Home Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
Article Open Access

Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics

  • Jörn Kretschmer EMAIL logo , Axel Riedlinger and Knut Möller
Published/Copyright: September 12, 2015

Abstract

Model based decision support helps in optimizing therapy settings for individual patients while providing additional insight into a patient’s disease state through the identified model parameters. Using multiple models with different simulation focus and complexity allows adapting decision support to the current clinical situation and the available data. A previously presented set of numerical criteria allows selecting the best model based on fit quality, model complexity, and how well the parameter values are defined by the presented data. To systematically evaluate those criteria in an algorithm we have created insilico data sets using four different respiratory mechanics models with three different parameter settings each. Each of those artificial patients was ventilated with three different manoeuvres and the resulting data was used to identify the same models used to create the data. The selection algorithm was then presented with the results to select the best model. Not considering determinateness of the identified model parameters, the algorithm chose the same model that was used to create the data in 78%, a more complex model in 5% and a less complex model in 18% of all cases. When including the determinateness of model parameters in the decision process, the algorithm chose the same model in 42% of the cases and a less complex model in 56% of all cases. In 2% of the presented cases, no model complied with the required criteria.

1 Introduction

Mechanical ventilation is a routinely applied therapy that can be life-saving in patients that are not able to maintain sufficient oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal. However, the application of mechanical ventilation bears the risk of ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) if ventilator settings are set inappropriately [1]. Mathematical models can be individualized to reflect a patient’s pathophysiological characteristics and can thus be implemented in medical decision support systems where they are used to predict patient reaction to changes in therapy settings. To enable a decision support system to adapt to changes in the clinical scenario it needs to be provided with a model that is able to simulate various pathologies. Individualization of such complex models is usually challenging as the available data at the bedside might not be sufficient to robustly identify all model parameters. Providing multiple models differing in complexity and simulation focus is thus advantageous. Various models are described in literature [26] comprising various pathologies, a different numbers of model parameters and are thus of different mathematical complexity. Based on the current clinical question and the available data to identify the models, the decision support system should then be able to select the model that fits the current situation best. This decision should be based on numerical criterias describing the eligibility of the models to choose from.

We have previously presented multiple criteria that allow evaluating models based on fit quality, model complexity and the determinateness of the model parameters [6] and have presented preliminary results on ten mechanically ventilated patients [7]. However, a systematic evaluation of the algorithms performance has not been presented so far and should thus be described below.

2 Methods

2.1 Selection algorithm

The presented algorithm employs three numerical criteria describing the ability of a model to reproduce a given data set. The criteria are described in short below.

Coefficient of Determination (CD): CD describes how well a model is able to reproduce a given data set with 1 denoting perfect agreement and 0 showing that there is no correlation between model results and the data. CD is calculated as [2]:

(1)CD=1SSEi=1n(ydataiyda¯ta)2

with SSE denoting the summed squared differences between simulated and measured results (ydata). ydāta is the mean ofydata, n is the number of samples.

Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc): The AICc allows identifying the model that has the maximum likelihood of describing a given data set while trading off between goodness-of-fit and the number of parameters that are adaptable. Lower values are preferred. AICc identifies which is the best among a given set models. The calculated values are thus not absolute and provide no information about how well a model reproduces the given data.

The AICc is calculated as [8, 9]:

(2)AICc=2m+n[ln(2πSSEn+1)]+2m(m+1)nm1

with m denoting the number of model parameters.

Confidence Interval (CI): The confidence intervals provide information about how well each model parameter is defined by the data. Large CI indicate that the parameter values are highly uncertain. CI were determined using the nlparci function in MATLAB (R2012a, The Mathworks, Natick, USA) which returns a range in which the parameter values are with a probability of 95%. All CI were normalized to their respective parameter value (relative CI, rCI).

Figure 1 Model selection algorithm. ydata – recorded patient data, ydatasim – model simulated data.
Figure 1

Model selection algorithm. ydata – recorded patient data, ydatasim – model simulated data.

Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the selection algorithm. CD values serve as primary selection parameter, as the model with highest CD and all models within 2% of that CD are selected for the next stage. From the selected models, the model with lowest AICc is then selected and the rCI of all parameters is checked. If one is above 20%, the model is eliminated and the model with next best AICc is checked. If no model with sufficient CI is found, the algorithm selects the remaining models with CD 0.8 and ranks them again with respect to AICc. If CI is critical for all those models as well, model selection fails and no model is selected.

2.2 Artificial patient data and evaluation

We have used four models of respiratory mechanics with different complexity and a different number of identifi-able parameters. The applied models are a trivial model of first order with one resistance and one compliance (FOM) comprising two parameters (resistance R and compliance C), a viscoelastic model (VEM) comprising four parameters (resistances R1 and R2, compliances C1 and C2) [10], a model to simulate pressure dependent alveolar recruitment (PRM) with five parameters (R, C, threshold opening pressure TOP, number of opened alveoli at the onset of inspiration NOpen, overdistension parameter K) [11], and a model to simulate both viscoelastic behaviour and recruitment (PRVEM) comprising seven parameters (R1, R2, C1, C2, TOP, NOpen, K) [12].

Three different parameter sets for each model were created to simulate healthy patients and different stages of lung disease. Each of those 12 artificial patients was ventilated with three different ventilation manoeuvres, each with three different flow rates. The applied ventilation manoeuvres were:

  • Low-Flow (LF): low and constant inspiration flow of 30 to 40 ml/s for 50 seconds. This manoeuvre is applied to determine quasi-static pressure-volume dependencies.

  • Dynamic-Slice (DS): high and constant inspiration flow of 350 to 500 ml/s for 1.5s. This manoeuvre is applied to determine dynamic lung properties.

  • Static Compliance Automated Single Step (SCASS): volume controlled ventilation cycle with inspiration flows of 500 to 600 ml/s for 1s and a prolonged inspira-tory pause of 5s. SCASS is applied to determine equilibration processes in the lung tissue under a quasi-static pressure-volume relation.

In total, 108 data sets were created and modified by adding white noise with an amplitude of 5% of the respective data point. Each of the four respiratory mechanics models was then fitted to each of the data sets using a hierarchical identification approach [10, 12]. It uses the identified parameter values of less complex models as initial guesses when identifying the more complex models. It thus does not require any initial guesses and ensures optimal identification outcome. The model results were then fed to the presented algorithm to select the model that fits the given data best.

3 Results

Figure 2 shows simulated response to the described manoeuvres for all four models compared to artificial patient data created using the PRVEM. In LF results, the PRVEM had best CD and AICc, however CI was critical in two parameters, leading to the algorithm to select VEM. In DS data, the PRVEM again had best CD and AICc, however CI was critical in five parameters, leading to FOM being the selected model. The SCASS results showed highest CD and lowest AICc in VEM, thus this being the selected model.

Tables 1 and 2 show which model was selected compared to which model was used to create the data. Table 1 shows results when CI of the model parameters is not included in the selection process, while Table 2 shows results when CI is included as a criteria.

When omitting the CI criteria, the same model as used to create the data was selected by the algorithm in 84 of 108 cases. In 5 cases, a more complex model was selected due to a lower AICc and in 19 cases a less complex model was selected due to the same reason.

When including the CI criteria, the same model was selected in 45 out of the 108 cases. A more complex model was never selected, while a less complex model was selected in 61 cases (8 cases because of lower AICc, 53 cases because CI was critical in other models). No selection at all was conducted in 2 cases, all due to critical CI values in every model with CD 0.8.

4 Discussion

Using multiple models in decision support allows adaption to a change in the clinical scenario and to the patient data available at the bedside. In cases where detailed measurements are available, complex models can be identified, while simple models are applied if less information is available. The presented algorithm should enable the decision support system to select the model that fits the given data best with the smallest number of parameters while ensuring the correctness of the identified parameter values.

Figure 2 Exemplary results for model simulated results fitted to artificial patient data.
Figure 2

Exemplary results for model simulated results fitted to artificial patient data.

When omitting the CI criteria, i.e. the algorithm does not check if the parameter values of a model are suffi-ciently defined by the data, the algorithm selected the correct model, i.e. the model that was used to create the data, in 78% of all cases. In 18% of the cases, a less complex model was selected, i.e. the data could be reproduced with sufficient accuracy while using less model parameters. In data created with the PRM, five cases led to the algorithm to select the PRVEM, i.e. a more complex model. In those cases, parameter identification failed to find the correct PRM parameters thus leading to the simulation results to slightly deviate from the presented data. Here, identification procedure should be improved.

When including the CI criteria, the algorithm was able to select the correct model in 42% of all cases. In 56% of the cases, a less complex model was selected either due to having a comparable accuracy using less parameters (7% total) or due to CI being critical in the higher ranked models (49% total). CD being below 0.8 in all but one model or in all models was never the case, leading to the assumption that the identification routine is robust. No model was selected in 2% of the cases, all due to CI being critical in every model with CD 0.8. Thus, except for those two cases, all models are able to reproduce the presented data with acceptable accuracy.

Table 1

Results of model selection when CI is not evaluated.

Same model selectedMore complex model selectedLess complex model selectedNo model selected
Lowest AICcOnly model with CD>0.8Lowest AICcOnly model with CD>0.8because of CD<0.8
FOM2700--0
VEM2400300
PRM1650600
PRVEM17--1000
Total84501900
Table 2

Results of model selection when CI is evaluated.

Same model selectedMore complex model selectedLess complex model selectedNo model selected
LowestOnly modelCI criticalLowestOnly modelCI criticalAll CDAll CI
AICcwith CD>0.8in other modelsAICcswith CD>0.8in other models<0.8critical
FOM27000---00
VEM1800030600
PRM0000302400
PRVEM0---202302
Total45000805302

The presented algorithm thus allows selecting the model that is able to reproduce the recorded patient data with sufficient accuracy with the lowest number of parameters possible. Both tests (with CI criteria and without it) showed that the algorithm is able to find the model that was used to create the data or a model that fits the data with comparable accuracy while being less complex in an acceptable number of cases (95% of cases when CI is neglected, 49% with CI criteria). Additionally, the algorithm ensures that the identified parameters may be trusted by checking if the information contained in the recorded data is sufficient to define the parameter values. Here, results showed that in more complex models (PRM and PRVEM), CI is almost always critical in at least one parameter, leading to a less complex or no model being selected. We conclude that identifying models of higher complexity it may be insufficient to apply only one manoeuvre. Future work is planned to investigate which manoeuvres prove to be beneficial for the identification of which parameter in those models.


Jörn Kretschmer: Institute of Technical Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, phone: +49 7720 307 4370, fax: +49 7720 307 4616

Author’s Statement

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest. Material and Methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] A. S. Slutsky, ”Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation,” Chest, vol. 116, pp. 9S-15S, 1999.10.1378/chest.116.suppl_1.9S-aSearch in Google Scholar

[2] J. H. T. Bates, Lung mechanics - An inverse modeling approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511627156Search in Google Scholar

[3] K. G. Hickling, ”The Pressure-Volume Curve Is Greatly Modified by Recruitment. A Mathematical Model of ARDS Lungs,” Am J Respir Crit Care Med, vol. 158, pp. 194-202, July 1, 1998 1998.10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9708049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] C. Schranz, et al., ”Structural Identifiability and Practical Applicability of an Alveolar Recruitment Model for ARDS Patients,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng., vol. 59, pp. 3396-3404, Dec 2012.10.1109/TBME.2012.2216526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] C. Schranz, et al., ”Iterative integral parameter identification of a respiratory mechanics model,” Biomed Eng Online, vol. 11, p. 38, 2012.10.1186/1475-925X-11-38Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] C. Schranz, et al., ”Selection criteria for competing models of respiratory mechanics,” Biomed Tech, vol. 58 (Suppl. 1), 2013.10.1515/bmt-2013-4326Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] S. Basavaraju, et al., ”Kriterien zur automatisierten Modellselektion in Modellen der menschlichen Atemmechanik,” presented at the DMtS, Dresden, Germany, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Akaike, ”A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans Automat Control, vol. 19, pp. 716-723, 1974.10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_16Search in Google Scholar

[9] K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model selection and multimodel interference: A practical information-theroretic approach, 2 ed. New York: Springer, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. Schranz, et al., ”Hierarchical parameter identification in models of respiratory mechanics,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 58, pp. 3234-3241, Nov 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-23508-5_76Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Schranz, et al., ”Identifiability Analysis of a Pressure-Depending Alveolar Recruitment Model,” in 8th IFAC Symposium on Biological and Medical Systems, Budapest, Hungary, 2012.10.3182/20120829-3-HU-2029.00015Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Schranz, et al., ”Hierarchical Individualization of a Recruitment Model with a Viscoelastic Component for ARDS Patients,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2013 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Osaka, Japan, 2013, pp. 5220-5223.10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610725Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2015-9-12
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Development and characterization of superparamagnetic coatings
  3. Research Article
  4. The development of an experimental setup to measure acousto-electric interaction signal
  5. Research Article
  6. Stability analysis of ferrofluids
  7. Research Article
  8. Investigation of endothelial growth using a sensors-integrated microfluidic system to simulate physiological barriers
  9. Research Article
  10. Energy harvesting for active implants: powering a ruminal pH-monitoring system
  11. Research Article
  12. New type of fluxgate magnetometer for the heart’s magnetic fields detection
  13. Research Article
  14. Field mapping of ballistic pressure pulse sources
  15. Research Article
  16. Development of a new homecare sleep monitor using body sounds and motion tracking
  17. Research Article
  18. Noise properties of textile, capacitive EEG electrodes
  19. Research Article
  20. Detecting phase singularities and rotor center trajectories based on the Hilbert transform of intraatrial electrograms in an atrial voxel model
  21. Research Article
  22. Spike sorting: the overlapping spikes challenge
  23. Research Article
  24. Separating the effect of respiration from the heart rate variability for cases of constant harmonic breathing
  25. Research Article
  26. Locating regions of arrhythmogenic substrate by analyzing the duration of triggered atrial activities
  27. Research Article
  28. Combining different ECG derived respiration tracking methods to create an optimal reconstruction of the breathing pattern
  29. Research Article
  30. Atrial and ventricular signal averaging electrocardiography in pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy
  31. Research Article
  32. Estimation of a respiratory signal from a single-lead ECG using the 4th order central moments
  33. Research Article
  34. Compressed sensing of multi-lead ECG signals by compressive multiplexing
  35. Research Article
  36. Heart rate monitoring in ultra-high-field MRI using frequency information obtained from video signals of the human skin compared to electrocardiography and pulse oximetry
  37. Research Article
  38. Synchronization in wireless biomedical-sensor networks with Bluetooth Low Energy
  39. Research Article
  40. Automated classification of stages of anaesthesia by populations of evolutionary optimized fuzzy rules
  41. Research Article
  42. Effects of sampling rate on automated fatigue recognition in surface EMG signals
  43. Research Article
  44. Closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation of slow oscillations
  45. Research Article
  46. Cardiac index in atrio- and interventricular delay optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy and cardiac contractility modulation
  47. Research Article
  48. The role of expert evaluation for microsleep detection
  49. Research Article
  50. The impact of baseline wander removal techniques on the ST segment in simulated ischemic 12-lead ECGs
  51. Research Article
  52. Metal artifact reduction by projection replacements and non-local prior image integration
  53. Research Article
  54. A novel coaxial nozzle for in-process adjustment of electrospun scaffolds’ fiber diameter
  55. Research Article
  56. Processing of membranes for oxygenation using the Bellhouse-effect
  57. Research Article
  58. Inkjet printing of viable human dental follicle stem cells
  59. Research Article
  60. The use of an icebindingprotein out of the snowflea Hypogastrura harveyi as a cryoprotectant in the cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem cells
  61. Research Article
  62. New NIR spectroscopy based method to determine ischemia in vivo in liver – a first study on rats
  63. Research Article
  64. QRS and QT ventricular conduction times and permanent pacemaker therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  65. Research Article
  66. Adopting oculopressure tonometry as a transient in vivo rabbit glaucoma model
  67. Research Article
  68. Next-generation vision testing: the quick CSF
  69. Research Article
  70. Improving tactile sensation in laparoscopic surgery by overcoming size restrictions
  71. Research Article
  72. Design and control of a 3-DOF hydraulic driven surgical instrument
  73. Research Article
  74. Evaluation of endourological tools to improve the diagnosis and therapy of ureteral tumors – from model development to clinical application
  75. Research Article
  76. Frequency based assessment of surgical activities
  77. Research Article
  78. “Hands free for intervention”, a new approach for transoral endoscopic surgery
  79. Research Article
  80. Pseudo-haptic feedback in medical teleoperation
  81. Research Article
  82. Feasibility of interactive gesture control of a robotic microscope
  83. Research Article
  84. Towards structuring contextual information for workflow-driven surgical assistance functionalities
  85. Research Article
  86. Towards a framework for standardized semantic workflow modeling and management in the surgical domain
  87. Research Article
  88. Closed-loop approach for situation awareness of medical devices and operating room infrastructure
  89. Research Article
  90. Kinect based physiotherapy system for home use
  91. Research Article
  92. Evaluating the microsoft kinect skeleton joint tracking as a tool for home-based physiotherapy
  93. Research Article
  94. Integrating multimodal information for intraoperative assistance in neurosurgery
  95. Research Article
  96. Respiratory motion tracking using Microsoft’s Kinect v2 camera
  97. Research Article
  98. Using smart glasses for ultrasound diagnostics
  99. Research Article
  100. Measurement of needle susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance images
  101. Research Article
  102. Dimensionality reduction of medical image descriptors for multimodal image registration
  103. Research Article
  104. Experimental evaluation of different weighting schemes in magnetic particle imaging reconstruction
  105. Research Article
  106. Evaluation of CT capability for the detection of thin bone structures
  107. Research Article
  108. Towards contactless optical coherence elastography with acoustic tissue excitation
  109. Research Article
  110. Development and implementation of algorithms for automatic and robust measurement of the 2D:4D digit ratio using image data
  111. Research Article
  112. Automated high-throughput analysis of B cell spreading on immobilized antibodies with whole slide imaging
  113. Research Article
  114. Tissue segmentation from head MRI: a ground truth validation for feature-enhanced tracking
  115. Research Article
  116. Video tracking of swimming rodents on a reflective water surface
  117. Research Article
  118. MR imaging of model drug distribution in simulated vitreous
  119. Research Article
  120. Studying the extracellular contribution to the double wave vector diffusion-weighted signal
  121. Research Article
  122. Artifacts in field free line magnetic particle imaging in the presence of inhomogeneous and nonlinear magnetic fields
  123. Research Article
  124. Introducing a frequency-tunable magnetic particle spectrometer
  125. Research Article
  126. Imaging of aortic valve dynamics in 4D OCT
  127. Research Article
  128. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an additional tool for the assessment of stent structures
  129. Research Article
  130. Simple concept for a wide-field lensless digital holographic microscope using a laser diode
  131. Research Article
  132. Intraoperative identification of somato-sensory brain areas using optical imaging and standard RGB camera equipment – a feasibility study
  133. Research Article
  134. Respiratory surface motion measurement by Microsoft Kinect
  135. Research Article
  136. Improving image quality in EIT imaging by measurement of thorax excursion
  137. Research Article
  138. A clustering based dual model framework for EIT imaging: first experimental results
  139. Research Article
  140. Three-dimensional anisotropic regularization for limited angle tomography
  141. Research Article
  142. GPU-based real-time generation of large ultrasound volumes from freehand 3D sweeps
  143. Research Article
  144. Experimental computer tomograph
  145. Research Article
  146. US-tracked steered FUS in a respiratory ex vivo ovine liver phantom
  147. Research Article
  148. Contribution of brownian rotation and particle assembly polarisation to the particle response in magnetic particle spectrometry
  149. Research Article
  150. Preliminary investigations of magnetic modulated nanoparticles for microwave breast cancer detection
  151. Research Article
  152. Construction of a device for magnetic separation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
  153. Research Article
  154. An IHE-conform telecooperation platform supporting the treatment of dementia patients
  155. Research Article
  156. Automated respiratory therapy system based on the ARDSNet protocol with systemic perfusion control
  157. Research Article
  158. Identification of surgical instruments using UHF-RFID technology
  159. Research Article
  160. A generic concept for the development of model-guided clinical decision support systems
  161. Research Article
  162. Evaluation of local alterations in femoral bone mineral density measured via quantitative CT
  163. Research Article
  164. Creating 3D gelatin phantoms for experimental evaluation in biomedicine
  165. Research Article
  166. Influence of short-term fixation with mixed formalin or ethanol solution on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone
  167. Research Article
  168. Analysis of the release kinetics of surface-bound proteins via laser-induced fluorescence
  169. Research Article
  170. Tomographic particle image velocimetry of a water-jet for low volume harvesting of fat tissue for regenerative medicine
  171. Research Article
  172. Wireless medical sensors – context, robustness and safety
  173. Research Article
  174. Sequences for real-time magnetic particle imaging
  175. Research Article
  176. Speckle-based off-axis holographic detection for non-contact photoacoustic tomography
  177. Research Article
  178. A machine learning approach for planning valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction
  179. Research Article
  180. An in-ear pulse wave velocity measurement system using heart sounds as time reference
  181. Research Article
  182. Measuring different oxygenation levels in a blood perfusion model simulating the human head using NIRS
  183. Research Article
  184. Multisegmental fusion of the lumbar spine a curse or a blessing?
  185. Research Article
  186. Numerical analysis of the biomechanical complications accompanying the total hip replacement with NANOS-Prosthetic: bone remodelling and prosthesis migration
  187. Research Article
  188. A muscle model for hybrid muscle activation
  189. Research Article
  190. Mathematical, numerical and in-vitro investigation of cooling performance of an intra-carotid catheter for selective brain hypothermia
  191. Research Article
  192. An ideally parameterized unscented Kalman filter for the inverse problem of electrocardiography
  193. Research Article
  194. Interactive visualization of cardiac anatomy and atrial excitation for medical diagnosis and research
  195. Research Article
  196. Virtualizing clinical cases of atrial flutter in a fast marching simulation including conduction velocity and ablation scars
  197. Research Article
  198. Mesh structure-independent modeling of patient-specific atrial fiber orientation
  199. Research Article
  200. Accelerating mono-domain cardiac electrophysiology simulations using OpenCL
  201. Research Article
  202. Understanding the cellular mode of action of vernakalant using a computational model: answers and new questions
  203. Research Article
  204. A java based simulator with user interface to simulate ventilated patients
  205. Research Article
  206. Evaluation of an algorithm to choose between competing models of respiratory mechanics
  207. Research Article
  208. Numerical simulation of low-pulsation gerotor pumps for use in the pharmaceutical industry and in biomedicine
  209. Research Article
  210. Numerical and experimental flow analysis in centifluidic systems for rapid allergy screening tests
  211. Research Article
  212. Biomechanical parameter determination of scaffold-free cartilage constructs (SFCCs) with the hyperelastic material models Yeoh, Ogden and Demiray
  213. Research Article
  214. FPGA controlled artificial vascular system
  215. Research Article
  216. Simulation based investigation of source-detector configurations for non-invasive fetal pulse oximetry
  217. Research Article
  218. Test setup for characterizing the efficacy of embolic protection devices
  219. Research Article
  220. Impact of electrode geometry on force generation during functional electrical stimulation
  221. Research Article
  222. 3D-based visual physical activity assessment of children
  223. Research Article
  224. Realtime assessment of foot orientation by Accelerometers and Gyroscopes
  225. Research Article
  226. Image based reconstruction for cystoscopy
  227. Research Article
  228. Image guided surgery innovation with graduate students - a new lecture format
  229. Research Article
  230. Multichannel FES parameterization for controlling foot motion in paretic gait
  231. Research Article
  232. Smartphone supported upper limb prosthesis
  233. Research Article
  234. Use of quantitative tremor evaluation to enhance target selection during deep brain stimulation surgery for essential tremor
  235. Research Article
  236. Evaluation of adhesion promoters for Parylene C on gold metallization
  237. Research Article
  238. The influence of metallic ions from CoCr28Mo6 on the osteogenic differentiation and cytokine release of human osteoblasts
  239. Research Article
  240. Increasing the visibility of thin NITINOL vascular implants
  241. Research Article
  242. Possible reasons for early artificial bone failure in biomechanical tests of ankle arthrodesis systems
  243. Research Article
  244. Development of a bending test procedure for the characterization of flexible ECoG electrode arrays
  245. Research Article
  246. Tubular manipulators: a new concept for intracochlear positioning of an auditory prosthesis
  247. Research Article
  248. Investigation of the dynamic diameter deformation of vascular stents during fatigue testing with radial loading
  249. Research Article
  250. Electrospun vascular grafts with anti-kinking properties
  251. Research Article
  252. Integration of temperature sensors in polyimide-based thin-film electrode arrays
  253. Research Article
  254. Use cases and usability challenges for head-mounted displays in healthcare
  255. Research Article
  256. Device- and service profiles for integrated or systems based on open standards
  257. Research Article
  258. Risk management for medical devices in research projects
  259. Research Article
  260. Simulation of varying femoral attachment sites of medial patellofemoral ligament using a musculoskeletal multi-body model
  261. Research Article
  262. Does enhancing consciousness for strategic planning processes support the effectiveness of problem-based learning concepts in biomedical education?
  263. Research Article
  264. SPIO processing in macrophages for MPI: The breast cancer MPI-SNLB-concept
  265. Research Article
  266. Numerical simulations of airflow in the human pharynx of OSAHS patients
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cdbme-2015-0103/html
Scroll to top button