Home Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer
Article Open Access

Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer

  • Zynab M. Al-gaban EMAIL logo , Alaa H. Abed and Hussain U. Bahia
Published/Copyright: March 19, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The increasing price of asphalt modifiers and the compulsory need for them make it necessary to find an alternative to improve the rheological properties of asphalt binders using economical polymeric materials. The aim of this study is to improve the rheological properties of asphalt binders and mixtures using nanopowder for polymer formaldehyde melamine (“NPFM”). The binder asphalt result showed that adding 4% NPFM to reference asphalt enhances the performance grade (PG) from PG (64-16) to PG (82-10). Additionally, the difference between the softening points of the upper and lower parts showed superior storage stability of less than 2.2%. As for Marshall properties, the results of the asphalt mixture modified with “NPFM” showed higher resilience, with a stability ratio increment of (17%) compared to the original mix. As for the tensile strength ratio (TSR), TSR% effects showed a high resistance level (85.44%), higher than that of the styrene-butane-styrene mixture. Adding “NPFM” to the reference asphalt gave a high resistance against permanent deformations. Rutting resistance increased by 67.6% at a temperature of 45°C, 80.6% at 55°C, and 60.5% at 70°C compared to other asphalt mixtures.

1 Introduction

Superpaving and the revolution of modern roads require new elements to improve the properties of asphalt mixtures, especially when the asphalt binder is the essential feature of the internal structure of the asphalt mixture in road networks [1]. Therefore, an increase in (G*/sin δ) is required, representing the internal structure's fundamental component as a function of binder bonding to resist permanent deformations [2,3]. Adding polymer to the asphalt binder enhances performance, manufactures modified asphalt with high shear modulus, and improves the adhesion between the asphalt and the rest of the asphalt mixture components [4,5]. It is essential to account for the stability of the polymer during its mixing with asphalt due to the oxidation and separation factors [6] and achieve sustainability based on meeting consumer requirements and keeping pace during technology development at the lowest cost [7,8]. Therefore, the new economic polymers compatible with asphalt were interesting reasons for developing the rheological properties of asphalt and thus improving the mixtures against different types of failures [9]. Due to the fine particle properties of polymeric materials, one essential consideration that enhances the workability and structural bonding is the modification of asphalt binder with nanomaterial [10]. The application of counting nanomaterials to asphalt is the most crucial discovery of researchers. It led to improvements that significantly improved the performance of asphalt and positively affected Marshall properties, with increased adhesion ability between the binder and the aggregate [11]. The percentage of polymers added to modify the asphalt binder ranges from 4 to 8% higher than the optimal asphalt content in the asphalt mixture, provided that it does not exceed this percentage, causing difficulty in its work [1,12]. There is a constant search for polymers similar to the styrene-butane-styrene (“SBS”) polymer, an exciting polymer used to improve the rheological properties of asphalt. Still, it is expensive and complicated due to continuous agitation during mixing [13,14]. Melamine formaldehyde polymer (“MFP”) was selected to add to the asphalt binder, which is considered one of the formaldehyde polymer applications in asphalt mixtures [15]. In addition, civil engineering used melamine formaldehyde polymer waste, achieving results consistent with the specifications [16].

2 Materials and laboratory testing

The results of the performance grade for the asphalt binder used in this study are shown in Table 1. PG (64-16) met the required specification in Iraq PG (82-10), and the performance grade should be increased. Therefore, the thermal stable polymer formaldehyde melamine (“PFM”) was used as a modifier. To ensure the compatibility and stability of mixing the modifier with asphalt, PFM was converted to nanomaterial with particles smaller than “100 μm” to increase the interaction by increasing the surface area and the chemical activity while raising its interacting surface through unrestricted electrons. Meanwhile, the atoms inside the material are more bound [17]. The granular size of the nanopolymer formaldehyde melamine “(NPFM”) is represented in Figures 1 and 2. All “NPFM” characteristics are tabulated in Table 2.

Table 1

Rheological characteristics of base asphalt binder

Performance grade of base asphalt binder
Parameter Temperature measured Parameter measured Requirements
Aging Standard specification Original binder
Rotational viscosity (Pa s), Dynamic shear rheometer (DSR), ASTM D 4402 @135°C 3 Pa s, Max
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 7175 0.542
1 kPa, Min
@64°C 1.36
@70°C 0.96
Flash point (°C) ASTM D 92
Penetration (0.1 mm) ASTM D 05 @25°C 291 230 min
Ductility (5 cm/min) ASTM D 113 @25°C 42
134 Greater than 100 cm
Aging Rolling thin film oven (RTFO) residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @64°C 2.55 2.2 kPa, Min
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 2872 @70°C 1.85
Mass loss (%) ASTM D 2872 0.53 1, max
Aging Pressure aging vessel (PAV-110_C) residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @25°C 6,125 5,000 kPa, Max
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 6521 @28°C 4,425
Figure 1 
               Effective diameter of NPFM.
Figure 1

Effective diameter of NPFM.

Figure 2 
               Particles diameter of melamine.
Figure 2

Particles diameter of melamine.

Table 2

Characteristics of NPFM

Measurement Standard specification Unit Limitation Result
Density D792 1.5–1.55 1.573
Specific gravity D792 1.5–1.55 1.5
Color D792 …. white
Tensile strength D638 MPa 55–83 58
Elongation at break D638 % 0.3–0.9 0.6
Melting temperature NTP1992 °C >300 345
ICSC1154
Dielectric strength D149 V/0.001in 160–240 200
Boiling point NTP1992 Sub limes
ICSC1154
Water absorption D570
24 h at 24°C Mg 10–50 20
30 h at 100°C Mg 40–110 55

2.1 Conversion of PFM to NPFM

To prepare the melamine formaldehyde from the damaged dishes, the following steps were taken:

  1. The damaged dishes were broken into small pieces and parts so that the particles could pass through sieve No. 4 (4.75 mm) and ground into powder by “Herson Mill,” as shown in Figure 3.

  2. After crushing, the melamine formaldehyde powder was sifted through sieve No. 325 (45 μm) by washing according to [18].

  3. After that, the particles were exposed to heat to dry, where they were inserted into an oven at 100°C until the sample was dehydrated, finally, the dried particles were crushed until we got Nanopowder using “Ball Mill,” as shown in Figure 4 to obtain Nano “PFM” powder shown through Figure 5.

Figure 3 
                  Herson Mill.
Figure 3

Herson Mill.

Figure 4 
                  Ball Mill.
Figure 4

Ball Mill.

Figure 5 
                  NPFM.
Figure 5

NPFM.

2.2 Method of preparing modified asphalt

The compatibility of asphalt with polymers and the properties of the polymer are essential in producing modified asphalt with good rheological properties due to the chemical composition of each polymer and asphalt. The chemical composition differs from one polymer to another. The chemical composition of asphalt varies from one country to another according to the type of oil extracted from it. The mixing temperatures and pressure were determined according to the ASTM D 4402 Standard Test Method [19], which is used for measuring rotational viscosity. Two different percentages of melamine (2 and 4%) were used. Mixing was carried out at automatic temperatures ranging between 160 and 170°C for 2 h. Figure 9 represents the mixing of melamine with asphalt. The interaction of melamine polymer with the asphalt is one of the strong interactions, complementing the many properties of melamine. It works on a strong ionic crosslinking between it and the asphalt. Nitrogen and hydrogen from melamine with (O═C–OH) form carboxylic acid groups within the asphalt element, as shown in Figure 6, forming epic coordinating bonds from six sides, and then these ramify in turn so that each component has a pair of bonds or electrons union to make a strong crosslinking between melamine and asphalt. Hence, it becomes an influential group that causes high stability. As it is known through the partial composition of asphalt, it is full of bonds, Figure 7, and can unite with “NPFM” quickly because there are hundreds of sites to link them from all sides. As a result of the strong interlocking between the asphalt and “NPFM,” it gains preference compared with the component “SBS,” which has a partial hexagonal structure, with one double bond in its composition (−CH═CH−), Figure 8. The ion bonding between SBS and asphalt occurs at a single site. Unlike NPFM, melamine cross-links with asphalt, bonding and union occurring at hundreds of sites. Unlike “NPFM,” the melamine crosslinks with asphalt, and hundreds of sites appear for the link. The “SBS” becomes ineffective when left in the atmosphere because its saturation in moisture will damage it, and the double bond turns into (−CH2−CH−OH−), which is useless.

Figure 6 
                  Structure of base asphalt binder. (a) Structural of asphalt binder and (b) fine section in asphalt binder.
Figure 6

Structure of base asphalt binder. (a) Structural of asphalt binder and (b) fine section in asphalt binder.

Figure 7 
                  Shows sites to link in melamine.
Figure 7

Shows sites to link in melamine.

Figure 8 
                  Shows sites to link in groups in asphalt SBS.
Figure 8

Shows sites to link in groups in asphalt SBS.

2.3 Mixing device

Mixing asphalt with other additives requires heat, high speed, shear mixing, and control of asphalt oxidation. These requirements become efficient if the additive has nanoparticles. There are special devices for mixing polymeric materials with asphalt. They are added as units with the asphalt concrete production process. A local device simulating the shear mixer was manufactured for laboratory evaluation. The requirements for mixing depend on the relationship between temperature and viscosity. The mixing temperature was found through an asphalt viscosity test [20]. The mixture was mixed with two ratios of “NPFM” 2 and 4%, and the powder was added to the asphalt gradually at a temperature of 160–170°C with a speed of 2,220 rpm for 2 h until a good spread of the additive was obtained in the binder asphalt. Figure 9 shows the mixing device and mixing process. Morphology of the nanomaterial, homogeneous distribution, and non-agglomeration of the polymer particles in the asphalt link structure was achieved by scanning electron microscopy “SEM,” as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 9 
                  Shows the mixing device during the mixing process.
Figure 9

Shows the mixing device during the mixing process.

Figure 10 
                  SEM image of (a) reference asphalt and (b) asphalt modified with nPFM.
Figure 10

SEM image of (a) reference asphalt and (b) asphalt modified with nPFM.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Asphalt binder tests

The results of the tests for adding melamine to the asphalt showed promising results, as shown in Table 3, when compared with the SBS-modified asphalt. Table 4 describes the characteristics of SBS-modified asphalt. Storage stability results are tabulated in Table 5.

Table 3

Physical properties of asphalt modified with 4% PFM

Type of asphalt Standard specification Performance grade of modified asphalt
Parameter Temperature measured Parameter measured Requirements
Aging Original binder
Rotational viscosity (Pa s) ASTM D 4402 @135°C 1.3 3 Pa s, Max
DSR ASTM D 7175 @76°C 2.31 1 kPa, Min
G*/sin δ, kPa
Flash point (ºC) ASTM D 92 270 230ºC, Min
Aging RTFO residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @76°C 5.72 2.2 kPa, Min
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 2872
Mass loss (%) ASTM D 2872 0.68 1, Max
Aging PAV-110 C residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @37°C 4,330 5,000 kPa, Max
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 6521
Bending beam rheometer (BBR) ASTM D 05 @0°C 135 300 MPa, Max
Creep stiffness, MPa
BBR ASTM D 6648 @0°C 0.37 0.3, Min
Slop m-value
Table 4

Physical properties of asphalt modified with 4% SBS

Type of asphalt Standard specification Performance grade of modified asphalt
Parameter Temperature measured Parameter measured Requirements
Aging Original binder
Rotational viscosity (Pa s) ASTM D 4402 @135°C 1.2 3 Pa s, Max
DSR ASTM D 7175 @76°C 1.21 1 kPa, Min
G*/sin δ, kPa
Flash Point (°C) ASTM D 92 270 230°C, Min
Aging RTFO residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @76°C 2.31 2.2 kPa, Min
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 2872
Mass Loss (%) ASTM D 2872 0.66 1, Max
Aging PAV-110 C residue
DSR ASTM D 7175 @37°C 3,950 5,000 kPa, Max
G*/sin δ, kPa ASTM D 6521
BBR ASTM D 05 @0°C 105 300 MPa, Max
Creep stiffness, MPa
BBR ASTM D 6648 @0°C 0.42 0.3, Min
Slop m-value
Table 5

Result of storage stability

Asphalt type Additive ratio (%) After storage stability test @3 days softening point (oC) ASTM D7173-14
Top Bottom Difference in value
Asphalt (SBS) 2 61.0 60.3 0.7
Asphalt (SBS) 4 72.9 72.0 0.9
Asphalt (nPFM) 2 65.7 65.2 0.5
Asphalt (nPFM) 4 77.3 77.0 0.3
Asphalt type Additive ratio After storage stability test @5 days softening point ( o C) ASTM D7173-14
Asphalt (SBS) 2 58.4 56.7 1.7
Asphalt (SBS) 4 62.6 60.5 2.1
Asphalt (nPFM) 2 67.5 67.2 0.3
Asphalt (nPFM) 4 79.3 79.2 0.1

Table 5 shows the equilibrium thermodynamics and phase separation dynamics of polymer-modified asphalt based on different softening points according to standard practice [21]. Figure 11 shows the sample preparation process to examine the softening points of the upper and lower parts of the sample. The results showed that the asphalt polymer modifier's storage stability and separation behavior strongly depend on the composition and internal structure of the asphalt and the polymer. Modified asphalt “NPFM” has also been shown to maintain its rheological properties due to the strong compatibility between the polymer and the asphalt and the bonding network between them. It was an essential factor for non-separation and a reason for high storage stability. The results also showed that “NPFM” is better than “SBS” in terms of storage stability, significantly when the ratio of the additive to the asphalt is increased. It also showed the high effectiveness of “NPFM” and a better cohesion reaction. The added nanostructure stopped the sinking process. In addition, there was enough surface area to make the “NPFM” particles move randomly through the internal structure of the asphalt instead of up and down. Unlike asphalt, a bonding element enhanced storage stability. Modified asphalt “SBS” is considered unstable for extended storage periods due to the deterioration of “SBS” at high temperatures, especially when high percentages of it are added [22]. Therefore, other additives are added to the asphalt to reduce stability and separation problems [23]. Due to the thermally stable properties of “NPFM,” it is not affected by the time it remains in the oven, but rather, the cohesive bonds between it and the asphalt are strengthened. The results also demonstrated increased bonding within 5 days, in contrast to SBS-modified asphalt.

Figure 11 
                  Demonstrates specimens for the softening point test.
Figure 11

Demonstrates specimens for the softening point test.

3.2 Asphalt mixture tests

As per ASTM D6927 Standard Test Method [24], Marshall samples were made using the asphalt mixture consisting of limestone dust as a filler and three types of asphalt: reference asphalt, SBS-modified asphalt, and NPFM-modified asphalt. Marshall stability test was carried out using the device after removing the samples from the molds and putting them in the water bath for half an hour, as required by the specification of testing the Marshall properties, as shown in Figure 12. Figure 13 shows the gravel gradation of the used mix.

Figure 12 
                  Marshall’s device with test samples.
Figure 12

Marshall’s device with test samples.

Figure 13 
                  Grain size diameter (mm) of (SCRB, 2003) for surface course layer.
Figure 13

Grain size diameter (mm) of (SCRB, 2003) for surface course layer.

The stability results for reference and modified asphalt “SBS” and “NPFM” showed higher strength of the asphalt mixtures containing melamine-modified asphalt than other asphalt mixtures. The increase in the result is due to the strong bonding between the asphalt “NPFM” and the elements of the asphalt mixture, which forms a vital bonding component. It resembles a network with increasing viscosity, a crosslinking factor component forming a homogeneous mass. The “NPFM” element is considered one of the most substantial elements, as it complements a strong chain when added to the asphalt. Figure 14 shows the stability result.

Figure 14 
                  Marshall test results.
Figure 14

Marshall test results.

A moisture damage test was carried out based on the specification [25], and the result showed that the tensile strength ratio (TSR) of NPFM-containing asphalt mixtures was higher than that of the asphalt mixture containing SBS-modified asphalt as well as the asphalt mixture that includes raw asphalt. Figure 15 shows the results of TSR with different types of asphalt. Moisture damage resistance when “NPFM” was used increased more than the TSR values of SBS-modified asphalt binders, all within a high improvement rate of more than 10%. This is attributed to “NPFM,” which improves the properties of asphalt due to the strong interlocking between the asphalt and “NPFM.” It is almost an insulating layer surrounding the components of the asphalt mixture and prevents moisture penetration into the mixture and, thus, weakening it.

Figure 15 
                  TSR% test results.
Figure 15

TSR% test results.

Compared to the original mix, the stability and TSR ratio of asphalt mixtures containing melamine-enhanced asphalt increase. The asphalt mixture containing SBS is attributed to the strong bonding between the melamine and asphalt particles from hundreds of places. This produces strong cohesion with high asphalt properties that effectively link aggregate particles as a solid homogeneous asphalt component at different conditions.

According to the rutting resistance test of asphalt mixtures containing modified asphalt “NPFM”, according to [26], was higher than that of the asphalt mixture containing SBS-modified asphalt and the asphalt mixture containing raw asphalt. The use of “NPFM” is more resistant than the rutting resistance for asphalt concrete with modified asphalt binder SBS, with a high rate of improvement. Adding “NPFM” to the asphalt formed a strong mesh that can resist continuous heavy loads for long periods and high temperatures. Figure 16 represents the results of the rutting test at 45, 55, and 70°C. The test was conducted using the rutting device (Figure 17). Figure 18 shows the paving of the samples in the mold, and Figure 19 shows the sample pressing device (Table 6).

Figure 16 
                  Shows the result of rutting resistance for the surface layer.
Figure 16

Shows the result of rutting resistance for the surface layer.

Figure 17 
                  Rutting device.
Figure 17

Rutting device.

Figure 18 
                  Paving of samples in the mold.
Figure 18

Paving of samples in the mold.

Figure 19 
                  Sample pressing device.
Figure 19

Sample pressing device.

Table 6

Rutting results

Layer type Temperature (°C) Filler type Asphalt type N cycles Rut depth (mm)
Surface 45 Lime stone dust Reference asphalt 10,000 3.7
Surface 45 Lime stone dust Asphalt SBS 10,000 2.5
Surface 45 Lime stone dust Asphalt NPFM 10,000 1.2
Surface 55 Lime stone dust Reference asphalt 10,000 5.3
Surface 55 Lime stone dust Asphalt SBS 10,000 3.6
Surface 55 Lime stone dust Asphalt NPFM 10,000 2.4
Surface 70 Lime stone dust Reference asphalt 10,000 12.9
Surface 70 Lime stone dust Asphalt SBS 10,000 7.3
Surface 70 Lime stone dust Asphalt NPFM 10,000 5.1

4 Economic analysis

  • In the case of using 4% modified asphalt (SBS), the cost is higher by 25% than when using regular asphalt, while in the case of using 4% modified asphalt (NPFM), the cost increases by 5% for sustainability purposes.

  • If commercial melamine powder is used to produce modified asphalt, the cost increases by 10% over regular asphalt production.

5 Conclusion

Through this study, the properties of the local asphalt binder were strengthened and improved by adding “NPFM” at two rates of (4 and 2%). The rheological behaviors of the asphalt modified with “NPFM” were obtained through a series of tests according to the international classification superpave to determine the value of PG and compare it with asphalt modified with SBS. The effectiveness of the asphalt with the new additive was confirmed by testing in the asphalt mixtures. The results were extracted and analyzed as follows:

  1. From the viscosity results, the improved material “NPFM” showed a higher increase in the binder asphalt's viscosity than with the modified asphalt SBS. The viscosity increased by 139.8% for melamine-modified asphalt, while the percentage increase for SBS asphalt was equal to 121.4%. Despite the higher viscosity of “NPFM,” the mixture sample needs a lower mixing temperature than the SBS asphalt mixing temperature, and this prevents damage to the adhesives during mixing and the production of modified asphalt mixtures. In addition, no such emissions occur when mixing “NPFM” with asphalt because melamine is thermally stable, so it maintains the viscosity of the mix.

  2. The addition of “NPFM” to the local asphalt led to an increase and improvement in the performance to become PG (82-10) and thus led to an improvement in the durability of asphalt mixtures (stability) by large values to prevent the occurrence of scratches in Iraq according to “PG” required in the governorates of Iraq, which is in general PG (76-10). Therefore, adding this type of polymer provides excellent benefits for achieving the desired goal.

  3. Moisture damage resistance was achieved when using “NPFM” more than the TSR values of SBS-modified asphalt binders, which were within a high improvement rate of more than 80%. The percentage increased (85.44%) in TSR% of the “NPFM” mixture compared to the “SBS” mixture, which was (83.61%).

  4. The importance of the cost of asphalt modifiers has been estimated on the environment, especially when comparing the asphalt mixture modified with “NPFM” with the modified asphalt mixture - SBS, through the recycling and use of damaged melamine plates. The results of the tests conducted on the mixture containing melamine proved that dispensing it with the modified binder SBS is possible. The result of the asphalt mixtures improved with melamine, which confirmed its high effectiveness during different conditions and gave better results than the modified asphalt mixture with SBS, especially the moisture damage test as one of the most critical problems leading to the destruction of asphalt concrete. This, in turn, reduces large amounts of road maintenance work.

  5. Depending on the results of the fragmentation resistance of the asphalt modified with “NPFM,” the cracking resistance increased by 67.6% at 45°C, 80.6% at 55°C, and 60.5% at 70°C compared to the local asphalt mixtures modified with SBS, where the percentages were 32.4, 32.1, and 43.4% at 45, 55, and 70°C, respectively.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript. AHA and HUB conceived the original idea, developed theoretical formalism, and supervised the research. ZMA-g planned the experiments under the supervision of AHA and HUB ZMA-g, AHA, and HUB discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. ZMA-g wrote the manuscript with support from AHA and HUB.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Most datasets generated and analyzed in this study are in this submitted manuscript. The other datasets are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author with the attached information.

References

[1] Enieb M, Al-Jumaili MAH, Al-Jameel HAE, Eltwati AS. Sustainability of using reclaimed asphalt pavement: based-reviewed evidence. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1973, No. 1, IOP Publishing; 2021, August. p. 012242. 10.1088/1742-6596/1973/1/012242.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Abed AH, Nasser AH. Assessment mixing and compaction temperatures for modified HMA using superpave high shear viscosity methods. Al-Nahrain J Eng Sci. 2018;21(4):516–22.10.29194/NJES.21040516Search in Google Scholar

[3] Abed AH, Bahia HU. Enhancement of permanent deformation resistance of modified asphalt concrete mixtures with nano-high density polyethylene. Constr Build Mater. 2020;236:117604. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117604.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bala N, Napiah M, Kamaruddin I. Effect of nano-silica particles on polypropylene polymer modified asphalt mixture performance. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2018;8:447–54. 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Taki ZNM, Abed AH, Al-Mosawe H. Evaluating Iraqi modified asphalt concrete moisture resistance based on strength ratio and fracture energy parameters. Adv Civ Eng. 2019;2019:8521682. 10.1155/2019/8521682.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Moghadas Nejad F, Zarroodi R, Naderi K. Effect of cross-linkers on the performance of polyethylene-modified asphalt binders. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Constr Mater. 2017;170(4):186–93. 10.1680/jcoma.16.00021.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Alwetaishi M, Kamel M, Al-Bustami N. Sustainable applications of asphalt mix with reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials: Innovative and new building brick. Int J Low-Carbon Technol. 2019;14(3):364–74. 10.1093/ijlct/ctz023.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Afrin T, Yodo N. A survey of road traffic congestion measures towards a sustainable and resilient transportation system. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4660. 10.3390/su12114660.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hasaninasab S. Effects of nanoparticles on cold recycled asphalt properties. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(6):632. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-021-04463-1.10.1007/s42452-021-04463-1Search in Google Scholar

[10] Arabani M, Tahami SA, Hamedi GH. Performance evaluation of dry process crumb rubber-modified asphalt mixtures with nanomaterial. Road Mater Pavement Des. 2018;19(5):1241–58. 10.1080/14680629.2017.1302356.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Debbarma K, Debnath B, Sarkar PP. A comprehensive review on the usage of nanomaterials in asphalt mixes. Constr Build Mater. 2022;361:129634. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129634.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hasaninia M, Haddadi F. The characteristics of hot mixed asphalt modified by nano-silica. Pet Sci Technol. 2017;35(4):351–9. 10.1080/10916466.2016.1258412.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Jamshidi A, Hasan MRM, Yao H, You Z, Hamzah MO. Characterization of the rate of change of rheological properties of nano-modified asphalt. Constr Build Mater. 2015;98:437–46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.069.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Alhamali DI, Wu J, Liu Q, Hassan NA, Yusoff NIM, Ali SIA. Physical and rheological characteristics of polymer-modified bitumen with nano silica particles. Arab J Sci Eng. 2016;41:1521–30. https://link.springer.com/journal/13369.10.1007/s13369-015-1964-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gunka V, Sidun I, Solodkyy S, Vytrykush N. Hot asphalt concrete with the application of formaldehyde-modified bitumen. In Proceedings of CEE 2019: Advances in Resource-saving Technologies and Materials in Civil and Environmental Engineering 18. Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 111–8. https://link.springer.com/bookseries/15087.10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_14Search in Google Scholar

[16] Chaitongrat C, Siwadamrongpong S. Recycling of melamine formaldehyde waste as fine aggregate in lightweight concrete. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 2018;40(1):39–45.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Salem SS, Hammad EN, Mohamed AA, El-Dougdoug W. A comprehensive review of nanomaterials: Types, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2022;13(1):41.10.33263/BRIAC131.041Search in Google Scholar

[18] ASTM C 430-08 Standard Test Method for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by the 45-Mm (No. 325); 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[19] ASTM D 4402 Standard Test Method for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt at Elevated Temperatures Using a Rotational Viscometer; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[20] AASHTO T 316 Standard Method of Test for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt Binder Using Rotational Viscometer; 2022; ASTM D 7175 Determining The Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using A Dynamic Shear Rheometer; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[21] ASTM D7173-14 Standard Practice for Determining the Separation Tendency of Polymer from Polymer Modified Asphalt; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Nasr D, Pakshir AH. Rheology and storage stability of modified binders with waste polymer composites. Road Mater Pavement Des. 2019;20(4):773–92. 10.1080/14680629.2017.1417152.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Liu XY, Wang P, Lu Y, Zhang TT, Wang LZ, Wang TF. Identifying the thermal storage stability of polymer-modified asphalt with carbon nanotubes based on its macro performance and micromorphology. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2021;2021:1–17. 10.1155/2021/6637999.Search in Google Scholar

[24] ASTM D6927 Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[25] ASTM D4867-D4867M – 09 Standard Test Method for Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Mixtures; 2022.Search in Google Scholar

[26] AASHTO T 340-10 Determining Rutting Susceptibility of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-22
Revised: 2024-06-09
Accepted: 2024-07-25
Published Online: 2025-03-19

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Modification of polymers to synthesize thermo-salt-resistant stabilizers of drilling fluids
  3. Study of the electronic stopping power of proton in different materials according to the Bohr and Bethe theories
  4. AI-driven UAV system for autonomous vehicle tracking and license plate recognition
  5. Enhancement of the output power of a small horizontal axis wind turbine based on the optimization approach
  6. Design of a vertically stacked double Luneburg lens-based beam-scanning antenna at 60 GHz
  7. Synergistic effect of nano-silica, steel slag, and waste glass on the microstructure, electrical resistivity, and strength of ultra-high-performance concrete
  8. Expert evaluation of attachments (caps) for orthopaedic equipment dedicated to pedestrian road users
  9. Performance and rheological characteristics of hot mix asphalt modified with melamine nanopowder polymer
  10. Second-order design of GNSS networks with different constraints using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms
  11. Impact of including a slab effect into a 2D RC frame on the seismic fragility assessment: A comparative study
  12. Analytical and numerical analysis of heat transfer from radial extended surface
  13. Comprehensive investigation of corrosion resistance of magnesium–titanium, aluminum, and aluminum–vanadium alloys in dilute electrolytes under zero-applied potential conditions
  14. Performance analysis of a novel design of an engine piston for a single cylinder
  15. Modeling performance of different sustainable self-compacting concrete pavement types utilizing various sample geometries
  16. The behavior of minors and road safety – case study of Poland
  17. The role of universities in efforts to increase the added value of recycled bucket tooth products through product design methods
  18. Adopting activated carbons on the PET depolymerization for purifying r-TPA
  19. Urban transportation challenges: Analysis and the mitigation strategies for road accidents, noise pollution and environmental impacts
  20. Enhancing the wear resistance and coefficient of friction of composite marine journal bearings utilizing nano-WC particles
  21. Sustainable bio-nanocomposite from lignocellulose nanofibers and HDPE for knee biomechanics: A tribological and mechanical properties study
  22. Effects of staggered transverse zigzag baffles and Al2O3–Cu hybrid nanofluid flow in a channel on thermofluid flow characteristics
  23. Mathematical modelling of Darcy–Forchheimer MHD Williamson nanofluid flow above a stretching/shrinking surface with slip conditions
  24. Energy efficiency and length modification of stilling basins with variable Baffle and chute block designs: A case study of the Fewa hydroelectric project
  25. Renewable-integrated power conversion architecture for urban heavy rail systems using bidirectional VSC and MPPT-controlled PV arrays as an auxiliary power source
  26. Exploitation of landfill gas vs refuse-derived fuel with landfill gas for electrical power generation in Basrah City/South of Iraq
  27. Two-phase numerical simulations of motile microorganisms in a 3D non-Newtonian nanofluid flow induced by chemical processes
  28. Sustainable cocoon waste epoxy composite solutions: Novel approach based on the deformation model using finite element analysis to determine Poisson’s ratio
  29. Review Articles
  30. A modified adhesion evaluation method between asphalt and aggregate based on a pull off test and image processing
  31. Architectural practice process and artificial intelligence – an evolving practice
  32. Special Issue: 51st KKBN - Part II
  33. The influence of storing mineral wool on its thermal conductivity in an open space
  34. Use of nondestructive test methods to determine the thickness and compressive strength of unilaterally accessible concrete components of building
  35. Use of modeling, BIM technology, and virtual reality in nondestructive testing and inventory, using the example of the Trzonolinowiec
  36. Tunable terahertz metasurface based on a modified Jerusalem cross for thin dielectric film evaluation
  37. Integration of SEM and acoustic emission methods in non-destructive evaluation of fiber–cement boards exposed to high temperatures
  38. Non-destructive method of characterizing nitrided layers in the 42CrMo4 steel using the amplitude-frequency technique of eddy currents
  39. Evaluation of braze welded joints using the ultrasonic method
  40. Analysis of the potential use of the passive magnetic method for detecting defects in welded joints made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 steel
  41. Analysis of the possibility of applying a residual magnetic field for lack of fusion detection in welded joints of S235JR steel
  42. Eddy current methodology in the non-direct measurement of martensite during plastic deformation of SS316L
  43. Methodology for diagnosing hydraulic oil in production machines with the additional use of microfiltration
  44. Special Issue: IETAS 2024 - Part II
  45. Enhancing communication with elderly and stroke patients based on sign-gesture translation via audio-visual avatars
  46. Optimizing wireless charging for electric vehicles via a novel coil design and artificial intelligence techniques
  47. Evaluation of moisture damage for warm mix asphalt (WMA) containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)
  48. Comparative CFD case study on forced convection: Analysis of constant vs variable air properties in channel flow
  49. Evaluating sustainable indicators for urban street network: Al-Najaf network as a case study
  50. Node failure in self-organized sensor networks
  51. Comprehensive assessment of side friction impacts on urban traffic flow: A case study of Hilla City, Iraq
  52. Design a system to transfer alternating electric current using six channels of laser as an embedding and transmitting source
  53. Security and surveillance application in 3D modeling of a smart city: Kirkuk city as a case study
  54. Modified biochar derived from sewage sludge for purification of lead-contaminated water
  55. The future of space colonisation: Architectural considerations
  56. Special Issue: AESMT-7 - Part II
  57. Experimental study on behavior of hybrid columns by using SIFCON under eccentric load
  58. Special Issue: ICESTA-2024 and ICCEEAS-2024
  59. A selective recovery of zinc and manganese from the spent primary battery black mass as zinc hydroxide and manganese carbonate
  60. Special Issue: REMO 2025 and BUDIN 2025
  61. Predictive modeling coupled with wireless sensor networks for sustainable marine ecosystem management using real-time remote monitoring of water quality
  62. Management strategies for refurbishment projects: A case study of an industrial heritage building
Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2024-0077/html
Scroll to top button