Home Technology Benefits and limitations of N2 addition with Ar as shielding gas on microstructure change and their effect on hardness and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel weldments
Article Open Access

Benefits and limitations of N2 addition with Ar as shielding gas on microstructure change and their effect on hardness and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel weldments

  • Mohamed S. Melad EMAIL logo , Mohamed A. Gebril , Farag M. Shuaeib , Thabet M. Elrabei , Dawod Elabar , Farag I. Haider and Osama M. Irfan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 5, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Duplexes stainless steels (DSSs) are widely used in various applications due to the equal amounts of the two phases, ferrite and austenite. These combined benefits provide the material with superior strength, corrosion resistance, and good welding capacity. During the welding process of DSS, equal amounts of both phases are disrupted, resulting in precipitation. To investigate this phenomenon, this study aims to analyze the effect of adding N2 with Ar (as a shielding gas) on microstructure changes. The study found that adding a small amount of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas makes it possible to control the appearance of Cr2N precipitation better. Moreover, the results indicate a direct relationship between the volume fraction of austenite and the use of N2 as a shielding gas. Reducing N2 shielding gas increases the micro-hardness of DSS welds due to higher ferrite volume fraction. The study also indicated that up to 10% amount of N2 is also enough to form chromium nitrides; moreover, much more nitrogen in argon shielding gas deteriorates mechanical and corrosion properties of DSS weldments.

1 Introduction

Duplex stainless steels (DSSs) are widely used due to their high alloying elements, ferrite and austenite microstructure, which provide good welding capacity, superior strength, and corrosion resistance. DSSs are utilized in corrosive industries such as pulp and paper, oil and gas, power plants, chemical, and desalination plants due to their high mechanical properties [1,2]. Aggressive environments can heighten the chances of localized corrosion, especially pitting corrosion. This type of corrosion occurs when the protective layer of a material breaks down due to the presence of chloride ions, inclusions or precipitates, along with other microscopic imperfections on the surface [35]. Fusion welding is a commonly used technique in the fabrication of DSS for technical applications. However, this process can lead to a shift in the balance of γ/δ phases and cause the loss of alloying elements, resulting in the formation of harmful phases [6,7]. It is crucial to investigate the changes in the microstructure of the 2205 DSS weld joint and their impact on its corrosion behavior. This is because the microstructure changes can significantly reduce the mechanical characteristics of the joint and make it more susceptible to localized corrosion. Mirakhorli et al. [8] analyzed the microstructure of a DSS’s weld metal in many locations. They observed that the regions with higher cooling rates might have greater ultimate austenite content.

In a study conducted by Geng et al. [9], the researchers examined the impact of microstructure changes on the corrosion behavior and hardness in different zones of a 2205 DSS weld joint. The study concluded that the microstructure in each zone was unique and varied due to differences in the welding thermal cycle. They observed higher levels of intragranular and secondary austenite presented in the ferrite grains within the weld zone (WZ), and coarse ferrite grains occurred close to the fusion line in the heat-affected zone (HAZ). Xie et al. [10] conducted a study on the microstructure characterization of DSS weldments using a multi-pass welding process. Their findings showed a significant phase imbalance at the HAZ and weld fillers, with ferritization occurring at the HAZ while the weld fillers were dominated by austenite. The mechanical and corrosion properties of DSS are significantly affected by the equilibrium between ferrite and austenite [11]. To achieve the best properties of DSSs, it is important to have nearly equal proportions of austenite and ferrite in the microstructure. This phase balance can be attained in the base metal (BM) through the correct combination of composition and solution heat treatment. However, maintaining a balance of ferrite/austenite in welds is more challenging than in BMs [12,13].

To improve the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of DSS, nitrogen is added as a nonmetallic austenite stabilizer [14]. This addition helps in enhancing the temperature transformation from ferrite to austenite. However, excessive ferrite concentration can lead to a loss of nitrogen from the weld pool and HAZ, which can reduce toughness and pitting corrosion resistance, and increase the susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement [15]. Hence, proper control over the nitrogen content is essential to ensure the desired material properties [1618].

Betini et al. [19] used autogenously pulsed tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding to investigate the impact of adding 2% N2 to argon (Ar) as a shielding gas on the microstructure and hardness of 1.8 mm-thick DSS. They concluded that during welding with a mixture of Ar + 2% N2 as shielding gas, the weldment had a higher austenite phase content than with pure gas. To achieve a satisfactory balance between austenite and ferrite phases, Rokanopoulou et al. [20] investigated the solubility of nitrogen in 2205 DSS weldments as a function of welding conditions. They concluded that combining of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas and using appropriate welding settings achieves a time- and cost-efficient technique. In a study conducted by Pimenta et al. [21], an autogenously TIG joint of hyper-DSS was used to investigate the optimum N2 amount to be added to the shielding gas. The results showed that the ideal volume proportion of austenite was found to be 50% when using values between 3.5 and 4.5%. This suggests that current industrial procedures need to be reviewed.

In a study conducted by Topić and Knezović [22], the ultimate tensile strength of specimens made of 2205 DSS plates was investigated. The specimens were created using laser welding techniques with different combinations of shielding gases. It was discovered that the introduction of N2 and Ar as shielding gases did not affect the ultimate tensile strength of the specimens. A study by Baghdadchi et al. [23] suggests that more research is needed to explore using nitrogen as a shielding gas. They found that using pure nitrogen instead of pure argon increased the welded austenite content from 22 to 39% when welding 1.5 mm-thick DSS using autogenous laser welding. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adding N2 to Ar as a shielding gas on the microstructure of DSS weldments. The microstructure alterations were evaluated using measures of corrosion resistance and hardness. Furthermore, the research explores the optimal amount of N2 to add when Ar is used as a shielding gas.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Material and welding procedure

The material used in the experiments was a DSS plate with the plate number of DSS 2205 and UNS number S32205. The filler material used was ER2209, which had a thickness of 1.6 mm. Table 1 provides the measurement chemical compositions of DSS and ER2209 filler material. The DSS BM was cut into 50 mm × 140 mm × 6 mm plates using an abrasive water jet-cutting machine. To perform a single pass on both sides, the samples were prepared as double V butt weld joints. Prior to welding, the samples were mechanically cleaned to eliminate corrosion and other impurities. This investigation used the TIG welding machine (DWHP250NL) with a heat input of 0.685 kJ·mm−1. For the experiment, an 8 mm cup size and a 2 mm arc gap were used along with a 2.4 mm tungsten electrode. Based on previous research, this study used shielding gas compositions of 100% Ar, 95% Ar + 5% N2, 90% Ar + 10% N2, 85% Ar + 15% N2, and 80% Ar + 20% N2.

Table 1

Measurement chemical composition of DSS and ER2209 filler material

Component Cr Ni Mn C Si P Mo Cu N Fe
DSS (wt%) 22.2 4.70 1.72 0.03 0.037 0.03 2.55 0.2 0.17 Balance
ER2209 (wt%) 23 8.5 1.6 0.02 0.5 0.01 3.1 0.11 Balance

2.2 Microstructure examination

A water jet-cutting machine was used to cut microstructure samples of the DSS weld joint. Microstructure observation was performed using the Olympus BX61 optical microscope (OM) coupled with an EP50 digital camera. Standard processes for polishing and grinding were followed to prepare all samples for microstructure analysis. Grinding was done using silicon carbide abrasive papers with grit sizes ranging from 240 to 1,200, according to the ASTM-E407-2002 standard. To achieve a dark ferrite and a white austenite phase, modified Bertha’s etching solution consisting of 60 mL H2O, 30 mL HCl, and 1 g K2S2O5 was used. Additionally, this method enables the observation of Cr-rich nitride by the OM [2427]. The volume fraction of ferrite and austenite was measured using ImageJ software.

2.3 Hardness test

The AKASHI MVK-E Vickers micro-hardness tester was utilized to measure the hardness of the samples under a 500 g load for 15 s. Prior to the micro-hardness test, the samples passed through grinding, polishing, and etching as part of the preparation for microstructure analysis. Micro-hardness measurements were taken in the transverse direction at five different locations: BM, HAZ, WZ, HAZ, and BM. The WZ was measured at six positions, while the HAZ was measured at four locations on each side.

2.4 Corrosion test

Electrochemical polarization measurements were conducted using the ACM instrument field machine with an Ag/AgCl-saturated reference electrode and a graphite counter electrode to perform a corrosion test. Small rectangular corrosion samples were obtained from the original DSS weld joint using a water jet-cutting machine. The electric wire connected the samples, which were then covered in epoxy. After that, the samples were mechanically ground to 800 grit using SiC emery paper, cleaned with distilled water, and rapidly dried using hot air. To ensure that the E corr became constant, the samples were submerged in 3.5% sodium chloride NaCl (simulating seawater) for 20 h under open-circuit conditions. Anodic cyclic polarization tests were then conducted at a scan rate of 60 mV·min−1, with a swept range of 500 mV below E corr. The scanning was repeated in the opposite direction when the voltage reached 700 mV. To ensure the reproducibility of the results, each test was recorded four times.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Microstructure characteristics

Figure 1 shows the microstructure of the DSS BM. The BM consists of white-like island austenite (γ) and dark ferrite (δ). The volume fraction of the γ phase in the BM is 48%, while the remaining 52% is composed of ferrite.

Figure 1 
                  BM microstructure.
Figure 1

BM microstructure.

Figure 2 shows the microstructure changes that occur in the weldments of DSS due to the addition of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas. The weldments in the WZ have three different types of austenite phases: intergranular austenite (IGA), widmanstätten austenite (WA), and grain boundary austenite (GBA). In the HAZ, the austenitic grains are primarily present as tiny WA and elongated GBA due to improper heating and rapid cooling. Additionally, this study has observed Cr2N precipitates, as shown in Figure 2(a), (b), (h), (i), and (k). This finding is consistent with the research that was conducted by Xie et al. [10], Cervo et al. [28], and Hosseini et al. [29]. The primary austenite is directly solidified from the molten metal, resulting in the formation of liquid to primary austenite and liquid plus ferrite to a primary austenite. Furthermore, the ferrite undergoes a solid-state phase transition into the primary austenite, leading to the formation of different types of austenite.

Figure 2 
                  Effect of adding N2 to Ar as a shielding gas on the microstructure of WZ and HAZ.
Figure 2

Effect of adding N2 to Ar as a shielding gas on the microstructure of WZ and HAZ.

The GBA began to nucleate and grew at pre-existing ferrite boundaries [30]. During the cooling process, the available nucleation sites at the ferrite boundaries decreased as the amount of GBA increased. This led to the formation of new nuclei at the ferrite–austenite interfaces. The new austenite nucleated at the ferrite–austenite boundaries grew toward the ferrite in the form of a side-plate WA [31]. The IGA ultimately forms at the center of ferrite grains. The findings indicate that the sample welded with 100% Ar as a shielding gas has a small amount of Cr2N precipitation in both WZ and HAZ, as shown in Figure 2(a) and (b). However, adding 5 and 10% N2 to Ar as a shielding gas resulted in the disappearance of these precipitations in both WZ and HAZ, as shown in Figure 2(c)–(f). Moreover, the addition of 15% N2 showed a small amount of Cr2N in HAZ, as illustrated in Figure 2(h). When increasing the amount of N2 up to 20%, the amount of Cr2N precipitation reappeared and increased in both WZ and HAZ, as clarified in Figure 2(i) and (k). It has been observed that the presence of a small quantity of N2 can prevent the formation of Cr2N precipitates. However, if the amount of N2 used as a shielding gas exceeds 10%, it can lead to the promotion of Cr2N precipitates in both WZ and HAZ, as illustrated in Figure 2(i) and (k).

Figure 3 shows how the amount of N2 added to Ar as shielding gas affects the measured austenite and ferrite volume fraction. The austenite volume fraction of the DSS weldment increased with an increase in N2 with Ar shielding gas. This aligns with the findings of Betini et al. [19] and Tahaei et al. [32]. There is a direct relationship between the amount of austenite present and the use of N2 shielding gas. However, the formation of Cr2N precipitates is a complex process. As shown in Figure 2(a), (b), (h), (i), and (k), welding on DSS without N2 addition and with a high concentration of N2 as shielding gas will encourage the development of Cr2N precipitates.

Figure 3 
                  Austenite and ferrite content as a function of shielding gas composition.
Figure 3

Austenite and ferrite content as a function of shielding gas composition.

3.2 Micro-hardness behavior

Numerous micro-hardness measurements have been conducted to assess the hardness of DSS weldments that have undergone changes in shielding gas composition. These measurements were taken along the transverse direction of the three different zones of the DSS weld joint. Figure 4 demonstrates how the hardness behavior changes along the transverse direction from BM to BM between samples that were welded using various shielding gas compositions. It can be observed that the sample welded with 100% Ar has a higher hardness behavior, ranging from 300 to 400 HV. However, the samples welded with 5 and 10% of N2 exhibit approximately the same behavior, ranging from 300 to 350 HV in both WZ and HAZ. Moreover, increased N2 shielding gas by more than 15 and 20% showed less hardness behavior below 300 HV. It has been observed that the hardness decreases when the amount of N2 is increased with argon as a shielding gas. This is similar to the findings of a previous study [33]. The ferrite phase is known to have a higher hardness than the austenite phase [8,34,35]. Therefore, the decrease in hardness when N2 is added with argon as a shielding gas can be attributed to the decrease in the ferrite volume fraction. Since the relationship between the addition of N2 as a shielding gas and austenite content is proportional, as shown in Figure 3, increasing the amount of N2 as a shielding gas reduces the ferrite volume fraction and hardness of DSS weldments.

Figure 4 
                  Effect of adding N2 to Ar shielding gas on the hardness behavior of DSS weldment.
Figure 4

Effect of adding N2 to Ar shielding gas on the hardness behavior of DSS weldment.

3.3 Corrosion resistance results

3.3.1 Open circuit potential (E corr)

Figure 5 shows how the open circuit potential (E corr) changes over time for welded samples using different shielding gas compositions. It is noticeable that the E corr of the samples welded with 5, 10, and 15% N2 mixed with Ar shielding gas shifted toward a more positive direction compared to the BM. However, both samples showed a shift in E corr toward the negative direction. The shift was more pronounced in the sample welded with 100% Ar–0% N2 and the sample welded with 80% Ar–20% N2. Moreover, the sample welded using 90% Ar–10% N2 as a shielding gas shows the highest E corr value, exceeding the E corr value of samples that welded with added 15 and 20% N2.

Figure 5 
                     
                        E
                        corr behavior as a function of time of the DSS samples welded using different shielding gas compositions.
Figure 5

E corr behavior as a function of time of the DSS samples welded using different shielding gas compositions.

When the potential rises in a positive direction, this means that the passive film develops and is strong. On the other hand, a negative potential drop indicates film fractures, collapse, or no film formation, which is an active corrosion. If a constant potential is maintained, it suggests that the film is still intact and protective. This information is based on research [36]. It has been found that the addition of a small quantity of N2 to Ar, as a shielding gas, can improve the strength of the passive film of DSS weldments, as observed in previous studies [37]. However, when the N2 concentration is raised to 20%, the passive film fails. The passive film can collapse due to the reappearance of Cr2N precipitations, resulting in a depletion zone of Cr when the amount of N2 increases.

3.3.2 Potentiodynamic polarization curve

Figure 6 illustrates how changes in shielding gas composition affect the polarization curve behavior of DSS weldments.

Figure 6 
                     Effect of N2 addition with Ar shielding gas on the polarization curve of DSS weldments.
Figure 6

Effect of N2 addition with Ar shielding gas on the polarization curve of DSS weldments.

The figure indicates that the critical pitting potential of the sample welded with pure argon (100% Ar) is around 157.19 mV. However, when 5 and 10% N2 were added to Ar, the pitting potential increased significantly to 188.41 and 322.16 mV, respectively. This indicates a proportional relationship between the pitting potential and the addition of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas. However, when the percentage of N2 was further increased to 15 and 20%, the pitting potential showed a decreasing trend, with values of 274.2 mV and 147.5 mV, respectively. Thus, the relationship between the pitting potential and the addition of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas is initially proportional but becomes reversed when the percentage of N2 goes beyond 10%. The reason behind this behavior is linked to the volume fraction of austenite and the Cr2N precipitates. The volume fraction of austenite increases as the amount of N2 with Ar as a shielding gas increases, as demonstrated in Figure 3. Furthermore, the Cr2N precipitates vanish upon the addition of 5 and 10% N2, and reappear when N2 is increased to 15% in HAZ and 20% in both WZ and HAZ, as depicted in Figure 2.

Adding 10% N2 with Ar provides the highest pitting potential due to high austenite volume fraction without Cr2N precipitations (Figures 2(e), (f) and 3). The surface morphology of samples welded using different compositions of shielding gas was observed under an OM following a cyclic polarization test, as shown in Figure 7. The results indicate that when 100% Ar or 20% N2 + 80% Ar shielding gas is used, intergranular corrosion (IGC) and large pits are observed. However, no IGC has been observed, and the pits will be extremely small when shielding gas containing 5, 10, and 15% N2 is used.

Figure 7 
                     OM surface morphology of the samples welded with different shielding gas compositions after a potentiodynamic polarization test.
Figure 7

OM surface morphology of the samples welded with different shielding gas compositions after a potentiodynamic polarization test.

4 Conclusions

DSS was welded using the TIG welding process with N2 and Ar as a shielding gas. The study evaluated the impact of different N2 and Ar gas mixtures on hardness and corrosion resistance. The conclusions are based on the results of this study:

  1. To prevent the formation of Cr2N precipitates, Ar gas with less than 10% N2 is used as a shielding gas. However, if N2 exceeds 10%, Cr2N precipitates will reappear.

  2. Introducing more N2 to Ar as a shielding gas increases the austenite volume fraction.

  3. Adding N2 to Ar as a shielding gas reduces the ferrite content in DSS weldments, leading to a decrease in hardness.

  4. By increasing the volume fraction of austenite and suppressing Cr2N precipitates, the critical pitting potential of DSS weldments increases when the amount of N2 addition rises to 10% with Ar shielding gas. Exceeding 10% addition results in decreasing critical pitting potential due to the reappearance of Cr2N precipitations.

  5. The sample that was welded without adding N2 (100% Ar) is significantly harder but shows less corrosion resistance due to the high ferrite phase content. On the other hand, the sample welded with 20% N2, despite having lower hardness, also exhibits low corrosion resistance because of the precipitation of Cr2N.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2025).

  1. Funding information: This study was financially supported (QU-APC-2025) by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University.

  2. Author contributions: Mohamed S. Melad: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, writing – original draft & editing; Mohamed A. Gebril: supervision, visualization, investigation, review & editing, conceptualization; Farag M. Shuaeib: co-supervision, visualization, investigation, review & editing; Thabet M. Elrabei: resources, review & editing; Dawod Elabar: resources, review & editing; Farag I. Haider: resources, review & editing; Osama M. Irfan: funding acquisition and review. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

[1] Armas, I. A. and S. D. Moreuil. Duplex stainless steels. Liljas M, Sjoholm F Applications. ISTE Ltd, Grã Bretanha, 2009, pp. 1–433.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sawczen, T., B. B. Ferraro, L. G. Barbosa, C. A. Barbosa, É. Teixeira Neto, and S. M. Agostinho. Evaluation of critical pitting temperature for superduplex stainless steel. Resumos, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gao, J., Y. Jiang, B. Deng, Z. Ge, and J. Li. Determination of pitting initiation of duplex stainless steel using potentiostatic pulse technique. Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 55, No. 17, 2010 Jul, pp. 4837–4844.10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.035Search in Google Scholar

[4] Nicholls, J. M. Corrosion properties of duplex stainless steels: general corrosion, pitting and crevice corrosion. In Duplex stainless steels, Vol. 94, 1994 Nov.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Pettersson, R. F. and J. Flyg. Electrochemical evaluation of pitting and crevice corrosion resistance of stainless steels in NaCl and NaBr, Outokumpu, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004 Mar.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Yousefieh, M., M. Shamanian, and A. Saatchi. Influence of heat input in pulsed current GTAW process on microstructure and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel welds. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, Vol. 18, No. 9, 2011 Sep, pp. 65–69.10.1016/S1006-706X(12)60036-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wang, X., Y. Jiang, Z. Ling, Z. Yuan, and J. Shi. Advancements in diffusion barrier layers based on heterogeneous connection of electrode/thermoelectric materials. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 1001, 2024 Oct, id. 175185.10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175185Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mirakhorli, F., F. Malek Ghaini, and M. J. Torkamany. Development of weld metal microstructures in pulsed laser welding of duplex stainless steel. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 21, No. 10, 2012 Oct, pp. 2173–2176.10.1007/s11665-012-0141-3Search in Google Scholar

[9] Geng, S., J. Sun, L. Guo, and H. Wang. Evolution of microstructure and corrosion behavior in 2205 duplex stainless steel GTA-welding joint. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 19, 2015 Aug, pp. 32–37.10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.009Search in Google Scholar

[10] Xie, X. F., J. Li, W. Jiang, Z. Dong, S. T. Tu, X. Zhai, et al. Nonhomogeneous microstructure formation and its role on tensile and fatigue performance of duplex stainless steel 2205 multi-pass weld joints. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 786, 2020 Jun, id. 139426.10.1016/j.msea.2020.139426Search in Google Scholar

[11] Solomon, H. D., and T. M. Jr Devine. Duplex stainless steels – a tale of two phases. In Duplex stainless steels, 1982 Oct, pp. 693–756.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Mourad, A. I., A. Khourshid, and T. Sharef. Gas tungsten arc and laser beam welding processes effects on duplex stainless steel 2205 properties. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 549, 2012 Jul, pp. 105–113.10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.012Search in Google Scholar

[13] Omura, T., T. Kushida, and Y. Komizo. Nitrogen distribution on rapid solidification in laser welded duplex stainless steels. Welding International, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2000 Jan, pp. 288–294.10.1080/09507110009549181Search in Google Scholar

[14] Muthupandi, V., P. B. Srinivasan, V. Shankar, S. K. Seshadri, and S. Sundaresan. Effect of nickel and nitrogen addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of power beam processed duplex stainless steel (UNS 31803) weld metals. Materials Letters, Vol. 59, No. 18, 2005 Aug, pp. 2305–2309.10.1016/j.matlet.2005.03.010Search in Google Scholar

[15] Valiente Bermejo, M. A., L. Karlsson, L. E. Svensson, K. Hurtig, H. Rasmuson, M. Frodigh, et al. Effect of shielding gas on welding performance and properties of duplex and superduplex stainless steel welds. Welding in the World, Vol. 59, 2015 Mar, pp. 239–249.10.1007/s40194-014-0199-7Search in Google Scholar

[16] Melad, M. S., M. A. Gebril, F. M. Shuaeib, F. I. Haidar, D. M. Elabar, and S. M. Elkoum. Parametric study and optimization the effect of TIG welding process parameters on the corrosion resistance of 2205 DSS weldment using potentiodynamic polarization technique. The Scientific Journal of University of Benghazi, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2023 Dec.10.37376/sjuob.v36i2.4296Search in Google Scholar

[17] Melad, M. S., M. A. Gebril, F. M. Shuaeib, R. M. Esmaael, and M. A. El-Hag. An in-depth investigation of the effects of tungsten inert gas welding process parameters on hardness and corrosion resistance of 2205 DSS weldments: new design of experiment parametric studies and optimization. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, Vol. 69, 2024 Jun, pp. 47–69.10.4028/p-mHdf4lSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Wang, X., G. Wu, S. Li, P. He, N. Fang, and W. Long. Effect of N–Cr compounds on the brazing of high nitrogen steel with Ag-based filler metal: first-principles calculation. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 23, 2023 Mar, pp. 370–378.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.198Search in Google Scholar

[19] Betini, E. G., M. P. Gomes, C. S. Mucsi, M. T. Orlando, T. D. Luz, M. N. Avettand-Fènoël, et al. Effect of nitrogen addition to shielding gas on cooling rates and in the microstructure of thin sheets of duplex stainless steel welded by pulsed gas tungsten arc welding process. Materials Research, Vol. 22, No. suppl 1, 2019 Aug, id. e20190247.10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2019-0247Search in Google Scholar

[20] Rokanopoulou, A., P. Skarvelis, and G. D. Papadimitriou. Welding design methodology for optimization of phase balance in duplex stainless steels during autogenous arc welding under Ar–N2 atmosphere. Welding in the World, Vol. 63, 2019 Jan, pp. 3–10.10.1007/s40194-018-0660-0Search in Google Scholar

[21] Pimenta, A. R., M. G. Diniz, G. Perez, and I. G. Solórzano-Naranjo. Nitrogen addition to the shielding gas for welding hyper-duplex stainless steel. Soldagem & Inspeção, Vol. 25, 2020 Jun, id. e2512.10.1590/0104-9224/si25.12Search in Google Scholar

[22] Topić, A. and N. Knezović. Influence of shielding gas mixture type on ultimate tensile strength of laser-welded joints in duplex stainless steel 2205. Annals of Daaam & Proceedings, Vol. 31, 2020 Aug.10.2507/31st.daaam.proceedings.056Search in Google Scholar

[23] Baghdadchi, A., V. A. Hosseini, K. Hurtig, and L. Karlsson. Promoting austenite formation in laser welding of duplex stainless steel—impact of shielding gas and laser reheating. Welding in the World, Vol. 65, 2021 Mar, pp. 499–511.10.1007/s40194-020-01026-7Search in Google Scholar

[24] Westin, E. M., B. Brolund, and S. Hertzman. Weldability aspects of a newly developed duplex stainless steel LDX 2101. Steel Research International, Vol. 79, No. 6, 2008 Jun, pp. 473–481.10.1002/srin.200806155Search in Google Scholar

[25] Westin, E. M. Microstructure and properties of welds in the lean duplex stainless steel LDX 2101. Doctoral dissertation. Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Westin, E. M., M. M. Johansson, and R. F. Pettersson. Effect of nitrogen-containing shielding and backing gas on the pitting corrosion resistance of welded lean duplex stainless steel LDX 2101®(EN 1.4162, UNS S32101). Welding in the World, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2013 Jul, pp. 467–476.10.1007/s40194-013-0046-2Search in Google Scholar

[27] Westin, E. M. and S. Hertzman. Element distribution in lean duplex stainless steel welds. Welding in the World, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2014 Mar, pp. 143–160.10.1007/s40194-013-0108-5Search in Google Scholar

[28] Cervo, R., P. Ferro, and A. Tiziani. Annealing temperature effects on super duplex stainless steel UNS s32750 welded joints. I: Microstructure and partitioning of elements. Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 45, 2010 Aug, pp. 4369–4377.10.1007/s10853-010-4310-1Search in Google Scholar

[29] Hosseini, V. A., S. Wessman, K. Hurtig, and L. Karlsson. Nitrogen loss and effects on microstructure in multipass TIG welding of a super duplex stainless steel. Materials & Design, Vol. 98, 2016 May, pp. 88–97.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[30] Eghlimi, A., M. Shamanian, and K. Raeissi. Effect of current type on microstructure and corrosion resistance of super duplex stainless steel claddings produced by the gas tungsten arc welding process. Surface and Coatings Technology, Vol. 244, 2014 Apr, pp. 45–51.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.047Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ramirez, A. J., J. C. Lippold, and S. D. Brandi. The relationship between chromium nitride and secondary austenite precipitation in duplex stainless steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 34, 2003 Aug, pp. 1575–1597.10.1007/s11661-003-0304-9Search in Google Scholar

[32] Tahaei, A., A. F. Perez, M. Merlin, F. A. Valdes, and G. L. Garagnani. Effect of the addition of nickel powder and post weld heat treatment on the metallurgical and mechanical properties of the welded UNS S32304 duplex stainless steel. Soldagem & Inspeção, Vol. 21, 2016 Apr, pp. 197–208.10.1590/0104-9224/SI2102.09Search in Google Scholar

[33] Başyiğit, A. B. and A. Kurt. The effects of nitrogen gas on microstructural and mechanical properties of TIG welded s32205 duplex stainless steel. Metals, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2018 Apr, id. 226.10.3390/met8040226Search in Google Scholar

[34] Jebaraj, A. V. and L. Ajaykumar. Influence of microstructural changes on impact toughness of weldment and base metal of duplex stainless steel AISI 2205 for low temperature applications. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 64, 2013 Jan, pp. 456–466.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.119Search in Google Scholar

[35] Cui, S., Y. Shi, K. Sun, and S. Gu. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of keyhole deep penetration TIG welds of S32101 duplex stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 709, 2018 Jan, pp. 214–222.10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.051Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ali, M. A. Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in cooling systems by low- and non-toxic corrosion inhibitors. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Muñoz, A. I., J. G. Antón, J. L. Guiñón, and V. P. Herranz. Effect of nitrogen in argon as a shielding gas on tungsten inert gas welds of duplex stainless steels. Corrosion, Vol. 61, No. 7, 2005 Jul, pp. 693–705.10.5006/1.3278204Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-18
Revised: 2024-10-03
Accepted: 2025-04-10
Published Online: 2025-05-05

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Review Articles
  2. Utilization of steel slag in concrete: A review on durability and microstructure analysis
  3. Technical development of modified emulsion asphalt: A review on the preparation, performance, and applications
  4. Recent developments in ultrasonic welding of similar and dissimilar joints of carbon fiber reinforcement thermoplastics with and without interlayer: A state-of-the-art review
  5. Unveiling the crucial factors and coating mitigation of solid particle erosion in steam turbine blade failures: A review
  6. From magnesium oxide, magnesium oxide concrete to magnesium oxide concrete dams
  7. Properties and potential applications of polymer composites containing secondary fillers
  8. A scientometric review on the utilization of copper slag as a substitute constituent of ordinary Portland cement concrete
  9. Advancement of additive manufacturing technology in the development of personalized in vivo and in vitro prosthetic implants
  10. Recent advance of MOFs in Fenton-like reaction
  11. A review of defect formation, detection, and effect on mechanical properties of three-dimensional braided composites
  12. Non-conventional approaches to producing biochars for environmental and energy applications
  13. Review of the development and application of aluminum alloys in the nuclear industry
  14. Advances in the development and characterization of combustible cartridge cases and propellants: Preparation, performance, and future prospects
  15. Recent trends in rubberized and non-rubberized ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete for sustainable construction: A review
  16. Cement-based materials for radiative cooling: Potential, material and structural design, and future prospects
  17. A comprehensive review: The impact of recycling polypropylene fiber on lightweight concrete performance
  18. A comprehensive review of preheating temperature effects on reclaimed asphalt pavement in the hot center plant recycling
  19. Exploring the potential applications of semi-flexible pavement: A comprehensive review
  20. A critical review of alkali-activated metakaolin/blast furnace slag-based cementitious materials: Reaction evolution and mechanism
  21. Dispersibility of graphene-family materials and their impact on the properties of cement-based materials: Application challenges and prospects
  22. Research progress on rubidium and cesium separation and extraction
  23. A step towards sustainable concrete with the utilization of M-sand in concrete production: A review
  24. Studying the effect of nanofillers in civil applications: A review
  25. Studies on the anticorrosive effect of phytochemicals on mild steel, carbon steel, and stainless-steel surfaces in acid and alkali medium: A review
  26. Nanotechnology for calcium aluminate cement: thematic analysis
  27. Research Articles
  28. Investigation of the corrosion performance of HVOF-sprayed WC-CoCr coatings applied on offshore hydraulic equipment
  29. A systematic review of metakaolin-based alkali-activated and geopolymer concrete: A step toward green concrete
  30. Evaluation of color matching of three single-shade composites employing simulated 3D printed cavities with different thicknesses using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulae
  31. Novel approaches in prediction of tensile strain capacity of engineered cementitious composites using interpretable approaches
  32. Effect of TiB2 particles on the compressive, hardness, and water absorption responses of Kulkual fiber-reinforced epoxy composites
  33. Analyzing the compressive strength, eco-strength, and cost–strength ratio of agro-waste-derived concrete using advanced machine learning methods
  34. Tensile behavior evaluation of two-stage concrete using an innovative model optimization approach
  35. Tailoring the mechanical and degradation properties of 3DP PLA/PCL scaffolds for biomedical applications
  36. Optimizing compressive strength prediction in glass powder-modified concrete: A comprehensive study on silicon dioxide and calcium oxide influence across varied sample dimensions and strength ranges
  37. Experimental study on solid particle erosion of protective aircraft coatings at different impact angles
  38. Compatibility between polyurea resin modifier and asphalt binder based on segregation and rheological parameters
  39. Fe-containing nominal wollastonite (CaSiO3)–Na2O glass-ceramic: Characterization and biocompatibility
  40. Relevance of pore network connectivity in tannin-derived carbons for rapid detection of BTEX traces in indoor air
  41. A life cycle and environmental impact analysis of sustainable concrete incorporating date palm ash and eggshell powder as supplementary cementitious materials
  42. Eco-friendly utilisation of agricultural waste: Assessing mixture performance and physical properties of asphalt modified with peanut husk ash using response surface methodology
  43. Benefits and limitations of N2 addition with Ar as shielding gas on microstructure change and their effect on hardness and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel weldments
  44. Effect of selective laser sintering processing parameters on the mechanical properties of peanut shell powder/polyether sulfone composite
  45. Impact and mechanism of improving the UV aging resistance performance of modified asphalt binder
  46. AI-based prediction for the strength, cost, and sustainability of eggshell and date palm ash-blended concrete
  47. Investigating the sulfonated ZnO–PVA membrane for improved MFC performance
  48. Strontium coupling with sulphur in mouse bone apatites
  49. Transforming waste into value: Advancing sustainable construction materials with treated plastic waste and foundry sand in lightweight foamed concrete for a greener future
  50. Evaluating the use of recycled sawdust in porous foam mortar for improved performance
  51. Improvement and predictive modeling of the mechanical performance of waste fire clay blended concrete
  52. Polyvinyl alcohol/alginate/gelatin hydrogel-based CaSiO3 designed for accelerating wound healing
  53. Research on assembly stress and deformation of thin-walled composite material power cabin fairings
  54. Effect of volcanic pumice powder on the properties of fiber-reinforced cement mortars in aggressive environments
  55. Analyzing the compressive performance of lightweight foamcrete and parameter interdependencies using machine intelligence strategies
  56. Selected materials techniques for evaluation of attributes of sourdough bread with Kombucha SCOBY
  57. Establishing strength prediction models for low-carbon rubberized cementitious mortar using advanced AI tools
  58. Investigating the strength performance of 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete using applicable predictive models
  59. An eco-friendly synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with jamun seed extract and their multi-applications
  60. The application of convolutional neural networks, LF-NMR, and texture for microparticle analysis in assessing the quality of fruit powders: Case study – blackcurrant powders
  61. Study of feasibility of using copper mining tailings in mortar production
  62. Shear and flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams with recycled concrete aggregates
  63. Advancing GGBS geopolymer concrete with nano-alumina: A study on strength and durability in aggressive environments
  64. Leveraging waste-based additives and machine learning for sustainable mortar development in construction
  65. Study on the modification effects and mechanisms of organic–inorganic composite anti-aging agents on asphalt across multiple scales
  66. Morphological and microstructural analysis of sustainable concrete with crumb rubber and SCMs
  67. Structural, physical, and luminescence properties of sodium–aluminum–zinc borophosphate glass embedded with Nd3+ ions for optical applications
  68. Eco-friendly waste plastic-based mortar incorporating industrial waste powders: Interpretable models for flexural strength
  69. Bioactive potential of marine Aspergillus niger AMG31: Metabolite profiling and green synthesis of copper/zinc oxide nanocomposites – An insight into biomedical applications
  70. Preparation of geopolymer cementitious materials by combining industrial waste and municipal dewatering sludge: Stabilization, microscopic analysis and water seepage
  71. Seismic behavior and shear capacity calculation of a new type of self-centering steel-concrete composite joint
  72. Sustainable utilization of aluminum waste in geopolymer concrete: Influence of alkaline activation on microstructure and mechanical properties
  73. Optimization of oil palm boiler ash waste and zinc oxide as antibacterial fabric coating
  74. Tailoring ZX30 alloy’s microstructural evolution, electrochemical and mechanical behavior via ECAP processing parameters
  75. Comparative study on the effect of natural and synthetic fibers on the production of sustainable concrete
  76. Microemulsion synthesis of zinc-containing mesoporous bioactive silicate glass nanoparticles: In vitro bioactivity and drug release studies
  77. On the interaction of shear bands with nanoparticles in ZrCu-based metallic glass: In situ TEM investigation
  78. Developing low carbon molybdenum tailing self-consolidating concrete: Workability, shrinkage, strength, and pore structure
  79. Experimental and computational analyses of eco-friendly concrete using recycled crushed brick
  80. High-performance WC–Co coatings via HVOF: Mechanical properties of steel surfaces
  81. Mechanical properties and fatigue analysis of rubber concrete under uniaxial compression modified by a combination of mineral admixture
  82. Experimental study of flexural performance of solid wood beams strengthened with CFRP fibers
  83. Eco-friendly green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with Syzygium aromaticum extract: characterization and evaluation against Schistosoma haematobium
  84. Predictive modeling assessment of advanced concrete materials incorporating plastic waste as sand replacement
  85. Self-compacting mortar overlays using expanded polystyrene beads for thermal performance and energy efficiency in buildings
  86. Enhancing frost resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete using surfactants: sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium abietate, and triterpenoid saponins
  87. Equation-driven strength prediction of GGBS concrete: a symbolic machine learning approach for sustainable development
  88. Empowering 3D printed concrete: discovering the impact of steel fiber reinforcement on mechanical performance
  89. Advanced hybrid machine learning models for estimating chloride penetration resistance of concrete structures for durability assessment: optimization and hyperparameter tuning
  90. Influence of diamine structure on the properties of colorless and transparent polyimides
  91. Post-heating strength prediction in concrete with Wadi Gyada Alkharj fine aggregate using thermal conductivity and ultrasonic pulse velocity
  92. Special Issue on Recent Advancement in Low-carbon Cement-based Materials - Part II
  93. Investigating the effect of locally available volcanic ash on mechanical and microstructure properties of concrete
  94. Flexural performance evaluation using computational tools for plastic-derived mortar modified with blends of industrial waste powders
  95. Foamed geopolymers as low carbon materials for fire-resistant and lightweight applications in construction: A review
  96. Autogenous shrinkage of cementitious composites incorporating red mud
  97. Mechanical, durability, and microstructure analysis of concrete made with metakaolin and copper slag for sustainable construction
  98. Special Issue on AI-Driven Advances for Nano-Enhanced Sustainable Construction Materials
  99. Advanced explainable models for strength evaluation of self-compacting concrete modified with supplementary glass and marble powders
  100. Analyzing the viability of agro-waste for sustainable concrete: Expression-based formulation and validation of predictive models for strength performance
  101. Special Issue on Advanced Materials for Energy Storage and Conversion
  102. Innovative optimization of seashell ash-based lightweight foamed concrete: Enhancing physicomechanical properties through ANN-GA hybrid approach
  103. Production of novel reinforcing rods of waste polyester, polypropylene, and cotton as alternatives to reinforcement steel rods
Downloaded on 21.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2025-0108/html
Scroll to top button