Home The use of numerical analysis of the injection process to select the material for the injection molding
Article Open Access

The use of numerical analysis of the injection process to select the material for the injection molding

  • Tomasz Jachowicz EMAIL logo , Ivan Gajdoš , Vlastimil Cech and Volodymyr Krasinskyi
Published/Copyright: October 7, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The article presents the methodology of using the results of computer simulation of the injection process to assess the suitability of the material for the injection molding. Computer simulation of the basic phenomena occurring during the filling phase, packing, and cooling phase of the injection molding provides a number of different results, containing typical information both on the suggested technological parameters of the process and on the dimensional accuracy of the molded part, but also allows obtaining data on the production efficiency and energy demand of the processing machine. On the basis of this information, it is possible to assess the suitability of the polymer materials used in the simulation, intended for the production of products from a specific industry, taking into account various criteria, mainly of an economic or qualitative nature.

1 Introduction

Injection molding is currently the basic method of processing polymer materials, due to the complexity of the structure and high accuracy of the moldings obtained, as well as the range of materials used. As a result of injection, plastic parts are obtained with complex shapes, various wall thicknesses, and a large mass span. When constructing an injection molding, many factors are of fundamental importance; the most important of which are: wall thickness, surface inclination, edge rounding radius, shape and dimensions of cross-sections, openings, undercuts, and reinforcing ribs, which should be selected according to appropriate recommendations ensuring proper filling of the mold cavity with plastic, proper cooling conditions for the molded part, and the desired geometric accuracy. These recommendations limit the freedom of designing the molded part at the stage of determining its functional shape and are related to the concept of mold technological correctness, understood as the compliance of the design of the designed product with the conditions of a specific production process, which in this case is injection [1,2,3,4].

Nowadays, numerical modeling is irreplaceable in many fields of technology. Thanks to computer simulation and analysis of the obtained results, many design and technological errors can be eliminated already at the design stage, therefore significantly reducing costs and shortening the production preparation time [5,6,7,8,9]. Obtaining a molding with high utility values takes the correct selection of process parameters, the type of material, a tool of appropriate design, and a processing machine with specific technological capabilities. A properly designed molding is a source of information on the basis of which the type of material is selected, the injection mold is constructed, and the technological conditions of the process are determined [10,11,12]. The final determination of the technological parameters of injection molding is a compromise between the expected maximum injection efficiency and the acceptable level of quality of the molded part and its functional features. Due to the very high costs of manufacturing injection molds, it is necessary to minimize the risk of errors at each stage of the preparation of the production process [12,13,14].

2 The essence of numerical modeling of the injection process

Injection of polymer materials, due to the complexity of the phenomena occurring during the implementation of this processing method, is the subject of a comprehensive analysis using specialized engineering software CAD/CAM/CAE [15,16]. The CAE software for numerical modeling of injection allows simulation of the phenomena occurring during filling the mold cavity with plastic and replenishing the material in the packing phase, as well as for following analysis of the cooling of the molded part, processing shrinkage, warpage, and deformation of the finished product. For the material forming the injection molding part, it is possible to analyze the primary shrinkage occurring during the process and the secondary shrinkage occurring during cooling. The simulation of the material flow and filling of the molding cavity and the resulting numerical description of the injection process facilitate the optimization of the mold structure, determination of process parameters, and the selection of the injection molding machine with appropriate technological capabilities in order to get the molded part of the appropriate quality. The simulation of the cooling of the injection molding is to optimize the design of the mold, in which the cooling system is designed in such a way as to achieve the most even possible cooling intensity while keeping the cycle time of the injection process as short as possible. The results of the analysis of the cooling of the molded part allow the injection cycle time to be shortened and the production costs to be reduced without loss of product quality.

Preparation of simulations of the phenomena occurring during injection demands the introduction of general characteristics concerning the shape and dimensions of the molded part, properties of the processed material, and process conditions [1,4,17,18]. In the case of using computer simulation of injection to select the most appropriate material for a specific injection molding, both the functional and processing properties of the material as well as the relevant simulation results should be taken into account. Usually, the first attention is paid to the results describing the dimensional accuracy of the molded part (shrinkage, warpage, and deformation) [10,18,19], while it is equally important to refer to the technological parameters of the process determined by numerical modeling (time of the injection phase, pressure and cooling phases, and appropriate pressures) [19,20,21]. Also, the results related to the energy load of the machine (mold clamping force and injection power) and the consumption of the raw material, which in the case of injection, where millions of the same parts are produced, is particularly important. Based on the simulation results, it is possible to meet the qualitative and economic requirements related to getting a molded part made of appropriately selected material, with high dimensional stability, good optical properties of the surface, and the required accuracy of fit with other cooperating parts [4,13,22].

3 Computer simulation of the cap manufacturing

3.1 Purpose of computer simulation

The purpose of computer simulation and numerical modeling of the injection process is to assess the suitability of selected thermoplastics for the production of a lid for packaging of food products. For selected five thermoplastics dedicated by manufacturers to be used in the packaging industry, numerical simulations of the injection phase, packing phase, and cooling phase of the molded part were performed. Selected parameters of the injection process were compared, like injection phase time, packing phase time, and cooling time, affecting the length of the injection cycle and thus the process efficiency. The processing temperature range, the required process pressures, the forces acting on the injection mold, and the injection power as factors influencing the energy demand of the machine were further analyzed. The dimensional accuracy of the obtained moldings was also assessed by means of shrinkage, distortion, and deformation analysis. On the basis of the obtained results, a material was selected which was assessed in three respects: economic, technological, and quality.

3.2 Solid model of the molded part

Before simulating the injection molding process with Cadmould 3D-F, it is necessary to import a solid model representing the mold cavity of the injection mold. Most often, the design is made in a CAD software and then converted to one of the formats read in Cadmould 3D-F (usually STL, STEP, IGES). The solid model of the cap used to simulate the injection process was made using Solid Edge software and saved in the STL format. The appearance of the solid model is shown in Figure 1. The surface area of the model is 7,459 mm2, and its volume is 4,295 mm3. Figure 2 shows the model introduced to the Cadmould 3D-F program with the generated FEM mesh. The relative size of the FEM mesh elements was 1.647%, while the absolute size of the FEM mesh elements was 0.87 mm. Four mold cavities were modelled with the material supply channels arranged in a star shape. The total volume of the elements forming the FEM mesh was 18,221 mm3, of which the volume of cylindrical elements was 1,579 mm3 and tetrahedral elements 16,642 mm3. Accordingly, the total actual volume of the solid models was 18,759 mm3, of which the volume of all four molding cavities was 17,180 mm3 and the material supply channels were 1,579 mm3. The FEM mesh fit factor, which is the ratio of the finite element volume to the real volume, is 0.971 and is within the recommended range of 1.0 ± 5% (Figure 3).

Figure 1 
                  The view of the solid model of the cap.
Figure 1

The view of the solid model of the cap.

Figure 2 
                  A solid model of a cap with a FEM mesh applied in the Cadmould 3D-F program.
Figure 2

A solid model of a cap with a FEM mesh applied in the Cadmould 3D-F program.

Figure 3 
                  A four-cavity mold insert with a runner system used to perform the simulation.
Figure 3

A four-cavity mold insert with a runner system used to perform the simulation.

3.3 Numerical analysis program

The computer simulation of the injection process was carried out with the Cadmould 3D-F software, version 13.0.5.0.

The constant factors during the computer simulations were the shape and geometrical dimensions of the solid model of the cap as well as the shape and dimensions of the material supply system. A single-point material supply system was used, simplified for one four-cavity mold insert. Due to the adopted goal of the computer simulations, the complete gating system for the entire multi-cavity injection mold was not built, and the design of the possible cooling system for the injection mold was not analyzed (if such would be needed). The same material was adopted for the injection mold – tool steel 1.2083 with a thermal conductivity coefficient of 20 W/m K, an ambient temperature of 20°C, and an ambient heat conductivity coefficient of 0,025 W/m K.

The variable factor is the generally understood characteristics of the material used to perform the computer simulation, including the physical quantities corresponding to individual plastics identifying their processing properties: among others, the melt flow rate, melt and solid density, and heat conductivity coefficient. The simulation was performed for five types of plastics, four of which are polypropylene varieties, and one is high-density polyethylene. These materials are presented in more detail later in the article.

The results of the computer simulation, treated as the basis for further analysis, were divided into factors related to the course of the injection process, factors related to the operation of the injection molding machine, and factors describing the properties of the obtained injection molding. Among other things, the influence of the type of material on the length of the injection phase, the packing and cooling phase, the risk of failure to fill the mold cavity, the risk of the sink marks, pressure loss in the mold, material flow rate, injection force, mold clamping force, molded part weight, shrinkage, warpage and deformation of the molded part, and change of curvature is important.

3.4 Materials used in the computer simulation

The following materials were used: PP HG313MO homopolymer, PP RE420MO random copolymer, PP RF365MO random copolymer, PP BorPure RJ377MO random copolymer, and HDPE MB5568. Only one manufacturer’s materials, Borealis, have been specially selected to highlight how differently similar raw materials offered by one manufacturer may behave when processing. Table 1 presents selected values characterizing individual materials, taken from the CMDB – material database of the Cadmould 3D-F software [23].

Table 1

Selected properties of polymers used in simulations [23]

Simulation number Simulation No. 1 Simulation No. 2 Simulation No. 3 Simulation No. 4 Simulation No. 5
Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Type of material Homopolymer PP Random copolymer PP Random copolymer PP Random copolymer PP High-density PE
Density at room temperature (kg/m3) 910 928 905 905 956
Density at processing temperature (kg/m3) 741 775 702.7 687 699
Young’s modulus (MPa) 1,500 1,671 1,150 1,100 1,000
Specific heat (J/kg °C) 2,459 2,947 2,776 2,859 2,038
Thermal conductivity W/(m K) 0.159 0.110 0.185 0.189 0.248
Thermal diffusivity (mm2/s) 0.087 0.048 0.095 0.096 0.174
Mass melt flow rate (g/10 min) 30 (230°C; 2.16 kg) 10 (230°C; 2.16 kg) 20 (230°C; 2.16 kg) 42 (230°C; 2.16 kg) 0.8 (190°C; 2.16 kg)
Injection temperature range (°C) 210 ÷ 250 235 210 ÷ 260 210 ÷ 260 190 ÷ 250
Mold temperature range (°C) 10 ÷ 30 35 30 ÷ 40 15 ÷ 40 10 ÷ 40
No flow temperature (°C) 154 175 129 129 120
Ejection temperature (°C) 110 110 86 104 70

Figure 4 presents a graph of the relationship between the viscosity of the material and the shear rate (Carreau diagram). It shows that the viscosity of the polymer decreases with increasing shear rate and also decreases with increasing processing temperature. Figure 5 shows graphically the dependence of the specific volume of the polymer on the process temperature and pressure (pvT diagram). Both charts were generated for polypropylene HG313MO from the Cadmould Material Database (CMDB) as examples. Similar charts are also available for the other materials used in the simulation.

Figure 4 
                  Graph of the dependence of the viscosity of the PP HG313MO on the shear rate [23].
Figure 4

Graph of the dependence of the viscosity of the PP HG313MO on the shear rate [23].

Figure 5 
                  Graph of the dependence of the specific volume of PP HG313MO on the process temperature and pressure [23].
Figure 5

Graph of the dependence of the specific volume of PP HG313MO on the process temperature and pressure [23].

4 Results

Cadmould 3D-F software presents the simulation results in graphic form and in text files. Selected simulation results related to the subject of this article were written down from text files and generated graphic files and placed in the appropriate tables. In the following figures, one sample bitmap illustrating a particular group of results is shown to limit the number of illustrations and maintain an appropriate volume of the article.

Figures 6 and 7 show graphically the places where problems with filling the mold cavity (Filing Problems module) and the places where surface sunken areas (Sink Marks module) can be expected. The probability of the occurrence of these defects of the molded part has been divided into three groups – the area where the risk of collapse of the mold surface or failure to fill the mold cavity is negligible is marked in green, the areas of the molding are marked in yellow where the probability of occurrence of the previously mentioned defects is medium, while the areas marked in red are where the risk of these defects is very high. In the case of simulations No. 1, 2, 3, and 4, the red areas were absent at all, and the yellow areas were minimal at the outer edge of the cap. Figure 6 shows the result of simulation No. 5, where the yellow area took the most space compared to the results of the other simulations, but in the overall summary it can be stated that the risk of failure to fill the mold cavity for all five materials is negligible. Figure 7 shows a small area on the inside of the cap, occurring only in the case of simulation No. 4, where the average risk of sink marks is marked in yellow. In the case of other simulations, there were no yellow or red areas at all, so it can be concluded that the cap model was designed correctly, with the appropriate selection of wall thickness.

Figure 6 
               Visualization of places where slight problems with filling the mold may occur, simulation No. 5, polymer PP MB5568.
Figure 6

Visualization of places where slight problems with filling the mold may occur, simulation No. 5, polymer PP MB5568.

Figure 7 
               Visualization of places where minor problems with the sink marks may occur, simulation No. 4, polymer PP RJ377MO.
Figure 7

Visualization of places where minor problems with the sink marks may occur, simulation No. 4, polymer PP RJ377MO.

Figure 8 shows the result of the simulation related to the analysis of the filling phase and the time of filling the molding cavities, on the example of simulation No. 2 concerning the RE420MO material. Figure 9 presents the simulation result illustrating the pressure loss distribution in the molding seat, based on the example of simulation No. 1, for the HG313MO material. Packing phase time, cooling time, and flow rate were read from simulation results saved in text files.

Figure 8 
               Example of results showing injection phase and mold filling time, simulation No. 2, polymer PP RE420MO.
Figure 8

Example of results showing injection phase and mold filling time, simulation No. 2, polymer PP RE420MO.

Figure 9 
               Example of results showing pressure loss in a cavity, simulation No. 1, polymer PP HG313MO.
Figure 9

Example of results showing pressure loss in a cavity, simulation No. 1, polymer PP HG313MO.

Table 2 lists selected factors describing the course of the injection molding process from all five simulations. The HG313MO material had the shortest filling phase time (0.582 s), and the longest for MB5568 material, equal to 0.741 s. The packing phase time was the shortest for MB5568 (1.239 s), and the longest for RE420MO, amounting to 2.996 s. The shortest cooling time was achieved by the HG313MO material (4.302 s), and the longest by the RF365MO material (7.635 s). The comparison of the total time of all phases is shown in Figure 10. The most favorable, i.e., the lowest value, was achieved for the HG313MO material.

Table 2

List of factors characterizing the course of the injection process

Simulation number Simulation No. 1 Simulation No. 2 Simulation No. 3 Simulation No. 4 Simulation No. 5
Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Filling time (s) 0.582 0.610 0.583 0.587 0.741
Packing time (s) 1.430 2.996 2.101 1.527 1.239
Cooling time (s) 4.302 6.839 7.635 4.852 5.331
Flow rate (cm3/s) 33.441 31.267 33.441 33.441 26.686
Pressure loss in the mold cavity (MPa) 20.22 23.71 16.76 12.60 48.15
Figure 10 
               Comparison of the total times: injection phase, packing phase, and cooling for individual polymers.
Figure 10

Comparison of the total times: injection phase, packing phase, and cooling for individual polymers.

The flow rate of the material in the filling phase in the case of the four types of polypropylene differed slightly, while an explicit decrease, about 20%, occurred for high-density polyethylene. Figure 11 shows a comparison of the simulation results for the flow rate for each of the five materials. Lower flow rate of the material reduces the shear rate and smoother filling the mold cavity with the material, reducing the risk of burns and mechanical and thermal degradation of the material.

Figure 11 
               Comparison of the flow rate of the material when filling the mold cavities in individual simulations.
Figure 11

Comparison of the flow rate of the material when filling the mold cavities in individual simulations.

Figure 12 shows a comparison of the pressure loss in the mold cavity during its filling with plastic. The most favorable value, equal to 12.60 MPa, was achieved for the MB5568 material.

Figure 12 
               Comparison of pressure loss in the mold cavity for individual simulations.
Figure 12

Comparison of pressure loss in the mold cavity for individual simulations.

Table 3 presents a list of technological factors selected from the simulation results related to the operation of the injection molding machine. The values of individual results were received from text files, only the injection power values were read using the “Result Selection” module and the “Diagrams” option. The maximum temperature of the material, resulting from the settings of the heaters in the plasticizing system, slightly differed in the case of all five materials, therefore its influence on the selection of the material most suitable for the cap was ignored.

Table 3

Summary of factors related to the operation of the injection molding machine

Simulation number Simulation No. 1 Simulation No. 2 Simulation No. 3 Simulation No. 4 Simulation No. 5
Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Maximum temperature of the polymer (°C) 239.1 246.1 240.6 238.6 237.2
X-axis clamping force (kN) 92.858 90.891 93.594 96.620 55.490
Y-axis clamping force (kN) 140.522 137.390 141.430 145.959 86.662
Z-axis clamping force (kN) 93.884 91.732 93.916 97.001 56.014
Injection power (kW) 2.780 2.501 3.784 6.470 1.281

Figure 13 presents charts prepared on the basis of data from the Cadmould software, showing a comparison of the mold clamping force, distributed along the X, Y, and Z axes for individual simulations. The diagrams of forces on the X and Z axes are similar, which results from the axial symmetry of the analyzed part. The Y-axis component, consistent with the main axis of the injection molding machine and the injection direction, had the greatest influence on the resultant value of the force. The most favorable result, i.e., the lowest force, was acquired for high-density polyethylene MB5568.

Figure 13 
               Comparison of the injection mold clamping force for individual materials: (a) force in the X axis, (b) force in the Y axis, (c) force in the Z axis.
Figure 13

Comparison of the injection mold clamping force for individual materials: (a) force in the X axis, (b) force in the Y axis, (c) force in the Z axis.

Figure 14 shows a comparison of the injection power demand for individual materials. The most favorable, i.e., the lowest, result was obtained for the MB5568 material, which is consistent with the previously discussed results regarding the injection mold clamping force.

Figure 14 
               Comparison of injection power demand for each simulation.
Figure 14

Comparison of injection power demand for each simulation.

Table 4 presents a list of factors related to the geometry of the injection molding selected from the simulation results, generally understood as pro-quality factors. The mass of the part, changing depending on the type of material, was read from the results saved in text files, while the maximum values of warpage, shrinkage, deformation, and curvature change were read from saved graphic files, examples of which are shown in Figures 1518. The difference between the contour of the mold cavity and the deformed shape of the molded part, visible in Figure 18, is specially enlarged in order to better visualize the shape and directions of the warpage; in fact, the degree of warpage ranges from −5.860 to 6.6872% and in real scale it would be difficult to show.

Table 4

List of factors related to the geometry of the injection molding

Simulation number Simulation No. 1 Simulation No. 2 Simulation No. 3 Simulation No. 4 Simulation No. 5
Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Part mass (g) 3.9 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.2
Maximum warpage (mm) 0.151 0.052 0.178 0.159 0.289
Maximum linear shrinkage (%) 2.194 1.682 2.355 3.304 2.419
Maximum deformation (mm) 0.300 0.283 0.304 0.419 0.344
Curvature change (%) −5.860 to 6.687 −2.267 to 1.906 −6.896 to 7.944 −7.827 to 8.863 −8.505 to 9.985
Figure 15 
               Example of results showing part warpage, simulation No. 3, polymer RF365MO.
Figure 15

Example of results showing part warpage, simulation No. 3, polymer RF365MO.

Figure 16 
               Example of results showing part shrinkage, simulation No. 4, polymer RJ377MO.
Figure 16

Example of results showing part shrinkage, simulation No. 4, polymer RJ377MO.

Figure 17 
               Example of results showing molding deformation (as sum of warpage and shrinkage), simulation No. 5, polymer MB5568.
Figure 17

Example of results showing molding deformation (as sum of warpage and shrinkage), simulation No. 5, polymer MB5568.

Figure 18 
               Example of results showing a curvature change of a molded part, simulation No. 1, polymer HG313MO.
Figure 18

Example of results showing a curvature change of a molded part, simulation No. 1, polymer HG313MO.

Figure 19 presents a list of mass of caps made of specific types of materials. The most significant mass equal to 4.2 g (with the same volume) was the molding made of MB5568, while the most favorable mass, i.e., the smallest, received the caps made of RF365MO and RJ377MO. In their case, the value of the cap mass obtains 3.8 g, which gives a raw material saving of 9%.

Figure 19 
               Comparison of the mass of moldings in each simulation.
Figure 19

Comparison of the mass of moldings in each simulation.

Figure 20 shows a summary of the deformation results obtained in individual simulations. Since the deformation is the geometric sum of the warpage and the shrinkage, no separate comparative plots for the warpage and the shrinkage were generated, showing only the corresponding data in Table 4. The most accurate molding, with the smallest deformation equal to 0.283 mm, was the cap made of RE420MO material. The largest difference between the dimension of the solid model and the real shape of the molded part occurred in the case of RJ377MO material and amounted to 0.419 mm.

Figure 20 
               Summary of the molding deformation results obtained in simulations for individual materials.
Figure 20

Summary of the molding deformation results obtained in simulations for individual materials.

Figure 21 presents a graphical summary of the curvature change values of injection moldings made of specific materials. A negative value of the curvature represents a concave surface, while a positive value means its convexity. The best result, i.e., the lowest value of the curvature change, was achieved for the RE420MO material.

Figure 21 
               Comparison of curvature changes in moldings made of each polymer analyzed by numerical method.
Figure 21

Comparison of curvature changes in moldings made of each polymer analyzed by numerical method.

5 Discussion

On the basis of the obtained simulation results, it is possible to conclude on the selection of the most appropriate material for the analyzed injection molding. The individual factors describing the course of the injection molding process, describing the operation of the injection molding machine and the properties of the injection molded part, can be assigned an appropriate role related to the economic or quality criteria. Depending on which of these criteria is more important in a given case, it can be assigned a higher criterion weight. For example, in the case of precision moldings, the qualitative criterion will be more important, while in the case of general-purpose moldings, the economic criterion will be more important. The choice of authors, on the basis of which the analyzed factors have been defined as technological, economic, and qualitative, is a subjective choice, because it can be discussed whether the clamping force of the injection mold is more of a technological factor. From the point of view of the energy demand of the injection molding machine and the energy costs needed to generate one kN of force clamping the mold, considering this force as an economic factor seems justified.

Table 5 summarizes the separate factors analyzed in the computer simulations, the numerical results of which are presented in Tables 24 as well as on the relevant charts. The individual values of separate factors were assigned point values from 4 to 0. Value 4 meant the most favorable impact, while the value 0 – the least favorable. In the event that the indicated results did not differ significantly, they were assigned the identical number of criteria points without grading the lowest value into the highest value. The material with the highest total point value will be considered to be the best material for making the cap by injection.

Table 5

List of scores for the analyzed quantities characterizing the injection process of the cap

Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Technological factors
  Flow rate (cm3/s) 0 3 0 0 4
  Pressure loss in the mold cavity (MPa) 2 1 3 4 0
Economic factors
  Filling time (s) 4 1 0 3 2
  Packing time (s)
  Cooling time (s)
  Maximum temperature of the polymer (°C) 0 0 0 0 0
  X-axis clamping force (kN) 0 0 0 0 4
  Y-axis clamping force (kN)
  Z-axis clamping force (kN)
  Injection power (kW) 2 3 1 0 4
  Part mass (g) 2 1 4 4 0
Qualitative factors
  Maximum warpage (mm) 2 4 3 0 1
  Maximum linear shrinkage (%)
  Maximum deformation (mm)
  Curvature change (%) 3 4 2 1 0

Table 6 presents a summary of the points, when each of the analyzed values was assigned the same importance. As a result, the polypropylene random copolymer RE420MO received the most points and it should be considered as the most suitable material for the cap.

Table 6

Summary points with equal weighting of all criteria

Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Technological factors 2 4 3 4 4
Economic factors 8 5 5 7 10
Qualitative factors 5 8 5 1 1
15 17 13 12 15

Bold numbers indicate the best polymer for making the part.

The situation in which the basic selection criterion represents the economic factor is presented in Table 7. Factors influencing in various ways the cost of production of the molded part were assigned a double weight, therefore the highest result was achieved by BorPure MB5568 high-density polyethylene.

Table 7

Summary points according to the criterion of the economic

Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Technological factors 2 4 3 4 4
Economic factors (double) 16 10 10 14 20
Qualitative factors 5 8 5 1 1
23 22 18 19 25

Bold numbers indicate the best polymer for making the part.

In another approach, when the qualitative factor was considered the selection criterion, the results of the analysis are shown in Table 8. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of the molded part were assigned a double value, which resulted in the fact that the RE420MO material scored the most points.

Table 8

Summary points according to the qualitative criterion

Polymer trade name HG313MO RE420MO RF365MO RJ377MO MB5568
Technological factors 2 4 3 4 4
Economic factors 8 5 5 7 10
Qualitative factors (double) 10 16 10 2 2
20 25 18 13 16

Bold numbers indicate the best polymer for making the part.

6 Conclusion

The injection process, as a method of producing plastic parts with complex shapes and very high dimensional accuracy, is becoming an increasingly popular and leading process nowadays – not only in the group of plastic processing methods, but also compared to other manufacturing technologies. Its main advantage is the ability to get products with complex shapes in a very short time, in one technological operation, on one machine, using one tool, while maintaining a very high accuracy of performance and repeatability of the product quality. The unit cost of making a plastic part, resulting from the cost of material, tool, and processing machine in the case of mass production and mass production in the case of injection, is many times lower than the cost of making the same product by combined methods of machining, plastic, or other processing. This resulted in the displacement of metal parts with plastic parts wherever the plastic part meets the strength expectations.

The main task of each CAD/CAM/CAE software is to support and shorten the time of work related to the construction of the product, to facilitate analyses in terms of correctness of performance, and to simplify the creation of technical documentation and the manufacturing process. Injection simulation programs, even if they do not detect all errors that may appear during the realization of the manufacturing process, certainly significantly reduce the risk of their occurrence and help choose the right course of action at the design stage, not just at the manufacturing stage.

On the basis of computer simulations, the process of injection of a popular object made of plastic, which is a screw cap, into the packaging in the form of a bottle was analyzed. Billions of pieces of these items are produced and even a slight alteration in the manufacturing conditions of a single cap has significant effects on mass production. Five plastics were selected for simulations, intended (as indicated by the information provided by manufacturers) for use in the packaging industry. The obtained simulation results were analyzed in terms of economic, technological, and qualitative factors. Individual factors were assigned scores in points, and depending on the significance of a given criterion (economic or qualitative), an additional modifier in the form of a weight was applied, multiplying the points from the evaluation, respectively. Based on the evaluation method used, without emphasizing a specific criterion, the polypropylene random copolymer RE420MO was considered to be the best material for the cap, which was identified by better properties than other materials. When choosing the economic criterion, the best to make a cap turned out to be high-density polyethylene under the name of BorPure MB5568. The indication of this type of raw material is interesting because both the packaging and the cap can be made of the same material, which improves waste separation. When choosing the quality criterion related to getting the dimensional accuracy of the compact, the best material was again polypropylene random copolymer RE420MO.

On the basis of the obtained results, conclusions of an analytical and utilitarian nature were drawn, indicating that by means of numerical simulation of the injection process, it is possible to determine the right choice of material for the production of a specific injection molding, which will meet the appropriate quality criteria. Currently, it is possible to predict the effect of the injection molding machine more and more precisely with the help of simulation programs, and the continuous development of this type of software means that the simulation results are closer to experimental measurements.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Beaumont JP, Sherman R, Nagel RF. Successful injection molding: process, design, and simulation. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rosato DV, Rosato DV, Rosato MG. Injection molding handbook. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2000.10.1007/978-1-4615-4597-2Search in Google Scholar

[3] Xiaoyang Xu, Peng Yu. Modeling and simulation of injection molding process of polymer melt by a robust SPH method. Appl Math Model. 2017;48:384–409.10.1016/j.apm.2017.04.007Search in Google Scholar

[4] Zhou H. Computer modeling for injection molding: simulation, optimization, and control. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2013.10.1002/9781118444887Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fedorko G, Molnar V. Design of a calculation fem model of the test static set-up of pipe conveyor for analysis of contact forces‎. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2017;11(2):220–5.10.12913/22998624/71268Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ivanco V, Kmet S, Fedorko G. Finite element simulation of creep of spiral strands. Eng Struct. 2016;117:220–38.10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.053Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mikusova N, Mill’o S. Modelling conveyor belt passage with a driving drum using finite element methods. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2017;11(4):239–46.10.12913/22998624/80311Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mikušová N, Stopka O, Stopková M, Opettová E. Use of simulation by modelling of conveyor belt contact forces. Open Eng. 2019;9(1):709–15.10.1515/eng-2019-0070Search in Google Scholar

[9] Stanova E, Fedorko G, Kmet S, Molnar V, Fabian M. Finite element analysis of spiral strands with different shapes subjected to axial loads. Adv Eng Softw. 2015;83:45–8.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[10] Choi D-S, Im Y-T. Prediction of shrinkage and warpage in consideration of residual stress in integrated simulation of injection molding. Comp Struct. 1999;47(1–4):655–65.10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00045-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Finkeldey F, Volke J, Zarges JCh, Heim HP, Wiederkehr P. Learning quality characteristics for plastic injection molding processes using a combination of simulated and measured data. J Manuf Process. 2020;60:134–43. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.028.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kazmer DO. Injection mold design engineering. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag; 2007.10.3139/9783446434196Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chen Z, Turng LS. A review of current developments in process and quality control for injection molding. Adv Polym Technol. 2005;24(3):165–82.10.1002/adv.20046Search in Google Scholar

[14] Godec D, Brnadić V, Breški T. Optimisation of mould design for injection moulding – numerical approach. Tehnički Glas. 2021;15(2):258–66. 10.31803/tg-20210531204548.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cadmould 3D-F Software. Version 13.0. Online Help. Simcon Kunststofftechnische Software GmbH; 2020. (digital version).Search in Google Scholar

[16] Staněk M, Maňas D, Maňas M, Javořík J. Simulation of injection molding process by cadmould rubber. Int J Math Comput Simul. 2011;5(5):422–9.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cardozo D. Three models of the 3D filling simulation for injection molding: a brief review. J Reinforced Plast Compos. 2008;27(18):1963–74.10.1177/0731684408092386Search in Google Scholar

[18] Zhan J, Li J, Wang G, Guan Y, Zhao G, Lin J, et al. Review on the performances, foaming and injection molding simulation of natural fiber composites. Polym Compos. 2021;42(3):1305–24.10.1002/pc.25902Search in Google Scholar

[19] Fen Liu F, Zeng S, Zhou H, Li J. A study on the distinguishing responses of shrinkage and warpage to processing conditions in injection molding. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;125(1):731–44.10.1002/app.35564Search in Google Scholar

[20] Song Z, Liu S, Wang X, Hu. Z. Optimization and prediction of volume shrinkage and warpage of injection-molded thin-walled parts based on neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;109:755–69. 10.1007/s00170-020-05558-6.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Modi D, Šimáček P, Advani S. Influence of injection gate definition on the flow-front approximation in numerical simulations of mold-filling processes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2003;42(11):1237–48.10.1002/fld.592Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yu L, Koh CG, Lee LJ, Koelling KW, Madou MJ. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of injection molding with micro-features. Polym Eng Sci. 2002;42(5):871–88.10.1002/pen.10998Search in Google Scholar

[23] CMDB Cadmould Database v.3.5.3.74 (digital version).Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-11
Revised: 2021-08-17
Accepted: 2021-08-23
Published Online: 2021-10-07

© 2021 Tomasz Jachowicz et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Electrochemical studies of the synergistic combination effect of thymus mastichina and illicium verum essential oil extracts on the corrosion inhibition of low carbon steel in dilute acid solution
  3. Adoption of Business Intelligence to Support Cost Accounting Based Financial Systems — Case Study of XYZ Company
  4. Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Supply Options for University Buildings in Saudi Arabia
  5. Optimized design of a semimetal gasket operating in flange-bolted joints
  6. Behavior of non-reinforced and reinforced green mortar with fibers
  7. Field measurement of contact forces on rollers for a large diameter pipe conveyor
  8. Development of Smartphone-Controlled Hand and Arm Exoskeleton for Persons with Disability
  9. Investigation of saturation flow rate using video camera at signalized intersections in Jordan
  10. The features of Ni2MnIn polycrystalline Heusler alloy thin films formation by pulsed laser deposition
  11. Selection of a workpiece clamping system for computer-aided subtractive manufacturing of geometrically complex medical models
  12. Development of Solar-Powered Water Pump with 3D Printed Impeller
  13. Identifying Innovative Reliable Criteria Governing the Selection of Infrastructures Construction Project Delivery Systems
  14. Kinetics of Carbothermal Reduction Process of Different Size Phosphate Rocks
  15. Plastic forming processes of transverse non-homogeneous composite metallic sheets
  16. Accelerated aging of WPCs Based on Polypropylene and Birch plywood Sanding Dust
  17. Effect of water flow and depth on fatigue crack growth rate of underwater wet welded low carbon steel SS400
  18. Non-invasive attempts to extinguish flames with the use of high-power acoustic extinguisher
  19. Filament wound composite fatigue mechanisms investigated with full field DIC strain monitoring
  20. Structural Timber In Compartment Fires – The Timber Charring and Heat Storage Model
  21. Technical and economic aspects of starting a selected power unit at low ambient temperatures
  22. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  23. Adaptation to driver-assistance systems depending on experience
  24. A SIMULINK implementation of a vector shift relay with distributed synchronous generator for engineering classes
  25. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in a static tensile test
  26. Errors in documenting the subsoil and their impact on the investment implementation: Case study
  27. Comparison between two calculation methods for designing a stand-alone PV system according to Mosul city basemap
  28. Reduction of transport-related air pollution. A case study based on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the level of NOx emissions in the city of Krakow
  29. Driver intervention performance assessment as a key aspect of L3–L4 automated vehicles deployment
  30. A new method for solving quadratic fractional programming problem in neutrosophic environment
  31. Effect of fish scales on fabrication of polyester composite material reinforcements
  32. Impact of the operation of LNG trucks on the environment
  33. The effectiveness of the AEB system in the context of the safety of vulnerable road users
  34. Errors in controlling cars cause tragic accidents involving motorcyclists
  35. Deformation of designed steel plates: An optimisation of the side hull structure using the finite element approach
  36. Thermal-strength analysis of a cross-flow heat exchanger and its design improvement
  37. Effect of thermal collector configuration on the photovoltaic heat transfer performance with 3D CFD modeling
  38. Experimental identification of the subjective reception of external stimuli during wheelchair driving
  39. Failure analysis of motorcycle shock breakers
  40. Experimental analysis of nonlinear characteristics of absorbers with wire rope isolators
  41. Experimental tests of the antiresonance vibratory mill of a sectional movement trajectory
  42. Experimental and theoretical investigation of CVT rubber belt vibrations
  43. Is the cubic parabola really the best railway transition curve?
  44. Transport properties of the new vibratory conveyor at operations in the resonance zone
  45. Assessment of resistance to permanent deformations of asphalt mixes of low air void content
  46. COVID-19 lockdown impact on CERN seismic station ambient noise levels
  47. Review Articles
  48. FMEA method in operational reliability of forest harvesters
  49. Examination of preferences in the field of mobility of the city of Pila in terms of services provided by the Municipal Transport Company in Pila
  50. Enhancement stability and color fastness of natural dye: A review
  51. Special Issue: ICE-SEAM 2019 - Part II
  52. Lane Departure Warning Estimation Using Yaw Acceleration
  53. Analysis of EMG Signals during Stance and Swing Phases for Controlling Magnetorheological Brake applications
  54. Sensor Number Optimization Using Neural Network for Ankle Foot Orthosis Equipped with Magnetorheological Brake
  55. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Civil Engineering - Part II
  56. Comparison of STM’s reliability system on the example of selected element
  57. Technical analysis of the renovation works of the wooden palace floors
  58. Special Issue: TRANSPORT 2020
  59. Simulation assessment of the half-power bandwidth method in testing shock absorbers
  60. Predictive analysis of the impact of the time of day on road accidents in Poland
  61. User’s determination of a proper method for quantifying fuel consumption of a passenger car with compression ignition engine in specific operation conditions
  62. Analysis and assessment of defectiveness of regulations for the yellow signal at the intersection
  63. Streamlining possibility of transport-supply logistics when using chosen Operations Research techniques
  64. Permissible distance – safety system of vehicles in use
  65. Study of the population in terms of knowledge about the distance between vehicles in motion
  66. UAVs in rail damage image diagnostics supported by deep-learning networks
  67. Exhaust emissions of buses LNG and Diesel in RDE tests
  68. Measurements of urban traffic parameters before and after road reconstruction
  69. The use of deep recurrent neural networks to predict performance of photovoltaic system for charging electric vehicles
  70. Analysis of dangers in the operation of city buses at the intersections
  71. Psychological factors of the transfer of control in an automated vehicle
  72. Testing and evaluation of cold-start emissions from a gasoline engine in RDE test at two different ambient temperatures
  73. Age and experience in driving a vehicle and psychomotor skills in the context of automation
  74. Consumption of gasoline in vehicles equipped with an LPG retrofit system in real driving conditions
  75. Laboratory studies of the influence of the working position of the passenger vehicle air suspension on the vibration comfort of children transported in the child restraint system
  76. Route optimization for city cleaning vehicle
  77. Efficiency of electric vehicle interior heating systems at low ambient temperatures
  78. Model-based imputation of sound level data at thoroughfare using computational intelligence
  79. Research on the combustion process in the Fiat 1.3 Multijet engine fueled with rapeseed methyl esters
  80. Overview of the method and state of hydrogenization of road transport in the world and the resulting development prospects in Poland
  81. Tribological characteristics of polymer materials used for slide bearings
  82. Car reliability analysis based on periodic technical tests
  83. Special Issue: Terotechnology 2019 - Part II
  84. DOE Application for Analysis of Tribological Properties of the Al2O3/IF-WS2 Surface Layers
  85. The effect of the impurities spaces on the quality of structural steel working at variable loads
  86. Prediction of the parameters and the hot open die elongation forging process on an 80 MN hydraulic press
  87. Special Issue: AEVEC 2020
  88. Vocational Student's Attitude and Response Towards Experiential Learning in Mechanical Engineering
  89. Virtual Laboratory to Support a Practical Learning of Micro Power Generation in Indonesian Vocational High Schools
  90. The impacts of mediating the work environment on the mode choice in work trips
  91. Utilization of K-nearest neighbor algorithm for classification of white blood cells in AML M4, M5, and M7
  92. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  93. Case study: Vocational student’s knowledge and awareness level toward renewable energy in Indonesia
  94. Contribution of collaborative skill toward construction drawing skill for developing vocational course
  95. Special Issue: Annual Engineering and Vocational Education Conference - Part II
  96. Vocational teachers’ perspective toward Technological Pedagogical Vocational Knowledge
  97. Special Issue: ICIMECE 2020 - Part I
  98. Profile of system and product certification as quality infrastructure in Indonesia
  99. Prediction Model of Magnetorheological (MR) Fluid Damper Hysteresis Loop using Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm
  100. A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters
  101. Facile rheological route method for LiFePO4/C cathode material production
  102. Mosque design strategy for energy and water saving
  103. Epoxy resins thermosetting for mechanical engineering
  104. Estimating the potential of wind energy resources using Weibull parameters: A case study of the coastline region of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  105. Special Issue: CIRMARE 2020
  106. New trends in visual inspection of buildings and structures: Study for the use of drones
  107. Special Issue: ISERT 2021
  108. Alleviate the contending issues in network operating system courses: Psychomotor and troubleshooting skill development with Raspberry Pi
  109. Special Issue: Actual Trends in Logistics and Industrial Engineering - Part II
  110. The Physical Internet: A means towards achieving global logistics sustainability
  111. Special Issue: Modern Scientific Problems in Civil Engineering - Part I
  112. Construction work cost and duration analysis with the use of agent-based modelling and simulation
  113. Corrosion rate measurement for steel sheets of a fuel tank shell being in service
  114. The influence of external environment on workers on scaffolding illustrated by UTCI
  115. Allocation of risk factors for geodetic tasks in construction schedules
  116. Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of tram impact speed
  117. Technological and organizational problems in the construction of the radiation shielding concrete and suggestions to solve: A case study
  118. Finite element analysis of train speed effect on dynamic response of steel bridge
  119. New approach to analysis of railway track dynamics – Rail head vibrations
  120. Special Issue: Trends in Logistics and Production for the 21st Century - Part I
  121. Design of production lines and logistic flows in production
  122. The planning process of transport tasks for autonomous vans
  123. Modeling of the two shuttle box system within the internal logistics system using simulation software
  124. Implementation of the logistics train in the intralogistics system: A case study
  125. Assessment of investment in electric buses: A case study of a public transport company
  126. Assessment of a robot base production using CAM programming for the FANUC control system
  127. Proposal for the flow of material and adjustments to the storage system of an external service provider
  128. The use of numerical analysis of the injection process to select the material for the injection molding
  129. Economic aspect of combined transport
  130. Solution of a production process with the application of simulation: A case study
  131. Speedometer reliability in regard to road traffic sustainability
  132. Design and construction of a scanning stand for the PU mini-acoustic sensor
  133. Utilization of intelligent vehicle units for train set dispatching
  134. Special Issue: ICRTEEC - 2021 - Part I
  135. LVRT enhancement of DFIG-driven wind system using feed-forward neuro-sliding mode control
  136. Special Issue: Automation in Finland 2021 - Part I
  137. Prediction of future paths of mobile objects using path library
  138. Model predictive control for a multiple injection combustion model
  139. Model-based on-board post-injection control development for marine diesel engine
  140. Intelligent temporal analysis of coronavirus statistical data
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2021-0094/html
Scroll to top button