Startseite Naturwissenschaften Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites
Artikel Open Access

Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites

  • Li Bianhong , Qi Wei und Wu Qiong EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. April 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is an additive manufacturing technology designed to rapidly process and manufacture complex geometrical components based on computer model design. Based on a 3D data model, materials are accumulated layer by layer through computer control, and the 3D model is finally turned into a stereoscopic object. Compared with traditional manufacturing methods, 3D printing technology has the advantages of saving man-hours, easy operation, no need for molds, and strong controllability of component geometry. With the development of this technology, according to the core materials and equipment and other elements of the printing molding technology, several types of 3D printing technologies such as fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, stereolithography, and solvent cast-3D printing have gradually formed. This review focuses on the principles and characteristics of several of the most representative 3D printing molding processes. And based on carbon nanomaterial (carbon fibers, graphene, and carbon nanotubes) reinforced polymer composite materials, the research progress of different 3D printing molding processes in recent years is reviewed. At the same time, the commercial application of 3D printing molding process in this field is analyzed and prospected.

1 Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is an important additive manufacturing technology for rapid manufacturing of complex components. This technology uses computer software to assist design, and then uses material-forming equipment to gradually stack up one layer at a time to create an entity consistent with the shape and structure of the imported model. It is very attractive and is widely regarded as a technological revolution in manufacturing [1,2,3]. Three-dimensional printing technology is widely used in biological tissue engineering [4], aerospace [5], energy storage [6], electronics and devices [7], vehicle manufacturing [8], engineering composite materials [9], and other fields, due to its low cost, high material utilization rate, no need for traditional tools, fixtures, machine tools, or any molds, and ability to quickly and accurately convert 3D models into entities. Three-dimensional printing technology is mainly divided into fused deposition modeling (FDM), powder bed fusion, inkjet printing and contour crafting, selective laser sintering (SLS), stereolithography (SLA), solvent cast-3D printing, and laminated object manufacturing, according to the core of the manufacturing molding process. Although different types of 3D printing processes have different technical cores, their suitable materials are mainly metals and alloys, ceramics, concrete, polymers, and their composite materials [10]. Among them, polymer composite materials are particularly popular for their excellent functions such as diverse types, strong processability, low cost, high strength, and electrical conductivity [11].

In recent years, nanomaterials have been widely used to prepare polymer nanocomposites [12]. Among them, carbon material reinforcements mainly include carbon fiber (CF), graphene, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), etc., and their introduction has given polymer nanocomposites excellent performance and various functions, such as high mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, magnetism, and electrical sensing [13].

This review uses nano-carbon material-reinforced polymer composites as a medium to review and analyze the research progress of different types of 3D printing processes in the preparation of composite materials, and analyze and prospect the commercial development prospects of 3D printing technology in this field.

2 Three-dimensional printing technology

2.1 FDM

The 3D printing technology based on fused deposition was first invented by Scott Crump in 1989 and applied for a patented technology with FDM as the core. As shown in Figure 1a, FDM is a thermally assisted printing technology. It mainly passes the filamentous material of thermoplastic polymer through a heated nozzle and is melted and extruded with a certain pressure. At the same time, the nozzle is controlled by software to move according to a certain trajectory, and the extruded material accumulates layer by layer, finally form a 3D printed product [14]. Due to the low cost and easy operation of FDM technology, it has been widely concerned and loved by people. At present, FDM is widely used in many fields such as medicine, art, industrial design, aerospace, and automobile [15,16].

Figure 1 
                  (a) Schematic of the working principle of FDM. Reproduced with permission from ref. [14], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (b) Schematic of the molecular design of the phages for use as a nanoink for 3D micro-extrusion bioprinting. Reproduced with permission from ref. [21], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (c) Illustrations of the SLS system. Reproduced with permission from ref. [23], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (d) Schematic of 3D SLA printing. Reproduced with permission from ref. [24], Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (e) Schematic of the solvent-cast printing process and side view scanning electron microscopic (SEM) image of a circular spiral. Reproduced with permission from ref. [34], Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the working principle of FDM. Reproduced with permission from ref. [14], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (b) Schematic of the molecular design of the phages for use as a nanoink for 3D micro-extrusion bioprinting. Reproduced with permission from ref. [21], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (c) Illustrations of the SLS system. Reproduced with permission from ref. [23], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (d) Schematic of 3D SLA printing. Reproduced with permission from ref. [24], Copyright 2017 Elsevier. (e) Schematic of the solvent-cast printing process and side view scanning electron microscopic (SEM) image of a circular spiral. Reproduced with permission from ref. [34], Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Compared with other printing technologies, the surface of FDM-printed products is rougher, with a general resolution of 100–800 μm, so FDM-printed products need further post-processing. At the same time, after the material is fused deposited, the compatibility between the layers is poor, and it is easy to produce pores, which leads to the formation of obvious anisotropy in the material, which limits the application of the material in specific fields [17]. For the selection of raw materials, traditional FDM is mainly based on heat-assisted extrusion molding, so the raw materials are limited to thermoplastic polymers, and the use of low thermoplastic materials often brings the trouble of nozzle clogging. At the same time, because the materials need to be at a higher temperature under the conditions of melt extrusion, if different materials are mixed and extruded at the same time, the material with lower melting point will often be partially degraded first, which will lead to the reduction of the performance of the final product [18]. In response to the above problems of FDM, nanomaterials, such as nano titanium dioxide and cellulose nanocrystals, have been used as fillers for FDM printing materials, and printed together with polymers. The results show that the addition of nanomaterials can improve the fluidity of the printing material in the molten state, enhance the combination between the printing layers, thereby improving the printing resolution and the strength of the printing material [19,20]. The emerging FDM technology, 3D micro extrusion, is a technology that uses physical or chemical methods to redistribute and layer extruded materials. The emergence of this technology has greatly broadened the range of raw materials available for FDM. Three-dimensional micro-extrusion technology can not only print thermoplastic polymers, but also suitable for thermosetting polymers, silicon materials, polymer emulsions, plastisols, hydrogels, multifunctional polymers, etc., and even active biological materials or cells (Figure 1b) can achieve the desired product effect through 3D micro-extrusion technology [21,22].

2.2 SLS

SLS is an important branch of additive manufacturing technology and a relatively mature 3D printing technology. As shown in Figure 1c, it can selectively sinter metal, ceramic, or polymer powder by using a carbon dioxide laser beam, where the powder material is evenly spread on the powder bed through a powder leveling roll. In this way, the movement of the powder bed in the Z-axis direction makes it possible to manufacture parts [23]. Unlike traditional processing methods, SLS technology is shear-free and free-flowing during the printing process. In addition, another feature of using SLS to prepare polymer composites is that only polymers in powder form can be used, and the materials, fillers, and polymers need to be fully mixed before they become consumables for 3D printing. The materials used in SLS technology are mainly metals, ceramics, and polymer materials. Among them, polymer materials have excellent molding conditions and high molding accuracy. More importantly, they do not have the “spheroidization” effect that is difficult to overcome during metal sintering. Therefore, it has become the most widely used and most successful selective laser sintered printing material. The most widely used thermoplastic polymers and their composite materials are polycarbonate, polystyrene, nylon, polypropylene, polyether ether ketone, and so on.

Because the SLS technology is not formed by applying pressure, it is only welded by the fluidity of the polymer powder after melting. And this kind of weld does not make the powders fully fused, so there will be a certain degree of defects and voids in the polymer SLS products, which causes the mechanical properties of the molded products prepared by SLS technology to be far inferior to the traditional molded product. However, adding a certain amount of inorganic nanomaterials to the SLS printing polymer powder can not only improve the mechanical properties of the molded product to a large extent, but also realize the functionalization of the molded product, such as high conductivity and construction dielectric network. These advantages make the polymer-based nanocomposites prepared by the SLS molding process have huge advantages and potentials in energy storage, biomedical fields, the preparation of conductive devices, flexible circuits, sensors, and wearable devices. However, the “precipitation” phenomenon caused by the density difference between the polymer and the nanofiller is an urgent problem that needs to be solved at the moment.

2.3 SLA

The basic structure and printing principle of the SLA technology printer are as shown in Figure 1d. During the printing process, the laser beam reaches the photopolymer through specular reflection, and the photopolymer is polymerized and attached to the printing platform. As the Z axis gradually rises, the photopolymer is polymerized and deposited layer by layer on the printing platform to finally form a product with a 3D structure [24]. The printing resolution of SLA mainly depends on the degree of curing of each layer of photopolymer, and the curing degree of the photopolymer is mainly determined by the exposure conditions of the photoinitiator and the bulk polymer in the raw materials. At the same time, additives such as nanomaterials, dyes, and laser absorbers will also affect the polymerization efficiency of raw materials during the printing process. To further improve the resolution of SLA printing materials, two-photon polymerization 3D printing technology, also known as micro-nano light curing 3D printing technology, has been developed rapidly. This technology greatly increases the possibility of preparing materials with a printing resolution below 100 nm, such as printing medical micro-stents. With the characteristics of rapid prototyping and high printing resolution, SLA printing technology has been widely used in aerospace, automation, architecture, art, and medicine [25], especially in the medical field, SLA printed products have applications in surgical models or functional bodies [26,27], tissue engineering [28], carriers for carrying special cells [29], and other fields.

Although SLA printing technology has been widely used, its raw materials are very limited. SLA printing technology is mainly based on photopolymerization, so the raw materials are mainly photosensitive-based liquid materials, such as acrylic-based photopolymers and epoxy resins. In the SLA printing process, the viscosity of the raw material has a greater impact on the quality of the printed product. If the viscosity is not strictly controlled, the quality of the printed material will be significantly reduced [30]. At the same time, these photosensitive resin molded products also have problems such as size shrinkage and incomplete curing during printing, which further leads to the degradation of the performance of printing materials [31]. Therefore, some inactive additives or nano materials are often used to reduce the viscosity of the printing resin while increasing the curing efficiency of the resin, so as to obtain higher performance printing products [32,33].

2.4 Solvent cast-3D printing

As shown in Figure 1e, solvent cast-3D printing technology is an additive manufacturing method based on polymer solvent solidification molding. It is controlled by a robot on a mobile platform to deposit polymer solvent on the platform according to a program model, and solidify the deposited sample by evaporating the solvent [34]. This solution-based printing technology is a kind of 3D printing technology with the most development potential. It is simple and easy to operate, low price, high precision, easy to prepare complex structure network, material selection flexibility, and easy to adjust, no need to consider changes in the melting point of composite materials due to the presence of fillers [35]. In addition, the precise matching of solvent evaporation rates and printing parameters enables the solvent cast-3D printing technology to fabricate stacked lattice structures with overhangs, and it is possible to manufacture helical-shaped parts without any external support.

Instead of using heat to drive the flow of the polymer, solvent cast-3D printing technology induces the flow of the polymer by dissolving it in a volatile solvent to create an “ink.” The solvent evaporates from the ink during extrusion, leaving behind shaped polymer filaments. The technique can be performed at room temperature and can be used with polymers whose processing temperatures are not suitable for melt-based 3D printing techniques. For example, polyaniline has been shown to thermally degrade before reaching its melting temperature. Poly(sulfone) melts are too viscous to be printed using commercially available 3D printing technologies. However, both polymers can be achieved using solvent cast-3D printing technology. Another advantage is that solvent cast-3D printing has been shown to produce stents with smaller feature sizes compared to stents printed using melt-based extrusion. And the polymer scaffolds fabricated using solvent cast-3D printing did not adversely affect fibroblasts and human mesenchymal stem cells. This suggests that solvent cast-3D printing is a suitable technique for the fabrication of biomedical scaffolds.

Solvent cast-3D printing technology is currently only in the laboratory stage, and has not been widely used in industrial production and market promotion, but its application in experimental research is still very effective, especially when preparing composite materials with a high content of nano-filled particles, it has more advantages.

3 Three-dimensional printing of polymer-based composite materials modified by CF

CF is a new type of fiber material with a carbon content of more than 95%, high strength and high modulus [93]. It is composed of graphite microcrystals and other inorganic fibers stacked along the fiber axis, and processed by carbonization and graphitization processes to obtain microcrystalline graphite aggregates [36,37,38]. CF has excellent mechanical properties, it is a good conductor of electricity and heat, meanwhile has excellent corrosion resistance [39,40]. And it has been widely used in sports goods, automobile manufacturing, national defense, medical equipment, aerospace, and other fields [41,42]. At present, CF/polymer composite materials have been widely used in various additive manufacturing processes, and it is gradually realizing commercialization. Compared with pure polymer materials, the improvement in mechanical and thermal properties is very significant.

As shown in Figure 2a, Jansson and Pejryd [43] studied the reinforcing effect of CF on nylon 12 (PA12) under the SLS process. The results show that, compared with pure PA12 sintered parts, the tensile strength of CF/PA12 sintered parts in the X and Y directions are increased by 28 and 12%, respectively, and the Young’s modulus in the X and Y directions is increased by 73 and 53%, respectively. Flodberg et al. [44] analyzed the effect of CF on the porosity and mechanical properties of composites under SLS process, and found that the addition of CF has a certain effect on reducing the porosity of the composite material while improving the mechanical properties of the material. The study found that the average pore diameter of CF/PA12 composite sintered parts was one order of magnitude smaller than that of pure PA12. The author concluded that the smaller pore size of the CF/PA12 sintered part may be due to the composite powder for the absorption of laser energy and internal thermal conductivity are greatly improved. Yan et al. [45] performed oxidation pretreatment on CF, make the distribution of CF more uniform in the matrix. When the CF content is 50%, the flexural strength and flexural modulus of the composite material are increased by 114 and 243.4%, respectively, compared with pure PA12 (Figure 2b). At the same time, the sintering test found that the initial melting temperature of the CF/PA12 composite powder has dropped, thereby reducing the preheating temperature required for SLS, which means lower energy consumption and less thermal degradation during the sintering process.

Figure 2 
               (a) Illustration of the rake spreading a powder layer in the build chamber. Reproduced with permission from ref. [43], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (b) Variations of the flexural strength and flexural modulus of the CF/PA SLS parts with the carbon fiber content. Reproduced with permission from ref. [45], Copyright 2011 Elsevier. (c) Schematic of heat-channel in the matrix. (d) The thermal conductivity in the matrix of type A (the blue line) and type B (the red line). Reproduced with permission from ref. [46], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (e) Schematic of 3D-printed CF-reinforced composite by FDM. Reproduced with permission from ref. [50], Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Figure 2

(a) Illustration of the rake spreading a powder layer in the build chamber. Reproduced with permission from ref. [43], Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (b) Variations of the flexural strength and flexural modulus of the CF/PA SLS parts with the carbon fiber content. Reproduced with permission from ref. [45], Copyright 2011 Elsevier. (c) Schematic of heat-channel in the matrix. (d) The thermal conductivity in the matrix of type A (the blue line) and type B (the red line). Reproduced with permission from ref. [46], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (e) Schematic of 3D-printed CF-reinforced composite by FDM. Reproduced with permission from ref. [50], Copyright 2014 Elsevier.

Liao et al. [46] used the FDM process to prepare CF/PA12 composites and studied their mechanical and thermal properties. It is found that adding 10 wt% CF to the PA12 matrix can significantly improve the mechanical properties of the material without sacrificing impact performance. The tensile strength increased from 46.4 to 93.8 MPa; the flexural strength increased from 35.6 to 124.9 MPa; the tensile modulus increased to 3.66 times the original; and the flexural modulus increased to 4.46 times the original. In addition, as shown in Figure 2c, because CF has established a heat conduction channel in the material, the thermal conductivity of the composite material is increased by 277.8% compared with pure PA12, from 0.221 to 0.835 W/(m K) (Figure 2d). Tian et al. [47,48] used FDM technology to study the molding properties of CF/polylactic (PLA) composites. Through the systematic study of the process parameters and the mechanical properties of the composite material, it was found that when the CF content reached 27 wt%, the bending strength of the composite material reached 335 MPa, which verified the feasibility of the CF/PLA composite material under this process, and laid a foundation for its application in the aerospace field. At the same time, the mechanical properties of CF/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) copolymer composites containing 10 wt% CF were also studied. The results show that the tensile strength and flexural strength of the CF/ABS composite formed parts are increased to 127 and 147 MPa, respectively. Ning et al. [49] studied the mechanical properties of CF/ABS composites under the FDM process. The results show that, compared with pure ABS formed parts, adding CF can increase the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the formed parts, but it will reduce its toughness, yield strength, and ductility. Among them, the tensile strength of the sample with a CF content of 5 wt% is 22.5% higher than that of the pure ABS formed part, and the Young’s modulus of the sample with a CF content of 7.5 wt% is 30.5% higher than that of the pure ABS formed part. As shown in Figure 2e, Tekinalp et al. [50] studied the processing performance, microstructure, and mechanical properties of CF reinforced ABS composite materials as raw materials for 3D printing. The results show that compared to pure ABS, the composite material has increased in tensile strength and tensile modulus to 115 and 700%, respectively.

4 Three-dimensional printing of polymer-based composite materials modified by graphene

Graphene is a two-dimensional nanosheet carbon material composed of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms in a hexagonal shape, which is closely packed in a honeycomb shape, with a thickness of only 0.334 nm. Its carbon six-membered ring structure can be considered as the basic building block of all sp2 carbon materials. Each carbon atom in graphene is connected to and interacts with three adjacent carbon atoms through σ bond. The stronger bond energy endows graphene with excellent mechanical properties. Relevant studies have shown that the strength of single-layer graphene prepared by mechanical exfoliation method is 130 GPa. In addition, since graphene is a zero-bandgap semiconductor, there are four valence electrons in the outer layer of carbon atoms, three of which form σ bonds with the three most adjacent carbon atoms, the remaining one acts as a π electron to form a π bond with the π electron of other carbon atoms, and the electron can move freely within the π bond. As graphene is all composed of carbon atoms, the entire graphene layer forms a π bond region, and electrons can move freely in the entire graphene layer, so graphene has excellent electrical conductivity. Because the lattice structure of graphene is very stable, the bond length of carbon–carbon bond is only 1.42 Å, which makes graphene have good thermal conductivity. Single-layer graphene also has a very high visible light transmittance due to its atomic-scale thickness.

As is well-known, graphene has poor dispersibility in common solvents and is incompatible with organic polymers [92]. Adding high content of graphene to polymer composites tends to agglomerate due to its own van der Waals force [91]. Fortunately, graphene oxide (GO) is rich in oxygen-containing functional groups [51]. These functional groups can be combined with polymer composite materials through non-covalent bonds to improve the compatibility of the two, making GO and polymer composite the materials are evenly mixed. At present, there are three main methods for preparing graphene/polymer composites [52]: solution mixing, melt mixing, and in-situ polymerization.

SLA technology is usually applied to the method of solution mixing. Lin et al. [53] first ultrasonically dispersed a single layer of GO in acetone, then added polymer resin to mix to form a suspension, and finally evaporated the acetone to prepare a composite resin material containing 0.2 wt% GO by SLA 3D printing. It was found that compared with pure polymer resin materials, the tensile strength of the resin material with GO was increased by 62.2%, and the elongation was increased by 12.8%. Xue and Zou [54] mixed GO with propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate and cyclopentanone under ultrasound to prepare a uniform slurry, then added SU-8 photoresist and ultrasonically stirred, and then dried and evaporated part of the solvent to obtain different GO content SU-8 photoresist. The study found that the addition of GO changed the internal crosslinking of the photoresist, and the interface between the two was strongly bonded, which enhanced the thermal stability of SU-8. Compared with pure SU-8, the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of GO/SU-8 with a GO content of 0.8 wt% increased by approximately 81 and 28%, respectively (Figure 3a). Chiappone et al. [55] used water as the solvent for GO dispersion, after ultrasonic treatment, mixed Polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) with GO suspension, studied the polymerization kinetics induced by visible light through optical rheology, and adjusted the layer thickness and layer exposure time of 3D printing to obtain the best 3D printing parameters. Manapat et al. [33] formed GO/resin composites by SLA printing, and annealed the GO/resin composites at different temperatures. The tensile test shows that when the annealing temperature is 100°C, the composite material with 1 wt% GO has the highest tensile strength, which is 673.6% higher than that of the pure resin material, which is attributed to the metastable structure of GO (Figure 3b). The bottleneck of this technology is the high cost, and the residual photoinitiator and uncured photosensitive resin may be toxic. In addition, it is necessary to prevent the graphene from settling out of the photosensitive resin during the printing process, causing uneven distribution of the graphene in the workpiece.

Figure 3 
               (a) Tensile strength and Young’s modulus curves of nanocomposites containing different concentrations of GO (0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 wt%). Reproduced with permission from ref. [54], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (b) Tensile strength as a function of GO loading and temperature. Reproduced with permission from ref. [33], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (c) TPU/PLA/GO nanocomposites filament preparation and FDM printing process. Reproduced with permission from ref. [58], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic of 3D printed laser-flash diffusivity analysis (LFA) specimens (type A: printing direction perpendicular to through-plane direction, type B: printing direction parallel to through-plane direction); and thermal conductivity of PA12 and PA12/GNPs as measured on type A, type B, and compression molded specimens. Reproduced with permission from ref. [59], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH.
Figure 3

(a) Tensile strength and Young’s modulus curves of nanocomposites containing different concentrations of GO (0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 wt%). Reproduced with permission from ref. [54], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (b) Tensile strength as a function of GO loading and temperature. Reproduced with permission from ref. [33], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (c) TPU/PLA/GO nanocomposites filament preparation and FDM printing process. Reproduced with permission from ref. [58], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic of 3D printed laser-flash diffusivity analysis (LFA) specimens (type A: printing direction perpendicular to through-plane direction, type B: printing direction parallel to through-plane direction); and thermal conductivity of PA12 and PA12/GNPs as measured on type A, type B, and compression molded specimens. Reproduced with permission from ref. [59], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH.

The raw materials required by FDM 3D printing technology are standard wires or filaments. Therefore, graphene and thermoplastic materials are generally heated to a molten state first, and the two are uniformly mixed under the action of shearing force, and then the composite material after melting and mixing is made into wire or wire by an extruder for FDM 3D printing. ABS and PLA are the most commonly used polymers for FDM [56]. Wei et al. [57] prepared reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/ABS and RGO/PLA composites by mixing the polymer with GO through solution mixing and adding hydrazine hydrate to reduce the composite materials, which were used for fused deposition molding after drawing. Among them, the maximum amount of GO can reach 5.6 wt%, and the conductivity can reach 1.05 × 10−3 S/m. The addition of graphene increases the glass transition temperature (T g) of the polymer, so the printing temperature needs to be appropriately increased compared to pure resin. As shown in Figure 3c, Chen et al. [58] used thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and PLA and GO through solution mixing to prepare a composite for fused deposition molding. The blending of TPU and PLA makes the composite materials have both toughness and rigidity. The addition of GO not only improves the mechanical and thermal properties, but also has good antibacterial and biocompatibility. The composite material can be used in biology scaffold and tissue engineering after fused deposition molding. Zhu et al. [59] used 6 wt% graphene nanosheets (GNPs) and PA12 to be melt-mixed together for fused deposition molding, and found that GNPs will be oriented during the extrusion process from the nozzle. The thermal conductivity and elastic modulus of the 3D printed parts along the orientation direction are increased by 51.4 and 7%, respectively, compared to the compression molded parts (Figure 3d). Kholkhoev et al. [60] mixed multi-layer graphene and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone ultrasonically, then added PLA and stirred vigorously. The composite material was obtained through precipitation, filtration, and vacuum drying, and then prepared at high temperature using a benchtop extruder Fiber for FDM 3D printing. Singh et al. [56] used the GNP/ABS composite material prepared by two methods of mechanical mixing and chemical mixing to be 3D printed into a 3D entity through FDM technology. After testing, it is found that the thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity of the raw materials prepared by the chemical mixing method are better than the mechanical mixing method after 3D printing into a solid. The disadvantage of this method is that the printing accuracy is not high enough; when the graphene is added in a large amount, it is easy to block the nozzle; holes are easy to form in the process of preparing the composite material wire, which affects the printing effect; the parts are easy to warp when the thermal stress is uneven; the resulting article has anisotropy and low interlayer strength.

Gaikwad et al. [61] first melted and mixed GNP and nylon 11 (PA11) with a twin-screw extruder, and then pulverized at low temperature to form a powder for SLS. The amount of graphene added was 1–7 wt%. The addition of graphene improves the Young’s modulus, flexural modulus, and thermal stability of PA11, and makes PA11 conductive. Compared with other molding methods, the composite material obtained by the SLS method has better conductivity. In addition, graphene can enhance thermal conductivity, making the laser melting and sintering process easier.

5 Three-dimensional printing of polymer-based composite materials modified by CNT

CNTs can be viewed as hollow cylinders rolled up by graphene sheets. They can be constructed from a single hollow cylinder, known as single-walled CNTs, or from a set of graphene concentric cylinders, known as multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). There are three main methods for synthesizing CNTs: arc discharge method, laser ablation method, and chemical vapor deposition method. CNTs have excellent thermal and electrical conductivity [62,63]. They are long and thin carbon pillars with a high aspect ratio. CNTs have the ability to induce the formation of high-order interphase polymer layers [64]. The mechanical strengthening is promoted through the interface stress transfer between the nanotube and the polymer [65,66,94]. Therefore, with the maturity of CNTs preparation methods [62,67], the use of 3D printing technology to prepare CNTs composite materials has gradually become a research hotspot.

The printing process of FDM technology is through the accumulation of layers of filaments extruded by the nozzle to finally form a 3D entity. The process of melting and solidification makes the strength of the prepared composite material component more superior, and at the same time, the uniform staggered formation between the layers the conductive network effectively expands the electron migration path, so that the conductivity of the composite material component is significantly improved. Thoams’ research group [68] prepared 3D printed components by dispersing MWCNTs of different concentrations into an ABS polymer matrix. The results showed that the high permeability threshold of CNTs did not cause a significant reduction in the printability of the composite material. Around 0.75 wt% of CNTs can significantly improve the conductivity of the printing component, and the increase is most significant when the addition amount is 1 wt%. Schmitz’s research group [69] mixed CNTs and carbon black as fillers into ABS, and fabricated composite components with electromagnetic shielding properties through 3D printing. As shown in Figure 4a, the electromagnetic shielding performance of the optimized composite material component can reach 16 dB, which basically meets the standard of effective electromagnetic attenuation. In addition, the author also comparatively studied the influence of different molding directions on the electromagnetic shielding performance. The vertical concentric molding direction can reduce the electrical conductivity of the component through the micropores and cavities without affecting the substantial changes in the mechanical properties of the printing component, thereby achieving the purpose of electromagnetic shielding (Figure 4a). With the wide application of 3D printing based on FDM technology, researchers have become more and more aware of the limitations of this technology. Printing materials are difficult to prepare, inflexible, and inconvenient for material modification, and other factors limit the development of this technology. Therefore, while researchers have modified the materials, Postiglione et al. [70] modified the FDM printer into a machine based on liquid deposition, and called it liquid deposition modeling. Concretely, a syringe is used to replace the standard print head of the original FDM type printer and the corresponding pressure-driven modification is performed on it. After the modification, the liquid will be directly used as the printing material. In the study of conductive polyester nanocomposites, PLA and MWCNTs are dissolved in methylene chloride as printing inks. As shown in Figure 4b, the results show that when the concentration of MWCNTs is 5–10 wt%, the conductivity of the printed sample MWCNTs/PLA nanocomposite material can reach 10–100 S/m, which is greatly improved compared with FDM technology (Figure 4c).

Figure 4 
               (a) Total electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ABS carbon-based composites in three different layer-by-layer growing directions: perpendicular (upper graph), horizontal concentric (middle graph), and horizontal alternate (bottom graph). Reproduced with permission from ref. [69], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (b) Volume electrical conductivity as a function of MWCNT concentration. The inset shows the log–log plot of the electrical conductivity versus the volume fraction of MWCNTs. (c) SEM images of 3D printed MWCNT-based nanocomposite woven structure and used as conductive element in a simple electrical circuit. Reproduced with permission from ref. [70], Copyright 2015 Elsevier. (d) The electrical resistance variation with the bending cycles. The inset shows the bending process. (e) The electrical resistance variation for the composites at a maximum strain of 10% with the stretching cycles. Reproduced with permission from ref. [71], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (f) Schematic of CNT/PLA composites fabricated via ball mill mixing method, and schematics of 3D printing method used for fabrication of CNT/PLA scaffold structures, and SEM image of a scaffold printed in two layers using the 3D printing method. (g) Liquid sensitivity of CNT/PLA scaffolds (circle) and electrical conductivity (square) of bulk CNT/PLA composites as a function of CNTs concentration. Reproduced with permission from ref. [75], Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH.
Figure 4

(a) Total electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ABS carbon-based composites in three different layer-by-layer growing directions: perpendicular (upper graph), horizontal concentric (middle graph), and horizontal alternate (bottom graph). Reproduced with permission from ref. [69], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (b) Volume electrical conductivity as a function of MWCNT concentration. The inset shows the log–log plot of the electrical conductivity versus the volume fraction of MWCNTs. (c) SEM images of 3D printed MWCNT-based nanocomposite woven structure and used as conductive element in a simple electrical circuit. Reproduced with permission from ref. [70], Copyright 2015 Elsevier. (d) The electrical resistance variation with the bending cycles. The inset shows the bending process. (e) The electrical resistance variation for the composites at a maximum strain of 10% with the stretching cycles. Reproduced with permission from ref. [71], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (f) Schematic of CNT/PLA composites fabricated via ball mill mixing method, and schematics of 3D printing method used for fabrication of CNT/PLA scaffold structures, and SEM image of a scaffold printed in two layers using the 3D printing method. (g) Liquid sensitivity of CNT/PLA scaffolds (circle) and electrical conductivity (square) of bulk CNT/PLA composites as a function of CNTs concentration. Reproduced with permission from ref. [75], Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH.

SLS molding technology, as a non-shearing and free-flowing pressureless processing technology, provides a unique method to construct the conductive isolation network of CNTs in the polymer matrix. And it has a very low permeation threshold and is an important method for preparing highly conductive materials. Li’s research group [71] used self-made CNTs to wrap TPU powder to prepare flexible TPU conductors. The author used ultrasound to disperse CNTs in ethanol. Then the TPU powder is added to the CNT suspension, and mechanically stirred before filtering and drying to obtain the CNT-wrapped TPU powder used as the raw material for SLS molding. The conductivity of TPU/CNT composites treated by SLS has a low threshold of 0.2%. At the same time, the conductivity of CNT composite materials has been significantly improved. When the concentration of CNTs does not exceed 1 wt%, SLS has a lower permeation threshold and higher conductivity than traditional molding methods. In addition, the TPU/CNT composite components prepared by the SLS molding method can maintain good flexibility and durability, and even after repeated bending tests thousands of times, the resistance can maintain a nearly constant value (Figure 4d and e). Through this method, flexible conductive TPU/CNT composites with complex structures and shapes can be easily obtained. Yuan’s research group [23] successfully dispersed MWCNTs uniformly in deionized water through ultrasonic induction and surface modification with sodium bile salt, and obtained functionalized CNTs. Then the polyamide-12 and polyurethane powder are dispersed in deionized water, and the surface of the polymer powder is softened and activated by heating. Finally, the heated functionalized CNTs aqueous suspension is added to the polymer emulsion suspension, and after mixing, cooling, filtering, and drying, functionalized CNT/polyamide-12 and functionalized CNT/polyurethane powder are prepared for raw materials of SLS technology molding. In addition, the isolation microstructure induced during processing is more conducive to the electrical conductivity of the composite material. The low permeability threshold behavior of 0.5% can increase the electrical conductivity of the prepared functionalized CNTs/polyamide-12 and functionalized CNTs/polyurethane by seven orders of magnitude. Although the simultaneous production of the inevitable pores will affect the thermal conductivity, such highly conductive composite parts (functionalized CNTs/polyamide-12) and porous hybrid composite parts (functionalized CNTs/polyurethane) have very great application potential in the fields of aerospace, electronic devices, and automobiles.

For SLA, Eng et al. [72] studied the improvement of mechanical properties of 3D printing components by CNTs on photosensitive resin developed from visible light cured acrylate and epoxy resin-based oligomers as raw materials. In this study, by combining an improved CNTs dispersion process and a thermal curing post-treatment method at the same time, the mechanical properties of the 3D components were significantly improved. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus were approximately 48 and 885 MPa, respectively. Although the elongation is still lower than the standard for injection molded parts, this enhancement is already very rare for SLA processes that are not good at mechanical properties, and for thermoset materials, they are often more brittle than thermoplastic materials. Sandoval’s research group [73] dispersed MWCNTs into epoxy resin by shearing, ultrasonic, and mechanical stirring, successively and used SLA technology to prepare complex 3D components, and evaluated the components through mechanical performance tests. The results show that only need a small amount of MWCNTs can have a significant impact on the physical properties of the polymer resin. Compared with the control group without MWCNTs, when the concentration of MWCNTs is only 0.05 wt%, the ultimate tensile stress and fracture stress of the nanocomposite are increased by 17 and 37%, respectively. Due to the advantages of SLA based 3D printing technology, such as high forming accuracy, fast curing, high forming quality, and low requirements for nozzle, more and more research is being conducted on the preparation of intelligent and functional materials with this technology. Mu et al. [74] used digital light processing type printers to prepare and study conductive polymer nanocomposites. The printing ink is a mixture of acrylic-based light-curing resin and MWCNTs. N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) and polyethylene glycol octylphenyl ether are used as the dispersion solvent for MWCNTs. The results show that when the conductive penetration threshold is only 0.1%, and when the conductivity and printability are considered at the same time, the layer thickness in the optimal printing parameters can be controlled to 19.05 μm, and the curing time is only 40 s. In addition, based on its electrical conductivity, the prepared MWCNT nanocomposite can be used as a smart material with strain sensitivity and shape memory effect. And mechanical performance experiments show that the addition of MWCNTs can slightly increase the modulus and ultimate tensile stress, while accompanied by a small decrease in ultimate elongation at break, which indicates that the new functions of the prepared MWCNT nanocomposite are not obtained at the expense of mechanical properties.

As shown in Figure 4f, Chizari et al. [75] used solvent cast-3D printing technology and used a mixed solution of CNTs and PLA as printing ink to prepare a stent structure for liquid sensors. The printing ink is prepared by dissolving PLA in dichloromethane to obtain a dichloromethane solution of PLA, and then uniformly dispersing MWCNTs into the dichloromethane solution of PLA by a ball milling method, and the resulting CNT/PLA dichloromethane solution is at room temperature dry for 24 h, and finally dissolve the dried CNT/dichloromethane composite material in a certain amount of dichloromethane. Test studies have shown that when the concentration of CNTs is 2 wt%, the conductivity can reach 45 S/m, which is sufficient for the study of the sensitivity of liquid sensors. However, in the actual application of low-voltage state, composite materials usually have high conductivity, which requires the content of CNTs in composite materials to be relatively high. Compared with several other 3D printing technologies, Solvent cast-3D printing technology is easier to obtain high conductivity. Composite material filled with particle content. The author uses ball milling to increase the content of CNTs in PLA/CNTs to 40 wt%. Considering printability, mechanical properties, and conductivity at the same time, 30 wt% CNTs concentration is the best effect (Figure 4g). The conductivity can reach 2,350 S/m, which is much higher than the 100 S/m reported by Postiglione et al., and can be applied to the application of different kinds of electronic components.

6 Commercial application of polymer-based composites modified by carbon materials

6.1 Application in the field of energy storage

Based on the excellent electrical conductivity and low thermal expansion coefficient of graphene, the researchers combined graphene with anode or cathode active materials to form 3D lithium-ion batteries or make GNP and sulfur copolymers into battery cathodes through 3D printing, and by using a supercapacitor composed of a thermally responsive ink mixed with GNP and Cu powder, to study the potential application of the high conductivity and low resistance of the composite material with GNP in lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors.

Shen et al. [76] mixed sublimated sulfur and GO solutions to prepare concentrated ink, and then added 1, 3-diisopropenylbenzene to it, and the sulfur copolymer-graphene structure (3DP-pSG) with periodic micro-lattices was formed by FDM-based 3D printing technology. The study found that the structure has a high reversible capacity of 812.8 mAh g and good cycle performance. Rocha et al. [77] referred to the water-based thermal response formula to mix Cu powder, chemically modified graphene and Pluronic F127 (thermally responsive ink). The electrode was solidified by freeze-drying and the GO was reduced by heat treatment, and an RGO/Cu 3D printed electrode with an interlocking interface was obtained. The test found that the Nyquist pattern generated by the RGO/Cu 3D printed electrode has the same shape as the ideal supercapacitor, indicating that the contact between the RGO electrode and the copper electrode is good. When the content of graphene in polymer composites is high, graphene can form a more compact microstructure and a well-connected conductive network. For example, Huang et al. [78] prepared graphene (200 mg/mL) inks that can be used for printing, and prepared a self-supporting graphene scaffold through FDM-based 3D printing technology. Through compression experiments, it was found that as the compressive strain increases, the resistance change of the 3D printing material with 50 wt% graphene content is slower than that of the composite material with 25 or 37 wt% graphene content. Vernardou et al. [79] used commercially available PLA-based conductive graphene as a raw material, and fabricated graphene pyramids layer by layer through a dual-extrusion FDM 3D printer. A graphene pyramid with a height of 5 mm can be used as an active material, and its current does not change significantly after 1,000 cycles; after charge and discharge analysis, the graphene pyramid’s initial discharge specific capacity is 265 mAh/g, after 1,000 cycles the electrical performance after scanning is equivalent to that of the actual lithium battery (Figure 5a).

Figure 5 
                  (a) Chronopotentiometric curves for 3D printed graphene pyramids with 5.0 mm height under specific current of 40 mA/g, potential ranging −0.5 to −1.0 V and scan numbers 1 and 1,000. Specific discharge capacity of the same sample as a function with scan numbers as inset. Reproduced with permission from ref. [79], Copyright 2017 Springer. (b) Schematic of the SLS process. (c) Piezoelectric strain coefficient d33 of the BT60, PBCNCs, and PBCNCs-3D. Reproduced with permission from ref. [80], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (d) Computed tomographic scanning of pig heart with deployed 3D-printed PCL-GR stent. Reproduced with permission from ref. [84], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (e) Actin cytoskeleton (phalloidin) staining of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on 3D printed PTMC–CCG 0.5% and PTMC scaffolds after 3 days of culture in maintenance medium. Scale bars represent 200 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. [87], Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (f) Schematic of graphene nerve conduit fabrication with layer-by-layer casting (LBLC) method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [88], Copyright 2018 Nature Publishing Group. (g) Enhanced neural stem cell proliferation in 3D printed scaffolds with or without MWCNTs after 7 days of culture. (h) Fluorescent micrographs of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transduced neural stem cells (NSCs) with different electrical stimulation parameters after 4 day of culture. Scale bar = 100 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. [90], Copyright 2018 IOP Publishing Group.
Figure 5

(a) Chronopotentiometric curves for 3D printed graphene pyramids with 5.0 mm height under specific current of 40 mA/g, potential ranging −0.5 to −1.0 V and scan numbers 1 and 1,000. Specific discharge capacity of the same sample as a function with scan numbers as inset. Reproduced with permission from ref. [79], Copyright 2017 Springer. (b) Schematic of the SLS process. (c) Piezoelectric strain coefficient d33 of the BT60, PBCNCs, and PBCNCs-3D. Reproduced with permission from ref. [80], Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (d) Computed tomographic scanning of pig heart with deployed 3D-printed PCL-GR stent. Reproduced with permission from ref. [84], Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (e) Actin cytoskeleton (phalloidin) staining of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on 3D printed PTMC–CCG 0.5% and PTMC scaffolds after 3 days of culture in maintenance medium. Scale bars represent 200 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. [87], Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (f) Schematic of graphene nerve conduit fabrication with layer-by-layer casting (LBLC) method. Reproduced with permission from ref. [88], Copyright 2018 Nature Publishing Group. (g) Enhanced neural stem cell proliferation in 3D printed scaffolds with or without MWCNTs after 7 days of culture. (h) Fluorescent micrographs of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transduced neural stem cells (NSCs) with different electrical stimulation parameters after 4 day of culture. Scale bar = 100 μm. Reproduced with permission from ref. [90], Copyright 2018 IOP Publishing Group.

As shown in Figure 5b, Qi et al. [80] proposed a polyamide/barium carbonate/CNT ternary nanocomposite suitable for piezoelectric devices. In this study, due to the shear-free and free-flowing characteristics of SLS technology, a three-dimensionally isolated permeable network was constructed in polyamide/barium carbonate/CNTs. The results show that the polyamide/barium carbonate nanocomposite powder coated with CNTs has higher laser absorption characteristics and a wider sintering window than the traditional polyamide/barium carbonate composite powder. Its structure is to randomly distribute CNTs in the powder particles, so that the composite powder has better sinterability. In the polyamide/barium carbonate/CNT module, a 3D isolated conduction path is effectively constructed, and its permeation threshold is only 0.3%. The 3D isolated percolation network greatly enhances the dielectric constant of the polyamide/barium carbonate/CNT ternary nanocomposite, covering the entire frequency range, because it is formed in the polyamide/barium carbonate/CNT module a large number of microcapacitors. More importantly, the value of the piezoelectric strain coefficient d33 of polyamide/barium carbonate/CNTs is increased to 2.1 Pc/N (Figure 5c). Therefore, the use of SLS technology to construct a 3D isolation percolation network in piezoelectric materials can effectively improve the performance of piezoelectric polymers, which will be an effective means to improve the performance of energy harvesting and energy storage devices.

6.2 Application in the field of biomedicine

Many researchers use 3D printing technology to make biocompatible polymer materials and graphene into hydrogels, 3D scaffolds, catheters, etc., and through in vitro experiments to simulate its impact on bone tissue, nerve tissue, and cell proliferation, it was found that low-content graphene is non-toxic to biological cells [81]. Similarly, GO has good biocompatibility, can enhance the stiffness of biomaterials, and promote cell proliferation, providing a good prospect for tissue engineering and biomedical research [66].

The development of 3D printing technology for manufacturing hydrogel structures has made mass production of engineered cartilage tissue possible. Cheng et al. [82] connected the bio 3D printing micro-injection system to the biopolymer reservoir and used chondrocytes to inoculate GO/chitosan hydrogel. The study found that compared with pure hydrogel, 3D printed GO/hydrogel tissue will have thicker new cartilage four weeks after transplantation into cartilage tissue. Wang et al. [83] used NaOH solution to process 3D printed poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds with low-concentration graphene added, and found that the scaffolds treated with NaOH had higher biocompatibility with cells. Misra et al. [84] used a homogeneous mixing method to prepare the GNP/PCL complex, and used FDM-based 3D printing technology to form a GNP/PCL composite 3D scaffold. After co-cultivating the scaffold and cells for a certain period of time, it was found that the scaffold was harmless to the growing human umbilical vein endothelial cell population. As shown in Figure 5d, they also placed the 3D printed GNP/PCL stent in the coronary arteries of pigs to observe the compatibility of the two, which provides the feasibility of using 3D printed GNP/PCL stents for personalized intervention of coronary heart disease. Shuai et al. [85] incorporated GO as an additive into PVA, and the two were combined through strong hydrogen bonds, and then used SLS technology to fabricate GO/PVA scaffolds. The scaffold has an open, uniform, and interconnected porous structure, and irregularly shaped pores with a diameter of less than 150 μm are randomly distributed on the surface of the pillars. When the amount of GO was 2.5 wt%, the compressive strength, Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the stent increased by 60, 152, and 69%, respectively. With the increase of the amount of GO, GO agglomerates, and stacks, resulting in the deterioration of the mechanical properties of the stent. After culturing MG-63 cells on the surface of the scaffold with 2.5 wt% GO for a period of time, it was found that the cells were tightly anchored on the surface of the scaffold and almost completely covered the entire surface, while the cell coverage of the scaffold without graphene was only about 30%. Sayyar et al. [86] incorporated chemically converted graphene into chitinated chitosan (ChiMA) hydrogels, and obtained a cell-compatible matrix with enhanced mechanical properties and cell adhesion characteristics, it is then processed into a stent through FDM-based printing technology. Culturing fiber cells on chitosan and graphene/chitosan composite film respectively found that compared with pure chitosan film, fiber cells achieved good adhesion and proliferation on the graphene/chitosan composite film, indicating that the addition of graphene changed the adhesion of chitosan. Sayyar et al. [87] mixed a photoinitiator, ethylene carbonate, polytrimethylene carbonate (PTMC), and graphene in a DMF solution, and then used the FDM method to 3D print the PTMC/graphene scaffold under nitrogen pressure. As shown in Figure 5e, cells were cultured on 3D printed PTMC/graphene-3 wt% scaffolds and PTMC scaffolds, and there was no significant difference in the DNA content of the cells on the two scaffolds, indicating that the addition of graphene had no significant effect on the number of cells. Therefore, PTMC/graphene composites with low graphene content have important application prospects in the field of biomedical materials, especially in the development of new conductive scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Graphene nanotechnology has great potential for peripheral nerve repair in clinical applications. In the 3D printed nerve conduit, the graphene nanoparticles are distributed very uniformly, ensuring the ideal electrical conductivity for peripheral nerve regeneration. As shown in Figure 5f, Qian et al. [88] mixed single-layer graphene or multilayer graphene with PCL, and fabricated multilayer graphene/PCL nerve conduits using FDM-based 3D printing technology. Studies have shown that 3D printed nerve conduits help functional sciatic nerve recovery and axon regeneration; 18 weeks after surgery, it was observed that the nerve conduits were softer than when implanted, and with the slow degradation of PCL substrates, graphene did not Causes toxic effects on the target. In addition, Bustillos et al. [89] fabricated PLA and graphene-reinforced PLA/graphene composites through 3D FDM printing, and found that compared to pure polylactic acid materials, the creep and wear resistance of PLA/graphene composites have been significantly improved. The wear resistance has increased by 14%, the creep displacement has been reduced by about 20.5%, and the nano-hardness has increased by 18%. This shows that it is feasible to use 3D printed PLA/graphene as an orthopedic scaffold.

Lee et al. [90] applied polymer composites containing CNTs in the field of neurotherapy by using SLA-based 3D printing technology. Polyethylene glycol diacrylate and amine-functionalized MWCNTs were used as the raw materials of SLA-based 3D printing technology, are used to prepare nerve scaffolds with controllable voids and complex structures, and the enhancement of electrical properties and nano-characteristics of the scaffold surface has been studied. The main research results show that compared with the scaffold without MWCNTs, the scaffold containing MWCNTs can promote the proliferation of neural stem cells and the differentiation of early neurons (Figure 5g). In addition, the addition of MWCNT makes the nerve scaffolds have conductivity. Experiments have confirmed that by cooperating with corresponding electrical stimulation, it will have a synergistic effect on promoting nerve regeneration in the application field of nerve regeneration therapy (Figure 5h).

7 Conclusion

In this review, first, the principles and characteristics of several representative 3D printing molding processes, such as FDM, SLS, SLA, and solvent cast-3D printing, are introduced. Subsequently, the application of 3D printing technology in the field of CF, graphene, and CNT-doped polymer composite molding was reviewed. And the application progress of 3D nano-carbon material–polymer composite materials in the field of commercialization.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Christ JF, Aliheidari N, Ameli A, Pötschke P. 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of multiwalled carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Mater & Des. 2017;131:394–401.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.011Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Campbell TA, Ivanova OS. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today. 2013;8(2):119–20.10.1016/j.nantod.2012.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Gnanasekaran K, Heijmans T, Van Bennekom S, Woldhuis H, Wijnia S, de With G, et al. 3D printing of CNT-and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. Appl Mater today. 2017;9:21–8.10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Tayebi L, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Cui Z, Ye H. 3D-printed thick structured gelatin membrane for engineering of heterogeneous tissues. Mater Lett. 2018;217:39–43.10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.032Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Kroll E, Artzi D. Enhancing aerospace engineering students’ learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models. Rapid Prototyp J. 2011;17:393–402.10.1108/13552541111156522Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Fu K, Yao Y, Dai J, Hu L. Progress in 3D printing of carbon materials for energy related applications. Adv Mater. 2017;29(9):1603486.10.1002/adma.201603486Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Lopes AJ, MacDonald E, Wicker RB. Integrating stereolithography and direct print technologies for 3D structural electronics fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J. 2012;18:129–43.10.1108/13552541211212113Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Wittbrodt B, Laureto J, Tymrak B, Pearce JM. Distributed manufacturing with 3-D printing: a case study of recreational vehicle solar photovoltaic mounting systems. J Frugal Innov. 2015;1(1):1–7.10.1186/s40669-014-0001-zSuche in Google Scholar

[9] Llewellyn-Jones T, Allen R, Trask R. Curved layer fused filament fabrication using automated toolpath generation. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2016;3(4):236–43.10.1089/3dp.2016.0033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials. Methods Appl Challeng Compos Part B. 2018;2:12.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Barathi Dassan EG, Anjang Ab Rahman A, Abidin MSZ, Akil HM. Carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer composite for electromagnetic interference application: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):768–88.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0064Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Li B, Wu S, Gao X. Theoretical calculation of a TiO2-based photocatalyst in the field of water splitting: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):1080–103.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0085Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Wu Q, Miao W, Zhang Y, Gao H, Hui D. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):259–73.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0021Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Zhang P, Wang Z, Li J, Li X, Cheng L. From materials to devices using fused deposition modeling: a state-of-art review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):1594–609.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0101Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Leigh SJ, Bradley RJ, Purssell CP, Billson DR, Hutchins DA. A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS one. 2012;7(11):e49365.10.1371/journal.pone.0049365Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J. 2014;20:192–204.10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. Int Sch Res Not. 2012;2012:1–10.10.5402/2012/208760Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;110:442–58.10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Yugang D, Yuan Z, Yiping T, Dichen L. Nano-TiO2-modified photosensitive resin for RP. Rapid Prototyp J. 2011;17:247–52.10.1108/13552541111138360Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Feng X, Yang Z, Rostom SSH, Dadmun M, Xie Y, Wang S. Structural, mechanical, and thermal properties of 3D printed L-CNC/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134(31):45082.10.1002/app.45082Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Lee DY, Lee H, Kim Y, Yoo SY, Chung WJ, Kim G. Phage as versatile nanoink for printing 3-D cell-laden scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2016;29:112–24.10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Nathan-Walleser T, Lazar IM, Fabritius M, Tölle FJ, Xia Q, Bruchmann B, et al. 3D micro-extrusion of graphene-based active electrodes: towards high-rate AC line filtering performance electrochemical capacitors. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(29):4706–16.10.1002/adfm.201304151Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Yuan S, Zheng Y, Chua CK, Yan Q, Zhou K. Electrical and thermal conductivities of MWCNT/polymer composites fabricated by selective laser sintering. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;105:203–13.10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.007Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Feng X, Yang Z, Chmely S, Wang Q, Wang S, Xie Y. Lignin-coated cellulose nanocrystal filled methacrylate composites prepared via 3D stereolithography printing: mechanical reinforcement and thermal stabilization. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;169:272–81.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6121–30.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] D'urso PS, Earwaker WJ, Barker TM, Redmond MJ, Thompson RG, Effeney DJ, et al. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plastic Surg. 2000;53(3):200–4.10.1054/bjps.1999.3268Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Popov VK, Evseev AV, Ivanov AL, Roginski VV, Volozhin AI, Howdle SM. Laser stereolithography and supercritical fluid processing for custom-designed implant fabrication. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(2):123–8.10.1023/B:JMSM.0000011812.08185.2aSuche in Google Scholar

[28] Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260(5110):920–6.10.1201/9781420051834.sec1Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Dhariwala B, Hunt E, Boland T. Rapid prototyping of tissue-engineering constructs, using photopolymerizable hydrogels and stereolithography. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(9–10):1316–22.10.1089/ten.2004.10.1316Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct. 2017;182:36–53.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Crivello JV, Reichmanis E. Photopolymer materials and processes for advanced technologies. Chem Mater. 2014;26(1):533–48.10.1021/cm402262gSuche in Google Scholar

[32] Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212–90.10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Manapat JZ, Mangadlao JD, Tiu BD, Tritchler GC, Advincula RC. High-strength stereolithographic 3D printed nanocomposites: graphene oxide metastability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(11):10085–93.10.1021/acsami.6b16174Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Guo SZ, Heuzey MC, Therriault D. Properties of polylactide inks for solvent-cast printing of three-dimensional freeform microstructures. Langmuir. 2014;30(4):1142–50.10.1021/la4036425Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Guo SZ, Gosselin F, Guerin N, Lanouette AM, Heuzey MC, Therriault D. Solvent-cast three-dimensional printing of multifunctional microsystems. Small. 2013;9(24):4118–22.10.1002/smll.201300975Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Bacon R, Tang MM. Carbonization of cellulose fibers-II. Physical property study. Carbon. 1964;2(3):221–5.10.1016/0008-6223(64)90036-3Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Zhong Y, Bian W, Wang M. The effect of nanostructure on the tensile modulus of carbon fibers. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(7):3564–73.10.1007/s10853-015-9676-7Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wang H, Shi J, Zhang J, Tao Z, et al. Microstructure and thermal/mechanical properties of short carbon fiber-reinforced natural graphite flake composites with mesophase pitch as the binder. Carbon. 2013;53:313–20.10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.013Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Chapiro M. Current achievements and future outlook for composites in 3D printing. Reinforced Plast. 2016;60(6):372–5.10.1016/j.repl.2016.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Stepashkin AA, Chukov DI, Senatov FS, Salimon AI, Korsunsky AM, Kaloshkin SD. 3D-printed PEEK-carbon fiber composites: Structure and thermal properties. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;164:319–26.10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.032Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Obradovic J, Boria S, Belingardi G. Lightweight design and crash analysis of composite frontal impact energy absorbing structures. Compos Struct. 2012;94(2):423–30.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.005Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Guo M, Yi X. The production of tough, electrically conductive carbon fiber composite laminates for use in airframes. Carbon. 2013;58:241–4.10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.052Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Jansson A, Pejryd L. Characterisation of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide manufactured by selective laser sintering. Addit Manuf. 2016;9:7–13.10.1016/j.addma.2015.12.003Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Flodberg G, Pettersson H, Yang L. Pore analysis and mechanical performance of selective laser sintered objects. Addit Manuf. 2018;24:307–15.10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Yan C, Hao L, Xu L, Shi Y. Preparation, characterisation and processing of carbon fibre/polyamide-12 composites for selective laser sintering. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71(16):1834–41.10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.013Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Liao G, Li Z, Cheng Y, Xu D, Zhu D, Jiang S, et al. Properties of oriented carbon fiber/polyamide 12 composite parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater Des. 2018;139:283–92.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.027Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q, Li D. Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2016;88:198–205.10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Yang C, Tian X, Liu T, Cao Y, Li D. 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism and performance. Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23:209–15.10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, Wei J, Wang S. Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B: Eng. 2015;80:369–78.10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Tekinalp HL, Kunc V, Velez-Garcia GM, Duty CE, Love LJ, Naskar AK, et al. Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;105:144–50.10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Wang Y, Feng J, Jin L, Li C. Photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide with cuprous oxide film under UV-vis irradiation. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59(1):207–14.10.1515/rams-2020-0022Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Wang J, Xu Y, Wu X, Zhang P, Hu S. Advances of graphene- and graphene oxide-modified cementitious materials. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9(1):465–77.10.1515/ntrev-2020-0041Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Lin D, Jin S, Zhang F, Wang C, Wang Y, Zhou C, et al. 3D stereolithography printing of graphene oxide reinforced complex architectures. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(43):434003.10.1088/0957-4484/26/43/434003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Xue B, Zou Y. Homogeneous transfer of graphene oxide into photoresist: Fabrication of high surface area three-dimensional micro-arrays by modified photolithography. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;157:78–85.10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.013Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Chiappone A, Roppolo I, Naretto E, Fantino E, Calignano F, Sangermano M, et al. Study of graphene oxide-based 3D printable composites: effect of the in situ reduction. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;124:9–15.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.049Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Singh R, Sandhu G, Penna R, Farina I. Investigations for thermal and electrical conductivity of ABS-graphene blended prototypes. Materials. 2017;10(8):881.10.3390/ma10080881Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[57] Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, Gu Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, et al. 3D printable graphene composite. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–7.10.1038/srep11181Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Chen Q, Mangadlao JD, Wallat J, De Leon A, Pokorski JK, Advincula RC. 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly (lactic acid)/graphene oxide nanocomposites: anisotropic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(4):4015–23.10.1021/acsami.6b11793Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Zhu D, Ren Y, Liao G, Jiang S, Liu F, Guo J, et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of polyamide 12/graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposites and parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134(39):45332.10.1002/app.45332Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Kholkhoev BC, Buinov AS, Kozlova MN, Makotchenko VG, Fedorov VE, Burdukovskii VF. Functional composites based on polylactide and graphene. Russian J Appl Chem. 2018;91(3):392–5.10.1134/S1070427218030084Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Gaikwad S, Tate J, Theodoropoulou N, Koo J. Electrical and mechanical properties of PA11 blended with nanographene platelets using industrial twin-screw extruder for selective laser sintering. J Compos Mater. 2013;47(23):2973–86.10.1177/0021998312460560Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Lau AK, Hui D. The revolutionary creation of new advanced materials – carbon nanotube composites. Compos Part B: Eng. 2002;33(4):263–77.10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00012-4Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Lau K-T, Chipara M, Ling H-Y, Hui D. On the effective elastic moduli of carbon nanotubes for nanocomposite structures. Compos Part B: Eng. 2004;35(2):95–101.10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.08.008Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Hashim H, Salleh MS, Omar MZ. Homogenous dispersion and interfacial bonding of carbon nanotube reinforced with aluminum matrix composite: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;58(1):295–303.10.1515/rams-2019-0035Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Visconti P, Primiceri P, de Fazio R, Strafella L, Ficarella A, Carlucci AP. Light-induced ignition of carbon nanotubes and energetic nano-materials: a review on methods and advanced technical solutions for nanoparticles-enriched fuels combustion. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59(1):26–46.10.1515/rams-2020-0010Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Lau K-T, Gu C, Hui D. A critical review on nanotube and nanotube/nanoclay related polymer composite materials. Compos Part B: Eng. 2006;37(6):425–36.10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.020Suche in Google Scholar

[67] Zheng N, Huang Y, Liu HY, Gao J, Mai YW. Improvement of interlaminar fracture toughness in carbon fiber/epoxy composites with carbon nanotubes/polysulfone interleaves. Compos Sci Technol. 2017;140:8–15.10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.017Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Thomas DJ. Developing nanocomposite 3D printing filaments for enhanced integrated device fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;95(9–12):4191–8.10.1007/s00170-017-1478-4Suche in Google Scholar

[69] Schmitz DP, Ecco LG, Dul S, Pereira ECL, Soares BG, Barra GMO, et al. Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of ABS carbon-based composites manufactured via fused deposition modelling. Mater Today Commun. 2018;15:70–80.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.02.034Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Postiglione G, Natale G, Griffini G, Levi M, Turri S. Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modeling. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;76:110–4.10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Li Z, Wang Z, Gan X, Fu D, Fei G, Xia H. Selective laser sintering 3D printing: a way to construct 3d electrically conductive segregated network in polymer matrix. Macromol Mater Eng. 2017;302(11):1700211.10.1002/mame.201700211Suche in Google Scholar

[72] Eng H, Maleksaeedi S, Yu S, Choong YYC, Wiria FE, Kheng RE, et al. Development of CNTs-filled photopolymer for projection stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23:129–36.10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0148Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Sandoval JH, Soto KF, Murr LE, Wicker RB. Nanotailoring photocrosslinkable epoxy resins with multi-walled carbon nanotubes for stereolithography layered manufacturing. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(1):156–65.10.1007/s10853-006-1035-2Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Mu Q, Wang L, Dunn CK, Kuang X, Duan F, Zhang Z, et al. Digital light processing 3D printing of conductive complex structures. Addit Manuf. 2017;18:74–83.10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.011Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Chizari K, Daoud MA, Ravindran AR, Therriault D. 3D printing of highly conductive nanocomposites for the functional optimization of liquid sensors. Small. 2016;12(44):6076–82.10.1002/smll.201601695Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Shen K, Mei H, Li B, Ding J, Yang S. 3D printing sulfur copolymer-graphene architectures for Li-S batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2018;8(4):1701527.10.1002/aenm.201701527Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Rocha VG, García-Tuñón E, Botas C, Markoulidis F, Feilden E, D'Elia E, et al. Multimaterial 3D printing of graphene-based electrodes for electrochemical energy storage using thermoresponsive inks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(42):37136–45.10.1021/acsami.7b10285Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Huang K, Yang J, Dong S, Feng Q, Zhang X, Ding Y, et al. Anisotropy of graphene scaffolds assembled by three-dimensional printing. Carbon. 2018;130:1–10.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.120Suche in Google Scholar

[79] Vernardou D, Vasilopoulos KC, Kenanakis G. 3D printed graphene-based electrodes with high electrochemical performance. Appl Phys A. 2017;123(10):1–7.10.1007/s00339-017-1238-1Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Qi F, Chen N, Wang Q. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties in selective laser sintered polyamide11/BaTiO3/CNT ternary nanocomposites. Mater Des. 2018;143:72–80.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.050Suche in Google Scholar

[81] Typek J, Guskos N, Zolnierkiewicz G, Pilarska M, Guskos A, Kusiak-Nejman E, et al. Magnetic properties of TiO2/graphitic carbon nanocomposites. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58(1):107–22.10.1515/rams-2019-0009Suche in Google Scholar

[82] Cheng Z, Landish B, Chi Z, Nannan C, Jingyu D, Sen L, et al. 3D printing hydrogel with graphene oxide is functional in cartilage protection by influencing the signal pathway of Rank/Rankl/OPG. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2018;82:244–52.10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.069Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Wang W, Caetano G, Ambler W, Blaker J, Frade M, Mandal P, et al. Enhancing the hydrophilicity and cell attachment of 3D printed PCL/graphene scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2016;9(12):992.10.3390/ma9120992Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[84] Misra SK, Ostadhossein F, Babu R, Kus J, Tankasala D, Sutrisno A, et al. 3D-printed multidrug-eluting stent from graphene-nanoplatelet-doped biodegradable polymer composite. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(11):1700008.10.1002/adhm.201700008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Shuai C, Feng P, Gao C, Shuai X, Xiao T, Peng S. Graphene oxide reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol): nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. RSC Adv. 2015;5(32):25416–23.10.1039/C4RA16702CSuche in Google Scholar

[86] Sayyar S, Gambhir S, Chung J, Officer DL, Wallace GG. 3D printable conducting hydrogels containing chemically converted graphene. Nanoscale. 2017;9(5):2038–50.10.1039/C6NR07516ASuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Sayyar S, Bjorninen M, Haimi S, Miettinen S, Gilmore K, Grijpma D, et al. UV cross-linkable graphene/poly (trimethylene carbonate) composites for 3D printing of electrically conductive scaffolds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(46):31916–25.10.1021/acsami.6b09962Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] Qian Y, Zhao X, Han Q, Chen W, Li H, Yuan W. An integrated multi-layer 3D-fabrication of PDA/RGD coated graphene loaded PCL nanoscaffold for peripheral nerve restoration. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–16.10.1038/s41467-017-02598-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[89] Bustillos J, Montero D, Nautiyal P, Loganathan A, Boesl B, Agarwal A. Integration of graphene in poly (lactic) acid by 3D printing to develop creep and wear-resistant hierarchical nanocomposites. Polym Compos. 2018;39(11):3877–88.10.1002/pc.24422Suche in Google Scholar

[90] Lee SJ, Zhu W, Nowicki M, Lee G, Heo DN, Kim J, et al. 3D printing nano conductive multi-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds for nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(1):016018.10.1088/1741-2552/aa95a5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Kośla K, Olejnik M, Olszewska K. Preparation and properties of composite materials containing graphene structures and their applicability in personal protective equipment: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59(1):215–42.10.1515/rams-2020-0025Suche in Google Scholar

[92] Mohan VB, Lau K-T, Hui D, Bhattacharyya D. Graphene-based materials and their composites: a review on production, applications and product limitations. Compos Part B: Eng. 2018;142:200–20.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.013Suche in Google Scholar

[93] Yao S-S, Jin F-L, Rhee KY, Hui D, Park S-J. Recent advances in carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites: a review. Compos Part B: Eng. 2018;142:241–50.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007Suche in Google Scholar

[94] Zare Y, Rhee KY, Hui D. Influences of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration on the interfacial/interphase and tensile properties of nanocomposites. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;122:41–6.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.008Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-15
Revised: 2022-01-19
Accepted: 2022-01-24
Published Online: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Li Bianhong et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Theoretical and experimental investigation of MWCNT dispersion effect on the elastic modulus of flexible PDMS/MWCNT nanocomposites
  3. Mechanical, morphological, and fracture-deformation behavior of MWCNTs-reinforced (Al–Cu–Mg–T351) alloy cast nanocomposites fabricated by optimized mechanical milling and powder metallurgy techniques
  4. Flammability and physical stability of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch/poly(lactic acid) blend bionanocomposites
  5. Glutathione-loaded non-ionic surfactant niosomes: A new approach to improve oral bioavailability and hepatoprotective efficacy of glutathione
  6. Relationship between mechano-bactericidal activity and nanoblades density on chemically strengthened glass
  7. In situ regulation of microstructure and microwave-absorbing properties of FeSiAl through HNO3 oxidation
  8. Research on a mechanical model of magnetorheological fluid different diameter particles
  9. Nanomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of rubber–wood–plastic composites
  10. Investigative properties of CeO2 doped with niobium: A combined characterization and DFT studies
  11. Miniaturized peptidomimetics and nano-vesiculation in endothelin types through probable nano-disk formation and structure property relationships of endothelins’ fragments
  12. N/S co-doped CoSe/C nanocubes as anode materials for Li-ion batteries
  13. Synergistic effects of halloysite nanotubes with metal and phosphorus additives on the optimal design of eco-friendly sandwich panels with maximum flame resistance and minimum weight
  14. Octreotide-conjugated silver nanoparticles for active targeting of somatostatin receptors and their application in a nebulized rat model
  15. Controllable morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures formed via hydrothermal vulcanization of Bi2O3 thin-film layer and their photoelectrocatalytic performances
  16. Development of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles for prostate cancer treatment
  17. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of HDPE mineral nanocomposites by filler particles modulation of the matrix plastic/elastic behavior
  18. Effect of plasticizers on the properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/cinnamon essential oil reinforced starch bionanocomposite films
  19. Optimization of nano coating to reduce the thermal deformation of ball screws
  20. Preparation of efficient piezoelectric PVDF–HFP/Ni composite films by high electric field poling
  21. MHD dissipative Casson nanofluid liquid film flow due to an unsteady stretching sheet with radiation influence and slip velocity phenomenon
  22. Effects of nano-SiO2 modification on rubberised mortar and concrete with recycled coarse aggregates
  23. Mechanical and microscopic properties of fiber-reinforced coal gangue-based geopolymer concrete
  24. Effect of morphology and size on the thermodynamic stability of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Experiment and molecular dynamics calculation
  25. Mechanical performance of a CFRP composite reinforced via gelatin-CNTs: A study on fiber interfacial enhancement and matrix enhancement
  26. A practical review over surface modification, nanopatterns, emerging materials, drug delivery systems, and their biophysiochemical properties for dental implants: Recent progresses and advances
  27. HTR: An ultra-high speed algorithm for cage recognition of clathrate hydrates
  28. Effects of microalloying elements added by in situ synthesis on the microstructure of WCu composites
  29. A highly sensitive nanobiosensor based on aptamer-conjugated graphene-decorated rhodium nanoparticles for detection of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells
  30. Progressive collapse performance of shear strengthened RC frames by nano CFRP
  31. Core–shell heterostructured composites of carbon nanotubes and imine-linked hyperbranched polymers as metal-free Li-ion anodes
  32. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory
  33. Simple models for tensile modulus of shape memory polymer nanocomposites at ambient temperature
  34. Preparation and morphological studies of tin sulfide nanoparticles and use as efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of rhodamine B and phenol
  35. Polyethyleneimine-impregnated activated carbon nanofiber composited graphene-derived rice husk char for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture
  36. Electrospun nanofibers of Co3O4 nanocrystals encapsulated in cyclized-polyacrylonitrile for lithium storage
  37. Pitting corrosion induced on high-strength high carbon steel wire in high alkaline deaerated chloride electrolyte
  38. Formulation of polymeric nanoparticles loaded sorafenib; evaluation of cytotoxicity, molecular evaluation, and gene expression studies in lung and breast cancer cell lines
  39. Engineered nanocomposites in asphalt binders
  40. Influence of loading voltage, domain ratio, and additional load on the actuation of dielectric elastomer
  41. Thermally induced hex-graphene transitions in 2D carbon crystals
  42. The surface modification effect on the interfacial properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy: A molecular dynamics study
  43. Molecular dynamics study of deformation mechanism of interfacial microzone of Cu/Al2Cu/Al composites under tension
  44. Nanocolloid simulators of luminescent solar concentrator photovoltaic windows
  45. Compressive strength and anti-chloride ion penetration assessment of geopolymer mortar merging PVA fiber and nano-SiO2 using RBF–BP composite neural network
  46. Effect of 3-mercapto-1-propane sulfonate sulfonic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the growth of cobalt pillar by electrodeposition
  47. Dynamics of convective slippery constraints on hybrid radiative Sutterby nanofluid flow by Galerkin finite element simulation
  48. Preparation of vanadium by the magnesiothermic self-propagating reduction and process control
  49. Microstructure-dependent photoelectrocatalytic activity of heterogeneous ZnO–ZnS nanosheets
  50. Cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of molybdenum and tungsten disulphide on human bronchial cells
  51. Improving recycled aggregate concrete by compression casting and nano-silica
  52. Chemically reactive Maxwell nanoliquid flow by a stretching surface in the frames of Newtonian heating, nonlinear convection and radiative flux: Nanopolymer flow processing simulation
  53. Nonlinear dynamic and crack behaviors of carbon nanotubes-reinforced composites with various geometries
  54. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its therapeutic efficacy against colon cancer
  55. Synthesis and characterization of smart stimuli-responsive herbal drug-encapsulated nanoniosome particles for efficient treatment of breast cancer
  56. Homotopic simulation for heat transport phenomenon of the Burgers nanofluids flow over a stretching cylinder with thermal convective and zero mass flux conditions
  57. Incorporation of copper and strontium ions in TiO2 nanotubes via dopamine to enhance hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility
  58. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles
  59. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-strengthened recycled aggregate concrete
  60. Glucose-responsive nanogels efficiently maintain the stability and activity of therapeutic enzymes
  61. Tunning matrix rheology and mechanical performance of ultra-high performance concrete using cellulose nanofibers
  62. Flexible MXene/copper/cellulose nanofiber heat spreader films with enhanced thermal conductivity
  63. Promoted charge separation and specific surface area via interlacing of N-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes on carbon nitride nanosheets for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B
  64. Elucidating the role of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mitigating the disease of the eggplant caused by Phomopsis vexans, Ralstonia solanacearum, and root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita
  65. An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial
  66. Robust synthesis of a composite phase of copper vanadium oxide with enhanced performance for durable aqueous Zn-ion batteries
  67. Tunning self-assembled phases of bovine serum albumin via hydrothermal process to synthesize novel functional hydrogel for skin protection against UVB
  68. A comparative experimental study on damping properties of epoxy nanocomposite beams reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets
  69. Lightweight and hydrophobic Ni/GO/PVA composite aerogels for ultrahigh performance electromagnetic interference shielding
  70. Research on the auxetic behavior and mechanical properties of periodically rotating graphene nanostructures
  71. Repairing performances of novel cement mortar modified with graphene oxide and polyacrylate polymer
  72. Closed-loop recycling and fabrication of hydrophilic CNT films with high performance
  73. Design of thin-film configuration of SnO2–Ag2O composites for NO2 gas-sensing applications
  74. Study on stress distribution of SiC/Al composites based on microstructure models with microns and nanoparticles
  75. PVDF green nanofibers as potential carriers for improving self-healing and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy prepregs
  76. Osteogenesis capability of three-dimensionally printed poly(lactic acid)-halloysite nanotube scaffolds containing strontium ranelate
  77. Silver nanoparticles induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and late non-canonical autophagy in HT-29 colon cancer cells
  78. Preparation and bonding mechanisms of polymer/metal hybrid composite by nano molding technology
  79. Damage self-sensing and strain monitoring of glass-reinforced epoxy composite impregnated with graphene nanoplatelet and multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Thermal analysis characterisation of solar-powered ship using Oldroyd hybrid nanofluids in parabolic trough solar collector: An optimal thermal application
  81. Pyrene-functionalized halloysite nanotubes for simultaneously detecting and separating Hg(ii) in aqueous media: A comprehensive comparison on interparticle and intraparticle excimers
  82. Fabrication of self-assembly CNT flexible film and its piezoresistive sensing behaviors
  83. Thermal valuation and entropy inspection of second-grade nanoscale fluid flow over a stretching surface by applying Koo–Kleinstreuer–Li relation
  84. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-SiO2 and basalt-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete
  85. Characterization and tribology performance of polyaniline-coated nanodiamond lubricant additives
  86. Combined impact of Marangoni convection and thermophoretic particle deposition on chemically reactive transport of nanofluid flow over a stretching surface
  87. Spark plasma extrusion of binder free hydroxyapatite powder
  88. An investigation on thermo-mechanical performance of graphene-oxide-reinforced shape memory polymer
  89. Effect of nanoadditives on the novel leather fiber/recycled poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate) polymer composites for multifunctional applications: Fabrication, characterizations, and multiobjective optimization using central composite design
  90. Design selection for a hemispherical dimple core sandwich panel using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods
  91. Improving tensile strength and impact toughness of plasticized poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose
  92. Green synthesis of spinel copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanoparticles and their toxicity
  93. The effect of TaC and NbC hybrid and mono-nanoparticles on AA2024 nanocomposites: Microstructure, strengthening, and artificial aging
  94. Excited-state geometry relaxation of pyrene-modified cellulose nanocrystals under UV-light excitation for detecting Fe3+
  95. Effect of CNTs and MEA on the creep of face-slab concrete at an early age
  96. Effect of deformation conditions on compression phase transformation of AZ31
  97. Application of MXene as a new generation of highly conductive coating materials for electromembrane-surrounded solid-phase microextraction
  98. A comparative study of the elasto-plastic properties for ceramic nanocomposites filled by graphene or graphene oxide nanoplates
  99. Encapsulation strategies for improving the biological behavior of CdS@ZIF-8 nanocomposites
  100. Biosynthesis of ZnO NPs from pumpkin seeds’ extract and elucidation of its anticancer potential against breast cancer
  101. Preliminary trials of the gold nanoparticles conjugated chrysin: An assessment of anti-oxidant, anti-microbial, and in vitro cytotoxic activities of a nanoformulated flavonoid
  102. Effect of micron-scale pores increased by nano-SiO2 sol modification on the strength of cement mortar
  103. Fractional simulations for thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid with aluminum oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles with water and blood base fluids
  104. The effect of graphene nano-powder on the viscosity of water: An experimental study and artificial neural network modeling
  105. Development of a novel heat- and shear-resistant nano-silica gelling agent
  106. Characterization, biocompatibility and in vivo of nominal MnO2-containing wollastonite glass-ceramic
  107. Entropy production simulation of second-grade magnetic nanomaterials flowing across an expanding surface with viscidness dissipative flux
  108. Enhancement in structural, morphological, and optical properties of copper oxide for optoelectronic device applications
  109. Aptamer-functionalized chitosan-coated gold nanoparticle complex as a suitable targeted drug carrier for improved breast cancer treatment
  110. Performance and overall evaluation of nano-alumina-modified asphalt mixture
  111. Analysis of pure nanofluid (GO/engine oil) and hybrid nanofluid (GO–Fe3O4/engine oil): Novel thermal and magnetic features
  112. Synthesis of Ag@AgCl modified anatase/rutile/brookite mixed phase TiO2 and their photocatalytic property
  113. Mechanisms and influential variables on the abrasion resistance hydraulic concrete
  114. Synergistic reinforcement mechanism of basalt fiber/cellulose nanocrystals/polypropylene composites
  115. Achieving excellent oxidation resistance and mechanical properties of TiB2–B4C/carbon aerogel composites by quick-gelation and mechanical mixing
  116. Microwave-assisted sol–gel template-free synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles obtained from South African coal fly ash
  117. Pulsed laser-assisted synthesis of nano nickel(ii) oxide-anchored graphitic carbon nitride: Characterizations and their potential antibacterial/anti-biofilm applications
  118. Effects of nano-ZrSi2 on thermal stability of phenolic resin and thermal reusability of quartz–phenolic composites
  119. Benzaldehyde derivatives on tin electroplating as corrosion resistance for fabricating copper circuit
  120. Mechanical and heat transfer properties of 4D-printed shape memory graphene oxide/epoxy acrylate composites
  121. Coupling the vanadium-induced amorphous/crystalline NiFe2O4 with phosphide heterojunction toward active oxygen evolution reaction catalysts
  122. Graphene-oxide-reinforced cement composites mechanical and microstructural characteristics at elevated temperatures
  123. Gray correlation analysis of factors influencing compressive strength and durability of nano-SiO2 and PVA fiber reinforced geopolymer mortar
  124. Preparation of layered gradient Cu–Cr–Ti alloy with excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity
  125. Recovery of Cr from chrome-containing leather wastes to develop aluminum-based composite material along with Al2O3 ceramic particles: An ingenious approach
  126. Mechanisms of the improved stiffness of flexible polymers under impact loading
  127. Anticancer potential of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using a battery of in vitro tests
  128. Review Articles
  129. Proposed approaches for coronaviruses elimination from wastewater: Membrane techniques and nanotechnology solutions
  130. Application of Pickering emulsion in oil drilling and production
  131. The contribution of microfluidics to the fight against tuberculosis
  132. Graphene-based biosensors for disease theranostics: Development, applications, and recent advancements
  133. Synthesis and encapsulation of iron oxide nanorods for application in magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal therapy
  134. Contemporary nano-architectured drugs and leads for ανβ3 integrin-based chemotherapy: Rationale and retrospect
  135. State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials
  136. Insights on magnetic spinel ferrites for targeted drug delivery and hyperthermia applications
  137. A review on heterogeneous oxidation of acetaminophen based on micro and nanoparticles catalyzed by different activators
  138. Early diagnosis of lung cancer using magnetic nanoparticles-integrated systems
  139. Advances in ZnO: Manipulation of defects for enhancing their technological potentials
  140. Efficacious nanomedicine track toward combating COVID-19
  141. A review of the design, processes, and properties of Mg-based composites
  142. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for varied applications: Green renewable resources and energy-efficient synthetic routes
  143. Two-dimensional nanomaterial-based polymer composites: Fundamentals and applications
  144. Recent progress and challenges in plasmonic nanomaterials
  145. Apoptotic cell-derived micro/nanosized extracellular vesicles in tissue regeneration
  146. Electronic noses based on metal oxide nanowires: A review
  147. Framework materials for supercapacitors
  148. An overview on the reproductive toxicity of graphene derivatives: Highlighting the importance
  149. Antibacterial nanomaterials: Upcoming hope to overcome antibiotic resistance crisis
  150. Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites
  151. A review of atomic layer deposition modelling and simulation methodologies: Density functional theory and molecular dynamics
  152. Recent advances in the preparation of PVDF-based piezoelectric materials
  153. Recent developments in tensile properties of friction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced composite: A review
  154. Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO2
  155. Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations
  156. Graphene-based nanocomposite using new modeling molecular dynamic simulations for proposed neutralizing mechanism and real-time sensing of COVID-19
  157. Nanotechnology application on bamboo materials: A review
  158. Recent developments and future perspectives of biorenewable nanocomposites for advanced applications
  159. Nanostructured lipid carrier system: A compendium of their formulation development approaches, optimization strategies by quality by design, and recent applications in drug delivery
  160. 3D printing customized design of human bone tissue implant and its application
  161. Design, preparation, and functionalization of nanobiomaterials for enhanced efficacy in current and future biomedical applications
  162. A brief review of nanoparticles-doped PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite for OLED and OPV
  163. Nanotechnology interventions as a putative tool for the treatment of dental afflictions
  164. Recent advancements in metal–organic frameworks integrating quantum dots (QDs@MOF) and their potential applications
  165. A focused review of short electrospun nanofiber preparation techniques for composite reinforcement
  166. Microstructural characteristics and nano-modification of interfacial transition zone in concrete: A review
  167. Latest developments in the upconversion nanotechnology for the rapid detection of food safety: A review
  168. Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks
  169. Molecular dynamics application of cocrystal energetic materials: A review
  170. Synthesis and application of nanometer hydroxyapatite in biomedicine
  171. Cutting-edge development in waste-recycled nanomaterials for energy storage and conversion applications
  172. Biological applications of ternary quantum dots: A review
  173. Nanotherapeutics for hydrogen sulfide-involved treatment: An emerging approach for cancer therapy
  174. Application of antibacterial nanoparticles in orthodontic materials
  175. Effect of natural-based biological hydrogels combined with growth factors on skin wound healing
  176. Nanozymes – A route to overcome microbial resistance: A viewpoint
  177. Recent developments and applications of smart nanoparticles in biomedicine
  178. Contemporary review on carbon nanotube (CNT) composites and their impact on multifarious applications
  179. Interfacial interactions and reinforcing mechanisms of cellulose and chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete strength and durability enhancement: A review
  180. Diamond-like carbon films for tribological modification of rubber
  181. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) modified cement-based materials: A systematic review
  182. Recent research progress and advanced applications of silica/polymer nanocomposites
  183. Modeling of supramolecular biopolymers: Leading the in silico revolution of tissue engineering and nanomedicine
  184. Recent advances in perovskites-based optoelectronics
  185. Biogenic synthesis of palladium nanoparticles: New production methods and applications
  186. A comprehensive review of nanofluids with fractional derivatives: Modeling and application
  187. Electrospinning of marine polysaccharides: Processing and chemical aspects, challenges, and future prospects
  188. Electrohydrodynamic printing for demanding devices: A review of processing and applications
  189. Rapid Communications
  190. Structural material with designed thermal twist for a simple actuation
  191. Recent advances in photothermal materials for solar-driven crude oil adsorption
Heruntergeladen am 28.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0051/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen