Home Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks
Article Open Access

Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks

  • Graciela Dolores Avila-Quezada ORCID logo , Avinash P. Ingle ORCID logo , Patrycja Golińska and Mahendra Rai ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 7, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The application of nano-fertilizers (NFs) is an emerging research field in agriculture. These are materials in the size range of 1–100 nm that support the nutrition of the plants. It is a novel way to optimize the nutrient supply, either alone or in combination. NFs are an economical alternative to ordinary chemical fertilizers that can increase global food production in a sustainable way. NFs are made up of nutrients and micronutrients and may act as carriers for nutrients. The nanocarriers deliver the nutrients to the right place, reducing the additional amount of active chemicals deposited in the plant, besides a slow release. Although nano-coated materials manage to penetrate through the stomata with a size exclusion limit greater than 10 nm, the nanoparticles appear to be able to make holes and enter the vascular system. This review addresses the potential benefits of NFs to agriculture, synthesis, mode of entry, mechanisms of action, and the fate of nanomaterials in soil. Finally, policy makers will have the bases to regulate the dose, frequency, and time period of NF applications for food production. We suggest formulating the integrated risk management frameworks for the possible applications of NFs in agriculture.

1 Introduction

Several challenges are faced by farmers in traditional agriculture, including chemical toxicity owing to the excessive use of fungicides/pesticides, development of resistance to the existing fungicides/pesticides, and sometimes their high cost, which is beyond the reach of marginal farmers, particularly in developing countries. In today’s agriculture, despite improvements in understanding the mechanisms behind nutrient assimilation by plants, there are no fertilizers that successfully provide optimal plant nutrients. The essential nutrients required for crop growth are nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K). However, it was reported that these key macronutrient elements (N, P, and K) applied to the soil are lost by 40–70, 80–90, and 50–90%, respectively, causing a considerable loss of resources. Therefore, their usage in agriculture is extensively increased. Wang et al. [1] and Zulfiqar et al. [2] proposed that NPK consumption for crops can increase to 265 million tons by 2020; however, recent data is not available on this aspect. Considering the various concerns associated with excessive usage of chemical fertilizers, the declaration of the European Commission to reduce 50% of pesticides by 2030 is highly appreciable.

Nitrogen required by the plants is usually supplied in the form of nitric acid, ammonium nitrate, synthetic ammonia, urea, or sodium nitrate [2,3,4]. Unfortunately, large quantities of urea are applied to fertilize the soils, 100–782 kg per 100 m2 [3,5]. Phosphate is supplied in the form of ammonium phosphates, calcium metaphosphates, defluorinated phosphates, diammonium phosphates, phosphoric acid, or superphosphates [3,6,7], which come from phosphate rocks [4]. To supply crops with potassium commonly kainite, sulfate potash magnesia, potassium chloride, and potassium carbonate are used, which are derived from potash [4,8].

Although fertilizers are essential for agriculture to feed the growing population, the excessive use of large amounts of chemical fertilizers leads to environmental pollution [9,10]. Besides, as discussed above, only 20–50% of the applied fertilizers are used efficiently; the other 50–80% are lost through leaching, emissions, or incorporation into the soil by microorganisms in the long term, generating ecological problems such as reduced soil fertility and economic losses [11]. The soil is a system full of life, particularly symbiotic relationships with plants. Plant–microbe interactions are mutually beneficial, where rhizosphere microorganisms such as rhizobacteria solubilize minerals and mycorrhizal fungi transport these nutrients to the plant [12].

Many efforts are being made to ensure world food production in a sustainable way. The UN has proclaimed the 17 sustainable development goals as an effective method of global mobilization to achieve social priorities around the world, such as zero hunger. Sustainability includes agricultural practices without adverse environmental impacts, ensuring the production and quality of fruits and vegetables. Faced with this situation, it is urgent to formulate new fertilizers to release the nutrients in smaller quantities and in a slow and sustainable way, so that the crops can absorb them. Recent research on the application of nanotechnology in crop production has received attention as it seeks to streamline resources with agrochemical supply systems or sensors. The controlled release of agricultural inputs reduces the quantity and cost of fertilizers [13].

Nanofertilizers (NFs) are designed to be more efficient than conventional fertilizers by providing available elements with little bioavailability, such as phosphorus and zinc, and reducing the loss of mobile nutrients to the soil, such as nitrate [14,15]. NFs can be divided into nanomaterials (NMs) that act as nutrients themselves made of macronutrients or micronutrients and NMs that act as carriers of macronutrients loaded with nutrients or enhanced fertilizers [16]. Crops can absorb nutrients slowly and sustainably because the nanostructure of NFs provides a high surface-to-volume ratio [17,18], leading to a greater number of active sites for biological activity. There are high expectations about the applications of nanotechnologies in the agricultural sector. Apparently, the nano-tools perform an efficient and controlled delivery of agricultural inputs, which will offer sustainable solutions to climate change and environmental pollution [19].

In this review, we have attempted to discuss the role of NMs in agriculture, synthesis, modes of entry, and mechanisms of action. Moreover, the fate of NMs in soil and legislation to regulate the application of NFs in food production have also been examined.

2 Smart NMs for sustainable agriculture

Nanotechnology has been defined as the understanding and control of matter at dimensions ranging from 1 to 100 nm, possessing unique properties where phenomena enable novel applications. In agriculture, nano-technological applications are well reported earlier [20,21,22,23,24]. It has been suggested that there is a smart release of fertilizer particles following some specific signals. Nanobiosensors are suspended in a biopolymer that coats fertilizer particles. Signals are emanated according to plant needs as a biogenic trigger through which the communication is carried out by ions released by the root system [25]. Several studies with nitrogenous NFs have demonstrated to be effective. One of them is the NF of hydroxyapatite modified by urea and encapsulated in softwood cavities of Gliricidia sepium, supplying N slowly and steadily to the soil [26]. In another study, Ramírez-Rodríguez et al. [27] studied calcium phosphate nanoparticles doped with urea to fertilize Triticum durum plants. These nanoparticles contained a considerable amount of nitrogen as adsorbed urea. They found a high yield and quality of the durum wheat. Also, phosphorus (P)-NPs are used successfully; for example, chemically synthesized hydroxylapatite (Ca5(PO4)3OH) NPs were evaluated in soybean (Glycine max). Interestingly, it was found that hydroxyl apatite NPs increased growth by 33% and seed yield by 20% when compared to conventional chemical phosphate fertilizers due to the supply of Ca and P [28].

Recently, due to noteworthy applications of nanotechnology in various sectors associated with agriculture, scientists around the globe are focusing on these fields. Moreover, it can be clearly seen from the currently published large number of scientific publications and patents on the application of NMs in agriculture and, particularly, as NFs for plant growth promotion and protection [10,29,30,31]. Technology developers in agriculture always look for the products or technologies that help to raise agricultural crop yields while reducing environmental damage. Since NFs minimize the use of chemical fertilizer inputs, they are becoming very popular. The bioactivity and biomodification of some metallic nanoparticles in soil that can influence plant growth have been studied, such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), titanium oxide nanoparticles (TiO2), nickel nanoparticles, (NiNPs), silica nanoparticles (SNPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and others, with relevance to plant yield [2,32,33,34,35,36,37].

NFs offer a number of benefits compared to conventional fertilizers for sustainable and eco-friendly crop production. Some of these mainly include the following: (i) the enhanced absorption and efficient utilization of nutrients without higher losses, (ii) significant reduction of the risk of environmental pollution due to the decrease in the losses of nutrients, (iii) the considerably higher diffusion rate and solubility of NFs compared to the conventional synthetic fertilizers, (iv) controlled release of nutrients in NFs compared to chemical fertilizers in which it is very spontaneous and rapid in case of chemical fertilizers, (v) requirement in low amounts of NFs than synthetic fertilizers due to reduced loss and higher absorption, and (vi) improvement of soil fertility and also development of a feasible environment for microorganisms [38,39]. Table 1 shows the difference between conventional fertilizers and NFs [38].

Table 1

The difference between conventional fertilizers and nanofertilizers

Properties Nanofertilizer Conventional fertilizer
Rate of nutrient loss Low loss of fertilizer nutrients High loss rate via drifting, leaching, run-off
Controlled release Rate of release and release pattern precisely controlled Excess release of nutrients lead to high toxicity and soil imbalance
Solubility High Low
Bioavailability High Low
Dispersion of mineral micronutrients Improved dispersion of insoluble nutrients Lower solubility due to large size particle
Effective duration of release Effective and extended duration Used by the plant at the site and time of application; the rest is converted into an insoluble form
The efficiency of nutrients uptake Enhanced uptake ratio and saves fertilizer resource It is not available to roots and the efficiency of nutrients uptake is low
Soil adsorption and fixation Reduced High

Aadapted and modified from Thavaseelan and Priyadarshana [38]; an open access article.

3 Harnessing the potential of NFs

Large amounts of fertilizers are currently used to produce food, as they are essential for crop productivity. However, the efficiency of conventional fertilizers is very low. For example, of the total nitrogen applied to the soil, 50–70% is lost through leaching as water-soluble nitrates and by emission of gaseous ammonia and nitrogen oxides [40,41]. The efficiency of phosphate fertilizers is from 10 to 25%, and that of potassium is from 35 to 40% [41]. For example, the consumption of NPK in India in 2014 was 23 Mt to produce grains to feed the population, and by the year 2025, taking into account the growing population, the country will require 45 Mt of these fertilizers [42].

In this context, nanotechnology can solve some of these problems. The main benefit of the use of NFs in agriculture is the greater efficiency of plants to absorb them, minimizing the amount of fertilizers and consequently reducing the toxicity to the soil environment [43] (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               Biosynthesis of nanofertilizers.
Figure 1

Biosynthesis of nanofertilizers.

NFs in agriculture have drawn attention for their unique features, such as ultra-high absorption, increased production, and increased photosynthesis due to leaf surface coverage. The uptake and penetration of zinc oxide nanoparticles in tomato plant leaves is an example of nanoparticles with potential of NFs, because when sprinkled on leaves, growth and biomass production of the plants improved as compared to control plants [44,45]. In another study, Shinde et al. [46] studied the efficacy of green synthesized magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles [Mg(OH)2NPs] in seed germination and in vitro and in vivo plant growth promotion on Zea mays at different concentrations. The results obtained showed that Mg(OH)2NPs at 500 ppm showed enhanced seed germination (100%) and growth. Moreover, the effect of Mg(OH)2NPs on plant growth was analysed using plant efficiency analyser by measuring the plants’ height and chlorophyll a fluorescence. Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements revealed that plants treated with Mg(OH)2NPs showed a high rate of photosynthesis which was confirmed by the maximum performance index and minimum dissipation as compared to control and plants treated with bulk Mg. All the findings strongly suggested that Mg(OH)2NPs can be promisingly used for the enhancement of seed germination and growth promotion in Z. mays. The application of different NFs in various crops was reported to have a considerable increase in crop yield. Table 2 shows the impact of NFs on the productivity of different crop plants [47].

Table 2

Impact of NFs on productivity of different crops plants

Nanofertilizers Crops Yield increment (%)
Nanofertilizer + urea Rice 10.2
Nanofertilizer + urea Rice 8.5
Nanofertilizer + urea Wheat 6.5
Nanofertilizer + urea Wheat 7.3
Nano-encapsulated phosphorous Maize 10.9
Nano-encapsulated phosphorous Soybean 16.7
Nano-encapsulated phosphorous Wheat 28.8
Nano-encapsulated phosphorous Vegetables 12.0–19.7
Nano chitosan-NPK fertilizers Wheat 14.6
Nano chitosan Tomato 20.0
Nano chitosan Cucumber 9.3
Nano chitosan Capsicum 11.5
Nano chitosan Beet-root 8.4
Nano chitosan Pea 20.0
Nanopowder of cotton seed and ammonium fertilizer Nanopowder of cotton seed and ammonium fertilizer 16.0
Aqueous solution on nanoiron Cereals 8–17
Nanoparticles of ZnO Cucumber 6.3
Nanoparticles of ZnO Peanut 4.8
Nanoparticles of ZnO Cabbage 9.1
Nanoparticles of ZnO Cauliflower 8.3
Nanoparticles of ZnO Chickpea 14.9
Rare earth oxides nanoparticles Vegetables 7–45
Nanosilver + allicin Cereals 4–8.5
Iron oxide nanoparticles + calcium carbonate nanoparticles + peat Cereals 14.8–23.1
Sulfur nanoparticles + silicon dioxide nanoparticles + synthetic fertilizer Cereals 3.4–45

Adapted from Iqbal [47]; an open access article.

The application of a nanocomposite that consists of the nutrients necessary for plants such as N–P–K and micronutrients improves the absorption and use of nutrients by crops [48]. Moreover, as compared to the chemical fertilizers, NFs have the potential to release nutrients gradually into the soil under a controlled system; hence, they are called smart fertilizers. We have reviewed two mode of applications of NFs, i.e., aerosol foliar spray and direct mixing in soil (Table 3) [28,33,45,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].

Table 3

Tested plants for the effects of NPs through a particular mode of application

Mode of application Nanoparticles tested Tested plants/system Reference
Aerosol foliar spray CeO2-NPs Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Adisa et al. [49]
CeO2 NPs Bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris) Salehi et al. [50]
Nano calcite Rice (Oryza sativa) Kumara et al. [51]
CuO-NPs Lettuce and cabbage (Lactuca sativa and Brassica oleracea) Xiong et al. [52]
Ag-NPs Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Larue et al. [53]
TiO2 and ZnONPs Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Raliya et al. [54]
TiO2NPs Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Janmohammadi et al. [55]
TiO-NPs Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Larue et al. [56]
Fe-NPs Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum illusion) Rasht [57]
Different NPs Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Wang et al. [58]
Fe-NPs Wheat (Triticum sp.) Reazaei et al. [59]
Chitosan-silicon nanofertilizer (CS–Si NF) Maize (Zea mays) Kumaraswamy et al. [60]
Salicylic acid-chitosan nanoparticles (SA-CS NPs) Wheat seedlings (Triticum sp.) Kadam et al. [61]
Nano chitosan NPK Wheat (Triticum sp.) Abdel-Aziz et al. [62]
Zn, Fe, NPK nanofertilizers Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Drostkar et al. [63]
Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nano-fertilizers Egyptian cotton (Gossyppium Barbadense) Sohair et al. [64]
Nano micronutrient (Mn, Fe, and Zn) Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Marzouk et al. [65]
Oxide nanoparticles of zinc, iron, and manganese Squash cv. Eskandarani F1 (Cucurbita sp.) Shebl et al. [66]
Silica-NPs Corn (Zea mays) Suriyaprabha et al. [67]
Zinc nano oxide Rice (Oryza sativa) Ghasemi et al. [68]
Zinc oxide nanoparticles Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) Kolencík et al. [69]
ZnONPs Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Khanm et al. [70]
Direct soil mixing Fe-NPs Peace Lily (Spathiphyllum illusion) Rasht [57]
CeO2-NPs Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Adisa et al. [49]
Ag-NPs Soil, root-zone in soil Colman et al. [71]
Fe3O4, TiO2, CuO, ZnO Soil, root-zone in soil Ben-Moshe et al. [72]
ZnONP Alfalfa (Medicago sativa), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) De la Rosa et al. [45]
ZnONP Maize (Zea mays) Adhikari et al. [73]
Ti-NPs Soil, root-zone in soil Fang et al. [74]
ZnO, TiO2 and Ni Soil, root-zone in soil Josko and Oleszczuk [33]
Nanometrials Soyabean (Glycine max) Priester [75]
FeO NPs Arabidopsis thaliana; root-zone in soil Kim et al. [76]
CuNPs Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) Shende et al. [77]
CuNPs Kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Apodaca et al. [78]
TiO2 and ZnONPs Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Raliya et al. [54]
Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer Soybean (Glycine max) Liu and Lal [28]
Layered double hydroxides interspersed with phosphate ions based on nanostructured materials. Maize (Zea mays) Benício et al. [79]
Hydroponic system mixing CuO NPs Rice (Oryza sativa) Da Costa et al. [80]
CuO and TiO2 NPs Chinese mustard (Brassica juncea) Rao and Shekhawat [81]

4 Synthesis/production of NFs

4.1 Top-down methods

Synthesis of NFs involves either the top-down approach (physical methods) or the bottom-up approach (chemical methods). The top-down approach usually involves the breaking down of the bulk material into their respective nanosized structures or particles. These techniques are the extension of those that have been used for producing micron-sized particles. This approach uses substrates such as zeolites or other materials, which are ball-ground for several hours to obtain the nanodimension. Other minerals, in addition to zeolites, which have high cation exchange capacities, include clays, smectites, typically montmorillonites, and caulinites [82,83,84,85]. For example, natural zeolite measures between 1,000 and 3,000 nm [42]; by means of grinding with a high energy ball mill reduced to the desired size. The physical method to synthesize nanoparticles is simple; however, the product is heterogeneous nanoparticles that generally agglomerate; thus, stabilizing agents such as polymers or surfactants must be used to reduce agglomeration [86].

Besides, NMs must have an affinity for anions so that the anionic nutrients can be loaded efficiently for use as slow-release fertilizers. Zeolite-based slow-release fertilizers are limited to nutrients that can be loaded in cations such as NH4 + and K+; however, if they are loaded in anions such SO4 2−, NO3 and PO4 3−, the charge is negligible in the unmodified zeolites. To achieve anionic properties on the surface of the zeolite, it can be modified with a surfactant such as surfactant modified zeolite and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMABr).

Surfactant-modified zeolites have high oxyanion sorption and retention capacity, and HDTMABr is a cationic surfactant used to obtain a zeolite surface with positively charged surfactant head groups. Thus, the surface-modified zeolite retains important nutrients such as phosphate [87], sulphate [88], and nitrate [89].

4.2 Bottom-up methods

Similarly, the bottom-up approach refers to the build-up of material from the bottom, i.e., atom-by-atom, molecule-by-molecule, or cluster-by-cluster. It means it starts with molecules in the solution and moves via molecule association to form NPs through certain chemical reactions. Since it is a chemically controlled process, the particle size can be controlled [90,91,92,93].

This approach begins at the atomic or molecular scale involving chemical reactions [91]. These controlled synthetis processes for producing NPs include emulsion, co-precipitation, micelle formation, and reverse micelle formation, focusing on minimal coagulation or aggregation and generating homogeneous NPs. Once synthesized, they must be characterized physicochemically and mechanically to know their functionality such as solubility, dispersibility and stability [94]. To achieve an adequate physiological interaction of NP with the plant, it is essential to know what characteristics will be effective depending on the type of nutrition of each crop. These characteristics are chemical properties, surface functionality, thermal stability and composition in addition to physicochemical characteristics such as shape, size, surface composition and charge, boiling point, melting point, pH variation, moisture, solubility, purity, soil type, stability, thermal and isoelectric properties, and heat and diffusion-controlled release [5,91,95]. Besides, NFs can be stabilized or encapsulated using synthetic polymers. Additionally, nutrients can be coated with a light NP film or encapsulated with NFs [42].

4.3 Hybrid NFs

Hybrid NFs are formed by an organic matrix (usually a polymer) and a dispersed inorganic phase in the form of homogeneously distributed nano-sized particles. Tarafdar et al. [38] demonstrated the slow release of hybrid NFs for up to 14 days in Abelmoschus esculentus. The authors synthesized hydroxyapatite modified with urea, as it is a source of nitrogen, calcium and phosphate. They could also be added to the modified hydroxyapatite, copper, iron, and zinc nanoparticles. As a result, they obtained a significant increase in the total absorption of copper, iron, zinc, and other nutrients in the fruit.

4.4 Biogenic synthesis: A greener way

Green synthesis is carried out with simple, cost-effective, less toxic, environmentally friendly, and efficient methods to synthesize NPs. Metal and metal oxide NPs can be synthesized biologically by using natural sources such as plant extracts, fungi, yeasts, bacteria, actinobacteria, and algae [41] (Figure 2).

Figure 2 
                  Nanofertilizers versus conventional fertilizers.
Figure 2

Nanofertilizers versus conventional fertilizers.

The green synthesis methods are eco-friendly because they can be implemented at room temperature without the use of high temperature, pressure, and toxic chemicals. The size of nanoparticles can be controlled by altering the synthesis conditions [41,96]. Bio-based molecules such as proteins, enzymes, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, pigments and amines of plants and microorganisms by the reduction reaction can synthesize NPs [41]. These NPs have a higher specific surface area and higher catalytic reactivity [97].

In the case of microbial synthesis of nanoparticles, the desired microbes are cultivated in the growth medium and the microbial biomass is separated by filtration [98]. This cell-free filtrate is used for the synthesis of NPs. In the biosynthesis technique, the nanoparticles are usually capped and stabilized by enzymes and proteins. However, in the case of biosynthesis of nanoparticles by plants, the phytochemicals such as phenolics, cofactors, terpenoids, and flavonoids, among other are used for biosynthesis and capping of nanoparticles.

5 Classification of NFs

NFs are usually classified into three types, which mainly include nanoscale fertilizers, nanoscale additives, and nanoscale coatings [99]. Among these, nanoscale fertilizers are composed of nanoparticles that contain nutrients. However, nanoscale additive fertilizers are referred to as traditional fertilizers containing nanoscale additives and nanoscale coating fertilizers are traditional fertilizers coated or loaded with nanoparticles [31]. It is well known that the application of nano-scale fertilizers has attracted considerable attention and hence, several nano-based fertilizers have been developed and their industrial-scale production has also been started. However, still, this field is in the early stages of development, and hence, considerable time and effort will be required in order to commercialize newly developed NFs. Currently, developed large-scale production methods are only for few NMs. Therefore, successful large-scale production up of different nanomaterial-based fertilizers will require a great deal of technological and scientific investigation, followed by the set-up of pilot plants before any full-scale production. Moreover, quality control can be one of the most crucial issues that need to be considered. Similarly, production cost would be another important factor because the application of NMs should not lead to a huge increase in the price of the final product. It is believed that, if all these problems are overcome, it will definitely help in accelerating the large-scale production of NFs. Moreover, to date several NFs have been approved and commercially available in the market. Some of the important NFs available in the market with their constituents and manufacturer are shown in Table 4 [100,101,102,103,104,105,106].

Table 4

Some important approved and commercially available nanofertilizers [100,101,102,103,104,105,106]

Nanofertilizers Constituents Name of manufacturer
Nano ultra-fertilizer (500) g Organic matter, 5.5%; nitrogen, 10%; P2O5, 9%; K2O, 14%; P2O5, 8%; K2O, 14%; MgO, 3% SMTET Eco-technologies Co., Ltd., Taiwan
Nano calcium (magic green) (1) kg CaCO3, 77.9%; MgCO3, 7.4%; SiO2, 7.47%; K, 0.2%; Na, 0.03%; P., 0.02%; Fe-7.4 ppm; Al2O3, 6.3 ppm; Sr, 804 ppm; sulfate, 278 ppm; Ba, 174 ppm; Mn, 172 ppm; Zn, 10 ppm AC International Network Co., Ltd., Germany
Nano capsule N, 0.5%; P2O5, 0.7%; K2O, 3.9%; Ca, 2.0%; Mg, 0.2%; S, 0.8%; Fe, 2.0%; Mn, 0.004%; Cu, 0.007%; Zn, 0.004% The Best International Network Co., Ltd., Thailand
Nano micro nutrient (EcoStar) (500) g Zn, 6%; B, 2%; Cu, 1%; Fe, 6%+; EDTA Mo, 0.05%; Mn, 5%+; AMINOS, 5% Shan Maw Myae Trading Co., Ltd., India
PPC nano (120) mL M protein, 19.6%; Na2O, 0.3%; K2O, 2.1%; (NH4)2SO4, 1.7%; diluent, 76% WAI International Development Co., Ltd., Malaysia
Nano max NPK fertilizer Multiple organic acids chelated with major nutrients, amino acids, organic carbon, organic micro nutrients/trace elements, vitamins, and probiotic JU Agri Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Janakpuri, New Delhi, India
TAG nano (NPK, PhoS, Zinc, Cal, etc.) fertilizers Proteino-lacto-gluconate chelated with micronutrients, vitamins, probiotics, seaweed extracts, and humic acid Tropical Agrosystem India (P) Ltd., India
Nano green Extracts of corn, grain, soybeans, potatoes, coconut, and palm Nano Green Sciences, Inc., India
Biozar nano-fertilizer Combination of organic materials, micronutrients, and macromolecules Fanavar Nano-Pazhoohesh Markazi Company, Iran
Nano urea liquid 30 nm urea particles (4.0% total nitrogen (w/v)) Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd, India
Plant nutrition powder (green nano) N, 0.5%; P2O5, 0.7%; K2O, 3.9%; Ca, 2.0%; Mg, 0.2%; S, 0.8%; Fe, 1.0%; Mn, 49 ppm; Cu, 17 ppm; Zn, 12 ppm Green Organic World Co., Ltd., Thailand
Hero super nano N, 0.7%; P2O5, 2.3%; K2O, 8.9%; Ca, 0.5%; Mg, 0.2%; S, 0.4%; World Connet Plus Myanmar Co., Ltd., Thailand
Supplementary powder (the best nano) N, 0.5%; P2O5, 0.7%; K2O, 3.9%; Ca, 2.0%; Mg, 0.2%; S, 0.75%; Fe, 0.03%; Mn, 0.004%; Cu, 0.007%; Zn, 0.004% The Best International Network Co., Ltd., Thailand
Zinc oxide [ZnO] – universal additive agent 1–50 nm zinc oxide 99.9% Land Green & Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan
Titanium dioxide [TiO2] – universal pigment [20 nm] Titanium dioxide 99% Land Green & Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan
Silicon dioxide [SiO2] – universal stabilizer agent [20–60 nm] Silicon dioxide 99%
Manganese dioxide [MnO2] – universal purifier [1–50 nm] Manganese dioxide 99.9%
Selenium colloid [Se] – universal antioxidant [1–20 nm] Selenium colloid 99.9%
NanoCS™ of NanoShield® products NPK, zinc Aqua-Yield®, USA
1–100 nm
NanoGro® NPK
1–100 nm
NanoN+™ Nitrogen
NanoK® Potassium
NanoPhos® Phosphorus
NanoZn® Zinc
NanoPack® Sulphur, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc
NanoCalSi® Calcium and silicate molecules
NanoFe™ Iron
Nano-Ag Answer® NPK = 1.0–0.1–5.5. Total nitrogen 1.0%. Available phosphate 0.1%. Soluble potash 5.5%. Other ingredients 93.4% Urth Agriculture, USA
Hibong biological fulvic acid Nano fertilizer, humic acid. Chitosan oligosacchairides ≥ 30 g/L, N ≥ 46 g/L, P2O5 ≥ 21 g/L, K2O ≥ 62 g/L, organic matter: 130 g/L, Qingdao Hibong Fertilizer Co., Ltd., China
Humic acid granular fertilizer Humic acid: 55%, organic matter: 70%,
Seaweed nano organic carbon fertilizer NPK: 2–3–3, seaweed extract ≥5%, organic matter: 35%, humic acid ≥5%, amino acid ≥5%

6 Mode of application of NFs

6.1 Foliar

The uptake of nanoparticles depends on the physiology of the plants [107]. Usually, NPs are absorbed by trichomes, stomata, stigma, and hydathodes and transported within the plant through the phloem and xylem [108]. The translocation of NPs takes place by two routes: apoplastic and symplastic pathways. In the apoplastic pathway, the movement of macromolecules (e.g., NPs, water, etc.) occurs through the apoplast, i.e., cell wall and other intercellular spaces. However, in this transport, the movement of such macromolecules is limited by the size exclusion limits (SELs) of cell walls (5–20 nm) [109]. However, in the case of the symplastic pathway, the movement of macromolecules (NPs) from one cell to another cell occurs by plasmodesmata which is an inner side of the plasma membrane.

The NPs can enter the cells from the cell wall by endocytosis [110,111]. The entry of the nanoparticles through the plant cell wall is determined by the diameter of the stomata, which varies from 5 to 20 nm [112], or by the base of the trichrome, and then they are transferred to the tissues.

Transport via the symplast route depends on the SELs of the plasmodesmata, which are 3–50 nm in diameter [113,114]. The Casparian strip is a barrier to transport into the vascular system [115]. In fact, NPs’ entry and translocation depend on SEL; however, there are studies that 50 nm NPs larger than SELs of cell walls, plasmodesmata, and the Casparian strip have been internalized, perhaps influenced by enzymes.

Some studies reported that CeO2 NPs were absorbed by cucumber leaves and distributed to plant tissues [116]. Similarly, Ag NPs sprayed on leaves can be absorbed and transported by all plant tissues of lettuce [53]. In another study, Abd El-Azeim et al. [117] recommended foliar application of NPK NFs to increase potato production when compared to edaphic applications of NPK conventional fertilizers. NPK NFs have been proved to be an environmental, economic, and ecological alternative.

NFs can also be combined with nanoparticles to control phytopathogens. Plant cell stress enzymes can break chemical bonds in the nanocapsule of the polymer wall. When the plant detects the attack of plant pathogens, it releases mucilage to prevent infection [118]. Moreover, the accumulation of nanoparticles on the surface of the leaflets may cause foliar heating that can generate alterations in gas exchange due to the obstruction of the stomata [119].

6.2 Roots

NPs penetrate through epidermis of the root crosses endodermis reaches the xylem, where they are transported to the aerial part of the plant. NPs enter the cell wall through pores, when they are between 3 and 8 nm [2,120,121].

NPs can also enter through the root tip meristem, or at the points of lateral root formation, since there are wounds in the Casparian strip. To enter the epidermal layers of the roots, NPs must penetrate cell walls and plasma membranes. From there they enter the vascular tissues (xylem). The sizes of the pores of the cell walls are 3 to 8 nm [122] which is a very small size for NPs to enter, however, it has been proved that NPs induce the formation of large pores in cell walls where they can be internalized [123].

For example, tomato roots can absorb AuNP of 3.5 nm, although they could not absorb these nanoparticles of size 18 nm [2]. Roots of Arabidopsis thaliana can uptake spherical silica NPs of 14–200 nm [124]. Besides, in Solanum lycopersicum, sphere AuNPs of 40 nm, were translocated from roots into shoots [125]. The microelements enter the plant through the hairs of the feeder roots. Thus, Ca, Mg, Fe, S or Zn encapsulated microspheres, are dissolved by the organic acids or phenols of the root exudates [126]. After the application of fertilizers in soil, much of the nutrients are lost due to leaching as a consequence of which soil and water are polluted. Not only this, certain agro chemicals are responsible for greenhouse gases and climate change [127,128]. As far as the controlled release of NPs is concerned, Torney et al. [129] reported the controlled intracellular release of desired chemicals in protoplasts using mesoporous silica nanoparticles. To overcome nitrogen leaching problems in the soil, treatments with polyolefin-coated urea, neem-coated urea, and sulphur-coated urea was given to control the release of N [130].

In a study, double layered hydroxide nanocomposites were used for the controlled release of nutrients [79]. Wang et al. [131] studied the slow release of integrated superabsorbent fertilizer and the water retention capacity of soils with this fertilizer. They found that the surface cross-linked product had good slow release property and also very good soil moisture conservation. Interestingly plants can also react to NPs. The diameter of Z. mays seedlings root cell wall pores were reduced from 6.6 to 3.0 nm after bentonite and TiO2 nanoparticles were applied [132].

7 Mechanism of action of NFs

The high reactivity of NMs ensures high and effective absorption of nutrients for plants [133] and greater utilization efficacy, thus having minimum losses compared to conventional fertilizers [4,134]. The efficiency in the absorption, distribution, and accumulation of NFs depends on the exposure to many factors such as the pH of the soil, organic matter content, and soil texture (Figure 3) in addition to factors inherent to the nanoparticle such as size and coating [135,136].

Figure 3 
               Effect of different factors on absorption, uptake, transport and penetration of nanoparticles in plants. (a) Nanoparticle traits affect how they are uptaken and translocated in the plant, as well as the application method. (b) In the soil, nanoparticles can interact with microorganisms and compounds, which might facilitate or hamper their absorption. Several tissues (epidermis, endodermis…) and barriers (Casparian strip, cuticle…) must be crossed before reaching the vascular tissues, depending on the entry point (roots or leaves). (c) Nanomaterials can follow the apoplastic and/or the symplastic pathways for moving up and down the plant, and radial movement for changing from one pathway to the other. (d) Several mechanisms have been proposed for the internalization of nanoparticles inside the cells, such as endocytosis, pore formation, mediated by carrier proteins, and through plasmodesmata. Reproduced from Pérez-de-Luque [126] under the Creative Commons Attribution 4 International Licence.
Figure 3

Effect of different factors on absorption, uptake, transport and penetration of nanoparticles in plants. (a) Nanoparticle traits affect how they are uptaken and translocated in the plant, as well as the application method. (b) In the soil, nanoparticles can interact with microorganisms and compounds, which might facilitate or hamper their absorption. Several tissues (epidermis, endodermis…) and barriers (Casparian strip, cuticle…) must be crossed before reaching the vascular tissues, depending on the entry point (roots or leaves). (c) Nanomaterials can follow the apoplastic and/or the symplastic pathways for moving up and down the plant, and radial movement for changing from one pathway to the other. (d) Several mechanisms have been proposed for the internalization of nanoparticles inside the cells, such as endocytosis, pore formation, mediated by carrier proteins, and through plasmodesmata. Reproduced from Pérez-de-Luque [126] under the Creative Commons Attribution 4 International Licence.

Indeed, as NFs can be absorbed through roots and leaves, this influences the behaviour, bioavailability, and absorption in the plant [135]. Several studies have shown that NFs are more effective than ordinary fertilizers. For instance, NFs of macronutrients increase plant development by 19% compared to conventional fertilizers. NFs of micronutrients are better by 18%, and NFs of carriers for macronutrients increase growth by 29% compared to ordinary fertilizers [14].

Similarly, NFs based on nanochitosan with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) increased the sugar content and improved the properties of wheat [137]. In another study on wheat, Salama [138] reported that when silver nanoparticles were applied, the length of the shoots and roots, the leaf area, and the contents of chlorophyll, carbohydrates, and proteins increased. Besides, nutrients can be released over 40–50 days in a slow release rather than 4–10 days by the conventional fertilizers [139].

8 Fate of NFs in soil

The fate of NFs is the same as conventional fertilizers, albeit in a small amount. The fate of NFs in soil appears to be controlled by their mobility and stability. The NFs when entering the soil can be modified depending on their nature and interaction with the organic and inorganic soil components [140]. Aggregation is the first physical process that occurs when NFs are applied to the soil, reducing the area of action. Increasing the size of aggregates will decrease their mobility in porous media [141]. Movement of nanoparticles in the soil is guided by the Brownian motion towards the soil pores [142]. Hence, the fate of NFs in the soil is influenced by soil composition.

Soils are composed of micro-pores and macro-pores. During transport through these pores, single NPs are absorbed into mobile colloids, and their mobility through micropores is improved, maintaining mega complexes of NPs in the macropores. However, the mobility of single NPs is inhibited when absorbed on non-mobile particles. Humic acids or organic matter in the soil and the ionic strength of water influence NP mobility [143].

Once released into the environment, engineered NFs are aggregated to some extent [144]. This suggests an association of NFs with suspended solids and sediments accumulated by organisms. The interaction of NF and soil molecules can be favoured by the traits of the particles and the surrounding environment. Therefore, the organic content of the soil, the environmental conditions, and the chemical characteristics of NFs can improve or inhibit NP mobility [74,145].

On the contrary, there is always a huge debate on the toxicological effects of different NPs used in different formulations like NFs on the environment, soil microflora, aquatic organisms, and human beings. It is well known that, soil microbes play a key role in maintaining the balance in the biosphere because soil microorganisms are closely in contact with plants [146]. However, the diversity, abundance, and activity of such soil microbes may be affected by NMs applied in the form of NFs or released into the soil from other sources. NMs can influence the performances of soil microbes in various manners [147]. It was demonstrated that metallic NPs such as silver NPs affect the dehydrogenase activity of bacteria and suppress growth when present in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg kg−1 in soil [148]. Moreover, Throbäck et al. [149] reported that denitrifying bacteria present in the soil are more susceptible, which disturbs the nitrogen cycle through blocking the denitrification of nitrates to nitrogen. Similarly, other metallic NPs, like copper NPs, iron NPs, etc., and CNTs are also reported to have some adverse effects on beneficial soil microflora.

In addition to soil microflora, NMs are also found to have toxic effects on aquatic life or the ecosystem, which mainly includes aquatic plants, aquatic microbes, and vertebrates [150]. Some of the studies on zinc NPs showed the accumulation of Zn2+ ions in aquatic vertebrates, microbes, and plants which is directly related to the toxicity of zinc NPs [151]. Moreover, from the study of Zhao et al. [152], it was revealed that graphene oxide NPs showed toxic effects on freshwater algae; they observed the penetration of these NPs inside the algal cell, which led to the generation of oxidative stress and ultimately caused membrane damage and nutrient depletion. Apart from all these, such NMs can directly or directly the human health because human beings are mostly dependent on agriculture and aquatic animals (fish) for their food. Consumption of food items contaminated with NMs can also have harmful effects on human health [153].

9 Legislation

Since it is important to validate extrinsic properties of NMs such as biological interactions, physiological effects, biokinetics, uptake and distribution, and biological effects in different scenarios of exposition, the European Chemicals Legislation revised the Annexes to Chemical Legislation (REACH) for NMs and specify the technical data requirements for these [154]. The new provisions, entered into force on January 1, 2020, list requirements for manufacturers, importers, and users for the registration and evaluation of the safety of NMs. It further recommends that protocols be developed to determine NMs’ adsorption/desorption, degradation, exposure scenarios, and ability to cross biological membranes [155].

In addition, the OECD has organized expert meetings to define concepts for NMs’ hazard assessment in different regulatory frameworks and to understand the application and extrapolate potential NM regulatory hazards [156,157]. Currently, the NPs’ legislative frameworks of many countries do not cover agriculture. Therefore, regulatory frameworks on the application of NFs in agriculture are an issue that must be addressed. The evaluation of the possible risks and the advantages of NFs and conventional fertilizers in the ecology of the soil and the environment should be considered to achieve sustainable agriculture.

10 Future research perspectives for the application of nano-fertilizers

Research to measure concentrations of NFs and conventional fertilizers accumulated in soil and evaluation of efficacy warrants further investigations since these are not quantified in experiments. Information underlying would help elucidate environmental fate, behaviour, transport pathways, eco-toxicology and sustenance of NFs in soil.

With regard to soil applications of NF, through metagenomics, the possible effects that the use of NF implies on the soil microbiota can be explored. Another interesting topic to investigate is the evaluation of the microbial signalling mechanisms of plants when interacting with NFs. The modelling of the biological and biochemical interactions of the NF in the soil should also be explored, and the degradation of the NFs are areas of research for a sustainable agriculture.

11 Conclusion and opinion

The efficiency of conventional fertilizers is very low; nitrogenous ones range from 20 to 50%, phosphates range from 10 to 25% and potassium range from 35 to 40%, thus, NFs have a positive impact on the agricultural sector by reducing the volume of conventional fertilizers currently applied, in addition to achieving higher crop yields. Moreover, the economic benefit of reducing the leaching and volatilization of conventional fertilizers is very attractive for producers in addition to being clean technologies for the environment. There is uncertainty related to the fate of NMs with the environment; however, they have the same fate as the thousands of tons of conventional fertilizers that are used today. In fact, the policies related to major NFs are made in developed countries (e.g., USA, Europe, etc.); whereas, developing countries (which are higher food supplier in the world) are far behind in forming the policies and implementations in this sector.


# This paper is dedicated to the memory of Mr. Sushant Bhusari.


Acknowledgments

MR is thankful to the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA) for financial support (Project No. PPN/ULM/2019/1/00117/A/DRAFT/00001) to visit the Department of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. API is highly thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi for providing financial assistance in the form of Ramanujan Fellowship.

  1. Funding information: MR is thankful to the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA) for financial support (Project No. PPN/ULM/2019/1/00117/A/DRAFT/00001) to visit the Department of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. API is highly thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi for providing financial assistance in the form of Ramanujan Fellowship (File No : RJF/2019/000044).

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization, M.R. and G.D.A.Q; writing-original draft preparation, M.R., G.D.A.Q, P.G. and A.P.I.; writing-review and editing, M.R. P.G. and A.P.I.; visualization, and supervision, M.R. and G.D.A.Q. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

References

[1] Wang P, Lombi E, Zhao F-J, Kopittke PM. Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21:699–712. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Zulfiqar F, Navarro M, Ashraf M, Akram NA, Munné-Bosch S. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: advantages and limitations. Plant Sci. 2019;289:110270. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110270.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Xie S, Feng H, Yang F, Zhao Z, Hu X, Wei C, et al. Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:2464–76. 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Fatima F, Hashim A, Anees S. Efficacy of nanoparticles as nanofertilizer production: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:1292–303. 10.1007/s11356-020-11218-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Ribeiro C, Carmo M. Why nonconventional materials are answers for sustainable agriculture. Cambridge: MRS Energy & Sustainability; 2019. p. 6. 10.1557/mre.2019.7.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ikram W, Akhtar M, Morel C, Rizwan M, Ali S. Phosphate fertilizer premixing with farmyard manure enhances phosphorus availability in calcareous soil for higher wheat productivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26:32276–84. 10.1007/s11356-019-06468-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Weeks JJ, Hettiarachchi GM. Source and formulation matter: new insights into phosphorus fertilizer fate and transport in mildly calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2020;84:731–46. 10.1002/saj2.20054.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E. Potassium in agriculture–status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171:656–66. 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Srivastav AL. Chemical fertilizers and pesticides: role in groundwater contamination. In: Vara Prasad MN, editor. Agrochemicals detection, treatment and remediation. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2020. p. 143–59. 10.1016/B978-0-08-103017-2.00006-4.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mahapatra DM, Satapathy KC, Panda B. Biofertilizers and nanofertilizers for sustainable agriculture: phycoprospects and challenges. Sci Total Environ. 2022;803:149990. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149990.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Ditta A, Arshad M. Applications and perspectives of using nanomaterials for sustainable plant nutrition. Nanotechnol Rev. 2016;5:209–29.10.1515/ntrev-2015-0060Search in Google Scholar

[12] Madrid-Delgado G, Orozco-Miranda M, Cruz-Osorio M, Hernández-Rodríguez OA, Rodríguez-Heredia R, Roa-Huerta M, et al. Pathways of phosphorus absorption and early signaling between the mycorrhizal fungi and plants. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 2021;90:1321–38. 10.32604/phyton.2021.016174.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mukhopadhyay SS. Nanotechnology in agriculture: prospects and constraints. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2014;7:63. 10.2147/NSA.S39409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Kah M, Kookana RS, Gogos A, Bucheli TD. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:677–84. 10.1038/s41565-018-0131-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Tarafder C, Daizy M, Alam MM, Ali MR, Islam MJ, Islam R, et al. Formulation of a hybrid nanofertilizer for slow and sustainable release of micronutrients. ACS Omega. 2020;5:23960–6.10.1021/acsomega.0c03233Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci Total Environ. 2015;514:131–9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Monreal CM, Derosa M, Mallubhotla SC, Bindraban PS, Dimkpa C. Nanotechnologies for increasing the crop use efficiency of fertilizer-micronutrients. Biol Fertil Soils. 2016;52:423–37. 10.1007/s00374-015-1073-5.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Feregrino-Pérez AA, Magaña-López E, Guzmán C, Esquivel K. A general overview of the benefits and possible negative effects of the nanotechnology in horticulture. Sci Horti. 2018;238:126–37. 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.060.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Solanki P, Bhargava A, Chhipa H, Jain N, Panwar J. Nano-fertilizers and their smart delivery system. In: Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N, editors. Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 81–101. 10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_4.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Park HJ, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Choi SH. A new composition of nanosized silica-silver for control of various plant diseases. Plant Pathol J. 2006;22:295–302. 10.5423/PPJ.2006.22.3.295.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Barik TK, Sahu B, Swain V, Res P. Nanosilica-from medicine to pest control. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:253–8. 10.1007/s00436-008-0975-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Jha Z, Behar N, Sharma SN, Chandel G, Sharma DK, Pandey MP. Nanotechnology: prospects of agricultural advancement. Nano Vision. 2011;1:88–100.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, Ehsani R, Schuster EW. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Protect. 2012;35:64–70. 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Helal NAS. Nanotechnology in agriculture: a review. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo. 2013;59:117–42.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Keswani C, editor. Intellectual property issues in. Nanotechnology. 1st edn. UK: CRC Press; 2020.10.1201/9781003052104Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kottegoda N, Munaweera I, Madusanka N, Karunaratne V. A green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood. Curr Sci. 2011;101:73–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24077865.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ramírez-Rodríguez GB, Miguel-Rojas C, Montanha GS, Carmona FJ, Sasso GD, Sillero JC, et al. Reducing nitrogen dosage in Triticum durum plants with urea-doped nanofertilizers. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1043. 10.3390/nano10061043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Liu R, Lal R. Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Sci Rep. 2014;4:5686–91. 10.1038/srep05686.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Yata VK, Tiwari BC, Ahmad I. Nanoscience in food and agriculture: research, industries and patents. Environ Chem Lett. 2018;16:79–84. 10.1007/s10311-017-0666-7.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kah M, Tufenkji N, White JC. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:532–40. 10.1038/s41565-019-0439-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Mejias JH, Salazar F, Pérez Amaro L, Hube S, Rodriguez M, Alfaro M. Nanofertilizers: a cutting-edge approach to increase nitrogen use efficiency in grasslands. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:635114. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.635114.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Dimkpa CO, McLean JE, Britt DW, Anderson AJ. Bioactivity and biomodification of Ag, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles with relevance to plant performance in agriculture. Ind Biotechnol. 2012;8:344–57. 10.1089/ind.2012.0028.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Josko I, Oleszczuk P. Influence of soil type and environmental conditions on ZnO, TiO2 and Ni nanoparticles phytotoxicity. Chemosphere. 2013;92:91–9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Abbas SS, Haneef M, Lohani M, Tabassum H, Khan AF. Nanomaterials used as a plants growth enhancer: an update. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2016;5:17–23.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Mukherjee A, Majumdar S, Servin AD, Pagano L, Dhankher OP, White JC. Carbon nanomaterials in agriculture: a critical review. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:172. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00172.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Javed Z, Dashora K, Mishra M, Fasake VD, Srivastva A. Effect of accumulation of nanoparticles in soil health- a concern on future. Front Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;5:1–9.10.15761/FNN.1000181Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kamal R, Mogazy AM. Effect of doping on TiO2 nanoparticles characteristics: studying of fertilizing effect on Cowpea plant growth and yield. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021. 10.1007/s42729-021-00648-0.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tarafdar C, Daizy M, Alam MM, Ali MR, Islam MJ, Islam R, et al. Formulation of a hybrid nanofertilizer for slow and sustainable release of micronutrients. ACS Omega. 2020;5:23960–6. 10.1021/acsomega.0c03233.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Thavaseelan D, Priyadarshana G. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture. J Res Technol Eng. 2021;2(1):41–59.Search in Google Scholar

[40] DeRosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020;5:91–1. 10.1038/nnano.2010.2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Yaseen R, Ahmed ISA, Omer MA, Agha MKM, Emam TM. Nano-fertilizers: bio-fabrication, application and biosafety. Novel Res Microbiol J. 2020;4:884–900. 10.21608/NRMJ.2020.107540.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Subramanian KS, Manikandan A, Thirunavukkarasu M, Rahale CS. Nano-fertilizers for balanced crop nutrition. In: Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N, editors. Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 69–80. 10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_3.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Naderi MR, Danesh SA. Nanofertilizers and their roles in sustainable agriculture. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2013;5:2229–32.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Panwar J, Jain N, Bhargaya A, Akhtar MS, Yun YS. Positive effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on tomato plants: a step towards developing Nano-fertilizers. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology (ICERT) May 30-June 1, 2012 Penang, Malaysia; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[45] De la Rosa G, Lopez-Moreno ML, DeHaro D, Botez CE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey J. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles in alfalfa, tomato, and cucumber at the germination stage: root development and X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies. Pure Appl Chem. 2013;85:2161–74. 10.1351/PAC-CON-12-09-05.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Shinde S, Paralikar P, Ingle AP, Rai M. Promotion of seed germination and seedling growth of Zea mays by magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles synthesized by the filtrate from Aspergillus niger. Arabian J Chem. 2020;13:3172–82.10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[47] Iqbal MA. Nano-fertilizers for sustainable crop production under changing climate: a global perspective. In: Hasanuzzaman M, editor. Sustainable crop production. UK: InTech Open publisher; 2020. 10.5772/intechopen.89089.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Guo J. Synchrotron radiation, soft X-ray spectroscopy and nanomaterials. Int J Nanotechnol. 2004;1:193–225. 10.1504/IJNT.2004.003729.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Adisa IO, Rawat S, Pullagurala VLR, Dimkpa CO, Elmer WH, White JC, et al. Nutritional status of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit grown in Fusarium-infested soil: impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68:1986–97. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06840.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Salehi H, Chehregani Rad A, Raza A, Chen JT. Foliar application of CeO2 nanoparticles alters generative components fitness and seed productivity in bean crop (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Nanomaterials. 2021;11:862. 10.3390/nano11040862.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Kumara KHCH, Wathugala DL, Hafeel RF, Kumarasinghe HKMS. Effect of nano calcite foliar fertilizer on the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa). J Agri Sci. 2019;14(3):154–64. 10.4038/jas.v14i3.8599.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Xiong T, Dumat C, Dappe V, Vezin H, Schreck E, Shahid M, et al. Copper oxide nanoparticle foliar uptake, phytotoxicity, and consequences for sustainable urban agriculture. Environ Sci Tech. 2017;51:5242–51. 10.1021/acs.est.6b05546.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Larue C, Castillo MH, Sobanska S, Cécillon L, Bureau S, Barthès V, et al. Foliar exposure of the crop (Lactuca sativa) to silver nanoparticles: evidence for internalization and changes in Ag speciation. J Hazard Mater. 2014a;264:98–106. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.053.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Raliya R, Nair R, Chavalmane S, Wang WN, Biswas P. Mechanistic evaluation of translocation and physiological impact of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant. Metallomics. 2015;7:1584–94. 10.1039/c5mt00168d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Janmohammadi M, Amanzadeh T, Sabaghnia N, Dashti S. Impact of foliar application of nano micronutrient fertilizers and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the growth and yield components of barley under supplemental irrigation. Acta Agric Slov. 2016;107:265–76. 10.14720/aas.2016.107.2.01.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Larue C, Castillo MH, Sobanska S, Trcera N, Sorieul S, Cécillon L, et al. Fate of pristine TiO2 nanoparticles and aged paint-containing TiO2 nanoparticles in lettuce crop after foliar exposure. J Hazard Mater. 2014b;273:17–26. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Rasht I. Effect of application of iron fertilizers in two methods’ foliar and soil application on growth characteristics of Spathyphyllum illusion. Eur J Exp Biol. 2013;3:232–40.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Wang WN, Tarafdar JC, Biswas P. Nanoparticle synthesis and delivery by an aerosol route for watermelon plant foliar uptake. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15:1–13. 10.1007/s11051-013-1417-8.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Reazaei M, Daneshvar M, Shirani AH. Effect of iron nano chelated fertilizers foliar application on three wheat cultivars in Khorramabad climatic conditions. Sci J Crop Sci. 2014;3:9–16. 10.14196/sjcs.v3i1.1178.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Kumaraswamy RV, Saharan V, Kumari S, Choudhary RC, Pal A, Sharma SS, et al. Chitosan-silicon nanofertilizer to enhance plant growth and yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;159:53–66. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Kadam PM, Prajapati D, Kumaraswamy RV, Kumari S, Devi KA, Pal A, et al. Physio-biochemical responses of wheat plant towards salicylic acid-chitosan nanoparticles. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;162:699–705. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.03.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Abdel-Aziz HMM, Hasaneen MNA, Aya MO. Foliar application of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer improves the yield of wheat plants grown on two different soils. Egypt J Exp Biol (Bot). 2018;14:63–72. 10.5455/egyjebb.20180106032701.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Drostkar E, Talebi R, Kanouni H. Foliar application of Fe, Zn and NPK nano-fertilizers on seed yield and morphological traits in chickpea under rain fed condition. J Resour Ecol. 2016;4:221–8. http://ecologyresearch.info/documents/EC0091.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Sohair EED, Abdall AA, Amany AM, Faruque HMD, Houda RA. Evaluation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nano-fertilizers on yield, yield components and fiber properties of Egyptian cotton (Gossyppium barbadense L.). J Plant Sci Crop Protec. 2018;1:208.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Marzouk NM, Abd-Alrahman HA, EL-Tanahy AMM, Mahmoud SH. Impact of foliar spraying of nano micronutrient fertilizers on the growth, yield, physical quality, and nutritional value of two snap bean cultivars in sandy soils. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2019;43:1–9. 10.1186/s42269-019-0127-5.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Shebl A, Hassan AA, Salama DM, El-Aziz A, Abd Elwahed MS. Green synthesis of nanofertilizers and their application as a foliar for Cucurbita pepo L. J Nanomater. 2019;2019:3476347. 10.1155/2019/3476347.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Yuvakkumar R, Rajendran V, Kannan N. Foliar application of silica nanoparticles on the phytochemical responses of maize (Zea mays L.) and its toxicological behavior. Synth React Inorg M. 2013;44:1128–31. 10.1080/15533174.2013.799197.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Ghasemi M, Noormohammadi G, Madani H, Mobasser H, Nouri M. Effect of foliar application of zinc nano oxide on agronomic traits of two varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Res. 2017;52:195–201.10.5958/2454-1761.2017.00017.1Search in Google Scholar

[69] Kolencík M, Ernst D, Komar M, Urík M, Sebesta M, Dobrocka E, et al. Effect of foliar spray application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on quantitative, nutritional, and physiological parameters of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under field conditions. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:1559. 10.3390/nano9111559.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Khanm H, Vaishnavi BA, Shankar AG. Rise of nanofertilizer era: effect of nano scale zinc oxide particles on the germination, growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Int J Curr Microbiol. Appl Sci. 2018;7:1861–71.10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.219Search in Google Scholar

[71] Colman BP, Arnaout CL, Anciaux S, Gunsch CK, Hochella Jr MF, Kim B, et al. Low concentrations of silver nanoparticles in biosolids cause adverse ecosystem responses under realistic field scenario. PloS one. 2013;8(1–10):e57189. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057189.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Ben-Moshe T, Dror I, Berkowitz B. Transport of metal oxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Chemosphere. 2010;81:387–93. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Adhikari T, Kundu S, Biswas AK, Tarafdar JC, Subba Rao A. Characterization of zinc oxide nano particles and their effect on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) plant. J Plant Nutr. 2015;38:1505–15. 10.1080/01904167.2014.992536.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Fang J, Shan XQ, Wen B, Lin JM, Owens G. Stability of titanium nanoparticles in soil suspensions and transport in saturated homogeneous soil columns. Environ Pollut. 2009;157:1101–9. 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.11.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Priester JH. Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nano-materials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. PNAS. 2012;109:14734–35. 10.1073/pnas.1205431109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[76] Kim JH, Lee Y, Kim EJ, Gu S, Sohn EJ, Seo YS, et al. Exposure of iron nanoparticles to Arabidopsis thaliana enhances root elongation by triggering cell wall loosening. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:3477–85. 10.1021/es4043462.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Shende S, Rathod D, Gade A, Rai M. Biogenic copper nanoparticles promote the growth of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017;11:773–81. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0179.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Apodaca SA, Tan W, Dominguez OE, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Physiological and biochemical effects of nanoparticulate copper, bulk copper, copper chloride, and kinetin in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. Sci Total Environ. 2017;599–600:2085–94. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Benício LPF, Constantino VRL, Pinto FG, Vergütz L, Tronto J, da Costa LM. Layered double hydroxides: new technology in phosphate fertilizers based on nanostructured materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:399–409. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01784.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Da Costa MVJ, Sharma PK. Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica. 2016;54:110–9. 10.1007/s11099-015-0167-5.Search in Google Scholar

[81] Rao S, Shekhawat GS. Phytotoxicity and oxidative stress perspective of two selected nanoparticles in Brassica juncea. 3 Biotech. 2016;6:1–12. 10.1007/s13205-016-0550-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[82] Bhardwaj D, Sharma M, Sharma P, Tomar R. Synthesis and surfactant modification of clinoptilolite and montmorillonite for the removal of nitrate and preparation of slow release nitrogen fertilizer. J Hazard Mater. 2012;227:292–300. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Borges R, Brunatto SF, Leitao AA, de Carvalho GSG, Wypych F. Solid-state mechanochemical activation of clay minerals and soluble phosphate mixtures to obtain slow-release fertilizers. Clay Miner. 2015;50:153–62. 10.1180/claymin.2015.050.2.01.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Borges R, Prevot V, Forano C, Wypych F. Design and kinetic study of sustainable potential slow-release fertilizer obtained by mechanochemical activation of clay minerals and potassium monohydrogen phosphate. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:708–16. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04378.Search in Google Scholar

[85] Chen L, Chen XL, Zhou CH, Yang HM, Ji SF, Tong DS, et al. Environmental-friendly montmorillonite-biochar composites: facile production and tunable adsorption-release of ammonium and phosphate. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;156:648–59. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.050.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Loghmani MH, Shojaei AF, Khakzad M. Hydrogen generation as a clean energy through hydrolysis of sodium borohydride over Cu-Fe-B nano powders: effect of polymers and surfactants. Energy. 2017;126:830–40. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

[87] Ramesh K, Reddy DD. Zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture. Adv Agron. 2011;113:219–41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-386473-4.00004-X.Search in Google Scholar

[88] Pizarro C, Escudey M, Bravo C, Gacitua M, Pavez L. Sulfate kinetics and adsorption studies on a zeolite/polyammonium cation composite for environmental remediation. Minerals. 2021;11:180. 10.3390/min11020180.Search in Google Scholar

[89] Gouran-Orimi R, Mirzayi B, Nematollahzadeh A, Tardast A. Competitive adsorption of nitrate in fixed-bed column packed with bio-inspired polydopamine coated zeolite. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018;6:2232–40. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.049.Search in Google Scholar

[90] Singh G, Rattanpal H. Use of nanotechnology in horticulture: a review. Int J Agric Sci Vet Med. 2014;2:34–42.Search in Google Scholar

[91] Pradhan S, Mailapalli DR. Interaction of engineered nanoparticles with the agri-environment. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:8279–94. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02528.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W. Nanomaterials: a review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater Adv. 2021;2:1821–71.10.1039/D0MA00807ASearch in Google Scholar

[93] Escudero A, Carrillo-Carrión C, Romero-Ben E, Franco A, Rosales-Barrios C, Castillejos MC, et al. Molecular bottom-up approaches for the synthesis of inorganic and hybrid nanostructures. Inorganics. 2021;9:58. 10.3390/inorganics9070058.Search in Google Scholar

[94] Lin PC, Lin S, Wang PC, Sridhar R. Techniques for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:711–26. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.11.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[95] Ramzan M, Arshad MI, Mahmood K, Amin N, Khan MI, Iqbal F, et al. Investigation of structural and optical properties of Pr3+ -substituted M-type Ba–Ni nano-ferrites. J Supercond Nov Magn. 2020;34:1759–64. 10.1007/s10948-020-05751-4.Search in Google Scholar

[96] Rai M, Ingle AP, Trzcińska-Wencel J, Wypij M, Bonde S, Yadav A, et al. Biogenic silver nanoparticles: what we know and what do we need to know? Nanomaterials. 2021;11:2901. 10.3390/nano11112901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Biener J, Wittstock A, Baumann TF, Weissmüller J, Bäumer M, Hamza AV. Surface chemistry in nanoscale materials. Materials. 2009;2(4):2404–28. 10.3390/ma2042404.Search in Google Scholar

[98] El-Ghamry A, Mosa AA, Alshaal T, El-Ramady H. Nanofertilizers vs. biofertilizers: new insights. Environ Biodivers Soil Secur. 2018;2:51–72. 10.21608/jenvbs.2018.3880.1029.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Mikkelsen R. Nanofertilizer and nanotechnology: a quick look. Better Crops. 2018;102:18–9. 10.24047/BC102318.Search in Google Scholar

[100] Azam F. Added nitrogen interaction in the soil-plant system: a review. Pak J Agron. 2002;1:54–9.10.3923/ja.2002.54.59Search in Google Scholar

[101] Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1–13.10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[102] Dimkpa CO, Bindraban PS. Nanofertilizers: new products for the industry? J Agric Food Chem. 2017;66(26):6462–73.10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02150Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] https://lgt.tw/nano.html (accessed on 28 March, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[104] https://www.aquayield.com/products (accessed on 28 March, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[105] https://www.urthagriculture.com/nano-ag-fertilizer (accessed on 28 March, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[106] https://www.made-in-china.com/products-search/hot-china-products/Nano_Fertilizers_Companies.html (accessed on 28 March, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[107] Schwab F, Zhai GS, Kern M, Turner A, Schnoor JL, Wiesner MR. Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants: critical review. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:257–78.10.3109/17435390.2015.1048326Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Wang P, Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Kopittke PM. Nanotechnology: a new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21:699–712.10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[109] Bernela M, Rani R, Malik P, Mukherjee TK. Nanofertilizers: applications and future prospects. In: Sindhu RK, Chitkara M, Singh IS, editors. Nanotechnology principles and applications. 1st edn. Singapore: Jenny Stanford Publishing; 2021. p. 289–332.10.1201/9781003120261-9Search in Google Scholar

[110] Šamaj J, Baluška F, Voigt B, Schlicht M, Volkmann D, Menzel D. Endocytosis, actin cytoskeleton, and signalling. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1150–61. 10.1104/pp.104.040683.Search in Google Scholar

[111] Etxeberria E, Gonzalez P, Baroja-Fernandez E, Romero JP. Fluid phase endocytic uptake of artificial nano-spheres and fluorescent quantum dots by sycamore cultured cells: evidence for the distribution of solutes to different intracellular compartments. Plant Signal Behav. 2006;1:196–200. 10.4161/psb.1.4.3142.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Fleischer MA, O’Neill R, Ehwald R. The pore size of non-graminaceous plant cell walls is rapidly decreased by borate ester cross-linking of the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:829–38. 10.1104/pp.121.3.829.Search in Google Scholar

[113] Lucas WJ, Lee JY. Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:712–26. 10.1038/nrm1470.Search in Google Scholar

[114] Heinlein M, Epel BL. Macromolecular transport and signaling through plasmodesmata. Int Rev Cytol. 2004;235:93–164.10.1016/S0074-7696(04)35003-5Search in Google Scholar

[115] Aubert T, Burel A, Esnault MA, Cordier S, Grasset F, Cabello-Hurtado F. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of nanosized molybdenum octahedral clusters. J Hazard Mater. 2012;219–220:111–8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Hong J, Peralta-Videa JR, Rico CM, Sahi SV, Viveros MN, Bartonjo J, et al. Evidence of translocation and physiological impacts of foliar applied CeO2 nanoparticles on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:4376–85. 10.1021/es404931g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Abd El-Azeim MM, Sherif MA, Hussien MS, Tantawy IAA, Bashandy SO. Impacts of nano-and non-nanofertilizers on potato quality and productivity. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020;40:388–97. 10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.12.007.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Ropitaux M, Bernard S, Schapman D, Follet-Gueye ML, Vicré M, Boulogne I, et al. Root border cells and mucilage secretions of soybean, Glycine max (Merr) L.: characterization and role in interactions with the oomycete Phytophthora parasitica. Cells. 2020;9:2215. 10.3390/cells9102215.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[119] Ma X, Geisler-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci Total Environ. 2010;15408(16):3053–61. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Rajput V, Minkina T, Mazarji M, Shend S, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, et al. Accumulation of nanoparticles in the soil-plant systems and their effects on human health. Ann Agri Sci. 2020;65(2):137–43.10.1016/j.aoas.2020.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[121] Ali S, Mehmood A, Khan N. Uptake, translocation, and consequences of nanomaterials on plant growth and stress adaptation. J Nanomater. 2021;2021:6677616. 10.1155/2021/6677616.Search in Google Scholar

[122] Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 1993;3:1–30. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[123] Navarro E, Piccapietra F, Wagner B, Marconi F, Kaegi R, Odzak N, et al. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:8959–64. 10.1021/es801785m.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[124] Slomberg DL, Schoenfisch MH. Silica nanoparticle phytotoxicity to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:10247–54. 10.1021/es300949f.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Dan Y, Zhang W, Xue R, Ma X, Stephan C, Shi H. Characterization of gold nanoparticle uptake by tomato plants using enzymatic extraction followed by single particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:3007–14. 10.1021/es506179e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Pérez-de-Luque A. Interaction of nanomaterials with plants: What do we need for real applications in agriculture?. Front Environ Sci. 2017;5:12. 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00012.Search in Google Scholar

[127] Rochette P, Liang C, Pelster D, Bergeron O, Lemke R, Kroebel R, et al. Soil nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in Canada: exploring relationships with soil, crop and climatic variables. Agri Ecosyst Environ. 2018;254:69–81. 10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.021.Search in Google Scholar

[128] Wesołowska M, Rymarczyk J, Góra R, Baranowski P, Sławiński C, Klimczyk M, et al. New slow-release fertilizers-economic, legal and practical aspects: a review. Int Agrophys. 2021;35:11–24.10.31545/intagr/131184Search in Google Scholar

[129] Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:295–300. 10.1038/nnano.2007.108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Preetha PS, Balakrishnan N. A review of nano fertilizers and their use and functions in soil. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6:3117–33. 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.364.Search in Google Scholar

[131] Wang W, Yang Z, Zhang A, Yang S. Water retention and fertilizer slow release integrated superabsorbent synthesized from millet straw and applied in agriculture. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;160:113126. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113126.Search in Google Scholar

[132] Asli S, Neumann PM. Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32:577–84. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01952.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[133] Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1014. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[134] Pérez-de-Luque A. Interaction of nanomaterials with plants: what do we need for real applications in agriculture? Front Environ Sci. 2017;5:12. 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00012.Search in Google Scholar

[135] El-Ramady H, Abdalla N, Alshaal T, El-Henawy A, Elmahrouk M, Bayoumi Y, et al. Plant nano-nutrition: perspectives and challenges. In: Gothandam K, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Ramalingam C, Lichtfouse E, editors. Nanotechnology, food security and water treatment. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 129–61. 10.1007/978-3-319-70166-0_4.Search in Google Scholar

[136] Ma C, White JC, Zhao J, Zhao Q, Xing B. Uptake of engineered nanoparticles by food crops: characterization, mechanisms, and implications. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2018;9:129–53. 10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012657.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Abdel-Aziz HMM, Hasaneen MNA, Omer AM. Nano chitosan NPK fertilizer enhances the growth and productivity of wheat plants grown in sandy soil. Span J Agric Res. 2016;14:902–11.10.5424/sjar/2016141-8205Search in Google Scholar

[138] Salama HMH. Effects of silver nanoparticles in some crop plants, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and corn (Zea mays L.). Int Res J Biotechnol. 2012;3:190–7.Search in Google Scholar

[139] Chen J, Wei X. Controlled-released fertilizers as a means to reduce nitrogen leaching and runoff in container-grown plant production. In: Khan A, Fahad S, editors. Nitrogen in agriculture-updates. UK: Interch Open; 2018. p. 33–50.10.5772/intechopen.73055Search in Google Scholar

[140] Usman M, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Nawaz A, Cheema SA, Rehman HU, et al. Nanotechnology in agriculture: current status, challenges and future opportunities. Sci Total Environ. 2020;721:137778. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137778.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[141] Lowry GV, Gregory KB, Apte SC, Lead JR. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:6893–9. 10.1021/es300839e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[142] Belal E-S, El-Ramady H. Nanoparticles in water, soils and agriculture. In: Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Lichtfouse E, editors. Nanoscience in food and agriculture 2. Sustainable agriculture reviews. Vol. 21, Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 311–58. 10.1007/978-3-319-39306-3_10.Search in Google Scholar

[143] Xu S, Shen C, Zhang X, Chen X, Radosevich M, Wang S, et al. Mobility of cellulose nanocrystals in porous media: effects of ionic strength, iron oxides, and soil colloids. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:348. 10.3390/nano10020348.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[144] Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut. 2007;150:5–22. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] Kah M, Machinski P, Koerner P, Tiede K, Grillo R, Fraceto LF, et al. Analysing the fate of nanopesticides in soil and the applicability of regulatory protocols using a polymer-based nanoformulation of atrazine. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:11699–707. 10.1007/s11356-014-2523-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[146] Juárez-Maldonado A, Tortella G, Rubilar O, Fincheira P, Benavides-Mendoza A. Biostimulation and toxicity: the magnitude of the impact of nanomaterials in microorganisms and plants. J Adv Res. 2021;31:113–26.10.1016/j.jare.2020.12.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[147] Ameen F, Alsamhary K, Alabdullatif JA, ALNadhari S. A review on metal-based nanoparticles and their toxicity to beneficial soil bacteria and fungi. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2021;213:112027. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[148] Murata T, Kanao-Koshikawa M, Takamatsu T. Effects of Pb, Cu, Sb, In and Ag contamination on the proliferation of soil bacterial colonies, soil dehydrogenase activity, and phospholipid fatty acid profiles of soil microbial communities. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005;164:103–18. 10.1007/s11270-005-2254-x.Search in Google Scholar

[149] Throbäck IN, Johansson M, Rosenquist M, Pell M, Hansson M, Hallin S. Silver (Ag+) reduces denitrification and induces enrichment of novel nirK genotypes in soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;270(2):189–94. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00632.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Otero-González L, Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R. Fate and long-term inhibitory impact of ZnO nanoparticles during high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment. J Environ Manage. 2014;15(135):110–7. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Punnoose A, Dodge K, Rasmussen JW, Chess J, Wingett D, Anders C. Cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles can be tailored by modifying their surface structure: a green chemistry approach for safer nanomaterials. ACS Sustain. Chem Eng. 2014;2:1666–73.10.1021/sc500140xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[152] Zhao J, Wang Z, White JC, Xing B. Graphene in the aquatic environment: adsorption, dispersion, toxicity and transformation. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(17):9995–10009.10.1021/es5022679Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] Malakar A, Kanel SR, Ray C, Snow DD, Nadagouda MN. Nanomaterials in the environment, human exposure pathway, and health effects: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;759:143470. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143470.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[154] European Commission (EC). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: nano-sciences and nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005–2009. B-1050, Brussels; 2005. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0607:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 03 June 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[155] Nielsen MB, Baun A, Mackevica A, Thit A, Wallinder IO, Gallego JA, et al. Nanomaterials in the European chemicals legislation–methodological challenges for registration and environmental safety assessment. Environ Sci Nano. 2021;8:731–47. 10.1039/D0EN01123A.Search in Google Scholar

[156] OECD. Categorisation of manufactured nanomaterials –workshop report. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO 2016; 2016a. p. 9. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO(2016)9&docLanguage=En.Search in Google Scholar

[157] OECD. Grouping and read-across for the hazard assessment of manufactured nanomaterials, report from the Expert Meeting. Paris: OECD, ENV/JM/MONO 2016; 2016b. p. 59. Available at: https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/JM/MONO%282016%2959/en/pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-28
Revised: 2022-04-01
Accepted: 2022-05-07
Published Online: 2022-06-07

© 2022 Graciela Dolores Avila-Quezada et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Theoretical and experimental investigation of MWCNT dispersion effect on the elastic modulus of flexible PDMS/MWCNT nanocomposites
  3. Mechanical, morphological, and fracture-deformation behavior of MWCNTs-reinforced (Al–Cu–Mg–T351) alloy cast nanocomposites fabricated by optimized mechanical milling and powder metallurgy techniques
  4. Flammability and physical stability of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch/poly(lactic acid) blend bionanocomposites
  5. Glutathione-loaded non-ionic surfactant niosomes: A new approach to improve oral bioavailability and hepatoprotective efficacy of glutathione
  6. Relationship between mechano-bactericidal activity and nanoblades density on chemically strengthened glass
  7. In situ regulation of microstructure and microwave-absorbing properties of FeSiAl through HNO3 oxidation
  8. Research on a mechanical model of magnetorheological fluid different diameter particles
  9. Nanomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of rubber–wood–plastic composites
  10. Investigative properties of CeO2 doped with niobium: A combined characterization and DFT studies
  11. Miniaturized peptidomimetics and nano-vesiculation in endothelin types through probable nano-disk formation and structure property relationships of endothelins’ fragments
  12. N/S co-doped CoSe/C nanocubes as anode materials for Li-ion batteries
  13. Synergistic effects of halloysite nanotubes with metal and phosphorus additives on the optimal design of eco-friendly sandwich panels with maximum flame resistance and minimum weight
  14. Octreotide-conjugated silver nanoparticles for active targeting of somatostatin receptors and their application in a nebulized rat model
  15. Controllable morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures formed via hydrothermal vulcanization of Bi2O3 thin-film layer and their photoelectrocatalytic performances
  16. Development of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles for prostate cancer treatment
  17. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of HDPE mineral nanocomposites by filler particles modulation of the matrix plastic/elastic behavior
  18. Effect of plasticizers on the properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/cinnamon essential oil reinforced starch bionanocomposite films
  19. Optimization of nano coating to reduce the thermal deformation of ball screws
  20. Preparation of efficient piezoelectric PVDF–HFP/Ni composite films by high electric field poling
  21. MHD dissipative Casson nanofluid liquid film flow due to an unsteady stretching sheet with radiation influence and slip velocity phenomenon
  22. Effects of nano-SiO2 modification on rubberised mortar and concrete with recycled coarse aggregates
  23. Mechanical and microscopic properties of fiber-reinforced coal gangue-based geopolymer concrete
  24. Effect of morphology and size on the thermodynamic stability of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Experiment and molecular dynamics calculation
  25. Mechanical performance of a CFRP composite reinforced via gelatin-CNTs: A study on fiber interfacial enhancement and matrix enhancement
  26. A practical review over surface modification, nanopatterns, emerging materials, drug delivery systems, and their biophysiochemical properties for dental implants: Recent progresses and advances
  27. HTR: An ultra-high speed algorithm for cage recognition of clathrate hydrates
  28. Effects of microalloying elements added by in situ synthesis on the microstructure of WCu composites
  29. A highly sensitive nanobiosensor based on aptamer-conjugated graphene-decorated rhodium nanoparticles for detection of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells
  30. Progressive collapse performance of shear strengthened RC frames by nano CFRP
  31. Core–shell heterostructured composites of carbon nanotubes and imine-linked hyperbranched polymers as metal-free Li-ion anodes
  32. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory
  33. Simple models for tensile modulus of shape memory polymer nanocomposites at ambient temperature
  34. Preparation and morphological studies of tin sulfide nanoparticles and use as efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of rhodamine B and phenol
  35. Polyethyleneimine-impregnated activated carbon nanofiber composited graphene-derived rice husk char for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture
  36. Electrospun nanofibers of Co3O4 nanocrystals encapsulated in cyclized-polyacrylonitrile for lithium storage
  37. Pitting corrosion induced on high-strength high carbon steel wire in high alkaline deaerated chloride electrolyte
  38. Formulation of polymeric nanoparticles loaded sorafenib; evaluation of cytotoxicity, molecular evaluation, and gene expression studies in lung and breast cancer cell lines
  39. Engineered nanocomposites in asphalt binders
  40. Influence of loading voltage, domain ratio, and additional load on the actuation of dielectric elastomer
  41. Thermally induced hex-graphene transitions in 2D carbon crystals
  42. The surface modification effect on the interfacial properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy: A molecular dynamics study
  43. Molecular dynamics study of deformation mechanism of interfacial microzone of Cu/Al2Cu/Al composites under tension
  44. Nanocolloid simulators of luminescent solar concentrator photovoltaic windows
  45. Compressive strength and anti-chloride ion penetration assessment of geopolymer mortar merging PVA fiber and nano-SiO2 using RBF–BP composite neural network
  46. Effect of 3-mercapto-1-propane sulfonate sulfonic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the growth of cobalt pillar by electrodeposition
  47. Dynamics of convective slippery constraints on hybrid radiative Sutterby nanofluid flow by Galerkin finite element simulation
  48. Preparation of vanadium by the magnesiothermic self-propagating reduction and process control
  49. Microstructure-dependent photoelectrocatalytic activity of heterogeneous ZnO–ZnS nanosheets
  50. Cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of molybdenum and tungsten disulphide on human bronchial cells
  51. Improving recycled aggregate concrete by compression casting and nano-silica
  52. Chemically reactive Maxwell nanoliquid flow by a stretching surface in the frames of Newtonian heating, nonlinear convection and radiative flux: Nanopolymer flow processing simulation
  53. Nonlinear dynamic and crack behaviors of carbon nanotubes-reinforced composites with various geometries
  54. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its therapeutic efficacy against colon cancer
  55. Synthesis and characterization of smart stimuli-responsive herbal drug-encapsulated nanoniosome particles for efficient treatment of breast cancer
  56. Homotopic simulation for heat transport phenomenon of the Burgers nanofluids flow over a stretching cylinder with thermal convective and zero mass flux conditions
  57. Incorporation of copper and strontium ions in TiO2 nanotubes via dopamine to enhance hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility
  58. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles
  59. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-strengthened recycled aggregate concrete
  60. Glucose-responsive nanogels efficiently maintain the stability and activity of therapeutic enzymes
  61. Tunning matrix rheology and mechanical performance of ultra-high performance concrete using cellulose nanofibers
  62. Flexible MXene/copper/cellulose nanofiber heat spreader films with enhanced thermal conductivity
  63. Promoted charge separation and specific surface area via interlacing of N-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes on carbon nitride nanosheets for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B
  64. Elucidating the role of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mitigating the disease of the eggplant caused by Phomopsis vexans, Ralstonia solanacearum, and root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita
  65. An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial
  66. Robust synthesis of a composite phase of copper vanadium oxide with enhanced performance for durable aqueous Zn-ion batteries
  67. Tunning self-assembled phases of bovine serum albumin via hydrothermal process to synthesize novel functional hydrogel for skin protection against UVB
  68. A comparative experimental study on damping properties of epoxy nanocomposite beams reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets
  69. Lightweight and hydrophobic Ni/GO/PVA composite aerogels for ultrahigh performance electromagnetic interference shielding
  70. Research on the auxetic behavior and mechanical properties of periodically rotating graphene nanostructures
  71. Repairing performances of novel cement mortar modified with graphene oxide and polyacrylate polymer
  72. Closed-loop recycling and fabrication of hydrophilic CNT films with high performance
  73. Design of thin-film configuration of SnO2–Ag2O composites for NO2 gas-sensing applications
  74. Study on stress distribution of SiC/Al composites based on microstructure models with microns and nanoparticles
  75. PVDF green nanofibers as potential carriers for improving self-healing and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy prepregs
  76. Osteogenesis capability of three-dimensionally printed poly(lactic acid)-halloysite nanotube scaffolds containing strontium ranelate
  77. Silver nanoparticles induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and late non-canonical autophagy in HT-29 colon cancer cells
  78. Preparation and bonding mechanisms of polymer/metal hybrid composite by nano molding technology
  79. Damage self-sensing and strain monitoring of glass-reinforced epoxy composite impregnated with graphene nanoplatelet and multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Thermal analysis characterisation of solar-powered ship using Oldroyd hybrid nanofluids in parabolic trough solar collector: An optimal thermal application
  81. Pyrene-functionalized halloysite nanotubes for simultaneously detecting and separating Hg(ii) in aqueous media: A comprehensive comparison on interparticle and intraparticle excimers
  82. Fabrication of self-assembly CNT flexible film and its piezoresistive sensing behaviors
  83. Thermal valuation and entropy inspection of second-grade nanoscale fluid flow over a stretching surface by applying Koo–Kleinstreuer–Li relation
  84. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-SiO2 and basalt-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete
  85. Characterization and tribology performance of polyaniline-coated nanodiamond lubricant additives
  86. Combined impact of Marangoni convection and thermophoretic particle deposition on chemically reactive transport of nanofluid flow over a stretching surface
  87. Spark plasma extrusion of binder free hydroxyapatite powder
  88. An investigation on thermo-mechanical performance of graphene-oxide-reinforced shape memory polymer
  89. Effect of nanoadditives on the novel leather fiber/recycled poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate) polymer composites for multifunctional applications: Fabrication, characterizations, and multiobjective optimization using central composite design
  90. Design selection for a hemispherical dimple core sandwich panel using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods
  91. Improving tensile strength and impact toughness of plasticized poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose
  92. Green synthesis of spinel copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanoparticles and their toxicity
  93. The effect of TaC and NbC hybrid and mono-nanoparticles on AA2024 nanocomposites: Microstructure, strengthening, and artificial aging
  94. Excited-state geometry relaxation of pyrene-modified cellulose nanocrystals under UV-light excitation for detecting Fe3+
  95. Effect of CNTs and MEA on the creep of face-slab concrete at an early age
  96. Effect of deformation conditions on compression phase transformation of AZ31
  97. Application of MXene as a new generation of highly conductive coating materials for electromembrane-surrounded solid-phase microextraction
  98. A comparative study of the elasto-plastic properties for ceramic nanocomposites filled by graphene or graphene oxide nanoplates
  99. Encapsulation strategies for improving the biological behavior of CdS@ZIF-8 nanocomposites
  100. Biosynthesis of ZnO NPs from pumpkin seeds’ extract and elucidation of its anticancer potential against breast cancer
  101. Preliminary trials of the gold nanoparticles conjugated chrysin: An assessment of anti-oxidant, anti-microbial, and in vitro cytotoxic activities of a nanoformulated flavonoid
  102. Effect of micron-scale pores increased by nano-SiO2 sol modification on the strength of cement mortar
  103. Fractional simulations for thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid with aluminum oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles with water and blood base fluids
  104. The effect of graphene nano-powder on the viscosity of water: An experimental study and artificial neural network modeling
  105. Development of a novel heat- and shear-resistant nano-silica gelling agent
  106. Characterization, biocompatibility and in vivo of nominal MnO2-containing wollastonite glass-ceramic
  107. Entropy production simulation of second-grade magnetic nanomaterials flowing across an expanding surface with viscidness dissipative flux
  108. Enhancement in structural, morphological, and optical properties of copper oxide for optoelectronic device applications
  109. Aptamer-functionalized chitosan-coated gold nanoparticle complex as a suitable targeted drug carrier for improved breast cancer treatment
  110. Performance and overall evaluation of nano-alumina-modified asphalt mixture
  111. Analysis of pure nanofluid (GO/engine oil) and hybrid nanofluid (GO–Fe3O4/engine oil): Novel thermal and magnetic features
  112. Synthesis of Ag@AgCl modified anatase/rutile/brookite mixed phase TiO2 and their photocatalytic property
  113. Mechanisms and influential variables on the abrasion resistance hydraulic concrete
  114. Synergistic reinforcement mechanism of basalt fiber/cellulose nanocrystals/polypropylene composites
  115. Achieving excellent oxidation resistance and mechanical properties of TiB2–B4C/carbon aerogel composites by quick-gelation and mechanical mixing
  116. Microwave-assisted sol–gel template-free synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles obtained from South African coal fly ash
  117. Pulsed laser-assisted synthesis of nano nickel(ii) oxide-anchored graphitic carbon nitride: Characterizations and their potential antibacterial/anti-biofilm applications
  118. Effects of nano-ZrSi2 on thermal stability of phenolic resin and thermal reusability of quartz–phenolic composites
  119. Benzaldehyde derivatives on tin electroplating as corrosion resistance for fabricating copper circuit
  120. Mechanical and heat transfer properties of 4D-printed shape memory graphene oxide/epoxy acrylate composites
  121. Coupling the vanadium-induced amorphous/crystalline NiFe2O4 with phosphide heterojunction toward active oxygen evolution reaction catalysts
  122. Graphene-oxide-reinforced cement composites mechanical and microstructural characteristics at elevated temperatures
  123. Gray correlation analysis of factors influencing compressive strength and durability of nano-SiO2 and PVA fiber reinforced geopolymer mortar
  124. Preparation of layered gradient Cu–Cr–Ti alloy with excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity
  125. Recovery of Cr from chrome-containing leather wastes to develop aluminum-based composite material along with Al2O3 ceramic particles: An ingenious approach
  126. Mechanisms of the improved stiffness of flexible polymers under impact loading
  127. Anticancer potential of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using a battery of in vitro tests
  128. Review Articles
  129. Proposed approaches for coronaviruses elimination from wastewater: Membrane techniques and nanotechnology solutions
  130. Application of Pickering emulsion in oil drilling and production
  131. The contribution of microfluidics to the fight against tuberculosis
  132. Graphene-based biosensors for disease theranostics: Development, applications, and recent advancements
  133. Synthesis and encapsulation of iron oxide nanorods for application in magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal therapy
  134. Contemporary nano-architectured drugs and leads for ανβ3 integrin-based chemotherapy: Rationale and retrospect
  135. State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials
  136. Insights on magnetic spinel ferrites for targeted drug delivery and hyperthermia applications
  137. A review on heterogeneous oxidation of acetaminophen based on micro and nanoparticles catalyzed by different activators
  138. Early diagnosis of lung cancer using magnetic nanoparticles-integrated systems
  139. Advances in ZnO: Manipulation of defects for enhancing their technological potentials
  140. Efficacious nanomedicine track toward combating COVID-19
  141. A review of the design, processes, and properties of Mg-based composites
  142. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for varied applications: Green renewable resources and energy-efficient synthetic routes
  143. Two-dimensional nanomaterial-based polymer composites: Fundamentals and applications
  144. Recent progress and challenges in plasmonic nanomaterials
  145. Apoptotic cell-derived micro/nanosized extracellular vesicles in tissue regeneration
  146. Electronic noses based on metal oxide nanowires: A review
  147. Framework materials for supercapacitors
  148. An overview on the reproductive toxicity of graphene derivatives: Highlighting the importance
  149. Antibacterial nanomaterials: Upcoming hope to overcome antibiotic resistance crisis
  150. Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites
  151. A review of atomic layer deposition modelling and simulation methodologies: Density functional theory and molecular dynamics
  152. Recent advances in the preparation of PVDF-based piezoelectric materials
  153. Recent developments in tensile properties of friction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced composite: A review
  154. Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO2
  155. Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations
  156. Graphene-based nanocomposite using new modeling molecular dynamic simulations for proposed neutralizing mechanism and real-time sensing of COVID-19
  157. Nanotechnology application on bamboo materials: A review
  158. Recent developments and future perspectives of biorenewable nanocomposites for advanced applications
  159. Nanostructured lipid carrier system: A compendium of their formulation development approaches, optimization strategies by quality by design, and recent applications in drug delivery
  160. 3D printing customized design of human bone tissue implant and its application
  161. Design, preparation, and functionalization of nanobiomaterials for enhanced efficacy in current and future biomedical applications
  162. A brief review of nanoparticles-doped PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite for OLED and OPV
  163. Nanotechnology interventions as a putative tool for the treatment of dental afflictions
  164. Recent advancements in metal–organic frameworks integrating quantum dots (QDs@MOF) and their potential applications
  165. A focused review of short electrospun nanofiber preparation techniques for composite reinforcement
  166. Microstructural characteristics and nano-modification of interfacial transition zone in concrete: A review
  167. Latest developments in the upconversion nanotechnology for the rapid detection of food safety: A review
  168. Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks
  169. Molecular dynamics application of cocrystal energetic materials: A review
  170. Synthesis and application of nanometer hydroxyapatite in biomedicine
  171. Cutting-edge development in waste-recycled nanomaterials for energy storage and conversion applications
  172. Biological applications of ternary quantum dots: A review
  173. Nanotherapeutics for hydrogen sulfide-involved treatment: An emerging approach for cancer therapy
  174. Application of antibacterial nanoparticles in orthodontic materials
  175. Effect of natural-based biological hydrogels combined with growth factors on skin wound healing
  176. Nanozymes – A route to overcome microbial resistance: A viewpoint
  177. Recent developments and applications of smart nanoparticles in biomedicine
  178. Contemporary review on carbon nanotube (CNT) composites and their impact on multifarious applications
  179. Interfacial interactions and reinforcing mechanisms of cellulose and chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete strength and durability enhancement: A review
  180. Diamond-like carbon films for tribological modification of rubber
  181. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) modified cement-based materials: A systematic review
  182. Recent research progress and advanced applications of silica/polymer nanocomposites
  183. Modeling of supramolecular biopolymers: Leading the in silico revolution of tissue engineering and nanomedicine
  184. Recent advances in perovskites-based optoelectronics
  185. Biogenic synthesis of palladium nanoparticles: New production methods and applications
  186. A comprehensive review of nanofluids with fractional derivatives: Modeling and application
  187. Electrospinning of marine polysaccharides: Processing and chemical aspects, challenges, and future prospects
  188. Electrohydrodynamic printing for demanding devices: A review of processing and applications
  189. Rapid Communications
  190. Structural material with designed thermal twist for a simple actuation
  191. Recent advances in photothermal materials for solar-driven crude oil adsorption
Downloaded on 5.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0126/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoo_n78U_GMY5EJPER5r55z890_A9UbEpEML4ZSjd8zdLEWm-IqX
Scroll to top button