Home Conductive and self-cleaning composite membranes from corn husk nanofiber embedded with inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell) by sol–gel and casting processes for smart membrane applications
Article Open Access

Conductive and self-cleaning composite membranes from corn husk nanofiber embedded with inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell) by sol–gel and casting processes for smart membrane applications

  • Surapit Posri and Nuchnapa Tangboriboon EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 16, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The utilization of corn husk as a renewable bio-cellulose material for producing bio-composite membranes through wet chemical and sol–gel process offers numerous advantages. It is an abundant, inexpensive, nontoxic, and readily available agricultural waste product. To enhance the properties of bio-composite membranes, various particulate ionic fillers such as titanium dioxide, calcium oxide, and eggshell (as a source of calcium carbonate) are incorporated in different weight percentages (0, 1, and 5%). These fillers act as additives to the corn husk nanofiber mixed with polyvinyl alcohol during the formation of the biomembrane. The resulting biocomposite membranes exhibit several desirable characteristics. They are lightweight, easy to shape, biodegradable, nontoxic, and possess excellent physical, mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Moreover, the addition of 5 wt% of eggshell powder leads to an increase in the dielectric constant and electrical conductivity, reaching approximately 3.300 ± 0.508 and 1.986 × 103 (Ω·m)−1, respectively. These measurements were taken at a frequency of 500 Hz and a temperature of 27°C. Furthermore, these membranes demonstrate self-cleaning abilities due to a contact angle greater than 90°. The electrical properties of the biocomposite membrane improve with a higher percentage of inorganic filler, making them suitable for applications in smart membranes, as well as mechanical, electrical, and thermal systems.

Graphical abstract

1 Introduction

Corn is widely cultivated in countries such as the United States, Europe, and Asia, with the current global maize production estimated to exceed 1.5 billion tons [1,2]. It is one of the world’s most prominent crops and a natural fiber waste. Selecting natural fiber waste offers numerous advantages, including sustainability, abundance, low cost, lightweight nature, renewability, biodegradability, low pollution, reduction of climate change impact, low energy consumption during production, and high specific properties such as ease of thin sheet preparation and good physical, mechanical, and thermal characteristics [3,4,5]. Corn is extensively grown for various purposes, including human and livestock consumption, as well as to produce corn starch, corn syrup, and bioethanol as an alternative energy source [6]. Corn is a nutrient-rich food source, providing proteins, vitamin C, carotenoids, lutein, zeaxanthin, tryptophan, essential amino acids, lysine, and antioxidants, which are beneficial for cell protection against cancer, heart disease, and lens damage leading to cataract [7]. In addition, corn contains high dietary fiber content that promotes a healthy lifestyle and helps prevent obesity [8]. There are six major types of corn, mainly dent corn, flint corn, pod corn, popcorn, flour corn, and sweet corn [9,10,11]. Consequently, corn exhibits a variety of colors, including yellow, red, orange, purple, blue, white, and black [12,13,14,15]. Corn also consists of various anatomical parts such as the stalk, root, ear, leaf, nodes, kernel, husk, tassel, and silk [16]. Corn husk, being an abundant agricultural waste, can be utilized to produce various industrial products such as fiber reinforcement for thermal insulation, corn paper, handmade paper, paper bags, packaging materials, plastics, and biopolymers, among others [1725]. Corn husk holds great potential as a cellulose source to produce carboxymethyl cellulose. The main components of corn husk comprise hemicellulose (34–41 wt%), cellulose (31–39 wt%), lignin (2–14 wt%), ash (3–7 wt%), and water-soluble components (10–18 wt%) [2630]. Therefore, in this study, corn husk fibers were utilized to create biocomposite membranes, incorporating inorganic fillers such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), calcium oxide (CaO), and eggshell, which serves as an important source of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). These fillers were selected due to their abundance, sustainability, low cost, ease of formation, bio-friendliness, and nontoxicity.

The filler functions as a dispersed phase in composite materials. There are two basic types of fillers: conductive fillers and extender fillers. Conductive filler is used to enhance the electrical and thermal properties of the corn husk fiber matrix [3135]. Extender filler is used to reduce material costs and provide reinforcement. In addition, fillers have key characteristics that are utilized in composite production such as particles (regular and irregular shapes), fiber (long and short fibers), and structural layer (sandwich and laminate layers) [36]. The advantages of using particulate fillers (such as TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) include increased physical, mechanical, and electrical properties, as well as homogeneous uniformity in three dimensions for biocomposite membrane products. This is due to their affordability, good interfacial properties, high interaction bonding through ionic and covalent bonds, good mechanical and electrical properties, and high efficiency in electronic polarization [3742]. In addition, Palimalam et al. investigated the addition of fillers such as nanosilica, TiO2, and zinc oxide (ZnO) to enhance the performance of epoxy hybrid coating with rubber latex. They found that TiO2 exhibited good chemical resistance and high ultraviolet radiation (UV) absorbance [43]. Azman et al. studied the addition of fillers silica (SiO2), eggshell, and CaCO3 (5, 10, 15, and 20 wt%) to fabricate epoxy-based biocomposites and analyzed their mechanical, structural, thermal, morphological properties [44]. They reported that the optimum loading of chicken eggshell filler was 15 wt%, outperforming other fillers [44]. Biocomposite membranes were prepared from cellulose derived from corn husk fibers, supplemented with metal oxides such as CaO, SiO2, ZnO, magnesium oxide (MgO), CaCO3, TiO2, and others. These biocomposite membranes have various applications, including energy storage devices like pacemakers, insulin pumps, charging devices for electronic devices like cell phones and computers, power banks, wound dressings, smart medical films, smart packaging, drug delivery systems, biosensors, toys (e.g., greeting cards), and remote sensing devices [45,46,47]. Biocomposite membranes are excellent thin films that are biodegradable and possess favorable thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties. Moreover, they find widespread use in industries such as food packaging, emulsification, adhesive, optical and electrical devices (optoelectronic devices), solar cells, photovoltaic devices, biosensor for food packaging, and biobattery membranes [48]. There are various types of batteries based on their sources such as enzymatic biobatteries, microbial biobatteries, body fluid-based biobatteries, and cellulose-based biobatteries [48,49]. The advantages of choosing biobatteries include faster charging, no need for an external power supply due to a constant glucose supply, suitability for use at room temperature, nonpolluting and renewable nature, environmental friendliness, absence of leaks or explosions like chemical batteries, and no metal corrosion compared to traditional batteries [50]. TiO2 exists in 12 polymorphs. Generally, there are three main crystal structures of TiO2: rutile (tetragonal), anatase (tetragonal), and brookite (orthorhombic). The anatase phase, particularly, is commonly found alongside the rutile crystal structure at room temperature. TiO2 nanoparticles, especially in the anatase form, exhibit photocatalytic behavior when exposed to ultraviolet irradiation, including UV-A (320–400 nm) and UV-B (290–320 nm), as shown in Eqs. (1)–(7).

(1) TiO 2 + e + h vb + ,

(2) h vb + h tr + ,

(3) O 2 + e O 2 ˙ ,

(4) O 2 ˙ + O 2 ˙ + 2 H + H 2 O 2 + O 2 ,

(5) O 2 ˙ + h vb + O 2 ,

(6) OH + h vb + HO,

(7) e + h tr + recombination,

where hʋ is photon, h vb + is photo-induced valence band holes, and h tr + is trapped holes. In the context of photocatalysis, TiO2 anatase does not absorb visible light but strongly absorbs UV at a wavelength of 387 nm, leading to the formation of hydroxyl radicals. This property has enabled the development of TiO2 for various applications, including smart food packaging, agricultural products, drugs, and fruit and vegetable packaging, which enhance product longevity and offer antimicrobial properties. TiO2 also finds applications in air cleaners, construction materials, coatings, and paints [3743]. In addition, CaO and eggshell, as sources of CaO, can be selected as additives. CaO and eggshell (>98 wt% CaCO3) are ionic compounds characterized by the ionic bond between calcium and oxygen, as represented by Eqs. (8) and (9) [51]. The electrical conductivity of CaO and eggshell (CaCO3) is 10−8 and 5.1 × 10−6–2.7 × 10−4 S·cm−1, respectively [51].

(8) Eggshell ( CaCO 3 ) CaO + CO 2 ,

(9) CaO + H 2 O Ca ( OH ) 2 .

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a water-soluble synthetic polymer with the chemical formula [CH2CH(OH)] n . It is commonly utilized in various applications, including papermaking and textile warp sizing. PVA serves as an effective thickener and emulsion stabilizer in adhesive formulations, coating, and 3D printing. It is colorless and odorless. PVA solutions can undergo gelation to form solid hydrogels that are biocompatible, exhibit low protein adhesion, and possess low toxicity. Therefore, PVA is well suited for medical and pharmaceutical applications such as vascular stents, cartilages, contact lens, and drug delivery systems [52]. In addition, PVA is employed as an aid in the suspension polymerization of the sol–gel process.

The sol–gel process is a wet chemical method suitable for the preparation of various nanostructures, including inorganic membranes, superconductors, ferroelectrics, photocatalysts, monolithic glasses and ceramics, thin films, nanowires, and ultra-high purity powders. It is also known as chemical solution deposition, particularly when utilizing metal alkoxide nanoparticles as precursors. The sol–gel process offers many advantages such as its popularity, the ability to be performed at room temperature, high purity of the resulting materials, and ease of chemical doping. The process involves several steps, including hydrolysis, polycondensation, gelation, aging, drying, densification, and crystallization. During the process, metal alkoxides are dissolved in water or alcohol, leading to hydrolysis or alcoholysis reactions that result in colloidal particles in suspension. The sol then transforms into a gel through condensation reactions. Hydrolysis of precursors can occur in either an acidic or basic medium, and polycondensation reactions are initiated by hydrolysis to produce the desired products [53,54,55].

The objective of this study is to prepare corn husk nanofiber composites by incorporating inorganic fillers such as TiO2, CaO, and eggshell. These composites were then used to produce 3D biocomposite membranes through sol–gel and casting processes. The suspension was cast onto a square sieve to control the membrane thickness via the sol–gel mechanism. The physical, mechanical, and electrical properties of the samples were investigated and compared with those of uncoated commercial paper. The physical properties including characteristics, phase formation, density, water absorption, and contact angle were analyzed. The mechanical properties such as stress, strain, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength were determined using ultimate tensile strength testing. The electrical properties including capacitance, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, and dielectric loss were measured using an impedance analyzer. In addition, X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and contact angle analyzer were employed for characterization and analysis.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials and methods

Corn husk fiber was collected from the local market in Bangkok. Commercial TiO2, CaO, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were purchased from Ajax Finechem in Bangkok, Thailand. Eggshells were collected from the local cafeteria in Bangkok, Thailand. The eggshells were classified using an eggshell classifier to separate them from the eggshell membrane. Then, the eggshells were ground using a rapid mill for 1 h to obtain eggshell powder. PVA was purchased from Chemipan Co., Ltd. in Bangkok, Thailand. Uncoated paper was used as a reference sample in this study.

2.2 Instruments

2.2.1 An XRD

Manufactured by Philips (X’Pert) was utilized for this study. This instrument was equipped with a VANTEC-1 detector and a double-crystal wide-angle goniometry. Scanning was performed at a speed of 2° 2θ min−1, with a 2θ increment of 0.05° or 0.03°, covering a range from 0° to 80°. The XRD analysis employed CuKα radiation with a wavelength (λ) of 0.15406 nm. The obtained peak patterns were compared and matched with standard peaks based on the International Center (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS)) to determine the patterns and positions of crystalline phases.

2.2.2 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)

Spectroscopy was conducted using the Perkin Elmer or Bruker Alpha E instrument to analyze and characterize the chemical functional groups present in the samples. The spectral range examined was 500–4,000 cm−1. For the analysis, raw materials and corn husk fiber were composited with filler samples. These mixtures were combined with potassium bromide as a reference substance within the wavenumber range 500–4,000 cm−1.

2.2.3 A universal testing machine (UTM)

HOUNSFEILD, H50KS was employed to measure the mechanical properties of the 3D biocomposite membrane samples, following the testing standard outlined in the Thai Industrial Standard (TIS 1211-50, TIS 378-2531).

2.2.4 A scanning electron microscope (SEM)

HITACHI, SU3500 was utilized to analyze and characterize the microstructure and nanostructure of the biocellulose fiber and membrane samples. To enhance electrical conductivity, the samples were coated with a 0.1 µm thickness of gold using an Edwards Pirani 501 sputtering coater. The SEM was operated at an accelerated electric voltage of 10 kV, and magnifications of 500 and 5,000× were used for the analysis.

2.2.5 An impedance analyzer

Hewlett Packard 4248A was utilized to measure the capacitance, dielectric properties, electrical conductivity, and dielectric loss of the biocomposite membrane samples.

2.2.6 A contact angle analyzer

KYOWA, DM-CE 1 (Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the contact angle at the interfacial surface between a water drop and the solid-composite membrane surface.

2.3 Preparation of corn husk nanofiber combined with inorganic fillers as a 3D biocomposite membrane

The corn husk was cleaned and dried at room temperature for 2–3 days, as shown in Figure 1a and b. The dried corn husk had a light-pale yellow color and was ground using a rapid mill to obtain finely ground corn peel fiber, as shown in Figure 1c. The corn husk fiber was then mixed with water at a ratio of 10:1, and then, NaOH (10 wt%) was added. The mixture was heated at 90°C. The choice of treatment in a 10 wt% alkaline NaOH aqueous solution was based on the efficient cleaning of the corn husk to obtain cleaned cellulose nanofiber. This treatment aimed to eliminate undesired accumulated residues, reduce stiffness, and remove noncellulosic components such as lignin, fatty acids, and resins, resulting in more accessible cellulose fibers. In addition, the Na+ ions bonded within the cellulose fiber nanostructure to form metal alkoxide, facilitating further sol–gel processes, as shown in Scheme 1. The resulting corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH exhibited a dark brown color and had a soft and fine texture. The treated corn husk nanofiber was thoroughly washed with tap water multiple times to remove the NaOH solution. Subsequently, the obtained corn husk nanofiber was utilized as a raw material to create a biocomposite membrane, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 1 
                  (a) Corn husk, (b) dried corn husk, and (c) ground corn husk fiber.
Figure 1

(a) Corn husk, (b) dried corn husk, and (c) ground corn husk fiber.

Figure 2 
                  (a) Corn husk fiber, (b) sieve the corn-husk plate (32 × 23 cm) using aluminum wire mesh no. 180 for the formation of a 3D composite membrane, (c) preparation of a corn husk membrane, (d) formula (1), (e) formula (5), and (f) formula (7).
Figure 2

(a) Corn husk fiber, (b) sieve the corn-husk plate (32 × 23 cm) using aluminum wire mesh no. 180 for the formation of a 3D composite membrane, (c) preparation of a corn husk membrane, (d) formula (1), (e) formula (5), and (f) formula (7).

Scheme 1 
                  Chemical structures of corn husk nanofiber with/without the addition of additives and PVA.
Scheme 1

Chemical structures of corn husk nanofiber with/without the addition of additives and PVA.

Figure 3 
                  FTIR spectra of the following raw materials: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.
Figure 3

FTIR spectra of the following raw materials: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.

The 3D biocomposite membrane samples were prepared based on the formulas listed in Table 1. The corn husk nanofiber served as the raw material for creating the 3D biocomposite membrane through sol–gel and casting processes. A square sieve was employed to control membrane thickness (80 g), as depicted in Figure 2b. A total of seven formulas were prepared, varying in the types of fillers used, including commercial CaO, commercial TiO2, and eggshell powder acting as a source of CaCO3. NaOH was utilized for the treatment of corn husk, removing substances other than cellulose. In addition, NaOH served as an alkaline catalyst, facilitating the transformation from sol to gel in two main reactions: hydrolysis and condensation. The casting process was employed as an innovative method for the preparation of the biocomposite membrane. For all formulas, a 5 wt% solution of PVA was used as a binder to form the biocomposite membrane. Formula (1) served as the reference sample.

Table 1

Formulas of preparation 3D biocomposite membrane samples

Raw materials/formulas 1 (g) 2 (g) 3 (g) 4 (g) 5 (g) 6 (g) 7(g)
Corn-husk fibera 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
NaOH solution (NaOH 10 wt%), ml 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
PVA 5 wt% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CaO commercial grade powder 1 wt% 1
CaO commercial grade powder 5 wt% 5
TiO2 commercial grade powder 1 wt% 1
TiO2 commercial grade powder 5 wt% 5
Eggshell powder 1 wt% 1
Eggshell powder 5 wt% 5

Remark.

aCorn husk fiber was prepared and passed sieve size according to the T240 Consistency (80 g mesh). “−” means no adding.

Commercial white paper (80 g) was used as a reference sample.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characteristics and physical properties of a 3D biocomposite membrane composited of corn husk nanofiber and inorganic fillers

The physical properties, including bulk density, true density, water absorption, contact angle values at initial time (t 0s) and at t 12,000s, of the biocomposite membrane samples were tabulated in Table 2. The uncoated white paper (reference sample, 80 g) exhibited bulk density, true density, water absorption, contact angle (t 0s), and contact angle (t 12,000s) values of 0.22 ± 0.03 g·cm−3, 0.50 ± 0.08 g·cm−3, 54.79 ± 10.34%, 9.42 ± 0.88°, and 1.25 ± 0.21°, respectively. After treating the corn husk nanofiber with 10 wt% NaOH, the resulting bulk density, true density, water absorption, contact angle at (t 0s), and contact angle (t 12,000s) values were 0.09 ± 0.03 g·cm−3, 0.48 ± 0.10 g·cm−3, 80.81 ± 4.05%, 9.77 ± 0.88°, and 1.25 ± 0.21°, respectively. The morphology of the corn husk, including fiber length (1.70 ± 0.2 mm), fiber diameter (21.89 ± 3.0 mm), cell wall thickness (7.63 ± 2.30 μm), and lumen width (6.63 ± 3.50 μm), was consistent with the results reported by Fagbemi et al. [56]. The corn husk nanofiber treated with 10 wt% NaOH and supplemented with 5 wt% PVA (formula (1)) exhibited bulk density, true density, water absorption, contact angle (t 0s), and contact angle (t 12,000s) values of 0.07 ± 0.00 g·cm−3, 0.48 ± 0.10 g·cm−3, 64.12 ± 4.91%, 10.20 ± 0.47°, and 2.00 ± 0.94°, respectively. The use of NaOH served two functions: as a basic catalyst and as an activator for the corn husk nanofiber, enabling the chemical reaction during the sol–gel and casting processes. This resulted in a biocomposite membrane with desirable characteristics such as purification, low cost, antimicrobial properties, and good mechanical and electrical properties. The addition of PVA as a binder increased viscosity, aiding in gelation and crystal growth, leading to an increased contact angle, decreased water absorption, and reduced bulk density. The precursor sol of biocomposite membrane underwent activation with a basic catalyst, dispersing in suspension through chemical reactions to transform and crosslink into a gel and solid membrane. This involved processes such as hydrolysis, polycondensation, gelation, aging, drying, densification, and crystallization. Among the various processes, the casting process was selected for this study due to its affordability, compatibility with room temperature conditions, suitable for thin and thick films, and versatility in shaping products depending on the size and shape of molds. The prepared biocomposite membrane exhibited a thickness comparable to commercial uncoated paper with a mesh size of 80 g, while having lower bulk and true density. Formula (1) with the addition of 5 wt% PVA showed lower water absorption compared to the corn husk nanofiber treated with 10 wt% NaOH without PVA and no filler. Wang et al. conducted a study on the preparation of smart food packaging using bio-based nanomaterials or biopolymers such as polylactic acid, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polycarprolactone, PVA, reinforced with nanofiber such as paper, vegetable fiber, flax, hemp, rice straw, bamboo fiber, and corn husk, incorporated with nano clay and ZnO using conventional plastic processes such as compression molding and injection molding [42]. They found that their food packaging exhibited high performance in mechanical properties, gas barrier properties, antimicrobial properties, food preservation, and extended shelf-life [42]. Therefore, the prepared 3D biocomposite membrane, supplemented with 5 wt% PVA and inorganic fillers, has the potential to be a suitable candidate for smart food packaging and other applications such as coating, encapsulation, wound dressing, and goods transportation. The addition of TiO2 to the biocomposite membrane resulted in characteristics consistent with biodegradation, hydrophobicity, self-cleaning, and improved gas penetration, and barrier properties, as observed in other studies [43,44]. Furthermore, the inclusion of inorganic fillers influenced the bulk and true density of the biocomposite membrane depending on the microstructures and density values of the chosen fillers.

Table 2

Physical properties of biocomposite membranes (avg ± SD, no. = 3)

Samples Bulk density (g·cm−3) True density (g·cm−3) Water absorption (%) Contact angle, t 0s (°) Contact angle, t 12,000s (°)
Commercial white paper 80 g 0.22 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.08 54.79 ± 10.34 9.42 ± 0.88 1.25 ± 0.21
Corn husk nanofibera treated by NaOH 10 wt% (without PVA and no filler) 0.09 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.10 80.81 ± 4.05 9.77 ± 0.88 1.25 ± 0.21
Formula (1) (PVA) (no filler) 0.07 ± 0.00 0.48 ± 0.10 64.12 ± 4.91 10.20 ± 0.47 2.00 ± 0.94
Formula (2) (1 wt% CaO) 0.09 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.01 N/A 60.20 ± 0.65 11.80 ± 1.30
Formula (3) (5 wt% CaO) 0.15 ± 0.08 0.56 ± 0.06 N/A 67.12 ± 0.80 13.16 ± 1.60
Formula (4) (1 wt% TiO2) 0.09 ± 0.02 0.50 ± 0.02 N/A 66.71 ± 0.50 13.08 ± 1.00
Formula (5) (5 wt% TiO2) 0.17 ± 0.10 0.58 ± 0.08 N/A 65.00 ± 0.41 12.75 ± 0.82
Formula (6) (1 wt% eggshell) 0.08 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.01 N/A >90 >90
Formula (7) (5 wt% eggshell) 0.13 ± 0.05 0.53 ± 0.03 N/A >90 >90

Remark.

Commercial white paper (80 g) was used as reference samples.

The contact angle values of glossy art paper or craft paper at t 0s and t 12,000s are 79.23° ± 9.78°, and 10.83° ± 7.22°, respectively.

The density value of corn husk is equal to 1.30 g·cm−3.

The density value of TiO2 is equal to 4.17 g·cm−3.

The density value of CaO is equal to 3.34 g·cm−3.

The density value of eggshell (CaCO3) is equal to 2.25 g·cm−3.

N/A means not measured.

The FTIR spectra of raw materials, including corn husk nanofiber, CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder, were measured and compared for the preparation of the 3D biocomposite membrane, as shown in Figure 3. The FTIR spectra of CaO and eggshell powder exhibited broadband peaks corresponding to chemical functional groups such as C═O, O–H, and Ca–O at wavenumber 1421.32, 3689.42, and 556.15 cm−1, respectively. These findings are consistent with the FTIR results reported by Hossain et al. [57]. CH2 and ═CH bending were observed in the wavenumber range of 600–800 cm−1, while a small peak at wavenumber 2,890 cm−1 indicated C–H stretching. The chemical functional groups of Ti–O, Ca–O, and Ca–C–O appeared at low wavenumbers within the range of 500–700 cm−1 [57,58,59,60]. The FTIR spectra of the corn husk fiber composited with inorganic fillers were compared to the FTIR spectrum of commercial uncoated white paper, which served as a reference (Figure 4). In addition, the obtained FTIR spectrum of the corn husk nanofiber was consistent with the FTIR result reported by Zheng et al. [25].

Figure 4 
                  A comparison of FTIR spectra was conducted for the following samples: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, and corn husk nanofiber composited with CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.
Figure 4

A comparison of FTIR spectra was conducted for the following samples: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, and corn husk nanofiber composited with CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.

The X-ray peak patterns of the raw materials, commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), and corn husk nanofiber combined with fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) via the sol–gel process were characterized and compared to the standard XRD peak patterns from the JCPDS database, as shown in Figure 5. The XRD pattern of commercial uncoated white paper exhibited semicrystalline structures similar to those observed in the XRD patterns of the corn husk nanofiber combined with fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder). The XRD peak patterns of TiO2 displayed a tetragonal crystalline structure, specifically the anatase phase, in agreement with the JCPDS file no. 00-004-0477 for the (hkl): (101), (200), and (105) planes. Thus, TiO2 was selected as an additive suitable for UV absorption and antimicrobial applications, aligning with Eqs. (1)–(7). The XRD peak pattern of commercial CaO corresponded to the JCPDS file no. 01–078–0649, representing a cubic structure for the (200), (220), and (111) planes. In addition, the eggshell consumption comprised CaO mixed with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) consistent with the JCPDS file nos. 01-078-0649 and 01-084-1264, respectively. The crystalline XRD peaks in the biocomposite membranes with added fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) exhibited a peak position at 2Ɵ similar to the XRD patterns of the corresponding inorganic filler raw materials (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder). Moreover, the obtained XRD peak pattern of the corn husk nanofiber was consistent with the XRD result reported by Chen et al. [28]. The XRD peak pattern of eggshell appeared at 2Ɵ = 17.5°, 28.8°, 34.0°, 37.3°, 50.5°, and 54.5°, in line with the XRD results reported by Ayodeji et al. [61]. The obtained XRD pattern of CaO was consistent with the XRD result reported by El-Sherif et al. [62] and Hossain et al. [57]. Therefore, the addition of inorganic filler particles as a dispersed phase or a reinforcement phase into the corn husk nanofiber matrix showed potential to enhance the physical, mechanical, and electrical properties of ceramic-polymer composites [42].

Figure 5 
                  The comparison of XRD peak patterns for the following samples: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, and corn husk nanofiber composited with CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.
Figure 5

The comparison of XRD peak patterns for the following samples: commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber, and corn husk nanofiber composited with CaO, TiO2, and eggshell powder.

SEM micrographs of the biocellulose nanofiber and membrane at magnifications of 500 and 5,000× are shown in Figure 6. The SEM micrograph of the commercial uncoated white paper revealed long, flat fiber overlapping randomly, as depicted in Figure 6a. On the other hand, the SEM micrograph of the corn husk fiber displayed interconnected hollow long fibers, as shown in Figure 6b, which were composed of nanofibers with diameters of up to 50 nm. Furthermore, the SEM micrographs of the biocomposite membrane with added TiO2 and eggshell powder exhibited different microstructures and surface compositions depending on the types and properties of the inorganic fillers, as shown in Figure 6c and d, respectively. In particular, the SEM micrograph of the biocomposite membrane with added eggshell powder revealed a remarkable hierarchical structure of nano papillae, resulting in a contact angle of water droplets on its surface exceeding 90°, as shown in Figure 6e and f. Generally, materials exhibiting hydrophilic behavior have a contact angle in the range of 0°–90°, while materials displaying hydrophobic behavior have contact angles in the range of 90°–150°.

Figure 6 
                  SEM micrographs and contact angles of the biocellulose fiber and membrane at magnification 500×. The images include (a) commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), (b) corn husk fiber, (c) formula (5) (TiO2), (d) formula (7) (eggshell), (e) formula (7) at a magnification of 5,000×, and (f) contact angle of water droplet on the sample surface.
Figure 6

SEM micrographs and contact angles of the biocellulose fiber and membrane at magnification 500×. The images include (a) commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), (b) corn husk fiber, (c) formula (5) (TiO2), (d) formula (7) (eggshell), (e) formula (7) at a magnification of 5,000×, and (f) contact angle of water droplet on the sample surface.

The contact angle measurement of commercial uncoated white paper, corn peel fiber with/without the addition of PVA, was analyzed to study the hydrophobic and hydrophilic behaviors from the initial time (t 0s) to t 12,000s, as shown in Figure 7, with the data tabulated in Table 2. NaOH was used to enhance the hydrophilic properties of the corn husk nanofiber, as the Na+ ions aided in achieving good water solubility and bonding with the corn husk nanofiber through gelation and crosslink via hydrolysis and condensation processes. This finding is consistent with the contact angle results reported by Debnath et al. [63]. Consequently, the contact angle value of the corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH was equivalent to that of the commercial uncoated white paper throughout the duration from t 0s to t 12,000s. Moreover, the addition of PVA as a polymer binder facilitated gelation formation and rapid crystal growth, resulting in increased hydrophobicity and decreased water absorption of the treated corn husk nanofiber [42]. The contact angle of corn husk nanofiber films with PVA (formula (1)) and without PVA (no filler) is 10.20° ± 0.47° and 9.77° ± 0.88°, respectively. The addition of fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) significantly influenced the contact angle, increasing it by 5–10 orders of magnitude in formula (1). The prepared biocomposite membrane exhibited favorable characteristics suitable for further applications. Eggshell powder demonstrated excellent performance as a biofiller when mixed with PVA for composite films, as it formed strong hydrogen bonding interaction between eggshell and PVA due to the presence of a collagen network in its composition. The contact angle values of formulas (6) and (7) with the addition of 1 and 5 wt% eggshell powder are greater than 90°. As a result, the biopolymer film obtained showed a high degree of hydrophobic behavior due to the morphology and structure of eggshell, enhancing the thermal stability of the composite films [64]. The behavior of liquid droplets and the contact angle on the surface of biocomposite membrane depends on the surface roughness and chemical composition, which influence wettability and spreading. In general, wettability follows Young’s equation, which is based on the balance of tensions among the liquid, gas, and solid phases at the three-phase boundary [64].

Figure 7 
                  A comparison of the avg. contact angle values for commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH, and corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH-added PVA. The values are expressed as the avg. ± SD, with three samples.
Figure 7

A comparison of the avg. contact angle values for commercial uncoated white paper (80 g), corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH, and corn husk nanofiber treated with NaOH-added PVA. The values are expressed as the avg. ± SD, with three samples.

3.2 Mechanical properties of corn husk nanofiber composited membrane with inorganic fillers in a 3D composite structure

The mechanical properties of corn husk nanofiber composites with inorganic fillers such as CaO, TiO2, and eggshell were tabulated in Table 3. When corn husk nanofiber was combined with 1 wt% of CaO, TiO2, and eggshell, the composite exhibited higher values of mechanical stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength compared to commercial uncoated white paper and the formula (1) without any fillers. Among the composites, the addition of 1 wt% eggshell (formula (6)) resulted in the highest mechanical stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength, measuring 5.00 ± 0.41, 10.00 ± 0.01, and 8.85 ± 2.32 MPa, respectively. In a study by Liu et al., intelligent starch/PVA films with antimicrobial activity for food packaging applications exhibited a tensile strength of 4.51 ± 0.14 MPa and a percentage of elongation of 11.39 ± 0.12% [65]. The addition of 1 wt% inorganic filler in each formula resulted in higher mechanical properties compared to adding 5 wt% filler, as the behavior of the added inorganic filler can differentially distribute, intercalate, and bond within the corn husk nanofiber matrix. Formula (1) without any filler exhibited lower mechanical stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength, measuring 2.68 ± 0.83, 2.52 ± 0.90, and 2.75 ± 0.77 MPa, respectively. Furthermore, commercial white paper exhibited high mechanical stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength, measuring 12.67 ± 2.51, 12.75 ± 0.87, and 9.25 ± 2.08 MPa, respectively. The treatment of lignin in the corn husk fiber with NaOH solution influenced the mechanical properties of corn husk nanofiber and the strength of intermolecular bonding within its structure, as shown in Scheme 1. The concentration of NaOH solution used for treatment affected the characteristics and physical properties of corn husk nanofiber, such as color, softness, size, and purity, depending on the remaining lignin content. In addition, other factors reported by Pirsa et al. [66,67], such as degree of polymerization, molecular weight, intermolecular bonds, and types and pH of solvent, can also influence the mechanical properties of biopolymer films. Stronger intermolecular bonds contribute to higher structural strength and improved mechanical properties [68]. Thakur et al. reported in 2015 that reinforcing particulate nanomaterials, such as SiO2, carbon black, oxides, CaCO3, and fibers, used as additives in polymer mixtures can enhance the thermal, mechanical, and electrical properties of food and beverage packaging [69].

Table 3

Mechanical properties of samples (avg ± SD, n = 3)

Samples Stress (MPa) Strain (%) Young’s modulus (MPa) Tensile strength (MPa)
Commercial white paper (80 g) 12.67 ± 2.51 1.73 ± 0.06 12.75 ± 0.87 9.25 ± 2.08
Corn-husk nanofibera treated by NaOH 10 wt% (without PVA and no filler) 2.04 ± 0.35 1.93 ± 0.65 4.45 ± 0.77 2.08 ± 0.17
Formula (1) (PVA) (no filler) 2.68 ± 0.83 1.92 ± 0.17 2.52 ± 0.9 2.75 ± 0.77
Formula (2) (1 wt% CaO) 4.57 ± 0.62 1.57 ± 0.23 4.13 ± 0.80 3.94 ± 1.01
Formula (3) (5 wt% CaO) 1.20 ± 0.18 1.25 ± 0.34 2.12 ± 0.60 2.67 ± 0.36
Formula (4) (1 wt% TiO2) 4.05 ± 0.83 1.25 ± 0.28 4.27 ± 1.65 4.22 ± 0.91
Formula (5) (5 wt% TiO2) 1.48 ± 0.15 1.18 ± 0.12 3.26 ± 0.40 3.71 ± 0.34
Formula (6) (1 wt% eggshell) 5.00 ± 0.41 1.65 ± 0.07 10.00 ± 0.01 8.85 ± 2.32
Formula (7) (5 wt% eggshell) 2.27 ± 0.25 0.83 ± 0.01 8.67 ± 2.31 4.41 ± 1.50

Remark.

aCorn husk nanofiber treated by NaOH 10 wt%.

Commercial white paper (80 g) was used as a reference sample.

The tensile strength of long corn peel fiber (6–9 cm) before NaOH treatment was approximately 5 MPa.

Bold values represent the highest mechanical properties, such as stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength, observed when 1 wt% fillers (CaO, TiO2, and eggshell) were added.

Therefore, the addition of inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell), particularly eggshell, proved beneficial in improving the mechanical properties of corn husk nanofiber composites in accordance with the mixture’s rule, consistent with the results reported by Azman et al. [44]. Furthermore, Nicolik et al. reported in 2021 the efficiency of incorporating metal oxide nanoparticles such as TiO2, ZnO, Fe3O4, and MgO into biopolymers and bio-based degradable composite materials like chitosan and cellulose nanofiber through casting and electrospinning processes to produce smart (active and/or intelligent) packaging [70]. They found that chitosan and cellulose nanofiber-based smart packaging films exhibited favorable mechanical and thermal properties [70].

3.3 Electrical properties of corn husk nanofiber composited with inorganic filler to prepare a 3D composite membrane

The electrical properties, including electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, and dielectric loss, were measured, and the average (avg.) data ± standard deviation (SD) of each formula from three samples was reported using an impedance analyzer. The measurements were taken at frequencies of 5 × 102, 1 × 105, and 1 × 106 Hz at a room temperature of 27°C. The results are tabulated in Table 4. The electrical conductivity of the raw materials, eggshell (CaCO3), CaO, and TiO2 were found to be 5.1 × 10−6–2.7 × 10−4, 10−8, and (2.3–2.7) × 10−6 S·cm−1, respectively, as reported in our previous study [51]. The addition of 5 wt% fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) to the corn husk nanofiber matrix increased the highest dielectric constant. This increase was attributed to the mobilization and polarization of charges in the electrical field, as shown in Schemes 2 and 3, which is consistent with previous results [71,72]. Formula (7) with the addition of 5 wt% eggshell power shows electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, and dielectric loss measured at 500 Hz equal to 1.986 × 103 (Ω·m)−1, 3.300 ± 0.508, and 0.67 ± 0.30, respectively. On the other hand, the addition of 5 wt% CaO into biocomposite films resulted in the highest electrical conductivity (2.111 × 103 (Ω·m)−1), dielectric loss (0.68 ± 0.12), and dielectric constant (1.612 ± 0.319) measured at 500 Hz and room temperature (27°C). The addition of 5 wt% eggshell powder also increased the highest electrical conductivity due to the orientation polarization or dipolar polarization of Ca2+ and CO3 2− ions when subjected to an electrical field, as shown in Scheme 4. The types of ions from the inorganic filler charges (Ti4+, O2−, Ca2+, and CO 3 2 ) in each formula added to the corn husk nanofiber affected the increase in electrical conductivity and dielectric constant differently, in accordance with the results reported by Pirsa and Asadi [73] and Pirsa et al. [66]. These studies have highlighted the importance of cations added to biopolymer made of natural cellulose, as they play a crucial role in the properties of the resulting biocomposite polymer. Such biocomposite polymers exhibit antimicrobial properties [43,74], good antioxidant properties [75], easy biodegradation [43,44,76], effective inhibition of oxygen [77], flexibility and fat resistance [78], as well as chemical sensor characteristics [7981]. Treating the corn husk fiber with a NaOH solution was found to enhance the electrical properties (electrical conductivity and dielectric constant) of the biocomposite membrane. This enhancement is attributed to the interfacial-space charge polarization of Na+ and OH ions, as illustrated in Scheme 5 [66,82]. The dielectric constant and polarization standard values of the materials were measured at an electrical frequency of 1 MHz and a temperature of 27°C, as shown in Scheme 6. These standard values were used to compare the electrical properties of the prepared biocomposite membranes. Furthermore, Pirsa reported that the addition of nanoparticle fillers is desirable for increasing optical properties and electrical conductivity [83]. Nanoparticles, which are elongated within cellulose fibers or nanotubes, are essential for the food industry in producing smart packaging that functions as sensors and detectors by measuring external conditions [8487]. According to the standard values of polarization shown in Scheme 6, commercial uncoated white paper and corn husk nanofiber exhibited an orderly arrangement polarization known as dipolar orientation [66,82]. On the other hand, all inorganic fillers such as TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder (CaCO3 source) exhibited electronic-ionic-interfacial space charge polarization [66,82]. Therefore, the addition of inorganic fillers to corn husk nanofiber to produce 3D-composite membranes can induce polarization, making them suitable for a variety of electrical and mechanical applications, such as smart food packaging, drug delivery, batteries, photovoltaics, and alternative energy [82,88,89]. In addition, the obtained 3D composite membrane exhibited low dielectric loss, making it suitable for applications across various electrical frequencies.

Table 4

Electrical properties of samples (avg ± SD, n = 3) measured at 27°C

Samples Frequency Dielectric constant Electrical conductivity (Ω·m)−1 Dielectric loss (tan δ)
Commercial white paper (80 g) 500 Hz Very close to 1 1.720 × 10−10 0.72 ± 0.22
100,000 Hz Very close to 1 7.102 × 10−11 0.13 ± 0.01
1 MHz Very close to 1 7.897 × 10−11 0.06 ± 0.01
Corn husk nanofiber atreated by NaOH 10 wt% (without PVA and no filler) 500 Hz Very close to 1 8.149 × 10−11 0.20 ± 0.01
100,000 Hz Very close to 1 4.527 × 10−11 0.56 ± 0.02
1 MHz Very close to 1 1.000 × 100 0.06 ± 0.02
Formula (1) (PVA) (no filler) 500 Hz 1.022 ± 0.048 0.645 × 103 1.15 ± 0.02
100,000 Hz 1.545 ± 0.239 0.615 × 103 0.02 ± 0.07
1 MHz 2.262 ± 0.525 0.324 × 103 0.09 ± 0.01
Formula (2) (1 wt% CaO) 500 Hz Very close to 1 0.707 × 103 0.82 ± 0.21
100,000 Hz 1.360 ± 0.177 0.519 × 103 0.16 ± 0.01
1 MHz 1.721 ± 0.405 0.495 × 103 0.08 ± 0.01
Formula (3) (5 wt% CaO) 500 Hz 1.612 ± 0.319 2.111 × 10 3 0.68 ± 0.12
100,000 Hz 2.484 ± 0.447 0.824 × 10 3 0.14 ± 0.05
1 MHz 2.569 ± 0.737 0.729 × 10 3 0.10 ± 0.01
Formula (4) (1 wt% TiO2) 500 Hz Very close to 1 1.438 × 103 1.80 ± 0.16
100,000 Hz 1.786 ± 0.177 0.563 × 103 0.15 ± 0.02
1 MHz 2.395 ± 0.140 0.476 × 103 0.08 ± 0.01
Formula (5) (5 wt% TiO2) 500 Hz Very close to 1 1.823 × 10 3 1.48 ± 0.51
100,000 Hz 2.049 ± 0.459 0.625 × 10 3 0.20 ± 0.04
1 MHz 2.429 ± 0.561 0.507 × 10 3 0.10 ± 0.03
Formula (6) (1 wt% eggshell) 500 Hz Very close to 1 0.409 × 103 0.46 ± 0.18
100,000 Hz 2.279 ± 0.196 0.342 × 103 0.22 ± 0.02
1 MHz 2.438 ± 0.094 0.291 × 103 0.12 ± 0.01
Formula (7) (5 wt% eggshell) 500 Hz 3.300 ± 0.508 1.986 × 10 3 0.67 ± 0.30
100,000 Hz 3.593 ± 0.010 0.930 × 10 3 0.11 ± 0.01
1 MHz 3.939 ± 0.872 0.715 × 10 3 0.04 ± 0.01

Bold values indicate that the addition of 5 wt% fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder) to the corn husk nanofiber matrix resulted in the highest dielectric constant and electrical conductivity.

Scheme 2 
                  Model the relationship between polarization and electrical conductivity of corn husk nanofiber combines with PVA and composite materials of titanium oxide (TiO2) and eggshell powder (CaCO3) [72,80].
Scheme 2

Model the relationship between polarization and electrical conductivity of corn husk nanofiber combines with PVA and composite materials of titanium oxide (TiO2) and eggshell powder (CaCO3) [72,80].

Scheme 3 
                  Prototype the behavior of dielectric materials when an electric field is applied between electrodes: (a) in the absence of any dielectric material and (b) with dielectric material, either with or without the addition of fillers [72,80].
Scheme 3

Prototype the behavior of dielectric materials when an electric field is applied between electrodes: (a) in the absence of any dielectric material and (b) with dielectric material, either with or without the addition of fillers [72,80].

Scheme 4 
                  Examine the relationship between dielectric constant and polarization as a function of electric frequency [72,80].
Scheme 4

Examine the relationship between dielectric constant and polarization as a function of electric frequency [72,80].

Scheme 5 
                  Types of polarization observed in materials: (a) electronic polarization, (b) atomic or ionic polarization, (c) high-frequency dipolar polarization or orientation polarization, (d) low-frequency dipolar polarization in linear dielectrics and glasses, (e) interfacial-space charge, and (f) interfacial-space charge at heterogeneities [69,72,76,80].
Scheme 5

Types of polarization observed in materials: (a) electronic polarization, (b) atomic or ionic polarization, (c) high-frequency dipolar polarization or orientation polarization, (d) low-frequency dipolar polarization in linear dielectrics and glasses, (e) interfacial-space charge, and (f) interfacial-space charge at heterogeneities [69,72,76,80].

Scheme 6 
                  The standard values of dielectric constant and polarization for materials at 27°C and an electrical frequency of 1 MHz [69,72,76,80].
Scheme 6

The standard values of dielectric constant and polarization for materials at 27°C and an electrical frequency of 1 MHz [69,72,76,80].

4 Conclusion

3D composite membranes were prepared by embedding inorganic fillers, such as TiO2, CaO, and eggshell powder (CaCO3), into a corn husk nanofiber matrix using the sol–gel and casting process. The addition of 5 wt% eggshell powder resulted in an increase in the highest dielectric constant and electrical conductivity. The increase in dielectric constant and electrical conductivity increase was attributed to orientation polarization or dipolar polarization, with measurements approximately 3.300 ± 0.508 and 1.986 × 103 (Ω·m)−1, respectively. These measurements were taken at a frequency of 500 Hz and a temperature of 27°C. When 1 wt% of eggshell powder was added to the corn husk nanofiber (formula (6)), the composite exhibited the highest mechanical stress, Young’s modulus, and tensile strength, measuring 5.00 ± 0.41, 10.00 ± 0.01, and 8.85 ± 2.32 MPa, respectively. Both samples with the addition of 1 and 5% eggshell powder showed high contact angles, indicating low water absorption. Therefore, the 3D composite membranes exhibited excellent physical, mechanical, and electrical properties. The inclusion of inorganic fillers (CaCO3, CaO, and TiO2) in the corn husk nanofiber matrix induced charge polarization when subjected to an electrical field. The higher the percentage of inorganic fillers added, the greater the effect on electrical conductivity and dielectric constant due to interfacial or dipolar polarization. Producing a 3D biocomposite membrane from corn husk nanofiber embedded with eggshell offers several advantages, such as utilizing abundant and natural raw materials, reducing corn husk waste, promoting sustainability, and facilitating easy formation. Furthermore, if the 3D biocomposite membrane is embedded with TiO2, it can exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, and self-cleaning properties. Therefore, the biocomposite membrane holds potential for development as multilayer composite membranes, effectively enhancing electrical properties, similar to the principles employed in the production of multilayer capacitors for alternative energy storage in the future.


tel: +66-2-797-0999-2106; fax: +66-2-955-1811

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, for providing access to the analytical equipment. They also, acknowledge the student project funding support provided by the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

  1. Funding information: The student project funding support provided by the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1] Zhao, M. and B. Chen. Corn Oil. Reference Module in Food Science, Vol. 2, Elsevier, Fargo, ND, United States, 2023, pp. 104–119.10.1016/B978-0-12-823960-5.00013-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aghaei, S., M. K. Alavijeh, M. Shafiei, and K. Karimi. A comprehensive review on bioethanol production from corn stover: Worldwide potential, environmental importance, and perspectives. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 161, 2022, id. 106447.10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106447Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zhang, Y., Z. He, M. Xu, X. Zhang, S. Cao, Y. Hu, et al. Physicochemical properties and protein structure of extruded corn gluten meal: Implication of temperature. Food Chemistry, Vol. 399, 2023, id. 133985.10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133985Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Zhao, C., Q. Li, N. Hu, H. Yin, T. Wang, X. Dai, et al. Improvement of structural characteristics and in vitro digestion properties of zein by controlling postharvest ripening process of corn. Food Control, Vol. 142, 2022, id. 109221.10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109221Search in Google Scholar

[5] Preciado-Ortiz, R. E., N. J. Ochoa-Centenoa, M. G. Vázquez-Carrillo, D. Santiago-Ramos, and A. D. Terrón-Ibarraa. Grain yield, physical and pasting properties, and anthocyanins of non-conventional pigmented corn hybrids for pozole end-use adapted to subtropical regions. Applied Food Research, Vol. 2, 2022, id. 100180.10.1016/j.afres.2022.100180Search in Google Scholar

[6] Li, D., X. Yu, P. Wang, B. Cui, E. Xu, Y. Tao, et al. Effect of pre-gelatinization on α-amylase-catalyzed hydrolysis of corn starch under moderate electric field. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 221, 2022, pp. 1335–1344.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Ibrahim, M. I. J., S. M. Sapuan, E. S. Zainudin, and M. Y. M. Zuhri. Extraction, chemical, and characterization of potential lignocellulosic biomasses and polymers from corn plant parts. BioResources, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2019, pp. 6485–6500.10.15376/biores.14.3.6485-6500Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yuksel, F., H. Ilyasoglu, and C. Baltaci. Development of a healthy corn-based snack with sage (Salvia officinalis L.) seed. Bioactive Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre, Vol. 21, 2020, id. 100207.10.1016/j.bcdf.2019.100207Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kutlu, N., R. Pandiselvam, A. Kamiloglu, I. Saka, N. U. Sruthi, A. Kothakota, et al. Impact of ultrasonication applications on color profile of foods. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 89, 2022, id. 106109.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106109Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Mondal, M. H., M. Akhtaruzzaman, and M. S. Sarker. Modeling of dehydration and color degradation kinetics of maize grain for mixed flow dryer. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 9, 2022, id. 100359.10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100359Search in Google Scholar

[11] Suriano, S., C. Balconi, P. Valoti, and R. Redaelli. Comparison of total polyphenols, profile anthocyanins, color analysis, carotenoids and tocols in pigmented maize. LWT- Food Science and Technology, Vol. 144, 2021, id. 111257.10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111257Search in Google Scholar

[12] Saenz, E., L. J. Abdala, L. Borrás, and J. A. Gerde. Maize kernel color depends on the interaction between hardness and carotenoid concentration. Journal of Cereal Science, Vol. 91, 2020, id. 102901.10.1016/j.jcs.2019.102901Search in Google Scholar

[13] Liang, X. G., Z. Gao, S. Shen, X. Zhao, L. Zhang, and S. L. Zhou. Cob color, an indicator of grain dehydration and agronomic traits in maize hybrids. The Crop Journal, Vol. 10, 2022, pp. 582–586.10.1016/j.cj.2021.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kang, M. S. and M. S. Zuber. Combining ability for grain moisture, husk moisture, and maturity in maize with yellow and white endosperms. Crop Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1989, pp. 689–692.10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030030xSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Feng, J., B. Xu, D. Ma, Z. Hao, Y. Jia, C. Wang, et al. Metabolite identification in fresh wheat grains of different colors and the influence of heat processing on metabolites via targeted and non-targeted metabolomics. Food Research International, Vol. 160, 2022, id. 111728.10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111728Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Chávez-Arias, C. C., A. Ramírez-Godoy, and H. Restrepo-Díaz. Influence of drought, high temperatures, and/or defense against arthropod herbivory on the production of secondary metabolites in maize plants. A review. Current Plant Biology, Vol. 32, 2022, id. 100268.10.1016/j.cpb.2022.100268Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rojas, C., M. Cea, A. Iriarte, G. Valdés, R. Navia, and J. P. Cárdenas-R. Thermal insulation materials based on agricultural residual wheat straw and corn husk biomass, for application in sustainable buildings. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, Vol. 17, 2019, id. e00102.10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00102Search in Google Scholar

[18] Duong, N. T., T. Satomi, and H. Takahashi. Potential of corn husk fiber for reinforcing cemented soil with high water content. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 271, 2021, id. 121848.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121848Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yang, X., F. Han, C. Xu, S. Jiang, L. Huang, L. Liu, et al. Effects of preparation methods on the morphology and properties of nanocellulose (NC) extracted from corn husk. Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 109, 2017, pp. 241–247.10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.032Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ratna, A. S., A. Ghosh, and S. Mukhopadhyay. Advances and prospects of corn husk as a sustainable material in composites and other technical applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 371, 2022, id. 133563.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133563Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ahumada, R., H. Ospina-Mateus, and K. Salas-Navarro. Use of the rice and corn husk ashes as an innovative pozzolanic material in ceramic tile adhesive production. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 198, 2022, pp. 572–577.10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.288Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ismail, M. S., M. D. Yahya, M. Auta, and K. S. Obayomi. Facile preparation of amine -functionalized corn husk derived activated carbon for effective removal of selected heavy metals from battery recycling wastewater. Heliyon, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2022, id. e09516.10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09516Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] García, A., A. Gandini, J. Labidi, N. Belgacem, and J. Bras. Industrial and crop wastes: A new source for nanocellulose biorefinery. Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 93, 2016, pp. 26–38.10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kirubagharan, R., S. Dhanabalan, and T. Karthikeyan. Effect of optimized alkali-silane treatment on mechanical and fatigue behavior of maize husk fiber epoxy composites: a strength factor approach. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022.10.1007/s13399-022-03661-0Search in Google Scholar

[25] Zheng, M., M. K. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. L. Zhu, G. Du, and R. Zheng. Cheap, high yield, and strong corn husk-based textile bio-fibers with low carbon footprint via green alkali retting-splicing-twisting strategy. Industrial Crops and Products Part B, Vol. 188, 2022, id. 115699.10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115699Search in Google Scholar

[26] Khalil, H. A., Y. Davoudpour, M. N. Islam, A. Mustapha, K. Sudesh, R. Dungani, et al. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 99, 2014, pp. 649–665.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Brinchi, L., F. Cotana, E. Fortunati, and J. M. Kenny. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and application. Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 94, 2013, pp. 154–169.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Chen, Q., J. Xiong, G. Chen, and T. Tan. Preparation and characterization of highly transparent hydrophobic nanocellulose film using corn husks as main material. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 158, 2020, pp. 781–789.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.250Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Chen, Z., P. Li, Q. Ji, Y. Xing, X. Ma, and Y. Xia. All-polysaccharide composite films based on calcium alginate reinforced synergistically by multidimensional cellulose and hemicellulose fractionated from corn husks. Materials Today Communications, Vol. 34, 2023, id. 105090.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105090Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ponce, J., J. G. da Silva Andrade, L. N. dos Santos, M. K. Bulla, B. C. Barros, S. L. Favaro, et al. Alkali pretreated sugarcane bagasse, rice husk and corn husk wastes as lignocellulosic biosorbents for dyes. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications, Vol. 2, 2021, id. 100061.10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100061Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ibrahim, M. I. J., S. M. Sapuan, E. S. Zainudin, and M. Y. M. Zuhri. Potential of using multiscale corn husk fiber as reinforcing filler in cornstarch-based biocomposites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 139, 2019, pp. 596–604.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Polat, S., M. K. Uslu, A. Aygün, and M. Certel. The effects of the addition of corn husk fibre, kaolin and beeswax on cross-linked corn starch foam. Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 2, 2013, pp. 267–276.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.12.017Search in Google Scholar

[33] Romani, A., R. Suriano, and M. Levi. Biomass waste materials through extrusion-based additive manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 386, 2023, id. 135779.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135779Search in Google Scholar

[34] Youssef, A. M., A. El-Gendy, and S. Kamel. Evaluation of corn husk fibers reinforced recycled low density polyethylene composites. Materials Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 152, 2015, pp. 26–33.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kamath, S. S. and R. K. Chandrappa. Additives used in natural fibre reinforced polymer composites-a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 50, No. 5, 2022, pp. 1417–1424.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.331Search in Google Scholar

[36] Rajeshkuma, G., S. A. Seshadri, G. L. Devnani, M. R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, J. P. Maran, et al. Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites – A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 310, 2021, id. 127483.10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127483Search in Google Scholar

[37] Murariu, M. and P. Dubois. PLA composites: From production to properties. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Vol. 107, 2016, pp. 17–46.10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Bhagia, S., K. Bornani, R. Agrawal, A. Satlewal, J. Ďurkovič, R. Lagaňa, et al. Critical review of FDM 3D printing of PLA biocomposites filled with biomass resources, characterization, biodegradability, upcycling and opportunities for biorefineries. Applied Materials Today, Vol. 24, 2021, id. 101078.10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101078Search in Google Scholar

[39] Amenorfe, L. P., E. S. Agorku, F. Sarpong, and R. B. Voegborlo. Innovative exploration of additive incorporated biopolymer-based composites. Scientific African, Vol. 17, 2022, id. e01359.10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01359Search in Google Scholar

[40] Cisneros-López, E. O., A. K. Pal, A. U. Rodriguez, F. Wu, M. Misra, D. F. Mielewski, et al. Recycled poly(lactic acid)–based 3D printed sustainable biocomposites: a comparative study with injection molding. Materials Today Sustainability, Vol. 7, No. 8, 2020, id. 100027.10.1016/j.mtsust.2019.100027Search in Google Scholar

[41] Arif, Z. U., M. Y. Khalid, M. F. Sheikh, A. Zolfagharian, and M. Bodaghi. Biopolymeric sustainable materials and their emerging applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2022, id. 108159.10.1016/j.jece.2022.108159Search in Google Scholar

[42] Wang, J., M. Euring, K. Ostendorf, and K. Zhang. Biobased materials for food packaging. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1–13.10.1016/j.jobab.2021.11.004Search in Google Scholar

[43] Parimalam, M., M. R. Islm, and R. M. Yunus. Effects of nanosilica, zinc oxide, titanium oxide on the performance of epoxy hybrid nanocoating in presence of rubber latex. Polymer Testing, Vol. 70, 2018, pp. 197–207.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[44] Azman, N. A. N., M. R. Islam, M. Parimalam, N. M. Rachidi, and M. Mupit. Mechanical, structural, thermal and morphological properties of epoxy composites filled with chicken eggshell and inorganic CaCO3 particles. Polymer Bulletin (Berlin, Germany), Vol. 77, 2020, pp. 805–821.10.1007/s00289-019-02779-ySearch in Google Scholar

[45] Landers, M. and S. Choi. Small-scale, storable paper biobatteries activated via human bodily fluids. Nano Energy, Vol. 97, 2022, id. 107227.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107227Search in Google Scholar

[46] Gao, Y., J. H. Cho, J. Ryu, and S. Choi. A scalable yarn-based biobattery for biochemical energy harvesting in smart textiles. Nano Energy, Vol. 74, 2020, id. 104897.10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104897Search in Google Scholar

[47] Yazdi, A. A., R. Preite, R. D. Milton, D. P. Hickey, S. D. Minteer, and J. Xu. Rechargeable membraneless glucose biobattery: Towards solid-state cathodes for implantable enzymatic devices. Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 343, 2017, pp. 103–108.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[48] Stolarczyk, K., M. Sepelowska, D. Lyp, K. Żelechowska, J. F. Biernat, J. Rogalski, et al. Hybrid biobattery based on arylated carbon nanotubes and laccase. Bioelectrochemistry, Vol. 87, 2012, pp. 154–163.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Vinayak, V., M. J. Khan, S. Varjani, G. D. Saratale, R. G. Saratale, and S. K. Bhatia. Microbial fuel cells for remediation of environmental pollutants and value addition: Special focus on coupling diatom microbial fuel cells with photocatalytic and photoelectric fuel cells. Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 338, 2021, pp. 5–19.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Jeevanandam, J., V. Vadanasundari, S. Pan, A. Barhoum, and M. K. Danquah. Chapter 1 - Bionanotechnology and Bionanomaterials: Emerging Applications, Market, and Commercialization, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 3–44.10.1016/B978-0-12-823915-5.00009-5Search in Google Scholar

[51] Tangboriboon, N., R. Kunanuruksapong, and A. Sirivat. Preparation and properties of calcium oxide from eggshells via calcination. Materials Science-Poland, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2012, pp. 313–322.10.2478/s13536-012-0055-7Search in Google Scholar

[52] Hallensleben, M. L. Polyvinyl Compounds. Others. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.10.1002/14356007.a21_743Search in Google Scholar

[53] Ensafi, A. A., Z. Saberi, and N. Kazemifard. 13 - Functionalized nanomaterial-based medical sensor for point-of-care applications: An overview. Principles, Fabrication methods, and applications woodhead publishing series in electronic and optical materials, 2022, pp. 277–308.10.1016/B978-0-12-823788-5.00018-1Search in Google Scholar

[54] Sakka, S. Chapter 11.1.2 - Sol–Gel Process and Applications. Handbook of Advanced Ceramics: Materials, Applications, Processing and Properties, Elsevier Inc., 2nd edn, 2013, pp. 883–91.10.1016/B978-0-12-385469-8.00048-4Search in Google Scholar

[55] Yilmaz, E. and M. Soylak. Functionalized nanomaterials for sample preparation methods. Handbook of Nanomaterials in Analytical Chemistry. Modern Trends in Analysis, Elsevier Inc., 2020, pp. 375–413.10.1016/B978-0-12-816699-4.00015-3Search in Google Scholar

[56] Fagbemigun, T. K., O. D. Fagbemi, O. Otitoju, E. Mgbachiuzor, and C. C. Igme. Pulp and papermaking potential of corn husk. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2014, pp. 209–213.10.9734/BJAST/2014/10745Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hossain, MdS, Jahan, S. A., and Ahmed, S. Crystallographic characterization of bio-waste material originated CaCO3, green-synthesized CaO and Ca(OH)2. Results in Chemistry, Vol. 5, 2023, id. 100822.10.1016/j.rechem.2023.100822Search in Google Scholar

[58] Roy, A. and J. Bhattacharya. Microwave assisted synthesis of CaO nanoparticles and use in waste water treatment. Nano Technology, Vol. 3, 2011, pp. 565–568.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Mirghiasi, Z., F. Bakhtiari, E. Darezereshki, and E. Esmaeilzadeh. Preparation and characterization of CaO nanoparticles from Ca(OH)2 by direct thermal decomposition method. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 20, 2014, pp. 113–117.10.1016/j.jiec.2013.04.018Search in Google Scholar

[60] Tizo, M. S., L. A. V. Blanco, A. C. Q. Cagas, B. R. B. Dela Cruz, J. C. Encoy, J. V. Gunting, et al. Efficiency of calcium carbonate from eggshells as an adsorbent for cadmium removal in aqueous solution. Sustainable Environment Research, Vol. 28, 2018, pp. 326–332.10.1016/j.serj.2018.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[61] Ayodeji, A. A., O. E. Modupe, B. Rasheed, and J. M. Ayodele. Data on CaO and eggshell catalysts used for biodiesel production. Data in Brief, Vol. 19, 2018, pp. 1466–1473.10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[62] El-sherif, A. A., A. M. Hamad, E. Shams-Eldin, H. A. A. Mohamed, A. M. Ahmed, M. A. Mohamed, et al. Power of recycling waste cooking oil into biodiesel via green CaO-based eggshells/Ag heterogeneous nanocatalyst. Renewable Energy, Vol. 202, 2023, pp. 1412–1423.10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.041Search in Google Scholar

[63] Debnath, B., P. Duarah, D. Haldar, and M. K. Purkait. Improving the properties of corn starch films for application as packaging material via reinforcement with microcrystalline cellulose synthesized from elephant grass. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, Vol. 34, 2022, id. 100937.10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100937Search in Google Scholar

[64] Wu, H., D. Xiao, J. Lu, T. Li, C. Jiao, S. Li, et al. Preparation and Properties of Biocomposite Films Based on Poly(vinylalcohol) Incorporated with Eggshell Powder as a Biological Filler. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 28, 2020, pp. 2020–2028.10.1007/s10924-020-01747-2Search in Google Scholar

[65] Liu, B., H. Xu, H. Zhao, W. Liu, L. Zhao, and Y. Li. Preparation and characterization of intelligent starch/PVA films for simultaneous colorimetric indication and antimicrobial activity for food packaging applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 157, 2017, pp. 842–849.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] Pirsa, S., I. K. Sani, and S. S. Mirtalebi. Nano-biocomposite based color sensors: Investigation of structure, function, and applications in intelligent food packaging. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, Vol. 31, 2022, id. 100789.10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100789Search in Google Scholar

[67] Pirsa, S., E. Farshchi, and L. Roufegarinejad. Antioxidant/Antimicrobial Film Based on Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Gelatin/TiO2–Ag Nano-Composite. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 28, 2020, pp. 3154–3163.10.1007/s10924-020-01846-0Search in Google Scholar

[68] Pająk, P., I. Przetaczek-Rożnowska, and L. Juszczak. Development and physicochemical, thermal and mechanical properties of edible films based on pumpkin, lentil and quinoa starches. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 138, 2019, pp. 441–449.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Thakur, V. K. and M. R. Kessler. Self-healing polymer nanocomposite materials: A review. Polymer, Vol. 69, 2015, pp. 369–383.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.086Search in Google Scholar

[70] Nikolic, M. V., Z. Z. Vasiljevic, S. Auger, and J. Vidic. Metal oxide nanoparticles for safe active and intelligent food packaging. Trends in Food Science and Technology, Vol. 116, 2021, pp. 655–668.10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.019Search in Google Scholar

[71] Toumvong, W., P. Chitcharoentaweechoke, and N. Tangboriboon. Bio-dielectric based on superconductors yttrium calcium barium copper oxide (YCaBa2Cu3O7-x) from eggshell as calcium oxide source via sol-gel process. Materials Science-Poland, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2021, pp. 305–318.10.2478/msp-2021-0026Search in Google Scholar

[72] Kasap, S. O. Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, New York, USA: Mcgraw-Hill: 2002, 2nd edn, p. 745. ISBN 10: 0072393424/ISBN 13: 9780072393422.Search in Google Scholar

[73] Pirsa, S. and S. Asadi. Innovative smart and biodegradable packaging for margarine based on a nano composite polylactic acid/lycopene film. Food Additives & Contaminants, Part A: Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, 2021, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1–14.10.1080/19440049.2021.1891299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Cazón, P. and M. Vázquez. Mechanical and barrier properties of chitosan combined with other components as food packaging film. Environmental Chemistry Letters, Vol. 18, 2020, pp. 257–267.10.1007/s10311-019-00936-3Search in Google Scholar

[75] Ramon-Marquez, T., A. L. Medina-Castillo, A. Fernandez-Gutierrez, and J. F. Fernandez-Sanchez. Novel optical sensing film based on a functional nonwoven nanofibre mat for an easy, fast and highly selective and sensitive detection of tryptamine in beer. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Vol. 79, 2016, pp. 600–607.10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[76] Jabraili, A., S. Pirsa, M. K. Pirouzifard, and S. Amiri. Biodegradable nanocomposite film based on gluten/silica/calcium chloride: Physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds extraction capacity. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 29, 2021, pp. 2557–2571. 10.1007/s10924-021-02050-4Search in Google Scholar

[77] Sani, I. K., S. Pirsa, and S. Tagı. Preparation of chitosan/zinc oxide/Melissa officinalis essential oil nano-composite film and evaluation of physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties by response surface method. Polymer Testing, Vol. 79, 2019, id. 106004.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106004Search in Google Scholar

[78] Barska, A. and J. Wyrwa. Innovations in the food packaging market - intelligent packaging - a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2017, pp. 1–6.10.17221/268/2016-CJFSSearch in Google Scholar

[79] Deng, Y., K. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Dong, and S. Li. A novel acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on nano-porous pseudo carbon paste electrode modified with gold nanoparticles for detection of methyl parathion. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Vol. 16, No. 9, 2016, pp. 9460–9467.10.1166/jnn.2016.13059Search in Google Scholar

[80] Nikhil, B., J. Pawan, F. Nello, and E. Pedro. Introduction to biosensors. Essays in Biochemistry, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–8.10.1042/EBC20150001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[81] Vanderroost, M., P. Ragaert, F. Devlieghere, and B. De Meulenaer. Intelligent food packaging: The next generation. Trends in Food Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2014, pp. 47–62.10.1016/j.tifs.2014.06.009Search in Google Scholar

[82] Hench, L. L. and J. K. West. Principles of Electronic Ceramics, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, USA, ISBN 10: 0471618217/ISBN 13: 9780471618218 1990, 576 pp.Search in Google Scholar

[83] Pirsa, D. Design of a portable gas chromatography with a conducting polymer nanocomposite detector device and a method to analyze a gas mixture. Journal of Separation Science, Vol. 48, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1724–1730.10.1002/jssc.201601393Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Yousefi, H., H. M. Su, S. M. Imani, K. M. Alkhaldi, C. D. Filipe, and T. F. Didar. Intelligent food packaging: A review of smart sensing technologies for monitoring food quality. ACS Sensors, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2019, pp. 808–821.10.1021/acssensors.9b00440Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Yun, D., H. Cai, Y. Liu, L. Xiao, J. Song, and J. Liu. Development of active and intelligent films based on cassava starch and Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) anthocyanins. RSC Advances, Vol. 9, No. 53, 2019, pp. 30905–30916.10.1039/C9RA06628DSearch in Google Scholar

[86] Zhang, X., Y. Liu, H. Yong, Y. Qin, J. Liu, and J. Liu. Development of multifunctional food packaging films based on chitosan, TiO2 nanoparticles and anthocyanin-rich black plum peel extract. Food Hydrocolloids, Vol. 94, 2019, pp. 80–92.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.009Search in Google Scholar

[87] Qin, Y., Y. Liu, H. Yong, J. Liu, X. Zhang, and J. Liu. Preparation and characterization of active and intelligent packaging films based on cassava starch and anthocyanins from Lycium ruthenicum Murr. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 134, 2019, pp. 80–90.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[88] Poças, M. F., T. F. Delgado, and F. A. Oliveira. Chapter 9: Smart packaging technologies for fruits and vegetables. Smart Packaging Technologies for Fast Moving Consumer Goods, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008, pp. 151–166.10.1002/9780470753699.ch9Search in Google Scholar

[89] Jayakumar, A., K. V. Heera, T. S. Sumi, M. Joseph, S. Mathew, G. Praveen, et al. Starch-PVA composite films with zinc-oxide nanoparticles and phytochemicals as intelligent pH sensing wraps for food packaging application. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Vol. 136, 2019, pp. 395–403.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-06-09
Revised: 2023-07-18
Accepted: 2023-09-19
Published Online: 2023-10-16

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Review Articles
  2. Progress in preparation and ablation resistance of ultra-high-temperature ceramics modified C/C composites for extreme environment
  3. Solar lighting systems applied in photocatalysis to treat pollutants – A review
  4. Technological advances in three-dimensional skin tissue engineering
  5. Hybrid magnesium matrix composites: A review of reinforcement philosophies, mechanical and tribological characteristics
  6. Application prospect of calcium peroxide nanoparticles in biomedical field
  7. Research progress on basalt fiber-based functionalized composites
  8. Evaluation of the properties and applications of FRP bars and anchors: A review
  9. A critical review on mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties of industrial by-product-based geopolymer composites
  10. Multifunctional engineered cementitious composites modified with nanomaterials and their applications: An overview
  11. Role of bioglass derivatives in tissue regeneration and repair: A review
  12. Research progress on properties of cement-based composites incorporating graphene oxide
  13. Properties of ultra-high performance concrete and conventional concrete with coal bottom ash as aggregate replacement and nanoadditives: A review
  14. A scientometric review of the literature on the incorporation of steel fibers in ultra-high-performance concrete with research mapping knowledge
  15. Weldability of high nitrogen steels: A review
  16. Application of waste recycle tire steel fibers as a construction material in concrete
  17. Wear properties of graphene-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite: A review
  18. Experimental investigations of electrodeposited Zn–Ni, Zn–Co, and Ni–Cr–Co–based novel coatings on AA7075 substrate to ameliorate the mechanical, abrasion, morphological, and corrosion properties for automotive applications
  19. Research evolution on self-healing asphalt: A scientometric review for knowledge mapping
  20. Recent developments in the mechanical properties of hybrid fiber metal laminates in the automotive industry: A review
  21. A review of microscopic characterization and related properties of fiber-incorporated cement-based materials
  22. Comparison and review of classical and machine learning-based constitutive models for polymers used in aeronautical thermoplastic composites
  23. Gold nanoparticle-based strategies against SARS-CoV-2: A review
  24. Poly-ferric sulphate as superior coagulant: A review on preparation methods and properties
  25. A review on ceramic waste-based concrete: A step toward sustainable concrete
  26. Modification of the structure and properties of oxide layers on aluminium alloys: A review
  27. A review of magnetically driven swimming microrobots: Material selection, structure design, control method, and applications
  28. Polyimide–nickel nanocomposites fabrication, properties, and applications: A review
  29. Design and analysis of timber-concrete-based civil structures and its applications: A brief review
  30. Effect of fiber treatment on physical and mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review
  31. Blending and functionalisation modification of 3D printed polylactic acid for fused deposition modeling
  32. A critical review on functionally graded ceramic materials for cutting tools: Current trends and future prospects
  33. Heme iron as potential iron fortifier for food application – characterization by material techniques
  34. An overview of the research trends on fiber-reinforced shotcrete for construction applications
  35. High-entropy alloys: A review of their performance as promising materials for hydrogen and molten salt storage
  36. Effect of the axial compression ratio on the seismic behavior of resilient concrete walls with concealed column stirrups
  37. Research Articles
  38. Effect of fiber orientation and elevated temperature on the mechanical properties of unidirectional continuous kenaf reinforced PLA composites
  39. Optimizing the ECAP processing parameters of pure Cu through experimental, finite element, and response surface approaches
  40. Study on the solidification property and mechanism of soft soil based on the industrial waste residue
  41. Preparation and photocatalytic degradation of Sulfamethoxazole by g-C3N4 nano composite samples
  42. Impact of thermal modification on color and chemical changes of African padauk, merbau, mahogany, and iroko wood species
  43. The evaluation of the mechanical properties of glass, kenaf, and honeycomb fiber-reinforced composite
  44. Evaluation of a novel steel box-soft body combination for bridge protection against ship collision
  45. Study on the uniaxial compression constitutive relationship of modified yellow mud from minority dwelling in western Sichuan, China
  46. Ultrasonic longitudinal torsion-assisted biotic bone drilling: An experimental study
  47. Green synthesis, characterizations, and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles from Themeda quadrivalvis, in conjugation with macrolide antibiotics against respiratory pathogens
  48. Performance analysis of WEDM during the machining of Inconel 690 miniature gear using RSM and ANN modeling approaches
  49. Biosynthesis of Ag/bentonite, ZnO/bentonite, and Ag/ZnO/bentonite nanocomposites by aqueous leaf extract of Hagenia abyssinica for antibacterial activities
  50. Eco-friendly MoS2/waste coconut oil nanofluid for machining of magnesium implants
  51. Silica and kaolin reinforced aluminum matrix composite for heat storage
  52. Optimal design of glazed hollow bead thermal insulation mortar containing fly ash and slag based on response surface methodology
  53. Hemp seed oil nanoemulsion with Sapindus saponins as a potential carrier for iron supplement and vitamin D
  54. A numerical study on thin film flow and heat transfer enhancement for copper nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol
  55. Research on complex multimodal vibration characteristics of offshore platform
  56. Applicability of fractal models for characterising pore structure of hybrid basalt–polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete
  57. Influence of sodium silicate to precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of the metakaolin/fly ash alkali-activated sustainable mortar using manufactured sand
  58. An experimental study of bending resistance of multi-size PFRC beams
  59. Characterization, biocompatibility, and optimization of electrospun SF/PCL composite nanofiber films
  60. Morphological classification method and data-driven estimation of the joint roughness coefficient by consideration of two-order asperity
  61. Prediction and simulation of mechanical properties of borophene-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites using molecular dynamics and FEA
  62. Nanoemulsions of essential oils stabilized with saponins exhibiting antibacterial and antioxidative properties
  63. Fabrication and performance analysis of sustainable municipal solid waste incineration fly ash alkali-activated acoustic barriers
  64. Electrostatic-spinning construction of HCNTs@Ti3C2T x MXenes hybrid aerogel microspheres for tunable microwave absorption
  65. Investigation of the mechanical properties, surface quality, and energy efficiency of a fused filament fabrication for PA6
  66. Experimental study on mechanical properties of coal gangue base geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete reinforced by steel fiber and nano-Al2O3
  67. Hybrid bio-fiber/bio-ceramic composite materials: Mechanical performance, thermal stability, and morphological analysis
  68. Experimental study on recycled steel fiber-reinforced concrete under repeated impact
  69. Effect of rare earth Nd on the microstructural transformation and mechanical properties of 7xxx series aluminum alloys
  70. Color match evaluation using instrumental method for three single-shade resin composites before and after in-office bleaching
  71. Exploring temperature-resilient recycled aggregate concrete with waste rubber: An experimental and multi-objective optimization analysis
  72. Study on aging mechanism of SBS/SBR compound-modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics
  73. Evolution of the pore structure of pumice aggregate concrete and the effect on compressive strength
  74. Effect of alkaline treatment time of fibers and microcrystalline cellulose addition on mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester composites reinforced by cantala fibers
  75. Optimization of eggshell particles to produce eco-friendly green fillers with bamboo reinforcement in organic friction materials
  76. An effective approach to improve microstructure and tribological properties of cold sprayed Al alloys
  77. Luminescence and temperature-sensing properties of Li+, Na+, or K+, Tm3+, and Yb3+ co-doped Bi2WO6 phosphors
  78. Effect of molybdenum tailings aggregate on mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites and stirrup-confined ECC stub columns
  79. Experimental study on the seismic performance of short shear walls comprising cold-formed steel and high-strength reinforced concrete with concealed bracing
  80. Failure criteria and microstructure evolution mechanism of the alkali–silica reaction of concrete
  81. Mechanical, fracture-deformation, and tribology behavior of fillers-reinforced sisal fiber composites for lightweight automotive applications
  82. UV aging behavior evolution characterization of HALS-modified asphalt based on micro-morphological features
  83. Preparation of VO2/graphene/SiC film by water vapor oxidation
  84. A semi-empirical model for predicting carbonation depth of RAC under two-dimensional conditions
  85. Comparison of the physical properties of different polyimide nanocomposite films containing organoclays varying in alkyl chain lengths
  86. Effects of freeze–thaw cycles on micro and meso-structural characteristics and mechanical properties of porous asphalt mixtures
  87. Flexural performance of a new type of slightly curved arc HRB400 steel bars reinforced one-way concrete slabs
  88. Alkali-activated binder based on red mud with class F fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag under ambient temperature
  89. Facile synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets for effective degradation of organic pollutants via ball milling
  90. DEM study on the loading rate effect of marble under different confining pressures
  91. Conductive and self-cleaning composite membranes from corn husk nanofiber embedded with inorganic fillers (TiO2, CaO, and eggshell) by sol–gel and casting processes for smart membrane applications
  92. Laser re-melting of modified multimodal Cr3C2–NiCr coatings by HVOF: Effect on the microstructure and anticorrosion properties
  93. Damage constitutive model of jointed rock mass considering structural features and load effect
  94. Thermosetting polymer composites: Manufacturing and properties study
  95. CSG compressive strength prediction based on LSTM and interpretable machine learning
  96. Axial compression behavior and stress–strain relationship of slurry-wrapping treatment recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tube short columns
  97. Space-time evolution characteristics of loaded gas-bearing coal fractures based on industrial μCT
  98. Dual-biprism-based single-camera high-speed 3D-digital image correlation for deformation measurement on sandwich structures under low velocity impact
  99. Effects of cold deformation modes on microstructure uniformity and mechanical properties of large 2219 Al–Cu alloy rings
  100. Basalt fiber as natural reinforcement to improve the performance of ecological grouting slurry for the conservation of earthen sites
  101. Interaction of micro-fluid structure in a pressure-driven duct flow with a nearby placed current-carrying wire: A numerical investigation
  102. A simulation modeling methodology considering random multiple shots for shot peening process
  103. Optimization and characterization of composite modified asphalt with pyrolytic carbon black and chicken feather fiber
  104. Synthesis, characterization, and application of the novel nanomagnet adsorbent for the removal of Cr(vi) ions
  105. Multi-perspective structural integrity-based computational investigations on airframe of Gyrodyne-configured multi-rotor UAV through coupled CFD and FEA approaches for various lightweight sandwich composites and alloys
  106. Influence of PVA fibers on the durability of cementitious composites under the wet–heat–salt coupling environment
  107. Compressive behavior of BFRP-confined ceramsite concrete: An experimental study and stress–strain model
  108. Interval models for uncertainty analysis and degradation prediction of the mechanical properties of rubber
  109. Preparation of PVDF-HFP/CB/Ni nanocomposite films for piezoelectric energy harvesting
  110. Frost resistance and life prediction of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste polypropylene fiber
  111. Synthetic leathers as a possible source of chemicals and odorous substances in indoor environment
  112. Mechanical properties of seawater volcanic scoria aggregate concrete-filled circular GFRP and stainless steel tubes under axial compression
  113. Effect of curved anchor impellers on power consumption and hydrodynamic parameters of yield stress fluids (Bingham–Papanastasiou model) in stirred tanks
  114. All-dielectric tunable zero-refractive index metamaterials based on phase change materials
  115. Influence of ultrasonication time on the various properties of alkaline-treated mango seed waste filler reinforced PVA biocomposite
  116. Research on key casting process of high-grade CNC machine tool bed nodular cast iron
  117. Latest research progress of SiCp/Al composite for electronic packaging
  118. Special Issue on 3D and 4D Printing of Advanced Functional Materials - Part I
  119. Molecular dynamics simulation on electrohydrodynamic atomization: Stable dripping mode by pre-load voltage
  120. Research progress of metal-based additive manufacturing in medical implants
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2023-0125/html
Scroll to top button