Home Extraction and characterization of nano-silica particles to enhance mechanical properties of general-purpose unsaturated polyester resin
Article Open Access

Extraction and characterization of nano-silica particles to enhance mechanical properties of general-purpose unsaturated polyester resin

  • Angaw Chaklu Engidaw EMAIL logo , Araya Abera Betelie and Daniel Tilahun Redda
Published/Copyright: April 5, 2024
Download Article (PDF)
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Science and Engineering of Composite Materials
From the journal Science and Engineering of Composite Materials Volume 31 Issue 1

Abstract

Unsaturated polyester resin (UPR) is the most versatile liquid polymer with a wide range of applications in every aspect of the industry but it has low impact strength, low elongation at break, and low toughness. Its mechanical properties can be enhanced with the addition of an optimum percentage of nano-silica fillers by using ASTM polymer test standards, which have been followed by various research groups. For this research, enhanced mechanical properties of the resin have been tested for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4% amount by weight fraction of the nano-silica as fiber nanomaterial. The sugar cane bagasse ash was collected from the Wenji Sugar Factory and extracted with the required size of the particle, which is 10 nm. The ability of extraction is used to manipulate the particle size as the researcher needs. The aim is to determine the enhanced mechanical properties of the UPR by the addition of optimum nano-silica particles. Nanoparticles have the effect of filling porous regions, crack path deflection, and crack bridging capability of the material, which provides good adhesion with the matrix to increase the mechanical properties of composite materials. Experimental result dictates that 0.5% nano-silica addition with 10 nm particle size performs best by enhancing the mechanical properties of composite material up to 30.45% for tensile, 33% for compression, 17.8% for flexural, a slightly 10% improvement for impact test and it shows an overall 27% better performance than the pure UPR. Thermal stability and glass transition temperature were not influenced by the addition of nano-silica.

Keywords: mechanical property; characterization; nano-silica; polyester resin; polymer; enhance

1 Introduction

Unsaturated polyester (USP) is a versatile and low-cost condensation resin formed generally by the reaction of polyols (polyhydric alcohols) with unsaturated dibasic acids whose production started in the year 1930 [1]. These resins are generally pale-yellow oligomers with a low degree of polymerization and are viscous liquids depending on their chemical composition and molecular weight. Unsaturated polyester resins (UPRs) are one among the many thermo-setting resins and belong to the family of esters [2]. It has excellent corrosion resistance, chemical resistance, fire resistance, rapid crosslinking, dimensional stability, design flexibility, and processing properties [3,4,5,6,7]. They find application in sanitary wares, matrix for composite materials, storage tank construction, sealant, pipes, gratings, and high-performance components for the marine and transportation industry (closure, body panels, fenders, boat hulls, decks, etc.). Unfortunately, UPRs are brittle, just like other thermo-setting resins of epoxy, phenolics, and vinyl esters [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Relatively poor mechanical and thermal properties of pure unsaturated polyester epoxy (UPe) limit their use in advanced composites, and their performances could be improved by designing macromolecules' chemical constitution, configuration, and conformation, changing the degree of material crystallinity, and phase formation/segregation. The performances of UPe resins may be improved by the addition of inorganic fillers, especially nano-filler with controllable size, shape, and textural properties, which improves rheological, optical, electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties, enhances fire resistance, and decreases the shrinkage effect of the neat UPe [8,16,17,18]. Embirsh et al. [19] reported that by using biobased unsaturated polyester resin (b-UPR), synthesized from waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) glycosylate and renewable origin maleic anhydride (MAnh), propylene glycol (PG) was reinforced with unmodified and vinyl-modified biosilica nanoparticles obtained from rice husk had given 88% increase of tensile strength upon addition of 2.5 wt% biosilica modified with vinyl silane. Soleyman et al. [20] reported that using highly controllable self-coiling and tensile shape memory behaviors of the 3D printed poly-ethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) thermoplastic structures as a novel shape memory polymer (SMP) obtained a maximum printing-induced pre-strain of the PETG stored in the first printed layer and a 20-fold increase in the deformation speed for the warm programming condition resulted in a doubled gentler undesired self-bending and a 14.3% higher shape recovery. Soleyman et al. [21] reported that using the 4D printing capability and shape memory effect of PETG as a novel shape memory thermoplastic with an option of emerging tailor-made excess curved third shape during the shape recovery step and obtained shape memory effect behavior with higher than 96% total shape recovery. Karimi et al. [22] also investigated that on plastic recycling, especially biodegradable plastics of polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT) for direct pellet printing, which eliminates the need for filament conversion and obtained SEM results as nozzle temperature increases, print quality improved and avoids micro holes and layered structure formation at 200°C.

Nagendra et al. [23] reported from their review of the impact of machining, tools, monitoring, and cooling techniques on carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites to achieve sustainable manufacturing processes while maintaining the desirable properties of CFRP composites. The objective was to meet diverse application needs and enhance CFRP machining processes, highlighting the importance of sustainable practices in shaping composite materials of the future; utilization of coating on the tool has enhanced tool life and drill hole quality as a review conclusion. Adin [24] reported that the effect of total accumulated weld volumes (TAWVs) and different groove angles (45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°) on the mechanical properties of AISI 1040 and AISI 8620 cylindrical steel joints was investigated experimentally. The result was observed that ultimate tensile strength (UTS) values of the dissimilar material joints were positively affected by the increase in TAWV. The UTS value of the 90° groove-angled joint was found to be 40.25% higher than the UTS value of the 45° groove-angled joint. Saraç et al. [25] investigated that using single lap joints and adding nano-Al2O3, nano-TiO2, and nano-Al2O3 powders in various proportions to the epoxy adhesive (DP460), and using the pure additive-free epoxy adhesive, the mechanical properties of the connections were experimentally investigated at 20, 25, 30, 50, and 70 mm overlap lengths under shear load for AISI 304 stainless steel plate as an adherent material. They obtained that the effective nanoparticle in increasing the failure strength of the adhesive joints is nano-Al2O3 particles, and the maximum failure strength increase rate was 20 mm in overlap length and 97% in 4 wt% nano-Al2O3-reinforced specimens. Elongation at break also increases as the nanoparticles incorporated into the epoxy adhesive. Adin and Adin [26] investigated the mechanical properties of composite materials from woven jute produced in the form of epoxy adhesive layers using the hand lay-up method. Aluminum, mica, and ceramic particles were added into the epoxy as structural adhesive as 2, 4, and 6 wt% as fiber of the composite. They obtained that tensile and bending failure loads of the composite materials using particle reinforced adhesive were increased. Enhanced tensile strength was achieved via aluminum particles with 4 wt%, and enhanced bending strength was found at aluminum particles of 2 wt%.

Huang et al. [27] reported that using reactive nano-silica coated with a silage coupling containing epoxy group (E-Sio2) and dimer fatty acids (DFA) were allowed to participate in the polycondensation reaction of UPR and they obtained E-Sio2/DFA/UPR hybrid composite material. They studied the influence of E-Sio2 on the mechanical performance of the composite material in comparison with pure USP. Finally, the 0.8 wt% E-Sio2 shows improved mechanical properties of the composite material as tensile strength, Young’s modulus, flexural strength, elongation at break, and shore a hardness enhanced by 37.03, 69.18, 86.81, 14.0, and 14.71%, respectively, compared with DFA/UPR. Similarly, the addition of E-Sio2 also enhances the water resistance of hybrid materials.

Gumus et al. [28] investigated the effect of nano/inorganic fillers on USP thermal, mechanical, and physical properties. UPR reinforced with nanoparticles showed better properties than the pure USP polymer, and the fillers were used in a polymeric matrix to enhance the thermal, mechanical, and physical properties. Their novelty was the use of boron nitride and silica particles with different weight ratios. Un-modified UPRs are not preferred in applications like construction and transportation due to their low impact strength, low elongation at break, resistance to crack propagation, and low toughness. Thus, their application is limited as the polymer matrix in the fiber-reinforced composite products. Hence, there is a need to enhance the mechanical properties and toughening of UPR to increase its scope of applications using different elastomers, thermoplastics, and fillers in the USP matrix [2,19]. Even though the reported literature above stated mechanical property enhancements, they did not address the issue of mechanical property enhancement as a function of smaller particle size using sugar cane bagasse ash (SCBA) with UPR till now. This research is different from the literature’s investigated result stated above since it uses a very small silica particle size (10 nm) extracted locally from SCBA at the Wenji Sugar Factory for structural application. The aim of this research is to enhance the mechanical properties of the UPR by adding silica particles for structural and industrial application which increases its scope of application. The materials have been determined from the literature and a detailed flow chart of the research is explained as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Detailed flowchart of the study.
Figure 1

Detailed flowchart of the study.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Matrix resin

The matrix material used for this research is UPR, which was bought from World Fiber Glass and Water Proofing Engineering Company, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The polyester resin is cured by hardener HY-951, which facilitates the chemical reaction between matrix and fiber without changing its own properties and composition was bought there. The density of the polyester is 1.103 g/cm3, and its dynamic viscosity is 11.789 Pa s. The matrix material was prepared using resin and hardener in a ratio of 10:1, as recommended in the study of Zhu and Joyce [3].

2.2 Fiber-nano-silica

SCBA, as shown in Figure 2, is collected from the Wenji Sugar Factory and transported to the Ethiopian Biotechnology Institute for extraction with the required nanoparticle size. SCBA is sieved with a 6 mm wire mesh to remove any remaining unknown dust and solid parts. The ash is burned again in the lab using a microwave to remove any unburned organic substances or mixed materials until complete ash is produced.

Figure 2 Silica extraction method from SCBA: (a) sugarcane bagasse, (b) crushed bagasse, (c) coarse black crushed silica, and (d) powder crushed silica.
Figure 2

Silica extraction method from SCBA: (a) sugarcane bagasse, (b) crushed bagasse, (c) coarse black crushed silica, and (d) powder crushed silica.

The SCBA was then washed thoroughly with water to remove the soluble particles, dust, and other contaminants present, whereby heavy impurities such as sand will also be removed. It is then dried in an air oven at about 105°C for 24 h. The dried SCBA refluxed with an acidic solution of HCl for nearly 120 min by stirring frequently. It is then cooled and kept intact for about 12 h. Later, it was decanted and thoroughly washed with warm distilled water until the rinse became free from acid. Finally, the wet SCBA was subsequently dried in an oven at 105°C for 24 h. The washed and dried SCBA is further subject to heat treatment to remove some metallic oxides left inside. Samples were burnt inside a programmable furnace at 950°C with a rate of 6°C/min as indicated in Figure 3. A sample of SCBA was stirred in a 2.5 M sodium hydroxide solution at a solid:solvent ratio of 1:10. The solution was heated in a covered beaker for 2.5 h by constantly stirring using a magnetic stirrer, and then it was filtered; the residue was then washed with the 10-fold original solvent amount by boiling with distilled water. The viscous, transparent, and colorless solution was produced when the solution was cooled at room temperature. Later, 10 M H2SO4 was added under constant stirring under controlled conditions until it reached pH 2. Finally, NH4OH was added to reach a pH of 8.5 and allowed to stand at room temperature for 3 h.

Figure 3 Procedures for production of sodium silicate using 2.5 mol of sodium hydroxide solution and burning of sugar cane bagasse with digital furnace to remove some metallic oxides. Section (a) Burned sodium silicate solution, (b) sodium silicate solution, (c) filtered viscous solution, (d) sodium hydroxide solution, and (e) furnace.
Figure 3

Procedures for production of sodium silicate using 2.5 mol of sodium hydroxide solution and burning of sugar cane bagasse with digital furnace to remove some metallic oxides. Section (a) Burned sodium silicate solution, (b) sodium silicate solution, (c) filtered viscous solution, (d) sodium hydroxide solution, and (e) furnace.

2.3 Preparation of the composite

Polyester resin (USP) and silica particles assisted with the addition of hardener were used to prepare the composite using the recommended weight ratio for mixing polyester resin with hardener at 10:1 [3]. Using the volume of the mold shown in Figure 4(b) as a reference, first of all, the calculated volume of resin was poured into the largest bowl, then the required amount of nano-silica, which also depends on its weight percentage using a digital weight balance shown in Figure 4(b), was added into the resin which is now ready to stir manually by hand, and then, it was stirred by a stirrer machine at 660 rpm vigorously for 6 min, and hardener has been added slowly. Stir for 2 min with the hardener and pour into the waxy-ready mold faster. The size of the mold is 170 mm × 265 mm × 4 mm for tensile and compression, as well as 170 mm × 35 mm × 10 mm for compression and impact. The unwanted amount of resin was disposed of simply by overflow before the reaction to cure started. The bubbles, which are the source of porosity, are simply avoided via having simple pressure over the composite up to 5 MPa for good bonding and longtime stirring. The curing process was by using open atmospheric air for 3–5 h. After the composite cured good enough, it was released with the help of a mold releaser from the mold and ready for other simple machining operations. A mold releaser agent is good for preventing the composite from sticking to the mold when the molds are apart. It is used depending on the mold material and desired characteristics of the finished parts, such as the common waxing types as in paste wax and polyethylene plastic for better surface finish of the composite.

Figure 4 Composite material preparation setup: (a) digital weight balance and (b) mold made from steel 1045 via welding.
Figure 4

Composite material preparation setup: (a) digital weight balance and (b) mold made from steel 1045 via welding.

2.4 Experimental apparatus

A computer-controlled small punch creep testing machine with a capacity of up to 200 kN and a load cell of 200 kN has been used to test tensile strength with a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min as the time rate of change of displacement in accordance with ASTM D638-14, compression strength, and high-temperature tensile test up to 1,200°C. The WDM-100S computer-controlled electromechanical universal testing machine with a capacity of 100 kN and a load cell of 300 kN is mainly used to test various polymer and non-metallic materials for compression in accordance with ASTM D-695-10, three-point flexural in accordance with ASTM D-790 + 17. The impact test was also done using a Charpy Izoid testing machine with a capacity of 90 J in accordance with polymer ASTM D6110.

2.4.1 Tensile characterization test setup and apparatus

For the tensile test of this polyester resin with nano-silica composite material, proportional additives of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4% by weight fraction as fiber to matrix experimental samples have been prepared and tested using a polymer ASTM standard as shown in Figure 5 with an ambient temperature of 23 ± 2°C and an approximate humidity value of 50 ± 5% as per the ASTM D638-14 specification. Strain rate and stress rate are also determined via cross-speed standard values for different mechanical test standards.

Figure 5 Tensile testing machine and specimen failure mode: σ t = P bh {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{t}}}=\frac{P}{{bh}} [29,30,31], where P is the failure load (N), B is the width of the specimen (mm), H is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ t {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{t}}} is the tensile strength (MPa).
Figure 5

Tensile testing machine and specimen failure mode: σ t = P bh [29,30,31], where P is the failure load (N), B is the width of the specimen (mm), H is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ t is the tensile strength (MPa).

2.4.2 Flexural characterization test setup and apparatus

Flexural mechanical property is also another point of interest to be enhanced using the ASTM standards via a UTM machine with a capacity of 100 kN, a load cell of 300 kN, a strain rate of 5 mm/min at an ambient temperature of 25°C with a relative humidity of 62% as per ASTM D-790 + 17 for UPR and nano-silica additive particles as a composite material shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6 Three-point flexural testing UTM machine setup: σ f = 3 PL b h 2 {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{f}}}=\frac{3{PL}}{b{h}^{2}} [29,30,31], where P is the maximum load (N), L is the span length of the specimen (mm), b is the width of the specimen (mm), h is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ f {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{f}}} is the flexural strength (MPa).
Figure 6

Three-point flexural testing UTM machine setup: σ f = 3 PL b h 2 [29,30,31], where P is the maximum load (N), L is the span length of the specimen (mm), b is the width of the specimen (mm), h is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ f is the flexural strength (MPa).

2.4.3 Impact characterization test setup and apparatus

The notched Charpy impact test using the Charpy Izoid impact testing machine as shown in Figure 7 with a capacity of 90 J was carried out. In each type, specimens were tested in the ambient condition according to the ASTM D-256 standards with an ambient temperature of 25°C and an approximate humidity value of 50 ± 10%. The average value was noted at the initial load deformation and tabulated as impact strength.

Figure 7 Charpy Izoid Impact testing machine: IS = A b × h {\rm{IS}}=\frac{A}{b\hspace{1em}{\rm{\times }}\hspace{1em}h} [29,30,31] where IS is the impact strength, A is the energy consumed by the impact specimen (Jm), b is the width (mm) of the specimen from the middle of the notch, h is the thickness (mm) of the specimen from the middle of the notch.
Figure 7

Charpy Izoid Impact testing machine: IS = A b × h [29,30,31] where IS is the impact strength, A is the energy consumed by the impact specimen (Jm), b is the width (mm) of the specimen from the middle of the notch, h is the thickness (mm) of the specimen from the middle of the notch.

2.4.4 Compression characterization test setup and apparatus

Compression mechanical property analysis was done using the WDM-100S UTM machine as shown in Figure 8 with a loading velocity of 2 mm/min as a strain rate, a load cell of 300 kN, and test samples were done at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C and a humidity of 55 ± 5% as per ASTM D-695-10 standard.

Figure 8 Compression testing machine setup: σ C = P bh {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{C}}}=\frac{P}{{bh}} [29,30,31], where P is the failure load (N), b is the width of the specimen (mm), h is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ C is the {{\sigma }}_{{\rm{C}}}\hspace{1em}{\rm{is\; the}}\hspace{1em} compression strength (MPa).
Figure 8

Compression testing machine setup: σ C = P bh [29,30,31], where P is the failure load (N), b is the width of the specimen (mm), h is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and σ C is the compression strength (MPa).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Tensile characterization of the composite material

NB for Sample Code: From Figure 9, the sample code is understood as TNS0.5%-S1 = tensile nano-silica with 0.5% for sample batch one. From Figure 10, the sample code is understood as FNS0.5%-S1 = flexural nano-silica with 0.5% for sample batch one, and from Figure 10, the sample code is understood as CNS0.5%-S1 = compression nano-silica with 0.5% for sample batch one and F m = failure maximum load.

Figure 9 Tensile test results for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica addition with UPR.
Figure 9

Tensile test results for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica addition with UPR.

Figure 10 Flexural test result for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica addition with UPR.
Figure 10

Flexural test result for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica addition with UPR.

The tensile test result dictates that sample batch (a) with TNS0.5%-S1, TNS0.5%-S2, and TNS0.5%-S3 has stress values of 16 MPa with an F m load of 0.908 kN, 38 MPa with an F m load of 2.108 kN, and 50 MPa with an F m load of 2.77 kN, respectively. TNS0.5%-S3 at 2.77 kN force shows good performance. Tensile sample batch (b) with TNS1%-S1, TNS1%-S2, and TNS1%-S3 has stress values of 31 MPa with an F m load of 1.752 kN, 32 MPa with an F m load of 1.808 kN, and 33 MPa with an F m load of 1.836 kN, respectively, and TNS1%-S3 performs well. Tensile sample batch (c) with TNS2%-S1, TNS2%-S2, and TNS2%-S3 has stress values of 26 MPa with an F m load of 1.478 kN, 31 MPa with an F m load of 1.736 kN, and 32.75 MPa with an F m load of 1.82 kN, respectively, and TNS1%-S3 shows good performance. Tensile sample batch (d) with TNS4%-S1, TNS4%-S2, and TNS4%-S3 has stress values of 18 MPa with an F m load of 1.024 kN, 37 MPa with an F m load of 2.096 kN, and 31 MPa with an F m load of 1.718 kN, respectively, and TNS4%-S2 shows good performance. From the result, the composite material shows overall good tensile strength at TNS0.5%-S3 compared with all silica by weight proportion test scenarios. The 0.5% addition of silica nano-filler has 50 MPa tensile strength, and this is compared with pure UPR tensile strength of 38.33 MPa tested primarily and has a 30.45% improvement on the overall strength of the composite material.

3.2 Flexural characterization of the composite material

The flexural test result shows that sample batch (a) with FNS0.5%-S1, FNS0.5%-S2, and FNS0.5%-S3 has a flexural maximum strength of 3.00 MPa at FNS0.5%-S3. Sample batch (b) with FNS1%-S1, FNS1%-S2, and FNS1%-S3 has a flexural maximum strength of 2.5 MPa at FNS1%-S1. Sample batch (c) with FNS2%-S1, FNS2%-S2, and FNS2%-S3 has a flexural maximum strength of 2.65 MPa at FNS2%-S2. The final batch (d) with FNS4%-S1, FNS4%-S2, and FNS4%-S3 has a flexural maximum strength of 2.8 MPa at FNS4%-S1. The addition of 0.5% nano-silica by weight has an improvement of the flexural strength from 2.24 MPa (pure USP tested result) to 3.00 MPa, which is around 33.9% enhancement.

3.3 Compression characterization of the composite material

The compression test result shows that sample batch (a) with CNS0.5%-S1 has a maximum compression strength of 141.4 MPa at 35.35 kN failure load, sample batch (b) with CNS1%-S1 has a maximum compression strength of 103.28 MPa at 25.82 kN failure load, sample batch (c) with CNS2%-S3 has a maximum compression strength of 122.4 MPa at 30.6 kN failure load, and sample batch (d) with CNS4%-S2 has a maximum compression strength of 139.76 MPa at 34.94 kN failure load. From these tabulated results, sample batch (a) with CNS0.5%-S3 nano-silica gives a good compression strength value of 141.4 MPa. This value was compared with the tested pure UPR compression strength value of 120 MPa and showed that the addition of 0.5% fraction by weight of silica particle enhances the compression strength of the UPR composite material by 17.8% of performance.

3.4 Impact characterization of the composite material

The mean value for 2% silica by weight is 4.7 J with a standard deviation of 0.2, the mean value for 3% silica by weight is 4.6 J with a standard deviation of 0.1, and the mean value for 4% silica by weight is 4.6 J with a standard deviation of 0.2 values. For this test, the machine considers mean values at different proportions of the silica particles, which also indicates that as the proportion of silica content increases, the impact strength value is not influenced too much. The UPR composite (USP + silica particles) shows a slightly enhanced impact strength than the pure UPR compared to the literature [26,30] with a value of 10% enhancement.

3.5 X-ray powder diffraction of the nano-silica

Nano-cellulose X-ray diffraction analysis is used for phase identification of a crystalline material and provides a good understanding of the unit cell dimension of the powder. The sample is exposed to an X-ray, which irradiates through a material and then measures the intensities and scattering angles of the X-ray that leave the material. The average crystalline size of the nano-particles was calculated using the Debye–Scherrer diffraction equation [31], as shown in Figure 11a. This has been done using miniflex 600, powder XRD machine, and upon calculation, the nano-silica particle size is about 10 nm on an average calculation using peak values, as shown in Figure 12b. This X-ray measurement is used to determine the size of the particle.

Figure 11 XRD powder diffraction graph of 0.5% nano-silica particle: (a) Gauss-fitted curve and (b) Gauss-fitted curve numeric value for calculation.
Figure 11

XRD powder diffraction graph of 0.5% nano-silica particle: (a) Gauss-fitted curve and (b) Gauss-fitted curve numeric value for calculation.

Figure 12 Compression test result for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica composite, respectively, and CNS0.5%-S1 sample code understands as = compression nano-silica with 0.5% for sample batch one.
Figure 12

Compression test result for (a) 0.5, (b) 1, (c) 2, and (d) 4% nano-silica composite, respectively, and CNS0.5%-S1 sample code understands as = compression nano-silica with 0.5% for sample batch one.

3.6 FTIR of nano-silica with resin

These measurements were carried out to identify the functional groups present on the silica and polyester resin during mixture formation. The measuring device thermo scientific Nicolet is50 FTIR shown in Figure 13, with a range of 12,000–50 cm−1 and a resolution of 0.125 cm−1 has been used. The FTIR result for nano-silica particles shows several peaks and functional groups, as shown in the figure. Carboxylic groups normally exist in a diametric form with very strong hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. This association results in the very broad, unusual −OH stretching absorption, which occurs from about 3,100 to 2,200 cm−1, as shown in Figure 14.

Figure 13 Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measuring device thermo scientific Nicolet is50.
Figure 13

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measuring device thermo scientific Nicolet is50.

Figure 14 FTIR spectra of 0.5% silica nanoparticles with USP as a composite material.
Figure 14

FTIR spectra of 0.5% silica nanoparticles with USP as a composite material.

3.7 Thermo gravimetric (TGA) analysis of nano-cellulose with resin

HCT_1 is a compressive thermal analyzer that is considered for the measurement of the thermal characteristics of the composite material. The decomposition of the composite was investigated as the temperature varied between 24 and 900°C using a heating rate of 20°C per minute in a nitrogen environment. The measurement shows the composite material is able to withstand a temperature of up to 420°C as shown in Figure 15(a) and (b), and it is stable under all circumstances. This test needs mass as a function of time or temperature to predict the thermal stability of the composite polymer under dynamic TGA and to measure filler content.

Figure 15 (a) TGA plot of pure resin (PR) and 0.5% silica modified composite resin (CR) thermo gravimetric analysis (TG) vs temperature and (b) TGA plot of pure resin and 0.5% silica modified composite resin differential thermal analysis (DTA]) vs temperature.
Figure 15

(a) TGA plot of pure resin (PR) and 0.5% silica modified composite resin (CR) thermo gravimetric analysis (TG) vs temperature and (b) TGA plot of pure resin and 0.5% silica modified composite resin differential thermal analysis (DTA]) vs temperature.

4 Conclusion

Mechanical property characterization of 0.5% nano-silica by weight addition with pure UPR shows an overall 30.45% enhancement compared with the literature tensile strength value of pure UPR. The flexural properties of the composite UPR have been improved by about 33.9% up on the addition of 0.5% nano-silica particle with 10 nm size, and this has a fragile nature of failure, which can be more improved with the addition of liquid rubber elastomer compared with literature flexural value of pure UPR, whereas compression strength is enhanced well compared to pure UPR material. Pure UPR material has relatively good compression strength, and this has also been enhanced more by the addition of 0.5% nano-silica by weight up to 17.8% enhancement compared with literature and pure UPR test results.

The impact strength was not much influenced by the addition of the nano-silica. The size of the nano-silica particle was also determined by the XRD powder diffraction method as 10 nm. The combination of 0.5% nano-silica by weight with UPR shows optimum and good mechanical property enhancement compared with literature values [32,33,34,35]. The FTIR result shows there is reaction and bond strength improvement within the composite material between polyester and nano-silica particles. This association results in the very broad, unusual –OH stretching absorption, which occurs from about 3,100 to 2,200 cm−1 which indirectly enhances the strength and improved elongation at the break of the composite material. The nano-silica particle used has great bridge application due to its small particle size. The ability to synthesize the nano-particles also helps to manipulate the required size as needed. TGA result also dictates that composite material is more stable up to 420°C, similar to the pure resin material. The new composite material is used as matrix, adhesive, sealant, waterproofing works, construction area, and furniture glue as an alternative material.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge sincere thanks to Addis Ababa Science and Technology university for supporting us with FTIR, XRD and othe labratory machine facility.

  1. Funding information: This research article was done as part of the employment without any sponsored funding.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: All data generated and analyzed during this study is included in this article. Supplementary information files are available from the corresponding author if required.

References

[1] Davallo M, Pasdar H, Mohseni M. Mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester resin. Int J ChemTech Res. 2010;2(4):2113–7.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Dholakiya B. Unsaturated polyester resin for specialty applications. Polyester. 2012;7:167–202.10.5772/48479Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zhu X-K, Joyce JA. Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng Fract Mech. 2012;85:1–46.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chae G-S, Park HW, Kwon K, Shin S. Comparative study of the impact wedge-peel performance of epoxy structural adhesives modified with functionalized silica nanoparticles. Polymers. 2021;13(3):469.10.3390/polym13030469Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Parameshwaraiah CM, Roopa S. Impact modification of SAN by dynamic vulcanization with liquid isoprene rubber. J Xi an Shiyou Univ Nat Sci Edit. 2022;18(2):194–8.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Irfan MH. Chemistry and technology of thermosetting polymers in construction applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 1998.10.1007/978-94-011-4954-9Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mekonen B, Bogale T. Experimental investigation of tensile, flexural and hardness properties of polyester resin echinatus fiber reinforced composite material. Eng Solid Mech. 2023;11(2):151–62.10.5267/j.esm.2023.1.001Search in Google Scholar

[8] Perrot A, Hyršl J, Bandžuch J, Waňousová S, Hájek J, Jenčík J, et al. A comparative study of a modified unsaturated polyester resin with dicyclopentadiene and methyl dicyclopentadiene blends. Polymer. 2023;267:125639.10.1016/j.polymer.2022.125639Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ramakrishnan T, Mohan Gift MD, Chitradevi S, Jegan R, Hency Jose PS, Nagaraja HN, et al. Study of numerous resins used in polymer matrix composite materials. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2022;2022:1088926.10.1155/2022/1088926Search in Google Scholar

[10] Betelie AA, Sinclair AN, Kortschot M, Li Y, Redda DT. Mechanical properties of sisal-epoxy composites as functions of fiber-to-epoxy ratio. AIMS Mater Sci. 2019;6(6):985–96.10.3934/matersci.2019.6.985Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ahmadi Z. Nanostructured epoxy adhesives: A review. Prog Org Coat. 2019;135:449–53.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.06.028Search in Google Scholar

[12] Guttmann R, Hoja J, Lechner C, Maurer RJ, Sax AF. Adhesion, forces and the stability of interfaces. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2019;15(1):106–29.10.3762/bjoc.15.12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Hossain SkS, Bae C-J, Roy PK. Recent progress of wastes derived nano-silica: synthesis, properties, and applications. J Clean Prod. 2022;377:134418.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134418Search in Google Scholar

[14] Singh SP, Endley N. Fabrication of nano-silica from agricultural residue and their application. Nanomaterials for agriculture and forestry applications. Elsevier; 2020. p. 107–34.10.1016/B978-0-12-817852-2.00005-6Search in Google Scholar

[15] Mor S, Manchanda CK, Kansal SK, Ravindra K. Nanosilica extraction from processed agricultural residue using green technology. J Clean Prod. 2017;143:1284–90.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.142Search in Google Scholar

[16] Indrayani NL, Sadiana R, Ramdani D. Optimization of unsaturated polyester resin matrix composite materials reinforced banana (Musa Balbisiana) fronds composition towards tensile test. E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 500. EDP Sciences; 2024.10.1051/e3sconf/202450003014Search in Google Scholar

[17] Martínez-López Á, Martínez-Barrera G, Vigueras-Santiago E, Martínez-López M, Gencel O. Mechanical improvement of polymer concrete by using aged polyester resin, Nano silica and gamma rays. J Build Eng. 2022;58:105083.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105083Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ren K, Tsai Y. Thermal hazard characteristics of unsaturated polyester resin mixed with hardeners. Polymers. 2021;13(4):522.10.3390/polym13040522Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Embirsh H, Stajčić I, Gržetić J, Mladenović IO, Anđelković B, Marinković A, et al. Synthesis, characterization and application of biobased unsaturated polyester resin reinforced with unmodified/modified biosilica nanoparticles. Polymers. 2023;15(18):3756.10.3390/polym15183756Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Soleyman E, Aberoumand M, Rahmatabadi D, Soltanmohammadi K, Ghasemi I, Baniassadi M, et al. Assessment of controllable shape transformation, potential applications, and tensile shape memory properties of 3D printed PETG. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:4201–15.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.076Search in Google Scholar

[21] Soleyman E, Aberoumand M, Soltanmohammadi K, Rahmatabadi D, Ghasemi I, Baniassadi M, et al. 4D printing of PET-G via FDM including tailor made excess third shape. Manuf Lett. 2022;33:1–4.10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[22] Karimi A, Rahmatabadi D, Baghani M. Direct pellet three-dimensional printing of polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate for a greener future. Polymers. 2024;16(2):267.10.3390/polym16020267Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Nagendra J, Yadav GPK, Srinivas R, Gupta N, Bandhu D, Fande A, et al. Sustainable shape formation of multifunctional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A study on recent advancements. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2023;30:1–35.10.1080/15376494.2023.2259901Search in Google Scholar

[24] Adin MŞ. A parametric study on the mechanical properties of MIG and TIG welded dissimilar steel joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2024;38(1):115–38.10.1080/01694243.2023.2221391Search in Google Scholar

[25] Saraç İ, Adin H, Temiz Ş. Investigation of the effect of use of Nano-Al2O3, Nano-TiO2 and Nano-SiO2 powders on strength of single lap joints bonded with epoxy adhesive. Compos Part B: Eng. 2019;166:472–82.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.007Search in Google Scholar

[26] Adin H, Adin MŞ. Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites. Mater Test. 2022;64(3):401–11.10.1515/mt-2021-2038Search in Google Scholar

[27] Huang X, Guo Y, Yan X, Yin G, Feng G. A new type of unsaturated polyester resin with epoxy functionalized nano‐silica and dimer fatty acid: Preparation and property. Polym Adv Technol. 2022;33(8):2459–69.10.1002/pat.5701Search in Google Scholar

[28] Gumus S, Aksoy K, Aytac A. Modification to unsaturated polyester resin with silica and silica/boron nitride mixture nanoparticles. Pigment Resin Technol. 2024;53(3):406–12.10.1108/PRT-11-2022-0140Search in Google Scholar

[29] Qin C, Jin Q, Zhao J, Wang Y, Jiang C. Study on the mechanical characteristics, heat resistance, and corrosion resistance of unsaturated polyester resin composite. Buildings. 2023;13(7):1700.10.3390/buildings13071700Search in Google Scholar

[30] Zhuang W, Wang E, Zhang D, Zhang H. Mesoscale study on the mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of aluminum foam-filled CFRP tubes under axial compression. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2023;1–17. 10.1080/15376494.2023.2287184 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sudarman S, Taufik M. Synthesis and application of nano-silicon prepared from rice husk with the hydrothermal method and its use for anode lithium-ion batteries. Mater Sci Energy Technol. 2024;7:1–8.10.1016/j.mset.2023.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[32] Farhan AJ. Characterization of the thermal degradation E kinetic of unsaturated polyester and polyester/silica nanoparticles composites by TGA and DSC Analysis. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci. 2020;71(1):10–20.10.37934/arfmts.71.1.1020Search in Google Scholar

[33] Rusmirović JD, Radoman T, Džunuzović ES, Džunuzović JV, Markovski J, Spasojević P, et al. Effect of the modified silica Nanofiller on the mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester resins based on recycled polyethylene terephthalate. Polym Compos. 2017;38(3):538–54.10.1002/pc.23613Search in Google Scholar

[34] Gañán P, Barajas J, Zuluaga R, Castro C, Marín D, Tercjak A, et al. The evolution and future trends of unsaturated polyester biocomposites: A bibliometric analysis. Polymers. 2023;15(13):2970.10.3390/polym15132970Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Kaliappan N, Govindarajan V, Anil Kumar TC, Vishnu Kumar R, Muthukumaran S, Ahamed M, et al. Investigation of mechanical and physical behaviours of polyester resin matrix from recycled polyethylene terephthalate with bamboo fibre. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2022;2022:4233302.10.1155/2022/4233302Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2024-02-03
Revised: 2024-03-08
Accepted: 2024-03-12
Published Online: 2024-04-05

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Research on damage evolution mechanisms under compressive and tensile tests of plain weave SiCf/SiC composites using in situ X-ray CT
  3. Structural optimization of trays in bolt support systems
  4. Continuum percolation of the realistic nonuniform ITZs in 3D polyphase concrete systems involving the aggregate shape and size differentiation
  5. Multiscale water diffusivity prediction of plain woven composites considering void defects
  6. The application of epoxy resin polymers by laser induction technologies
  7. Analysis of water absorption on the efficiency of bonded composite repair of aluminum alloy panels
  8. Experimental research on bonding mechanical performance of the interface between cementitious layers
  9. A study on the effect of microspheres on the freeze–thaw resistance of EPS concrete
  10. Influence of Ti2SnC content on arc erosion resistance in Ag–Ti2SnC composites
  11. Cement-based composites with ZIF-8@TiO2-coated activated carbon fiber for efficient removal of formaldehyde
  12. Microstructure and chloride transport of aeolian sand concrete under long-term natural immersion
  13. Simulation study on basic road performance and modification mechanism of red mud modified asphalt mixture
  14. Extraction and characterization of nano-silica particles to enhance mechanical properties of general-purpose unsaturated polyester resin
  15. Roles of corn starch and gellan gum in changing of unconfined compressive strength of Shanghai alluvial clay
  16. A review on innovative approaches to expansive soil stabilization: Focussing on EPS beads, sand, and jute
  17. Experimental investigation of the performances of thick CFRP, GFRP, and KFRP composite plates under ballistic impact
  18. Preparation and characterization of titanium gypsum artificial aggregate
  19. Characteristics of bulletproof plate made from silkworm cocoon waste: Hybrid silkworm cocoon waste-reinforced epoxy/UHMWPE composite
  20. Experimental research on influence of curing environment on mechanical properties of coal gangue cementation
  21. Multi-objective optimization of machining variables for wire-EDM of LM6/fly ash composite materials using grey relational analysis
  22. Synthesis and characterization of Ag@Ni co-axial nanocables and their fluorescent and catalytic properties
  23. Beneficial effect of 4% Ta addition on the corrosion mitigation of Ti–12% Zr alloy after different immersion times in 3.5% NaCl solutions
  24. Study on electrical conductive mechanism of mayenite derivative C12A7:C
  25. Fast prediction of concrete equivalent modulus based on the random aggregate model and image quadtree SBFEM
  26. Research on uniaxial compression performance and constitutive relationship of RBP-UHPC after high temperature
  27. Experimental analysis of frost resistance and failure models in engineered cementitious composites with the integration of Yellow River sand
  28. Influence of tin additions on the corrosion passivation of TiZrTa alloy in sodium chloride solutions
  29. Microstructure and finite element analysis of Mo2C-diamond/Cu composites by spark plasma sintering
  30. Low-velocity impact response optimization of the foam-cored sandwich panels with CFRP skins for electric aircraft fuselage skin application
  31. Research on the carbonation resistance and improvement technology of fully recycled aggregate concrete
  32. Study on the basic properties of iron tailings powder-desulfurization ash mine filling cementitious material
  33. Preparation and mechanical properties of the 2.5D carbon glass hybrid woven composite materials
  34. Improvement on interfacial properties of CuW and CuCr bimetallic materials with high-entropy alloy interlayers via infiltration method
  35. Investigation properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating pond ash
  36. Effects of binder paste-to-aggregate ratio and polypropylene fiber content on the performance of high-flowability steel fiber-reinforced concrete for slab/deck overlays
  37. Interfacial bonding characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/ultralight foamed concrete
  38. Classification of damping properties of fabric-reinforced flat beam-like specimens by a degree of ondulation implying a mesomechanic kinematic
  39. Influence of mica paper surface modification on the water resistance of mica paper/organic silicone resin composites
  40. Impact of cooling methods on the corrosion behavior of AA6063 aluminum alloy in a chloride solution
  41. Wear mechanism analysis of internal chip removal drill for CFRP drilling
  42. Investigation on acoustic properties of metal hollow sphere A356 aluminum matrix composites
  43. Uniaxial compression stress–strain relationship of fully aeolian sand concrete at low temperatures
  44. Experimental study on the influence of aggregate morphology on concrete interfacial properties
  45. Intelligent sportswear design: Innovative applications based on conjugated nanomaterials
  46. Research on the equivalent stretching mechanical properties of Nomex honeycomb core considering the effect of resin coating
  47. Numerical analysis and experimental research on the vibration performance of concrete vibration table in PC components
  48. Assessment of mechanical and biological properties of Ti–31Nb–7.7Zr alloy for spinal surgery implant
  49. Theoretical research on load distribution of composite pre-tightened teeth connections embedded with soft layers
  50. Coupling design features of material surface treatment for ceramic products based on ResNet
  51. Optimizing superelastic shape-memory alloy fibers for enhancing the pullout performance in engineered cementitious composites
  52. Multi-scale finite element simulation of needle-punched quartz fiber reinforced composites
  53. Thermo-mechanical coupling behavior of needle-punched carbon/carbon composites
  54. Influence of composite material laying parameters on the load-carrying capacity of type IV hydrogen storage vessel
  55. Review Articles
  56. Effect of carbon nanotubes on mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites: A review
  57. On in-house developed feedstock filament of polymer and polymeric composites and their recycling process – A comprehensive review
  58. Research progress on freeze–thaw constitutive model of concrete based on damage mechanics
  59. A bibliometric and content analysis of research trends in paver blocks: Mapping the scientific landscape
  60. Bibliometric analysis of stone column research trends: A Web of Science perspective
https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2024-0001
Keywords for this article
mechanical property; characterization; nano-silica; polyester resin; polymer; enhance
Creative Commons
BY 4.0

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Research on damage evolution mechanisms under compressive and tensile tests of plain weave SiCf/SiC composites using in situ X-ray CT
  3. Structural optimization of trays in bolt support systems
  4. Continuum percolation of the realistic nonuniform ITZs in 3D polyphase concrete systems involving the aggregate shape and size differentiation
  5. Multiscale water diffusivity prediction of plain woven composites considering void defects
  6. The application of epoxy resin polymers by laser induction technologies
  7. Analysis of water absorption on the efficiency of bonded composite repair of aluminum alloy panels
  8. Experimental research on bonding mechanical performance of the interface between cementitious layers
  9. A study on the effect of microspheres on the freeze–thaw resistance of EPS concrete
  10. Influence of Ti2SnC content on arc erosion resistance in Ag–Ti2SnC composites
  11. Cement-based composites with ZIF-8@TiO2-coated activated carbon fiber for efficient removal of formaldehyde
  12. Microstructure and chloride transport of aeolian sand concrete under long-term natural immersion
  13. Simulation study on basic road performance and modification mechanism of red mud modified asphalt mixture
  14. Extraction and characterization of nano-silica particles to enhance mechanical properties of general-purpose unsaturated polyester resin
  15. Roles of corn starch and gellan gum in changing of unconfined compressive strength of Shanghai alluvial clay
  16. A review on innovative approaches to expansive soil stabilization: Focussing on EPS beads, sand, and jute
  17. Experimental investigation of the performances of thick CFRP, GFRP, and KFRP composite plates under ballistic impact
  18. Preparation and characterization of titanium gypsum artificial aggregate
  19. Characteristics of bulletproof plate made from silkworm cocoon waste: Hybrid silkworm cocoon waste-reinforced epoxy/UHMWPE composite
  20. Experimental research on influence of curing environment on mechanical properties of coal gangue cementation
  21. Multi-objective optimization of machining variables for wire-EDM of LM6/fly ash composite materials using grey relational analysis
  22. Synthesis and characterization of Ag@Ni co-axial nanocables and their fluorescent and catalytic properties
  23. Beneficial effect of 4% Ta addition on the corrosion mitigation of Ti–12% Zr alloy after different immersion times in 3.5% NaCl solutions
  24. Study on electrical conductive mechanism of mayenite derivative C12A7:C
  25. Fast prediction of concrete equivalent modulus based on the random aggregate model and image quadtree SBFEM
  26. Research on uniaxial compression performance and constitutive relationship of RBP-UHPC after high temperature
  27. Experimental analysis of frost resistance and failure models in engineered cementitious composites with the integration of Yellow River sand
  28. Influence of tin additions on the corrosion passivation of TiZrTa alloy in sodium chloride solutions
  29. Microstructure and finite element analysis of Mo2C-diamond/Cu composites by spark plasma sintering
  30. Low-velocity impact response optimization of the foam-cored sandwich panels with CFRP skins for electric aircraft fuselage skin application
  31. Research on the carbonation resistance and improvement technology of fully recycled aggregate concrete
  32. Study on the basic properties of iron tailings powder-desulfurization ash mine filling cementitious material
  33. Preparation and mechanical properties of the 2.5D carbon glass hybrid woven composite materials
  34. Improvement on interfacial properties of CuW and CuCr bimetallic materials with high-entropy alloy interlayers via infiltration method
  35. Investigation properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating pond ash
  36. Effects of binder paste-to-aggregate ratio and polypropylene fiber content on the performance of high-flowability steel fiber-reinforced concrete for slab/deck overlays
  37. Interfacial bonding characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/ultralight foamed concrete
  38. Classification of damping properties of fabric-reinforced flat beam-like specimens by a degree of ondulation implying a mesomechanic kinematic
  39. Influence of mica paper surface modification on the water resistance of mica paper/organic silicone resin composites
  40. Impact of cooling methods on the corrosion behavior of AA6063 aluminum alloy in a chloride solution
  41. Wear mechanism analysis of internal chip removal drill for CFRP drilling
  42. Investigation on acoustic properties of metal hollow sphere A356 aluminum matrix composites
  43. Uniaxial compression stress–strain relationship of fully aeolian sand concrete at low temperatures
  44. Experimental study on the influence of aggregate morphology on concrete interfacial properties
  45. Intelligent sportswear design: Innovative applications based on conjugated nanomaterials
  46. Research on the equivalent stretching mechanical properties of Nomex honeycomb core considering the effect of resin coating
  47. Numerical analysis and experimental research on the vibration performance of concrete vibration table in PC components
  48. Assessment of mechanical and biological properties of Ti–31Nb–7.7Zr alloy for spinal surgery implant
  49. Theoretical research on load distribution of composite pre-tightened teeth connections embedded with soft layers
  50. Coupling design features of material surface treatment for ceramic products based on ResNet
  51. Optimizing superelastic shape-memory alloy fibers for enhancing the pullout performance in engineered cementitious composites
  52. Multi-scale finite element simulation of needle-punched quartz fiber reinforced composites
  53. Thermo-mechanical coupling behavior of needle-punched carbon/carbon composites
  54. Influence of composite material laying parameters on the load-carrying capacity of type IV hydrogen storage vessel
  55. Review Articles
  56. Effect of carbon nanotubes on mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites: A review
  57. On in-house developed feedstock filament of polymer and polymeric composites and their recycling process – A comprehensive review
  58. Research progress on freeze–thaw constitutive model of concrete based on damage mechanics
  59. A bibliometric and content analysis of research trends in paver blocks: Mapping the scientific landscape
  60. Bibliometric analysis of stone column research trends: A Web of Science perspective
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2024-0001/html
Scroll to top button