Home Preparation and characterization of sisal fibre reinforced sodium alginate gum composites for non-structural engineering applications
Article Open Access

Preparation and characterization of sisal fibre reinforced sodium alginate gum composites for non-structural engineering applications

  • Balaji Rao Pradeepa and Amirthalingam V. Kiruthika EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 15, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this work, untreated/treated sisal fibre (SF)-reinforced sodium alginate composites for three different concentrations (1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%) are fabricated by the hand lay-up method, and the variations in mechanical properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact strength are studied. The treated and untreated composites are analysed and compared using scanning electron microscope to study the surface morphology. Energy-dispersive spectroscopic analysis is carried out to evaluate the elemental compositions. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis is conducted to determine the interaction between fibres and matrix material. The thermal observations such as differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis showed only slight variations between the untreated and treated SF composites. The results of this work indicate that untreated sample with the maximum sodium alginate gum concentration had significantly enhanced mechanical properties and low moisture absorption rate. Biodegradation test inferred that it was superior for the treated fibre rather than the untreated fibre composites. The primary objective of this work is to assess the suitability of these composites for non-structural engineering applications.

1 Introduction

In recent years, biodegradable composites have garnered a significant attention, primarily for applications in a variety of industrial sectors. Furthermore, the depletion of petroleum resources and worldwide environmental concerns need the development of new green materials that are biodegradable and eco-friendlier (1). Biodegradable composites have the greater potential in the utilization of plant fibres as reinforcing material due to their recyclability, inexpensive, biodegradability, naturally occurring abundance, specific mechanical characteristics, etc. Compared to synthetic (traditional) fibres such as carbon, Kevlar, glass, and aramid, the plant fibres are sustainable, non-toxic, and have been proven to be more effective in the field of lightweight engineering (2). In general, it is quite difficult to dispose of synthetic polymer composites, and the use of plastic has been outlawed. As a result, there is a greater need today for the plant fibres as an alternative to the synthetic fibres in a variety of disciplines (3).

Plant fibres are lignocellulose in nature, which absorb moisture and are used in packaging, vibration isolators, and roofing sheets. The main disadvantages of these fibres are less adherence with the matrix due to their matrix’s hydrophobicity and hydrophilic nature of fibres. Thus, weak fibre matrix lowers the fibre’s reinforcing behaviour, thus preventing stress transfer from the matrix to load-carrying fibres. In order to find a solution to the aforesaid issues, researchers used various chemical treatments (silane, alkali, permanganate, isocyanate), incorporation of filler substances into matrix, and hybridization (with other plant fibres or filler or conventional fibres) (4).

Numerous researchers used different kinds of plant fibres such as jute (5), bamboo (6,7), hemp (8), flax (9), and kenaf (10), obtained from the plant’s stem, sisal (11,12,13), pine apple leaf fibre (14), abaca (15), from the leaf and coir (16,17), cotton (18) from the fruit of the plant. Sisal, a hard fibre that belongs to Agave sisalana, received greater attention, because of their lightweight, easy availability, and low thermal conductivity. A good sisal plant is about 1 m tall, 28 mm wide, and yields 200–250 leaves (19). Each leaf has 1,000–1,200 fibre bundles, which contain 4% of fibres, moisture content of 87.25%, cuticle of 0.75%, and other matters of 8%. Sisal fibre (SF) consists of porosity (17%), density (1.45 g‧cm−3), spiral angle (20–25°), diameter (21.5 × 10−3), and crystallinity (62.8%). The physico-mechanical properties of SF have been highly dependent on source, age, location, fibre diameter, gauge length, extracting techniques, and strain ratio. SFs are potential reinforcements in various resins, elastomers, and other types of polymeric systems (20).

On the other hand, sodium alginate (NaAg), a biodegradable polymer used for this study, could replace commodity petro-based plastics. NaAg, a linear natural polysaccharide, is obtained from marine brown algae, and it consists of 1,4-β-d-mannuronic acid (M) and α-l-guluronic acid (G). Alginate can be determined by its M/G ratio and its molecular weight. The M/G units create random arrangements of MM, GG, and MG blocks. By increasing the length of their G block and molecular weight, the mechanical properties of NaAg gels have been increased (21). The gel is an ionic polyelectrolyte and has widespread applications in wastewater treatment (22), wound dressing, tissue engineering, antimicrobial and antiviral activities, cosmeto textiles, sensors, etc. (23,24,25).

For the past two decades, extensive research works have been carried out to investigate the various characteristics of SF-reinforced polymer composites. The effect of various concentrations of matrix, fibre loading, and fibre length influenced the physico-mechanical behaviours of composites. Samouh et al. (26) reported that the increase in the rate of reinforcement (fibre) enhanced the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of SF/polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Since the SF served as a nucleating agent for PLA, increasing their concentration in the matrix increased the degree of crystallinity from 47% to 61%. Chemical treatment played an important role in determining the mechanical strength of the composites. Adane and Awoke (27) characterized the chemically treated SF/polyester composites, and the results revealed that the treated SF composites have better mechanical properties and low water absorption than the untreated fibre composites. The similar results were observed by Agernew et al. (28), who found that alkali treatment enhanced the mechanical strength with an increase in fibre content. Parul and Gupta (29) studied the influence of alkali treatment and PLA coating as a new treatment on mechanical properties of sisal composites, and the results inferred that treated SF composites showed higher value of storage modulus and mechanical strength than the untreated one.

The purpose of this investigation is to prepare the effect of alkali treatment on the SF-reinforced NaAg composites. The mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of alkali-treated composites with the effect of various matrix concentrations are studied. In addition, the result of the mechanical strength of treated composites is compared to that of the untreated one. At the end of soil burial, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and moisture absorption (MA) tests are carried out.

2 Materials and methods

SFs were purchased from Wholesale Trader, Tamil Nadu, India. The length of the SFs obtained was 1 m. NaAg powder and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in pellet form were supplied by Shri Balaji Scientific Company, Tamil Nadu, India. The properties of NaAg and SF are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Material properties of NaAg and SF

Materials Parameters
NaAg Viscosity of 2% aqueous solution at 20°C 1,000–1,200 cPs
Bulk density 0.9090 g‧mL−1
Tapped density 0.9523 g‧mL−1
SF Density (untreated) 1.46 g‧cm−3
Density (treated) 1.66 g‧cm−3
Moisture absorption 6.9088%

2.1 Fibre surface treatment

Raw SFs were treated with 5% NaOH (alkali solution) and were continuously heated to 80°C for 3 h, thereby maintaining the material-to-liquid ratio of 1:30. The fibres were thoroughly rinsed with water to eliminate any residues of alkali that may have been present on the fibre surface and achieve a pH level of 7. The treated fibres were then dried at room temperature (32°C) for 24 h (30). The untreated and alkali-treated fibres chopped in the range of 10 mm were used for this study.

2.2 Preparation of NaAg gum

In order to make the matrix material for the composite structure, NaAg powder and distilled water were used as the two primary components. Subsequently, the NaAg gum solution was prepared at three discrete concentrations, namely 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%. To prepare the matrix material, it was recommended that NaAg powder was mixed with distilled water at room temperature (32°C) and stirred continuously for 45 min to prevent the formation of agglomerates or stratification on the surface. Then, the solution was subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at a speed of 3,000 rpm to remove any undissolved particles present in the gum solution.

2.3 Fabrication of composites

The composite specimens were prepared for untreated and treated SFs with NaAg solution of various concentrations (1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%) using the hand lay-up process. About 10 g of fibre was taken and cut into small pieces of the order of 10 mm in length. The material-to-composite preparation ratio was 1:20 (SF:NaAg). The fibres were spread on the plastic tray, and 200 mL of NaAg solution having 1.5% concentration was poured over the fibre and intermixed manually. The fibre–gum mixture was dried under sunlight for 10–20 h depending on the atmospheric condition. A typical view of steps involved in the preparation of composites is shown in Figure 1. The prepared material does not yield considerable strength. In order to increase the mechanical characteristics, humidification cum compression techniques were used. Similar procedure was adopted for the preparation of SFC with the other concentrations of NaAg (2% and 2.5%). U1, U2, and U3 samples represented the untreated SF composites and T1, T2, T3 were the treated SF composites with NaAg concentrations at 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%. Similarly, UH1, UH2, and UH3 were the untreated SFs and TH1, TH2, and TH3 were the treated SFs with heating the solution of NaAg at 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5% concentrations, respectively.

Figure 1 
                  Procedure for the preparation of composites: (a) NaAg powder, (b) untreated SF, (c) NaAg gum solution, (d) plastic mould, (e) untreated SF in plastic mould, (f) NaAg gum solution added to untreated SF, (g) untreated SF with NaAg gum solution (wet), and (h) untreated SF/NaAg composite (dry).
Figure 1

Procedure for the preparation of composites: (a) NaAg powder, (b) untreated SF, (c) NaAg gum solution, (d) plastic mould, (e) untreated SF in plastic mould, (f) NaAg gum solution added to untreated SF, (g) untreated SF with NaAg gum solution (wet), and (h) untreated SF/NaAg composite (dry).

2.4 Mechanical properties

The tensile and flexural properties of the composites were investigated by Tinius Olsen H10KL at a crosshead speed of 2 mm‧min−1. Five samples were tested, and the average values were reported for the untreated and treated SFC. From the stress–strain curve, the tensile strength (maximum force/cross-sectional area of the composites) was calculated.

(1) Flexural strength = 3 PL 2 b d 2

where P, L, d, and b are the flexural load, length of the span, depth, and width of the composites, respectively. Impact test for the prepared composites was analysed by Tinius Olsen Model IT 504 Plastic impact testing machine. Six samples were taken, and the average was calculated for each concentration.

2.5 Soil burial test

The soil burial test of untreated/treated SF-reinforced NaAg composites was carried out in an open environment for biodegradation studies. The test samples chosen were from the SF/NaAg composite of 2.5% concentration. The natural soil biodegradation test lasted for 1 month. The ambient temperature and time during the tests were noted down. The test samples of untreated/treated SF NaAg composites were cut into a rectangular shape of size 5 cm × 3 cm pieces (approximately 2–2.5 g). The ground was dug to a depth of 35 cm. Regular weeding of the ground was done in order to maintain its quality. Each sample was buried at a depth of 35 cm below the surface of the soil. Incubation of the samples was done at a temperature of 34°C for a period of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days. After every 5 days, the samples were carefully removed, gently brushed to remove adhering soil, without deforming its shape, and then dried at room temperature until a constant weight was obtained. Each sample was weighed before and after degradation using a SHIMADZU digital weighing scale (0.001 g precision). Weight loss was calculated using the following relationship. Three replicates of each sample were taken for the test.

(2) Percentage weight loss = W 0 W d W 0 × 100 %

where W 0 is the initial weight of samples (g) and W d is the weight of dried samples (g).

2.6 FTIR

The presence of interfacial bonds in the SF and composites was studied using FTIR. Using the kBr pellet, FTIR analysis was performed, and the spectrum was obtained with a resolution of 4 cm−1, with the range of 400–4,000 cm−1.

2.7 Morphological study

The SEM images of the untreated and treated composites were taken using JSMIT200 SEM with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV to analyse the morphological characteristics of the prepared composite. The surface of the specimen is gold-sputtered and scanned at a magnification of 1,000×.

2.8 Thermal properties

SF-treated and untreated composites with 2.5% concentration of NaAg were subjected to TGA and DSC thermograms using Perkin Elmer Simultaneous Thermal Analyser (STA6000). Samples of 5–20 mg were taken and heated at the rate of 10°C‧min−1. From this study, the weight loss of the composites with temperature was noted.

2.9 MA

MA of untreated and treated SF/NaAg composites has been carried out (31). Five specimens were dried and weighed in the digital balance to the nearest of 0.001 g. All the samples were kept in a humidification chamber for about 5 h at room temperature. The weight of the composites was measured after taking from the chamber. The percentage of increase in weight during the absorption of moisture was calculated.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Mechanical properties

In order to examine the contribution of SF and the matrix concentration to the composites, the tensile characteristics were analysed. Figure 2 shows the tensile results of U1, U2, and U3 samples. The stress–strain curve was recorded for U1 to U3 samples, especially for various concentrations of NaAg (1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%). From Figure 2, it was observed that the U3 sample had the maximum strength because it has more adhesiveness with the fibre particles. This enhances the load-bearing capacity, which in turn increases the mechanical strength of the U3 sample. In contrast, the tensile strength of the U1 and U2 samples was lower in comparison with that of the U3 samples; this is due to the fact that there was less bonding between the fibres and the matrix in the U1 and U2 samples. The U3 samples had a higher tensile strength than the U1 and U2 samples. The increase in tensile values for untreated fibre composites that occurred as a result of increasing the matrix concentration from 1.5% to 2.5% followed the order of U3 > U2 > U1.

Figure 2 
                  Tensile and flexural strength of the samples.
Figure 2

Tensile and flexural strength of the samples.

A considerable reduction takes place in the tensile strength for the alkali-treated sisal fibre composites (SFCs). In the case of treated fibre combination, the maximum strength was achieved for T1, and the strength was reduced by 33.3%, 50.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, for T1, T2, and T3. When the concentration of the matrix was increased from 1.5% to 2.5%, the tensile values of the treated fibre composites fell, and the order of the decreases was T1 > T2 > T3. According to the findings of this study, untreated fibre composites considerably improved the strength of the material, but treated combinations had the opposite effect.

We have studied the mechanical properties of untreated and treated fibre composites that were reinforced with a heating solution of NaAg, and the results are illustrated in Figure 2. The tensile strength was gradually increased (all the way up to 2% of NaAg), and subsequently, it was lowered for UH3 sample (sample containing 2.5% concentration). UH2 and TH1 samples possesses superior strength when compared to the other combinations.

Figure 3 
                  Impact strength of the samples.
Figure 3

Impact strength of the samples.

Using load vs displacement curve, the flexural property was measured with a crosshead speed of 2 mm‧min−1. Figure 2 displays the results of flexural testing conducted on both untreated and treated fibre composites. It was found that the prepared composites had findings for their flexural strength that are extremely similar to the results of tensile strength. According to Figure 2, the flexural strength of the U3 sample was the highest compared to that of the other combinations (U1, U2, T1, T2, and T3). On the other hand, the random intermediate flexible strength was displayed by the composites UH2, UH3, TH2, and TH3. As a result, a higher strength was noted for UH1, which pointed out to a successful coupling of untreated SF with the composite. As reported by Tengsuthiwat et al. (32), the tensile strength of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/SF composites at 5 wt% fibre loading showed 23.6 MPa, and the same results were obtained by Thorsak et al. (33). In the case of SF/PLA composite reinforced with different fibre contents (5%, 10%, and 15%), the 15% fibre loading had the greatest tensile strength of 70.76 MPa. In addition to that, the tensile strength and flexural strength were increased from 4.5 to 8.5 MPa and from 7.6 to 11.8 MPa, respectively, for SF/cassava starch-based biocomposites, and the authors concluded that the prepared materials have the possible use of low-cost housing, civil structure, and food packaging applications.

The impact test was conducted, and the results are shown in Figure 3. Impact resistance is the material’s capacity to withstand breaking when subjected to sudden mechanical load, such as when a pendulum hits the surface of a composite (34). It is clear from Figure 3 that impact strength was increased with increasing NaAg concentration. Like tensile and flexural strength, the impact was also found maximum for the U3 sample. Because of the strong interfacial adhesion that existed between the SF and the NaAg concentration (at 2.5%), the U3 specimen was able to absorb a greater portion of the impact load. Therefore, the 2.5% concentration of NaAg reinforced with untreated and treated SF demonstrated higher impact strength compared to the 1.5% and 2% concentrations of NaAg for all specifications. This was the case for both the solution of NaAg that was heated and the solution of NaAg when it was not heated. The untreated SFC that was reinforced with a 2.5% concentration of NaAg solution exhibited favourable results for its mechanical properties, including tensile, flexural, and impact strengths. Based on the findings of this research, it is determined that the treatment with alkali reduces the strength of the composites. This was attributed to the fact that the alkali treatment diminished the hydrophilic characteristics of SF, and as a result, hydrophilic NaAg served as the good reinforcement to the composites. Ismail et al. (35), who conducted the research work on mechanical properties of kenaf fibre/epoxy composites, noted the similar pattern. The impact strength of the SF-reinforced cassava starch biocomposites was studied by Siddesh et al. (36). The results showed that increasing fibre length from 5 to 20 mm increased the impact strength from 4.1 to 5.2 kJ‧m−2, respectively, and suddenly decreased the strength (4.8 kJ‧m−2) for 25 mm fibre length. Samouh et al. (26) studied the impact strength of SF/PLA composites is 3.87 kJ‧m−2 (at 15% fibre loading) and concluded in their studies that increasing the fibre content (from 5% to 15%) increased the impact strength of the composites.

Composites prepared with plant fibre (sisal, flax, jute, kenaf, banana, pineapple leaf, hemp)-reinforced natural polymer (PLA, cassava starch, cellulose) exhibited a high level of tensile, flexural, and impact strengths as well as good thermal stability, when compared to the SF/NaAg composites. However, the challenges lie in the rate of biodegradation after the end-of-life that presents a number of issues. From the literature, it was observed that the biodegradation rate of PHBV/peach palm particles (37), PLA/chitosan (38,39,40), flax fibre/PLA (41), vetiver grass/PLA (42), and polyhydroxyalkanoates (43) composites took the duration of over 5 months, 150 days, 50 days, 180 days, and 120 days, respectively. On the other hand, the composites that we developed have a lower strength than the aforementioned material, but SF/NaAg composites are completely biodegradable and user-friendly with a soil biodegradation rate of 30 days. The main contribution of the current work is the availability of both SF and matrix in nature, and the composites that have been made are light in weight, biodegradable, and inexpensive, which makes them useful for a wide range of engineering applications.

3.2 Soil burial test

The biodegradation of a material depends on the living organisms (micro/macro), the pH value of the soil, temperature, moisture, and humidity of the environment. Also, the degradation rates are dependent on the type (treated/untreated) and nature of the material preferred. In this work, the biodegradation behaviour of the U3 and T3 composites of maximum concentration of 2.5%, after a period of 1-month soil burial test, has been investigated. The result showed that both untreated and treated SF/NaAg composites were able to degrade. However, the biodegradation rate showed a variation for the untreated/treated SF/NaAg biocomposites. It was observed that the treated SF/NaAg biocomposites (T3) are more easily biodegraded than untreated SF/NaAg composites (U3), as they are consumed easily by living organisms (Figure 4) that exist in the soil. The reduction in the percentage weight loss of untreated/treated SF-NaAg biocomposites in the natural soil burial test was also due to temperature and humidity conditions of the environment to which the biocomposites were exposed.

Figure 4 
                  The U3 (raw/untreated) and T3 (treated) samples in burial pit from day 1 to 30: (a) samples placed in pit for soil burial test, (b) SRCO represents U3 sample, (c) STCO represents T3 sample, (d) U3 and T3 samples after 5 days of soil burial test, (e and f) U3 and T3 samples after 10 days, (g) samples after 15 days, (h) samples after 20 days, (i and j) samples after 25 days, and (k and l) samples after 30 days.
Figure 4

The U3 (raw/untreated) and T3 (treated) samples in burial pit from day 1 to 30: (a) samples placed in pit for soil burial test, (b) SRCO represents U3 sample, (c) STCO represents T3 sample, (d) U3 and T3 samples after 5 days of soil burial test, (e and f) U3 and T3 samples after 10 days, (g) samples after 15 days, (h) samples after 20 days, (i and j) samples after 25 days, and (k and l) samples after 30 days.

3.3 FTIR

The untreated and treated SFCs were subjected to FTIR spectroscopy for the purpose of conducting research on the chemical linkages that are inherent in the composites. FTIR spectra and the corresponding transmittance peaks are illustrated in Figure 5. The spectra showed the characteristic absorption peaks in the regions of 3,400–2,860 and 2,025–400 cm−1, respectively. Seven prominent vibrating bands are observed for all the composites, which are shown in Figure 5a. The characteristic peaks appeared in the region 3,428–3,433 and 2,922 cm−1, which were due to the O–H and C–H stretching vibrations of cellulosic SF. The spectral bands at 1,620 cm−1 (vibration of water molecules absorbed in cellulose) (44) and 1,383 cm−1 were attributed to C–O stretching and CH bending vibrations, respectively. The peaks observed at 1,420, 1,268, to 1,105 cm−1 was due to the CH2 deformation and C–O–H stretching in cellulose, respectively. Similarly, FTIR spectra were taken for NaAg in the powder form, which are shown in Figure 5b. The major peaks in the wavenumber range of 3,419, 2,922, 1,326, and 1,105 cm−1 were attributed to the OH, CH stretching, CH bending, and C–O–C stretching vibrations in NaAg. In general, it was observed that the FTIR spectra for untreated/treated SFCs with and without heating the NaAg solution were substantially identical (Figure 5c).

Figure 5 
                  (a) FTIR of untreated and treated SFC without heating the NaAg solution; (b) FTIR of NaAg powder; and (c) FTIR of untreated and treated SFC with heating the NaAg solution.
Figure 5

(a) FTIR of untreated and treated SFC without heating the NaAg solution; (b) FTIR of NaAg powder; and (c) FTIR of untreated and treated SFC with heating the NaAg solution.

3.4 SEM

SEM images are used to analyse the internal structure, fibre pullouts, and interfacial adhesion of the composites. It was carried out on the U3 and T3 composites, at a higher concentration (2.5%) of samples. Figure 6a displays the scanning electron micrograph that was taken of the U3 sample. The presence of NaAg gum across the fibre was observed, and there was strong interfacial adhesion between the fibre and the NaAg. It is possible that this is the reason why the U3 sample has such a remarkable mechanical strength, that is, the maximal load was transmitted from NaAg to SF in the composites. In the T3 composite, there was evidence of both fibre breakage and poor adhesion (Figure 6b). Incomplete distribution of SF and NaAg can be seen in the UH3 sample (Figure 6c), whereas greater agglomeration and voids (factors that reduce strength) were also available in the TH3 material (Figure 6d).

Figure 6 
                  SEM images of (a) U3 sample, (b) T3 sample, (c) UH3 sample, and (d) TH3 sample.
Figure 6

SEM images of (a) U3 sample, (b) T3 sample, (c) UH3 sample, and (d) TH3 sample.

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy is a common technique that can be used to determine the elemental compositions of a given sample even in micrometres (45). Figure 7 shows the compositions along with their distributions for both treated (T3) and untreated (U3) SFCs. It was seen that the composites contain traces of oxygen, chlorine, and sodium in their weight percentages. Table 2 presents the results of an energy-dispersive spectroscopy analysis performed on composites. This analysis reveals that the cellulosic fibre distribution in the composites contains the highest weight percentage of oxygen, chlorine, and sodium.

Figure 7 
                  EDS of (a) U3 sample, (b) T3 sample, (c) UH3 sample, and (d) TH3 sample.
Figure 7

EDS of (a) U3 sample, (b) T3 sample, (c) UH3 sample, and (d) TH3 sample.

Table 2

Elemental compositions of the composites (%)

Sample code O Cl Na
U3 18.26 40.99 35.12
T3 69.82 5.20 24.99
UH3 47.89 18.43 27.13
TH3 14.71 41.76 38.61

3.5 TGA

TGA was carried out to ascertain the thermal stability, weight loss, and thermal degradation of the prepared composites in relation to temperature. Table 3 indicates the initial and final degradation temperature as well as char residues (at 610°C), and also, the associated TGA curves are detailed in Figure 8. Initial weight loss of the samples in the range of 40–140°C was accounted for the evaporation of water molecules. Simultaneously, the weight loss from 180°C to 338°C was due to the thermal degradation of chemical constituents such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin that were present in the SF. At a temperature of 360°C, the final degradation takes place, which indicates the removal of the carboxyl group and the decomposition of the NaAg gum. According to the results from the TGA curve at 610°C, the char content (made of organic material) of U1, U2, and U3 samples was found to be 10.5%, 35.5%, and 37.3%, respectively. According to Kumaran et al. (46), the treated portunus shell powder-based jute fabric-reinforced epoxy composites have the maximum char residue of 35%, which indicates that portunus powder has a high molecular weight and experiences less degradation. Although each composite (U1 to U3) followed a similar pattern in terms of the temperature at which it degraded but varied in the char residues obtained. The U1 composites have a lower level of stability, and the char remains 10.5%. As a result, the composites followed the lower thermal stability in the order of U3 > U2 > U1.

Table 3

TGA data of the composites

Sample code Initial temperature (°C) Final temperature (°C) Degradation temperature (°C) Char residues (%)
U1 180 345 303 10.5
U2 181 340 316 35.5
U3 180 354 331 37.3
T1 182 361 324 29.6
T2 182 357 324 33.1
T3 181 354 324 24.8
Figure 8 
                  TGA and DSC curves of U1 to U3 samples.
Figure 8

TGA and DSC curves of U1 to U3 samples.

The alkali treatment of SFC could influence the thermal analysis (Figure 9) of composites (T1 to T3) to some extent, and the degradation process occurs as similar to U3. The less incompatibility between the alkali-treated SF and the soluble matrix decreases the thermal stability when compared to U1, U2, and U3. The char residues of T1, T2, and T3 were 29.6%, 33.1%, and 24.8%, respectively, at 640°C.

Figure 9 
                  TGA and DSC curves of T1 to T3 samples.
Figure 9

TGA and DSC curves of T1 to T3 samples.

3.6 DSC

The process of releasing or absorbing heat energy for the prepared composites was done by DSC. In addition to this, it gives information about the physico-chemical changes that occur in relation to the heat flow and temperature. The magnitude and location of DSC curves inferred the thermal-phase transition of the material. A range of endothermic and exothermic events occur during the decomposition of fibres at different temperatures. It was noted from the DSC curves (Figure 8) that all specimens had a broad curve between the temperature ranges of 46–260°C. These curves accounted for the elimination of water molecules from within the fibre. U1 composites showed thermal stability from 46°C to 146°C and melting temperature (T m) reached at 500°C. U2 is thermally stable at 48–180°C, and there were no considerable changes observed at above 350°C. In the case of U3, two sharp exothermic peaks were noted at 311°C and 351°C with the area smaller than U1. For the composites T1 (Figure 9), two sharp exothermic peaks at 285°C and 357°C were noted with small area. The melting temperature at 350°C for T2 and 352°C for T3 was noted. No significant changes were observed in T2 and T3 composites above 355°C.

3.7 MA

The existence of microvoids, the type of fibre, the viscous matrix, and the relative humidity were the primary factors that determined the moisture properties. The experimental investigation of MA is used to study the feasibility of composites when it is subjected to false roofing and outdoor applications. Likewise, the qualities of MA could have a direct effect on the mechanical properties of composites. Figure 10 shows the results of MA on the treated/untreated fibre composite specimens versus the percentage of MA after 24 h. As described from Figure 10, the less MA rate was noted for U3 specimens (0.96%), whereas the samples U1 and U2 exhibited the highest MA of 3.22% and 1.44%, respectively. Because the cellulosic components of the fibre are removed from the treated fibre during the alkali treatment process, the treated fibre composites demonstrated a lower MA when compared to U1 to U3. These components are primarily responsible for higher MA (47). As a consequence of the removal of the cellulosic components, a decrease in the proportion of MA may be seen in the treated SFC. The most successful bonding of NaAg with SF was observed in the specimens U3 and T1, with the highest mechanical strength, thus resulting in a decreased MA rate. This could be explained by the fact that there were no gaps between the SF and the NaAg; in other words, compatibility was good for U3 specimen. There was the least degree of variation in the results for the composites (UH1, UH2, UH3, TH1, TH2, TH3). The MA values for each instance are different and were determined arbitrarily. It is interesting to note that 6.46% of MA was noted for alkali-treated, hemp fibre-reinforced epoxy composites (8). Other researcher noted that the moisture content absorption of the sugar palm fibre (SPF)/sugar palm starch biocomposites decreases with increasing fibre loading. It was observed that the composite with 30% of SPF showed an MA of 6% (48). Similarly, in the case of tamarind seed gum, banana fibre composites had 6.5–7.8% MA for various varieties of banana fibre, which suggested that the composite was especially designed for false roofing applications (31).

Figure 10 
                  Moisture absorption rate of untreated and treated SF samples.
Figure 10

Moisture absorption rate of untreated and treated SF samples.

4 Conclusions

SF-reinforced NaAg gum composites (with different concentrations of gum solution: 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%) were successfully prepared by the hand lay-up process. The following are the findings that were reached after conducting experiments to study the mechanical, degradation, and morphological aspects of composites. It was inferred that the effect of gum concentration increases the mechanical properties of U3 samples, and it was observed that with heating solution of NaAg provided lower strength when compared to without heating NaAg solution. Biodegradation rate of the treated fibre composites was much faster than that of the untreated fibre composites. Initially, biodegradation was a slow process, but gradually weight loss of untreated/treated SF NaAg composites increased as the number of days of soil incubation period was increased. Biodegradation supports micro-/macrobial activities, thus enriching the soil. Thus, the use of untreated/treated SF-NaAg biocomposites will reduce the environmental issues associated with waste disposal. SEM images of U3 specimen have good interfacial bonding between the fibre and the NaAg gum. The findings of this study lend credence to the role of SF/NaAg biocomposites as potential “ecomaterials.” These materials are non-hazardous and have the potential to serve as alternatives to non-biodegradable materials in a variety of non-structural engineering applications, including false roofs, interiors, tablemates, packaging material, low-cost housing, and disposable products. It is recommended that plant fibre composites should be used rather than synthetic fibre composites for the purpose of protecting our environment. At this point, we have developed composites that are superior to conventional materials in every way, including being completely biodegradable, inexpensive, and lightweight. Further research is conducted on the hybridization of the SF composite with the other plant fibres. These fibres, which may include banana and jute fibres, may be tested in an effort to improve the mechanical properties of composites.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi, for their help to test the mechanical strength of the composites.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Balaji Rao Pradeepa prepared manuscript and figures; Amirthalingam V. Kiruthika reviewed the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

(1) Stelescu MD, Manaila E, Craciun G, Chirila C. Development and characterization of polymer eco-composites based on natural rubber reinforced with natural fibers. Materials. 2017;10:787. 10.3390/ma10070787.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(2) Arumugam C, Senthilkumar A, Sarojadevi M. Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of unsaturated polyester/chemically treated woven kenaf fiber/AgNPs@PVA hybrid nanobiocomposites for automotive applications. J Mater Sci Technol. 2020;9:15298–312. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.084.Search in Google Scholar

(3) Durowaye SI, Lawal GI, Sekunowo OI, Okonkwo EG. Synthesis and characterisation of hybrid polyethylene terephthalate matrix composites reinforced with Entada mannii fibre particles and almond shell particles. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci. 2018;31:305–13. 10.1016/j.jksues.2017.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

(4) Ashok KG, Kalaichelvan K, Ajith D. Effect of nano fillers on mechanical properties of luffa fiber epoxy composites. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19:1472–89. 10.1080/15440478.2020.1779898.Search in Google Scholar

(5) Sajin JB, Christu PR, Binoj JS, Brailson MB, Gerald ASM, Kheng LG, et al. Impact of fiber length on mechanical, morphological and thermal analysis of chemical treated jute fiber polymer composites for sustainable applications. Curr Res Green Sustain Chem. 2022;5:100241. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100241.Search in Google Scholar

(6) Lokesh P, Surya KTSA, Gopi R, Ganesh BL. A study on mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced polymer composite. Mater Today: Proc. 2020;22:897–903. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.100.Search in Google Scholar

(7) Rapeeporn S, Laongdaw T, Vinod A, Sanjay MR, Suchart S . Agro-waste from Bambusa flexuosa stem fibers: A sustainable and green material for lightweight polymer composites. J Build Eng. 2023;73:106674. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106674.Search in Google Scholar

(8) Flavia B, Venanzio G, Enrico A, Raffaele S. Mechanical behavior of chemically-treated hemp fibers reinforced composites subjected to moisture absorption. J Mater Sci Technol. 2023;22:762–75. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.152.Search in Google Scholar

(9) Delphin P, Anton LR, Darshil US, Christophe B, Alain B. Interfacial and mechanical characterisation of biodegradable polymer-flax fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2021;201:108529. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108529.Search in Google Scholar

(10) Jauhar F, Akmaluddin A, Femiana G. Utilization of kenaf fiber waste as reinforced polymer composites. Results Eng. 2022;13:100380. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100380.Search in Google Scholar

(11) Venkatram B, Kailasanathan C, Seenikannan P, Paramasamy S. Study on the evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of natural sisal fiber/general polymer composites reinforced with nanoclay. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2016;21:647–56. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.1194616.Search in Google Scholar

(12) Deeban B, Maniraj J, Ramesh M. Experimental investigation of properties and aging behavior of pineapple and sisal leaf hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer composites. e-Polymers. 2023;23:20228104. 10.1515/epoly-2022-8104.Search in Google Scholar

(13) Ramesh M, Rajeshkumar, Lakshmi NR, Nagarajan S, Damodaran VK, Devarajan B. Influence of filler material on properties of fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review. e-Polymers. 2022;22:898–916. 10.1515/epoly-2022-0080.Search in Google Scholar

(14) Habibur R, Farjana Y, Shadma AK, Zayedul H, Mowshumi R, Muhamad BU, et al. Fabrication and analysis of physico-mechanical characteristics of NaOH treated PALF reinforced LDPE composites: Effect of gamma irradiation. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:914–28. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.067.Search in Google Scholar

(15) Sivasankar GA, Arun KP, Boopathi C, Brindha S, Nirmalraj RJT, Benham A. Evaluation and comparison on mechanical properties of abaca and hemp fiber reinforced hybrid epoxy resin composites. Mater Today Proc. 2023. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.400.Search in Google Scholar

(16) Libo Y, Nawawi C, Liang H, Bohumil K. Effect of alkali treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of coir fibres, coir fibre reinforced-polymer composites and reinforced-cementitious composites. Const Build Mater. 2016;112:168–82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.182.Search in Google Scholar

(17) Reshwanth KNGL, Chandrasekar M, Sathish KP, Mohammad J, Reddy DM, Norrrahim MNF, et al. Chapter 8 - Mechanical properties of coir and coir-based hybrid polymeric composites. In: Jawaid M, editor. Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering, Coir Fiber and its Composites. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2022; p. 175–91. 10.1016/B978-0-443-15186-6.00088-6.Search in Google Scholar

(18) Wei C, Qiuying L, Chifei W. The HDPE composites reinforced with waste hybrid PET/cotton fibers modified with the synthesized modifier. e-Polymers. 2022;22:30–7. 10.1515/epoly-2022-0008.Search in Google Scholar

(19) Puttegowda M, Rangappa SM, Jawaid M, Shivanna P, Basavegowda Y, Saba N. Potential of natural/synthetic hybrid composites for aerospace applications. In: M Jawaid, M Thariq, editors. Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering, Sustainable Composites for Aerospace Applications. United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 315–51. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102131-6.00021-9.Search in Google Scholar

(20) Navin C, Mohammed F. Sisal-reinforced polymer composites. Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering, Tribology of Natural Fiber Polymer Composites. 2nd edn. In: Navin C, Mohammed F, editors. Woodhead Publishing; 2021. p. 87–110. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818983-2.00003-7.Search in Google Scholar

(21) George M, Abraham TE. Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: Alginate and chitosan — a review. J Control Release. 2006;114:1–14. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

(22) Zdiri K, Adel E, Omar H, Mohamed, Jocelyn HB. Properties of recycled PP/clay filaments used for simulation of wastewater treatment filter. J Tex Inst. 2021;112:1753–62. 10.1080/00405000.2020.1841946.Search in Google Scholar

(23) Zdiri K, Cayla A, Elamri A, Erard A, Salaun F. Alginate-based Bio-Composites and their potential applications. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13:117. 10.3390/jfb13030117.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(24) Zdiri K, Elamri A, Harzallah O, Hamdaoui M. Thermo-mechanical characterization of post-consumer PP/Tunisian organo-clay filaments. In: Msahli S, Debbabi F, editors. Advances in Applied Research on Textile and Materials - IX. CIRATM 2020. Springer Proceedings in Materials. Vol 17. Cham: Springer; 2022. 10.1007/978-3-031-08842-1_7.Search in Google Scholar

(25) Zdiri K, Elamri A, Hamdaoui M, Harzallah O, Khenoussi N, Brendlé J. Valorization of post-consumer PP by (Un)modified Tunisian clay nanoparticles incorporation. Waste Biomass Valori. 2020;11:2285–96. 10.1007/s12649-018-0427-2.Search in Google Scholar

(26) Samouh Z, Molnar K, Boussu F, Cherkaoui O, Moznine R. Mechanical and thermal characterization of sisal fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites. Polym Adv Technol. 2019;30:529–37. 10.1002/pat.4488.Search in Google Scholar

(27) Adane AA, Awoke FW. Characterization of Chemically treated sisal fiber/polyester composites. J Eng. 2022;2022:Article ID 8583213, 1–11. 10.1155/2022/8583213.Search in Google Scholar

(28) Agernew M, Mulu BK, Abrha GT. Mechanical and water-absorption properties of sisal fiber (Agave sisalana)-reinforced polyester composite. J Nat Fibers. 2019;16:877–85. 10.1080/15440478.2018.1441088.Search in Google Scholar

(29) Parul S, Gupta MK. PLA coated sisal fibre reinforced polyester composite: static and dynamic mechanical properties. Mater Today: Proc. 2018;5:19799–19807. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.343.Search in Google Scholar

(30) Vardhini VKJ, Murugan R, Rathinamoorthy R. Effect of alkali treatment on physical properties of banana fibre. Indian J Fibre Text Res. 2019;44:459–65. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/298009346.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

(31) Kiruthika AV, Priyadarzini TRK, Veluraja K. Preparation, properties and application of tamarind seed gum reinforced banana fibre composite materials. Fibers Polym. 2012;13:51–6. 10.1007/s12221-012-0051-x.Search in Google Scholar

(32) Tengsuthiwat J, Boonyasopon P, Dangtungee R, Siengchin S. Characterization of poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate)/Sisal Fiber/Clay bio-composites prepared by casting technique. Period Polytech Mech Eng. 2016;60:103–12. 10.3311/PPme.8721.Search in Google Scholar

(33) Thorsak K, Raminatun M, Emma S, Monica EK, Sigbritt K. Enhancement of mechanical, thermal and antibacterial properties of sisal/polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate biodegradable composite. J Met Mater Miner. 2018;28:52–61. 10.14456/jmmm.2018.08.Search in Google Scholar

(34) Sathishkumar TP, Navaneethakrishnan P, Shankar S, Rajasekar R. Investigation of chemically treated randomly oriented sansevieria ehrenbergii fiber reinforced isophthallic polyester composites. J Compos Mater. 2014;48:2961–75. 10.1177/0021998313503589.Search in Google Scholar

(35) Ismail NF, Radzuan NA, Sulong AB, Muhamad N, Haron CH. The effect of alkali treatment on physical, mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf fiber and polymer epoxy composites. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13:2005. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/12/2005.10.3390/polym13122005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(36) Siddesh NV, Prabakara SS, Raghavendra S. Mechanical properties of sisal fiber reinforced starch based bio composites. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2057; 2019. p. 020019. 10.1063/1.5085590.Search in Google Scholar

(37) Batista KC, Silva DAK, Coelho LAF, Sergio P, Pezzin APT. Soil biodegradation of PHBV/peach palm particles biocomposites. J Polym Envir on. 2010;18:346–54. 10.1007/s10924-010-0238-4.Search in Google Scholar

(38) Siakeng R, Jawaid M, Asim M, Siengchin S. Accelerated weathering and soil burial effect on biodegradability, colour and texture of coir/pineapple leaf fibres/pla biocomposites. Polymers. 2020;12:458. 10.3390/polym12020458.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(39) Vasile C, Pamfil D, Râpă M, Darie-Ni¸tă RN, Mitelut AC, Popa EE, et al. Study of the soil burial degradation of some PLA/CS Biocomposites. Compos. Part B. 2018;142:251–62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.026.Search in Google Scholar

(40) Moriana R, Strömberg E, Ribes A, Karlsson S. Degradation behaviour of natural fibre reinforced starch-based composites under different environmental conditions. J Renew Mater. 2014;2:145–56. 10.7569%2FJRM.2014.634103.Search in Google Scholar

(41) Kumar R, Yakubu MK, Anandjiwala RD. Biodegradation of flax fiber reinforced poly lactic acid. Express Polym Lett. 2010;4:423–30. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.53.Search in Google Scholar

(42) Juntuek P, Chumsamrong P, Ruksakulpiwat Y, Ruksakulpiwat C. Effect of vetiver grass fiber on soil burial degradation of natural rubber and polylactic acid composites. Int Polym Process. 2014;3:379–88. 10.3139/217.2836.Search in Google Scholar

(43) Chin-San W. Preparation, characterization and biodegradability of crosslinked tea plant-fibre-reinforced polyhydroxyalkanoate composites. Polym Degrad Stab. 2013;98:1473–80. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.04.013.Search in Google Scholar

(44) Rosa MF, Medeiros ES, Malmonge JA, Gregorski KS, Wood DF, Mattoso LHC, et al. Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behaviour. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;81:83–92. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059.Search in Google Scholar

(45) Sina E. Material surface preparation techniques, Surface treatment of materials for adhesion bonding. Vol. 95; 2014.10.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00006-XSearch in Google Scholar

(46) Kumaran P, Mohanamurugan S, Madhu S, Vijay R, Lenin DS, Sanjay MR, et al. Investigation on thermo-mechanical characteristics of treated/untreated Portunus sanguinolentus shell powder-based jute fabrics reinforced epoxy composites. J Ind Text. 2020;50:427–59. 10.1177/1528083719832851.Search in Google Scholar

(47) Gurdag G, Sarmad S. Cellulose graft copolymers: synthesis, properties, and applications. In: S Kalia, M Sabaa, editors. Polysaccharide based graft copolymers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. 10.1007/978-3-642-36566-9_2.Search in Google Scholar

(48) Sahari J, Sapuan SM, Zainudin ES, Maleque MA. Mechanical and thermal properties of environmentally friendly composites derived from sugar palm tree. Mater Des. 2013;49:285–9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.048.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-03
Revised: 2023-06-08
Accepted: 2023-06-10
Published Online: 2023-07-15

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Chitosan nanocomposite film incorporating Nigella sativa oil, Azadirachta indica leaves’ extract, and silver nanoparticles
  3. Effect of Zr-doped CaCu3Ti3.95Zr0.05O12 ceramic on the microstructure, dielectric properties, and electric field distribution of the LDPE composites
  4. Effects of dry heating, acetylation, and acid pre-treatments on modification of potato starch with octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA)
  5. Loading conditions impact on the compression fatigue behavior of filled styrene butadiene rubber
  6. Characterization and compatibility of bio-based PA56/PET
  7. Study on the aging of three typical rubber materials under high- and low-temperature cyclic environment
  8. Numerical simulation and experimental research of electrospun polyacrylonitrile Taylor cone based on multiphysics coupling
  9. Experimental investigation of properties and aging behavior of pineapple and sisal leaf hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer composites
  10. Influence of temperature distribution on the foaming quality of foamed polypropylene composites
  11. Enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of 4-methylcatechol oligomer and preliminary evaluations as stabilizing agent in polypropylene
  12. Molecular dynamics simulation of the effect of the thermal and mechanical properties of addition liquid silicone rubber modified by carbon nanotubes with different radii
  13. Incorporation of poly(3-acrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride-co-acrylic acid) branches for good sizing properties and easy desizing from sized cotton warps
  14. Effect of matrix composition on properties of polyamide 66/polyamide 6I-6T composites with high content of continuous glass fiber for optimizing surface performance
  15. Preparation and properties of epoxy-modified thermosetting phenolic fiber
  16. Thermal decomposition reaction kinetics and storage life prediction of polyacrylate pressure-sensitive adhesive
  17. Effect of different proportions of CNTs/Fe3O4 hybrid filler on the morphological, electrical and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites
  18. Doping silver nanoparticles into reverse osmosis membranes for antibacterial properties
  19. Melt-blended PLA/curcumin-cross-linked polyurethane film for enhanced UV-shielding ability
  20. The affinity of bentonite and WO3 nanoparticles toward epoxy resin polymer for radiation shielding
  21. Prolonged action fertilizer encapsulated by CMC/humic acid
  22. Preparation and experimental estimation of radiation shielding properties of novel epoxy reinforced with Sb2O3 and PbO
  23. Fabrication of polylactic acid nanofibrous yarns for piezoelectric fabrics
  24. Copper phenyl phosphonate for epoxy resin and cyanate ester copolymer with improved flame retardancy and thermal properties
  25. Synergistic effect of thermal oxygen and UV aging on natural rubber
  26. Effect of zinc oxide suspension on the overall filler content of the PLA/ZnO composites and cPLA/ZnO composites
  27. The role of natural hybrid nanobentonite/nanocellulose in enhancing the water resistance properties of the biodegradable thermoplastic starch
  28. Performance optimization of geopolymer mortar blending in nano-SiO2 and PVA fiber based on set pair analysis
  29. Preparation of (La + Nb)-co-doped TiO2 and its polyvinylidene difluoride composites with high dielectric constants
  30. Effect of matrix composition on the performance of calcium carbonate filled poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) composites
  31. Low-temperature self-healing polyurethane adhesives via dual synergetic crosslinking strategy
  32. Leucaena leucocephala oil-based poly malate-amide nanocomposite coating material for anticorrosive applications
  33. Preparation and properties of modified ammonium polyphosphate synergistic with tris(2-hydroxyethyl) isocynurate for flame-retardant LDPE
  34. Thermal response of double network hydrogels with varied composition
  35. The effect of coated calcium carbonate using stearic acid on the recovered carbon black masterbatch in low-density polyethylene composites
  36. Investigation of MXene-modified agar/polyurethane hydrogel elastomeric repair materials with tunable water absorption
  37. Damping performance analysis of carbon black/lead magnesium niobite/epoxy resin composites
  38. Molecular dynamics simulations of dihydroxylammonium 5,5′-bistetrazole-1,1′-diolate (TKX-50) and TKX-50-based PBXs with four energetic binders
  39. Preparation and characterization of sisal fibre reinforced sodium alginate gum composites for non-structural engineering applications
  40. Study on by-products synthesis of powder coating polyester resin catalyzed by organotin
  41. Ab initio molecular dynamics of insulating paper: Mechanism of insulating paper cellobiose cracking at transient high temperature
  42. Effect of different tin neodecanoate and calcium–zinc heat stabilizers on the thermal stability of PVC
  43. High-strength polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel by vermiculite and lignocellulosic nanofibrils for electronic sensing
  44. Impacts of micro-size PbO on the gamma-ray shielding performance of polyepoxide resin
  45. Influence of the molecular structure of phenylamine antioxidants on anti-migration and anti-aging behavior of high-performance nitrile rubber composites
  46. Fiber-reinforced polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel via in situ fiber formation
  47. Preparation and performance of homogenous braids-reinforced poly (p-phenylene terephthamide) hollow fiber membranes
  48. Synthesis of cadmium(ii) ion-imprinted composite membrane with a pyridine functional monomer and characterization of its adsorption performance
  49. Impact of WO3 and BaO nanoparticles on the radiation shielding characteristics of polydimethylsiloxane composites
  50. Comprehensive study of the radiation shielding feature of polyester polymers impregnated with iron filings
  51. Preparation and characterization of polymeric cross-linked hydrogel patch for topical delivery of gentamicin
  52. Mechanical properties of rCB-pigment masterbatch in rLDPE: The effect of processing aids and water absorption test
  53. Pineapple fruit residue-based nanofibre composites: Preparation and characterizations
  54. Effect of natural Indocalamus leaf addition on the mechanical properties of epoxy and epoxy-carbon fiber composites
  55. Utilization of biosilica for energy-saving tire compounds: Enhancing performance and efficiency
  56. Effect of capillary arrays on the profile of multi-layer micro-capillary films
  57. A numerical study on thermal bonding with preheating technique for polypropylene microfluidic device
  58. Development of modified h-BN/UPE resin for insulation varnish applications
  59. High strength, anti-static, thermal conductive glass fiber/epoxy composites for medical devices: A strategy of modifying fibers with functionalized carbon nanotubes
  60. Effects of mechanical recycling on the properties of glass fiber–reinforced polyamide 66 composites in automotive components
  61. Bentonite/hydroxyethylcellulose as eco-dielectrics with potential utilization in energy storage
  62. Study on wall-slipping mechanism of nano-injection polymer under the constant temperature fields
  63. Synthesis of low-VOC unsaturated polyester coatings for electrical insulation
  64. Enhanced apoptotic activity of Pluronic F127 polymer-encapsulated chlorogenic acid nanoparticles through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in liver cancer cells and in vivo toxicity studies in zebrafish
  65. Preparation and performance of silicone-modified 3D printing photosensitive materials
  66. A novel fabrication method of slippery lubricant-infused porous surface by thiol-ene click chemistry reaction for anti-fouling and anti-corrosion applications
  67. Development of polymeric IPN hydrogels by free radical polymerization technique for extended release of letrozole: Characterization and toxicity evaluation
  68. Tribological characterization of sponge gourd outer skin fiber-reinforced epoxy composite with Tamarindus indica seed filler addition using the Box–Behnken method
  69. Stereocomplex PLLA–PBAT copolymer and its composites with multi-walled carbon nanotubes for electrostatic dissipative application
  70. Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of Krestin–chitosan nanocomplex for cancer medication via activation of the mitochondrial intrinsic pathway
  71. Variation in tungsten(vi) oxide particle size for enhancing the radiation shielding ability of silicone rubber composites
  72. Damage accumulation and failure mechanism of glass/epoxy composite laminates subjected to repeated low velocity impacts
  73. Gamma-ray shielding analysis using the experimental measurements for copper(ii) sulfate-doped polyepoxide resins
  74. Numerical simulation into influence of airflow channel quantities on melt-blowing airflow field in processing of polymer fiber
  75. Cellulose acetate oleate-reinforced poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) composite materials
  76. Radiation shielding capability and exposure buildup factor of cerium(iv) oxide-reinforced polyester resins
  77. Recyclable polytriazole resins with high performance based on Diels-Alder dynamic covalent crosslinking
  78. Adsorption and recovery of Cr(vi) from wastewater by Chitosan–Urushiol composite nanofiber membrane
  79. Comprehensive performance evaluation based on electromagnetic shielding properties of the weft-knitted fabrics made by stainless steel/cotton blended yarn
  80. Review Articles
  81. Preparation and application of natural protein polymer-based Pickering emulsions
  82. Wood-derived high-performance cellulose structural materials
  83. Flammability properties of polymers and polymer composites combined with ionic liquids
  84. Polymer-based nanocarriers for biomedical and environmental applications
  85. A review on semi-crystalline polymer bead foams from stirring autoclave: Processing and properties
  86. Rapid Communication
  87. Preparation and characterization of magnetic microgels with linear thermosensitivity over a wide temperature range
  88. Special Issue: Biodegradable and bio-based polymers: Green approaches (Guest Editors: Kumaran Subramanian, A. Wilson Santhosh Kumar, and Venkatajothi Ramarao)
  89. Synthesis and characterization of proton-conducting membranes based on bacterial cellulose and human nail keratin
  90. Fatigue behaviour of Kevlar/carbon/basalt fibre-reinforced SiC nanofiller particulate hybrid epoxy composite
  91. Effect of citric acid on thermal, phase morphological, and mechanical properties of poly(l-lactide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(l-lactide)/thermoplastic starch blends
  92. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity against lung cancer cells via green synthesized ZnFe2O4/cellulose nanocomposites
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/epoly-2023-0027/html
Scroll to top button