Home Physical Sciences Recent trends and advancements in the utilization of green composites and polymeric nanocarriers for enhancing food quality and sustainable processing
Article Open Access

Recent trends and advancements in the utilization of green composites and polymeric nanocarriers for enhancing food quality and sustainable processing

  • Nibedita Dey , Monisha Mohan , Ramesh Malarvizhi Dhaswini , Arpita Roy , Mohammed Mujahid Alam , Abdullah G. Al-Sehemi , Rasiravathanahalli Kaveriyappan Govindarajan , Muhammad Fazle Rabbee EMAIL logo , Thanigaivel Sundaram EMAIL logo and Maximilian Lackner EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 9, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Consumers now have access to synthetic natural organic nanofoods with tailored properties. These nanofoods use organic or inorganic nanostructured ingredients to enhance bioavailability, making them more effective than traditional supplements. Common materials include metals like iron, silver, titanium dioxide, magnesium, calcium, selenium, and silicates. Modifying the surface of these nanoparticles can provide unique benefits such as improved preservation, mechanical strength, moisture control, and flavor enhancement. Nanocarriers, such as polymeric, lipid, and dendrimer-based carriers, are used in food production. Common polymers include polyglycolic acid, poly (lactic acid), chitosan, and sodium alginate. Lipid carriers have a hydrophobic outer layer and a hydrophilic core, while dendrimer carriers are made from materials like polyethylene glycol and polyamidoamine. These nanocarriers can encapsulate up to 99% of active ingredients, ensuring precise delivery and stability. The nanocarriers in commercial foods are emulsions, inorganic coatings, and fiber coatings. For instance, cucumbers coated with nano emulsions show up to 99% antimicrobial effectiveness. Inorganic coatings, such as potassium sorbate, calcium caseinate, and titanium dioxide, significantly extend the shelf life of packaged foods. Lipid and protein-encapsulated nanosystems offer complete gas barrier protection. This review highlights the exclusive use of nanoparticles in food processing and packaging to enhance quality, safety, and shelf life.

Graphical abstract

1 Introduction

Innovation in foods has been of great interest to mankind for ages. They were differentiated based on their size and structure. Several building blocks of food are naturally occurring nanoparticles. For years together they have been a part of the roots of nutrition for centuries. Nanostructures of natural origin are made up of an ordered arrangement of proteins and starch. The ever-increasing demand for nutritionally advanced foods and smart foods has driven scientists to venture into many potential nanoparticles in foods. Both the major categories of nanofoods were studied and discussed in detail. The major edible foods were discussed under the food processing section. Packing of foods did throw light into the fact the incorporation of nanomaterials did yield it to have properties like antimicrobial control, biofilm control, barrier control for gases, sensing ability for toxins, etc. Special emphasis was given to the types, fabrication, and applications of nanocarriers used in food designing and upgradation. Organic-based nanocarriers have been found to be of maximum use in food processing to date. The main applications of nanotechnology in food are emphasized in the current review. Control and enhancement of essence, appeal, biological availability, sensing ability, gas diffusion, monitoring, etc., are very much essential for sensory and customer satisfaction. Smart packaging using functional materials and sensing toxins, pathogens, and undesired substances are also discussed in the present review. The main objective of the present review is to bring a comprehensive article that focuses on the latest updates used in green composites and polymeric nanocarriers for enhancing food quality and processing. The potential safety issues and trends are also brought to light and pondered on, to still curiosity in future researchers in the field of food nanotechnology.

1.1 Food nanotechnology – an overview

Naturally, our foods contain various essential components. These components are studied and differentiated based on their size and structure. Among them, we have many naturally occurring nanoparticles. They have consumed safely for generations together all around the world. The basic composition of any food (carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids) undergoes transformation and property changes at micro to nanometre ranges [1]. Proteins in food like beta-lactoglobulin get denatured by pH, heat, or pressure to form longer fibers or aggregates. These get assembled systematically to form a gel-like matrix. This is a natural example of the formation of curd from milk. Taking this natural phenomenon as an example, reports have been published on the utilization of alpha-lactalbumin of hydrolyzed protein from milk as a potential carrier of nano grade in pharmaceuticals, supplements, and food sector [2].

When polysaccharides and proteins are mixed in a solution, they separate spontaneously into micro- and nano-phased droplets. The recrystallized starch granules lie between 10 and 20 nm range. These crystals are formed and released in response to heat and hydration. This is the science behind our flat breads. For lipids, triglycerides can be crystallized and arranged as self-assembled hierarchical layers. These will range from 10 to 100 m initially and later will lead to the formation of flocs and finally fat network [3]. Nanostructures of natural origin are made up of ordered arrangements of proteins and starch. For example, arrangement of amylopectin and amylose of starch in food-binding processes are candidates for nanomaterials. Myriad structured proteins of the cow are made in its udder. This is a very apt example of nano assembly, nano synthesis, and nano dispensing of fats. Fine milling and grinding also change the phase of foods into the nanometre range. Milk in homogenized form has droplets ranging from 100 nm in size. The three basic nanostructures of milk namely (1) fat globules, (2) whey, and (3) casein are used to make most of the dairy products we use today. These include emulsions of butter, foams of ice and whipped cream, homogenized milk, solid cheese, and jelly-like yogurt [4]. This through light that the traditional dairy industry was actually a nanotechnology industry for ages together.

Nanotechnology has opened doors for many fields to merge together and thrive toward targeted goals of overall development. Their scope in the field of functional nutrition and foods with enhanced molecules of biological origin, but quite varying from nature, has been a major jump in research and development in the food industry. This field provides new innovative tools and alternatives for scientists to reach new extremes in the area of food sciences. The use of nanosized materials in the advancement of technology is called nanotechnology [5]. They are generally below 100 nm in overall size to be recruited under the nanometer scale. Their properties flip and become unique at the nanoscale compared to their bulk form. To name a few of these changes are novel chemical and physical properties – thermodynamics, solubility, etc., high surface area, enhanced electrical conductivity, etc. [6,7]. Milk protein casein is sought to be a good nanovesicle for drug delivery and food enrichment via encapsulation [8]. Extrusion-based degradation of natural food products like dextrin can be utilized for encapsulation processes [3]. When it comes to food, nanotization leads to enhanced taste, color, and texture perception of food for the customer. To name a few, mayonnaise and ice – creams made up of low nanostructured fat are found to be healthier than the ones made up of natural ingredients. Their consistency is found to be as creamier as its full-fat natural counterpart [9]. They also provide novel protection mechanisms against potential spoilage agents. Sensing through nano sensors and packaging using nanomaterials has enabled rapid, reliable, and highly sensitive alternatives for assaying contaminations in food. The processing of foods in encapsulations of nano forms to trigger heightened bioavailability of bioactive agents in foods is also gaining momentum [10]. These aspects of nanotechnology have revolutionized the food industry [11,12]. Hence, investing in this field is of great interest among the different countries [13].

The rising demand for quality foods with advanced health benefits is pushing researchers to search for ways of incorporating these nano systems, structures, and materials in foods without disturbing their natural nutritional balance [14]. They are designed to be non-toxic and have high stability at elevated temperatures and pressures [15]. The use of nanosized materials delivers a combined package of high-quality food with advanced safety and sensing abilities along with good health benefits of the food. Several industries and laboratories are working day and night to come up with various applications, protocols, and products for direct implementation of nanotechnology in foods [16,17]. Therefore, the overall application of food nanotechnology can be divided into two main categories – (1) nanostructured agents and (2) nano sensors for food. The first category will contain domains like food packing and processing. In food processing, criteria like additives, carriers, anti-caking agents, fillers, etc., will be covered. In the packaging section, criteria like antimicrobial and mechanical durability agents will be emphasized. The second category will deal with food safety and quality assessment and agents [18].

1.2 Green composites and their properties

Green composites, made from renewable resources and biodegradable polymers like starch, chitosan, and cellulose, are eco-friendly alternatives to traditional petroleum-based composites [19,20]. They offer benefits such as lighter weight, flexibility, and reduced carbon emissions, making them carbon-neutral and compostable. However, drawbacks include lower strength, poor fire resistance, and moisture absorption, which can cause fiber swelling [21]. Reinforced with materials like clay nanoparticles or cellulose nanofibers, green composites decompose naturally through microbial action, minimizing environmental impact [22]. Despite some limitations, they are gaining popularity for their sustainability and reduce harm to the ecosystem.

Green composites typically use biodegradable polymers made from substances like chitosan, cellulose, or starch. The biodegradation depends on the polymers, microorganism type, and environmental conditions. Biodegradable polymers based on starch or synthetic polymers may be used as a useful substitute with superior qualities. Nevertheless, the ingredients in packaging materials made from synthetic starch are not entirely harmless. It is possible for harmful compounds to migrate into food products and have an impact on people. This issue is prompting research into substitute packaging materials [23]. Biodegradable films have the following qualities: they are ecological, non-poisonous, flavorless, and odorless. These films protect food products from oxidation and increase shelf life and quality without sacrificing customer acceptability in low-humidity environments by exhibiting extremely little oxygen penetrability [24]. Due to its superior barrier qualities and gas selectivity, plastic packaging not only offers protection during storage and transportation but also stability and an extended shelf life for food. However, because of their hydrophilic nature, natural biopolymers, such as those made from proteins and starch, usually have strong oxygen barriers but low moisture resistance [25]. Improved gas, moisture, and scent barrier qualities of bioplastics are needed to meet the stringent criteria of some food packaging, such as an oxygen barrier lower than 5 cc·m−2-day for items like instant coffee [26]. These barrier qualities, which guard against oxygen, water vapor, and UV light, are crucial for preserving food quality while it is being stored [27]. When it comes to safeguarding food under stressful circumstances like handling, processing, and storage, a packaging system’s mechanical qualities are essential. These mechanical qualities are mostly determined by the polymer matrix’s structure. Important parameters including elastic modulus, elongation at break, and tensile strength are utilized to evaluate the mechanical performance of the material. Since the food may contain acidic ingredients that could interact with the packaging material, chemical resistance is also essential. Knowing the food’s chemical makeup before packing is crucial for safety. Mechanical characteristics of the material can change when molecules from the food are absorbed into the biopolymer matrix. Furthermore, the packing material’s thermal characteristics, as determined by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, are significant. These thermal properties ensure that the packaging can withstand the temperatures required for storing and transporting food products safely [28,29]

The mechanical properties of green composites, such as tensile strength, elongation at break, and modulus, are influenced by the type and treatment of natural fibers and the polymer matrix. Fibers like jute or hemp can enhance the strength and stiffness of the material, making it suitable for packaging applications. The strength and flexibility of green composites largely depend on the combination of fibers and the matrix. For example, reinforcing materials with natural fibers like flax or hemp improves mechanical strength. The development of fiber-reinforced polymers also has the potential to reduce the carbon footprint [30]. In the case of sugar palm yarn/glass fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composites, chemical treatment of the sugar palm yarn significantly improved fiber/matrix interfacial adhesion, resulting in enhanced overall mechanical properties [31]. Green composites often have lower thermal stability than synthetic polymers, limiting their use in high-temperature food processing [19]. Some green composites, like those made from polylactic acid (PLA), provide transparency, making them ideal for food packaging where visibility is important. PLA has gained popularity as a biopolymer in recent decades due to its renewable nature, non-toxicity, wide availability, affordability, excellent mechanical properties, and versatile applications in food packaging [32].

1.3 Polymeric nanocarriers and their properties

Polymeric nanocarriers, including nanoparticles, nanofibers, and nano capsules, offer advanced solutions in food processing and packaging, such as enhancing nutrient delivery and providing active packaging functions. Hydrocolloids, such as polysaccharides, are extensively used in both food and non-food applications as crystallization inhibitors, encapsulating agents, gelling agents, solidifying agents, and stabilizers. These hydrocolloid coatings demonstrate excellent permeability to gasses and lipids, but they are less permeable to moisture, making them effective in maintaining food quality [33]. Many hydrocolloid polymers also exhibit remarkable mechanical properties, which are advantageous for protecting delicate food items. Among these, protein-based polymeric foods are particularly intriguing due to their multifunctionality. Polymeric nanocarriers, such as those based on chitosan or PLA nanoparticles, are used to encapsulate bioactive compounds, flavors, or preservatives. These nanocarriers enable controlled release in response to environmental triggers such as pH, temperature, or enzymatic action, which helps to extend food freshness and improve quality [34]. Food systems typically contain complex mixtures of polypeptides and polysaccharides, whose structures vary based on chain length, chemical and physical properties, and molecular aggregation. Polymeric foods derived from plants, animals, and microorganisms composed of peptides, polysaccharides, and proteins are key contributors to the structure, function, and shelf life of food products [35]. The performance of polymeric food coatings depends on several factors, including their color, mechanical strength, and barrier properties, all of which are influenced by the preparation method. For example, coatings made with modified (oxidized) starch exhibit superior mechanical properties compared to those made with unmodified starch [36]. Nanocarriers can also be chemically modified to improve compatibility with food ingredients or packaging materials. For instance, surface modifications using surfactants or coupling agents can enhance the dispersion of nanoparticles within the polymer matrix, improving the barrier properties of the packaging. These advances in polymer nanocarriers hold great promise in food processing, contributing to better preservation and protection while extending shelf life [37].

Nanomaterials differ from bulk materials in their unique properties and behaviors, with their diameters spanning from 1 to 100 nm [38]. More research is being done on their multifaceted functions, especially in antibacterial and antioxidant applications. Numerous sectors, including automotive, aerospace, electronics, packaging, and biomedical, use these materials [39]. Because of their many uses, nanomaterials are becoming more and more in demand in the packaging sector. Usually, smaller than 100 nm in size, polymeric nanocarriers take use of their tiny size and high surface-to-volume ratio to improve their interaction with food matrices. By doing this, it becomes easier to integrate encapsulated active components like antioxidants and antimicrobials into food packaging materials and guarantees that food products are effectively protected and preserved. It also improves the transport efficiency of these compounds [40]. Foods’ physical properties, such as liquid or solid state, affect how well antimicrobial agents are absorbed and diffused in food products, which in turn affects the activities of antimicrobials [41]. Polymeric nanocarriers often exhibit enhanced thermal stability, making them suitable for processing at higher temperatures without degradation. This is critical in food packaging applications, where heat treatments are involved (e.g., during sterilization or pasteurization). The incorporation of nanocarriers into biopolymer matrices can significantly improve the mechanical properties of the packaging material, such as toughness, elasticity, and resistance to breakage. Nanocarriers act as reinforcement fillers, improving the strength of biopolymers like PLA or starch-based materials, which are otherwise brittle.

1.4 Nanostructure materials in the food sector

They are the first category of nanotechnological application in the food industry. They offer new opportunities for processing edible goods [42]. Unique and innovative structures are created and designed using different functional nanostructures. They form the building blocks of such marvelous food varieties. Weiss and his team in 2006 reported that nanostructures in the form of fibers, emulsions, particles, and liposomes have potential applications in food building, processing, storing, and packaging [43]. Materials of nano origin administered in foods basically fall into three sections: (1) organic, (2) inorganic, and (3) surface functionalized compounds [44].

1.4.1 Organic engineered nanostructured food materials

Many substances used in this section are of natural origin. They are engineered to harbor structures and features of their choice in foods. They have specialized characteristics like increased bioavailability, enhanced antioxidant property, and increased uptake in the gut compared to their bulk counterparts. Some of the major candidates in this section are food additives and supplements incorporated into foods to enhance their nutritional value [45]. To name a few examples of the former we have ascorbic acid, citric acid, and benzoic acid. For the latter vitamins E, vitamin A, beta carotenes, isoflavones, omega-3 fatty acids, lutein, and coenzyme-10 are some examples [46]. Evidence for engineered nanomaterial of organic origin is manipulated lycopene. The synthetic carotenoid of tomato is manufactured in nanosized from and is equivalent to its natural bulk counterpart in terms of functionality [47]. Materials whose sources are from plants like fats, proteins, nutraceuticals, and sugars are all part of organic nanomaterials used in foods.

1.4.2 Inorganic engineered nanostructured food materials

Inorganic materials in nanoforms are mostly transition metals. These metals range from iron, silver, and titanium dioxide to earth metals (magnesium and calcium) to non- metals (selenium, silicates). Packaging is the major sector where inorganic nanostructures are used in foods. Silver in its nanoform is in great demand in the consumer market. They cover all areas in food processing and packing (antimicrobial agent, supplement, ant odorant, food contact surfaces, etc.). Nanosilica is an amorphous nanomaterial known for food contact and packing utility applications. Selenium in its nanoform is marketed in green tea for its proclaimed benefits to health [48]. Patents have been filed on the potential food applications of nano calcium. Along with magnesium and iron in nanotized form are used as supplements in foods. Nano iron is also used to clean contaminated water (killing pathogens and breakdown organic matter). A specially engineered salt called nano salt is designed for customers with hypertension to cut down their salt consumption in foods [49]. Their nano size gives them a large surface area that spreads in food even in the smallest of quantities [50]. Milk tasting like cola and fat-reduced mayonnaise is still on the way to the commercial market. Nano sensors in food products act as barcodes that can be detected electronically [51].

1.4.3 Surface-functionalized nanostructured food materials

These structures add some special functionalities to the food. These can be preservation properties, mechanical strength, barrier for gas diffusion, moisture control, flavor control, etc. They have a tendency to have a greater affinity toward food matrices and food components [52]. Therefore, they are restricted from moving out of their packing or the GI tract. Bentonite is engineered to form nano-clay from volcanic rocks. They are bound to polymers with their nano-scaled layers to form a gas barrier packing for foods [53].

2 Nanocarrier

They belong to the first category of nanostructured materials used in foods. They are classified as organic and inorganic or a combination of both [7]. Liposomes, polymers, nano emulsions, micelles, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, etc., are components of organic-based nanocarriers. Quantum dots and metallic structures are comprised of inorganic-based nanocarriers [14]. The major types of materials of nano origin and different nano carriers that are used in the food sector have been depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1 
               Schematic representation of different types of nanocarriers used in foods.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of different types of nanocarriers used in foods.

2.1 Polymers

Biodegradable synthetic and natural polymers are utilized to make specialized carriers of nano range. Biocompatibility is also an essential aspect that in kept in mind while designing these carriers [15]. Polyglycolic acid, poly(ε-caprolactone), poly(amino acid), poly(lactic acid), polymethyl methacrylate, and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) are few synthetic resins used for making polymeric nanocarriers. Chitosan, sodium alginate, fibrin, and agarose are few natural polymers used for the same [13]. Polymeric nanoparticles have special features like sustained release and enhanced flexibility to apt integration with food materials in the form of supplements and growth factors [51].

2.2 Liposomes

These are concentric double layers of lipids. Nanocarriers will have a core of aqueous nature enclosed by functionalized surfactants. These can be synthetic or natural phospholipid layers. Liposomal nanocarriers are categorized based on the type of vesicles they contain. These ca be unilamellar vesicles, multilamellar vesicles, and oligolamellar vesicles [52]. They are abbreviated as ULV, MLV, and OLV, respectively. Unilamellar vesicles based on size are divided into four subclasses – nearly 20 nm in diameter (small unilamellar vesicles), 20–100 nm in diameter (medium unilamellar vesicles), larger than 100 nm (large unilamellar vesicles), and larger than 1,000 nm in diameter (giant unilamellar vesicles). Virosomes, archaeosomes, immunoliposomes, and stealth liposomes are some carriers that naturally have stable and soluble biocompatible cores [53].

2.3 Dendrimers

They are macromolecular nanocarriers that are monodispersed in a medium. They consist of an inner core center and branched dendrites outside. They can be constructed from convergent monomers or divergent monomers via polymerization [54]. Their number of branching and repeating units determines the size and shape of the dendrimer. Polyethylene glycol, polyamidoamine, polyethyleneimine, chitin, melamine, polypropyleneimine, and poly l-glutamic acid are some fundamental units used in dendrimer formation [55]. Targeted delivery is feasible using the core of the dendrimer for loading many functional and bioactive agents [56].

2.4 Carbon nanocarriers

Graphene sheets can be arranged in a cylindrical structure for nanotubes or capped structures on both sides as bucky balls. Based on the walls of the carbon structures, they can be classified as single-walled nanotubes and multiwalled nanotubes [57]. Based on the functionalization process and storage conditions, carbon-based nanocarriers can be divided into surface-grafted nanocarriers, ligand-attached nanocarriers, and solvent-dispersed nanocarriers [58]. The geometrical arrangement of carbon atoms to manifest hexagonal and pentagonal sides is also a type of carbon nanocarrier called fullerenes. Bioactive compounds can be loaded in the core and used for sustained and targeted delivery in foods [59].

2.5 Hydrogel nanocarriers

They are three-dimensional networks of polymers with hydrophilic groups on their surfaces. They absorb a large quantity of biological fluids or water. These groups can be –SO3H, −CONH, −OH, CONH2, etc. [60]. The bonds that hold these polymers intact are a combination of van der Waals interactions, covalent bonds, dipole–dipole interactions, physical entanglements, and hydrogen bonds [61]. The polymers also make their own crosslinked networks. Some basic polymers discussed in the above sections form good hydrogel nanocarriers too. They get influenced by temperature, pH, electric field, and light’s intensity [62].

2.6 Quantum dots

They are examples of inorganic nanocarriers. They are crystals in the nano range of semiconductor materials. They have sizes ranging from 2 to 10 nm. They are fabricated in such a way that they emit light in all ranges (from UV to IR) [63]. The emitted intensity is propositional to the subcellular responses. They are biocompatible and stable and harbor surfaces to functionalize with various biomolecules [63,64].

2.7 Nano emulsions

These are tiny drop-like structures with various size ranges. Generally, they are approximately 100 nm. They are classified into two major categories based on the spatial configuration between the two major building blocks – water and oil. Basically, it comprises oil suspended with an aqueous phase [65]. This is referred to as oil in the water micellar system. The reverse of this is termed as water in an oil micellar system. Nanoemulsions have a unique property of light scattering in the weakest order [65]. Hence, they are incorporated in light foods for fortification like soft drinks, whitening cosmetics, soups, waters, and sauces [66].

3 Preparation methods for nanocarriers

There are several methods and approaches to fabricate a nanocarrier. New techniques are emerging every day for the food-based application and generation of nanocarriers. The pioneer technique is emulsification [67]. Each carrier has its own set of specifications incorporated in the fabrication process to yield its characteristic traits. Different methods of preparation of nanocarriers are represented in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
               Schematic representation of different methods of preparation of nanocarriers.
Figure 2

Schematic representation of different methods of preparation of nanocarriers.

3.1 Conventional methods

3.1.1 Homogenization

Lipid-based carriers are basically synthesized using high-pressure homogenization. Few examples are solid lipid-based nanoparticles, emulsions, etc. The high-pressure atmosphere creates shear stress of high magnitude. This leads to the breaking of particles to the nano range [68]. The atmosphere in which the homogenization takes place divides the whole process into two as hot and cold. The hot homogenization process gives rise to low particle sizes as the viscosity decreases with an increase in temperature [69,70]. The main drawback associated with this technique is the possibility of degradation of the core food component that is carried in these carriers. Cold homogenization is the remedy for the former disadvantage [71].

3.1.2 Diffusion method

Polymer and lipid-based carriers are nowadays made using this method. The oil medium will harbor the polymer in a solvent of organic nature. Stabilizers are added and mixed well. Water will initiate the diffusion of the solvent and form nanocarriers. Later, the solvent is removed. The complexity of the nanocarriers can be enhanced by double emulsification processes [66]. A minute amount of water is added to an organic solvent that is immiscible in water. The phospholipids are dissolved and further large amount of aqueous medium is incorporated to create a water in oil in water-type medium [72]. A monolayer of fatty acids is formed around the organic matter, resulting in an aqueous core. The ability of entrapment can be increased by the removal of solvent afterward [73,74].

3.1.3 Injection method

The solvent used for this method generally uses two solvents, namely ethanol or ether. Mixtures of ether – methanol and diethyl ether – are also used to dissolve the constituent lipids [75]. The ether-based lipid solution is added to the water medium. This leads to the formation of nanocarriers [76,77]. As the speed is increased, LUVs can be fabricated. Ether injection techniques allow the removal of solvent from the end product. This helps in concentrating products and extending running time. Even the entrapment efficiency is enhanced. The final products are heterogeneous in nature and need high-temperature working conditions [78]. The sizes range from 700 to 200 nm. For the ethanol-based injection technique, concentration can be enhanced for the core in the water phase by doing multiple incorporations of formative lipids [79]. It forms MLVs and the process is also simple and quick [80]. The disadvantage is the same as the former technique which is the formation of heterogenous end products. The sizes vary from 30 to 110 nm. The removal of ethanol is a herculean task followed by liposomes generated in lower concentrations. This removal is very crucial when liposomes are created with a motive for microbial treatment and cell culture-based applications [81].

3.1.4 Evaporation method (reverse phase)

The main principle behind this is the formation of micelles in the reversed order. The central core is an aqueous medium and the lipid surrounds the core in a solvent of organic nature [82]. An organic solvent is sonicated after the addition of minute quantities of aqueous and lipids. This produces micelles in the inverted order. A rotary evaporator is employed on the crude mixture to produce a gel-like matrix [83]. Further removal of the solvent leads to the gel collapsing and vesicles get suspended [84,85]. The major drawback of this method is the fact that the material to be incorporated is in contact with the external organic solvent. Hence, fragile and degradable materials are at great risk of breaking down during the process of incorporation in the nanocarrier. But the potential encapsulation efficiency is 80% [86].

3.2 Emerging technologies

3.2.1 Channel method (microfluids)

Polydimethylsiloxane wafers are usually employed in the fabrication of the channel. Two wafers are attached together and one side of the wafer is engraved [81]. The engraving width is kept to be around 1,000 μm max. One outlet and two inlet lines are carved and connected to the microfluid channel [87]. The central point is the two inlet points merging at the center. The aqueous medium is incorporated from the outer inlet and the lipid is from the central channel. This creates a difference in the shear forces due to the different liquid interfaces and hence leads to the fabrication of the liposome [88]. The perks of this technique are the ease of operation, vesicle size control, and mono-layer dispersion. A continuous system of fabrication through micro channels is yet to be devised.

3.2.2 Fluid method (supercritical)

The drawbacks of the conventional method are tackled at times using gas or liquids. These are called supercritical fluids. A certain parameter gives these fluids or gases unique properties that aid in nanocarrier formation [85]. For example, carbon dioxide and water are used above critical thermodynamic points of pressure (250 bar) and temperature (60°C). Based on the property opted by the supercritical fluid, they are classified as antisolvent precipitation technique and rapid expansion method [86,89]. The main highlights of this method are better liposome particle design and environmental friendliness. Scalability is an issue that needs to be addressed as it may lead to varying size ranges for the end product [90].

3.2.3 Self-assembly method

It is a process where disordered structures arrange and regulate themselves in an ordered fashion [91]. These occur without a prior external force. The formation of micelles itself is a self-assembly. It has not been used to its full potential yet. Encoding them will give way to various properties never ventured [92].

4 Current trends

Attributing to the large surface-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles, the food quality, physical and chemical features, and biological potency can be altered with good efficiency. Gold, silver, titanium, zinc oxides, and carbon nanomaterials of various dimensions are structures used in food storage applications [93]. The main issue that is to be tackled in the current day scenario is the wastage of food. This leads to a major loss for the company and a shortage of supply for the customers. The wastage of raw resources and recycling of the same for environmental cleanliness is an overall loss for the world economy. 1.3 billion tons of food wastages have been recorded every year all around the world by the special division of food and agriculture organizations under the United Nations. These losses are due to poor harvest approaches, market wastages, transport delay, and consumer wastages [88]. The ability to fortify the quality of foods should go hand in hand with food wastage management initiatives. A combined effort will help the present generation to solve the emerging crisis situations related to food wastage and environmental remediation. As previously discussed in the above sections, nanotechnology has been successfully utilized in the food sector for production, processing, preservation, distribution, and sensing [88]. The plastic physical barriers imposed and proposed by these novel functional nanomaterials provide functional fortification to the food component simultaneously. This enhances shelf life and overall quality and productivity. Sensing is also feasible for various toxins and pathogens via changes in color and hue [94]. These intelligent and novel systems have incorporated a greater assessment in the food industry through their smart reporting and controlling of the foods with the help of localized sensing. The nutraceutical value of the food is also enhanced to a good level. Nanotubes have been reported as potent cellular damaging agents for Escherichia coli. The main mechanism is the direct puncturing of the cell wall [94]. Biosensors made up of nanomaterials have been reported previously for their proficiency in sensing pathogenic that are carcinogenic in nature. Ideally, post-harvest-based techniques are preferred and researched on now a day. It aids in the enhancement of texture, flavor, consistency, and availability for assimilation [95]. Many confectionaries use coated with nano edible coatings for their anti-bacterial properties [96]. Innovative filters impregnated with nanomaterials have been devised to remove color from extracts of beetroot. They enable the retention of pigments and flavors for red wine. Similarly, milk is filtered out of its lactose ingredient and altered to be consumer friendly for people who are lactose intolerant. The same principle can be employed for the removal of bacterial pathogens from beverages like milk or water without any heat treatments. Beers are also filtered and refined using nano sieves [97,98].

Healthier foods are feasible at much more economical costs thanks to nanotechnology in the food industry. Low-salt, low-sugar, and low-fat products have their own place in the world share market due to the ever increase in lifestyle disorders among people. Certain nanomaterials are accepted to such a level that they are used in bulk measures in factories as additives in foods. E551 and E171 made of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide are very well-known additives used in bulk form [99]. Poly-d,l-lactide in bio-degenerative encapsulated form is used to enhance the shelf life of various vegetables and fruits, especially tomatoes [100]. Neosino, a supplement of green tea in the nano range, is commercialized effectively today because of the nanotechnology revolution in the food market. Along with the former Aquanova, an active ingredient of canola oil is used to increase the biological availability and absorption of most of the fat-soluble vitamins through pills. Omega fatty acids, beta carotene, nutraceuticals, and medicinal drugs in carriers of nano range (Nutra lease) have also been successfully commercialized in recent times. Many Western countries have their very own nano-fortified foods in the form of teas, fruit juices, oats drinks, and supplements composed of tuna oil with breads and slim shakes made up of nanoceuticals [101,102].

When it comes to packaging the ultimate main to avoid spoilage and contamination to the maximum. Muscle and meat-based products are packaged with utmost care with the latest smart packing systems to ensure better shelf life, good tenderness of products due to enzymatic activity, retain the hue of the protein meat produced, and reduce overall weight loss [80]. The unique flavors and colors generated through these nanosystems in accordance with the foods help the consumers to analyze the condition of the food products based on the presence of contamination, toxins, pathogens, or pesticides [103,104]. Colloids of starch are often used as carriers for potential antimicrobials for packaging materials [105]. These packaging materials can harbor and transport antioxidants, flavors, enzymes, anti-browning materials, etc., for the preservation of foods post-opening of the sealed package [106]. Many nanoparticles (magnesium dioxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, gold, silver) used in packaging provide high thermal resistance, mechanical stability, and low mass along with anti-pathogenic properties. They also are capable of generating reactive oxygen species which is found to be detrimental for most of the pathogens. They also provide a suitable barrier against oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapors, ultraviolet radiations, chemical fumes, etc., and fire resistance can be attained for smart packing materials by filling their matrix with composites in nano sizes. Silicate nanoplatelets, cellulose-based nanofibers, chitin- or chitosan-based materials, carbon nanotubes, clay, graphene, and many more components can be used as fillers for active packaging in foods [107]. The features of the above-mentioned materials get further enhanced due to the uniquely high surface-to-volume ratio attained in the nano dimension [108]. Silver zeolite is specialized used in the antimicrobial packaging of foods. The silver nanoparticle is responsible for the ROS activity and the ceramic used in combination with silver zeolite is in charge of the disinfection mechanism [109]. Nanocarbon is of great use in the elimination of unpleasant odors and flavors, especially carbon dioxide. Many bottles and packaging materials are fabricated from bentonite (nanoclay) as it has advanced gas barrier features, thereby aiding in beverage stabilization and extending shelf life [110]. Nanocor, a US-based company, developed a nanocomposite harboring nanocrystals in beer bottles. These special bottles have very limited carbon dioxide loss and the inflow of oxygen is also very low [111]. Similarly, ethylene-vinyl alcohol incorporated with clay and PLA forms a nanocomposite with good oxygen barrier control for foods [112]. The addition of nanofillers provides better degradation properties to the polymer than when compared to its parent polymer. Hence making the nano system to be environment friendly [110].

4.1 Trends in food processing

There are many companies today in the market that have revolutionized the nano-based food supplements and products in the market. A self-assembled nanostructure made up of Leaseanola essential oil is commercialized by Israel to reduce cholesterol absorption in the gut into the systemic circulation. It is a form of liquid self-assembled structure (NSSL) [113,114]. Shenzhen in China is a major trader for nano tea as a beverage. A team of researchers from United States have come up with micelles incorporated with lycopene. They have been used in fortified juices and beverages. The size of the micelles ranges to a max of 100 nm in dimension (diameter). RBC Life Sciences in the United States has successfully launched a flavor-based diet shake and health drink for people who are calorie conscious. Nanoscale chocolate and vanilla flavors are converted into low-calorie slim shakes of preferred choice [115]. Even baby products are introduced to these remarkable nanosystems for better nutritional support to infants. Los Angeles-based toddler Health Company has launched an oats drink as a beverage for babies to provide enhanced essential nutritional needs. This beverage has 33% more micro and macro nutrients which will aid in the overall development of the infant [116]. In Australia, a bread company has successfully incorporated nanocapsules of essential oils into confectionary items to elevate their nutritive values. Omega 3 FA is one of the main essential oils that they majorly use in their products. A supplement company in the United States has bagged the attention of pharmaceutical as they have formulated nanodroplets that can be loaded with vitamin B-12 with great efficiency [117]. Kimchi has been tailored with nanosized bacterial species to have a dual function of fermentation as well as deal with the colitis of consumers. Lactobacillus plantarum has been nanosized and substituted with traditional probiotics used in kimchi. The nano size gives it a unique feature of being anticolitic [118]. German-based Aquanova has fabricated nano micelles that have special features to improve the solubility of various active agents like omega fatty acids, vitamins, β-carotenes, etc. [119]. Oats-based nutritional drinks with a variety of flavors are formulated in combination with iron nanoparticles. The nanoparticles increase the biological availability and reactivity of the overall health drink with the body. The size ranges to an approximate value of 300 nm [120]. Cutting boards are incorporated with nanosized silver to provide good antimicrobial features to the food in contact with the board [121]. Baby feeding bottles are lined with nano silver for better storage conditions of infant formulas. These bottles are in great demand in South Korea. A special type of nano colloid is utilized to reduce the surface tension of portable drinking water. It also enhances solvent properties and neutralizes free radicals. It is composed of hydracel and silicate minerals [122].

Solgar, a US-based product is a nano nutrient of the CoQ-10 enzyme. It increases the absorption of lipids in the gut. The size of the nano food product is around 30 nm in size. Clusters in the nano range are devised to make a yummy alternative for a low-calorie diet. The flavors are boosted using nanoclusters of cocoa to provide chocolate or coffee essence. The main nanocluster consists of ingredients like spirulina and artichoke. Spirulina provides the protein base for nourishment and muscle mass [123]. Another type of nutrient derived from soya beans is nanochelated to form carrier systems and vehicles for various active nutrients. Their carrier matrix is composed of 50-nm-sized phosphatidylserine base. Even antioxidants can be delivered with sustained release features. Lypo-Spheric is a well-known vitamin C health booster supplement that is used by consumers all around the United States for potential health applications [124]. Hawaii has its very own fortified juice of Jambu that is loaded with daily essential vitamins and minerals. Silver along with 22 rich minerals is supplied to the consumer via this health drink [125]. For patients with acidity and ulcer issues, Aquanova has brought to the market SoluE, a nano supplement with vitamin E. It soothes the stomach and prevents an acidic environment for the mucosal layer of the gut. Appetite can be stimulated by dispersed nanocrystals in association with micronized components. Ceramic products of the nano range have been used to inhibit the breakdown and degradation of oils. They are known by the commercial name Oil Fresh [126].

4.2 Trends in food packaging

Silicon dioxide is a very bright candidate in terms of food drying, hygroscopic, preservation, coloring, anti-caking, and packaging [127]. Titanium dioxide is used along with dairy products like cheese, butter, and milk as a whitening agent. They are also used in food packaging and preservation. Zinc oxide is utilized in packaging materials because of their unique property to inhibit the flow of air, especially oxygen, hence delaying spoilage of products [128]. Silver nanoparticles in smart packaging aid in the antibacterial protection of the foods and eliminate the chemicals produced by ripened fruits and vegetables, hence preserving them for longer hours [129]. For fried food preservation, nanoparticles of inorganic ceramics are opted for extensively [130]. Polymers like chitosan are used to preserve fresh fruits like strawberries and mandarin. Food contaminants and adulterants are efficiently detected through nanoplate-shaped graphene composites [131]. Water packaging is made safe and secure by cellulose nanocrystals lining into packaging bottles. Magnetic nanomaterials are used for monitoring pathogens in foods as they have large surface areas [132]. For foods that require quality inspection and vacuum-sealed packaging, carbon nanotubes are employed with regard to their thermal, electrical, mechanical, and optical properties. The strength of packaging materials along with barrier properties were enhanced by including clay-polymer composites in them. The type of material opted in the packaging for foods will determine the oxidations that it would hinder, the amount of moisture bypassed through, control on respiration rate, volatile fumes managed over time, and the impact on the flavor of the product as a whole [133]. Essential oils of garlic were used in combination with PEG for the packaging of goods. Their unique trait aided in prohibiting pests that feed on foods while stored. Ɛ-Polylysine with nanoparticles of phyto glycogen octenyl has been shown to increase the shelf life of various fresh and synthetic produce [134]. Glycerine-based nano micelle in packaging identifies vegetable and fruit pesticide residues as well as dirt and oil contaminants from cutlery.

Overwraps can be used as chilled storage systems for many foods. However, the duration should be kept short along with modified atmospheric conditions. Vacuum can be used for sealing and packaging with a 100% carbon dioxide flushing system. If the duration of refrigeration needs to be made longer bulk flushing of gas can be employed. Many simple polymers like polypropylene and polyethylene of lower density are also used in packaging foods even if they are not incorporated with advanced nano systems. They are known to be hydrophobic and inert in nature with minimum surface energy. Food spoilage can be avoided on the basis of modifications of the inserted nanosystems both functionally and chemically. Special and intensive care should be taken for meat products. They have various parameters that get altered like aroma, hue, dehydration, and oxidation leading to changes in texture [135]. Modified atmospheric conditions are a key aspect that needs to be considered during meat handling and storage. Very cold conditions are always favored by protein producers to sustain their quality.

A unique formulation of non-inert gases is employed on the meat product to replace the surrounding air and sealed well for transportation and storage in deep freezers. The commonly used gases in MAP are oxygen and carbon dioxide. Their profiles are varied based on criteria like product type, packaging material used, size and dimension of the product, respiration rates involved with the ingredients of the products, the integrity of the package, and the conditions for storage [136]. The German-based chemical company has launched nano-dispersed clay in plastic storage materials. They have heightened gas barrier features. Even moisture is controlled for maintaining the freshness of the meat. Several patents are filed all around the world in regard to nano silver and nano clay for innovative food packaging fillers [137]. Carbon nanotubes and allyl isothiocyanate are known to regulate many metabolisms associated with cooked products, especially chicken. It also aids in the depletion of the pathogenic population and any change in the aesthetic appeal of the cooked chicken for up to 40 days. Figure 3 and Table 1 summarize the trends followed incurred by nanosystems in the food industry [138].

Figure 3 
                  Schematic representation of different trends in food processing and packaging by nanosystems.
Figure 3

Schematic representation of different trends in food processing and packaging by nanosystems.

Table 1

Different nanosystems used in the food Industry

Nanosystems Components Properties Applications References
Films Lipids, proteins, and polysaccharides Oxygen barrier, gas diffusion Smart packaging (coatings) [143,144]
Zinc Multifunctional nanoparticles Antimicrobial Food additives and fortification agents (Coatings) [141,145]
Nano-SiO2x Nano-SiO2 and PVA Thickening agent CODEX food additives (coatings) [141,146]
Nanoclay Silicates Enhancing the mechanical attributes Reinforcing materials (coatings) [147,148]
Nanotubes Milk protein, Polymers, nanotubes Targeted delivery Controlled release (coatings) [142,149]
Nano fiber Enzymes, carrot starch fibers, gelatin of fish, polymers Modified properties mechanical stiffness Transport and carry numerous active ingredients (coatings) [142,150]
Nanoemulsions Carvacrol chitosan cucumber, cinnamaldehyde pectin, garlic essential oil with gelatin, α-tocopherol, lemon grass on fresh fruits like apples Antimicrobial properties Delivery vehicle (carriers) coatings [140,151]
Polymers Essential oils, cellulose, chitosan, gelatin, Tragacanth Antioxidant, biodegradable, non-toxic, biologically compatible Shelf-life extender, spray-coated films, carriers [152,153]
Solid lipid nanoparticles Lipid carriers, flavonoids, carotenoids, phytosterols, polyphenols Antioxidants, lipophilic, accelerate the creaming effect Nutraceuticals, coating for groceries [154,155]
Beverage coatings Krill oil, NLC coatings, Rutin, coco butter NLC with olive oil and cardamom oil, silver nanoparticles Better stability, transport, mechanical, thermal, and optical features, rarely interfere with the sensory trait Dietary supplement, coatings for milk-based beverages and juices [156,157]
Inorganic coatings Montmorillonite, potassium sorbate, calcium caseinate, titanium dioxide, silver nanoparticles Antimicrobial activity Increase the longevity of foods [139,158]

From the current review, it can be suggested that the most common forms of nanocarriers for commercial foods are emulsions, inorganic, and fiber coatings. Cucumbers with nanoemulsions have antimicrobial properties up to 99% [136]. To enhance the shelf life of packed foods inorganic coatings of potassium sorbate, calcium caseinate, titanium dioxide, and silver nanoparticles have been reported to provide 100% efficiency [139]. Lipid- and protein-encapsulated nanosystems have manifested 100% gas barrier diffusion [140]. Silicon dioxide is a major component of CODEX additive with a 33% thickening property [141]. Milk proteins and nanotubes have a controlled release characteristics of 88%. Nanofiber coatings on carrots and enzymes have been reported 90% transport agents [142].

4.3 Safety and toxicity assessments

Nanotechnology in food-contact materials, particularly in packaging and coatings, has shown great potential for enhancing food safety and shelf life. However, it raises concerns regarding safety and toxicity, as nanoparticles may migrate from packaging into food and cause potential health risks [159]. The two primary safety issues with employing nanoparticles are allergies and heavy metal leakage. Currently, food items are using nanoparticles more quickly than intended and without the required understanding or laws, endangering both human health and the environment [19]. The similarities between nanoparticles (NPs) and nanostructures, namely their enormous surface area, high reactivity, and nanoscale, could be harmful to human health as well as the health of other living things. Although the usage of nanostructures in food may not directly affect human health, some inevitable side effects may result from their nanoscale properties. The toxicity mechanisms generated by nanoparticles, or NPs, have been well investigated [143]. Nano-entities have the potential to disrupt a variety of cellular pathways and functional processes that change the intracellular milieu which may result in excessive exposure to nanomaterials. This can have unanticipated effects on the overall functionality of the cellular system, fidelity of cell division, and DNA replication. DNA damage has been linked to cellular exposure to some nanomaterials, resulting in genome rearrangements, single- and double-stranded breaks, as well as inter/intra-strand breaks [160]. One key concern is the migration of nanoparticles into food. Studies have demonstrated that under certain conditions, nanoparticles can leach from packaging into the food matrix. For example, silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles, commonly used for their antimicrobial properties in food packaging, have been found to migrate in low concentrations, raising concerns about long-term exposure [161].

Nanomaterials, due to their small size and large surface area, have the potential to interact with biological systems in unintended ways. Cytotoxicity tests involving cells in vitro have shown that certain nanoparticles, like titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles, can cause oxidative stress, inflammation, and even DNA damage [162], Genotoxicity testing is essential to determine the potential of nanoparticles to induce mutations, which could have long-term health implications. Toxicity assessments often involve in vivo testing on animals, where doses of nanoparticles are introduced through ingestion or skin contact to study their effects on different organs [145]. Recent studies using rodents have shown that nanoparticles such as zinc oxide and silicon dioxide, when ingested at high doses, can accumulate in organs such as the liver and spleen, leading to systemic toxicity [163]. This highlights the importance of establishing safe limits for nanoparticle exposure in food-contact materials. Government agencies like the European Food Safety Authority and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have issued guidelines for the use of engineered nanomaterials in food-contact applications [162]. These guidelines emphasize the need for thorough risk assessment which includes evaluations of toxicity, bio persistence, and potential bioaccumulation in the body. The EFSA recommends that any new nanomaterial intended for use in food packaging must undergo a full safety evaluation, focusing on migration studies, as well as acute and chronic toxicity assessments [164]. To mitigate the potential toxicity risks associated with nanotechnology in food contact materials, researchers are focusing on developing biodegradable nanomaterials and safer nanoparticle coatings. These materials are designed to minimize migration and ensure that any exposure to nanoparticles is well within safe limits.

4.4 Limitations and challenges

Assessment of risks pertaining to the health of the consumers is the most important parameter that needs to be kept in mind when working with nanomaterials. The safety and quality of food is the utmost priority of any food inspecting authority. The utilization of nanomaterials to purify water has been already noted to be toxic to the environment and to human life forms. Nanoforms used in these exports of quality drinking water need to be addressed in detail in the future [140,159]. Various forms of nanocarbon like single-walled, multi-walled, buckyballs and quantum dots have shown undesirable interactions with markers and test reagents that make it quite an unreliable nanosystem for food processing. Thus, extensive real-time evaluation is termed necessary for the application of nanomaterials when applied to food products. Developing targeted and specific assessment assays is a major challenge that researchers face that would aid them to analyze the safety of nanosystems for enhancing food quality for commercial applications [165,166]. Furthermore, less heat is used for nanoencapsulation to inactivate or kill microorganisms than in the thermal process, which allows for energy savings. It is important to remember that an innovative ohmic heating method can be used in place of traditional heating [167]. Biodegradable polymers can decompose or degrade after use, making them great substitutes for the non-biodegradable packaging stated above. This is due to the difficulties in achieving oxygen/water vapor barrier performance on par with conventional petroleum-based polymers, or their blends [168]. In the food sector, encapsulating natural preservatives is a useful tactic for shielding delicate ingredients from unfavorable processing-related environmental factors. Even in modest concentrations, this method improves the stability and effectiveness of preservatives, enabling continuous release and residual antibacterial action. Nanoemulsions, polymer nanoparticles, and nanoliposomes are often used as nanocarriers for this reason since they all provide the enclosed substances with controlled release characteristics [169,170]. Despite the fact that nanocomposites are widely used in the production of food, active food packaging, and delivery of functional ingredients, the majority of these applications have focused on the nanoparticles that incorporate nanocomposites. There are fewer applications for other nanocarriers such as nanogels, nanoemulsions, nano-micelles, and nanoliposomes. These systems have greater advantages over nanoparticles, like higher loading and absorption efficiencies. It is necessary to expand the application ranges of different nanoencapsulation systems [161].

5 Conclusion

The present article deals with the use of nanotechnology in food processing using promising polymeric nanomaterials. Among the various polymeric nanomaterials used in food processing carbon nanotubes and allyl isothiocyanate are known to regulate many metabolisms associated with cooked produces especially chicken by depleting pathogenic population and change in aesthetic appeal of the cooked chicken for up to 40 days. Nanoscience provides new innovative tools and alternatives to scientists to reach new extremes in the area of food sciences. For example, the arrangement of amylopectin and amylose of starch in food binding processes are candidates for nanomaterials. In all the innovations done, one thing is tried to keep constant is the natural balance and the originality of the food. Nanosystem-based health drinks have 33% more micro and macro nutrients which will aid in the overall development of infants. Design protocols were mostly found to be biocompatible and environment friendly. The concentration of 0.2% of nanosized zinc oxide is found to be optimal to effectively reduce the mold proliferation for up to 12 days. Two main crossroads for any food researcher would be to either go for nanofood processing or nano food sensing aspect. The use of a green approach to manufacture most of the components related to novel foods is in great demand as it gives a sense of clean and green technology-based drive. The application of polymeric nanomaterials like allyl isothiocyanate and carbon nanotubes, which have been demonstrated to improve the shelf life and aesthetic quality of cooked goods like chicken by lowering pathogenic populations, opens up revolutionary possibilities for food processing and preservation using nanotechnology. Applications of nanoscience in food science, such as the alignment of amylopectin and amylose in starch binding processes, show how versatile nanoscale substances are in enhancing the texture, structure, and usefulness of food. Furthermore, by providing 33% more nutritional content than conventional formulations, nano-based health drinks enhanced with micro- and macronutrients hold the potential for enhancing nutritional outcomes, especially in vulnerable groups like babies. Biocompatibility and environmental sustainability are crucial factors to take into account as research progresses, with an increased emphasis on eco-friendly techniques and green synthesis processes. In addition to improving food safety, innovations like edible and biodegradable packaging materials also lessen their negative environmental effects. These advancements are in line with the industry’s increased emphasis on sustainability and clean technology. Even yet, there are still a lot of obstacles to overcome. Nanofood technologies need to be further refined to make them commercially viable. More efficient production procedures are also required. Furthermore, even though nanoparticles have a lot to offer in terms of food safety, preservation, and nutrient delivery, more research needs to be done on their possible toxicity and long-term health impacts. To fully comprehend how nanoparticles interact with biological systems and how they affect the environment, more thorough research is needed. Global laws and safety standards need to advance together with technology to address these worries. For consumer use of nano-based food items to be both safe and effective, a strong regulatory framework must be established. Furthermore, by providing a methodical way to mimic and improve the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of nanofood systems, mathematical modeling tools may be crucial in optimizing design and development processes. Even though there have been great advancements in the use of nanotechnology in food science, innovation in this field must be balanced with sustainability, scalability, and safety. To fully utilize nanotechnology in food processing and produce safer, more nutrient-dense, and environmentally friendly food items, extensive regulatory policies and ongoing research are required.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this research work through a Large Research Project under the grant number RGP2/292/1445.

  1. Funding information: The research was granted by Large Research Project under the grant number RGP2/292/1445.

  2. Author contributions: Nibedita Dey and Monisha Mohan: original draft, writing – review and editing, methodology, and formal Analysis; Ramesh Malarvizhi Dhaswini, Arpita Roy, and Mohammed Mujahid Alam: writing – original draft, formal analysis, visualization, and project administration; Abdullah G. Al-Sehemi, Rasiravathanahalli Kaveriyappan Govindarajan, Muhammad Fazle Rabbee, Thanigaivel Sundaram, and Maximilian Lackner: resource.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Huimin C, Xixi C, Jing C, Shaoyun W. Self-assembling peptides: Molecule nanostructure-function and application on food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022;120:212–22. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.027.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bugusu B, Mejia C, Magnuson B, Tafazoli S. Global regulatory policies on: Food nanotechnology. Food Technol. 2009;63:24–8, https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093148676 (accessed November 24, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gilmore LA, Redman LM. Weight gain in pregnancy and application of the 2009 IOM guidelines: Toward a uniform approach. Obesity. 2015;23:507–11. 10.1002/oby.20951.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Aguilera J, Stanley D. Microstructural principles of food processing and engineering. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 1999, https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nIeJiL_dLeQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Aguilera+JM+and+Stanley+DW+1999&ots=q-WmIJD8K4&sig=E6-4aKIIohdodclPyJijsP7hMAg (accessed November 24, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[5] Nasrollahi M, Fathi MR, Sobhani SM, Khosravi A, Noorbakhsh A. Modeling resilient supplier selection criteria in desalination supply chain based on fuzzy DEMATEL and ISM. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag. 2021;16:264–78. 10.1080/17509653.2021.1965502.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Freger V, Ramon GZ. Polyamide desalination membranes: Formation, structure, and properties. Prog Polym Sci. 2021;122:101451. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101451.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chen C, Sun M, Wang J, Su L, Lin J, Yan X. Active cargo loading into extracellular vesicles: Highlights the heterogeneous encapsulation behaviour. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10:12163. 10.1002/jev2.12163.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] VanDecar JC, Russo RM, James DE, Ambeh WB, Franke M. Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath continental South America. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2003;108:2043. 10.1029/2001jb000884.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sebaaly C, Greige-Gerges H. Advances in the application of liposomes in dairy industries. In Liposomal Encapsulation Food Sci. Technol. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2023. p. 125–44. 10.1016/b978-0-12-823935-3.00008-4.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83:761–9. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Tripathi PK, Gorain B, Choudhury H, Srivastava A, Kesharwani P. Dendrimer entrapped microsponge gel of dithranol for effective topical treatment. Heliyon. 2019;5:01343. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01343.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Baruah A, Chaudhary V, Malik R, Tomer VK. Nanotechnology based solutions for wastewater treatment. Nanotechnol Water Wastewater Treat Theory Appl. 2019;1:337–68. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813902-8.00017-4.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Singh AR, Desu PK, Nakkala RK, Kondi V, Devi S, Alam MS, et al. Nanotechnology-based approaches applied to nutraceuticals. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12:485–99. 10.1007/s13346-021-00960-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Kesharwani P, Choudhury H, Meher JG, Pandey M, Gorain B. Dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles as promising nanocarriers for anticancer therapeutics and imaging. Prog Mater Sci. 2019;103:484–508. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kesharwani P, Banerjee S, Gupta U, Mohd Amin MCI, Padhye S, Sarkar FH, et al. PAMAM dendrimers as promising nanocarriers for RNAi therapeutics. Mater Today. 2015;18:565–72. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.003.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Anzani C, Boukid F, Drummond L, Mullen AM, Álvarez C. Optimising the use of proteins from rich meat co-products and non-meat alternatives: Nutritional, technological and allergenicity challenges. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109575. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109575.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Gandhi M. Nanoemulsions in food: market demand. Env Chem Lett. 2019;17:1003–9. 10.1007/s10311-019-00856-2.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Delfanian M, Sahari MA. Improving functionality, bioavailability, nutraceutical and sensory attributes of fortified foods using phenolics-loaded nanocarriers as natural ingredients. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109555. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109555.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Raj H, Tripathi S, Bauri S, Mallick Choudhury A, Sekhar Mandal S, Maiti P. Green composites using naturally occurring fibers: A comprehensive review. Sustain Polym & Energy. 2023;1:1–26.10.35534/spe.2023.10010Search in Google Scholar

[20] Samir A, Ashour FH, Hakim AAA, Bassyouni M. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. Npj Mater Degrad. 2022;6:68. 10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Karimah A, Ridho MR, Munawar SS, Adi DS, Ismadi N, Damayanti R, et al. A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations. J Jpn Res Inst Adv Copper-Base Mater Technol. 2021;13:2442–58.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014Search in Google Scholar

[22] Arun R, Shruthy R, Preetha R, Sreejit V. Biodegradable nano composite reinforced with cellulose nano fiber from coconut industry waste for replacing synthetic plastic food packaging. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132786.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132786Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Rafiee K, Schritt H, Pleissner D, Kaur G, Brar SK. Biodegradable green composites: It’s never too late to mend. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2021;30:100482.10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100482Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mugdha Bhat K, Rajagopalan J, Mallikarjunaiah R, Nagaraj Rao N, Sharma A. Eco-friendly and biodegradable green composites. In Biocomposites. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2022.10.5772/intechopen.98687Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jiménez A, Zaikov GE. Recent advances in research on biodegradable polymers and sustainable composites. USA: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Dong T, Yun X, Li M, Sun W, Duan Y, Jin Y. Biodegradable high oxygen barrier membrane for chilled meat packaging. J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;132:41871. 10.1002/app.41871.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Rukmanikrishnan B, Ramalingam S, Rajasekharan SK, Lee J, Lee J. Binary and ternary sustainable composites of gellan gum, hydroxyethyl cellulose and lignin for food packaging applications: Biocompatibility, antioxidant activity, UV and water barrier properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;153:55–62.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Roy S, Rhim J-W, Jaiswal L. Bioactive agar-based functional composite film incorporated with copper sulfide nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;93:156–66.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.034Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rukmanikrishnan B, Ismail FRM, Manoharan RK, Kim SS, Lee J. Blends of gellan gum/xanthan gum/zinc oxide based nanocomposites for packaging application: Rheological and antimicrobial properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;148:1182–9.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.155Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Aaliya B, Sunooj KV, Lackner M. Biopolymer composites: a review. Int J Biobased Plast. 2021;3:40–84.10.1080/24759651.2021.1881214Search in Google Scholar

[31] Haris NIN, Hassan MZ, Ilyas RA, Suhot MA, Sapuan SM, Dolah R, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites: a review. J Jpn Res Inst Adv Copper-Base Mater Technol. 2022;19:167–82.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.155Search in Google Scholar

[32] Donkor L, Kontoh G, Yaya A, Bediako JK, Apalangya V. Bio-based and sustainable food packaging systems: relevance, challenges, and prospects. Appl Food Res. 2023;3:100356.10.1016/j.afres.2023.100356Search in Google Scholar

[33] Saha D, Bhattacharya S. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: a critical review. J Food Sci Technol. 2010;47:587–97.10.1007/s13197-010-0162-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Shah P. Polymers in food. Polymer science and innovative applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020. p. 567–92.10.1016/B978-0-12-816808-0.00018-4Search in Google Scholar

[35] Embuscado ME, Huber KC, eds. Edible films and coatings for food applications. 2009th edn. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Cazón P, Velazquez G, Ramírez JA, Vázquez M. Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017;68:136–48.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.009Search in Google Scholar

[37] Onyeaka H, Passaretti P, Miri T, Al-Sharify ZT. The safety of nanomaterials in food production and packaging. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022;5:763–74.10.1016/j.crfs.2022.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Rai M, Ingle AP, Gupta I, Pandit R, Paralikar P, Gade A, et al. Smart nanopackaging for the enhancement of food shelf life. Env Chem Lett. 2019;17:277–90.10.1007/s10311-018-0794-8Search in Google Scholar

[39] Ghanem AF, Youssef AM, Abdel Rehim MH. Hydrophobically modified graphene oxide as a barrier and antibacterial agent for polystyrene packaging. J Mater Sci. 2020;55:4685–700.10.1007/s10853-019-04333-7Search in Google Scholar

[40] Zafar A, Khosa MK, Noor A, Qayyum S, Saif MJ. Carboxymethyl cellulose/gelatin hydrogel films loaded with zinc oxide nanoparticles for sustainable food packaging applications. Polymers. 2022;14:5201. 10.3390/polym14235201.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Wang L, Dekker M, Heising J, Zhao L, Fogliano V. Food matrix design can influence the antimicrobial activity in the food systems: A narrative review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64:8963–89.10.1080/10408398.2023.2205937Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Zhong J, Xia B, Shan S, Zheng A, Zhang S, Chen J, et al. High-quality milk exosomes as oral drug delivery system. Biomaterials. 2021;277:121126. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121126.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Wadhawan J, Parmar PK, Bansal AK. Nanocrystals for improved topical delivery of medium soluble drug: A case study of acyclovir. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;65:102662. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102662.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Desai D, Shende P. Monodispersed cyclodextrin-based nanocomplex of neuropeptide Y for targeting MCF-7 cells using a central composite design. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;65:102692. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102692.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Saadat S, Pandey G, Tharmavaram M, Braganza V, Rawtani D. Nano-interfacial decoration of Halloysite Nanotubes for the development of antimicrobial nanocomposites. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;275:102063. 10.1016/J.CIS.2019.102063.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Mishra A, Pradhan D, Biswasroy P, Kar B, Ghosh G, Rath G. Recent advances in colloidal technology for the improved bioavailability of the nutraceuticals. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;65:102693. 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102693.Search in Google Scholar

[47] McCarthy B, O’Neill G, Abu-Ghannam N. Potential psychoactive effects of microalgal bioactive compounds for the case of sleep and mood regulation: Opportunities and challenges. Mar Drugs. 2022;20:493. 10.3390/md20080493.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Lafontaine S, Caffrey A, Dailey J, Varnum S, Hale A, Eichler B, et al. Evaluation of variety, maturity, and farm on the concentrations of monoterpene diglycosides and hop volatile/nonvolatile composition in five Humulus lupulus cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:4356–70. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07146.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Mor S, Battula SN, Swarnalatha G, Pushpadass H, Naik LN, Franklin M. Preparation of casein biopeptide-loaded niosomes by high shear homogenization and their characterization. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:4371–80. 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05982.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Wang YY, You LC, Lyu HH, Liu YX, He LL, Di Hu Y, et al. Role of biochar–mineral composite amendment on the immobilization of heavy metals for Brassica chinensis from naturally contaminated soil. Env Technol Innov. 2022;28:102622. 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102622.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Xu C, Qi J, Yang W, Chen Y, Yang C, He Y, et al. Immobilization of heavy metals in vegetable-growing soils using nano zero-valent iron modified attapulgite clay. Sci Total Env. 2019;686:476–83. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.330.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Saint Akadiri S, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA. Contemporaneous interaction between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability in South Africa: What drives what? Sci Total Env. 2019;686:468–75. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.421.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Yang X, Lin J, Zhan Y. Effect of aged nanoscale zero-valent iron amendment and capping on phosphorus mobilization in sediment. Chem Eng J. 2023;451:139072. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139072.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Dai W, Ruan C, Zhang Y, Wang J, Han J, Shao Z, et al. Bioavailability enhancement of EGCG by structural modification and nano-delivery: A review. J Funct Foods. 2020;65:103732. 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103732.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Mu R, Hong X, Ni Y, Li Y, Pang J, Wang Q, et al. Recent trends and applications of cellulose nanocrystals in food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;93:136–44. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Wang H, Zhang M, Hu J, Du H, Xu T, Si C. Sustainable preparation of surface functionalized cellulose nanocrystals and their application for Pickering emulsions. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;297:120062. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] De Leo V, Maurelli AM, Giotta L, Catucci L. Liposomes containing nanoparticles: preparation and applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;218:112737. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112737.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Noah NM, Ndangili PM. Green synthesis of nanomaterials from sustainable materials for biosensors and drug delivery. Sens Int. 2022;3:100166. 10.1016/j.sintl.2022.100166.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Zor E, Soyalp S, Bingol H, Erdem A. Nanomaterials-enriched nucleic acid-based biosensors. In New developments in nanosensors for pharmaceutical analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. p. 303–25. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816144-9.00010-9.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Kurbanoglu S, Yarman A, Scheller FW, Ozkan SA. Molecularly imprinted polymer-based nanosensors for pharmaceutical analysis. In New developments in nanosensors for pharmaceutical analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. p. 231–71. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816144-9.00008-0.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Mousa E, Taha EO. Synergetic effects of nano-SiO2/glycerol on the electrical and optical properties of PVA for embedded electronics and optical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2022;33:23088–106. 10.1007/s10854-022-09075-y.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Staňo R, Košovan P, Tagliabue A, Holm C. Electrostatically cross-linked reversible gels-effects of pH and ionic strength. Macromolecules. 2021;54:4769–81. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00470.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Mella M, Tagliabue A, Mollica L, Izzo L. Monte Carlo study of the effects of macroion charge distribution on the ionization and adsorption of weak polyelectrolytes and concurrent counterion release. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;560:667–80. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Mella M, Tagliabue A. Impact of chemically specific interactions between anions and weak polyacids on chain ionization, conformations, and solution energetics. Macromolecules. 2022;55:4533–47. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c02625.Search in Google Scholar

[65] de Oliveira Filho JG, de ON, Bezerra CC, Albiero BR, Oldoni FCA, Miranda M, et al. New approach in the development of edible films: The use of carnauba wax micro- or nanoemulsions in arrowroot starch-based films. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2020;26:100589. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100589.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Fathi M, Mozafari MR, Mohebbi M. Nanoencapsulation of food ingredients using lipid based delivery systems. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2012;23:13–27. 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Li J, Pan D, Yi J, Hao L, Kang Q, Liu X, et al. Protective effect of β-cyclodextrin on stability of nisin and corresponding interactions involved. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;223:115115. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Wang S, Farnood R, Yan N. Corn-derived dendrimer-like carbohydrate phytoglycogen nanoparticles as selective fluorescent sensor for silver ions. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;223:115095. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Balan L, Sanker J, Chandrasekaran S, Vallinayagam S. Enzyme-encapsulated nanoparticles for biodegradation of materials. In Biodegradation and biodeterioration at the nanoscale. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2021. p. 137–51. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823970-4.00007-5.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Zhu M, Nie G, Meng H, Xia T, Nel A, Zhao Y. Physicochemical properties determine nanomaterial cellular uptake, transport, and fate. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:622–31. 10.1021/ar300031y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Cao Y, Teng J, Selbo J. Amorphous solid dispersion of epigallocatechin gallate for enhanced physical stability and controlled release. Pharmaceuticals. 2017;46:88. 10.3390/ph10040088.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Biswas S, Dodwadkar NS, Deshpande PP, Torchilin VP. Liposomes loaded with paclitaxel and modified with novel triphenylphosphonium-PEG-PE conjugate possess low toxicity, target mitochondria and demonstrate enhanced antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. J Control Rel. 2012;159:393–402. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[73] Siddiquee S, Melvin GJH, Rahman MM. Nanotechnology: Applications in energy, drug and food. New York, USA: Springer International Publishing; 2019. 10.1007/978-3-319-99602-8.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Saman RA, Iqbal M. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems: Past, present and future. In Nanotechnology: Applications in energy, drug and food. New York, USA: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 175–85. 10.1007/978-3-319-99602-8_7.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Bajpai VK, Kamle M, Shukla S, Mahato DK, Chandra P, Hwang SK, et al. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J Food Drug Anal. 2018;26:1201–14. 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[76] Duncan TV. Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: Barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;363:1–24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Da Silva DP, Rosales TKO, de Freitas, Pedrosa L, Fabi JP. Creation of a new proof-of-concept pectin/lysozyme nanocomplex as potential β-lactose delivery matrix: Structure and thermal stability analyses. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;134:108011. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108011.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Rehman A, Ahmad T, Aadil RM, Spotti MJ, Bakry AM, Khan IM, et al. Pectin polymers as wall materials for the nano-encapsulation of bioactive compounds. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;90:35–46. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.05.015.Search in Google Scholar

[79] Huang Y, Stonehouse A, Abeykoon C. Encapsulation methods for phase change materials – A critical review. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2023;200:123458. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123458.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Alehosseini E, Jafari SM. Micro/nano-encapsulated phase change materials (PCMs) as emerging materials for the food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;91:116–28. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.003.Search in Google Scholar

[81] Dymek M, Sikora E. Liposomes as biocompatible and smart delivery systems – the current state. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;309:102757. 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102757.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[82] Maurya VK, Bashir K, Aggarwal M. Vitamin D microencapsulation and fortification: Trends and technologies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;196:105489. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105489.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[83] De B, Goswami TK. Chemometrics optimized microencapsulation of ergocalciferol using emulsification technique and its physico-chemical characterization. Appl Food Res. 2022;2:100157. 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100157.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Qiu L, Zhao X, Zu Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wu W, et al. Ursolic acid nanoparticles for oral delivery prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation method: characterization. Vitro Eval Radic Scavenging Act Bioavailability, Artif Cells, Nanomed, Biotechnol. 2019;47:609–20. 10.1080/21691401.2019.1573739.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Yu H, Park JY, Kwon CW, Hong SC, Park KM, Chang PC. An overview of nanotechnology in food science: Preparative methods, practical applications, and safety. J Chem. 2018;2018:427978. 10.1155/2018/5427978.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Ogura I, Kotake M, Kuboyama T, Kajihara H. Measurements of cellulose nanofiber emissions and potential exposures at a production facility. NanoImpact. 2020;20:100273. 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100273.Search in Google Scholar

[87] Lüdtke FL, Stahl MA, Grimaldi R, Cardoso LP, Gigante ML, Ribeiro APB. High oleic sunflower oil and fully hydrogenated soybean oil nanostructured lipid carriers: Development and characterization. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;654:130039. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130039.Search in Google Scholar

[88] Akhavan S, Assadpour E, Katouzian I, Jafari SM. Lipid nano scale cargos for the protection and delivery of food bioactive ingredients and nutraceuticals. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;74:132–46. 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

[89] Singh A, Chugh S, Sinha D, De A. Role of nanotechnology in fortifying nutraceuticals. In Nanotechnology in functional foods. New Jersey, United States: Wiley; 2022. p. 25–60. 10.1002/9781119905059.ch2.Search in Google Scholar

[90] David Q, de la Luz ZM, Gerardo L, Mendoza‐Muñoz N. Liposomal nanotechnology in nutraceuticals. In Handbook of nutraceuticals and natural products: Biological, medicinal, and nutritional properties and applications. New Jersey, United States: Wiley; 2022. p. 29–62. 10.1002/9781119746843.ch3.Search in Google Scholar

[91] Tanaka Y, Uemori C, Kon T, Honda M, Machmudah S, Kanda H, et al. Preparation of liposomes encapsulating β–carotene using supercritical carbon dioxide with ultrasonication. J Supercrit Fluids. 2020;161:104848. 10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104848.Search in Google Scholar

[92] Xu PY, Fu CP, Kankala RK, Bin Wang S, Chen AZ. Supercritical carbon dioxide-assisted nanonization of dihydromyricetin for anticancer and bacterial biofilm inhibition efficacies. J Supercrit Fluids. 2020;161. 10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104840.Search in Google Scholar

[93] Pandey S, Giri VP, Tripathi A, Bajpai R, Sharma D, Bahadur L, et al. Interaction, fate and risks associated with nanomaterials as fertilizers and pesticides. In Advances in nano-fertilizers and nano-pesticides in agriculture. A smart deliv. syst. crop improv. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020. p. 229–48. 10.1016/B978-0-12-820092-6.00009-4.Search in Google Scholar

[94] Saini A, Panwar D, Panesar PS, Chandra P. Potential of nanotechnology in food analysis and quality improvement. In Nanosensing and bioanalytical technologies in food quality control. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 169–94. 10.1007/978-981-16-7029-9_8.Search in Google Scholar

[95] Zhang F, Xing J, Zhou Y, Wang S, Zhao B, Zheng H, et al. Estimation of abatement potentials and costs of air pollution emissions in China. J Env Manage. 2020;260:110069. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[96] Mo F, Zhou Q, He Y. Nano–Ag: Environmental applications and perspectives. Sci Total Env. 2022;829:154644. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154644.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[97] Romeh AA, Ibrahim Saber RA. Green nano-phytoremediation and solubility improving agents for the remediation of chlorfenapyr contaminated soil and water. J Env Manage. 2020;260:110104. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[98] Tiwari A, Barbhuiya RI, Dash KK. Nanotechnology-based sensors for shelf-life determination of food materials. In Nanotechnology applications for food safety and quality monitoring. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2023. p. 289–300. 10.1016/b978-0-323-85791-8.00014-8.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Qiaorun Z, Honghong S, Yao L, Bing J, Xiao X, Julian McClements D, et al. Investigation of the interactions between food plant carbohydrates and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Food Res Int. 2022;159:111574. 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111574.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Kumar Das P, Mohanty C, Krishna Purohit G, Mishra S, Palo S. Nanoparticle assisted environmental remediation: Applications, toxicological implications and recommendations for a sustainable environment. Env Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2022;18:100679. 10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100679.Search in Google Scholar

[101] Medina-Reyes EI, Rodríguez-Ibarra C, Déciga-Alcaraz A, Díaz-Urbina D, Chirino YI, Pedraza-Chaverri J. Food additives containing nanoparticles induce gastrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and alterations in animal behavior: The unknown role of oxidative stress. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020;146:111814. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111814.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Zhang X, Liu Y, Gong S, Li M, Li S, Hemar Y. Probing the biotoxicity of starch nanoparticles in vivo and their mechanism to desensitize β-lactoglobulin. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;135:108166. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108166.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Ahari H, Naeimabadi M. Employing nanoemulsions in food packaging: Shelf life enhancement. Food Eng Rev. 2021;13:858–83. 10.1007/s12393-021-09282-z.Search in Google Scholar

[104] Singh AK, Kim JY, Lee YS. Phenolic compounds in active packaging and edible films/coatings: Natural bioactive molecules and novel packaging ingredients. Molecules. 2022;27:7513. 10.3390/molecules27217513.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[105] Agrimonti C, White JC, Tonetti S, Marmiroli N. Antimicrobial activity of cellulosic pads amended with emulsions of essential oils of oregano, thyme and cinnamon against microorganisms in minced beef meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;305:108246. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108246.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Avilés M, Juárez C, Larsen IL, Rodas-González A, Aalhus JL. Effect of multiple vacuum packs on colour development and stability in beef steaks. Can J Anim Sci. 2014;94:63–9. 10.4141/CJAS2013-037.Search in Google Scholar

[107] Bahmid NA, Dekker M, Fogliano V, Heising J. Development of a moisture-activated antimicrobial film containing ground mustard seeds and its application on meat in active packaging system. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2021;30:100753. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100753.Search in Google Scholar

[108] Tyuftin AA, Kerry JP. The storage and preservation of meat: Storage and packaging. In Lawrie's meat science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2023. p. 315–62. 10.1016/b978-0-323-85408-5.00017-0.Search in Google Scholar

[109] Silva B, Biluca FC, Gonzaga LV, Fett R, Dalmarco EM, Caon T, et al. In vitro anti-inflammatory properties of honey flavonoids: A review. Food Res Int. 2021;141:110086. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Soltani Firouz M, Mohi-Alden K, Omid M. A critical review on intelligent and active packaging in the food industry: Research and development. Food Res Int. 2021;141:110113. 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110113.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Nath PC, Nandi NB, Tiwari A, Das J, Roy B. Applications of nanotechnology in food sensing and food packaging. In Nanotechnology applications for food safety and quality monitoring. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2023. p. 321–40. 10.1016/b978-0-323-85791-8.00006-9.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Deshmukh SP, Pawar KK, Dalavi DK. Incorporation of nanocarriers as antimicrobial agents in food packaging. In: Nanotechnology in intelligent food packaging. New Jersey, United States: Wiley; 2022. p. 203–34. 10.1002/9781119819011.ch9.Search in Google Scholar

[113] Kamarudin SH, Rayung M, Abu F, Ahmad S, Fadil F, Karim AA, et al. A review on antimicrobial packaging from biodegradable polymer composites. Polym (Basel). 2022;14:174. 10.3390/polym14010174.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[114] Karthi N, Kumaresan K, Sathish S, Gokulkumar S, Prabhu L, Vigneshkumar N. An overview: Natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites, chemical treatments and application areas. In Materials Today: Proceedings. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd; 2019. p. 2828–34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

[115] Fu Y, Dudley EG. Antimicrobial-coated films as food packaging: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021;20:3404–37. 10.1111/1541-4337.12769.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] González-Ceballos L, Guirado-moreno JC, Guembe-García M, Rovira J, Melero B, Arnaiz A, et al. Metal-free organic polymer for the preparation of a reusable antimicrobial material with real-life application as an absorbent food pad. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2022;33:100910. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100910.Search in Google Scholar

[117] Braun S, Ilberg V, Langowski HC. Antimicrobial effectiveness of beverage containers made of silver doped PET. J Food Eng. 2021;300:110526. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110526.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Wrighton-Araneda K, Ortega DE, Cortés-Arriagada D. Effective removal of water-soluble methylated arsenic contaminants with phosphorene oxide nanoflakes: A DFT study. J Mol Liq. 2021;341:117423. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117423.Search in Google Scholar

[119] Minakshi P, Kumar R, Ghosh M, Brar B, Barnela M, Lakhani P. Application of polymeric nano-materials in management of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Top Med Chem. 2020;20:982–1008. 10.2174/1568026620666200320113322.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Mazur U, Hipps KW. A systematic approach toward designing functional ionic porphyrin crystalline materials. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:22803–20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03091.Search in Google Scholar

[121] Curtis J, Greenberg M, Kester J, Phillips S, Krieger G. Nanotechnology and nanotoxicology: a primer for clinicians. Toxicol Rev. 2006;25:245–60. 10.2165/00139709-200625040-00005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[122] Satalkar P, Elger BS, Shaw DM. Defining nano, nanotechnology and nanomedicine: Why should it matter? Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22:1255–76. 10.1007/s11948-015-9705-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[123] Servin AD, White JC. Nanotechnology in agriculture: Next steps for understanding engineered nanoparticle exposure and risk. NanoImpact. 2016;1:9–12. 10.1016/j.impact.2015.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

[124] Boverhof DR, Bramante CM, Butala JH, Clancy SF, Lafranconi WM, West J, et al. Comparative assessment of nanomaterial definitions and safety evaluation considerations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;73:137–50. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Liang SS, Makamba H, Huang SY, Chen SH. Nano-titanium dioxide composites for the enrichment of phosphopeptides. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1116:38–45. 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.012 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Sharma S, Jaiswal S, Duffy B, Jaiswal A. Nanostructured materials for food applications: Spectroscopy, microscopy and physical properties. Bioengineering. 2019;6:26. 10.3390/bioengineering6010026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[127] Aversa C, Barletta M, Cappiello G, Gisario A. Compatibilization strategies and analysis of morphological features of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)/poly(lactic acid) PLA blends: A state-of-art review. Eur Polym J. 2022;173:111304. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111304.Search in Google Scholar

[128] Ahmed MW, Haque MA, Mohibbullah M, Khan MSI, Islam MA, Mondal MHT, et al. A review on active packaging for quality and safety of foods: Current trends, applications, prospects and challenges. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2022;33:100913. 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100913.Search in Google Scholar

[129] Aguda ON, Lateef A. Recent advances in functionalization of nanotextiles: A strategy to combat harmful microorganisms and emerging pathogens in the 21st century. Heliyon. 2022;8:09761. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09761.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[130] Enescu D, Cerqueira MA, Fucinos P, Pastrana LM. Recent advances and challenges on applications of nanotechnology in food packaging. A literature review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;134:110814. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110814.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[131] Pandey S, Sharma K, Gundabala V. Antimicrobial bio-inspired active packaging materials for shelf life and safety development: A review. Food Biosci. 2022;48:101730. 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101730.Search in Google Scholar

[132] Cassani L, Gomez-Zavaglia A, Jimenez-Lopez C, Lourenço-Lopes C, Prieto MA, Simal-Gandara J. Seaweed-based natural ingredients: Stability of phlorotannins during extraction, storage, passage through the gastrointestinal tract and potential incorporation into functional foods. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109676. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109676.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[133] Marín-San Román S, Rubio-Bretón P, Pérez-Álvarez EP, Garde-Cerdán T. Advancement in analytical techniques for the extraction of grape and wine volatile compounds. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109712. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109712.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Rai A, Sharma VK, Jain A, Sharma M, Pandey A, Singh HB, et al. Microbe-fabricated nanoparticles as potent biomaterials for efficient food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2022;379:109833. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109833.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Alfei S, Marengo B, Zuccari G. Nanotechnology application in food packaging: A plethora of opportunities versus pending risks assessment and public concerns. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109664. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109664.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Yang X, Yu Q, Gao W, Tang X, Yi H, Tang X. The mechanism of metal-based antibacterial materials and the progress of food packaging applications: A review. Ceram Int. 2022;48:34148–68. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.249.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[137] Asraf MH, Sani NS, Williams CD, Jemon K, Malek NANN. In situ biosynthesized silver nanoparticle-incorporated synthesized zeolite A using Orthosiphon aristatus extract for in vitro antibacterial wound healing. Particuology. 2022;67:27–34. 10.1016/j.partic.2021.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

[138] Dutta P, Wang B. Zeolite-supported silver as antimicrobial agents. Coord Chem Rev. 2019;383:1–29. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.12.014.Search in Google Scholar

[139] Preethi R, Maria Leena M, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C. Biopolymer nanocomposites and its application in food processing. In Advanced structured materials. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 283–317. 10.1007/978-981-15-3560-4_12.Search in Google Scholar

[140] Zhang S, Bilal M, Zdarta J, Cui J, Kumar A, Franco M, et al. Biopolymers and nanostructured materials to develop pectinases-based immobilized nano-biocatalytic systems for biotechnological applications. Food Res Int. 2021;140:109979. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109979.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[141] Singh Sekhon B. Nanotechnology in agri-food production: An overview. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2014;7:31–53. 10.2147/NSA.S39406.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[142] Saba N, Jawaid M, Asim M. Recent advances in nanoclay/natural fibers hybrid composites. In Engineering materials. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media B.V.; 2016. p. 1–28. 10.1007/978-981-10-0950-1_1.Search in Google Scholar

[143] Pathakoti K, Manubolu M, Hwang HM. Nanostructures: Current uses and future applications in food science. J Food Drug Anal. 2017;25:245–53. 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.02.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[144] Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Boxall A, Castle L, et al. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam – Part A. 2008;25:241–58. 10.1080/02652030701744538 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] He X, Hwang HM. Nanotechnology in food science: Functionality, applicability, and safety assessment. J Food Drug Anal. 2016;24:671–81. 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[146] Kondle R, Sharma K, Singh G, Kotiyal A. Using nanotechnology for enhancing the shelf life of fruits. In: Food processing and packaging technologies-recent advances [Working Title]. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2022. 10.5772/intechopen.108724.Search in Google Scholar

[147] Xie Q, Liu G, Zhang Y. Edible films/coatings containing bioactive ingredients with micro/nano encapsulation: A comprehensive review of their fabrications, formulas, multifunctionality and applications in food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;64:5341–78. 10.1080/10408398.2022.2153794.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[148] Tahir HE, Xiaobo Z, Mahunu GK, Arslan M, Abdalhai M, Zhihua L. Recent developments in gum edible coating applications for fruits and vegetables preservation: A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;224:115141. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115141.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[149] Kim E, Ban C, Kim SO, Lim S, Choi YJ. Applications and perspectives of polyphenol-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for foods. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2022;31:1009–26. 10.1007/s10068-022-01093-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[150] Li B, He J, Evans DG, Duan X. Enteric-coated layered double hydroxides as a controlled release drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2004;287:89–95. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.08.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Patel HA, Somani RS, Bajaj HC, Jasra RV. Nanoclays for polymer nanocomposites, paints, inks, greases and cosmetics formulations, drug delivery vehicle and waste water treatment. Bull Mater Sci. 2006;29:133–45. 10.1007/BF02704606.Search in Google Scholar

[152] Trajkovska Petkoska A, Daniloski D, D’Cunha NM, Naumovski N, Broach AT. Edible packaging: Sustainable solutions and novel trends in food packaging. Food Res Int. 2021;140:109981. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109981.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] Ramos M, Mellinas C, Solaberrieta I, Garrigós MC, Jiménez A. Emulsions incorporated in polysaccharide-based active coatings for fresh and minimally processed vegetables. Foods. 2021;10:665. 10.3390/foods10030665.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[154] Aditya NP, Shim M, Lee I, Lee Y, Im MI, Ko S. Curcumin and genistein coloaded nanostructured lipid carriers: In vitro digestion and antiprostate cancer activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:1878–83. 10.1021/jf305143k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Aditya NP, Ko S. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs): Delivery vehicles for food bioactives. RSC Adv. 2015;5:30902–11. 10.1039/c4ra17127f.Search in Google Scholar

[156] Nobari Azar FA, Pezeshki A, Ghanbarzadeh B, Hamishehkar H, Mohammadi M. Nanostructured lipid carriers: Promising delivery systems for encapsulation of food ingredients. J Agric Food Res. 2020;2:100084. 10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100084.Search in Google Scholar

[157] Mozafari MR, Flanagan J, Matia-Merino L, Awati A, Omri A, Suntres ZE, et al. Recent trends in the lipid-based nanoencapsulation of antioxidants and their role in foods. J Sci Food Agric. 2006;86:2038–45. 10.1002/jsfa.2576.Search in Google Scholar

[158] Basumatary IB, Mukherjee A, Katiyar V, Kumar S. Biopolymer-based nanocomposite films and coatings: recent advances in shelf-life improvement of fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62:1912–35. 10.1080/10408398.2020.1848789.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[159] Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Chakraborty AR, Melvin Samuel S, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, et al. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies in food industries: opportunities and research trends. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16:2464. 10.1007/s11051-014-2464-5.Search in Google Scholar

[160] Fu PP, Xia Q, Hwang H-M, Ray PC, Yu H. Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J Food Drug Anal. 2014;22:64–75.10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[161] Cacciatore FA, Brandelli A, Malheiros PDS. Combining natural antimicrobials and nanotechnology for disinfecting food surfaces and control microbial biofilm formation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61:3771–82.10.1080/10408398.2020.1806782Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[162] Cushen M, Kerry J, Morris M, Cruz-Romero M, Cummins E. Nanotechnologies in the food industry – Recent developments, risks and regulation. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2012;24:30–46.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[163] McClements DJ, Xiao H. Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles. NPJ Sci Food. 2017;1:6.10.1038/s41538-017-0005-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[164] Juneja VK, Dwivedi HP, Yan X. Novel natural food antimicrobials. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012;3:381–403.10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101241Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[165] Anjum M, Miandad R, Waqas M, Gehany F, Barakat MA. Remediation of wastewater using various nano-materials. Arab J Chem. 2019;12:4897–919. 10.1016/J.ARABJC.2016.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

[166] Stoker E, Purser F, Kwon S, Bin Park Y, Lee JS. Alternative estimation of human exposure of single-walled carbon nanotubes using three-dimensional tissue-engineered human lung. Int J Toxicol. 2008;27:441–8. 10.1080/10915810802552138.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[167] Taouzinet L, Djaoudene O, Fatmi S, Bouiche C, Amrane-Abider M, Bougherra H, et al. Trends of nanoencapsulation strategy for natural compounds in the food industry. Process (Basel). 2023;11:1459.10.3390/pr11051459Search in Google Scholar

[168] Wu F, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Challenges and new opportunities on barrier performance of biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging. Prog Polym Sci. 2021;117:101395.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395Search in Google Scholar

[169] Lavanya M, Namasivayam SKR, John A. Developmental formulation principles of food preservatives by nanoencapsulation-fundamentals, application, and challenges. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024;196:1–31. 10.1007/s12010-024-04943-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[170] Ferreira S, Sanchez G, Alves MJ, Fraqueza MJ. Editorial: Natural compounds in food safety and preservation. Front Nutr. 2021;8:759594.10.3389/fnut.2021.759594Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2024-07-18
Accepted: 2024-10-14
Published Online: 2024-12-09

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Green polymer electrolyte and activated charcoal-based supercapacitor for energy harvesting application: Electrochemical characteristics
  3. Research on the adsorption of Co2+ ions using halloysite clay and the ability to recover them by electrodeposition method
  4. Simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen, caffeine, and paracetamol in commercial products using a green reverse-phase HPTLC method
  5. Isolation, screening and optimization of alkaliphilic cellulolytic fungi for production of cellulase
  6. Functionalized gold nanoparticles coated with bacterial alginate and their antibacterial and anticancer activities
  7. Comparative analysis of bio-based amino acid surfactants obtained via Diels–Alder reaction of cyclic anhydrides
  8. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles on yellow phosphorus slag and its application in organic coatings
  9. Exploring antioxidant potential and phenolic compound extraction from Vitis vinifera L. using ultrasound-assisted extraction
  10. Manganese and copper-coated nickel oxide nanoparticles synthesized from Carica papaya leaf extract induce antimicrobial activity and breast cancer cell death by triggering mitochondrial caspases and p53
  11. Insight into heating method and Mozafari method as green processing techniques for the synthesis of micro- and nano-drug carriers
  12. Silicotungstic acid supported on Bi-based MOF-derived metal oxide for photodegradation of organic dyes
  13. Synthesis and characterization of capsaicin nanoparticles: An attempt to enhance its bioavailability and pharmacological actions
  14. Synthesis of Lawsonia inermis-encased silver–copper bimetallic nanoparticles with antioxidant, antibacterial, and cytotoxic activity
  15. Facile, polyherbal drug-mediated green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles and their potent biological applications
  16. Zinc oxide-manganese oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose-folic acid-sesamol hybrid nanomaterials: A molecularly targeted strategy for advanced triple-negative breast cancer therapy
  17. Exploring the antimicrobial potential of biogenically synthesized graphene oxide nanoparticles against targeted bacterial and fungal pathogens
  18. Biofabrication of silver nanoparticles using Uncaria tomentosa L.: Insight into characterization, antibacterial activities combined with antibiotics, and effect on Triticum aestivum germination
  19. Membrane distillation of synthetic urine for use in space structural habitat systems
  20. Investigation on mechanical properties of the green synthesis bamboo fiber/eggshell/coconut shell powder-based hybrid biocomposites under NaOH conditions
  21. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles using endophytic fungal strain to improve the growth, metabolic activities, yield traits, and phenolic compounds content of Nigella sativa L.
  22. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from rice and annual upland crops in Red River Delta of Vietnam using the denitrification–decomposition model
  23. Synthesis of humic acid with the obtaining of potassium humate based on coal waste from the Lenger deposit, Kazakhstan
  24. Ascorbic acid-mediated selenium nanoparticles as potential antihyperuricemic, antioxidant, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic agents
  25. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Illicium verum extract: Optimization and characterization for biomedical applications
  26. Antibacterial and dynamical behaviour of silicon nanoparticles influenced sustainable waste flax fibre-reinforced epoxy composite for biomedical application
  27. Optimising coagulation/flocculation using response surface methodology and application of floc in biofertilisation
  28. Green synthesis and multifaceted characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles derived from Senna bicapsularis for enhanced in vitro and in vivo biological investigation
  29. Potent antibacterial nanocomposites from okra mucilage/chitosan/silver nanoparticles for multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium eradication
  30. Trachyspermum copticum aqueous seed extract-derived silver nanoparticles: Exploration of their structural characterization and comparative antibacterial performance against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria
  31. Microwave-assisted ultrafine silver nanoparticle synthesis using Mitragyna speciosa for antimalarial applications
  32. Green synthesis and characterisation of spherical structure Ag/Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite using acacia in the presence of neem and tulsi oils
  33. Green quantitative methods for linagliptin and empagliflozin in dosage forms
  34. Enhancement efficacy of omeprazole by conjugation with silver nanoparticles as a urease inhibitor
  35. Residual, sequential extraction, and ecological risk assessment of some metals in ash from municipal solid waste incineration, Vietnam
  36. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using the mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) leaf extract: Comparative preliminary in vitro antibacterial study
  37. Simultaneous determination of lesinurad and febuxostat in commercial fixed-dose combinations using a greener normal-phase HPTLC method
  38. A greener RP-HPLC method for quaternary estimation of caffeine, paracetamol, levocetirizine, and phenylephrine acquiring AQbD with stability studies
  39. Optimization of biomass durian peel as a heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production using microwave irradiation
  40. Thermal treatment impact on the evolution of active phases in layered double hydroxide-based ZnCr photocatalysts: Photodegradation and antibacterial performance
  41. Preparation of silymarin-loaded zein polysaccharide core–shell nanostructures and evaluation of their biological potentials
  42. Preparation and characterization of composite-modified PA6 fiber for spectral heating and heat storage applications
  43. Preparation and electrocatalytic oxygen evolution of bimetallic phosphates (NiFe)2P/NF
  44. Rod-shaped Mo(vi) trichalcogenide–Mo(vi) oxide decorated on poly(1-H pyrrole) as a promising nanocomposite photoelectrode for green hydrogen generation from sewage water with high efficiency
  45. Green synthesis and studies on citrus medica leaf extract-mediated Au–ZnO nanocomposites: A sustainable approach for efficient photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B dye in aqueous media
  46. Cellulosic materials for the removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous environments
  47. The analytical assessment of metal contamination in industrial soils of Saudi Arabia using the inductively coupled plasma technology
  48. The effect of modified oily sludge on the slurry ability and combustion performance of coal water slurry
  49. Eggshell waste transformation to calcium chloride anhydride as food-grade additive and eggshell membranes as enzyme immobilization carrier
  50. Synthesis of EPAN and applications in the encapsulation of potassium humate
  51. Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Cedrela toona leaf extracts: An exploration into their antibacterial, anticancer, and antioxidant potential
  52. Enhancing mechanical and rheological properties of HDPE films through annealing for eco-friendly agricultural applications
  53. Immobilisation of catalase purified from mushroom (Hydnum repandum) onto glutaraldehyde-activated chitosan and characterisation: Its application for the removal of hydrogen peroxide from artificial wastewater
  54. Sodium titanium oxide/zinc oxide (STO/ZnO) photocomposites for efficient dye degradation applications
  55. Effect of ex situ, eco-friendly ZnONPs incorporating green synthesised Moringa oleifera leaf extract in enhancing biochemical and molecular aspects of Vicia faba L. under salt stress
  56. Biosynthesis and characterization of selenium and silver nanoparticles using Trichoderma viride filtrate and their impact on Culex pipiens
  57. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes and biological potentials of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using the polar extract of Cyperus scariosus R.Br. (Cyperaceae)
  58. Assessment of antiproliferative activity of green-synthesized nickel oxide nanoparticles against glioblastoma cells using Terminalia chebula
  59. Chlorine-free synthesis of phosphinic derivatives by change in the P-function
  60. Anticancer, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities of nanoemulsions based on water-in-olive oil and loaded on biogenic silver nanoparticles
  61. Study and mechanism of formation of phosphorus production waste in Kazakhstan
  62. Synthesis and stabilization of anatase form of biomimetic TiO2 nanoparticles for enhancing anti-tumor potential
  63. Microwave-supported one-pot reaction for the synthesis of 5-alkyl/arylidene-2-(morpholin/thiomorpholin-4-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4(5H)-one derivatives over MgO solid base
  64. Screening the phytochemicals in Perilla leaves and phytosynthesis of bioactive silver nanoparticles for potential antioxidant and wound-healing application
  65. Graphene oxide/chitosan/manganese/folic acid-brucine functionalized nanocomposites show anticancer activity against liver cancer cells
  66. Nature of serpentinite interactions with low-concentration sulfuric acid solutions
  67. Multi-objective statistical optimisation utilising response surface methodology to predict engine performance using biofuels from waste plastic oil in CRDi engines
  68. Microwave-assisted extraction of acetosolv lignin from sugarcane bagasse and electrospinning of lignin/PEO nanofibres for carbon fibre production
  69. Biosynthesis, characterization, and investigation of cytotoxic activities of selenium nanoparticles utilizing Limosilactobacillus fermentum
  70. Highly photocatalytic materials based on the decoration of poly(O-chloroaniline) with molybdenum trichalcogenide oxide for green hydrogen generation from Red Sea water
  71. Highly efficient oil–water separation using superhydrophobic cellulose aerogels derived from corn straw
  72. Beta-cyclodextrin–Phyllanthus emblica emulsion for zinc oxide nanoparticles: Characteristics and photocatalysis
  73. Assessment of antimicrobial activity and methyl orange dye removal by Klebsiella pneumoniae-mediated silver nanoparticles
  74. Influential eradication of resistant Salmonella Typhimurium using bioactive nanocomposites from chitosan and radish seed-synthesized nanoselenium
  75. Antimicrobial activities and neuroprotective potential for Alzheimer’s disease of pure, Mn, Co, and Al-doped ZnO ultra-small nanoparticles
  76. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Bauhinia variegata and their biological applications
  77. Synthesis and optimization of long-chain fatty acids via the oxidation of long-chain fatty alcohols
  78. Eminent Red Sea water hydrogen generation via a Pb(ii)-iodide/poly(1H-pyrrole) nanocomposite photocathode
  79. Green synthesis and effective genistein production by fungal β-glucosidase immobilized on Al2O3 nanocrystals synthesized in Cajanus cajan L. (Millsp.) leaf extracts
  80. Green stability-indicating RP-HPTLC technique for determining croconazole hydrochloride
  81. Green synthesis of La2O3–LaPO4 nanocomposites using Charybdis natator for DNA binding, cytotoxic, catalytic, and luminescence applications
  82. Eco-friendly drugs induce cellular changes in colistin-resistant bacteria
  83. Tangerine fruit peel extract mediated biogenic synthesized silver nanoparticles and their potential antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic assessments
  84. Green synthesis on performance characteristics of a direct injection diesel engine using sandbox seed oil
  85. A highly sensitive β-AKBA-Ag-based fluorescent “turn off” chemosensor for rapid detection of abamectin in tomatoes
  86. Green synthesis and physical characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) derived from the methanol extract of Euphorbia dracunculoides Lam. (Euphorbiaceae) with enhanced biosafe applications
  87. Detection of morphine and data processing using surface plasmon resonance imaging sensor
  88. Effects of nanoparticles on the anaerobic digestion properties of sulfamethoxazole-containing chicken manure and analysis of bio-enzymes
  89. Bromic acid-thiourea synergistic leaching of sulfide gold ore
  90. Green chemistry approach to synthesize titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Fagonia Cretica extract, novel strategy for developing antimicrobial and antidiabetic therapies
  91. Green synthesis and effective utilization of biogenic Al2O3-nanocoupled fungal lipase in the resolution of active homochiral 2-octanol and its immobilization via aluminium oxide nanoparticles
  92. Eco-friendly RP-HPLC approach for simultaneously estimating the promising combination of pentoxifylline and simvastatin in therapeutic potential for breast cancer: Appraisal of greenness, whiteness, and Box–Behnken design
  93. Use of a humidity adsorbent derived from cockleshell waste in Thai fried fish crackers (Keropok)
  94. One-pot green synthesis, biological evaluation, and in silico study of pyrazole derivatives obtained from chalcones
  95. Bio-sorption of methylene blue and production of biofuel by brown alga Cystoseira sp. collected from Neom region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  96. Synthesis of motexafin gadolinium: A promising radiosensitizer and imaging agent for cancer therapy
  97. The impact of varying sizes of silver nanoparticles on the induction of cellular damage in Klebsiella pneumoniae involving diverse mechanisms
  98. Microwave-assisted green synthesis, characterization, and in vitro antibacterial activity of NiO nanoparticles obtained from lemon peel extract
  99. Rhus microphylla-mediated biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for enhanced antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy
  100. Harnessing trichalcogenide–molybdenum(vi) sulfide and molybdenum(vi) oxide within poly(1-amino-2-mercaptobenzene) frameworks as a photocathode for sustainable green hydrogen production from seawater without sacrificial agents
  101. Magnetically recyclable Fe3O4@SiO2 supported phosphonium ionic liquids for efficient and sustainable transformation of CO2 into oxazolidinones
  102. A comparative study of Fagonia arabica fabricated silver sulfide nanoparticles (Ag2S) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with distinct antimicrobial, anticancer, and antioxidant properties
  103. Visible light photocatalytic degradation and biological activities of Aegle marmelos-mediated cerium oxide nanoparticles
  104. Physical intrinsic characteristics of spheroidal particles in coal gasification fine slag
  105. Exploring the effect of tea dust magnetic biochar on agricultural crops grown in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil
  106. Crosslinked chitosan-modified ultrafiltration membranes for efficient surface water treatment and enhanced anti-fouling performances
  107. Study on adsorption characteristics of biochars and their modified biochars for removal of organic dyes from aqueous solution
  108. Zein polymer nanocarrier for Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascens extract: Potential biomedical use
  109. Green synthesis, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo biological screening of iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4) generated with hydroalcoholic extract of aerial parts of Euphorbia milii
  110. Novel microwave-based green approach for the synthesis of dual-loaded cyclodextrin nanosponges: Characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics evaluation
  111. Bi2O3–BiOCl/poly-m-methyl aniline nanocomposite thin film for broad-spectrum light-sensing
  112. Green synthesis and characterization of CuO/ZnO nanocomposite using Musa acuminata leaf extract for cytotoxic studies on colorectal cancer cells (HCC2998)
  113. Review Articles
  114. Materials-based drug delivery approaches: Recent advances and future perspectives
  115. A review of thermal treatment for bamboo and its composites
  116. An overview of the role of nanoherbicides in tackling challenges of weed management in wheat: A novel approach
  117. An updated review on carbon nanomaterials: Types, synthesis, functionalization and applications, degradation and toxicity
  118. Special Issue: Emerging green nanomaterials for sustainable waste management and biomedical applications
  119. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using mature-pseudostem extracts of Alpinia nigra and their bioactivities
  120. Special Issue: New insights into nanopythotechnology: current trends and future prospects
  121. Green synthesis of FeO nanoparticles from coffee and its application for antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-oxidation activity
  122. Dye degradation activity of biogenically synthesized Cu/Fe/Ag trimetallic nanoparticles
  123. Special Issue: Composites and green composites
  124. Recent trends and advancements in the utilization of green composites and polymeric nanocarriers for enhancing food quality and sustainable processing
  125. Retraction
  126. Retraction of “Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Cedrela toona leaf extracts: An exploration into their antibacterial, anticancer, and antioxidant potential”
  127. Retraction of “Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes and biological potentials of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using the polar extract of Cyperus scariosus R.Br. (Cyperaceae)”
  128. Retraction to “Green synthesis on performance characteristics of a direct injection diesel engine using sandbox seed oil”
Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2024-0161/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button