Home Medicine Recommendations for outpatient activity in COVID-19 pandemic
Article Open Access

Recommendations for outpatient activity in COVID-19 pandemic

  • Piergaspare Palumbo EMAIL logo , Fanny Massimi , Antonio Biondi , Roberto Cirocchi , Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca , Giorgio Giraudo , Sergio Giuseppe Intini , Roberta Monzani , Giampaolo Sozio , Sofia Usai and The Società Italiana di Chirurgia Ambulatoriale e Day Surgery (SICADS) Board
Published/Copyright: November 9, 2021

Abstract

The spread of the COVID-19 disease substantially influenced the International Healthcare system, and the national governments worldwide had before long to decide how to manage the available resources, giving priority to the treatment of the COVID-infected patients. Then, in many countries, it was decided to limit the elective procedures to surgical oncology and emergency procedures. In fact, most of the routine, middle-low complexity surgical interventions were reduced, and the day surgery (DS) activities were almost totally interrupted. As a result of this approach, the waiting list of these patients has significantly increased. In the current phase, with a significant decrease in the incidence of COVID-19 cases, the surgical daily activity can be safely and effectively restarted. Adjustments are mandatory to resume the DS activity. The whole separation of pathways with respect to the long-stay and emergency surgery, an accurate preoperative protocol of patient management, with a proper selection and screening of all-day cases, careful scheduling of surgical organization in the operating room, and planning of the postoperative pathway are the goals for a feasible, safe, and effective resumption of DS activity.

1 Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic is incontestably one of the greatest events with social and public health impact ever recorded in the history of humanity. Up to now (April 2021), over 141 million confirmed cases of infection and more than 3 million deaths are reported worldwide [1]. The Italian and European panorama is recording a considerable reduction of the infection curve of data, with an Rt index lower than 1 in all regions. The state of alert, however, remains very high. It is an unmatched medical emergency, being able to induce a sudden change in management of available healthcare resources for elective surgery, to reallocate funding to the COVID-19 patient’s care. The negative impact on surgery activities has been very significant. It is estimated that since February 2020 more than 30 million surgical procedures were canceled. During this emergency, the not strictly required surgical procedures, outpatient activities, and overall surgical benefits have been postponed. Only the emergency surgical procedures never suspended their activities. The oncologic surgery too, after an initial braking, quickly adjusted to new assistance pathways [2]. Instead, the day surgery (DS) recorded a complete cessation of intervention, and the dedicated operating rooms are no longer used. For this reason, these surgical models need to get valid, standardized recommendations to restart as quickly as possible [3].

Furthermore, in 2018 in Italy, more than a million of surgical procedures have been performed in a DS setting. This really means that, during the period from February 2020 to February 2021, more than a million procedures have been delayed. This sets a great problem in terms of patients retrieving once the activities will start again. Such conditions should not accept a further delay of the resumption of DS, especially observing a strong reduction in infection rate.

In our country, we can consider that, now, after a decrease in the incidence of COVID-19 cases, elective surgical activity has been prudently resumed. Indeed, according to the American College of Surgeons, the time of resumption for elective surgery is at least 14 days after the reduction of the cases [4]. In Italy, the sanitary authorities decided to adopt a more restrictive behavior for DS patients, and up to now, the outpatient wards and activities are only partially resumed. The aim of this article is to recommend a quick and safe resumption of work in DS units.

DS is commonly performed in free-standing units or dedicated hospital areas, with separated access to spaces for admission, and operating rooms exclusively reserved for daycare activities, with separate pathways regarding the emergency and long-stay units.

This allows safer and more appropriate activities and processes management. In this phase, only surgical facilities able to guarantee a true separation of pathways should be authorized to restart the activities.

In this phase, a limited but consistent number of patients should be considered asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Some precautions therefore must be adopted in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative processes.

Patients selected in DS might be COVID-19 negative, undergoing only an elective, nonurgent pathology generally treated in this setting. COVID-positive patients could be postponed to a more appropriate stage when the disease will be healed [5,6].

In different cases, if the disease does not allow a delay of care, patients must be sent to a common COVID pathway, as well as emergency and long-stay patients, not able to set back the surgical interventions.

Currently, the common behavior is to consider elective, nonurgent surgery on COVID-19-positive patients to be postponed.

In fact, the COVID-19-positive patients undergoing surgery have higher mortality than other patients with similar conditions in a non-COVID time [7].

According to Lei et al., who examined a series of 34 patients operated electively, surgery worsened the course of COVID-19 disease [8].

However, there is no reason to delay any longer the elective daily surgery on COVID-19-negative patients in the countries where the epidemic peak has been reached and the healthcare quality can ensure safe and ethically acceptable delivery of care.

In fact, morbidity and mortality following outpatient surgery are exceptional. In an experience conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the Kingston General Hospital (Ontario, Canada), only 2.9% of cases were rehospitalized after outpatient procedures, most of them for clinical observation [9], and emergency postoperative surgical procedures are extremely uncommon.

This article proposes an array of recommendations regarding surgical risk stratification and management of surgical procedures in a DS setting, at the COVID time. The implementation of protocols and recommendations can allow an early restart of DS procedures, remaining ready to stay active also in the unfortunate event of a possible further wave of the epidemic.

2 Risk management

The rational approach to the risk management in DS must be based on the peculiarities of this surgical activity, typically characterized by high-flow production processes and with a high possibility of standardization.

A proactive approach can be realized through a careful engineering process of clinical pathways. It is used by a variety of organizations, including the World Health Organization and the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency [10]. Process analysis is therefore essential in managing clinical risk; for each activity, an attempt is made to identify the errors that may occur during execution and the associated risk is quantitatively assessed. Once all possible adverse events have been identified, the probabilities with which they may occur must be assessed and therefore different priority requirements must be assigned to the various occurrences.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, DS allows to offer the patients a safe care setting, able to provide high-quality proposals, and personalization services in a short period of time. This is particularly important in the COVID-19 pandemic when the patient’s exposure time within a healthcare facility must be minimized with good effectiveness. The management of the daycare pathway must be directed to minimize the risk of in-hospital infection. Critical issues are as follows:

  1. The preoperative undiagnosed infection with evidence of the disease during hospital stay or after discharge.

  2. The infection transmission to or from the health staff.

  3. The need of an adequate pathway for the alert in case of contact with positive subjects.

In the high-income countries, the high number of elderly patients with comorbidity increases the risk of adverse events related to infection brought by silent healthy COVID-19 carriers [11].

3 Preoperative pathway

The selection of the surgical procedures, allowing a fast recovery (no longer than 4 h) and safe discharge the same day of surgery, is mandatory.

Patients selected for DS procedures in the descending curve of the COVD-19 circulation should be considered potentially positive, and appropriate precautions should be observed, without forgetting to implement the consent form with a sentence that explains to patients that is always possible to contract a COVID infection in the hospital, despite a safe therapeutic way is ensured [10,11].

A delicate issue concerns the acceptance of frailty patients: children and adults, who need to be assisted by a caregiver throughout their hospitalization. Only one career is admitted and must be submitted to the same precautions required to patients, as in the following description.

The main criteria for admission of patients in a DS unit will remain similar with respect to the pre-COVID time.

Primarily, the selection criteria universally acknowledged are still valid. We need to be careful during the evaluation of patients who have had COVID-19 who undergo surgery because they are at an increased risk of postoperative death. Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of the patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality [11].

In the last years, a growing interest in terms of prehabilitation before surgical procedures is reported in the literature. Prehabilitation is considered as a process of optimizing physical functionality preoperatively to permit maintaining a normal level of function during and after surgery [12]. Prehabilitation could be useful in ambulatory surgery, especially during a pandemic: high-risk patients in the ambulatory setting should be identified, stratified, and optimized [13].

Moreover, the possibility to get a faster discharge, related to the government legal provisions about the people’s mobility, must be considered [14,15]. Nevertheless, the DS unit should be independently organized in terms of management of the preoperative pathway. When it would not be disconnected from other structures of the hospital, an independent space should be created, and the hospital structures adapted.

The exams and the anesthetic assessment should be undertaken in the same ward, without moving the patient. The routine blood exams should be supplemented, if possible, by the vitamin C and D level assay [16,17]. Chest X-ray, instead, unless necessary due to the patients’ clinic conditions, should be avoided.

Moreover, the possibility to get a faster discharge is related to the government legal provisions about the people’s mobility.

Patients should be carefully selected. COVID exposure, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and overall risk factors must be considered. At this stage, only patients with 1-2 ASA scores should be admitted, due to the increased risk of infection in people with comorbidity. The selection, in summary, should consider the clinical risk factors, and only intermediate or minor risk factors can be admitted [18,19].

Compared to the time before the COVID pandemic, closer attention is dedicated to the elderly. Patients with cerebral, cardiovascular, bronchopulmonary disease, renal failure, blood disorders, and diabetes should be carefully considered [20,21]. When a delay is not feasible, an adequate preoperative balance of comorbidities is mandatory. The agedness is currently considered not a risk factor in elderly patients with good performance status, but in this condition should be restrictively considered, due to the increased severity of the disease manifestation in the elderly population [22]. Obesity as well should be considered a risk factor [23]. We are faced, unfortunately, with a new virus of which we do not yet know all the characteristics, so the age of patients and comorbidities are the most important indicators of the intraoperative risk.

Very careful management is required to minimize the contact among patients themselves and with the health workers, particularly nurses: the physical separation signaling for 1.5 m distance should be indicated. The different pathways (acceptance area, admission room) should be highlighted by color dots on the floor.

Hand sanitizer dispensers must be distributed at each DS entrance. The workers and the patients must wear the PPE mask. Each patient can be accompanied by a person who waits outside and comes in only when the patient can be discharged. Preoperative consultations by the surgeon and anesthesiologists should be scheduled (30 min a patient), and it is important to respect the social distance in the waiting room.

Before accessing the operating room, a safety kit – mask, disposable gowns, gloves, must be prepared at each stay bed [24].

4 Screening

A careful information of patients and accurate covid tests are essential. The RT-PCR is the most sensitive test to ensure a safe surgical procedure.

The preoperative screening can start by phone or video calling, submitting some questions about their COVID conditions, as exposure, symptoms, disease development, and previous testing. All patients who are not known to have had COVID-19 and who are scheduled for surgery should be screened for exposure to COVID-19, and for symptoms (i.e. fever, cough, shortness of breath, muscle pain, sore throat, and/or new loss of taste or smell) within the prior 2 weeks; patients with symptoms should be referred for further evaluation.

Then, the patient must be carefully informed about the emergency that has reshaped the health system, and the safety systems that the hospital is able to ensure [25]. With the aim to assess the infectious condition, a preoperative COVID-19 test is essential. The reverse-rranscriptase polimerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is sensitive and reliable, easy to run, and provides results in a very short time [26].

In a Cochrane study [27], the RT-PCR test had an average sensitivity of 95.2% whereas the antigen test had a sensitivity of 56.2%. The antigen test correctly detects SARS CoV-2 in the presence of a high viral load, and its sensitivity rapidly declines when the viral load decreases [28].

As even asymptomatic patients and patients with negative results could be contagious, we should consider every patient who comes to our departments as potentially COVID-19 positive bringing us to implement safety measures and choosing pre-, intra-, and postoperative procedures that can expose less hospital staff and the other patients to the infection.

Considering that patients presumed to be infected must be excluded from DS, a systematic lung CT scan is unnecessary [29,30,31].

The RT-PCR test should be carried out 48–72 h before surgery, and, afterward, patients should self-isolate themselves up to the time of admission, even if patients are vaccinated. A trust agreement, in this sense, is mandatory [5].

There is no evidence that a rapid antigen test performed right before admission is demonstrated to be useful [32].

5 Surge protection device (SPD) usage

A rational usage of SPD is central in epidemic phase because it ensures health worker protection and prevents disease diffusion.

An operating room is an environment in which forced air circulation promotes dispersion of particles eventually contaminated. According to current thought, greater droplets remain next to the source, while smaller one is dispersed in major areas, being contamination aerosol source. Recent studies demonstrate that both, smaller and greater droplets, persist at a short distance from the diffusion source, which means that aerosol contamination happens also next to the source [33]. Proper usage of SPD is essential to prevent infective disease diffusion among patients and health care workers. However, due to the rapid diffusion of the pandemic, healthcare workers are not enough educated on the corrected usage of SPD. There are several studies built up on the importance of donning and doffing to prevent self-contamination at the end of procedures. Fluorescent markers were used to perform simulation, identifying at the end of procedures if there were personal self-contamination. Results demonstrate that healthcare workers diverge from protocol mainly in doffing; in fact, fluorescent marker remnants were found on the hands of the workers as detection of ineffective and high-risk procedures [34].

A study proposes active training through the exercise of donning and doffing or passive training viewing tutorials [35] and by the usage of a checklist with all steps for correct procedures. It is clear the need to realize studies with the goals of continuous education of health workers, not only in proximity to a pandemic but also to ensure correct usage of SPD and consequently a low risk of contamination.

6 Scheduling of surgery in the operating room

Two groups of surgery candidates can be considered, with different pathways.

  1. A group undergoing procedures not producing airborne droplets.

    These patients are submitted to surgery with local anesthesia, with continued monitoring, and locoregional anesthesia, including the central block. Moderate sedation or analgosedation is admitted. Many surgical procedures can be performed in this manner (hernia repair, minor urological procedures, varicose vein surgery, arthroscopy, and many others). Only upper gastrointestinal procedures should be excluded from this group [36].

    To reduce viral contamination during the surgical procedure, a dose of nasal povidone-iodine before the placement in the operating room can be useful [37]. Alcoholic sanitizers must be used by health professionals before and after any contact with patients [38]. Double gloves are used when the patient’s mouth or nose are touched to remove the external ones when the procedure is completed. Carefully wipe any surfaces that have been exposed and possibly infected by the patients. If oxygen needs to be administered, a nasal cannula under the surgical mask should be applied without using high flow [39,40].

    The number of surgeons, nurses, and other workers inside the operating room should be minimized. It is preferable to define one rotation of the residents/students if you work in a research/university hospital. Only then, it is possible to reduce the virus transmission and infection, involving not only the patients but also all the health professionals and workers.

    The operating time should be reduced to the strict minimum. Surgeons, nurses, and other workers need to use only disposable devices, surgical masks (FFP2 are the safest) and/or FFP2, high-quality sterile surgical gowns, and protective glasses (during nebulizer operations). All the instruments should be sealed in a sharp container, and those not disposable are transferred to the sterilizing room. After surgery, patients are quickly brought back to the ward, without staying in a recovery room. The necessary environment cleaning extends the time between each surgical procedure and could determine the performance of fewer surgical procedures for each day [14,15]. This problem could be resolved if the plan of work is distributed on 6 days/week and not only 5!

  2. A second group interested by procedures producing airborne droplets.

    In this group, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, bronchoscopy, upper respiratory surgery, ORL surgery, maxillofacial surgery, and all procedures should be done under general anesthesia. These procedures require extreme cautions and specific procedures of environmental treatment, especially the use of double gloves during intubation and the maintenance of anesthesia. Special care is taken to the safe disposal of laryngoscope blades, or it is better if it is possible to use a video laryngoscope. The rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is strongly recommended [21,41], to avoid aerosolization during manual ventilation with a mixture enriched of oxygen; if manual ventilation is necessary, it is suggested to use little tidal volume and a close circuit for airway aspiration must be prepared. Total intravenous anesthesia could be preferred [42], but when it is possible it is suggested to choose locoregional anesthesia, with the purpose to consent to a rapid recovery. When general anesthesia is performed, a double filtration system, with high efficiency, must be allocated between the expiratory circuit, the ventilator, and the extremity of the breathing circuit connecting the patient to the ventilator [42].

The procedure’s turnover is significantly prolonged, considering that the presence of workers in the operating room is reduced, and the total number of treated patients per day is lower.

These procedures, whenever possible, should be delayed in this acute phase of COVID-19, or shifted to the general surgery operating rooms, considering specific COVID safety precautions. Accordingly, the surgical pathway is different than the one dedicated to outstanding patients.

If the local/regional anesthesia must be converted to the general one, all described precautions must be adopted.

However, local or regional anesthesia should be preferred, associated with sedation whenever needed. Unlike in the non-COVID period, general anesthesia should be preferably performed using a laryngeal mask, because the supraglottic devices do not ensure a complete seal of the airway, and a possible droplets contamination on the surgical room can occur [41].

7 Postoperative care

During the postoperative phase, a close attention should be paid to respect social distancing between patients and use protection devices.

After surgery, all patients, treated with any type of anesthesia, should be directly admitted to the ward for short monitoring (Levels 1–2) to reach an adequate Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) and discharged as soon as possible. In the case of general anesthesia, it is mandatory to awake and stabilize the patients in the theater. They should not stay in the recovery room, and a quick return to the ward is recommendable.

Reduced postoperative access in the hospital and fast recovery (no longer than 4 h) are recommended. Caregivers cannot be admitted since the patients are ready to discharge. The use of protection devices inside the ward, for patients and health professionals, is mandatory. Prescriptions and instructions should be already available at the time of discharge, so patients can be turned into caregivers without further transit to the reception [24]. The admission and discharge pathways are in this case completely separate. The use of the PADSS is highly recommended [43]. An appropriate postoperative pathway, using telemedicine in some cases, could be adopted. SICADS, in this regard, developed a Web App, “Con.Te SICADS” [44] with the aim to define an optimized health pathway for patients enrolled in an outpatient program. If any patient develops COVID-19 symptoms during the postoperative period, the specialist team must be immediately alerted, and all patients and professionals who had contact with the infected patient must be submitted to controls, even if vaccinated. Our goal is to protect patients by health professionals and to protect health staff by patients donning adequate PPE [41].

8 Discussion

This article is based on the review of recent studies about a new surgical organization during the COVID-19 pandemic and on the experience of Members of the Board of SICADS (Italian Society for Ambulatory ad Day Case Surgery). Our article is one of few concerning the resumption of the DS activity.

Peri- and postoperative COVID-19 complications significantly increase the risk of deaths and are considered a concern to defer or cancel nonurgent surgical services. Even in many high-income countries, the activities are limited to oncological and emergency surgery [11].

Surgery, however, should be maintained also during a pandemic, because it is an essential service of healthcare. Delays and cancellations may withhold patients from treatment that helps improve their quality of life.

The infection rate, indeed, could be underestimated [45], and the critical period may persist for many months. The risk for minor surgery is not negligible [46]; the risk related to COVID-19 adverse event, however, should be balanced against the deterioration of quality of life from delay or cancellation of the procedures.

Right now, following a long time of significant reduction of the minor procedures, surgical activity should be reopened, limiting the occurrence of infection. Otherwise, a high number of patients must be rescheduled in the future, and the healthcare system could collapse.

Waiting for a substantial change, over time, with the attainment of herd immunity by vaccines and specific medical care, full attention to limit any risk of infection must be taken.

DS can be considered at low risk due to its short duration, low complexity, and kind of anesthetic management, but needs a very strategic organization. This happened every time, more now during the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, the best management for surgical elective patients must consider a short stay in hospital before, during, and after surgery. The question is how to safely organize the pathway. The 70% approximately of all kinds of surgery could be treated under DS, but a re-engineering of health pathways and hospital facilities could help to manage most surgical patients reducing to stay in hospital. We need a new model to carry out the visit of prehospitalization, a video call or video chat might be the first step to select the clinical risk of the patient and organize the best way of prehospitalization. The postoperative period could be also converted to a contactless way, using telemedicine, web call, and web apps, able to provide details and adequate information [47,48]. A new period has started, and we should change our thinking for a new model of health.

The goal of this kind of surgery is the separation of pathways with respect to the long-stay and emergency surgery, and this allows a lower risk of contamination during admission. The shortness of the admission time also reduces the risk of contamination.

The preoperative pathway is very subdued. The limited number of the preoperative procedures avoids long commutes of patients inside the hospital.

The surgical rooms dedicated to not producing droplets patients should be separated from other day cases procedures. The choice of the kind of anesthesia should be pointed to the easier possible.

The decontamination procedures after surgery must be very strict. This extends the time of each procedure and necessarily reduces their number per day. Any specific measures to limit the biological risk of contamination must be adopted [49].

All these recommendations significantly increase the costs of management of the operating rooms, the wards, and the health workers, in violation of the main principle, under which outpatient surgery is a low-cost procedure [50,51,52].

Considering costs sustained in the pandemic period examined for SPD, lab tests, services, and algorithmic paths used, it is possible to conclude that costs sustained for secure and adequate surgical management and to guarantee healthcare workers are 1.32%, higher than the cost in standard conditions. Effectively in the operating room and in the surgical department, the usage of these devices is normal; it is correct to add only the cost of COVID-19 pharyngeal nose swabs and a greater need for equipment. It is possible to guarantee a safe surgical pathway by a good organization, with no consequences on patients’ and healthcare workers’ safety.

The request for low complexity surgical procedures is nevertheless very high from the population of patients, and they are not less important than others.

At present, the waiting lists of this kind of surgical patients have significantly increased, and in this phase of decrease of incidence of COVID-19 cases, the surgical activity of DS can be safely and effectively restarted. Any delay can conduct to further prolongation of the waiting lists, with additional damage for the patients.


Francesco Basile, Ferdinando Campitiello, Silvestro Canonico, Giorgio Celli, Marsilio Francucci, Francesco Gossetti, Vincenzo Maria Greco, Giovanni Francesco Manfredi, Lorenzo Mannino, Salvatore Massa, Claudio Nazzaro, Mauro Patiti, Davide Pozzobon, Mariuccia Rizzuto, Giuseppe Silvestre, Angelo Sorge, Maurizio Verga, Roberto Dino Villani, Vincenzo Vittorini, Guido Zanghì.

tel: +39-333-6090560

  1. Funding information: The authors did not receive any funding for this submission.

  2. Author contributions: Palumbo P., Massimi F.: conceptualization. Palumbo P., Monzani R., Cirocchi R.: methodology. Massimi F., De Luca G.M., Giraudo G., Intini D.S., Sozio G., Usai S.: data collecting, analysis and article writing. Monzani R., Biondi A., Cirocchi R.: validation. Palumbo P.: supervision.

  3. Conflict of interest: All authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data avalilability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

[1] World Health Organization. Webpage. Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) outbreak; 2019. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus. [Online].Search in Google Scholar

[2] Moletta L, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Costantini M, Salvador R, Merigliano S, et al. International guidelines and recommendations for surgery during Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2020;79:180–8.10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.061Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Palumbo P, Massimi F, Usai S, Biondi A, Monzani R. Resumption of day surgery activity in the acute phase of COVID-19 pandemic. Surg Innov. 2021;28(2):247–8.10.1177/1553350620987788Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, American Hospital Association. Joint statement: roadmap for resuming elective surgery after Covid-19 pandemic. AORN; 2020. https://www.aorn.org/guidelines/aorn-support/roadmap-for-resuming-elective-surgery-after-covid-19.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Mouton C, Hirschmann MT, Ollivier M, Seil R, Menetrey J. COVID-19 – ESSKA guidelines and recommendations for resuming elective surgery. J Exp Orthop. 2020;13(7):28.10.1186/s40634-020-00248-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Coccolini F, Perrone G, Chirugi M, Di Marzo F, Ansaloni L, Scandroglio I, et al. Surgery in COVID-19 patients: operational directives. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;7(15):25.10.1186/s13017-020-00307-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Aminian A, Safari S, Jahromi RA, Ghorbani M, Delaney CP. COVID-19 outbreak and surgical practice: unexpected fatality in perioperative period. Ann Surg. 2020;272(1):27–9.10.1097/SLA.0000000000003925Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Lei S, Jiang F, Wating S, Chen C, Chen J, Mei W, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. Elsevier Clin Med. 2020;5(21):100331.10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100331Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sawhney M, Goldstein DH, Wei X, Pare GC, Wang L, VanDenKerkhof EG. Pain and haemorrhage are the most common reasons for emergency department use and hospital admission in adults following ambulatory surgery: results of a population-based cohort study. Perioper Med. 2020;19(9):25.10.1186/s13741-020-00155-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] FEMA IS 0100. An introduction to the incident command system. SM1. Emmitsburg (USA); 2018. p. 120–39.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Soreide K, Yaqub S, Hallet J, Kvaløy JT, Kleppe TS. A risk model of admitting patients with silent SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery and development of severe postoperative outcomes and death: projections over 24 months for 5 geographical regions. Ann Surg. 2021;1(273):208–16.10.1097/SLA.0000000000004583Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Cabilan CJ, Hines S, Munday J. The effectiveness of prehabilitation or preoperative exercise for surgical patients: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(1):46–87.10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1885Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Rajan N. The high-risk patient for ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(6):724–31.10.1097/ACO.0000000000000919Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Williams BA, Kentor ML, Williams JP, Figallo CM, Sigl JC, Anders JW. Process analysis in outpatient knee surgery – effects of regional and general anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled time. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:529–38.10.1097/00000542-200008000-00033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Friedman DM, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL. Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann Surg. 2006;243:10–4.10.1097/01.sla.0000193600.97748.b1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Hemila H, Chalker E. Vitamin C can shorten the length of stay in the ICU: a meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):708.10.3390/nu11040708Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Fowler AA, Truwit JD, Hite RD, Morris PE, DeWilde C, Priday A, et al. Effect of vitamin C infusion on organ failure and biomarkers of inflammation and vascular injury in patients with sepsis and severe acute respiratory failure: the CITRIS-ALI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(13):1261–70.10.1001/jama.2019.11825Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] ASA Physical Status Classification. American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2019. https://asahq.org/standars-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system. [Online].Search in Google Scholar

[19] Stanak M, Strohmaier C. Minimun volume in day surgery: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(886):1–17.10.1186/s12913-020-05724-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kamps BS, Hoffmann C. COVID reference. Steinhauser Verlag. 2020;15:265–319.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Cabrera SFD, Clavel LLM, Roman MAH. COVID-19. Vision de Anestesiologo. Revista Cubana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. 2020;26(1):36–41.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Rothan RA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433.10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Samuels JD. Obesity phenotype is a predictor of COVID-19 disease susceptibility. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(8):1368.10.1002/oby.22866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Kaye K, Paprottka F, Escudero R, Casabona G, Montes J, Fakin R, et al. Elective, non-urgent procedures and aesthetic surgery in the wake of SARS–COVID-19: considerations regarding safety, feasibility and impact on clinical management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(3):1014–42.10.1007/s00266-020-01752-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch B, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):970–1.10.1056/NEJMc2001468Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Okba NMA, Müller MA, Li W, Wang C. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;26:7.10.3201/eid2607.200841Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Adriano A, Berhane S, Davenport C, Dittrich S, et al. Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;25(6):6.10.1002/14651858.CD013705Search in Google Scholar

[28] Scohy A, Anantharajah A, Bodéus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Verroken A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol. 2020;8(129):104455.10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Huang P, Liu T, Huang L, Liu H, Lei M, Xu W, et al. Use of chest CT in combination with negative RT-PCR assay for the 2019 novel coronavirus but high clinical suspicion. Radiology. 2020;295:22–3.10.1148/radiol.2020200330Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Mao R, Liang J, Shen J, Ghosh S, Zhu LR, Yang H. Implications of COVID-19 for patients with pre-existing digestive diseases. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(5):425–7.10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30076-5Search in Google Scholar

[31] Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, Sverzellati N, Kanne JP, Raoof S, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner society. Chest. 2020. Epub ahead of print.10.1148/radiol.2020201365Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau CS, Lam ET, et al. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020;8(129):104500.10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA, Rahman B, Peng Y, Zhang Y, Seale H, et al. The efficacy of medical masks and respirators against respiratory infection in healthcare workers. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017;11(6):511–7.10.1111/irv.12474Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Alhmidi H, Koganti S, Tomas ME, Cadnum JL, Jencson A, Donskey CJ, et al. A pilot study to assess use of fluorescent lotion in patient care simulations to illustrate pathogen dissemination and train personnel in correct use of personal protective equipment. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;20(5):40.10.1186/s13756-016-0141-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Verbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, et al. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Emergencias. 2021;3:19–61.10.1136/oemed-2018-ICOHabstracts.500Search in Google Scholar

[36] Culver DA, Gordon SM, Mehta AC. Infection control in the bronchoscopy suite. a review of outbreaks and guidelines for prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1050–6.10.1164/rccm.200208-797CCSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Phillips M, Rosenber A, Shopsin B, Cuff G, Faith Skeete F, Foti A, et al. Preventing surgical site infections: a randomized, open-label trial of nasal mupirocin ointment and nasal povidone-iodine solution. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:826–32.10.1086/676872Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Koff MD, Loftus RW, Burchman CC, Schwartzman JD, Read ME, Henry ES. Reduction in intraoperative bacterial contamination of peripheral intravenous tubing through the use of a novel device. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:978–85.10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a06ec3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Loftus RW, Dexter F, Goodheart MJ, McDonald M, Keech J, Noiseux N. Improving basic preventive measures in the perioperative arena to reduce S. aureus transmission and surgical site infections, a randomized trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201934.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1934Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Eggers M, Eickmann M, Zorn J. Rapid and effective virucidal activity of povidone-iodine products against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). Infect Dis Ther. 2015;4:491–501.10.1007/s40121-015-0091-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Lobo CA, Kolli S, Kalagara HKP. Practice recommendations on neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. A joint statement by the American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine (ASRA) and European society of regional anesthesia and pain therapy; 2020. https://www.asra.com/page/2905/practice-recommendations-on-neuraxial-anesthesia-and-peripheral-nerve-blocks-during-covid-19-pandemic. [Online].Search in Google Scholar

[42] Rajan N, Joshi GP. The Covid-19: role of ambulatory surgery facilities in this global pandemic. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(1):31–6.10.1213/ANE.0000000000004847Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Palumbo P, Tellan G, Perotti B, Pacilè MA, Vietri F, Illuminati G. Modified PADSS (post anaesthetic discharge scoring system) for monitoring outpatients discharge. Ann Ital Chir. 2013;84(6):661–5.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Con.Te SICADS-Web App. https://webapp.sicads.com.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Wu SL, Mertens AN, Crider YS, Nguyen A, Pokpongkiat NN, Djajadi S, et al. Substantial underestimation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States. Nat Commun. 2020;9(11):4507.10.1038/s41467-020-18272-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] COVIDSurg Collaborative. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396:17–38.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Gambardella C, Pagliuca R, Pomilla G, Gambardella A. COVID-19 risk contagion: organization and procedures in south Italy geriatric oncology ward. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(7):1187–8. 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.05.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[48] Tolone S, Gambardella C, Brusciano L, Del Genio G, Lucido FS, Docimo L. Telephonic triage before surgical ward admission and telemedicine during COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Effective and easy procedures to reduce in-hospital positivity. Int J Surg. 2020;78:123–5. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Al-Omar K, Bakkar S, Khasawneh L, Donatini G, Miccoli P. Resuming elective surgery in the time of COVID-19: a safe and comprehensive strategy. Updates Surg. 2020;72(2):291–5.10.1007/s13304-020-00822-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Sento Y, Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, Scott DA, Sobue K. The past, present and future of the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) in Japan. J Anesth. 2017;31:601–7.10.1007/s00540-017-2341-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Thenuwara KN, Yoshi T, Nakata Y, Dexter F. Time to recovery after general anesthesia at hospitals with and without a phase I post-anesthesia care unit: a historical cohort study. Can J Anesth. 2018;12:1296–302.10.1007/s12630-018-1220-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Covarelli P, Badolato M, Tomassini GM, Poponesi V, Listorti C, Castellani E, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia: reliability and cost-effectiveness analysis in 153 patients with malignant melanoma. In Vivo. 2012;26(2):315–8.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-06-17
Revised: 2021-08-23
Accepted: 2021-10-04
Published Online: 2021-11-09

© 2021 Piergaspare Palumbo et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Identification of ZG16B as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer
  3. Behçet’s disease with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
  4. Erratum
  5. Erratum to “Suffering from Cerebral Small Vessel Disease with and without Metabolic Syndrome”
  6. Research Articles
  7. GPR37 promotes the malignancy of lung adenocarcinoma via TGF-β/Smad pathway
  8. Expression and role of ABIN1 in sepsis: In vitro and in vivo studies
  9. Additional baricitinib loading dose improves clinical outcome in COVID-19
  10. The co-treatment of rosuvastatin with dapagliflozin synergistically inhibited apoptosis via activating the PI3K/AKt/mTOR signaling pathway in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury rats
  11. SLC12A8 plays a key role in bladder cancer progression and EMT
  12. LncRNA ATXN8OS enhances tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer
  13. Case Report
  14. Serratia marcescens as a cause of unfavorable outcome in the twin pregnancy
  15. Spleno-adrenal fusion mimicking an adrenal metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma: A case report and embryological background
  16. Research Articles
  17. TRIM25 contributes to the malignancy of acute myeloid leukemia and is negatively regulated by microRNA-137
  18. CircRNA circ_0004370 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and inhibits cell apoptosis of esophageal cancer via miR-1301-3p/COL1A1 axis
  19. LncRNA XIST regulates atherosclerosis progression in ox-LDL-induced HUVECs
  20. Potential role of IFN-γ and IL-5 in sepsis prediction of preterm neonates
  21. Rapid Communication
  22. COVID-19 vaccine: Call for employees in international transportation industries and international travelers as the first priority in global distribution
  23. Case Report
  24. Rare squamous cell carcinoma of the kidney with concurrent xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: A case report and review of the literature
  25. An infertile female delivered a baby after removal of primary renal carcinoid tumor
  26. Research Articles
  27. Hypertension, BMI, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases
  28. Case Report
  29. Coexistence of bilateral macular edema and pale optic disc in the patient with Cohen syndrome
  30. Research Articles
  31. Correlation between kinematic sagittal parameters of the cervical lordosis or head posture and disc degeneration in patients with posterior neck pain
  32. Review Articles
  33. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database
  34. Research Articles
  35. Thermography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
  36. Pemetrexed-based first-line chemotherapy had particularly prominent objective response rate for advanced NSCLC: A network meta-analysis
  37. Comparison of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
  38. The influence of smoking in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery
  39. Impact of body mass index on left atrial dimension in HOCM patients
  40. Expression and clinical significance of CMTM1 in hepatocellular carcinoma
  41. miR-142-5p promotes cervical cancer progression by targeting LMX1A through Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  42. Comparison of multiple flatfoot indicators in 5–8-year-old children
  43. Early MRI imaging and follow-up study in cerebral amyloid angiopathy
  44. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a biomarker for the diagnosis of strangulated intestinal obstruction: A meta-analysis
  45. miR-128-3p inhibits apoptosis and inflammation in LPS-induced sepsis by targeting TGFBR2
  46. Dynamic perfusion CT – A promising tool to diagnose pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  47. Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches
  48. Review Articles
  49. The ambiguous role of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) in human immunity
  50. Case Report
  51. Membranous nephropathy with pulmonary cryptococcosis with improved 1-year follow-up results: A case report
  52. Fertility problems in males carrying an inversion of chromosome 10
  53. Acute myeloid leukemia with leukemic pleural effusion and high levels of pleural adenosine deaminase: A case report and review of literature
  54. Metastatic renal Ewing’s sarcoma in adult woman: Case report and review of the literature
  55. Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration in a patient with AIDS and a patient without AIDS: Two cases reports and literature review
  56. Skull hemophilia pseudotumor: A case report
  57. Judicious use of low-dosage corticosteroids for non-severe COVID-19: A case report
  58. Adult-onset citrullinaemia type II with liver cirrhosis: A rare cause of hyperammonaemia
  59. Clinicopathologic features of Good’s syndrome: Two cases and literature review
  60. Fatal immune-related hepatitis with intrahepatic cholestasis and pneumonia associated with camrelizumab: A case report and literature review
  61. Research Articles
  62. Effects of hydroxyethyl starch and gelatin on the risk of acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation: A multicenter retrospective comparative clinical study
  63. Significance of nucleic acid positive anal swab in COVID-19 patients
  64. circAPLP2 promotes colorectal cancer progression by upregulating HELLS by targeting miR-335-5p
  65. Ratios between circulating myeloid cells and lymphocytes are associated with mortality in severe COVID-19 patients
  66. Risk factors of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  67. Clinical features of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 compared with a normotensive group: Single-center experience in China
  68. Surgical myocardial revascularization outcomes in Kawasaki disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
  69. Decreased chromobox homologue 7 expression is associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition and poor prognosis in cervical cancer
  70. FGF16 regulated by miR-520b enhances the cell proliferation of lung cancer
  71. Platelet-rich fibrin: Basics of biological actions and protocol modifications
  72. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer using logistic regression
  73. miR-377 inhibition enhances the survival of trophoblast cells via upregulation of FNDC5 in gestational diabetes mellitus
  74. Prognostic significance of TRIM28 expression in patients with breast carcinoma
  75. Integrative bioinformatics analysis of KPNA2 in six major human cancers
  76. Exosomal-mediated transfer of OIP5-AS1 enhanced cell chemoresistance to trastuzumab in breast cancer via up-regulating HMGB3 by sponging miR-381-3p
  77. A four-lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis of recurrence patients with gastric cancer
  78. Knockdown of circ_0003204 alleviates oxidative low-density lipoprotein-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells injury: Circulating RNAs could explain atherosclerosis disease progression
  79. Propofol postpones colorectal cancer development through circ_0026344/miR-645/Akt/mTOR signal pathway
  80. Knockdown of lncRNA TapSAKI alleviates LPS-induced injury in HK-2 cells through the miR-205/IRF3 pathway
  81. COVID-19 severity in relation to sociodemographics and vitamin D use
  82. Clinical analysis of 11 cases of nocardiosis
  83. Cis-regulatory elements in conserved non-coding sequences of nuclear receptor genes indicate for crosstalk between endocrine systems
  84. Four long noncoding RNAs act as biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma
  85. Real-world evidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation in non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with bendamustine-containing regimens
  86. Relation between IL-8 level and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
  87. circAGFG1 sponges miR-28-5p to promote non-small-cell lung cancer progression through modulating HIF-1α level
  88. Nomogram prediction model for renal anaemia in IgA nephropathy patients
  89. Effect of antibiotic use on the efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
  90. NDRG2 inhibition facilitates angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma
  91. A nomogram for predicting metabolic steatohepatitis: The combination of NAMPT, RALGDS, GADD45B, FOSL2, RTP3, and RASD1
  92. Clinical and prognostic features of MMP-2 and VEGF in AEG patients
  93. The value of miR-510 in the prognosis and development of colon cancer
  94. Functional implications of PABPC1 in the development of ovarian cancer
  95. Prognostic value of preoperative inflammation-based predictors in patients with bladder carcinoma after radical cystectomy
  96. Sublingual immunotherapy increases Treg/Th17 ratio in allergic rhinitis
  97. Prediction of improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  98. Effluent Osteopontin levels reflect the peritoneal solute transport rate
  99. circ_0038467 promotes PM2.5-induced bronchial epithelial cell dysfunction
  100. Significance of miR-141 and miR-340 in cervical squamous cell carcinoma
  101. Association between hair cortisol concentration and metabolic syndrome
  102. Microvessel density as a prognostic indicator of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  103. Characteristics of BCR–ABL gene variants in patients of chronic myeloid leukemia
  104. Knee alterations in rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of US and MRI
  105. Long non-coding RNA TUG1 aggravates cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury by sponging miR-493-3p/miR-410-3p
  106. lncRNA MALAT1 regulated ATAD2 to facilitate retinoblastoma progression via miR-655-3p
  107. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting severity in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: A retrospective study
  108. Analysis of COVID-19 outbreak origin in China in 2019 using differentiation method for unusual epidemiological events
  109. Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-matched analysis of short- and long-term outcomes
  110. Travelers’ vaccines and their adverse events in Nara, Japan
  111. Association between Tfh and PGA in children with Henoch–Schönlein purpura
  112. Can exchange transfusion be replaced by double-LED phototherapy?
  113. circ_0005962 functions as an oncogene to aggravate NSCLC progression
  114. Circular RNA VANGL1 knockdown suppressed viability, promoted apoptosis, and increased doxorubicin sensitivity through targeting miR-145-5p to regulate SOX4 in bladder cancer cells
  115. Serum intact fibroblast growth factor 23 in healthy paediatric population
  116. Algorithm of rational approach to reconstruction in Fournier’s disease
  117. A meta-analysis of exosome in the treatment of spinal cord injury
  118. Src-1 and SP2 promote the proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  119. Dexmedetomidine may decrease the bupivacaine toxicity to heart
  120. Hypoxia stimulates the migration and invasion of osteosarcoma via up-regulating the NUSAP1 expression
  121. Long noncoding RNA XIST knockdown relieves the injury of microglia cells after spinal cord injury by sponging miR-219-5p
  122. External fixation via the anterior inferior iliac spine for proximal femoral fractures in young patients
  123. miR-128-3p reduced acute lung injury induced by sepsis via targeting PEL12
  124. HAGLR promotes neuron differentiation through the miR-130a-3p-MeCP2 axis
  125. Phosphoglycerate mutase 2 is elevated in serum of patients with heart failure and correlates with the disease severity and patient’s prognosis
  126. Cell population data in identifying active tuberculosis and community-acquired pneumonia
  127. Prognostic value of microRNA-4521 in non-small cell lung cancer and its regulatory effect on tumor progression
  128. Mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width is associated with prognosis in premature neonates with sepsis
  129. 3D-printed porous scaffold promotes osteogenic differentiation of hADMSCs
  130. Association of gene polymorphisms with women urinary incontinence
  131. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on stress levels of urologic patients
  132. miR-496 inhibits proliferation via LYN and AKT pathway in gastric cancer
  133. miR-519d downregulates LEP expression to inhibit preeclampsia development
  134. Comparison of single- and triple-port VATS for lung cancer: A meta-analysis
  135. Fluorescent light energy modulates healing in skin grafted mouse model
  136. Silencing CDK6-AS1 inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory damage in HK-2 cells
  137. Predictive effect of DCE-MRI and DWI in brain metastases from NSCLC
  138. Severe postoperative hyperbilirubinemia in congenital heart disease
  139. Baicalin improves podocyte injury in rats with diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway
  140. Clinical factors predicting ureteral stent failure in patients with external ureteral compression
  141. Novel H2S donor proglumide-ADT-OH protects HUVECs from ox-LDL-induced injury through NF-κB and JAK/SATA pathway
  142. Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook: A propensity score matching analysis
  143. Long noncoding RNA MIAT inhibits the progression of diabetic nephropathy and the activation of NF-κB pathway in high glucose-treated renal tubular epithelial cells by the miR-182-5p/GPRC5A axis
  144. Serum exosomal miR-122-5p, GAS, and PGR in the non-invasive diagnosis of CAG
  145. miR-513b-5p inhibits the proliferation and promotes apoptosis of retinoblastoma cells by targeting TRIB1
  146. Fer exacerbates renal fibrosis and can be targeted by miR-29c-3p
  147. The diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-92a in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  148. Prognostic value of α2δ1 in hypopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study
  149. No significant benefit of moderate-dose vitamin C on severe COVID-19 cases
  150. circ_0000467 promotes the proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer cells through regulating KLF12 expression by sponging miR-4766-5p
  151. Downregulation of RAB7 and Caveolin-1 increases MMP-2 activity in renal tubular epithelial cells under hypoxic conditions
  152. Educational program for orthopedic surgeons’ influences for osteoporosis
  153. Expression and function analysis of CRABP2 and FABP5, and their ratio in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  154. GJA1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by mediating TGF-β-induced activation and the epithelial–mesenchymal transition of hepatic stellate cells
  155. lncRNA-ZFAS1 promotes the progression of endometrial carcinoma by targeting miR-34b to regulate VEGFA expression
  156. Anticoagulation is the answer in treating noncritical COVID-19 patients
  157. Effect of late-onset hemorrhagic cystitis on PFS after haplo-PBSCT
  158. Comparison of Dako HercepTest and Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER2 (4B5) tests and their correlation with silver in situ hybridization in lung adenocarcinoma
  159. VSTM1 regulates monocyte/macrophage function via the NF-κB signaling pathway
  160. Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis
  161. Treatment of osteoporosis with teriparatide: The Slovenian experience
  162. New targets of morphine postconditioning protection of the myocardium in ischemia/reperfusion injury: Involvement of HSP90/Akt and C5a/NF-κB
  163. Superenhancer–transcription factor regulatory network in malignant tumors
  164. β-Cell function is associated with osteosarcopenia in middle-aged and older nonobese patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study
  165. Clinical features of atypical tuberculosis mimicking bacterial pneumonia
  166. Proteoglycan-depleted regions of annular injury promote nerve ingrowth in a rabbit disc degeneration model
  167. Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  168. miR-150-5p affects AS plaque with ASMC proliferation and migration by STAT1
  169. MALAT1 promotes malignant pleural mesothelioma by sponging miR-141-3p
  170. Effects of remifentanil and propofol on distant organ lung injury in an ischemia–reperfusion model
  171. miR-654-5p promotes gastric cancer progression via the GPRIN1/NF-κB pathway
  172. Identification of LIG1 and LIG3 as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer
  173. MitoQ inhibits hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis by enhancing PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy
  174. Dissecting role of founder mutation p.V727M in GNE in Indian HIBM cohort
  175. circATP2A2 promotes osteosarcoma progression by upregulating MYH9
  176. Prognostic role of oxytocin receptor in colon adenocarcinoma
  177. Review Articles
  178. The function of non-coding RNAs in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
  179. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic plasma exchange in stiff person syndrome
  180. Role of cesarean section in the development of neonatal gut microbiota: A systematic review
  181. Small cell lung cancer transformation during antitumor therapies: A systematic review
  182. Research progress of gut microbiota and frailty syndrome
  183. Recommendations for outpatient activity in COVID-19 pandemic
  184. Rapid Communication
  185. Disparity in clinical characteristics between 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia and leptospirosis
  186. Use of microspheres in embolization for unruptured renal angiomyolipomas
  187. COVID-19 cases with delayed absorption of lung lesion
  188. A triple combination of treatments on moderate COVID-19
  189. Social networks and eating disorders during the Covid-19 pandemic
  190. Letter
  191. COVID-19, WHO guidelines, pedagogy, and respite
  192. Inflammatory factors in alveolar lavage fluid from severe COVID-19 pneumonia: PCT and IL-6 in epithelial lining fluid
  193. COVID-19: Lessons from Norway tragedy must be considered in vaccine rollout planning in least developed/developing countries
  194. What is the role of plasma cell in the lamina propria of terminal ileum in Good’s syndrome patient?
  195. Case Report
  196. Rivaroxaban triggered multifocal intratumoral hemorrhage of the cabozantinib-treated diffuse brain metastases: A case report and review of literature
  197. CTU findings of duplex kidney in kidney: A rare duplicated renal malformation
  198. Synchronous primary malignancy of colon cancer and mantle cell lymphoma: A case report
  199. Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography and pathologic characters of CD68 positive cell in primary hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumors: A case report and literature review
  200. Persistent SARS-CoV-2-positive over 4 months in a COVID-19 patient with CHB
  201. Pulmonary parenchymal involvement caused by Tropheryma whipplei
  202. Mediastinal mixed germ cell tumor: A case report and literature review
  203. Ovarian female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin – Case report
  204. Rare paratesticular aggressive angiomyxoma mimicking an epididymal tumor in an 82-year-old man: Case report
  205. Perimenopausal giant hydatidiform mole complicated with preeclampsia and hyperthyroidism: A case report and literature review
  206. Primary orbital ganglioneuroblastoma: A case report
  207. Primary aortic intimal sarcoma masquerading as intramural hematoma
  208. Sustained false-positive results for hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin M: A case report and literature review
  209. Peritoneal loose body presenting as a hepatic mass: A case report and review of the literature
  210. Chondroblastoma of mandibular condyle: Case report and literature review
  211. Trauma-induced complete pacemaker lead fracture 8 months prior to hospitalization: A case report
  212. Primary intradural extramedullary extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PIEES/PNET) of the thoracolumbar spine: A case report and literature review
  213. Computer-assisted preoperative planning of reduction of and osteosynthesis of scapular fracture: A case report
  214. High quality of 58-month life in lung cancer patient with brain metastases sequentially treated with gefitinib and osimertinib
  215. Rapid response of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma to apatinib: A case report
  216. Retrieval of intrarenal coiled and ruptured guidewire by retrograde intrarenal surgery: A case report and literature review
  217. Usage of intermingled skin allografts and autografts in a senior patient with major burn injury
  218. Retraction
  219. Retraction on “Dihydromyricetin attenuates inflammation through TLR4/NF-kappa B pathway”
  220. Special Issue Computational Intelligence Methodologies Meets Recurrent Cancers - Part I
  221. An artificial immune system with bootstrap sampling for the diagnosis of recurrent endometrial cancers
  222. Breast cancer recurrence prediction with ensemble methods and cost-sensitive learning
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2021-0378/html
Scroll to top button