Abstract
Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a new type of concrete with improved features such as high strength, long service life, ductility, and toughness. UHPC’s energy-intensive cement and quartz sand may make it unsustainable despite its engineering expertise. Thus, a UHPC that is energy efficient and environmentally benign should use less energy-intensive components and industrial wastes. This review consolidates and critically reviews the latest global research on coal bottom ash (CBA) as a fine aggregate replacement material and nano-calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) as concrete additives. Based on the critical evaluation, replacing aggregate with CBA up to 60% improves strength by 23%. Since high-quality natural sand is depleting and CBA output is increasing due to coal power plants, the concrete industry can use CBA as an aggregate. However, CBA as an aggregate substitute in UHPC has been scarcely reported. Besides, nanomaterial technologies like nano-C–S–H have also been proven to increase traditional concrete’s strength by 33%. But, their impact on UHPC has yet to be fully explored. Thus, to develop UHPC with a lower carbon footprint and comparable or better performance to market-available UHPC, further research on CBA as aggregate replacement in UHPC with nano-C–S–H as an additive on mechanical durability and microstructure is needed.
1 Introduction
Construction has been crucial to the expansion of cities and manufacturing in recent decades [1]. From the time of Romans, when it was first utilised, concrete has been a core part of the construction field [2,3]. Concrete has been a core component of the construction industry since its introduction in the nineteenth century [2]. Gravel sand is combined with cement and water to make concrete [4]. Concrete’s status as the world’s second most widely employed material, after water, has increased rapidly due to the rapid infrastructure development [5]. The world’s demand for concrete is forecast to reach about 7.5 billion m3 by 2,050 (approximately 18 billion tons) [6]. Since its invention, concrete has become the most widely used construction material due to its inexpensive cost, versatility in design, and ability to withstand heavy loads [7]. Various engineering structures have extensively used concrete [6,8,9]. Concrete technology has advanced to build bigger buildings, longer bridges, and more earthquake-resistant constructions due to unforeseen demands [4,10]. Because of the improved strength-to-weight ratio, smaller section sizes will be feasible and hugely beneficial for developing long-lasting constructions [11]. Due to its high intrinsic density, concrete has various downsides, including a large footprint and hefty finished components [12]. In view of these restrictions, scientists have applied packing theory to design new concretes with improved qualities like high strength, long service life, ductility, and toughness [12,13]. Furthermore, the widespread shortage of essential materials was exacerbated by the extensive use of crushed rock and cement as binding agents in concrete production [4,14]. The building sector’s massive concrete demand will increase the rate at which carbon dioxide (CO2) is released into the atmosphere [15,16,17]. The use of environmentally friendly concrete has been the focus of numerous strategies [16,18]. Green concrete fits the criteria of being made from one or more alternative or recycled waste materials, having an ecologically friendly production process, or having excellent performance and outstanding durability [14,16,19]. Because of this, it is essential to develop advanced cementitious products [13,20], namely high-performance concrete (HPC) and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). These types of concrete can last longer and withstand a higher structural load than conventional concrete (CC) [3,21,22,23,24,25,26].
It was in the early 1990s that the initial concept of UHPC was first developed in France [27,28,29,30]. UHPC denotes a relatively novel group of advanced cementitious composite materials with significantly superior mechanical and durability capabilities compared to CC materials [21,22,23]. The four theoretical ideas commonly followed in the development of UHPC are reducing the overall pore structure, improving the microstructure, enhancing mixing homogeneity, and increasing deformation toughness [31,32,33]. The material offers compressive and flexural strengths of up to 200 and 48 MPa, respectively [11,34,35]. Besides, UHPC is also a very dense material with exceptional durability. These attributes are achieved by 1) improving the particle packing, 2) lowering the water/binder ratio to below 0.3, and 3) using a high water reducer dosage [36,37,38]. According to ASTM C1856, UHPC is a concrete that meets a stipulated durability level, ductility behaviour, toughness standards, and compressive strength of at least 120 MPa [39]. The EN 206:2013 standard specifies that UHPC’s compressive strength must be greater than 100 MPa [40], making it a reliable and durable material for the innovative architecture of modern buildings and bridges. UHPC has a wide range of potential applications due to its high performance in long-span bridge engineering, defensive military engineering, peculiar-shaped structure, maritime construction engineering, and many others [41,42,43].
It is difficult for concrete structures and infrastructure to create sustainably since cement and concrete are greenhouse gas emitters [19,36]. UHPC contains 600–1,300 kg·m−3 carbon emissions from its three times more cement than CC [16,44,45]. Sustainable development requires energy-efficient building designs due to the global energy crisis and environmental destruction [42]. Therefore, despite UHPC’s high performance, its further use and advancement are hampered because it does not meet the present policy of lowering carbon emissions [46]. UHPC may be a viable material in the building sector due to its better engineering features [46]. Still, it may not be sustainable due to the high dosage of energy-intensive constituents such as cement and river sand [36,47,48]. Thus, developing energy-efficient and environmentally friendly UHPC utilising less energy-intensive components and industrial by-products would help expand the material’s use [36,49,50]. UHPC must maximise its use of a low-carbon, low-energy-consumption alternative material [17,44,46,51,52,53,54]. Sustainable UHPC can be made by replacing cement, aggregate, and reinforcing components with agricultural and industrial byproducts [55,56,57].
On the other hand, energy requirements are increasing rapidly due to the rapid growth of the global economy and urbanisation rate [58]. As with many other countries, Malaysia has long relied on coal as a low-cost energy option [59]. Coal supplies 30% of global primary energy and will likely be the leading power source for the foreseeable future [60]. As Malaysia’s electricity demand increases, so will the ash residue produced by the country’s coal-fired power plants [61]. Fly ash (FA), coal bottom ash (CBA), and boiler slag result from power plant coal burning. These materials pollute and cause disposal concerns [62,63,64]. FA is widely used as a cement alternative in mortar and concrete and has proven to enhance concrete’s performance and toughness when used as a supplemental cementing material [14,65,66]. CBA’s particle size distribution is close to natural sand. Thus, it can replace sand in the construction and architecture of buildings and infrastructure [67,68,69]. Therefore, using both in concrete production is a reliable way to lessen the waste disposal issue and help preserve the environment [14,70,71]. Ecological sustainability of coal-fired power plant byproducts is essential to achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs), especially SDG 12, which seeks to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns” [72]. SDG 12 aspires to sustainably manage and efficiently utilise natural resources and considerably reduce environmental pollution through prevention, reduction, and recycling by 2030 [72]. Thus, coal ash recycling became popular as a green alternative to non-renewable aggregates [73,74,75]. Fine concrete aggregates have primarily come from river banks [68,76,77]. Global concrete production has caused various concerns about natural aggregate depletion [57,60]. Over 230 million cubic metres of river sand are mined annually [78]. UHPC’s highly fine aggregate concentration (1,000 kg·m−3) threatens its sustainability and embodied energy [29]. Overmining sand can harm the ecology, economy, and society [78]. Sand mining depletes natural resources, lowers subsurface water levels, and destroys microorganism habitats, which could have long-term environmental effects. Concrete aggregates are popular. Therefore, more sustainable materials are needed [7,79]. Global sustainable development can be achieved by converting coal thermal electricity generating waste into an eco-friendly byproduct for concrete manufacturing [70]. Over 85% of CBA is stored in open impoundments and landfills worldwide because current waste management systems cannot handle the growing amounts [58,60,80]. Thus, using this material to make concrete products would save landfill space, time, resources, and energy [81,82]. The Malaysian Construction Industry Development Board pioneered using this byproduct to augment recycled resources in concrete [19]. This approach would lower manufacturing costs without compromising waste landfilling’s environmental and health dangers [6].
In current construction materials science and technology advances, synthetic calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) seed is being investigated extensively as a possible hydration accelerator in cement-based products [83,84]. This nanoscale material is around 10 nm across. It shares chemical features with the main cement hydration product (C–S–H gel) [83,85]. The C–S–H gel primarily provides cement-based products with their binding effect [83]. UHPC with microfibres exhibits strain-hardening and ductile failure modes under tension and flexural load [86]. Fibres may not delay microcracks due to their considerable separation distance and less interlocking with the binder phase [86]. Thus, humidity and other detrimental chemicals infiltrate concrete faster, accelerating its deterioration [86]. Therefore, it is essential to optimise UHPC performance using nanoparticle modification at the nanoscale [85]. Nanoparticles prevent microcracks from developing and spreading due to their nanometre-scale spacing and high specific surface areas [86,87,88]. The first working mechanism is the “filler effect,” in which pores are filled to increase packing density due to the particles’ small particle size [85,89,90]. The second effect, the seeding or nucleation effect [90], helps produce primary C–S–H gels by providing nucleation sites [88]. In addition, the modern building sector has prioritised the research and development of low-carbon concrete [83,89,90]. One method of doing so is using SCMs instead of cement [83]. Synergistic effects between supplemental materials and nano-C–S–H may enhance aggregate substitution levels with CBA, decreasing the conventional aggregate and cement content [84,90].
2 Significance and aim
Existing studies have reported numerous mix designs of UHPC, including different kinds of supplementary material to reduce carbon footprint [8,55]. However, there is a lack of elaboration on using CBA in the UHPC mix and utilising nano-C–S–H as the nanomaterials. Besides, previous literature of the main author has extensively discussed the utilisation of CBA as a cement and fine aggregate replacement [59]. However, the available data mainly discuss the treatment method of CBA, the chemical and physical properties of CBA, and the influence of CBA incorporation in conventional high-strength concrete towards the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. Besides, review articles from the previous works [68,91,92] also focused mainly on the fresh and hardened properties of different kinds of mortar and CC with CBA as an aggregate replacement, but none of the scopes is related to UHPC application. Besides, the existing studies of nano-C–S–H applications [84,90] are limited to CC only. Therefore, their influence on UHPC concrete in terms of mechanical and durability parameters is yet to be further investigated. Previous research literature prompted ongoing findings on CBA as an aggregate replacement and nano-C–S–H as an additive in UHPC.
The present work aims to comprehensively review various studies and research investigations on the properties of UHPC and CC with CBA as the aggregate replacement and nanoadditives. The findings of related articles published in key scientific databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were reviewed and consolidated into suitable tables or figures to derive a critical review. The review is intended to increase the readers’ awareness and knowledge regarding the application and usability of CBA in UHPC and conventional mortar/concrete with suitable nanoadditives. With the increasing understanding of the material’s properties, CBA will be made viable for broader application in the construction industry in the near future to reduce the negative impact the construction industry imposes on the environment. The work presented also provides consolidated information and critical analysis of the existing literature on UHPC and CC made with CBA as an aggregate replacement and nanoadditives. This review covered various topics, including the mix design and particle size grading of aggregate in UHPC. Besides, the physical and chemical properties of CBA material were also reviewed. In terms of concrete behaviour, the workability, mechanical, and durability properties of CBA concrete are elucidated in the present work. Moreover, the microstructure of CBA UHPC, ordinary concrete and mortar, and the effect of nano-C–S–H as additives in cementitious products were also elaborated. Therefore, the present review thoroughly explains CBA material properties and potential uses in UHPC and traditional mortar/concrete. As more is learned about the material’s qualities, CBA will be in a better position to be advocated for its widespread use in the construction industry, helping to mitigate the industry’s detrimental environmental impact.
3 UHPC – Material design and aggregate grading
Portland cement, fine aggregates, coarse aggregates, water, and optional admixtures make up the base ingredients for CC. To fabricate UHPC, on the other hand, one must eliminate the coarse aggregate, replace some of the cement with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), and use superplasticisers (SPs) to get low water-to-cement ratios. According to the Portland Cement Association (PCA) definition, UHPC is a high-strength, ductile construction material produced by blending Portland cement, supplemental cementitious ingredients, quartz flour, fine silica sand, and high-range water reducer, water, and steel or organic fibres [34]. As a result, UHPC would likely have much lower w/c ratios than regular concrete, which is ordinarily around 0.40 [22,43]. Furthermore, without dispersed fibre reinforcement, UHPC would be rather weak in tension and prone to cracking because of plastic and drying shrinkage, despite being exceptionally resilient under compression. Fibrous reinforcement is added to concrete to avoid cracking by transferring tensile stresses within the material [86]. Fibers’ inability to prevent the onset of microcracks is likely due to the greater spacing and the reduced degree of interlocking between them [86]. Therefore, optimising the UHPC using nanoparticles at the nanoscale is crucial to ensure optimal mechanical strength and durability performance. The following impact was observed when nanoparticles were added to cement-based materials.
The packing fraction of various components like cement, sand, etc., and their combinations determine the mix designation of UHPC. Fuller and Thompson’s seminal work established that aggregate packing had an effect on concrete’s final qualities [93]. Therefore, they concluded that the quality of the concrete might be enhanced by using aggregates with a continuous geometric grading. Theoretically, as indicated in the following Eq. (1) based on the research of Fuller and and Thompson, a minimal porosity might be attained by employing an ideal particle size distribution across all of the used particle components in the mix [93,94]:
where D is the particle size (μm), P(D) is a fraction of the total solids being smaller than size D, D max is the maximum particle size (μm), and q is the distribution modulus. However, the equation does not consider the smallest possible particle size, despite the fact that there must be some lower bound, which can be used to refine the packing model. So, Funk and Dinger proposed an adjusted version of the Andreasen and Andersen equation, as shown in Eq. (2) [95]. All the concrete mixtures developed for this investigation were derived using a version of the Andreasen and Andersen model with adjustments made to account for smaller aggregate sizes, where D min is denoted in μm [95]:
Since the ratio of fine to coarse particles is determined by the distribution modulus q, the equation can be used to build a wide variety of concrete. Concrete mixes that are high in tiny particles tend to have distribution moduli that are below 0.25, while coarse mixtures tend to have moduli that are above 0.5 [96]. The value of q to be applied for UHPC is usually lower than 0.23 [97].
The mix designation of UHPC from previous researchers is tabulated in Table 1. Based on all the different mix proportions of UHPC, cement and silica fume were the most used materials as the binder. Some studies describe using fillers like quartz sand in place of cement. Besides, some other SCMs also being utilised to replace cement, such as FA and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). However, some researchers have successfully replaced silica fume with an equivalent quantity of metakaolin and natural zeolite [8]. For the aggregate phase, a few types of aggregates were used in different mix designs, such as fine sand, micro sand, river sand, and ground quartz, which have different particle size distributions. Based on the reported results in Table 1, the sand-to-binder ratio of UHPC is relatively low (0.50–1.60) compared to CC, which ranges from 2.00 to 8.00. At the same time, the water-to-binder ratio of UHPC ranged from 0.15 to 0.30. Therefore, a higher SP dosage was needed to achieve the desired workability compared to the CC mix. Despite having exceptional mechanical strength, UHPC tends to shrink more obviously than normal concrete mixes due to the low content of aggregate. Therefore, fibre reinforcement is introduced into UHPC as reported by different findings, ranging from 78 to 470 kg·m−3. To further improve the interface transition zone between the paste and aggregate or fibre, nanoparticles are added to enhance the properties of the UHPC. A few types of nanoparticles were used as the filler materials, e.g. nanosilica (12.2 kg·m−3), nanocotton straw ash (25.0 kg·m−3), and nanorice husk ash (7.0 kg·m−3). It was observed that when nanoparticles are incorporated into the UHPC mix, the quantity of fibre reinforcement required will be reduced to only about 30.0 kg·m−3 or possibly excluded from the mix design but still able to maintain or even improve the strength of the specimens.
UHPC mix designation from previous studies
| Ref. | Mix designation (kg·m−3) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | FA | GGBS | Fine sand | Microsand | River sand | Masonry sand | Ground quartz | Quartz sand | CBA | SF | Natural zeolite | Metakaolin | Fibers | Nanoparticles | S/B | W/C | SP | 28-days compressive strength (MPa) | |
| [98] | 1,114 | — | — | 1,072 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 169 | — | — | 234 | — | 0.96 | 0.19 | 40 | — |
| [99] | 700 | — | — | 1,055 | 219 | — | — | 175 | — | — | 44 | — | — | — | — | 1.50 | 0.29 | 46 | 149 |
| [100] | 832 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 207 | 975 | — | 135 | — | — | 192 | — | 1.17 | 0.20 | 30 | 174 |
| [101] | 900 | — | — | 1,125 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 135 | — | — | 160 | — | 1.25 | 0.23 | 54 | 194 |
| [102] | 691 | — | — | 759 | — | — | — | 276 | — | — | — | — | 172 | 138 | — | 1.10 | 0.27 | 22 | 146 |
| [103] | 486 | 556 | — | — | — | 715 | 304 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 156 | — | 0.98 | 0.20 | 5.5 | 125 |
| [104] | 896 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,019 | — | 134 | 27.3 | — | — | — | 1.14 | 0.21 | 20.1 | 152 |
| [105] | — | 44 | 670 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,170 | — | — | — | — | 78 | — | 1.60 | 0.23 | 50.1 | 110 |
| [106] | 955 | — | — | 1,051 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 239 | — | — | 168 | — | 1.10 | 0.17 | 15 | 170 |
| [107] | — | 170 | 690 | 900 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46 | — | — | 155 | — | 1.05 | 0.30 | — | 156 |
| [108] | 890 | — | — | 1,050 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 230 | — | — | — | — | 1.18 | 0.18 | 1.60 | 117 |
| [109] | 1133.1 | — | — | 953.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 156 | — | 0.84 | 0.23 | 7.60 | 104.7 |
| [110] | 884 | — | — | 1,040 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 156 | — | — | — | — | 1.18 | 0.24 | 20.8 | 115 |
| [37] | 640 | 160 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 750 | 202.5 | 176 | — | — | — | — | 1.02 | 0.18 | 32 | 165 |
| [111] | 1,050 | — | — | 514 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 268 | — | — | 470 | — | 0.50 | 0.17 | 44 | 205 |
| [112] | 758 | — | — | 733 | — | — | — | — | 295 | — | 497 | — | — | 140 | — | 1.35 | 0.20 | 13 | 200 |
| [113] | 712 | — | — | 1,020 | — | — | — | — | 211 | — | 231 | — | — | 156 | — | 1.43 | 0.25 | 31 | 149 |
| [114] | 800 | — | — | 880 | — | — | — | — | 200 | — | 200 | — | — | 156 | — | 1.10 | 0.15 | 9.6 | 140 |
| [103] | 712 | 221 | — | 1,020 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 231 | — | — | 156 | — | 1.43 | 0.23 | 6.5 | 135 |
| [1] | 960 | — | — | 1,017 | — | — | — | — | 115 | — | 144 | — | — | 156 | — | 1.05 | 0.17 | 34 | 116 |
| [115] | 710 | 71 | 106 | 1,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 142 | — | — | — | — | 1.15 | 0.25 | 25.7 | 117.61 |
| [116] | 856.5 | — | — | 1177.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214.1 | — | — | 120 | — | 1.10 | 0.17 | 19.7 | 155 |
| [96] | 600.2 | — | — | 843.8 | 218.7 | — | — | — | — | 210.9 | — | — | — | 37.5 | Nanosilica: 12.2 | 1.20 | 0.22 | 45.9 | 67.8 |
| [38] | 720 | 80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,250 | — | 160 | — | — | — | — | 1.30 | 0.18 | 9.6 | 166 |
| [117] | 775 | — | — | 610.2 | — | — | 610.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Nanocotton straw ash: 25 | 1.28 | 0.18 | 22 | 144.8 |
| [118] | 700 | — | — | 682.4 | — | 904.6 | — | — | — | — | 105 | — | — | 35.88 | Nanorice Husk ash: 7 | 0.97 | 0.18 | 17.5 | 140 |
As illustrated in Figure 1, the particle size grading of the aggregate used in UHPC is relatively fine. Only a minority of the researchers have an aggregate size ranging between 2.36 and 4.75 mm. Most of the aggregates used in UHPC have a particle size smaller than 2.36 mm, with the finest particles at about 0.15 mm. It can be seen that the aggregate used for UHPC was well graded to ensure optimal packing and resulting in a denser microstructure.

Particle size grading of the aggregate in UHPC from previous studies.
4 Physical and chemical properties of CBA
In this section, the physical and chemical properties of CBA are discussed. Comparisons are also made with reference to the technical guidelines of concrete aggregate to demonstrate the material’s suitability for use as a concrete constituent.
4.1 Physical properties of CBA
FA and CBA are the two types of coal ash gathered in the furnace. The coarser and denser ash that settles to the bottom of the furnace is referred to as CBA [119]. Given the global scale of CBA production, it is recommended that CBA be reused as a secondary building material ingredient to significantly reduce the use of scarce natural aggregates and the accumulation of waste in landfills [96]. CBA might have different physical characteristics depending on when and where it was collected, even from the same source [65,120]. Moreover, the particle size distribution of CBA varies with the different combustion technology, combustible sources, and the rate of combustion, which in turn affects the overall performance of CBA [63]. Furthermore, the combustion temperature and the level of pulverisation have a significant influence on its physical properties, particularly the size distributions of CBA [121,122,123].
CBA concrete’s huge potential in the building industry can be attributed to the high demand for aggregate materials in this market [124]. CBA can be used as a fine aggregate replacement in concrete due to its appearance and particle size distribution, comparable to river sand [70,96,125]. CBA particles are often angular, highly irregular in shape, and visibly porous, having a rough, gritty surface texture and interlocking properties [65,66,123]. Additionally, research shows that the most consistent growth of concrete strength and pore structure features occurs when CBA is employed as a fine aggregate in place of sand [126]. Constant hydration and refinishing pores with the C–S–H gel created by pozzolanic action increased the compressive strength in concrete containing CBA over an extended curing time [127]. Furthermore, it was determined that the concrete with a pozzolanic material had a higher resilience than the projected life when subjected to harsh exposure settings [4]. As a result, there is a need to incorporate novel pozzolanic elements into concrete that are safer for the environment [4]. The use of CBA in concrete is largely responsible for lowering emissions of greenhouse gases from coal-fired thermal power plants and the production of solid waste [4].
Based on results from various researchers, the specific gravity (G s) of CBA ranged from 1.11 to 3.05 g·cm−3. The different fineness modulus (FM) of CBA could explain the discrepancy in G s values. Previous researchers’ results showed that CBA’s FM ranges from 1.15 to 5.63. On the other hand, river sand had a specific gravity of 2.60 and a FM of 1.97, [125]. Therefore, the reduced density in bottom ash concrete can be attributed to CBA’s lower specific gravity than river sand. In addition, CBA’s porous internal structure makes it lighter and more fragile than natural sand [91]. Therefore, when CBA is used to replace river sand to make concrete, the resulting mix will be lighter since a lighter material (CBA) has replaced the heavier particles (river sand). Besides, the decreasing concrete density was also because of the increased void space [125]. Previous studies also reported that the water absorption, ω, of CBA particles varies widely between 1.00 and 37.20% of total weight.
Figure 2 summarises the physical parameters of CBA, including specific gravity, FM, and water absorption (ω), as reported by various researchers.
![Figure 2
Whisker diagram summarising the physical properties of CBA from previous studies [6,7,14,17,36,37,47,49,53,54,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,68,71,76,77,78,79,92,119,120,121,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_002.jpg)
Whisker diagram summarising the physical properties of CBA from previous studies [6,7,14,17,36,37,47,49,53,54,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,68,71,76,77,78,79,92,119,120,121,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178].
4.2 Chemical properties of CBA
Silica, iron, and alumina form the bulk of CBA, with other chemical compounds and gradings added for convenience in concrete production [65,136]. According to BS EN 12620: 2013 requirements, the primary chemical composition intended for concrete application is the total sulphur (S) content of the aggregates, and filler aggregates must be less than 1% by mass [179]. As reported by various researchers, the chemical components of CBA are consolidated from the listed literature and summarised in Figure 3 as a whisker plot diagram. Based on the whisker plot, the main compositions of CBA are silicon dioxide (SiO2), which weighed about 45–58%, aluminium oxide (Al2O3) at 18–26%, and iron(ii) oxide (Fe2O3) at 6–11% of the total weight. Magnesium oxide (MgO) and sulphur trioxide (SO3) are the minor components of CBA, which are less than 1 and 0.75%, respectively. Only 18 out of 58 sources of CBA reported a total content of oxide of sulphur (SO3) higher than 1% from the overall mass, based on chemical composition data from several investigations illustrated in Figure 4. As a result, according to European Standards, most CBA from various studies is suitable for aggregate replacement in concrete. The highest content of SO3 was 8.76% [128]. Conversely, the lowest content of SO3 was less than 0.01% [164].
![Figure 3
Chemical compositions of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104,118,127,128,129, 131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_003.jpg)
Chemical compositions of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104,118,127,128,129, 131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].
![Figure 4
SO3 content of different sources of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104, 118,127,128,129,131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_004.jpg)
SO3 content of different sources of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104, 118,127,128,129,131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].
Discolouration, poor air entrainment, segregation, and low compressive strength of the concrete were all prevalent impacts of more significant loss of ignition (LOI) of the pozzolanic material [92]. In CBA, higher LOI values indicate more carbon that was not burned [92]. Furthermore, as the unburned carbon formed in larger porous particles would absorb water, the high LOI resulted in higher water demand for fresh concrete [92,146]. As a result, CBA with a high LOI is unqualified for use in construction materials like mortar and concrete [65]. In that case, ASTM C618-22 limits the LOI of Class F and C ash to be less than 6% [180]. However, only 13 of 64 sources from different researchers presented CBA with an LOI value greater than 6%, as displayed in Figure 5. The highest LOI value reported is 27.1% [120], while the lowest is less than 0.01% [159].
![Figure 5
LOI values of different sources of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104,118, 127,128,129,131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_005.jpg)
LOI values of different sources of CBA from previous studies [4,11,12,16,17,18,19,29,44,54,71,74,75,81,82,83,84,86,88,89,91,92,93,95,96,98,101,102,103,104,118, 127,128,129,131,132,135,136,137,138,140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187].
5 Properties of cementitious composites containing CBA as aggregate replacement material
In this section, the properties of UHPC and CC containing CBA as an aggregate replacement material are elucidated in terms of fresh properties, mechanical strength, fluid transport properties, length change behaviour, and microstructure morphology.
5.1 Workability
The physical properties of CBA particles are critical in determining the design concrete mix’s workability. The increased inter-particle friction caused by the CBA’s uneven form and rough surface reduces mortar fluidity and workability.
The workability test results from the slump test or flow table test of CC obtained from previous researchers are summarised in Figure 6. The results showed that when the content of CBA aggregates increases, fresh mortar’s workability will decrease regardless of their source and concrete categories. Therefore, more SP is needed to increase the workability when the slump flow is fixed as constant for increasing the CBA aggregate content.

Workability of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies in terms of (a) workability value and (b) SP quantity.
The mix workability is affected by the physical properties of CBA, which are finer and have a porous texture than the river sand [81,96,154]. The use of CBA as aggregate improves the texture of the concrete by adding more irregular and fine-shaped porous particles to the mix, which are often highly rough surfaced [136]. However, due to the CBA’s irregular shape and constant water absorption, its workability deteriorates [4,120,183]. As a result, during the mixing process, the porous CBA particles absorbed more water internally than natural river sand particles [122,125], reducing the amount of free water available for particle lubrication [168]. The trend was confirmed by a consistent decrease in the free water content as the CBA sand content increased [139]. Furthermore, replacing river sand with CBA also increased the specific surface area of fine aggregate in concrete [53]. CBA particles’ rough surface texture and intricate shape also increased inter-particle friction [53,125,170]. The portion of cement paste used to coat the CBA particles reduced as the percentage of CBA incorporated increased, increasing the friction between the CBA particles [160]. It is worth noting that while the W/B ratio remained constant, the amount of SP continued to increase, achieving a constant slump range due to the presence of CBA particles, which have higher water absorption rates [19,77,130].
As a result, it can be concluded that the increased specific surface area, irregular particle shape, and surface texture of CBA particles cause a decrease in the workability of concrete containing CBA aggregate. Besides, partial internal absorption of the mixing water by the dry and porous CBA particles also led to the same observation. Consequently, when the W/B ratio is kept constant, more SP content is needed to improve the workability of fresh mortar in achieving the desired slump flow for both UHPC and CC.
5.2 Compressive strength
The previous findings on the compressive strength of CBA aggregate UHPC and CC have been summarised. Most of the results illustrated that the compressive strength of the CBA aggregate concrete decreases when the aggregate replacement level of CBA increases.
A related study reported that due to the CBA particles’ fragility and the greater pore volume constituted while they are utilised, the compressive strength drops as the CBA concentration increases, as shown in Figure 7 [187]. A reduction in the compressive strength of all CBA aggregate concrete is reported at all curing ages [188,189]. The decrease in the compressive strength is more significant when the content of CBA as an aggregate is at a higher rate [190]. This observation could be due to the mixes’ high initial free water content [65], which resulted in bleeding and poor interfacial bonding between the aggregates and the cement pastes [65,153,160]. In comparison to dense river sand particles, CBA particles have a higher water absorption tendency due to their porous nature. The attribute reduces concrete mix workability and hinders adequate compaction of concrete containing CBA aggregate, resulting in a lower strength value [77]. Furthermore, as water enters the CBA’s pores, the evacuation of air bubbles may induce voids between the cement paste and aggregate interfaces, resulting in a decreased bond strength [160]. The trend also showed that improved compressive strength over time is better for using CBA at a lower level of aggregate replacement. Numerous previous studies also reported similar results on the subject matter [172]. However, the compressive strength of CBA concrete increased more substantially compared to the control concrete without CBA on extended curing duration beyond 28 days [126]. The early-compressive strength was negatively affected as the amount of sand substituted by CBA increased [152]. CBA concrete mixtures’ compressive strength may have been influenced by the emergence of an inadequate C–S–H gel and a more significant percentage of voids at an incipient curing age [136]. The delay in hydration and stalled pozzolanic activity of CBA during the early curing period caused the concrete strength to be reduced when CBA is used as an aggregate replacement [119,121]. Additionally, while the water binder ratio is fixed, the free water trapped in the pores of CBA aggregate concrete affects the hydration process due to water deficiency in the binder phase. Therefore, it causes the binder to perform poorly due to the incomplete hydration of cement [132]. Due to the porous characteristics of CBA aggregates, moisture transfers from the aggregate to the cement paste via porous networks and stimulates hydration reaction at a later age [132].
![Figure 7
Reduction in the compressive strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [187].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_007.jpg)
Reduction in the compressive strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [187].
A different finding reported that the compressive strength of specimens increases when more CBA is incorporated as a sand replacement, as shown in Figure 8 [126]. A similar trend was also reported by other researchers [4,123]. The observation was reported due to the pore refinement effect of the CBA pozzolanic reaction with the surrounding binder phase [6,163]. It might also be due to the more significant development of C–S–H resulting from the higher silica content of CBA that aid in strength development [14]. However, the situation is limited to using CBA aggregate below 30% [183]; beyond that aggregate replacement level, the strength deteriorates because the increase in the porosity of concrete became more dominant over the effect of pore refinement, as aforementioned. Similar strength behaviour was displayed for 7- and 28-day periods.
![Figure 8
Improvement in the compressive strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [126].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_008.jpg)
Improvement in the compressive strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [126].
On extended curing duration, the compressive strength of CBA concrete mixes increases correspondingly. The compressive strength of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures improved faster than the control concrete mixture as time progressed [158,161,164]. Beyond 28 days of the curing period, CBA’s pozzolanic effect may have consumed the portlandite in the concrete mixtures to yield additional C–S–H gel, thus improving the gain in the compressive strength [119,136,158]. The improved compressive strength of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures was also aided by the decreased free water binder ratio caused by the absorption of some water by porous CBA particles [125]. As the curing time progresses, the reactive silica in the CBA reacts with the alkali calcium hydroxide produced by cement hydration to form calcium silicate and aluminate hydrates [53]. As a result, the ITZ’s pores are filled and compressive strength increases [125]. Due to the generation of extra C–S–H gel by the consumption of portlandite by the secondary hydration of CBA, the compressive strength was increased [54,122,136]. The cumulative effect of all these parameters is the reason for CBA aggregate concrete mixtures having analogous compressive strength to the control concrete mixture with only natural aggregates.
In conclusion, when CBA is used as aggregate replacement above the optimal content, the compressive strength of CBA aggregate concrete deteriorates. The behaviour of the compressive strength development of CBA aggregate concrete with curing time is almost identical to that of control concrete. There was a significant drop in the compressive strength at an early curing age when compared to control concrete. However, CBA aggregate concrete mixtures’ compressive strength increased substantially as the curing period progressed. Therefore, it can be stated with considerable assurance that the pozzolanic activity of CBA was responsible for the significant increase in the compressive strength of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures over time.
5.3 Flexural strength
Modulus of fracture, or the ability to resist bending forces, is another term for flexural strength [122]. The flexural strength test findings of CBA aggregate UHPC and CC by previous researchers are summarised. General trends showed that the flexural strength of the CBA aggregate concrete decreased while more CBA was utilised as aggregate replacement. However, on a positive note, the flexural strength of CBA aggregate concrete improves with extended curing age.
It is shown in Figure 9 that replacing the natural aggregate with 30% of CBA in CC without fibre reinforcement improved the strength [191]. In addition, the pozzolanic attribute of CBA particles helps to consume portlandite by generating additional secondary C–S–H gel at the paste aggregate interfacial transition zone (ITZ) due to the particles’ secondary hydration [119,136,158].
![Figure 9
Improvement in the flexural strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [191].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_009.jpg)
Improvement in the flexural strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [191].
The results from Abbas et al. [54] show that the porous properties of CBA have diminished flexural strength value as the aggregate replacement levels have increased over 30%, as shown in Figure 10. A similar trend was also reported by numerous studies [19,122]. This trend is due to the presence of numerous pores in CBA particles, which weaken the strength of the resultant concrete [136]. Furthermore, because the flexure strength depends on aggregate performance, the nature of CBA aggregate, which is relatively soft, porous, and brittle, produces concretes with a poorer elasticity, allowing cracks to propagate through it quickly [71,141]. In addition, the CBA’s high porosity increased in the ITZ, which hindered the full hydration of cement particles, increasing the likelihood of micro-crack propagation and interface fracture under stress and lowering the flexural strength [71,160]. It was reported that concrete using CBA as a sand replacement loses some of its flexural strength at an early age because of an increase in the number and volume of all pores and an expansion of the ITZ [14,65].
![Figure 10
Reduction in the flexural strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [54].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_010.jpg)
Reduction in the flexural strength of CBA CC with increasing CBA content [54].
Additionally, the flexural strength of CBA aggregate concrete increased with age [53]. The deterioration in the flexural strength of CBA aggregate concrete at earlier ages could be due to a delay in hydration and delayed pozzolanic activity of CBA during the early curing period [53,172]. The uniform dispersion of the C–S–H gel and the presence of secondary C–S–H gel due to the consumption of portlandite by secondary hydration of CBA resulted in greater flexural strength of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures. It is especially apparent for mixes with a high proportion of CBA as a fine aggregate over 91 days and beyond.
Previous findings on the load deflection test of CBA aggregate CC are presented in Table 2. The results illustrate that the deflection of CBA aggregate concrete increases when the aggregate replacement level of CBA increases. In the present literature, there has not been enough research on the bending deflection of concrete made with CBA as an aggregate replacement for UHPC. For CC, it has been shown that structural beams integrating with 100% CBA aggregate have better load–deflection behaviour [124]. The beam with concrete containing higher CBA aggregate content can withstand a higher imposed load. The deflection improvement is proportional to the beam’s strength capacity. Due to the high CBA concrete beam stiffness, the deflection capacity has increased. Increased CBA quantity led to a stronger pozzolanic reaction of CBA with calcium hydroxide, resulting in the formation of additional C–S–H gel in the paste aggregate interface. These C–S–H gel fill the gaps between cement paste components and aggregates in the ITZ and improve its strength [108,158].
Load–deflection of CBA aggregate conventional concrete (CC) and UHPC of previous studies
| Ref. | Replacement ratio (%) | Load–deflection of CBA aggregate concrete | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max deflection (mm) | Ultimate load (kN) | ||
| CC | |||
| [124] | 0 | 17.654 | 77 |
| 50 | 18.760 | 74 | |
| 100 | 18.871 | 88 | |
To summarise, a small sample of findings showed that an increase in the CBA content as aggregate replacement in the concrete mix at a low level might increase the flexural strength of concrete containing the CBA aggregate. However, most research findings showed that increasing the CBA content beyond 60% as an aggregate would decrease flexural strength. However, the flexural strength of CBA aggregate concrete mixes increased faster than control concrete as the curing time increased.
5.4 CBA concrete quality
Previous research on the UPV of CBA aggregate CC is summarised in Figure 11. When using a higher percentage of CBA as aggregate, all the data showed that the UPV results of the resultant CBA concrete decreased. However, no existing study reporting the UPV results of UHPC incorporates CBA as an aggregate replacement.
The UPV technique is based on the propagation of a high-frequency sound wave through the specimen. It is used to test the consistency and quality of concrete [65]. The UPV test is a non-destructive method of identifying defects, including void space, honeycombing, and other fractures in a material’s continuity [173]. Ultrasonic wave velocity is proportional to the concrete’s density [65]. The concrete with CBA as a sand replacement results in a linear decrease in the UPV value, as reported by previous findings [53,65,171]. In addition, the porosity of concrete and the time required for a high-frequency sound wave to penetrate the concrete at an early stage increased with the CBA content as a sand replacement [65,143]. Therefore, using CBA as a sand replacement causes a reduction in the UPV values through the concrete. However, at a later age, the concrete micro-structure becomes dense due to the filling of pores with more C–S–H gel generated by the pozzolanic action of CBA with the surrounding paste, and the UPV value increases correspondingly [53,65]. Positive results for density, homogeneity, and uniformity in the bottom ash concrete mixtures tested herein were indicated by the study’s higher values for UPV [119]. Based on the standard BS 1881: Part 203 (Table 3), most of the concrete made with CBA as sand replacement at an optimal level (up to 40%) can achieved an UPV value of higher than 3,500 m·s−1, which put the concrete quality at a good grading [192].
Therefore, previous studies came to a similar conclusion that the UPV value of the concrete made with CBA aggregate decreased when CBA substituted the natural aggregate. Compared to the control concrete, the UPV value dropped dramatically, especially at the early ages of the concrete. However, the UPV value of concrete mixtures, including the CBA aggregate, increased over extended curing duration due to the pozzolanic activity of CBA.
Evaluation of UPV test results based on BS 1881: part 203 [192]
| Pulse velocity (m·s−1) | Concrete quality (grading) |
|---|---|
| ≥4,500 | Excellent |
| 3,500–4,500 | Good |
| 3,000–3,500 | Questionable |
| 2,000–3,000 | Poor |
| ≤2,000 | Very poor |
5.5 Water absorption
Previous findings on water absorption of CBA aggregate CC are summarised in Figures 12 and 14. Generally, the water absorption level is more significant when the replacement level of CBA aggregate increases. Therefore, compared to control mix concrete, CBA aggregate concrete with higher CBA contents had a relatively higher water absorption over a prolonged curing duration. However, no published research has yet reported the water absorption results of UHPC that uses CBA as aggregate replacement.
Concrete absorbs more water when the CBA content increases, an example is shown in Figure 12. With increasing percentages of natural sand substitution by CBA in concrete, the permeable pore space and water absorption in concrete increased [120,125]. When more CBA is added to the concrete, the quantity of water absorbed by the concrete increases gradually. It was because more empty pores are present in the concrete after the evaporation of free water, which tends to absorb more water [81,92,143]. A larger water/solid ratio produces a weaker and unconfined matrix, leading to an enhanced capillary porosity, responsible for the increased water absorption of CBA mixtures [166].
A different finding was reported by Bheel et al. [4]: the water absorption rate of specimens reduced with an increase in the CBA content. The trend persisted when CBA was used as an aggregate replacement of up to 40%, as displayed in Figure 13. Other researchers also reported similar outcomes when the replacement is up to 20% [92,163]. The pore refinement of CBA likely contributed to the concrete’s lower water absorption rate compared to control specimens. Furthermore, fine CBA particles also behaved as a filler for pores in the concrete, reducing the overall porosity and capillary pore and producing a denser microstructure [4]. Beyond the optimum replacement rate, water absorption starts to increase, which might be due to the porous structure of the concrete attributed to the presence of a large quantity of CBA in the concrete.
![Figure 13
Reduction in the water absorption of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies with increasing CBA content [4].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_013.jpg)
Reduction in the water absorption of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies with increasing CBA content [4].
With the extended curing duration, the permeable pore spaces of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures were reduced correspondingly [119,125,158]. The decrease in the permeable pore space was due to the pozzolanic activity of CBA, which reduced the amount of water absorbed by the concrete [125]. In addition, the synthesis of ettringites and the uniform distribution of the C–S–H gel reduced voids, resulting in lower water absorption [92,119]. The emergence of aluminate hydration products due to a chemical reaction between cement and fine CBA aggregate particles can also be accounted for lowered water absorption [143].
In conclusion, the water absorption of CBA aggregate concrete increases with a higher aggregate replacement ratio with CBA. Different findings might also occur where the water absorption is reduced when more CBA is used to replace the natural aggregate. This observation could be caused by different physical properties, such as the water absorption level of the CBA from different sources [65,120]. The different particle grading distributions of CBA particles might also have different effects towards the performance of concrete made. Generally, with the curing period progression, the permeability of concrete will be reduced due to an internal pozzolanic reaction which reduces the available voids.
5.6 Pore space and permeability
The findings on the permeability properties of CBA aggregate CC based on two different testing methods are compared in Figure 14. The tests were nitrogen gas permeability and the percentage of pore spaces in the concrete. In the case of nitrogen gas, when more gas is allowed to pass through the specimens, the concrete is more porous and permeable. Similarly, a higher percentage of pore spaces in specimens indicates a more porous concrete.
According to the gas permeability test results, the apparent permeability of mortar increased as the level of sand replacement by CBA in the mortar increased [143]. However, with time progression, the results showed that the concrete became less permeable to nitrogen gas. The development of the pozzolanic reaction in these mixes, which reduces the permeable pore space, can explain this decrease. In addition, the reactive silica in the CBA combines with the alkali calcium hydroxide produced by cement hydration to form calcium silicate and aluminate hydrates as the curing time increases. Therefore, the voids in the matrix are filled, and the porosity and transfer characteristics of the matrix are improved [143].
In terms of total porosity, the degree of the voids increased with a higher level of sand replacement by CBA [188,194]. The porous structure of CBA was largely responsible for this phenomenon [54]. As free water evaporates from mortar, it leaves voids in the cement matrix, which could also be responsible for this phenomenon [143]. With time, the permeable pore space of CBA aggregate concrete mixtures shrank. The trend was more significantly observed in concrete mixes with higher CBA aggregate content. The sharp decrease of the permeable pore space is due to the pozzolanic activity of CBA at a later age, which formed additional C–S–H gel for pore refinement [125].
In conclusion, the pore space and permeability of CBA aggregate concrete increase with a higher aggregate replacement ratio with CBA. However, with the curing period progression, the permeability of concrete reduced due to an internal pozzolanic reaction which reduces the available voids.
5.7 Chloride diffusivity
A comprehensive finding on chloride diffusion properties of CBA aggregate UHPC and CC is presented in Figure 15. The chloride diffusion properties of UHPC using CBA as an aggregate replacement have not yet been mentioned in the literature. When more chloride ion charges pass through the specimens, the concrete is more porous and permeable, which indicates a higher degree of pore spaces in specimens resulting in more porous concrete.
The chloride diffusivity of mortar also increases with higher CBA content as an aggregate [49,92,194]. Compared to ordinary river sand, the increased pore volume of the CBA aggregate decreased the resistance of concrete to chloride-ion diffusion with an increased CBA aggregate content [142]. The substantially higher porosity of these mixes is related to the abrupt increase in chloride ion diffusivity at greater substitution levels of aggregate with CBA. The defects mentioned above and inconsistencies provide an easy conduit for chloride ions to diffuse into the concrete [49]. However, it is noticeable that CBA’s pozzolanic activity has improved chloride ion resistance on prolonged curing duration [130,135]. Another possible explanation for the reduced charge transmitted was a decrease in the alkalinity of the pores [130]. In addition, the Coulomb charge decreased over time, indicating that the microstructure of the CBA concrete became denser with an extended curing duration [138]. The pozzolanic activity and chloride binding capacity of CBA contributed to the decrease in chloride content by impeding the diffusion of chloride ions on extended curing duration [92,194].
With a higher natural aggregate replacement ratio with CBA, concrete is less resistant to chloride diffusivity due to increased porosity. However, on extended curing duration, the resistance of concrete towards chloride ions increased because of an internal pozzolanic reaction that reduced the degree of permeable voids.
5.8 Drying shrinkage
The literature on the drying shrinkage of CBA aggregate UHPC and CC is summarised. Changes in the concrete volume are due to water movement in or out of a concrete mass. In principle, concrete swells due to moisture ingress and shrinks when the moisture is lost due to drying. Drying shrinkage occurs in hardened concrete when exposed to air that is not fully humid.
The findings showed that when the content of CBA as an aggregate replacement in CC increases, the drying shrinkage of concrete increases, as shown in Figure 16 [92,120,134]. This development stems from the substitution of weaker and porous CBA for the normal fine aggregate, which provides less resistance to shrinkage between the cement paste and aggregates [157]. In addition, because of the pozzolanic reaction induced by CBA, sufficient C–S–H gel was formed to conceal the pores of the CBA mix mortars, which could be the reason for the increased shrinkage value with increasing CBA content in the mixtures [134]. Besides, it would also cause the mortar’s microscopic structures to become more compact [134]. Thus, additional C–S–H is created, filling the gaps in the CBA mix mortars and displacing the moisture during drying [134].
![Figure 16
Increase in drying shrinkage of CBA aggregate CC with increasing CBA content [134].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_016.jpg)
Increase in drying shrinkage of CBA aggregate CC with increasing CBA content [134].
Previous studies have shown different findings that when CBA is used to replace natural sand in CC, it results in a material with greater dimensional stability than the control mix, as shown in Figure 17. Generally, the degree of drying shrinkage was reduced when CBA was used as an aggregate replacement material [134]. It is theorised that the CBA’s porous particles operate as water reservoirs, slowly releasing moisture during the concrete’s drying phase to aid in lowering the magnitude of drying shrinkage [65,92,136]. Similarly, drying shrinkage in CBA-based concrete mixes was lower than in control mixes when both were designed for the same slump ranges [92].
When more CBA is used as a natural aggregate replacement in concrete, the drying shrinkage reduces. Since the saturated or partially saturated pores of CBA particles would slowly release moisture while the concrete is subjected to a drying environment, the final values for drying shrinkage would be less than those of the control concrete without CBA aggregate.
5.9 Microstructure
In general, when the content of CBA as an aggregate is at a low level (below 40%), the strength of mortar will increase due to the interlocking properties of the CBA irregular particles that have a stronger binding force between the aggregate and the binder paste. However, further increase of the CBA as an aggregate replacement will increase the pores within the microstructure, which leads to a decrease in strength.
Figure 18 shows gel products that densify the interface between the CBA aggregate and the cement paste due to a pozzolanic reaction [152]. The observation was further supported by findings in Figure 19, where the irregular-shaped CBA particles have stronger interlocking interaction with the cement mortar, and the ITZ is densified with the C–S–H gel produced [141]. Therefore, the mechanical strengths of specimens should improve when CBA is utilised as an aggregate replacement at a low content.
![Figure 18
Microscopic image of the interface between the CBA aggregate and cement paste on 200× magnification: The interface between (a) CBA aggregate and (b) cement paste is densified by (c) gel products due to the pozzolanic reaction [152].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_018.jpg)
Microscopic image of the interface between the CBA aggregate and cement paste on 200× magnification: The interface between (a) CBA aggregate and (b) cement paste is densified by (c) gel products due to the pozzolanic reaction [152].
![Figure 19
Cross section of the hardened concrete with CBA [141].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_019.jpg)
Cross section of the hardened concrete with CBA [141].
However, it was discovered that when the CBA content in the mortar increased (above 40%), its strength decreased [60]. Figure 20 shows scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of concrete mixtures with 0, 50 and 100% CBA as a sand replacement, indicating an increase in the number and size of pores on using CBA at high content (50–100%) in concrete [119]. For CBA concrete mixtures with 50 and 100% CBA as in Figure 20(b) and (c), the C–S–H gel is not as uniform and dense as in the control concrete mixture without CBA content, as illustrated in Figure 20(a) [119]. Therefore, the strength of CBA concrete mixtures may have been impacted by creating an indistinct C–S–H gel and a greater number of empty spaces within the mixture [119]. Figure 21 displays SEM images of mortar with 0, 40, and 100% of CBA as a sand replacement [60]. The results in Figure 21(b) and (e) show that the mortar with 40% CBA was denser than the control mortars without CBA, as shown in Figure 21(a) and (d) [60]. The decrease in the pore size is believed to be caused by the pozzolanic reaction of CBA, which fill some of the pores over time [60]. In samples containing a high volume of CBA fine aggregate, the porous structure of the material is prominent [60]. As seen in Figure 21(c) and (f), the size of the pores of the matrix became relatively larger, which is due to the presence of pores within the CBA particles and the air pocket trapped between the irregularly shaped particles and the cement paste [60]. Since the number of pores significantly increased with the presence of CBA, this study corroborates the previously reported findings from the investigation into the impacts of bottom ash on permeability and mechanical strength when used at high content, i.e. above 60%.
![Figure 20
SEM image of concrete mixtures with (a) 0 CBA (b) 50 CBA, and (c) 100% CBA at 28 days of curing period [119].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_020.jpg)
SEM image of concrete mixtures with (a) 0 CBA (b) 50 CBA, and (c) 100% CBA at 28 days of curing period [119].
![Figure 21
SEM analysis of CBA/sand matrices based on (a and d) 0% CBA replacement, (b and e) 40% CBA replacement, and (c and f) 100% CBA replacement [60].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_021.jpg)
SEM analysis of CBA/sand matrices based on (a and d) 0% CBA replacement, (b and e) 40% CBA replacement, and (c and f) 100% CBA replacement [60].
In conclusion, replacing the natural aggregate with CBA at a controlled optimal level (20–60%) will tend to increase the performance of the specimens due to the better-interlocking properties of the CBA particles. Besides, the pozzolanic reaction of CBA aggregate with the calcium hydroxide of the surrounding cement paste also aided in densifying the ITZ. However, a further increase in the replacement level beyond the optimal level (40%) will no longer benefit the specimens’ performance. The excessive CBA content may yield more permeable void spaces, weakening the ITZ and causing deterioration of strengths and durability.
6 Nano-C–S–H and its application as an additive in cementitious composites
The main hydration product generated during the interactions between Portland cement and water is C–S–H, which is primarily accountable for the binding ability of cement-based products. Nano-C–S–H, a stable suspension of synthetically manufactured C–S–H nanoparticles, was granted a patent in 2009 [197]. Since nano-C–S–H has low interfacial energy, it can serve as a nucleation site and physically speed up calcium silicate hydration when added to cement-based materials, a phenomenon known as the filler effect [90]. It promotes the formation of hydrated phases, speeding up the hydration of the cement at an early stage [83]. Nano-C–S–H in concrete mixtures as a hydration accelerator aid in the subsequent crystallisation of C–S–H adjacent particles. The presence of nano-C–S–H shifts the gel nucleation centres and growth away from the hydrating clinker particles. It enables secondary nucleation in the capillary pores of the paste and a more uniform dispersion of C–S–H yielded from the primary hydration of cement throughout the paste [90]. When this happens, the final binder’s mechanical strength attributes improve and its permeability decreases since the porosities have been reduced [90]. Therefore, the addition of nano-C–S–H speeds up the formation of the C–S–H network of the binder phase [89]. Furthermore, including nano-C–S–H allowed primary C–S–H to develop more uniformly in the cementitious matrix. When nano-C–S–H was incorporated into concrete mixtures in previous studies [88,89], as shown in Table 4, it revealed that they contributed to expediting cement hydration and improved the heat of hydration, shortening the setting time and boosting the strength and durability of concrete. However, existing studies of nano-C–S–H application are only limited to CC. Their influence towards UHPC concrete is yet to be further investigated.
Mechanical strength, hydration degree, and setting properties of concrete with nano-C–S–H
| References | Nano-C–S–H content (%) | Compressive strength (MPa) | Flexural strength (MPa) | Degree of hydration (%) | Setting time (min) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 3D | 7D | 14D | 28D | 1D | 3D | 7D | 28D | Initial | Final | |||
| [90] | 0 | 15 | — | 34 | — | 52 | 3.5 | — | 7 | 9.3 | 54 | — | — |
| 2 | 24 | 43 | 53 | 5.4 | 7.8 | 9 | 55 | ||||||
| 15 | — | 34 | — | 52 | 3.5 | — | 7 | 9.3 | 54 | — | — | ||
| 22 | 49 | 61 | 4.9 | 8.3 | 10 | 59 | |||||||
| 0 | 24 | — | 49 | — | 58 | 4.4 | — | 8.1 | 9 | 53 | — | — | |
| 2 | 34 | 49 | 58 | 6.6 | 8 | 8.9 | 55 | ||||||
| 24 | — | 49 | — | 58 | 4.4 | — | 8.1 | 9 | 53 | — | — | ||
| 34 | 57 | 63 | 5.6 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 57 | |||||||
| [83] | 0 | 25 | 40 | 52.5 | — | 65 | — | — | — | — | 37.5 | — | — |
| 1 | 30.8 | 52 | 65.1 | 74.8 | 45 | ||||||||
| 0 | 20 | 45 | 55 | — | 60 | — | — | — | — | 42.5 | — | — | |
| 1 | 26.8 | 51.8 | 60 | 64.8 | 47.5 | ||||||||
| 0 | 10 | 35 | 50 | — | 62.5 | — | — | — | — | 35 | — | — | |
| 1 | 13.8 | 37.8 | 58.5 | 66.9 | 40 | ||||||||
| [84] | 0 | — | 27.5 | 37.5 | — | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 35.5 | 35 | 60 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 35 | 33 | 55 | ||||||||||
| 0 | — | 18 | 32 | — | 37.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2 | 22 | 35 | 46 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 21 | 33 | 42 | ||||||||||
| [89] | 0 | 26 | 40 | 48 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 236 | 410 |
| 0.5 | 32 | 50 | 55 | 59 | — | — | |||||||
| 1 | 32 | 48 | 56 | 60 | 85 | 163 | |||||||
| 1.5 | 29 | 38 | 41 | 44 | — | — | |||||||
| [87] | 0 | 8 | — | 35 | 49 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 15 | 50 | 65 | 75 | |||||||||
| 0 | 5 | — | 30 | 40 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2 | 10 | 35 | 48 | 61 | |||||||||
| [88] | 0 | — | 21.1 | — | — | 44.1 | — | 6.4 | — | 8.1 | — | 125 | 175 |
| 0.5 | 22.5 | 46.7 | 6.6 | 8.7 | 110 | 145 | |||||||
| 1 | 25.5 | 48.2 | 6.7 | 9.4 | 100 | 140 | |||||||
| 2 | 32.2 | 53.1 | 6.8 | 9.5 | 100 | 135 | |||||||
Zhao and Khoshnazar [83] found that the compressive strength of the specimens with nano-C–S–H added demonstrated a vast increase compared to those without, especially at early curing ages. Furthermore, when nano-C–S–H was adopted, backscattered electron (BSE) micrographs revealed a greater hydration reaction degree of cement clinker. In addition, the enhancement in pore space-filling was more prominent, leading to a more homogeneous and denser microstructure in all C–S–H seeding additive specimens at every curing period. Because these engineering properties are directly related to the pore structure of cement-based materials, the alteration can be crucial for improving the mechanical performance and durability.
According to Alzaza et al. [84], the nano-C–S–H concentration of 2% to binder weight is the best dosage, considering that increasing the nano-C–S–H amount to 5% did not result in any additional strength gains independent of the curing period. Furthermore, the nano-C–S–H also enhanced the reaction rate of the binders, according to the heat of hydration measurements. Adding nano-C–S–H thus improves the amount of precipitated C–S–H and ettringite in the binder.
The findings from Zhou et al. [89] also revealed that when the nano-C–S–H level was adjusted from 0.5 to 1%, the compressive strength increased. However, the compressive strength decreased from the optimum level when the nano-C–S–H dose increased from 1 to 1.5%. Besides, incorporating nano-C–S–H into concrete mixtures can reduce the time it takes for them to set, with the effect being more substantial on the initial setting time than the final setting time. Therefore, the above findings imply that adding nano-C–S–H to concrete can be a realistic strategy for increasing the hardening rate and strength gain as curing ages progress.
A similar positive impact on the application of nano-C–S–H was also explored and reported by Kanchanason and Plank [87]. The compressive strength of mortars was improved at all curing periods. It was discovered that the nano-C–S–H functions as a seeding material, initiating sooner and stronger C–S–H crystallisation from the clinker’s silicates. The C–S–H expedited cement hydration, resulting in significantly improved early strength development of mortar.
A study by Li et al. [88] also demonstrated similar benefits of incorporating nano-C–S–H in cement-based mortar. The compressive strength increased drastically when the C–S–H dosage was increased from 0.5 to 2%. The flexural strength developed in the same way as the compressive strength. The use of nano-C–S–H is advantageous to the densification of specimen microstructures. It fosters more formation of C–S–H gels, promoting the improvement of strength properties, notably at an early age. It was because the mechanical properties of cement are pertinent to the hydration of the cementing phase and microstructure development. In addition, adding nano-C–S–H from 0.5 to 2% reduces the time it takes for the cement paste to set. This observation was due to the nano-C–S–H’s ability to speed up hydration and, as a result, shorten setting times.
The findings from Morales-Cantero et al. [90] also exhibited beneficial results when nano-C–S–H was added to the cement-based mortar. The mechanical strengths were maintained or increased when 2% nano-C–S–H was added to the mortar mixes. In addition, shorter induction times, steeper slopes in the acceleration period, and higher heat flow values at the first hydration peak may all be traced back to the increased hydration rate of cement made possible by the used admixtures.
In conclusion, using artificial nano-C–S–H or gel in cementitious-based concrete will help enhance the hydration processes and densification of the binder phase. Thus, it promotes an even distribution of the C–S–H gel and improves the concrete mix’s mechanical properties and durability. However, the optimal dosage of nano-C–S–H to be added to the concrete mixture depends on the solid concentration and their types since there are an increasing variety of similar products recently found in the market. Therefore, further experiments and findings are recommended to propose the optimal dosage for any given concrete mix design.
7 Knowledge gap analysis
A scarce amount of work has been reported on using CBA as a sand replacement in the formulation of UHPC.
Due to lack of evidence, the influence of adding nano-C–S–H to a UHPC using CBA as a sand substitute on mechanical and durability properties is not well comprehended.
The mechanical strength development and fluid transport properties of UHPC containing CBA aggregate are not well defined in the present literature on the subject matter.
Reports of durability properties, especially on bending deflection, UPV, water absorption, and chloride diffusivity on CBA aggregate UHPC, are limited.
Evidence on the microstructure of UHPC incorporated with CBA as an aggregate replacement and nano-C–S–H are not well defined in the prior literature.
8 Critical summary of the literature
UHPC is usually produced by blending Portland cement, supplemental cementing ingredients, fine aggregate, SP, a relatively low amount of water with fibre reinforcement, or nanoparticles to improve the performance further, achieving a 28-day compressive strength of at least 100 MPa.
CBA resembles river sand in appearance and particle size distribution, making it an ideal candidate for use as a fine aggregate replacement in concrete. According to studies, the most consistent development of concrete strength and pore structure features arises when CBA is employed as a fine aggregate in partial substitution of natural sand. Since the source of high-quality natural sand is depleting, while at the same time, production of CBA is increasing due to an increase in coal power plants, CBA is suitable to be used as an aggregate replacement in conventional and UHPC concrete.
The chemical composition of CBA meets the requirement of standards to produce concrete with similar or better performance when being used as a sand replacement. Therefore, it is suitable for sustainable concrete production, ensuring concrete with exceptional properties such as UHPC can be produced in a more environmentally friendly manner.
CBA aggregate conventional and UHPC concrete’s workability decreases when CBA aggregate’s content is increased. It was due to increased specific surface area, complicated shape and texture of CBA particles, and internal absorption of part of the mixing water by the dry and porous particles. Therefore, more SP is required to promote workability when more CBA is employed as a concrete aggregate and the slump value is fixed.
An increase in the CBA content as a natural aggregate replacement in the conventional and UHPC concrete mix may cause a decrease in the flexural strength, compressive strength, and UPV values at an early stage due to a delay in the hydration and pozzolanic action between the binder and the CBA aggregate to form a dense microstructure and superior ITZ. However, the flexural and compressive strength of the CBA aggregate conventional and UHPC concrete mixes will increase faster than the control concrete as the curing period increases. When the specimens’ stiffness increases, the deflection capacity will also increase.
Water absorption, total porosity, and chloride diffusivity increased as the replacement ratio of river sand to CBA in CC was increased due to more permeable voids. As the curing age progressed, permeable voids filled with C–S–H gel were generated by the pozzolanic action of CBA and cement, which aid in reducing fluid transport abilities. However, there is a lack of evidence on using CBA as aggregate replacement in UHPC towards water absorption, total porosity, and chloride diffusivity.
The drying shrinkage of conventional and UHPC concrete is reduced when more CBA is used as an aggregate replacement leading to improved dimension stability. It was due to the porous CBA particles which retained part of the mixing water and gradually released it into the hardened concrete when it was exposed to drying.
Due to the greater interlocking ability of CBA particles and their improved pozzolanic response, which helps to densify the ITZ, replacing natural aggregate with CBA at a controlled level tends to boost the specimen performance. However, if the replacement rate is higher than optimal (60%), more void areas are generated, lowering the ITZ’s strength and durability.
Adding nano-C–S–H into CC can be a viable technique for speeding up the hardening and hydration of the concrete and promoting improvement in mechanical strength and durability growth. However, the effect of nano-C–S–H on UHPC concrete has not been well studied.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) for providing the financial resources to carry out the work.
-
Funding information: The work was funded by the Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) under the International Collaboration Fund (Reference No. IF0420I1224) with the title “The Optimization of Mineral Processing of Coal Bottom Ash for Large Volume Reuse as Constituent Binder and Aggregate for Concrete Production at Industrial Scale.”
-
Author contributions: Cheah Chee Ban: conceptualisation, methodology, supervision, validation, and funding acquisition. Saw Yoong Kang: investigation, data curation, writing – original draft. Rafat Siddique: writing – review and editing. Weerachart Tangchirapat: writing – review and editing. The authors applied the SDC approach for the sequence of authors. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Ganesh, P., A. R. Murthy, A. Ramachandra Murthy, and A. R. Murthy. Tensile behaviour and durability aspects of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with GGBS as cementitious material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 197, 2019, pp. 667–680.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.240Search in Google Scholar
[2] Bajaber, M. A. and I. Y. Hakeem. UHPC evolution, development, and utilization in construction: a review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 10, 2021, pp. 1058–1074.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.051Search in Google Scholar
[3] Shaikh, F. U. A., S. Luhar, H. Ş. Arel, and I. Luhar. Performance evaluation of Ultrahigh performance fibre reinforced concrete – A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 232, 2020, id. 117152.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117152Search in Google Scholar
[4] Bheel, N., M. A. keerio, A. Kumar, J. Shahzaib, Z. Ali, M. Ali, et al. An Investigation on fresh and hardened properties of concrete blended with rice husk ash as cementitious ingredient and coal bottom ash as sand replacement material. Silicon, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 677–688.10.1007/s12633-020-00906-3Search in Google Scholar
[5] Aisheh, Y. I. A., D. S. Atrushi, M. H. Akeed, S. Qaidi, and B. A. Tayeh. Influence of polypropylene and steel fibers on the mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01234.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01234Search in Google Scholar
[6] Ali, T., A. S. Buller, F. U. R. Abro, Z. Ahmed, S. Shabbir, A. R. Lashari, et al. Investigation on mechanical and durability properties of concrete mixed with silica fume as cementitious material and coal bottom ash as fine aggregate replacement material. Buildings, Vol. 12, 2022, id. 44.10.3390/buildings12010044Search in Google Scholar
[7] Kota, S. K. and J. S. Kalyana Rama. Impact of locally available sustainable materials on the overall economy of the construction sector – A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 43, 2021, pp. 1103–1109.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.343Search in Google Scholar
[8] Xue, J., B. Briseghella, F. Huang, C. Nuti, H. Tabatabai, and B. Chen. Review of ultra-high performance concrete and its application in bridge engineering. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 260, 2020, id. 119844.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119844Search in Google Scholar
[9] Sankar, L. P., G. Aruna, A. K. Rao, K. S. Kadrekar, and G. Aruna. Studies on drying shrinkage and water permeability of fine fly ash high performance concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 46, 2021, pp. 930–933.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.069Search in Google Scholar
[10] Akeed, M. H., S. Qaidi, H. U. Ahmed, W. Emad, R. H. Faraj, A. S. Mohammed, et al. Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Part III: Fresh and hardened properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01265.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01265Search in Google Scholar
[11] Nodehi, M. and S. E. Nodehi. Ultra high performance concrete (UHPC): Reactive powder concrete, slurry infiltrated fiber concrete and superabsorbent polymer concrete. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 7, 2022, pp. 1–22.10.1007/s41062-021-00641-7Search in Google Scholar
[12] Faried, A. S., S. A. Mostafa, B. A. Tayeh, and T. A. Tawfik. Mechanical and durability properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with various nano waste materials under different curing conditions. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 43, 2021, id. 102569.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102569Search in Google Scholar
[13] Marvila, M. T., A. R. G. De Azevedo, P. R. De Matos, S. N. Monteiro, and C. M. F. Vieira. Materials for production of high and ultra-high performance concrete: Review and perspective of possible novel materials. Mater, Vol. 14, 2021, id. 4304.10.3390/ma14154304Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] Majhi, R. K. and A. N. Nayak. Properties of concrete incorporating coal fly ash and coal bottom ash. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, Vol. 100, 2019, pp. 459–469.10.1007/s40030-019-00374-ySearch in Google Scholar
[15] Irshidat, M. R. and N. Al-Nuaimi. Industrial waste utilization of carbon dust in sustainable cementitious composites production. Mater, Vol. 13, 2020, id. 3295.10.3390/ma13153295Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] Shi, Y., G. Long, C. Ma, Y. Xie, and J. He. Design and preparation of ultra-high performance concrete with low environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 214, 2019, pp. 633–643.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.318Search in Google Scholar
[17] Lin, W. T., T. L. Weng, A. Cheng, S. J. Chao, and H. M. Hsu. Properties of controlled low strength material with circulating fluidized bed combustion ash and recycled aggregates. Mater, Vol. 11, 2018, id. 715.10.3390/ma11050715Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Danish, A. and M. A. Mosaberpanah. Influence of cenospheres and fly ash on the mechanical and durability properties of high-performance cement mortar under different curing regimes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 279, 2021, id. 122458.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122458Search in Google Scholar
[19] Keerio, M. A., A. Saand, A. Kumar, N. Bheel, and K. Ali. Effect of local metakaolin developed from natural material soorh and coal bottom ash on fresh, hardened properties and embodied carbon of self-compacting concrete. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, 2021, pp. 60000–60018.10.1007/s11356-021-14960-wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Vieira, M., G. Pereira, F. Pacheco, M. L. S. Marques, R. Christ, and R. C. E. Modolo. Assessment of the impact of adding fly ash and coal bottom ash to an advanced cement-based composite matrix. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais, Vol. 28, 2022, id. 15.10.1590/s1983-41952022000500006Search in Google Scholar
[21] Li, J., Z. Wu, C. Shi, Q. Yuan, and Z. Zhang. Durability of ultra-high performance concrete – A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 255, 2020, id. 119296.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119296Search in Google Scholar
[22] Amin, M., A. M. Zeyad, B. A. Tayeh, and I. Saad Agwa. Effect of ferrosilicon and silica fume on mechanical, durability, and microstructure characteristics of ultra high-performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 320, 2022, id. 126233.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126233Search in Google Scholar
[23] Amin, M., I. Y. Hakeem, A. M. Zeyad, B. A. Tayeh, A. M. Maglad, and I. S. Agwa. Influence of recycled aggregates and carbon nanofibres on properties of ultra-high-performance concrete under elevated temperatures. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e01063.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01063Search in Google Scholar
[24] Du, J., W. Meng, K. H. Khayat, Y. Bao, P. Guo, Z. Lyu, et al. New development of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 224, 2021, id. 109220.10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109220Search in Google Scholar
[25] Zhou, M., W. Lu, J. Song, and G. C. Lee. Application of ultra-high performance concrete in bridge engineering. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 186, 2018, pp. 1256–1267.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.036Search in Google Scholar
[26] Yu, K., L. Li, J. Yu, J. Xiao, J. Ye, and Y. Wang. Feasibility of using ultra-high ductility cementitious composites for concrete structures without steel rebar. Engineering Structures, Vol. 170, 2018, pp. 11–20.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.037Search in Google Scholar
[27] Liu, J., Z. Chen, D. Guan, Z. Lin, and Z. Guo. Experimental study on interfacial shear behaviour between ultra-high performance concrete and normal strength concrete in precast composite members. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 261, 2020, id. 120008.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120008Search in Google Scholar
[28] Kamal, M. M., M. A. Safan, Z. A. Etman, and R. A. Salama. Behavior and strength of beams cast with ultra high strength concrete containing different types of fibers. HRBC Journal, Vol. 10, 2014, pp. 55–63.10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.09.008Search in Google Scholar
[29] Liu, T., H. Wei, D. Zou, A. Zhou, and H. Jian. Utilization of waste cathode ray tube funnel glass for ultra-high performance concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 249, 2020, id. 119333.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119333Search in Google Scholar
[30] Shen, P., L. Lu, Y. He, F. Wang, J. Lu, H. Zheng, et al. Investigation on expansion effect of the expansive agents in ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 105, 2020, id. 103425.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103425Search in Google Scholar
[31] Yang, L., C. Shi, and Z. Wu. Mitigation techniques for autogenous shrinkage of ultra-high-performance concrete – A review. Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 178, 2019, id. 107456.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107456Search in Google Scholar
[32] Teng, J. G., Y. Xiang, T. Yu, and Z. Fang. Development and mechanical behaviour of ultra-high-performance seawater sea-sand concrete. Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 22, 2019, pp. 3100–3120.10.1177/1369433219858291Search in Google Scholar
[33] Wu, Z., C. Shi, and K. H. Khayat. Multi-scale investigation of microstructure, fiber pullout behavior, and mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete with nano-CaCO3 particles. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 86, 2018, pp. 255–265.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.11.014Search in Google Scholar
[34] Portland Cement Association. Ultra-High Performance Concrete, Portl Cem Assoc - Am Cem Manuf, n.d. https://www.cement.org/learn/concrete-technology/concrete-design-production/ultra-high-performance-concrete (accessed September 11, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
[35] Mansour, W., M. A. Sakr, A. A. Seleemah, B. A. Tayeh, and T. M. Khalifa. Bond behavior between concrete and prefabricated Ultra High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) plates. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 81, 2022, pp. 305–316.Search in Google Scholar
[36] Pyo, S. and H. K. Kim. Fresh and hardened properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating coal bottom ash and slag powder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 131, 2017, pp. 459–466.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.109Search in Google Scholar
[37] Shen, P., H. Zheng, D. Xuan, J. X. Lu, and C. S. Poon. Feasible use of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 114, 2020, id. 103814.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103814Search in Google Scholar
[38] Shen, P., L. Lu, F. Wang, Y. He, S. Hu, J. Lu, et al. Water desorption characteristics of saturated lightweight fine aggregate in ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 106, 2020, id. 103456.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103456Search in Google Scholar
[39] ASTM International. ASTM C1856/C1856M-17: Standard Practice for Fabricating and Testing Specimens of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. 2017. https://www.astm.org/c1856_c1856m-17.html (accessed September 1, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
[40] British Standard. BS EN 206:2013 + A2:2021: Concrete - Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. 2021. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/concrete-specification-performance-production-and-conformity-2/standard(accessed September 1, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
[41] Pyo, S., H. K. Kim, and B. Y. Lee. Effects of coarser fine aggregate on tensile properties of ultra high performance concrete, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 84, 2017, pp. 28–35.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.014Search in Google Scholar
[42] Ren, M., X. Wen, X. Gao, and Y. Liu. Thermal and mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with microencapsulated phase change material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 273, 2021, id. 121714.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121714Search in Google Scholar
[43] Huang, H., X. Gao, and L. Teng. Fiber alignment and its effect on mechanical properties of UHPC: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 296, 2021, id. 123741.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123741Search in Google Scholar
[44] Liu, Y., Z. Zhang, C. Shi, D. Zhu, N. Li, and Y. Deng. Development of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC): Influence of steel fiber on mechanical properties. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 112, 2020, id. 103670.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103670Search in Google Scholar
[45] Vatannia, S., E. Kearsley, and D. Mostert. Development of economic, practical and green ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete verified by particle packing model. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 13, 2020, id. e00415.10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00415Search in Google Scholar
[46] Zhang, X. Y., R. Yu, J. J. Zhang, and Z. H. Shui. A low-carbon alkali activated slag based ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): Reaction kinetics and microstructure development. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 363, 2022, id. 132416.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132416Search in Google Scholar
[47] Khongpermgoson, P., A. Abdulmatin, W. Tangchirapat, and C. Jaturapitakkul. Evaluation of compressive strength and resistance of chloride ingress of concrete using a novel binder from ground coal bottom ash and ground calcium carbide residue. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 214, 2019, pp. 631–640.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.145Search in Google Scholar
[48] Pyo, S., B. J. Kim, and H. K. Kim. Effects of quartz-based mine tailings on characteristics and leaching behavior of ultra-high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 166, 2018, pp. 110–117.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.087Search in Google Scholar
[49] Kumar, P. and N. Singh. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates and Coal Bottom Ash on various properties of high volume fly ash-self compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 32, 2020, id. 101491.10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101491Search in Google Scholar
[50] Bahedh, M. A. and M. S. Jaafar. Ultra high-performance concrete utilizing fly ash as cement replacement under autoclaving technique. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 9, 2018, id. e00202.10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00202Search in Google Scholar
[51] Lao, J. C., L. Y. Xu, B. T. Huang, J. G. Dai, and S. P. Shah. Strain-hardening Ultra-High-Performance Geopolymer Concrete (UHPGC): Matrix design and effect of steel fibers. Composites Communications, Vol. 30, 2022, id. 101081.10.1016/j.coco.2022.101081Search in Google Scholar
[52] He, Z. H., S. G. Du, and D. Chen. Microstructure of ultra high performance concrete containing lithium slag. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 353, 2018, pp. 35–43.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.03.063Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[53] Park, J. H., Q. T. Bui, S. H. Jung, and I. H. Yang. Selected strength properties of coal bottom ash (CBA) concrete containing fly ash under different curing and drying conditions. Mater, Vol. 14, 2021, id. 5381.10.3390/ma14185381Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[54] Abbas, S., U. Arshad, W. Abbass, M. L. Nehdi, and A. Ahmed. Recycling Untreated Coal Bottom Ash with Added Value for Mitigating Alkali–Silica Reaction in Concrete: A Sustainable Approach. Sustain, Vol. 12, 2020, id. 10631.10.3390/su122410631Search in Google Scholar
[55] Wang, X., D. Wu, J. Zhang, R. Yu, D. Hou, and Z. Shui. Design of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 307, 2021, id. 124643.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124643Search in Google Scholar
[56] Karimipour, A. and J. de Brito. Influence of polypropylene fibres and silica fume on the mechanical and fracture properties of ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 283, 2021, id. 122753.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122753Search in Google Scholar
[57] Amin, M., B. A. Tayeh, and I. S. Agwa. Effect of using mineral admixtures and ceramic wastes as coarse aggregates on properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 273, 2020, id. 123073.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123073Search in Google Scholar
[58] Zhou, H., R. Bhattarai, Y. Li, B. Si, X. Dong, T. Wang, et al. Towards sustainable coal industry: Turning coal bottom ash into wealth. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 804, 2022, id. 149985.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149985Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[59] Le Ping, K. K., C. B. Cheah, J. J. Liew, R. Siddique, W. Tangchirapat, and M. A. Johari. Coal bottom ash as constituent binder and aggregate replacement in cementitious and geopolymer composites: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 52, 2022, id. 104369.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104369Search in Google Scholar
[60] Hashemi, S. S. G., H. B. Mahmud, J. N. Y. Djobo, C. G. Tan, B. C. Ang, and N. Ranjbar. Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of bottom ash mortar. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 170, 2018, pp. 797–804.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.191Search in Google Scholar
[61] Hasim, A. M., K. A. Shahid, N. F. Ariffin, N. N. Nasrudin, and M. N. S. Zaimi. Materials Today: Proceedings Properties of high volume coal bottom ash in concrete production. Mater Today Proc, Vol. 48, 2021, pp. 1861–1867.Search in Google Scholar
[62] Rafieizonooz, M., E. Khankhaje, and S. Rezania. Assessment of environmental and chemical properties of coal ashes including fly ash and bottom ash, and coal ash concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 49, 2022, id. 104040.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104040Search in Google Scholar
[63] Singh, N., M. Mithulraj, and S. Arya. Influence of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates replacement on various properties of concretes: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 138, 2018, pp. 257–271.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.025Search in Google Scholar
[64] Kim, H. K. and H. K. Lee. Hydration kinetics of high-strength concrete with untreated coal bottom ash for internal curing. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 91, 2018, pp. 67–75.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.04.017Search in Google Scholar
[65] Singh, M. Coal bottom ash. waste suppl cem mater concr characterisation. Prop Appl, 2018, pp. 3–50.10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00001-8Search in Google Scholar
[66] Gupta, N., R. Siddique, and R. Belarbi. Sustainable and Greener self-compacting concrete incorporating industrial By-products: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 284, 2021, id. 124803.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124803Search in Google Scholar
[67] Miraldo, S., S. Lopes, F. Pacheco-Torgal, and A. Lopes. Advantages and shortcomings of the utilization of recycled wastes as aggregates in structural concretes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 298, 2021, id. 123729.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123729Search in Google Scholar
[68] Gooi, S., A. A. Mousa, and D. Kong. A critical review and gap analysis on the use of coal bottom ash as a substitute constituent in concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 268, 2020, id. 121752.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121752Search in Google Scholar
[69] Schafer, M. L., K. A. Clavier, T. G. Townsend, R. Kari, and R. F. Worobel. Assessment of the total content and leaching behavior of blends of incinerator bottom ash and natural aggregates in view of their utilization as road base construction material. Waste management (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 98, 2019, pp. 92–101.10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[70] Pushkar, S. The effect of different concrete designs on the life-cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of concretes containing furnace bottom-ash instead of sand. Sustain, Vol. 11, 2019, id. 4083.10.3390/su11154083Search in Google Scholar
[71] Ngohpok, C., V. Sata, T. Satiennam, P. Klungboonkrong, and P. Chindaprasirt. Mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and sound absorption of pervious concrete containing recycled concrete and bottom ash aggregates. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, 2018, pp. 1369–1376.10.1007/s12205-017-0144-6Search in Google Scholar
[72] United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. United Nations, New York, 2015. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication (accessed September 18, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
[73] Zhu, Y., Y. Zhao, C. Zhao, and R. Gupta. Physicochemical characterization and heavy metals leaching potential of municipal solid waste incinerated bottom ash (MSWI-BA) when utilized in road construction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 27, 2020, pp. 14184–14197.10.1007/s11356-020-08007-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[74] Pushkar, S. Modeling the substitution of natural materials with industrial byproducts in green roofs using life cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 227, 2019, pp. 652–661.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.237Search in Google Scholar
[75] Schafer, M. L., K. A. Clavier, T. G. Townsend, C. C. Ferraro, J. M. Paris, and B. E. Watts. Use of coal fly ash or glass pozzolan addition as a mitigation tool for alkali-silica reactivity in cement mortars amended with recycled municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. Waste and Biomass Valorization, Vol. 10, 2019, pp. 2733–2744.10.1007/s12649-018-0296-8Search in Google Scholar
[76] Kirthika, S. K., M. Surya, and S. K. Singh. Effect of clay in alternative fine aggregates on performance of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 228, 2019, id. 116811.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116811Search in Google Scholar
[77] Nakararoj, N., T. Nhat Ho Tran, P. Sukontasukkul, A. Attachaiyawuth, W. Tangchirapat, C. Chee Ban, et al. Effects of High-Volume bottom ash on Strength, Shrinkage, and creep of High-Strength recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 356, 2022, id. 129233.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129233Search in Google Scholar
[78] Srivastava, A. and S. K. Singh. Utilization of alternative sand for preparation of sustainable mortar: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 253, 2020, id. 119706.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119706Search in Google Scholar
[79] Li, Z., R. Kondo, and K. Ikeda. Recycling of Waste Incineration Bottom Ash and Heavy Metal Immobilization by Geopolymer Production. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, Vol. 19, 2021, pp. 259–279.10.3151/jact.19.259Search in Google Scholar
[80] Le, N. H., A. Razakamanantsoa, M. L. Nguyen, V. T. Phan, P. L. Dao, and D. H. Nguyen. Evaluation of physicochemical and hydromechanical properties of MSWI bottom ash for road construction. Waste management (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 80, 2018, pp. 168–174.10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[81] Muthusamy, K., N. F. A. Jamaludin, M. N. Kamaruzzaman, M. Z. Ahmad, N. A. Zamri, and A. M. Albshir Budiea. Compressive strength of palm oil clinker lightweight aggregate concrete containing coal bottom ash as sand replacement. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 46, 2020, pp. 1724–1728.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.527Search in Google Scholar
[82] Yoon, J. Y., J. Y. Lee, and J. H. Kim. Use of raw-state bottom ash for aggregates in construction materials. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 21, 2019, pp. 838–849.10.1007/s10163-019-00841-5Search in Google Scholar
[83] Zhao, D. and R. Khoshnazar. Hydration and microstructural development of calcined clay cement paste in the presence of calcium-silicate-hydrate (C–S–H) seed. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 122, 2021, id. 104162.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104162Search in Google Scholar
[84] Alzaza, A., K. Ohenoja, and M. Illikainen. Improved strength development and frost resistance of Portland cement ground-granulated blast furnace slag binary binder cured at 0 ◦ C with the addition of calcium silicate hydrate seeds. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 48, 2022, id. 103904.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103904Search in Google Scholar
[85] Wu, Z., K. H. Khayat, C. Shi, B. F. Tutikian, and Q. Chen. Mechanisms underlying the strength enhancement of UHPC modified with nano-SiO2 and nano-CaCO3. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 119, 2021, id. 103992.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103992Search in Google Scholar
[86] Meng, W. and K. H. Khayat. Effect of graphite nanoplatelets and carbon nanofibers on rheology, hydration, shrinkage, mechanical properties, and microstructure of UHPC. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 105, 2018, pp. 64–71.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.001Search in Google Scholar
[87] Kanchanason, V. and J. Plank. Cement and Concrete Research Effect of calcium silicate hydrate – polycarboxylate ether ( C-S-H – PCE) nanocomposite as accelerating admixture on early strength enhancement of slag and calcined clay blended cements. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 119, 2019, pp. 44–50.10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.01.007Search in Google Scholar
[88] Li, H., Z. Xue, G. Liang, K. Wu, B. Dong, and W. Wang. Effect of C-S-Hs-PCE and sodium sulfate on the hydration kinetics and mechanical properties of cement paste. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 266, 2021, id. 121096.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121096Search in Google Scholar
[89] Zhou, Z., M. Sofi, J. Liu, S. Li, A. Zhong, and P. Mendis. Nano-CSH modified high volume fly ash concrete: Early-age properties and environmental impact analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 286, 2021, id. 124924.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124924Search in Google Scholar
[90] Morales-Cantero, A., A. Cuesta, A. G. De la Torre, O. Mazanec, P. Borralleras, K. S. Weldert, et al. Portland and belite cement hydration acceleration by C-S-H seeds with variable w/c ratios. Mater, Vol. 15, 2022, id. 3553.10.3390/ma15103553Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[91] Muthusamy, K., M. H. Rasid, G. A. Jokhio, A. M. Budiea, M. W. Hussin, and J. Mirza. Coal bottom ash as sand replacement in concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 236, 2020, id. 117507.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117507Search in Google Scholar
[92] Ankur, N. and N. Singh. Performance of cement mortars and concretes containing coal bottom ash: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 149, 2021, id. 111361.10.1016/j.rser.2021.111361Search in Google Scholar
[93] Fuller, W. B. and S. E. Thompson. The laws of proportioning concrete. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 59, 1907, pp. 67–143.10.1061/TACEAT.0001979Search in Google Scholar
[94] Andreasen, A. H. M. Ueber die Beziehung zwischen Kornabstufung und Zwischenraum in Produkten aus losen Körnern (mit einigen Experimenten). Kolloid-Zeitschrift, Vol. 50, 1930, pp. 217–228.10.1007/BF01422986Search in Google Scholar
[95] Funk, J. E. and D. R. Dinger. Predictive process control of crowded particulate suspensions. Predict Process Control Crowded Part Suspens, Springer Science & Business Media, Ist Edn, 1994.10.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0Search in Google Scholar
[96] Yu, R., P. Tang, P. Spiesz, and H. J. H. Brouwers. A study of multiple effects of nano-silica and hybrid fibres on the properties of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) incorporating waste bottom ash (WBA). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 60, 2014, pp. 98–110.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.059Search in Google Scholar
[97] Hunger, M. An integral design concept for ecological self-compacting concrete, Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
[98] Azmee, N. M. and N. Shafiq. Ultra-high performance concrete: From fundamental to applications. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 9, 2018, id. e00197.10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00197Search in Google Scholar
[99] Yu, R., P. Spiesz, and H. J. H. Brouwers. Mix design and properties assessment of Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC). Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 56, 2014, pp. 29–39.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.002Search in Google Scholar
[100] Ritter, R. and M. Curbach. Material behavior of ultra-high-strength concrete under multiaxial stress states. ACI Materials Journal, Vol. 112, 2015, id. 641.10.14359/51687663Search in Google Scholar
[101] Mohammed, H. Mechanical properties of ultra high strength fiber reinforced concrete. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Akron, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[102] Tafraoui, A., G. Escadeillas, and T. Vidal. Durability of the ultra high performances concrete containing metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 112, 2016, pp. 980–987.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.169Search in Google Scholar
[103] Meng, W., M. Valipour, and K. H. Khayat. Optimization and performance of cost-effective ultra-high performance concrete. Materials and Structures, Vol. 50, 2017, pp. 1–16.10.1617/s11527-016-0896-3Search in Google Scholar
[104] Pezeshkian, M., A. Delnavaz, and M. Delnavaz. Development of UHPC mixtures using natural zeolite and glass sand as replacements of silica fume and quartz sand. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, 2021, pp. 2023–2038.10.1080/19648189.2019.1610074Search in Google Scholar
[105] You, W., M. A. Bradford, H. Liu, W. Zhao, and G. Yang. Steel-alkali activated cement based ultra-high performance concrete lightweight composite bridge decks: Flexural behavior. Engineering Structures, Vol. 266, 2022, id. 114639.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114639Search in Google Scholar
[106] Akeed, M. H., S. Qaidi, H. U. Ahmed, R. H. R. H. Faraj, A. S. A. S. Mohammed, W. Emad, et al. Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Part I: Developments, principles, raw materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01290.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01290Search in Google Scholar
[107] Aisheh, Y. I. A., D. S. Atrushi, M. H. Akeed, S. Qaidi, and B. A. Tayeh. Influence of steel fibers and microsilica on the mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete (UHP-GPC). Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01245.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01245Search in Google Scholar
[108] Tolga Cogurcu, M. Investigation of mechanical properties of red pine needle fiber reinforced self-compacting ultra high performance concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, id. 16, id. e00970.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00970Search in Google Scholar
[109] Du, J., Z. Liu, C. Christodoulatos, M. Conway, Y. Bao, and W. Meng. Utilization of off-specification fly ash in preparing ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC): Mixture design, characterization, and life-cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 180, 2022, id. 106136.10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106136Search in Google Scholar
[110] Gu, C., Y. Ji, J. Yao, Y. Yang, J. Liu, T. Ni, et al. Feasibility of recycling sewage sludge ash in ultra-high performance concrete: Volume deformation, microstructure and ecological evaluation. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 318, 2022, id. 125823.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125823Search in Google Scholar
[111] Rossi, P., A. Arca, E. Parant, and P. Fakhri. Bending and compressive behaviours of a new cement composite. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 35, 2005, pp. 27–33.10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.043Search in Google Scholar
[112] Williams, E. M., S. S. Graham, P. A. Reed, and T. S. Rushing. Laboratory characterization of Cor-Tuf concrete with and without steel fibers. Geotech Struct Lab, 2009.10.21236/ADA509343Search in Google Scholar
[113] Wang, W., C. Wu, Z. Liu, and H. Si. Compressive behavior of ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) confined with FRP. Composite Structures, Vol. 204, 2018, pp. 419–437.10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.102Search in Google Scholar
[114] Kang, S. H., S. G. Hong, and J. Moon. The use of rice husk ash as reactive filler in ultra-high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 115, 2019, pp. 389–400.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.004Search in Google Scholar
[115] Liu, K., R. Song, J. Li, T. Guo, X. Li, J. Yang, et al. Effect of steel fiber type and content on the dynamic tensile properties of ultra-high performance cementitious composites (UHPCC). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 342, 2022, id. 127908.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127908Search in Google Scholar
[116] Li, Y., X. Zeng, J. Zhou, Y. Shi, H. A. Umar, G. Long, et al. Development of an eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete based on waste basalt powder for Sichuan-Tibet Railway. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 312, 2021, id. 127775.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127775Search in Google Scholar
[117] Amin, M., A. M. Zeyad, B. A. Tayeh, and I. Saad Agwa. Effects of nano cotton stalk and palm leaf ashes on ultrahigh-performance concrete properties incorporating recycled concrete aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 302, 2021, id. 124196.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124196Search in Google Scholar
[118] Faried, A. S., S. A. Mostafa, B. A. Tayeh, and T. A. Tawfik. The effect of using nano rice husk ash of different burning degrees on ultra-high-performance concrete properties. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 290, 2021, id. 123279.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123279Search in Google Scholar
[119] Singh, M. and R. Siddique. Properties of concrete containing high volumes of coal bottom ash as fine aggregate. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 91, 2015, pp. 269–278.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.026Search in Google Scholar
[120] Rodríguez-Álvaro, R., B. González-Fonteboa, S. Seara-Paz, and E. J. Rey-Bouzón. Masonry mortars, precast concrete and masonry units using coal bottom ash as a partial replacement for conventional aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 283, 2021, id. 122737.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122737Search in Google Scholar
[121] Singh, M. and R. Siddique. Effect of coal bottom ash as partial replacement of sand on workability and strength properties of concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, 2016, pp. 620–630.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar
[122] Hasim, A. M., K. A. Shahid, N. F. Ariffin, N. N. Nasrudin, and M. N. S. Zaimi. Properties of high volume coal bottom ash in concrete production. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 48, 2022, pp. 1861–1867.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.250Search in Google Scholar
[123] Hamada, H., A. Alattar, B. Tayeh, F. Yahaya, and A. Adesina. Sustainable application of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates in concrete: A comprehensive review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 16, 2022, id. e01109.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01109Search in Google Scholar
[124] Nasrudin, N., N. F. Ariffin, A. Alias, A. M. Hasim, M. N. S. Zaimi, M. R. Ashaari, et al. Structural performance of beam using high volume bottom ash as fine and coarse aggregate replacement. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 48, 2021, pp. 1810–1815.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.130Search in Google Scholar
[125] Singh, M. and R. Siddique. Strength properties and micro-structural properties of concrete containing coal bottom ash as partial replacement of fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 50, 2014, pp. 246–256.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.026Search in Google Scholar
[126] Kim, Y. H., H. Y. Kim, K. H. Yang, and J. S. Ha. Effect of concrete unit weight on the mechanical properties of bottom ash aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 273, 2021, id. 12199810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121998Search in Google Scholar
[127] Lakhiar, M. T., Y. Bai, L. S. Wong, S. C. Paul, V. Anggraini, and S. Y. Kong. Mechanical and durability properties of epoxy mortar incorporating coal bottom ash as filler. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, Vol. 315, id. 125677.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125677Search in Google Scholar
[128] Nguyen Thi, N., S. Bui Truong, and N. Do Minh. Reusing coal ash of thermal power plant in a pavement base course. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, Vol. 33, 2021, pp. 346–354.10.1016/j.jksues.2020.09.017Search in Google Scholar
[129] Singh, N., P. Kumar, and P. Goyal. Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 26, 2019, id. 100882.10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100882Search in Google Scholar
[130] Singh, N., M. Mithulraj, and S. Arya. Utilization of coal bottom ash in recycled concrete aggregates based self compacting concrete blended with metakaolin. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 144, 2019, pp. 240–251.10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.044Search in Google Scholar
[131] Andrade, B., J. C. Rocha, and M. Cheriaf. Influence of coal bottom ash as fine aggregate on fresh properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, 2009, pp. 609–614.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.003Search in Google Scholar
[132] Ramzi Hannan, N. I. R., S. Shahidan, N. Ali, N. M. Bunnori, S. S. Mohd Zuki, and M. H. Wan Ibrahim. Acoustic and non-acoustic performance of coal bottom ash concrete as sound absorber for wall concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 13, 2020, id. 8.10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00399Search in Google Scholar
[133] Khongpermgoson, P., K. Boonlao, N. Ananthanet, T. Thitithananon, C. Jaturapitakkul, W. Tangchirapat, et al. The mechanical properties and heat development behavior of high strength concrete containing high fineness coal bottom ash as a pozzolanic binder. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 253, 2020, id. 119239.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119239Search in Google Scholar
[134] Yang, K. H., K. H. Young, and L. H. Jin. Shrinkage behavior of concrete containing bottom ash granules as partial replacement of natural sands. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, id. 124188.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124188Search in Google Scholar
[135] Bilir, T. Effects of non-ground slag and bottom ash as fine aggregate on concrete permeability properties. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 26, 2012, pp. 730–734.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.080Search in Google Scholar
[136] Rafieizonooz, M., J. Mirza, M. R. Salim, M. W. Hussin, and E. Khankhaje. Investigation of coal bottom ash and fly ash in concrete as replacement for sand and cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 116, 2016, pp. 15–24.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.080Search in Google Scholar
[137] Park, S. B., Y. I. l Jang, J. Lee, and B. J. Lee. An experimental study on the hazard assessment and mechanical properties of porous concrete utilizing coal bottom ash coarse aggregate in Korea. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 166, 2009, pp. 348–355.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[138] Siddique, R. Compressive strength, water absorption, sorptivity, abrasion resistance and permeability of self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, 2013, pp. 1444–1450.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.081Search in Google Scholar
[139] Bai, Y., F. Darcy, and P. A. M. Basheer. Strength and drying shrinkage properties of concrete containing furnace bottom ash as fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 691–697.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.021Search in Google Scholar
[140] Yüksel, I., T. Bilir, and Ö. Özkan. Durability of concrete incorporating non-ground blast furnace slag and bottom ash as fine aggregate. Building and Environment, Vol. 42, 2007, pp. 2651–2659.10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[141] Kim, H. K. and H. K. Lee. Use of power plant bottom ash as fine and coarse aggregates in high-strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 25, 2011, pp. 1115–1122.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.065Search in Google Scholar
[142] Zhang, B. and C. S. Poon. Use of Furnace Bottom Ash for producing lightweight aggregate concrete with thermal insulation properties. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 99, 2015, pp. 94–100.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.007Search in Google Scholar
[143] Baite, E., A. Messan, K. Hannawi, F. Tsobnang, and W. Prince. Physical and transfer properties of mortar containing coal bottom ash aggregates from Tefereyre (Niger). Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 125, 2016, pp. 919–926.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.117Search in Google Scholar
[144] Aydin, E. Novel coal bottom ash waste composites for sustainable construction. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 124, 2016, pp. 582–588.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.142Search in Google Scholar
[145] Kim, H. K., J. H. Jeon, and H. K. Lee. Flow, water absorption, and mechanical characteristics of normal- and high-strength mortar incorporating fine bottom ash aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 26, 2012, pp. 249–256.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.019Search in Google Scholar
[146] Abdulmatin, A., W. Tangchirapat, and C. Jaturapitakkul. An investigation of bottom ash as a pozzolanic material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 186, 2018, pp. 155–162.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.101Search in Google Scholar
[147] Aggarwal, Y. and R. Siddique. Microstructure and properties of concrete using bottom ash and waste foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 54, 2014, pp. 210–223.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.051Search in Google Scholar
[148] Argiz, C., A. Moragues, and E. Menéndez. Use of ground coal bottom ash as cement constituent in concretes exposed to chloride environments. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 170, 2018, pp. 25–33.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.117Search in Google Scholar
[149] Kim, H. K. Utilization of sieved and ground coal bottom ash powders as a coarse binder in high-strength mortar to improve workability. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 91, 2015, pp. 57–64.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.017Search in Google Scholar
[150] Oruji, S., N. A. Brake, L. Nalluri, and R. K. Guduru. Strength activity and microstructure of blended ultra-fine coal bottom ash-cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 153, 2017, pp. 317–326.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.088Search in Google Scholar
[151] Kasaniya, M., M. D. A. Thomas, and E. G. Moffatt. Pozzolanic reactivity of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes and implication of their incorporation on the chloride permeability of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 139, 2021, id. 106259.10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106259Search in Google Scholar
[152] Jang, J. G., Kim H. K., Kim H. K., and Lee H. K. Resistance of coal bottom ash mortar against the coupled deterioration of carbonation and chloride penetration. Materials & Design, Vol. 93, 2016, pp. 160–167.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.074Search in Google Scholar
[153] Kou, S. C., C. S. Poon, K. Shi-cong, and P. Chi-sun. Properties of concrete prepared with crushed fine stone, furnace bottom ash and fine recycled aggregate as fine aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, 2009, pp. 2877–2886.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.009Search in Google Scholar
[154] Hasim, A. M., K. A. Shahid, N. F. Ariffin, N. N. Nasrudin, and M. N. S. Zaimi. Materials today: Proceedings study on mechanical properties of concrete inclusion of high-volume coal bottom ash with the addition of fly ash. Mater Today Proc, Vol. 51, 2022, pp. 1355–1361.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.400Search in Google Scholar
[155] Balasubramaniam, T. and S. J. Stephen. Influence of industrial wastes on the mechanical and durability characteristics of high strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 317, 2022, id. 126202.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126202Search in Google Scholar
[156] Lo, F. C., M. G. Lee, and S. L. Lo. Effect of coal ash and rice husk ash partial replacement in ordinary Portland cement on pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 286, 2021, id. 122947.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122947Search in Google Scholar
[157] Gencel, O., S. M. S. Kazmi, M. J. Munir, G. Kaplan, O. Y. Bayraktar, D. O. Yarar, et al. Influence of bottom ash and polypropylene fibers on the physico-mechanical, durability and thermal performance of foam concrete: An experimental investigation. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 306, 2021, id. 124887.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124887Search in Google Scholar
[158] Singh, M. and R. Siddique. Compressive strength, drying shrinkage and chemical resistance of concrete incorporating coal bottom ash as partial or total replacement of sand. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 68, 2014, pp. 39–48.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.034Search in Google Scholar
[159] García, C., M. Marrero, C. Leiva, J. Solís-Guzmán, L. F. Vilches, C. García Arenas, et al. High fire resistance in blocks containing coal combustion fly ashes and bottom ash. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 31, 2011, pp. 1783–1789.10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[160] Cadersa, A. and I. Auckburally. Use of unprocessed coal bottom ash as partial fine aggregate replacement in concrete. University of Mauritius Research Journal, Vol. 20, 2014, pp. 62–84.Search in Google Scholar
[161] Andrade, L. B., J. C. Rocha, and M. Cheriaf. Evaluation of concrete incorporating bottom ash as a natural aggregates replacement. Waste management (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 1190–1199.10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[162] Özkan, Ö., I. Yüksel, and Ö. Muratoǧlu. Strength properties of concrete incorporating coal bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag. Waste management (New York, N.Y.), Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 161–167.10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[163] Zainal Abidin, N. E., M. H. Wan Ibrahim, N. Jamaluddin, K. Kamaruddin, and A. F. Hamzah. The effect of bottom ash on fresh characteristic, compressive strength and water absorption of self-compacting concrete. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 660, 2014, pp. 145–151.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.660.145Search in Google Scholar
[164] Luna, Y., C. G. Arenas, A. Cornejo, C. Leiva, L. F. Vilches, and C. Fernández-Pereira. Recycling by-products from coal-fired power stations into different construction materials. International Journal of Energy and Environmental, Vol. 5, 2014, pp. 387–397.10.1007/s40095-014-0120-6Search in Google Scholar
[165] Kadam, M. P. and Y. D. Patil. Effect of sieved coal bottom ash as a sand replacement on the properties of cement concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 67, 2015, pp. 227–234.10.1680/macr.14.00179Search in Google Scholar
[166] Onprom, P., K. Chaimoon, and R. Cheerarot. Influence of bottom ash replacements as fine aggregate on the property of cellular concrete with various foam contents. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2015, 2015, pp. 1–11.10.1155/2015/381704Search in Google Scholar
[167] Siddique, R. and Kunal. Design and development of self-compacting concrete made with coal bottom ash. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, Vol. 4, 2015, pp. 225–237.10.1080/21650373.2015.1004138Search in Google Scholar
[168] Jamaluddin, N., A. F. Hamzah, M. H. Wan Ibrahim, R. P. Jaya, M. F. Arshad, N. E. Z. Abidin, et al. Fresh properties and flexural strength of self-compacting concrete integrating coal bottom ash. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 47, 2016, pp. 1–6.10.1051/matecconf/20164701010Search in Google Scholar
[169] Soofinajafi, M., P. Shafigh, F. W. Akashah, Mahmud, and H. B. Mechanical properties of high strength concrete containing coal bottom ash and Oil-palm boiler clinker as fine aggregates. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 66, 2016.10.1051/matecconf/20166600034Search in Google Scholar
[170] Torkittikul, P., T. Nochaiya, W. Wongkeo, and A. Chaipanich. Utilization of coal bottom ash to improve thermal insulation of construction material. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 19, 2017, pp. 305–317.10.1007/s10163-015-0419-2Search in Google Scholar
[171] Ong, S. K., K. H. Mo, U. J. Alengaram, M. Z. Jumaat, and T. C. Ling. Valorization of wastes from power plant, steel-making and palm oil industries as partial sand substitute in concrete. Waste and Biomass Valorization, Vol. 9, 2018, pp. 1645–1654.10.1007/s12649-017-9937-6Search in Google Scholar
[172] Alhokabi, A. A. and S. I. Doh. Study on The mechanical properties of bottom ash as a partial sand replacement in a non-load bearing fly ash bricks. Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 3, 2019, pp. 59–66.Search in Google Scholar
[173] Jawahar, S., M. Magesh, V. Jagen, and V. Vasugi. Performance evaluation of concrete using bottom ash as fine aggregate. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, Vol. 8, 2019, pp. 95–100.Search in Google Scholar
[174] Kim, G. M., J. G. Jang, H. R. Khalid, and H. K. Lee. Water purification characteristics of pervious concrete fabricated with CSA cement and bottom ash aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 136, 2017, pp. 1–8.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.020Search in Google Scholar
[175] Pyo, S., S. Y. Abate, and H. K. Kim. Abrasion resistance of ultra high performance concrete incorporating coarser aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 165, 2018, pp. 11–16.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.036Search in Google Scholar
[176] Ahn, Y. B., J. G. Jang, and H. K. Lee. Mechanical properties of lightweight concrete made with coal ashes after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 72, 2016, pp. 27–38.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.05.028Search in Google Scholar
[177] Cheah, C. B., J. J. Liew, K. L. P. Kevin, R. Siddique, and W. Tangchirapat. Influence of milling parameters on the properties of ground coal bottom ash and its blended cement. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 363, 2023, id. 129745.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129745Search in Google Scholar
[178] Cheah, C. B., J. J. Liew, K. Khaw Le Ping, R. Siddique, and W. Tangchirapat. Properties of ternary blended cement containing ground granulated blast furnace slag and ground coal bottom ash. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 315, 2022, id. 125249.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125249Search in Google Scholar
[179] British Standard. BS EN 12620:2013 Aggregates for concrete 2013. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/aggregates-for-concrete-1/standard (accessed December 19, 2022), 2013.Search in Google Scholar
[180] ASTM. ASTM C618-22. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM Int, 2022. https://www.astm.org/c0618-22.html (accessed November 14, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
[181] Mangi, S. A., M. H. Wan Ibrahim, S. H. Khahro, N. Jamaluddin, and S. Shahidan. Development of supplementary cementitious materials: a systematic review. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol. 29, 2020, pp. 4682–4691.Search in Google Scholar
[182] Balapour, M., R. Rao, E. J. Garboczi, S. Spatari, Y. G. Hsuan, P. Billen, et al. Thermochemical principles of the production of lightweight aggregates from waste coal bottom ash. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 104, 2021, pp. 613–634.10.1111/jace.17458Search in Google Scholar
[183] Chand, G., S. Ram, S. Kumar, and U. Gupta. Microstructural and engineering properties investigation of sustainable hybrid concrete produced from industrial wastes. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, 2021, id. 100052.10.1016/j.clet.2021.100052Search in Google Scholar
[184] Balapour, M., W. Zhao, E. J. Garboczi, N. Y. Oo, S. Spatari, and Y. G. Hsuan, et al. Potential use of lightweight aggregate (LWA) produced from bottom coal ash for internal curing of concrete systems. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 105, 2020, id. 103428.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103428Search in Google Scholar
[185] Ibrahim, M. H. W., A. F. Hamzah, N. Jamaluddin, P. J. Ramadhansyah, and A. M. Fadzil. Split tensile strength on self-compacting concrete containing coal bottom ash. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195, 2015, pp. 2280–2289.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.317Search in Google Scholar
[186] Wyrzykowski, M., S. Ghourchian, and S. Sinthupinyo. Internal curing of high performance mortars with bottom ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 71, 2016, pp. 1–9.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.04.009Search in Google Scholar
[187] Singh, M. Effect of coal bottom ash on strength and durability properties of concrete, Thapar University, Patiala, India, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[188] Balasubramaniam, T. and G. S. Thirugnanam. Durability studies on bottom ash concrete with manufactured sand as fine aggregate. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, Vol. 31, 2015, pp. 69–72.Search in Google Scholar
[189] Hamzah, A. F., M. H. W. Ibrahim, N. Jamaluddin, R. P. Jaya, M. F. Arshad, N. E. Zainal Abidin, et al. Nomograph of self-compacting concrete mix design incorporating coal bottom ash as partial replacement of fine aggregates. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 1671–1675.Search in Google Scholar
[190] Muthusamy, K., M. Hafizuddin Rasid, N. Nabilah Isa, N. Hanis Hamdan, N. Atikah Shafika Jamil, A. Mokhtar Albshir Budiea, et al. Mechanical properties and acid resistance of oil palm shell lightweight aggregate concrete containing coal bottom ash. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 41, 2020, pp. 47–50.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.1001Search in Google Scholar
[191] Kumar, D., R. Kumar, and M. Abbass. Study the effect of coal bottom ash on partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete with sugarcane molasses as an admixture. IJSRE 4, Vol. 4, 2016, pp. 5355–5362.10.18535/ijsre/v4i05.10Search in Google Scholar
[192] British Standard. BS 1881-203 Testing Concrete - Part 203: Recommendations for Measurement of Velocity of Ultrasonic Pulses in Concrete. 1986.Search in Google Scholar
[193] Raju, R., M. M. Paul, and K. A. Aboobacker. Strength performance of concrete using bottom ash as fine aggregate. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2, 2014, pp. 111–122.Search in Google Scholar
[194] Rodríguez-Álvaro, R., S. Seara-Paz, B. González-Fonteboa, and F. Martínez-Abella. Use of granular coal combustion products as aggregates in structural concrete: Effects on properties and recommendations regarding mix design. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 273, 2021, id. 121690.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121690Search in Google Scholar
[195] Kadam, M. and Y. Patil. Effect of coal bottom ash as sand replacement on the properties of concrete with different W/C ratio. International Journal of Advanced Technology in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2, 2013, pp. 2231–5721.10.47893/IJATCE.2013.1049Search in Google Scholar
[196] Shin, S. U. Development and field demonstration of air-entrained concrete composites using Illinois PCC bottom ash. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
[197] MBCC. Master X-Seed STE. Master Build Solut, n.d. https://www.master-builders-solutions.com/en-my/products/master-x-seed/master-x-seed-ste (accessed December 16, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Review Articles
- Progress in preparation and ablation resistance of ultra-high-temperature ceramics modified C/C composites for extreme environment
- Solar lighting systems applied in photocatalysis to treat pollutants – A review
- Technological advances in three-dimensional skin tissue engineering
- Hybrid magnesium matrix composites: A review of reinforcement philosophies, mechanical and tribological characteristics
- Application prospect of calcium peroxide nanoparticles in biomedical field
- Research progress on basalt fiber-based functionalized composites
- Evaluation of the properties and applications of FRP bars and anchors: A review
- A critical review on mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties of industrial by-product-based geopolymer composites
- Multifunctional engineered cementitious composites modified with nanomaterials and their applications: An overview
- Role of bioglass derivatives in tissue regeneration and repair: A review
- Research progress on properties of cement-based composites incorporating graphene oxide
- Properties of ultra-high performance concrete and conventional concrete with coal bottom ash as aggregate replacement and nanoadditives: A review
- A scientometric review of the literature on the incorporation of steel fibers in ultra-high-performance concrete with research mapping knowledge
- Weldability of high nitrogen steels: A review
- Application of waste recycle tire steel fibers as a construction material in concrete
- Wear properties of graphene-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite: A review
- Experimental investigations of electrodeposited Zn–Ni, Zn–Co, and Ni–Cr–Co–based novel coatings on AA7075 substrate to ameliorate the mechanical, abrasion, morphological, and corrosion properties for automotive applications
- Research evolution on self-healing asphalt: A scientometric review for knowledge mapping
- Recent developments in the mechanical properties of hybrid fiber metal laminates in the automotive industry: A review
- A review of microscopic characterization and related properties of fiber-incorporated cement-based materials
- Comparison and review of classical and machine learning-based constitutive models for polymers used in aeronautical thermoplastic composites
- Gold nanoparticle-based strategies against SARS-CoV-2: A review
- Poly-ferric sulphate as superior coagulant: A review on preparation methods and properties
- A review on ceramic waste-based concrete: A step toward sustainable concrete
- Modification of the structure and properties of oxide layers on aluminium alloys: A review
- A review of magnetically driven swimming microrobots: Material selection, structure design, control method, and applications
- Polyimide–nickel nanocomposites fabrication, properties, and applications: A review
- Design and analysis of timber-concrete-based civil structures and its applications: A brief review
- Effect of fiber treatment on physical and mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review
- Blending and functionalisation modification of 3D printed polylactic acid for fused deposition modeling
- A critical review on functionally graded ceramic materials for cutting tools: Current trends and future prospects
- Heme iron as potential iron fortifier for food application – characterization by material techniques
- An overview of the research trends on fiber-reinforced shotcrete for construction applications
- High-entropy alloys: A review of their performance as promising materials for hydrogen and molten salt storage
- Effect of the axial compression ratio on the seismic behavior of resilient concrete walls with concealed column stirrups
- Research Articles
- Effect of fiber orientation and elevated temperature on the mechanical properties of unidirectional continuous kenaf reinforced PLA composites
- Optimizing the ECAP processing parameters of pure Cu through experimental, finite element, and response surface approaches
- Study on the solidification property and mechanism of soft soil based on the industrial waste residue
- Preparation and photocatalytic degradation of Sulfamethoxazole by g-C3N4 nano composite samples
- Impact of thermal modification on color and chemical changes of African padauk, merbau, mahogany, and iroko wood species
- The evaluation of the mechanical properties of glass, kenaf, and honeycomb fiber-reinforced composite
- Evaluation of a novel steel box-soft body combination for bridge protection against ship collision
- Study on the uniaxial compression constitutive relationship of modified yellow mud from minority dwelling in western Sichuan, China
- Ultrasonic longitudinal torsion-assisted biotic bone drilling: An experimental study
- Green synthesis, characterizations, and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from Themeda quadrivalvis, in conjugation with macrolide antibiotics against respiratory pathogens
- Performance analysis of WEDM during the machining of Inconel 690 miniature gear using RSM and ANN modeling approaches
- Biosynthesis of Ag/bentonite, ZnO/bentonite, and Ag/ZnO/bentonite nanocomposites by aqueous leaf extract of Hagenia abyssinica for antibacterial activities
- Eco-friendly MoS2/waste coconut oil nanofluid for machining of magnesium implants
- Silica and kaolin reinforced aluminum matrix composite for heat storage
- Optimal design of glazed hollow bead thermal insulation mortar containing fly ash and slag based on response surface methodology
- Hemp seed oil nanoemulsion with Sapindus saponins as a potential carrier for iron supplement and vitamin D
- A numerical study on thin film flow and heat transfer enhancement for copper nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol
- Research on complex multimodal vibration characteristics of offshore platform
- Applicability of fractal models for characterising pore structure of hybrid basalt–polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete
- Influence of sodium silicate to precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of the metakaolin/fly ash alkali-activated sustainable mortar using manufactured sand
- An experimental study of bending resistance of multi-size PFRC beams
- Characterization, biocompatibility, and optimization of electrospun SF/PCL composite nanofiber films
- Morphological classification method and data-driven estimation of the joint roughness coefficient by consideration of two-order asperity
- Prediction and simulation of mechanical properties of borophene-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites using molecular dynamics and FEA
- Nanoemulsions of essential oils stabilized with saponins exhibiting antibacterial and antioxidative properties
- Fabrication and performance analysis of sustainable municipal solid waste incineration fly ash alkali-activated acoustic barriers
- Electrostatic-spinning construction of HCNTs@Ti3C2T x MXenes hybrid aerogel microspheres for tunable microwave absorption
- Investigation of the mechanical properties, surface quality, and energy efficiency of a fused filament fabrication for PA6
- Experimental study on mechanical properties of coal gangue base geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete reinforced by steel fiber and nano-Al2O3
- Hybrid bio-fiber/bio-ceramic composite materials: Mechanical performance, thermal stability, and morphological analysis
- Experimental study on recycled steel fiber-reinforced concrete under repeated impact
- Effect of rare earth Nd on the microstructural transformation and mechanical properties of 7xxx series aluminum alloys
- Color match evaluation using instrumental method for three single-shade resin composites before and after in-office bleaching
- Exploring temperature-resilient recycled aggregate concrete with waste rubber: An experimental and multi-objective optimization analysis
- Study on aging mechanism of SBS/SBR compound-modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics
- Evolution of the pore structure of pumice aggregate concrete and the effect on compressive strength
- Effect of alkaline treatment time of fibers and microcrystalline cellulose addition on mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester composites reinforced by cantala fibers
- Optimization of eggshell particles to produce eco-friendly green fillers with bamboo reinforcement in organic friction materials
- An effective approach to improve microstructure and tribological properties of cold sprayed Al alloys
- Luminescence and temperature-sensing properties of Li+, Na+, or K+, Tm3+, and Yb3+ co-doped Bi2WO6 phosphors
- Effect of molybdenum tailings aggregate on mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites and stirrup-confined ECC stub columns
- Experimental study on the seismic performance of short shear walls comprising cold-formed steel and high-strength reinforced concrete with concealed bracing
- Failure criteria and microstructure evolution mechanism of the alkali–silica reaction of concrete
- Mechanical, fracture-deformation, and tribology behavior of fillers-reinforced sisal fiber composites for lightweight automotive applications
- UV aging behavior evolution characterization of HALS-modified asphalt based on micro-morphological features
- Preparation of VO2/graphene/SiC film by water vapor oxidation
- A semi-empirical model for predicting carbonation depth of RAC under two-dimensional conditions
- Comparison of the physical properties of different polyimide nanocomposite films containing organoclays varying in alkyl chain lengths
- Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on micro and meso-structural characteristics and mechanical properties of porous asphalt mixtures
- Flexural performance of a new type of slightly curved arc HRB400 steel bars reinforced one-way concrete slabs
- Alkali-activated binder based on red mud with class F fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag under ambient temperature
- Facile synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets for effective degradation of organic pollutants via ball milling
- DEM study on the loading rate effect of marble under different confining pressures
- Conductive and self-cleaning composite membranes from corn husk nanofiber embedded with inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell) by sol–gel and casting processes for smart membrane applications
- Laser re-melting of modified multimodal Cr3C2–NiCr coatings by HVOF: Effect on the microstructure and anticorrosion properties
- Damage constitutive model of jointed rock mass considering structural features and load effect
- Thermosetting polymer composites: Manufacturing and properties study
- CSG compressive strength prediction based on LSTM and interpretable machine learning
- Axial compression behavior and stress–strain relationship of slurry-wrapping treatment recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tube short columns
- Space-time evolution characteristics of loaded gas-bearing coal fractures based on industrial μCT
- Dual-biprism-based single-camera high-speed 3D-digital image correlation for deformation measurement on sandwich structures under low velocity impact
- Effects of cold deformation modes on microstructure uniformity and mechanical properties of large 2219 Al–Cu alloy rings
- Basalt fiber as natural reinforcement to improve the performance of ecological grouting slurry for the conservation of earthen sites
- Interaction of micro-fluid structure in a pressure-driven duct flow with a nearby placed current-carrying wire: A numerical investigation
- A simulation modeling methodology considering random multiple shots for shot peening process
- Optimization and characterization of composite modified asphalt with pyrolytic carbon black and chicken feather fiber
- Synthesis, characterization, and application of the novel nanomagnet adsorbent for the removal of Cr(vi) ions
- Multi-perspective structural integrity-based computational investigations on airframe of Gyrodyne-configured multi-rotor UAV through coupled CFD and FEA approaches for various lightweight sandwich composites and alloys
- Influence of PVA fibers on the durability of cementitious composites under the wet–heat–salt coupling environment
- Compressive behavior of BFRP-confined ceramsite concrete: An experimental study and stress–strain model
- Interval models for uncertainty analysis and degradation prediction of the mechanical properties of rubber
- Preparation of PVDF-HFP/CB/Ni nanocomposite films for piezoelectric energy harvesting
- Frost resistance and life prediction of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste polypropylene fiber
- Synthetic leathers as a possible source of chemicals and odorous substances in indoor environment
- Mechanical properties of seawater volcanic scoria aggregate concrete-filled circular GFRP and stainless steel tubes under axial compression
- Effect of curved anchor impellers on power consumption and hydrodynamic parameters of yield stress fluids (Bingham–Papanastasiou model) in stirred tanks
- All-dielectric tunable zero-refractive index metamaterials based on phase change materials
- Influence of ultrasonication time on the various properties of alkaline-treated mango seed waste filler reinforced PVA biocomposite
- Research on key casting process of high-grade CNC machine tool bed nodular cast iron
- Latest research progress of SiCp/Al composite for electronic packaging
- Special Issue on 3D and 4D Printing of Advanced Functional Materials - Part I
- Molecular dynamics simulation on electrohydrodynamic atomization: Stable dripping mode by pre-load voltage
- Research progress of metal-based additive manufacturing in medical implants
Articles in the same Issue
- Review Articles
- Progress in preparation and ablation resistance of ultra-high-temperature ceramics modified C/C composites for extreme environment
- Solar lighting systems applied in photocatalysis to treat pollutants – A review
- Technological advances in three-dimensional skin tissue engineering
- Hybrid magnesium matrix composites: A review of reinforcement philosophies, mechanical and tribological characteristics
- Application prospect of calcium peroxide nanoparticles in biomedical field
- Research progress on basalt fiber-based functionalized composites
- Evaluation of the properties and applications of FRP bars and anchors: A review
- A critical review on mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties of industrial by-product-based geopolymer composites
- Multifunctional engineered cementitious composites modified with nanomaterials and their applications: An overview
- Role of bioglass derivatives in tissue regeneration and repair: A review
- Research progress on properties of cement-based composites incorporating graphene oxide
- Properties of ultra-high performance concrete and conventional concrete with coal bottom ash as aggregate replacement and nanoadditives: A review
- A scientometric review of the literature on the incorporation of steel fibers in ultra-high-performance concrete with research mapping knowledge
- Weldability of high nitrogen steels: A review
- Application of waste recycle tire steel fibers as a construction material in concrete
- Wear properties of graphene-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite: A review
- Experimental investigations of electrodeposited Zn–Ni, Zn–Co, and Ni–Cr–Co–based novel coatings on AA7075 substrate to ameliorate the mechanical, abrasion, morphological, and corrosion properties for automotive applications
- Research evolution on self-healing asphalt: A scientometric review for knowledge mapping
- Recent developments in the mechanical properties of hybrid fiber metal laminates in the automotive industry: A review
- A review of microscopic characterization and related properties of fiber-incorporated cement-based materials
- Comparison and review of classical and machine learning-based constitutive models for polymers used in aeronautical thermoplastic composites
- Gold nanoparticle-based strategies against SARS-CoV-2: A review
- Poly-ferric sulphate as superior coagulant: A review on preparation methods and properties
- A review on ceramic waste-based concrete: A step toward sustainable concrete
- Modification of the structure and properties of oxide layers on aluminium alloys: A review
- A review of magnetically driven swimming microrobots: Material selection, structure design, control method, and applications
- Polyimide–nickel nanocomposites fabrication, properties, and applications: A review
- Design and analysis of timber-concrete-based civil structures and its applications: A brief review
- Effect of fiber treatment on physical and mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review
- Blending and functionalisation modification of 3D printed polylactic acid for fused deposition modeling
- A critical review on functionally graded ceramic materials for cutting tools: Current trends and future prospects
- Heme iron as potential iron fortifier for food application – characterization by material techniques
- An overview of the research trends on fiber-reinforced shotcrete for construction applications
- High-entropy alloys: A review of their performance as promising materials for hydrogen and molten salt storage
- Effect of the axial compression ratio on the seismic behavior of resilient concrete walls with concealed column stirrups
- Research Articles
- Effect of fiber orientation and elevated temperature on the mechanical properties of unidirectional continuous kenaf reinforced PLA composites
- Optimizing the ECAP processing parameters of pure Cu through experimental, finite element, and response surface approaches
- Study on the solidification property and mechanism of soft soil based on the industrial waste residue
- Preparation and photocatalytic degradation of Sulfamethoxazole by g-C3N4 nano composite samples
- Impact of thermal modification on color and chemical changes of African padauk, merbau, mahogany, and iroko wood species
- The evaluation of the mechanical properties of glass, kenaf, and honeycomb fiber-reinforced composite
- Evaluation of a novel steel box-soft body combination for bridge protection against ship collision
- Study on the uniaxial compression constitutive relationship of modified yellow mud from minority dwelling in western Sichuan, China
- Ultrasonic longitudinal torsion-assisted biotic bone drilling: An experimental study
- Green synthesis, characterizations, and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from Themeda quadrivalvis, in conjugation with macrolide antibiotics against respiratory pathogens
- Performance analysis of WEDM during the machining of Inconel 690 miniature gear using RSM and ANN modeling approaches
- Biosynthesis of Ag/bentonite, ZnO/bentonite, and Ag/ZnO/bentonite nanocomposites by aqueous leaf extract of Hagenia abyssinica for antibacterial activities
- Eco-friendly MoS2/waste coconut oil nanofluid for machining of magnesium implants
- Silica and kaolin reinforced aluminum matrix composite for heat storage
- Optimal design of glazed hollow bead thermal insulation mortar containing fly ash and slag based on response surface methodology
- Hemp seed oil nanoemulsion with Sapindus saponins as a potential carrier for iron supplement and vitamin D
- A numerical study on thin film flow and heat transfer enhancement for copper nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol
- Research on complex multimodal vibration characteristics of offshore platform
- Applicability of fractal models for characterising pore structure of hybrid basalt–polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete
- Influence of sodium silicate to precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of the metakaolin/fly ash alkali-activated sustainable mortar using manufactured sand
- An experimental study of bending resistance of multi-size PFRC beams
- Characterization, biocompatibility, and optimization of electrospun SF/PCL composite nanofiber films
- Morphological classification method and data-driven estimation of the joint roughness coefficient by consideration of two-order asperity
- Prediction and simulation of mechanical properties of borophene-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites using molecular dynamics and FEA
- Nanoemulsions of essential oils stabilized with saponins exhibiting antibacterial and antioxidative properties
- Fabrication and performance analysis of sustainable municipal solid waste incineration fly ash alkali-activated acoustic barriers
- Electrostatic-spinning construction of HCNTs@Ti3C2T x MXenes hybrid aerogel microspheres for tunable microwave absorption
- Investigation of the mechanical properties, surface quality, and energy efficiency of a fused filament fabrication for PA6
- Experimental study on mechanical properties of coal gangue base geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete reinforced by steel fiber and nano-Al2O3
- Hybrid bio-fiber/bio-ceramic composite materials: Mechanical performance, thermal stability, and morphological analysis
- Experimental study on recycled steel fiber-reinforced concrete under repeated impact
- Effect of rare earth Nd on the microstructural transformation and mechanical properties of 7xxx series aluminum alloys
- Color match evaluation using instrumental method for three single-shade resin composites before and after in-office bleaching
- Exploring temperature-resilient recycled aggregate concrete with waste rubber: An experimental and multi-objective optimization analysis
- Study on aging mechanism of SBS/SBR compound-modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics
- Evolution of the pore structure of pumice aggregate concrete and the effect on compressive strength
- Effect of alkaline treatment time of fibers and microcrystalline cellulose addition on mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester composites reinforced by cantala fibers
- Optimization of eggshell particles to produce eco-friendly green fillers with bamboo reinforcement in organic friction materials
- An effective approach to improve microstructure and tribological properties of cold sprayed Al alloys
- Luminescence and temperature-sensing properties of Li+, Na+, or K+, Tm3+, and Yb3+ co-doped Bi2WO6 phosphors
- Effect of molybdenum tailings aggregate on mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites and stirrup-confined ECC stub columns
- Experimental study on the seismic performance of short shear walls comprising cold-formed steel and high-strength reinforced concrete with concealed bracing
- Failure criteria and microstructure evolution mechanism of the alkali–silica reaction of concrete
- Mechanical, fracture-deformation, and tribology behavior of fillers-reinforced sisal fiber composites for lightweight automotive applications
- UV aging behavior evolution characterization of HALS-modified asphalt based on micro-morphological features
- Preparation of VO2/graphene/SiC film by water vapor oxidation
- A semi-empirical model for predicting carbonation depth of RAC under two-dimensional conditions
- Comparison of the physical properties of different polyimide nanocomposite films containing organoclays varying in alkyl chain lengths
- Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on micro and meso-structural characteristics and mechanical properties of porous asphalt mixtures
- Flexural performance of a new type of slightly curved arc HRB400 steel bars reinforced one-way concrete slabs
- Alkali-activated binder based on red mud with class F fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag under ambient temperature
- Facile synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets for effective degradation of organic pollutants via ball milling
- DEM study on the loading rate effect of marble under different confining pressures
- Conductive and self-cleaning composite membranes from corn husk nanofiber embedded with inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell) by sol–gel and casting processes for smart membrane applications
- Laser re-melting of modified multimodal Cr3C2–NiCr coatings by HVOF: Effect on the microstructure and anticorrosion properties
- Damage constitutive model of jointed rock mass considering structural features and load effect
- Thermosetting polymer composites: Manufacturing and properties study
- CSG compressive strength prediction based on LSTM and interpretable machine learning
- Axial compression behavior and stress–strain relationship of slurry-wrapping treatment recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tube short columns
- Space-time evolution characteristics of loaded gas-bearing coal fractures based on industrial μCT
- Dual-biprism-based single-camera high-speed 3D-digital image correlation for deformation measurement on sandwich structures under low velocity impact
- Effects of cold deformation modes on microstructure uniformity and mechanical properties of large 2219 Al–Cu alloy rings
- Basalt fiber as natural reinforcement to improve the performance of ecological grouting slurry for the conservation of earthen sites
- Interaction of micro-fluid structure in a pressure-driven duct flow with a nearby placed current-carrying wire: A numerical investigation
- A simulation modeling methodology considering random multiple shots for shot peening process
- Optimization and characterization of composite modified asphalt with pyrolytic carbon black and chicken feather fiber
- Synthesis, characterization, and application of the novel nanomagnet adsorbent for the removal of Cr(vi) ions
- Multi-perspective structural integrity-based computational investigations on airframe of Gyrodyne-configured multi-rotor UAV through coupled CFD and FEA approaches for various lightweight sandwich composites and alloys
- Influence of PVA fibers on the durability of cementitious composites under the wet–heat–salt coupling environment
- Compressive behavior of BFRP-confined ceramsite concrete: An experimental study and stress–strain model
- Interval models for uncertainty analysis and degradation prediction of the mechanical properties of rubber
- Preparation of PVDF-HFP/CB/Ni nanocomposite films for piezoelectric energy harvesting
- Frost resistance and life prediction of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste polypropylene fiber
- Synthetic leathers as a possible source of chemicals and odorous substances in indoor environment
- Mechanical properties of seawater volcanic scoria aggregate concrete-filled circular GFRP and stainless steel tubes under axial compression
- Effect of curved anchor impellers on power consumption and hydrodynamic parameters of yield stress fluids (Bingham–Papanastasiou model) in stirred tanks
- All-dielectric tunable zero-refractive index metamaterials based on phase change materials
- Influence of ultrasonication time on the various properties of alkaline-treated mango seed waste filler reinforced PVA biocomposite
- Research on key casting process of high-grade CNC machine tool bed nodular cast iron
- Latest research progress of SiCp/Al composite for electronic packaging
- Special Issue on 3D and 4D Printing of Advanced Functional Materials - Part I
- Molecular dynamics simulation on electrohydrodynamic atomization: Stable dripping mode by pre-load voltage
- Research progress of metal-based additive manufacturing in medical implants
![Figure 11
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies in (a) ref. [187], (b) ref. [119], (c) ref. [143], and (d) ref. [173].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_011.jpg)
![Figure 12
Increase in water absorption of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies with increasing CBA content in (a) ref. [193] and (b) ref. [125].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_012.jpg)
![Figure 14
Porosity coefficient of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies: (a) ref. [143], (b) ref. [125], (c) ref. [170], and (d) ref. [195].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_014.jpg)
![Figure 15
Chloride diffusivity of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies: (a) ref. [130], (b) ref. [196], (c) ref. [49], and (d) ref. [188].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_015.jpg)
![Figure 17
Reduction in drying shrinkage of CBA aggregate CC from previous studies with increasing CBA content in (a) ref. [136] and (b) ref. [139].](/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0323/asset/graphic/j_rams-2022-0323_fig_017.jpg)