Yield and vegetation index of different maize varieties and nitrogen doses under normal irrigation
-
Rusnadi Padjung
, Yunus Musa
Abstract
Nitrogen is essential nutrient that supports the growth and yield of corn. The correct dose of nitrogen fertilization is one of the keys to increasing corn productivity by its yield potential. Using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drones, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) can be obtained, which can provide accurate information about the health condition of plant vegetation directly. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of nitrogen fertilizer dose and type of maize variety on crop production and vegetation index obtained through UAV technology. This study was designed with a separate plot design and a group randomized design as the environmental design. The research was conducted by applying various doses of nitrogen (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) and maize varieties (Sinhas, Nasa 29, HJ 36, Bisi 18, and Pioneer). The combination of all treatments resulted in 35 combinations and was repeated three times, resulting in 105 experimental units. Vegetation condition measurements were conducted using drones at time intervals (40, 55, and 70 DAP). Selection criteria were determined systematically through Pearson correlation, path, and principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that higher nitrogen doses increased NDVI values, which reflected better vegetation health and contributed to increased crop yields. The PCA results showed that four principal components had eigenvalues greater than 1 with a cumulative proportion of 0.21. This research indicates that using optimal nitrogen doses and vegetation health monitoring using UAVs can significantly increase maize yields. These findings provide valuable insights to increase maize production through the best maize cultivation technologies that farmers can use.
1 Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is a carbohydrate-producing food crop for most of the world’s population that is widely used as an industrial fuel, food source, feed, and bioethanol production [1,2]. Maize development on a broader scale with higher production can improve the regional economy. National maize productivity in 2020 and 2021 was only around 5.22 and 5.24 t·ha−1, respectively, or only increased by around 0.20%. This productivity is still relatively low compared to the genetic production potential based on variety descriptions (10–12 t·ha−1) [3]. This condition is because the released hybrid varieties were selected under optimal conditions; meanwhile, the corn development land is marginal mainly due to land conversion and global climate change. This causes maize extension programs directed at marginal lands such as dry-humid lands. Global warming causes changes in environmental balance, such as temperature intensity and rainfall, so most lands change their status to suboptimal [4,5]. Global warming also reduces soil function and characteristics, so the soil does not optimally support the plant growth [6]. Plant growth and environmental management are two things that can improve and increase land productivity. The action or activity of managing the growing environment can be done through plant fertilization.
Fertilization is an effort to add or engineer nutrients to make them available to plants. It is essential in supporting plant growth and production [7,8]. In general, fertilization in maize has developed a lot based on the type, dosage, and application. Nitrogen fertilizers are macro-fertilizers and are essential in maize growth and productivity. Nitrogen fertilizers play a significant role in forming proteins and enzymes, including chlorophyll [8,9,10]. High nitrogen levels will result in ineffective photosynthesis, susceptibility to plant-disrupting organisms, drought, and reduced product quality [11]. Therefore, the correct dose of nitrogen fertilization is one of the keys to increasing corn productivity by its yield potential.
The effectiveness of nitrogen fertilization can be optimized through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drone imaging, an uncrewed aircraft driven by a remote control from a distance. Using UAV drones in agriculture can help monitor crop conditions, maintain crops, and predict crop growth and productivity [12,13,14]. According to studies of Miller et al. and Sakinah et al. [15,16], monitoring plant growth can be done using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) method, where data images were acquired using near-infrared (NIR) or RBG cameras. The UAVs are equipped with tools in the form of multispectral cameras that support agricultural activities in monitoring plant development. This camera can provide various types of information such as the number of plants, nitrogen nutrient status, and health level through the greenness value of plants using the NDVI [12,17]. Living green plants absorb solar radiation in the process of photosynthesis. Chlorophyll in plants will emit more solar radiation to the NIR camera, so plants with average growth will appear greener when compared to plants that have abnormal growth [18].
Several researchers with various systems have developed the drone-based vegetation index for nitrogen fertilization of corn [9,19,20]. However, the research studies were conducted in a subtropical climate with relatively uniform agroecosystems, cultures, and monocultures. This condition is very different from Indonesia because Indonesia has a tropical climate with very diverse agroecosystems and cultures [21,22]. This indicates that Indonesia’s developed vegetation index cannot be applied optimally. Therefore, a vegetation index model for nitrogen fertilization of corn crops in Indonesia still needs to be developed. This research aims to produce a vegetation index model for nitrogen fertilization in estimating corn productivity and compare the accuracy of the vegetation index of corn plants to that of nitrogen.
2 Materials and methods
This research was conducted at the Experimental Station of the Cereal Crops Research Center (KP) Bajeng, Bajeng District, Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, at an altitude of 27.2 m above the sea level, with coordinates 5o18'21.5″ N, 119o28'38.6″ E. The research was carried out in February to May 2023.
2.1 Experimental design
This phase focused on the effect of a combination of nitrogen doses on the growth response of several corn varieties. This study was designed with a split-plot design and a randomized group design as the environmental design. By dividing the experiment into similar blocks and using random allocation of treatments within those blocks, this design minimizes environmental variability that could affect the results of the experiment. The main plot was nitrogen dosage consisting of seven dosage levels (N0: 0 kg/ha, N1: 50 kg/ha, N2: 100 kg/ha, N3: 150 kg/ha, N4: 200 kg/ha, N5: 250 kg/ha, and N6: 300 kg/ha). The subplots are corn varieties consisting of five levels, which are V1: Sinhas, V2: Nasa 29, V3: HJ 36, V4: Bisi 18, and V5: Pioneer. The combination of all treatments resulted in 35 combinations and was repeated thrice, resulting in 105 experimental units.
2.2 Research procedure
Land preparation started with clearing the land of weeds and then plowing. The land was then made into three blocks with a size of 3 m × 5 m and a distance of 100 cm between blocks. Two seeds were planted in each planting hole with a 75 cm × 20 cm spacing. After 2 weeks, thinning and replanting were done in each planting hole so that each hole contained only one plant.
Maintenance activities carried out in this study included fertilization, irrigation at 7-day intervals, weeding, hilling, pest and disease control, and insect control. Fertilization was done three times using urea, SP36, and Phonska fertilizers at the age of 7 DAP, 35 DAP, and 50 DAP. Watering was done every 10 days until harvest, depending on weather conditions. Weeding was done when the plants were 10 DAP and 35 DAP by clearing weeds around the corn plants. Hilling was done when the plants were 35 DAP by raising the mounds and loosening the soil. Pest and disease control was done by spraying pesticides. Harvesting was done when the cobs reached physiological maturity (black spots at the base of the seeds) or around 100 DAP.
2.3 Observations
The parameters observed were plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, cob height, male flowering age, female flowering age, panicle exit interval, harvest age, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) chlorophyll meter, cob weight, cob diameter, cob length, seeded cob length, number of seeds per row, 100 seed weight, yield percentage, and yield. The concept of these parameters has been reported by Abduh et al. [23] and Fikri et al. [24]. Meanwhile, leaf pigment parameters included total chlorophyll based on the chlorophyll content meter (CCM), NDVI, green seeker, and NDVI-UAV. Chlorophyll observations based on CCM 200+, SPAD, were carried out on the third leaf from the top of the plant, the middle leaf, and the lowest leaf at 60 DAP. The chlorophyll index was calculated using the formula: chlorophyll index = average leaf chlorophyll index + standard deviation. The procedure and concept analysis of CCM 200+ was adopted from the studies of Rakutko et al. [25], Almansoori et al. [26], and Ardiansyah et al. [10], which have been adjusted to the research conditions. The NDVI-UAV value can be used for crop analysis of corn seed production as a different application than NDVI Greenseeker (ground-based platform). UAV images in data collection were taken in three stages of plant age, namely 40, 55, and 70 DAP. The selection of 40, 55, and 70 DAP intervals for NDVI measurements was scientifically based on the need to capture key changes in plant physiology during different growth phases. At each point, plants underwent significant changes in biomass, leaf number, and photosynthetic activity, directly reflected in fluctuations in NDVI values. This NDVI-UAV captured the plant condition with a plot image on an aerial platform (Figure 1). Meanwhile, the NDVI calculation was performed using the following equation:
where M represents red and IMD represents NIR.

Drone image acquisition, data processing with ArcGIS, and NDVI analysis in QGIS.
The procedure and concept analysis of NDVI-UAV was adopted from the studies of Singhal et al. [27], Padjung et al. [14], and Miller et al. [15], which have been adjusted to the research conditions.
2.4 Data analysis
The data obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a split-plot design. ANOVA results became the basis for determining the heritability of characters in a broad sense where the classification of heritability is divided into three, namely high (>50%), medium (20–50%), and low (<20%). In addition to heritability in a broad sense, the determination of the genotype coefficient of variation (GCV) was also analyzed with the following formula:
where σg represents the genetic variance and X represents the population mean.
GCV criteria also consist of three components, namely very high (>14.5%), medium (5–14.5%), and narrow (0–5%) [28]. Selection criteria were determined systematically through Pearson correlation, path, and principal component analysis (PCA) [29,30]. In addition, the analysis also continued with the development of cropping models by utilizing drone analysis, physiology, and agronomy.
3 Results
3.1 ANOVA
ANOVA showed that all characters related to growth, physiology, and yield of corn were significantly affected by nitrogen, variety, and interaction between nitrogen and variety (Table 1). The results of heritability values are listed in Table 1. From the table, traits related to growth, physiology, and yield showed high heritability values, namely the number of leaves (51.73), male flowering age (93.62), female flowering age (90.58), harvest age (89.89), chlorophyll (82.21), cob location (75.64), cob diameter (75.54), and yield percentage (55.90). The characters with moderate heritability values were plant height (42.84), SPAD (45.75), cob weight (27.26), number of seed rows (45.54), 1000 seed weight (42.66), and yield (49.06). However, characters with low heritability values were stem diameter (6.72), anthesis-silking interval (1.60), NDVI.1 (23.03), NDVI.2 (5.79), NDVI.3 (12.72), cob length (15.00), and seed cob length (13.79). Furthermore, the average coefficient of variation (CV) for most of the parameters studied ranged from 1.28% to 13.39%, as detailed in Table 1. The CV is also often used by plant breeders as one of the alternatives in the selection process, which gives an idea of diversity in a population.
ANOVA of maize growth characters in complete diallel hierarchical populations
Character | N | V | N × V | CV (n) (%) | CV (v) (%) | RG | RF | RL | H2 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | 92.357** | 257.239** | 121.088** | 1.26 | 1.58 | 6.48 | 15.13 | 8.65 | 42.84 |
NL | 24.872** | 0.907* | 0.406 | 3.19 | 2.85 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 6.72 |
SD | 5.908** | 6.012** | 0.675** | 4.21 | 3.85 | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.24 | 51.73 |
MFA | 57.149** | 259.595** | 10.701** | 2.16 | 1.65 | 11.85 | 12.66 | 0.81 | 93.62 |
FFA | 79.771** | 247.919** | 10.958** | 2.35 | 1.85 | 11.28 | 12.46 | 1.17 | 90.58 |
ASI | 18.133** | 2.343 | 11.390 | 14.07 | 13.39 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.60 |
HA | 520.914** | 1004.724** | 285.943** | 1.72 | 1.28 | 11.39 | 12.67 | 1.28 | 89.89 |
CH | 245.925 | 3854.855** | 3413.840** | 4.28 | 3.73 | 39.12 | 51.71 | 12.60 | 75.64 |
CW | 3988.660** | 1014.818** | 4958.473** | 2.29 | 2.08 | 2.24 | 8.23 | 5.98 | 27.26 |
CD | 406.587** | 597.846** | 165.206** | 3.38 | 3.64 | 6.79 | 8.99 | 2.20 | 75.54 |
CL | 126.751** | 7.535** | 15.518* | 3.69 | 3.75 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 15.00 |
SCL | 89.782** | 7.073** | 14.415* | 3.95 | 4.22 | 0.06 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 13.78 |
NSR | 43.639** | 33.532** | 22.937** | 5.62 | 4.41 | 0.35 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 45.54 |
YP | 0.072** | 0.051** | 0.101** | 2.20 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 55.90 |
1000-GW | 27117.704** | 18886.593** | 14497.502** | 3.96 | 5.85 | 196.08 | 459.64 | 263.56 | 42.66 |
Y | 10.777** | 5.209** | 13.851** | 3.18 | 3.10 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 49.06 |
Chl.a | 129824.022** | 10172.615** | 15410.709** | 3.18 | 1.76 | 90.53 | 111.74 | 21.22 | 81.01 |
Chl.b | 32346.700** | 2921.739** | 4631.382** | 3.42 | 2.03 | 25.59 | 30.44 | 4.85 | 84.08 |
Chl.Tot | 291552.626** | 23961.735** | 36622.746** | 3.24 | 1.83 | 212.59 | 258.60 | 46.01 | 82.21 |
SPAD | 4405.675** | 316.994** | 822.114** | 5.50 | 5.15 | 2.14 | 4.68 | 2.54 | 45.75 |
NDVI.1 | 0.111* | 0.081** | 0.178** | 24.34 | 14.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 23.03 |
NDVI.2 | 0.023 | 0.019** | 0.076** | 16.71 | 8.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.79 |
NDVI.3 | 0.008 | 0.019** | 0.046* | 14.12 | 10.4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.72 |
Notes: **: significant at α = 1%, *: significant at α = 5%, N: nitrogen, V: variety, N × V: interaction between nitrogen and variety, CV: coefficient of variance, VG: variance of genotypes, VP: variance of phenotypes, H: heritability, PH: plant height, NL: number of leaves, SD: stem diameter, MFA: male flowering age, FFA: female flowering age, ASI: anthesis-silking interval, HA: harvest age, CH: cob height, CW: cob weight, CD: cob diameter, CL: cob length, SCL: seed cob length, NSR: number of seeds per row, YP: yield percentage, 1000-GW: 1000 grain weight, Y: yield, Chl: chlorophyll, SPAD: Soil Plant Analysis Development, NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index.
3.2 NDVI-UAV
ANOVA of NDVI-UAV showed that the interaction between nitrogen dosage and corn varieties had a significant effect. The interaction showed a very substantial response to the characters and varieties that had mean values of NDVI-UAV, NDVI.1 (40 DAP) (23.03), NDVI.2 (55 DAP) (5.79), and NDVI.3 (70 DAP) (12.72), as shown in Table 1.
3.3 Correlation analysis
Table 2 shows the results of correlation analysis between various phenotypically and destructively collected image-derived characters. The analysis showed significant negative and positive correlations with yield attributes, especially in cob weight characters, namely several leaves (0. 38), male flowering age (−0.23), female flowering age (−0.24), harvesting age (−0.25), cob location (0.25), cob weight (0.76), cob diameter (0.44), cob length (0.23), seeded cob length (0.21), number of seed rows (0.38), yield percentage (0.41), and 1000 seed weight (0.21). Other characteristics did not show significant relationships with yield attributes, indicating that changes in these characteristics did not significantly affect the yield.
Correlation analysis of all analyzed traits
PH | NL | SD | MFA | FFA | ASI | HA | CH | CW | CD | CL | SCL | NSR | YP | 1000-GW | Y | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | 1.00 | −0.03tn | 0.21* | 0.03tn | −0.01tn | −0.21* | −0.02tn | 0.23* | −0.27** | 0.31** | 0.06tn | 0.01tn | 0.07tn | 0.28** | 0.26** | −0.08tn |
NL | 1.00 | 0.07tn | 0.03tn | 0.02tn | −0.09tn | 0.01tn | 0.18tn | 0.00tn | 0.16tn | 0.23* | 0.16tn | 0.32** | 0.21* | 0.24* | 0.14tn | |
SD | 1.00 | −0.29** | −0.35** | −0.43** | −0.35** | 0.24* | 0.27** | 0.54** | 0.48** | 0.44** | 0.44** | 0.17tn | 0.48** | 0.38** | ||
MFA | 1.00 | 0.99** | 0.11tn | 0.98** | −0.03tn | −0.08tn | −0.51** | −0.27** | −0.22* | −0.2* | −0.26** | 0.01tn | −0.23* | |||
FFA | 1.00 | 0.28** | 0.99** | −0.04tn | −0.09tn | −0.54** | −0.34** | −0.3** | −0.24* | −0.26** | −0.05tn | −0.24* | ||||
ASI | 1.00 | 0.28** | −0.05tn | −0.09tn | −0.29** | −0.48** | −0.48** | −0.29** | −0.08tn | −0.4** | −0.14tn | |||||
HA | 1.00 | −0.04tn | −0.1tn | −0.54** | −0.36** | −0.31** | −0.25* | −0.25* | −0.06tn | −0.25* | ||||||
CH | 1.00 | 0.15tn | 0.29** | 0.05tn | 0.00tn | 0.44** | 0.16tn | 0.04tn | 0.25** | |||||||
CW | 1.00 | 0.19* | 0.21* | 0.21* | 0.24* | −0.26** | 0.12tn | 0.76** | ||||||||
CD | 1.00 | 0.41** | 0.35** | 0.52** | 0.40** | 0.43** | 0.44** | |||||||||
CL | 1.00 | 0.91** | 0.47** | 0.03tn | 0.52** | 0.23* | ||||||||||
SCL | 1.00 | 0.45** | −0.01tn | 0.45** | 0.21* | |||||||||||
NSR | 1.00 | 0.21* | 0.30** | 0.38** | ||||||||||||
YP | 1.00 | 0.12tn | 0.41** | |||||||||||||
1000-GW | 1.00 | 0.21* | ||||||||||||||
Y | 1.00 |
Notes: **: significant at α = 1%, *: significant at α = 5%, PH: plant height, NL: number of leaves, SD: stem diameter, MFA: male flowering age, FFA: female flowering age, ASI: anthesis-silking interval, HA: harvest age, CH: cob height, CW: cob weight, CD: cob diameter, CL: cob length, SCL: seed cob length, NSR: number of seeds per row, YP: yield percentage, 1000-GW: 1000 grain weight, Y: yield.
3.4 Path analysis
Path analysis showed that cob weight directly affected yield characters with a coefficient of 0.93 (Table 3); this trait also had a considerable indirect effect on other phenotypic characteristics. In addition to cob weight, yield attributes were directly influenced by yield percentage and female flowering age, each with a coefficient. In contrast, the trait with the least direct effect resulted in a cob diameter of −0.01.
Path analysis of traits that remained positive toward results
Character | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Residual | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD | MFA | FFA | HA | CH | CW | CD | CL | SCL | NSR | YP | 1000-GW | |||
SD | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.12 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.25 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
MFA | −0.04 | −0.01 | 0.33 | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.17 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
FFA | 0.33 | −0.01 | −0.03 | −0.28 | 0.00 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.17 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
HA | −0.28 | −0.01 | −0.03 | 0.33 | 0.00 | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.16 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
CH | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
CW | 0.93 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.17 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
CD | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.18 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
CL | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.20 | −0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
SCL | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.10 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
NSR | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.08 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.22 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
YP | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.09 | 0.07 | 0.00 | −0.24 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | |
1000-GW | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
Notes: SD: stem diameter, MFA: male flowering age, FFA: female flowering age, HA: harvest age, CH: cob height, CW: cob weight, CD: cob diameter, CL: cob length, SCL: seed cob length, NSR: number of seeds per row, YP: yield percentage, 1000-GW: 1000 grain weight.
3.5 Scatterplot matrix
Figure 2 shows a scatterplot matrix which illustrates the relationship between the variables in the dataset. Each row and column represent a variable and is usually distributed, such as Chl. a (chlorophyll a), Chl. b (chlorophyll b), Chl. Tot (total chlorophyll), SPAD (leaf chlorophyll content indicator), as well as vegetation index variants NDVI.1 (40 DAP), NDVI.2 (55 DAP), and NDVI.3 (70 DAP). The diagonal part displays the variable names, while the rest of the cells show a graph of the relationship between pairs of variables. The patterns seen can be a positive correlation (points form a line rising from the bottom left to the top right), a negative correlation (points form a line falling from the top left to the bottom right), or no relationship (random distribution of points).

Relationship between characters in the matrix scatterplot.
3.6 PCA
Based on the PCA (Table 4), four principal components had eigenvalues greater than 1, namely PC1 and PC2, indicating that these components were significant in explaining the data variance, with PC1 explaining 54% of the variance. The eigenvector associated with NDVI.3 at 70 HST for PC1 had a value of −0.08, indicating an inverse relationship between this variable and PC1. However, PC2 showed variance values of 0.18% and 0.72%. This means that when NDVI values increase, PC1 values decrease, and vice versa. NDVI at 70 DAP plays an essential role in PC1, and PC1 can be used to weigh the selection index.
PCA of image-based maize physiological characters
Character | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chl.a | 0.50 | 0.01 | −0.10 | 0.05 | 0.28 |
Chl.b | 0.51 | 0.02 | −0.12 | 0.03 | 0.22 |
Chl.Tot | 0.51 | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.04 | 0.26 |
SPAD | 0.46 | −0.10 | 0.14 | 0.10 | −0.87 |
NDVI.1 | 0.02 | 0.66 | −0.53 | −0.49 | −0.21 |
NDVI.2 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.82 | −0.26 | 0.11 |
NDVI.3 | −0.08 | 0.56 | −0.06 | 0.82 | −0.02 |
Standard deviation | 1.95 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.46 |
Proportion of variance | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.03 |
Cumulative proportion | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 1.00 |
Eigen values | 3.81 | 1.24 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.21 |
Notes: Chl: chlorophyll, SPAD: Soil Plant Analysis Development, NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index, and PC: principal component.
4 Discussion
NDVI analysis shows that the nitrogen and variety interaction had good vegetation index values in the 55 DAP observation phase. The validation test results show the potential of imagery with this model to estimate vegetation greenness, especially by using vegetation index values with a strong relationship with field measurements [24,31]. According to the studies of García-Martínez et al. and Padjung et al. [6,14], using UAVs with ArcGIS software provides complete and accurate data information. Digital image data from the light range obtained from uncrewed aircraft can be used to quickly assess and record the leaf chlorophyll content and N content in corn plant leaves. Using UAVs and multispectral cameras, data capture can produce high-resolution NDVI readings [7,32]. NDVI is highly proposed because light absorption and reflectance in leaves have been measured using a technological approach from satellites. NDVI data provide a strong approximation when measuring the leaf chlorophyll content and nitrogen concentration during the growing season.
The application of multivariate analysis techniques, such as Pearson correlation, path analysis, and PCA, is effective assessment packages for selection [33,34,35]. The correlation results show that cob weight is the selected character, with the yield attribute showing a coefficient value of around 0.76. According to the study of Mustafa et al. [36], if the correlation value is closer to +1, then the increase in one trait will follow the increase in the other trait, and closer to −1 indicates that the increase in one trait will decrease the other trait. This suggests that there is a proportion of each character’s value that is indicative of the yield attribute.
Based on the results of correlation analysis, the number of leaves, male flowering age, female flowering age, harvesting age, cob location, cob weight, cob diameter, cob length, seed cob length, number of seed rows, yield percentage, and 1,000 seed weight have a significant influence on the yield, so these characters can be used as a benchmark or as a consideration in determining nitrogen fertilizer packages, varieties, and the interaction of nitrogen fertilizer packages with varieties in this study. According to research on hybrid corn [37,38], one of the characteristics that correlates very significantly with yield is cob weight. This proves that cob weight influences the yield, where the grain yield increases considerably according to the increase in cob weight. The increase in cob weight in corn plants will align with the yield obtained. This aligns with the research of Fromme et al. [39], which states that cob weight affects corn production because the more significant the cob weight is, the greater the corn production. Therefore, quality seeds and high seed productivity can be produced by selecting plant height, cob height, diameter, number of seed rows, 1,000 seed weight, cob length, and cob weight.
The correlation matrix table between observation parameters where SPAD, chlorophyll, and NDVI value characters significantly correlated with productivity [12,15,40]. The more active the photosynthesis process is, the higher the NDVI value, and the lower the greenness of the plant, the lower the NDVI value. The relationship between the NDVI and the maize growth phase is related to the variation of NDVI values in each growth phase.
Based on the observations, the 40 and 55 DAP intervals show a significant effect, with the results measured at 40 DAP and 55 DAP showing substantial differences in plant growth and yield. According to studies of Panek and Gozdowski and Xue and Su [32,41], their research explained that moderate vegetation age, plant stand density, and plant canopy density generally provide high ratio values in vegetation index values. In this study, it is analogous that stand density also affects the crown density, so the analysis results show a strong relationship. The denser the vegetation stands, the greater the crown density, which will affect the vegetation index value. The taller the corn plant and the older the plant, the denser the leaf canopy. Growth and changes in vegetation canopy cover that are relatively thicker and denser significantly affect the pixel value of aerial imagery, so that the chlorophyll and nitrogen vegetation index values are higher.
Combining these two characteristics with yield is optimal for developing a selection index. However, the selection index should be considered based on the priority value or variance of the characteristics. This priority can be done with used path analysis and PCA, which indicate the genotype selection index [16,33]. However, the eigenvalues of selection characteristics can be weighted with a positive sign because the negative sign is limited to the direction of variance and not to the absolute value [35]. The effectiveness of the three indices is determined using heritability analysis of the selection indices, which indicates the efficacy of genetically weighted combinations [1,42]. Combining some secondary characters with yield characters can increase the genetic potential of the main character, such as the yield, which increases the effectiveness of selection compared to using the yield alone. [30] We reported the same efficacy in wheat selection [29] in rice under salinity stress. However, the in-depth analysis still included characters with significant genetic correlations.
5 Conclusions
In conclusion, traits related to cob weight, flowering time, and yield percentage significantly improve the maize yield, with high heritability values making them selection criteria. Vegetation indices, such as NDVI at 70 DAP, play a significant role in PC1, and PC1 can be used to weigh selection indices. These findings provide valuable insights for improving maize production through targeted breeding strategies and field trials that can determine the best maize cultivation technologies that farmers can use.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia through the Collaborative Fundamental Research scheme with the Institute for Research and Community Service with grant number 02035/UN4.22/PT.01.03/2024.
-
Funding information: We are grateful to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia through the Collaborative Fundamental Research scheme with the Institute for Research and Community Service with grant number 02035/UN4.22/PT.01.03/2024.
-
Author contributions: All co-authors reviewed and approved the manuscript before submission. All authors reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. Conceptualization: R.P. and M.F. Methodology: R.P. and M.F. Software: M.F.A. and N.A. Validation: M.F., N.N. (4th co-author), N.N. (5th co-author). Formal analysis: M.F.A., N.N. (4th co-author), and N.A. Investigation: N.N. (4th co-author), N.N. (5th co-author), and M.A. Resources: Y.M. and M.F. Data curation: R.P. and A.R.A. Writing – original draft: All the authors. Visualization: M.F.A. and Y.M. Funding acquisition: R.P., M.F., and Y.M.
-
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: At this moment, we declare that all data reported in this article are available and will be produced on demand.
References
[1] Badr A, El-shazly HH, Tarawneh RA, Börner A. Screening for drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm using germination and seedling traits under simulated drought conditions. Plants. 2020;9:1–23.10.3390/plants9050565Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[2] Louto FF, Shamdas GBN, Masrianih. Response of sweet corn plants (Zea mays sacharata) through eco-farming organic fertilizer and its utilization as learning media. J Biol Sci Educ. 2022;10(2):38–49.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Statistic Indonesia. Catalog: 1101001. Stat Indones. 2023;1101001:790.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Chuanromanee TS, Cohen JI, Ryan GL. Morphological analysis of size and shape (MASS): An integrative software program for morphometric analyses of leaves. Appl Plant Sci. 2019;7(9):1–9.10.1002/aps3.11288Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[5] Dietz KJ, Zörb C, Geilfus CM. Drought and crop yield. Plant Biol. 2021;23(6):881–93.10.1111/plb.13304Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] García-Martínez H, Flores-Magdaleno H, Ascencio-Hernández R, Khalil-Gardezi A, Tijerina-Chávez L, Mancilla-Villa OR, et al. Corn grain yield estimation from vegetation indices, canopy cover, plant density, and a neural network using multispectral and RGB images acquired with uncrewed aerial vehicles. Agriculture. 2020;10(7):1–24.10.3390/agriculture10070277Search in Google Scholar
[7] Farid M, Musa Y, Jamil H, Ridwan I, Pati S, Wahid A, et al. Diseminasi Produk Jagung Sintetik Unhas (Sinhas 1) dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Benih dan Produksi Jagung di Kabupaten Takalar. J Din Pengabdi. 2020;6(1):166–78.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Phares CA, Amoakwah E, Danquah A, Afrifa A, Beyaw LR, Frimpong KA. Biochar and NPK fertilizer co-applied with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhanced maize grain yield and nutrient use efficiency of inorganic fertilizer. J Agric Food Res. 2022;10(Oct):100434. 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100434.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Kayad A, Sozzi M, Gatto S, Whelan B, Sartori L, Marinello F. Ten years of corn yield dynamics at field scale under digital agriculture solutions: A case study from North Italy. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;185(April):106126. 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106126.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Ardiansyah M, Nugroho B, Sa’diyah K. Estimasi Kadar Klorofil Dan Kadar N Daun Jagung Menggunakan Chlorophyll Content Index. J Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkung. 2022;24(2):53–61.10.29244/jitl.24.2.53-61Search in Google Scholar
[11] Padjung R, Bdr MF, Nasaruddin N, Ridwan I, Anshori MF, Abduh TADM, et al. Growth and production of corn in various planting distances systems. Agrotech J. 2020;5(2):89–93.10.31327/atj.v5i2.1352Search in Google Scholar
[12] Junges AH, Fontana DC, Lampugnani CS. Relationship between the normalized difference vegetation index and leaf area in vineyards. Bragantia. 2019;78(2):297–305.10.1590/1678-4499.2018168Search in Google Scholar
[13] Zhang A, Pérez-rodríguez P, San F, Palacios-rojas N, Dhliwayo T, Liu Y, et al. Genomic prediction of the performance of hybrids and the combining abilities for line-by-tester trials in maize. Crop J. 2022;10(1):109–16. 10.1016/j.cj.2021.04.007.Search in Google Scholar
[14] Padjung R, Farid M, Adzima AF, Ridwan I, Musa Y, Nasaruddin, et al. Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer doses on several corn varieties using UAV-based multi-sensor imagery. Asian J Plant Sci. 2024;23(1):98–105.10.3923/ajps.2024.98.105Search in Google Scholar
[15] Miller JO, Mondal P, Sarupria M. Sensor-based measurements of NDVI in small grain and corn fields by tractor, drone, and satellite platforms. Crop Env. 2024;3(1):33–42. 10.1016/j.crope.2023.11.001.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Sakinah AI, Farid M, Musa Y, Hairmansis A, Anshori MF. Seedling stage image-based phenotyping selection criteria through tolerance indices on drought and salinity stress in rice. Plant Breed Biotechnol. 2024;12:43–58.10.9787/PBB.2024.12.43Search in Google Scholar
[17] Lo Bianco R, Mirabella F. Use of leaf and fruit morphometric analysis to identify and classify white mulberry (Morus alba L.) genotypes. Agriculture. 2018;8:1–9.10.3390/agriculture8100157Search in Google Scholar
[18] Glenn DM, Tabb A. Evaluation of five methods to measure normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in apple and citrus. Int J Fruit Sci. 2019;19(2):191–210. 10.1080/15538362.2018.1502720.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Rutan J, Steinke K. Determining corn nitrogen rates using multiple prediction models. J Crop Improv. 2017 Nov;31(6):780–800. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15427528.2017.1359715.10.1080/15427528.2017.1359715Search in Google Scholar
[20] Farid HU, Khan ZM, Anjum MN, Shakoor A, Qureshi HS. Precision nitrogen management for cotton using (GreenSeeker) Handheld crop sensors. Environ Sci Proc. 2022;23(1):12.10.3390/environsciproc2022023012Search in Google Scholar
[21] Hammad SAR, Ali OAM. Physiological and biochemical studies on wheat plants’ drought tolerance by applying amino acids and yeast extract. Ann Agric Sci. 2014;59(1):133–45.10.1016/j.aoas.2014.06.018Search in Google Scholar
[22] Ceccarelli S, Grando S. Diversity as a plant breeding objective. Agronomy. 2024;14:97–8.10.3390/agronomy14030550Search in Google Scholar
[23] Abduh ADM, Padjung R, Farid M, Bahrun AH, Anshori MF, Nasaruddin, et al. Interaction of genetic and cultivation technology in maize prolific and productivity increase. Pak J Biol Sci. 2021;24(6):716–23.10.3923/pjbs.2021.716.723Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Fikri M, Farid M, Musa Y, Anshori MF, Padjung R, Nur A. Multivariate analysis in developing technology packages for corn cultivation by adding fertilizer to compost. Chil J Agric Res. 2023;83(4):471–83.10.4067/S0718-58392023000400471Search in Google Scholar
[25] Rakutko S, Alsina I, Avotins A, Berzina K. Manifestation of the effect of fluctuating asymmetry of bilateral traits of tomato growing in industrial greenhouses. Eng Rural Dev. 2018;17(Sept 2020):186–91.10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N196Search in Google Scholar
[26] Almansoori T, Salman M, Aljazeri M. Rapid and nondestructive estimations of chlorophyll concentration in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaflets using SPAD-502 + and CCM-200 portable chlorophyll meters. Emirates J Food Agric. 2021 Aug;33(7):544–54. https://ejfa.me/index.php/journal/article/view/2723.10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i7.2723Search in Google Scholar
[27] Singhal G, Bansod B, Mathew L, Goswami J, Choudhury BU, Raju PLN. Chlorophyll estimation using a multi-spectral unmanned aerial system based on machine learning techniques. Remote Sens Appl Soc Env. 2019;15(May):100235. 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100235 Search in Google Scholar
[28] Fadhilah AN, Farid M, Ridwan I, Anshori MF, Yassi A. Genetic parameters and selection index of high-yielding tomato F2 populations. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2022;54(5):1026–36.10.54910/sabrao2022.54.5.6Search in Google Scholar
[29] Anshori MF, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, Ardie SW, Suwarno WB. The selection index is based on multivariate analysis for selecting doubled-haploid rice lines in lowland saline-prone areas. Sabrao J Breed Genet. 2019;51(2):161–74.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Fadhli N, Farid M, Rafiuddin, Effendi R, Azrai M, Anshori M. Multivariate analysis to determine secondary traits in selecting adaptive hybrid corn lines under drought stress. Biodiversitas. 2020;21:3617–24.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Amas ANK, Hardiansyah MY, Musa Y, Amin AR. Several hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes were selected under low nitrogen conditions. IOP Conf Ser Earth Env Sci. 2021;807(3):032014.10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032014Search in Google Scholar
[32] Panek E, Gozdowski D. Analysis of the relationship between cereal yield and NDVI for selected regions of Central Europe based on MODIS satellite data. Remote Sens Appl Soc Env. 2020;17(Dec 2019):100286. 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100286.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Shoba D, Vijayan R, Robin S, Manivannan N, Iyanar K, Arunachalam P, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm using PCA and cluster analysis. Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(3):1095–104.10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00140.6Search in Google Scholar
[34] Fadhli N, Farid M, Rafiuddin, Efendi R, Azrai M, Anshori MF. Multivariate analysis determines secondary characters when selecting adaptive hybrid corn lines under drought stress. Biodiversitas. 2020;21(8):3617–24.10.13057/biodiv/d210826Search in Google Scholar
[35] Roy S, Chatterjee S, Hossain MA, Basfore S, Karak C. Path analysis study and morphological characterization of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum.). Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(1):1777–84.Search in Google Scholar
[36] Mustafa M, Syukur M, Sutjahjo SH, Sobir. Inheritance study for fruit characters of tomato IPBT78 x IPBT73 using joint scaling test. IOP Conf Ser Earth Env Sci. 2019;382(1):012009.10.1088/1755-1315/382/1/012009Search in Google Scholar
[37] Riwandi. Corn cultivation techniques with organic systems in marginal land. Bengkulu: UNIB Press; 2014. p. 1–67.Search in Google Scholar
[38] Wang X, Miao Y, Dong R, Zha H, Xia T, Chen Z, et al. Machine learning-based in-season nitrogen status diagnosis and side-dress nitrogen recommendation for corn. Eur J Agron. 2021;123(Oct 2020):126193. 10.1016/j.eja.2020.126193.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Fromme DD, Spivey TA, Grichar WJ. Agronomic response of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to plant populations. Int J Agron. 2019;2019:589768.10.1155/2019/3589768Search in Google Scholar
[40] Bijay-Singh, Ali AM. Using hand-held chlorophyll meters and canopy reflectance sensors for fertilizer nitrogen management in cereals in small farms in developing countries. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(4):1127.10.3390/s20041127Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[41] Xue J, Su B. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. J Sensors. 2017;2017:353691.10.1155/2017/1353691Search in Google Scholar
[42] Sayekti TWDA, Syukur M, Hidayat SH, Maharijaya A. Diversity and genetic parameter of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum) based on yield component in three locations. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 2021 Jan;22(2):823–9. https://smujo.id/biodiv/article/view/7386.10.13057/biodiv/d220236Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Optimization of sustainable corn–cattle integration in Gorontalo Province using goal programming
- Competitiveness of Indonesia’s nutmeg in global market
- Toward sustainable bioproducts from lignocellulosic biomass: Influence of chemical pretreatments on liquefied walnut shells
- Efficacy of Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides for managing whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), on cucumber plants
- Assessment of nutrition status of pineapple plants during ratoon season using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system
- Nutritional value and consumer assessment of 12 avocado crosses between cvs. Hass × Pionero
- The lacked access to beef in the low-income region: An evidence from the eastern part of Indonesia
- Comparison of milk consumption habits across two European countries: Pilot study in Portugal and France
- Antioxidant responses of black glutinous rice to drought and salinity stresses at different growth stages
- Differential efficacy of salicylic acid-induced resistance against bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice genotypes
- Yield and vegetation index of different maize varieties and nitrogen doses under normal irrigation
- Urbanization and forecast possibilities of land use changes by 2050: New evidence in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam
- Organizational-economic efficiency of raspberry farming – case study of Kosovo
- Application of nitrogen-fixing purple non-sulfur bacteria in improving nitrogen uptake, growth, and yield of rice grown on extremely saline soil under greenhouse conditions
- Digital motivation, knowledge, and skills: Pathways to adaptive millennial farmers
- Investigation of biological characteristics of fruit development and physiological disorders of Musang King durian (Durio zibethinus Murr.)
- Enhancing rice yield and farmer welfare: Overcoming barriers to IPB 3S rice adoption in Indonesia
- Simulation model to realize soybean self-sufficiency and food security in Indonesia: A system dynamic approach
- Gender, empowerment, and rural sustainable development: A case study of crab business integration
- Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses of bacterial communities in short mackerel (Rastrelliger brachysoma) under storage conditions and inoculation of the histamine-producing bacterium
- Fostering women’s engagement in good agricultural practices within oil palm smallholdings: Evaluating the role of partnerships
- Increasing nitrogen use efficiency by reducing ammonia and nitrate losses from tomato production in Kabul, Afghanistan
- Physiological activities and yield of yacon potato are affected by soil water availability
- Vulnerability context due to COVID-19 and El Nino: Case study of poultry farming in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
- Wheat freshness recognition leveraging Gramian angular field and attention-augmented resnet
- Suggestions for promoting SOC storage within the carbon farming framework: Analyzing the INFOSOLO database
- Optimization of hot foam applications for thermal weed control in perennial crops and open-field vegetables
- Toxicity evaluation of metsulfuron-methyl, nicosulfuron, and methoxyfenozide as pesticides in Indonesia
- Fermentation parameters and nutritional value of silages from fodder mallow (Malva verticillata L.), white sweet clover (Melilotus albus Medik.), and their mixtures
- Five models and ten predictors for energy costs on farms in the European Union
- Effect of silvopastoral systems with integrated forest species from the Peruvian tropics on the soil chemical properties
- Transforming food systems in Semarang City, Indonesia: A short food supply chain model
- Understanding farmers’ behavior toward risk management practices and financial access: Evidence from chili farms in West Java, Indonesia
- Optimization of mixed botanical insecticides from Azadirachta indica and Calophyllum soulattri against Spodoptera frugiperda using response surface methodology
- Mapping socio-economic vulnerability and conflict in oil palm cultivation: A case study from West Papua, Indonesia
- Exploring rice consumption patterns and carbohydrate source diversification among the Indonesian community in Hungary
- Determinants of rice consumer lexicographic preferences in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
- Effect on growth and meat quality of weaned piglets and finishing pigs when hops (Humulus lupulus) are added to their rations
- Healthy motivations for food consumption in 16 countries
- The agriculture specialization through the lens of PESTLE analysis
- Combined application of chitosan-boron and chitosan-silicon nano-fertilizers with soybean protein hydrolysate to enhance rice growth and yield
- Stability and adaptability analyses to identify suitable high-yielding maize hybrids using PBSTAT-GE
- Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria-mediated rock phosphate utilization with poultry manure enhances soil nutrient dynamics and maize growth in semi-arid soil
- Factors impacting on purchasing decision of organic food in developing countries: A systematic review
- Influence of flowering plants in maize crop on the interaction network of Tetragonula laeviceps colonies
- Bacillus subtilis 34 and water-retaining polymer reduce Meloidogyne javanica damage in tomato plants under water stress
- Vachellia tortilis leaf meal improves antioxidant activity and colour stability of broiler meat
- Evaluating the competitiveness of leading coffee-producing nations: A comparative advantage analysis across coffee product categories
- Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP5 in vacuum-packaged cooked ham as a bioprotective culture
- Evaluation of tomato hybrid lines adapted to lowland
- South African commercial livestock farmers’ adaptation and coping strategies for agricultural drought
- Spatial analysis of desertification-sensitive areas in arid conditions based on modified MEDALUS approach and geospatial techniques
- Meta-analysis of the effect garlic (Allium sativum) on productive performance, egg quality, and lipid profiles in laying quails
- Review Articles
- Reference dietary patterns in Portugal: Mediterranean diet vs Atlantic diet
- Evaluating the nutritional, therapeutic, and economic potential of Tetragonia decumbens Mill.: A promising wild leafy vegetable for bio-saline agriculture in South Africa
- A review on apple cultivation in Morocco: Current situation and future prospects
- Quercus acorns as a component of human dietary patterns
- CRISPR/Cas-based detection systems – emerging tools for plant pathology
- Short Communications
- An analysis of consumer behavior regarding green product purchases in Semarang, Indonesia: The use of SEM-PLS and the AIDA model
- Effect of NaOH concentration on production of Na-CMC derived from pineapple waste collected from local society
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Optimization of sustainable corn–cattle integration in Gorontalo Province using goal programming
- Competitiveness of Indonesia’s nutmeg in global market
- Toward sustainable bioproducts from lignocellulosic biomass: Influence of chemical pretreatments on liquefied walnut shells
- Efficacy of Betaproteobacteria-based insecticides for managing whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), on cucumber plants
- Assessment of nutrition status of pineapple plants during ratoon season using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system
- Nutritional value and consumer assessment of 12 avocado crosses between cvs. Hass × Pionero
- The lacked access to beef in the low-income region: An evidence from the eastern part of Indonesia
- Comparison of milk consumption habits across two European countries: Pilot study in Portugal and France
- Antioxidant responses of black glutinous rice to drought and salinity stresses at different growth stages
- Differential efficacy of salicylic acid-induced resistance against bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice genotypes
- Yield and vegetation index of different maize varieties and nitrogen doses under normal irrigation
- Urbanization and forecast possibilities of land use changes by 2050: New evidence in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam
- Organizational-economic efficiency of raspberry farming – case study of Kosovo
- Application of nitrogen-fixing purple non-sulfur bacteria in improving nitrogen uptake, growth, and yield of rice grown on extremely saline soil under greenhouse conditions
- Digital motivation, knowledge, and skills: Pathways to adaptive millennial farmers
- Investigation of biological characteristics of fruit development and physiological disorders of Musang King durian (Durio zibethinus Murr.)
- Enhancing rice yield and farmer welfare: Overcoming barriers to IPB 3S rice adoption in Indonesia
- Simulation model to realize soybean self-sufficiency and food security in Indonesia: A system dynamic approach
- Gender, empowerment, and rural sustainable development: A case study of crab business integration
- Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses of bacterial communities in short mackerel (Rastrelliger brachysoma) under storage conditions and inoculation of the histamine-producing bacterium
- Fostering women’s engagement in good agricultural practices within oil palm smallholdings: Evaluating the role of partnerships
- Increasing nitrogen use efficiency by reducing ammonia and nitrate losses from tomato production in Kabul, Afghanistan
- Physiological activities and yield of yacon potato are affected by soil water availability
- Vulnerability context due to COVID-19 and El Nino: Case study of poultry farming in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
- Wheat freshness recognition leveraging Gramian angular field and attention-augmented resnet
- Suggestions for promoting SOC storage within the carbon farming framework: Analyzing the INFOSOLO database
- Optimization of hot foam applications for thermal weed control in perennial crops and open-field vegetables
- Toxicity evaluation of metsulfuron-methyl, nicosulfuron, and methoxyfenozide as pesticides in Indonesia
- Fermentation parameters and nutritional value of silages from fodder mallow (Malva verticillata L.), white sweet clover (Melilotus albus Medik.), and their mixtures
- Five models and ten predictors for energy costs on farms in the European Union
- Effect of silvopastoral systems with integrated forest species from the Peruvian tropics on the soil chemical properties
- Transforming food systems in Semarang City, Indonesia: A short food supply chain model
- Understanding farmers’ behavior toward risk management practices and financial access: Evidence from chili farms in West Java, Indonesia
- Optimization of mixed botanical insecticides from Azadirachta indica and Calophyllum soulattri against Spodoptera frugiperda using response surface methodology
- Mapping socio-economic vulnerability and conflict in oil palm cultivation: A case study from West Papua, Indonesia
- Exploring rice consumption patterns and carbohydrate source diversification among the Indonesian community in Hungary
- Determinants of rice consumer lexicographic preferences in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
- Effect on growth and meat quality of weaned piglets and finishing pigs when hops (Humulus lupulus) are added to their rations
- Healthy motivations for food consumption in 16 countries
- The agriculture specialization through the lens of PESTLE analysis
- Combined application of chitosan-boron and chitosan-silicon nano-fertilizers with soybean protein hydrolysate to enhance rice growth and yield
- Stability and adaptability analyses to identify suitable high-yielding maize hybrids using PBSTAT-GE
- Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria-mediated rock phosphate utilization with poultry manure enhances soil nutrient dynamics and maize growth in semi-arid soil
- Factors impacting on purchasing decision of organic food in developing countries: A systematic review
- Influence of flowering plants in maize crop on the interaction network of Tetragonula laeviceps colonies
- Bacillus subtilis 34 and water-retaining polymer reduce Meloidogyne javanica damage in tomato plants under water stress
- Vachellia tortilis leaf meal improves antioxidant activity and colour stability of broiler meat
- Evaluating the competitiveness of leading coffee-producing nations: A comparative advantage analysis across coffee product categories
- Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP5 in vacuum-packaged cooked ham as a bioprotective culture
- Evaluation of tomato hybrid lines adapted to lowland
- South African commercial livestock farmers’ adaptation and coping strategies for agricultural drought
- Spatial analysis of desertification-sensitive areas in arid conditions based on modified MEDALUS approach and geospatial techniques
- Meta-analysis of the effect garlic (Allium sativum) on productive performance, egg quality, and lipid profiles in laying quails
- Review Articles
- Reference dietary patterns in Portugal: Mediterranean diet vs Atlantic diet
- Evaluating the nutritional, therapeutic, and economic potential of Tetragonia decumbens Mill.: A promising wild leafy vegetable for bio-saline agriculture in South Africa
- A review on apple cultivation in Morocco: Current situation and future prospects
- Quercus acorns as a component of human dietary patterns
- CRISPR/Cas-based detection systems – emerging tools for plant pathology
- Short Communications
- An analysis of consumer behavior regarding green product purchases in Semarang, Indonesia: The use of SEM-PLS and the AIDA model
- Effect of NaOH concentration on production of Na-CMC derived from pineapple waste collected from local society