Startseite Economic aspect of combined transport
Artikel Open Access

Economic aspect of combined transport

  • Zdeněk Říha und Iveta Dočkalíková EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Oktober 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The article deals with the current issues of combined transport; at the beginning, the crucial terms and definitions are stated. Combined transport is evaluated on the basis of statistics in the Czech Republic. According to these statistics, combined transport has a rising tendency, although the potential has not been fully utilized. The article defines reasons why carriers might choose only road transport. Problems of the utilization of combined transport from the carriers´ point of view are mentioned; increased demand for organization and carriage in particular. Furthermore, it focuses on modern trends in combined transport, especially in terms of modern technologies and the utilization of informatics systems. In the conclusion, the article also presents a method of economic evaluation of combined transport on the basis of its cost comparison with road transport.

1 Introduction

Combined transport is generally defined as a transport system of items (goods) in one and the same transport unit or a road vehicle that gradually uses different modes of transport without handling the items themselves when changing the modes of transport. The prevailing part of the transport route is carried out on the railway or inland waterway and the initial part (collection) and/or the final part (distribution) takes part on the road and it is usually as short as possible. Combined transport is part of multimodal transport which is defined as goods transport by two different modes of transport at least.

Currently, the term of sustainability is very topical and the whole society applies it within many sectors and many connections. Transport, e.g. in the field of waste management, plays a crucial role, particularly when various regional municipalities are served by different collection companies.

Nowadays, combined or multimodal transport is the most growing segment of railway transport with a high potential to overtake great volumes of freight transport from the road transport to those modes of transport that are much environment-friendlier [1]. Continental combined transport has a great potential as it uses transport throughout the continent without the need of seaway transport.

The introduction of the current trend of supporting the transfer of freight transport from road to rail and the promotion of environmentally friendly modes of transport are based on the European Union’s strategic document “White Paper – Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Creating a competitive and resource-efficient transport system” (hereinafter referred to as the “White Paper”). At present, it appears that the implementation of the White Paper’s objectives in the field of freight transport is not entirely satisfactory [2]. The objective of all EU member countries should be to introduce measures that will increase the competitiveness of combined transport and its share of the freight transport market.

Combined transport must be understood as a complete system – road/rail vehicle, transport unit, transport route, and terminal.

The most commonly used transport units for combined transport are ISO containers, inland and roll containers, swap bodies, and road intermodal trailers. ISO containers were originally developed for sea transport and subsequently were used for land transport. For continental combined transport, swap bodies and road intermodal trailers are mainly used, which are directly transferable to a road vehicle and allow transhipment from road to rail transport [3]. Inland and roll containers are also useful for continental combined transport [4].

2 Definition of combined transport

This section should include sufficient technical information to enable the experiments to be reproduced. In theoretical papers comprising the computational analyses, technical details (methods, models applied, or newly developed) should be provided to enable the readers to reproduce the calculations.

Combined transport (combined traffic) is such transport in which one (passive) means of transport is carried on another (active) means of transport. The movement of goods is provided in a single transport unit or container which is successively transported by several different modes of transport, without the goods themselves being handled during the change of mode. Freight transport uses road or water transport in addition to railway transport during one journey – it is a system of transporting goods in one and the same transport unit (large container, swap body, roll container) or road vehicle which also uses rail or water transport on one journey. The road transport of the transport units within the framework of the combined transport is used for collection and distribution from the place of loading or unloading to the combined transport transhipment point or from the combined transport transhipment point to the place of unloading or loading.

The key to the use of multimodal (combined) transport is its economic efficiency from the point of view of the carrier. The parameter examined can then be either the limit transport distance of the rail transport or the limit number of units transported. Of course, this relates to transports where there is the choice between road and multimodal transport [5]. In cases of intercontinental transport, where maritime transport must be used, the use of multimodal transport is a necessity. However, it should be noted that any transport is a highly individual matter and there are several factors that will play a role in the final decision of the carrier and his choice of transport mode:

  • connection to the transport infrastructure (access to railway transport),

  • route parameters, esp. the distance, where it is generally true that the longer the distance, the more convenient the multimodal transport,

  • volume transported, in general, the bigger volume, the more convenient the multimodal transport,

  • requirements on means of transport and its price.

The following figure shows the percentage growth in combined transport performance. In 2009, the decline is mainly related to the weakening of the economy in the context of the global economic depression. Data from 2020 are not yet available to show the impact of the coronavirus epidemic on intermodal transport (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               Base index of combined transport growth (in tkm) – (%). Source: own calculations.
Figure 1

Base index of combined transport growth (in tkm) – (%). Source: own calculations.

Last but not the least, the share of combined transport in freight transport as a whole is increasing. In 2019, the share of combined transport reached 5.61%. However, this is still lower than the share usually achieved abroad, especially in Western Europe (Figure 2).

Figure 2 
               Combined transport share (in tkm) of the total freight transport (%). Source: own calculations.
Figure 2

Combined transport share (in tkm) of the total freight transport (%). Source: own calculations.

3 Carriers´ point of view of combined transport

Enterprises that want to use combined transport must take into account a lot of circumstances. In most cases, they come to the conclusion that combined transport is ineffective for them [6]. The reasons are following:

  • lack of intermodal terminals (which can be just a local problem)

  • missing railway connection

  • higher cost demand (the conclusion of the article contains more information)

  • transport time prolonging (generally speaking, a carrier who invested money in the goods does not want to make the transport time longer)

  • more requirements for planning and organizing the transport (more requirements on the employees)

  • lower flexibility of operation management

A separate issue is the question of the use of combined transport terminals. In practice, it often happens that the owner of a combined transport terminal is also a carrier and consequently they prefer their own transport activities. In this context, we divide terminals into two groups – with public and nonpublic access.

A public access transhipment terminal is a transhipment terminal where the basic services of the transhipment terminal must be provided by the operator to any customer/interested party in using the CT terminal on a nondiscriminatory basis under guaranteed conditions known in advance and at a price set and published by the operator beforehand. The prices set for the provision of the basic terminal services must correspond to the actual operating costs of the transhipment terminal, including a reasonable profit. In the event that the demand exceeds the capacity of the terminal, the requirements shall be reduced equally among all bidders [7].

In 2019, there were 17 private combined transport transhipment facilities operating in the Czech Republic (3 of which are located in the public port of Mělník). These transhipment points currently have at their disposal, according to information provided by their operators, a storage capacity of 68,530 TEU (equivalent to one 20-foot container, i.e. 6 m in length). Nine intermodal transhipment facilities have handling equipment for the transhipment of intermodal road trailers. Three transhipment points have been supported from public funds (the financial settlement of the project has already been made) and have thus become public access transhipment points, which ensures the nondiscriminatory provision of services on the basis of equal conditions and a published price list that is freely available. It is the transshipment point of PKP Cargo International in Ostrava Paskov (formerly AWT), ČD – DUSS Terminal in Lovosice, and UPLINE CZ in Obrnice. By the end of 2022, further transshipment points supported from public funds, OPD II in particular, will have complied with conditions for public access.

In addition, there are private company transhipment facilities in the Czech Republic that serve the needs of the owners only or one exclusive customer; in general, these transhipment points provide services to various customers on the basis of commercial agreements. The Czech Republic does not operate a public transhipment facility owned by the state or another public institution, as is the case in the neighbouring EU countries.

In the field of combined transport, the Ministry of Transport also cooperates with professional associations and unions such as ŽESNAD.CZ (Association of Rail Freight Carriers of the Czech Republic), ČESMAD BOHEMIA, (Czech Association of Road Transport Operators), the Transport Union, SCHP ČR (Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic), and other experts (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
               Location of container transshipment terminals in the Czech Republic [8]. (1) Praha Uhříněves, (2) Obrnice, (3) Česká Třebová, (4) Mělník (tři překladiště), (5) Želechovice nad Dřevnicí – Lípa, (6) Brno, (7) Šenov, (8) Nýřany, (9) Paskov, (10) Ústí nad Labem, (11) Lovosice, (12) Děčín – Loubí, (13) Přerov, and (14) Pardubice – Černá za Bor.
Figure 3

Location of container transshipment terminals in the Czech Republic [8]. (1) Praha Uhříněves, (2) Obrnice, (3) Česká Třebová, (4) Mělník (tři překladiště), (5) Želechovice nad Dřevnicí – Lípa, (6) Brno, (7) Šenov, (8) Nýřany, (9) Paskov, (10) Ústí nad Labem, (11) Lovosice, (12) Děčín – Loubí, (13) Přerov, and (14) Pardubice – Černá za Bor.

4 Modern technologies of combined transport

“The freight transport concept for period 2017–2023 with prospect till 2030” claims that the network of transhipment points is relatively dense; however, it adds that “the transshipment points are not usually located on public transport infrastructure, the movement of rail wagons between public transport infrastructure and terminals with a possible link to logistics centres located on branch lines represents an additional cost item lowering the competitiveness of combined and multimodal transport lines which are being newly introduced” [9].

The situation where terminals are owned by a freight transport operator is also problematic.

The following problems can then arise:

  • reluctance of other carriers to use such a terminal,

  • the setting of high prices by the terminal owner,

  • preference for the terminal owner’s activities when there is a lack of terminal capacity,

  • high transhipment prices (e.g. compared to Germany)

When it comes to transhipment, we mainly refer to various technologies, so-called horizontal transshipment, which do not require a crane or other handling equipment and the transport unit is in permanent contact with the ground or the means of transport. Examples of such technologies include ModaLohr, which takes place in specially adapted terminals with pivoting loading ramps, where the platform of the low-level rail car is pivoted by 30° during transhipment, the road trailer is driven onto it, the intermodal unit is disconnected, and the rail car is pivoted to its original position. [10] The estimated investment costs for one terminal, depending on its length, will be between 15 and 20 million EUR [11] (Figure 4).

Figure 4 
               Horizontal transhipment technology ModaLohr, zdroj [12].
Figure 4

Horizontal transhipment technology ModaLohr, zdroj [12].

However, a significant limitation of horizontal transshipment technology is its application mainly for complete trains and the high initial investment, which for example for the ModaLohr system for one rail and one railcar can be around 500 million CZK. This is a significant barrier to the development of these transshipment technologies. In practice, it turns out that the efficiency of these systems is not great and they cannot do without operating subsidies. The technological shortcomings of the system are also a matter of concern, and its use is thus currently very limited.

An important factor for the efficiency of combined transport is the length of freight trains. In general, the longer the train, the lower the cost of transporting one container. According to European Commission Regulation 1315/2013, the capacity of terminals and main lines is formulated by a train length of at least 740 m in the 2030 time frame. The undeniable economic advantage of such long trains is countered by an operational disadvantage – the small number of so-called intermediate stations, where crossing or overtaking is problematic for such long trains. Trains must therefore be arranged to pass through stations where this length of a track does not exist. A length of 650–700 m is therefore recommended, which means 80–100 TEUs/train when there are different combinations of carriages.

5 Economic evaluation of combined transport

In this section, we deliberately abstract from the fact that there will be a number of factors involved in whether a carrier uses combined transport and we will only address the question of what parameters are needed to make combined transport economically advantageous compared to road transport. From an economic point of view, the objective is to find the limit number of units transported or limit distance of the part of the transport that is carried by rail transport so that combined transport is acceptable to customers as far as costs are concerned. We follow the equation

(1) N RT = N CT ,

where N RT , transport costs using road transport; N CT , transport costs using combined transport.

Road transport costs [10] will depend on the number of transported units, distance, and road transport unit cost:

(2) N RT = p n km  R L R 1 ,

where p , number of transported units (pcs); n km R , rate per kilometer made on roads (CZK/km); L R 1 , number of kilometers made on roads – roads transport (km); n km T , rate per kilometer made on the freight railway line (CZK/km).

Part of combined transport costs [13] will be created by railway transport cost and transhipment (we suppose it will be done twice, i.e. road transport will be used both at the beginning and at the end of the process), it is also necessary to add up the final transport that is performed by road transport, that is:

(3) N CT = n km  T L T + 2 p n + p n km R L R 2 .

The following equation will be used for the calculation:

(4) p n km R L R 1 = n km T L T + 2 p n + p n km R L R 2 ,

where L R 2 , number of kilometres made on roads – combined transport (km); L T , number of kilometers made on the freight railway line (km); n km T , rate per kilometer made on the freight railway line (CZK/km); n , transshipment costs per one transport unit (CZK/transshipment)

From formula (4), we can express the number of units transported as an unknown quantity and the result is a relation for the limit number of units transported, which is the minimum for the use of combined transport in terms of cost-effectiveness p M :

(5) p M = n km T L T n km R L R 1 2 n p n km R L R 2 .

Similarly, we can express the limit distance of rail transport at which combined transport will be more cost-effective than road transport L TM :

(6) L TM = p ( n km R L R 1 2 n p n km R L R 2 ) n km T .

It is necessary to mention that the quantification will vary for every transport; however, the following conclusions will be valid:

  1. the higher the number of units transported, the lower the cost of rail transport and thus the more advantageous the use of combined transport,

  2. the advantage of combined transport increases with greater transport distance,

  3. of course, economically the synergistic effect of both factors is the most effective, i.e. large transport volume and a long distance

  4. the ratio of the distance covered by rail and road transport is also important; in this respect, we can introduce the coefficient for which it is valid that, the larger it is, the more advantageous combined transport will be:

(7) γ = L T L R 2 .

In fact, the above-stated relationships can be illustrated with official statistics that indicate the distance over which combined transport takes place. The following graph shows that transport activities over 600 km dominate, and in recent years, transport activities over 900 km have even reached a share of over 50% (Figure 5).

Figure 5 
               Transport distance of combined transport. Source: ref. [14].
Figure 5

Transport distance of combined transport. Source: ref. [14].

6 Conclusion

Combined transport is on the rise in the Czech Republic, despite the fact that it is still not exploiting its potential. This can be supported by several factors, e.g. increasing the capacity of the rail network (the construction of high-speed lines, on which part of the rail freight transport can be realized in the future and which will also reduce the load on the rest of the rail network, may be an important help) or modernizing combined transport terminals and increasing their capacity. A separate factor is the approach of carriers to the choice of transport mode. It is natural for small- and medium-sized enterprises to choose road freight transport for their needs. However, for larger enterprises, where material flows are more intense, combined transport may find a more significant application. In this context, there is an opportunity to deepen the marketing and awareness of multimodal transport to improve cooperation between manufacturing companies and operators, freight forwarders, and transport companies.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Poliak M, Poliakova A. Sustainability of trucks parking in European Union. EAI Endorsed Trans Energy Web. 2021;8(32):1–6.10.4108/eai.1-7-2020.166005Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Lizbetin J, Stopka O, Nemec F. Methodological assessment of environmental indicators in combined transport in comparison with direct road freight transport. Transport Means – 20th International Scientific Conference on Transport Means, Juodkrante, Lithuania: Kaunas University of Technology; 2016. p. 151–5. ISSN 1822-296X.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Lizbetin J, Vejs P, Stopka O, Cempírek V. The significance of dynamic detection of the railway vehicles weight. Nase More. 2016;63(3):156–60. 10.17818/NM/2016/SI15.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Dočkalíková I, Cempírek V, Indruchová I. Multimodal transport as a substitution for standard wagons. Transp Res Proc. 2020;44:30–4.10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Kubáňová J, Kubasáková I, Jagelčák J, Jurga L. The possibility of using an intermodal transport. Transport Means – Proceedings of the International Conference, 2019; 2019 Oct. p. 872–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Kubáňová J, Otáhalová Z, Senko Š. Advantages and disadvantages of intermodal freight transportation. Commun Comput Inf Sci. 2020;1289:285–95.10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_21Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Koncepce nákladní dopravy pro období 2017–2023 s výhledem do roku 2030. Ministry of Transport of Czech Republic; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Cempírek V, Vrbová P, Zákorová E. The possibility of transferring the transport performance on railway transport MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 134; 2017. p. 00006.10.1051/matecconf/201713400006Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Kubánová J, Kubasáková I, Špruncová K. The impact of the telematics systems using in the road freight transport business. Transport Means – Proceedings of the International Conference, 2020; 2020 Sept. p. 767–72.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Valdman S. Technologie překládky jednotek kombinované přepravy. Vědeckotechnický sborník ČD, 39/2015.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Široký J, Cempírek V, Hlavsová P, Chalupová Vohánková H. Aspekty rozvoje kontinentální kombinované dopravy v ČR, Perners Contact, ročník XI, číslo 1; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Říha Z, Tichý J. The Costs Calculation and Modelling in Transport Transport Means – Proceedings of the International Conference, 2015; 2015 Jan. p. 388–91.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] https://www.railwaypro.com.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] https://www.ioda.cz.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-03
Revised: 2021-08-06
Accepted: 2021-08-17
Published Online: 2021-10-14

© 2021 Zdeněk Říha and Iveta Dočkalíková, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Electrochemical studies of the synergistic combination effect of thymus mastichina and illicium verum essential oil extracts on the corrosion inhibition of low carbon steel in dilute acid solution
  3. Adoption of Business Intelligence to Support Cost Accounting Based Financial Systems — Case Study of XYZ Company
  4. Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Supply Options for University Buildings in Saudi Arabia
  5. Optimized design of a semimetal gasket operating in flange-bolted joints
  6. Behavior of non-reinforced and reinforced green mortar with fibers
  7. Field measurement of contact forces on rollers for a large diameter pipe conveyor
  8. Development of Smartphone-Controlled Hand and Arm Exoskeleton for Persons with Disability
  9. Investigation of saturation flow rate using video camera at signalized intersections in Jordan
  10. The features of Ni2MnIn polycrystalline Heusler alloy thin films formation by pulsed laser deposition
  11. Selection of a workpiece clamping system for computer-aided subtractive manufacturing of geometrically complex medical models
  12. Development of Solar-Powered Water Pump with 3D Printed Impeller
  13. Identifying Innovative Reliable Criteria Governing the Selection of Infrastructures Construction Project Delivery Systems
  14. Kinetics of Carbothermal Reduction Process of Different Size Phosphate Rocks
  15. Plastic forming processes of transverse non-homogeneous composite metallic sheets
  16. Accelerated aging of WPCs Based on Polypropylene and Birch plywood Sanding Dust
  17. Effect of water flow and depth on fatigue crack growth rate of underwater wet welded low carbon steel SS400
  18. Non-invasive attempts to extinguish flames with the use of high-power acoustic extinguisher
  19. Filament wound composite fatigue mechanisms investigated with full field DIC strain monitoring
  20. Structural Timber In Compartment Fires – The Timber Charring and Heat Storage Model
  21. Technical and economic aspects of starting a selected power unit at low ambient temperatures
  22. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  23. Adaptation to driver-assistance systems depending on experience
  24. A SIMULINK implementation of a vector shift relay with distributed synchronous generator for engineering classes
  25. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in a static tensile test
  26. Errors in documenting the subsoil and their impact on the investment implementation: Case study
  27. Comparison between two calculation methods for designing a stand-alone PV system according to Mosul city basemap
  28. Reduction of transport-related air pollution. A case study based on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the level of NOx emissions in the city of Krakow
  29. Driver intervention performance assessment as a key aspect of L3–L4 automated vehicles deployment
  30. A new method for solving quadratic fractional programming problem in neutrosophic environment
  31. Effect of fish scales on fabrication of polyester composite material reinforcements
  32. Impact of the operation of LNG trucks on the environment
  33. The effectiveness of the AEB system in the context of the safety of vulnerable road users
  34. Errors in controlling cars cause tragic accidents involving motorcyclists
  35. Deformation of designed steel plates: An optimisation of the side hull structure using the finite element approach
  36. Thermal-strength analysis of a cross-flow heat exchanger and its design improvement
  37. Effect of thermal collector configuration on the photovoltaic heat transfer performance with 3D CFD modeling
  38. Experimental identification of the subjective reception of external stimuli during wheelchair driving
  39. Failure analysis of motorcycle shock breakers
  40. Experimental analysis of nonlinear characteristics of absorbers with wire rope isolators
  41. Experimental tests of the antiresonance vibratory mill of a sectional movement trajectory
  42. Experimental and theoretical investigation of CVT rubber belt vibrations
  43. Is the cubic parabola really the best railway transition curve?
  44. Transport properties of the new vibratory conveyor at operations in the resonance zone
  45. Assessment of resistance to permanent deformations of asphalt mixes of low air void content
  46. COVID-19 lockdown impact on CERN seismic station ambient noise levels
  47. Review Articles
  48. FMEA method in operational reliability of forest harvesters
  49. Examination of preferences in the field of mobility of the city of Pila in terms of services provided by the Municipal Transport Company in Pila
  50. Enhancement stability and color fastness of natural dye: A review
  51. Special Issue: ICE-SEAM 2019 - Part II
  52. Lane Departure Warning Estimation Using Yaw Acceleration
  53. Analysis of EMG Signals during Stance and Swing Phases for Controlling Magnetorheological Brake applications
  54. Sensor Number Optimization Using Neural Network for Ankle Foot Orthosis Equipped with Magnetorheological Brake
  55. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Civil Engineering - Part II
  56. Comparison of STM’s reliability system on the example of selected element
  57. Technical analysis of the renovation works of the wooden palace floors
  58. Special Issue: TRANSPORT 2020
  59. Simulation assessment of the half-power bandwidth method in testing shock absorbers
  60. Predictive analysis of the impact of the time of day on road accidents in Poland
  61. User’s determination of a proper method for quantifying fuel consumption of a passenger car with compression ignition engine in specific operation conditions
  62. Analysis and assessment of defectiveness of regulations for the yellow signal at the intersection
  63. Streamlining possibility of transport-supply logistics when using chosen Operations Research techniques
  64. Permissible distance – safety system of vehicles in use
  65. Study of the population in terms of knowledge about the distance between vehicles in motion
  66. UAVs in rail damage image diagnostics supported by deep-learning networks
  67. Exhaust emissions of buses LNG and Diesel in RDE tests
  68. Measurements of urban traffic parameters before and after road reconstruction
  69. The use of deep recurrent neural networks to predict performance of photovoltaic system for charging electric vehicles
  70. Analysis of dangers in the operation of city buses at the intersections
  71. Psychological factors of the transfer of control in an automated vehicle
  72. Testing and evaluation of cold-start emissions from a gasoline engine in RDE test at two different ambient temperatures
  73. Age and experience in driving a vehicle and psychomotor skills in the context of automation
  74. Consumption of gasoline in vehicles equipped with an LPG retrofit system in real driving conditions
  75. Laboratory studies of the influence of the working position of the passenger vehicle air suspension on the vibration comfort of children transported in the child restraint system
  76. Route optimization for city cleaning vehicle
  77. Efficiency of electric vehicle interior heating systems at low ambient temperatures
  78. Model-based imputation of sound level data at thoroughfare using computational intelligence
  79. Research on the combustion process in the Fiat 1.3 Multijet engine fueled with rapeseed methyl esters
  80. Overview of the method and state of hydrogenization of road transport in the world and the resulting development prospects in Poland
  81. Tribological characteristics of polymer materials used for slide bearings
  82. Car reliability analysis based on periodic technical tests
  83. Special Issue: Terotechnology 2019 - Part II
  84. DOE Application for Analysis of Tribological Properties of the Al2O3/IF-WS2 Surface Layers
  85. The effect of the impurities spaces on the quality of structural steel working at variable loads
  86. Prediction of the parameters and the hot open die elongation forging process on an 80 MN hydraulic press
  87. Special Issue: AEVEC 2020
  88. Vocational Student's Attitude and Response Towards Experiential Learning in Mechanical Engineering
  89. Virtual Laboratory to Support a Practical Learning of Micro Power Generation in Indonesian Vocational High Schools
  90. The impacts of mediating the work environment on the mode choice in work trips
  91. Utilization of K-nearest neighbor algorithm for classification of white blood cells in AML M4, M5, and M7
  92. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  93. Case study: Vocational student’s knowledge and awareness level toward renewable energy in Indonesia
  94. Contribution of collaborative skill toward construction drawing skill for developing vocational course
  95. Special Issue: Annual Engineering and Vocational Education Conference - Part II
  96. Vocational teachers’ perspective toward Technological Pedagogical Vocational Knowledge
  97. Special Issue: ICIMECE 2020 - Part I
  98. Profile of system and product certification as quality infrastructure in Indonesia
  99. Prediction Model of Magnetorheological (MR) Fluid Damper Hysteresis Loop using Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm
  100. A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters
  101. Facile rheological route method for LiFePO4/C cathode material production
  102. Mosque design strategy for energy and water saving
  103. Epoxy resins thermosetting for mechanical engineering
  104. Estimating the potential of wind energy resources using Weibull parameters: A case study of the coastline region of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  105. Special Issue: CIRMARE 2020
  106. New trends in visual inspection of buildings and structures: Study for the use of drones
  107. Special Issue: ISERT 2021
  108. Alleviate the contending issues in network operating system courses: Psychomotor and troubleshooting skill development with Raspberry Pi
  109. Special Issue: Actual Trends in Logistics and Industrial Engineering - Part II
  110. The Physical Internet: A means towards achieving global logistics sustainability
  111. Special Issue: Modern Scientific Problems in Civil Engineering - Part I
  112. Construction work cost and duration analysis with the use of agent-based modelling and simulation
  113. Corrosion rate measurement for steel sheets of a fuel tank shell being in service
  114. The influence of external environment on workers on scaffolding illustrated by UTCI
  115. Allocation of risk factors for geodetic tasks in construction schedules
  116. Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of tram impact speed
  117. Technological and organizational problems in the construction of the radiation shielding concrete and suggestions to solve: A case study
  118. Finite element analysis of train speed effect on dynamic response of steel bridge
  119. New approach to analysis of railway track dynamics – Rail head vibrations
  120. Special Issue: Trends in Logistics and Production for the 21st Century - Part I
  121. Design of production lines and logistic flows in production
  122. The planning process of transport tasks for autonomous vans
  123. Modeling of the two shuttle box system within the internal logistics system using simulation software
  124. Implementation of the logistics train in the intralogistics system: A case study
  125. Assessment of investment in electric buses: A case study of a public transport company
  126. Assessment of a robot base production using CAM programming for the FANUC control system
  127. Proposal for the flow of material and adjustments to the storage system of an external service provider
  128. The use of numerical analysis of the injection process to select the material for the injection molding
  129. Economic aspect of combined transport
  130. Solution of a production process with the application of simulation: A case study
  131. Speedometer reliability in regard to road traffic sustainability
  132. Design and construction of a scanning stand for the PU mini-acoustic sensor
  133. Utilization of intelligent vehicle units for train set dispatching
  134. Special Issue: ICRTEEC - 2021 - Part I
  135. LVRT enhancement of DFIG-driven wind system using feed-forward neuro-sliding mode control
  136. Special Issue: Automation in Finland 2021 - Part I
  137. Prediction of future paths of mobile objects using path library
  138. Model predictive control for a multiple injection combustion model
  139. Model-based on-board post-injection control development for marine diesel engine
  140. Intelligent temporal analysis of coronavirus statistical data
Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2021-0095/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen