Home Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz
Article Open Access

Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz

  • Ahmed Alhumaidan , Hamsakutty Vettikalladi EMAIL logo , Meshal Bahammam , Tariq Alrashied and Majeed Alkanhal
Published/Copyright: February 22, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article presents the design of a 60 GHz beam-scanning antenna system with a coverage range of 50–100 m for high-speed indoor communication systems. The design incorporates beam-scanning techniques to meet the coverage requirements while minimizing system cost and size. The system comprises a substrate-integrated waveguide for stable operation, a printed log periodic dipole array operating at 60 GHz with a 10 GHz bandwidth (54–67 GHz), which provides a 6.99 dB directivity. Adding a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens improves pattern coverage performance and increases the system directivity to 17 dBi (14.8 dB gain) with a 4.6° beam width. With 37 source antennas, it can provide a total beam coverage area of 170°, which is highly suitable for future high-speed indoor communication.

1 Introduction

Fifth-generation technologies are being researched to meet consumer, service, and corporate expectations. The essential goal of 5G technology is to provide higher coverage with minimal power usage and cheap cost by using a high-frequency band along with a large bandwidth for enhancing data transfer rates. To address the lack of available bandwidth, higher operating frequencies in the millimeter wave (mm-Wave) region of the electromagnetic spectrum are being considered. However, the short-range coverage of higher frequency bands poses a challenge, increasing the infrastructure cost due to the need for more cells to cover a specific location [1,2]. Beam-scanning techniques, such as phase variation, offer a solution to increase wide-angle coverage. In a previous study [3], a beam-scanning lens antenna is proposed, but the beam-scanning range is only ±60°, and also the gain tolerance is as high as 3.6 dB. Also, in the literature [4,5], a superstrate/metasurface antenna is proposed for high gain, but this cannot be used for beam tilting or scanning. Hybrid designs, including lens antennas, are of interest due to their high gain, low cost, low profile, and ease of integration. One such low-cost and high-gain antenna manufacturing technique is elaborated by Bor et al. [6]. Another passive beam steering millimeter wave antenna is detailed by Das et al. [7], but the maximum steering angle is ±30° only. Here, passive beam-steering is achieved with the change in orientation of the metasurface, which reverses the sequence of unit cells that avoids the need for active components, which leads to a bulky structure.

This work aims to design a wide-band, high-gain antenna system using a Luneburg lens integrated with a log-periodic dipole array (LPDA) and a substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW). The goal is to achieve a system gain higher than 14 dB (directivity higher than 16 dB) with wide beam scanning of around 170°, while considering the total cost and compact size of the system. The design process involves stages, including SIW design, LPDA design used for increasing the bandwidth, and Luneburg lens design for increasing the directivity and beam scanning. The theoretical design optimization of a multi-shell luneburg lens is well illustrated in a study by Fuchs et al. [8]. The design and practical verification of a three-dimensional printed flat Luneburg lens is demonstrated by Che et al. [9] with high gain but a limited beam-scanning capacity of ±30°. There are several source antenna types suitable for this work, including the Yagi-Uda, Microstrip Patch, and LPDA. While the Yagi-Uda antenna offers high gain and narrow beamwidth, its limited bandwidth may not be ideal. The microstrip patch antenna is compact and lightweight but has limited bandwidth. The LPDA provides a wide bandwidth and high directivity and is cost-effective in fabrication [10]. The chosen approach for beam-scanning design is the dielectric focusing architecture, utilizing a dielectric lens. This architecture offers beam switching and scanning capabilities, enhances antenna gain and performance, and provides cost-effective material and manufacturing options. The design comprises three major parts: SIW to avoid feed radiation, LPDA, and flat Luneburg lens. SIW improves overall performance and stability, as described in the research studies [11,12], LPDA offers the desired operating bandwidth and directive source radiation beam, and the flat Luneburg lens enhances antenna directivity, in addition to beam scanning and shaping capabilities. Section 2 provides the methodology used for the design, and Section 3 details the simulation of the proposed antenna system and its results. The prototyping of the antenna is provided in Section 4 with a comparison of previous works. Finally, Section 5 provides the conclusion remarks.

2 Methodology

2.1 SIW design

SIW is a low-cost and highly efficient integrated planar architecture that overcomes the limitations of traditional waveguide technology. SIW is designed by incorporating metallic through holes or slot trenches on a flat substrate, as seen in Figure 1, providing advantages such as cost-effectiveness, compact size, light-weight, and ease of manufacturing. To design the SIW, the dimensions and parameters of the rectangular waveguide are determined based on the TE10 mode and the cutoff frequency. Integration and interconnect techniques of planar and non-planar structures are demonstrated by Wu [13]. In previous studies [14,15,16], the design and propagation characteristic of SIW are detailed.

Figure 1 
                  SIW structure.
Figure 1

SIW structure.

2.2 Source antenna design

The LPDA antenna is chosen for its wide bandwidth, high gain, efficiency, and ease of integration. The LPDA design involves determining the scale factor, spacing factor, and the number of dipole elements. The design parameters such as the lengths, widths, and spacing between the dipole components are calculated based on the desired bandwidth and directivity. The LPDA design is optimized to achieve the desired performance metrics. The detailed analysis of LPDA design is well illustrated in previous studies [17,18]. The integration of the LPDA and SIW antennas was accomplished through a tapered connection, ensuring seamless transition and proper feeding. Transition from microstrip to waveguide is demonstrated in the literature [19,20].

2.3 Luneburg lens design

A Luneburg lens is introduced to enhance antenna gain and provide beam scanning and shaping capabilities, while reducing the overall size of the antenna. The lens design consists of different layers with specific dielectric constants and radius, as illustrated in Figure 2. The radius and permittivity of each layer are determined using mathematical equations based on the number of layers. The Luneburg lens is designed to focus the radiation pattern in the H-plane and is fabricated using a novel, low-cost, and easy technological approach. The lens is evaluated in the 60 GHz bandwidth spectrum, and its behavior is analyzed using Airex PXc 245 foam materials.

Figure 2 
                  Cross-sectional view of Luneburg lens.
Figure 2

Cross-sectional view of Luneburg lens.

The different layer radii of the Luneburg (r i ) lens and the different dielectric permittivities (ε i ) of each layer can be obtained from the equations below, where N is the number of layers [8]:

ε i = 2 ( 2 i 1 ) M ,

r i = 2 ε i + M ,

M = 1 2 N + 1 .

3 Simulation

3.1 SIW simulation

The simulation was carried out in CST Microwave Studio with a lambda/20 mesh size. The SIW simulation involves designing and optimizing a 60 GHz SIW using Roger RT/Duroid5880 as the substrate material (ε r = 2.23, δ = 0.003, h = 0.127 mm) with copper thickness M t = 0.018 mm. The SIW transmission line, modeled using CST Microwave Studio, is shown in Figure 3 with its optimized parameter tabulated in Table 1. Figure 4 shows excellent performance with a cutoff frequency of 44 GHz.

Figure 3 
                  SIW structure with transition and feed.
Figure 3

SIW structure with transition and feed.

Table 1

SIW parameters dimension

Parameters W siw (mm) W trans (mm) W 0 (mm) L trans (mm) P (mm) D (mm)
Dimensions (mm) 2.41 2.11 0.34 2 0.48 0.3
Figure 4 
                  SIW return loss plot vs frequency.
Figure 4

SIW return loss plot vs frequency.

The analysis of scattering parameters (S11, S21) demonstrates a strong match between the SIW and antenna design at 60 GHz (above 48 GHz).

3.2 LPDA simulation

In the LPDA simulation, a log periodic antenna (LPDA) design is presented. The optimized LPDA design incorporates changes in the leg values (a n , b n ) and leg spacing. The LPDA structure which shown in Figure 5 is designed to optimise the performance with a wide bandwith and directivity, and its dimensions are provided in Table 2, is based on a Roger RT/Duroid 5,880 substrate with dielectric parameters (ε r = 2.23, δ = 0.003) with a thickness of (h = 0.127 mm), which helps in reducing surface waves.

Figure 5 
                  LPDA structure with dimensions.
Figure 5

LPDA structure with dimensions.

Table 2

LPDA dimensions

Parameters a n (mm) b n (mm) S n−1 (mm)
n 1 0.17 0.82 1.20
2 0.14 0.77 1.07
3 0.11 0.77 0.69
4 0.09 0.66 0.59
5 0.07 0.42 0.49
6 0.06 0.29 0.41
7 0.05 0.23 0.34
8 0.04 0.19 0.29
9 0.03 0.15 0.24
10 0.03 0.12 0.20
L (mm) 5.58
W (mm) 0.34

The optimized LPDA design achieves a bandwidth of 9 GHz below −10 dB. The optimized S-parameter is plotted along with the antenna gain in Figure 6, highlighting the performance characteristics.

Figure 6 
                  LPDA gain and S11 
                     vs frequency plot.
Figure 6

LPDA gain and S11 vs frequency plot.

3.3 LPDA, SIW, and Luneburg lens (system) simulation

This section focuses on the integration of the optimized LPDA and SIW components with the Luneburg lens to form a complete system. A tapered transition is introduced between the SIW and LPDA antenna to ensure a smooth connection, as shown in Figure 7. The thickness of metal on either side of the substrate is 0.127 mm. The optimized dimensions are displayed in Table 3.

Figure 7 
                  Single SIW antenna with LPDA: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.
Figure 7

Single SIW antenna with LPDA: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.

Table 3

Single antenna element dimensions

Parameters a n (mm) b n (mm) S n−1 (zmm) L n(mm) Ltrans, n (mm)
n 1 0.17 0.65 0.78 1.4 2
2 0.14 0.79 0.96 4.56 1.95
3 0.11 0.64 0.78 5.16
4 0.09 0.52 0.66
5 0.07 0.28 0.51
6 0.06 0.23 0.41
7 0.05 0.18 0.33
8 0.04 0.15 0.27
9 0.03 0.12 0.22
10 0.03 0.10 0.18
L (mm) 15.27
W (mm) 4.46

The optimized structure achieves a wide bandwidth of 20 GHz at 60 GHz, as depicted in Figure 8. Additionally, a directivity of 6.99 dB and a half-power beamwidth (HPBW) of 59° are achieved.

Figure 8 
                  Antenna gain and S11 
                     vs frequency plot.
Figure 8

Antenna gain and S11 vs frequency plot.

3.4 Luneburg lens and full system simulation

Next, the simulation focuses on the Luneburg lens and the performance of the full system comprising multiple antennas. The lens design process involves optimizing the number of layers and choosing the optimal structure based on the radiation pattern, which can be seen in Figure 9 with one source element. The optimized dimensions of the lens are tabulated in Table 4. The results indicate that a six-layer lens provides a smoother radiation pattern.

Figure 9 
                  Luneburg lens structure with a single feed: (a) top view and (b) side view.
Figure 9

Luneburg lens structure with a single feed: (a) top view and (b) side view.

Table 4

Luneburg lens parameters

Parameters Radius (mm) Permittivity (ε) Loss tangent
Layer number 1 11.625 1.92 0.015
2 16.5 1.77 0.014
3 20.15 1.62 0.013
4 23.275 1.46 0.01
5 26 1.31 0.008
6 28.5 1.15 0.007
Lens thickness (h) (mm) 3.2
Air gap (mm) 2.6

The optimized single antenna element with a lens is achieved with specific parameters, resulting in a directivity of 16.5 dB and a HPBW of 4.6°, as illustrated in Figure 10 at 60 GHz. Additionally, Figure 11 shows a gain of 14.5 dB, which complements the performance characteristics of the antenna element.

Figure 10 
                  Far-field directivity plot.
Figure 10

Far-field directivity plot.

Figure 11 
                  Gain and S11 vs frequency plot.
Figure 11

Gain and S11 vs frequency plot.

The phase distribution of a Luneburg lens is a key characteristic that contributes to its unique focusing properties. In a Luneburg lens, the refractive index varies radially from the center to the outer surface, creating a gradient lens. The phase distribution across the lens is such that it compensates for the spherical aberration that would occur in a simple lens with a uniform refractive index.

For a Luneburg lens, the phase distribution is typically designed to be radially symmetric. The phase distribution is such that the wavefronts passing through different regions of the lens converge at the same focal point, resulting in the effective focusing of incoming waves.

The phase distribution of the Luneburg lens with different feeding angles (90°, 0°, and 45°) is shown in Figure 12.

Figure 12 
                  Phase distribution. (a) 90°, (b) 0°, (c) 45°.
Figure 12

Phase distribution. (a) 90°, (b) 0°, (c) 45°.

Expanding the system to three antenna elements, as shown in Figure 13, their behavior in the far field is examined for multiple-angle separations. The adjacent placement of the three antennas was tested with varying separation angles to achieve 3 dB overlapping. However, the results provided in Figure 14 show a version of the incomplete coverage and increased side lobe levels when setting the separation angle to be 4.5°.

Figure 13 
                  Adjacent antenna structure.
Figure 13

Adjacent antenna structure.

Figure 14 
                  Far-field plot without coverage.
Figure 14

Far-field plot without coverage.

To address this issue of incomplete coverage, we first propose a new idea of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens with feed elements in the lower and upper lens concept is introduced as shown in Figure 15 with an angle separation of 9° between two feed elements in the same lens and the angle between the adjacent feed element in the lower and upper lens is 4.5°.

Figure 15 
                  Doubled stacked Luneburg lens: (a) top view and (b) side view.
Figure 15

Doubled stacked Luneburg lens: (a) top view and (b) side view.

The optimization process focuses on determining the vertical alignment and separation distance between the lenses. The best results are obtained when the antennas are aligned in the middle, and the optimized vertical lens separation is 0.75 mm. The directivity and gain for different frequencies are analyzed, and the one-dimensional far-field pattern is observed at 60 GHz, which can be seen in Figure 16.

Figure 16 
                  Far-field plot with coverage.
Figure 16

Far-field plot with coverage.

Additionally, the coupling between the three adjacent antenna elements was minimal and reached a value of −20 dB on the operating frequency, as shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17 
                  S-parameter of three-adjacent antenna elements to show coupling effect.
Figure 17

S-parameter of three-adjacent antenna elements to show coupling effect.

Finally, the full system integration consists of 37 antenna feeds in both lenses, providing a coverage area of 170°, as shown in Figure 18. The structure of both lenses and feeds is supported using FR-3703 polyurethane foam (ε r = 1.04, tans δ = 0.00170), as seen in the same figure. The performance is evaluated in terms of directivity, gain, and overlapping. The results demonstrate a difference of ≥13 dB between the main and side lobes, achieving 3 dB overlapping as illustrated in Figures 19 and 20, with a directivity of 17 and 14.8 dB gain, respectively.

Figure 18 
                  Full system doubled stacked Luneburg lens with supporting foam with complete feed: (a) top view and (b) side view.
Figure 18

Full system doubled stacked Luneburg lens with supporting foam with complete feed: (a) top view and (b) side view.

Figure 19 
                  Full system far-field directivity plot.
Figure 19

Full system far-field directivity plot.

Figure 20 
                  Full system far field gain plot.
Figure 20

Full system far field gain plot.

The optimized system showed consistent performance throughout the operating frequency range with an efficiency reaching 63%, as shown in Figure 21.

Figure 21 
                  Efficiency vs frequency plot.
Figure 21

Efficiency vs frequency plot.

4 Prototyping

The fabricated design of the antenna yielded promising results. Figure 22 displays the simulated structure. Due to the limitations in manufacturing capabilities in our lab, the substrate thickness was increased to 0.79 mm (h = 0.79 mm). Consequently, the feed is optimized to match the new thickness, with the optimized dimensions provided in Table 5.

Figure 22 
               Simulation structure.
Figure 22

Simulation structure.

Table 5

Prototype feed dimensions

Parameter (mm)
W n 1 0.60
2 2.38
3 8.00
D 0.50
P 0.90
L 23.59
W 17.00

The prototype is depicted in Figure 23 with SIW and LPDA. The LPDA antenna is printed using LPKF laser and electronics PhotoMat S-103, and the S-parameter is measured using a Keysight vector network analyzer (PNAX; N5247A). The measured return loss closely matched the simulated results (55–75 GHz), as shown in Figure 24, validating the accuracy of the design and manufacturing procedures.

Figure 23 
               Prototype.
Figure 23

Prototype.

Figure 24 
               Return loss vs frequency plot of the prototype.
Figure 24

Return loss vs frequency plot of the prototype.

These findings provide strong evidence for the practical applicability of the fabricated design in this microcell technology, highlighting the effectiveness of the beam-scanning antenna in enabling precise and efficient control of electromagnetic radiation. This research contributes to the advancement of high-speed antenna networks, facilitating the development of reliable and high-performance 5G microcell technology.

A comparison of the proposed antenna with other work is given Table 6, which clearly shows that the proposed antenna achieved better performance in terms of a gain of 14.8 dB and a pattern coverage of around 170° compared with state-of-the-art antenna designs. The other works in the literature show a maximum beam scanning angle of only 120°. Also, the gain is maximum in this work. This antenna is cost-effective and easy to fabricate compared to others mentioned in the table. Due to this wide-angle scanning capability, this work is suitable for high-speed wireless communication applications.

Table 6

Comparative analysis between the proposed antenna and state-of-the-art antennas

Ref. Frequency f (GHz) Bandwidth (BW) Gain (dB) Scanning range Efficiency η (%)
[21] 60 58/67 11.7 21° (38° to 7°) 90
[22] 60 50/75 14.2 49° (−9° to 40°) 75
[23] 60 52/63 11.4 9° (12° to 3°)
[24] 60 55/65 14.5 120° (−72° to 48°) 88.2
Proposed 60 54/67 14.8 170° (−85° to 85°) 63

5 Conclusion

This study presents the design and simulation of a beam-scanning antenna for future high-speed short-range communication systems operating at 60 GHz. The system incorporates an SIW, an LPDA antenna, and a Luneburg lens. The optimized SIW and LPDA antenna achieve directivities of 5.95 and 6.99 dB at 60 GHz, respectively, with improved bandwidth and radiation patterns. The addition of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens enhances the system’s directivity to 17 dB. Simulation results demonstrate wide-angle beam scanning and good radiation efficiency, making the antenna suitable for power-efficient future high-speed applications. The integrated system comprises 37 antenna elements achieving around 170° coverage with beam-scanning capability. Hence, it offers a promising candidate for real-world implementation in high-frequency 60 GHz communication systems.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia, under Award 13-ELE1184-02-R. The authors are grateful for the reviewer’s valuable comments that improved the manuscript.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia, under Award 13-ELE1184-02-R.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript. Ahmed Alhumaidan, Meshal Bahammam, and Tariq Alrashied did all the simulation and manufacturing of the work. Hamsakutty Vettikalladi and Majeed Alkanhal did the overall supervision of the work and manuscript preparation.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

[1] Lawrence NP, Ng BW, Hansen HJ, Abbott D. 5G terrestrial networks: Mobility and coverage – Solution in three dimensions. IEEE Access. 2017;5:8064–93. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2693375.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rangan S, Rappaport TS, Erkip E. Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: Potentials and challenges. Proc IEEE. 2014;102(3):366–85. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2299397.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wang HF, Wang ZB, Wu ZH, Zhang YR. Beam-scanning lens antenna based on elliptical paraboloid phase distribution metasurfaces. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2019;18(8):1562–6. 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2922695.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Vettikalladi H, Lafond O, Himdi M. High-efficient and high-gain superstrate antenna for 60-GHz indoor communication. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2009;8:1422–5. 10.1109/LAWP.2010.2040570.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Das P, Singh AK. Gain enhancement of millimeter wave antenna by ultra-thin radial phase gradient metasurface for 5G applications. IETE J Res. 2023;69:2400–8. 10.1080/03772063.2023.2191998.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bor J, Lafond O, Merlet H, Le Bars P, Himdi M. Foam based Luneburg lens antenna at 60 GHz. Prog Electromagn Res Lett. 2014;44:1–7. 10.2528/PIERL13092405.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Das P, Singh AK, Mandal K. Beam-steering of millimeter wave antenna using linear phase gradient metalens for 5G applications. Int J RF Microw Comput Eng. 2022;32(12):e23459. 10.1002/mmce.23459.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fuchs B, Le Coq L, Lafond O, Rondineau S, Himdi M. Design optimization of multishell Luneburg lenses. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2007;55(2):283–9. 10.1109/TAP.2006.889849.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Che X, Gao J, Li Z. 3-D printed high-gain elliptic flat Luneburg lens. Results Phys. 2024;57:1–9. 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107350.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Balanis CA. Antenna theory: analysis and design. 3rd edn. NJ: John Wiley; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wu K, Deslandes D, Cassivi Y. The substrate integrated circuits - a new concept for high-frequency electronics and optoelectronics. 6th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Service. Telsiks; 2003. p. P-III. 10.1109/TELSKS.2003.1246173.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Entesari K, Saghati AP, Sekar V, Armendariz M. Tunable SIW structures: antennas, VCOs, and filters. IEEE Microw Mag. 2015;16(5):34–54. 10.1109/MMM.2015.2408273.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wu K. Integration and interconnect techniques of planar and non-planar structures for microwave and millimeter-wave circuits – current status and future trend. 2001 Asia-Pacific Microw Conference. 2001. p. 411–6. 10.1109/APMC.2001.985398.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Yan L, Hong W, Wu K, Cui TJ. Investigations on the propagation characteristics of the substrate integrated waveguide based on the method of lines. Microwaves, Antennas Propag, IEE Proc. 2005;152:35–42. 10.1049/IP-MAP:20040726.Search in Google Scholar

[15] He F. Innovative microwave and millimetre-wave components and sub-systems based on substrate integration technology. Ph.D. thesis. Montreal, Canada: École Polytechnique de Montréal; 2011. https://publications.polymtl.ca/524/.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Che W, Deng K, Wang D, Chow Y. Analytical equivalence between substrate-integrated waveguide and rectangular waveguide. IET Microw Antennas Propag. 2008;2:35–41. 10.1049/IET-MAP:20060283.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Campbell C, Traboulay I, Suthers M, Kneve H. Design of a stripline log-periodic dipole antenna. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1977;25(5):718–21. 10.1109/TAP.1977.1141653.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Carrel R. The design of log-periodic dipole antennas. 1958 IRE International Convention Record. 1966. p. 61–75. 10.1109/IRECON.1961.1151016.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Deslandes D, Wu K. Integrated microstrip and rectangular waveguide in planar form. IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett. 2001;11(2):68–70.10.1109/7260.914305Search in Google Scholar

[20] Aqlan B, Vettikalladi H, Alkanhal MA. Millimeter wave antenna with frequency selective surface (FSS) for 79 GHz automotive radar applications. Int J Microw Wirel Technol. 2016;9(2):281–90. 10.1017/S1759078716000027.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jackson DR, Caloz C, Itoh T. Leaky-wave antennas. Proc IEEE. 2012;100(7):2194–206. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2187410.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Bai X, Qu SW, Ng KB, Chan CH. Sinusoidally modulated leaky wave antenna for millimeter – wave application. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2016;64(3):849–55. 10.1109/TAP.2015.2513089.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Jackson DR, Oliner AA, Balanis CA. Leaky-wave antennas. Modern antenna handbook. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2007. p. 325–67. 10.1002/9780470294154.ch7.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sarkar A, Lim S. 60 GHz compact larger beam scanning range PCB leaky-wave antenna using HMSIW for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2020;68(8):5816–26. 10.1109/TAP.2020.2983.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-18
Revised: 2024-11-25
Accepted: 2024-11-25
Published Online: 2025-02-22

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Modification of polymers to synthesize thermo-salt-resistant stabilizers of drilling fluids
  3. Study of the electronic stopping power of proton in different materials according to the Bohr and Bethe theories
  4. AI-driven UAV system for autonomous vehicle tracking and license plate recognition
  5. Enhancement of the output power of a small horizontal axis wind turbine based on the optimization approach
  6. Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz
  7. Synergistic effect of nano-silica, steel slag, and waste glass on the microstructure, electrical resistivity, and strength of ultra-high-performance concrete
  8. Expert evaluation of attachments (caps) for orthopaedic equipment dedicated to pedestrian road users
  9. Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer
  10. Second-order design of GNSS networks with different constraints using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms
  11. Impact of including a slab effect into a 2D RC frame on the seismic fragility assessment: A comparative study
  12. Analytical and numerical analysis of heat transfer from radial extended surface
  13. Comprehensive investigation of corrosion resistance of magnesium–titanium, aluminum, and aluminum–vanadium alloys in dilute electrolytes under zero-applied potential conditions
  14. Performance analysis of a novel design of an engine piston for a single cylinder
  15. Modeling performance of different sustainable self-compacting concrete pavement types utilizing various sample geometries
  16. The behavior of minors and road safety – case study of Poland
  17. The role of universities in efforts to increase the added value of recycled bucket tooth products through product design methods
  18. Adopting activated carbons on the PET depolymerization for purifying r-TPA
  19. Urban transportation challenges: Analysis and the mitigation strategies for road accidents, noise pollution and environmental impacts
  20. Enhancing the wear resistance and coefficient of friction of composite marine journal bearings utilizing nano-WC particles
  21. Sustainable bio-nanocomposite from lignocellulose nanofibers and HDPE for knee biomechanics: A tribological and mechanical properties study
  22. Effects of staggered transverse zigzag baffles and Al2O3–Cu hybrid nanofluid flow in a channel on thermofluid flow characteristics
  23. Mathematical modelling of Darcy–Forchheimer MHD Williamson nanofluid flow above a stretching/shrinking surface with slip conditions
  24. Energy efficiency and length modification of stilling basins with variable Baffle and chute block designs: A case study of the Fewa hydroelectric project
  25. Renewable-integrated power conversion architecture for urban heavy rail systems using bidirectional VSC and MPPT-controlled PV arrays as an auxiliary power source
  26. Review Articles
  27. A modified adhesion evaluation method between asphalt and aggregate based on a pull off test and image processing
  28. Architectural practice process and artificial intelligence – an evolving practice
  29. Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part II
  30. The influence of storing mineral wool on its thermal conductivity in an open space
  31. Use of nondestructive test methods to determine the thickness and compressive strength of unilaterally accessible concrete components of building
  32. Use of modeling, BIM technology, and virtual reality in nondestructive testing and inventory, using the example of the Trzonolinowiec
  33. Tunable terahertz metasurface based on a modified Jerusalem cross for thin dielectric film evaluation
  34. Integration of SEM and acoustic emission methods in non-destructive evaluation of fiber–cement boards exposed to high temperatures
  35. Non-destructive method of characterizing nitrided layers in the 42CrMo4 steel using the amplitude-frequency technique of eddy currents
  36. Evaluation of braze welded joints using the ultrasonic method
  37. Analysis of the potential use of the passive magnetic method for detecting defects in welded joints made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 steel
  38. Analysis of the possibility of applying a residual magnetic field for lack of fusion detection in welded joints of S235JR steel
  39. Eddy current methodology in the non-direct measurement of martensite during plastic deformation of SS316L
  40. Methodology for diagnosing hydraulic oil in production machines with the additional use of microfiltration
  41. Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part II
  42. Enhancing communication with elderly and stroke patients based on sign-gesture translation via audio-visual avatars
  43. Optimizing wireless charging for electric vehicles via a novel coil design and artificial intelligence techniques
  44. Evaluation of moisture damage for warm mix asphalt (WMA) containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)
  45. Comparative CFD case study on forced convection: Analysis of constant vs variable air properties in channel flow
  46. Evaluating sustainable indicators for urban street network: Al-Najaf network as a case study
  47. Node failure in self-organized sensor networks
  48. Comprehensive assessment of side friction impacts on urban traffic flow: A case study of Hilla City, Iraq
  49. Design a system to transfer alternating electric current using six channels of laser as an embedding and transmitting source
  50. Security and surveillance application in 3D modeling of a smart city: Kirkuk city as a case study
  51. Modified biochar derived from sewage sludge for purification of lead-contaminated water
  52. Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part II
  53. Experimental study on behavior of hybrid columns by using SIFCON under eccentric load
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0103/html
Scroll to top button