Home Driver intervention performance assessment as a key aspect of L3–L4 automated vehicles deployment
Article Open Access

Driver intervention performance assessment as a key aspect of L3–L4 automated vehicles deployment

  • Aleksandra Rodak EMAIL logo , Paweł Budziszewski , Małgorzata Pędzierska and Mikołaj Kruszewski
Published/Copyright: July 21, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In L3–L4 vehicles, driving task is performed primarily by automated driving system (ADS). Automation mode permits to engage in non-driving-related tasks; however, it necessitates continuous vigilance and attention. Although the driver may be distracted, a request to intervene may suddenly occur, requiring immediate and appropriate response to driving conditions. To increase safety, automated vehicles should be equipped with a Driver Intervention Performance Assessment module (DIPA), ensuring that the driver is able to take the control of the vehicle and maintain it safely. Otherwise, ADS should regain control from the driver and perform a minimal risk manoeuvre. The paper explains the essence of DIPA, indicates possible measures, and describes a concept of DIPA framework being developed in the project.

1 Introduction

Driving is commonly considered as a multifactorial process that requires significant cognitive resources. It necessitates continuous road monitoring, surroundings analysis, and quick decision-making [1]. The process involves three levels of control [2]:

  • Operational – refers to the driver’s reaction to traffic conditions with limited decision information. This level takes advantage of sensorimotor abilities and occurs in short intervals of time, e.g. steering and braking due to sudden changes.

  • Tactic – requires vehicle manoeuvring in response to normal road conditions, e.g. at junctions. This type of control occurs for a few seconds.

  • Strategic – refers to route planning, including destination selection. Occurs at intervals of minutes to hours.

Technology development in the field of advanced sensors, software, and artificial intelligence encouraged car companies to develop a self-driving vehicle (e.g. refs.[3,4]). Automated driving systems (ADS) [5] in which perception and decision-making are being made by machine/artificial components are said to become a reality in the following decades. Automation requires drivers to relinquish control of the vehicle, while maintaining awareness to enable safe performance in case the system reaches its limits. ADS should have both automated and manual modes. According to the society of automotive engineers (SAE 2018 [6]), there is a six-level scale of driving automation – from 0 (no automation) to 5 (full automation):

  • Level 0 – no automation, the driver performs the entire dynamic driving task (DDT), even when enhanced by active safety systems.

  • Level 1 – driver assistance, the driver controls the vehicle, and the system makes adjustments to speed and direction (e.g. adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist). The system executes only one subtask – not both simultaneously.

  • Level 2 – partial automation, the driver controls the vehicle, and the system makes simultaneous adjustments to both speed and direction (e.g. park assist, traffic jam assist).

  • Level 3 – conditional automation, the system has full control over the vehicle (speed, direction, environment monitoring – e.g. Steering Collision Avoidance) but only under specific conditions (e.g. motorway, limited speed, no crossings). The driver has to be constantly ready to intervene if a dangerous situation is detected.

  • Level 4 – high automation, the system has full control over the vehicle, and driver presence is not necessary, but only up to the system’s limits. The driver can undertake non-driving-related tasks. If the actual driving conditions exceed the system performance limits, it may ask the driver to intervene or decide to stop the journey. The system works under specific conditions.

  • Level 5 – full automation, the human-driver is not necessary and considered as a passenger. The system works unconditionally. An ADS performs the entire DDT and DDT fallback without any expectation that a user will respond to a request to intervene (RtI).

There are two paths to achieve full automation. The first one involves designing the vehicle from scratch, while the second uses incremental development through all the above-mentioned levels of automation. In this article, the second path will be discussed, namely the L3 and L4 levels, where the vehicle can move independently, but only under certain conditions, and there may be a need to retake control. It is assumed that in L3–L4 vehicles, during periods of automated driving, human will be out-of-the-loop and may not have enough information to safely maintain control at the operational and tactic level. Attention shifting may result in reduced situation awareness, causing distraction or fatigue. A Driver Intervention Performance Assessment (DIPA) uses a variety of methods to ascertain that the driver is able to respond safely to dangerous traffic incidents. DIPA comprises time-based intervention performance measures (e.g. for assessing different time budget components), as well as objective (e.g. minimum time headway) and subjective (e.g. perceived controllability) take over quality measures. Owing to the risk of an accident, which varies depending on vehicle type, driving skills, age, gender, personal characteristics [7], and arousal level, the assessment should focus on the knowledge and attitude of the driver. It could identify the risk management capability and ensure that drivers are aware of vulnerable road users, in particular pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists.

2 DIPA definition

DIPA involves the definition of relevant objective measures to assess the quality of intervention performance, such as driver take over time (TOT) from onset of RtI, driver intervention time, control stabilization time, remaining action time, as well as subjective measures for the quality of intervention performance.

From the ADS’s perspective, DIPA is implemented as a decision system, laying above modules intended to monitor driver’s state, behaviour, and reactions. DIPA module activates when a RtI appears. It gathers information from driver state monitoring (DSM) and vehicle monitoring. When system identified that driver took the control, DIPA module ascertains if the human is able to safely maintain manual driving, or a decision of performing a Minimal Risk Maneuver should be taken (otherwise).

Figure 1 shows a simplified flow diagram of the input information to the DIPA module.

Figure 1 
               DIPA system.
Figure 1

DIPA system.

3 Control transition

The assessment of the driver is crucial primarily in relation to reacting to a sudden, unexpected event on a road. It necessitates the completion of a sequence of processes in a very short time. In level 3 conditional automation, the driver is not required to constantly monitor the environment and the automated system performance. That may result in shifting attentional resources to other tasks. However, the driver has to maintain readiness for taking over vehicle control in “situations that exceed the operational limits of the ADS” [8], detected and announced by the automation system. The transition from automated driving to manual mode may be human- or system-initiated.

DIPA refers to transition forced by ADS, which is started by a RtI – a critical event requiring active driver intervention. The driver has to relocate hands and feet to the driving position, regain situation awareness, and execute an adequate response to the system limit [9,10]. ADS can met with trust by end-users if the driver state is continuously monitored, his/her availability properly evaluated and sufficiently triggered (through tailored human-machine interfaces – HMIs) [11]. The human factor is essential for the safety deployment of L3–L4 vehicles, mainly due to the necessary driver-vehicle interaction in cases where the boundaries of the Operational Design Domain are being reached. ADS limits may be caused by sensor malfunction, extreme weather conditions, appearance of evolving accident scenes, unexpected roadblocks, hazardous traffic violations falling of goods, etc. The figure below (Figure 2) describes the processes during the transition from automated to manual driving initiated by ADS.

Figure 2 
               System-initiated vehicle control transition [8].
Figure 2

System-initiated vehicle control transition [8].

4 DIPA measures

While the capabilities of an automated system may be exceeded in some circumstances, the RtI signal may appear. Once a RtI occurred, a driver has limited time to react, to ensure safety. The time interval between the RtI and the system limit is defined as “total time budget.” It represents the maximum time window after a RtI for a successful resumption of manual control. In assessing the quality of driver intervention, selected factors should describe the driver’s behaviour and driving technique, meeting the following criteria [12,13]:

  • suggesting an unambiguous method of measuring,

  • measurement repeatability,

  • can be applied both in a simulation environment and in a real vehicle,

  • have one interpretation,

  • can be easily measured and presented graphically,

  • applicable to engineering procedures and calculations,

  • applicable in various countries, vehicles, and conditions,

  • used in research and described in the literature,

  • use SI units.

There is still a lack of unanimity on how to ensure driver’s ability to take over the control and safely perform the manoeuvre. The monitoring and assessment of a driver should ensure that he/she is able to control the vehicle himself/herself. It includes monitoring of sensory, motoric, cognitive, arousal, and emotional states, as refers also to DSM, but expanding these factors by measures of driving performance. The take over phases should be measured ensuring the minimal safety level after turning the driver back-in-the-loop. It could be done using objective and subjective measures. Objective measures relate to speed, manoeuvres, or other forms of behavioural analysis (time-to-collision, time headway, time-to-lane-change), as well as driver reaction measures (TOT, driver intervention time, control stabilization time, remaining action time). Subjective ones are associated with perceived controllability [5].

The objective measures are time-based intervention performance and take over quality measures as follows:

  • TOT – an interval between RtI occurring and user-initiated intervention or deactivation of an engaged automation function. The transition can be divided into further subprocesses, e.g.: time to first driver reaction, time to visually fixate RtI message (if visual HMI is involved), time to start to move (at least one) hand to wheel/feet to pedals, and time to start to operate relevant vehicle controls (e.g. blinker) [8]. TOT is a human-based measure and should not be considered in relation with system deactivation time.

  • Reaction time – a subprocess of take over, it is defined as the time that elapses from the moment of the stimulus (nervous impulse) activation to the moment of movement initiation [14].

  • Decision time – an interval between detection of a silent system failure and the decision to disengage the automation feature.

  • Intervention time – a period of time required to handle the imminent take over situation by performing an appropriate driving manoeuver.

  • Driving recovery time – a measure combined with TOT and intervention time. Comparison between total time budget and driving recovery time should be used to provide guidelines that take account of all the driver’s reactions to ensure a successful manoeuvre.

  • Remaining action time – a comparison between total time budget and a successfully finished driver intervention time. It may be paraphrased as a remaining time to last intervention possibility at the time of intervention [3].

  • Control stabilization time – a period of time until vehicle control performance is fully re-established. After the immediate driver intervention phase, manual vehicle control performance can be below the average performance of an individual driver [8].

  • Headway – the space between the reference points of two vehicles. It may be defined in both time and distance domains. Headway can be defined as the space between the outer edges of the leading vehicle’s rear bumper and the following vehicle’s front bumper (Figure 3). The size of this parameter determines the safety margin that the driver of the following vehicle leaves to react to manoeuvres of the leading vehicle. Measuring this parameter necesitates meeting the following conditions [13]: vehicles move in the same lane, vehicles follow each other on the passage path, longitudinal parameter of the distance is measured (assuming movement on a straight road).

Figure 3 
               Definition of headway [12].
Figure 3

Definition of headway [12].

In the time domain, the headway is expressed by the length of time that elapses from the moment it is measured until the following vehicle’s reference point reaches the point that determined the location of the leading vehicle’s reference point, assuming that the speed of the following vehicle does not change.

  • Time to collision (TTC) – indicates the time left until a collision occurs if both vehicles continue on converging trajectories at their current speed (Figure 4). Low values of minimum TTC indicate either a slow braking reaction time or an inadequately low braking force [15]. TTC is only calculated when the following vehicle has a higher speed than the vehicle in front [16].

  • Brake application – an indicator of maximum deceleration between the moment of resuming manual control and the moment of lane change/stopping the vehicle. May be measured in m/s2. Higher values indicate larger deceleration.

  • Acceleration pedal steering – a parameter describing driver’s activities due to the location of the vehicle in its longitudinal axis indirectly indicating a number of vehicle control operations undertaken to stay behind the preceding vehicle.

  • Lateral lane position – a parameter indicating the vehicle’s fixed point location in the longitudinal axis relative to the fixed point of the lane cross section [17]. It describes the driver’s ability to keep the vehicle on a straight (desired) trajectory.

  • Steering wheel reversal rate – an indicator of steering wheel changes from clockwise to counter clockwise, or vice versa. The frequency and amplitude of these movements identify driver’s ability to maintain control over the vehicle.

  • Time to lane crossing (TtLC) – an indicator of the uncontrolled vehicle’s approach to the lane border (Figure 5). TtLC determines the time it will take the vehicle to cross the lane if the driver does not intervene (e.g. the current steering angle will be maintained).

  • Post-encroachment time (PET) – time difference between a moment when an offending road user leaves an area of potential collision and a moment of arrival of a conflicted road user possessing the right of way. The value indicates the extent to which they missed each other.

  • Deceleration-to-safety time – the necessary deceleration to reach a positive PET value if the movement of the conflicting road users remains unchanged.

    Subjective take over quality measures:

  • Intervention accuracy – the accuracy of choosing intervention type (every intervention should be carried out using the best possible method). The choice of intervention method is subjective and depends on the skills and experience, as well as the environmental and ethical context. Resuming manual control may be performed by: braking, accelerating, or steering intervention. The best intervention method may differ in various driving scenarios [18].

  • Quality assessment of safety effects – a measure using subjective rating of criticality. Each level is set based on measurements, but categorization and intervention time division is done subjectively. The method may be designed with categories, e.g. uncontrollable situation (no time to react), dangerous, unpleasant, harmless, and nothing noticed (no danger). The assessment method may be based on time-metrics, acceleration values, or distance [16].

  • Crash probability – a method similar to the previous one, but in addition to measuring time or motion-oriented values; it is also based on the likelihood of an accident. It can result in categorization or present results in percentages [10].

  • Self-reported difficulty/danger – a survey carried out after performing a take over. The subjective driver’s rating of the difficulty/danger of the situation. The outcomes may be presented on the scale or converted to a percentage [19].

  • Expert-based assessment – a method of integrating different timing and quality parameters into a global controllability measure [8]. Trained evaluators are required to integrate different aspects of driving performance by using a standardized rating scheme (Figure 6). The method proposed by Naujoks et al. [20] was developed in reference to automated vehicles, based on an existing assessment procedure that has been successfully applied to assess the criticality of driving situations in manual driving conditions (Kaussner’s driving behaviour assessment [21]). The TOC-Rating (Take over controllability rating) may be used in empirical studies on controllability in accordance with the Code of Practice [22].

Figure 4 
               Definition of TTC [12].
Figure 4

Definition of TTC [12].

Figure 5 
               Definition of TtLC [12].
Figure 5

Definition of TtLC [12].

Figure 6 
               Overview of TOC-rating process [20].
Figure 6

Overview of TOC-rating process [20].

5 DIPA framework

Trustonomy (trust + autonomy) is a project connecting stakeholders from different automotive industry, research, and transport areas. It aims to compare in terms of performance, ethics, and acceptability different technologies and approaches in different scenarios for automatic driving and requests to take control. The project investigates several ADS-related domains including DSM, performance assessment, and training. A DIPA framework is being under the development within the project [23]. Other assumptions, goals, and expected results are described in the article Bringing Trust to Autonomous Mobility, written in proceedings of the 5th AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (18–20 November 2020) [24].

5.1 Expected framework components

DIPA framework is a set of objective measures ensuring the minimal safety level after turning the driver back-in-the-loop. At the current stage of research (eight months since the project started), this set will most likely consist of:

  • set of measures allowing to assess if driver performs within expected boundaries,

  • DIPA framework software.

Decisions taken by the DIPA module, which is part of the ADS decision system, are crucial for vehicle safety. It is extremely important that the system remains reliable and provide low latency. Therefore, the DIPA module must operate in the vehicle ecosystem, regardless of any external communication.

5.2 Development plan

DIPA Framework development plan requires few steps to be taken. First, applicable methods, measurements, and scenarios will be selected based on literature review. Second, simulator-based research will be conducted to identify which methods and measurements are a good DIPA indicators in particular scenarios and sensors configurations. Third, DIPA Framework will be developed, based on preliminary pilot research results. Fourth, DIPA Framework will be tested in the second series of trials.

5.3 DIPA software

The main task of DIPA software will be to analyse input data from different sources (mainly sensors) and perform situation assessment. The result of the analysis is the choice of take over manoeuvre, i.e. making a decision about manual or automatic emergency mode. Planned interfaces are:

  • vehicle monitoring: information about vehicle controls, steering wheel hands sensor, etc.

  • vehicle movement monitoring: vehicle trajectory, acceleration, etc.

  • DSM: driver state – distraction, drowsiness, etc.

  • Human–Machine interface: warning indication

  • Automated vehicle decision layer: information about RtI (input) and resultant decision (output).

6 Conclusion and discussion

In assessing driver’s intervention performance, it is essential to present the overall safety effects of a transition in a particular traffic situation. Driving scenario context is crucial, as there is no intervention type suitable for all dangerous situations. Thus, different outcomes and measures of take over quality should always be compared carefully and with extensive attention to details. It is always recommended to use a combination of appropriate measures as single measures may not be sufficient enough to differentiate safe and unsafe events.

DIPA can be considered in various sensor configurations, involving different measures of driver state and behaviour. It can be also considered in multiple road situations, with different causes of RtI, which may differ driver behaviour and maximal available time for reaction (total time budget). Since it is not possible to consider all possible cases, in Trustonomy, several typical scenarios will be selected and used as a basis for the DIPA framework to be developed. All details presented in this paper are early estimations and may change in further work.

Although a driver is considered to be an end-user of the final design, the main outcomes of the project directly address the needs of the automotive industry. DIPA framework will provide methodology and measures that can be used to develop decision system for the RtI situation. The outcomes of the project may be useful for developers and integrators of Automated Vehicle systems and treated as a background for standardization activities or for test protocols development.

Acknowledgement

The publication discusses analysis that is being conducted within Trustonomy. The authors would like to thank all partners involved in the Trustonomy project (www.h2020-trustonomy.eu) for their precious collaboration in the research activities that contributed to achieve the results herein described.

  1. Funding information: This work has been performed in the context of the Trustonomy project, which has received funding from the European Community’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 812003.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Ma R , Kaber DB . Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. Int J Ind Ergonom. 2005;35(10):939–53.10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[2] Michon JA . A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In Evans L , Schwing R , editors. Human behavior and traffic safety. New York, London: Plenum Press; 1985. p. 485–520.10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bonfitto A , Feraco S , Tonoli A , Amati N . Combined regression and classification artificial neural networks for sideslip angle estimation and road condition identification. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;58(4):1–22.10.1080/00423114.2019.1645860Search in Google Scholar

[4] Feraco S , Bonfitto A , Amati N , Tonoli A . Combined lane keeping and longitudinal speed control for autonomous driving. ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Anaheim, California, USA. August 18–21 2019. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2019;59216:V003T01A018.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Trustonomy Project Consortium. Operational context analysis, deliverable D1.1; 2019. https://h2020-trustonomy.eu/download/operational-context-analysis/ .Search in Google Scholar

[6] SAE. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE); 2018 June.Search in Google Scholar

[7] The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Driving for work: driver assessment and training, guidelines. United Kingdom: The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[8] ISO/TR PRF 21959-1:2018 (E), Road vehicles: human performance and state in the context of automated driving: part 1 – common underlying concepts. Switzerland: International standard produced and published by the International Organization for Standardization; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gold C , Damboeck D , Lorenz L , Bengler K . Take over!: how long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc Human Factors Ergonom Soc Ann Meet. 2013;57(1):1938–42.10.1177/1541931213571433Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gold C , Happee R , Bengler K . Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;116:3–13.10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Trustonomy Project Consortium. Trustonomy requirements, deliverable D1.2, trustonomy – building acceptence and trust in autonomous mobility; 2019. https://h2020-trustonomy.eu/download/d1-2-deliverable-trustonomy-requirements/. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kruszewski M . The method for assessment the distraction of inexperienced drivers using fuzzy logic. PhD thesis. Poland: Warsaw University of Technology; 2019. Polish.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Savino MR . Standarized names and definitions for driving performance measures. M. Sc. thesis, Tufts University, USA; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Iermakov S Szybkość ruchowych reakcji człowieka. Czas reakcji i czas motoryczny w ruchach sportowca. Wykład na Uniwersytecie Kazimierza Wielkiego; 2014. Bydgoszcz. Polish.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Radlmayr J , Gold C , Lorenz L , Farid M , Bengler K . How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proc Hum Factors Ergonom Soc Annu Meet. 2014;58(1):2063–7.10.1177/1541931214581434Search in Google Scholar

[16] Naujoks F , Höfling S , Purucker C , Zeeb K . From partial and high automation to manual driving: relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;121:28–42.10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Porter RJ , Donnell TE , Mahoney KM . Evaluation of effects of centreline rumble strips on lateral vehicle placement and speed Transport. Transp Res Rec. 2004;1862(1):10–6.10.3141/1862-02Search in Google Scholar

[18] Morando A , Victor T , Bengler K , Dozza M . Users’ response to critical situations in automated driving: rear-ends, sideswipes, and false warnings. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2019;22(5):2809–22.10.1109/TITS.2020.2975429Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lu Z , Happee R , de Winter J . Take over! attention, situation awareness, and decision-making in the face of an impending threat. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2020;72:211–25.10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[20] Naujoks F , Wiedemann K , Schomig N , Jarosch O , Gold C . Expert-based controllability assessment of control transitions from automated to manual driving. MethodsX. 2018;5:579–92.10.1016/j.mex.2018.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Kaussner Y , Kenntner-Mabiala R , Hoffmann S , Klatt J , Tracik T , Kruger HP . Effects of oxycarbazepine and carbamazepine on driving ability: a double-blind, randomized crossover trial with healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology. 2010;210(1):53–63.10.1007/s00213-010-1814-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Response Consortium. PReVENT Project. Code of practice for the design and evaluation of ADAS; 2006. https://www.acea.auto/files/20090831_Code_of_Practice_ADAS.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Trustonomy Consortium. Trustonomy framework definition, deliverable D1.3, trustonomy – building acceptance and trust in autonomous mobility; 2019. https://h2020-trustonomy.eu/download/d1-3-deliverable-trustonomy-framework-definition/. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kosmides P , Demestichas K , Avgerinakis K , Moustakas K , Risvas K , Rodak A , et al. Bringing trust to autonomous mobility. Proceedings of the 5th AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive, 2020 November 18–20. Turin, Italy: IEEE Xplore; 2020.10.23919/AEITAUTOMOTIVE50086.2020.9307432Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-23
Revised: 2021-06-11
Accepted: 2021-06-20
Published Online: 2021-07-21

© 2021 Aleksandra Rodak et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Electrochemical studies of the synergistic combination effect of thymus mastichina and illicium verum essential oil extracts on the corrosion inhibition of low carbon steel in dilute acid solution
  3. Adoption of Business Intelligence to Support Cost Accounting Based Financial Systems — Case Study of XYZ Company
  4. Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Supply Options for University Buildings in Saudi Arabia
  5. Optimized design of a semimetal gasket operating in flange-bolted joints
  6. Behavior of non-reinforced and reinforced green mortar with fibers
  7. Field measurement of contact forces on rollers for a large diameter pipe conveyor
  8. Development of Smartphone-Controlled Hand and Arm Exoskeleton for Persons with Disability
  9. Investigation of saturation flow rate using video camera at signalized intersections in Jordan
  10. The features of Ni2MnIn polycrystalline Heusler alloy thin films formation by pulsed laser deposition
  11. Selection of a workpiece clamping system for computer-aided subtractive manufacturing of geometrically complex medical models
  12. Development of Solar-Powered Water Pump with 3D Printed Impeller
  13. Identifying Innovative Reliable Criteria Governing the Selection of Infrastructures Construction Project Delivery Systems
  14. Kinetics of Carbothermal Reduction Process of Different Size Phosphate Rocks
  15. Plastic forming processes of transverse non-homogeneous composite metallic sheets
  16. Accelerated aging of WPCs Based on Polypropylene and Birch plywood Sanding Dust
  17. Effect of water flow and depth on fatigue crack growth rate of underwater wet welded low carbon steel SS400
  18. Non-invasive attempts to extinguish flames with the use of high-power acoustic extinguisher
  19. Filament wound composite fatigue mechanisms investigated with full field DIC strain monitoring
  20. Structural Timber In Compartment Fires – The Timber Charring and Heat Storage Model
  21. Technical and economic aspects of starting a selected power unit at low ambient temperatures
  22. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  23. Adaptation to driver-assistance systems depending on experience
  24. A SIMULINK implementation of a vector shift relay with distributed synchronous generator for engineering classes
  25. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in a static tensile test
  26. Errors in documenting the subsoil and their impact on the investment implementation: Case study
  27. Comparison between two calculation methods for designing a stand-alone PV system according to Mosul city basemap
  28. Reduction of transport-related air pollution. A case study based on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the level of NOx emissions in the city of Krakow
  29. Driver intervention performance assessment as a key aspect of L3–L4 automated vehicles deployment
  30. A new method for solving quadratic fractional programming problem in neutrosophic environment
  31. Effect of fish scales on fabrication of polyester composite material reinforcements
  32. Impact of the operation of LNG trucks on the environment
  33. The effectiveness of the AEB system in the context of the safety of vulnerable road users
  34. Errors in controlling cars cause tragic accidents involving motorcyclists
  35. Deformation of designed steel plates: An optimisation of the side hull structure using the finite element approach
  36. Thermal-strength analysis of a cross-flow heat exchanger and its design improvement
  37. Effect of thermal collector configuration on the photovoltaic heat transfer performance with 3D CFD modeling
  38. Experimental identification of the subjective reception of external stimuli during wheelchair driving
  39. Failure analysis of motorcycle shock breakers
  40. Experimental analysis of nonlinear characteristics of absorbers with wire rope isolators
  41. Experimental tests of the antiresonance vibratory mill of a sectional movement trajectory
  42. Experimental and theoretical investigation of CVT rubber belt vibrations
  43. Is the cubic parabola really the best railway transition curve?
  44. Transport properties of the new vibratory conveyor at operations in the resonance zone
  45. Assessment of resistance to permanent deformations of asphalt mixes of low air void content
  46. COVID-19 lockdown impact on CERN seismic station ambient noise levels
  47. Review Articles
  48. FMEA method in operational reliability of forest harvesters
  49. Examination of preferences in the field of mobility of the city of Pila in terms of services provided by the Municipal Transport Company in Pila
  50. Enhancement stability and color fastness of natural dye: A review
  51. Special Issue: ICE-SEAM 2019 - Part II
  52. Lane Departure Warning Estimation Using Yaw Acceleration
  53. Analysis of EMG Signals during Stance and Swing Phases for Controlling Magnetorheological Brake applications
  54. Sensor Number Optimization Using Neural Network for Ankle Foot Orthosis Equipped with Magnetorheological Brake
  55. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Civil Engineering - Part II
  56. Comparison of STM’s reliability system on the example of selected element
  57. Technical analysis of the renovation works of the wooden palace floors
  58. Special Issue: TRANSPORT 2020
  59. Simulation assessment of the half-power bandwidth method in testing shock absorbers
  60. Predictive analysis of the impact of the time of day on road accidents in Poland
  61. User’s determination of a proper method for quantifying fuel consumption of a passenger car with compression ignition engine in specific operation conditions
  62. Analysis and assessment of defectiveness of regulations for the yellow signal at the intersection
  63. Streamlining possibility of transport-supply logistics when using chosen Operations Research techniques
  64. Permissible distance – safety system of vehicles in use
  65. Study of the population in terms of knowledge about the distance between vehicles in motion
  66. UAVs in rail damage image diagnostics supported by deep-learning networks
  67. Exhaust emissions of buses LNG and Diesel in RDE tests
  68. Measurements of urban traffic parameters before and after road reconstruction
  69. The use of deep recurrent neural networks to predict performance of photovoltaic system for charging electric vehicles
  70. Analysis of dangers in the operation of city buses at the intersections
  71. Psychological factors of the transfer of control in an automated vehicle
  72. Testing and evaluation of cold-start emissions from a gasoline engine in RDE test at two different ambient temperatures
  73. Age and experience in driving a vehicle and psychomotor skills in the context of automation
  74. Consumption of gasoline in vehicles equipped with an LPG retrofit system in real driving conditions
  75. Laboratory studies of the influence of the working position of the passenger vehicle air suspension on the vibration comfort of children transported in the child restraint system
  76. Route optimization for city cleaning vehicle
  77. Efficiency of electric vehicle interior heating systems at low ambient temperatures
  78. Model-based imputation of sound level data at thoroughfare using computational intelligence
  79. Research on the combustion process in the Fiat 1.3 Multijet engine fueled with rapeseed methyl esters
  80. Overview of the method and state of hydrogenization of road transport in the world and the resulting development prospects in Poland
  81. Tribological characteristics of polymer materials used for slide bearings
  82. Car reliability analysis based on periodic technical tests
  83. Special Issue: Terotechnology 2019 - Part II
  84. DOE Application for Analysis of Tribological Properties of the Al2O3/IF-WS2 Surface Layers
  85. The effect of the impurities spaces on the quality of structural steel working at variable loads
  86. Prediction of the parameters and the hot open die elongation forging process on an 80 MN hydraulic press
  87. Special Issue: AEVEC 2020
  88. Vocational Student's Attitude and Response Towards Experiential Learning in Mechanical Engineering
  89. Virtual Laboratory to Support a Practical Learning of Micro Power Generation in Indonesian Vocational High Schools
  90. The impacts of mediating the work environment on the mode choice in work trips
  91. Utilization of K-nearest neighbor algorithm for classification of white blood cells in AML M4, M5, and M7
  92. Car braking effectiveness after adaptation for drivers with motor dysfunctions
  93. Case study: Vocational student’s knowledge and awareness level toward renewable energy in Indonesia
  94. Contribution of collaborative skill toward construction drawing skill for developing vocational course
  95. Special Issue: Annual Engineering and Vocational Education Conference - Part II
  96. Vocational teachers’ perspective toward Technological Pedagogical Vocational Knowledge
  97. Special Issue: ICIMECE 2020 - Part I
  98. Profile of system and product certification as quality infrastructure in Indonesia
  99. Prediction Model of Magnetorheological (MR) Fluid Damper Hysteresis Loop using Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm
  100. A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters
  101. Facile rheological route method for LiFePO4/C cathode material production
  102. Mosque design strategy for energy and water saving
  103. Epoxy resins thermosetting for mechanical engineering
  104. Estimating the potential of wind energy resources using Weibull parameters: A case study of the coastline region of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  105. Special Issue: CIRMARE 2020
  106. New trends in visual inspection of buildings and structures: Study for the use of drones
  107. Special Issue: ISERT 2021
  108. Alleviate the contending issues in network operating system courses: Psychomotor and troubleshooting skill development with Raspberry Pi
  109. Special Issue: Actual Trends in Logistics and Industrial Engineering - Part II
  110. The Physical Internet: A means towards achieving global logistics sustainability
  111. Special Issue: Modern Scientific Problems in Civil Engineering - Part I
  112. Construction work cost and duration analysis with the use of agent-based modelling and simulation
  113. Corrosion rate measurement for steel sheets of a fuel tank shell being in service
  114. The influence of external environment on workers on scaffolding illustrated by UTCI
  115. Allocation of risk factors for geodetic tasks in construction schedules
  116. Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of tram impact speed
  117. Technological and organizational problems in the construction of the radiation shielding concrete and suggestions to solve: A case study
  118. Finite element analysis of train speed effect on dynamic response of steel bridge
  119. New approach to analysis of railway track dynamics – Rail head vibrations
  120. Special Issue: Trends in Logistics and Production for the 21st Century - Part I
  121. Design of production lines and logistic flows in production
  122. The planning process of transport tasks for autonomous vans
  123. Modeling of the two shuttle box system within the internal logistics system using simulation software
  124. Implementation of the logistics train in the intralogistics system: A case study
  125. Assessment of investment in electric buses: A case study of a public transport company
  126. Assessment of a robot base production using CAM programming for the FANUC control system
  127. Proposal for the flow of material and adjustments to the storage system of an external service provider
  128. The use of numerical analysis of the injection process to select the material for the injection molding
  129. Economic aspect of combined transport
  130. Solution of a production process with the application of simulation: A case study
  131. Speedometer reliability in regard to road traffic sustainability
  132. Design and construction of a scanning stand for the PU mini-acoustic sensor
  133. Utilization of intelligent vehicle units for train set dispatching
  134. Special Issue: ICRTEEC - 2021 - Part I
  135. LVRT enhancement of DFIG-driven wind system using feed-forward neuro-sliding mode control
  136. Special Issue: Automation in Finland 2021 - Part I
  137. Prediction of future paths of mobile objects using path library
  138. Model predictive control for a multiple injection combustion model
  139. Model-based on-board post-injection control development for marine diesel engine
  140. Intelligent temporal analysis of coronavirus statistical data
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2021-0079/html
Scroll to top button