Startseite Use of enzymatic processes in the tanning of leather materials
Artikel Open Access

Use of enzymatic processes in the tanning of leather materials

  • Magdalena Lasoń-Rydel , Katarzyna Sieczyńska , Dorota Gendaszewska , Katarzyna Ławińska EMAIL logo und Tomasz P. Olejnik
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Februar 2024

Abstract

The policy of sustainable development, the need to save natural environmental resources, and the use of waste as raw materials in new production processes allow the use of enzymes in many industries. Enzymatic tanning and chrome tanning are two different methods used in the leather industry to transform raw hides into a durable and usable material. Enzymatic tanning uses natural enzymes that are biodegradable and environmentally friendly. Additionally, enzymatic tanning requires less water and generates less waste than chrome tanning. Moreover, enzymatic tanning can result in softer and more flexible leather with better uniformity. Enzymes selectively break down collagen fibers, resulting in a more even tanning and a consistent leather product. The use of combined enzymatic technologies with non-obvious leather finishing methodologies in tanning is forced by European Union regulations limiting the use of hazardous substances and generating significant amounts of corrosive wastewater for the environment. However, tanning with enzymes is not a perfect process; therefore, this work presents the advantages and disadvantages of tanning with enzymes and describes new technological trends in the tanning industry.

1 Introduction

The European Union (EU) is an important global supplier of leather to the international market. Italy accounts for around 15% of the world’s leather production and around 60% of total European production. About 40–90% of the leather products fabricated in individual member states of the EU are exported. Asian regions, particularly the Far East, are developing economies and are becoming more and more important markets for EU tanners. This industry is mainly relevant in developing countries, such as Brazil, China, and India, with Brazil having the largest commercial cattle herd in the world. Other countries also have large leather goods industries. For example, there are 2,009 tanneries in India, which are gaining more and more market share, and in Brazil, finished leather is responsible for 59.6% of leather export revenue [1] (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               Use of enzymes in various industrial sectors [2].
Figure 1

Use of enzymes in various industrial sectors [2].

Leather products remain the consumer’s first choice due to their durability, flexibility, and uniqueness. Leather is still the most optimal material for footwear as it has many properties, which are important from a comfort and healthiness point of view (especially in the case of children’s footwear) [3,4]. At the same time, the most effective form of recycling livestock skins is the processing and finishing of skins by tanning. However, the leather industry produces toxic waste and non-biodegradable industrial pollutants, as well as consuming large amounts of energy and water. Pollution from the leather industry poses a serious threat to the environment and human health [5], breaking the boundary of clean production [6] and the principles of the circular economy. Environmental degradation has attracted the attention of the business world, leading to the implementation of practices aimed at reducing environmental pollution and creating a circular economy [7,8,9,10]. Chemical dyes and colorants are being replaced with bio-based dyes. Chrome split formation can be reduced if splitting is performed before tanning. Water-based liquors can replace organic solvent-based liquors, reducing hydrocarbon emissions. As an alternative to traditional leather preservation, phyto-based preservation options for raw hides and skins can be used, which reduces total dissolved solids and chloride content by approximately 70%. Traditional unhairing can be replaced with oxidative unhairing, which reduces biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) by approximately 40%. There are high-performance tanning technologies based on copolymers that increase the absorption of tannins to the level of 95%, for example, glyoxal/cotton wool tanning, which is characterized by the production of leather with increased organoleptic properties. Modern leather dyeing systems use high-efficiency dyeing systems, e.g., a copolymer of collagen hydrolysate grafted with starch, which exhausts the dyeing bath by up to 96%. In order to reduce unpleasant odors, and often volatile organic substances and odors harmful to human health and the environment, systems based on biofilters are used to capture harmful gas emissions from the tannery environment.

Environmentally friendly leather production technologies in the tanning industry concern not only the use of new methods in the area of leather production, tanning, and finishing processes, but also in the processes of utilization of harmful tanning waste; e.g., a biodegradation system based on the laccase enzyme is being tested for resistant wastewater after tanning [11]. One of the most innovative directions in the development of new technologies in leather production processes is the use of enzymes. The most widely used group of enzymes in the tanning industry are proteolytic enzymes. Proteases can be found in almost all living organisms at some point during their lifetimes [12]. Proteases have been broadly grouped into three primary classes based on the sources from which they are obtained: animal proteases, plant proteases, and microbial proteases. Proteolytic enzymes are bioactive macromolecules that constitute indispensable parts of life on earth, including microorganisms, animals, and plants [13]. Leather manufacture consists of mainly three steps of processing: (a) pre-tanning also known as beam house process, (b) tanning, and (c) post-tanning. Conventional chemical-based leather processing involves the use of many hazardous chemicals that generate and discharge a wide range of pollutants. The use of enzymes in tanning processes, e.g. alkaline proteases with optimal activity in a wide pH range (neutral to alkaline reaction) significantly reduce the level of pollution generated by the tanning industry [14]. These enzymes are ideal for commercial applications due to their compatibility with metal ions, compatibility with commercially available detergents, denaturants, and resistance to pH and temperature changes. Although this is not the only direction in the development of new technologies in leather-making processes, with the development of enzyme engineering, green and efficient proteases and biotechnology processes have been introduced into the leather-making process. The interdependencies of the use of environmentally friendly technologies in tanning, taking into account their impact on the natural environment and the mechanisms of the circular economy, are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 
               Leather processing showing basic raw materials and sewage [14].
Figure 2

Leather processing showing basic raw materials and sewage [14].

2 Transformation of raw leather into finished leather

Figure 3 illustrates the transformation of raw leather into finished leather. To transform raw hides and skins into finished hides, the skins are subjected to numerous physical, physicochemical, and chemical operations. The most important steps are divided between beamhouse operations (salt shake-off to bating), tanning operations (pickling and tanning), post-tanning operations (deacidulation to fixing), pre-finishing operations (samming to sanding), and finishing operations [15]. The following list provides a brief description of the various steps involved in the tanning process.

Figure 3 
               Leather processing showing basic raw materials and sewage [15].
Figure 3

Leather processing showing basic raw materials and sewage [15].

2.1 Processes in the wet workshop

Soaking allows the skins to reabsorb any water lost after skinning, salting, and transportation. Soaking is also used to clean the hides of feces, blood, and dust and remove fibrous material. The soaking methods used depend on the condition of the skins. The hides are usually pre-soaked to remove salt and dust. The main soaking operation may last from several hours to several days [16]. Putrefying bacteria may develop during soaking. To limit their activity, biocides are added. Depending on the type of raw material, other additives may also be used, e.g., surfactants and enzyme preparations [17]. Unhairing and liming are performed to remove the hair, cuticle, and to some extent proteins fibrillary skins. The skins are thereby prepared for the removal of adhering flesh and fat in the fleshing process. The fibrous structure of the hide is opened in the liming step (by swelling) for cleaning and degreasing [18]. The keratin from the hair and epidermis is also removed from the hide by the action of reducing agents, usually sodium sulfide. After the liming process, the presence of lime or other alkali in the hides is no longer necessary and may have an adverse effect on further tanning. The descaling process involves a gradual lowering of the pH (by rinsing with fresh water or weak solutions of acids or salts, e.g., ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, or boric acid) and increasing the temperature. Residues of chemicals and decomposed components are removed from the hide.

2.2 Tannery process

In the tanning process, collagen fibers are stabilized with tannins, increasing their resistance to mechanical factors and high temperatures so that the hide is less prone to decay and rotting. Basic chromium sulfate is added to the pickled hide in drum II, with continuous stirring for 4–6 h to allow for absorption. To promote the final reaction of chromium to collagen, the temperature is increased to around 50°C and the pH of the bath is increased to 3.8–4.0 by the addition of basifying agents, such as sodium basic salts or magnesium oxide [14]. Unfortunately, the presence of these substances leads to high COD, BOD, suspended solids, and conductivity [19].

The tanning process modifies the rawhide by stabilizing the collagen fibers against enzymatic attack, mold, and chemical damage. Chrome tanning is still the most popular method of tanning leather, due to its ability to produce high-quality leather [20], with properties such as excellent hydrothermal stability, better dyeing properties, and softness [21]. The chromium tanning process is not an effective technology, due to the absorption rate of chromium Cr(iii) by skin collagen, which ranges from 55 to 70% [22]. A large amount of chromium is discharged into the wastewater, resulting in large losses of chromium tannin. The process increases environmental pollution and wastewater treatment costs and additionally causes huge losses of chromium [23].

Untreated tannery wastewater contains up to 3,000–3,500 mg/l of chromium, which classifies tannery waste as one of the most dangerous industrial wastes [24]. Under oxidizing environmental conditions, Cr(iii) is easily oxidized to Cr(vi), which is harmful to humans and causes allergies, cancer, or necrosis of the liver and kidneys. Cr(vi) causes significant damage to the environment. It reduces the rate of seed germination, leads to high teratogenic and carcinogenic rates, threatens the growth of aquatic organisms, and finally threatens the ecosphere by affecting the process of mitosis [24].

2.3 Post-tanning or bath finishing

Neutralization and rinsing followed by retanning, dyeing, and greasing are most often carried out in one technological container. Specialized activities can also be carried out at this stage of production, to ensure that the leather has certain properties, e.g., hydrophobic or waterproof properties, oleophobicity, gas permeability, flammability resistance, or antistatic properties [25].

3 Enzymatic processes

Enzymatic processes have always been part of leather processing. The first patent appeared at the beginning of the twentieth century and concerned the use of enzymes in bating [26]. In Poland, enzymatic processes were included as part of an industrial scientific description of collagen technology in the 1960s, but they were still poorly understood. Today, enzymes are used for many purposes in the industrial tanning and finishing of leather. Nonetheless, despite the obvious environmental benefits resulting from the use of enzymes in the leather industry, this technology has been developing much slower than technologies for the use of enzymes in the food, pharmaceutical, or cosmetic industries. Enzyme-based processes are used in some stages of leather production, including [27,28]:

  • soaking – enzymes have been developed for loosening the scud and initiating fiber opening, producing leather with a less wrinkled grain, decreasing soaking time, improving softness and elasticity, and increasing area yield.

  • unhairing – enzymes are used for (partial) elimination of toxic chemicals, reducing the pollution load, enabling milder process conditions, and providing non-toxic working conditions. The use of enzymes results in leather with better smoothness and strength properties, simplifying the pre-tanning process. Good quality hair with commercial value can be recovered.

  • bating – removes non-leather foaming proteinaceous materials, for example, albumins and globulins, enhances the penetration of tanning chemicals and other technological process, smooth and supple leather. Bating is entirely dependent on proteolytic enzymes. Among others, proteases have long been used in the bating stage of leather processing.

  • degreasing – eliminates chemicals (solvents, surfactants), facilitates even penetration of tanning materials, fat liquor and dyes, and results in soft leather.

  • tanning and post-tanning – improves softness of leather, improves properties such as dye affinity, uniformity of color, dye penetration, and absorption [28].

Enzymes have been widely used in leather making during soaking, dehairing, bating, and degreasing steps, which are depicted in Figure 4 [22].

Figure 4 
               Mechanism of enzymatic actions they perform on skin at different leather stages [22].
Figure 4

Mechanism of enzymatic actions they perform on skin at different leather stages [22].

3.1 Soaking

Soaking is the first stage of a wet workshop in leather processing technology. Soaking can be divided into two stages [29]:

  1. The first soaking is used for preliminary cleaning of the skin by removing large amounts of dirt and unwanted materials.

  2. The second soaking uses water and small quantities of imbibing substances to hydrate the skin proteins and open the contracted fibers of the dried skins, solubilizing the denatured proteins and eliminating the salt used in the preservation step. Residual blood, excrement, and earth are removed from the skin [30].

To produce multifunctional enzyme preparations, multi-enzymatic systems are used. The enzyme preparations most frequently used in the soaking process are alkaline proteases. Alkaline proteases are used to ensure faster absorption of water and to reduce the soaking time [31]. The addition of a small amount of amylase and lipase may assist in the degradation and eventual removal of glycoproteins (resulting in fiber opening) and of lipoproteins in the soaking process itself, by aiding structural opening and allowing the chemicals to penetrate more rapidly [32]. Multi-enzyme systems containing proteases and lipases are more efficient due to the synergistic effects of the different enzymes [33]. Scientists continue to explore new and more effective enzyme preparations for use in soaking hides, and there are reports on the use of enzymes such as amidases, hyaluronidases, phospholipases, chondroitinases, and lignocellulases. However, these enzymes are not widely used due to their low specificity [34].

3.2 Unhairing

The process of hair removal is the next step after the soaking process. Leather makes up 7% of cattle weight, and only 25% of this weight is effectively used in the tanning industry. This results in a large amount of solid waste. Other process intermediates and by-products also have a significant impact on the environment. Hair removal is performed with the use of chemicals and usually generates about 60–70% of the total pollution from leather processing. The unhairing process produces high concentrations of environmentally toxic waste. Enzymatic processes using keratinase (the vast majority of which belong to the group of proteolytic enzymes) are now used for enzymatic environmentally friendly dehairing, replacing the traditional chemicals CaO and Na2S [35]. Proteases have received special attention, due to their ability to hydrolyze keratin, which is an insoluble fibrous protein. Keratin is a major constituent of hair, feather, wool, and nails [36].

Proteases are increasingly being considered as a reliable alternative to conventional lime sulfide, to avoid problems caused by sulfide contamination. The main advantage of enzymatic unhairing is the complete elimination of lime and sulfide from the wastewater. Hair can be used for making many products such as brushes and carpets, and flesh is a main raw material for the glue/gelatin industry [37]. Hydrolyzed hair can also be used as an agricultural fertilizer and soil improver, in animal/poultry feed, and for the production of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and amino acids (e.g., cysteine) [38]. Proteases can be isolated from microorganisms (e.g., Bacillus sp., Aspergillus sp., and Amycolatopsis sp.). The greatest technological advantages of microbial proteases include low cost, high production, and efficient activity [39]. Enzymatic–oxidative unhairing does not contribute to the degradation of the hair and generates less organic waste with a lower pollutant load. The combined use of crude enzymatic extract and hydrogen peroxide has been shown to reduce processing time by hair saving (reducing hair destruction). The enzymatic extract was produced by cultivating the Bacillus subtilis strain BLBc 1 [40].

In the green unhairing cycle used in the leather industry, some keratinolytic proteases are used that exhibit high resistance to reducing agents (S2-, dithiothreitol, and β-mercaptoethanol) and are quite stable under extreme conditions [41]. High-alkalinity and high-concentration detergents are needed in the chemical unhairing process. Most enzymes are not stable under these conditions, except a few keratinolytic proteases [42]. Yongquan examined the enzymatic activity of extracellular alkaline protease from Bacillus cereus TD5B and its potential application as a sheep skin dehairing agent [43]. The Bacillus cereus TD5B strain was screened for extracellular alkaline protease production on skimmed milk agar media. Its alkaline protease activity was measured at concentrations of 1, 1.5, and 2%. The results showed that 2% alkaline protease had the highest enzymatic activity. The highest tensile strength of sheep leather was obtained after dehairing with 1% alkaline protease.

In addition to its undoubted advantages, including greater process efficiency, non-toxic sewage and sludge, and a more stable product, the use of keratinase or keratinolytic protease in the unhairing of hides in the tanning industry has the following three basic disadvantages [44]:

  1. High cost of enzyme production with the inability to use the biocatalysts again.

  2. The keratinolytic activity/caseinolytic activity (K/C) ratio, which evaluates substrate specificity, is below 0.5 in the case of most keratinolytic proteases and keratinases, which decreases unhairing efficiency and leather quality substantially.

  3. There is no enzymatic technology that does not damage the hides in the unhairing process [44].

The latest scientific reports indicate that a novel serine protease is produced with the bio-enzyme G3726, which is heterologously expressed by the B. subtilis strain SCK6. With good stability at alkaline pH, the crude enzyme could efficiently and cleanly complete the dehairing of goatskins without damaging the skin collagen, while the leather obtained shows excellent physical properties. Overall, protease G3726 is an attractive candidate for industrial applications, especially in detergent formulations and leather manufacturing [45].

3.3 Bating

Bating is the process of the removal and hydrolysis of the keratose remaining on the surface of a de-limed pelt, as well as the removal of scud consisting of epidermis, hair roots, pigments, fats, sebaceous glands, and sweat gland debris. Generally, it is the process of removing proteins other than collagen, using proteolytic enzymes such as albumin or globulin [46]. In the conventional bating process, pelt bating is carried out in a deliming solution with the help of enzyme preparations (a mixture of protease and ammonium salt), at 30–37°C and pH 7.0–8.5 [47]. Commercially produced trypsin is considered the best enzyme for pelt bating, but it is mainly extracted from bovine pancreatic tissue, which has many disadvantages, such as purity, poor batch stability, unpleasant odor, potential cross-infection, the limited availability of the raw material, and damage to mammal immunogenicity [48]. The search for new enzyme products for bating processes in the leather industry has led to research into neutral and alkaline microbial proteases, which are a class of enzymes with promising industrial applications in pelt bating. However, in alkaline environments, these enzymes have little effect on hides and do not remove plaque and the remains of hair grains satisfactorily. Therefore, it has been suggested to use enzyme preparations that are active in acid environments [49]. The acid protease from Aspergillus usamii is known to be an effective bating agent for sheep pelts and has been found to be more effective than neutral protease [50]. Recent studies have investigated one-bath pickling bating chrome as a method of replacing the conventional trypsin method. The innovative pickling bating method based on microbial origin acidic protease L80A can provide outstanding performance for pelt bating [51].

3.4 Degreasing

The degreasing process is another stage in tanning. The quantities of natural fats in skin are very high, especially in some types of sheepskins: 20–30% of the total weight of skins is composed of fats [52]. The degreasing process can be broken down into the following three successive stages:

  1. breakdown of the protein membrane of the fat-containing;

  2. removal of the fat;

  3. emulsification of the fat in water or solubilization in solvent.

Three-component processes using two enzymes (proteolysis, lipolysis, and emulsification) are used in the drift-greasing process for effective degreasing. Some authors suggest using alkaline lipase combined with proteinase and pancreatin to improve the degreasing effect and soften pig skin [27]. Kanagaraj et al. claims that a combination of enzymes might be necessary not only to break down products but also to release them from the hide [53]. Hydrolysis of ovine storage lipid using lipid hydrolases was demonstrated in an attempt to understand the mechanism of degreasing. Lipases were used as agents for degreasing. Lipases are known to play a critical role in leather processing and represent an environmentally sound method of removing fat. In the case of bovine hides, tensides can be replaced completely with lipases and surfactants. However, the disadvantages are that lipase does not remove all types of fats in the same way [16].

Ejaz et al. used LIP2 lipase from the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica (YLLIP2) to degrease sheep skins [54]. The results showed that using only 10 mg of lipase/kg of raw hides enabled successful degreasing in only 15 min at pH 7. Comparative scanning electron microscope, attenuated total reflectance – fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and physicochemical analyses showed that the enzymatically treated leather had better properties than the chemically treated leather. However, differences were observed in the composition of the wastewater, where the proportion of solid waste was higher for enzymatic degreasing than for conventional degreasing with chemicals.

3.5 Tanning/post-tanning

In the tanning process, collagen fibers are stabilized with tannins and with the help of tannin cross-links, so the hides are less prone to decay or rotting. The resistance of the leather to mechanical factors and to high temperatures increases. There are many different tanning methods and materials that may be chosen, depending on the required properties of the finished leather, the cost of the materials, the technology available in the plant, and type of raw material. Most tannins can be assigned to one of the following groups:

  • mineral tannins,

  • vegetable tannins,

  • syntans,

  • aldehydes,

  • fatty tannins.

The most commonly used tanning agent is basic chromium sulfate (Cr(OH)SO4). Currently, 80–90% of all hides are tanned with chromium salts [55]. The present study focused on the use in the tanning process of proteolytic enzymes during the wet finishing of leather and the dyeing of leather. The authors reported improvement in properties such as dye affinity, bath exhaustion, uniformity of color, dye penetration into the hide, wettability of the fiber, dye absorption, shrinkage, and tension in stretched wool fibers. In the study of Rakib et al. [56], an attempt was made to develop an eco-friendly vegetable tanning process combining pickle-free tanning and proteolytic enzymes. Leather dyeing is a post-tanning process, but it is worth noting that ecofriendly dyeing using enzymes to achieve increased uptake of dye can result in uniform dyeing with intense and bright shades. Staining with proteolytic enzymes also improves the absorption of the dye, which results in deeper shades of color. Researchers have attempted to develop an eco-friendly vegetable tanning process combining pickle-free tanning and the application of proteolytic enzymes [28]. The results showed more than 95% tannin exhaustion, an increase of 10% compared with the conventional vegetable tanning process.

3.6 New trends in enzyme treatment in leather industry

Proteases, also called proteinases, peptidases, or proteolytic catalysts, represent important enzymes commonly used in the leather industry. Proteases are a large group of enzymes belonging to the class of hydrolases, associated with the processing of long protein chains into short chains and the degradation of peptide bonds connecting amino acid residues [57].

According to historical data, proteases were classified based on source, molecular size, charge, substrate specificity, and catalytic activity. The division of proteases according to the mechanism of action, the species of microorganisms producing them, and the presence of amino acids in the active site is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 
                  Division of proteases according to the mechanism of action, the species of microorganisms producing them, and the presence of amino acids in the active site [57].
Figure 5

Division of proteases according to the mechanism of action, the species of microorganisms producing them, and the presence of amino acids in the active site [57].

The applications of proteases isolated from different microbial sources in different industries are represented in Table 1 [58].

Table 1

Applications of proteases isolated from different microbial sources in different industries [58]

Microbial stains Applications
Aspergillus niger Food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic
B. subtilis Leather industry
A. niger Detergents and leather industry
A. niger Detergent
A. niger Detergent
Aspergillus tamari Leather processing
B. subtilis Industrial purposes
A. niger Peptide production
Bacillus sp. No. AH-101 Degradation of human hairs
Conidiobolus coronatus Silver recovery
Aspergillus oryzae NRRL-447 Feather degradation
Aspergillus flavus MTCC 277 Leather treatment, detergents
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Feather degradation
Aspergillus sojae ATCC20235 Peptide synthesis
Bacillus sp. SSR1 Laundry detergent
Pseudomonas fluorescens Detergent and textile industries
Aspergillus oryzae U1521 Animal feed and food processing
Aspergillus flavus Leather processing
Bacillus cereus Laundry detergent
B. subtilis PE-11 Detergent industry
Bacillus horikoshii Industrial, medical applications
B. subtilis Deproteinize crustacean wastes
B. subtilis Industrial applications
Bacillus sp. KG5 Food industry
Engyodontium album BTMFS10 Detergent industry
Bacillus licheniformis RP1 Chitin extraction, chicken feather degradation, dehairing agent
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Detergent and environmental bioremediation in cold, regions
Mutant Bacillus licheniformis B18 Collagen replacement therapy, detergent stability, waste treatment
Streptomyces Leather, keratin waste treatment, animal feeding industry, cosmetic industry
Chaetomium globosum Detergent industry, feathers degradation, removal of gelatin layer from X-ray, film
Penicillium chrysogenum Textile industry
Bacillus safensis Detergent industry

Proteases are widely used as catalysts for various organic transformations; meanwhile, biocatalysis mainly involves the effective use of proteases as process catalysts in specific environments. Enzymatic biocatalysis has remarkable properties under moderate conditions, such as high activity, biodegradability, and specificity. Currently, extensive research focuses on the use of techniques that increase the stability of enzymes through, for example, the process of immobilization, aggregation, or changing their chemical structure [57].

Despite the enormous applications of enzymes as potential biocatalysts and process catalysts in various organic reactions, enzymes are associated with certain limitations such as high cost, lack of effective availability, instability, low substrate specificity, and requirement for multiple cofactors [33].

In the tanning industry, acidic proteases are of great interest in processes such as unhairing, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 
                  Mechanism of enzymatic unhairing at 100 and 400 µm [33].
Figure 6

Mechanism of enzymatic unhairing at 100 and 400 µm [33].

Meanwhile, it should be noted that in recent years, there has been a huge increase in the use of alkaline protease as an industrial catalyst. The increasing use of alkaline proteases, not only in the tanning industry, is due to their biocatalytic activity in various organic transformations, namely, Knoevenagel condensation, aldol reaction, transesterification reaction, separation of amino acids in organic solvents, kinetic separation of carboxylic acids, and enantioselective hydrolysis of amino acid esters or fragmentation of p-amidobenzyl ethers [57].

Basic proteases constitute the largest group with optimal protease activity at neutral to alkaline pH and are serine or metal proteases. Alkaline proteases owe their success in commercial applications to the following features: compatibility with metal ions, resistance to commercially available detergents, and resistance to pH and temperature changes.

In leather tanning processes, during the chemical removal of hair, lime and sulfide act as a shaving blade, leaving the hair follicles intact [59]. These intact hair roots are then removed in the next skin wiping step. This is an important pre-tanning step where not only are hair follicles and other unwanted proteins removed from the de-haired skin, but they also help split the fiber into fibrils. Efficient rubbing of the skin results in high porosity and thumbprints; smoothness and better elasticity of treated leather can be obtained by using alkaline serine protease from B. subtilis ZMS-2. The enzyme at a concentration of 2% w/w effectively removes hair bulbs and undesirable non-structural proteins (globulin, albumin, elastin) from the skin without affecting the main structural protein – collagen [60]. Moreover, not all proteolytic enzymes due to their properties, they are suitable for combing/combing collagenolytic effect. During the de-bristle/de-combing process, proteases are selectively degraded soft keratin tissues inside the hair follicles, thus causing them to be pulled out intact hairs without disturbing the tensile strength of the processed leather. This hair removal at the root level is a very important stage of leather processing, which ensures the ideal smoothness and suppleness of the processed leather, which is influenced by this enzyme.

Most tanneries in Europe today use wet blue leather for processing. This is due to the avoidance of environmentally harmful leather tanning stages in the first stages of the wet workshop. However, wet blue leather is stored in warehouses and basements for a long time before it is processed further, which may cause the leather to dry out and thus make it more difficult for chemicals and enzymes to penetrate in the further stages of leather processing [61]. Therefore, the enzymatic process (i.e., treating wet blue with acid protease) is more widely used in tanneries to improve the comprehensive properties of leather. Acid proteases can hydrolyze proteins either internally or externally cause cleavage at low pH 2–4 to produce small peptides and amino acids [61]. The wet blue bath environment typically has a pH of around 3.5. Hence, acid proteases are the choice of enzyme preparations for moderate hydrolysis of skin protein and good dispersion of skin collagen fiber optical network. However, this process also has some drawbacks: acid protease proteins slowly penetrate the collagen structure (the process takes about 2 h), which significantly reduces the effectiveness of the process. Additionally, the large size of the enzyme molecules further delays the skin penetration process. A solution to this problem was proposed by Tochetto et al. who found that the surface charge of nanoparticles (NPs) was an important factor that affects their penetration into cancer cells and the penetration effect of NP was improved when NPs were negatively charged [62]. Tamilselvi et al. developed supramolecular nanocarriers with the ability to switch surface charges and found that the reversal of surface charge promotes penetration nanocarriers for skin biofilm [63]. The results suggested a slow penetration of acid protease into wet blue mainly due to the electrostatic attraction between the acid protease (usually negatively charged) and the wet blue surface (positively charged). Moreover, optimizing the regulation of the electrostatic interaction between wet blue and acid protease is a future direction of research to increase the effectiveness of wet blue processing in the wet workshop.

Research on the use of enzymes as leather tanning agents is inextricably linked to the need to reduce the use of chromium sulfate in this process. Although the development of various improved chromium tanning methods has significantly reduced the use of chemicals and water in leather tanning, this change is not sufficient due to the production of wastewater containing harmful chromium content. Additionally, there is strong evidence that when treated leather is disposed in the environment, some of the released trivalent chromium is converted to carcinogenic hexavalent chromium. Over the years, many sustainable alternatives to chromium tanning have been developed, based on chemical and enzymatic cross-linking, various bio-based polymers, enzymes, modified zeolites, and nanostructured materials. Proteases are arguably the most extensively utilized enzymes for dehairing hides and skins. Some researchers have utilized them in soaking, rehydration, pickling, and chrome tanning. The search for new protease sources prompted researchers to focus on enzyme engineering utilizing recombinant and immobilization technology [64].

3.7 Use of enzymes in the textile industry – in comparison with the tanning industry

The tanning industry and the textile industry are two sectors that are responsible for a large amount of chemical pollutants emitted into the environment. The use of enzymatic processes in the tanning and textile industries can save both industries from collapse caused by strict restrictions on the emission of pollutants into the environment. Despite similarities in the area of using enzymes as process-efficient molecules while saving energy, both industrial sectors struggle with different types of problems and use different types of enzymes, replacing chemical processes with enzyme-based technologies. In the tanning industry, the most widely used proteases are responsible for the breakdown of peptide bonds present in proteins and animal cells. In the textile industry, the enzymatic technology has a high application potential from the fiber treatment to products’ finalization [65]. In the textile preparation, the enzymes can modify the fibers’ structure, degrade the gum, remove natural pigments, give the fiber a white color, dye, give shine, and soften the textiles [66]. In terms of type, the global textile enzymes market is divided into enzymes such as cellulase, amylase, catalase, pectinase, and laccase.

Catalase and amylase constitute the greatest demand on the market. The cellulase segment has a significant share due to the increase in demand for cellulase in the so-called bio-polishing. Cellulases are used in the final stage of textile production: they are used to remove starch sizing and to soften and reduce the fabric’s tendency to pill. The use of enzymes in textile production significantly improves the quality of final products, including clothing.

Based on the applications in which enzymes are used quite extensively, the global market is segmented into:

  • enzymes for bio-polishing fabrics (i.e., biological enzyme finishing, the purpose of which is to improve the surface finish of cotton fabric with cellulase to obtain a longer-lasting anti-adhesive effect, thereby increasing the overall smoothness and softness of the fabric);

  • starch-sizing enzymes (pre-treatment of cotton);

  • bleaching enzymes (including cotton enzymes, which are necessary to remove brown and yellow discoloration of cotton fibers caused by cotton flower proteins and pigments);

  • bioleather/bioskin enzymes.

Increasing demand for textile enzymes in the apparel industry and increasing application to bring technological and manufacturing improvements in various end-use industries are the key factors in the textile enzyme market. Rapid industrialization and urbanization and growing environmental concerns are expected to drive the demand for textile enzymes in the near future. Similar predictions regarding the demand for enzymes are observed in the leather product market, but the sizes of both industries are significantly different, with an advantage for the textile sector. This does not change the fact that in both these industries, intensive work is underway on the use of enzymes instead of chemical technologies [67]. A representation of enzyme application is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7 
                  Diagram of textile processing steps where enzymes can be industrially used [67].
Figure 7

Diagram of textile processing steps where enzymes can be industrially used [67].

4 Innovative trends in the leather industry

The global leather trade is worth 150 billion USD annually. However, solid, liquid, and gaseous emissions from the leather sector damage the environment. Therefore, current trends in the tanning industry focus on implementing a range of more sustainable and environmentally friendly options (e.g., the use of enzymes at various stages of leather processing) in all leather manufacturing unit operations. Researchers have proposed the preservation of raw hides and hides with phyto-based methods, such as using the paste from leaves [68]. This could reduce the total amount of dissolved solids and chlorides by approximately 70%, while the leather cured by this technique showed comparable physical strength of leather with respect to conventionally cured leather. Another innovative solution is oxidative unhairing, which can reduce the BOD and COD by about 40%. This method has been suggested as an alternative to traditional unhairing, which is harmful to the environment [69]. The finished leather obtained by these processes shows good physical, mechanical, and technical properties, comparable with leather treated using the traditional process. The obtained leather was technically assessed as satisfactory and suitable for use in the production of high-quality upper leathers. Highly exhaustive tanning technologies based on copolymers can increase absorption by up to 95% [70]. New methods of extracting a cellulose derivative from further waste from the sugar sector for use in leather finishing have also been described [71]. Cellulose was found to impart fullness to the finished leather without impacting its aesthetic properties. Gandu et al. described the possibility of using an innovative odor reduction system based on biofilters, capturing harmful gas emissions from the tannery environment. The deodorization of gases emitted from tanneries, e.g., NH3 and H2S, using eco-friendly and cost-effective methods is necessary for the safe disposal of industrial emissions [72].

Another new trend in the tanning industry is the use of its rich protein resources for, for example, the production of bacteria producing keratinolytic proteases. Microorganisms are an excellent source of enzymes and are of increasing interest due to their wide biochemical diversity, ease of isolation and screening, susceptibility to genetic manipulation, and cost-effective and consistent production [73]. Bacteria producing keratinolytic proteases have been isolated and found in various habitats, including tannery soil [74]. Keratinolytic proteases have potential applications in various areas of industrial processes and are widely used in food and feed, medicine, detergents, silk degumming, leather, silver recovery, waste management, and pharmaceutical industry [75]. Current industry demand for keratinolytic proteases with beneficial properties continues to improve the search for new sources of enzymes. Many studies have shown that bacterial isolates can produce keratinolytic proteases from a variety of environments. Research on the optimization of biotechnological processes producing keratinolytic enzymes by bacteria led to the isolation of a new B. subtilis ES5, which strongly decomposes feathers, from soils originating from traditional leather tanning. Producing keratinase from waste chicken feathers using soil bacteria from tanneries could play an important role in producing the enzyme using inexpensive substrates. The enzyme substrate obtained in this way has a promising ability to produce keratinase without additional carbon and nitrogen sources and is stable in alkaline pH, surfactants and commercially available detergents. Due to its stable properties, the product can be used in the production of environmentally friendly detergents.

Recently, trends in the production of leather products have included a completely new area of using living organisms to produce leather products. An alternative to leather of animal origin or leather substitutes in the form of plastics are products made from the leather of filamentous fungi. Basically, these alternative materials have been observed with various limitations, especially their undesirably high hydrophilicity [76]. Mycelium products still have several drawbacks that require improvement. Pure mushroom mycelium leather substitutes were found to have low tensile strength, poor performance properties, and lack of thickness uniformity [77]. Therefore, many efforts are currently being invested in circumventing these challenges; therefore, many believe that leather substitutes derived from fungal biomass are one of the most cost-effective and feasible options. There are currently 36 application-related patent worldwide materials of fungal origin, such as leather substitutes or textiles [78]. Companies point out the huge potential of leather materials made from mycelium in terms of sustainable development, low flammability potential, low production costs, fast growth rate, and relatively low carbon footprint [79]. Filamentous fungi have been identified as extremely rich and a diverse group of species and products originating from this group of organisms are now considered essential building blocks of the transition toward a more sustainable future for us and the planet because they also provide a pollution-free environment. Production of leather alternative materials from filamentous fungi obtained through environmentally benign processes has been recognized as one of these sustainable solutions. In this biogenic process, agricultural waste is recycled into cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and highly versatile leather-like products.

The process fits perfectly into the principles of closed-loop bioeconomy, the aim of which is to increase the efficiency of resource use and reduce the accumulation of waste to the necessary minimum.

However, despite the commercial progress made in the development of fungal skin substitutes, there is still a gap in scientific knowledge in this area. The production process of leather from filamentous fungi requires filling the knowledge gap regarding the fungi themselves and their species due to the huge number of occurrence of these organisms in the world. The strength properties of the produced materials also require optimization, especially in the context of the excellent strength properties of leather made from animal skins [80].

Each of these sustainable leather technologies can be applied to reduce the ecological impact of leather production.

5 Conclusions

Proteases are divided according to their source of origin into three basic classes: animal, plant, and microbial proteases [63]. In the protease database MEROPS, there are 259 different substances cataloged by amino acid sequence similarity [81]. Proteolytic enzymes differ in working pH, working temperature, substrate selectivity, and active site specificity [82]. Due to disadvantages such as uncertainty of operation in a wide range of pH and temperature, non-resistance of operation in alkaline pH, poor hair removal efficiency, and significant damage to collagen or low tolerance to chemical reagents in leather processing [83], more research is needed on the use of these enzymes in the leather processing industry.

The leather-producing industry increasingly uses proteolytic enzymes, lipases, and amylases. Almost all major leather manufacturing processes from soaking to finishing use enzymatic products to improve the efficiency and performance properties of the finished products. Thanks to the use of enzymes, more environmentally friendly leather products are being produced with fewer solvents, salts, acids, and surface-active agents. The use of biocatalysis in production processes is an essential element in creating a circular economy. The energy and mass already produced must be recycled to matter with the least possible loss and without the use of additional energy resources. The use of enzyme preparations has some problems, primarily concerning their efficiency, specificity, and high cost, but it is one of the possibilities for achieving more environmentally friendly leather production [8]. Protein engineering of keratinolytic protease opens further opportunities for leather biotechnology, either in the unhairing process or the treatment of organic-rich wastewater. Using a biocatalyst of keratinase is an environmentally friendly and sustainable way to produce high-quality leather with low pollution emissions. More work is needed to improve the performance of keratinase in the unhairing process [36]. Microorganisms are natural sources of commercial enzyme preparations (proteases from microbial sources account for around 40–60% of the total global enzyme sales) [84], due to their physiology and biochemistry, facile culturing conditions, and the ease of manipulating their cells. Some fungal strains (Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Rhizopus) are considered useful for the production of protease enzymes [85].

Another interesting avenue for the development of alternative leather production methods is the use of alkaline proteases, which have high catalytic activity and substrate specificity and can be produced in large quantities at low cost. Their use in the processes of soaking, dehairing, bathing, and degreasing hides reduces waste, recovers valuable by-products, lowers costs, and improves leather quality. These enzymes can catalyze reactions at the extremes of pH, temperature, and salinity during leather manufacturing processes [86].

The tanning industry generates nearly 2 MT of waste biomass annually, most of which goes to landfills. The biomass in landfills contaminates soil and water, contributes to global warming, and makes land unsuitable for use due to the bioaccumulation of pollutants. However, leather biomass mainly contains protein (30–35% collagen) and fat. It is a possible raw material for high-value materials, including biofilms, bioplastics, biofiber, superabsorbent material, additives for various industries, sizing agents, and surfactants. It is considered as a replacement for materials based on fossil fuels. Utilizing this biomass for value-added material production can both bring economic benefits and help prevent pollution [85]. Managing waste from the leather industry is crucial, as valuable components can be recovered (methods that produce digestate, biogas, collagen hydrolysate, fat, or fertilizers) and reused in the same sector (chrome) or in other branches of industry, such as the pharmaceutical, food, or medical industry. The greatest challenge is the introduction of zero-waste technologies, where each stream can be recycled. New sustainable technologies need to be integrated with the waste management hierarchy, ensure the maximization of material recycling, and include valorization methods for all material streams [86].

  1. Funding information: This research was funded by the state budget under the program of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education Republic of Poland called “Science for Society” (Poland), project title “The impact of footwear design, materials and proper fit on the health of children and adolescents,” project number NdS/539367/2021/2021, amount of funding 796964,00 PLN, and total value of the project 796964,00 PLN.

  2. Author contributions: This article has been completed while the first author (Magdalena Lasoń – Rydel) was the Doctoral Candidate in the Interdisciplinary Doctoral School at the Lodz University of Technology, preparing his PhD thesis within the framework of the Implementation Doctorate 2020 project, funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education Republic of Poland.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Ayele, M., Limeneh, D. Y., Tesfaye, T., Mengie, W., Abuhay, A., Haile, A., et al. (2021). A review on utilization routes of the leather industry biomass. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1503524. 10.1155/2021/1503524.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hamza, T. A. (2017). Bacterial protease enzyme: Safe and good alternative for industrial and commercial use. Chemistry, Environmental Science, 3, 1–10.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Ławińska, K., Serweta, W., Popovych, N., Sieczyńska, K., Decka, S., Woźnicki, D., et al. (2021). Microbiological and chemical analysis of bamboo textile materials and leathers modified with bamboo extract at the tanning stage. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 29, 33–39.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Alvarez, J., Ławińska, K., Falkiewicz-Dulik, M. (2020). Quality assessment of viscose bamboo fabrics intended for use inside children’s and special footwear. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 28, 82–88.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Sathish, M., Madhan, B., Rao, J. R. (2019). Leather solid waste: An eco-benign raw material for leather chemical preparation – A circular economy example. Waste Management, 87, 357–367.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Gao, D., Li, X., Cheng, Y., Lyu, B., Ma, J. (2022). The modification of collagen with biosustainable POSS graft oxidized sodium alginate composite. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 200, 557–565.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Ławińska, K., Szufa, S., Modrzewski, R., Obraniak, A., Wężyk, T., Rostocki, A., et al. (2020). Obtaining granules from waste tannery shavings and mineral additives by wet pulp granulation. Molecules, 25, 5419. 10.3390/molecules25225419.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Basu, S., Roy, M., Pal, P. (2019). Corporate greening in a large developing economy: Pollution prevention strategies. Environ Development Sustainability, 21, 1603–1633.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Ławińska, K., Obraniak, A., Modrzewski, R. (2019). Granulation process of waste tanning shavings. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 27, 107–110.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Ławińska, K., Modrzewski, R., Serweta, W. (2019). Tannery shavings and mineral additives as a basis of new composite materials. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 27, 89–93.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Dziuba, R., Jabłońska, M., Ławińska, K., Wysokińska, Z. (2022). Overview of EU and global conditions for the transformation of the TCLF industry on the way to a circular and digital economy (Case studies from Poland). Comparative economic RESEARCH. Central and Eastern Europe, 25, 75–94.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Hansen, E., Monteiro de Aquim, P., Gutterres, M. (2021). Environmental assessment of water, chemicals and effluents in leather post-tanning process: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106597. 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106597.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Chojnacka, K., Skrzypczak, D., Mikula, K., Witek-Krowiak, A., Izydorczyk, G., Kuligowski, K., et al. (2021). Progress in sustainable technologies of leather wastes valorization as solutions for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127902. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127902.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Lyu, B., Cheng, K., Ma, J., Hou, X., Gao, D., Gao, H., et al. (2017). Cleaning and efficient approach to improve wet-blue sheep leather quality by enzymatic degreasing. Journal of Clean Production, 148, 701–708.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Yang, F., Huang, Z., Huang, J., Wu, C., Zhou, R., Jin, Y. (2021). Tanning wastewater treatment by ultrafiltration: Process efficiency and fouling behavior. Membranes, 11, 461. 10.3390/membranes11070461.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Seguendo Espada, A., Marruflo Saldana, L., Barra Hinojosa, J., Contereras Panizo, R. (2020). Development of a degreasing process for paiche skins (Arapaima gigas) for tanning preserving the natural pattern and color. Leather & Footwear Journal/Revista de Pielarie Incaltaminte, 20, 119–132.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Jimenez-Paz, J., Lozada-Castro, J. J., Lester, E., Williams, O., Stevens, L., Barraza-Burgos, J. (2023). Solutions to hazardous wastes issues in the leather industry: Adsorption of Chromium iii and vi from leather industry wastewaters using activated carbons produced from leather industry solid wastes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11, 1–14. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109715.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Hansen, E., Monteiro de Aquim, P., Witt Hansen, A., Kern Cardoso, J., Ziulkoski, A. L., Gutterres, M. (2020). Impact of post-tanning chemicals on the pollution load of tannery wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110787. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110787.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Rohm, O. (1910). Dehairing and cleaning of skins. German Patent 268.837.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Thanikaivelan, P., Rao, J. R., Nair, B. U., Ramasami, T. (2004). Progress and recent trends in biotechnological methods for leather processing. Trends in Biotechnology, 22, 181–188.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Ławińska, K. (2021). Production of agglomerates, composite materials, and seed coatings from tannery waste as new methods for its management. Materials, 14, 6695. 10.3390/ma14216695.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Aravindhan, R., Saravanabhavan, S., Thanikaivelan, P., Rao, J. R., Nair, B. U. (2007). A chemo-enzymatic pathway leads towards zero discharge tanning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1217–1227.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Hansen, E., Monteiro de Aquimb, P., Gutterres, M. (2021). Current technologies for post-tanning wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 113003. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113003.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Queiros, Â., Silva, V. F. M., Santos, T., Crispin, A. (2013). Optimization of bovine leather soaking process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 315–322.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Jose, R. P., Adzet, M., Brouta-Agnésa, M., Balsells, S., Esteve, H. (2012). Hydrolyzed collagen: A novel additive in cotton and leather dyeing. Dyes and Pigments, 3, 475–480.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Manfred, R., Eckhard, W., Björn, J., Helmut, G. (2012). Free of water tanning using CO2 as process additive-An overview on the process development. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 66, 291–296.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Bharagava, R. N., Mishra, S. (2017). Hexavalent chromium reduction potential of Cellulosimicrobium sp. isolated from common effluent treatment plant of tannery industries. Elsevier Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 147, 102–109.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Saran, S., Mahajan, R. V., Kaushik, R., Isar, J., Saxena, R. K. (2013). Enzyme mediated beam house operations of leather industry: A needed step towards greener technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 315–322.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Maa, J., Hou, X., Gao, D., Lv, B., Zhang, J. (2014). Greener approach to efficient leather soaking process: Role of enzymes and their synergistic effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78, 226–232.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Valeika, V., Širvaitytė, J., Bridžiuvienė, D., Švedienė, J. (2019). An application of advanced hair-save processes in leather industry as the reason of formation of keratinous waste: Few peculiarities of its utilization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 6223–6233.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Pradeepa, S., Sundaramoorthy, S., Sathish, M., Jayakumar, G., Rathinam, A., Madhan, B., et al. (2021). Chromium-free and waterless vegetable-aluminium tanning system for sustainable leather manufacture. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 7, 1–10. 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100108.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Contesini, F. J., Rodrigues de Melo, R., Harumi Sato, H. (2019). An overview of Bacillus proteases: From production to application. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 38, 321–334.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Shukla, P. (2019). Synthetic biology perspectives of microbial enzymes and their innovative applications. Indian Journal Microbiology, 59, 401–409.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Kanagaraj, J. (2009). Cleaner leather processing by using enzymes: A review. Advantage of Biotechnology, 9, 13–18.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Liu, B., Zhang, J., Li, B., Liao, X., Du, G., Chen, J. (2013). Expression and characterization of extreme alkaline, oxidation-resistant keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis in recombinant Bacillus subtilis WB600 expression system and its application in wool fiber processing. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29, 825–832.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Ugbede, A. S., Abioye, O. P., Aransiola, A. S., Oyewole, O. A., Naga Raju Maddela, Prasad, R. R. (2023). Production, optimization and partial purification of bacterial and fungal proteases for animal skin dehairing: A sustainable development in leather-making process. Bioresource Technology Reports, 24, 101632. 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101632.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Fang, Z., Yong, Y-C, Zhang, J., Du, G., Chen, J. (2017). Keratinolytic protease: A green biocatalyst for leather industry. Application of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101, 7771–7779.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Xiaoguang, L., Shihao, Z., Zhang, Q., Gan, L., Jiang, G., Yongqiang, T., et al. (2022). Characterization and application of a novel halotolerant protease with no collagenase activity for cleaner dehairing of goatskin. Process Biochemistry, 113, 203–215.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Bhandari, S., Poudel, D. K., Marahatha, R., Dawadi, S., Khadayat, K., Phuyal, S., et al. (2021). Microbial enzymes used in bioremediation. Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 8849512. 10.1155/2021/8849512.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Jaouadi, N. Z., Rekik, H., Elhoul, M. B., Rahem, F. Z., Hila, C. G., Aicha, H. S. B., et al. (2015). A novel keratinase from Bacillus tequilensis strain Q7 with promising potential for the leather bating process, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 79, 952–964.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Goudarzi, B. G. H., Talebi, M., Bagherian, R., HajiHosseini, R. (2011). A simple, fast and commercial method for trypsin purifcation from bovine pancreas. Veterinary Researches and Biological Products, 24, 33–39.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Ding, W., Liu, H., Remón, J., Jiang, Z., Chen, G., Pang, X., et al. (2022). A step-change toward a sustainable and chrome-free leather production: Using a biomass-based, aldehyde tanning agent combined with a pioneering terminal aluminum tanning treatment (BAT-TAT). Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130201. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130201.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Yongquan, L. (2001). Sheep-pelt bating with acid protease. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 96, 398–400.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Zhang, X., Gao, M., Ali Chattha, S., Zhu, Y., Peng, B., Ye, Y. (2021). Application of acidic protease in the pickling to simplify the pelt bating process. Journal of Leather Science and Engineering, 3, 2–14.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Paul, T., Jana, A., Mandal, A. K., Mandal, A., Das Mohpatra, P. K., Mondal, K. C. (2016). Bacterial keratinolytic protease, imminent starter for NextGen leather and detergent industries. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 3, 8–22. 10.1016/j.scp.2016.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Lyu, B.,Cheng, K., Ma, J., Hou, X.,Gao, D.,Gao, H., et al. (2017). A cleaning and efficient approach to improve wet-blue sheep leather quality by enzymatic degreasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 701–708. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.170.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Moujehed, E., Zarai, Z., Khemir, H., Miled, N. Salah Bchir, M., Gablin, C., et al. (2022). Cleaner degreasing of sheepskins by the Yarrowia lipolytica LIP2 lipase as a chemical-free alternative in leather industry. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 211, 112292. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112292.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Cao, S., Song, J., Li, H., Wang, K., Li, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2020). Improving characteristics of biochar produced from collagen-containing solid wastes based on protease application in leather production. Waste Management, 105, 531–539. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.043.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Selvi, A. T., Brindha, V., Vedaraman, N., Kanagaraj, J., Sundar, V. J., Khambhaty, Y., et al. (2020). Eco-friendly curing of hides/skins using phyto based Citrus limon leaves paste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119117. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119117.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Yuvaraj, A., Karmegam, N., Ravindran, B., Chang, S. W., Awasthi, M. K., Kannan, S., et al. (2020). Recycling of leather industrial sludge through vermitechnology for a cleaner environment – a review. Industrial Crops and Products, 155, 112791.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Ding, H., Sun, L., Liang, C. (2005). Action of pancreatin on residual epidermis of goatskin – examination via histological changes during bating. Journal of the Society of Leather Technologies and Chemists, 89, 141–144.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Liu, C., Chen, X., Zeng, Y., Shi, B. (2022). Effect of the surface charge of the acid protease on leather bating performance. Process Biochemistry, 121, 330–338. 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.07.023.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Kanagaraj, J., Panda R. C., Vinodh, K. M. (2020). Trends and advancements in sustainable leather processing: Future directions and challenges-a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8, 104379. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104379.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Ejaz, U., Muhammad, S., Ali, F. I., Hashmi, I. A., Sohail, M. (2019). Methyltrioctylammonium chloride mediated removal of lignin from sugarcane bagasse for themostable cellulase production. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 140, 1064–1072.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Nnolim, N. E., Okoh, A. I., Nwodo, U. U. (2020). Bacillus sp. FPF-1 Produced keratinase with high potential for chicken feather degradation. Molecules, 25, 1505. 10.3390/molecules25071505.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Rakib, K., Nain, Z., Ahammed, B., Karim, M. M. (2020). Developing Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants with hyper-proteolytic activity through UV mutagenesis and characterization for optimized production. Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Experimental Therapeutics, 3(2), 135–142. 10.5455/jabet.2020.d118.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Aruna, V., Chandrakala, V., Angajala, G., Nagarajan, E. R. (2023). Proteases: An overview on its recent industrial developments and current scenario in the revolution of biocatalysis. Materialstoday Proceedengs, 92, 565–573. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.806.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Khan, Z., Shafique, M., Jabeen, N., Afshan Naz, S., Yasmeen, K., Sohail, E. U. (2023). Protease from Bacillus subtilis ZMS-2: Evaluation of production dynamics through Response Surface Methodology and application in leather tannery. Journal of King Saud University – Science, 35, 1–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Bronco, S., Castiello, D. S., D’Elia, G., Salvadori, M., Seggiani, M., Vitolo, S. (2005). Oxidative unhairing with hydrogen peroxide: Development of an industrial scale process for high-quality upper leather. Journal of The American Leather Chemists Association, 100, 45–53.Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Rahman, M., Billah, M. M., Hack-Polay, D. (2019). What is hindering change? Anticipating the barriers to the adoption of enzyme-based textile processing in a developing country, Business Strategy & Development, 2, 137–147. 10.1002/bsd2.58.Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Eid, B. M., Ibrahim, N. A. (2021). Recent developments in sustainable finishing of cellulosic textiles employing biotechnology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124701. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124701.Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Tochetto, G. A., Aragao, A. M. I., de Oliveira, D., Immich, A. P. S. (2022). Can enzymatic processes transform textile processes? A critical analysis of the industrial application. Process Biochemistry, 123, 27–35 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.10.030.Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Tamilselvi, A., Jayakumar, G. C., Charan, K. S., Sahu, B., Deepa, P. R., Swarna, V. K., et al. (2019). Extraction of cellulose from renewable resources and its application in leather finishing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 694–699.Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Kanagaraj, J., Panda, R. C., Kumar, M. V. (2020). Trends and advancements in sustainable leather processing: Future directions and challenges—a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8, 2–3. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104379.Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Gandu, B., Palanivel, S., Juntupally, S., Arelli, V., Begum, S., Anupoju, G. R. (2021). Removal of NH3 and H2S from odor causing tannery emissions using biological filters: Impact of operational strategy on the performance of a pilot-scale bio-filter. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 56, 625–634.Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Andrioli, E., Petry, L., Gutterres, M. (2014). Environmentally friendly hide unhairing: Enzymatic-oxidative unhairing as an alternative to use of lime and sodium sulfide. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 7, 9–17.Suche in Google Scholar

[67] Hasan, M. J., Haque, P., Rahman, M. M. (2022). Protease enzyme based cleaner leather processing: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132826. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132826.Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Puvankrishanan, R. (2003). Microbial enzyme technology in leather industry. Advantage of Biotechnology, 4, 17–18.Suche in Google Scholar

[69] Kanagaraj, J., Panda, R. C., Kumar, V. (2020). Trends and advancements in sustainable leather processing: Future directions and challenges-a review. Journal of Environmental Chemica Engineering, 8, 104379. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104379.Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Domskiene, J., Sederaviciute, F., Simonaityte, J. (2019). Kombucha bacterial cellulose for sustainable fashion. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 31, 644–652. 10.1108/IJCST-02-2019-0010.Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Kumar, R., Singh, R. K., Dwivedi, J. K. (2020). Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges, Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 124063. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124063.Suche in Google Scholar

[72] Rawling, G. H., Brown, I., Reubera, M. (2017). Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy & Behavior, 68, 153–158.Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Homaei, A. A., Sariri, R., Vianello, F., Stevanato, R. (2013). Enzyme immobilization: An update. Journal of Chemical Biology, 6, 185–205.Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Maitig, A. M. A., Alhoot, M. A. M., Tiwari, K. (2018). Isolation and screening of extracellular protease enzyme from fungal isolates of soil. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 12, 2059–2067.Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Rathinamoorthy, R., Bharathi, T. S., Snehaa, M., Swetha, C. (2023). Mycelium as sustainable textile material–review on recent research and future prospective. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 35, 454–476.Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Elsacker, E., Zhang, M., Dade-Robertson, M. (2023). Fungal engineered living materials: The viability of pure mycelium materials with self-healing functionalities. Advanced Functional Materials, 33, 2301875. 10.1002/adfm.202301875.Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Khan, Z., Shafique, M., Jabeen, N., Naz, S. A., Yasmeen, K., Ejaz, U., et al. (2023). Protease from Bacillus subtilis ZMS-2: Evaluation of production dynamics through Response Surface Methodology and application in leather tannery. Journal of King Saud University – Science, 35,147–158.Suche in Google Scholar

[78] Sharma, K. M., Kumar, R., Panwar, S., Kumar, A. (2017). Microbial alkaline proteases: Optimization of production parameters and their properties. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 15,115–126. 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[79] Mahbubul, H. M., Harris, J., Busfield, J. J. C., Emiliano, B. (2023). A review of the green chemistry approaches to leather tanning in imparting sustainable leather manufacturing. Green Chemistry, 10, 7441–7469. 10.1039/d3gc02948d.Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Alamnie, G., Gessesse, A., Andualem, B. (2023). Production of surfactant-stable keratinolytic protease from B. subtilis ES5 and its application as a detergent additive. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 50, 3–17. 10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102750.Suche in Google Scholar

[81] Huang, K., Boerhan, R., Liu, C., Jiang, G. (2017). Nanoparticles penetrate into the multicellular spheroid-on-chip. Effect of surface charge, protein corona, and exterior flow. Molecular Pharmaceutical, 14, 4618–4627.Suche in Google Scholar

[82] Hu, D., Deng, Y., Jia, F., Jin, Q., Ji, J.,(2020). Surface charge switchable supramolecular nanocarriers for nitric oxide synergistic photodynamic eradication of biofilms. ACS Publications Nano, 14, 347–359.Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Naveed, M., Nadeem, F., Mehmood, T., Bilal, M., Anwar, Z., Amjad, F. (2020). Protease—a versatile and ecofriendly biocatalyst with multi‑industrial applications: An updated review. Catalysis Letters, 151, 307–323.Suche in Google Scholar

[84] Vandelook, S., Elsacker, E., Van Wylick, A., De Laet, P., Peeters, E. (2021). Current state and future prospects of pure mycelium materials. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, 8, 1–10. 10.1186/s40694-021-00128-1.Suche in Google Scholar

[85] Khambhaty, Y. (2020). Applications of enzymes in leather processing. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18, 747–769.Suche in Google Scholar

[86] Amobonye, A., Lalung, J., Awasthi, M. K., Pillai, S. (2023). Fungal mycelium as leather alternative: A sustainable biogenic material for the fashion industry. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 38, 1–13. 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00724.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-18
Revised: 2023-12-07
Accepted: 2023-12-12
Published Online: 2024-02-21

© 2024 by the authors, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Characterization of viscoelastic properties of yarn materials: Dynamic mechanical analysis in the transversal direction
  2. Analysis of omni-channel implementations that are preferred by consumers in clothing sector
  3. Structural modeling and analysis of three-dimensional cross-linked braided preforms
  4. An experimental study of mechanical properties and comfortability of knitted imitation woven shirt fabrics
  5. Technology integration to promote circular economy transformation of the garment industry: a systematic literature review
  6. Research on T-shirt-style design based on Kansei image using back-propagation neural networks
  7. Research on She nationality clothing recognition based on color feature fusion with PSO-SVM
  8. Accuracy prediction of wearable flexible smart gloves
  9. Preparation and performance of stainless steel fiber/Lyocell fiber-blended weft-knitted fabric
  10. Development of an emotional response model for hospital gown design using structural equation modeling
  11. Preparation and properties of stainless steel filament/pure cotton woven fabric
  12. Facemask comfort enhancement with graphene oxide from recovered carbon waste tyres
  13. Use of enzymatic processes in the tanning of leather materials
  14. Optical-related properties and characterization of some textile fibers using near-infrared spectroscopy
  15. Network modeling of aesthetic effect for Chinese Yue Opera costume simulation images
  16. Predicting consumers’ garment fit satisfactions by using machine learning
  17. Non-destructive identification of wool and cashmere fibers based on improved LDA using NIR spectroscopy
  18. Study on the relationship between structure and moisturizing performance of seamless knitted fabrics of protein fibers for autumn and winter
  19. Antibacterial and yellowing performances of sports underwear fabric with polyamide/silver ion polyurethane filaments
  20. Numerical and experimental analysis of ballistic performance in hybrid soft armours composed of para-aramid triaxial and biaxial woven fabrics
  21. Phonetic smart clothing design based on gender awareness education for preschoolers
  22. Determination of anthropometric measurements and their application in the development of clothing sizing systems for women in the regions of the Republic of Croatia
  23. Research on optimal design of pleated cheongsam based on Kano–HOQ–Pugh model
  24. Numerical investigation of weaving machine heald shaft new design using composite material to improve its performance
  25. Corrigendum to “Use of enzymatic processes in the tanning of leather materials”
  26. Shaping of thermal protective properties of basalt fabric-based composites by direct surface modification using magnetron sputtering technique
  27. Numerical modeling of the heat flow component of the composite developed on the basis of basalt fabric
  28. Weft insertion guideway design based on high-temperature superconducting levitation
  29. Ultrasonic-assisted alkali hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate fabric and its effect on the microstructure and dyeing properties of fibers
  30. Comparative study on physical properties of bio-based PA56 fibers and wearability of their fabrics
  31. Investigation of the bias tape roll change time efficiency in garment factories
  32. Analysis of foot 3D scans of boys from Polish population
  33. Optimization of garment sewing operation standard minute value prediction using an IPSO-BP neural network
  34. Influence of repeated switching of current through contacts made of electroconductive fabrics on their resistance
  35. Numerical calculation of air permeability of warp-knitted jacquard spacer shoe-upper materials based on CFD
  36. Compact Spinning with Different Fibre Types: An Experimental Investigation on Yarn Properties in the Condensing Zone with 3D-Printed Guiding Device
  37. Modeling of virtual clothing and its contact with the human body
  38. Advances in personalized modelling and virtual display of ethnic clothing for intelligent customization
  39. Investigation of weave influence on flame retardancy of jute fabrics
  40. Balloonless spinning spindle head shape optimisation
  41. Research on 3D simulation design and dynamic virtual display of clothing flexible body
  42. Turkish textile and clothing SMEs: Importance of organizational learning, digitalization, and internationalization
  43. Corrigendum To: “Washing characterization of compression socks”
  44. Study on the promotion multiple of blood flow velocity on human epidermal microcirculation of volcanic rock polymer fiber seamless knitted fabric
  45. Bending properties and numerical analysis of nonorthogonal woven composites
  46. Bringing the queen mother of the west to life: Digital reconstruction and analysis of Taoist Celestial Beings Worshiping mural’s apparel
  47. Modeling process for full forming sports underwear
  48. Retraction of: Ionic crosslinking of cotton
  49. An observational study of female body shape characteristics in multiracial Malaysia
  50. Study on theoretical model and actual deformation of weft-knitted transfer loop based on particle constraint
  51. Design and 3D simulation of weft-knitted jacquard plush fabrics
  52. An overview of technological challenges in implementing the digital product passport in the textile and clothing industry
  53. Understanding and addressing the water footprint in the textile sector: A review
  54. Determinants of location changes in the clothing industry in Poland
  55. Influence of cam profile errors in a modulator on the dynamic response of the heald frame
  56. Quantitative analysis of wool and cashmere fiber mixtures using NIR spectroscopy
  57. 3D simulation of double-needle bar warp-knitted clustered pile fabrics on DFS
  58. Finite element analysis of heat transfer behavior in glass fiber/metal composite materials under constant heat load
  59. Price estimation and visual evaluation of actual white fabrics used for dress shirts and their photographic images
  60. Effect of gluing garment materials with adhesive inserts on their multidirectional drape and bending rigidity
  61. Optimization analysis of carrier-track collision in braiding process
  62. Numerical and experimental analysis of the ballistic performance of soft bulletproof vests for women
  63. The antimicrobial potential of plant-based natural dyes for textile dyeing: A systematic review using prisma
  64. Influence of sewing parameters on the skin–fabric friction
  65. Validation by experimental study the relationship between fabric tensile strength and weave structures
  66. Optimization of fabric’s tensile strength and bagging deformation using surface response and finite element in stenter machine
  67. Analysis of lean manufacturing waste in the process flow of ready-to-wear garment production in Nigeria
  68. An optimization study on the sol–gel process to obtain multifunctional denim fabrics
  69. Drape test of fully formed knitted flared skirts based on 3D-printed human body posture
  70. Supplier selection models using fuzzy hybrid methods in the clothing textile industry
Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aut-2023-0012/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqJaxWlyQJj4eeFTnsugEK8j1ZcZDGJVbipFKcYmMjY1Adoi3kr
Button zum nach oben scrollen