Home Multi-objective parametric optimization on the EDM machining of hybrid SiCp/Grp/aluminum nanocomposites using Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II): Fabrication and microstructural characterizations
Article Open Access

Multi-objective parametric optimization on the EDM machining of hybrid SiCp/Grp/aluminum nanocomposites using Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II): Fabrication and microstructural characterizations

  • Harish K. Garg , Shubham Sharma EMAIL logo , Rajesh Kumar , Alakesh Manna , Changhe Li , Kuwar Mausam and Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 27, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this study, different input parameters for electric discharge machining (EDM) are examined in order to revise the distinctiveness of EDM for machining aluminum-based hybrid metal matrix composites (MMCs). The versatility of hybrid aluminum MMCs makes them very popular and sought after in the automotive, aerospace, marine, and space industries. In this article, an optimized process parameter setting for hybrid MCCs machining with an EDM machine is determined that have silicon carbide (SiCp) and graphite (Grp) particles added as reinforcement materials in varying amounts (Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC, Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn/15 wt%SiC/5 wt%Gr–MMC, and Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.373Cr–0.25Zn/20 wt%SiC/8 wt%Gr–MMC). The stir casting method was used to prepare these hybrid aluminum MMCs (3 samples). A study of surface roughness (SR) and material removal rate (MRR) was conducted to examine the effects of dominant parameters. An experiment is planned using a central composite rotatable design (CCRD) of response surface methodology (RSM). It is possible to predict MRR and SR with 95% degree of accuracy by utilizing the quadratic model. Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II was employed to solve “mathematical models” for multi-objective optimization of output response characteristics. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the tool and workpiece materials show that the recast layer has been formed on the tool face and the surface of the machined work-piece. Based on the results, it was determined that an optimal value of MRR (2.97 g·min−1) was obtained at 90 µs, 30 µs, 7.0 V, and 14 A as P on, P off, gap voltage, and peak current, respectively. As a result of the findings, the SR is reciprocally proportional to P on, and the SR is commensurate with P off. It was determined that the optimal value of SR (2.41 µm) could be attained at 30 µs, 52 µs, 6.0 V, and 12 A as the P on, P off, gap voltage, and peak current, respectively. For an optimal set of response variables, P on can be specified as 30 µs, P off as 30 µs, gap voltage as 6 V, and peak current as 14 A as process parameters for MRR and SR. The SEM images of the tool material and the workpiece material clearly demonstrate a recast layer formed on the tool face and the machined surface of the workpiece. The optical microscopy analysis reveals a uniform distribution of SiCp and Grp particles in the Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn matrix. In addition to recast layers and machined surfaces, EDS analysis reveals the deposition of tool material on the surface of the workpiece. The composites fabricated may replace materials in many of these applications where “friction” is a significant factor.

Nomenclature

ANOVA

analysis of variance

CCRD

central composite rotatable design

CLA

centerline average

EDM

electric discharge machining

EDS

energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer

GRA

gray relational analysis

Grp

graphite particles

MMC

metal matrix composite

MRR

material removal rate

NSGA-II

Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II

PC

powder concentration

RSM

response surface methodology

RLT

recast layer thickness

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

SiCp

silicon carbide particles

SI

surface integrity

SMA

shape memory alloys

SON

spark on duration

SOFF

spark off duration

SR

surface roughness

T off

pulse off time

1 Introduction

In order to prevent degradation of the material characteristics during machining, “precision machining” is challenging because both soft-matrix phase and hard-reinforced particles are present. The advent of computers in manufacturing and production technology led to a radical change in the 1980s when traditional machines were almost replaced with computer numerical control machines, such as electric discharge machining (EDM) [1,2,3]. For tasks such as machining electrically conductive work material, EDM is used as it is highly accurate and can be used for complex geometries with high productivity. For advanced work materials, EDM is used on a wide-reaching scale. The price and quality standard of the final manufactured goods play an essential job in the existence and survival of modern manufacturing factories. Control parameters of EDM play a decisive role in selecting the product price and quality standard of manufacturing. Hybrid aluminum metal matrix composites (MMCs), because of their wide applications in the automobile and space industry, are in high demand and possess unique tailorable properties such as lightweight, high durability, good resistance to wear, and a low coefficient of thermal expansion [4]. Because of the possession of superior stiffness and reinforcement strength, hybrid composite materials are hard to process through conventional methods [3,4,5,6]. In this regard, the EDM process becomes an effective method for these kinds of composite materials [5,6,7,8]. EDM is the way towards machining electrically conductive materials through the means of precisely controlled sparks that occur between an electrode and a workpiece when the dielectric liquid is present. The dielectric fluid works as an electrical encasing unless adequate voltage is applied to bring it to its ionization position when it turns into a good conductor of electricity or heat [9,10,11,12,13]. The subsequent spark discharge erodes the work part or job to shape into a required contour. Among the variety of fabrication processes available, stir casting is generally accepted because of its simplicity, flexibility, and low cost. Bodunrin et al. [6] cited the significant demand for Al hybrid MMC in engineering applications as a result of the superior mechanical and tribological properties of these materials. To further improve the performance of hybrid MMC, the right reinforcements need to be added into an ethical composition [6,14,15,16,17]. Kansal et al. [7] fabricated a hybrid MMC at a modest cost with a strong performance index. Because of its wide range of applications, hybrid MMC is used in a variety of industries [7,18,19,20,21]. The performance of the hybrid MMC has been observed to be low due to the poor mixture of armatures and matrix alloy. Authors concluded that the reliability and flexibility rates are very much high for hybrid MMC. James et al. [8] analyzed the effect of SiC and TiB2 as particulates to produce hybrid-MMC. Increasing the weight percentage of SiC and TiB2 had legitimate effects on the mechanical and tribological properties, according to the results [8,22,23,24]. Analysis of variance demonstrated the reinforcing of TiB2 unswervingly influenced the recitals and surface quality characteristics. Chaudhary and Jadoun [9] revealed that EDM is a suitable non-traditional method to accomplish the superlative positioning. EDM process is utilized to shape the rigid metallic materials and to create a profound multifaceted intricate shape [25,26,27]. In the past few years, numerous investigators have done entire forms of EDM for their tentative experimentation trials because of their higher and advanced superior applications. Sarkar et al. [10] conducted a superlative optimum machining factors of EDM at which the surface roughness (SR) attains a lesser valued level, while the material removal rate (MRR) reaches a higher valued level. In a study of the recital performance, four operating procedural factors were varied up to three stages, and MRR and SR were measured [28,29,30]. The L27 orthogonal array has been utilized to progress an ultimate experimentation trial design. A repeated test at particular set of machining parameters was carried out to confirm the output. Kumar et al. [11] determined the feasible variables of EDM of a microwave thermal processed, aluminum graded hybrid MMC. Thermally processed aluminum-boron carbide (15 vol%) and Plumbago (5 vol%) were stirred up via liquid state processing method to prepare a hybrid aluminum MMC. Through trial investigational analysis, they revealed an utmost persuasive machining factor for required manufacture [31,32,33]. Beri et al. [12] examined the ANOVA and signal to noise ratio techniques to find out the influence of input parameters of EDM for attaining a required performance (MRR and tool wear rate (TWR)) for an Al 2618 based hybrid MMC. Pulse-on time and current showed their significant effects on MRR and TWR. Ghosal et al. [13] examined the consequences of diverse factors throughout the machined processing of aluminum/Al2O3-MMC by Ytterbium fiber lasers. The precise scientific model was produced for accomplishing superior machining operation. Response surface methodology (RSM) was selected to mainly recognize momentous substantial factors for achieving the optimal response. Garg et al. [14] employed the RSM approach for designing the final experiment matrix. From the literature review, it is evident that a lot of work has been carried out in the characterization of aluminum-based composites. However, a little work has been reported on the machining characteristics of aluminum-based hybrid composites [34,35,36]. An investigation was undertaken by Kenneth Kanayo Alaneme for “aluminum matrix hybrid composites” reinforced with Al2O3, rice husk ash (RHA), and Gr in order to determine their microstructural characteristics, mechanical characteristics, and wear behavior [37]. Bisaria and Shandilya [38] demonstrated that surface crack density is directly correlated with pulse on time, while micro-hardness is directly correlated with spark gap voltage and pulse on time, but inversely correlated with spark gap voltage and pulse off time. Using silicon carbide as reinforcement, Arora and Sharma [39] found that composites increased in density by 1.8%, hardness by 37%, and tensile strength by 39%, despite a decrease in density of 3.9%. For composites reinforced with RHA, hardness and tensile strength were improved by 16 and 21%, respectively. As a result of adding 5 wt% SiC to conventional sintering (CS) and electric resistance sintering (ERS), Shaikh et al. [40] demonstrated that hardness improved in the CS batch by 32% and wear resistance increased in the ERS batch by 40%, while coefficient of friction improved in the CS and ERS batch by 32 and 62%, respectively. In the powder-mixed electrical discharge machining (PM-EDM) process, research was primarily concerned on improving the output results, which include MRR, TWR, and SR as reported by the Alhodaib et al. [41]. The other key output responses, such as recast layer thickness, overcut, and microhardness, have not received much attention. Only a few studies have been reported on PM-EDM of Nimonic-90. A PM-EDM setup is used to machine Nimonic-90 using silicon powder mixed with kerosene after considering previous arguments. In the work explored by Alhodaib et al., the aim is to determine the impact of dominant process parameters such as the powder concentration (PC), discharge current (IP), spark on duration (SON), and spark off duration (SOFF) on the amount of SR, and the thickness of the recast layer (RLT) [41]. Multi-response optimization was performed using gray relational analysis (GRA) in order to determine the minimum RLT and SR. When silicon powder is added to kerosene oil, the SR of the recast layer is significantly reduced as compared to the thickness of the recast layer when using kerosene oil alone. Both the SR and thickness of the recast layer were significantly influenced by SON. A GRA was employed to determine the minimum SR (3.107 μm) and the thinnest recast layer (14.926 μm) at optimum process parameters, including PC = 12 g·L−1, IP = 3 A, SON = 35 μs, and SOFF = 49 μs [41]. Because of their inherent characteristics, such as shape memory effect and super elasticity, the NiTi shape memory alloys (SMAs) find extensive applications in the aerospace, biomedical, automobile, and robotics fields [42]. In spite of these difficulties, it is difficult to machine these alloys according to conventional machining practices. This is because they exhibit numerous shortcomings, such as strain hardening, tool failure, long machining times, and poor surface quality. As a result of these challenges, performance characteristics of NiTi SMAs need to be improved. Bisaria and Shandilya have explored a variety of advanced and unconventional machining processes in recent years [42]. Among the various advanced machining processes available to machine these hard-to-machine alloys, wire electric discharge machining (WEDM) has proven to be particularly effective and a reasonable alternative. An overview of NiTi SMAs, their characteristics, applications, and conventional machining techniques have been included in this study [42]. It provides comprehensive insights into the various aspects of surface integrity (SI) for NiTi SMAs manufactured by WEDM. Specifically, the Bisaria and Shandilya have examined the literature on SI aspects of NiTi-based SMAs, namely, surface characteristics, recast layer, phase analysis, elemental composition, microhardness, shape recovery abilities, and residual stress, which have been accomplished thus far in the domains [42]. In addition to its outstanding properties, Nimonic C-263 superalloy exhibits high-temperature resistance, high specific strength, high thermal fatigue resistance, and high corrosion resistance under heavy loads [43]. A major focus of the study by Bisaria and Shandilya have determined that how the one-parameter-at-a-time approach has affected the SR, average cutting rate, and SI of Nimonic C-263 superalloy by examining the effects of WEDM process parameters [43]. As the “spark energy,” and “peak current” increased, the “SR”, and “average cutting rate” also increased, while the “spark frequency” decreased [43]. In addition to “surface topography,” and “morphology,” Bisaria and Shandilya have also examined the RLT, elemental composition, and phase analysis of Nimonic C-263. On the micrograph of the machined surface, taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), discharge craters, micro-globules, and droplets of molten material can be observed on the machined surface [43]. In comparison to higher spark energies, a recast layer of minimum thickness has been formed at lower spark energies, with less transfer of foreign atoms (Mo, C, and O) [43]. As a result of XRD analysis, various Ni, Fe, Al, and Ti compounds were identified on the machined surface, including Fe1.2Ni0.8, Fe1.5Ni0.5, Co0.06Fe0.94, and Alo.29Ni0.27Ti0.44 [43]. It has therefore been attempted in the present study to develop Al-based hybrid composites with SiC, and graphite particles (Grp) as reinforcements. After the fabrication of composites, the composites have been evaluated for morphological, elemental mapping analysis, microstructural examination processed with different tool materials on EDM. The influence of diverse tool materials and operating input variables is investigated on the surface characteristics of hybrid composites. Thus, in this experimental work, three different Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn–MMC materials were fabricated by adding the reinforcements (SiCp and Grp) in three different compositions (Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC; Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.37 5Cr–0.25Zn/15 wt%SiC/5 wt%Gr–MMC, and Al–0.7Fe–0.6Si–0.375Cr–0.25Zn/20 wt% SiC/8wt %Gr–MMC). The electric discharge machine has a number of machining parameters, but in this study, six significant operating factors (P on, P off, current, voltage, tool, and workpiece material) were considered for the final investigation. Analyses of the SR and MRR have been conducted at varying values of the six process parameters. A final experimental plan was developed utilizing the design expert software 7.0.0.

2 Experimentation: materials and methods

2.1 Fabrication of aluminum-based hybrid MMCs

The aluminum alloy Al6061 as a base matrix is electrically charged in a graphite container (crucible) and heated to nearly 750°C until the whole metal in the container has been liquefied [15,44,45]. Melting temperature of Al6061 is 650°C, which is quite less than the set temperature of the muffle furnace. This temperature difference helps in melting the aluminum alloy at a faster rate and reduces the oxidation level. It also improves the wettability of the reinforced particles in the base matrix [16,46,47]. In this experimental work, three different aluminum-based hybrid composite materials have been fabricated by varying weight percentages of reinforcements (SiCp and Grp) of 200 mesh size (average size of 75 μm) as reinforcements. It was discovered that cubic boron nitride cutting tools could not be used to machine MMC containing SiC particles of 110 μm because the cutting edge and nose were heavily fractured [17,48,49]. SiCp and Grp have been preheated separately at 630°C for 3 h in another electric muffle furnace [50,51,52]. By doing so, the absorbed hydroxide and other gases are removed from the reinforcements. The temperature of retort kiln based electrical furnace was initially maintained at a temperature beyond the melting temperature of Al alloy, i.e., at 750°C to completely liquefy the Al compound and after that it is cooled down to 630°C to transform it to semisolid state. Preheated particles of SiC and graphite in three different weight percentage as shown in Table 1 have been poured (one by one) into semi solid aluminum alloy. To enhance the wettability of the reinforcements and prevent particles from setting at the bottom of the crucible, a stirrer made of graphite was lowered gently into the melt and speeded up to 500 rpm to stir the molten metal [53,54,55]. The rotation speed of the stirrer can be controlled employing a regulator provided on the stirrer [56,57,58]. Magnesium powder as a wetting agent was added by 1% by weight to increase the wettability [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].

Table 1

Composition merits for three different Al MMCs

Hybrid composite Reinforcements
SiCp (%) Grp (%)
Workpiece 1: Al MMC-1 10 3
Workpiece 2: Al MMC-2 15 5
Workpiece 3: Al MMC-3 20 8

The mixture was then reheated to a temperature of 750°C to change the composite to a complete liquid state and then the composite was immediately poured to a preheated metallic mold. To obtain uniform solidification, the mixture was also heated to 500°C for 30 min in the mold [59,60,61]. It was assured that the composite poured in the mold was in the liquid state all through the pouring time. This mixture in the metal mold was kept at ambient room temperature to acquire solidification [62,63,64]. From the existing studies, it has been unveiled to merge reinforcement particulates with Al molten matrix at a volume fraction of 30% [65,66]. It has been found that weight fractions of SiC, graphite, and alumina (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30%) varied significantly, whereas graphite weight fractions of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% and all other components kept constant. It has been observed from the results of this study that hardness increases with an increase in the composition of SiC. In this study, the most promising results were obtained with a weight fraction of 25% for SiC particles. A maximum hardness of 45.5 BHN can be achieved. The stirring process results in a more homogeneous dispersion of SiC particles in the Al matrix. When graphite particles are added to the matrix with a strong interfacial bond, the particle distribution and mechanical properties of the composites are significantly improved. Graphite particles with a 4% weight fraction produced the most favorable results. It has been reported that the maximum hardness is 74 BHN. Compared to SiC reinforcement, Al reinforced with graphite showed higher interfacial binding and higher mechanical properties [37,38,39,66,67]. In order to develop the monolithic composites of AA-6351/SiC and “AA-6351/RHA,” the stir casting technique was employed [39]. As specified, AA-6351 ingots were melted in a graphite crucible in a temperature range of 830–860°C using an electric furnace [39]. To develop the composites, the determined quantities of SiC and RHA (2, 4, 6, and 8 wt%) were preheated at 520 and 270°C, respectively. A 400 rpm stirring was performed for 10–12 min in order to ensure uniform distribution of the reinforcement in the melting matrix. After the composites had been fabricated, they were cooled and then collected from the crucible [39]. Thus, in this study, the experimental investigation has been carried out by taking 28% of reinforcing constituents of SiCp and Grp within Al matrix composites using stir casting for automobile, aviation, and electronics sectors.

2.2 Testing of prepared samples

Each aluminum-based hybrid MMC sample has been individually scanned for microstructure and homogeneity using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figure 1 shows a sample of Al6061 aluminum alloy with its matrix phase reinforced with SiCp and graphite. By utilizing SEM, the uniformity of the reinforcement particles has been examined [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. EDM was used to machine samples with the most uniform and thorough distribution. An energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was also be used to obtain qualitative, and quantitative chemical analysis information of the fabricated composite samples, as illustrated in Figure 2. Optical microscopy was completed with an optical magnifying instrument, which utilized visible light and an arrangement of focal point lenses to amplify pictures of small specimens as illustrated in Figure 3. To check the homogeneity of the prepared samples, SEM and optical microscopy have been used to examine the casted composites. After the specimens were prepared, an optical microscope- Nikon model “EPIPHOT,” was used to observe the fabricated composite samples at various magnification scales. The microstructure of the casted composite is helpful to examine and ensure whether the reinforcement added to the base matrix is uniformly dispersed. To check the microstructure of the Al/10 wt% SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC, a SEM by JEOL, JSM-6100, Japan placed at NITTTR, Chandigarh, has been used. A cylindrical specimen of diameter 30 mm was prepared by polishing the material from both sides followed by cleaning the specimen with acetone. EDS analysis, Oxford Instruments X-act with conventional cathode, measured the intensity of the emitted X-ray as a function of their energy. EDS figure shows the composition of reinforcements and SEM shows the uniform distribution of SiCp and Grp in the base matrix [65,66,67]. Table 2 shows various process parameters and their levels.

Figure 1 
                  SEM images of Al/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite before machining.
Figure 1

SEM images of Al/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite before machining.

Figure 2 
                  EDS analysis of SiCp/Grp/Al-MMC hybrid composites.
Figure 2

EDS analysis of SiCp/Grp/Al-MMC hybrid composites.

Figure 3 
                  (a) Optical micrograph of Al-6061/15SiC/5Gr at 200× magnification and (b) optical micrograph of Al-6061/15SiC/5Gr at 400× magnification.
Figure 3

(a) Optical micrograph of Al-6061/15SiC/5Gr at 200× magnification and (b) optical micrograph of Al-6061/15SiC/5Gr at 400× magnification.

Table 2

Process parameters and their levels

Machining parameters Symbols Units Levels
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
P on T on µs 30 60 90
P off T off µs 30 60 90
Voltage V V 6 7 8
Current A Amp 10 12 14
Tool T Steel 304 (−1) Brass (0) Copper (1)
Workpiece w/p Al MMC (−1) Al MMC (0) Al MMC (1)

3 Experimental work

The design expert software version 7.0.0 has been utilized for the design of final 52 experiments developed by the RSM approach [68,69,70]. These 52 experiments display various combinations of process parameters. At each combination performances or response (SR) have been checked, to improve the quality and productivity. To investigate and calculate our desired performance, experimental work on EDM has been done by varying its six process parameters up to their three levels. Table 2 shows the projected machining operating factors and their respective level. A CMAX S645 EDM machine (Taiwan made) placed at Central Institute of Hand Tools (CIHT), Jalandhar as shown in Figure 4 has been used for this experimental work.

Figure 4 
               The schematic outlook of an EDM.
Figure 4

The schematic outlook of an EDM.

The EDM oil (specific gravity – 0.763) has been used as the dielectric fluid in this experimental procedure. The fabricated specimens of hybrid aluminum MMC (Al6061 + 10%SiCp + 3%Gr), (Al6061 + 15%SiCp + 5%Gr) and (Al6061 + 20%SiCp + 8 Gr%) have been used as workpieces and copper, brass, and steel 304 rods of 12 mm (Ø) have been used as electrodes. EDM machine has various numbers of process parameters which directly affect its performance [71,72,73]. In this work, four parametric factors like P on, P off, voltage, and current up to three levels have been selected and their response regarding MRR and SR have been calculated. 52 experiments by RSM approach were designed for final experimental investigation as shown in Table 3, and during each experiment, a blind hole cavity of 12 mm (Ø) diameter and 1 mm depth were made. The machining time was calculated for each trial.

Table 3

Design matrix and trial results for MRR and SR

Trial runs Pulse on time (T on in μs) Pulse off time (T off in μs) Voltage (V) Current (I) Tool Workpiece SR (R a in μm) MRR (g·min−1)
1 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.74 0.862
2 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.68 0.849
3 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.74 0.86
4 60 60 7 12 0 −1.56508 3.56 1.079
5 60 60 5.43492 12 0 0 3.03 0.953
6 90 30 6 10 1 −1 4.59 2.34
7 90 90 6 10 −1 −1 4.2 1.17
8 60 60 7 8.86983 0 0 3.3502 0.704
9 30 90 8 10 −1 −1 3.822 0.48
10 60 13.0475 7 12 0 0 3.12 2.17
11 90 30 8 10 1 1 5.1858 2.12
12 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.7 0.856
13 30 30 6 14 1 −1 3.6016 2.354
14 90 30 8 14 1 −1 5.32 2.96
15 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.65 0.847
16 90 90 6 14 −1 1 4.908 1.77
17 30 90 6 14 1 1 4.1832 1.33
18 60 60 7 12 1.56508 0 4.24 1.44
19 60 60 8.56508 12 0 0 3.4512 0.879
20 30 90 8 14 1 −1 3.91 1.25
21 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.71 0.87
22 30 90 8 10 1 1 4.4 0.535
23 60 60 7 15.1302 0 0 3.6 1.94
24 30 90 6 10 −1 1 4.36 0.49
25 90 90 8 10 1 −1 4.5398 1.23
26 30 90 8 14 −1 1 4.3446 1.35
27 90 30 6 14 −1 −1 4.934 2.832
28 90 30 8 10 −1 −1 4.9746 1.94
29 90 30 6 10 −1 1 4.7684 2.103
30 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.675 0.854
31 90 90 6 14 1 −1 4.503 1.78
32 30 30 8 14 −1 −1 4.0568 2.012
33 30 30 8 10 1 −1 3.99 1.24
34 13.0475 60 7 12 0 0 2.44 0.37
35 60 60 7 12 −1.56508 0 4.3084 1.25
36 90 90 8 10 −1 1 4.55 1.222
37 60 60 7 12 0 1.56508 4.0368 1.16
38 30 90 6 10 1 −1 3.65 0.42
39 60 60 7 12 0 0 2.61 0.865
40 30 30 8 14 1 1 4.19 2.26
41 90 90 6 10 1 1 4.51 1.24
42 30 90 6 14 −1 −1 4.01 1.108
43 90 90 8 14 −1 −1 4.9258 1.72
44 106.953 60 7 12 0 0 3.69 1.5
45 90 30 8 14 −1 1 5.3768 2.73
46 30 30 6 10 −1 −1 3.78 1.26
47 90 90 8 14 1 1 5.208 2
48 30 30 6 14 −1 1 3.9362 2.21
49 30 30 8 10 −1 1 4.14 1.037
50 30 30 6 10 1 1 4.21 1.34
51 90 30 6 14 1 1 4.7756 3.11
52 60 106.953 7 12 0 0 2.92 0.714

4 RSM

RSM is a dynamic and foremost important tool, within a specified range of the factors, it is developed to find the optimal response [74,75,76]. It comprises a bundle of mathematical and arithmetical techniques utilized for the competent functional association between a response variable (y) and several affiliated control variables expressed by x 1, x 2,., x k [20,77,78,79]. For fitting a second-degree prediction equation for the output, these designs are fully capable. The objective of quality improvement can often be accomplished directly through RSM. If a maximum or minimum output response exists inside the factor limits, RSM is capable to estimate it. There are small number of factors associated as far as industrial applications are concerned. Several factors have a direct relationship with several runs. A regression expression is constructed using experimental data. The line of the best fit based mathematical model was represented as

(1) Y = f ( T on , T off , v , c , t , w / p ) + ε ,

where Y is the preferred output and f is the response function. ε represents random experimental error assumed to have a zero mean value associated with the experiments, respectively. The surface generated by f (T on, T off, v, c, t, w/p) + ε is called response surface.

(2) y = β 0 + i = 1 n d β i x i + i = 1 n d j i n d β i j x i x j .

where x i is the design attribute, n d is the number of intended design attributes, β i is the unknown coefficient, and x refers to the design matrix of experimental points.

Figures 57 show the recast layer formed on the workpiece. Because of the long spark gap, the eroded material gets cluster in the machining zone and stick over the surface. Recast formed on the surface is a result of high-intensity current for a long pulse on time and long gap voltage.

Figure 5 
               SEM image of Al/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.
Figure 5

SEM image of Al/10 wt%SiC/3 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.

Figure 6 
               SEM image of Al/15 wt%SiC/5 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.
Figure 6

SEM image of Al/15 wt%SiC/5 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.

Figure 7 
               SEM image of Al/20 wt%SiC/8 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.
Figure 7

SEM image of Al/20 wt%SiC/8 wt%Gr–MMC hybrid composite after machining.

Figure 8 shows the analysis of the EDX of machined surfaces and recast layers on workpiece surfaces.

Figure 8 
               EDX analysis of machined surface.
Figure 8

EDX analysis of machined surface.

5 Results and discussion

To identify the main parameters (significant), in addition to the interaction effect of operating factors, and to analyze the acquired data is important. Design expert 7.0.0 ® software has been employed to ensure the competence and capability of the mathematical model. Analysis of variance technique is constructed to ensure the competence and capability of the mathematical model, lack of fit, and model summary statistics [80,81,82]. Multi-objective optimization is done via NSGA-II. The MRR and SR based prediction models developed by employing RSM depend upon a central composite rotatable design technique. The results obtained after the measurement of MRR and SR as shown in Tables 4 and 5 are input to Design expert 7.0.0 ® software for further analysis.

Table 4

ANOVA for response surface of MRR

Source Sum of squares Degrees of freedom Mean square F value P-value Remarks
Model 24.49498 27 0.907222 5462.061 <0.0001 Significant
A-on time 4.836921 1 4.836921 29121.4 <0.0001
B-off time 7.86149 1 7.86149 47331.26 <0.0001
C-voltage 0.021313 1 0.021313 128.3205 <0.0001
D-current 5.732185 1 5.732185 34511.46 <0.0001
E-tool 0.152528 1 0.152528 918.3161 <0.0001
F-w/p 0.020881 1 0.020881 125.7164 <0.0001
AB 0.049063 1 0.049063 295.3897 <0.0001
AC 0.000176 1 0.000176 1.058317 0.3139
AD 0.073632 1 0.073632 443.3125 <0.0001
AE 0.00816 1 0.00816 49.12867 <0.0001
Residual 0.003986 24 0.000166
Lack of fit 0.003551 17 0.000209 3.362677 0.0545 Not significant
Pure error 0.000435 7 6.21 × 10−05
Cor total 24.49897 51
Std Dev. 0.012887789 R-squared 0.999837288
Mean 1.422403846 Adj R-squared 0.999654236
CV% 0.906056963 Pred R-squared 0.99875968
PRESS 0.030386566 Adeq precision 291.2370801
Table 5

ANOVA for response surface of SR

Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean square F value P-value Remarks
Model 33.66 24 1.4 301.18 <0.0001 Significant
Pulse on time 5.81 1 5.81 1247.53 <0.0001
Pulse off time 0.12 1 0.12 26.11 <0.0001
Voltage 0.59 1 0.59 127.1 <0.0001
Current 0.23 1 0.23 49.07 <0.0001
Workpiece 0.67 1 0.67 144.62 <0.0001
AB 0.35 1 0.35 75.57 <0.0001
AC 0.098 1 0.098 21.01 <0.0001
AD 0.24 1 0.24 50.83 <0.0001
Residual 0.13 27 4.66 × 10−03
Lack of fit 0.11 20 5.59 × 10−03 2.8 0.0833 Not significant
Pure error 0.014 7 1.99 × 10−03
Std Dev. 0.068 R-squared 0.9963
Mean value 3.95 Adequate R-squared 0.993
C.V% 1.73 Predicted R-squared 0.9846
PRESS 0.52 Adequate precision 62.564

5.1 Analysis of MRR

Table 4 demonstrates the analysis of variance for MRR quadratic model. This investigation was carried out for significance level of α = 0.05, i.e., for a certainty dimension-based confidence level of 95%. The estimation of “Prob. > F” for the model is 0.0001 ≪ 0.05, signifies that the model is considerably noteworthy, i.e., the stipulations and factors in the model significantly affect the reaction.

The insignificant model terms can be removed to obtain an improved model. Lack of fit F value of 3.362677 entails that the lack of fit was not noteworthy comparative or relative to the pure error. There is a 0.906056963% probability to facilitate a lack of fit F value and this large could occur because of noise. The value of “Prob. > F” for lack of fit 0.0545 ≫ 0.05, specifies with the aim that lack of fit is still insignificant. Non-significant lack of fit was excellent.

The R-squared value, which was assessed of a fraction of overall variability elucidated through the model, is equivalent to 0.999837288 ≅ 1, and is invariably wanted. The adjusted R-squared value is equivalent to 0.999654236; it is most valuable while contrasting models amid a diverse number of terms. The outcome illustrates that adj. R-squared value (0.999654236) ≅ R-squared value (0.999837288). Adequate precision value is equal to 291.2370801, which is signal to noise (S/N) ratio; a proportion larger than four was advantageous, which signifies plenty of model discrimination.

A quadratic regression mathematical model has been developed employing the RSM approach for predicting MRR based on the coded assets and actual assets following the elimination of non-significant terms as illustrated by equations (3) and (4).

(3) MRR ( g min 1 ) = + 7.93422 + 0.02014 × on time 0.0476 × off time 0.5528 × voltage 0.889 × current 0.0330 × tool 0.15730 × w / p 4.41 × 10 5 × on time × off time 8.20833 × 10 4 × on time × current ( in coded terms ) ,

(4) MRR ( g min 1 ) = + 0.86 + 0.36 × A 0.46 × B 0.023 × C + 0.39 × D + 0.065 × E + 0.023 × F 0.040 × A × B 0.049 × A × D + 0.016 × A × E 4.312 E 003 × A × F + 0.055 × B × C 0.049 × B × D 0.034 × B × E + 0.025 × B × F + 0.011 × C × D + 3.875 E 003 × C × E + 0.018 × D × E + 0.023 × D × F ( In actual factors ) .

A diagram of the actual against the predicted response values for MRR is depicted in Figure 9(a). It helps you detect a value, or group of values, that are not easily predicted by the model. Based on the graph, we can observe that the entirety of the statistical records is based on a 45° line divided uniformly by the entire dataset.

Figure 9 
                  (a) Predicted vs actual plot of MRR and (b) normal probability plot for MRR.
Figure 9

(a) Predicted vs actual plot of MRR and (b) normal probability plot for MRR.

To analyze the feasibility and practicality of the hypothesis of analysis of variance for residuals, the usual normal probability plot of the residuals for MRR is shown in Figure 9(b). The normal probability plot demonstrates whether the residuals pursue normal distribution [83,84]. If the residuals trail a normal distribution, the most extreme number of focuses should drop on a straight line. If the residuals were falling external to the straight line, it means that the residuals not entirely following the typical conveyance normal distribution [85,86].

5.1.1 Parametric interaction effect on MRR

The interaction between process parameters has a significant effect on MRR. From the 3D process graphs in Figure 10(a)–(c), it was clarified that with the increase in pulse on time and current, the intensity of MRR also increases, while on the other side, by enhancement of P off, the MRR reduces and there is no notable effect of voltage.

Figure 10 
                     (a) Interaction effect of P
                        on and P
                        off on MRR, (b) interaction influence of voltage and P
                        on on MRR and (c) interaction effect of voltage and P
                        off on MRR.
Figure 10

(a) Interaction effect of P on and P off on MRR, (b) interaction influence of voltage and P on on MRR and (c) interaction effect of voltage and P off on MRR.

5.2 Analysis of SR

All experiments conducted involves machining as per design matrix followed by MRR and SR while EDM. The machining operation EDM has been carried out on hybrid composite workpieces using steel 304, pure copper, and brass rods of diameter 12 mm as an electrode during EDM. The average centerline SR value (R a) of finish-machined parts has been measured using the ISR-S400 instrument.

Table 5 shows the analysis of variance for the SR quadratic model. The R-squared value, which was assessed of a fraction of total variability explicated via model, equivalent to 0.9963 ≅ 1 is invariably desirable. The adjusted R-squared value is equal to 0.993; it is most valuable while contrasting models amid a different quantity of terms. The outcome exemplifies that the adj. R-squared value (0.993) ≅ R-squared value (0.9963). Ample exactitude asset was equivalent to 62.564, which is a S/N ratio; a fraction superior to 4 was enviable, which shows an ample model prejudice.

After eliminating the non-significant terms from equations (5) and (6), our quadratic regression model was derived based on RSM for correlating the SR in codes of provisioned assets and actual assets with machining parameters.

(5) SR ( µm ) = + 23.42764 0.025473 × on time 8.07657 × 10 3 × off time 2.66761 × voltage 1.89322 × current 0.059175 × tool ( in coded terms ) ,

(6) SR ( µm ) = + 2.73 + 0.40 × 0.056 × B + 0.13 × C + 0.075 × D 0.014 × E + 0.14 × F 0.11 × A × B + 0.057 × A × C + 0.087 × A × D 0.049 × A × F 0.039 × B × C + 0.043 × B × D + 0.050 × B × F + 0.026 × C × D + 0.039 × C × E 0.038 × D × E 0.033 × D × F + 0.023 × E × F ( in actual factors ) .

To scrutinize the feasibility of the hypothesis of analysis of variance for residuals, the typical likelihood standard probability plot of the residuals for SR is shown in Figure 11(a). Normal vs residual probability plot of SR demonstrates whether the residuals trail a typical dispersion based normal probability [38,87,88].

Figure 11 
                  (a) Normal vs residual probability plot of SR and (b) predicted vs actual response values graph for SR.
Figure 11

(a) Normal vs residual probability plot of SR and (b) predicted vs actual response values graph for SR.

If residuals follow a standard normal probability distribution, the utmost volume of spots should drop on a straight line contour, and the comparable findings have been unveiled [39,89,90]. If residuals were descending exterior to the outer surface straight line, it implies not entirely following a normal distribution. Figure 11(b) exhibits the predicted vs actual graph for SR.

The findings have concluded that the residuals drop on a straight line inferring that the residuals were dispersed ordinarily.

5.2.1 Parametric interaction effect on SR

EDM is known for its accuracy and high surface quality [41,91,92]. A good response output is an interaction effect of input parameters. Figure 12 depicts some graphs for significant interaction effect on SR-based response characteristics. From Figure 12(a)–(d), it replicates that surface quality deteriorates at superior assets of P on, whereas by the means of an increase in P off there is a significant improvement in surface quality. Voltage is also a significant factor as SR height amplifies with enhancement in voltage, whereas, SR is low during machining second workpiece material. SR value is minimum at a low value of voltage and current, i.e., at 6.5 V and 12 A. Thereafter, the roughness height increases with the increase in current and voltage. Interaction effect of workpiece material and tool material have a significant effect on SR. Copper as tool material and second workpiece material has a lower SR heights.

Figure 12 
                     (a) Interaction effect of P
                        on and P
                        off on SR height (R
                        a in µm), (b) interaction influence of voltage and P
                        on on SR height (R
                        a in µm), (c) interaction influence of voltage and current on SR height (R
                        a in µm), and (d) interaction effect of workpiece and tool material on SR height (R
                        a in µm).
Figure 12

(a) Interaction effect of P on and P off on SR height (R a in µm), (b) interaction influence of voltage and P on on SR height (R a in µm), (c) interaction influence of voltage and current on SR height (R a in µm), and (d) interaction effect of workpiece and tool material on SR height (R a in µm).

The comparable outcomes have been unveiled by Khajuria et al., where they have reported that the MRR, TWR, and SR all had enhanced when the current and P on have been raised [93]. Findings have exhibited lesser TWR but a superior surface quality has been accomplished when the current, P on, and voltage were all adjusted to their optimal values for AA-2014/Al2O3 composites. Creep-behavior of the welded heat-affected zone (HAZ) of boron-free P-91 (PM) and boron-modified P-91-B (B-PM) steels were explored by Khajuria et al. [94]. Outcomes have been discovered that by incorporating 100 ppm of boron to standard P-91 steel enhanced creep-rupture-ductileness, which in turn deferred type-IV breakdowns in HAZs of P-91 steel-welded joints. Throughout EDM machining of stir-casted AA-2014 composite materials, Khajuria et al. have investigated the influence of variability within wt% of ceramic-alumina as reinforcing particulates [95]. The MRR and SR were found to be lower when the wt% of ceramic-alumina particulates were raised; however, the TWR was observed to be escalated [42,43,95].

6 Multi-response optimization using Non-dominating Sorted Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II)

The major goal of the present research was to optimize EDM factors for the desired output responses. Both the responses in this study are conflicting as an increase in MRR will result in poor surface quality but in manufacturing work, an increase in MRR is desirable to meet production output. Hence, to set up a compromise is must between output responses to preserve superiority and extent. Further, NSGA-II is used to establish a most favorable stipulation for mutual responses as shown in Figure 13. Table 6 shows several operators used during NSGA-II analysis and Table 7 illustrates a set of solutions suggested by NSGA-II.

(7) Objective 1 = SR,

(8) Objective 2 = 1 / MRR or ( MRR ) .

Figure 13 
               NSGA-II genetic algorithm.
Figure 13

NSGA-II genetic algorithm.

Table 6

Drivers or actuators utilized during NSGA-II

Sr. no. Operator Type Value
1 Population size 100
2 Number of generations 1,000
3 Crossover Simulated binary 0.8
4 Mutation Polynomial 0.2
5 Selection Non-dominating sorting and crowding distance
Table 7

Solution set suggested by NSGA-II

Sr no. T on T off Voltage Current Tool Workpiece SR MRR
1 30.0559 88.17259 7.998975 13.58342 −0.12544 −0.98413 −21.1831 0.470727
2 30.00903 83.44194 7.291668 10.24155 −0.0124 −0.09539 −13.9603 0.128558
3 30.68383 89.2314 7.999376 12.85318 −0.18521 −0.91374 −24.4379 1.141943
4 30.02465 83.53458 7.984257 12.16802 −0.03812 −0.51002 −19.9216 0.321807
5 30.00903 84.48689 6.772159 10.00125 0.005715 −0.10183 −16.5914 0.154659
6 30.02661 89.22198 7.998884 13.84435 −0.18521 −0.91374 −21.5216 0.518039
7 30.0813 89.22242 7.999988 13.58002 −0.13382 −0.75166 −14.8322 0.131788
8 30.02513 84.49668 7.998548 12.75501 −0.02482 −0.31629 −23.318 0.829139
9 30.02596 89.22611 7.999086 13.99565 −0.77095 −0.95462 −22.7397 0.720066
10 30.02465 83.3961 7.995625 10.01966 −0.08786 −0.16131 −23.8303 0.954423
11 30.16198 84.4886 7.999995 12.4 −0.16188 −0.70887 −22.162 0.616704
12 30.0093 89.21858 7.999647 13.99742 −0.39597 −0.98991 −15.4845 0.138252
13 30.05702 84.4894 6.775895 10.06707 −0.01345 −0.1644 −20.9311 0.448893
14 30.02465 88.86023 7.999427 13.96865 −0.65709 −0.97172 −20.2732 0.357794
15 30.00903 83.43818 7.999235 12.4 −0.04594 −0.97172 −23.6028 0.895679
16 30.02661 84.49681 7.098247 10.01966 −0.08786 −0.16131 −21.5337 0.544917
17 30.0091 89.21827 7.999882 13.98641 −0.86097 −0.99577 −19.6998 0.309399
18 30.0093 84.49717 7.998177 11.61248 −0.15289 −0.90287 −16.464 0.152951
19 30.15356 83.39415 7.99998 12.16822 0.010258 −0.70835 −20.4923 0.40178
20 30.0093 84.49717 7.998177 10.62443 −0.02409 −0.31818 −24.4119 1.108837
21 30.02512 83.53458 7.983769 12.16837 −0.03762 −0.91427 −24.4783 1.187697
22 30.01708 81.69032 7.893018 10.0015 −0.02502 −0.09444 −20.4159 0.375745
23 30.00903 83.44271 7.999859 11.61277 −0.15191 −0.7084 −21.3794 0.506632
24 30.02694 84.48774 7.999914 13.40785 −0.15242 −0.91374 −23.1921 0.800603
25 30.15356 83.39415 7.998548 10.24287 −0.08691 −0.16131 −17.5873 0.175732
26 30.00942 83.3961 7.99885 10.24204 −7.97 × 10−05 −0.15778 −23.3346 0.856275
27 30.02596 83.50303 7.99885 10.24204 −0.03788 −0.5098 −18.9049 0.240512
28 30.02465 83.3961 7.999235 12.4 −0.03812 −0.51002 −14.9595 0.133293
29 30.1614 83.37566 7.999952 11.33627 −7.97 × 10−05 −0.15778 −16.9364 0.161107
30 30.68612 89.2314 7.999235 12.40059 −0.16285 −0.53129 −24.3167 1.047891
31 30.01684 88.17259 7.998975 13.58342 −0.12495 −0.97156 −22.6062 0.709093
32 30.02661 89.22198 7.999274 13.84386 −0.1849 −0.99674 −19.4409 0.278317
33 30.02944 89.21854 7.999778 10.90246 −0.0124 −0.31874 −24.424 1.139366
34 30.01684 84.49668 7.998901 12.95635 −0.39586 −0.98967 −18.6056 0.226207
35 30.01684 84.49668 7.998548 12.95732 −0.39597 −0.98991 −15.5347 0.141403
36 30.00903 88.17259 7.998975 13.99961 −0.15669 −0.71 −14.1277 0.129611
37 30.0093 84.49717 7.999857 11.92279 −0.23707 −0.16521 −13.9603 0.128558
38 30.08141 88.17024 7.999613 13.75535 −0.23796 −0.53129 −24.3711 1.077797
39 30.00903 83.3961 7.999006 12.75501 −0.15602 −0.70838 −21.8624 0.565486
40 30.08093 88.17024 7.999613 13.75535 −0.23796 −0.98967 −24.0653 0.980265
41 30.15386 83.39439 7.995625 11.61248 −0.15289 −0.16521 −22.389 0.659426
42 30.0093 82.02168 7.267655 10.01975 −0.02514 −0.08791 −19.6896 0.308993
43 30.02465 89.21858 7.999647 13.75582 −0.15653 −0.71049 −17.7661 0.185878
44 30.0093 83.3961 7.995625 10.90248 −0.0124 −0.1438 −16.1035 0.147647
45 30.16193 88.16931 7.999613 13.40882 −0.16139 −0.70702 −20.0394 0.34828
46 30.03185 81.68251 7.893995 10.90248 −0.0124 −0.1438 −24.4534 1.176383
47 30.0093 84.49668 7.998548 13.22133 −0.02445 −0.91427 −15.9574 0.14369
48 30.01684 89.21858 7.999647 13.99961 −0.15242 −0.90205 −18.9647 0.242042
49 30.02596 89.22611 7.999086 13.99565 −0.16188 −0.97156 −22.8502 0.735165
50 30.68481 88.07271 7.998548 11.33627 −0.03776 −0.5315 −21.9886 0.597481
51 30.02596 83.50303 7.999778 10.90246 −0.0124 −0.31874 −23.5297 0.893173
52 30.02944 89.21854 7.999613 11.61248 −0.0236 −0.31825 −23.7682 0.930905
53 30.0559 88.17259 7.998548 12.95684 −0.18603 −0.91427 −24.1009 0.996277
54 30.0559 88.17259 7.998975 13.58342 −0.04594 −0.31629 −14.4539 0.130842
55 30.02465 83.39415 7.99998 12.16822 0.010258 −0.70835 −17.3073 0.168812
56 30.026 81.6914 7.97913 10.59397 0.00075 −0.08791 −21.6886 0.545571
57 30.68383 89.2314 7.999376 12.85318 −0.18521 −0.98413 −22.8972 0.760598
58 30.68383 89.2314 7.999376 12.85318 −0.18521 −0.71049 −23.6294 0.925698
59 30.0093 81.6914 7.979374 11.16822 −0.08642 −0.16131 −18.0186 0.193158
60 30.0093 84.49717 7.998177 11.61248 −0.15289 −0.70838 −22.5028 0.676961
61 30.02661 89.21858 7.999648 13.99961 −0.86097 −0.99674 −19.1565 0.271524
62 30.15288 83.39516 7.575015 10.24498 −0.08728 −0.16111 −19.4961 0.285213
63 30.01709 82.02208 7.267848 10.02073 −0.02418 −0.0871 −24.135 1.041988
64 30.02671 89.22618 7.999086 13.99581 −0.77192 −0.95462 −24.3335 1.069649
65 30.01024 88.17357 7.998975 13.58342 −0.03812 −0.51002 −21.9613 0.59187
66 30.00832 84.49717 7.998177 13.22031 −0.02641 −0.7085 −20.7321 0.415504
67 30.68612 89.2314 7.999236 12.40059 −0.16285 −0.97221 −18.4125 0.209227
68 30.00942 83.43857 7.046576 10.00169 −0.02281 −0.10244 −22.2404 0.6391
69 30.08093 88.17024 7.999613 13.75535 −0.23699 −0.9012 −19.0775 0.26211
70 30.02567 84.49682 7.999158 12.75509 −0.0258 −0.31629 −23.4251 0.86142

With the assistance of NSGA-II, the factual Pareto ideal elucidations can be acquired by keeping up exclusivity in the outcomes (based on the swarming separation and non-mastery grade) [9698]. The non-subjugated results acquired toward the finishing stage of 1000 age groups or generations are shown in Figure 15. This demonstrates the creation & development of Pareto ideal facade prompting to the ultimate arrangement of results.

Thirty elucidations beyond 100 arrangements are chosen where there is a considerable variation in values of cutting rate and SR.

Table 8 demonstrates an inaccuracy amid affirmative outcomes and anticipated assets are fewer than 5%. It affirms the magnificent resemblance of the outcomes. Thus, it can safely be concluded that 70 solutions as presented in Table 7 can be used by manufacturing planners as guidelines for concurrent optimization of MRR and SR. Figure 14 shows the initial solution set. The figure discloses that the inaugural sorts of elucidations are haphazardly distributed beside the realms of cutting rate and SR and the findings have been similar with the existing studies [99101]. On running the program, it has been perceived that nearly all analogous arrangements of explication were accomplished when the computation was kept running for 950, 960, 970, 980, 990, and 1,000 age groups or epochs. It demonstrates that the NSGA-II is suitably congregated or matched when it is kept running for 1,000 eons. The non-subjugated resolution arrangement acquired toward the finish of 1,000 epochs as appeared in Figure 15.

(9) 30 P on 90 ,

(10) 30 P off 90 ,

(11) 6 Voltage 8 ,

(12) 10 Current 14 .

Table 8

Confirmation experiments and results

S. no. T on (µs) T off (µs) I P (A) V g (V) Tool Workpiece Actual values Predicted values Error (%)
MRR (g·min−1) SR (µm) MRR (g·min−1) SR (µm) MRR (g·min−1) SR (µm)
1. 30.0 88 7.99 13.5 −0.1 −0.9 0.3714 0.45 0.3531 0.47 −4.92 −4.2
2. 30.0 83 7.29 10.2 −0.0 −0.0 0.2318 0.122 0.2327 0.128 +4.12 −4.6
3. 30 88 7.9 13.7 −0.2 −0.9 0.3105 0.27 0.3180 0.26 +2.30 +3.7
4. 30 84 7.9 12.7 −0.0 −0.3 0.3784 0.82 0.3904 0.86 −3.07 −4.6
Figure 14 
               The initial solution set of 200 generations.
Figure 14

The initial solution set of 200 generations.

Figure 15 
               Pareto optimal solution of NSGA-II.
Figure 15

Pareto optimal solution of NSGA-II.

A total of 70 solutions as shown in Table 7 are forecasted by NSGA-II; however, none of these clarifications can be superior to another. These outcomes are comparable to those found in prior investigations [102104]. The decision of one elucidation over alternate relies upon the prerequisite of the procedure route design. As long as the recital execution extents are clashing or contradictory in the environment, surface eminence reduces as MRR enhances and similar conduct of execution measures is viewed in the outcomes accomplished, and the related works have been published by numerous studies [105,106].

7 Conclusion

An EDM experimentation have been designed using the central composite design to investigate the effect of EDM parameters on selected responses. Validation experiments confirm the proximity of the results produced by RSM. Additionally, the model obtained can be applied to artificial intelligence. In order to ensure the fit of the models, quadratic models have been developed and followed by a validity test. Multi-objective optimization using NSGA-II has been conducted to identify the most favorable set of factors to obtain the same optimal result. A surface analysis has been completed for the tool and the workpiece to determine how operating route factors affect surface texture. As a result of these tentative trials, the following outcomes have been achieved:

  1. SEM images of the tool material and workpiece material show the recast layer formed on the tool face and workpiece-machined surface.

  2. EDS analysis also exhibits the machined surface and deposition of tool material on the workpiece surface in the form of a recast layer.

  3. P on, P off and current have a significant effect on MRR. Gap voltage has an almost insignificant contribution. The optimal value of MRR (2.97 g·min−1) has been achieved at 90 µs, 30 µs, 7.0 V, and 14 A as P on, P off, gap voltage, and peak current, respectively.

  4. It has been recorded that SR is commensurate to P on and reciprocal proportional to P off. The optimal value of SR (2.41 µm) has been achieved at 30 µs, 52 µs, 6.0 V, and 12 A as P on, P off, gap voltage, and peak current, respectively.

  5. MRR and SR increase on increasing the value of Ton and current (individual and combined effect), which are two major machining parameters of EDM. Peak current, P on, and P off were significant and noteworthy factors influencing response output; however, gap voltages and materials of the workpiece had limited impact.

  6. On the other hand, with an increase in P off, there is a decrease in MRR and also improvement in surface quality. SR increases with the increment in P off. Voltage has no significant impact on both MRR and SR.

  7. An increase in the value of current results in the increase in MRR but has no significant effect on SR as initially SR decreases at 6.5 V but afterward with increment in current, SR increases.

  8. P off has been revealed to be contributory parameter followed by current and P on for MRR.

  9. The validity experiments confirmed that models developed for selected responses predicted results exceedingly concordant with investigational results. Based on the developed models, the output response can be expected in favor of a known set of input factors and oppositely for the desired value of output response; parametric values of input variables can be calculated in advance. In various combinations of process parameters, a developed model can effectively predict MRRs and SR heights.

  10. For SR height, voltage is also a significant factor as SR height enhances with enhancement in voltage, whereas, SR is low during machining second workpiece material.

  11. In multi-objective optimization, for an optimal set of response variables, P on as 30 µs, P off as 30 µs, gap voltage as 6 V, and peak current as 14 A can be set as process parameters for MRR and SR.



  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Literature review and analysis have been conducted by Harish K Garg, Shubham Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, Alakesh Manna, Changhe Li, and Kuwar Mausam, along with the article’s development and writing. Several aspects of the final version of the article were developed, supervised, and approved by Harish K Garg, Shubham Sharma, and Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin. Apart from writing the article, Shubham Sharma and Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin also helped with the literature review and analysis. This manuscript has been approved for submission by all authors and they accept responsibility for its content.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: Human or animal participants have not been used in any of the experiments reported in this article.

  5. Informed consent statement: Not applicable.

  6. Data availability statement: Not Applicable.

References

[1] Allien, V. J., H. Kumar, and V. Desai. Dynamic analysis and optimization of SiC reinforced Al6082 and Al7075 MMCs. Materials Research Express, Vol. 6, 2019, id. 056528.10.1088/2053-1591/ab038eSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Yadav, R. S. and V. Yadava. Hybrid design-based modeling and multi-objective optimization of hybrid machining of hybrid metal matrix composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 233, No. 7, 2018, pp. 2275–2301.10.1177/0954406218786324Search in Google Scholar

[3] Khullar, V. R., N. Sharma, S. Kishore, and R. Sharma. RSM- and NSGA-II-based multiple performance characteristics optimization of EDM parameters for AISI 5160. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 42, 2017, pp. 1917–1928.10.1007/s13369-016-2399-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Garg, H. K., K. Verma, A. Manna, and R. Kumar. Hybrid metal matrix composites and a further improvement in their machinability-A review. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, Vol. 1, 2012, pp. 36–44.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gopalakannan, S., T. Senthilvelan, and S. Ranganathan. Statistical optimization of EDM parameters on machining of aluminum hybrid metal matrix composite by applying Taguchi based Grey analysis. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (India), Vol. 72, 2013, pp. 358–365.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bodunrin, M. O., K. K. Alaneme, and L. H. Chown. Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 4, 2015, pp. 434–445.10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kansal, H. K., S. Singh, and P. Kumar. Numerical simulation of powder mixed electric discharge machining (PMEDM) using finite element method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 47, 2008, pp. 1217–1237.10.1016/j.mcm.2007.05.016Search in Google Scholar

[8] James, S. J., K. Venkatesan, P. Kuppan, and R. Ramanujam. Hybrid aluminum metal matrix composite reinforced with SiC and TiB2. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 97, 2014, pp. 1018–1026.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.379Search in Google Scholar

[9] Choudhary, S. K. and R. S. Jadoun. Current advanced research development of electric discharge machining (EDM): A review. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol. 2, 2014, pp. 273–297.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sarkar, A., S. C. Panja, D. Das, and B. Sarkar. Developing an efficient decision support system for non-traditional machine selection: an application of MOORA and MOOSRA. Production and Manufacturing Research, Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 324–342.10.1080/21693277.2014.895688Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kumar, S. S., M. Uthayakumar, S. T. Kumaran, and P. Parameswaran. Electrical discharge machining of Al(6351)-SiC-B4C hybrid composite. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 29, 2014, pp. 1395–1400.10.1080/10426914.2014.952024Search in Google Scholar

[12] Beri, N., S. Maheshwari, C. Sharma, and A. Kumar. Technological advancement in electrical discharge machining with powder metallurgy processed electrodes: A review. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 25, 2010, pp. 1186–1197.10.1080/10426914.2010.512647Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ghosal, A., A. Manna, and A. K. Lall. Modelling of Ytterbium Fiber Laser parameters during micromachining of Al-15wt%Al2O3-MMC. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 90, 2014, pp. 704–709.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.799Search in Google Scholar

[14] Garg, S. K., A. Manna, and A. Jain. Experimental investigation of spark gap and material removal rate of Al/ZrO2(P)-MMC machined with wire EDM. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 38, 2016, pp. 481–491.10.1007/s40430-015-0394-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] Singh, J. and A. Chauhan. Characterization of hybrid aluminum matrix composites for advanced applications – A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 5, 2016, pp. 159–169.10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[16] Bhandare, R. G. and P. M. Sonawane. Preparation of aluminium matrix composite by using stir casting method. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 3, 2013, pp. 61–65.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ciftci, I., M. Turker, and U. Seker. CBN cutting tool wear during machining of particulate reinforced MMCs. Wear, Vol. 257, 2004, pp. 1041–1046.10.1016/j.wear.2004.07.005Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sharma, V., U. Prakash, and B. V. M. Kumar. Surface composites by friction stir processing: A review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 224, 2015, pp. 117–134.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.019Search in Google Scholar

[19] Srivastava, A., P. Garg, A. Kumar, and Y. Krishna. A review on fabrication & characterization of hybrid aluminium metal matrix composite. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation, Vol. 1, 2014, pp. 242–246.10.51976/ijari.211433Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kulkarni, A. S., K. C. Hegade, O. V. Karale, and P. S. Joshi. Coupled thermal and structural analysis of brake disc rotor manufactured from aluminum metal matrix composite (AMMC) reinforced with silicon carbide. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 2, 2016, pp. 1188–1194.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Chohan, J. S., N. Mittal, R. Kumar, S. Singh, S. Sharma, S. P. Dwivedi, et al. Optimization of FFF process parameters by naked mole-rat algorithms with enhanced exploration and exploitation capabilities. Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 11, 2021, id. 1702.10.3390/polym13111702Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[22] Kumar, J., D. Singh, N. S. Kalsi, S. Sharma, C. I. Pruncu, D. Y. Pimenov, et al. Comparative study on the mechanical, tribological, morphological and structural properties of vortex casting processed, Al-SiC-Cr hybrid metal matrix composites for high strength wear-resistant applications: Fabrication and characterizations. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2020, pp. 13607–13615.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dwivedi, S. P., A. Saxena, and S. Sharma. Influence of nano-CuO on synthesis and mechanical behavior of spent alumina catalyst and grinding sludge reinforced aluminum based composite. International Journal of Metalcasting, Vol. 16, 2021, pp. 292–303.10.1007/s40962-021-00597-5Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sivalingam, P., V. Krishnaraj, S. Sharma, S. K. Mouleeswaran, R. J. Kumar, and R. Zitoune. Experimental study on thermal and morphological analysis of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 139, 2020, pp. 3003–3012.10.1007/s10973-019-08691-xSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Muni, R. N., J. Singh, V. Kumar, and S. Sharma. Parametric optimization of rice husk ash, copper, magnesium reinforced aluminium matrix hybrid composite processed by EDM. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, Vol. 14, No. 22, 2019, pp. 1828–1834.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Muni, R. N., J. Singh, V. Kumar, and S. Sharma. Influence of rice husk ash, Cu, Mg on the mechanical behaviour of Aluminium Matrix hybrid composites. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2019, pp. 1828–1834.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Dwivedi, S. P., A. Saxena, S. Sharma, A. K. Srivastava, and N. K. Maurya. Influence of SAC and eggshell addition in the physical, mechanical and thermal behaviour of Cr reinforced aluminium based composite. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2021, pp. 43–55.10.1080/13640461.2021.1877943Search in Google Scholar

[28] Saxena, A., S. P. Dwivedi, A. Dixit, S. Sharma, A. K. Srivastava, and N. K. Maurya. Computational and experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of zirconia toughened alumina and nickel powder reinforced EN31 based composite material. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2021, pp. 548–560. 10.1002/mawe.202000152Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sharma, S., J. Singh, M. K. Gupta, M. Mia, S. P. Dwivedi, A. Saxena, et al. Investigation on mechanical, tribological and microstructural properties of Al-Mg-Si-T6/SiC/muscovite-hybrid metal-matrix composites for high strength applications. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 21, 2021, pp. 1564–1581.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.095Search in Google Scholar

[30] Dwivedi, S. P., R. Agrawal, and S. Sharma. Effect of friction stir process parameters on mechanical properties of chrome containing leather waste reinforced aluminium based composite. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2021, pp. 935–943.10.1007/s40684-021-00312-zSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Kumar, J., D. Singh, N. S. Kalsi, S. Sharma, J. Mia, M. Singh, et al. Investigation on the mechanical, tribological, morphological and machinability behavior of stir-casted Al/SiC/Mo reinforced MMCs. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 12, 2021, pp. 930–946.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.034Search in Google Scholar

[32] Aggarwal, V., J. Singh, S. Sharma, A. Sharma, G. Singh, J. Parshad. Empirical modeling of machining parameters during WEDM of Inconel 690 using response surface methodology. AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2281, 2020, id. 020032.10.1063/5.0027284Search in Google Scholar

[33] Aggarwal, V., J. Singh, S. Sharma, K. Harish, A. Garg, G. Sharma, et al. An experimental study of wire breakage frequency on different electrodes during WEDM of Inconel-722. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 954, 2020, id. 12013.10.1088/1757-899X/954/1/012013Search in Google Scholar

[34] Aggarwal, V., C. I. Pruncu, J. Singh, S. Sharma, and D. Y. Pimenov. Empirical investigations during WEDM of Ni-27Cu-3.15Al- 2Fe-1.5Mn based superalloy for high temperature corrosion resistance applications. Materials, Vol. 13, No. 16, 2020, id. 3470.10.3390/ma13163470Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Qureshi, M. N., S. Sharma, J. Singh, S. D. A. Khadar, and R. U. Baig. Evaluation of surface roughness in the turning of mild steel under different cutting conditions using back propagation neural network. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 69, 2020, pp. 109–115. 10.3176/proc.2020.2.02Search in Google Scholar

[36] Islam, S., S. P. Dwivedi, V. K. Dwivedi, S. Sharma, and D. Kozak. Development of marble dust/waste PET based polymer composite material for environmental sustainability: fabrication and characterizations. Journal of Materials Performance and Characterization, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2021, pp. 538–552.10.1520/MPC20210034Search in Google Scholar

[37] Alaneme, K. K. and K. O. Sanusi. Microstructural characteristics, mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium matrix hybrid composites reinforced with alumina, rice husk ash and graphite. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2015, pp. 416–422.10.1016/j.jestch.2015.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[38] Bisaria, H. and P. Shandilya. Wire electric discharge machining induced surface integrity for Ni55.95Ti44.05 shape memory alloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 235, No. 2, 2020, pp. 178–185.10.1177/0954408920951146Search in Google Scholar

[39] Arora, G. and S. Sharma. A comparative study of AA6351 mono-composites reinforced with synthetic and agro waste reinforcement. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 19, 2018, pp. 631–638.10.1007/s12541-018-0076-1Search in Google Scholar

[40] Shaikh, M. B., T. Aziz, S. Arif, A. H. Ansari, P. G. Karagiannidis, and M. Uddin. Effect of sintering techniques on microstructural, mechanical and tribological properties of Al-SiC composites. Surfaces and Interfaces, Vol. 20, 2020, id. 100598.10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100598Search in Google Scholar

[41] Alhodaib, A., P. Shandilya, A. K. Rouniyar, and H. Bisaria. Experimental Investigation on Silicon Powder Mixed-EDM of Nimonic-90 Superalloy. Metals, Vol. 11, No. 11, 2021, id. 1673.10.3390/met11111673Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bisaria, H. and P. Shandilya. Surface integrity aspects for NiTi shape memory alloys during wire electric discharge machining: A review. Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 35, 2020, pp. 537–558.10.1557/jmr.2020.32Search in Google Scholar

[43] Bisaria, H. and P. Shandilya. Experimental investigation on wire electric discharge machining (WEDM) of Nimonic C-263 superalloy. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 34, 2018, pp. 83–92.10.1080/10426914.2018.1532589Search in Google Scholar

[44] Sharma, S., P. Sudhakara, J. Singh, R. A. Ilyas, M. R. M. Asyraf, and M. R. Razman. Critical review of biodegradable and bioactive polymer composites for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2021, id. 2623. 10.3390/polym13162623Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[45] Ilyas, R. A., S. M. Sapuan, M. R. M. Asyraf, D. A. Z. N. Dayana, J. J. N. Amelia, M. S. A. Rani, et al. Polymer composites filled with metal derivatives: a review of flame retardants. Polymers, Vol. 13, 2021, id. 1701.10.3390/polym13111701Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Sharma, S., P. Sudhakara, A. Borhana, J. Singh, and R. A. Ilyas. Recent trends and developments in conducting polymer nanocomposites for multifunctional applications. Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 17, 2021, id. 2898.10.3390/polym13172898Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Sharma, S. and P. Sudhakara. Fabrication and optimization of hybrid AA-6082-T6 alloy/8%Al2O3(Alumina)/2%Grp metal matrix composites using novel Box-Behnken methodology processed by wire-sinking electric discharge machining. Materials Research Express, Vol. 6, 2019, id. 116594. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab4b97Search in Google Scholar

[48] Singh, Y., J. Singh, S. Sharma, T. D. Lam, and D. N. Nguyen. Fabrication and characterization of coir/carbon-fiber reinforced epoxy based hybrid composite for helmet shells and sports-goods applications: influence of fiber surface modifications on the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 20, 2020, id. 31989.10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.023Search in Google Scholar

[49] Singh, Y., J. Singh, S. Sharma, V. Aggarwal, and C. I. Pruncu. Multi-objective optimization of Kerf-taper and surface-roughness quality characteristics for cutting-operation on coir and carbon fibre reinforced epoxy hybrid polymeric composites during CO2-pulsed laser-cutting using RSM. Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, Vol. 8, 2021, pp. 157–182.10.1007/s40516-021-00142-6Search in Google Scholar

[50] Singh, H., J. Singh, S. Sharma, S. P. Dwivedi, and A. J. Obaid. Comparative performance of copper, graphite, brass and aluminium/graphite based different tool electrodes for optimizing the material removal rate during die-sinking EDM of stir-casted Al6061/SiC MMCs for sustainable manufacturing and energy applications. Journal of Green Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2021, pp. 922–938.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Dwivedi, S. P., A. Saxena, S. Sharma, G. Singh, J. Singh, M. Mia, et al. Effect of ball-milling process parameters on mechanical properties of Al/Al2O3/collagen powder composite using statistical approach. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 15, 2021, pp. 2918–2932.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.082Search in Google Scholar

[52] Jha, K., Y. K. Tyagi, R. Kumar, S. Sharma, M. R. M. Huzaifah, C. Li, et al. Assessment of dimensional stability, biodegradability, and fracture energy of bio-composites reinforced with novel pine cone. Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 19, 2021, id. 3260.10.3390/polym13193260Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[53] Khare, J. M., S. Dahiya, B. Gangil, L. Ranakoti, S. Sharma, M. R. M. Huzaifah, et al. Comparative analysis of erosive wear behaviour of epoxy, polyester and vinyl esters based thermosetting polymer composites for human prosthetic applications using Taguchi design. Polymers, Vol. 13, No. 20, 2021, id. 3607.10.3390/polym13203607Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Dwivedi, S. P., N. Maurya, and S. Sharma. Study of CCLW, alumina and the mixture of alumina and CCLW reinforced aluminum based composite material with and without mechanical alloying. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, Vol. 103, 2022, pp. 319–331.10.1007/s40033-021-00312-ySearch in Google Scholar

[55] Dwivedi, S. P., R. Sahu, A. Saxena, V. K. Dwivedi, K. Srinivas, and S. Sharma. Recovery of Cr from chrome-containing leather waste and its utilization as reinforcement along with waste spent alumina catalyst and grinding sludge in AA5052-based metal matrix composites. Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 236, 2021, pp. 160–170.10.1177/09544089211038385Search in Google Scholar

[56] Dwivedi, S. P., A. Saxena, and S. Sharma. Synthesis and characterization of spent alumina catalyst and grinding sludge reinforced aluminium based composite material. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, 2021, pp. 5523–5534.10.1177/09544062211061451Search in Google Scholar

[57] Dwivedi, S. P., P. Pachauri, M. Maurya, A. Saxena, R. Butola, R. Sahu, et al. Alumina catalyst waste utilization for aluminum-based composites using the friction stir process. Materials Testing, Vol. 64, 2022, pp. 5533–5540.10.1515/mt-2021-2074Search in Google Scholar

[58] Rajawat, A. S., S. Singh, B. Gangil, L. Ranakoti, S. Sharma, M. R. M. Asyraf, et al. Effect of marble dust on the mechanical, morphological, and wear performance of basalt fibre-reinforced epoxy composites for structural applications. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 1325–1325.10.3390/polym14071325Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] Chandel, P. S., Y. K. Tyagi, K. Jha, R. Kumar, S. Sharma, J. Singh, et al. Study of mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of laminated composites of glass and jute fibres in Epoxy for structural applications. Functional Composites and Structures, Vol. 3, 2021, pp. 44002–44002.10.1088/2631-6331/ac376eSearch in Google Scholar

[60] Yeswanth, I. V., K. Jha, S. Bhowmik, R. Kumar, S. Sharma, and A. I. Rushdan. Recent developments in RAM based MWCNT composite materials: A short review. Functional Composites and Structures, Vol. 4, 2022, id. 024001.10.1088/2631-6331/ac5730Search in Google Scholar

[61] Virk, G. S., B. Singh, Y. Singh, S. Sharma, R. A. Ilyas, and V. Patyal. Abrasive water jet machining of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composites: A review. Functional Composites and Structures, Vol. 4, 2022, id. 014001.10.1088/2631-6331/ac586cSearch in Google Scholar

[62] Juneja, S., J. S. Chohan, R. Kumar, S. Sharma, R. A. Ilyas, M. R. M. Asyraf, et al. Impact of process variables of acetone vapor jet drilling on surface roughness and circularity of 3D-printed ABS Parts: Fabrication and studies on thermal, morphological, and chemical characterizations. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 1367–1367.10.3390/polym14071367Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Khare, J. M., S. Dahiya, B. Gangil, L. Ranakoti, S. Sharma, M. Huzaifah, et al. Comparative analysis of erosive wear behaviour of epoxy, polyester and vinyl esters based thermosetting polymer composites for human prosthetic applications using Taguchi design. Polymers, Vol. 13, 2021, pp. 3607–3607.10.3390/polym13203607Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] Dwivedi, S. P., M. Maurya, A. Saxena, and S. Sharma. Synthesis and characterization of spent alumina catalyst and grinding sludge reinforced aluminium based composite material. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, 2021, pp. 5523–5534.10.1177/09544062211061451Search in Google Scholar

[65] Chandla, N. K., C. S. Jawalkar, and N. M. Suri. Effect of different weight percentage on mechanical properties of Aluminum metal matrix composites through hybrid reinforcement – A review. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2017, pp. 91–96.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Saheb D. A. Aluminum silicon carbide and aluminum graphite particulate composites. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 10, 2011, pp. 41–46.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Sidhu, S. S., T. R. Ablyaz, P. S. Bains, K. R. Muratov, E. S. Shlykov, and V. V. Shiryaev. Parametric optimization of electric discharge machining of metal matrix composites using analytic hierarchy process. Micromachines (MDPI), Vol. 12, No. 11, 2021, id. 1289.10.3390/mi12111289Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[68] Dwivedi, S. P. and S. Sharma. Synthesis and characterization of Cr, eggshell and grinding sludge reinforced aluminum based metal matrix composites: An ingenious experimental approach. Green Materials (ICE Virtual), 2021, id. 024001.10.1680/jgrma.21.00035Search in Google Scholar

[69] Ilyas, R. A., H. A. Aisyah, A. H. Nordin, N. Ngadi, M. Zuhri, M. Asyraf, et al. Natural-fiber-reinforced chitosan, chitosan blends and their nanocomposites for various advanced applications. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 874–874.10.3390/polym14050874Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[70] Asyraf, M. R., A. Syamsir, N. M. Zahari, A. B. Supian, M. R. Ishak, S. M. Sapuan, et al. Product development of natural fibre-composites for various applications: Design for sustainability. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 920–920.10.3390/polym14050920Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[71] Chohan, J. S., N. Mittal, R. Kumar, S. Singh, S. Sharma, J. Singh, et al. Mechanical strength enhancement of 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer components using neural network optimization algorithm. Polymers, Vol. 12, 2020, pp. 2250–2250.10.3390/polym12102250Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Sharma, S., J. Singh, H. Kumar, A. Sharma, V. Aggarwal, A. S. Gill, et al. Utilization of rapid prototyping technology for the fabrication of an orthopedic shoe inserts for foot pain reprieve using thermo-softening viscoelastic polymers: a novel experimental approach. Measurement and Control, Vol. 53, 2020, pp. 519–530.10.1177/0020294019887194Search in Google Scholar

[73] Singh, Y., J. Singh, S. Sharma, A. Sharma, and J. S. Chohan. Process parameter optimization in laser cutting of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composite-a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, pp. 4738–4744.10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.344Search in Google Scholar

[74] Chohan, J. S., R. Kumar, and T. B. Singh. Taguchi S/N and TOPSIS based optimization of fused deposition modelling and vapor finishing process for manufacturing of ABS plastic parts. Materials, Vol. 13, 2020, pp. 5176–5176.10.3390/ma13225176Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Prabhakaran, S., V. Krishnaraj, S. Sharma, M. Senthilkumar, R. Jegathishkumar, and R. Zitoune. Experimental study on thermal and morphological analyses of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 139, 2020, pp. 3003–3012.10.1007/s10973-019-08691-xSearch in Google Scholar

[76] Suriani, M. J., R. A. Ilyas, and M. Y. M. Zuhri. Critical review of natural fiber reinforced hybrid composites: processing, properties, applications and cost. Polymers, Vol. 13, 2021, pp. 3514–3514.10.3390/polym13203514Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[77] Kumar, R., N. Ranjan, and V. Kumar. Characterization of friction stir-welded polylactic acid/aluminum composite primed through fused filament fabrication. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2021, pp. 2391–409.10.1007/s11665-021-06329-4Search in Google Scholar

[78] Ilyas, R. A., M. Zuhri, M. Norrrahim, M. Misenan, M. A. Jenol, S. A. Samsudin, et al. Natural fiber-reinforced polycaprolactone green and hybrid biocomposites for various advanced applications. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 182–182.10.3390/polym14010182Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[79] Azlin, M., R. A. Ilyas, M. Zuhri, S. M. Sapuan, M. M. Harussani, S. Sharma, et al. 3D printing and shaping polymers, composites, and nanocomposites: A review. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 180–180.10.3390/polym14010180Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[80] Muni, R. N., J. Singh, V. Kumar, S. Sharma, P. Sudhakara, V. Aggarwal, et al. Multiobjective optimization of EDM parameters for rice husk Ash/Cu/Mg-reinforced hybrid Al-0.7Fe-0.6Si-0.375Cr-0.25Zn metal matrix nanocomposites for engineering applications: Fabrication and morphological analysis. Journal of Nanomaterials, Vol. 2022, 2022, id. 2188705.10.1155/2022/2188705Search in Google Scholar

[81] Ilyas, R. A., M. Y. M. Zuhri, H. A. Aisyah, M. R. M. Asyraf, S. A. Hassan, E. S. Zainudin, et al. Natural fiber-reinforced polylactic acid, polylactic acid blends and their composites for advanced applications. Polymers, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 202–202.10.3390/polym14010202Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[82] Sharma, S., V. Patyal, P. Sudhakara, J. Singh, M. Petru, and R. Ilyas. Mechanical, morphological, and fracture-deformation behavior of MWCNTs reinforced (Al-Cu-Mg-T351) alloy cast nanocomposites fabricated by optimized Mechanical milling and Powder metallurgy techniques. Nanotechnology Reviews, Vol. 11, 2022, pp. 65–85.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0005Search in Google Scholar

[83] Sharma, S., P. Sudhakara, M. Petru, J. Singh, and S. Rajkumar. Effect of nanoadditives on the novel leather fiber/recycled poly(ethylene-vinyl-acetate) polymer composites for multifunctional applications: Fabrication, characterizations, and multiobjective optimization using central composite design. Nanotechnology Reviews, Vol. 11, 2022, pp. 2366–2432.10.1515/ntrev-2022-0067Search in Google Scholar

[84] Singh, M., S. Sharma, A. Muniappan, D. Y. Pimenov, S. Wojciechowski, K. Jha, et al. In situ micro-observation of surface roughness and fracture mechanism in metal microforming of thin copper sheets with newly developed compact testing apparatus. Materials, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2022, id. 1368.10.3390/ma15041368Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[85] Tiwari, A., S. Singh, R. Kumar, J. S. Chohan, S. Sharma, J. Singh, et al. The behavior residual properties of a sustainable concrete based composite material containing marble dust and foundry sand under elevated temperature. Materials (MDPI), Vol. 15, 2022, id. 3632.10.3390/ma15103632Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[86] Prabhakaran, S., S. Sharma, A. Verma, S. M. Rangappa, S. Siengchin. Thermal and acoustical studies on natural alternative material for partition walls: A novel experimental investigation. Polymer Composites (Wiley), Vol. 43, 2022, id. 4711.10.1002/pc.26723Search in Google Scholar

[87] Gill, A. S., S. Kumar, J. Singh, V. Aggarwal, and S. Sharma. A review of recent methods for tool wear reduction in electrical discharge machining. Surface Review and Letters (SRL)-World Scientific Publishers, Vol. 27, No. 12, 2020, id. 2030002.10.1142/S0218625X20300026Search in Google Scholar

[88] Jha, K., P. Tamrakar, R. Kumar, S. Sharma, J. Singh, R. A. Ilyas, et al. Effect of hybridization on physio-mechanical behavior of Vetiver and Jute fibres reinforced epoxy composites for structural applications: Studies on fabrication, physicomechanical, water-absorption, and morphological properties. Journal of Industrial Textiles (SAGE), Vol. 51, 2022, pp. 2642S–2664S.10.1177/15280837221098573Search in Google Scholar

[89] Alaneme, K. K. and K. O. Sanusi. Microstructural characteristics, mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium matrix hybrid composites reinforced with alumina, rice husk ash and graphite. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2015, pp. 416–422.10.1016/j.jestch.2015.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[90] Shaikh, M. B., T. Aziz, S. Arif, A. H. Ansari, P. G. Karagiannidis, and M. Uddin. Effect of sintering techniques on microstructural, mechanical and tribological properties of Al-SiC composites. Surfaces and Interfaces, Vol. 20, 2020, id. 100598.10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100598Search in Google Scholar

[91] Umasankar, V., M. A. Xavior, and S. Karthikeyan. Experimental evaluation of the influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of SiC particle reinforced AA6061 aluminium alloy matrix composite by powder processing. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 582, 2014, pp. 380–386.10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.129Search in Google Scholar

[92] Arif, S., M. T. Alam, A. H. Ansari, M. B. Shaikh, and M. A. Siddiqui. Analysis of tribological behaviour of zirconia reinforced Al-SiC hybrid composites using statistical and artificial neural network technique. Materials Research Express, Vol. 5, 2018, id. 056506.10.1088/2053-1591/aabec8Search in Google Scholar

[93] Khajuria, A., R. Bedi, B. Singh, and M. Akhtar. EDM machinability and parametric optimisation of 2014Al/Al2O3 composite by RSM. International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, Vol. 20, 2018, id. 536. 10.1504/IJMMM.2018.096380Search in Google Scholar

[94] Khajuria, A., M. Akhtar, and R. Bedi. A novel approach to envisage effects of boron in P91 steels through Gleeble Weld-HAZ simulation and impression-creep. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, Vol. 57, No. 8, 2021, pp. 647–663.10.1177/03093247211061943Search in Google Scholar

[95] Khajuria, A., M. Akhtar, M. K. Pandey, M. P. Singh, A. Raina, R. Bedi, et al. Influence of ceramic Al2O3 particulates on performance measures and surface characteristics during sinker EDM of stir cast AMMCs. World Journal of Engineering, Vol. 16, 2019, pp. 526–538.10.1108/WJE-01-2019-0015Search in Google Scholar

[96] Han, M. C., S. Z. Cai, J. Wang, and H. W. He. Single-side superhydrophobicity in Si3N4-doped and SiO2-treated polypropylene nonwoven webs with antibacterial activity. Polymers, Vol. 14, No. 14, 2022, id. 2952.10.3390/polym14142952Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Lv, B., S. Wang, T. Xu, and F. Guo. Effects of minor Nd and Er additions on the precipitation evolution and dynamic recrystallization behavior of Mg–6.0Zn–0.5Mn alloy. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2021, pp. 840–852.10.1016/j.jma.2020.06.018Search in Google Scholar

[98] Zhu, H. and R. Zhao. Isolated Ni atoms induced edge stabilities and equilibrium shapes of CVD-prepared hexagonal boron nitride on Ni (111) surface. New Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 46, 2022, pp. 17496–17504.10.1039/D2NJ03735ASearch in Google Scholar

[99] Ye, R., P. Liu, K. Shi, and B. Yan. State damping control: A novel simple method of rotor UAV with high performance. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 214346–214357.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040779Search in Google Scholar

[100] Li, X., X. Yang, D. Yi, B. Liu, J. Zhu, J. Li, et al. Effects of NbC content on microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of laser cladded Fe50Mn30Co10Cr10-xNbC composite coatings. Intermetallics, Vol. 138, 2021, id. 138.10.1016/j.intermet.2021.107309Search in Google Scholar

[101] Liu, J., S. MAO, S. Song, L. Huang, L. A. Belfiore, and J. Tang. Towards applicable photoacoustic micro-fluidic pumps: Tunable excitation wavelength and improved stability by fabrication of Ag-Au alloying nanoparticles. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 884, 2021, id. 884.10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161091Search in Google Scholar

[102] Liang, L., M. Xu, Y. Chen, T. Zhang, W. Tong, H. Liu, et al. Effect of welding thermal treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based superalloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering A, Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing, Vol. 819, 2021, id. 141507.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141507Search in Google Scholar

[103] Zhong, Y., J. Xie, Y. Chen, L. Yin, P. He, and W. Lu. Microstructure and mechanical properties of micro laser welding NiTiNb/Ti6Al4V dissimilar alloys lap joints with nickel interlayer. Materials Letters, Vol. 306, 2022, id. 130896.10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130896Search in Google Scholar

[104] Huang, Z., P. Luo, H. Zheng, and Z. Lyu. Sulfur-doped graphene promoted Li4Ti5O12@C nanocrystals for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 908, No. 5, 2022, id. 164599.10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164599Search in Google Scholar

[105] Luo, Y., Y. Xie, W. Geng, J. Chu, H. Wu, D. Xie, et al. Boosting fire safety and mechanical performance of thermoplastic polyurethane by the face-to-face two-dimensional phosphorene/MXene architecture. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 129, 2022, pp. 27–39.10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[106] Gong P., D. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Jamili-Shirvan, K. Yao, et al. Corrosion behavior of TiZrHfBeCu(Ni) high-entropy bulk metallic glasses in 3.5wt% NaCl. npj Materials Degradation, Vol. 6, 2022, id. 77.10.1038/s41529-022-00287-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-24
Revised: 2022-10-24
Accepted: 2022-11-01
Published Online: 2022-12-27

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Review Articles
  2. State of the art, challenges, and emerging trends: Geopolymer composite reinforced by dispersed steel fibers
  3. A review on the properties of concrete reinforced with recycled steel fiber from waste tires
  4. Copper ternary oxides as photocathodes for solar-driven CO2 reduction
  5. Properties of fresh and hardened self-compacting concrete incorporating rice husk ash: A review
  6. Basic mechanical and fatigue properties of rubber materials and components for railway vehicles: A literature survey
  7. Research progress on durability of marine concrete under the combined action of Cl erosion, carbonation, and dry–wet cycles
  8. Delivery systems in nanocosmeceuticals
  9. Study on the preparation process and sintering performance of doped nano-silver paste
  10. Analysis of the interactions between nonoxide reinforcements and Al–Si–Cu–Mg matrices
  11. Research Articles
  12. Study on the influence of structural form and parameters on vibration characteristics of typical ship structures
  13. Deterioration characteristics of recycled aggregate concrete subjected to coupling effect with salt and frost
  14. Novel approach to improve shale stability using super-amphiphobic nanoscale materials in water-based drilling fluids and its field application
  15. Research on the low-frequency multiline spectrum vibration control of offshore platforms
  16. Multiple wide band gaps in a convex-like holey phononic crystal strip
  17. Response analysis and optimization of the air spring with epistemic uncertainties
  18. Molecular dynamics of C–S–H production in graphene oxide environment
  19. Residual stress relief mechanisms of 2219 Al–Cu alloy by thermal stress relief method
  20. Characteristics and microstructures of the GFRP waste powder/GGBS-based geopolymer paste and concrete
  21. Development and performance evaluation of a novel environmentally friendly adsorbent for waste water-based drilling fluids
  22. Determination of shear stresses in the measurement area of a modified wood sample
  23. Influence of ettringite on the crack self-repairing of cement-based materials in a hydraulic environment
  24. Multiple load recognition and fatigue assessment on longitudinal stop of railway freight car
  25. Synthesis and characterization of nano-SiO2@octadecylbisimidazoline quaternary ammonium salt used as acidizing corrosion inhibitor
  26. Perforated steel for realizing extraordinary ductility under compression: Testing and finite element modeling
  27. The influence of oiled fiber, freeze-thawing cycle, and sulfate attack on strain hardening cement-based composites
  28. Perforated steel block of realizing large ductility under compression: Parametric study and stress–strain modeling
  29. Study on dynamic viscoelastic constitutive model of nonwater reacted polyurethane grouting materials based on DMA
  30. Mechanical behavior and mechanism investigation on the optimized and novel bio-inspired nonpneumatic composite tires
  31. Effect of cooling rate on the microstructure and thermal expansion properties of Al–Mn–Fe alloy
  32. Research on process optimization and rapid prediction method of thermal vibration stress relief for 2219 aluminum alloy rings
  33. Failure prevention of seafloor composite pipelines using enhanced strain-based design
  34. Deterioration of concrete under the coupling action of freeze–thaw cycles and salt solution erosion
  35. Creep rupture behavior of 2.25Cr1Mo0.25V steel and weld for hydrogenation reactors under different stress levels
  36. Statistical damage constitutive model for the two-component foaming polymer grouting material
  37. Nano-structural and nano-constraint behavior of mortar containing silica aggregates
  38. Influence of recycled clay brick aggregate on the mechanical properties of concrete
  39. Effect of LDH on the dissolution and adsorption behaviors of sulfate in Portland cement early hydration process
  40. Comparison of properties of colorless and transparent polyimide films using various diamine monomers
  41. Study in the parameter influence on underwater acoustic radiation characteristics of cylindrical shells
  42. Experimental study on basic mechanical properties of recycled steel fiber reinforced concrete
  43. Dynamic characteristic analysis of acoustic black hole in typical raft structure
  44. A semi-analytical method for dynamic analysis of a rectangular plate with general boundary conditions based on FSDT
  45. Research on modification of mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete by replacing sand with graphite tailings
  46. Dynamic response of Voronoi structures with gradient perpendicular to the impact direction
  47. Deposition mechanisms and characteristics of nano-modified multimodal Cr3C2–NiCr coatings sprayed by HVOF
  48. Effect of excitation type on vibration characteristics of typical ship grillage structure
  49. Study on the nanoscale mechanical properties of graphene oxide–enhanced shear resisting cement
  50. Experimental investigation on static compressive toughness of steel fiber rubber concrete
  51. Study on the stress field concentration at the tip of elliptical cracks
  52. Corrosion resistance of 6061-T6 aluminium alloy and its feasibility of near-surface reinforcements in concrete structure
  53. Effect of the synthesis method on the MnCo2O4 towards the photocatalytic production of H2
  54. Experimental study of the shear strength criterion of rock structural plane based on three-dimensional surface description
  55. Evaluation of wear and corrosion properties of FSWed aluminum alloy plates of AA2020-T4 with heat treatment under different aging periods
  56. Thermal–mechanical coupling deformation difference analysis for the flexspline of a harmonic drive
  57. Frost resistance of fiber-reinforced self-compacting recycled concrete
  58. High-temperature treated TiO2 modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane as photoactive nanomaterials
  59. Effect of nano Al2O3 particles on the mechanical and wear properties of Al/Al2O3 composites manufactured via ARB
  60. Co3O4 nanoparticles embedded in electrospun carbon nanofibers as free-standing nanocomposite electrodes as highly sensitive enzyme-free glucose biosensors
  61. Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on deformation properties of deep foundation pit supported by pile-anchor in Harbin
  62. Temperature-porosity-dependent elastic modulus model for metallic materials
  63. Effect of diffusion on interfacial properties of polyurethane-modified asphalt–aggregate using molecular dynamic simulation
  64. Experimental study on comprehensive improvement of shear strength and erosion resistance of yellow mud in Qiang Village
  65. A novel method for low-cost and rapid preparation of nanoporous phenolic aerogels and its performance regulation mechanism
  66. In situ bow reduction during sublimation growth of cubic silicon carbide
  67. Adhesion behaviour of 3D printed polyamide–carbon fibre composite filament
  68. An experimental investigation and machine learning-based prediction for seismic performance of steel tubular column filled with recycled aggregate concrete
  69. Effects of rare earth metals on microstructure, mechanical properties, and pitting corrosion of 27% Cr hyper duplex stainless steel
  70. Application research of acoustic black hole in floating raft vibration isolation system
  71. Multi-objective parametric optimization on the EDM machining of hybrid SiCp/Grp/aluminum nanocomposites using Non-dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II): Fabrication and microstructural characterizations
  72. Estimating of cutting force and surface roughness in turning of GFRP composites with different orientation angles using artificial neural network
  73. Displacement recovery and energy dissipation of crimped NiTi SMA fibers during cyclic pullout tests
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rams-2022-0279/html
Scroll to top button