Startseite Impacts of the calcinated clay on structure and gamma-ray shielding capacity of epoxy-based composites
Artikel Open Access

Impacts of the calcinated clay on structure and gamma-ray shielding capacity of epoxy-based composites

  • Sitah Alanazi , Karem A. Mahmoud EMAIL logo , Mohammad Marashdeh EMAIL logo , Mamduh J. Aljaafreh , Asmaa Abu El-Soad und Mohammad Hanfi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. Juni 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
e-Polymers
Aus der Zeitschrift e-Polymers Band 24 Heft 1

Abstract

The current work aims to develop a new composite-based epoxy doped with calcinated clay for low and intermediate gamma-ray energy applications. The increased calcinated clay material concentration between 0 and 60 wt% enhances the constructed composites by 21.07%, from 1.139 ± 0.011 to 1.379 ± 0.013 g·cm−3. Moreover, new bonds have appeared in Fourier transform infrared analyses of fabricated composites, which confirm the diffusion and interactions between the calcinated clay material and epoxy resin. Furthermore, the impacts of the calcinated clay on the gamma-ray shielding properties were examined experimentally using the NaI (Tl) detector over an energy interval changing from 33 to 1,408 keV. The experimental examinations depict that the addition of calcinated clay with concentrations between 0 and 60 wt% enhances the developed composites’ linear attenuation coefficient by 67.9%, 24.5%, 35.9%, and 46.0% at gamma-ray energies of 81, 662, 1,275, and 1,408 keV, respectively. The improvement in the linear attenuation coefficient leads to a decrease in the required half-value layer for each composite, where it decreased between 4.82–3.87 cm (at 662 keV) and 7.63–5.22 cm (at 1,408 keV).

1 Introduction

Radiation shielding is a crucial aspect of various industries, including healthcare, nuclear power, and aerospace. It involves the use of materials and techniques to protect humans and sensitive equipment from the harmful effects of radiation exposure (1,2,3). Radiation, in the form of electromagnetic waves or particles, can have detrimental effects on living organisms, causing DNA damage, cellular mutations, and even acute sickness or death. Therefore, it becomes paramount to implement effective shielding measures to minimize these risks (4,5,6).

The importance of radiation shielding cannot be overstated, especially in environments where radiation sources are present. In medical facilities, for instance, radiation is commonly used in diagnostic imaging procedures such as X-rays, computed tomography scans, and radiation therapy for cancer treatment. Shielding materials are utilized to protect medical staff, patients, and the general public from unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation (7,8). Similarly, in nuclear power plants, shielding materials are employed to contain radiation and prevent its release into the environment. By strategically placing shielding barriers around radioactive materials, workers and nearby communities can be adequately protected from the potential hazards associated with nuclear energy production (9,10). Furthermore, the aerospace industry also places great emphasis on radiation shielding. As astronauts venture beyond the Earth’s protective atmosphere, they are exposed to increased levels of ionizing radiation from cosmic rays and solar flares. Effective shielding materials are essential in spacecraft design to safeguard astronauts during their missions (11,12).

Epoxy resin and clay composites are a fascinating combination that has gained significant attention in recent years for their exceptional radiation shielding properties. To truly grasp the potential of these materials, it is essential to understand their composition and how they work together to provide effective shielding against harmful radiation (13,14,15). Epoxy resin, known for its strong adhesive and protective properties, is a thermosetting polymer that is derived from a combination of epoxy monomers and a curing agent. This versatile material is widely used in various industries, including aerospace, construction, and electronics, due to its excellent mechanical strength and resistance to chemicals and heat (15,16,17). Clay, on the other hand, is a naturally occurring mineral that is abundant in the Earth’s crust. It is composed of tiny particles stacked together in layers, giving it unique properties such as low density, high thermal stability, and good mechanical strength. These characteristics make clay an ideal candidate for enhancing the radiation shielding capabilities of epoxy resin composites (18,19,20,21,22,23). When epoxy resin and clay are combined, a synergistic effect takes place. The clay particles act as fillers within the epoxy matrix, creating a barrier that effectively absorbs and attenuates radiation waves. This is attributed to the high atomic number elements present in the clay, such as aluminum, silicon, and oxygen, which have a greater ability to interact with radiation compared to organic compounds (24). Moreover, the layered structure of clay allows for the formation of tortuous paths for radiation to travel through, increasing the chances of interaction and absorption. The interfacial interactions between the clay particles and the epoxy resin matrix further contribute to the overall shielding performance by improving the material’s mechanical and thermal properties (24,25). In addition to their exceptional radiation shielding capabilities, epoxy resin and clay composites offer other advantages as well. They are lightweight, making them suitable for applications where weight reduction is crucial, such as in aerospace or medical equipment. Furthermore, these composites can be easily molded into desired shapes, providing flexibility in design and fabrication (13,26).

The development of a new, inexpensive radiation shielding material for gamma ray shielding applications based on epoxy-resin and calcinated clay mineral is an innovative aspect of the current study. A thorough analysis was conducted to determine the impact of the calcined clay mineral on the structural, physical, and gamma-ray shielding capabilities of the newly developed materials.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Fabrication and characterization

The fired clay is a result of calcinated clay mineral at 1,000°C, to exclude the moisture and organic materials in the natural clay. Then, the fired clay was mixed with epoxy resin according to the mixing formula (100−x) (0.66 epoxy + 0.34 curing agent) + x fired clay; x is 0, 20, 40, and 60 wt% for samples EC0, EC20, EC40, and EC60, respectively. The SlabDOC (Ivanovo, Russia) produces the epoxy resin, and its curing agent with purities reach 98%. The required amount of fired clay, epoxy resin, and curing agent were weighted accurately using an electric balance and then mixed for 15 min using a vertical blender. After that, the mixture was molded in silicon rubber cubic molds with dimensions of 3 cm in length and 3 cm in width. For solidifying the molded sample, they were kept at +25°C overnight. For each sample, three different thicknesses were fabricated to be used in the gamma-ray attenuation experimental examination as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 
                  Fabricated samples of composite-based epoxy doped with calcinated clay.
Figure 1

Fabricated samples of composite-based epoxy doped with calcinated clay.

The density (ρ, g·cm−3) of the developed fired clay-based epoxy composites was determined with the MXBAOHENG MH 300A density meter (Guangdong, China). The uncertainty in the ρ measurements is ±0.001 g·cm−3. The Archimedes principle in Eq. 1 is the method used to determine ρ values for the developed composites, where W L and W a stand for the composite weight in immersing liquid and in dry air, respectively. In addition, ρ L ≈ 1 for the immersing liquid, which is tap water (2729).

(1) Density ( ρ , g·cm 3 ) = W a ( W a W L ) ρ L

The chemical concentration (wt%) of the developed calcinated clay-based epoxy composites was determined using an X-ray fluorescence analyzer (OLYMPUS X-5000 portable analyzer field EDXRF lab analysis capability, USA). The X-5000 combines the dependability and low cost of conventional benchtop EDXRF analysis with the safety and superior performance of field-proven handheld X-ray fluorescence (XRF) equipment. The Olympus X-5000 portable analyzer provides a high degree of performance because of its 50 keV/10 W X-ray tube, which offers a flawless detection limit (LOD) from light elements like magnesium (Mg) to heavy elements like uranium (U). In addition, different anode types, such as silver (Ag), tantalum (Ta), and rhodium (Rh), are used to differentiate it. The chemical composition and the density of the fabricated samples are listed in Table 1. In addition, for the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) measurements spanning a wavenumber range of 4,500–500 cm−1, a compact FTIR spectrometer, ALPHA II (Bruker Optics, USA), was used.

Table 1

The chemical composition of the fabricated composites as measured by XRF spectroscopy

Chemical composition (wt%)
EC0 EC20 EC40 EC60
Al2O3 2.374 2.050 2.664 2.356
SiO2 6.361 21.577 33.814 54.236
Cl 15.963 13.263 7.613 4.717
K2O 0.776 3.391 4.323 5.874
CaO 1.104 2.157 2.056 1.581
TiO2 0.000 0.154 0.259 0.372
V2O5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.067
Cr2O3 0.000 0.043 0.030 0.035
MnO 0.027 0.065 0.059 0.043
Fe2O3 1.930 6.554 7.851 10.812
NiO 0.019 0.030 0.031 0.017
CuO 0.010 0.015 0.013 0.016
ZnO 0.075 0.274 0.116 0.100
ZrO2 0.002 0.004 0.007 0.011
MoO3 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003
CdO 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.006
PbO 0.013 0.017 0.017 0.009
Bi2O3 0.007 0.003 0.018 0.009
Density 1.139 ± 0.023 1.204 ± 0.012 1.300 ± 0.013 1.379 ± 0.013

2.2 Gamma-ray attenuation parameters examination

A NaI(Tl) crystal gamma-ray spectrometer was employed to gauge the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC, in cm−1) at fixed γ-ray energies emitted from the radioactive sources Cs-137, Co-60, Na-22, Ba-133, and Eu-152, as depicted in Figure 2. To prevent photon accumulation and mitigate the impact of the buildup factor, the narrow beam transmission technique was utilized. During the measurement, the NaI(Tl) detector captured the activity of the radioactive sources that reached the detector with the presence of the fabricated EC composites (I t), as well as without their presence (I o). To ensure precision, the thickness of the fabricated EC composites was precisely measured using a micrometer with an uncertainty of ±0.01 µm. The relationship between ln (I o/I t) and the thickness was modeled with a straight line, and the slope of this line yielded the LAC values, as demonstrated in Eq. 2 (30,31).

(2) LAC ( cm 1 ) = 1 x ln I o I t

Figure 2 
                  The experimental setup for the linear attenuation coefficient measurements.
Figure 2

The experimental setup for the linear attenuation coefficient measurements.

The half-value layer (HVL), measured in centimeters, represents the thickness of the manufactured composite material that effectively reduces the intensity of photon radiation emitted by a radioactive source by half (see Eq. 3). Within this context, the HVL is directly influenced by the LAC, such that composites with higher LAC values exhibit correspondingly higher HVL values. Conversely, the transmission factor (TF; see Eq. 4), expressed as a percentage, quantifies the proportion of the radioactive source’s activity that successfully traverses the composite’s thickness (I t) relative to the original activity of the source (I o) (32,33).

(3) HVL ( cm ) = ln ( 2 ) LAC ( cm 1 )

(4) TF ( % ) = I t I o × 100

The radiation protection efficiency (RPE), expressed as a percentage, quantifies the extent to which the fabricated EC composites absorb the radioactive source’s activity (I a) in comparison to the original radioactive source activity (I o). Eq. 5 is employed to calculate this vital parameter.

(5) RPE ( % ) = I a I o × 100

3 Results and discussion

Figure 3 illustrates the experimental determination of the density of fabricated EC composites. The density increase is closely tied to the partial replacement of conventional epoxy (made from epoxy resin and hardener) with clay concentration, which has significant implications.

Figure 3 
               The experimental influences of clay concentration on the density of the fabricated epoxy-based composites.
Figure 3

The experimental influences of clay concentration on the density of the fabricated epoxy-based composites.

The density increased by a factor of 20.26%, from 1.145 to 1.377 g·cm−3, by implementing a clay concentration in the range of 0–60 wt%. The increase in density can be attributed to the substantial rise in Fe and Ti ions in the overall composition of clay (Fe2O3 and TiO2).

Figure 4(a) and (b) shows the FTIR spectrum of pure epoxy resin (EC0 composite), and fired clay-doped epoxy composites (i.e., EC20, EC40, and EC60 composites). Figure 4(a) and (b) shows peaks characterizing the pure epoxy that were detected for C–O alcoholic stretching (at 1,030–1,060 cm−1), for C–O aromatic stretching (at 1,260–320 cm−1), for C–O aliphatic stretching (at 1,140–1,260 cm−1), and for CH2 and CH3 symmetric stretching (at 2,750–3,000 cm−1) (34). The significantly decreased intensity of the C–H out-of-plane bending demonstrated at 970–800 cm−1 is attributed to the fully cured epoxy (35). Regarding the FTIR spectrum for the pure fired clay mineral (i.e., CE0 composite), there are many peaks that identified and characterized the kaolinite mineral in the clay, which appeared at 3,699, 3,627, 1,048, 913, 796, 743, 693, and 527 cm−1 (36). The high intensity of the peak at 1,048 cm−1 is attributed to the Si-O stretching, which indicates a significant amount of kaolinite mineral in fired clay. The peaks detected at 796 and 527 cm−1 may identify the Si–O–Fe, Si–O–Mg, and Si–O–Al bonds. A characteristic band for bending vibrations of adsorbed water occurs as a small intensity at 1,636 cm−1, confirming the annealing of the employed clay fillers as well as confirms the removal of almost all of the water content from the clay fillers. Small intensity peaks were detected for stretching vibrations of the surface hydroxyl groups (Si–Si–OH, or Al–Al–OH) at 3,699 and 3,627 cm−1. The large peak at 1,048 cm−1 also characterized the montmorillonite-Na mineral within the utilized clay material (3638). In the fabricated samples EC20, EC40, and EC60, the previously illustrated characteristic peaks for both pure epoxy (i.e., EC0 composite) and pure fired clay (i.e., CE0 composite) were appeared in the FTIR spectrum, which confirms the diffusion of the fired clay mineral within the epoxy structure.

Figure 4 
               FT-IR for the fabricated composites as well as the pure materials (pure clay and pure epoxy) in the range of wavenumbers. (a) 2000–4000 cm−1, (b) 600–1800 cm−1.
Figure 4

FT-IR for the fabricated composites as well as the pure materials (pure clay and pure epoxy) in the range of wavenumbers. (a) 2000–4000 cm−1, (b) 600–1800 cm−1.

The significance of pre-decision analyses that involve experimental investigations for radiation shielding materials is still being researched actively. Within the energy range of 33–1,408 keV, the experimental analysis was employed to establish various radiation shielding parameters such as LAC, HVL, TF, and RPE for the purpose of this study. In Figure 5, the photon energies function was used to calculate the LAC results for EC samples. The variation of the LAC with different gamma energies is a crucial factor to consider when working with EC of varying weight percentages of clay concentration. Analyzing the data shows that the LAC values varied significantly with different gamma energies and clay compositions. Figure 5 shows that the rapid reduction of the LAC values corresponds to an increase in photon energy from 33 to just 100 keV.

Figure 5 
               The experimental linear attenuation coefficient (µ, cm−1) for the fabricated composites at various γ-ray energies.
Figure 5

The experimental linear attenuation coefficient (µ, cm−1) for the fabricated composites at various γ-ray energies.

3.1 Based on the measured LAC

The demeanor can be explained in relation to the photoelectric effect (σ PE), which denotes the interaction between particles and their environment, particularly at low photon energies. In the photoelectric effect, cross-sectional mechanism is proportional with the ratio of Z 4–5 and E 3.5, which is determined by the atomic number (Z) and energy of the material (E), which are also represented by their respective values. Above 100 keV, the LAC values decreased within the range of medium gamma photon energy. The energy (E) and atomic number (Z) are directly related to the Compton scattering cross sections (CS) in the formula given (σ CSZ/E) (39,40). At energies above 1,000 keV, the pair production mechanism becomes more important, resulting in a slight decrease in both the LAC values. The cross-section for pair production, denoted as σ pp, increases with the square of the atomic number (Z 2).

ρ values for the fabricated samples and the mass attenuation coefficient (MAC, cm2·g−1) were calculated at gamma-ray energy of 662 keV and compared to some polymetric composites (µm) as recently reported in publications, as illustrated in Table 2. The MAC values for the fabricated samples at 662 keV are 0.1263, 0.1258, 0.1329, and 0.1299 cm2·g−1 for samples EC0, EC20, EC40, and EC60, respectively. The fabricated calcinated clay-based-epoxy composites have high shielding capacity compared to other reported polymetric composites, as illustrated in Table 2.

Table 2

Comparison between the mass attenuation coefficient (µ m, cm2·g−1) of the fabricated samples and those of similar polymetric composites recently published

Sample Description Mass attenuation coefficient (cm2·g−1) at 662 keV
EC0 Epoxy + 0 wt% calcinated clay 0.1263 Present work
EC20 Epoxy + 20 wt% calcinated clay 0.1258
EC40 Epoxy + 40 wt% calcinated clay 0.1329
EC60 Epoxy + 60 wt% calcinated clay 0.1299
P-Bi (10%) Polyester + 10 wt% Bi2O3 0.0798 (41)
P-Bi (15%) Polyester + 15 wt% Bi2O3 0.0851
P-Bi (20%) Polyester + 20 wt% Bi2O3 0.0848
HDP High-density polyethylene 0.0790 (42)
HDP- PbO (50%) High-density polyethylene + 50 wt% PbO (nano) 0.1140
P-ZnO (5%) Polyacrylamide + 5 wt% ZnO 0.0820 (43)
P-ZnO (10%) Polyacrylamide + 10 wt% ZnO 0.0810
P-ZnO (15%) Polyacrylamide + 15 wt% ZnO 0.0810
P-ZnO (20%) Polyacrylamide + 20 wt% ZnO 0.0800
UP-nanoclay Unsaturated polyster + nanoclay 0.0740 (44)
UP-nanoclay-PbO (10%) Unsaturated polyster + nanoclay + 10 wt% PbO 0.0780
UP-nanoclay-PbO (20%) Unsaturated polyster + nanoclay + 20 wt% PbO 0.0830
UP-nanoclay-PbO (30%) Unsaturated polyster + nanoclay + 30 wt% PbO 0.0840
Per hydro-polysilaxane Per hydro-polysilaxane 0.0810 (45)
Poly dimethyl silaxane Poly dimethyl silaxane 0.0820
Methylsilses quioxane Methylsilses quioxane 0.0800
Silalkalyene polymer Silalkalyene polymer 0.0810
Epoxy Pure epoxy 0.0832 (46)
E-Al2O3 (6%) Epoxy + 6 wt% Al2O3 0.0824
E-Al2O3 (15%) Epoxy + 15 wt% Al2O3 0.0827
E-Fe2O3 (6%) Epoxy + 6 wt% Fe2O3 0.0827
E-Fe2O3 (15%) Epoxy + 15 wt% Fe2O3 0.0814

Figure 6 shows how the HVL of EC composites changes with photon energy for different concentrations of clay. At low photon energies, the HVL increases rapidly due to the photoelectric effect. At medium photon energies, the HVL increases more slowly due to compton scattering. At high photon energies, the HVL continues to increase, but more slowly, because some photons can penetrate the EC composites without interacting with them. The figure also shows that the HVL of EC composites increases with the concentration of clay from 0 to 60 wt%. During the evolution of gamma photon energy from 33 to 1,408 keV, the HVL values were observed to increase with the increasing gamma photon energy. HVL values at 33 keV ranged from 2.8 to 0.6 cm for compositions containing 0 and 60 wt% clay, respectively. When gamma energies are increased to 1,407 keV, HVL values are expected to be 7.6 cm for compositions with 0% clay and 5.2 cm for compositions with 60% clay.

Figure 6 
                  The fabricated composites half-value layer (HVL, cm) at various γ-ray energies.
Figure 6

The fabricated composites half-value layer (HVL, cm) at various γ-ray energies.

The TF of synthetic EC composites has been computed and is presented in Figure 7. The figure demonstrates the variations in TF as the incoming gamma photon energies span from 33 to 1,408 keV. The increase in the gamma-photon energy decreases the PE and CS interaction CS, leading to a reduction in the photon–electron interaction and an increase in the I t photon number. Then, the increase in I t photon increases the I t I o ratio and TF values. For example, the increase in applied photon energy between 33 and 1,408 keV is followed by an increase in the TF values between 78.13–91.32% (for the EC sample), 64.28–88.28% (for the EC20 sample), 53.16–87.95% (for the EC40 samples), and 43.57–87/58% (for the EC60 sample), as presented in Figure 7. In contrast, the increase in the I t photons decreases the photons absorbed within the fabricated sample thickness and decreases the RPE values. Figure 8 shows a reduction in the RPE values when the photon energy increases. In this regard, the fabricated samples’ RPE decreased between 21.87–8.68% (for the EC0 sample), 35.72–10.28% (for the EC20 sample), 46.84–12.05% (for the EC40 sample), and 56.43–12.42% (for the EC60 sample) with increasing the gamma-photon energy between 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively.

Figure 7 
                  The fabricated composite transmission factor (TF, %) at various γ-ray energies.
Figure 7

The fabricated composite transmission factor (TF, %) at various γ-ray energies.

Figure 8 
                  The fabricated composite radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %) at various γ-ray energies.
Figure 8

The fabricated composite radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %) at various γ-ray energies.

Figure 9 illustrates how EC composite materials with thicknesses between 0.5 and 10 cm exhibit an impact on the mutation of TF and RPE data. A fixed gamma energy of 122 keV was used to observe the variation in composites of EC, containing clay concentrations of 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60%. TF and RPE values of EC composites are influenced significantly by their thickness. As the composite material thickness reduced to 0.5 cm, gamma photons are easily able to traverse it with low impulse, resulting in a reduction in TF values from 91% to 87% and an increase in RPE from 8% to 12%. However, with an increase in thickness, the gamma photons encounter more interactions, resulting in a decrease in their transmission (TF) and a simultaneous increase in impulse (RPE) for the EC composite material. The reduction of TF and the increase in RPE values are attributed to the track length of gamma-photons with increasing thickness of the fabricated samples. The increase in the sample thickness increases the path length of gamma-photons as well as increases the interactions between applied photons and the material electrons. As a result, I t , I t I o , and TF values were reduced accompanied by an increase in the RPE values, as illustrated in Figure 9(a) and (b).

Figure 9 
                  Impacts of the samples’ thickness on (a) transmission factor (TF, %) and (b) radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %).
Figure 9

Impacts of the samples’ thickness on (a) transmission factor (TF, %) and (b) radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %).

The LAC of gamma-rays in a composite made of clay and epoxy resin is determined by various factors like the density, the atomic number of the clay particles, and the volume fraction of the clay particles in the composite. One of these factors is the density of EC composites. The density of the EC composite has a direct impact on the LAC. This is because a denser material contains more atoms per unit volume, which means that there are more opportunities for the gamma-rays to interact with the EC material. In the case of EC composites made of clay and epoxy resin, the LAC will increase with increasing density and increasing volume fraction of clay particles. This is because clay has a higher atomic number than epoxy resin and therefore interacts more strongly with gamma-rays. As shown in Figure 10(a), at the selected gamma energies (33, 662, and 1,408 keV), the LAC increases with the increasing density. For example, the LAC of Composite EC60 is 3.5 and 1.4 times higher than the LAC of Composite EC 0% at gamma energies, 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively. This is because Composite EC60 has a higher density and a higher volume fraction of clay particles. The volume fraction of the clay particles in the composite also has an impact on the LAC. This is because the LAC is a weighted average of the LACs of the individual components of the composite. The weight of each component is determined by its volume fraction. This means that the LAC of the composite can be controlled by adjusting the volume fractions of the clay particles and the epoxy resin. As depicted in Figure 10(b), it is evident that the LAC values increase with the variation of Fe2O3 concentrations from 1.93% to 10.8% in the EC composites. The LAC values increase from 0.24 to 0.83 cm−1 and from 0.09 to 0.13 cm−1 at gamma energies 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively. It is clear that the highest values of LAC with the variation of Fe2O3 concentrations are detected at the low gamma energy, 33 keV. This is because Fe2O3 has a higher atomic number than the other constituents of the EC composition. As a result, the EC composite doped with clay the higher probability of interacting with photons through the photoelectric effect.

Figure 10 
                  Variation of the linear attenuation coefficient for the fabricated composites as a function of (a) sample density (ρ, g·cm−3) and (b) Fe2O3 concentration.
Figure 10

Variation of the linear attenuation coefficient for the fabricated composites as a function of (a) sample density (ρ, g·cm−3) and (b) Fe2O3 concentration.

The addition of Fe2O3 to composites made of clay and epoxy resin has a significant impact on the HVL values. The Fe2O3 is a dense material with a high atomic number, which makes it a good absorber of gamma-rays. The HVL is the thickness of material required to reduce the intensity of a gamma beam by half. As the concentration of Fe2O3 in the composite increases, the HVL increases. This is because the Fe2O3 atoms in the composite interact more strongly with the gamma-rays and therefore absorb more of them. The evidence depicted in Figure 11(a) undeniably portrays the conclusive fact that the maximum (2.8, 4.8, and 7.9 cm at 33, 662, and 1,408 keV, respectively) and minimum (0.8, 3.8, and 5.2 cm at 33, 662, and 1,408 keV, respectively) HVL values are detected at the lowest (1.93%) and highest (10.8%) concentrations of Fe2O3 across all the specified gamma energies.

Figure 11 
                  The impact of Fe2O3 concentrations on (a) half-value layer (HVL, cm), (b) transmission factor (TF, %), and (c) radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %) of the fabricated composites.
Figure 11

The impact of Fe2O3 concentrations on (a) half-value layer (HVL, cm), (b) transmission factor (TF, %), and (c) radiation protection efficiency (RPE, %) of the fabricated composites.

The addition of Fe2O3 to composites made of clay and epoxy resin has a significant impact on both the TF and the RPE. The TF is the fraction of incident radiation that is transmitted through a material. RPE is a measure of how well a material shields against radiation. As the concentration of Fe2O3 in the composite increases, the TF decreases and the RPE increases. This is because the Fe2O3 atoms in the composite interact more strongly with the radiation and therefore absorb more of it. As shown in Figure 11(b) and (c), the TF decreases and the RPE increases with the increasing Fe2O3 concentration. This means that composites with higher concentrations of Fe2O3 are more effective at shielding against radiation. As the amount of Fe2O3 in EC composites rises, the TF values drop by a large amount, going from 78% and 91% to 43% and 88% at gamma energies of 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively. In addition, the RPE values increased from 21% and 8.7% to 56% and 12.4% at gamma energies of 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively. This reduction in TF and rise in RPE values highlights the critical role of Fe2O3 in mediating the attenuation of gamma-rays.

4 Conclusions

The work concludes the fabrication of new epoxy-based composites for radiation shielding applications. The filler in the current work is various concentrations of calcinated clay minerals. The impact of calcinated clay mineral in the composite structure is examined experimentally using the FTIR spectroscopy, which proved the formation of peaks characterizing the calcinated clay within the fabricated composites such as the peaks detected at 796 and 527 cm−1 that attributed to be the Si–O–Fe, Si–O–Mg, and Si–O–Al bonds. Besides the small intensity peaks detected at for 3,699 and 3,627 cm−1 stretching vibrations of the surface hydroxyl groups (Si–Si–OH or Al–Al–OH). In addition, the gamma-ray attenuation characteristics were examined experimentally using the NaI (Tl) detector, which proved an increase in the fabricated composites’ LAC between 0.247–0.091 cm−1 (for the EC0 sample), 0.442–0.108 cm−1 (for the EC20 sample), 0.632–0.128 cm−1 (for EC40 sample), and 0.831–0.133 cm−1 (for the EC60 sample) with raising the gamma-photon energy between 33 and 1,408 keV, respectively. Simultaneously, the TF decreased while the RPE for the fabricated composites increased with increasing the calcinated concentrations within the fabricated epoxy resin. The RPE for a 5 cm thickness of the fabricated composites EC60 reaches 98%, 59%, 50%, and 48.4% at gamma-ray energies of 33, 662, 1,275, and 1,408 keV, respectively. The aforementioned results show that doping the epoxy with calcinated clays enhances its shielding properties and produces new composites that can attenuate the low and intermediate gamma-ray energies effectively.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-RP23046).

  2. Author contribution: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. K.A. Mahmoud, M. Hanfi and A.M. Abuelsoad designed the experiments and carried them out. M. Marashdeh and K.A. Mahmoud developed the model code and performed the simulations. S. Alanazi and M.J. Aljaafreh prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

(1) Ali SIA, Lublóy É. Radiation shielding structures: Concepts, behaviour and the role of the heavy weight concrete as a shielding material - Rewiev. Concr Struct. 2020;21:24–30.10.32970/CS.2020.1.4Suche in Google Scholar

(2) Zhang W, Feng Y, Althakafy JT, Liu Y, Abo-Dief HM, Huang M, et al. Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fiber/boron nitride composites with high neutron shielding efficiency and mechanical performance. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2022;5(3):2012–20.10.1007/s42114-022-00539-7Suche in Google Scholar

(3) Rathod VT, Kumar JS, Jain A. Polymer and ceramic nanocomposites for aerospace applications. Appl Nanosci. 2017;7(8):519–48.10.1007/s13204-017-0592-9Suche in Google Scholar

(4) Islam MS. Analyzing the effect of radiation on human beings of electromagnetic waves from BTS and MS in Kushtia, Bangladesh. Turkish J Computer Math Educ (TURCOMAT). 2021;12(10):448–58.10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.4199Suche in Google Scholar

(5) Ruediger HW. Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology. 2009;16(2–3):89–102.10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.11.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

(6) McKenney S, Gingold E, Zaidi H. Gonadal shielding should be discontinued for most diagnostic imaging exams. Med Phys. 2019;46(3):1111–4.10.1002/mp.13409Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

(7) Prabhu S, Bubbly SG, Gudennavar SB. X-ray and γ-ray shielding efficiency of polymer composites: Choice of fillers, effect of loading and filler size, photon energy and multifunctionality. Polym Rev. 2023;63(1):246–88.10.1080/15583724.2022.2067867Suche in Google Scholar

(8) Kamoru L, Joseph E. The study of shielding design parameter (thickness) in two health tertiary institutions in Katsina Metropolis, Nigeria. Dutse J Pure Appl Sci. 2023;9(3a):281–8.10.4314/dujopas.v9i3a.28Suche in Google Scholar

(9) Abdullah MAH, Rashid RSM, Amran M, Hejazii F, Azreen NM, Fediuk R, et al. Recent trends in advanced radiation shielding concrete for construction of facilities: Materials and properties. Polym (Basel). 2022;14(14):2830.10.3390/polym14142830Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(10) Hu G, Sun W, Yan Y, Wu R, Xu H. Review on the change law of the properties and performance of polymer-matrix nuclear radiation shielding materials under the coupling of nuclear radiation and thermal effects. Front Energy Res. 2021;9:777956. 10.3389/fenrg.2021.777956.Suche in Google Scholar

(11) Dobynde MI, Shprits YY, Drozdov AY, Hoffman J, Li J. Beating 1 sievert: Optimal radiation shielding of astronauts on a mission to mars. Space Weather. 2021;19(9):e2021SW002749. 10.1029/2021SW002749.Suche in Google Scholar

(12) Wu Z, Ma Y, Lu J, Sun H, Liu G, Zhao H, et al. Comparison of the radiation shielding properties of wall materials for the manned spacecraft for future China space exploration missions. J Korean Phys Soc. 2019;75(9):666–71.10.3938/jkps.75.666Suche in Google Scholar

(13) Abbas MI, Alahmadi AH, Elsafi M, Alqahtani SA, Yasmin S, Sayyed MI, et al. Effect of Kaolin clay and ZnO-nanoparticles on the radiation shielding properties of epoxy resin composites. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(22):4801.10.3390/polym14224801Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(14) Darwesh R, Sayyed MI, Al-Hadeethi Y, Alasali HJ, Alotaibi JS. Enhanced radiation shielding performance of epoxy resin composites with Sb2O3 and Al2O3 additives. Radiat Phys Chem. 2023;213:111247.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111247Suche in Google Scholar

(15) Dang Z, Zhang B, Li J, Zha J, Hu G. Copper particles/epoxy resin thermosetting conductive adhesive using polyamide resin as curing agent. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;126(3):815–21.10.1002/app.36951Suche in Google Scholar

(16) Matykiewicz D, Skórczewska K. Characteristics and application of eugenol in the production of epoxy and thermosetting resin composites: A review. Materials. 2022;15(14):4824.10.3390/ma15144824Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(17) Li A, Mao P, Liang B. The application of a phosphorus nitrogen flame retardant curing agent in epoxy resin. e-Polymers. 2019;19(1):545–54.10.1515/epoly-2019-0058Suche in Google Scholar

(18) Panko AV, Kovzun IG, Nikipelova OM, Prokopenko VA, Tsyganovich OA, Oliinyk VO. Nanostructural effects in iron oxide silicate materials of the earth’s crust; 2019. p. 367–8610.1007/978-3-030-17759-1_25Suche in Google Scholar

(19) van der Pluijm BA, Hall CM, Vrolijk PJ, Pevear DR, Covey MC. The dating of shallow faults in the Earth’s crust. Nature. 2001;412(6843):172–5.10.1038/35084053Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

(20) Elsafi M, Almuqrin AH, Yasmin S, Sayyed MI. The affinity of bentonite and WO3 nanoparticles toward epoxy resin polymer for radiation shielding. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230011. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0011.Suche in Google Scholar

(21) Almuqrin AH, ALasali HJ, Sayyed MI, Mahmoud KG. Preparation and experimental estimation of radiation shielding properties of novel epoxy reinforced with Sb2O3 and PbO. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230019. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0019.Suche in Google Scholar

(22) Mahmoud KA, Binmujlli MM, Marashdeh MW, Aljaafreh MJ, Saleh A, Hanfi MY. Gamma-ray shielding analysis using the experimental measurements for copper(ii) sulfate-doped polyepoxide resins. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230142. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0142.Suche in Google Scholar

(23) Alorain DA, Sayyed MI, Almuqrin AH, Mahmoud KG. Impacts of micro-size PbO on the gamma-ray shielding performance of polyepoxide resin. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230032. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0032.Suche in Google Scholar

(24) Yang X, Li Y, Li Y, Lu A, Dong H, Jin S, et al. Microbially induced clay weathering: Smectite-to-kaolinite transformation. Am Mineralogist. 2023;108(10):1940–7.10.2138/am-2022-8442Suche in Google Scholar

(25) Jacob A, Kurian P, Aprem AS. Transport properties of natural rubber latex layered clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;108(4):2623–9.10.1002/app.26615Suche in Google Scholar

(26) Abuali Galehdari N, Kelkar AD. Effect of neutron radiation on the mechanical and thermophysical properties of nanoengineered polymer composites. J Mater Res. 2017;32(2):426–34.10.1557/jmr.2016.494Suche in Google Scholar

(27) Abouhaswa AS, Kavaz E. A novel B2O3-Na2O-BaO-HgO glass system: Synthesis, physical, optical and nuclear shielding features. Ceram Int. 2020;46(10):16166–77.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.172Suche in Google Scholar

(28) Aloraini DA, Almuqrin AH, Sayyed MI, Elsafi M. Variation in tungsten(vi) oxide particle size for enhancing the radiation shielding ability of silicone rubber composites. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230137. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0137.Suche in Google Scholar

(29) Aloraini DA, Almuqrin AH, Kaky KM, Sayyed MI, Elsafi M. Radiation shielding capability and exposure buildup factor of cerium(iv) oxide-reinforced polyester resins. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230128. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0128.Suche in Google Scholar

(30) Al-Saleh WM, Dahi MRH, Sayyed MI, Almutairi HM, Saleh IH, Elsafi M. Comprehensive study of the radiation shielding feature of polyester polymers impregnated with iron filings. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230096. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0096.Suche in Google Scholar

(31) Alorain DA, Almuqrin AH, Sayyed MI, Elsafi M. Impact of WO3 and BaO nanoparticles on the radiation shielding characteristics of polydimethylsiloxane composites. e-Polymers. 2023;23(1):20230037. 10.1515/epoly-2023-0037.Suche in Google Scholar

(32) El-Mallawany R, Sayyed MI, Dong MG, Rammah YS. Simulation of radiation shielding properties of glasses contain PbO. Radiat Phys Chem. 2018;151:239–52.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.06.035Suche in Google Scholar

(33) Chanthima N, Kaewkhao J, Limkitjaroenporn P, Tuscharoen S, Kothan S, Tungjai M, et al. Development of BaO–ZnO–B2O3 glasses as a radiation shielding material. Radiat Phys Chem. 2017;137:72–7.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

(34) Jamali N, Khosravi H, Rezvani A, Tohidlou E. Mechanical properties of multiscale graphene oxide/basalt fiber/epoxy composites. Fibers Polym. 2019;20(1):138–46.10.1007/s12221-019-8794-2Suche in Google Scholar

(35) Bouvet G, Dang N, Cohendoz S, Feaugas X, Mallarino S, Touzain S. Impact of polar groups concentration and free volume on water sorption in model epoxy free films and coatings. Prog Org Coat. 2016;96:32–41.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.12.011Suche in Google Scholar

(36) Madejová J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vib Spectrosc. 2003;31(1):1–10.10.1016/S0924-2031(02)00065-6Suche in Google Scholar

(37) Hajjaji M, Kacim S, Alami A, El Bouadili A, El Mountassir M. Chemical and mineralogical characterization of a clay taken from the Moroccan Meseta and a study of the interaction between its fine fraction and methylene blue. Appl Clay Sci. 2001;20(1–2):1–12.10.1016/S0169-1317(00)00041-7Suche in Google Scholar

(38) Djebbar M, Djafri F, Bouchekara M, Djafri A. Adsorption of phenol on natural clay. Appl Water Sci. 2012;2(2):77–86.10.1007/s13201-012-0031-8Suche in Google Scholar

(39) Abouhaswa AS, Sayyed MI, Altowyan AS, Al-Hadeethi Y, Mahmoud KA. Evaluation of optical and gamma ray shielding features for tungsten-based bismuth borate glasses. Opt Mater (Amst). 2020;106:109981. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.109981.Suche in Google Scholar

(40) Kumar A, Jain A, Sayyed MI, Laariedh F, Mahmoud KA, Nebhen J, et al. Tailoring bismuth borate glasses by incorporating PbO/GeO2 for protection against nuclear radiation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–14.10.1038/s41598-021-87256-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

(41) Sharma A, Sayyed MI, Agar O, Kaçal MR, Polat H, Akman F. Photon-shielding performance of bismuth oxychloride-filled polyester concretes. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;241:122330.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122330Suche in Google Scholar

(42) Mahmoud ME, El-Khatib AM, Badawi MS, Rashad AR, El-Sharkawy RM, Thabet AA. Recycled high-density polyethylene plastics added with lead oxide nanoparticles as sustainable radiation shielding materials. J Clean Prod. 2018;176:276–87.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.100Suche in Google Scholar

(43) Farnaz Nasehi MII. Evaluation of X and gamma-rays attenuation parameters for polyacrylamide and ZnO composites as ligh. J Nucl Med Radiat Ther. 2019;10:1000404.Suche in Google Scholar

(44) Bagheri K, Razavi SM, Ahmadi SJ, Kosari M, Abolghasemi H. Thermal resistance, tensile properties, and gamma radiation shielding performance of unsaturated polyester/nanoclay/PbO composites. Radiat Phys Chem. 2018;146:5–10.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.12.024Suche in Google Scholar

(45) Nagaraja N, Manjunatha HC, Seenappa L, Sridhar KN, Ramalingam HB. Radiation shielding properties of silicon polymers. Radiat Phys Chem. 2020;171:108723.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108723Suche in Google Scholar

(46) Aldhuhaibat MJR, Amana MS, Jubier NJ, Salim AA. Improved gamma radiation shielding traits of epoxy composites: Evaluation of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic and electron number. Radiat Phys Chem. 2021;179:109183.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109183Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-29
Revised: 2024-02-21
Accepted: 2024-02-22
Published Online: 2024-06-19

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Flame-retardant thermoelectric responsive coating based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiphene) modified metal–organic frameworks
  3. Highly stretchable, durable, and reversibly thermochromic wrapped yarns induced by Joule heating: With an emphasis on parametric study of elastane drafts
  4. Molecular dynamics simulation and experimental study on the mechanical properties of PET nanocomposites filled with CaCO3, SiO2, and POE-g-GMA
  5. Multifunctional hydrogel based on silk fibroin/thermosensitive polymers supporting implant biomaterials in osteomyelitis
  6. Marine antifouling coating based on fluorescent-modified poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene) resin
  7. Preparation and application of profiled luminescent polyester fiber with reversible photochromism materials
  8. Determination of pesticide residue in soil samples by molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction method
  9. The die swell eliminating mechanism of hot air assisted 3D printing of GF/PP and its influence on the product performance
  10. Rheological behavior of particle-filled polymer suspensions and its influence on surface structure of the coated electrodes
  11. The effects of property variation on the dripping behaviour of polymers during UL94 test simulated by particle finite element method
  12. Experimental evaluation on compression-after-impact behavior of perforated sandwich panel comprised of foam core and glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid facesheets
  13. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of a pH-responsive molecular imprinted polymer for Matrine as an intelligent drug delivery system
  14. Twist-related parametric optimization of Joule heating-triggered highly stretchable thermochromic wrapped yarns using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution
  15. Comparative analysis of flow factors and crystallinity in conventional extrusion and gas-assisted extrusion
  16. Simulation approach to study kinetic heterogeneity of gadolinium catalytic system in the 1,4-cis-polyisoprene production
  17. Properties of kenaf fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites
  18. Cellulose acetate filter rods tuned by surface engineering modification for typical smoke components adsorption
  19. A blue fluorescent waterborne polyurethane-based Zn(ii) complex with antibacterial activity
  20. Experimental investigation on damage mechanism of GFRP laminates embedded with/without steel wire mesh under low-velocity-impact and post-impact tensile loading
  21. Preparation and application research of composites with low vacuum outgassing and excellent electromagnetic sealing performance
  22. Assessing the recycling potential of thermosetting polymer waste in high-density polyethylene composites for safety helmet applications
  23. Mesoscale mechanics investigation of multi-component solid propellant systems
  24. Preparation of HTV silicone rubber with hydrophobic–uvioresistant composite coating and the aging research
  25. Experimental investigation on tensile behavior of CFRP bolted joints subjected to hydrothermal aging
  26. Structure and transition behavior of crosslinked poly(2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethylmethacrylate-co-(ethyleneglycol) methacrylate) gel film on cellulosic-based flat substrate
  27. Mechanical properties and thermal stability of high-temperature (cooking temperature)-resistant PP/HDPE/POE composites
  28. Preparation of itaconic acid-modified epoxy resins and comparative study on the properties of it and epoxy acrylates
  29. Synthesis and properties of novel degradable polyglycolide-based polyurethanes
  30. Fatigue life prediction method of carbon fiber-reinforced composites
  31. Thermal, morphological, and structural characterization of starch-based bio-polymers for melt spinnability
  32. Robust biaxially stretchable polylactic acid films based on the highly oriented chain network and “nano-walls” containing zinc phenylphosphonate and calcium sulfate whisker: Superior mechanical, barrier, and optical properties
  33. ARGET ATRP of styrene with low catalyst usage in bio-based solvent γ-valerolactone
  34. New PMMA-InP/ZnS nanohybrid coatings for improving the performance of c-Si photovoltaic cells
  35. Impacts of the calcinated clay on structure and gamma-ray shielding capacity of epoxy-based composites
  36. Preparation of cardanol-based curing agent for underwater drainage pipeline repairs
  37. Preparation of lightweight PBS foams with high ductility and impact toughness by foam injection molding
  38. Gamma-ray shielding investigation of nano- and microstructures of SnO on polyester resin composites: Experimental and theoretical study
  39. Experimental study on impact and flexural behaviors of CFRP/aluminum-honeycomb sandwich panel
  40. Normal-hexane treatment on PET-based waste fiber depolymerization process
  41. Effect of tannic acid chelating treatment on thermo-oxidative aging property of natural rubber
  42. Design, synthesis, and characterization of novel copolymer gel particles for water-plugging applications
  43. Influence of 1,1′-Azobis(cyclohexanezonitrile) on the thermo-oxidative aging performance of diolefin elastomers
  44. Characteristics of cellulose nanofibril films prepared by liquid- and gas-phase esterification processes
  45. Investigation on the biaxial stretching deformation mechanism of PA6 film based on finite element method
  46. Simultaneous effects of temperature and backbone length on static and dynamic properties of high-density polyethylene-1-butene copolymer melt: Equilibrium molecular dynamics approach
  47. Research on microscopic structure–activity relationship of AP particle–matrix interface in HTPB propellant
  48. Three-layered films enable efficient passive radiation cooling of buildings
  49. Electrospun nanofibers membranes of La(OH)3/PAN as a versatile adsorbent for fluoride remediation: Performance and mechanisms
  50. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable polyester fibers enhanced with antibacterial and antiviral organic composites
  51. Preparation of hydrophobic silicone rubber composite insulators and the research of anti-aging performance
  52. Surface modification of sepiolite and its application in one-component silicone potting adhesive
  53. Study on hydrophobicity and aging characteristics of epoxy resin modified with nano-MgO
  54. Optimization of baffle’s height in an asymmetric twin-screw extruder using the response surface model
  55. Effect of surface treatment of nickel-coated graphite on conductive rubber
  56. Experimental investigation on low-velocity impact and compression after impact behaviors of GFRP laminates with steel mesh reinforced
  57. Development and characterization of acetylated and acetylated surface-modified tapioca starches as a carrier material for linalool
  58. Investigation of the compaction density of electromagnetic moulding of poly(ether-ketone-ketone) polymer powder
  59. Experimental investigation on low-velocity-impact and post-impact-tension behaviors of GFRP T-joints after hydrothermal aging
  60. The repeated low-velocity impact response and damage accumulation of shape memory alloy hybrid composite laminates
  61. Exploring a new method for high-performance TPSiV preparation through innovative Si–H/Pt curing system in VSR/TPU blends
  62. Large-scale production of highly responsive, stretchable, and conductive wrapped yarns for wearable strain sensors
  63. Preparation of natural raw rubber and silica/NR composites with low generation heat through aqueous silane flocculation
  64. Molecular dynamics simulation of the interaction between polybutylene terephthalate and A3 during thermal-oxidative aging
  65. Crashworthiness of GFRP/aluminum hybrid square tubes under quasi-static compression and single/repeated impact
  66. Review Articles
  67. Recent advancements in multinuclear early transition metal catalysts for olefin polymerization through cooperative effects
  68. Impact of ionic liquids on the thermal properties of polymer composites
  69. Recent progress in properties and application of antibacterial food packaging materials based on polyvinyl alcohol
  70. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) technologies for fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials: A review on fabrication methods and process parameters
  71. Rapid Communication
  72. Design, synthesis, characterization, and adsorption capacities of novel superabsorbent polymers derived from poly (potato starch xanthate-graft-acrylamide)
  73. Special Issue: Biodegradable and bio-based polymers: Green approaches (Guest Editors: Kumaran Subramanian, A. Wilson Santhosh Kumar, and Venkatajothi Ramarao)
  74. Development of smart core–shell nanoparticles-based sensors for diagnostics of salivary alpha-amylase in biomedical and forensics
  75. Thermoplastic-polymer matrix composite of banana/betel nut husk fiber reinforcement: Physico-mechanical properties evaluation
  76. Special Issue: Electrospun Functional Materials
  77. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile/regenerated cellulose/citral nanofibers as active food packagings
Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/epoly-2024-0017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen