Home Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations
Article Open Access

Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations

  • Nilofar Asim EMAIL logo , Mohd Sukor Su’ait , Marzieh Badiei , Masita Mohammad , Md. Akhtaruzzaman , Armin Rajabi , Nowshad Amin and Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 5, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Graphene-based materials are widely applied due to their interesting physical and chemical properties, but their hydrophobic surface and toxicity to living creatures limit their application in some fields. Biopolymers are incorporated with graphene-based materials to overcome these issues and improve their biodegradability, biocompatibility, and ecological friendliness, and the synergetic effect enhances other properties as well. These properties make graphene-based materials a novel subject of interest in science and industry. In this study, the various applications of developed biopolymer/graphene-based composites are broadly addressed, and recent progress in the field is emphasized. Modification, stability, and compatibility are among the key merits for developing highly advanced composites with desirable properties. The major challenges and some recommendations in various applications based on reviewed studies are covered. However, the development of environmentally friendly, low-cost, high-quality, and large-scale biopolymer/graphene-based composites for specified applications is challenging. Studies based on application and trend are conducted. Opportunities and limitations can guide researchers in the field to solve challenges, provide directions for future studies, and optimize sustainable biopolymer/graphene-based composites for specified industrial applications.

Graphical abstract

1 Introduction

Since the discovery of graphene, its various derivatives are developed and extensively investigated for different applications. Graphene-based nanocomposites in different forms, such as films, 3D porous scaffolds, fibrils, hydrogel, and nacre-like structures, have been developed and studied [1,2].

Given the huge potential of utilizing waste materials as precursors for the preparation of graphene derivatives, the dependence of their morphology, structure, and properties on conversion methods and type and composition of waste materials should be considered [3,4].

The invention of graphene and its potential for making various composites have opened up new interesting research areas to tailor new materials with chemical and physical properties designed on the basis of their bonding mechanism [5]. Biopolymers are materials derived from biological sources, such as animals, microorganisms, and plants. Biopolymers, as potential materials to combine with graphene, have attracted huge attention because of their abundance, renewability, biodegradability, low cost, and various applications [5]. Figure 1 shows the various available biopolymers for combination with graphene-based materials.

Figure 1 
               Classification of biopolymers (reprinted with permission from refs [5,6]).
Figure 1

Classification of biopolymers (reprinted with permission from refs [5,6]).

According to Rouf and Kokini [5], biopolymer–graphene composites are synthesized through (1) solution intercalation, (2) melt intercalation, and (3) in situ polymerization. Other methods such as wet spinning, electrospinning, freeze-drying, microwave synthesis, molecular beam epitaxy drop casting, and layer-by-layer assembly are also utilized by researchers to prepare biopolymer–graphene-based composites [6,7]. The preparation method has important influences on the prepared nanocomposites’ physical and chemical properties because of their effect on homogeneity (distribution), interaction, and structure [8]. Figure 2 depicts the various available interactions between graphene derivatives and biopolymers.

Figure 2 
               Common enabling interactions between graphene-based materials and biopolymers (reproduced with permission from refs. [9,10]).
Figure 2

Common enabling interactions between graphene-based materials and biopolymers (reproduced with permission from refs. [9,10]).

Interfacial interactions, including covalent and noncovalent bonding, improve the mechanical properties of graphene-based nanocomposites. These different kinds of interactions usually work synergistically together, resulting in excellent integrated mechanical properties. Noncovalent bonding, including hydrogen bonding, ionic bonding, and π–π interactions, usually shows relatively weak strength compared with covalent bonding [10]. However, the mechanical properties of graphene-based nanocomposites have been enhanced via noncovalent bonding due to their easy construction with graphene nanosheets. Covalent bonding shows strong interfacial strength and can be tuned by adjusting the length of the molecule chain and the density of crosslinking. The use of small molecules as crosslinkers usually enhances strength and stiffness but results in relatively low toughness due to the restriction of sliding between adjacent graphene nanosheets. Recent investigations reveal that long-chain linear molecules are good for enhancing tensile strength and toughness. Compared with long-chain linear molecules, a polymer or macromolecules with active functional groups can achieve integrated strength, stiffness, and toughness due to their high density of covalent crosslinking [9]. Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on earth, is widely utilized for different applications. Despite the cheap and abundant resource for the preparation of cellulose from biomass, bacterial cellulose has attracted attention because the prepared cellulose does not attach to hemicellulose or lignin [11,12]. Bacterial cellulose can be utilized for various applications. Figure 3 shows the various preparation methods of graphene-based/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites.

Figure 3 
               Some utilized processing routes for the preparation of bacterial cellulose–graphene oxide nanocomposites [11].
Figure 3

Some utilized processing routes for the preparation of bacterial cellulose–graphene oxide nanocomposites [11].

The flexible bacterial cellulose/graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite with excellent electrical conductivity is prepared via a facile two-step strategy and presents a high potential for application in electromagnetic shielding and flexible electrodes [13].

To overcome the utilization of the conventional chemical-based preparation method, Dhar et al. [14] prepared bacterial cellulose/graphene-based films via a single step in situ fermentation. The physicochemical and structural properties of the composite depend on reduced graphene oxide compositions and fermentation conditions. The excellent inherent properties of prepared composites suggest flexible electronic materials.

Luo et al. [15] developed a facile layer-by-layer assembly method to prepare bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide hydrogels with excellent mechanical properties. Hydrogels contain highly dispersed graphene oxide nanosheets bundled by 3D interconnected bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Considering that the properties of composites are highly related to the miscibility and compatibility of the components, their modification can improve their properties dramatically.

2 Physical and chemical modifications of biopolymer, graphene-based materials, and their composites

The graphene derivatives’ properties can be modified for different applications by tailoring their structural changes, activation, and functionalization. Modification methods include covalent functionalization, noncovalent functionalization, substitutional doping of graphene, and hybridization with nanoparticles and nanowires [16]. Noncovalent modification can use π–π interactions, van der Waals forces, ionic interactions, and hydrogen bonding [17].

Various available functional groups, such as carboxyl, amino, or hydroxyl groups, on the biopolymer can establish effective interactions with functional groups on graphene derivatives and prepare new environmentally friendly composites with wide applications, which depend on their composition, interaction, and preparation conditions [5,6].

Xiong et al. [9] investigated structures, morphologies, functionalization, and processing applications of various bionanocomposites. Synergy effects are due to the combination of biopolymers with other materials, and their interfacial interactions and structures control their properties in different applications. Preparation methods have vital effects on the nanocomposites’ properties.

The biopolymer can be modified by grafting, crosslinking, blending, and coating [18,19]. The physical modification with or without the destruction of granular structure can modify some biopolymer properties [20].

The combination of the hierarchical structures of biopolymer nanofibrils, such as cellulose, chitin, silk, and collagen nanofibrils, and the unique strength and toughness of graphene derivatives by a simple preparation method are opening a new interesting research field to prepare new modified nanocomposites for specified applications [21].

The functionalization of available groups on biopolymer can provide wide opportunities for the preparation of tailored graphene-based nanocomposites. Cellulose has three active hydroxyl groups, including the primary hydroxyl of C-6 and the secondary hydroxyls of C-2 and C-3, which can undergo a series of modification reactions (including esterification, etherification, crosslinking, and graft copolymerization) [22]. These reactions produce cellulose derivatives with functional groups, such as silylates, sulfates, sulfonates, amines, hemiacetals, azides, and carbanilates. These functionalized cellulose derivatives find applications in different fields, such as medicine, agriculture, or textile. Moreover, many applications of chitosan have been limited by its low solubility in the aqueous solution. The efficient transformations of chitin and chitosan have also been limited by the lack of organosolubility due to its high molecular weight and interunit hydrogen bonding [23]. The chemical modification of these biopolymers through the introduction of different protecting groups at the hydroxyl and amino groups enhances good bioactivity properties and increases the solubility in organic and aqueous media (physiological conditions). The main reactions are acylation, alkylation, quaternization, sulfation, azidation, and phosphonation. Figure 4 presents various functionalization methods for nanocellulose and chitin or chitosan.

Figure 4 
               (a) General paths for the modification of nanocellulose (reproduced from refs. [24,25]). (b) Regioselective and chemoselective modifications of chitosan [26].
Figure 4

(a) General paths for the modification of nanocellulose (reproduced from refs. [24,25]). (b) Regioselective and chemoselective modifications of chitosan [26].

The addition of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides to graphene-based materials is considered a key modification approach for improving hydrophilicity and dispersibility in polar solvents and their biodegradability for biomedical and environmental applications [27]. Among the available various methods for the (poly)saccharide functionalization of graphene, click chemistry is considered one of the best methods [28]. Click chemistry is defined as numerous chemical reactions that have some important common characteristics, including high modularity, high chemical yield, no byproduct, and minimal sensitivity to oxygen, water, and solvent. Click chemistry enables the covalent attachment of functional groups with affinity to the π-conjugated surface of graphene. Accordingly, the modifications of graphene with polysaccharides either at its edges or at the basal plane become possible through different approaches. However, in some cases, other functionalization methods of graphene or graphene oxide are needed before click chemistry [27]. Therefore, various complementary methods to click chemistry that are typically performed on –COOH or –OH groups on the edge or epoxide groups on basal plane of graphene or graphene oxide are known. Oxygen-containing groups, including hydroxyl, carboxyl, and epoxy groups, on the surface of graphene oxide are used for common chemical reactions, such as esterification, isocyanation, carboxylic acylation, epoxy ring opening, diazotization, and addition [22]. The functionalization of carboxylic acid groups is performed through the addition of nucleophilic species, whereas the functionalization via epoxy groups is done through ring-opening reactions. Figure 5 presents other methods complementary to click chemistry. Li and Papadakis [27] reviewed various modifications of graphene-based materials with (poly)saccharides through click chemistry. Figure 6 presents the three types of polysaccharide/graphene modifications.

Figure 5 
               Different methods for the functionalization of graphene (upper part) and graphene oxide (lower part) relevant/complementary to click chemistry (R1–R10, various substituents; Nu, nucleophile) [27].
Figure 5

Different methods for the functionalization of graphene (upper part) and graphene oxide (lower part) relevant/complementary to click chemistry (R1–R10, various substituents; Nu, nucleophile) [27].

Figure 6 
               Schematic of the covalent functionalization of graphene via click chemistry in the (a) basal plane and (b) edges. (c) Noncovalent modification of graphene through π–π stacking interactions of a functionalized pyrene through click chemistry (L, linker; F, functional group attached through a click approach; R, random graphene substituent; ∟ and ◆, two complementary chemical parts prone to undergo click coupling) [27].
Figure 6

Schematic of the covalent functionalization of graphene via click chemistry in the (a) basal plane and (b) edges. (c) Noncovalent modification of graphene through π–π stacking interactions of a functionalized pyrene through click chemistry (L, linker; F, functional group attached through a click approach; R, random graphene substituent; ∟ and ◆, two complementary chemical parts prone to undergo click coupling) [27].

Functionalization and hybridization play important roles in dispersion, stabilization, reduction, and reinforcement of nanocellulose/graphene-based nanocomposites, which control their properties [29].

The interaction of graphene-based materials with biopolymers is due to available hydroxyl, epoxy, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups [30]. These interactions include covalent, electrostatic, hydrogen, and noncovalent bonds. Then, functionalization can modify graphene-based biopolymer composites for specified applications [6,31,32]. The main categories of graphene-based biopolymer composites include 3D porous scaffolds, electrospun mats, hydrogel, and nacre-like structures, which present different properties. However, preparation methods affect the properties of prepared composites [1].

The vacuum-assisted self-assembly method is used to prepare casein phosphopeptide-biofunctionalized graphene oxide nanoplatelets/cellulose nanofibers [33]. The prepared composites show high thermal conductivity and excellent flame retardancy.

The microstructure-tunable cellulose nanofiber/reduced graphene oxide aerogels developed via the concentration of cellulose nanofiber present lightweight and high-efficiency microwave absorption materials [34].

The functionalization of chitosan with sulfonated graphene oxide and polyvinyl alcohol results in polymer electrolyte membrane with remarkable increment in electrochemical properties for high-temperature energy applications [35,36].

3 Applications of biopolymer/graphene-based composites

Eco-friendly biopolymer/graphene-based composites with various physicochemical properties can be used for different applications. The following sections provide some references for other researchers utilizing biodegradable and biocompatible biopolymer/graphene-based composite materials for various applications, which sometimes overlap.

3.1 Application in the construction sector

The construction industry has a huge influence on the global economic growth. Finding construction materials with high performance, low cost, and sustainability is the center of concern for researchers in this field. The improvement of performance such as strength [37], barrier and permeability properties [38,39], leaching [40], and durability [41] by the addition of graphene-based materials to cement has been studied. Despite wide studies on utilizing biopolymers and graphene-based materials in cement, the addition of biopolymer/graphene-based composite materials into cement is rarely studied [42].

Thermal isolation materials are widely used to improve energy saving in industries and buildings [43]. Modified cellulose nanofiber/graphene oxide/sodium montmorillonite aerogel materials present improved properties compared with traditional organic insulation materials and are considered as potential materials in building insulation, firefighting, and the chemical industry [44]. Cao and Yuan [43] developed doped ammonium polyphosphate/graphene oxide/cellulose nanofiber-based aerogel with excellent thermal isolation and flame-retardant properties via the freeze-drying method. Composites prepared by utilizing expandable graphite/chemically treated pulverized oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber-reinforced epoxy exhibit improved fire resistivity, thermal properties, and mechanical properties [45].

Wicklein et al. [46] developed lightweight anisotropic foams on the basis of cellulose nanofibers, graphene oxide, and sepiolite nanorods through the freeze-casting of suspensions. The produced foams have excellent thermal-insulating and fire-retardant properties, which can be utilized in buildings. Spatial confinement and freeze-drying methods are used to prepare the hierarchical graphene-confined zirconium phosphate/cellulose nanofiber aerogel [47]. The prepared hybrid aerogel, which is mechanically stable and has outstanding thermal insulation and flame retardancy, can be utilized as a thermal insulator for improving energy efficiency in buildings. Guo et al. [48] prepared phosphorus-hybridized graphene nanosheets/cellulose nanofibers foam with excellent fire retardancy through the freeze-drying method.

Ternary nanocomposites utilizing bentonite, graphene oxide, and galactomannan crosslinked and strengthened with borate with the hierarchical structure are developed and exhibit high tensile stress and toughness. The brilliant fire-retardant property of these nanocomposites make them potential candidates in fire-protective insulation, packaging, and coating applications [49]. Efficient flame-retardant chitosan and graphene oxide in open-cell polyurethane foam coatings are prepared via layer-by-layer methods. The three bilayers exhibit 54% reduction in the peak of heat release rate, whereas six bilayers slow down the volatile release to low flammability limit [50].

Wang et al. [51] developed the multifunctional hybrid film through the reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets in the presence of montmorillonite nanoplatelets and cellulose nanofibers via vacuum filtration. The film has outstanding fire resistance, high thermal stability, and good flexibility. Its high dielectric constant and low dielectric loss show its potential as dielectric material in the capacitor field application.

Metal corrosion considers global challenges that seriously affect the economy, industry, and society [52]. Among various protection methods, anticorrosion coatings have attracted huge attention, and graphene-based anticorrosion coating materials are extensively studied [53,54,55]. However, chitosan, as a green, low-cost, and nontoxic natural biopolymer with good film-forming tendency, is used as anticorrosive coating for metals [56,57], and improved hydrophobicity by the incorporation of graphene-based materials leads to improved anticorrosion performance. Fayyad et al. [58] improved the anticorrosion performance of pure chitosan through the preparation of oleic acid-grafted chitosan/graphene oxide composite coating on carbon steel by 100-fold. The corrosion inhibition activities of some biopolymers as cheap, abundant, and eco-friendly counterpart in graphene-based composites have been studied to investigate the hybridizing effect. Graphene oxide–chitosan and graphene oxide–chitosan–ZnO composites have higher anticorrosion efficiencies by 83.8 and 85.6%, respectively, compared with graphene oxide [59]. The incorporation of modified gelatin and modified gelatin/graphene oxide in epoxy coating shows better anticorrosion performance on mild steel compared with pure epoxy coating [60]. Homogeneously dispersed graphene oxide improves the compactness and crosslinking degree of coating and increase the anticorrosion performance of coating by 59%. These results are promising for conducting research for the development of green and improved anticorrosion coating by incorporating biopolymer/graphene-based composites into usual coating materials. Linseed oil-based/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with anticorrosion properties exhibit the decreased corrosion rate by around 5,000 times when applied on mild steel [61].

Despite utilizing various phase-change materials in walls, floor heating, and building envelopes, which can consist of biopolymer/graphene-based composites for energy management in buildings, these composites will be reviewed under phase-change materials in the following subsections.

3.2 Biopolymer/graphene-based composites for catalyst applications

Despite developing various graphene-based composite for fuel cell application [62], biopolymer/graphene-based nanocomposites can be considered as green substrates for various catalyst materials. The synergetic effect of nanocomposite can promote the catalyst performance.

Pt/1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride-functionalized graphene oxide/chitosan shows good catalytic activity for methanol [63] and ethanol electro-oxidation methods for direct ethanol fuel-cell application [64]. Pd-functionalized chitosan/reduced graphene oxide is developed as a catalyst with high activity and stability for formic acid electro-oxidation reaction in fuel cells [65].

The Pd/graphene oxide/chitosan/cellulose nanowhisker hydrogel presents good catalytic activity in the Mizoroki–Heck reaction to generate new C–C bonds [66].

Esmaeilzadeh et al. [67] synthesized Pd immobilized on the hybrid of magnetic graphene quantum dots/cyclodextrin-decorated chitosan as a hydrogenation catalyst. Chitosan/glutaraldehyde/reduced graphene oxide/Pd composite hydrogels are prepared via crosslinking and exhibit promising catalytic performance for the degradation of p-nitrophenol and o-nitroaniline. The developed hydrogels are considered as a potential catalyst for the reduction of organic pollutants in wastewater treatment [68]. The synthesis of porous Pd/chitosan/reduced graphene oxide microspheres via etching and freeze-drying methods leads to active and easily recyclable catalysts for Heck reactions [69]. Developed sodium alginate/sulfonated graphene oxide using blending and casting methods [70] exhibit good results to be considered as a potential alternative membrane in direct methanol fuel cell application.

3.3 Biopolymer/graphene-based composites in medical applications

Graphene may be used for various applications, like biosensing, bioimaging, and medical and electronic devices [71]. For biological applications, the high dispersibility and stability of applied nanomaterials in biological fluids are important and considered as shortcomings for graphene nanomaterials because of their intrinsic properties. The tendency of graphene nanomaterials for the adsorption of proteins that make them prone to internalization by macrophages and clearance from the body due to shortage of their half-life in the blood circulation is another consequence of utilizing graphene-based nanomaterials in biological applications. Other drawbacks are toxicity, low biocompatibility, and in vivo distribution profile, which may cause adverse side effects [32].

Different modification and functionalization methods of graphene via covalent or noncovalent mechanism have been studied to improve the various properties of graphene, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, and safety [16,17]. Consequently, various biocomposites, which utilize carbohydrates (such as cellulose, chitin, alginate, and cyclodextrins), are prepared and investigated [32,72]. For example, antibacterial graphene-reinforced composite coatings based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite, and antibiotic gentamicin are fabricated for bone tissue engineering [73]. Dacrory [74] recently reported the antimicrobial activity of dialdehyde cellulose/graphene oxide film against COVID-19. Many applications based on using graphene and biomolecules require biomolecules (such as peptides, proteins, and enzymes) to interact with graphene at one end while simultaneously exposing the other end to the surrounding medium for biosensing analytes in solution. For example, the molecular interaction of graphene nanoribbons with peptides and enzymes present in the body for nanobiotechnological applications is reported [75]. Moreover, Wang and coworkers [76] successfully probed the molecular interaction of graphene oxide and nitrogen-functionalized graphene with bone morphogenetic protein-2 as key proteins implicated in bone repair with highest adsorption energy. Functionalization can provide different features for the development of an efficient drug delivery system with different drug release profiles, such as water solubility, biocompatibility, stability, bioavailability, and enhanced loading capacity, and reduce the immune system activation. Hybrid materials comprising graphene oxide, β-cyclodextrin, and poly(amidoamine) dendrimer are successfully prepared by covalent bonding and utilized as potential nanocarriers for anticancer drugs [77]. Moreover, Pooresmaeil et al. [78] utilized carboxymethyl cellulose as a coating agent for the encapsulation of magnetic graphene oxide coated with mesoporous silica for safe and sustained ibuprofen delivery. Shende and Pathan [72,79] extensively reviewed the interaction and application of various carbohydrate/graphene-based composites in biomedical fields, such as drug delivery and tissue engineering (Figures 7 and 8).

Figure 7 
                  Biomedical applications of carbohydrate–graphene-based nanocomposites [72,79].
Figure 7

Biomedical applications of carbohydrate–graphene-based nanocomposites [72,79].

Figure 8 
                  Methods for targeted delivery by graphene-based materials decorated with different carbohydrate polymers [32].
Figure 8

Methods for targeted delivery by graphene-based materials decorated with different carbohydrate polymers [32].

Functionalization can also provide the capability of targeting the nanocarrier, thereby improving the therapeutic efficiency (Figure 8). The modified graphene biocomposite tends to adsorb a wide range of hydrophobic drugs quickly and release them to the selected zone of organisms as a targeted drug delivery system. For example, galactosylated chitosan in combination with graphene oxide has been introduced as a new nanobiocomposite for doxorubicin delivery [80]. This strategy is considered advantageous because functionalized polymer–graphene biocomposites allow the targeting of high drug doses at the site of action, prevent the nonhomogenous biodistribution of therapeutic cargos, and overcome the adverse effects to the normal tissues caused by their interactions with anticancer therapeutics to an extent.

The biomedical application of graphene-based/biopolymer composites has been studied by Chen et al. [81]. Studies showed that graphene size and structure affect the properties of graphene–biopolymer composite properties [82,83]. Lalwani et al. [84] showed that the mechanical strength of biocomposite follows the order: graphene nanoplatelets > graphene nanoribbons > graphene nanotubes. These findings can extend their application in tissue engineering.

The antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties of graphene-based biopolymer composites make them interesting materials for active food packaging applications [85]. These properties are promoted because of the synergetic effect for free-radical inhibition (Figure 9). The amino and hydroxyl groups on biopolymers improve the oxidation inhibition by hydrogen donation [86].

Figure 9 
                  Improvement of the scavenger activity of reduced graphene oxide in the presence of free radicals when combined with natural bioactive compounds [86].
Figure 9

Improvement of the scavenger activity of reduced graphene oxide in the presence of free radicals when combined with natural bioactive compounds [86].

Preparation conditions, such as ultrasonication time and heat treatment, affect the properties of chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite films. Optimum conditions lead to the preparation of films with complete degradation property, which can be used as green packing materials, in soil compost within 28 days [87].

Sonication mixing and solution casting methods are used to prepare cellulose nanowhisker/graphene nanoplatelet films [88]. The prepared films show high thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties with potential as green antistatic and electronic packaging materials.

To overcome the low mechanical strength of hydrogel as a drawback in nerve tissue regeneration application, Jafarkhani et al. [89] developed nanographene oxide/chitosan hydrogels with a 20% increase in the nerve cell growth. The developed poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/modified graphene oxide biocomposite presents improved antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties in vivo [90].

The design and preparation of graphene-based biomaterial scaffolds for neural regeneration application have been investigated by Reddy et al. [91]. Zhang et al. [92] synthesized antibacterial Ag-polydopamine/bacterial cellulose/reduced graphene oxide composite film, which shows excellent biocompatibility as wound dressing materials. Sodium alginate/graphene oxide/polyvinyl alcohol sponge nanocomposites prepared via the freeze–thaw cyclic process and freeze-dried molding show good water absorption, breathability, and mechanical properties. Investigation revealed that these nanocomposites are promising materials for wound healing applications. Despite the huge potential of chitosan as food packaging and wound healing materials, various modifications are required to tailor related properties, such as vapor permeability, optical transparency, and hydrophilicity. In this regard, the simple solvent casting method has been used to prepare flexible and transparent antimicrobial films by using chitosan/polyvinylpyrrolidone/graphene oxide nanosheets [93].

Bacterial cellulose/graphene-based composites show good potential in the biomedical application as well. Luo et al. [94] presented the improved cell behavior of graphene and graphene oxide in 3D nanofibrous bacterial cellulose scaffold compared with that of graphene. Rostami et al. [95] developed sharkskin-mimicked graphene oxide/chitosan membrane with improved antibacterial and cytocompatibility properties for diverse biomedical applications.

Qi et al. [96] prepared graphene oxide/poly-l-lysine composites films as bioscaffold coatings for potential application in stem cell research and developed a mild and inexpensive preparation method that can utilize other biomacromolecules, such as chitosan and gelatin in the composite preparation. The developed graphene nanoplatelet/hydroxyethyl cellulose graft poly(lactic acid) copolymer–polyurethane bionanocomposites with high thermal stability and water resistance show potential applications for electronics and medical areas [97].

Rebekah et al. [98] developed Fe nanoparticles decorated with graphene oxide/chitosan composite as a nanocarrier for protein delivery. The composite’s good drug loading and release profile make it a potential nanocarrier for clinical applications.

Functional 3D scaffold chitosan–graphite oxide nanoplatelet core–shell microparticles are synthesized via alkaline gelation and template-assisted assembly methods [99]. The outer shell protects the inner chitosan from enzymatic degradation and hydrophilic oxygen-containing functionalities on the outermost layer of graphene oxide, and its inner conductive graphitic core can maintain the bioactivity of the scaffold and promote the adhesion and growth of the neuronal cell.

3.4 Application as self-healing materials

Intelligent materials with the capability to respond to external stimulus, such as heat, electromagnetic wave, and mechanical force, and repair themselves after damage are self-healing materials. This ability allows them to refurbish their intrinsic properties and reach sustainable development by extending their lifetime, security, and saving cost [100]. Given their interesting graphene properties, self-healing graphene-based materials have attracted a huge interest. Considering the importance of preparation methods on the structure and properties of materials, various methods, such as solution mixing, in situ polymerization, layer-by-layer assembly, wet-fusing assembly, and hydrothermal method, are utilized to prepare graphene-based self-healing materials [100]. These materials can be utilized in different applications, such as biological applications, sensors [101], coatings [102,103], supercapacitors, flexible electronic devices and artificial skin, self-cleaning, adsorbent, biomimetic materials, and actuator. Figure 10 presents various forms of graphene-based self-healing composites. Graphene can be used as a reinforcement agent or a compound material in self-healing composites. The forms of graphene in self-healing materials are (a) graphene- [104], (b) graphene derivative- [105], and (c) crosslinked polymer/graphene-based [106] self-healing materials.

Figure 10 
                  Forms of graphene in self-healing materials: (a) graphene, (b) graphene derivatives, and (c) crosslinked polymer/graphene [100].
Figure 10

Forms of graphene in self-healing materials: (a) graphene, (b) graphene derivatives, and (c) crosslinked polymer/graphene [100].

The self-healing chitosan/graphene oxide nanosheet hydrogel prepared by the self-assembly method shows potential in biomaterial, wastewater treatment, and smart material applications [107].

Lee et al. [108] fabricated a series of self-healing composites by utilizing graphene-based biopolymers for advanced electromagnetic applications. The modified cellulose graphene-based nanocomposite reveals fast electronic self-healing property, making it an interesting candidate in self-healing electronics, artificial skins, soft robotics, biomimetic prostheses, and energy storage applications [109].

The crosslinking of hydrogel to achieve reversible coordination bonding is considered a method for the preparation of stimulus-responsive and self-healing materials. Wang et al. [110] prepared mussel-inspired catechol-containing polyaspartamide/graphene oxide hydrogel with highly improved storage, loss moduli, and tensile and compressive strengths as soft matter for biomedical applications. The photo-crosslinked gelatin/reduced graphene oxide hydrogel exhibits potential in rapid bone regeneration application [111].

Samadi et al. [112] developed polyvinyl alcohol/agar/graphene nanocomposite hydrogels based on three construct dynamic networks with high strength, toughness, and quick self-healing property for biomedical applications. The stretchable, self-healing, and conductive TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber/graphene nanocomposite hydrogel has been developed via an in situ free-radical polymerization with good potential in self-healing wearable electronics applications [113]. Xie et al. [114] developed the multifunctional flame-retardant nacre-inspired functional cellulose/graphene oxide nanocoating by using a one-step self-assembly method. Its ultrasensitive fire warning and self-healing make the nanocoating interesting materials in building, transportation, and electrical equipment applications.

Chitosan/graphene oxide composite hydrogels incorporated with mussel-inspired protein polydopamine have been developed [115]. Covalent bonds, supramolecular interactions, hydrogen bonding, and π–π stacking in these polydopamine-based hydrogels provide adhesive, conductive, self-healing, and fast-recovering hydrogels with remarkable potential in electroactive tissue engineering applications.

Three-dimensional bioprinted phenol-rich gelatin/graphene oxide hydrogel as a component for a myogenesis-inducing material is considered as potential materials in muscle tissue engineering and regenerative medicine application [116]. Bioderived aliphatic hyperbranched polyurethane/3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-modified graphene oxide nanocomposites produce smart materials with considerable enhanced mechanical and self-healing properties under microwave and sunlight. These materials have versatile application as self-healing and self-cleaning materials [117].

Despite the preparation of the self-healing bio-based elastomer [118] and possibility of the addition of graphene-based materials, these composites have not been studied yet.

3.5 Application in electronics

The abundance, biocompatibility, biodegradability, lightweight, strong electrical conductivity, excellent ion conduction, and mechanical flexibility of biopolymers make them interesting materials for developing flexible, wearable, implantable, and environment-friendly electronic materials [119].

Given their functional groups, such as hydroxyl, amino, amine, and carboxylic groups, various molecular engineering strategies can be used to modify and tailor optoelectrical properties [120,121]. Their abundant functional groups provide high solubility and dispersion properties, thereby giving the potential to adopt low-temperature manufacturing methods and avoiding degradation caused by other tough techniques used for semiconductor patterning methods [119]. It provides an opportunity to develop low-cost, large-area, and flexible bioelectronic devices by using conventional printing techniques [119,122,123,124]. For example, the preparation of flexible nanofibrillated cellulose/reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube-conductive composite membrane via ultrasonic dispersion and low-temperature hot pressing leads to composite membranes with potential in conductive membranes, electrode materials, and other electronic applications [125].

The development of environmental-friendly triboelectric nanogenerator biopolymer/graphene-based composites can prepare potential low-cost and biocompatible materials for various applications [126]. Gao et al. [127] prepared a super-elastic, lightweight chitosan/graphene oxide scaffold with potential in mechanical cushioning, energy damping, and flexible device applications via bidirectional freezing and annealing.

3.6 Application in fuel cells

The request for low-cost polymers with optimized proton conductivity, reduced methanol crossover, and thermal stability for fuel-cell membrane is increasing [128]. Chitosan, as a cheap, abundant, and eco-friendly biodegradable polymer with amino/hydroxyl groups, is considered an interesting biopolymer to prepare biopolymer/graphene-based composites as proton-exchange membranes for fuel cell applications [129]. Various functionalization methods can be considered to overcome the low proton conductivity of chitosan. Shirdast et al. [130] prepared sulfonated chitosan/sulfonated graphene oxide membranes for fuel cell application. Nanocomposites showed high thermal/mechanical conductivity and selectivity (increases by 454 and 650%, respectively) properties compared with chitosan membranes for proton transport. Chen et al. [81] studied various preparation methods of advanced graphene-based/bio-based polymer composite membranes for fuel cell applications. Chitosan/sulfonated graphene oxide nanosheet membranes are developed as superior conduction proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells [131]. Pandy and Shahi [132] developed N,N-dimethylene phosphonic acid propylsilane graphene oxide/N-o-sulphonic acid benzyl chitosan with high water retention and conductivity for the preparation of multifunctional polymer electrolyte membranes.

Azli et al. [133] prepared potato starch/graphene oxide composite as the Li+ -conducting polymer electrolyte with high ionic conductivity and mechanical properties.

The layer-by-layer deposition method is used to prepare chitosan and graphene oxide on the membrane substrates of sulfonated poly(vinylidenefluoride) (PVdF) or sulfonated PVdF-co-hexafluoropropylene) for utilization as proton-exchange membrane in high-temperature fuel cells [134]. Yaqoob et al. [135] developed cellulose-derived graphene/polyaniline nanocomposites as novel and natural anode materials for benthic microbial fuel cells. The modified anode has higher performance by four times and high removal of Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) heavy metals from wastewater through benthic microbial fuel cells.

The synthesis of a new anion-exchange membrane with high conductivity achieves the utilization of cellulose, graphene oxide, and polyphenylene oxide [136]. After functionalization with 1,4-diazabicyclo [2.2.2] octane, the mechanically stable membrane shows a hydroxyl conductivity of 215 mS cm−1 at 80°C. Hosseinpour et al. [137] developed multilayer proton-exchange membrane utilizing cellulose nanocrystal for direct methanol fuel cell application. The developed membrane has presented a 20% increase in proton conductivity and 11% reduction in methanol crossover compared with Nafion N115.

3.7 Application in batteries

In the production of commercial Li-ion batteries as energy storage devices (including EV), active ingredient slurries are prepared using PVdF as a binder due to its adhesion properties and electrochemical stability. Unfortunately, some disadvantages, such as toxicity and nonenvironmental friendliness, are associated with the use of PVdF. N-Methyl-pyrrolidone (NMP) has been used as a solvent in the preparation of Li-ion electrodes, and both are costly [138,139,140]. The disadvantages of NMP are toxicity, nonvolatility (high melting point of about 200°C), and nonenvironmental friendliness because expensive solvents require high costs for purchase and waste maintenance [141]. Therefore, many researchers attempted to find other alternatives and investigate the suitability of other water-soluble, inexpensive, and environmental-friendly materials toward green binders to test as alternative binders (e.g., gelatin, chitosan tragacanth gum, and sodium alginate) [142]. Next, graphene can be considered as an active ingredient in preparing the biopolymer composite for Li-ion batteries due to its capability to participate in the energy storage intercalation mechanism (Figure 11). As reported by Raccichini et al. [143], an anode consisting of a single layer of graphene can host twice as many Li+ than that consisting of conventional graphite. The storage of a lithium ion on each side produces graphene in Li2C6 stoichiometry, which provides a specific capacity of 744 mA h g−1 that is twice that given by conventional graphite (372 mA h g−1) [144,145,146]. Sandwiched pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composite is prepared via a simple method [147]. Li–S batteries assembled with pure sulfur as cathodes and prepared composite interlayer exhibit around 600 mA h g−1 at 3 C and only 0.055% capacity decay per cycle, which can be observed in over 200 cycles.

Figure 11 
                  Varieties of binders applied in electrode composition for Li-ion batteries.
Figure 11

Varieties of binders applied in electrode composition for Li-ion batteries.

Table 1 presents the data of some studies in biopolymer/graphene-based composites in batteries.

Table 1

Studies related to biopolymer composite/Li and its specific capacities (mAh g−1)

Ref. Composites Electrolytes Properties
[148] Graphite:graphene:CMC carrageenan 1 M LiPF6, EC:EMC:DMC (1:1:1, v/v/v) ▪Graphite:graphene vs roman in table 1:CMC carrageenan composite/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity and voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V.
Q d = 202.2 mAh g−1 and CE of 94% for 100%:0%:10% composition
Q d = 314.3 mAh g−1 and CE of 96% for 95%:5%:10% composition
Q d = 304 mAh g−1 and CE of 93% for 90%:10%:10% composition
▪Improved capacity, cycle performance, and CE effect of using CMC carrageenan binder over PVdF
▪Increased CE effect of graphene addition
[148] Graphite:graphene:CMC chitosan 1 M LiPF6, EC:EMC:DMC (1:1:1, v/v/v) ▪Graphite:graphene:CMC chitosan composite/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity and voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V.
Q d = 324 mAh g−1 and CE of 93% for 100%:0%:10% composition
Q d = 298 mAh g−1 and CE of 95% for 95%:5%:10% composition
Q d = 386 mAh g−1 and CE of 91% for 90%:10%:10% composition
▪Improved capacity, cycle performance, and CE effect of using CMC chitosan binder over PVdF
Pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide 1 mol LiTFSI and 4 wt% LiNO3 dissolved in (TEGDME) ▪Sandwiched pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composite was prepared via a simple method. Li–S batteries were assembled with pure sulfur as cathodes, and the prepared composite interlayer exhibited around 600 mAh g−1 at 3 C and only 0.055% capacity decay per cycle, which could be observed in over 200 cycles
[149] (Si:graphite:graphene)/CB:biobinder BTR Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, China 1 M LiPF6, EC:EMC:DMC (1:1:1, v/v/v) ▪2%:8%:5% composition of Si:Graphite:Graphene/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity and voltage range of 0.01–2.0 V.
Q d = 820.7 mAh g−1 and CE of 77.98% for 8%:1%:20% composition of (Si:graphite:graphene)/CB:BTR
▪Superior cycle performance improvement effect of graphene addition
▪Impedance reduction due to addition of graphene
[148] Sn:PVDF/LiSn:CMC/LiSn:CMC:AB/Li 1 M LiClO4, EC:DEC (1:1, v/v) ▪Sn:PVDF/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–2.0 V vs Li/Li+, Q d = 500 mAh g−1, and CE of 67.2% for 80%:20% composition.
▪Sn:CMC/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–2.0 V vs Li/Li+, Q d = 800 mAh g−1, and CE of 65.4% for 80%:20% composition.
▪Sn:CMC:AB/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–2.0 V vs Li/Li+, Q d = 800 mAh g−1, and CE of 76% for 60%:20%:20% composition.
▪Superior cycle performance improvement of CMC binder effect
▪The type of binder affects the capacitance performance of the LIB electrode
[150] Graphite:graphene oxide:CB/Li 1 M LiPF6, EC:DMC:DEC (1:1:1, v/v/v) ▪Graphite:graphene oxide:CB/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V vs Li/Li+, and Q d = 450 mAh g−1 for GCG (75%:17%:8%)
▪Graphite:graphene oxide:CB/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V Li/Li+, and Q d = 695 mAh g−1 for GCG (66%:17%:17%).
▪Graphite:graphene oxide:CB/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V Li/Li+, and Q d = 590 mAh g−1 for GCG (58%:17%:25%).
▪Graphene oxide serves as lithium storage and binder.
▪Mixtures of carbon-based active materials can be blended into composites and affect the performance of LIB electrode capacitance
[140] Graphite:SP:PVdF/LiGraphite:chitosan/Li 1 M LiPF6, EC:DEC (1:1, v/v) ▪Graphite:SP:PVdF/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V, Q d = 364.9 mAh g−1, and CE of 89.3% for 88.8%:3.2%:8% composition
▪Graphite:chitosan/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V vs Li/Li+, Q d = 374 mAh g−1, and CE of 95.4% for 94%:6% composition.
▪Improved capacity, cycle performance, and CE effect of the use of chitosan binders compared with those of PVdF
▪Impedance reduction due to addition of graphene
[139] Si:CB:PVdF/LiSi:CB:CMC chitosan Si:CB:alginate(62:30:8) at % composition 1 M LiPF6, EC:DEC:DMC (1:1:1, v/v/v) 1 M LiPF6 ▪Si:CB:PVdF/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V, Q d = 3579 mAh g−1, and CE of 71%
▪Si:CB:CMC chitosan/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V, Q d = 4270 mAh g−1, and CE of 89%
▪Si:CB:alginate/Li achieves optimum discharge capacity, voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V, Q d = 3807 mAh g−1, and CE of 86%
▪Improved capacity, cycle performance, and CE effect of use of CMC chitosan binder over those of PVdF
▪CMC chitosan serves as an effective binder for the Si anode

3.8 Applications in supercapacitors

Supercapacitors with energy storage properties have fast charge–discharge process and outstanding cyclability and are considered environmentally friendly materials. Their performance depends on their surface area. Flexible supercapacitors require electrodes with high electrochemical performance and flexibility. The physical and chemical properties of nanocellulose and graphene-based materials make them interesting materials in supercapacitor application. Cellulose, as one of the most abundant natural organic polymers that originate from plants, woods, and bacteria, is a promising biopolymer with excellent mechanical properties, which can be improved by functionalization or structural modification [151].

Cellulose and its composites with various materials, such as lignin [152], have been used as electrodes, electrolytes, and membranes in supercapacitors [153,154]. Cellulose and its composites with different structures and properties can be utilized [21]. Graphene and graphene-based materials in various structures have been utilized extensively in supercapacitor application [155].

The use of nitrogen self-doped biopolymers, such as chitosan, in the preparation of graphene-based composite aerogels for high-performance supercapacitors also open new interesting research areas for the use of biopolymers in supercapacitors [156]. Various technologies, such as carbonization, biotemplate methods, and biocomplex technologies, can be used to prepare biopolymer-based composites for supercapacitors and other applications [157,158].

Xing et al. [159] reviewed the utilized design and preparation methods for nanocellulose/graphene-based composites in flexible supercapacitor application. Xing et al. [159] found out that controlling the distribution, structure, morphology, and quantity of nanoparticles on the surface; improving synergy in the composite; and simplifying the preparation process are the key factors for tailoring the properties of nanocellulose/graphene-based composites and their industrialization.

Liu et al. [160] developed 3D hierarchical porous glucose/graphene-based aerogels via hydrothermal and CO2 activation processes for gas adsorption and supercapacitor applications. Table 2 presents some studies conducted on biopolymer/graphene-based composites for supercapacitor application.

Table 2

Selected studies on biopolymer/graphene-based composites in supercapacitors

Composite Property Ref.
Fe3O4 nanoparticles embedded in cellulose nanofiber/graphite carbon hybrid aerogels Capacitance and energy density of 5.82 F cm−3 and 2.35 mW h cm−3, respectively, and 94.7% of initial capacitance after 5,000 charge–discharge cycles [161]
Flexible reduced graphene oxide/tin dioxide nanocomposite and cellulose fiber membranes Capacitance of 53 F s−1 and 90% retention of its initial specific capacitance after 1,000 cycles [162]
Carbonized cellulose nanofibril/graphene oxide composite aerogels Capacitance of 398.47 F g−1 at the current density of 0.5 A g−1 and initial capacity maintained at 99.77% after 10,000 charge–discharge cycles [163]
Cellulose/graphene oxide/polyaniline aerogel Capacitance of 1218 mF cm−2 at the current density of 1.0 mA cm−2 and energy density of 258.2 µW h cm−2 at a power density of 1201.4 µW cm2 [164]
Cellulose nanofibers/reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole aerogel Capacitance of 720 mF cm−2 at 0.25 mA cm–2 and 95% retention after 2,000 cycles [165]
Cellulose/reduced graphene oxide/silver/Fe2O3 hybrid film Capacitance of 2,044 mF cm−2 and areal energy density of 226.4 μW h cm−2 [166]
3D porous tannic acid/graphene-based composite by introducing Ni2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ Specific capacitance values of 373.6, 412.4, 460.4, and 429.4 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 and energy densities of 14.76, 16.76, 19.13, and 17.6 Wh kg−1 at 300 W kg−1 [167]
Cellulose nanofibril/reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum oxynitride aerogel Specific capacitance of 680 F g−1 in an aqueous electrolyte, 518 F g−1 in an ionic liquid electrolyte, and energy density of 114 Wh kg−1 [168]
3D nanocellulose/graphene/MnO2 composite Capacitance of 212.73 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1 and stability of 86.5% capacitance retention ratio after 5,000 cycles at 2 A g−1 [169]
Polypyrrole@TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/reduced graphene oxide macrofibers Capacitance of 391 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 and energy density of 8.8 mW h cm−3 [170]
3D graphene oxide/bacterial cellulose fibers Capacitance of 160 F g−1 at 0.4 A g−1 and capacitance retention of 90.3% over 2000 recycles [171]
Nitrogen-doped MnO2 nanowire-reduced graphene oxide–cellulose nanofibril aerogel electrodes Capacitance of 455.8 F g−1 and energy densities of 49.0 and 43.7 Wh kg−1 at power densities of 953.7 (aqueous electrolyte) and 948.3 (solid-state polymer gel electrolyte) W kg−1, respectively [172]
Core–shell structured cellulose nanofibers/graphene@polypyrrole microfibers Electrochemical properties (647 mF cm−2 and 14.37 µW h cm−2 at 0.1 mA cm−2), prominent cycling stability (92.5% capacitance retention and 92.6% coulomb efficiency after 10,000 cycles), and extraordinary flexibility (no significant decay in capacitance after 5,000 bending cycles) [173]
3D polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites Highest electrical conductivity (1,320 S m−1) and volumetric capacitance (278 F cm−3) and 93.5% retention over 2,000 recycles [174]
Graphene/silk fibroin-based carbon Specific capacitance of 256 F g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1 and 96.3% retention for 10,000 cycles at 5 A g−1 [175]
3D holey graphene oxide/bacterial cellulose Specific capacity of 65.9 F g−1 at a current density of 0.4 A g−1 and an energy density of 9.2 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 112.9 W kg−1 [176]

3.9 Biopolymer/graphene-based composites as phase-change materials

Phase-change materials are promising for energy storage in smart thermal energy management, transfer, conversion (such as solar-to-thermal and electric-to-thermal), portable thermal energy, and advanced multifunctional areas [177]. Phase-change materials with low thermal conductivity can be utilized as a thermal insulator for buildings to maintain indoor thermal comfort and HVAC systems overload [178,179,180,181,182]. However, on the basis of their application overcoming their deficiencies, such as low thermal conductivity, low electrical conductivity, weak photo absorption, and shape instability, their performance should be increased. The incorporation of various carbon-based support materials, such as graphene-based nanostructure composites, is considered a versatile solution for these issues [177,183]. The modification can be done using various methods, such as physical blending, microencapsulation, spinning, and preconstruction 3D filler network [184].

Fatty acid/graphene and fatty acid/graphene oxide nanocomposites are promising materials for phase-change materials with high thermal conductivity [185]. Yuan et al. [186] prepared microcapsules of paraffin@ethylcellulose/methylcellulose/graphene oxide composite with improved photo-to-thermal conversion performance for solar–thermal storage application. The polyethylene glycol/cellulose/graphene aerogel is prepared via vacuum impregnation with high thermal conductivity, good shape stability, and large latent heat of fusion [187]. The incorporation of cellulose nanocrystals with graphene nanoplatelets and polyethylene glycol (PEG) control the leakage during phase transition and improve thermal conductivity [188]. The prepared composite has excellent light–thermal and electrothermal conversion capabilities. Thus, phase-change materials may provide stable temperature conditions for electronics operating in extreme environmental conditions. The new organic phase-change materials with a three-dimensional network are prepared by utilizing graphene nanoplatelet aerogel, melamine foam, cellulose nanofiber, and paraffin wax [189,190,191]. The developed phase-change material shows a 407% increase in thermal conductivity compared with paraffin wax and presents outstanding light–thermal and electrothermal transition capabilities. Considering the biomass waste management concept, the 3D, porous, reduced graphene oxide/modified spent coffee grounds with capability to adsorb 60% PEG is prepared and exhibits high leakage control performance [192]. The synthesized composite with high stability shows the excellent light–heat conversion rate, making the composite a good candidate for solar thermal storage in a short time.

Darzi et al. [193] prepared phase-change materials via the electrospinning of fatty acid ternary eutectic mixture with carbon fiber powder and graphene. The prepared nanofiber composites show improved thermal and electrical properties and potential for use in energy storage/retrieval systems operated in near-ambient temperatures. The performance improvement of paraffin as phase-change materials with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT)-, graphene-, and MWCNT/graphene-based composites has been investigated [194]. Optimum composites show improved thermal conductivity and restrain the rapid rise in temperature of liquid phase-change composites and can be potential materials for lithium-ion power battery. The comb-like poly(hexadecyl acrylate) polymer is modified by its grafting to cellulose and modified graphene to increase its thermally induced flexibility for solar–thermal energy management [195]. The developed phase-change materials show high enthalpy, thermal conductivity, and physical strength. Oh et al. [196] prepared sodium sulfate decahydrate/nanofibril cellulose/graphite composite as phase-change materials with enhanced thermal conductivity by 250% for thermal energy storage application. Improved hydrogen bonding among fibrils and water molecules is the reason for thermal stability enhancement.

3.10 Application as sensor materials

The presence of various pollutant materials in air and water and the hazardous effects of creatures reveal the importance of sensors for their detection. Various fluorescence sensors for molecular recognition have been developed using functional nucleic acid-based composites due to their high flexibility [197]. Gao et al. [198] studied graphene-based DNA sensors. Lopez and Liu [199] reviewed the covalent and noncovalent functionalization of graphene oxide/DNA sensors. The advantages and disadvantages of each sensor are discussed.

Nanocellulose/graphene-based nanocomposites with outstanding mechanical properties and high electrical and thermal conductivity properties may be used in multisensing applications. These nanocomposites can respond to multiple stimuli, such as mechanical stimuli, environmental stimuli, and other human biosignals [29]. These nanocomposites can be combined with other materials to fabricate sensors. Various studies in this area are conducted and reviewed [29].

In biopolymer/graphene-based composite preparation, the homogenic dispersion of graphene-based materials in the polymer matrix is an important factor for the modification of its properties for various applications. Utilizing a facile, rapid, green, and inexpensive way for the large-scale preparation methods is important for commercialization and sustainability. Magerusan et al. [200] utilized the electrochemical exfoliation of graphite rods without the use of any organic solvent to prepare chitosan/graphene nanomaterial as a sunset yellow sensor. Table 3 lists some related studies in the sensor field.

Table 3

Some biopolymer/graphene-based composites for sensor applications

Composite Detection Ref.
Graphene oxide and G-quadruplex DNA Ag+ and cysteine [201]
Graphene oxide–DNA nanosystem Live cell imaging and detection [202]
DNA-grafted graphene oxide pH biosensors [203]
Graphene oxide/G-rich single-stranded DNA K+ [204]
Graphene oxide–quadruplex DNA Pb2+ [205]
Graphene oxide–DNAzyme Pb2+ and Hg2+ [206]
Cellulose/graphene-based nanocomposite Multiple sensing (temperature, humidity, stress/strain, and liquids) [207]
Cellulose/graphene nanoplate nanocomposite Stretch and compress sensor [208]
Cellulose nanofibers/graphene oxide composite Humidity sensor and moist-induced electricity generator [209]
Cellulose/reduced graphene oxide Chemical vapor sensors [210]
Cellulose paper coated with graphene Humidity and piezoresistive force sensor [211]
Cellulose/graphene/polyamide electrospun nanofibers Hg2+ sensor [212]
Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composite Nitrite sensor [213]
3D bacterial cellulose/nitrogen-doped graphene oxide quantum dot Iron ion sensor [214]
Graphene/nafion/Pt NPs/chitosan/glucose oxidase Glucose biosensor [215]
Piezoresistive graphene–nanocellulose nanopaper Strain sensor [216]
Cellulose microfiber/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite Nitrobenzene sensor [217]
Graphene/sodium alginate aerogels Strain sensor [218]
Reduced graphene oxide/cellulose films Flexible temperature sensor [219]

3.11 Application in microextraction

Sample preparation in analytical chemistry is considered as the most time-consuming step and the main source of laboratory wastes. Microextraction methods with green solvents and sorbents are the solution to these issues. Biopolymers prove their potential as sorbents in microextraction methods due to their biodegradability, versatility, and easy functionalization [220]. Biopolymer/graphene-based composites also show promising performance as sorbent materials in microextraction. Table 4 presents samples for this application.

Table 4

Some conducted studies on biopolymer/graphene-based composites in microextraction

Composite Application Ref.
Graphene oxide/chitosan Analysis of sulfonamide residues in egg and honey in liquid chromatography–ultraviolet detection [221]
Hierarchically porous monolith polypyrrole/octadecyl silica/graphene oxide/chitosan cryogel Extraction and preconcentration of carbamate pesticides in fruit juices [222]
Hierarchical mercapto-grafted graphene oxide/magnetic chitosan Preconcentration and extraction of mercury ion from water samples [223]
Magnetic chitosan and graphene oxide functional guanidinium ionic liquid composite Solid-phase extraction of protein [224]
Graphene oxide–alizarin yellow R–magnetic chitosan nanocomposite Selective determination of aluminum in water samples [225]
Magnetic chitosan–Schiff base grafted on graphene oxide nanocomposite Extraction and quantification of lead ion in blood samples [226]
Molecular imprinted magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide Selective separation/preconcentration of fluoxetine from environmental and biological samples [227]
Magnetic graphene/chitosan nanocomposite Nanoadsorbent for the removal of 2-naphthol from aqueous solution [228]
Zn(ii)-imprinted polymer grafted on graphene oxide/magnetic chitosan nanocomposite Extraction of zinc ions from different food samples [229]
Magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide composite Solid-phase extraction of phenyl urea herbicides [230]
Magnetic graphene oxide/grafted chitosan copolymer Adsorbent for catechin in magnetic solid-phase extraction [231]
3D Chitosan/reduced graphene oxide composites Solid-phase extraction adsorbents for pesticide analysis [232]
Alginate/graphene oxide biocomposite Microsolid-phase extraction for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [233]

3.12 Biopolymer/graphene-based composites for CO2 capture

The dramatic increase in atmospheric CO2 as greenhouse gas due to rapid industrialization and its effect on climate change make it an environmental concern in recent years. CO2 capture is considered a vital solution to overcome this issue [234]. Developing various materials for effective CO2 capture is an interesting research area. Various adsorbents are investigated for improved performance. Various materials, such as carbonaceous materials [234,235], nanoadsorbents [236], and inorganic-based materials [237,238], can be utilized in CO2 capture. Amine-rich solid sorbent materials are extensively studied for CO2 capture application [239]. Porous materials, such as aerogel, are considered as potential adsorbent materials for various applications, such as CO2 capture [240]. Chitosan, a low-cost, eco-friendly, and abundant natural polymer with amine groups, is considered an attractive material in CO2 capture application. However, the mechanical properties and low surface area of chitosan limit its application as an adsorbent. Various modifications, such as doping, amine modification, physical/chemical activation, impregnation, and composite formation, are used to enhance the CO2 capture performance of adsorbents [234]. The addition of various nanofillers, such as graphene-based materials and aerogel preparation, can be an effective solution. In this regard, Alhwaige et al. [241] prepared the chitosan aerogel composite with graphene oxide by using the freeze-drying method. They studied the effect of graphene oxide amount on the CO2 capture performance of composites. The increase in graphene oxide amounts results in increased surface area and CO2 capture performance. The prepared composite exhibits superior CO2 adsorption and high stability during prolonged cyclic operations.

Hsan et al. [242] prepared chitosan-grafted graphene oxide aerogels for CO2 adsorption. The CO2 capture of these aerogels reaches 0.257 mmol g−1, which is much higher than that of chitosan, at 1 bar. The developed low-cost aerogel can decrease the anthropogenic CO2 gas at favorable temperature and pressure. Kumar et al. [243] developed chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite film for environmental-friendly CO2 adsorption and its catalytic conversion to valuable products for industrial application. Polyvinyl amine/chitosan/graphene oxide membrane is prepared using the surface coating method for CO2 capture [244]. Results show that adding grafted graphene oxide as a nanofiller can enhance CO2/N2 selectivity of the membrane.

3.13 Biopolymer/graphene-based composites as adsorbent materials

The importance of water purification is known. Among various solutions, developing tailored nanocomposite membranes attracts huge attention. Natural abundant biopolymers, such as chitosan and cellulose, are considered due to their cost and biodegradability and are a concern in the development of new membranes.

Chen et al. [81] studied graphene derivative/bio-based polymer composite preparation methods and tailored their various properties for specified applications. Their utilization in separation applications, such as dye/organic separation and ion adsorption and separation, is studied.

Spoială et al. reviewed [245] the effect of different nanomaterials on chitosan-based nanocomposite membranes’ water purification performance.

Various strategies can be utilized to expand the adsorption properties of graphene-based materials on the basis of their composition, surface area, surface electrical structure, and spatial effect toward specific pollutants. The interaction mechanisms between pollutants and adsorbents are critical parameters to consider for improved adsorption performance. Wang et al. [246] studied the material design, performance, regeneration, and reuse of graphene-based functional material adsorbents; their associated adsorption mechanisms with heavy metal ions, dyes, and oils; and co-adsorption of their mixture from water. Various interactions, such as hydrophobic, van der Waals, electrostatic, complexation, π-interaction, and hydrogen bonding interactions, take place in the adsorption process. Considering that the material composition, morphology, structure, and functional groups on the adsorbent play a critical role in removal performance, Kong et al. [247] reviewed available methods for optimizing the heavy metal ions and their compound pollutant adsorption performance of graphene-based materials. Various modification methods to functionalize graphene-based adsorbents with various functional groups are studied for adsorbent optimization [247].

Biomass materials present interesting performance as biosorbents in wastewater remediation. Researchers utilized various modification techniques to improve their adsorption performance for dyes and heavy metals. H-bonding, chelation, electrostatic interaction, and π–π interactions are used for pollutant adsorption [248] Ahmed et al. [249] investigated different chitosan/chitin–carbonaceous material composites for the adsorption of various water pollutants and their regeneration and reusability as adsorbents.

Bacterial cellulose/graphene-based nanocomposites can be utilized as an adsorbent for water–oil separation and metal ion removal in water purification [11]. Their adsorption performance depends on various physicochemical properties, such as density, surface tension, viscosity, polarity, hydrophobicity, porosity, and pore size [250].

The development of super amphiphilic polyurethane/cellulose nanowhisker/graphene nanoplatelet foams with good reusability and durability leads to potential materials with an opportunity to be used in oil emulsion-purifying and catalyst-anchoring applications [251]. The development of a 3D magnetic bacterial cellulose nanofiber/graphene oxide polymer aerogel leads to an excellent adsorbent for malachite green with 93% removal performance [252]. Table 5 presents some recent studies conducted on the adsorbent application of biopolymer/graphene-based composites.

Table 5

Some recent studies on depollution application

Composite Adsorbent Preparation method Ref.
Chitosan/graphene oxide composite aerogel Methyl orange Hydrothermal method [253]
Cellulose nanofibril/graphene nanoplates hybrid aerogels Cationic and anionic organic dyes Freeze-drying [254]
Chitosan/graphene oxide nanofibrous Cu2+, Pb2+, and Cr6+ Electrospinning [255]
Metal ions
Immobilized horseradish peroxidase chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite Ofloxacin [256]
Fe2O3–graphene oxide/chitosan composite Cr6+ Immersion–evaporation, coprecipitation [257]
Schiff base chitosan/graphene oxide Cu2+ and Pb2+ [258]
Chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite Pb2+ [259]
Chitosan/aminopropylsilane graphene oxide nanocomposite hydrogel Pb2+ and dyes NIPS process [260]
Chitosan-functionalized EDTA–silane/magnetic graphene oxide Cd2+ and Pb2+ Solvothermal [261]

4 Perspectives, challenges, and recommendations

The industry is waiting to absorb and implement the latest innovations and start manufacturing batteries, solar panels, electronics, photonic and communication devices, and medical technologies utilizing eco-friendly and sustainable materials. Biomedical applications are considered as the first mass applications to pave the way to emerging high value-added materials. Then, graphene can be incorporated in ubiquitous commodities, such as adsorbents, batteries, and electronics. However, the growth of biopolymer/graphene-based composite’s market is restrained by the price of production, competitive technologies, market fragmentation, and technical limitations.

Even with the development of various biopolymer/graphene oxides for medical applications, high purity is required to avoid toxicity and contamination and should be considered carefully. Thus, one of the important challenges for medical application is increasing the purity of prepared composites to avoid the side effects of other intermediates. Increased studies on developing bacteria-based nanocellulose can be a solution.

Modification plays a critical role in developing and increasing the performance of tailored biopolymer/graphene-based composites. Various physical and chemical modification methodologies can spearhead efforts to make initiatives in their fabrication to ensure consistency and trustworthiness.

The main goal of all studies is to see biopolymer/graphene-based composites fully integrated in day-to-day products and manufacturing. Based on the achievements and opportunities, future research trends can focus on the following:

  1. Various modifications for graphene-based materials, biopolymers, and their composites for tailoring their structure, composition, and properties by considering interfacial interactions and processes and modification strategies that add value throughout the value chain (from new materials to individual components and products) to fulfill future industrial needs should be studied.

  2. Finding a facile, rapid, green, and inexpensive way for large-scale preparation methods is important for commercialization and sustainability. Although several production routes for laboratory-scale have been reported, developing new ways to leverage versatility and unique properties of biopolymer/graphene-based composites should lead to continuous market growth.

  3. The size control, uniformity, and compatibility based on the properties and performance of biopolymer/graphene-based composites are important and should be investigated.

  4. Some properties and performance limitations of biopolymer/graphene-based composites can address by adding another building block or metal or metal oxide functionalization. Metal or metal oxide nanoparticles possess unique features and can alter chemical, electrical, magnetic, and conducting characteristics of targeted composite desirably.

  5. The life cycle assessment is an important research area for innovative biopolymer/graphene-based composite materials for their industrialization. Studies should focus on potential differences in energy use, blue water footprint, human toxicity, and ecotoxicity of production routes. The life cycle assessment studies of products at early stages of technological development should be conducted in the future.

  6. New composites, such as bioelastomer/graphene-based materials, with superior mechanical, electrical, and/or thermal behaviors for use as a biocompatible elastomer that provides structures with critical strengths for self-healing and 3D-printed scaffold should be developed.

  7. Studies on minimally investigated areas, such as the effect of incorporation of biopolymer/graphene-based composites on cement, anticorrosion, and insulator coating materials, must be conducted.

5 Conclusion

Despite the different advantages of utilizing biopolymer/graphene-based composites in wide applications, such as medical, energy, adsorbent, electronic, and construction, their application is mostly limited to the laboratory scale. Research on understanding their various modification, size, and uniformity control and life cycle assessment should be carried out to overcome this issue and find easy, fast, green, and cheap methods for large-scale preparation. In the future, the increasing interest in developing engineered biopolymer/graphene-based composites with high performance and sustainability is expected to enhance their industrial application. Utilizing biomass wastes as precursors for developing biopolymer/graphene-based composites can enhance their cost effectiveness and eco-friendliness. We hope that this study provides some insight and inspiration for researchers in this field to develop green and sustainable biopolymer/graphene-based composites for various applications.



  1. Funding information: This study was partially supported by the FRGS/1/2019/TK10/UKM/02/1 and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia’s grant GP-K019259.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflicts of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Ege D, Kamali AR, Boccaccini AR. Graphene oxide/polymer-based biomaterials. Adv Eng Mater. 2017;19(12):1700627.10.1002/adem.201700627Search in Google Scholar

[2] Khoshnam M, Farahbakhsh J, Zargar M, Mohammad AW, Benamor A, Ang WL, et al. α-Fe2O3/graphene oxide powder and thin film nanocomposites as peculiar photocatalysts for dye removal from wastewater. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20378.10.1038/s41598-021-99849-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Ikram R, Jan BM, Ahmad W. Advances in synthesis of graphene derivatives using industrial wastes precursors; prospects and challenges. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(6):15924–51.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.043Search in Google Scholar

[4] Abbas A, Mariana LT, Phan AN. Biomass-waste derived graphene quantum dots and their applications. Carbon. 2018;140:77–99.10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.016Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rouf TB, Kokini JL. Biodegradable biopolymer–graphene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(22):9915–45.10.1007/s10853-016-0238-4Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sharma B, Malik P, Jain P. Biopolymer reinforced nanocomposites: a comprehensive review. Mater Today Commun. 2018;16:353–63.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.07.004Search in Google Scholar

[7] Azizi-Lalabadi M, Jafari SM. Bio-nanocomposites of graphene with biopolymers; fabrication, properties, and applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;292:102416.10.1016/j.cis.2021.102416Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Mianehrow H, Lo Re G, Carosio F, Fina A, Larsson PT, Chen P, et al. Strong reinforcement effects in 2D cellulose nanofibril–graphene oxide (CNF–GO) nanocomposites due to GO-induced CNF ordering. J Mater Chem A. 2020;8(34):17608–20.10.1039/D0TA04406GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Xiong R, Grant AM, Ma R, Zhang S, Tsukruk VV. Naturally-derived biopolymer nanocomposites: interfacial design, properties and emerging applications. Mater Sci Engineering: R: Rep. 2018;125:1–41.10.1016/j.mser.2018.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gong S, Ni H, Jiang L, Cheng Q. Learning from nature: constructing high performance graphene-based nanocomposites. Mater Today. 2017;20(4):210–9.10.1016/j.mattod.2016.11.002Search in Google Scholar

[11] Troncoso OP, Torres FG. Bacterial cellulose—graphene based nanocomposites. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6532.10.3390/ijms21186532Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Cannon RE, Anderson SM. Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiology. 1991;17(6):435–47.10.3109/10408419109115207Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Wan Y, Li J, Yang Z, Ao H, Xiong L, Luo H. Simultaneously depositing polyaniline onto bacterial cellulose nanofibers and graphene nanosheets toward electrically conductive nanocomposites. Curr Appl Phys. 2018;18(8):933–40.10.1016/j.cap.2018.05.008Search in Google Scholar

[14] Dhar P, Etula J, Bankar SB. In situ bioprocessing of bacterial cellulose with graphene: percolation network formation, kinetic analysis with physicochemical and structural properties assessment. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2(9):4052–66.10.1021/acsabm.9b00581Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Luo H, Dong J, Yao F, Yang Z, Li W, Wang J, et al. Layer-by-layer assembled bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide hydrogels with extremely enhanced mechanical properties. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018;10(3):42.10.1007/s40820-018-0195-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, et al. Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev. 2012;112(11):6156–214.10.1021/cr3000412Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Georgakilas V, Tiwari JN, Kemp KC, Perman JA, Bourlinos AB, Kim KS, et al. Noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide for energy materials, biosensing, catalytic, and biomedical applications. Chem Rev. 2016;116(9):5464–519.10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00620Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Thakur MK, Rana AK, Liping Y, Singha AS, Thakur VK. Surface modification of biopolymers. Chapter 1. Surface Modification of Biopolymers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015. p. 1–19.10.1002/9781119044901.ch1Search in Google Scholar

[19] Khademian E, Salehi E, Sanaeepur H, Galiano F, Figoli A. A systematic review on carbohydrate biopolymers for adsorptive remediation of copper ions from aqueous environments-part A: classification and modification strategies. Sci Total Environ. 2020;738:139829.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139829Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Ojogbo E, Ogunsona EO, Mekonnen TH. Chemical and physical modifications of starch for renewable polymeric materials. Mater Today Sustainability. 2020;7–8:100028.10.1016/j.mtsust.2019.100028Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ling S, Chen W, Fan Y, Zheng K, Jin K, Yu H, et al. Biopolymer nanofibrils: structure, modeling, preparation, and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2018;85:1–56.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] Yu W, Sisi L, Haiyan Y, Jie L. Progress in the functional modification of graphene/graphene oxide: a review. RSC Adv. 2020;10(26):15328–45.10.1039/D0RA01068ESearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Pokhrel S, Yadav PN. Functionalization of chitosan polymer and their applications. J Macromol Sci Part A. 2019;56(5):450–75.10.1080/10601325.2019.1581576Search in Google Scholar

[24] Isik M, Sardon H, Mecerreyes D. Ionic liquids and cellulose: dissolution, chemical modification and preparation of new cellulosic materials. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(7):11922–40.10.3390/ijms150711922Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Lagerwall JPF, Schütz C, Salajkova M, Noh J, Hyun Park J, Scalia G, et al. Cellulose nanocrystal-based materials: from liquid crystal self-assembly and glass formation to multifunctional thin films. NPG Asia Mater. 2014;6(1):e80.10.1038/am.2013.69Search in Google Scholar

[26] Carvalho LCR, Queda F, Santos CVA, Marques MMB. Selective modification of chitin and chitosan: en route to tailored oligosaccharides. Chem Asian J. 2016;11(24):3468–81.10.1002/asia.201601041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Li H, Papadakis R. Click chemistry enabling covalent and non-covalent modifications of graphene with (poly)saccharides. Diabetol Metab Syndrome. 2021;13(1):142.10.3390/polym13010142Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Lahann J. Chapter 1. Click chemistry: a universal ligation strategy for biotechnology and materials science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. p. 1–7.10.1002/9780470748862.ch1Search in Google Scholar

[29] Brakat A, Zhu H. Nanocellulose-graphene hybrids: advanced functional materials as multifunctional sensing platform. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13(1):94.10.1007/s40820-021-00627-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Wu Z, Huang Y, Xiao L, Lin D, Yang Y, Wang H, et al. Physical properties and structural characterization of starch/polyvinyl alcohol/graphene oxide composite films. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2019;123:569–75.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Wang K, Ma Q, Pang K, Ding B, Zhang J, Duan Y. One-pot synthesis of graphene/chitin nanofibers hybrids and their remarkable reinforcement on Poly(vinyl alcohol). Carbohydr Polym. 2018;194:146–53.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Makvandi P, Ghomi M, Ashrafizadeh M, Tafazoli A, Agarwal T, Delfi M, et al. A review on advances in graphene-derivative/polysaccharide bionanocomposites: therapeutics, pharmacogenomics and toxicity. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;250:116952.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116952Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Liu Y, Lu M, Hu Z, Liang L, Shi J, Huang X, et al. Casein phosphopeptide-biofunctionalized graphene oxide nanoplatelets based cellulose green nanocomposites with simultaneous high thermal conductivity and excellent flame retardancy. Chem Eng J. 2020;382:122733.10.1016/j.cej.2019.122733Search in Google Scholar

[34] Kuang B, Ning M, Wang L, Li J, Wang C, Hou Z, et al. Biopolymer nanofiber/reduced graphene oxide aerogels for tunable and broadband high-performance microwave absorption. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;161:1–9.10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.037Search in Google Scholar

[35] Sharma PP, Kulshrestha V. Synthesis of highly stable and high water retentive functionalized biopolymer-graphene oxide modified cation exchange membranes. RSC Adv. 2015;5(70):56498–506.10.1039/C5RA08042HSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Rosli NAH, Loh KS, Wong WY, Yunus RM, Lee TK, Ahmad A, et al. Review of chitosan-based polymers as proton exchange membranes and roles of chitosan-supported ionic liquids. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(2):632.10.3390/ijms21020632Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[37] Liu J, Fu J, Yang Y, Gu C. Study on dispersion, mechanical and microstructure properties of cement paste incorporating graphene sheets. Constr Build Mater. 2019;199:1–11.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[38] Du H, Pang SD. Enhancement of barrier properties of cement mortar with graphene nanoplatelet. Cem Concr Res. 2015;76:10–9.10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[39] Zeng H, Lai Y, Qu S, Yu F. Effect of graphene oxide on permeability of cement materials: an experimental and theoretical perspective. J Build Eng. 2021;41:102326.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102326Search in Google Scholar

[40] Long W-J, Ye TH, Gu Y-C, Li H-D, Xing F. Inhibited effect of graphene oxide on calcium leaching of cement pastes. Constr Build Mater. 2019;202:177–88.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.194Search in Google Scholar

[41] Zhao L, Hou D, Wang P, Guo X, Zhang Y, Liu J, et al. Experimental and molecular dynamics studies on the durability of sustainable cement-based composites: reinforced by graphene. Constr Build Mater. 2020;257:119566.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119566Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sun X, Wu Q, Zhang J, Qing Y, Wu Y, Lee S. Rheology, curing temperature and mechanical performance of oil well cement: combined effect of cellulose nanofibers and graphene nano-platelets. Mater & Des. 2017;114:92–101.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.050Search in Google Scholar

[43] Cao C, Yuan B. Thermally induced fire early warning aerogel with efficient thermal isolation and flame-retardant properties. Polym Adv Technol. 2021;32(5):2159–68.10.1002/pat.5246Search in Google Scholar

[44] Zuo B, Yuan B. Flame-retardant cellulose nanofiber aerogel modified with graphene oxide and sodium montmorillonite and its fire-alarm application. Polym Adv Technol. 2021;32(4):1877–87.10.1002/pat.5231Search in Google Scholar

[45] Khalili P, Tshai KY, Kong I. Natural fiber reinforced expandable graphite filled composites: evaluation of the flame retardancy, thermal and mechanical performances. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2017;100:194–205.10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.015Search in Google Scholar

[46] Wicklein B, Kocjan A, Salazar-Alvarez G, Carosio F, Camino G, Antonietti M, et al. Thermally insulating and fire-retardant lightweight anisotropic foams based on nanocellulose and graphene oxide. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10(3):277–83.10.1038/nnano.2014.248Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Wang D, Peng H, Yu B, Zhou K, Pan H, Zhang L, et al. Biomimetic structural cellulose nanofiber aerogels with exceptional mechanical, flame-retardant and thermal-insulating properties. Chem Eng J. 2020;389:124449.10.1016/j.cej.2020.124449Search in Google Scholar

[48] Guo W, Hu Y, Wang X, Zhang P, Song L, Xing W. Exceptional flame-retardant cellulosic foams modified with phosphorus-hybridized graphene nanosheets. Cellulose. 2019;26(2):1247–60.10.1007/s10570-018-2127-2Search in Google Scholar

[49] Tao Y, Huang C, Lai C, Huang C, Yong Q. Biomimetic galactomannan/bentonite/graphene oxide film with superior mechanical and fire retardant properties by borate cross-linking. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;245:116508.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116508Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Maddalena L, Carosio F, Gomez J, Saracco G, Fina A. Layer-by-layer assembly of efficient flame retardant coatings based on high aspect ratio graphene oxide and chitosan capable of preventing ignition of PU foam. Polym Degrad Stab. 2018;152:1–9.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.013Search in Google Scholar

[51] Wang Y, Shao Z, Wang F, Wang W, Yang R. Multifunctional hybrid films prepared by aqueous stabilization of graphene sheets viaing cellulose nanofibers and exfoliated montmorillonite system. Eur Polym J. 2017;86:85–93.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.08.036Search in Google Scholar

[52] Chauhan DS, Quraishi MA, Ansari KR, Saleh TA. Graphene and graphene oxide as new class of materials for corrosion control and protection: Present status and future scenario. Prog Org Coat. 2020;147:105741.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105741Search in Google Scholar

[53] Othman NH, Che Ismail M, Mustapha M, Sallih N, Kee KE, Ahmad Jaal R. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites as barrier coatings for corrosion protection. Prog Org Coat. 2019;135:82–99.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.05.030Search in Google Scholar

[54] Cui G, Bi Z, Zhang R, Liu J, Yu X, Li Z. A comprehensive review on graphene-based anti-corrosive coatings. Chem Eng J. 2019;373:104–21.10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.034Search in Google Scholar

[55] Ding R, Chen S, Lv J, Zhang, W, Zhao X-D, Liu J, et al. Study on graphene modified organic anti-corrosion coatings: a comprehensive review. J Alloy Compd. 2019;806:611–35.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.256Search in Google Scholar

[56] Ma IAW, Sh A, Bashir S, Kumar SSA, Ramesh K, Ramesh S. Development of active barrier effect of hybrid chitosan/silica composite epoxy-based coating on mild steel surface. Surf Interfaces. 2021;25:101250.10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101250Search in Google Scholar

[57] Lai X, Hu J, Ruan T, Zhou J, Qu J. Chitosan derivative corrosion inhibitor for aluminum alloy in sodium chloride solution: a green organic/inorganic hybrid. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;265:118074.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Fayyad EM, Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, Al-Maadeed MAA. Oleic acid-grafted chitosan/graphene oxide composite coating for corrosion protection of carbon steel. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:871–8.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Joz Majidi H, Mirzaee A, Jafari SM, Amiri M, Shahrousvand M, Babaei A. Fabrication and characterization of graphene oxide-chitosan-zinc oxide ternary nano-hybrids for the corrosion inhibition of mild steel. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2020;148:1190–200.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Rajitha K, Mohana KNS, Mohanan A, Madhusudhana AM. Evaluation of anti-corrosion performance of modified gelatin-graphene oxide nanocomposite dispersed in epoxy coating on mild steel in saline media. Colloids Surf A: Physicochemical Eng Asp. 2020;587:124341.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124341Search in Google Scholar

[61] Hegde MB, Mohana KNS, Rajitha K, Madhusudhana AM. Reduced graphene oxide-epoxidized linseed oil nanocomposite: a highly efficient bio-based anti-corrosion coating material for mild steel. Prog Org Coat. 2021;159:106399.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106399Search in Google Scholar

[62] Mumtazah Atiqah H, Siti Kartom K, Siti Kartom K, Loh KS. Structural study of reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite as methanol sensor in direct methanol fuel cell. Malaysian J Anal Sci. 2016;20(4):965–70.10.17576/mjas-2016-2004-32Search in Google Scholar

[63] Ekrami-Kakhki M-S, Farzaneh N, Abbasi S, Makiabadi B. Electrocatalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles supported on novel functionalized reduced graphene oxide-chitosan for methanol electrooxidation. J Mater Science: Mater Electron. 2017;28(17):12373–82.10.1007/s10854-017-7057-5Search in Google Scholar

[64] Ekrami-Kakhki M-S, Farzaneh N, Abbasi S, Beitollahi H, Ekrami-Kakhki SA. An investigation of methyl viologen functionalized reduced graphene oxide: chitosan as a support for pt nanoparticles towards ethanol electrooxidation. Electron Mater Lett. 2018;14(5):616–28.10.1007/s13391-018-0071-9Search in Google Scholar

[65] Wang M, Zhang J, Yan N. Pd catalyst supported on a chitosan-functionalized large-area 3D reduced graphene oxide for formic acid electrooxidation reaction. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1(23):6839–48.10.1039/c3ta10214aSearch in Google Scholar

[66] Ashiri S, Mehdipour E. Preparation of a novel palladium catalytic hydrogel based on graphene oxide/chitosan NPs and cellulose nanowhiskers. RSC Adv. 2018;8(57):32877–85.10.1039/C8RA06623JSearch in Google Scholar

[67] Esmaeilzadeh M, Sadjadi S, Salehi Z. Pd immobilized on hybrid of magnetic graphene quantum dots and cyclodextrin decorated chitosan: an efficient hydrogenation catalyst. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2020;150:441–8.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.094Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Ge L, Zhang M, Wang R, Li N, Zhang L, Liu S, et al. Fabrication of CS/GA/RGO/Pd composite hydrogels for highly efficient catalytic reduction of organic pollutants. RSC Adv. 2020;10(26):15091–7.10.1039/D0RA01884HSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Zheng X, Zhao J, Xu M, Zeng M. Preparation of porous chitosan/reduced graphene oxide microspheres supported Pd nanoparticles catalysts for Heck coupling reactions. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;230:115583.10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115583Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Norazuwana S, Siti, Kartom K. Characterization studies of sodium alginate/sulfonated graphene oxide based polymer electrolyte membrane for direct methanol fuel cell. Malaysian J Anal Sci. 2017;21(1):113–8.10.17576/mjas-2017-2101-13Search in Google Scholar

[71] Hamzah AA, Selvarajan RS, Majlis BYJSM. Graphene for biomedical applications: a review. Sains Malaysiana. 2017;46:1125–39.10.17576/jsm-2017-4607-16Search in Google Scholar

[72] Shende P, Pathan N. Potential of carbohydrate-conjugated graphene assemblies in biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;255:117385.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117385Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Stevanović M, Djošić M, Janković A, Kojić V, Vukašinović-Sekulić M, Stojanović J, et al. Antibacterial graphene-based hydroxyapatite/chitosan coating with gentamicin for potential applications in bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2020;108(11):2175–89.10.1002/jbm.a.36974Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Dacrory S. Antimicrobial activity, DFT calculations, and molecular docking of dialdehyde cellulose/graphene oxide film against covid-19. J Polym Environ. 2021;29(7):2248–60.10.1007/s10924-020-02039-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Zou X, Wei S, Jasensky J, Xiao M, Wang Q, Brooks Iii CL, et al. Molecular interactions between graphene and biological molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(5):1928–36.10.1021/jacs.6b11226Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Zhao L, Fu K, Li X, Zhang R, Wang W, Xu F, et al. Molecular mechanisms of interactions between BMP-2 and graphene: effects of functional groups and microscopic morphology. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;525:146636.10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146636Search in Google Scholar

[77] Siriviriyanun A, Tsai Y-J, Voon SH, Kiew SF, Imae T, Kiew LV, et al. Cyclodextrin- and dendrimer-conjugated graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for the delivery of selected chemotherapeutic and photosensitizing agents. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;89:307–15.10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Pooresmaeil M, Javanbakht S, Behzadi Nia S, Namazi H. Carboxymethyl cellulose/mesoporous magnetic graphene oxide as a safe and sustained ibuprofen delivery bio-system: synthesis, characterization, and study of drug release kinetic. Colloids Surf A Physicochemi Eng Asp. 2020;594:124662.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124662Search in Google Scholar

[79] Shende P, Pathan N. Graphene nanoribbons: a state-of-the-art in health care. Int J Pharmaceutics. 2021;595:120269.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120269Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Wang C, Zhang Z, Chen B, Gu L, Li Y, Yu S. Design and evaluation of galactosylated chitosan/graphene oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;516:332–41.10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[81] Chen S, Yang K, Leng X, Chen M, Novoselov KS, Andreeva DV. Perspectives in the design and application of composites based on graphene derivatives and bio-based polymers. J Agric food Chem. 2020;69(12):1173–86.10.1002/pi.6080Search in Google Scholar

[82] Erdal NB, Hakkarainen M. Construction of bioactive and reinforced bioresorbable nanocomposites by reduced nano-graphene oxide carbon dots. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(3):1074–81.10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00207Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] Rashkow JT, Talukdar Y, Lalwani G, Sitharaman B. In vivo hard and soft tissue response of two-dimensional nanoparticle incorporated biodegradable polymeric scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci & Eng. 2017;3(10):2533–41.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00425Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Lalwani G, Henslee AM, Farshid B, Lin L, Kasper FK, Qin Y-X, et al. Two-dimensional nanostructure-reinforced biodegradable polymeric nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(3):900–9.10.1021/bm301995sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[85] Barra A, Santos JDC, Silva MRF, Nunes C, Ruiz-Hitzky E, Gonçalves I, et al. Graphene derivatives in biopolymer-based composites for food packaging applications. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switz). 2020;10(10):2077.10.3390/nano10102077Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[86] Carvalho APAD, Conte Junior CA. Green strategies for active food packagings: a systematic review on active properties of graphene-based nanomaterials and biodegradable polymers. Trends Food Sci & Technol. 2020;103:130–43.10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[87] Han Lyn F, Tan CP, Zawawi RM, Nur Hanani ZA. Effect of sonication time and heat treatment on the structural and physical properties of chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite films. Food Packaging Shelf Life. 2021;28:100663.10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100663Search in Google Scholar

[88] Liu D, Dong Y, Liu Y, Ma N, Sui G. Cellulose nanowhisker (CNW)/graphene nanoplatelet (GN) composite films with simultaneously enhanced thermal. Electr Mech Prop. 2019;6:235.10.3389/fmats.2019.00235Search in Google Scholar

[89] Jafarkhani M, Salehi Z, Nematian T. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/graphene oxide composite hydrogels for nerve tissue engineering. Mater Today: Proc. 2018;5(7, Part 3):15620–8.10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.171Search in Google Scholar

[90] Chen S, Wang H, Jian Z, Fei G, Qian W, Luo G, et al. Novel poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/modified graphene oxide biocomposite for wound dressing application. Macromol Biosci. 2020;20(3):1900385.10.1002/mabi.201900385Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Reddy S, Xu X, Guo T, Zhu R, He L, Ramakrishana S. Allotropic carbon (graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide) based biomaterials for neural regeneration. Curr OpBiomed Eng. 2018;6:120–9.10.1016/j.cobme.2018.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[92] Zhang L, Yu Y, Zheng S, Zhong L, Xue J. Preparation and properties of conductive bacterial cellulose-based graphene oxide-silver nanoparticles antibacterial dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;257:117671.10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117671Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[93] Mahmoudi N, Ostadhossein F, Simchi A. Physicochemical and antibacterial properties of chitosan-polyvinylpyrrolidone films containing self-organized graphene oxide nanolayers. 2016;133(11).10.1002/app.43194Search in Google Scholar

[94] Luo H, Ao H, Peng M, Yao F, Yang Z, Wan Y. Effect of highly dispersed graphene and graphene oxide in 3D nanofibrous bacterial cellulose scaffold on cell responses: a comparative study. Mater Chem Phys. 2019;235:121774.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121774Search in Google Scholar

[95] Rostami S, Puza F, Ucak M, Ozgur E, Gul O, Ercan UK, et al. Bifunctional sharkskin mimicked chitosan/graphene oxide membranes: reduced biofilm formation and improved cytocompatibility. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;544:148828.10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148828Search in Google Scholar

[96] Qi W, Yuan W, Yan J, Wang H. Growth and accelerated differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on graphene oxide/poly-l-lysine composite films. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(33):5461–7.10.1039/C4TB00856ASearch in Google Scholar

[97] Zia F, Zia KM, Aftab W, Tabasum S, Nazli ZI, Mohammadi M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of graphene nanoplatelets-hydroxyethyl cellulose copolymer-based polyurethane bionanocomposite system. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2020;165:1889–99.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.069Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Rebekah A, Sivaselvam S, Viswanathan C, Prabhu D, Gautam R, Ponpandian N. Magnetic nanoparticle-decorated graphene oxide-chitosan composite as an efficient nanocarrier for protein delivery. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2021;610:125913.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125913Search in Google Scholar

[99] Arnaldi P, Carosio F, Di Lisa D, Muzzi L, Monticelli O, Pastorino L. Assembly of chitosan-graphite oxide nanoplatelets core shell microparticles for advanced 3D scaffolds supporting neuronal networks growth. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;196:111295.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111295Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Li G, Xiao P, Hou S, Huang Y. Graphene based self-healing materials. Carbon. 2019;146:371–87.10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.011Search in Google Scholar

[101] Vu V-P, Sinh LH, Choa S-H. Recent progress in self-healing materials for sensor arrays. ChemNanoMat. 2020;6(11):1522–38.10.1002/cnma.202000361Search in Google Scholar

[102] Cui G, Zhang C, Wang A, Zhou X, Xing X, Liu J, et al. Research progress on self-healing polymer/graphene anticorrosion coatings. Prog Org Coat. 2021;155:106231.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106231Search in Google Scholar

[103] Zhang R, Yu X, Yang Q, Cui G, Li Z. The role of graphene in anti-corrosion coatings: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2021;294:123613.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123613Search in Google Scholar

[104] Li Y, Gao F, Xue Z, Luan Y, Yan X, Guo Z, et al. Synergistic effect of different graphene-CNT heterostructures on mechanical and self-healing properties of thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Mater & Des. 2018;137:438–45.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.018Search in Google Scholar

[105] Noack M, Merindol R, Zhu B, Benitez A, Hackelbusch S, Beckert F, et al. Light-fueled, spatiotemporal modulation of mechanical properties and rapid self-healing of graphene-doped supramolecular elastomers. 2017;27(25):1700767.10.1002/adfm.201700767Search in Google Scholar

[106] Lin C, Sheng D, Liu X, Xu S, Ji F, Dong L, et al. A self-healable nanocomposite based on dual-crosslinked graphene oxide/polyurethane. Polymer. 2017;127:241–50.10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[107] Han D, Yan L. Supramolecular hydrogel of chitosan in the presence of graphene oxide nanosheets as 2D cross-linkers. ACS Sustain Chem & Eng. 2014;2(2):296–300.10.1021/sc400352aSearch in Google Scholar

[108] Lee Y-H, Ko W-C, Zhuang Y-N, Wang L-Y, Yu T-W, Lee S-Y, et al. Development of self-healable organic/inorganic hybrid materials containing a biobased copolymer via Diels–Alder chemistry and their application in electromagnetic interference shielding. Polymers. 2019;11(11):1755.10.3390/polym11111755Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[109] Yue L, Zhang X, Wang Y, Li W, Tang Y, Bai Y. Cellulose nanocomposite modified conductive self-healing hydrogel with enhanced mechanical property. Eur Polym J. 2021;146:110258.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110258Search in Google Scholar

[110] Wang B, Jeon YS, Park HS, Kim J-H. Self-healable mussel-mimetic nanocomposite hydrogel based on catechol-containing polyaspartamide and graphene oxide. Mater Sci Engineering: C. 2016;69:160–70.10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.065Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Jiao D, Zheng A, Liu Y, Zhang X, Wang X, Wu J, et al. Bidirectional differentiation of BMSCs induced by a biomimetic procallus based on a gelatin-reduced graphene oxide reinforced hydrogel for rapid bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(7):2011–28.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[112] Samadi N, Sabzi M, Babaahmadi M. Self-healing and tough hydrogels with physically cross-linked triple networks based on Agar/PVA/Graphene. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2018;107:2291–7.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Zheng C, Lu K, Lu Y, Zhu S, Yue Y, Xu X, et al. A stretchable, self-healing conductive hydrogels based on nanocellulose supported graphene towards wearable monitoring of human motion. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;250:116905.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116905Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Xie H, Lai X, Li H, Gao J, Zeng X, Huang X, et al. A highly efficient flame retardant nacre-inspired nanocoating with ultrasensitive fire-warning and self-healing capabilities. Chem Eng J. 2019;369:8–17.10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.045Search in Google Scholar

[115] Jing X, Mi H-Y, Napiwocki BN, Peng X-F, Turng L-S. Mussel-inspired electroactive chitosan/graphene oxide composite hydrogel with rapid self-healing and recovery behavior for tissue engineering. Carbon. 2017;125:557–70.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.071Search in Google Scholar

[116] Kang MS, Kang JI, Le Thi P, Park KM, Hong SW, Choi YS, et al. Three-dimensional printable gelatin hydrogels incorporating graphene oxide to enable spontaneous myogenic differentiation. ACS Macro Lett. 2021;10(4):426–32.10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00845Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Bayan R, Karak N. Bio-derived aliphatic hyperbranched polyurethane nanocomposites with inherent self healing tendency and surface hydrophobicity: towards creating high performance smart materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;110:142–53.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.024Search in Google Scholar

[118] Rahman SS, Arshad M, Qureshi A, Ullah A. Fabrication of a self-healing, 3D printable, and reprocessable biobased elastomer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(46):51927–39.10.1021/acsami.0c14220Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Li X, Ding C, Li X, Yang H, Liu S, Wang X, et al. Electronic biopolymers: from molecular engineering to functional devices. Chem Eng J. 2020;397:125499.10.1016/j.cej.2020.125499Search in Google Scholar

[120] Wronska MA, O’Connor IB, Tilbury MA, Srivastava A, Wall JG. Adding functions to biomaterial surfaces through protein incorporation. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2016;28(27):5485–508.10.1002/adma.201504310Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[121] Gahoual R, François Y-N, Mignet N, Houzé P. 4-Emerging biotechnological approaches with respect to tissue regeneration: from improving biomaterial incorporation to comprehensive omics monitoring. In: Vrana NE, Knopf-Marques H, Barthes J, editors. Biomaterials for organ and tissue regeneration. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2020. p. 83–112.10.1016/B978-0-08-102906-0.00017-9Search in Google Scholar

[122] Kotikian A, Truby RL, Boley JW, White TJ, Lewis JA. 3D printing of liquid crystal elastomeric actuators with spatially programed nematic order. 2018;30(10):1706164.10.1002/adma.201706164Search in Google Scholar

[123] Pavinatto FJ, Paschoal CWA, Arias AC. Printed and flexible biosensor for antioxidants using interdigitated ink-jetted electrodes and gravure-deposited active layer. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;67:553–9.10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[124] Li D, Lai W-Y, Zhang Y-Z, Huang W. Printable transparent conductive films for flexible electronics. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2018;30(10):1704738.10.1002/adma.201704738Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Zou H, Li X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhuo B, Ti P, et al. Effects of different hot pressing processes and NFC/GO/CNT composite proportions on the performance of conductive membranes. Mater & Des. 2021;198:109334.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109334Search in Google Scholar

[126] Parandeh S, Kharaziha M, Karimzadeh F. An eco-friendly triboelectric hybrid nanogenerators based on graphene oxide incorporated polycaprolactone fibers and cellulose paper. Nano Energy. 2019;59:412–21.10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.058Search in Google Scholar

[127] Gao H-L, Zhu Y-B, Mao L-B, Wang F-C, Luo X-S, Liu Y-Y, et al. Super-elastic and fatigue resistant carbon material with lamellar multi-arch microstructure. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12920.10.1038/ncomms12920Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[128] Farooqui UR, Ahmad AL, Hamid NA. Graphene oxide: a promising membrane material for fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;82:714–33.10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.081Search in Google Scholar

[129] Pandey RP, Shukla G, Manohar M, Shahi VK. Graphene oxide based nanohybrid proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications: an overview. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;240:15–30.10.1016/j.cis.2016.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Shirdast A, Sharif A, Abdollahi M. Effect of the incorporation of sulfonated chitosan/sulfonated graphene oxide on the proton conductivity of chitosan membranes. J Power Sources. 2016;306:541–51.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.076Search in Google Scholar

[131] Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Ma C, Liu J, Cao S, et al. Enhancement of proton conductivity of chitosan membrane enabled by sulfonated graphene oxide under both hydrated and anhydrous conditions. J Power Sources. 2014;269:898–911.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.075Search in Google Scholar

[132] Pandey RP, Shahi VK. A N-o-sulphonic acid benzyl chitosan (NSBC) and N,N-dimethylene phosphonic acid propylsilane graphene oxide (NMPSGO) based multi-functional polymer electrolyte membrane with enhanced water retention and conductivity. RSC Adv. 2014;4(100):57200–9.10.1039/C4RA09581BSearch in Google Scholar

[133] Azli AA, Manan NSA, Kadir MFZ. The development of Li+ conducting polymer electrolyte based on potato starch/graphene oxide blend. Ionics. 2017;23(2):411–25.10.1007/s11581-016-1874-zSearch in Google Scholar

[134] Shen S, Jia T, Jia J, Wang N, Song D, Zhao J, et al. Constructing anhydrous proton exchange membranes through alternate depositing graphene oxide and chitosan on sulfonated poly(vinylidenefluoride) or sulfonated poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) membranes. Eur Polym J. 2021;142:110160.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110160Search in Google Scholar

[135] Yaqoob AA, Mohamad Ibrahim MN, Umar K, Bhawani SA, Khan A, Asiri AM, et al. Cellulose derived graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite anode for energy generation and bioremediation of toxic metals via benthic microbial fuel cells. 2021;13(1):135.10.3390/polym13010135Search in Google Scholar

[136] Das G, Park BJ, Kim J, Kang D, Yoon HH. Quaternized cellulose and graphene oxide crosslinked polyphenylene oxide based anion exchange membrane. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9572.10.1038/s41598-019-45947-wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[137] Hosseinpour M, Sahoo M, Perez-Page M, Baylis SR, Patel F, Holmes SM. Improving the performance of direct methanol fuel cells by implementing multilayer membranes blended with cellulose nanocrystals. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2019;44(57):30409–19.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.194Search in Google Scholar

[138] Versaci D, Nasi R, Zubair U, Amici J, Sgroi M, Dumitrescu MA, et al. New eco-friendly low-cost binders for Li-ion anodes. J Solid State Electrochem. 2017;21(12):3429–35.10.1007/s10008-017-3665-5Search in Google Scholar

[139] Yue L, Zhang L, Zhong H. Carboxymethyl chitosan: a new water soluble binder for Si anode of Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2014;247:327–31.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.073Search in Google Scholar

[140] Chai L, Qu Q, Zhang L, Shen M, Zhang L, Zheng H. Chitosan, a new and environmental benign electrode binder for use with graphite anode in lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta. 2013;105:378–83.10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[141] Waluś S, Robba A, Bouchet R, Barchasz C, Alloin F. Influence of the binder and preparation process on the positive electrode electrochemical response and Li/S system performances. Electrochim Acta. 2016;210:492–501.10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.130Search in Google Scholar

[142] Liu J, Zhang Q, Zhang T, Li J-T, Huang L, Sun S-G. A robust ion-conductive biopolymer as a binder for Si anodes of lithium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(23):3599–605.10.1002/adfm.201500589Search in Google Scholar

[143] Raccichini R, Varzi A, Passerini S, Scrosati B. The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nat Mater. 2015;14(3):271–9.10.1038/nmat4170Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[144] Hassoun J, Bonaccorso F, Agostini M, Angelucci M, Betti MG, Cingolani R, et al. An advanced lithium-ion battery based on a graphene anode and a lithium iron phosphate cathode. Nano Lett. 2014;14(8):4901–6.10.1021/nl502429mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] Kheirabadi N, Shafiekhani A. Graphene/Li-ion battery. J Appl Phys. 2012;112(12):124323.10.1063/1.4771923Search in Google Scholar

[146] Tao H, Feng Z, Liu H, Kan X, Chen P. Reality and future of rechargeable lithium batteries. TOMSJ Open Mater Sci J. 2011;5(1):204–14.10.2174/1874088X01105010204Search in Google Scholar

[147] Shen Y-D, Xiao Z-C, Miao L-X, Kong D-B, Zheng X-Y, Chang Y-H, et al. Pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide sandwich interlayer for lithium–sulfur batteries. Rare Met. 2017;36(5):418–24.10.1007/s12598-017-0906-9Search in Google Scholar

[148] Wesma Salehen PM, Razali H, Sopian K, Sukor Su’ait M, Khoon LT, Mobarak NN, et al., editors. Composite electrode graphene/graphite using carboxymethyl carrageenan bio-polymer as an eco-binder for lithium ion battery. Graphene Malaysia 2019. Putrajaya Marriott Hotel, IOI Resort City, Sepang, Malaysia: 21st–22nd August 2019 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[149] Su M, Wang Z, Guo H, Li X, Huang S, Xiao W, et al. Enhancement of the Cyclability of a Si/graphite@graphene composite as anode for lithium-ion batteries. EA Electrochim Acta. 2014;116:230–6.10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.195Search in Google Scholar

[150] Zhang J, Cao H, Tang X, Fan W, Peng G, Qu M. Graphite/graphene oxide composite as high capacity and binder-free anode material for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2013;241:619–26.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[151] Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem (Int ed Engl). 2005;44(22):3358–93.10.1002/anie.200460587Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Adam AA, Ojur Dennis J, Al-Hadeethi Y, Mkawi EM, Abubakar Abdulkadir B, Usman F, et al. State of the art and new directions on electrospun lignin/cellulose nanofibers for supercapacitor application: a systematic literature review. 2020;12(12):2884.10.3390/polym12122884Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[153] Sun Z, Qu K, You Y, Huang Z, Liu S, Li J, et al. Overview of cellulose-based flexible materials for supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(12):7278–300.10.1039/D0TA10504JSearch in Google Scholar

[154] Gu P, Liu W, Hou Q, Ni Y. Lignocellulose-derived hydrogel/aerogel-based flexible quasi-solid-state supercapacitors with high-performance: a review. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(25):14233–64.10.1039/D1TA02281DSearch in Google Scholar

[155] Korkmaz S, Kariper İA. Graphene and graphene oxide based aerogels: synthesis, characteristics and supercapacitor applications. J Energy Storage. 2020;27:101038.10.1016/j.est.2019.101038Search in Google Scholar

[156] Hao P, Zhao Z, Leng Y, Tian J, Sang Y, Boughton RI, et al. Graphene-based nitrogen self-doped hierarchical porous carbon aerogels derived from chitosan for high performance supercapacitors. Nano Energy. 2015;15:9–23.10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.035Search in Google Scholar

[157] Zhang Y, Liu X, Wang S, Li L, Dou S. Bio-nanotechnology in high-performance supercapacitors. Sci Rep. 2017;7(21):1700592.10.1002/aenm.201700592Search in Google Scholar

[158] Enock TK, King’ondu CK, Pogrebnoi A, Jande YAC. Status of biomass derived carbon materials for supercapacitor application. Int J Electrochem. 2017;2017:6453420.10.1155/2017/6453420Search in Google Scholar

[159] Xing J, Tao P, Wu Z, Xing C, Liao X, Nie S. Nanocellulose-graphene composites: a promising nanomaterial for flexible supercapacitors. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;207:447–59.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[160] Liu K-K, Jin B, Meng L-Y. Glucose/graphene-based aerogels for gas adsorption and electric double layer capacitors. Polymers. 2019;11(1):40.10.3390/polym11010040Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[161] Xia L, Li X, Wu X, Huang L, Liao Y, Qing Y, et al. Fe3O4 nanoparticles embedded in cellulose nanofibre/graphite carbon hybrid aerogels as advanced negative electrodes for flexible asymmetric supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2018;6(36):17378–88.10.1039/C8TA05678ASearch in Google Scholar

[162] Garino N, Lamberti A, Stassi S, Castellino M, Fontana M, Roppolo I, et al. Multifunctional flexible membranes based on reduced graphene oxide/tin dioxide nanocomposite and cellulose fibers. Electrochim Acta. 2019;306:420–6.10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.095Search in Google Scholar

[163] Yang Q, Yang J, Gao Z, Li B, Xiong C. Carbonized cellulose nanofibril/graphene oxide composite aerogels for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2020;3(1):1145–51.10.1021/acsaem.9b02195Search in Google Scholar

[164] Li Y, Xia Z, Gong Q, Liu X, Yang Y, Chen C, et al. Green synthesis of free standing cellulose/graphene oxide/polyaniline aerogel electrode for high-performance flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switz). 2020;10(8):1546.10.3390/nano10081546Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[165] Zhang Y, Shang Z, Shen M, Chowdhury SP, Ignaszak A, Sun S, et al. Cellulose nanofibers/reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole aerogel electrodes for high-capacitance flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. ACS Sustain Chem & Eng. 2019;7(13):11175–85.10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00321Search in Google Scholar

[166] Zou Z, Xiao W, Zhang Y, Yu H, Zhou W. Facile synthesis of freestanding cellulose/RGO/silver/Fe2O3 hybrid film for ultrahigh-areal-energy-density flexible solid-state supercapacitor. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;500:144244.10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144244Search in Google Scholar

[167] Xiong C, Zou Y, Peng Z, Zhong W. Synthesis of morphology-tunable electroactive biomass/graphene composites using metal ions for supercapacitors. Nanoscale. 2019;11(15):7304–16.10.1039/C9NR00659ASearch in Google Scholar

[168] Zheng Q, Kvit A, Cai Z, Ma Z, Gong S. A freestanding cellulose nanofibril–reduced graphene oxide–molybdenum oxynitride aerogel film electrode for all-solid-state supercapacitors with ultrahigh energy density. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5(24):12528–41.10.1039/C7TA03093BSearch in Google Scholar

[169] Wang Y-Y, Fu Q-J, Bai Y-Y, Ning X, Yao C-L. Construction and application of nanocellulose/graphene/MnO2 three-dimensional composites as potential electrode materials for supercapacitors. J Mater Science: Mater Electron. 2020;31(2):1236–46.10.1007/s10854-019-02635-9Search in Google Scholar

[170] Sheng N, Chen S, Yao J, Guan F, Zhang M, Wang B, et al. Polypyrrole@TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/reduced graphene oxide macrofibers for flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. Chem Eng J. 2019;368:1022–32.10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.173Search in Google Scholar

[171] Liu Y, Zhou J, Zhu E, Tang J, Liu X, Tang W. Facile synthesis of bacterial cellulose fibres covalently intercalated with graphene oxide by one-step cross-linking for robust supercapacitors. J Mater Chem C. 2015;3(5):1011–7.10.1039/C4TC01822BSearch in Google Scholar

[172] Zheng Q, Xie R, Fang L, Cai Z, Ma Z, Gong S. Oxygen-deficient and nitrogen-doped MnO2 nanowire-reduced graphene oxide–cellulose nanofibril aerogel electrodes for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2018;6(47):24407–17.10.1039/C8TA09374ASearch in Google Scholar

[173] Chen M, Wu B, Li D. Core–shell structured cellulose nanofibers/graphene@polypyrrole microfibers for all-solid-state wearable supercapacitors with enhanced electrochemical performance. 2020;305(6):1900854.10.1002/mame.201900854Search in Google Scholar

[174] Liu Y, Zhou J, Tang J, Tang W. Three-dimensional, chemically bonded polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem Mater. 2015;27(20):7034–41.10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03060Search in Google Scholar

[175] Wang Y, Song Y, Wang Y, Chen X, Xia Y, Shao Z. Graphene/silk fibroin based carbon nanocomposites for high performance supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2015;3(2):773–81.10.1039/C4TA04772ASearch in Google Scholar

[176] Guan F, Chen S, Sheng N, Chen Y, Yao J, Pei Q, et al. Mechanically robust reduced graphene oxide/bacterial cellulose film obtained via biosynthesis for flexible supercapacitor. Chem Eng J. 2019;360:829–37.10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.202Search in Google Scholar

[177] Chen X, Cheng P, Tang Z, Xu X, Gao H, Wang G. Carbon-based composite phase change materials for thermal energy storage, transfer, and conversion. Adv Sci (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Ger). 2021;8(9):2001274.10.1002/advs.202001274Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[178] Guo J, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Zou B. Thermal storage and thermal management properties of a novel ventilated mortar block integrated with phase change material for floor heating: an experimental study. Energy Convers Manag. 2020;205:112288.10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112288Search in Google Scholar

[179] Heniegal AM, Omar Ibrahim OM, Frahat NB, Amin M. New techniques for the energy saving of sustainable buildings by using phase change materials. J Build Eng. 2021;41:102418.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102418Search in Google Scholar

[180] Zhu X, Sheng X, Li J, Chen Y. Thermal comfort and energy saving of novel heat-storage coatings with microencapsulated PCM and their application. Energy Build. 2021;251:111349.10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111349Search in Google Scholar

[181] Liu Z, Yu Z, Yang T, Qin D, Li S, Zhang G, et al. A review on macro-encapsulated phase change material for building envelope applications. Build Environ. 2018;144:281–94.10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.030Search in Google Scholar

[182] Cui Y, Xie J, Liu J, Pan S. Review of phase change materials integrated in building walls for energy saving. Procedia Eng. 2015;121:763–70.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.09.027Search in Google Scholar

[183] Allahbakhsh A, Arjmand M. Graphene-based phase change composites for energy harvesting and storage: state of the art and future prospects. Carbon. 2019;148:441–80.10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[184] Xue F, Qi X-D, Huang T, Tang C-Y, Zhang N, Wang Y. Preparation and application of three-dimensional filler network towards organic phase change materials with high performance and multi-functions. Chem Eng J. 2021;419:129620.10.1016/j.cej.2021.129620Search in Google Scholar

[185] Yu S, Jeong S-G, Chung O, Kim S. Bio-based PCM/carbon nanomaterials composites with enhanced thermal conductivity. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cell. 2014;120:549–54.10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.037Search in Google Scholar

[186] Yuan K, Liu J, Fang X, Zhang Z. Novel facile self-assembly approach to construct graphene oxide-decorated phase-change microcapsules with enhanced photo-to-thermal conversion performance. J Mater Chem A. 2018;6(10):4535–43.10.1039/C8TA00215KSearch in Google Scholar

[187] Yang J, Zhang E, Li X, Zhang Y, Qu J, Yu Z-Z. Cellulose/graphene aerogel supported phase change composites with high thermal conductivity and good shape stability for thermal energy storage. Carbon. 2016;98:50–7.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.082Search in Google Scholar

[188] Wei X, Jin X-Z, Zhang N, Qi X-D, Yang J-H, Zhou Z-W, et al. Constructing cellulose nanocrystal/graphene nanoplatelet networks in phase change materials toward intelligent thermal management. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;253:117290.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117290Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[189] Xue F, Jin X-Z, Wang W-Y, Qi X-D, Yang J-H, Wang Y. Melamine foam and cellulose nanofiber co-mediated assembly of graphene nanoplatelets to construct three-dimensional networks towards advanced phase change materials. Nanoscale. 2020;12(6):4005–17.10.1039/C9NR10696KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[190] Wu H, Deng S, Shao Y, Yang J, Qi X, Wang Y. Multiresponsive shape-adaptable phase change materials with cellulose nanofiber/graphene nanoplatelet hybrid-coated melamine foam for light/electro-to-thermal energy storage and utilization. ACS Appl Mater & Interfaces. 2019;11(50):46851–63.10.1021/acsami.9b16612Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[191] Xue F, Lu Y, Qi X-D, Yang J-H, Wang Y. Melamine foam-templated graphene nanoplatelet framework toward phase change materials with multiple energy conversion abilities. Chem Eng J. 2019;365:20–9.10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.023Search in Google Scholar

[192] Hu X, Huang H, Hu Y, Lu X, Qin Y. Novel bio-based composite phase change materials with reduced graphene oxide-functionalized spent coffee grounds for efficient solar-to-thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cell. 2021;219:110790.10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110790Search in Google Scholar

[193] Darzi ME, Golestaneh SI, Kamali M, Karimi G. Thermal and electrical performance analysis of co-electrospun-electrosprayed PCM nanofiber composites in the presence of graphene and carbon fiber powder. Renew Energy. 2019;135:719–28.10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.028Search in Google Scholar

[194] Zou D, Ma X, Liu X, Zheng P, Hu Y. Thermal performance enhancement of composite phase change materials (PCM) using graphene and carbon nanotubes as additives for the potential application in lithium-ion power battery. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;120:33–41.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.024Search in Google Scholar

[195] Qian Y, Han N, Zhang Z, Cao R, Tan L, Li W, et al. Enhanced thermal-to-flexible phase change materials based on cellulose/modified graphene composites for thermal management of solar energy. ACS Appl Mater & Interfaces. 2019;11(49):45832–43.10.1021/acsami.9b18543Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[196] Oh K, Shen Z, Kwon S, Toivakka M. Thermal properties of graphite/salt hydrate phase change material stabilized by nanofibrillated cellulose. Cellulose. 2021;28(11):6845–56.10.1007/s10570-021-03936-1Search in Google Scholar

[197] Yusuf M, Kumar M, Khan MA, Sillanpää M, Arafat H. A review on exfoliation, characterization, environmental and energy applications of graphene and graphene-based composites. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;273:102036.10.1016/j.cis.2019.102036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[198] Gao L, Lian C, Zhou Y, Yan L, Li Q, Zhang C, et al. Graphene oxide–DNA based sensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;60:22–9.10.1016/j.bios.2014.03.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[199] Lopez A, Liu J. Covalent and noncovalent functionalization of graphene oxide with DNA for smart sensing. 2020;2(11):2000123.10.1002/aisy.202000123Search in Google Scholar

[200] Magerusan L, Pogacean F, Coros M, Socaci C, Pruneanu S, Leostean C, et al. Green methodology for the preparation of chitosan/graphene nanomaterial through electrochemical exfoliation and its applicability in Sunset Yellow detection. Electrochim Acta. 2018;283:578–89.10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.203Search in Google Scholar

[201] Liu L, Liu W, Hong T, Weng X, Zhai Q, Zhou X. Ag+ and cysteine detection by Ag+–guanine interaction based on graphene oxide and G-quadruplex DNA. Anal Methods. 2012;4(7):1935–9.10.1039/c2ay25362cSearch in Google Scholar

[202] Shao C, Liang J, He S, Luan T, Yu J, Zhao H, et al. pH-Responsive graphene oxide–DNA nanosystem for live cell imaging and detection. Anal Chem. 2017;89(10):5445–52.10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00369Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[203] He S, Yu J, Wang F, Tian L. Well-optimized conjugated GO-DNA nanosystem for sensitive ratiometric pH detection in live cells. Langmuir. 2019;35(42):13745–52.10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02417Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[204] Zhen SJ, Yu Y, Li CM, Huang CZ. Graphene oxide amplified fluorescence anisotropy for label-free detection of potassium ion. Analyst. 2015;140(1):353–7.10.1039/C4AN01433BSearch in Google Scholar

[205] Bai Y, Zhao L, Chen Z, Wang H, Feng F. A label-free fluorescent sensor for Pb2+ based on G-quadruplex and graphene oxide. Anal Methods. 2014;6(20):8120–3.10.1039/C4AY01389ASearch in Google Scholar

[206] Ravikumar A, Panneerselvam P, Radhakrishnan K. Fluorometric determination of lead(II) and mercury(II) based on their interaction with a complex formed between graphene oxide and a DNAzyme. Microchimica Acta. 2017;185(1):2.10.1007/s00604-017-2585-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[207] Chen Y, Pötschke P, Pionteck J, Voit B, Qi H. Smart cellulose/graphene composites fabricated by in situ chemical reduction of graphene oxide for multiple sensing applications. J Mater Chem A. 2018;6(17):7777–85.10.1039/C8TA00618KSearch in Google Scholar

[208] Liu Y, Liu L, Li Z, Zhao Y, Yao J. Green and facile fabrication of smart cellulose composites assembled by graphene nanoplates for dual sensing. Cellulose. 2019;26(17):9255–68.10.1007/s10570-019-02735-zSearch in Google Scholar

[209] Li Z, Wang J, Dai L, Sun X, An M, Duan C, et al. Asymmetrically patterned cellulose nanofibers/graphene oxide composite film for humidity sensing and moist-induced electricity generation. ACS Appl Mater & Interfaces. 2020;12(49):55205–14.10.1021/acsami.0c17970Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[210] Chen Y, Pötschke P, Pionteck J, Voit B, Qi H. Aerogels based on reduced graphene oxide/cellulose composites: preparation and vapour sensing abilities. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switz). 2020;10(9):1729.10.3390/nano10091729Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[211] Khalifa M, Wuzella G, Lammer H, Mahendran AR. Smart paper from graphene coated cellulose for high-performance humidity and piezoresistive force sensor. Synth Met. 2020;266:116420.10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116420Search in Google Scholar

[212] Teodoro KBR, Migliorini FL, Facure MHM, Correa DS. Conductive electrospun nanofibers containing cellulose nanowhiskers and reduced graphene oxide for the electrochemical detection of mercury(II). Carbohydr Polym. 2019;207:747–54.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[213] Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Wen F, Yuan K, Tan J, Zhang Z, et al. Tubular structured bacterial cellulose-based nitrite sensor: preparation and environmental application. J Solid State Electrochem. 2017;21(12):3649–57.10.1007/s10008-017-3707-zSearch in Google Scholar

[214] Lv P, Zhou H, Mensah A, Feng Q, Lu K, Huang J, et al. In situ 3D bacterial cellulose/nitrogen-doped graphene oxide quantum dot-based membrane fluorescent probes for aggregation-induced detection of iron ions. Cellulose. 2019;26(10):6073–86.10.1007/s10570-019-02476-zSearch in Google Scholar

[215] Zhang W, Du Y, Wang ML. Noninvasive glucose monitoring using saliva nano-biosensor. Sens Bio-Sensing Res. 2015;4:23–9.10.1016/j.sbsr.2015.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[216] Yan C, Wang J, Kang W, Cui M, Wang X, Foo CY, et al. Highly stretchable piezoresistive graphene–nanocellulose nanopaper for strain sensors. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2014;26(13):2022–7.10.1002/adma.201304742Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[217] Balasubramanian P, Balamurugan TST, Chen S-M, Chen T-W, Tseng T-W, Lou B-S. A simple architecture of cellulose microfiber/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for the electrochemical determination of nitrobenzene in sewage water. Cellulose. 2018;25(4):2381–91.10.1007/s10570-018-1719-1Search in Google Scholar

[218] Yuan X, Wei Y, Chen S, Wang P, Liu L. Bio-based graphene/sodium alginate aerogels for strain sensors. RSC Adv. 2016;6(68):64056–64.10.1039/C6RA12469KSearch in Google Scholar

[219] Sadasivuni KK, Kafy A, Kim H-C, Ko H-U, Mun S, Kim J. Reduced graphene oxide filled cellulose films for flexible temperature sensor application. Synth Met. 2015;206:154–61.10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.05.018Search in Google Scholar

[220] Pacheco-Fernández I, Allgaier-Díaz DW, Mastellone G, Cagliero C, Díaz DD, Pino V. Biopolymers in sorbent-based microextraction methods. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020;125:115839.10.1016/j.trac.2020.115839Search in Google Scholar

[221] Li Y, Li Z, Wang W, Zhong S, Chen J, Wang A-J. Miniaturization of self-assembled solid phase extraction based on graphene oxide/chitosan coupled with liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfonamide residues in egg and honey. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1447:17–25.10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[222] Klongklaew P, Naksena T, Kanatharana P, Bunkoed O. A hierarchically porous composite monolith polypyrrole/octadecyl silica/graphene oxide/chitosan cryogel sorbent for the extraction and pre-concentration of carbamate pesticides in fruit juices. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(27):7185–93.10.1007/s00216-018-1323-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[223] Ziaei E, Mehdinia A, Jabbari A. A novel hierarchical nanobiocomposite of graphene oxide–magnetic chitosan grafted with mercapto as a solid phase extraction sorbent for the determination of mercury ions in environmental water samples. Analytica Chim Acta. 2014;850:49–56.10.1016/j.aca.2014.08.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[224] Ding X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Pan Q, Chen J, Huang Y, et al. Preparation of magnetic chitosan and graphene oxide-functional guanidinium ionic liquid composite for the solid-phase extraction of protein. Analytica Chim Acta. 2015;861:36–46.10.1016/j.aca.2015.01.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[225] Sadeghi SJ, Seidi S, Ghasemi JB. Graphene oxide–alizarin yellow R–magnetic chitosan nanocomposite: a selective and efficient sorbent for sub-trace determination of aluminum in water samples. Anal Methods. 2017;9(2):222–31.10.1039/C6AY03057BSearch in Google Scholar

[226] Seidi S, Majd M, Rezazadeh M, Shanehsaz M. Magnetic nanocomposite of chitosan-Schiff base grafted graphene oxide for lead analysis in whole blood. Anal Biochem. 2018;553:28–37.10.1016/j.ab.2018.05.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[227] Barati A, Kazemi E, Dadfarnia S, Haji Shabani AM. Synthesis/characterization of molecular imprinted polymer based on magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide for selective separation/preconcentration of fluoxetine from environmental and biological samples. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;46:212–21.10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.033Search in Google Scholar

[228] Rebekah A, Bharath G, Naushad M, Viswanathan C, Ponpandian N. Magnetic graphene/chitosan nanocomposite: a promising nano-adsorbent for the removal of 2-naphthol from aqueous solution and their kinetic studies. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2020;159:530–8.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.113Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[229] Kazemi E, Dadfarnia S, Haji Shabani AM, Ranjbar M. Synthesis, characterization, and application of a Zn (II)-imprinted polymer grafted on graphene oxide/magnetic chitosan nanocomposite for selective extraction of zinc ions from different food samples. Food Chem. 2017;237:921–8.10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[230] Shah J, Jan MR, Tasmia S. Magnetic chitosan graphene oxide composite for solid phase extraction of phenylurea herbicides. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;199:461–72.10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[231] Sereshti H, Samadi S, Asgari S, Karimi M. Preparation and application of magnetic graphene oxide coated with a modified chitosan pH-sensitive hydrogel: an efficient biocompatible adsorbent for catechin. RSC Adv. 2015;5(13):9396–404.10.1039/C4RA11572DSearch in Google Scholar

[232] Zhang M, Ma G, Zhang L, Chen H, Zhu L, Wang C, et al. Chitosan-reduced graphene oxide composites with 3D structures as effective reverse dispersed solid phase extraction adsorbents for pesticides analysis. Analyst. 2019;144(17):5164–71.10.1039/C9AN00927BSearch in Google Scholar

[233] Tabish MS, Hanapi NSM, Ibrahim WNW, Saim N, Yahaya N. Alginate-graphene oxide biocomposite sorbent for rapid and selective extraction of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using micro-solid phase extraction. 2019. J Indonesian J Chem. 2019;19(3):12.10.22146/ijc.38168Search in Google Scholar

[234] Kamran U, Park S-J. Chemically modified carbonaceous adsorbents for enhanced CO2 capture: a review. J Clean Prod. 2021;290:125776.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125776Search in Google Scholar

[235] Abuelnoor N, AlHajaj A, Khaleel M, Vega LF, Abu-Zahra MRM. Activated carbons from biomass-based sources for CO2 capture applications. Chemosphere. 2021;282:131111.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[236] Lee JW, Kim S, Torres Pineda I, Kang YT. Review of nanoabsorbents for capture enhancement of CO2 and its industrial applications with design criteria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;138:110524.10.1016/j.rser.2020.110524Search in Google Scholar

[237] Nocito F, Dibenedetto A. Atmospheric CO2 mitigation technologies: carbon capture utilization and storage. Curr OpGreen SustaChem. 2020;21:34–43.10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[238] English NJ, El-Hendawy MM, Mooney DA, MacElroy JMD. Perspectives on atmospheric CO2 fixation in inorganic and biomimetic structures. Coord Chem Rev. 2014;269:85–95.10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.015Search in Google Scholar

[239] Ünveren EE, Monkul BÖ, Sarıoğlan Ş, Karademir N, Alper E. Solid amine sorbents for CO2 capture by chemical adsorption: a review. Petroleum. 2017;3(1):37–50.10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[240] Keshavarz L, Ghaani MR, MacElroy JMD, English NJ. A comprehensive review on the application of aerogels in CO2-adsorption: materials and characterisation. Chem Eng J. 2021;412:128604.10.1016/j.cej.2021.128604Search in Google Scholar

[241] Alhwaige AA, Agag T, Ishida H, Qutubuddin S. Biobased chitosan hybrid aerogels with superior adsorption: role of graphene oxide in CO2 capture. RSC Adv. 2013;3(36):16011–20.10.1039/c3ra42022aSearch in Google Scholar

[242] Hsan N, Dutta PK, Kumar S, Bera R, Das N. Chitosan grafted graphene oxide aerogel: synthesis, characterization and carbon dioxide capture study. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2019;125:300–6.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[243] Kumar S, Wani MY, Koh J, Gil JM, Sobral AJFN. Carbon dioxide adsorption and cycloaddition reaction of epoxides using chitosan–graphene oxide nanocomposite as a catalyst. J Env Sci. 2018;69:77–84.10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[244] Shen Y, Wang H, Liu J, Zhang Y. Enhanced Performance of a Novel Polyvinyl Amine/Chitosan/Graphene Oxide Mixed Matrix Membrane for CO2 Capture. ACS Sustain Chem & Eng. 2015;3(8):1819–29.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00409Search in Google Scholar

[245] Spoială A, Ilie C-I, Ficai D, Ficai A, Andronescu E. Chitosan-based nanocomposite polymeric membranes for water purification—a review. Mater (Basel, Switz). 2021;14(9):2091.10.3390/ma14092091Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[246] Wang J, Zhang J, Han L, Wang J, Zhu L, Zeng H. Graphene-based materials for adsorptive removal of pollutants from water and underlying interaction mechanism. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;289:102360.10.1016/j.cis.2021.102360Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[247] Kong Q, Shi X, Ma W, Zhang F, Yu T, Zhao F, et al. Strategies to improve the adsorption properties of graphene-based adsorbent towards heavy metal ions and their compound pollutants: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2021;415:125690.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125690Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[248] Yadav A, Bagotia N, Sharma AK, Kumar S. Advances in decontamination of wastewater using biomass-basedcomposites: a critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;784:147108.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147108Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[249] Ahmed MJ, Hameed BH, Hummadi EH. Review on recent progress in chitosan/chitin-carbonaceous material composites for the adsorption of water pollutants. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;247:116690.10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116690Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[250] Wan Y, Zhang F, Li C, Xiong G, Zhu Y, Luo H. Facile and scalable production of three-dimensional spherical carbonized bacterial cellulose/graphene nanocomposites with a honeycomb-like surface pattern as potential superior absorbents. J Mater Chem A. 2015;3(48):24389–96.10.1039/C5TA07464ASearch in Google Scholar

[251] Zhang X, Liu D, Sui G. Superamphiphilic polyurethane foams synergized from cellulose nanowhiskers and graphene nanoplatelets. 2018;5(2):1701094.10.1002/admi.201701094Search in Google Scholar

[252] Arabkhani P, Asfaram A. Development of a novel three-dimensional magnetic polymer aerogel as an efficient adsorbent for malachite green removal. J Hazard Mater. 2020;384:121394.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121394Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[253] Zhu W, Jiang X, Liu F, You F, Yao C. Preparation of chitosan—graphene oxide composite aerogel by hydrothermal method and its adsorption property of methyl orange. Polymers. 2020;12(9):2169.10.3390/polym12092169Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[254] Yu Z, Hu C, Dichiara AB, Jiang W, Gu J. Cellulose nanofibril/carbon nanomaterial hybrid aerogels for adsorption removal of cationic and anionic organic dyes. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switz). 2020;10(1):169.10.3390/nano10010169Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[255] Hadi Najafabadi H, Irani M, Roshanfekr Rad L, Heydari Haratameh A, Haririan I. Removal of Cu2+, Pb2+ and Cr6+ from aqueous solutions using a chitosan/graphene oxide composite nanofibrous adsorbent. RSC Adv. 2015;5(21):16532–9.10.1039/C5RA01500FSearch in Google Scholar

[256] Suri A, Khandegar V, Kaur PJ. Ofloxacin exclusion using novel HRP immobilized chitosan cross-link with graphene-oxide nanocomposite. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2021;12:100515.10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100515Search in Google Scholar

[257] Shan H, Zeng C, Zhao C, Zhan H. Iron oxides decorated graphene oxide/chitosan composite beads for enhanced Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2021;172:197–209.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[258] Naeimi A, Amini M, Okati N. Removal of heavy metals from wastewaters using an effective and natural bionanopolymer based on Schiff base chitosan/graphene oxide. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2021;19:1301–12.10.1007/s13762-021-03247-9Search in Google Scholar

[259] Croitoru A-M, Ficai A, Ficai D, Trusca R, Dolete G, Andronescu E, et al. Chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposite membranes as adsorbents with applications in water purification. Mater (Basel, Switz). 2020;13(7):1687.10.3390/ma13071687Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[260] Amiri S, Asghari A, Vatanpour V, Rajabi M. Fabrication of chitosan-aminopropylsilane graphene oxide nanocomposite hydrogel embedded PES membrane for improved filtration performance and lead separation. J Env Manage. 2021;294:112918.10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112918Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[261] Shahbazi A, Marnani NN, Salahshoor Z. Synergistic and antagonistic effects in simultaneous adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions onto chitosan functionalized EDTA-silane/mGO. Biocatalysis Agric Biotechnol. 2019;22:101398.10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101398Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-31
Revised: 2022-02-17
Accepted: 2022-03-14
Published Online: 2022-04-05

© 2022 Nilofar Asim et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Theoretical and experimental investigation of MWCNT dispersion effect on the elastic modulus of flexible PDMS/MWCNT nanocomposites
  3. Mechanical, morphological, and fracture-deformation behavior of MWCNTs-reinforced (Al–Cu–Mg–T351) alloy cast nanocomposites fabricated by optimized mechanical milling and powder metallurgy techniques
  4. Flammability and physical stability of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch/poly(lactic acid) blend bionanocomposites
  5. Glutathione-loaded non-ionic surfactant niosomes: A new approach to improve oral bioavailability and hepatoprotective efficacy of glutathione
  6. Relationship between mechano-bactericidal activity and nanoblades density on chemically strengthened glass
  7. In situ regulation of microstructure and microwave-absorbing properties of FeSiAl through HNO3 oxidation
  8. Research on a mechanical model of magnetorheological fluid different diameter particles
  9. Nanomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of rubber–wood–plastic composites
  10. Investigative properties of CeO2 doped with niobium: A combined characterization and DFT studies
  11. Miniaturized peptidomimetics and nano-vesiculation in endothelin types through probable nano-disk formation and structure property relationships of endothelins’ fragments
  12. N/S co-doped CoSe/C nanocubes as anode materials for Li-ion batteries
  13. Synergistic effects of halloysite nanotubes with metal and phosphorus additives on the optimal design of eco-friendly sandwich panels with maximum flame resistance and minimum weight
  14. Octreotide-conjugated silver nanoparticles for active targeting of somatostatin receptors and their application in a nebulized rat model
  15. Controllable morphology of Bi2S3 nanostructures formed via hydrothermal vulcanization of Bi2O3 thin-film layer and their photoelectrocatalytic performances
  16. Development of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate-loaded folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles for prostate cancer treatment
  17. Enhancement of the mechanical properties of HDPE mineral nanocomposites by filler particles modulation of the matrix plastic/elastic behavior
  18. Effect of plasticizers on the properties of sugar palm nanocellulose/cinnamon essential oil reinforced starch bionanocomposite films
  19. Optimization of nano coating to reduce the thermal deformation of ball screws
  20. Preparation of efficient piezoelectric PVDF–HFP/Ni composite films by high electric field poling
  21. MHD dissipative Casson nanofluid liquid film flow due to an unsteady stretching sheet with radiation influence and slip velocity phenomenon
  22. Effects of nano-SiO2 modification on rubberised mortar and concrete with recycled coarse aggregates
  23. Mechanical and microscopic properties of fiber-reinforced coal gangue-based geopolymer concrete
  24. Effect of morphology and size on the thermodynamic stability of cerium oxide nanoparticles: Experiment and molecular dynamics calculation
  25. Mechanical performance of a CFRP composite reinforced via gelatin-CNTs: A study on fiber interfacial enhancement and matrix enhancement
  26. A practical review over surface modification, nanopatterns, emerging materials, drug delivery systems, and their biophysiochemical properties for dental implants: Recent progresses and advances
  27. HTR: An ultra-high speed algorithm for cage recognition of clathrate hydrates
  28. Effects of microalloying elements added by in situ synthesis on the microstructure of WCu composites
  29. A highly sensitive nanobiosensor based on aptamer-conjugated graphene-decorated rhodium nanoparticles for detection of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells
  30. Progressive collapse performance of shear strengthened RC frames by nano CFRP
  31. Core–shell heterostructured composites of carbon nanotubes and imine-linked hyperbranched polymers as metal-free Li-ion anodes
  32. A Galerkin strategy for tri-hybridized mixture in ethylene glycol comprising variable diffusion and thermal conductivity using non-Fourier’s theory
  33. Simple models for tensile modulus of shape memory polymer nanocomposites at ambient temperature
  34. Preparation and morphological studies of tin sulfide nanoparticles and use as efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of rhodamine B and phenol
  35. Polyethyleneimine-impregnated activated carbon nanofiber composited graphene-derived rice husk char for efficient post-combustion CO2 capture
  36. Electrospun nanofibers of Co3O4 nanocrystals encapsulated in cyclized-polyacrylonitrile for lithium storage
  37. Pitting corrosion induced on high-strength high carbon steel wire in high alkaline deaerated chloride electrolyte
  38. Formulation of polymeric nanoparticles loaded sorafenib; evaluation of cytotoxicity, molecular evaluation, and gene expression studies in lung and breast cancer cell lines
  39. Engineered nanocomposites in asphalt binders
  40. Influence of loading voltage, domain ratio, and additional load on the actuation of dielectric elastomer
  41. Thermally induced hex-graphene transitions in 2D carbon crystals
  42. The surface modification effect on the interfacial properties of glass fiber-reinforced epoxy: A molecular dynamics study
  43. Molecular dynamics study of deformation mechanism of interfacial microzone of Cu/Al2Cu/Al composites under tension
  44. Nanocolloid simulators of luminescent solar concentrator photovoltaic windows
  45. Compressive strength and anti-chloride ion penetration assessment of geopolymer mortar merging PVA fiber and nano-SiO2 using RBF–BP composite neural network
  46. Effect of 3-mercapto-1-propane sulfonate sulfonic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the growth of cobalt pillar by electrodeposition
  47. Dynamics of convective slippery constraints on hybrid radiative Sutterby nanofluid flow by Galerkin finite element simulation
  48. Preparation of vanadium by the magnesiothermic self-propagating reduction and process control
  49. Microstructure-dependent photoelectrocatalytic activity of heterogeneous ZnO–ZnS nanosheets
  50. Cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of molybdenum and tungsten disulphide on human bronchial cells
  51. Improving recycled aggregate concrete by compression casting and nano-silica
  52. Chemically reactive Maxwell nanoliquid flow by a stretching surface in the frames of Newtonian heating, nonlinear convection and radiative flux: Nanopolymer flow processing simulation
  53. Nonlinear dynamic and crack behaviors of carbon nanotubes-reinforced composites with various geometries
  54. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its therapeutic efficacy against colon cancer
  55. Synthesis and characterization of smart stimuli-responsive herbal drug-encapsulated nanoniosome particles for efficient treatment of breast cancer
  56. Homotopic simulation for heat transport phenomenon of the Burgers nanofluids flow over a stretching cylinder with thermal convective and zero mass flux conditions
  57. Incorporation of copper and strontium ions in TiO2 nanotubes via dopamine to enhance hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility
  58. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of starch films incorporated with chitosan nanoparticles
  59. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-strengthened recycled aggregate concrete
  60. Glucose-responsive nanogels efficiently maintain the stability and activity of therapeutic enzymes
  61. Tunning matrix rheology and mechanical performance of ultra-high performance concrete using cellulose nanofibers
  62. Flexible MXene/copper/cellulose nanofiber heat spreader films with enhanced thermal conductivity
  63. Promoted charge separation and specific surface area via interlacing of N-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes on carbon nitride nanosheets for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B
  64. Elucidating the role of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in mitigating the disease of the eggplant caused by Phomopsis vexans, Ralstonia solanacearum, and root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita
  65. An implication of magnetic dipole in Carreau Yasuda liquid influenced by engine oil using ternary hybrid nanomaterial
  66. Robust synthesis of a composite phase of copper vanadium oxide with enhanced performance for durable aqueous Zn-ion batteries
  67. Tunning self-assembled phases of bovine serum albumin via hydrothermal process to synthesize novel functional hydrogel for skin protection against UVB
  68. A comparative experimental study on damping properties of epoxy nanocomposite beams reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets
  69. Lightweight and hydrophobic Ni/GO/PVA composite aerogels for ultrahigh performance electromagnetic interference shielding
  70. Research on the auxetic behavior and mechanical properties of periodically rotating graphene nanostructures
  71. Repairing performances of novel cement mortar modified with graphene oxide and polyacrylate polymer
  72. Closed-loop recycling and fabrication of hydrophilic CNT films with high performance
  73. Design of thin-film configuration of SnO2–Ag2O composites for NO2 gas-sensing applications
  74. Study on stress distribution of SiC/Al composites based on microstructure models with microns and nanoparticles
  75. PVDF green nanofibers as potential carriers for improving self-healing and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy prepregs
  76. Osteogenesis capability of three-dimensionally printed poly(lactic acid)-halloysite nanotube scaffolds containing strontium ranelate
  77. Silver nanoparticles induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and late non-canonical autophagy in HT-29 colon cancer cells
  78. Preparation and bonding mechanisms of polymer/metal hybrid composite by nano molding technology
  79. Damage self-sensing and strain monitoring of glass-reinforced epoxy composite impregnated with graphene nanoplatelet and multiwalled carbon nanotubes
  80. Thermal analysis characterisation of solar-powered ship using Oldroyd hybrid nanofluids in parabolic trough solar collector: An optimal thermal application
  81. Pyrene-functionalized halloysite nanotubes for simultaneously detecting and separating Hg(ii) in aqueous media: A comprehensive comparison on interparticle and intraparticle excimers
  82. Fabrication of self-assembly CNT flexible film and its piezoresistive sensing behaviors
  83. Thermal valuation and entropy inspection of second-grade nanoscale fluid flow over a stretching surface by applying Koo–Kleinstreuer–Li relation
  84. Mechanical properties and microstructure of nano-SiO2 and basalt-fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete
  85. Characterization and tribology performance of polyaniline-coated nanodiamond lubricant additives
  86. Combined impact of Marangoni convection and thermophoretic particle deposition on chemically reactive transport of nanofluid flow over a stretching surface
  87. Spark plasma extrusion of binder free hydroxyapatite powder
  88. An investigation on thermo-mechanical performance of graphene-oxide-reinforced shape memory polymer
  89. Effect of nanoadditives on the novel leather fiber/recycled poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate) polymer composites for multifunctional applications: Fabrication, characterizations, and multiobjective optimization using central composite design
  90. Design selection for a hemispherical dimple core sandwich panel using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods
  91. Improving tensile strength and impact toughness of plasticized poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose
  92. Green synthesis of spinel copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) nanoparticles and their toxicity
  93. The effect of TaC and NbC hybrid and mono-nanoparticles on AA2024 nanocomposites: Microstructure, strengthening, and artificial aging
  94. Excited-state geometry relaxation of pyrene-modified cellulose nanocrystals under UV-light excitation for detecting Fe3+
  95. Effect of CNTs and MEA on the creep of face-slab concrete at an early age
  96. Effect of deformation conditions on compression phase transformation of AZ31
  97. Application of MXene as a new generation of highly conductive coating materials for electromembrane-surrounded solid-phase microextraction
  98. A comparative study of the elasto-plastic properties for ceramic nanocomposites filled by graphene or graphene oxide nanoplates
  99. Encapsulation strategies for improving the biological behavior of CdS@ZIF-8 nanocomposites
  100. Biosynthesis of ZnO NPs from pumpkin seeds’ extract and elucidation of its anticancer potential against breast cancer
  101. Preliminary trials of the gold nanoparticles conjugated chrysin: An assessment of anti-oxidant, anti-microbial, and in vitro cytotoxic activities of a nanoformulated flavonoid
  102. Effect of micron-scale pores increased by nano-SiO2 sol modification on the strength of cement mortar
  103. Fractional simulations for thermal flow of hybrid nanofluid with aluminum oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles with water and blood base fluids
  104. The effect of graphene nano-powder on the viscosity of water: An experimental study and artificial neural network modeling
  105. Development of a novel heat- and shear-resistant nano-silica gelling agent
  106. Characterization, biocompatibility and in vivo of nominal MnO2-containing wollastonite glass-ceramic
  107. Entropy production simulation of second-grade magnetic nanomaterials flowing across an expanding surface with viscidness dissipative flux
  108. Enhancement in structural, morphological, and optical properties of copper oxide for optoelectronic device applications
  109. Aptamer-functionalized chitosan-coated gold nanoparticle complex as a suitable targeted drug carrier for improved breast cancer treatment
  110. Performance and overall evaluation of nano-alumina-modified asphalt mixture
  111. Analysis of pure nanofluid (GO/engine oil) and hybrid nanofluid (GO–Fe3O4/engine oil): Novel thermal and magnetic features
  112. Synthesis of Ag@AgCl modified anatase/rutile/brookite mixed phase TiO2 and their photocatalytic property
  113. Mechanisms and influential variables on the abrasion resistance hydraulic concrete
  114. Synergistic reinforcement mechanism of basalt fiber/cellulose nanocrystals/polypropylene composites
  115. Achieving excellent oxidation resistance and mechanical properties of TiB2–B4C/carbon aerogel composites by quick-gelation and mechanical mixing
  116. Microwave-assisted sol–gel template-free synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles obtained from South African coal fly ash
  117. Pulsed laser-assisted synthesis of nano nickel(ii) oxide-anchored graphitic carbon nitride: Characterizations and their potential antibacterial/anti-biofilm applications
  118. Effects of nano-ZrSi2 on thermal stability of phenolic resin and thermal reusability of quartz–phenolic composites
  119. Benzaldehyde derivatives on tin electroplating as corrosion resistance for fabricating copper circuit
  120. Mechanical and heat transfer properties of 4D-printed shape memory graphene oxide/epoxy acrylate composites
  121. Coupling the vanadium-induced amorphous/crystalline NiFe2O4 with phosphide heterojunction toward active oxygen evolution reaction catalysts
  122. Graphene-oxide-reinforced cement composites mechanical and microstructural characteristics at elevated temperatures
  123. Gray correlation analysis of factors influencing compressive strength and durability of nano-SiO2 and PVA fiber reinforced geopolymer mortar
  124. Preparation of layered gradient Cu–Cr–Ti alloy with excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity
  125. Recovery of Cr from chrome-containing leather wastes to develop aluminum-based composite material along with Al2O3 ceramic particles: An ingenious approach
  126. Mechanisms of the improved stiffness of flexible polymers under impact loading
  127. Anticancer potential of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using a battery of in vitro tests
  128. Review Articles
  129. Proposed approaches for coronaviruses elimination from wastewater: Membrane techniques and nanotechnology solutions
  130. Application of Pickering emulsion in oil drilling and production
  131. The contribution of microfluidics to the fight against tuberculosis
  132. Graphene-based biosensors for disease theranostics: Development, applications, and recent advancements
  133. Synthesis and encapsulation of iron oxide nanorods for application in magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal therapy
  134. Contemporary nano-architectured drugs and leads for ανβ3 integrin-based chemotherapy: Rationale and retrospect
  135. State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials
  136. Insights on magnetic spinel ferrites for targeted drug delivery and hyperthermia applications
  137. A review on heterogeneous oxidation of acetaminophen based on micro and nanoparticles catalyzed by different activators
  138. Early diagnosis of lung cancer using magnetic nanoparticles-integrated systems
  139. Advances in ZnO: Manipulation of defects for enhancing their technological potentials
  140. Efficacious nanomedicine track toward combating COVID-19
  141. A review of the design, processes, and properties of Mg-based composites
  142. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for varied applications: Green renewable resources and energy-efficient synthetic routes
  143. Two-dimensional nanomaterial-based polymer composites: Fundamentals and applications
  144. Recent progress and challenges in plasmonic nanomaterials
  145. Apoptotic cell-derived micro/nanosized extracellular vesicles in tissue regeneration
  146. Electronic noses based on metal oxide nanowires: A review
  147. Framework materials for supercapacitors
  148. An overview on the reproductive toxicity of graphene derivatives: Highlighting the importance
  149. Antibacterial nanomaterials: Upcoming hope to overcome antibiotic resistance crisis
  150. Research progress of carbon materials in the field of three-dimensional printing polymer nanocomposites
  151. A review of atomic layer deposition modelling and simulation methodologies: Density functional theory and molecular dynamics
  152. Recent advances in the preparation of PVDF-based piezoelectric materials
  153. Recent developments in tensile properties of friction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced composite: A review
  154. Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO2
  155. Perspectives in biopolymer/graphene-based composite application: Advances, challenges, and recommendations
  156. Graphene-based nanocomposite using new modeling molecular dynamic simulations for proposed neutralizing mechanism and real-time sensing of COVID-19
  157. Nanotechnology application on bamboo materials: A review
  158. Recent developments and future perspectives of biorenewable nanocomposites for advanced applications
  159. Nanostructured lipid carrier system: A compendium of their formulation development approaches, optimization strategies by quality by design, and recent applications in drug delivery
  160. 3D printing customized design of human bone tissue implant and its application
  161. Design, preparation, and functionalization of nanobiomaterials for enhanced efficacy in current and future biomedical applications
  162. A brief review of nanoparticles-doped PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite for OLED and OPV
  163. Nanotechnology interventions as a putative tool for the treatment of dental afflictions
  164. Recent advancements in metal–organic frameworks integrating quantum dots (QDs@MOF) and their potential applications
  165. A focused review of short electrospun nanofiber preparation techniques for composite reinforcement
  166. Microstructural characteristics and nano-modification of interfacial transition zone in concrete: A review
  167. Latest developments in the upconversion nanotechnology for the rapid detection of food safety: A review
  168. Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks
  169. Molecular dynamics application of cocrystal energetic materials: A review
  170. Synthesis and application of nanometer hydroxyapatite in biomedicine
  171. Cutting-edge development in waste-recycled nanomaterials for energy storage and conversion applications
  172. Biological applications of ternary quantum dots: A review
  173. Nanotherapeutics for hydrogen sulfide-involved treatment: An emerging approach for cancer therapy
  174. Application of antibacterial nanoparticles in orthodontic materials
  175. Effect of natural-based biological hydrogels combined with growth factors on skin wound healing
  176. Nanozymes – A route to overcome microbial resistance: A viewpoint
  177. Recent developments and applications of smart nanoparticles in biomedicine
  178. Contemporary review on carbon nanotube (CNT) composites and their impact on multifarious applications
  179. Interfacial interactions and reinforcing mechanisms of cellulose and chitin nanomaterials and starch derivatives for cement and concrete strength and durability enhancement: A review
  180. Diamond-like carbon films for tribological modification of rubber
  181. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) modified cement-based materials: A systematic review
  182. Recent research progress and advanced applications of silica/polymer nanocomposites
  183. Modeling of supramolecular biopolymers: Leading the in silico revolution of tissue engineering and nanomedicine
  184. Recent advances in perovskites-based optoelectronics
  185. Biogenic synthesis of palladium nanoparticles: New production methods and applications
  186. A comprehensive review of nanofluids with fractional derivatives: Modeling and application
  187. Electrospinning of marine polysaccharides: Processing and chemical aspects, challenges, and future prospects
  188. Electrohydrodynamic printing for demanding devices: A review of processing and applications
  189. Rapid Communications
  190. Structural material with designed thermal twist for a simple actuation
  191. Recent advances in photothermal materials for solar-driven crude oil adsorption
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0087/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button