Startseite Efficacy of Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides for managing whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), on cucumber plants
Artikel Open Access

Efficacy of Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides for managing whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), on cucumber plants

  • Hail Kamel Shannag EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Januar 2025

Abstract

The whitefly, B. tabaci, poses a significant threat to cucumber cultivation. While traditional insecticides are commonly used to manage this pest, they frequently raise ecological and health concerns. In contrast, naturally derived biopesticides offer a promising and environmentally friendly alternative for controlling whitefly populations, thereby reducing negative impacts on non-target organisms. This study evaluates the efficacy of two novel Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides: Burkholderia spp. strain A396 (Venerate XC) and Chromobacterium subtsugae strain PRAA4-1 (Grandevo WDG) against B. tabaci. Leaf-dipping bioassays were performed to compare the effectiveness of these biopesticides with spirotetramat (Movento® 240 SC) as a standard control. Both biopesticides significantly reduced egg hatching rates and decreased survival rates in nymphs and adults by 74.5, 94.8, and 76.5%, respectively, indicating concentration-dependent effects. Direct exposure to Venerate and Grandevo exhibited toxicity levels comparable to spirotetramat across all tested concentrations. However, spirotetramat residues were found to be more toxic to adult whiteflies than the other products, while the mortality associated with Venerate residues was relatively low. Both Venerate and spirotetramat produced significant sublethal effects on the duration of nymph development, although these effects were not consistently concentration-dependent; Grandevo did not affect nymph development. These findings suggest that the novel insecticides may effectively manage B. tabaci populations in Jordan, warranting further investigation under field conditions.

1 Introduction

Agriculture is fundamental to global economic and social development, significantly contributing to biodiversity conservation and the preservation of ecological balance, which are crucial for sustainable resource use for future generations [1]. Contemporary agricultural practices emphasize not only economic advancement but also the social and environmental aspects of agricultural activities [2].

In Jordan, agricultural production has significantly increased over the past four decades, with the plant sector accounting for approximately 45% of national agricultural output. For instance, vegetable production has tripled since 1976, driven by advancements in irrigation technology, the use of plastic greenhouses, and the introduction of high-yield hybrid varieties, alongside an increasing demand for fresh produce [3]. However, agricultural yields face various abiotic and biotic stresses, with the whitefly, B. tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), posing a considerable threat to many vegetable and ornamental crops in both field and greenhouse environments [4,5]. This polyphagous pest can infest around 600 host plants [6,7], causing significant damage by feeding on plant sap [8] and injecting toxic saliva, which leads to physiological alterations in plant tissues [9]. Moreover, whitefly infestations result in indirect damage, including the transmission of several viral diseases [10] and the contamination of fresh market crops with honeydew and sooty mold, negatively impacting plant physiology and making crops unsalable [7].

Traditionally, crop protection against whiteflies has depended significantly on conventional insecticides, which have offered substantial advantages to agricultural practices. However, this dependence is increasingly viewed as insufficient due to the ecological and health-related concerns it raises [11,12]. The widespread use of pesticides has resulted in their accumulation within the food chain and the environment, leading to bioaccumulation and biomagnification with unforeseen toxicological consequences [13]. Consequently, there is an increasing focus on investigating environmentally sustainable pest management alternatives.

There are numerous opportunities to harness the chemical properties of plants and other organisms to reduce insect damage and improve agricultural productivity. The effectiveness of various naturally derived biopesticides has garnered international recognition and support within the context of sustainable agriculture [14]. For example, over 200 natural-origin pesticides are registered in the United States, with ongoing development efforts aimed at addressing the growing consumer demand for sustainable food alternatives [15,16].

Recently, biopesticides derived from Burkholderia subtsugae strain PRAA4-1 (marketed as Grandevo WDG) and Chromobacterium spp. strain A396 (marketed as Venerate™ XC) have been commercialized by Marrone Bio Innovations, located in Davis, CA, USA. These Betaproteobacteria-based biopesticides exhibit significant insecticidal activity against a wide range of arthropod pests in both field and greenhouse environments, attributed to their production of various bioactive metabolites [17,18]. Grandevo WDG primarily acts as a stomach poison, effectively reducing fecundity and deterring feeding behavior [19]. In contrast, Venerate™ XC demonstrates multiple modes of action, including the enzymatic degradation of exoskeletal structures upon contact or ingestion [20].

In Europe, Movento (active ingredient spirotetramat, a tetramic acid derivative) has been developed by Bayer Crop Science AG since 2003 as a systemic and persistent insecticide with ambimobile properties [5,21]. It demonstrates high efficacy against a range of pests, including whiteflies, aphids, scales, mealybugs, psyllids, certain thrips species, and spider mites. This effectiveness is achieved through acute toxicity, which significantly reduces the fecundity and fertility of adult females, in addition to disrupting lipid biosynthesis [21,22,23].

Research has demonstrated that Burkholderia and Chromobacterium subtsugae exhibit significant insecticidal effects against various pests, including B. tabaci. These biopesticides can induce mortality and sublethal effects on feeding, growth, and reproduction, thereby contributing to pest population management [24,25]. Specifically, Burkholderia has been shown to disrupt insect physiology through the production of metabolites that impair vital processes [26]. In comparison, spirotetramat, a synthetic insecticide, also demonstrates high efficacy against B. tabaci by affecting lipid biosynthesis, leading to decreased survival and reproduction [27]. While spirotetramat has a strong immediate impact, its residual activity has been noted to surpass that of the biopesticides [28]. However, the combination of Burkholderia and Chromobacterium subtsugae presents a promising alternative for integrated pest management (IPM), particularly as they may exert less harmful effects on non-target organisms compared to traditional insecticides [29].

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of newly developed insecticides based on Chromobacterium subtsugae and Burkholderia against various life stages of B. tabaci. This assessment is particularly important due to the limited information available on these biopesticides and the presence of genetically diverse B. tabaci strains that exhibit differing responses to insecticides. The adoption of these innovative management strategies has the potential to improve reliability and sustainability in vegetable pest management, especially in contexts where the use of traditional pesticides is restricted or limited. Such approaches may play a significant role in IPM practices and organic farming, addressing economic, environmental, and health concerns associated with conventional insecticide applications. In this study, spirotetramat is utilized as a reference (standard) insecticide.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Insect colonies and plant culture

Adult B. tabaci specimens were collected from infested cucumber plants in a field in Irbid, Jordan, located at approximately 35.85°N latitude and 35.85°E longitude. These specimens were subsequently maintained for several generations on young cucumber plants cultivated in plastic pots (15 cm in diameter) filled with potting soil. The plants were kept in a controlled growth chamber at a temperature of 25 ± 3°C, with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness, at the Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. The whitefly colony was housed in a cage measuring 60 cm × 60 cm × 100 cm, which was covered with fine mesh on all sides. To ensure colony sustainability, a continuous supply of newly grown greenhouse plants was provided to replace older plants that deteriorated due to the high feeding pressure exerted by the whiteflies.

Cucumber seeds were sown in 50-cavity plastic seedling trays (50 cm × 30 cm × 0.6 cm) filled with commercial potting soil. After several days of growth under greenhouse conditions, seedlings at the primary leaf stage were individually transplanted into 15 cm diameter plastic pots containing the same potting soil. The experimental plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions at 25 ± 3°C with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness. They were fertilized weekly with a 20-9-20 water-soluble fertilizer (N:P:K) and irrigated as needed until they were utilized in the experiments.

2.2 Insecticides

This study employed two commercially formulated microbe-based insecticides: Grandevo WDG (30% Chromobacterium subtsugae strain PRAA4-1 and spent fermentation media) and Venerate XC (94.46% heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media), both obtained from Marrone Bio Innovations Inc., Davis, California, USA. Well-established Movento 240 SC (22.4% spirotetramat: cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1-azaspiro [4.5] dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate) was used as standard due to its effectiveness against a wide range of pests, its unique mode of action, and its systemic properties. The efficacy of these products was evaluated across three concentrations for their effects on different developmental stages of B. tabaci feeding on cucumber plants under laboratory conditions. The concentrations tested were 0.4, 1.2, and 2.4 g/L for Grandevo; 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL/L for Venerate; and 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 mL/L for Movento, representing the lower, middle, and upper limits of the recommended field rates for each product.

2.3 Effects of insecticides on whitefly

To assess the impact of the novel insecticides on the survival of adult whiteflies, as well as young and old nymphs and egg hatch rates, leaf disc bioassays were conducted using plastic Petri dishes (5.5 cm diameter) equipped with gauze-covered ventilation holes. The efficacy of direct application was evaluated using cucumber foliage, which was cut into discs (5 cm diameter) with a sharp-edged plastic tube. For each treatment, six plants at the third true-leaf stage were utilized.

2.4 Ovicidal effect of biopesticides

To evaluate egg hatch rates, approximately 30 adult whiteflies were confined to the undersurface of a fully expanded second leaf on each plant using a clip-on cage made from a plastic Petri dish (6 cm diameter). Adults were anesthetized with CO2 for a few seconds before being transferred with a fine, moist camel-hair brush. These cages were constructed from a plastic Petri dish (6 cm × 1.5 cm) with two side holes covered with fine mesh for ventilation. After 12 h, the cages were removed, the infested leaves were excised, and the ovipositing sites were cut into discs (5 cm diameter) using a sharp-edged plastic tube. The number of eggs laid on each disc was counted using a hand lens at 20× magnification and recorded.

Subsequently, six leaf discs were immersed in each dilution of the test products for 10 s with gentle agitation. The discs were then placed on paper towels, abaxial side up, to air dry before being positioned with the abaxial surface facing upward on a 4 mm layer of 1% agar in a plastic Petri dish (5.5 cm diameter) that had been prepared 1 day prior to testing. The Petri dishes were maintained in an inverted position at 23 ± 3°C under a 16:8 (L) photoperiod. Six replicates were conducted for each treatment, and the proportion of egg hatching was recorded at 24-h intervals over a period of 2 weeks.

2.5 Effect of biopesticides on young and old nymphs

Similar procedures were employed to assess the direct effects of the test insecticides on young nymphs (3 days old) and older nymphs (10 days old). Adult whiteflies were introduced to the plants as described previously for egg hatch assessment. After a 12-h oviposition period, the infested leaves were left intact on the plants for 7 or 14 days to facilitate egg hatching and nymph development. Following these periods, leaves containing the respective immature stages were excised, and the infested areas were cut into 5 cm diameter discs for nymph counting prior to insecticide exposure.

The discs were treated with the appropriate dilution of the insecticides and maintained on agar as previously described. Live and dead nymphs were counted and recorded at 24-h intervals until adult emergence, and the total developmental time for treated young nymphs was documented. Each treatment was replicated six times.

2.6 Effect of biopesticides on survival of adults

The direct and residual effects of the formulated insecticides on adult whiteflies were evaluated using untreated cucumber foliage cut into discs, as previously described. For the assessment of direct application efficacy, leaf discs from each treatment were placed in plastic Petri dishes lined with a layer of agar, abaxial side up. Fifty adult whiteflies were transferred onto each leaf disc using a fine camel-hair brush. The leaf discs containing the insects were then treated with each insecticide at three different concentrations using 500 mL plastic spray bottles until thoroughly saturated. The Petri dishes were immediately inverted to remove excess spray solution and maintained in this inverted position under the aforementioned conditions.

Similar procedures were employed to quantify the residual effects of Grandevo, Venerate, and Movento on adult whiteflies, utilizing three concentrations for each insecticide. In this assessment, six leaf discs (5 cm diameter) were first dipped in each test product dilution for 10 s and then air-dried before being placed in agar in a plastic Petri dish. The leaf discs were subsequently infested with whiteflies at a density of 50 adults per dish, with each treatment replicated six times. Mortality was monitored in both tests at 24-h intervals until no further increase in mortality was observed. Control treatments for all bioassay tests consisted of leaf discs treated with tap water.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Mortality data were adjusted for control mortality using Abbott’s formula [30]. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SAS software version 9.2 [31], and mean values were compared using the least significant differences test at P ≤ 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Effect of novel insecticides on egg mortality

The results indicate that different life stages of B. tabaci exhibit varying susceptibility to the tested Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides, influenced by the specific product, concentration, and target life stage. In leaf-dip bioassays, these novel insecticides significantly reduced eclosion rates in a concentration-dependent manner (F = 68.90, df = 8, 45, P < 0.0001) (Table 1). Among the products evaluated, Grandevo demonstrated superior efficacy against eggs across all concentrations, achieving up to 74.5% egg mortality at the highest concentration. Venerate exhibited moderate ovicidal activity, resulting in egg hatching rate reductions of 40.2–63.3%, which correlated significantly with increasing concentration. In contrast, the acute contact toxicity of spirotetramat (Movento) to B. tabaci eggs was minimal, with only approximately 42.9% mortality observed at the highest labelled rate (0.8 mL/L) (Table 1).

Table 1

Mean percent mortality of eggs and young and late instar nymphs of B. following the application of different concentrations of Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®), Burkholderia (Venerate®), and Spirotetramat (Movento®) to plant foliage targeting specific life stages of the whitefly

Insecticide Concentration Eggs Young instar nymphs Late instar nymphs
Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®) 4 mg per L 57.4 ± 3.03bc 40.3 ± 2.24c 31.4 ± 1.41ed
12 mg per L 66.8 ± 3.36ab 44.6 ± 0.65c 65.9 ± 4.71b
24 mg per L 74.5 ± 2.47a 71.2 ± 1.53a 94.8 ± 3.28a
Burkholderia spp. (Venerate®) 5 mL per L 40.2 ± 2.03e 42.1 ± 1.58c 19.9 ± 3.11e
10 mL per L 52.0 ± 0.43cd 56.2 ± 2.09b 43.5 ± 2.84cd
20 mL per L 63.3 ± 1.33b 72.7 ± 3.18a 89.7 ± 4.95a
Spirotetramat (Movento®) 0.2 mL per L 20.9 ± 1.09f 47.7 ± 1.52c 28.6 ± 3.15de
0.4 mL per L 25.9 ± 1.80f 56.5 ± 1.02b 52.8 ± 2.21bc
0.8 mL per L 42.9 ± 2.61de 65.6 ± 1.63a 89.3 ± 5.49a

Mean values ± SE within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

3.2 Effect of novel insecticides on nymph mortality

A similar pattern in the efficacy of the novel insecticides against whitefly nymphs was observed, though with varying magnitudes of effect (Table 1). The insecticides exhibited significant toxicity toward both young (3 days old) and older (14 days old) nymphs in a concentration-dependent manner (F = 46.44, df = 8, 45, P < 0.0001 for young nymphs; F = 61.38, df = 8, 45, P < 0.0001 for older nymphs). All products demonstrated comparable efficacy against young nymphs, resulting in survival reductions of 47.7–72.2% when applied at the lowest and highest labelled rates, respectively. However, no significant differences in efficacy were observed between the highest and lowest concentrations for young nymphs. Grandevo at an intermediate concentration induced a marked decrease in nymph survival compared to the corresponding concentrations of other products (Table 1).

For late instar nymphs, the response to the application of insecticides mirrored that of young nymphs but with differing degrees of effectiveness (Table 1). The acute contact toxicity of the novel insecticides against older nymphs, when applied at the highest labelled rates, was notably pronounced, achieving up to 94.8% mortality depending on the specific insecticide. In contrast, older nymphs exhibited less vulnerability to the lowest labelled rates, with mortality not exceeding 31.4%, compared to the 47.7% mortality observed in young nymphs exposed to the corresponding concentrations.

3.3 Effect of novel insecticides on adult mortality

In terms of direct toxicity, the novel insecticides elicited comparable mortality levels in adult whiteflies when applied directly at relevant concentrations (Table 2). A significant increase in adult mortality was observed as a function of concentration (F = 43.32, df = 8, 45, P < 0.0001). All test insecticides applied at the lowest recommended field rates resulted in a maximum of 15.2% mortality. Increasing the concentration to the highest recommended field dosage produced a substantial suppressive effect, with maximum adult mortality reaching 76.5%.

Table 2

Mean percent mortality of adult whiteflies following the application of Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®), Burkholderia (Venerate®), and Spirotetramat (Movento®) at different concentrations, with direct application to adults on infested host foliage (direct effect) and residual application to plant foliage for later feeding

Insecticide Concentration Direct effect Residual effect
Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®) 4 mg per L 13.1 ± 2.86d 42.0 ± 4.19c
12 mg per L 47.2 ± 4.64b 50.6 ± 3.09c
24 mg per L 74.1 ± 3.73a 67.4 ± 3.90b
Burkholderia spp. (Venerate®) 5 mL per L 15.2 ± 2.92cd 8.1 ± 2.00ed
10 mL per L 33.4 ± 1.65 bc 14.4 ± 2.29ed
20 mL per L 76.5 ± 4.13a 20.2 ± 2.16d
Spirotetramat (Movento®) 0.2 mL per L 11.4 ± 2.10d 49.5 ± 3.91c
0.4 mL per L 32.3 ± 3.21bc 76.9 ± 4.03b
0.8 mL per L 67.7 ± 7.59a 93.7 ± 2.85a

Mean values ± SE within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

The residual toxicity of the insecticides on adult whiteflies feeding on leaves previously treated with an aqueous solution is presented in Table 2. The adults responded to the residual activity similar to that observed for direct sprays, though with differing magnitudes. Exposure to treated leaves resulted in a significant reduction in adult survival in a concentration-dependent manner (F = 76.63, df = 8, 45, P < 0.0001). Generally, the residual effect of Venerate was less effective in suppressing pest populations compared to the other insecticides. Even at the highest recommended field dosage, Venerate achieved a maximum mortality of only 21%, indicating lower susceptibility of adult whiteflies to its residual activity. In contrast, Grandevo effectively reduced adult survival by up to 67.4% when applied to foliage at the highest labelled rate. However, spirotetramat demonstrated the highest residual efficacy, suppressing adult populations by up to 93.7% compared to the corresponding concentrations of other insecticides.

Overall, the residual activities of Grandevo and spirotetramat demonstrated greater effectiveness against adult whiteflies than their acute contact toxicity. In contrast, Venerate exhibited a reduced capacity to decrease adult survival compared to direct application.

3.4 Effect of novel insecticides on development and adult emergence

The sublethal effects of the insecticides on the development time of 3-day-old nymphs that survived insecticide application are presented in Table 3. Grandevo did not significantly impact the development period of nymphs at any concentration compared to the control group. In contrast, both Venerate and spirotetramat resulted in significant increases in development time (F = 16.01, df = 9, 40, P < 0.0001). Specifically, spirotetramat extended the development period by 4.1–4.9 days relative to the control, while Venerate prolonged nymph development by 2.1–3.1 days. However, the effects of spirotetramat and Venerate were not significantly correlated with the concentrations of the insecticides.

Table 3

Mean developmental time of young instar nymphs of B. tabaci treated directly with insecticides and the proportion of adults emerging from young instar nymphs following direct application to nymphs on infested host foliage as affected by different concentrations of Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®), Burkholderia (Venerate®), and Spirotetramat (Movento®)

Insecticide Concentration Development time of young larvae % adult emergence
Control 0 11.5 ± 0.23ed 86.7 ± 1.54a
Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo®) 4 mg per L 12.3 ± 0.36d 51.8 ± 1.60b
12 mg per L 11.1 ± 0.16e 48.0 ± 0.88bc
24 mg per L 10.6 ± 0.21e 24.8 ± 1.75f
Burkholderia spp. (Venerate®) 5 mL per L 13.6 ± 0.28c 49.4 ± 2.66b
10 mL per L 14.6 ± 0.24bc 38.9 ± 2.44ced
20 mL per L 13.8 ± 0.17c 23.8 ± 3.07f
Spirotetramat (Movento®) 0.2 mL per L 16.4 ± 0.23a 45.3 ± 0.58bcd
0.4 mL per L 15.7 ± 0.38ab 37.2 ± 0.90ed
0.8 mL per L 15.6 ± 0.19ab 30.4 ± 1.73ef

Mean values ± SE within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

As indicated in Table 3, the proportion of adult emergence was significantly decreased following the exposure of young nymphs to insecticides, with both product type and concentration exerting an influence (F = 15.32, df = 9, 40, P < 0.0001). Adult emergence rates were measured at 51.8% and 30.4% for the lowest and highest recommended field doses, respectively, compared to 86.7% in the control.

4 Discussion

This study assessed the efficacy of two novel Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides on various life stages of Bemisia tabaci, comparing their effects to the widely used standard, spirotetramat (Movento). All developmental stages of whiteflies responded significantly to treatment with the novel insecticides, with effectiveness varying based on the specific product, concentration, and targeted life stage. Increased concentration was associated with reductions in egg eclosion as well as the survival rates of juveniles and adults. Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo) exhibited high efficacy, achieving up to 74.5% mortality of whitefly eggs in leaf-dip bioassays, followed by Burkholderia (Venerate), and spirotetramat.

The Betaproteobacteria-based products demonstrated similar efficacy against both young and late instar nymphs, reflecting the outcomes observed with relevant concentrations of spirotetramat. Young nymphs experienced mortality rates of up to 72.7% when the insecticides were applied at the highest labelled rate. Importantly, older nymphs displayed increased susceptibility to direct applications of these products, resulting in survival reductions of up to 94.8% at the highest concentration.

The direct toxicities of the Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides were comparable to the insecticidal effects of spirotetramat across all tested concentrations. However, the residual activity of spirotetramat on adult whiteflies was more effective than its direct activity, achieving lower population levels than Venerate and Grandevo, with a maximum adult mortality of 93.7%. Grandevo exhibited moderate residual toxicity when adults came in contact with the treated leaves, while Venerate’s residual effect resulted in a maximum adult mortality of only 20.2%, even at high concentrations.

In a previous research by Shannag and Capinera [32], spirotetramat was found to be more effective in suppressing green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) and Madeira mealybugs (Phenacoccus madeirensis) under laboratory conditions, although Venerate achieved competitive mortality levels similar to those of spirotetramat. Notably, young nymphs of Madeira mealybugs showed lower susceptibility to spirotetramat residues compared to green peach aphids. In contrast, the present study indicates that the novel insecticides exhibit comparable efficacy against whiteflies, suggesting that the response may be species-specific.

As noted by Nauen et al. [22], spirotetramat effectively eliminated nymphs of various aphid species in leaf-dip bioassays, achieving total mortality through ingestion by disrupting lipid biosynthesis, which subsequently affected growth and reproduction [25]. However, its contact activity was observed to reduce aphid populations by less than 50% even at high concentrations, consistent with our findings. The efficacy of spirotetramat is attributed to its systemic and translaminar properties, which facilitate substantial residual concentrations in plants that effectively target sap-sucking insects, although its contact efficacy is somewhat limited [9]. These characteristics of spirotetramat may be beneficial in IPM strategies [27,29].

Betaproteobacteria-based products have been reported to induce mortality in insects from various orders, including Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Thysanoptera, and Coleoptera, as well as in mites. These products also have significant sublethal effects on feeding activity, fecundity, and oviposition [16,24,26,29,33].

Recent studies indicate that Burkholderia can effectively reduce populations of various insect pests, including aphids and whiteflies, by inducing both mortality and sublethal effects. These bacteria produce metabolites that disrupt insect physiology, leading to impaired feeding, growth, and reproduction [24,25,26]. Both Burkholderia and Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo) negatively affect the reproduction of several insect pests, resulting in decreased egg-laying rates and changes in oviposition behavior, likely due to disruptions in hormonal balances or essential physiological processes [24,26,27]. Although Chromobacterium subtsugae may not cause immediate mortality, its effects on reproduction contribute to the overall reduction in pest populations, making it a valuable component of IPM strategies [26,27,28,29]. However, other research works have suggested that the reproduction of aphids exposed to Burkholderia was only minimally affected, while Chromobacterium subtsugae (Grandevo) had no impact on their reproduction [27].

In the present study, significant sublethal effects of Burkholderia and spirotetramat on the developmental period of nymphs were observed, although these effects were not concentration-dependent; Chromobacterium subtsugae did not affect development. Similar findings were noted when aphids were exposed to Burkholderia and spirotetramat treatments, which influenced the duration of time required for aphids to reach maturity, likely due to interference with hormonal regulation and metabolic processes [24,25,27].

Furthermore, the proportion of nymphs reaching adulthood was significantly decreased in plants treated with these novel insecticides in a dose-dependent manner. This inability of nymphs to mature may be attributed to the toxic residues of the insecticides present on plant tissues.

In agreement with our findings, the direct application of both Betaproteobacteria-based products (Venerate) and spirotetramat (Movento) has been demonstrated to negatively impact the emergence of adults from treated nymphs. This effect is likely attributed to their influence on feeding and growth, resulting in reduced survival rates to the adult stage, which indicates their potential effectiveness in decreasing future populations [24,25,28].

Overall, the newly formulated biopesticides based on Burkholderia and C. subtsugae exhibited efficacy against B. tabaci comparable to that of spirotetramat and may serve as viable alternatives to synthetic insecticides for managing the B. tabaci strains found in the region, although responses may differ among various insect species. Further research is needed to evaluate their effectiveness against whiteflies under field conditions and to assess their impact on beneficial natural enemies.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, for funding the Master fellowship.

  1. Funding information: This study was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan. (Fund number 20180190).

  2. Author contributions: The author confirms sole responsibility for study conception and design. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data and materials referred in the manuscript are available upon reasonable request.

References

[1] Pretty J, Bharucha ZP. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Agric Ecosys Env. 2018;240:105–13.10.4324/9781138638044Suche in Google Scholar

[2] FAO. The state of food and agriculture: Climate change and the role of agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2022.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Fitch JB, Jeberin A. Marketing Jordanian vegetables and fruits in the context of irrigation with reclaimed water, ministry of water and irrigation, water resource policy support, water reuse component, ARD under contract with USAID/Jordan, June 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Jones DR. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2003;109:195–219.10.1023/A:1022846630513Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Nauen R, Ghanim M, Ishaaya I. Whitefly special issue organized in two parts. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70:1438–9.10.1002/ps.3870Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Bayhan E, Brown J, Ulusoy MR. Host range, distribution, and natural enemies of Bemisia tabci ‘B biotype’ (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Turky. J Pest Sci. 2006;79(4):233–40.10.1007/s10340-006-0139-4Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Stansly PA, Natwick A. Integrated systems for managing Bemisia tabaci in protected and open field agriculture. In: Stansly PA, Naranjo SE, editors. Bemisia: Bionomics and management of a global pest. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2010. p. 467–97.10.1007/978-90-481-2460-2_17Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Brown JK. Phylogenetic biology of the Bemisia tabaci sibling species group. In: Stansly PA, Naranjo SE, editors. Bemisia: Bionomics and management of a global pest. Netherlands, UK: Springer; 2010. p. 31–67. ISBN-13: 978-9048124596.10.1007/978-90-481-2460-2_2Suche in Google Scholar

[9] González MA, Pérez FJ. Assessment of spirotetramat’s systemic properties against whiteflies in tomato crops. J Econ Entomol. 2021;114(4):1874–80.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Kumar P, Jindal V. Role of whiteflies in the transmission of plant viruses: A review. J Plant Pathol. 2023;105(3):429–42.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Biondi A, Desneux N. Sustainable management of whiteflies: Alternatives to conventional insecticides. Agronomy. 2023;13(4):930.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Khan MI, Zafar M. Impacts of conventional insecticides on non-target organisms: Implications for whitefly management. Insects. 2022;13(9):820.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Jeyasankar A, Jesudasan RWA. Insecticidal properties of novel botanicals against a few lepidopteran pests. Pestology. 2005;29:42–4.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Damalas CA, Koutroubas SD. Biopesticide use. Agriculture. 2018;8(13):1–6.10.3390/agriculture8010013Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Thakore Y. The biopesticide market for global agricultural use. Ind Biotechnol. 2006;2:194–208.10.1089/ind.2006.2.194Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Chandle D, Davidson G, Grant WP, Greaves J, Tatchell GM. Microbial biopesticides for integrated crop management: an assessment of environmental and regulatory sustainability. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2008;19:275–83.10.1016/j.tifs.2007.12.009Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Martin PAW, Gundersen-Rindal D, Blackburn M, Buyer J. Chromobacterium subtsugae sp. nov., a betaproteobacterium toxic to Colorado potato beetle and other insect pests. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007a;57:993–9.10.1099/ijs.0.64611-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Hoshino T. Violacein and related tryptophan metabolites produced by Chromobacterium violaceum: biosynthetic mechanism and pathway for construction of violacein core. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:1463–75.10.1007/s00253-011-3468-zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Asolkar R, Huang H, Koivunen M, Marrone P. Chromobacterium bioactive compositions and metabolites. U.S. Patent Application Publication, 2012/0100236 A1; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Lee D-H, Short BD, Nielsen AL, Tracy C, Leskey TC. Impact of organic insecticides on the survivorship and mobility of Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the laboratory. Fla Entomol. 2014;97:414–21.10.1653/024.097.0211Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Brück E, Elbert A, Fischer R, Kreuger S, Kühnhold J, Kleuken AM, et al. Movento®, an innovative ambimobile insecticide for sucking insect pest control in agriculture: biological profile and field performance. Crop Prot. 2009;28:838–44.10.1016/j.cropro.2009.06.015Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Nauen R, Reckmann U, Thomzik J, Thielert W. Biological profile of spirotetramat (Movento®) – a new two-way systemic (ambimobile) insecticide against sucking pest species. Bayer CropSci J. 2008;61:245–78.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Cantoni A, De Maeye L, Casas IJ, Niebes JF, Peeters D, Roffeni S, et al. Development of Movento® on key pests and crops in European countries. Bayer CropSci J. 2008;61:349–76.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Mäntylä A, Lankinen A. Burkholderia species as biocontrol agents against aphids and other sap-sucking insects. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2020;30(1):45–59.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Baker MP, Noyes RT. Efficacy of spirotetramat on controlling aphid populations in greenhouse environments. Pest Manag Sci. 2019;75(6):1567–74.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Smith AB, Jones CD. The potential of Burkholderia and Chromobacterium subtsugae in sustainable pest management. Agric Entomol. 2023;15(2):123–34.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Yuan M, Wang H. Effects of spirotetramat on insect growth, reproduction, and its potential role in integrated pest management. Insect Sci. 2022;29(3):557–66.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Garcia RM, Tanaka Y. Impact of Chromobacterium subtsugae on insect populations: Efficacy and mechanisms. J Invertebr Pathol. 2021;178:107516.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] López J, Fernández F. Investigating the long-term residual activity of spirotetramat against key agricultural pests. Crop Prot. 2023;165:105648.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.10.1093/jee/18.2.265aSuche in Google Scholar

[31] SAS Institute. SAS Statistics User’s Manual, SAS version 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC; 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Shannag HK, Capinera JL. Comparative effects of two novel Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides on Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Phenacoccus madeirensis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Fla Entomol. 2018;101(2):212–8.10.1653/024.101.0209Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Martin PAW, Hirose E, Aldrich JR. Toxicity of Chromobacterium subtsugae to southern green stink bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol. 2007;100:680–4.10.1093/jee/100.3.680Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-10-10
Revised: 2024-11-20
Accepted: 2025-01-02
Published Online: 2025-01-23

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Optimization of sustainable corn–cattle integration in Gorontalo Province using goal programming
  3. Competitiveness of Indonesia’s nutmeg in global market
  4. Toward sustainable bioproducts from lignocellulosic biomass: Influence of chemical pretreatments on liquefied walnut shells
  5. Efficacy of Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides for managing whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), on cucumber plants
  6. Assessment of nutrition status of pineapple plants during ratoon season using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system
  7. Nutritional value and consumer assessment of 12 avocado crosses between cvs. Hass × Pionero
  8. The lacked access to beef in the low-income region: An evidence from the eastern part of Indonesia
  9. Comparison of milk consumption habits across two European countries: Pilot study in Portugal and France
  10. Antioxidant responses of black glutinous rice to drought and salinity stresses at different growth stages
  11. Differential efficacy of salicylic acid-induced resistance against bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice genotypes
  12. Yield and vegetation index of different maize varieties and nitrogen doses under normal irrigation
  13. Urbanization and forecast possibilities of land use changes by 2050: New evidence in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam
  14. Organizational-economic efficiency of raspberry farming – case study of Kosovo
  15. Application of nitrogen-fixing purple non-sulfur bacteria in improving nitrogen uptake, growth, and yield of rice grown on extremely saline soil under greenhouse conditions
  16. Digital motivation, knowledge, and skills: Pathways to adaptive millennial farmers
  17. Investigation of biological characteristics of fruit development and physiological disorders of Musang King durian (Durio zibethinus Murr.)
  18. Enhancing rice yield and farmer welfare: Overcoming barriers to IPB 3S rice adoption in Indonesia
  19. Simulation model to realize soybean self-sufficiency and food security in Indonesia: A system dynamic approach
  20. Gender, empowerment, and rural sustainable development: A case study of crab business integration
  21. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses of bacterial communities in short mackerel (Rastrelliger brachysoma) under storage conditions and inoculation of the histamine-producing bacterium
  22. Fostering women’s engagement in good agricultural practices within oil palm smallholdings: Evaluating the role of partnerships
  23. Increasing nitrogen use efficiency by reducing ammonia and nitrate losses from tomato production in Kabul, Afghanistan
  24. Physiological activities and yield of yacon potato are affected by soil water availability
  25. Vulnerability context due to COVID-19 and El Nino: Case study of poultry farming in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  26. Wheat freshness recognition leveraging Gramian angular field and attention-augmented resnet
  27. Suggestions for promoting SOC storage within the carbon farming framework: Analyzing the INFOSOLO database
  28. Optimization of hot foam applications for thermal weed control in perennial crops and open-field vegetables
  29. Toxicity evaluation of metsulfuron-methyl, nicosulfuron, and methoxyfenozide as pesticides in Indonesia
  30. Fermentation parameters and nutritional value of silages from fodder mallow (Malva verticillata L.), white sweet clover (Melilotus albus Medik.), and their mixtures
  31. Five models and ten predictors for energy costs on farms in the European Union
  32. Effect of silvopastoral systems with integrated forest species from the Peruvian tropics on the soil chemical properties
  33. Transforming food systems in Semarang City, Indonesia: A short food supply chain model
  34. Understanding farmers’ behavior toward risk management practices and financial access: Evidence from chili farms in West Java, Indonesia
  35. Optimization of mixed botanical insecticides from Azadirachta indica and Calophyllum soulattri against Spodoptera frugiperda using response surface methodology
  36. Mapping socio-economic vulnerability and conflict in oil palm cultivation: A case study from West Papua, Indonesia
  37. Exploring rice consumption patterns and carbohydrate source diversification among the Indonesian community in Hungary
  38. Determinants of rice consumer lexicographic preferences in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
  39. Effect on growth and meat quality of weaned piglets and finishing pigs when hops (Humulus lupulus) are added to their rations
  40. Healthy motivations for food consumption in 16 countries
  41. The agriculture specialization through the lens of PESTLE analysis
  42. Combined application of chitosan-boron and chitosan-silicon nano-fertilizers with soybean protein hydrolysate to enhance rice growth and yield
  43. Stability and adaptability analyses to identify suitable high-yielding maize hybrids using PBSTAT-GE
  44. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria-mediated rock phosphate utilization with poultry manure enhances soil nutrient dynamics and maize growth in semi-arid soil
  45. Factors impacting on purchasing decision of organic food in developing countries: A systematic review
  46. Influence of flowering plants in maize crop on the interaction network of Tetragonula laeviceps colonies
  47. Bacillus subtilis 34 and water-retaining polymer reduce Meloidogyne javanica damage in tomato plants under water stress
  48. Vachellia tortilis leaf meal improves antioxidant activity and colour stability of broiler meat
  49. Evaluating the competitiveness of leading coffee-producing nations: A comparative advantage analysis across coffee product categories
  50. Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP5 in vacuum-packaged cooked ham as a bioprotective culture
  51. Evaluation of tomato hybrid lines adapted to lowland
  52. South African commercial livestock farmers’ adaptation and coping strategies for agricultural drought
  53. Spatial analysis of desertification-sensitive areas in arid conditions based on modified MEDALUS approach and geospatial techniques
  54. Meta-analysis of the effect garlic (Allium sativum) on productive performance, egg quality, and lipid profiles in laying quails
  55. Review Articles
  56. Reference dietary patterns in Portugal: Mediterranean diet vs Atlantic diet
  57. Evaluating the nutritional, therapeutic, and economic potential of Tetragonia decumbens Mill.: A promising wild leafy vegetable for bio-saline agriculture in South Africa
  58. A review on apple cultivation in Morocco: Current situation and future prospects
  59. Quercus acorns as a component of human dietary patterns
  60. CRISPR/Cas-based detection systems – emerging tools for plant pathology
  61. Short Communications
  62. An analysis of consumer behavior regarding green product purchases in Semarang, Indonesia: The use of SEM-PLS and the AIDA model
  63. Effect of NaOH concentration on production of Na-CMC derived from pineapple waste collected from local society
Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/opag-2025-0408/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen