 1 φ 2 ) [ ( 1 φ 3 ) ρ f + φ 3 ρ 3 ] + φ 2 ρ 2 } + φ 1 ρ 1 ,

(14) μ f ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 , K h n f K n f = K 2 + 2 K n f 2 φ 1 ( K n f K 2 ) K 2 + 2 K n f + φ 2 ( K n f K 2 ) ,

(15) K T h n f K h n f = K 1 + 2 K h n f 2 φ 1 ( K h n f K 1 ) K 1 + 2 K h n f + φ 1 ( K h n f K 1 ) , K n f K f = K 3 + 2 K f 2 φ 3 ( K f K 3 ) K 3 + 2 K f + φ 3 ( K f K 3 ) ,

(16) σ T n f σ h n f = σ 1 ( 1 + 2 φ 1 ) φ h n f ( 1 2 φ 1 ) σ 1 ( 1 φ 1 ) + σ h n f ( 1 + φ 1 ) , σ h n f σ n f = σ 2 ( 1 + 2 φ 2 ) + φ n f ( 1 2 φ 2 ) σ 2 ( 1 φ 2 ) + σ n f ( 1 + φ 2 ) ,

(17) σ n f σ f = σ 3 ( 1 + 2 φ 3 ) + φ f ( 1 2 φ 3 ) σ 3 ( 1 φ 3 ) + σ f ( 1 + φ 3 ) .

Drag force coefficient of Carreau Yasuda liquid is formulated as

(18) ( Re ) 1 2 C f = m 1 d We 2 ( f ' ' ( 0 ) ) d + 1 f ' ' ( 0 ) ( 1 φ 3 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 φ 1 ) 2.5 .

Rate of heat transfer in the presence of tri-hybrid nanoparticles is

(19) ( Re ) 0.5  Nu = k f k Thnf θ ' ( 0 ) .

3 Finite element approach

A strong numerical approach based on FEM is implemented to simulate numerical results of ODEs along with boundary conditions. An FEM is used to conduct the solutions of various CDD problems. It has the capacity to handle complex geometries as well as various types of boundary conditions. Six steps of FEMs are discussed below, while six steps are mentioned in Figure 3. An FEM is observed as a good method in view of accuracy analysis, convergence analysis and stability analysis rather than other numerical methods. The following advantages of implementing FEM are as follows.

  • Numerous applications of FEM are investigated in computational fluid mechanics problems;

  • Complex types of geometries are tackled by FEM;

  • Physical problems based on applied science are developed by FEM;

  • It has the ability to discretize the derivatives with very ease;

  • An important role of FEM is to solve various types of boundary conditions;

  • FEM requires low investment and time rather than other numerical techniques.

Figure 3 
               Steps related to FEM.
Figure 3

Steps related to FEM.

Step I: Domain discretization

The first step is about domain discretization of problem domain. Domain is broken into small elements of up to 300 elements. Three hundred elements are enough to simulate the solution of current analysis. It is noticed that a system of ODEs is called strong form, whereas weak form is achieved via the residual method.

Step II: Selection of shape function

A significant role of shape functions is used to obtain approximation solution of current analysis. Various types of shape functions are used in finite element procedure. In this procedure, linear kind of shape functions is used. The desired form of shape functions is defined as

(20) ψ j = ( 1 ) j 1 η + η j 1 η j + η j + 1 , i = 1 , 2 .

Step III: Weak formulation

Eqs. (12)–(14) are known as strong form along with boundary conditions. In this procedure, weak forms are needed to achieve approximation solution. Collection of all terms is placed on one side and integrated over 300 elements. The desired residuals of present problems are derived as

(21) η e η e + 1 w 1 ( F ' S ) d η = 0 ,

(22) η e η e + 1 w 2 S + ( W e ) d ( m 1 ) ( d + 1 ) d S ( S ' ) d ν Thnf ν f ( S 2 + f S ' θ ρ f 2 β ( η + γ ) 4 ) d η = 0 ,

(23) η e η e + 1 w 3 θ + ( ρ C p ) THnf k f ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf [ f θ ' 2 S θ ] + ( ρ C p ) THnf k f ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf λ 2 β f ( θ ϵ ) ( η + γ ) 3 k f k Thnf Pr H t θ + k f k Thnf EcPr ( 1 ϕ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 3 ) 2.5 ( S ' ) 2 + k f k Thnf ( S ' ) 2 d η = 0 .

Step IV: Finite element formulation

In this step, stiffness elements are obtained from current problem. Finally, global stiffness matrices are achieved over each element. The stiffness elements are derived as

(24) K i j 13 = 0 , K i j 11 = η e η e + 1 d ψ j d η ψ i d η , K i j 12 = η e η e + 1 ( ψ j ψ i ) d η , B i 1 = 0 ,

(25) K i j 22 = η e η e + 1 d ψ i d η d ψ j d η ( We ) d ( m 1 ) ( d + 1 ) d ( S ' ¯ ) d d ψ i d η d ψ j d η ν Thnf ν f ( S ¯ ψ i ψ j + f ¯ ψ i d ψ j d η ) d η ,

(26) K i j 21 = 0 , K i j 23 = η e η e + 1 ν Thnf ν f θ ρ f 2 β ( η + γ ) 4 d η , B i 2 = 0 , K i j 31 = 0 , B i 3 = 0 ,

(27) K i j 33 = η e + 1 η e d ψ i d η d ψ j d η + k f ( ρ C p ) THnf ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf f ¯ ψ i d ψ j d η 2 S ¯ ψ i ψ j + k f k Thnf Pr H t ψ i ψ j + ( ρ C p ) THnf k f ( ρ C p ) f k Thnf λ 2 β f ( ϵ ) ( η + γ ) 3 ψ i ψ j d η ,

(28) K i j 32 = η e + 1 η e k f k Thnf 4 λ ( 1 ϕ 2 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 1 ) 2.5 ( 1 ϕ 3 ) 2.5 S ' ¯ ψ i d ψ j d η + k f k Thnf S ' ¯ ψ i d ψ j d η d η .

Step V: Assembly process

Assembly process is an integral part of FEM. Stiffness matrices are formulated using concept of assembly approach.

Step VI: Solution of algebraic equations

Finally, a system of linear algebraic equations is numerically solved within computational tolerance ( 10 5 ). The stopping condition is listed below. Flow chart of finite element procedure is given in Figure 4. Furthermore, validation of numerical results in terms of Nusselt number is shown in Table 3. Moreover, programming of FEM is designed on MAPLE 18. Homemade code regarding FEM is developed using MAPLE 18, whereas this code is tested with already published studies.

(29) δ i + 1 δ i δ i < 10 5 .

Figure 4 
               Flow chart via FEM.
Figure 4

Flow chart via FEM.

3.1 Mesh-free study

The convergence of problem is investigated through investigation of mesh-free. It is noticed that the present problem becomes grid independent by observing 300 elements. The outcomes of velocity and temperature profiles against 30–300 elements are recorded in Table 2. The convergence of problem is achieved by observing 300 elements. It is included that numerical as well as graphical study is simulated via 300 elements.

Table 2

Simulations of temperature and velocity at mid of each 300 elements [47,49]

Number of elements f ' η 2 θ η 2
30 0.3830450314 0.3240812858
60 0.3833760528 0.2922311857
90 0.3831603611 0.2819022485
120 0.3829500648 0.2768517260
150 0.3827836469 0.2738692845
180 0.3826538369 0.2719045859
210 0.3825512827 0.2705127850
240 0.3824686218 0.2694762872
270 0.3824008552 0.2686761587
300 0.3823104321 0.2683721231

3.2 Validation of numerical results

Table 3 is prepared to investigate the numerical results of present problem with already published work [46] considering Ec = H t = λ = γ = β = 0 . It is noticed that numerical results of current analysis are simulated by FEM while published results are derived by optimal homotopy analysis method (OHAM) analysis method. It is observed that good comparison is investigated. Moreover, [0, 8] is considered as computational domain and computational domain is taken as η max = 8 while η max is based on asymptotic boundary conditions where η is satisfied.

Table 3

Validation of Nusselt number when H t = λ = γ = β = 0 .

Pr Nadeem et al. [46] Present problem
OHAM results FEM results
0.72 0.808641 0.80855192
1.0 1.000000 1.00000000
3.0 1.923690 1.92394013
4.0 2.003170 2.00300358

4 Results and discussion

A developing model is analyzed inserting heat generation and heat absorption phenomena in Carreau Yasuda martial past a stretching surface. A role of magnetic dipole is implemented toward stretching surface. A viscous dissipation effect is added into heat energy. Such complex-type model is handled with the help of FEM. Graphical simulations and tables are tabulated, whereas graphical discussion of heat energy and velocity fields versus physical parameters is listed below. Here, base fluid is considered as engine oil in ternary hybrid nanofluid. Numerical value of Prandtl fluid [50] is taken as Pr = 6,450 .

4.1 Graphical simulations of velocity field

A variation in β , We and m is observed against velocity curves inserting ternary hybrid nanomaterials, whereas these simulations are noticed by Figures 57. Figure 5 is prepared to notice variation in velocity curves versus the implication of β . A role of β appeared because of magnetic dipole, while a magnetic dipole is applied at the surface of wall. It is noticed that a magnetic dipole attracts fluid particles at the surface of wall and this attraction of fluid particles toward magnetic dipole creates frictional force among particles and layers. So, this attraction force is the reason for slow down velocity of fluid particles. Therefore, it is included that velocity curves have decreasing function against implication of β . This graph is studied for a case without dipole and presence of magnetic dipole. It is investigated that ferrohydrodynamic interaction number is a dimensionless parameter. The viscosity of fluid is enhanced when ferrohydrodynamic interaction parameter is increased. Physically, viscous force is produced into motion via fluid particles. Moreover, thermal layer thickness is reduced using argument values of β . An influence of We on velocity curves using ternary hybrid nanoparticles is carried out by Figure 6. Physically, a ratio among viscous force and elastic force makes a Weissenberg number. It is visualized that an increment in We results in increment in viscosity of fluid particles. Hence, fluid becomes significantly vicious when We is increased. Moreover, layers of momentum boundary are also decreasing against higher values of We. The Weissenberg number is a dimensionless parameter, which appeared due to occurrence of Carreau Yasuda liquid in the present problem. The present analysis is called non-Newtonian model in the presence of Carreau Yasuda liquid. Figure 7 is plotted to know variation in velocity curves versus implication of power law number. A power law parameter is used to characterize the behavior of fluid category among layers. It is noticed that m is a dimensionless number which appeared due to occurrence of Carreau Yasuda liquid. Momentum boundary layers have less thickness when m is increased. A frictional force is generated among momentum layers, whereas frictional force makes fluid more thick. Furthermore, flow over surface is decreased versus higher values of We

Figure 5 
                  Variation in velocity curves versus 
                        
                           
                           
                              β
                           
                           \beta 
                        
                      when 
                        
                           
                           
                              P
                              r
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              m
                              =
                              0.3
                              ,
                              
                              d
                              =
                              0.1
                              ,
                              
                              λ
                              =
                              1.2
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                              =
                              −
                              1.3
                           
                           Pr=6450,m=0.3,\hspace{.2em}d=0.1,\hspace{.2em}\lambda =1.2,\hspace{.2em}{H}_{t}=-1.3
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                           
                           {\epsilon }=0.4,\gamma =1.4,
                        
                      
                     
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              
                              W
                              e
                              =
                              2.0
                              .
                           
                           {\varphi }_{1}=0.003,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{3}=0.94,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\hspace{.25em}We=2.0.
Figure 5

Variation in velocity curves versus β when P r = 6450 , m = 0.3 , d = 0.1 , λ = 1.2 , H t = 1.3 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 , φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , W e = 2.0 .

Figure 6 
                  Variation in velocity curves versus 
                        
                           
                           
                              W
                              e
                           
                           We
                        
                      when 
                        
                           
                           
                              Pr
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              m
                              =
                              0.5
                              ,
                              
                              d
                              =
                              0.7
                              ,
                              
                              λ
                              =
                              1.3
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                              =
                              1.5
                           
                           \text{Pr}=6450,m=0.5,\hspace{.25em}d=0.7,\hspace{.25em}\lambda =1.3,\hspace{.25em}{H}_{t}=1.5
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              2.4
                              ,
                           
                           {\epsilon }=0.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =2.4,
                        
                      
                     
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              
                              β
                              =
                              3.0
                              .
                           
                           {\varphi }_{1}=0.003,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{3}=0.94,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\hspace{.25em}\beta =3.0.
Figure 6

Variation in velocity curves versus W e when Pr = 6450 , m = 0.5 , d = 0.7 , λ = 1.3 , H t = 1.5 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 2.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 , φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , β = 3.0 .

Figure 7 
                  Variation in velocity curves versus 
                        
                           
                           
                              m
                           
                           m
                        
                      when 
                        
                           
                           
                              Pr
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              d
                              =
                              0.7
                              ,
                              
                              β
                              =
                              1.3
                              ,
                              
                              λ
                              =
                              1.2
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                              =
                              −
                              1.3
                           
                           \text{Pr}=6450,d=0.7,\hspace{.25em}\beta =1.3,\hspace{.25em}\lambda =1.2,\hspace{.25em}{H}_{t}=-1.3
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              ϵ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                           
                           {\epsilon }=1.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =1.4,
                        
                      
                     
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                              ,
                              
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              
                              We
                              =
                              4.0
                              .
                           
                           {\varphi }_{1}=0.003,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{3}=0.94,\hspace{.25em},\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\hspace{.25em}\text{We}=4.0.
Figure 7

Variation in velocity curves versus m when Pr = 6450 , d = 0.7 , β = 1.3 , λ = 1.2 , H t = 1.3 , ϵ = 1.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 , φ 3 = 0.94 , , φ 1 = 0.057 , We = 4.0 .

4.2 Graphical simulations of temperature field

Figures 811 are plotted to notice the behavior of heat energy versus β , H t and Ec, while Figure 9 shows the comparison of tri-hybrid nanoparticles, fluid, nanofluid and hybrid nanomaterials. Increase is investigated into heat energy when β is increased. Appearance of β is occurred using the strength of magnetic dipole. A magnetic dipole is used to slow down velocity in particles. It is predicted that higher values of β lead to enhanced thermal energy in fluid particles. This effect occurred due to interaction of magnetic field and nanoparticles. So, a frictional heating phenomenon is enhanced in fluid particles because of interaction of magnetic field in fluid particles. Thickness regarding thermal layers is declined versus argument numerical values of β . Physically, it is a dimensionless parameter which is based on the strength of magnetic dipole. Hence, fluid particles absorbed more heat energy when β is increased. Figure 8 is developed to characterize thermal energy among fluid layers, hybrid nanoparticles layers, nanofluid layers and tri-hybrid nanofluid layers. Figure 8 is most significant visualization among layers using hybrid nanoparticles, nanofluid and tri-hybrid nanofluid. It is concluded that tri-hybrid nanoparticles (mixture of TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 in engine oil) are observed to be most significant among fluid layers for the development of more heat energy rather than heat energy is manufactured for nanofluid, fluid and hybrid nanofluid. Hence, maximum amount of heat energy is achieved for the case of tri-hybrid nanomaterials. Figure 10 exhibits an effect of heat generation parameter on temperature field. Maximum production in thermal energy is generated when external heat source is implemented at the surface of wall. Physically, it happened due to the occurrence of external heat source. It is noticed that two kinds of heat phenomena occurred based on heat absorption and heat generation. Heat absorption is based on H t < 0 , whereas heat generation is based on H t > 0 . For both cases, heat energy is augmented by implanted higher values of H t because external heat source is placed at wall. Basically, viscous dissipation number is observed as dimensionless parameter based on viscous dissipation. In energy equation, viscous dissipation parameter appeared in viscous dissipation term. So, a directly proportional relation is investigated among heat energy and viscous dissipation number. Hence, large values of viscous dissipation number bring more enhancements in heat energy. An influence of viscous dissipation number on temperature field is shown in Figure 11. Heat energy is boosted against implication of viscous dissipation.

Figure 8 
                  Variation in temperature curves versus 
                        
                           
                           
                              β
                           
                           \beta 
                        
                      when 
                        
                           
                           
                              Pr
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              m
                              =
                              0.3
                              ,
                              
                              d
                              =
                              0.2
                              ,
                              
                              β
                              =
                              1.7
                              ,
                              
                              λ
                              =
                              1.2
                           
                           \text{Pr}=6450,m=0.3,\hspace{.25em}d=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\beta =1.7,\hspace{.25em}\lambda =1.2
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                              =
                              −
                              1.6
                              ,
                              
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                           
                           \hspace{.25em}{H}_{t}=-1.6,\hspace{.25em}{\epsilon }=0.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =1.4,
                        
                      
                     
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                           
                           {\varphi }_{1}=0.003,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{3}=0.94
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              
                              We
                              =
                              3.0
                              .
                           
                           \hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\hspace{.25em}\text{We}=3.0.
Figure 8

Variation in temperature curves versus β when Pr = 6450 , m = 0.3 , d = 0.2 , β = 1.7 , λ = 1.2 , H t = 1.6 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 , φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , We = 3.0 .

Figure 9 
                  Comparative performance of temperature curves in fluid, hybrid nanofluid, tri-hybrid nanomaterials and hybrid nanofluid.
Figure 9

Comparative performance of temperature curves in fluid, hybrid nanofluid, tri-hybrid nanomaterials and hybrid nanofluid.

Figure 10 
                  Variation in temperature curves versus 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                           
                           {H}_{t}
                        
                      when 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                              ,
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              
                              We
                              =
                              4.0
                           
                           {\varphi }_{3}=0.94,{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\hspace{.2em}\text{We}=4.0
                        
                     . 
                        
                           
                           
                              Pr
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              
                              m
                              =
                              0.3
                              ,
                              
                              d
                              =
                              0.3
                              ,
                              
                              β
                              =
                              1.3
                           
                           \text{Pr}=6450,\hspace{.2em}m=0.3,\hspace{.2em}d=0.3,\hspace{.2em}\beta =1.3
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                              λ
                              =
                              4.2
                              ,
                              
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              .
                           
                           \hspace{.25em}\lambda =4.2,\hspace{.25em}{\epsilon }=0.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =1.4,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.003.
Figure 10

Variation in temperature curves versus H t when φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , We = 4.0 . Pr = 6450 , m = 0.3 , d = 0.3 , β = 1.3 , λ = 4.2 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 .

Figure 11 
                  Variation in temperature curves versus Ec when 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.94
                              ,
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.057
                              ,
                              Pr
                              =
                              6450
                              ,
                              
                           
                           {\varphi }_{3}=0.94,{\varphi }_{1}=0.057,\text{Pr}=6450,\hspace{.25em}
                        
                      
                     
                        
                           
                           
                              d
                              =
                              0.1
                              ,
                              
                              β
                              =
                              1.3
                              ,
                              
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              ,
                              β
                              =
                              1.3
                           
                           d=0.1,\hspace{.25em}\beta =1.3,\hspace{.25em}{\epsilon }=0.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =1.4,{\varphi }_{1}=0.003,\beta =1.3
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                              
                                 
                                    H
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                 
                              
                              =
                              −
                              1.3
                              ,
                              
                              ϵ
                              =
                              0.4
                              ,
                              
                              γ
                              =
                              1.4
                              ,
                              
                              
                                 
                                    φ
                                 
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                              
                              =
                              0.003
                              .
                           
                           \hspace{.25em}{H}_{t}=-1.3,\hspace{.25em}{\epsilon }=0.4,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =1.4,\hspace{.25em}{\varphi }_{1}=0.003.
Figure 11

Variation in temperature curves versus Ec when φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , Pr = 6450 , d = 0.1 , β = 1.3 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 , β = 1.3 , H t = 1.3 , ϵ = 0.4 , γ = 1.4 , φ 1 = 0.003 .

4.3 Aspects of Nusselt number and skin friction coefficient against various parameters

Table 4 is tabulated to sketch the effects of Nusselt number and skin friction coefficient against variation in Weissenberg number, heat source parameter, viscous dissipation number and power law number. From Table 4, it is estimated that flow rate and heat transfer rate are decreased versus higher numerical values of heat source parameter. But flow rate is enhanced when Weissenberg number is increased. The role of power law number is observed as very significant to develop maximum amount of heat transfer rate and flow rate. Moreover, heat transfer rate is declined versus argument numerical values of viscous dissipation number.

Table 4

Numerical aspects of Nusselt number and skin friction coefficient against H t , β , We , m and λ when φ 3 = 0.94 , φ 1 = 0.057 , We = 2.0 , Pr = 6450 , m = 0.3 , d = 0.1

Variation in parameters ( R e ) 1 2 C f R e 1 2 N u
0.0 0.2620890941 0.6269023682
We 0.5 0.2805125031 0.6150064882
1.5 0.2983840010 0.6038369770
−1.5 0.4793868421 0.3524502521
H t 0.0 0.3864742265 0.2572577431
0.7 0.1464279369 0.2116707874
0.1 0.07467530385 0.3641197594
m 0.4 0.1547010729 0.5585388446
0.7 0.2398573119 0.7083760632
0.0 0.2619130138 0.7417210656
λ 0.4 0.2614998160 0.6310409286
0.8 0.2612520196 0.5406326980

5 Final outcomes

Mathematical model of Carreau Yasuda liquid is developed in the presence of magnetic dipole via stretching surface. Ternary hybrid nano-structures are used to visualize the thermal performance under heat source sink. A finite element scheme is implemented to conduct numerical consequences via flow and temperature profiles. Key remarks are summarized as follows:

  • Three hundred elements are ensured for visualization of convergence simulations;

  • It is noticed that ternary hybrid nanomaterials are observed as a significant source to conduct maximum inclination into thermal energy rather than hybrid nano-structures and nanofluid;

  • Temperature profile is inclined versus the higher values of heat generation and viscous dissipation numbers while thermal layers are also increasing the behavior;

  • A vital role of magnetic dipole is examined to raise the production of thermal layers but declination is noticed in flow profile;

  • Flow rate and heat transfer rate are declined versus argument numerical values of viscous dissipation parameter but opposite behavior on heat transfer rate and flow is studied versus power law number;

  • Heat transfer rate is boosted against higher impact of viscous dissipation.

  1. Funding information: Choonkil Park was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2017R1D1A1B04032937).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Shah SNA, Shah Z, Hussain M, Khan M. Hazardous effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in ecosystem. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:2017.10.1155/2017/4101735Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Khan NS, Zuhra S, Shah Z, Bonyah E, Khan W, Islam S. Slip flow of Eyring-Powell nanoliquid film containing graphene nanoparticles. AIP Adv. 2018;8(11):115302.10.1063/1.5055690Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Rehman KU, Malik MY, Al-Mdallal QM. Physical aspects of magnetized suspended nanoparticles in a rotatory frame: numerical simulation. Ain Shams Eng J. 2020;11(2):479–87.10.1016/j.asej.2019.10.010Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Alobaid A, Rehman KU, Andleeb S, Erinle KO, Mahmood A. Capacity assessment of carbon-based nanoparticles in stabilizing degraded soils. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34(1):101716.10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101716Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Ali U, Malik MY, Alderremy AA, Aly S, Rehman KU. A generalized findings on thermal radiation and heat generation/absorption in nanofluid flow regime. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;553:124026.10.1016/j.physa.2019.124026Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Boarescu PM, Boarescu I, Bocșan IC, Gheban D, Bulboacă AE, Nicula C, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of curcumin nanoparticles on drug-induced acute myocardial infarction in diabetic rats. Antioxidants. 2019;8(10):504.10.3390/antiox8100504Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Pop NL, Nan A, Urda-Cimpean AE, Florea A, Toma VA, Moldovan R, et al. Chitosan functionalized magnetic nanoparticles to provide neural regeneration and recovery after experimental model induced peripheral nerve injury. Biomolecules. 2021;11(5):676.10.3390/biom11050676Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Iacoviță C, Fizeșan I, Nitica S, Florea A, Barbu-Tudoran L, Dudric R, et al. Silica coating of ferromagnetic iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles significantly enhances their hyperthermia performances for efficiently inducing cancer cells death In Vitro. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(12):2026.10.3390/pharmaceutics13122026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Swain K, Mebarek-Oudina F, Abo-Dahab SM. Influence of MWCNT/Fe3O4 hybrid nanoparticles on an exponentially porous shrinking sheet with chemical reaction and slip boundary conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;147:1–10.10.1007/s10973-020-10432-4Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Gul T, Firdous K. The experimental study to examine the stable dispersion of the graphene nanoparticles and to look at the GO–H2O nanofluid flow between two rotating disks. Appl Nanosci. 2018;8(7):1711–27.10.1007/s13204-018-0851-4Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Tassaddiq A, Khan S, Bilal M, Gul T, Mukhtar S, Shah Z, et al. Heat and mass transfer together with hybrid nanofluid flow over a rotating disk. AIP Adv. 2020;10(5):055317.10.1063/5.0010181Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Shafiq A, Rasool G, Khalique CM, Aslam S. Second grade bioconvective nanofluid flow with buoyancy effect and chemical reaction. Symmetry. 2020;12(4):621.10.3390/sym12040621Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Nisar KS, Khan U, Zaib A, Khan I, Morsy A. A novel study of radiative flow involving micropolar nanoliquid from a shrinking/stretching curved surface including blood gold nanoparticles. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020;135(10):1–19.10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00830-wSuche in Google Scholar

[14] Khan U, Zaib A, Sheikholeslami M, Wakif A, Baleanu D. Mixed convective radiative flow through a slender revolution bodies containing molybdenum-disulfide graphene oxide along with generalized hybrid nanoparticles in porous media. Crystals. 2020;10(9):771.10.3390/cryst10090771Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Waqas H, Khan SU, Hassan M, Bhatti MM, Imran M. Analysis on the bioconvection flow of modified second-grade nanofluid containing gyrotactic microorganisms and nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2019;291:111231.10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111231Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Sohail M, Shah Z, Tassaddiq A, Kumam P, Roy P. Entropy generation in MHD Casson fluid flow with variable heat conductance and thermal conductivity over non-linear bi-directional stretching surface. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–16.10.1038/s41598-020-69411-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Sohail M, Naz R, Shah Z, Kumam P, Thounthong P. Exploration of temperature dependent thermophysical characteristics of yield exhibiting non-Newtonian fluid flow under gyrotactic microorganisms. AIP Adv. 2019;9(12):125016.10.1063/1.5118929Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Sohail M, Naz R, Abdelsalam SI. Application of non-Fourier double diffusions theories to the boundary-layer flow of a yield stress exhibiting fluid model. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl. 2020;537:122753.10.1016/j.physa.2019.122753Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD, Javed MY, Ellahi R. Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;374:36–43.10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.021Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Sadat R, Agarwal P, Saleh R, Ali MR. Lie symmetry analysis and invariant solutions of 3D Euler equations for axisymmetric, incompressible, and inviscid flow in the cylindrical coordinates. Adv Differ Equ. 2021;2021(1):1–16.10.1186/s13662-021-03637-wSuche in Google Scholar

[21] Mousa MM, Ali MR, Ma WX. A combined method for simulating MHD convection in square cavities through localized heating by method of line and penalty-artificial compressibility. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2021;15(1):208–17.10.1080/16583655.2021.1951503Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Ali MR, Baleanu D. New wavelet method for solving boundary value problems arising from an adiabatic tubular chemical reactor theory. Int J Biomath. 2020;13(7):2050059.10.1142/S179352452050059XSuche in Google Scholar

[23] Sabir Z, Ali MR, Raja MAZ, Shoaib M, Núñez RAS, Sadat R. Computational intelligence approach using Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation neural networks to solve the fourth-order nonlinear system of Emden–Fowler model. Eng Computers. 2021;1–17.10.1007/s00366-021-01427-2Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Baleanu D, Sadat R, Ali MR. The method of lines for solution of the carbon nanotubes engine oil nanofluid over an unsteady rotating disk. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020;135(10):1–13.10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00763-4Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Khan MI, Alzahrani F. Binary chemical reaction with activation energy in dissipative flow of non-Newtonian nanomaterial. J Theor Comput Chem. 2020;19(3):2040006.10.1142/S0219633620400064Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Khan MI, Alzahrani F, Hobiny A, Ali Z. Modeling of Cattaneo-Christov double diffusions (CCDD) in Williamson nanomaterial slip flow subject to porous medium. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(3):6172–7.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.019Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Khan MI, Alzahrani F, Hobiny A. Simulation and modeling of second order velocity slip flow of micropolar ferrofluid with Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(4):7335–40.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.079Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Khan MI, Hayat T, Waqas M, Alsaedi A. Outcome for chemically reactive aspect in flow of tangent hyperbolic material. J Mol Liq. 2017;230:143–51.10.1016/j.molliq.2017.01.016Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Hayat T, Tamoor M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Numerical simulation for nonlinear radiative flow by convective cylinder. Results Phys. 2016;6:1031–5.10.1016/j.rinp.2016.11.026Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Khan MI, Qayyum S, Kadry S, Khan WA, Abbas SZ. Irreversibility analysis and heat transport in squeezing nanoliquid flow of non-Newtonian (second-grade) fluid between infinite plates with activation energy. Arab J Sci Eng. 2020;45(6):4939–47.10.1007/s13369-020-04442-5Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Wang J, Khan MI, Khan WA, Abbas SZ, Khan MI. Transportation of heat generation/absorption and radiative heat flux in homogeneous–heterogeneous catalytic reactions of non-Newtonian fluid (Oldroyd-B model). Computer Methods Prog Biomed. 2020;189:105310.10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105310Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Qayyum S, Khan MI, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Comparative investigation of five nanoparticles in flow of viscous fluid with Joule heating and slip due to rotating disk. Phys B Condens Matter. 2018;534:173–83.10.1016/j.physb.2018.01.044Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Hayat T, Ahmad S, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Simulation of ferromagnetic nanomaterial flow of Maxwell fluid. Results Phys. 2018;8:34–40.10.1016/j.rinp.2017.11.021Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Bhatti MM, Alamri SZ, Ellahi R, Abdelsalam SI. Intra-uterine particle–fluid motion through a compliant asymmetric tapered channel with heat transfer. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;144(6):2259–67.10.1007/s10973-020-10233-9Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Bhatti MM, Abdelsalam SI. Thermodynamic entropy of a magnetized Ree‐Eyring particle‐fluid motion with irreversibility process: a mathematical paradigm. ZAMM‐J Appl Math Mech/Zeitschrift für Angew Math und Mech. 2021;101(6):e202000186.10.1002/zamm.202000186Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Elkoumy SR, Barakat EI, Abdelsalam SI. Hall and transverse magnetic field effects on peristaltic flow of a Maxwell fluid through a porous medium. Glob J Pure Appl Math. 2013;9(2):187–203.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Abdelsalam SI, Velasco-Hernández JX, Zaher AZ. Electro-magnetically modulated self-propulsion of swimming sperms via cervical canal. Biomech Modeling Mechanobiol. 2021;20(3):861–78.10.1007/s10237-020-01407-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Eldesoky IM, Abdelsalam SI, El-Askary WA, Ahmed MM. The integrated thermal effect in conjunction with slip conditions on peristaltically induced particle-fluid transport in a catheterized pipe. J Porous Media. 2020;23(7):695–713.10.1615/JPorMedia.2020025581Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Bhatti MM, Abdelsalam SI. Bio-inspired peristaltic propulsion of hybrid nanofluid flow with Tantalum (Ta) and Gold (Au) nanoparticles under magnetic effects. Waves Random Complex Media. 2021;1–26.10.1080/17455030.2021.1998728Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Mekheimer KS, Abo-Elkhair RE, Abdelsalam SI, Ali KK, Moawad AMA. Biomedical simulations of nanoparticles drug delivery to blood hemodynamics in diseased organs: Synovitis problem. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;130:105756.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105756Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Kalaivanan R, Ganesh NV, Al-Mdallal QM. Buoyancy driven Flow of a Second-Grade nanofluid flow taking into account the Arrhenius activation energy and elastic deformation: models and numerical results. Fluid Dynam Mater Process. 2021;17(2):319–32.10.32604/fdmp.2021.012789Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Ganesh NV, Qasem AM, Kalaivananc R. Exact solution for heat transport of Newtonian fluid with quadratic order thermal slip in a porous medium. Adv Theory Nonlinear Anal Appl. 2021;5(1):39–48.10.31197/atnaa.749630Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Ganesh NV, Al-Mdallal QM, Öztop HF, Kalaivanan R. Analysis of natural convection for a Casson-based multiwall carbon nanotube nanofluid in a partially heated wavy enclosure with a circular obstacle in the presence of thermal radiation. J Adv Res. 2021Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Ganesh NV, Al-Mdallal QM, Hirankumar G, Kalaivanan R, Chamkha AJ. Buoyancy-driven convection of MWCNT–Casson nanofluid in a wavy enclosure with a circular barrier and parallel hot/cold fins. Alex Eng J. 2022;61(4):3249–64.10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.055Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Ganesh NV, Kalaivanan R, Al-Mdallal QM, Reena K. Buoyancy driven second grade nano boundary layers over a catalytic surface with reaction rate, heat of reaction and activation energy at boundary. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021;28:101346.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101346Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Nadeem S, Ahmad S, Muhammad N. Analysis of ferrite nanoparticles in liquid. Pramana. 2020;94(1):1–9.10.1007/s12043-019-1913-1Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Muhammad N, Nadeem S. Ferrite nanoparticles Ni-ZnFe2O4, Mn-ZnFe2O4 and Fe2O4 in the flow of ferromagnetic nanofluid. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132(9):1–12.10.1140/epjp/i2017-11650-2Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Hou E, Wang F, Nazir U, Sohail M, Jabbar N, Thounthong P. Dynamics of tri-hybrid nanoparticles in the rheology of pseudo-plastic liquid with dufour and soret effects. Micromachines. 2022;2022(13):201.10.3390/mi13020201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Wang F, Nazir U, Sohail M, El-Zahar ER, Park C, Thounthong P. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory. Nanotechnol Rev. 2022;11(1):834–45.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0050Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Ouni M, Ladhar LM, Omri M, Jamshed W, Eid MR. Solar water-pump thermal analysis utilizing copper–gold/engine oil hybrid nanofluid flowing in parabolic trough solar collector: Thermal case study. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2022;30:101756.10.1016/j.csite.2022.101756Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-05
Revised: 2022-02-24
Accepted: 2022-03-19
Published Online: 2022-04-11

© 2022 Fuzhang Wang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Theoretical and experimental investigation of MWCNT dispersion effect on the elastic modulus of flexible PDMS/MWCNT nanocomposites
  3. Mechanical, morphological, and fracture-deformation behavior of MWCNTs-reinforced (Al–Cu–Mg–T351) alloy cast nanocomposites fabricated by optimized mechanical milling and powder metallurgy techniques
  4. Flammability and physical stability of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch/poly(lactic acid) blend bionanocomposites
  5. Glutathione-loaded non-ionic surfactant niosomes: A new approach to improve oral bioavailability and hepatoprotective efficacy of glutathione
  6. Relationship between mechano-bactericidal activity and nanoblades density on chemically strengthened glass
  7. In situ regulation of microstructure and microwave-absorbing properties of FeSiAl through HNO3 oxidation
  8. Research on a mechanical model of magnetorheological fluid different diameter particles
  9. Nanomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of rubber–wood–plastic composites
  10. Investigative properties of CeO2 doped with niobium: A combined characterization and DFT studies
  11. Miniaturized peptidomimetics and nano-vesiculation in endothelin types through probable nano-disk formation and structure property relationships of endothelins’ fragments
  12. N/S co-doped CoSe/C nanocubes as anode materials for Li-ion batteries
  13. Synergistic effects of halloysite nanotubes with metal and phosphorus additives on the optimal design of eco-friendly sandwich panels with maximum flame resistance and minimum weight
  14. Octreotide-conjugated silver nanoparticles for active targeting of somatostatin receptors and their application in a nebulized rat model
  15. Controllable morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures formed via hydrothermal vulcanization of Bi2O3 thin-film layer and their photoelectrocatalytic performances
  16. Development of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles for prostate cancer treatment
  17. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of HDPE mineral nanocomposites by filler particles modulation of the matrix plastic/elastic behavior
  18. Effect of plasticizers on the properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/cinnamon essential oil reinforced starch bionanocomposite films
  19. Optimization of nano coating to reduce the thermal deformation of ball screws
  20. Preparation of efficient piezoelectric PVDF–HFP/Ni composite films by high electric field poling
  21. MHD dissipative Casson nanofluid liquid film flow due to an unsteady stretching sheet with radiation influence and slip velocity phenomenon
  22. Effects of nano-SiO2 modification on rubberised mortar and concrete with recycled coarse aggregates
  23. Mechanical and microscopic properties of fiber-reinforced coal gangue-based geopolymer concrete
  24. Effect of morphology and size on the thermodynamic stability of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Experiment and molecular dynamics calculation
  25. Mechanical performance of a CFRP composite reinforced via gelatin-CNTs: A study on fiber interfacial enhancement and matrix enhancement
  26. A practical review over surface modification, nanopatterns, emerging materials, drug delivery systems, and their biophysiochemical properties for dental implants: Recent progresses and advances
  27. HTR: An ultra-high speed algorithm for cage recognition of clathrate hydrates
  28. Effects of microalloying elements added by in situ synthesis on the microstructure of WCu composites
  29. A highly sensitive nanobiosensor based on aptamer-conjugated graphene-decorated rhodium nanoparticles for detection of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells
  30. Progressive collapse performance of shear strengthened RC frames by nano CFRP
  31. Core–shell heterostructured composites of carbon nanotubes and imine-linked hyperbranched polymers as metal-free Li-ion anodes
  32. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory
  33. Simple models for tensile modulus of shape memory polymer nanocomposites at ambient temperature
  34. Preparation and morphological studies of tin sulfide nanoparticles and use as efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of rhodamine B and phenol
  35. Polyethyleneimine-impregnated activated carbon nanofiber composited graphene-derived rice husk char for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture
  36. Electrospun nanofibers of Co3O4 nanocrystals encapsulated in cyclized-polyacrylonitrile for lithium storage
  37. Pitting corrosion induced on high-strength high carbon steel wire in high alkaline deaerated chloride electrolyte
  38. Formulation of polymeric nanoparticles loaded sorafenib; evaluation of cytotoxicity, molecular evaluation, and gene expression studies in lung and breast cancer cell lines
  39. Engineered nanocomposites in asphalt binders
  40. Influence of loading voltage, domain ratio, and additional load on the actuation of dielectric elastomer
  41. Thermally induced hex-graphene transitions in 2D carbon crystals
  42. The surface modification effect on the interfacial properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy: A molecular dynamics study
  43. Molecular dynamics study of deformation mechanism of interfacial microzone of Cu/Al2Cu/Al composites under tension
  44. Nanocolloid simulators of luminescent solar concentrator photovoltaic windows
  45. Compressive strength and anti-chloride ion penetration assessment of geopolymer mortar merging PVA fiber and nano-SiO2 using RBF–BP composite neural network
  46. Effect of 3-mercapto-1-propane sulfonate sulfonic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the growth of cobalt pillar by electrodeposition
  47. Dynamics of convective slippery constraints on hybrid radiative Sutterby nanofluid flow by Galerkin finite element simulation
  48. Preparation of vanadium by the magnesiothermic self-propagating reduction and process control
  49. Microstructure-dependent photoelectrocatalytic activity of heterogeneous ZnO–ZnS nanosheets
  50. Cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of molybdenum and tungsten disulphide on human bronchial cells
  51. Improving recycled aggregate concrete by compression casting and nano-silica
  52. Chemically reactive Maxwell nanoliquid flow by a stretching surface in the frames of Newtonian heating, nonlinear convection and radiative flux: Nanopolymer flow processing simulation
  53. Nonlinear dynamic and crack behaviors of carbon nanotubes-reinforced composites with various geometries
  54. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its therapeutic efficacy against colon cancer
  55. Synthesis and characterization of smart stimuli-responsive herbal drug-encapsulated nanoniosome particles for efficient treatment of breast cancer
  56. Homotopic simulation for heat transport phenomenon of the Burgers nanofluids flow over a stretching cylinder with thermal convective and zero mass flux conditions
  57. Incorporation of copper and strontium ions in TiO2 nanotubes via dopamine to enhance hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility
  58. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles
  59. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-strengthened recycled aggregate concrete
  60. Glucose-responsive nanogels efficiently maintain the stability and activity of therapeutic enzymes
  61. Tunning matrix rheology and mechanical performance of ultra-high performance concrete using cellulose nanofibers
  62. Flexible MXene/copper/cellulose nanofiber heat spreader films with enhanced thermal conductivity
  63. Promoted charge separation and specific surface area via interlacing of N-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes on carbon nitride nanosheets for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B
  64. Elucidating the role of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mitigating the disease of the eggplant caused by Phomopsis vexans, Ralstonia solanacearum, and root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita
  65. An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial
  66. Robust synthesis of a composite phase of copper vanadium oxide with enhanced performance for durable aqueous Zn-ion batteries
  67. Tunning self-assembled phases of bovine serum albumin via hydrothermal process to synthesize novel functional hydrogel for skin protection against UVB
  68. A comparative experimental study on damping properties of epoxy nanocomposite beams reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets
  69. Lightweight and hydrophobic Ni/GO/PVA composite aerogels for ultrahigh performance electromagnetic interference shielding
  70. Research on the auxetic behavior and mechanical properties of periodically rotating graphene nanostructures
  71. Repairing performances of novel cement mortar modified with graphene oxide and polyacrylate polymer
  72. Closed-loop recycling and fabrication of hydrophilic CNT films with high performance
  73. Design of thin-film configuration of SnO2–Ag2O composites for NO2 gas-sensing applications
  74. Study on stress distribution of SiC/Al composites based on microstructure models with microns and nanoparticles
  75. PVDF green nanofibers as potential carriers for improving self-healing and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy prepregs
  76. Osteogenesis capability of three-dimensionally printed poly(lactic acid)-halloysite nanotube scaffolds containing strontium ranelate
  77. Silver nanoparticles induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and late non-canonical autophagy in HT-29 colon cancer cells
  78. Preparation and bonding mechanisms of polymer/metal hybrid composite by nano molding technology
  79. Damage self-sensing and strain monitoring of glass-reinforced epoxy composite impregnated with graphene nanoplatelet and multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Thermal analysis characterisation of solar-powered ship using Oldroyd hybrid nanofluids in parabolic trough solar collector: An optimal thermal application
  81. Pyrene-functionalized halloysite nanotubes for simultaneously detecting and separating Hg(ii) in aqueous media: A comprehensive comparison on interparticle and intraparticle excimers
  82. Fabrication of self-assembly CNT flexible film and its piezoresistive sensing behaviors
  83. Thermal valuation and entropy inspection of second-grade nanoscale fluid flow over a stretching surface by applying Koo–Kleinstreuer–Li relation
  84. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-SiO2 and basalt-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete
  85. Characterization and tribology performance of polyaniline-coated nanodiamond lubricant additives
  86. Combined impact of Marangoni convection and thermophoretic particle deposition on chemically reactive transport of nanofluid flow over a stretching surface
  87. Spark plasma extrusion of binder free hydroxyapatite powder
  88. An investigation on thermo-mechanical performance of graphene-oxide-reinforced shape memory polymer
  89. Effect of nanoadditives on the novel leather fiber/recycled poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate) polymer composites for multifunctional applications: Fabrication, characterizations, and multiobjective optimization using central composite design
  90. Design selection for a hemispherical dimple core sandwich panel using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods
  91. Improving tensile strength and impact toughness of plasticized poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose
  92. Green synthesis of spinel copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanoparticles and their toxicity
  93. The effect of TaC and NbC hybrid and mono-nanoparticles on AA2024 nanocomposites: Microstructure, strengthening, and artificial aging
  94. Excited-state geometry relaxation of pyrene-modified cellulose nanocrystals under UV-light excitation for detecting Fe3+
  95. Effect of CNTs and MEA on the creep of face-slab concrete at an early age
  96. Effect of deformation conditions on compression phase transformation of AZ31
  97. Application of MXene as a new generation of highly conductive coating materials for electromembrane-surrounded solid-phase microextraction
  98. A comparative study of the elasto-plastic properties for ceramic nanocomposites filled by graphene or graphene oxide nanoplates
  99. Encapsulation strategies for improving the biological behavior of CdS@ZIF-8 nanocomposites
  100. Biosynthesis of ZnO NPs from pumpkin seeds’ extract and elucidation of its anticancer potential against breast cancer
  101. Preliminary trials of the gold nanoparticles conjugated chrysin: An assessment of anti-oxidant, anti-microbial, and in vitro cytotoxic activities of a nanoformulated flavonoid
  102. Effect of micron-scale pores increased by nano-SiO2 sol modification on the strength of cement mortar
  103. Fractional simulations for thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid with aluminum oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles with water and blood base fluids
  104. The effect of graphene nano-powder on the viscosity of water: An experimental study and artificial neural network modeling
  105. Development of a novel heat- and shear-resistant nano-silica gelling agent
  106. Characterization, biocompatibility and in vivo of nominal MnO2-containing wollastonite glass-ceramic
  107. Entropy production simulation of second-grade magnetic nanomaterials flowing across an expanding surface with viscidness dissipative flux
  108. Enhancement in structural, morphological, and optical properties of copper oxide for optoelectronic device applications
  109. Aptamer-functionalized chitosan-coated gold nanoparticle complex as a suitable targeted drug carrier for improved breast cancer treatment
  110. Performance and overall evaluation of nano-alumina-modified asphalt mixture
  111. Analysis of pure nanofluid (GO/engine oil) and hybrid nanofluid (GO–Fe3O4/engine oil): Novel thermal and magnetic features
  112. Synthesis of Ag@AgCl modified anatase/rutile/brookite mixed phase TiO2 and their photocatalytic property
  113. Mechanisms and influential variables on the abrasion resistance hydraulic concrete
  114. Synergistic reinforcement mechanism of basalt fiber/cellulose nanocrystals/polypropylene composites
  115. Achieving excellent oxidation resistance and mechanical properties of TiB2–B4C/carbon aerogel composites by quick-gelation and mechanical mixing
  116. Microwave-assisted sol–gel template-free synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles obtained from South African coal fly ash
  117. Pulsed laser-assisted synthesis of nano nickel(ii) oxide-anchored graphitic carbon nitride: Characterizations and their potential antibacterial/anti-biofilm applications
  118. Effects of nano-ZrSi2 on thermal stability of phenolic resin and thermal reusability of quartz–phenolic composites
  119. Benzaldehyde derivatives on tin electroplating as corrosion resistance for fabricating copper circuit
  120. Mechanical and heat transfer properties of 4D-printed shape memory graphene oxide/epoxy acrylate composites
  121. Coupling the vanadium-induced amorphous/crystalline NiFe2O4 with phosphide heterojunction toward active oxygen evolution reaction catalysts
  122. Graphene-oxide-reinforced cement composites mechanical and microstructural characteristics at elevated temperatures
  123. Gray correlation analysis of factors influencing compressive strength and durability of nano-SiO2 and PVA fiber reinforced geopolymer mortar
  124. Preparation of layered gradient Cu–Cr–Ti alloy with excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity
  125. Recovery of Cr from chrome-containing leather wastes to develop aluminum-based composite material along with Al2O3 ceramic particles: An ingenious approach
  126. Mechanisms of the improved stiffness of flexible polymers under impact loading
  127. Anticancer potential of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using a battery of in vitro tests
  128. Review Articles
  129. Proposed approaches for coronaviruses elimination from wastewater: Membrane techniques and nanotechnology solutions
  130. Application of Pickering emulsion in oil drilling and production
  131. The contribution of microfluidics to the fight against tuberculosis
  132. Graphene-based biosensors for disease theranostics: Development, applications, and recent advancements
  133. Synthesis and encapsulation of iron oxide nanorods for application in magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal therapy
  134. Contemporary nano-architectured drugs and leads for ανβ3 integrin-based chemotherapy: Rationale and retrospect
  135. State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials
  136. Insights on magnetic spinel ferrites for targeted drug delivery and hyperthermia applications
  137. A review on heterogeneous oxidation of acetaminophen based on micro and nanoparticles catalyzed by different activators
  138. Early diagnosis of lung cancer using magnetic nanoparticles-integrated systems
  139. Advances in ZnO: Manipulation of defects for enhancing their technological potentials
  140. Efficacious nanomedicine track toward combating COVID-19
  141. A review of the design, processes, and properties of Mg-based composites
  142. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for varied applications: Green renewable resources and energy-efficient synthetic routes
  143. Two-dimensional nanomaterial-based polymer composites: Fundamentals and applications
  144. Recent progress and challenges in plasmonic nanomaterials
  145. Apoptotic cell-derived micro/nanosized extracellular vesicles in tissue regeneration
  146. Electronic noses based on metal oxide nanowires: A review
  147. Framework materials for supercapacitors
  148. An overview on the reproductive toxicity of graphene derivatives: Highlighting the importance
  149. Antibacterial nanomaterials: Upcoming hope to overcome antibiotic resistance crisis
  150. Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites
  151. A review of atomic layer deposition modelling and simulation methodologies: Density functional theory and molecular dynamics
  152. Recent advances in the preparation of PVDF-based piezoelectric materials
  153. Recent developments in tensile properties of friction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced composite: A review
  154. Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO2
  155. Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations
  156. Graphene-based nanocomposite using new modeling molecular dynamic simulations for proposed neutralizing mechanism and real-time sensing of COVID-19
  157. Nanotechnology application on bamboo materials: A review
  158. Recent developments and future perspectives of biorenewable nanocomposites for advanced applications
  159. Nanostructured lipid carrier system: A compendium of their formulation development approaches, optimization strategies by quality by design, and recent applications in drug delivery
  160. 3D printing customized design of human bone tissue implant and its application
  161. Design, preparation, and functionalization of nanobiomaterials for enhanced efficacy in current and future biomedical applications
  162. A brief review of nanoparticles-doped PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite for OLED and OPV
  163. Nanotechnology interventions as a putative tool for the treatment of dental afflictions
  164. Recent advancements in metal–organic frameworks integrating quantum dots (QDs@MOF) and their potential applications
  165. A focused review of short electrospun nanofiber preparation techniques for composite reinforcement
  166. Microstructural characteristics and nano-modification of interfacial transition zone in concrete: A review
  167. Latest developments in the upconversion nanotechnology for the rapid detection of food safety: A review
  168. Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks
  169. Molecular dynamics application of cocrystal energetic materials: A review
  170. Synthesis and application of nanometer hydroxyapatite in biomedicine
  171. Cutting-edge development in waste-recycled nanomaterials for energy storage and conversion applications
  172. Biological applications of ternary quantum dots: A review
  173. Nanotherapeutics for hydrogen sulfide-involved treatment: An emerging approach for cancer therapy
  174. Application of antibacterial nanoparticles in orthodontic materials
  175. Effect of natural-based biological hydrogels combined with growth factors on skin wound healing
  176. Nanozymes – A route to overcome microbial resistance: A viewpoint
  177. Recent developments and applications of smart nanoparticles in biomedicine
  178. Contemporary review on carbon nanotube (CNT) composites and their impact on multifarious applications
  179. Interfacial interactions and reinforcing mechanisms of cellulose and chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete strength and durability enhancement: A review
  180. Diamond-like carbon films for tribological modification of rubber
  181. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) modified cement-based materials: A systematic review
  182. Recent research progress and advanced applications of silica/polymer nanocomposites
  183. Modeling of supramolecular biopolymers: Leading the in silico revolution of tissue engineering and nanomedicine
  184. Recent advances in perovskites-based optoelectronics
  185. Biogenic synthesis of palladium nanoparticles: New production methods and applications
  186. A comprehensive review of nanofluids with fractional derivatives: Modeling and application
  187. Electrospinning of marine polysaccharides: Processing and chemical aspects, challenges, and future prospects
  188. Electrohydrodynamic printing for demanding devices: A review of processing and applications
  189. Rapid Communications
  190. Structural material with designed thermal twist for a simple actuation
  191. Recent advances in photothermal materials for solar-driven crude oil adsorption
Heruntergeladen am 8.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0100/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen