Home Seed regeneration aided by nanomaterials in a climate change scenario: A comprehensive review
Article Open Access

Seed regeneration aided by nanomaterials in a climate change scenario: A comprehensive review

  • Utkarsh Chadha EMAIL logo , Kinga Zablotny , Aishwarya Mallampati , Harshal Gopal Pawar , M. Asfer Batcha , S. K. Gokula Preethi , A. Naga Sai Arunchandra , Moharana Choudhury and Bhanu Pratap Singh
Published/Copyright: December 23, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Nanotechnology has demonstrated its potential for advancing sustainable agriculture. This article explores new advancements in nanotechnology in agriculture, including plant extraction and validation, by emphasizing nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, nano-biosensors, and nanoenergy recycling processes. Nanomaterials are important for the formation, transport, and degradation of soil toxins and are a fundamental starting point for various biotic and abiotic rehabilitation processes. Research on nanoparticles’ remediation applications and soil stay insufficient and are generally restricted. When integrated into agricultural systems, nanomaterials may influence the soil quality and plant development examined by setting their impacts on supplement discharge in target soils, soil biota, soil natural matter, and plant morphological and physiological reactions. The current research works show that the seed coat acts as a barrier to nanomaterial penetration, in which both the seed coat and cell wall allowed easy water passage. Additionally, the uptake, movement, and associated defense mechanisms of nanomaterials within plants have been investigated. Future research directions have been identified to further the study toward the sustainable development of nano-enabled agriculture.

1 Introduction

Biodiversity is an essential aspect of the present and future. However, with ongoing problems caused by humans, nature has started to deteriorate. Over the years, there have been adverse weather conditions and drastic climatic changes affecting the growth of plants. Although some efforts to bring the situation back to normal have been taken, but the humans’ responsibilities do not end there [1,2]. One effective method to mitigate the impacts of sudden stresses, such as changes in optimal growth parameters or extreme climatic conditions, is the use of stress-tolerant seeds. Seed regeneration, through pretreatments like priming or nanomaterial application, helps maintain steady and resilient plant growth during early developmental stages. The method of seed regeneration is commonly used not only to improve a particular crop’s resistance, but it is also being used widely to enhance some of the plant’s properties by making them immune to certain diseases, increase the resistance to pests, and increase the yield.

Seed regeneration itself is a complex process involving several stages and parameters. In order to minimize the complexity and difficulties during seed regeneration, the most suitable option is using nanomaterials [3]. Nanomaterials are highly versatile in nature and can also enhance seed regeneration by helping the plants inhibit various properties. It is possible for plants to exhibit desired traits using nanomaterials; however, altering plants’ properties also has its own risks [4,5,6]. The technological advancements in the field would require datasets where the plant growth and properties are taken into account. Furthermore, using these technologies for future studies can be encouraged for better growth strategies [7].

While these are the basic concepts involved in using nanomaterials in seed regeneration, it is also essential to discuss their exact role and significance in climate change. Nowadays, climate change has become unpredictable. This alone leads to several problems and imbalances involving a lack of water sources, including groundwater [8]. It has become a necessary trait for a plant to survive throughout extreme weather conditions similar to drought and depending on the place, calamity changes. If we are able to develop a method to protect plant species against these climatic changes and calamities, there is a hope for humanity to survive [9]. A calamity does not necessarily imply the extinction of a species in most cases, but it is essential to consider the rare and endemic species. A great example of such a scenario would be an endemic species like Azadirachta indica, widely known as “Neem,” that has substantial medicinal properties and is commonly known as an effective antibacterial remedy; neem habitat conditions are ideally in th tropical and subtropical regions, including North India, Central India and even the dry tropical climates worldwide. For example, South India is prone is prone to natural calamities like floods yearly, which could dramatically affect the survival of neem trees, and such drastic changes in the specific environmental conditions required for its growth may limit its natural occurrence in certain regions [10].

Preserving plant species with seed regeneration is a significant finding in the field of agriculture and the innovative methods to deploy nanomaterials that have been assessed by researchers in their studies. These studies offer detailed insights into how nanomaterials have been deployed for offering potential solutions to enhance crop resilience and productivity [11]. This review accumulates information from various research works and provides an insight into the seed regeneration process rigorously [12,13].

2 Understanding the literature

2.1 Seed regeneration

Changing climatic conditions due to global warming creates a drastic impact on the survival of many species, often causing them to approach extinction. Although this situation applies to plants, protecting some of the essential species is crucial due to rising uncertainties in the current climate which leads to extremely complex situations for human existence [14].

This is where seed regeneration (Figure 1) as a concept is necessary to understand for crop growth support during variable climate conditions. In simplest terms, seed regeneration means the ability to raise a plant from its seed stage under any adverse conditions, i.e., changing climate, lack of nutrients, existence of pests, and possible diseases that can affect the plant’s growth or desired output in any manner.

Figure 1 
                  Overview of seed regeneration under climate change: Impacts on plant life cycle and population dynamics. Inspired by the study of Misra et al. [9].
Figure 1

Overview of seed regeneration under climate change: Impacts on plant life cycle and population dynamics. Inspired by the study of Misra et al. [9].

Climate change is a vast topic, and even if we restrict the topic to the seed regeneration process alone, the number of factors that we need to consider is large (Figure 1). Still, it is an efficient way of discussing the problem, involving all kinds of challenges that we may face so that the selection process of nanomaterials can be narrowed down [15]. There are several factors causing climate change, but all can be pointed down to one primary reason: human activities. Initially, we will specifically discuss the lacking factors for a seed to grow if its original climatic condition or ecosystem is changed due to one or several reasons. The most common change would be the increase in temperature, UV exposure, and decrease in water resources, which are the immediate effects of global warming. Under these circumstances, plant growth has to encounter the mentioned factors, excess of which could hamper the same [16].

However, crops used for agriculture may also experience a lack of nutrients due to a decrease in soil quality or an improper supply of fertilizers. The usage of powder fertilizers that are sprinkled on plants may not be sufficient, and may require some added minerals. Seed regeneration has to take place irrespective of the external factors, where nanofertilizers serve the purpose for supplying nutrients to promote the plant growth [17,18].

During the selection of desired nanomaterials, there are high chances that there could be a cancellation of the effectiveness if the properties of nanomaterials being used may mutually inhibit their effects if not processed adequately. Hence, the growth stage becomes the most unreliable and unpredictable stage in the entire seed regeneration process, as there is no efficient way to determine whether the nanomaterials inhibit or exacerbate the process [19,20]. However, with further research, gold nanoparticles (NPs) have proven to be more efficient than both silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and silicon NPs in preventing seed damage due to high heat exposure [21]. The most economical and feasible nanomaterials available have to be rigorously studied. As cost is a major factor, there has been an increased usage of AgNPs over gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) for research and utility purposes [22]. Based on such a topic alone, we can classify several nanomaterials best suited for the purpose while being economical and feasible. Such a common and essential discussion is seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
                  Application of nanomaterials in agriculture. Adapted from the study of Paramo et al. [27].
Figure 2

Application of nanomaterials in agriculture. Adapted from the study of Paramo et al. [27].

2.2 Stages of seed regeneration

Seed regeneration involves several important steps that differ depending upon the type of seeds [23]. This crucial process serves the purpose of enhancing plant growth by creating new seeds from existing plant materials. The proper completion of seed regeneration will allow for the production of high-quality seeds with specific desirable traits. The seed regeneration process may vary depending on the type of seed that is being regenerated. However, the general steps required for the seed regeneration process begin at the selection of seed and ends at the growth of the plant, where the process will be as follows:

  1. Selection of parent plants. This first stage involves analyzing characteristics to be achieved for the target population. In this step, the parent plants that have ideal features, like high yield, resistance to diseases, or other qualities that align with the ideal traits of the target population will be chosen.

  2. Pollination. Once the parent plants have been carefully identified and chosen, further steps can be taken. The pollination process takes place through the transfer of pollen from the reproductive organs of the male to the reproductive organs of the female. In other words, pollen contained in the anther is passed to the stigma. This occurs to either the same or distinct species of flower. Aside from human action, pollination can also occur through naturally occurring factors, such as wind, insects, or birds. These naturally induced ways of pollinating are referred to as “cross-pollination,” where the insects and birds are referred to as the “pollinators.” A plant may gain the ability to fertilize itself, also known as “self-pollination.” [24].

  3. Seed development. Once pollination is successful, the seed development process may begin. In simple terms, after the pollen has been successfully transferred to the stigma, the fertilized ovule within the flower’s ovary turns into a seed. However, this process is a much more protracted procedure. This stage is a complex process and can be separated into two major phases, embryogenesis (cell division and morphogenesis), followed by maturation. Seed development begins with double fertilization, where one sperm will fertilize the egg to form the zygote. After multiple cycles of cell division, the zygote will form the embryo. The other sperm will merge with two polar nuclei forming a triploid cell, which will divide and form the endosperm (cellular or helobial). Layers of tissue will begin to stack in order to form the seed coat, which will serve the purpose of protecting both the embryo and endosperm from damage. Finally, maturation of the endosperm, embryo, and seed coat will begin, which involves the collection of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids. Once maturation has finished, seeds are distributed from the parent plant, either through human-induced actions or natural occurrences such as wind, gravity, insects, birds, or water [25,26].

  4. Seed harvesting. A successful completion of the seed development process will ensure that the seed is viable for germination. After the seeds have reached maturity and full development, the parent plants’ seeds are collected. There are different methods used for gathering the seeds, depending on the species, size, and structure of the mature seeds. These methods include handpicking, cutting, shaking, and beating.

  5. Seed processing. Once the mature seeds have been collected, seed processing may begin. In this stage, the seeds must be cleaned to get rid of any chaff debris, or other contaminants. To maintain the quality of the seeds, they must be dried first. Later, they are stored in a cool, dry environment to prevent the absorption of moisture and pest infestation.

  6. Seed testing. Once all of the seeds have been collected and stored properly, they must be tested prior to subsequent use. This will ensure that only viable seeds will continue the process. During testing, a seed is assessed through its viability, germination rate, genetic purity, and may also test the vigor and overall health of the seed. The germination test involves placing seeds in a setting with optimal environmental conditions, and the amount of seeds that germinate is recorded. Additionally, viability testing may involve X-rays to analyze the embryo and endosperm, floatation test to determine if the seed will sink (viable) or float (non-viable), and assess for electrical conductivity (those with lower conductivity are viable) [28].

  7. Seed storage. When seed testing is complete, the viable seeds are placed in ideal environmental conditions to maintain the overall high quality of the seed. This optimal setting involves a cool, dry environment in order to block the entrance of moisture and degradation.

  8. Seed treatment. As the seeds are stored, they may undergo seed treatment. However, this step is usually optional. Physical, biological, and chemical treatments can be applied to seeds to improve their vigor and resistance to stress. This is the step where nanomaterial-based intervention would be involved. These may include priming, coating, or sensors [29].

  9. Seed distribution. Now, the seeds are ready to be distributed “for consumption to the users”, such as farmers.

  10. Germination and plant growth. Finally, the seeds are planted in soil and must be taken care of properly.

Carefully completing these steps will help maintain a sustainable agricultural production by enhancing the resilience of plants. Properly managing seeds throughout this process will allow for strong, stress resistant, and long-term feasibility of seeds.

The seed growth life cycle as explained above, is complemented by understanding and implementation of seed regeneration process as explained in the below steps:

  1. Selection of seeds. As mentioned earlier, this is a decisive step for selection of seeds that would require regeneration. Regeneration of wild seeds might prove quite tricky because recreating the entire ecosystem required for its growth is simply impossible. But the very factor depends upon the ecosystem that the seed grew in, and depending on these varying factors, results may also vary significantly. On the other hand, regeneration of domestic seeds might be a less tedious process, comparatively, since it can adapt to the certain idealized conditions, but not all seeds can be differentiated likewise and are highly dependent on the ecosystem they are subjected to [30,31].

  2. Climatic conditions. The next step would be to select the climatic condition that we need the seed to grow in, it is almost impossible to regenerate a seed that can grow in all climatic conditions, so limiting the conditions may ease up the process that can be done by selecting specific climatic conditions. For instance, regenerating a seed in a condition of drought narrows down the recreation of its entire ecosystem for lack of water, high temperature, and lack of nutrients. On the other hand, if a flood condition has to be overcome, the case is opposite and requires a different approach. Being precise on the climatic conditions that we want a seed to grow in might narrow down the scope of the process [31,32].

  3. Methods of seed regeneration. After seed selection, climatic conditions are set to desired variables. The next step is to find the most efficient way for seed regeneration. It is certainly impossible to ideally meet all the conditions by using simple physical methods, but utilizing chemical methods to provide nutrients for it, or simply the presence of nanomaterials can enhance the properties required to facilitate seed regeneration, considering that it depends on the conditions that we choose the most desirable nanomaterials that can accommodate the needs. In contrast, SiO2 nanomaterials can be used for drought resistance, AgNPs are used for agricultural purposes, TiO2 NPs can enhance fennel seed germination [33]; thus, depending on the utility, a wide range of choices of nanomaterials are available [31,34].

  4. Growth of plants from seed. It is always uncertain that the imitation of the ecosystem required for the seed to grow into a plant will necessarily function. There are chances that these factors may inhibit the very growth it was intended for. There are no methods to evaluate explicitly to see how the nanomaterials function, and would require an observation up to several days [35]. There is always the risk of failure and lack of data on nanomaterial’s functioning, but the necessity of seed regeneration far exceeds these factors.

Being a very tedious process, despite current research in the field, there are certain aspects of the process that could be further regulated using nanomaterials and emerging technologies that could be incorporated to make the process comparatively simpler and manageable [17,31,35].

3 Nanomaterials in seed regeneration

AgNPs have an advantage over other nanomaterials due to the uniqueness in the physicochemical properties they contain, including antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Moreover, AgNPs provide stronger and more efficient qualities over other NPs, including enhancing pH, temperature, and incubation time. [36]. When enhanced with Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, NPs showed improved development in Zea mays L. seedlings compared to seedlings developed on Mg-poor MS medium and standard MS medium. The higher chlorophyll content in the plants dealing with NPs shows that they increase the chlorophyll content in the plants. The Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer study confirmed the high magnesium content in the leaves and roots of plants treated with nanoparticles compared to their respective salt-treated counterparts, demonstrating that the nanoparticles facilitate efficient penetration and translocation within various plant tissues [37].

Although environmental changes may impact all types of farming systems, their effects are likely to be more noticeable in dry-land areas where agriculture relies heavily on rainfall. Simulation output analyses indicates that crop yield will lower because of weather change and variability in dry lands [23,38]. However, this will be mitigated significantly by using existing information on crop, soil, and water management, as well as through retargeting and redeployment of the present germplasms of the plants inside the medium term [39].

The role of amorphous silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) in working on the development and yield of cucumber under water shortage and saltiness stresses was surveyed [40]. The outcomes discovered that SiNPs worked on the development and efficiency of cucumber regardless of the quantity of water [40]. Nanomaterials under development can effectively utilize carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, capture toxic pollutants from water, and break down solid waste into valuable products. CO2 facilitates the cleavage of palladium carbonyl complexes in the presence of coordinated water and copper(I)-activated oxygen [41].

The maximum yield increase in irrigated cucumber was 85%. This increase might be due to enhanced nutrient uptake, as SiNPs significantly increased the levels of nitrogen (by 30%) and potassium (by 52%, 75%, and 41% in the root, stem, and leaves, respectively), as well as silicon (by 51%, 57%, 8%, and 78% in the root, stem, leaf, and fruit, respectively). The critical role of SiNPs in alleviating water deficiency and salinity stress is due to present high silicon content material seen in the leaf, which controls water loss by transpiration [19]. Nowadays, nanoscience and nanotechnology must continue to progress rapidly in order to make it possible to synthesize and produce engineered NPs with diverse types, sizes, and morphologies. Extensively using NPs may cause harm considering dangerous agricultural, environmental hazards, capability of novel fertilizers and possibility of inhibition. For example, CuO NPs do not affect maize seed germination but inhibit root elongation.

3.1 Synthesis of nanomaterials for seed regeneration

The factors that affect the characterization and synthesis of NPs are extract concentration, size, temperature, pH of the solution, the concentration of the raw materials used, and synthesis methods [14]. Generally, nanomaterials can be synthesized in two different ways, which include top-down and bottom-up approaches. Comparatively, bottom-up is the most preferred because of its cost-efficiency. Due to their antimicrobial properties, the most widely used nanomaterials are metal NPs such as copper, silver, and zinc; polymers are also used, where carbon-based nanomaterials are used as antimicrobial agents. In general, nanomaterials applied in trace amounts act as bio-stimulants that help induce plant innate immunity, increasing tolerance to diseases to suppress biotic stresses [42]. Considering the bio-stimulation potential of nanomaterials in host plants, the application of NPs as foliar and seed application can be a practical and preventive approach before the onset of pathogen infection by boosting the plant’s innate immunity.

However, the particular characteristics regarding the range of specific concentration associated with biostimulation should be further examined [43]. There are two sources of NPs: biotic and abiotic. AgNPs can be synthesized in various ways. However, the biological route is considered as non-toxic, non-harmful, biocompatible, and economical. Here AgNPs are synthesized both chemically and biologically (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
                  Synthesis of AgNPs using green synthesis. Adapted from the study of Roy et al. [47].
Figure 3

Synthesis of AgNPs using green synthesis. Adapted from the study of Roy et al. [47].

The biotic form of NPs is biodegradable, eco-friendly, and prepared from organic sources. On the other hand, the abiotic form of NPs can be retrieved from inorganic sources like salts that are unsafe, mostly non-biodegradable [44]. Due to their size (1–100 nm), shape, and structure, NPs display improved properties over other materials. Compared to other metallic NPs, AgNPs exhibit unique physicochemical properties imparting antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Various methods have been used to produce NPs, but synthesis using plant extracts is popular due to its advantages, including rapid development, cost-effective protocol, single-step method, non-pathogenicity, and environmentally friendly [45,46].

The synthesized AgNPs are generally characterized using several characterization techniques to distinguish synthesized NPs [48]. For example, researchers have used UV–Vis spectrometer, Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy to characterize synthesized AgNPs by using Ananas comosus, spherical NPs of an average diameter of 12 nm were described in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs [49]. The magnesium hydroxide NPs (Mg(OH)2NPs) were synthesized by using the modified co-precipitation method [50]. The Zea mays L. seeds were sterilized, treated, and various concentrations of Mg(OH)2NPs were observed on the growth of Zea mays L. seeds compared to the untreated Zea mays L. seeds [51].

The chitosan-based nanomaterials can be prepared through chemical methods like interfacial polymerization, in situ polymerization, and interfacial polycondensation. Furthermore, physicochemical methods are also used to enhance specific traits, such as complex coacervation, ionic gelation, and spray cooling. There are physical methods that may involve the use of centrifugal extrusion – spheronization, spray-drying, and fluid bed coating. Among these, ionic gelation is considered the standard method to prepare copper and zinc-based chitosan NPs. To characterize the various physicochemical properties of advanced nanomaterials, methods such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) were used [52,53].

Chitosan, a biopolymer, is well known because of its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Chitosan can be synthesized biologically in the Czapek-Dox broth medium in which Penicillium oxalicum, an endophytic fungus, was grown for 3 days. The extracellular proteins produced by the fungus were precipitated with ammonium sulfate saturation of 80% (W/V), and then the precipitated proteins of 5 mg were made to pass through the presaturated carboxymethyl-cellulose column. The unbounded proteins removed from the column were checked and collected for the required protein content. It will be utilized to prepare chitosan NPs [54].

The chitosan was made to dissolve at 0.5% (w/v) with acetic acid of 1% (v/v) and the corresponding pH of 4.8. The chitosan solution of 15 mL was added to the anionic proteins of (180 µg/mL) removed from the void volume of the (6 mL) column stirred for 30 min under magnetic stirring and kept overnight at room temperature [55]. After incubation, the colloidal suspension was centrifuged so that the precipitate was made to wash twice to remove the unreacted substances and then freeze-dried. Hence, the highly stable NPs are delivered by biological preparation with high zeta potential and low polydispersity Index compared to other methods [56].

To produce stable and uniform ZnO NPs, various methods have been developed, where such methods are employed to produce ZnO NPs are the reaction of metabolic zinc with alcohol, hydrothermal technique, precipitation method, vapor transport synthesis, and green synthesis. The uptake, accumulation, and translocation of NPs depend on the charge, size, chemical configuration, and stability of the NPs and plant species used [57].

Biosynthesis of gold NPs was conducted at room temperature with Cassia auriculata L. leaf extract. Characterization techniques such as UV-Vis spectroscopy, X-Ray diffraction, and TEM have been used to characterize the extracted bio-nanogold particles. Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. is considered an essential plant for biofuel and food production. The effect of the application of bio-nanogold on the plant Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. was studied [58]. There was another study which focused on green synthesis of magnesium hydroxide NPs, along with its efficacy in germination seeds. Both in vitro and in vivo promotion of plant growth were observed in Zea Mays L. at various concentrations and the improved seed germination of 100% when the concentration of NPs is 50 ppm [59].

3.2 Prerequisite nanomaterial properties

The small size of nanomaterials enables direct nutrient and pesticide delivery to the seed, ultimately augmenting the efficiency, minimizing negative environmental impact, and enhancing plant growth. This targeted delivery to the plant allows for quicker and more precise intake of nutrients, water, and develops a resistance to diseases. In becoming more sustainable through various climatic changes, nanomaterials present such qualities vital for a plant’s survival [60,61]. In any case, the reaction of metal NPs on plants focuses on the phase of development (Table 1).

Table 1

Demonstration of the properties of nanomaterials and their benefits in seed regeneration

Nanomaterials Properties Benefit in seed regeneration Ref.
AgNPs
  • Supports plant growth and gas exchange rate under different abiotic stresses

  • Physicochemical properties determine antimicrobial and antioxidant activities

  • Defensive effects on plants under salt stress

  • Non-toxic

  • Identifying new biomarkers to monitor and predict seed regeneration outcomes.

  • AgNPs in the seed coat promote seed germination and early seedling development

  • May build water retention measures by sprouting seeds, enhancing the seeds’ nutrient uptake and assimilation

  • Increased photosynthetic pigment levels and enhanced activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) reduced the accumulation of proline and soluble sugars

[2,14,34,36]
AuNPs
  • Facilitates better nutrient absorption by seed

  • Acts as carriers for bioactive molecules or nutrients protect seeds under abiotic stress (e.g., salinity, drought)

  • Non-toxic

  • Exhibits high stability and is not prone to aggregation

  • Enhances plant growth and gas exchange under abiotic stress conditions

[36]
CuNPs
  • Defensive effects on plants under salt stress

  • Used as a fungicide

  • Enhanced antioxidant activity of phenols, Vitamin C, and glutathione

  • Improved sodium ion (Na+)/potassium ion (K+) ratio

  • Mitigates oxidative and ionic stress by upregulating jasmonic acid (JA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) genes

[4,14]
FeNPs
  • Defensive effects on plants under salt stress

  • Enhanced antioxidant activities

  • Fe content influences the endogenous levels of salicylic acid (SA), which enhances the activity of antioxidant proteins within the cells

[14]
FeS2NPs
TiO2NPs
  • Defensive effects on plants under salt stress

  • Acts as growth regulators, but the enhancement effects depend on plant genotype

  • Increases antioxidant enzyme activities

[14,62]
ZnNPs
  • Zinc aids intracellular and intercellular signaling and regulates DNA transcription

  • Promoted root elongation and improved seed germination rates

  • Zn NPs improve plant tolerance to environmental stresses

  • Enhanced morphological and physiological properties under normal and stress conditions, including salinity stress

[14,30,36]
ZnO NPs
Mg(OH)2NPs (Zea mays seeds)
  • Regulating compounds such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), DNA, and RNA to enhance cellular processes

  • Exhibited improved morphological characteristics compared to untreated seedlings

  • Improved the level of seed germination (can be used for early germination of seeds to break the seed dormancy)

[37]
Cu and Zn chitosan NPs
  • Delivery of micronutrients and agrochemicals to improve the crop

  • Enhanced seed germination, seedling length, fresh and dry weight, and antifungal development against Alternaria solani and Fusarium

  • Stimulates seedling growth through increased amylase and protease activity in maize

  • Enhances germination of seed enhanced the germination rate

  • Increased hypocotyls and radicles length, as well as their weight

[23]

3.3 Nanomaterial types

The benefits of supplementing NPs in agriculture can be analyzed by the penetration and transportation of NPs in plants. NPs, due to their unique properties, help in the growth of plants. They are more biologically active than their bulk counterparts due to the extraordinary surface region per mass unit of NPs [63,64]. However, the impact of NPs relies upon the properties of both plants and NPs. Such nutrients may either be classified biotic or abiotic. The biotic NPs are prepared naturally and are biodegradable, whereas the abiotic NPs are prepared from inorganic ones, which are not safe [65]. Nanomaterials have been found to have beneficial outcomes in sustainable farming yield production, and numerous investigations revealed their positive effect on different crops (Table 2).

Table 2

Effects of various NPs when applied to different plant species

NPs Biotic/abiotic Plant species Effects Observation of effects Ref.
AgNPs Abiotic
  • Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)

  • Enhanced percentage of germination, speed of germination

  • Increased salt tolerance

[36]
  • Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic)

  • Enhanced percent of germination, increased germination rate

  • Increased drought stress tolerance

  • Saffron (Crocus sativus)

  • Parameters that are the length of shoot, fresh weight, and dry weight of the plant was expanded

  • Improved flooding tolerance

  • Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Increased dry and fresh load (weight) of roots and leaves

  • Regulated salt tolerance

  • Summer Savory (Satureja hortensis L.)

  • Chlorophyll content was improved

  • Relative water content (RWC) was balanced

  • Increase in percentage of germination and shoot length

  • Improved salt stress tolerance

Mg(OH)2NPs (magnesium hydroxide NPs) Abiotic
  • Corn Plant (Zea mays)

  • Increased germination percentage

  • Enhances growth

  • Excess magnesium content found in leaves and roots of the plant

[37]
CeNPs (cerium oxide NPs) Abiotic
  • Sorghum

  • Decreases drought-induced oxidative damage

  • Increased photosynthesis and grain yield

[38]
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) Abiotic
  • Soybean (Glycine max)

  • Increased percentage of germination and germination rate under drought stress

  • Decrease in seed’s fresh and dry weight under drought stress

[30]
  • Mung bean chickpea

  • Increased length of the root

  • Effects were observed during the seedling stage

[31]
Silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) Abiotic
  • Thale cress

  • Silicon uptake by the plant is contingent on the concentration of silicon

  • Reduction in plant development caused by the high adverse zeta potential

[3]
Carbon nanotube Abiotic
  • Caucasian alder

  • Increased stress tolerance

  • The effects were observed during seed priming

[31]
  • Cucumber, onion

  • Enhanced root growth

  • Effects were observed during the seedling stage

  • Tomato

  • Increased seed germination

  • The effects were observed during germination of the seed.

Ferrous disulfide nanoparticles (FeS2NPs) Abiotic
  • Chickpea

  • Increased germination

  • The effects were observed during seed priming

[31]
  • Spinach

Calcium carbonate nanoparticles (CaCO3NPs) Abiotic
  • Peanut

  • Increased soluble sugar, mineral content, and proteins

  • Effects were observed during seedling stage

[31]
CuNPs Abiotic
  • Elodea densa (planch)

  • Enhanced photosynthetic activity

  • Effects were observed during seedling stage

[31]
AuNPs Abiotic
  • Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic)

  • At low concentrations, there was an increase in the growth and biochemical parameters

  • At higher concentrations, growth and biochemical performance declined, indicating potential toxicity

[61]

4 Leveraging nanotechnology in seed regeneration

Using nanomaterials, the plant’s growth is supported throughout the inconsistent weather conditions without hindering its overall growth rate. The use of nanomaterials incorporates nanotechnology to enhance the plant’s strength, nutrient absorption, and water retention throughout the stages of the seed regeneration process. Nanomaterials are quickly emerging as an effective way to improve the overall quality of a plant by improving the seed quality and germination rates. In agriculture, there are a variety of potential methods that can be used throughout the seed regeneration process, as shown in Table 3 [66].

Table 3

Comparison of all the applicable methods of use

Method Commonly used nanomaterials Commonly benefited seeds/plants Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
Nanopriming
  • AgNPs

  • Carbon nanotubes

  • SiNPs

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Oilseeds

  • Benefits seed germination rates

  • Strengthens the seed

  • Improves the uptake of water

  • Enhances absorption of nutrients

  • Expensive

  • Potential accumulation of NPs in soil and water

[75]
Nano-fertilizers
  • Nano-urea

  • Nano-phosphates

  • Nano-potassium

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Enables faster and healthier growth

  • Quicker nutrient transport to seeds

  • Potential risk to soil contamination (large surface area, small size)

[21]
Nano-pesticides
  • Metal oxide NPs (silver, zinc, etc.)

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Allows for localized pest control

  • Requires minimal amount of pesticides

  • Reduction in damaging residue

  • Potential contamination of soil and water

  • Risk to disturb the food chain

[76]
Nano-coating
  • Polymer infused NPs (chitosan, silica)

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Controlled release of nutrients

  • Protection from pathogens

  • Better storage for water

  • Accumulation of NPs in the soil

  • Expensive implementation

[77,78]
Nano-sensors
  • Carbon nanotubes

  • Quantum dots

  • Nanoscale sensors

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Constant observation of temperature, soil, and nutrients

  • Allows for stronger and healthier growth

  • Complex and expensive

  • Lack of extensive research

[79]
Nanoparticle-mediated gene delivery
  • Carbon nanotubes

  • Au NPs

  • Mesoporous SiNPs

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Simple genetic alterations

  • Strengthens plant

  • Quickens growth rate

  • Risk of random genomic integration

[80]
Nanoclay-based soil amendments
  • Layered double hydroxides

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Improves water retention in the soil

  • Makes nutrients easily accessible

  • Soil compaction may reduce space for air and water movement

  • Alteration of nutrient levels in the soil

[81]
Nano-enabled delivery systems
  • Liposomes

  • Dendrimers

  • Nano-emulsions

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Monitors the release of nutrients

  • Travels directly to the seed and roots

  • Some molecular compounds may be unstable through varying weather conditions

  • Expensive

[82]
Nanotechnology for seed resistance
  • Metal oxides

  • Carbon

  • Biopolymer NPs

  • Legumes

  • Cereal crops

  • Fruit trees

  • Vegetables

  • Improves growth rate under all conditions

  • Strengthens seed resistance to stresses

  • Potential resistance

  • Reducing water quality

[83]
Electrospinning
  • Polymer nanofibers

  • Carbon nanotubes

  • Graphene and graphene oxide

  • Nanocellulose

  • Legumes

  • Medicinal plants

  • Fruit trees

  • Forage crops

  • Improved bioavailability of the pesticides

  • Improvement in controlled and targeted release of pesticides

  • Expensive

  • Time consuming process

  • Residual NPs in soil

[84]

Nanotechnology for seed resistance involves coating the seeds with chosen nanomaterials that serve the purpose to provide additional strength and give the plants the ability to survive in environmental conditions, such as drought, salinity, and even under presence of harmful pathogens. This system facilitates eliminating the plant pathogenic microorganisms and simultaneously protecting against plant viruses. The use of nanotechnology in this case, involves the application of various NPs through methods such as coating, direct delivery, and monitoring. These applications have shown to enhance seed germination as well as biomass yield. Furthermore, they improve the seed's resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [67,68].

There is an adverse effect of salinity on agriculture. Salt stress on plants is majorly categorized into primary and secondary effects. Primary effects include osmotic and ionic effects, whereas secondary effects constitute nutritional and hormonal imbalances and oxidative stress. Supplementing NPs to plants can help injurious effects caused by the harsh environment, including salt stress. However, the excessive concentrations of NPs can cause damage to the plants. It is important to note that the response of plants toward salinity depends on various factors, including the concentration of a solute, genetic potential and growth stage of the plant, and the severity of stress. By interfering with the activities of key enzymes, salt stress affects the metabolism of plants. Furthermore, upon supplementing plants’ NPs, the Relative Water Content (RWC), stress tolerance, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity were increased. Nanotechnology plays an essential role in developing methods for efficient and targeted delivery of agrochemicals, advancement of novel superabsorbent polymers, constant monitoring of agrochemicals through nano biosensors, enhanced resilience and adaptability of microorganisms under heat stress is crucial under varying climate conditions [69,70,71].

Long-term assessment of nanoproducts (composts, pesticides, nanogels, biosensors, and heat-stable catalysts) under different agro-climatic conditions, various soil types, and crop ecologies would give straightforward answers to agricultural production constraints. Additionally, nanomaterials can encourage bioaccumulation in ecological systems. Regarding exposure pathways arising from the production, processing, and application of nanoscale substances, their primary impacts and transformation products should be monitored through life-cycle assessments and exposure scenarios and evaluated in environmental compartments such as air, water, and soil [72].

There are a few steps to be followed:

  1. Identifying persistent and accumulate in the environment,

  2. Using appropriate measurement techniques for water, soil and sediment detection.

  3. Studying the behaviour of nanomaterials after consumption and even during disposal, landfilling, incineration and reuse.

  4. Ecotoxicity assessments throughout the life cycle should be conducted for the nanomaterials.

It is important to assess the risks of exposing the nanomaterials to the climatic conditions, while also keeping account of their stability and durability [73,74].

Sections 4.14.9 address the unique mechanism followed by each of these methods that complement the seed regeneration process.

4.1 Nanopriming

Nanopriming is a technique commonly used to enhance germination and growth process by priming the seeds with nanopriming solutions. These solutions are made of NPs, often silver, copper, silicon, or zinc, and are applied to the seed surface prior to planting. This solution interacts with the seed by penetrating through the seed coat, enabling many cellular processes and stimulating biochemical and physiological changes in the seed, enabling seedling vigor and better germination rates. The NPs that pass through the seed coat interact with the seed can facilitate delivery of nutrients and growth hormones and enhance antimicrobial properties or also enhance. This will allow the seed to continue to grow under harsh environments, including drought, salinity, or temperature stress. Furthermore, this direct delivery ensures the seed receives essential materials for its growth and development, as well as protecting the seeds from infections and improving the crop yield [75].

4.2 Nano-fertilizers

Nano-fertilizers are combinations of various fertilizers containing the most suitable nanomaterials with desired properties to improve the plant’s ability to store and absorb nutrients, thus enhancing both the plant’s growth and yield. This method allows for a direct transport of nutrients to the seed. Nano-fertilizers often are made of nutrient-rich particles that have a high surface area and enhanced chemical reactivity, promoting efficient absorption and storage of nutrients within the plant. In storing such minerals, as the seed germinates and grows, the NPs will slowly release these nutrients to enhance it. Nano-fertilizers are efficient in direct transport of nutrients to the seed and roots, which maximizes nutrient usage and reduces nutrient runoff or over-fertilization [85].

4.3 Nano-pesticides

Nano-pesticides are made of active chemicals like herbicides, fungicides, or insecticides that are embedded in NPs to protect the plant from pests and diseases, as well as ensuring that these active chemicals are released at a controlled rate. Nano-pesticides penetrate through the seed coat and interact with the seed during germination, to protect it from various diseases. Nano-pesticides are effective through their controlled release of pesticides delivered to the plant. This allows for a targeted delivery and a minimized resistivity to pests. Nano-pesticides can be applied in different ways [86,87]:

  1. Foliar application: Applied directly on the plants surface where they penetrate plant tissues.

  2. Soil application: Applied to the soil, allowing absorption through the plant’s roots.

  3. Seed treatment: Applied as a coating to the seed, for early-stage protection of the plant.

4.4 Nano-coating

Nano-coating covers the seed and coats them with a single thin layer of specified nanomaterials in order to protect them from harsh conditions presented by the external environment, ultimately improving the plant’s resilience. Similar to nano-priming, nano-coating involves the use of a solution made of nanomaterials that is applied onto the seed. However, in nano-coating, common nanoparticle solutions contain polymers, metals, metal oxides, or carbon-based materials. Through a variety of coating techniques, such as dipping, spraying, or vacuum-assisted methods, the thin coating is placed on the seed and enhances the plant’s overall health. This coating allows for improved water absorption, efficient nutrient delivery, enhanced resistance to diseases, and an increased tolerance to stresses [88].

4.5 Nano-sensors

Nano-sensors are implemented into agricultural practices to observe and analyze environmental conditions immediately. Nano-sensors are used to effectively monitor a plant’s health and observe specific qualities, while providing real-time information. This method allows us to track the plants’ amount of moisture, temperature, nutrient levels, pH levels, detection of pathogens, and environmental stressors. This allows for data collection for farmers and agronomists in order to properly assess the quality and growth of the plant. This will help improve the crop yield. Nano-sensors are made of materials typically ranging from 1 to 100 nm, such as nanowires, NPs, and nanoplates [89]. This detection method can involve different mechanisms including:

  1. Optical detection: Observed changes in visual properties (absorption and scattering).

  2. Electrochemical detection: Chemical reactions causing current or voltage.

  3. Mechanical detection: Observed changes in mechanical properties (mass and deformation) [71].

4.6 Nanoparticle-mediated gene delivery

Nanoparticle-mediated gene delivery is an advanced method used to create plants with desirable traits. During this process, NPs are chosen and used to supply desired genes or genetic materials to the target seeds. These ideal characteristics may include improved yield, enhanced resistance to diseases and pests, or improved stress tolerance and nutrient content [90]. This method works by utilizing the chosen NPs as carriers delivering specific DNA into the seeds’ cells. NP-mediated gene delivery offers several advantages, including precision of genes, efficiency of delivery, and versatility of choosing the NP transporters. This mechanism involves a variety of steps, which includes

  1. NP synthesis: Creation of nanoparticles suitable for gene delivery.

  2. DNA encapsulation: Encasing genetic material within the nanoparticles.

  3. Seed treatment: Applying the nanoparticles to seeds.

  4. Cellular uptake: Nanoparticles delivering the DNA into seed cells.

  5. Expression of the transgene: Activation and expression of the introduced gene.

4.7 Nanoclay-based soil amendments

Nanoclay-based soil amendments are not directly applied to seed itself but aim to improve the seed’s environment to create optimal conditions for the plant to grow. This method uses nanoclay particles that are placed in soil to improve the seed’s surroundings. The chosen nanoclay is often taken from natural materials such as montmorillonite, kaolinite, or bentonite, as they carry specific physical and chemical properties. Nanoclays have high surface area, are rich in nutrients, and have antimicrobial properties. All these properties improve water retention, nutrient availability, enhanced soil structure, and prevention against diseases [91].

4.8 Nano-enabled delivery systems

Nano-enabled delivery systems are advanced methods that provide an efficient delivery mechanism using nanomaterials to improve the plant’s growth process, similar to the discussions in 4.6 but in a generalized utilization. These substances vary from delivering specific nutrients, pesticides, growth regulators, or certain genetic material. These carriers enhance germination, stress resistance, and the overall performance of the plant. Nano-enabled delivery may include nutrient delivery, pesticide delivery, gene delivery, and growth regulatory delivery. All of these methods allow for a precise delivery of chosen materials to the seed in order to promote the health and growth of the plant [83].

4.9 Electrospinning

Electrospinning is a versatile and effective process for producing continuous polymer strands with diameters ranging from a few nanometers to several micrometers. This method is utilized to make polymeric nano-microfibers and nano-microparticles separately for various applications [92,93]. Electrospinning offers several advantages, such as improved bioavailability of pesticides, enhanced specificity, improved controlled release and ease and safety in handling [92]. Roughly 90% of the seed harvests are for human and animal food consumption, which makes seed health a crucial factor. The inoculums present in the seeds can cause outbtreaks in the field and spread to the unaffected areas, introducing new microbes. Studies have shown that seeds treated with fungicides using electrospinning exhibit higher germination rates compared to untreated seeds. The fungicide effectively inhibits fungal growth on seeds, reducing fungal activity and protecting seed quality from harmful parasites [92,94].

5 Comparison of seed priming techniques: Conventional vs nano-based approaches

Seed priming is a crucial aspect to activate metabolic processes of seed by pre-sowing them for enhanced seed germination and seedling vigor by partially hydrating them. The commonly used methods are as follows:

  • Hydropriming: Soaking seeds in water,

  • Osmo-priming: Using osmotic solutions like polyethylene glycol,

  • Chemical priming: Use of chemical agents such as calcium chloride [95].

These methods allow germination rates to be improved, enhanced seedling growth and stress tolerance. Traditional priming methods have been proven effective in increasing crop resistance to abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, and temperature changes. However, nano-based seed priming is known to enhance water uptake, nutrient absorption, and enzymatic activities in the plants. It involves NPs like silver and zinc oxide, or chitosan, which is either directly coated onto the seeds or dissolved in the priming solutions. The NPs allow a targeted nutrient and bioactive compound delivery, which increases seed germination rates and enhances the tolerance of the plants to biotic as well as abiotic stresses [96,97]. This also allows higher yield potential of the crops and their stress tolerance. The expanded overview of the comparison is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 
               Conventional vs nano-based seed priming.
Figure 4

Conventional vs nano-based seed priming.

When compared, nano-based approaches provide more precision over the conventional methods. But these methods come with their own complexities like higher cost, potential environmental impact, etc. [9698]. The approaches are supposed to be specifically tailored in formulations to support seed growth for crops under specific conditions.

While both conventional and nano-based seed priming methods have distinct advantages and disadvantages, there are possibilities to provide a combination of both of these methods and utilize the advantages of both of these techniques under a conditionally controlled setting. For example: Osmo-priming can be enhanced using NPs, enabling water retention as well as targeted nutrient delivery [95,96]. A hybrid form of these methods could provide optimal balance, and also reduce the harm to the environment with a hybrid, yet sustainable approach of seed priming under varying climatic conditions.

6 Discussion

Increasing food production through traditional methods is challenging as these methods restrict utilization of the available farmland to its full potential [99].

When nanofertilizers were used, they exhibited dissolvability and scattering of micronutrients, with plants’ enhanced and effective nutrient uptake, extended duration for nutrient release, and reduced nutrient loss when compared to conventional fertilizers. When nanotechnology was used throughout different agricultural stages, the following effects emerged:

  1. Seed priming – showed viability and controlled aging of seeds.

  2. Seed storage – protected against bacterial, fungal, and other contaminants.

  3. Seed germination – showed increased and uniform germination.

  4. Seedling – increased yield and productivity.

  5. Nano agrochemicals – showed targeted and extended periods for delivery of chemicals.

  6. Post-harvest strategy – long-term storage of various agricultural products.

It is vital to understand physiology while performing seed regeneration to imitate the habitat and conditions of a particular crop. Although we have already discussed the significant steps involved in seed regeneration, such cases are highly generic. In order to go into detail, one can discuss several steps in between where the seed is collected until how the addition of nanomaterials makes it universally applicable [100,101]. Thus, it is essential to discuss the regeneration scheme involved in such a process in detail.

The seed regeneration process begins with the collection of seeds. This is followed by taking the seeds directly to the laboratory for the germination phase (Figure 5) [102]. In the laboratory, utmost care is taken while handling the seeds while in the germination stage, each growth phase of the seed is carefully monitored. Once no abnormalities are found in the seeds, they are then sent to the greenhouse to grow after the essential addition of nanomaterials if needed in the pre-germination phase [103].

Figure 5 Different phases involved in germination. Inspired from previous studies. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].
Figure 5

Different phases involved in germination. Inspired from previous studies. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].

The plants are allowed to grow in the greenhouse for about 100 days and are carefully monitored. The required nanomaterials are introduced during this phase, similar to other nutrients for plants to absorb. After this, the plants are sent to a controlled environment for cross breeding to determine their ability to reproduce and are examined to recognize if any changes have occurred due to the addition of nanomaterials. Furthermore, this step is necessary to ensure that the seeds obtained from the host plant have similar genetic integrity. After completion of this step, the plants are transferred to the greenhouse and prepare for harvesting. It is ensured that these plants are grown in dry places with enough moisture for their growth. Then, the yield is measured and compared with its original yield under normal conditions in its natural habitat, and the effectiveness of the applied nanomaterials is calculated [104,105]. The overall method and nanomaterials are evaluated from this process. Once successful, the method is applicable for common usage.

The efficiency of nanoparticle synthesis using parts of plants depends on which plant parts have been used, which also influences the subsequent steps of extraction, isolation, and purification. The recovery rate of NPs may be reduced due to reduced synthesis rates, which is influenced by plant-specific factors like type and yield of biomolecules (e.g., proteins) secreted during synthesis.

On the other hand, the scale of defects or failure is calculated as the first remedial measure for some defects. If the defect is within minimal ranges it may be due to the inability of some particular plants to adapt and can be considered as a minor issue. If the results are negligible or zero then the process must be repeated, as there are some mistakes or an oversight while calculating the scale of defects. This means the whole process which usually requires 150 days or more would have to be repeated [106].

Another concerning issue would be the effective or defective seeds that the hosts produce due to two significant factors: seed viability and genetic integrity. All specific traits of a particular seed may not always get inherited. It results in a significant margin of error in the seed viability. This issue can be overcome by carefully altering the conditions and ensuring that exact environmental conditions are met during the crossing or breeding process. This again does not ensure 100% seed viability, but the magnitude of error is drastically reduced. On the other hand, the case of genetic integrity is not entirely controllable [107].

Regardless of the process, there are several complexities involved. Handling of such crops is crucial, in regards to the wild varieties and core crops of International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. The available knowledge of cultivation and wild varieties of crops should be considered. The quantity and quality always depend on handling of the seeds, until the growth phase. There are other factors to consider, like pest attacks and diseases or infections. Inappropriate drying time and improper harvest will significantly affect seeds’ quality and hinder the desired outcomes [108]. More research is required in this field in order to ensure seed viability and optimization of the yield. Another significant factor apart from handling of seeds would be maintaining seed health. These are some of the many factors inhibiting efficient seed regeneration. There are other factors like environmental abnormalities, alien pollen, etc. Even with such complexity, seed regeneration is significant due to the worsening environmental conditions over the period. This summarizes the whole idea of the seed regeneration process. However, the entire process does not end there. While we have discussed what happens inside the plants and how the nanomaterials are applied, much remains vague and ambiguous. Figure 6(a) and (b) illustrates some of these processes, which gives us the simple idea of such a phenomenon occurring in plants during the seed regeneration process [109,110].

Figure 6 
               (a) Path followed by nanomaterials after reaching the soil. Adapted from the study of Ahmed et al. [111]. (b) Types of biotic and abiotic stress. Adapted from the study of Paramo et al. [27].
Figure 6

(a) Path followed by nanomaterials after reaching the soil. Adapted from the study of Ahmed et al. [111]. (b) Types of biotic and abiotic stress. Adapted from the study of Paramo et al. [27].

Figure 6a describes how nanomaterials mix into soil and absorb the plants like the other minerals. A detailed description of biotic and abiotic stress has been mentioned in Figure 6. It is important to note such stresses in plants as they affect plants’ entire health system and modifications. While a deficiency in resources such as sun, water, and minerals or contamination due to chemicals occur, it can be classified as an abiotic stress. The primary problem is that another living organism that involves microorganisms can be classified as a biotic stress. Such classification helps us immediately recognize the component lacking and the root cause, so nanomaterial selection for seed regeneration becomes much more manageable. A detailed expansion of biotic and abiotic stress has been given in Figure 6b.

Another major factor acting as a hindrance to the seed process is ROS (Figure 7). In plants, ROS exists in both ionic and molecular forms. Ionic forms include hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) and superoxide anions ( O 2 ), while molecular forms primarily consist of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and singlet oxygen (O2). Each sort of ROS has an alternative oxidative limit and influences distinctive physiological and biochemical responses controlled by various qualities in plants. In the excited state of oxygen, singlet oxygen (O2) is generally created in chloroplast photosystem II and is oxidizable. Even though O2 exists for an exceptionally brief time frame and is highly reactive, it significantly influences the photosynthesis process.

Figure 7 
               Reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in seeds. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].
Figure 7

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in seeds. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].

The superoxide anion ( O 2 ) is the precursor for different ROS due to its instability and strong oxidative and reductive properties. O 2 potentially contributes to the stability of the young plant. In any case, extreme O 2 causes expanded ROS levels and could lead to cell death (phagocytosis). In rice, roots and stems appear to be the fundamental organs of O 2 creation, which may be identified with their transformation to the aquatic climate. O 2 can be delivered by photosynthetic electron transport chains, mitochondrial respiratory electron transport chains, and membrane-associated NADPH oxidase (Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homolog proteins) frameworks. These systems can either transform hydrogen ions into oxygen molecules or convert O 2 into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with the help of SOD [112,113].

Under normal conditions, plants utilize various antioxidant defense mechanisms to regulate and manage excessive ROS. While the balance between ROS production and elimination could be disrupted by biotic as well as abiotic stresses that lead to sudden spike in ROS levels within cells, which causes significant damage to cellular structures. The plants, over time, must adapt to such high levels of ROS for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. With the fluctuations in ROS levels, mainly when it spikes, the plants tend to regulate these molecules through ROS-targeting systems.

Figures 7 and 8 present the processes during various stages and phases of germination within plants. This diagram serves as the base for using nanomaterials, and integrating it with these functions is mandatory for having effective regeneration. These diagrams provide a general understanding of the process of seed regeneration and highlight some of its most essential parameters involved and further expanded using current studies in Table 4 [114,115].

Figure 8 
               The standard method followed to germinate seeds without optimum ROS levels. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].
Figure 8

The standard method followed to germinate seeds without optimum ROS levels. Adapted and Recreated from Ref. [45].

Table 4

Demonstration of regeneration of crops comparing original and regeneration growth conditions aided by nanomaterials with their respective effects

Crop Nanomaterials used in seed regeneration Original growth conditions Regeneration conditions Effects Ref.
Tomato ZnO
  • Warm-season crop

  • 21–24°C temperature range

  • 6.0–7.0 pH range

  • Two different concentrations (15 and 30 mg L−1) were applied to the sterilized tomato seeds and were cultured in vitro under aseptic conditions on a hormone-free germination medium

  • Cultured seeds were kept in an incubator at 25 ± 2°C in darkness for a week to stimulate seed germination

  • pH was adjusted to 5.7 before autoclaving

  • Mitigated the effects of salt stress by upregulating SOD (superoxide dismutase) and GPX (glutathione peroxidase) enzymes

  • Reduces adverse effects of NaCl

  • A lower concentration (15 mg L−1) showed better results than a higher concentration (30 mg L−1)

[20,22,128]
SiO2
  • Warm-season crop

  • 21–24°C temperature range

  • 6.0–7.0 pH range

  • Two different types of concentrations (1 mM and 2 mM) were used

  • Seeds regenerated in the Petri plate

  • 1 mM NPs were seen to act better in contrast with 2 mM in which the transformation of plants under salinity stress, with improved root and shoot development

[129]
Zea mays L. Mg(OH)2
  • 18–27°C during the day and 14°C during the evening temperature range

  • 5.5–7.3 pH range

  • Sterilized Zea mays seeds were sprouted on half-strength and full-strength MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium.

  • Seeds were treated with two concentrations of Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles (200 ppm and 500 ppm) and incubated for 7 days at 28 ± 2°C under light conditions for in vitro evaluation.

  • For in vivo testing, seeds were surface sterilized and planted in disinfected soil:sand mixtures in a 3:1 ratio.

  • Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles were applied in concentrations of 100 ppm, 200 ppm, 500 ppm, and 1000 ppm

  • At 500 ppm, seed germination and growth parameters showed significant improvement.

  • Increased root length, shoot length, and chlorophyll content compared to untreated plants.

  • High germination percentages and improved growth rates were observed in both in vitro and in vivo conditions.

  • The nanoparticles enhanced the overall development of Zea mays seedlings in a concentration-dependent manner

[37]
Cucumis sativus L. ZnO
  • sandy topsoil rich in organic matter with good drainage

  • 6.5–7.5 pH range

  • Warm temperature

  • 800 mg kg−1 concentration of ZnONP is required

  • Improved development and increased dry weight were noticed

[105]
Rice (Oryza sativa) Nanocarbon
  • Requires hot and humid climate

  • 21–37°C temperature range

  • 5.5 pH level

  • The cleaned seeds were moved to NMI medium containing unique proportions of nanocarbons at (5, 25, 50, and 100 mg L−1), individually

  • The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.6–5.8

  • The seeds were refined under 25 ± 2°C in dark condition for 3 weeks

  • Parameters such as callus induction rate, fresh weight, dry weight, and size were assessed after three weeks of incubation

  • Higher concentrations of nanocarbons reduced the rate of callus induction but increased fresh weight, dry weight, and size

  • Low concentrations enhanced plant regeneration frequency in the recovery medium

[57]
Wheat (Triticum) AgNPs
  • Requires cold climate

  • 18–30°C temperature range

  • 6.0–8.0 pH range

  • Various concentrations of AgNPs (25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L) were applied to the plants at a trifoliate stage

  • Heat stress was induced at a temperature range of 35–40°C for 3 h/day for around 3 days

  • Heat stress alone decreased the plant's growth parameters

  • Application of AgNPs mitigated the adverse effects of heat stress and enhanced growth parameters

  • Significant improvements in growth were observed at concentrations of 50 and 75 mg L−1 under heat stress conditions

[7]
Sorghum Nanoceria
  • 26–30°C temperature range

  • 6.0–7.5 pH range

  • Nanoceria was applied to 10 pots of sorghum grown under drought conditions

  • Five pots were used for physiological, biochemical, and anatomical analyses of leaves

  • The other five pots were evaluated for pollen germination, seed-set percentage, and seed yield

  • Plants under drought and irrigated conditions were foliar-sprayed with either water or 10 mg L−1 nanoceria

  • Each pot received 600 mL of spray containing 6 mg of nanoceria for three plants, with a single foliar application

  • Under drought conditions, foliar application of nanoceria enhanced carbon assimilation and pollen germination, resulting in a higher seed-set percentage and improved seed yield.

  • Nanoceria increased photosynthetic rates and pollen germination by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated under drought stress, reducing membrane lipid peroxidation

[38]
G.O Sars (Ceriodaphnia cornuta) ZnO synthesized from Musa paradisiaca (edible banana)
  • Can be grown under various conditions

  • The plants were treated with 50 µg/mL ZnO NPs under lab conditions

  • A mortality rate of 42% was observed after 24 hours

  • The treatment led to the accumulation of ZnO nanoparticles in the gut of Ceriodaphnia cornuta, resulting in significant morphological distortions

[105]
Arachis hypogaea L. ZnO synthesized from parthenium hysterophorus
  • Suitable for light, medium, and heavy soil types

  • Thrives in acidic and alkaline soils but cannot grow in shaded areas.

  • Prefers moist air for optimal growth

  • Under greenhouse conditions, the various concentration of ZnO was applied up to 300 ppm concentration of ZnO in zinc-deficient soil

  • It showed positive effects on growth parameters

  • Increase in germination, plant growth, and amount of chlorophyll content

  • Under drought conditions, yield and its components (e.g., grain size, number of grains) were reduced

  • The use of chitosan NPs mitigated drought stress effects by expanding leaf area, enhancing leaf color, increasing grain yield, and improving the number of grains per spike compared to control plants

[105]
Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Chitosan NPs
  • Grows in subtropical climate conditions

  • Sensitive to pH levels <5.0

  • Barley seeds planted in pots were applied with chitosan NPs in soil and foliar applications at three stages

  • Under drought conditions, the use of chitosan NPs significantly improved the relative water content (RWC), 1000-grain weight, grain protein levels, proline content, and antioxidant enzyme activities, including catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)

  • No large difference was observed between soil and foliar application methods

  • Optimal results were achieved with chitosan NPs at concentrations of 60 and 90 ppm, enhancing overall plant growth parameters

[44]

Numerous microscopic organisms (bacteria) and plants have been utilized to deliver various NPs for yield assurance and protection of the crop. For example, AgNPs, which act as an excellent antioxidant and antimicrobial agent, can be synthesized from flower, fruit, leaves, and seed coats of various plants. AgNPs show a protective effect against oxidative damage when used in plants, balancing RWC of the plant species. In vivo tests utilizing tomato plants under nursery conditions showed a critical decrease in root invasion when the plants were treated with AgNPs and synthesized utilizing latex from Euphorbia tirucalli L. and stronger plant development [116]. On the other hand, extracting AgNPs by reducing silver nitrate solution by Vitex negundo L. leaf extracts are known for its medical usage against many diseases. The sterilized Cassia occidentalis L. (Antbush) seeds were supplemented with different concentrations of AgNPs. Various parameters such as seed germination, root and shoot length, fresh and dry weight, and leaf surface area were calculated. The results showed that higher concentrations of AgNPs could show adverse effects on seed germination and plant growth. As the concentration of AgNPs increased, the root and shoot length increased. However, as the concentration reached 100 mg/L, there was retardation in the root and shoot length due to the toxicity of NPs at higher concentrations. The results for fresh and dry weight were in correspondence with fresh and dry weight. As the concentration increased, the leaf surface area decreased. At an optimal concentration of 80 mg/L, we can observe that seed germination, root and shoot length, fresh and dry weight, and leaf surface area of the plant increased [117].

7 Conclusion

Due to the increasing population and uncertain weather conditions, the global food sector has been adversely affected. To escape the destructive impacts of climate change on agriculture, it is essential to provide for the needs of a growing population and protect the environment. When used on seeds, the unique properties of nanomaterials showed improved properties of the plant when they were regenerated using NPs [118,119]. Under drought circumstances, the application of NPs to the plants enhanced plant growth parameters [120]. Despite innovative techniques, such as genetic modifications, efficient water supply systems, etc., there have been complexities when it comes to uncertain climate changes [37].

When applied on seeds, NPs must show effective advantages throughout all weather extremities to be considered beneficial in agriculture practices. As climate change becomes more vigorous, it is important to determine how it could influence agriculture. In the future, the productivity, quality, and quantity of plants can vary. Through changes in the usage of water (irrigation systems) and inputs of agriculture methods, which include herbicides, insecticides, and fertilizers change conventional agriculture. Environmental impacts can arise, specifically in connection with recurrence and intensity of soil waste (prompting nitrogen draining), soil disintegration, and decrease in the yield of crop varieties [121,122,123,124].

The most observed impacts of changing climate can include the following:

  • Varying precipitation patterns: increased or inconsistent durations of both heavy rain and dryness.

  • Expansion in average temperature levels: summer and winter temperatures can influence plant cycles and lead to early blossoming, lesser fertilization, and frost harm.

  • Expansion of flooding: causes crop harming, water contamination, and soil disintegration.

  • Expansion of drought levels: weakens plants’ endurance.

  • Degraded soils: inclined to disintegration and water contamination.

  • Agricultural industry lacks biodiversity.

  • Fertilizers and pesticides: cause water contamination, exposure to chemicals, and more significant expenses for farmers [125127].

Seed regeneration is a vital part of the future and holds a strong hope for sustainability. Although the limited access to advanced technology challenges a way to determine the exact behavior of NPs involved in seed regeneration, it is possible that the mechanism behind such an efficient process will be discovered [59].

Detailed discussions involving the seed regeneration process have brought an understanding of its significance and mitigating the consequences of human activities on nature [13]. Seed regeneration aided by nanomaterials for climatic changes has proved to be efficient and advantageous. With the developments in such a sector, the technology will develop into a new advanced stage and recreate the life of plants and further into the future [130]. As of now, seed regeneration is a milestone for human technology and humanity itself, and continuing on the path, we can ensure a sustainable future [131,132].

8 Future directions

Analyzing the connection between nanotechnology and agriculture highlights great potential for a transformative change. The application of nanomaterials in agriculture presents different possibilities for sustainability, efficiency, and precision in the process of seed regeneration. Moving forward, many important aspects require further research and developments, such as implementing nano-sensors for real-time soil property monitoring, examine antimicrobial nanomaterials for a sustainable observation of pests, improving the performance of additively manufactured seed coating to maximize nutrient delivery and plants’ resilience, and improving controlled nutrient delivery system to maximize the crop yield and minimize the environmental impact [133].

8.1 Additively manufactured seed coatings

Implementing nanomaterials into additively manufactured seed coating will enhance the overall productivity of agriculture due to enhanced seed germination rates and early plant growth. This method will also allow for a controlled distribution of nutrients throughout all weather conditions. Further research of additively manufactured seed coatings will lead to optimization of the coatings for greater efficiency in the delivery of required nutrients. This will maximize the crop yield while simultaneously minimizing the amount of materials used [134,135].

8.2 Nano-sensors for soil property detections

Using nanosensors in agriculture allows for great precision in agriculture by providing an accurate real-time monitoring of the soil properties, including moisture levels, content of nutrients, and pH levels. Implementing such devices will let researchers or users analyze the data and properly adjust levels to optimal ones. Future research works can focus on improving the sensitivity and reliability of nano-sensor devices in order to provide necessary data. Furthermore, such devices can be used in a variety of farming industries in order to streamline operations related to agriculture and encourage sustainable practices [71].

8.3 Anti-bacterial protection and prospective nanomaterials

Through further research, nanomaterials can provide strong anti-bacterial protection for plants. There is a scope for reducing reliable on standard pesticides, and focusing on performance of NPs as a multipurpose coating while also being sustainable itself. Currently, researchers are focused on NPs with innate antimicrobial properties, such as AgNPs [136]. In the future, it would be beneficial to continue conducting research on a variety of nanomaterials, like nanocarbons (carbon nanotubes, graphene).

8.4 Controlled delivery of nutrients

An important aspect of enhancing plant strength and resilience is finding an efficient and environmentally safe method to control the delivery of nutrients to the plant. It is crucial that the delivery mechanisms being studied or implemented is precise and exact, allowing for accurate and proper growth of the plant. Additionally, alongside targeted delivery, a more meticulous study of specific nanomaterials is needed to evaluate their impact on nutrient uptake and reduction of nutrient wastage. Delivery mechanism may be influenced due to the material combinations used in NPs and their respective properties. This necessitates study of various material combinations and their delivery mechanisms specifically in the context of seed regeneration.

Acknowledgments

The authors enthusiastically acknowledge and thank Professor Alison McGuigan and Professor Lydia Wilkinson, for the course TEP5500 “Research Methods and Project Execution,” delivered at the University of Toronto, Canada; which equipped the authors with essential skills to undertake this study with rigor and such detailing: From the literature surveys to the original diagrams in this study are curated using the skills and methods explained in the subject. The authors also strongly acknowledge Professor Senthil Kumaran Selvaraj from Vellore Institute of Technology, India for providing initial head start support for this study.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

[1] Gurmu S. Performance of dry land agricultural systems under future climate change. Int J Res. 2018;4(11):1–9.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Mujeeb M, Ismail MV, Aqil M, Khan AH, Ikram S, Ahmad A. Evaluation of phytotoxic impact of plant mediated silver nanoparticles on seed germination and growth of seedling of Cassia occidentalis. Pharm Innov J. 2018;7:08–12.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rastogi A, Tripathi DK, Yadav S, Chauhan DK, Živčák M, Ghorbanpour M, et al. Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. 3 Biotech. 2019 Mar;9:1–11.10.1007/s13205-019-1626-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Jasrotia P, Kashyap PL, Bhardwaj AK, Kumar S, Singh GP. Scope and applications of nanotechnology for wheat production: a review of recent advances. Wheat Barley Res. 2018;10(1):1–14.10.25174/2249-4065/2018/76672Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ali S, Mehmood A, Khan N. Uptake, translocation, and consequences of nanomaterials on plant growth and stress adaptation. J Nanomater. 2021;2021(1):6677616.10.1155/2021/6677616Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dutta P. Seed priming: new vistas and contemporary perspectives. Advances in seed priming. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 3–22.10.1007/978-981-13-0032-5_1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Iqbal M, Raja NI, Mashwani ZU, Hussain M, Ejaz M, Yasmeen F. Effect of silver nanoparticles on growth of wheat under heat stress. Iran J Sci Technol, Trans A: Sci. 2019 Apr;43:387–95.10.1007/s40995-017-0417-4Search in Google Scholar

[8] Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci Total Environ. 2015 May;514:131–9.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Misra P, Shukla PK, Pramanik K, Gautam S, Kole C. Nanotechnology for crop improvement. Plant nanotechnology: principles and practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. p. 219–56.10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_9Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sabir S, Arshad M, Chaudhari SK. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for revolutionizing agriculture: synthesis and applications. Sci World J. 2014;2014(1):925494.10.1155/2014/925494Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Maroufpoor N, Mousavi M, Hatami M, Rasoulnia A, Lajayer BA. Mechanisms involved in stimulatory and toxicity effects of nanomaterials on seed germination and early seedling growth. Advances in phytonanotechnology. London: Elsevier Inc.; 2019 Jan. p. 153–81.10.1016/B978-0-12-815322-2.00006-7Search in Google Scholar

[12] Guo H, Ma F, Feng X, Lou X, Tade MO. Application of iron oxide based nanomaterials (NMs) in magnetic assisted chemical separation (MACS) processes for water/wastewater treatment. Adv Mater Res. 2013 Feb;610:1242–51.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.610-613.1242Search in Google Scholar

[13] Patel DK, Kim HB, Dutta SD, Ganguly K, Lim KT. Carbon nanotubes-based nanomaterials and their agricultural and biotechnological applications. Materials. 2020 Apr;13(7):1679.10.3390/ma13071679Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Zulfiqar F, Ashraf M. Nanoparticles potentially mediate salt stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 Mar;160:257–68.10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Mishra S, Keswani C, Abhilash PC, Fraceto LF, Singh HB. Integrated approach of agri-nanotechnology: challenges and future trends. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr;8:471.10.3389/fpls.2017.00471Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Ali MA, Rehman I, Iqbal A, Din S, Rao AQ, Latif A, et al. Nanotechnology, a new frontier in Agriculture. Adv Life sci. 2014 May;1(3):129–38.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun;8:1014.10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Polischuk S, Fadkin G, Churilov D, Churilova V, Churilov G. The stimulating effect of nanoparticle suspensions on seeds and seedlings of Scotch pine (Pínus sylvéstris). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 226, No. 1, IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 012020.10.1088/1755-1315/226/1/012020Search in Google Scholar

[19] Alsaeedi A, El-Ramady H, Alshaal T, El-Garawany M, Elhawat N, Al-Otaibi A. Silica nanoparticles boost growth and productivity of cucumber under water deficit and salinity stresses by balancing nutrients uptake. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Jun;139:1–10.10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Sedghi M, Hadi M, Toluie SG. Effect of nano zinc oxide on the germination parameters of soybean seeds under drought stress. Ann West Univ Timis Ser Biol. 2013 Jul;16(2):73.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Zulfiqar F, Navarro M, Ashraf M, Akram NA, Munné-Bosch S. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: Advantages and limitations. Plant Sci. 2019 Dec;289:110270.10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110270Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] López-Vargas ER, González-García Y, Pérez-Álvarez M, Cadenas-Pliego G, González-Morales S, Benavides-Mendoza A, et al. Seed priming with carbon nanomaterials to modify the germination, growth, and antioxidant status of tomato seedlings. Agronomy. 2020 May;10(5):639.10.3390/agronomy10050639Search in Google Scholar

[23] Choudhary RC, Kumaraswamy RV, Kumari S, Pal A, Raliya R, Biswas P, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and application of chitosan nanomaterials loaded with zinc and copper for plant growth and protection. Nanotechnology: An agricultural paradigm. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 227–47.10.1007/978-981-10-4573-8_10Search in Google Scholar

[24] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). What is pollination? [Internet]. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service; [cited 2024 Aug 10]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/wildflowers/pollinators/what-is-pollination.Search in Google Scholar

[25] ScienceDirect. Seed development [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; [cited 2024 Aug 11]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/seed-development.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kozaki A, Aoyanagi T. Molecular aspects of seed development controlled by gibberellins and abscisic acids. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb;23(3):1876.10.3390/ijms23031876Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Paramo LA, Feregrino-Pérez AA, Guevara R, Mendoza S, Esquivel K. Nanoparticles in agroindustry: Applications, toxicity, challenges, and trends. Nanomaterials. 2020 Aug;10(9):1654.10.3390/nano10091654Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Seed Laboratory, Iowa State University. Testing methods, seed quality testing [Internet]. Ames, IA: Iowa State University; [cited 2024 Aug 11]. https://seedlab.iastate.edu/testing-methods/.Search in Google Scholar

[29] PhycoTerra®. Seed treatments 101: What you need to support and protect your seeds this spring [Internet]; [cited 2024 Aug 11]. https://phycoterra.com/blog/seed-treatments-101/.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Faizan M, Hayat S, Pichtel J. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on crop plants: A perspective analysis. Sustainable agriculture reviews 41: nanotechnology for plant growth and development. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. p. 83–99.10.1007/978-3-030-33996-8_4Search in Google Scholar

[31] Shukla P, Chaurasia P, Younis K, Qadri OS, Faridi SA, Srivastava G. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: studies from seed priming to post-harvest management. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. 2019 Dec;4:1–5.10.1007/s41204-019-0058-2Search in Google Scholar

[32] Dimkpa CO, Singh U, Bindraban PS, Elmer WH, Gardea-Torresdey JL, White JC. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate drought-induced alterations in sorghum performance, nutrient acquisition, and grain fortification. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct;688:926–34.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.392Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Feizi H, Kamali M, Jafari L, Moghaddam PR. Phytotoxicity and stimulatory impacts of nanosized and bulk titanium dioxide on fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill). Chemosphere. 2013 Apr;91(4):506–11.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Fu L, Wang Z, Dhankher OP, Xing B. Nanotechnology as a new sustainable approach for controlling crop diseases and increasing agricultural production. J Exp Bot. 2020 Jan;71(2):507–19.10.1093/jxb/erz314Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] González-Melendi P, Fernández-Pacheco R, Coronado MJ, Corredor E, Testillano PS, Risueño MC, et al. Nanoparticles as smart treatment-delivery systems in plants: assessment of different techniques of microscopy for their visualization in plant tissues. Ann Bot. 2007;101(1):187–95.10.1093/aob/mcm283Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Alabdallah NM, Hasan MM. Plant-based green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its effective role in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Oct;28(10):5631–9.10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Shinde S, Paralikar P, Ingle AP, Rai M. Promotion of seed germination and seedling growth of Zea mays by magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles synthesized by the filtrate from Aspergillus niger. Arab J Chem. 2020 Jan;13(1):3172–82.10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[38] Djanaguiraman M, Nair R, Giraldo JP, Prasad PV. Cerium oxide nanoparticles decrease drought-induced oxidative damage in sorghum leading to higher photosynthesis and grain yield. ACS Omega. 2018 Oct;3(10):14406–16.10.1021/acsomega.8b01894Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] El-Beltagy A, Madkour M. Impact of climate change on arid lands agriculture. Agric Food Secur. 2012 Dec;1:1–2.10.1186/2048-7010-1-3Search in Google Scholar

[40] Shang Y, Hasan MK, Ahammed GJ, Li M, Yin H, Zhou J. Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: a review. Molecules. 2019 Jul;24(14):2558.10.3390/molecules24142558Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Paramsothy M. Alleviating climate change and pollution with nanomaterials. Nanomaterials. 2020 Feb;10(2):358.10.3390/nano10020358Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[42] López-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Cruz-Jiménez G, Castellano L, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on corn seedlings at different temperatures; X-ray absorption spectroscopy and ICP/OES studies. Microchem J. 2017 Sep;134:54–61.10.1016/j.microc.2017.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[43] Cao Z, Rossi L, Stowers C, Zhang W, Lombardini L, Ma X. The impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the physiology of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under different soil moisture conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018 Jan;25:930–9.10.1007/s11356-017-0501-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Behboudi F, Tahmasebi Sarvestani Z, Kassaee MZ, Modares Sanavi SA, Sorooshzadeh A, Ahmadi SB. Evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles effects on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under late season drought stress. J Water Environ Nanotechnol. 2018 Jan;3(1):22–39.Search in Google Scholar

[45] do Espirito Santo Pereira A, Caixeta Oliveira H, Fernandes Fraceto L, Santaella C. Nanotechnology potential in seed priming for sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials. 2021 Jan 20;11(2):267.10.3390/nano11020267Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Pandey G. Challenges and future prospects of agri-nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture in India. Environ Technol Innov. 2018 Aug;11:299–307.10.1016/j.eti.2018.06.012Search in Google Scholar

[47] Roy A, Bulut O, Some S, Mandal AK, Yilmaz MD. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: biomolecule-nanoparticle organizations targeting antimicrobial activity. RSC Adv. 2019;9(5):2673–702.10.1039/C8RA08982ESearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Elsheery NI, Sunoj VS, Wen Y, Zhu JJ, Muralidharan G, Cao KF. Foliar application of nanoparticles mitigates the chilling effect on photosynthesis and photoprotection in sugarcane. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Apr;149:50–60.10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Shalaby TA, Bayoumi Y, Abdalla N, Taha H, Alshaal T, Shehata S, et al. Nanoparticles, soils, plants and sustainable agriculture. Nanosci Food Agric. 2016;1:283–312.10.1007/978-3-319-39303-2_10Search in Google Scholar

[50] Kah M, Tufenkji N, White JC. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019 Jun;14(6):532–40.10.1038/s41565-019-0439-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Almutairi ZM, Alharbi A. Effect of silver nanoparticles on seed germination of crop plants. Int J Nucl Quantum Eng. 2015 Jul;9(6):689–93.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Ashkavand P, Tabari M, Zarafshar M, Tomásková I, Struve D. Effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on drought resistance in hawthorn seedlings. Leśne Prace Badawcze/Forest Res Pap. 2015;76(4):350–9.10.1515/frp-2015-0034Search in Google Scholar

[53] Dubey A, Mailapalli DR. Nanofertilisers, nanopesticides, nanosensors of pest and nanotoxicity in agriculture. Sustain Agric Rev. 2016;19:307–30.10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_7Search in Google Scholar

[54] Shankramma K, Yallappa S, Shivanna MB, Manjanna J. Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles to enhance S. lycopersicum (tomato) plant growth and their biomineralization. Appl Nanosci. 2016 Oct;6:983–90.10.1007/s13204-015-0510-ySearch in Google Scholar

[55] Mahmoud LM, Dutt M, Shalan AM, El-Kady ME, El-Boray MS, Shabana YM, et al. Silicon nanoparticles mitigate oxidative stress of in vitro-derived banana (Musa acuminata ‘Grand Nain’) under simulated water deficit or salinity stress. S Afr J Bot. 2020 Aug;132:155–63.10.1016/j.sajb.2020.04.027Search in Google Scholar

[56] Sathiyabama M, Parthasarathy R. Biological preparation of chitosan nanoparticles and its in vitro antifungal efficacy against some phytopathogenic fungi. Carbohydr Polym. 2016 Oct;151:321–5.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Chutipaijit S, Sutjaritvorakul T. Application of activated charcoal and nanocarbon to callus induction and plant regeneration in aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chem Speciat Bioavailab. 2018 Jan;30(1):1–8.10.1080/09542299.2017.1418184Search in Google Scholar

[58] Chutipaijit S, Sutjaritvorakul T. Application of nanomaterials in plant regeneration of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mater Today: Proc. 2017 Jan;4(5):6140–5.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.107Search in Google Scholar

[59] Eftekhari A, Maleki Dizaj S, Sharifi S, Salatin S, Rahbar Saadat Y, Zununi Vahed S, et al. The use of nanomaterials in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration; current approaches and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan;21(2):536.10.3390/ijms21020536Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Pandey K, Anas M, Hicks VK, Green MJ, Khodakovskaya MV. Improvement of commercially valuable traits of industrial crops by application of carbon-based nanomaterials. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec;9(1):19358.10.1038/s41598-019-55903-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[61] Abd El-Aziz AR, Al-Othman MR. Gold nanoparticles biosynthesis using zingiber officinale and their impact on the growth and chemical composition of lentil (lens culinaris medic.). Pak J Bot. 2019 Apr;51(2):443–50.10.30848/PJB2019-2(21)Search in Google Scholar

[62] Rodríguez-González V, Terashima C, Fujishima A. Applications of photocatalytic titanium dioxide-based nanomaterials in sustainable agriculture. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev. 2019 Sep;40:49–67.10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[63] Abbasi Khalaki M, Moameri M, Asgari Lajayer B, Astatkie T. Influence of nano-priming on seed germination and plant growth of forage and medicinal plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2021 Jan;93(1):13–28.10.1007/s10725-020-00670-9Search in Google Scholar

[64] Marchiol L, Filippi A, Adamiano A, Degli Esposti L, Iafisco M, Mattiello A, et al. Influence of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on germination and plant metabolism of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): Preliminary evidence. Agronomy. 2019 Mar;9(4):161.10.3390/agronomy9040161Search in Google Scholar

[65] Elizabath A, Babychan M, Mathew AM, Syriac GM. Application of nanotechnology in agriculture. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2019;7(2):131–9.10.18782/2320-7051.6493Search in Google Scholar

[66] Lowry GV, Avellan A, Gilbertson LM. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019 Jun;14(6):517–22.10.1038/s41565-019-0461-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Yashveer S, Singh V, Kaswan V, Kaushik A, Tokas J. Green biotechnology, nanotechnology and bio-fortification: perspectives on novel environment-friendly crop improvement strategies. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2014 Jul;30(2):113–26.10.1080/02648725.2014.992622Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Rai PK, Kumar V, Lee S, Raza N, Kim KH, Ok YS, et al. Nanoparticle-plant interaction: Implications in energy, environment, and agriculture. Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:1–9.10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Taran NY, Gonchar OM, Lopatko KG, Batsmanova LM, Patyka MV, Volkogon MV. The effect of colloidal solution of molybdenum nanoparticles on the microbial composition in rhizosphere of Cicer arietinum L. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014 Dec;9:1–8.10.1186/1556-276X-9-289Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Timmusk S, Seisenbaeva G, Behers L. Titania (TiO2) nanoparticles enhance the performance of growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan;8(1):617.10.1038/s41598-017-18939-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Chadha U, Bhardwaj P, Agarwal R, Rawat P, Agarwal R, Gupta I, et al. Recent progress and growth in biosensors technology: A critical review. J Ind Eng Chem. 2022 May;109:21–51.10.1016/j.jiec.2022.02.010Search in Google Scholar

[72] Mukhopadhyay SS. Nanotechnology in agriculture: prospects and constraints. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2014 Aug;63–71.10.2147/NSA.S39409Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[73] War JM, Fazili MA, Mushtaq W, Wani AH, Bhat MY. Role of nanotechnology in crop improvement. Nanobiotechnology in agriculture: An approach towards sustainability. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. p. 63–97.10.1007/978-3-030-39978-8_4Search in Google Scholar

[74] Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Krystofova O, Nejdl L, Adam V. Nanoparticles based on essential metals and their phytotoxicity. J Nanobiotechnol. 2017 Dec;15:1–9.10.1186/s12951-017-0268-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Kandhol N, Singh VP, Ramawat N, Prasad R, Chauhan DK, Sharma S, et al. Nano-priming: Impression on the beginner of plant life. Plant Stress. 2022 Aug;5:100091.10.1016/j.stress.2022.100091Search in Google Scholar

[76] Chaud M, Souto EB, Zielinska A, Severino P, Batain F, Oliveira-Junior J, et al. Nanopesticides in agriculture: Benefits and challenge in agricultural productivity, toxicological risks to human health and environment. Toxics. 2021 Jun;9(6):131.10.3390/toxics9060131Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Thirugnanasambandan T, Iswarya S, Ajitha M, Gopinath SC, Selvarani K. Sustained release of chemical fertiliser by nanochitosan: Insights and updates. BioNanoScience. 2024 Jul;1–4.10.1007/s12668-024-01533-7Search in Google Scholar

[78] Naaz H, Rawat K, Saffeullah P, Umar S. Silica nanoparticles synthesis and applications in agriculture for plant fertilization and protection: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2023 Feb;21(1):539–59.10.1007/s10311-022-01515-9Search in Google Scholar

[79] ScienceDirect. Nanosensor [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; [cited 2024 Aug 12]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/nanosensor.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Piperno A, Sciortino MT, Giusto E, Montesi M, Panseri S, Scala A. Recent advances and challenges in gene delivery mediated by polyester-based nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2021 Aug;16:5981–6002.10.2147/IJN.S321329Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Merino D, Tomadoni B, Salcedo MF, Mansilla AY, Casalongué CA, Alvarez VA. Nanoclay as carriers of bioactive molecules applied to agriculture. Handbook of nanomaterials and nanocomposites for energy and environmental applications. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

[82] Vega-Vásquez P, Mosier NS, Irudayaraj J. Nanoscale drug delivery systems: from medicine to agriculture. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Feb;8:79.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00079Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[83] Shelar A, Nile SH, Singh AV, Rothenstein D, Bill J, Xiao J, et al. Recent advances in nano-enabled seed treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture: challenges, risk assessment, and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023 Dec;15(1):54.10.1007/s40820-023-01025-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[84] Meraz-Dávila S, Pérez-García CE, Feregrino-Perez AA. Challenges and advantages of electrospun nanofibers in agriculture: a review. Mater Res Express. 2021 Apr;8(4):042001.10.1088/2053-1591/abee55Search in Google Scholar

[85] Solanki P, Bhargava A, Chhipa H, Jain N, Panwar J. Nano-fertilizers and their smart delivery system. Nanotechnol Food Agric. 2015;81–101.10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_4Search in Google Scholar

[86] Tabata Y. Nanomaterials of drug delivery systems for tissue regeneration. Protein nanotechnology: Protocols, instrumentation, and applications. Humana Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005. p. 81–100.Search in Google Scholar

[87] Kumar M, Shamsi TN, Parveen R, Fatima S. Application of nanotechnology in enhancement of crop productivity and integrated pest management. Nanotechnology: An agricultural paradigm. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 361–71.10.1007/978-981-10-4573-8_17Search in Google Scholar

[88] Chakkalakkal ND, Thomas M, Chittillapilly PS, Sujith A, Anjali PD. Electrospun polymer nanocomposite membrane as a promising seed coat for controlled release of agrichemicals and improved germination: Towards a better agricultural prospect. J Clean Prod. 2022 Dec;377:134479.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134479Search in Google Scholar

[89] Shaw DS, Honeychurch KC. Nanosensor applications in plant science. Biosensors. 2022 Aug;12(9):675.10.3390/bios12090675Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[90] Cunningham FJ, Goh NS, Demirer GS, Matos JL, Landry MP. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery towards advancing plant genetic engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2018 Sep;36(9):882–97.10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[91] Merino D, Tomadoni B, Salcedo MF, Mansilla AY, Casalongué CA, Alvarez VA. Nanoclay as carriers of bioactive molecules applied to agriculture. Handb Nanomater Nanocomposites Energy Environ Appl. 2020;1–22.10.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_62-1Search in Google Scholar

[92] Castañeda LM, Genro C, Roggia I, Bender SS, Bender RJ, Pereira CN. Innovative rice seed coating (Oryza sativa) with polymer nanofibres and microparticles using the electrospinning method. J Res Updates Polym Sci. 2014 Apr;3(1):33–9.10.6000/1929-5995.2014.03.01.5Search in Google Scholar

[93] Sarkar K, Gomez C, Zambrano S, Ramirez M, De Hoyos E, Vasquez H, et al. Electrospinning to forcespinning™. Mater Today. 2010 Nov;13(11):12–4.10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70199-1Search in Google Scholar

[94] Bhaskar KU, Sripathy KV, Kumar SP, Radhika C, Naik KB, Kumar S. Seed quality enhancement through analyte-infused electrospun microcapsules in maize. J Plant Growth Regul. 2024 Feb:1–11.10.1007/s00344-024-11244-8Search in Google Scholar

[95] Corbineau F, Taskiran-Özbingöl N, El-Maarouf-Bouteau H. Improvement of seed quality by priming: concept and biological basis. Seeds. 2023 Feb;2(1):101–5.10.3390/seeds2010008Search in Google Scholar

[96] Marthandan V, Geetha R, Kumutha K, Renganathan VG, Karthikeyan A, Ramalingam J. Seed priming: a feasible strategy to enhance drought tolerance in crop plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov;21(21):8258.10.3390/ijms21218258Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Forni C, Borromeo I. The utilization of seed priming as a tool to overcome salt and drought stresses: is still a long way to go? Seeds. 2023 Oct;2(4):406–20.10.3390/seeds2040031Search in Google Scholar

[98] Salam A, Afridi MS, Javed MA, Saleem A, Hafeez A, Khan AR, et al. Nano-priming against abiotic stress: A way forward towards sustainable agriculture. Sustainability. 2022 Nov;14(22):14880.10.3390/su142214880Search in Google Scholar

[99] Pereira AD, Oliveira HC, Fraceto LF. Polymeric nanoparticles as an alternative for application of gibberellic acid in sustainable agriculture: a field study. Sci Rep. 2019 May;9(1):7135.10.1038/s41598-019-43494-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[100] Savassa SM, Duran NM, Rodrigues ES, De Almeida E, Van Gestel CA, Bompadre TF P, et al. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on Phaseolus vulgaris germination and seedling development determined by X-ray spectroscopy. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018 Nov;1(11):6414–26.10.1021/acsanm.8b01619Search in Google Scholar

[101] Walck JL, Hidayati SN, Dixon KW, Thompson KE, Poschlod P. Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Glob Change Biol. 2011 Jun;17(6):2145–61.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.xSearch in Google Scholar

[102] Remédios C, Rosário F, Bastos V. Environmental nanoparticles interactions with plants: morphological, physiological, and genotoxic aspects. J Bot. 2012;2012(1):751686.10.1155/2012/751686Search in Google Scholar

[103] Abd-Elrahman SH, Mostafa MA. Applications of nanotechnology in agriculture: an overview. Egypt J Soil Sci. 2015;55(2):197–214.10.21608/ejss.2015.324Search in Google Scholar

[104] Joshi H, Choudhary P, Mundra SL. Future prospects of nanotechnology in agriculture. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(2):957–63.Search in Google Scholar

[105] Bartolucci C, Antonacci A, Arduini F, Moscone D, Fraceto L, Campos E, et al. Green nanomaterials fostering agrifood sustainability. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020 Apr;125:115840.10.1016/j.trac.2020.115840Search in Google Scholar

[106] Khan MN, Mobin M, Abbas ZK, AlMutairi KA, Siddiqui ZH. Role of nanomaterials in plants under challenging environments. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jan;110:194–209.10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Parveen A, Mazhari BB, Rao S. Impact of bio-nanogold on seed germination and seedling growth in Pennisetum glaucum. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2016 Dec;95:107–11.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Ilakiya T, Parameswari E, Davamani V. Seed priming – A tool for sustainable agriculture. Agri MIrror: Future India. 2020 August;1(4):41–4.Search in Google Scholar

[109] Kale SK, Parishwad GV, Patil AS. Emerging agriculture applications of silver nanoparticles. ES Food Agrofor. 2021 Mar;3:17–22.Search in Google Scholar

[110] Hojjat SS, Kamyab M. The effect of silver nanoparticle on Fenugreek seed germination under salinity levels. Russ Agric Sci. 2017 Jan;43:61–5.10.3103/S1068367417010189Search in Google Scholar

[111] Ahmed R, Yusoff Abd Samad M, Uddin MK, Quddus MA, Hossain MM. Recent trends in the foliar spraying of zinc nutrient and zinc oxide nanoparticles in tomato production. Agronomy. 2021 Oct;11(10):2074.10.3390/agronomy11102074Search in Google Scholar

[112] Kaphle A, Navya PN, Umapathi A, Daima HK. Nanomaterials for agriculture, food and environment: applications, toxicity and regulation. Environ Chem Lett. 2018 Mar;16:43–58.10.1007/s10311-017-0662-ySearch in Google Scholar

[113] Gartland KM, Gartland JS. Green biotechnology for food security in climate change. Reference module in food science. 2016. p. 1–7.10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.03071-7Search in Google Scholar

[114] Sivakumar P, Law YS, Ho CL, Harikrishna JA. High frequency plant regeneration from mature seed of elite, recalcitrant Malaysian indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) CV. MR 219. Acta Biol Hung. 2010 Sep;61:313–21.10.1556/ABiol.61.2010.3.7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Singh S, Husen A. Behavior of agricultural crops in relation to nanomaterials under adverse environmental conditions. In Nanomaterials for agriculture and forestry applications. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2020 Jan. p. 219–56.10.1016/B978-0-12-817852-2.00009-3Search in Google Scholar

[116] Zhao L, Lu L, Wang A, Zhang H, Huang M, Wu H, et al. Nano-biotechnology in agriculture: use of nanomaterials to promote plant growth and stress tolerance. J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Jan;68(7):1935–47.10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06615Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Ali MH, Sobze JM, Pham TH, Nadeem M, Liu C, Galagedara L, et al. Carbon nanoparticles functionalized with carboxylic acid improved the germination and seedling vigor in upland boreal forest species. Nanomaterials. 2020 Jan;10(1):176.10.3390/nano10010176Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[118] Shende S, Rathod D, Gade A, Rai M. Biogenic copper nanoparticles promote the growth of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017 Oct;11(7):773–81.10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0179Search in Google Scholar

[119] Badawy AA, Abdelfattah NAH, Salem SS, Awad MF, Fouda A. Efficacy assessment of biosynthesized copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) on stored grain insects and their impacts on morphological and physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant. Biology. 2021;10(3):233.10.3390/biology10030233Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[120] Fawzy ZF, Haggag WM. Smart fertilizers and pesticides VIA nanotechnology for agricultural sustainability. J Biogeneric Sci Res. 2020 July;3(1):1–4.Search in Google Scholar

[121] Ditta A, Arshad M, Ibrahim M. Nanoparticles in sustainable agricultural crop production: applications and perspectives. Nanotechnology and plant sciences: nanoparticles and their impact on plants. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 55–75.10.1007/978-3-319-14502-0_4Search in Google Scholar

[122] Hashimoto T, Mustafa G, Nishiuchi T, Komatsu S. Comparative analysis of the effect of inorganic and organic chemicals with silver nanoparticles on soybean under flooding stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb;21(4):1300.10.3390/ijms21041300Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[123] Maity A, Vijay D, Mukherjee A, Lamichaney A. Potential impacts of climate change on quality seed production: a perspective of hill agriculture. Conservation agriculture: An approach to combat climate change in Indian Himalaya. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 459–85.10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_18Search in Google Scholar

[124] Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Prot. 2012 May;35:64–70.10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[125] Hojjat SS, Hojjat H. Effect of nano silver on seed germination and seedling growth in fenugreek seed. Int J Food Eng. 2015 Dec;1(2):106–10.10.18178/ijfe.1.2.106-110Search in Google Scholar

[126] Chandrika KP, Singh A, Tumma MK, Yadav P. Nanotechnology prospects and constraints in agriculture. Environ Nanotechnol. 2018;1:159–86.10.1007/978-3-319-76090-2_5Search in Google Scholar

[127] Hojjat SS, Mozumder C, Bora T, Hornyak GL. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticle mitigation of salinity on germination and seedling parameters of bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia L.) plants. Nanotechnol Russia. 2019 Nov;14:582–7.10.1134/S1995078019060077Search in Google Scholar

[128] Alharby HF, Metwali EM, Fuller MP, Aldhebiani AY. The alteration of mRNA expression of SOD and GPX genes, and proteins in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) under stress of NaCl and/or ZnO nanoparticles. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016 Nov;23(6):773–81.10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.04.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[129] Sembada AA, Maki S, Faizal A, Fukuhara T, Suzuki T, Lenggoro IW. The role of silica nanoparticles in promoting the germination of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seeds. Nanomaterials. 2023 Jul;13(14):2110.10.3390/nano13142110Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[130] Khan J, Chandra J, Xalxo R, Korram J, Satnami ML, Keshavkant S. Amelioration of ageing associated alterations and oxidative inequity in seeds of Cicer arietinum by silver nanoparticles. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021 Jun;40:1341–51.10.1007/s00344-020-10193-2Search in Google Scholar

[131] Alharby H, Metwali E, Fuller M, Aldhebiani A. Impact of application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on callus induction, plant regeneration, element content and antioxidant enzyme activity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) under salt stress. Arch Biol Sci. 2016;68(4):723–35.10.2298/ABS151105017ASearch in Google Scholar

[132] Kulkarni K, Chadha U, Yadav S, Tarun DM, Thenmukilan KG, Bhardwaj P, et al. Latest trends and advancement in porous carbon for biowaste organization and utilization. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;11(1):011003.10.1149/2162-8777/ac438aSearch in Google Scholar

[133] Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug;7(1):8263.10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[134] Rahman MH, Liza NY, Hossain KR, Kalambhe DR, Shyeed MA, Noor MD. Additive manufacturing in nano drug delivery systems. Pharm Sci Adv. 2024;2:100036.10.1016/j.pscia.2024.100036Search in Google Scholar

[135] Ram Kishore S, Sridharan AP, Chadha U, Narayanan D, Mishra M, Selvaraj SK, et al. Natural fiber biocomposites via 4D printing technologies: A review of possibilities for agricultural bio-mulching and related sustainable applications. Prog Addit Manuf. 2024 Feb;9(1):37–67.10.1007/s40964-023-00433-8Search in Google Scholar

[136] Chadha U, Bhardwaj P, Selvaraj SK, Arasu K, Praveena S, Pavan A, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of nanomaterials in food packaging application. J Nanomater. 2022;2022(1):2745416.10.1155/2022/2745416Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-08-26
Revised: 2024-10-19
Accepted: 2024-11-06
Published Online: 2024-12-23

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Tension buckling and postbuckling of nanocomposite laminated plates with in-plane negative Poisson’s ratio
  3. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-stabilised gold nanoparticle coatings inhibit blood protein adsorption
  4. Energy and mass transmission through hybrid nanofluid flow passing over a spinning sphere with magnetic effect and heat source/sink
  5. Surface treatment with nano-silica and magnesium potassium phosphate cement co-action for enhancing recycled aggregate concrete
  6. Numerical investigation of thermal radiation with entropy generation effects in hybrid nanofluid flow over a shrinking/stretching sheet
  7. Enhancing the performance of thermal energy storage by adding nano-particles with paraffin phase change materials
  8. Using nano-CaCO3 and ceramic tile waste to design low-carbon ultra high performance concrete
  9. Numerical analysis of thermophoretic particle deposition in a magneto-Marangoni convective dusty tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow – Thermal and magnetic features
  10. Dual numerical solutions of Casson SA–hybrid nanofluid toward a stagnation point flow over stretching/shrinking cylinder
  11. Single flake homo p–n diode of MoTe2 enabled by oxygen plasma doping
  12. Electrostatic self-assembly effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on performance of carbon nanotubes in cement-based materials
  13. Multi-scale alignment to buried atom-scale devices using Kelvin probe force microscopy
  14. Antibacterial, mechanical, and dielectric properties of hydroxyapatite cordierite/zirconia porous nanocomposites for use in bone tissue engineering applications
  15. Time-dependent Darcy–Forchheimer flow of Casson hybrid nanofluid comprising the CNTs through a Riga plate with nonlinear thermal radiation and viscous dissipation
  16. Durability prediction of geopolymer mortar reinforced with nanoparticles and PVA fiber using particle swarm optimized BP neural network
  17. Utilization of zein nano-based system for promoting antibiofilm and anti-virulence activities of curcumin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  18. Antibacterial effect of novel dental resin composites containing rod-like zinc oxide
  19. An extended model to assess Jeffery–Hamel blood flow through arteries with iron-oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles and melting effects: Entropy optimization analysis
  20. Comparative study of copper nanoparticles over radially stretching sheet with water and silicone oil
  21. Cementitious composites modified by nanocarbon fillers with cooperation effect possessing excellent self-sensing properties
  22. Confinement size effect on dielectric properties, antimicrobial activity, and recycling of TiO2 quantum dots via photodegradation processes of Congo red dye and real industrial textile wastewater
  23. Biogenic silver nanoparticles of Moringa oleifera leaf extract: Characterization and photocatalytic application
  24. Novel integrated structure and function of Mg–Gd neutron shielding materials
  25. Impact of multiple slips on thermally radiative peristaltic transport of Sisko nanofluid with double diffusion convection, viscous dissipation, and induced magnetic field
  26. Magnetized water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet with thermal convective and mass flux conditions: HAM solution
  27. A numerical investigation of the two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic water-based hybrid nanofluid flow composed of Fe3O4 and Au nanoparticles over a heated surface
  28. Development and modeling of an ultra-robust TPU-MWCNT foam with high flexibility and compressibility
  29. Effects of nanofillers on the physical, mechanical, and tribological behavior of carbon/kenaf fiber–reinforced phenolic composites
  30. Polymer nanocomposite for protecting photovoltaic cells from solar ultraviolet in space
  31. Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled concrete reinforced with basalt fibers and nano-silica in early low-temperature environments
  32. Synergistic effect of carbon nanotubes and polyvinyl alcohol on the mechanical performance and microstructure of cement mortar
  33. CFD analysis of paraffin-based hybrid (Co–Au) and trihybrid (Co–Au–ZrO2) nanofluid flow through a porous medium
  34. Forced convective tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow subject to heat source/sink and Lorentz force over a permeable wedge: Numerical exploration
  35. Physiochemical and electrical activities of nano copper oxides synthesised via hydrothermal method utilising natural reduction agents for solar cell application
  36. A homotopic analysis of the blood-based bioconvection Carreau–Yasuda hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet with convective conditions
  37. In situ synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/SnIn4S8 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic performance for pollutant degradation
  38. A coarse-grained Poisson–Nernst–Planck model for polyelectrolyte-modified nanofluidic diodes
  39. A numerical investigation of the magnetized water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over an extending sheet with a convective condition: Active and passive controls of nanoparticles
  40. The LyP-1 cyclic peptide modified mesoporous polydopamine nanospheres for targeted delivery of triptolide regulate the macrophage repolarization in atherosclerosis
  41. Synergistic effect of hydroxyapatite-magnetite nanocomposites in magnetic hyperthermia for bone cancer treatment
  42. The significance of quadratic thermal radiative scrutinization of a nanofluid flow across a microchannel with thermophoretic particle deposition effects
  43. Ferromagnetic effect on Casson nanofluid flow and transport phenomena across a bi-directional Riga sensor device: Darcy–Forchheimer model
  44. Performance of carbon nanomaterials incorporated with concrete exposed to high temperature
  45. Multicriteria-based optimization of roller compacted concrete pavement containing crumb rubber and nano-silica
  46. Revisiting hydrotalcite synthesis: Efficient combined mechanochemical/coprecipitation synthesis to design advanced tunable basic catalysts
  47. Exploration of irreversibility process and thermal energy of a tetra hybrid radiative binary nanofluid focusing on solar implementations
  48. Effect of graphene oxide on the properties of ternary limestone clay cement paste
  49. Improved mechanical properties of graphene-modified basalt fibre–epoxy composites
  50. Sodium titanate nanostructured modified by green synthesis of iron oxide for highly efficient photodegradation of dye contaminants
  51. Green synthesis of Vitis vinifera extract-appended magnesium oxide NPs for biomedical applications
  52. Differential study on the thermal–physical properties of metal and its oxide nanoparticle-formed nanofluids: Molecular dynamics simulation investigation of argon-based nanofluids
  53. Heat convection and irreversibility of magneto-micropolar hybrid nanofluids within a porous hexagonal-shaped enclosure having heated obstacle
  54. Numerical simulation and optimization of biological nanocomposite system for enhanced oil recovery
  55. Laser ablation and chemical vapor deposition to prepare a nanostructured PPy layer on the Ti surface
  56. Cilostazol niosomes-loaded transdermal gels: An in vitro and in vivo anti-aggregant and skin permeation activity investigations towards preparing an efficient nanoscale formulation
  57. Linear and nonlinear optical studies on successfully mixed vanadium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by sol–gel technique
  58. Analytical investigation of convective phenomena with nonlinearity characteristics in nanostratified liquid film above an inclined extended sheet
  59. Optimization method for low-velocity impact identification in nanocomposite using genetic algorithm
  60. Analyzing the 3D-MHD flow of a sodium alginate-based nanofluid flow containing alumina nanoparticles over a bi-directional extending sheet using variable porous medium and slip conditions
  61. A comprehensive study of laser irradiated hydrothermally synthesized 2D layered heterostructure V2O5(1−x)MoS2(x) (X = 1–5%) nanocomposites for photocatalytic application
  62. Computational analysis of water-based silver, copper, and alumina hybrid nanoparticles over a stretchable sheet embedded in a porous medium with thermophoretic particle deposition effects
  63. A deep dive into AI integration and advanced nanobiosensor technologies for enhanced bacterial infection monitoring
  64. Effects of normal strain on pyramidal I and II 〈c + a〉 screw dislocation mobility and structure in single-crystal magnesium
  65. Computational study of cross-flow in entropy-optimized nanofluids
  66. Significance of nanoparticle aggregation for thermal transport over magnetized sensor surface
  67. A green and facile synthesis route of nanosize cupric oxide at room temperature
  68. Effect of annealing time on bending performance and microstructure of C19400 alloy strip
  69. Chitosan-based Mupirocin and Alkanna tinctoria extract nanoparticles for the management of burn wound: In vitro and in vivo characterization
  70. Electrospinning of MNZ/PLGA/SF nanofibers for periodontitis
  71. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by Nd-doped titanium dioxide thin films
  72. Shell-core-structured electrospinning film with sequential anti-inflammatory and pro-neurogenic effects for peripheral nerve repairment
  73. Flow and heat transfer insights into a chemically reactive micropolar Williamson ternary hybrid nanofluid with cross-diffusion theory
  74. One-pot fabrication of open-spherical shapes based on the decoration of copper sulfide/poly-O-amino benzenethiol on copper oxide as a promising photocathode for hydrogen generation from the natural source of Red Sea water
  75. A penta-hybrid approach for modeling the nanofluid flow in a spatially dependent magnetic field
  76. Advancing sustainable agriculture: Metal-doped urea–hydroxyapatite hybrid nanofertilizer for agro-industry
  77. Utilizing Ziziphus spina-christi for eco-friendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Antimicrobial activity and promising application in wound healing
  78. Plant-mediated synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of a copper oxide/silicon dioxide nanocomposite by an antimicrobial study
  79. Effects of PVA fibers and nano-SiO2 on rheological properties of geopolymer mortar
  80. Investigating silver and alumina nanoparticles’ impact on fluid behavior over porous stretching surface
  81. Potential pharmaceutical applications and molecular docking study for green fabricated ZnO nanoparticles mediated Raphanus sativus: In vitro and in vivo study
  82. Effect of temperature and nanoparticle size on the interfacial layer thickness of TiO2–water nanofluids using molecular dynamics
  83. Characteristics of induced magnetic field on the time-dependent MHD nanofluid flow through parallel plates
  84. Flexural and vibration behaviours of novel covered CFRP composite joints with an MWCNT-modified adhesive
  85. Experimental research on mechanically and thermally activation of nano-kaolin to improve the properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete
  86. Analysis of variable fluid properties for three-dimensional flow of ternary hybrid nanofluid on a stretching sheet with MHD effects
  87. Biodegradability of corn starch films containing nanocellulose fiber and thymol
  88. Toxicity assessment of copper oxide nanoparticles: In vivo study
  89. Some measures to enhance the energy output performances of triboelectric nanogenerators
  90. Reinforcement of graphene nanoplatelets on water uptake and thermomechanical behaviour of epoxy adhesive subjected to water ageing conditions
  91. Optimization of preparation parameters and testing verification of carbon nanotube suspensions used in concrete
  92. Max-phase Ti3SiC2 and diverse nanoparticle reinforcements for enhancement of the mechanical, dynamic, and microstructural properties of AA5083 aluminum alloy via FSP
  93. Advancing drug delivery: Neural network perspectives on nanoparticle-mediated treatments for cancerous tissues
  94. PEG-PLGA core–shell nanoparticles for the controlled delivery of picoplatin–hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex in triple-negative breast cancer: In vitro and in vivo study
  95. Conduction transportation from graphene to an insulative polymer medium: A novel approach for the conductivity of nanocomposites
  96. Review Articles
  97. Developments of terahertz metasurface biosensors: A literature review
  98. Overview of amorphous carbon memristor device, modeling, and applications for neuromorphic computing
  99. Advances in the synthesis of gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) of proteins extracted from nature
  100. A review of ternary polymer nanocomposites containing clay and calcium carbonate and their biomedical applications
  101. Recent advancements in polyoxometalate-functionalized fiber materials: A review
  102. Special contribution of atomic force microscopy in cell death research
  103. A comprehensive review of oral chitosan drug delivery systems: Applications for oral insulin delivery
  104. Cellular senescence and nanoparticle-based therapies: Current developments and perspectives
  105. Cyclodextrins-block copolymer drug delivery systems: From design and development to preclinical studies
  106. Micelle-based nanoparticles with stimuli-responsive properties for drug delivery
  107. Critical assessment of the thermal stability and degradation of chemically functionalized nanocellulose-based polymer nanocomposites
  108. Research progress in preparation technology of micro and nano titanium alloy powder
  109. Nanoformulations for lysozyme-based additives in animal feed: An alternative to fight antibiotic resistance spread
  110. Incorporation of organic photochromic molecules in mesoporous silica materials: Synthesis and applications
  111. A review on modeling of graphene and associated nanostructures reinforced concrete
  112. A review on strengthening mechanisms of carbon quantum dots-reinforced Cu-matrix nanocomposites
  113. Review on nanocellulose composites and CNFs assembled microfiber toward automotive applications
  114. Nanomaterial coating for layered lithium rich transition metal oxide cathode for lithium-ion battery
  115. Application of AgNPs in biomedicine: An overview and current trends
  116. Nanobiotechnology and microbial influence on cold adaptation in plants
  117. Hepatotoxicity of nanomaterials: From mechanism to therapeutic strategy
  118. Applications of micro-nanobubble and its influence on concrete properties: An in-depth review
  119. A comprehensive systematic literature review of ML in nanotechnology for sustainable development
  120. Exploiting the nanotechnological approaches for traditional Chinese medicine in childhood rhinitis: A review of future perspectives
  121. Twisto-photonics in two-dimensional materials: A comprehensive review
  122. Current advances of anticancer drugs based on solubilization technology
  123. Recent process of using nanoparticles in the T cell-based immunometabolic therapy
  124. Future prospects of gold nanoclusters in hydrogen storage systems and sustainable environmental treatment applications
  125. Preparation, types, and applications of one- and two-dimensional nanochannels and their transport properties for water and ions
  126. Microstructural, mechanical, and corrosion characteristics of Mg–Gd–x systems: A review of recent advancements
  127. Functionalized nanostructures and targeted delivery systems with a focus on plant-derived natural agents for COVID-19 therapy: A review and outlook
  128. Mapping evolution and trends of cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: A bibliometric analysis and scoping review
  129. Nanoparticles and their application in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
  130. In situ growth of carbon nanotubes on fly ash substrates
  131. Structural performance of boards through nanoparticle reinforcement: An advance review
  132. Reinforcing mechanisms review of the graphene oxide on cement composites
  133. Seed regeneration aided by nanomaterials in a climate change scenario: A comprehensive review
  134. Surface-engineered quantum dot nanocomposites for neurodegenerative disorder remediation and avenue for neuroimaging
  135. Graphitic carbon nitride hybrid thin films for energy conversion: A mini-review on defect activation with different materials
  136. Nanoparticles and the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
  137. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials and Composites for Energy Conversion and Storage - Part II
  138. Highly safe lithium vanadium oxide anode for fast-charging dendrite-free lithium-ion batteries
  139. Recent progress in nanomaterials of battery energy storage: A patent landscape analysis, technology updates, and future prospects
  140. Special Issue on Advanced Nanomaterials for Carbon Capture, Environment and Utilization for Energy Sustainability - Part II
  141. Calcium-, magnesium-, and yttrium-doped lithium nickel phosphate nanomaterials as high-performance catalysts for electrochemical water oxidation reaction
  142. Low alkaline vegetation concrete with silica fume and nano-fly ash composites to improve the planting properties and soil ecology
  143. Mesoporous silica-grafted deep eutectic solvent-based mixed matrix membranes for wastewater treatment: Synthesis and emerging pollutant removal performance
  144. Electrochemically prepared ultrathin two-dimensional graphitic nanosheets as cathodes for advanced Zn-based energy storage devices
  145. Enhanced catalytic degradation of amoxicillin by phyto-mediated synthesised ZnO NPs and ZnO-rGO hybrid nanocomposite: Assessment of antioxidant activity, adsorption, and thermodynamic analysis
  146. Incorporating GO in PI matrix to advance nanocomposite coating: An enhancing strategy to prevent corrosion
  147. Synthesis, characterization, thermal stability, and application of microporous hyper cross-linked polyphosphazenes with naphthylamine group for CO2 uptake
  148. Engineering in ceramic albite morphology by the addition of additives: Carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide for energy applications
  149. Nanoscale synergy: Optimizing energy storage with SnO2 quantum dots on ZnO hexagonal prisms for advanced supercapacitors
  150. Aging assessment of silicone rubber materials under corona discharge accompanied by humidity and UV radiation
  151. Tuning structural and electrical properties of Co-precipitated and Cu-incorporated nickel ferrite for energy applications
  152. Sodium alginate-supported AgSr nanoparticles for catalytic degradation of malachite green and methyl orange in aqueous medium
  153. An environmentally greener and reusability approach for bioenergy production using Mallotus philippensis (Kamala) seed oil feedstock via phytonanotechnology
  154. Micro-/nano-alumina trihydrate and -magnesium hydroxide fillers in RTV-SR composites under electrical and environmental stresses
  155. Mechanism exploration of ion-implanted epoxy on surface trap distribution: An approach to augment the vacuum flashover voltages
  156. Nanoscale engineering of semiconductor photocatalysts boosting charge separation for solar-driven H2 production: Recent advances and future perspective
  157. Excellent catalytic performance over reduced graphene-boosted novel nanoparticles for oxidative desulfurization of fuel oil
  158. Special Issue on Advances in Nanotechnology for Agriculture
  159. Deciphering the synergistic potential of mycogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles and bio-slurry formulation on phenology and physiology of Vigna radiata
  160. Nanomaterials: Cross-disciplinary applications in ornamental plants
  161. Special Issue on Catechol Based Nano and Microstructures
  162. Polydopamine films: Versatile but interface-dependent coatings
  163. In vitro anticancer activity of melanin-like nanoparticles for multimodal therapy of glioblastoma
  164. Poly-3,4-dihydroxybenzylidenhydrazine, a different analogue of polydopamine
  165. Chirality and self-assembly of structures derived from optically active 1,2-diaminocyclohexane and catecholamines
  166. Advancing resource sustainability with green photothermal materials: Insights from organic waste-derived and bioderived sources
  167. Bioinspired neuromelanin-like Pt(iv) polymeric nanoparticles for cancer treatment
  168. Special Issue on Implementing Nanotechnology for Smart Healthcare System
  169. Intelligent explainable optical sensing on Internet of nanorobots for disease detection
  170. Special Issue on Green Mono, Bi and Tri Metallic Nanoparticles for Biological and Environmental Applications
  171. Tracking success of interaction of green-synthesized Carbopol nanoemulgel (neomycin-decorated Ag/ZnO nanocomposite) with wound-based MDR bacteria
  172. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using genus Inula and evaluation of biological therapeutics and environmental applications
  173. Biogenic fabrication and multifunctional therapeutic applications of silver nanoparticles synthesized from rose petal extract
  174. Metal oxides on the frontlines: Antimicrobial activity in plant-derived biometallic nanoparticles
  175. Controlling pore size during the synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using CTAB by the sol–gel hydrothermal method and their biological activities
  176. Special Issue on State-of-Art Advanced Nanotechnology for Healthcare
  177. Applications of nanomedicine-integrated phototherapeutic agents in cancer theranostics: A comprehensive review of the current state of research
  178. Smart bionanomaterials for treatment and diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease
  179. Beyond conventional therapy: Synthesis of multifunctional nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis therapy
Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2024-0126/html
Scroll to top button