Startseite Assessing the geotourism potential of glacial lakes in Plav, Montenegro: A multi-criteria assessment by using the M-GAM model
Artikel Open Access

Assessing the geotourism potential of glacial lakes in Plav, Montenegro: A multi-criteria assessment by using the M-GAM model

  • Eldin Brđanin EMAIL logo , Milan Gazdić , Filip Vujović , Miško Milanović und Eldin Feratović
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Oktober 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the significance of glacial lakes within the municipality of Plav from the perspective of geotourism development, employing the modified geosite assessment model methodology for geosite assessment. Although the Plav region is distinguished by its exceptional natural values and landscape diversity, it has not yet been the subject of systematic investigation concerning its geoheritage and geotourism potential. This research represents an initial contribution toward the identification, valorization, and promotion of glacial geosites as a foundation for the development of sustainable geotourism in the area. The analysis encompasses four glacial lakes: Lake Plav, Visitor Lake, Hrid Lake, and Abdija Lake. These lakes represent attractive geosites and play a vital complementary role in shaping an integrated geotourism offer, contributing to the diversity of content and spatial cohesion of tourist attractions within the municipality. The findings confirm that the glacial lakes in Plav possess considerable geotourism potential, providing a robust basis for the planning of specialized tours, educational activities, and the dissemination of geoscientific knowledge. Realizing this potential necessitates coordinated collaboration among local government bodies, tourism organizations, and other relevant stakeholders to develop infrastructural support, enhance the interpretation of geosites, and promote geotourism as a sustainable form of tourism. Although previously underrecognized within the geoheritage framework, the Plav area offers substantial opportunities for further scientific research, educational initiatives, geoconservation efforts, and recreational use in alignment with the principles of geotourism development.

1 Introduction

As relatively popular areas within the geosciences, geoheritage and geoconservation are focused on recognizing, analyzing, and ensuring the long-term protection of valuable non-living natural features. Also known as geosites, these landforms have attained scientific, aesthetic, cultural, historical, and socio-economic values due to their recognition and use by humans [1,2]. They are generally made available for public access through sustainable geotourism strategies that emphasize educational potential and the conservation of geoheritage [3]. All efforts related to geoconservation and geotourism are fundamentally based on geodiversity, which represents the extensive range of Earth’s natural components and is often referred to as the foundation of geoheritage. Scientific literature related to geotourism typically includes disciplines such as geology, geomorphology, hydrology, soil science, mineralogy, and paleontology within the broader concept of geodiversity, highlighting their essential roles in supporting both human society and planetary systems [4].

The tourism valorization of geosites forms the foundation for the development of geotourism, a modern form of sustainable tourism based on visiting sites of geological heritage and natural geo-features. Geotourism is emerging as a specialized branch of tourism focused on the interpretation, promotion, and conservation of geoheritage through education and recreational activities [5]. It encompasses not only recreational aspects but also holds significant scientific, educational, ethical, and economic implications [6,7].

As a concept, geotourism includes all forms of tourism that involve visiting geologically important locations – such as glacial lakes, canyons, caves, and mountain ranges – with the aim of educating visitors and preserving natural assets [8]. In this regard, geotourism contributes to a broader societal goal: recognizing, valuing, and protecting geoheritage, thus ensuring the long-term sustainability of these areas [9].

A special role in contemporary geotourism is played by geoethics, a discipline that promotes responsible behavior toward the natural environment and geodiversity. A geoethical approach to planning and developing geotourism ensures the protection of sensitive geosites and promotes a moral obligation to preserve natural values for future generations. This is especially important in regions rich in geoheritage, such as northeastern Montenegro.

In the context of the municipality of Plav, geotourism can have a significant economic impact. The natural attractiveness of glacial lakes, mountain ranges, and geological phenomena of the Prokletije Mountains provides a strong basis for diversifying the local tourism offer. Geotourism opens opportunities for job creation, development of small businesses (guiding services, accommodation, local products), increased revenue from tourism taxes, and the promotion of sustainable local development. Moreover, geotourism contributes to the international recognition of Plav as a destination of geoheritage significance, strengthening its competitiveness on the tourism map of Montenegro and the Balkans.

The authors stress the importance of aligning geotourism initiatives with the Sustainable Development Goals (The Sustainable Development Goals, also known as the “Global Goals,” represent a universal call to action by the United Nations, adopted in 2015, urging all countries to work together to eradicate poverty, protect the environment, and ensure peace and prosperity for all people by 2030 at the latest.) and call for more targeted, practical strategies to bridge the gap between policy and implementation [10].

Montenegro is a country of remarkable natural diversity and richness, where a wide range of landscapes and natural attractions can be found within a relatively small area. Along the southern coast lie attractive Adriatic beaches surrounded by historic old towns, while just inland, high mountains rise sharply, concealing authentic villages, dense forests, and unspoiled wilderness. Among the most impressive natural areas in the mountainous part of the country is the Prokletije massif, considered one of the last preserved wild regions of Europe.

The main attraction of this area is its natural glacial lakes – Plav, Hridsko, Visitor, and Abdija Lakes – which are gaining increasing attention from visitors, nature lovers, and researchers due to their scenic beauty, geomorphological features, and ecological integrity. These lakes not only provide valuable insight into post-glacial landform development but also represent key elements of the region’s geoheritage. Despite their exceptional appeal and potential for niche tourism development, such as geotourism, these sites are still underutilized and lack proper promotion, infrastructure, and a coordinated conservation strategy. This study aims to highlight the significance of Plav’s glacial lakes for the sustainable development of geotourism, to protect these sensitive areas while enabling responsible tourism use.

A special focus will be placed on preserving the natural characteristics of these fragile ecosystems, alongside the promotion of sustainable management models that actively involve the local community and relevant institutions. In doing so, the glacial lakes of Plav have the potential to become a model for successfully integrating natural heritage with modern tourism flows, in line with the principles of sustainable development.

In Montenegro, significant scientific attention has been devoted to the glacial history of the Dinaric and Prokletije mountain ranges, and glacial lakes have been acknowledged as important components of these mountain environments [11,12].

Accordingly, this study applies the modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) methodology to four glacial lakes within the municipality of Plav – Lake Plav, Visitor Lake, Hrid Lake, and Abdija Lake – with the aim of initiating a systematic evaluation of these features as geosites. The objective is to support their recognition and integration into strategies for sustainable geotourism development in northeastern Montenegro.

1.1 Literature review

A growing body of research on geoheritage and geotourism potential has highlighted the necessity of developing effective geoheritage assessment models [13]. Numerous inventory and assessment approaches have been developed in the field of geoheritage evaluation [4,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. These assessment processes enable the identification of geologically significant areas [22], the formulation of conservation initiatives [23], and the regulation of their sustainable use [24]. As noted by Suzuki and Takagi [25], assessing the value of geosites is widely recognized as a valuable tool for the effective development, management, and protection of geological heritage. Over the past three decades, methodologies for geosite evaluation have continued to evolve, reflecting the increasing importance of geoheritage conservation within sustainable tourism development. The selection of evaluation criteria often reflects the specific aims and perspectives of the researchers involved. Additionally, some authors, such as Brilha [26], Różycka and Migoń [27], Tomić and Božić [28], and Zorlu and Dede [29] applied weighted scoring systems to enhance the objectivity and precision of the evaluations.

The M-GAM was originally developed by Tomić and Božić for tourism-oriented geosite evaluation in the Lazar Canyon area in Eastern Serbia [28]. Since then, it has been successfully applied many times in various regional contexts to assess the geotourism potential of different geomorphological and hydrological sites. In Serbia, the model has been employed to evaluate the geomorphological and hydrological heritage of Mt. Stara Planina [30], the geoheritage value of Chernozem soils and loess profiles in Vojvodina [31], and the karst formations in the lower basin of the Pek River [32]. It has also been used in studies comparing tourist preferences in Serbian canyons and gorges [33], as well as to assess the geotourism potential of the Danube region [34]. Further applications include urban geosite assessment in the city of Niš [35] and strategic planning in the Toplica District [36].

Most notably, M-GAM was applied in northeastern Montenegro to evaluate sites for future canyoning-based tourism. This study marked the first structured geosite assessment in Montenegro using M-GAM methodology, positioning it as a pioneering effort to promote geoheritage through adventure tourism and sustainable regional development [37].

The MGAM model primarily refers to the tourist evaluation of different types of geoheritage in a certain area. Although it was widely used, there was a need to create other methods that were narrowly specialized for the evaluation of the same types of geoheritage. Thus, the MGAM model influenced the creation of the show cave assessment model (SCAM) [38] for assessing the tourist potential of show caves and the UGAM model [39] for assessing the tourist potential of urban geoheritage. Extended SCAM is an updated version of the SCAM, consisting of three groups of indicators: speleological value, infrastructural value, and touristic value [40], the SMAM [41], and others for assessing the potential of show mines.

For the purposes of this study, the M-GAM was selected due to its comprehensive nature, methodological flexibility, and capacity to integrate both scientific evaluation criteria and visitor perception. Unlike traditional geoheritage assessment methods, which primarily rely on expert-based analysis, M-GAM allows for the inclusion of user perspectives – namely those of tourists – thereby providing a more realistic and holistic understanding of a site’s geotouristic value.

The M-GAM model is particularly suitable because it: enables a combined assessment of expert-defined and visitor-oriented values, applies a quantitative and comparative framework that facilitates ranking and evaluation of multiple sites, emphasizes sustainable development and geoheritage conservation by identifying both the strengths and weaknesses of individual locations, encourages active involvement of local communities and tourists, thereby contributing to increased awareness and long-term protection of natural assets.

Although the M-GAM model has been successfully applied across diverse geographical regions, its use in assessing glacial landscapes – particularly glacial lakes – has remained limited. For this reason, its application to the glacial lakes of Plav represents a meaningful contribution to both academic research and the development of practical guidelines for sustainable geotourism in northeastern Montenegro.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area

The Municipality of Plav covers an area of approximately 328 km² and is located in the northeastern part of Montenegro, near the borders with Albania and Serbia. This mountainous region is characterized by complex terrain shaped through intense glacial, fluvial, and karstic processes. Evidence of glaciation, among the most pronounced in the Balkans, is clearly visible in the form of cirques, moraines, glacial valleys, and depressions. The Plav-Gusinje basin, the region’s most prominent glacial feature, lies above 900 m in elevation and is framed by terminal moraines through which the Lim River flows. The lowest point of the municipality is at 810 m above sea level (the confluence of the Zorićki stream with the Lim), while the highest peak, Bogićevica, reaches 2,358 m. Although the terrain is predominantly steep, mountain plateaus between 1,500 and 2,000 m provide more moderate slopes and favorable microclimatic conditions (Figure 1). One of the most valuable components of Plav’s geoheritage is its glacial lakes. Among them, Lake Plav, Hridsko, Visitorsko, and Abdijino are of particular significance due to their geological origin and natural integrity. Lake Hridsko and Lake Abdijino are located within the boundaries of Prokletije National Park and are under formal protection, which ensures the preservation of their geomorphological and ecological features. Lake Plav and Lake Visitorsko, while situated outside protected areas, remain key representatives of glacial lake systems in the Dinaric region. The monograph “Hydrological Route Plav” lists and locates 31 lakes within the territory of the municipality of Plav. The hydrological network of Plav encompasses numerous water resources, including larger and smaller watercourses, drinking water springs, mountain springs, and irrigation canals. The very fact that Plav is home to the largest glacial lake in the Balkans – Lake Plav – and the longest irrigation canal in Europe, “Bjelajka,” highlights the area’s water wealth and supports its epithet as the town with the richest hydrological network in Montenegro [42].

Figure 1 
                  Presentation of geosites on the map of the Municipality of Plav.
Figure 1

Presentation of geosites on the map of the Municipality of Plav.

2.1.1 Lake Plav

Lake Plav is the largest glacial lake in the Balkans. It is located in the municipality of Plav, at an altitude of 906 meters above sea level. In addition to offering excellent opportunities for sport fishing, the lake is suitable for swimming during the summer months, as well as for rowing and sailing. Its tributaries, the Ljuča River and the outflow into the Lim River, also make it an ideal location for kayak tourism. Lake Plav lies within the boundaries of the “Prokletije” National Park. The lake was formed at the end of the Würm glaciation, the last phase of the great Pleistocene glaciation, around 24,000 years ago, when water accumulated in a depression created by the Gusinje-Plav glacier. The shape of the lake resembles an irregular ellipse, elongated in a south–north direction, with a shoreline of approximately 7,520 m, which varies throughout the year depending on the lake’s water level. The lake is 2,160 m long, 1,490 m wide, with an average width of about 900 m. Its maximum depth is 9.15 m, while the average depth is 3.86 m. The lake covers an area of 1.99 km2. Due to its geographical position, the lake is characterized by cold water temperatures, with monthly averages ranging from 2.8°C in January to 15.5°C in August [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].

2.1.2 Lake visitor

Visitor Lake is located at the source of the Murinska River, on the northwestern side of Mount Visitor, at an altitude of 1,735 m. The lake is situated about 2 km from the highest peak of Visitor. Surrounding the lake are forest species such as Molika pine and spruce. The lake was formed by the accumulation of water in the lowest glacial cirque on Visitor. On the northwestern side, the basin of this glacial lake is enclosed by moraine material, which is 25 m wide and rises 2 m above the lake’s surface. The lake’s maximum length is 91.5 m, its width is 72.5 m, the shoreline length is 294 m, the maximum depth is 4 m, and it covers an area of 4,212 m2. Visitor Lake is fed by rainwater, snowmelt, several intermittent springs, and a small stream [42,43,44,45,46,47,48].

2.1.3 Lake Hrid

Hridsko Lake is located in the northwest part of the rocky mountains, specifically on Hridski Krš (2,358 m), at an altitude of 1,970 m, and is among the highest mountain lakes in the region. Surrounding the lake is a relic and endemic species of the beautiful Molika pine (Pinus peuce), also known as the “Pearl of the Balkans.” During the summer, the lake covers an area of 33,376 m2, with a length of 295 m, a width of 175 m, and a maximum depth of 5 m. The shoreline is mostly rocky and slightly indented. The lake is fed by precipitation, snowmelt, and springs, while it loses water through underground outflow. In the summer months, the water temperature ranges between 16 and 18°C [42,43,44,45,46,47,48].

2.1.4 Lake Abdija

The lake is located in a cirque beneath the highest peak of Horolac and is notable for being situated at the highest elevation of any lake in Montenegro, at 2,054 m above sea level. The lake reaches a length of up to 50 m and a width of around 40 m, with a maximum depth of 4 m. It lies approximately 500 m from the state border with Albania and can be accessed via the Bjelajka summer pasture and the valleys of the Komarača and Treskavac rivers. Every year, the Tourism Organization of Plav organizes a summer hike to this geosite, offering nature lovers and tourists an opportunity for adventure along wild, untouched mountain trails that lead to the lake [42,43,44,45,46,47,48].

Together, these lakes represent essential elements of local geoheritage, offering insight into Pleistocene glaciation processes and post-glacial landscape evolution. Despite the high geotouristic potential of the area, current visitor statistics suggest underutilization. The lakes do not have regular, organized tourist tours from nearby towns. The only organized visits to these lakes are conducted by the Plav Tourist Organization, which organizes annual hiking trips to the lakes during the summer months, with approximately 100–150 participants attending these excursions.

The lakes lack additional tourist infrastructure, such as information boards in the town center and promotional photo and video materials, and there is insufficient promotion by local and national institutions, including the Municipality of Plav, the “Prokletije” National Park, and the National Tourism Organization of Montenegro. Currently, the only active promoter is the Plav Tourist Organization.

Overview and comparative analysis of tourist arrivals, overnight stays, and residence tax revenue in Plav from 2022 to 2024: In 2023, the municipality of Plav recorded 690 arrivals and 12,342 overnight stays, with a total of €4746.48 collected in residence tax. Compared to the previous year (2022), when there were 381 arrivals and 5,671 overnight stays, and only €878.64 collected in residence tax, a significant increase in all indicators is evident: the number of arrivals increased by 80.8%, the number of overnight stays by 117.6% and residence tax revenue grew more than fivefold.

In 2024, the Tourist Organization of Plav improved its system for recording tourist activity by introducing electronic registration and deregistration of foreign visitors, which contributed to more accurate statistics and more efficient collection of the residence tax. According to available data, in 2024, there were 1,252 arrivals and 14,391 overnight stays, while €6097.80 was collected from the residence tax. These results confirm a continued upward trend in tourism in Plav, with almost double the number of arrivals compared to 2022 and a steady growth in both overnight stays and revenue [50] (Figure 2).

Figure 2 
                     Geosites: Glacial Lakes of the Municipality of Plav (a, Plavsko Lake; b, Visitor Lake; c, Hridsko Lake; d, Abdijino Lake). Note. Retrieved May 2, 2025, from https://www.plavto.me/turisticka-ponuda?kategorija=hidroloska-ruta.
Figure 2

Geosites: Glacial Lakes of the Municipality of Plav (a, Plavsko Lake; b, Visitor Lake; c, Hridsko Lake; d, Abdijino Lake). Note. Retrieved May 2, 2025, from https://www.plavto.me/turisticka-ponuda?kategorija=hidroloska-ruta.

2.2 Methods

The M-GAM model was applied to evaluate four glacial geosites in Montenegro with the goal of identifying their current status, advantages, and constraints in relation to the potential for geotourism. The M-GAM methodology relies on two primary categories of indicators: main values (MV) and additional values (AV). Within the MV category, there are three key components, while the AV category is composed of two. MV encompasses a total of 12 sub-indicators, and AV consists of 15. These indicators are represented through the following equations:

M GAM = MV + AV

MV = VSE + VSA + VPr

AV = VFn + VTr

Here, VSE refers to scientific and educational value, VSA to aesthetic and scenic value, VPr to protection, VFn to functional aspects, and VTr to tourist-related value. The full structure and methodological background of the M-GAM model can be found in the publication by Tomić and Božić [28]. Survey participants rate the importance of each sub-indicator using a scale from 0.00 to 1.00. Based on these inputs, the average importance score (Im) for each sub-indicator is calculated. This Im value reflects how tourists perceive the relevance of each element within the assessment and is later multiplied by expert evaluations (ranging from 0.00 to 1.00) to derive the final score for each criterion [13].

The importance value is determined using the following formula:

m = k = 1 K Iv k K ,

where Iv k denotes the individual rating provided by each participant and K is the total number of respondents.

To obtain the final values of MV and AV, the following expressions are used:

MV = Σ ( Im i × MV i ) ,

AV = Σ ( Im j × AV j ) .

As defined in the M-GAM methodology, the final value of each subindicator is calculated by multiplying the expert-assigned score by the average importance value (Im) derived from visitor responses. This approach allows for a more objective and comprehensive evaluation by incorporating both expert knowledge and tourist perception. Božić and Tomić [28] applied this method to assess geotourism segments in Serbia and calculated the Im values accordingly. The Importance factor for the Montenegrin geotourism market was calculated by Brđanin et al. [37]. For this research, the Im factor was adopted from previously mentioned research, to maintain consistency with the regional context of Montenegro. Table 1 presents the evaluation results for the 27 sub-indicators, as well as the Im values for Montenegro, which were obtained through a survey (Figure 3).

Table 1

Values of glacial geosites in plav according to the M-GAM methodology for Montenegro

Main indicators/subindicators Geosites Total value
GS1 GS2 GS3 GS4 Im GS1 GS2 GS3 GS4
MV
Scientific/educational value (VSE)
Rarity (SIMV1) 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.57 0.76 0.57 0.57
Representativeness (SIMV2) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Knowledge on geoscientific issues (SIMV3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73
Level of interpretation (SIMV4) 0.75 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.74 0.55 0.37 0.55 0.74
Scenic/aesthetic (VSA)
Viewpoints (SIMV5) 1.00 0.50 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.83 0.41 0.62 0.62
Surface (SIMV6) 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.65 0.32 0.16 0.16 0.16
Surrounding landscape and nature (SIMV7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Environmental fitting of sites (SIMV8) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78
Protection (VPr)
Current condition (SIMV9) 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.22 0.89 0.89 0.89
Protection level (SIMV10) 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.21 0.86 0.86 0.86
Vulnerability (SIMV11) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.77 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.19
Suitable number of visitors (SIMV12) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
AV
Functional values (VFn)
Accessibility (SIAV1) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.19
Additional natural values (SIAV2) 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.76 0.57 0.76 0.76 0.38
Additional anthropogenic values (SIAV3) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.74 0.37 0.37 0.55 0.18
Vicinity of emissive centers (SIAV4) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.25 0.63 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.15
Vicinity of important road network (SIAV5) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76
Additional functional values (SIAV6) 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.35 0.00 0.00
Touristic values (VTr)
Promotion (SIAV7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.18
Organized visits (SIAV8) 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.64 0.64 0.16 0.16 0.16
Vicinity of visitors centers (SIAV9) 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.68 0.68 0.34 0.34 0.34
Interpretative panels (SIAV10) 1.00 0.75 0.25 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.60 0.20 0.00
Number of visitors (SIAV11) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.61 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Tourism infrastructure (SIAV12) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.00
Tour guide service (SIAV13) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Hostelry service (SIAV14) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.54
Restaurant service (SIAV15) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.51

The importance factor (Im) for Montenegro represents the mean values ​​of all respondents, that is the values ​​are in bold. Im values ​​are further multiplied with values ​​by scientists in order to obtain final values, i.e. results for determining sub indicators.

Figure 3 
                  Position of glacial lakes Plav on the M-GAM matrix.
Figure 3

Position of glacial lakes Plav on the M-GAM matrix.

The study was conducted during the period from October 2023 to March 2024, the survey was conducted through the online digital platform Google Forms, and it was anonymous. In the survey conducted to calculate the importance factor (Im) for Montenegro, a total of 365 respondents participated, of which 204 were female (55.90%) and 161 were male (44.10%). The majority of participants were from Podgorica – 142 respondents (38.90%), followed closely by Rožaje with 140 participants (38.35%). Bijelo Polje ranked third, with 18 respondents (4.93%). The remaining participants came from other cities across Montenegro, but with significantly lower percentages. Regarding the level of education, respondents were categorized as follows: primary school – 15 individuals (4.10%), secondary school – 83 individuals (22.73%), completed university studies – 155 individuals (42.46%), completed master’s degree – 87 individuals (23.83%), and doctoral degree – 25 individuals (6.84%). In terms of employment status, the majority of respondents were employed – 239 individuals (65.47%). They were followed by students – 62 participants (16.98%) – and unemployed individuals – 38 participants (10.40%) [37].

3 Results and discussion

For the purpose of assessing and evaluating the current state of geosites, specifically glacial lakes in the Municipality of Plav, an analysis was conducted to determine the present condition, identify advantages and existing infrastructural shortcomings, and assess the significance of these geosites for the further development of geotourism.

All four lakes were evaluated with very high ratings for scientific and educational values, with the geosite GS4 Abdijino Lake standing out as the highest-rated with the score of 2.79. The other three sites have a slightly lower score for scientific and educational values (2.61). The highest scores among the scientific and educational value indicators (VSE) were awarded for representativeness (SIMV2 = 1.00) and knowledge on geoscientific issues (SIMV3 = 1.00), which were achieved by all four assessed glacial geosites – Plav Lake, Visitor Lake, Hridsko Lake, and Abdijino Lake. These maximum values confirm that all four sites are highly representative examples of glacial landforms and that they are well-documented and thoroughly studied in scientific literature. The lakes were formed in glacial cirques and illustrate characteristic geomorphological features shaped by Quaternary glaciation. This makes them ideal for geoscientific research and field-based education, providing accessible real-world examples for understanding glacial processes, paleoclimate interpretation, and geomorphological evolution in mountainous regions. In terms of rarity (SIMV1), scores range from 0.75 to 1.00, with Visitor Lake receiving the highest score (1.00) due to the presence of a floating island, a highly unusual geomorphological feature at both national and regional scales. The other three lakes, although still considered rare (0.75), have more analogues in the region and thus are deemed slightly less unique. The interpretation level (SIMV) is highest at Abdijino Lake (1.00), reflecting the presence of organized hiking events, educational walks, and growing use of the site for outdoor learning, which enhances its accessibility to the public and its role in science communication. In contrast, the other sites have lower interpretation scores due to the lack of interpretive infrastructure such as information panels, guided tours, or educational signage, which limits their broader geotouristic and pedagogical value. Collectively, these indicators demonstrate that the evaluated lakes are highly valuable scientific and educational resources, capable of supporting both specialized academic inquiry and broader public engagement. They offer direct insights into glacial morphology and processes, and they represent important assets for developing field-based education, thematic tourism, and raising awareness about the geoheritage of Montenegro.

The landscape and aesthetic values of all geosites are of great significance, with the GS1 Plav Lake standing out in particular, receiving a score of 2.83. Hridsko and Abdijino Lakes were evaluated with overall scores of 2.46, while Visitor Lake received a score of 2.25. All four glacial geosites exhibit notable scenic and aesthetic value, with Plav Lake (GS1) standing out as the most visually prominent, receiving the highest score (2.83). Its large surface area, clear panoramic views, and harmonious integration within the Prokletije mountain landscape contribute to a strong visual identity and year-round appeal. The lake’s accessibility, recreational use, and reflection of surrounding peaks enhance its aesthetic experience. Hridsko Lake (GS3) and Abdijino Lake (GS4) follow with equal scores of 2.46, offering high-mountain aesthetics shaped by alpine terrain, elevation, and seclusion. Hridsko Lake, surrounded by coniferous forest and located at nearly 2,000 m altitude, presents a tranquil and pristine setting, while Abdijino Lake, the highest glacial lake in Montenegro, offers a dramatic, rugged cirque landscape with minimal vegetation, appealing to those seeking untouched natural beauty. Both are visually harmonious but limited by smaller surface areas. Visitor Lake (GS2) received the lowest aesthetic score (2.25) due to its smaller size and lower viewpoint value, despite the presence of a unique floating island. Although integrated into a forested glacial basin, its limited openness and visual dominance affect its rating. Overall, while all sites are aesthetically valuable, Plav Lake’s expansive, accessible, and multifaceted landscape gives it a clear advantage in scenic evaluation.

The level of protection for these lakes is very specific because they are located within the protected zones of Prokletije National Park, except for Plav Lake, which lies outside the National Park zone and received an overall protection rating of only 1.57. The other three lakes were rated with exceptionally high scores, highlighting their great importance for continued conservation. At the same time, this makes some aware of great caution regarding further tourism development of these glacial lakes, as they could be damaged by excessive tourist visits and the construction of tourism infrastructure, which must be carefully managed.

The overall MVs are presented in Table 2, where the highest score was recorded for GS3 – Hridsko Lake (7.99), which is widely recognized as one of the most beautiful and attractive glacial lakes in Montenegro. This high rating reflects its outstanding scenic/aesthetic qualities, well-preserved natural setting, and excellent scientific and conservation value, particularly due to its location within a national park and the pristine alpine environment surrounding it. In second place is GS4 – Abdijino Lake (7.98), the highest-altitude glacial lake in Montenegro (2,054 m), valued for its excellent scientific representativeness, strong interpretive potential, and unique high-mountain landscape. The third-ranked site is GS2 – Visitor Lake (7.75), which received slightly lower scores due to limited visual openness and interpretative infrastructure, though it still ranks highly because of its rarity (floating island) and high conservation status. GS1 – Plav Lake received the lowest score among the four (7.01) in terms of MV; yet, this is still a very high score, reflecting its significance as the largest glacial lake in Montenegro, its educational value, and its scenic harmony within the landscape. The slightly lower MV score can be attributed to lower ratings in protection indicators, such as current condition and vulnerability, as well as moderate interpretation levels compared to other sites. Despite this, Plav Lake remains an essential geosite due to its geomorphological importance, accessibility, and multifunctional role in recreation, education, and conservation. The term geosites is used instead of geolocations as it more accurately refers to natural sites of geological significance that possess scientific, educational, ecological, and aesthetic values within geoheritage frameworks.

Table 2

Overall results of the evaluation of glacial geosites in the municipality of Plav

Geosites MV Σ AV Σ Field
VSE + VSA + VPr VFn + VTr
GS1 – Plavsko Lake 2.61 + 2.83 + 1.57 7.01 3.67 + 6.09 9.76 Z22
GS2 – Visitor Lake 2.61 + 2.25 + 2.89 7.75 3.50 + 5.06 8.56 Z22
GS3 – Hridsko Lake 2.61 + 2.46 + 2.92 7.99 3.33 + 4.66 7.99 Z22
GS4 – Abdijino Lake 2.79 + 2.46 + 2.73 7.98 1.66 + 2.68 4.34 Z21

The difference between the main and AVs of these geosites is significant, with a noticeable weakness in functional and tourism values, especially at the GS4 Abdijino Lake site, which received an overall score of 4.34. The low score for functional values of this glacial lake (1.66) is due to its great distance and poor accessibility. It can only be reached on foot, which creates a major challenge in organizing large tourist visits to the lake, as well as its considerable distance from major centers and important transport routes. The tourism values were rated with an overall score of 2.68, with organized visits and a guide service always available at this geosite (Table 2).

The other three geosites are characterized by exceptionally high ratings in terms of functional and tourism values. The geosite GS1 Plav Lake, with an overall score of 9.76, represents an outstanding tourist potential for the development of geotourism in this region, both for Montenegro and the municipality of Plav. As the largest glacial lake in the Balkans, the lake is located in the very center, where the town of Plav has developed, along with additional anthropogenic values and proximity to major centers and important transport routes.

Although the assessed geosites received high scores in terms of MV, the indicators associated with touristic infrastructure and interpretive capacity, which carry a high weight in the context of sustainable geotourism development, reveal notable deficiencies. Key indicators such as the presence of visitor centers (SIAV9), interpretative panels (SIAV10), tour guide services (SIAV13), actual visitor numbers (SIAV11), and the proximity of hospitality and accommodation services (SIAV14 and SIAV15) are either completely absent or very limited in their physical presence across most of the evaluated sites. Plav Lake performs relatively well in this regard, benefiting from its proximity to the town of Plav, some basic infrastructure, and limited recreational services. However, Hridsko, Visitor, and especially Abdijino Lakes show a very low level of interpretive infrastructure and institutional support, which significantly restricts their tourism potential. The main reasons for this include difficult terrain accessibility, environmental protection restrictions (as many sites are located in or near protected areas), and a lack of strategic investment or integration into local development policies. Most of these sites are reachable only via long hiking routes, with minimal or no signage, and a lack of formal educational materials, which reflects a broader institutional gap in geosite management and interpretation planning. The absence of visitor centers, guide services, and interpretive signage limits the capacity of these geosites to engage the public in understanding glacial processes and the broader geoheritage context. Therefore, improving these indicators through the establishment of basic infrastructure, formal trail systems, trained guides, and interpretative materials should be a priority for enhancing the touristic and educational value of these geosites and realizing their full potential within the framework of sustainable tourism.

The Visitorsko and Hridsko Lakes sites were rated slightly lower compared to Plavsko Lake. Visitorsko Lake received an overall score of 8.56, with functional values rated at 3.50 and tourism values at 5.06. Hridsko Lake was rated with an overall score of 7.99, where functional values received a score of 3.33 and tourism values 4.66 (Table 2).

These geosites, specifically the glacial lakes, possess significant tourism potential and could become an important attraction for the municipality of Plav in the future. Accommodation and hospitality facilities, as well as guide services, are already available in the vicinity.

However, it is necessary to enhance promotional activities at the local level in order to achieve greater visibility in both national and international markets, especially considering that these geosites are perfectly integrated into the stunning natural landscape of the Prokletije mountains. Modern promotion strategies should include the use of digital marketing tools such as official websites, travel blogs, geotourism platforms, and mobile-friendly interactive maps. In particular, social media channels like Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube offer powerful means for visual storytelling and real-time engagement with potential visitors. These platforms allow for showcasing the scenic beauty, outdoor experiences, and cultural context of the sites through short videos, reels, photo series, and influencer collaborations. Additionally, inclusion on international travel platforms such as TripAdvisor, Google Travel, Booking.com, and Airbnb Experiences could further promote these destinations and integrate them into the broader geotourism offer. Developing a consistent online presence with high-quality content, multilingual access, and geolocation tagging would significantly increase recognition, especially among ecotourists, hikers, and educational groups seeking unique nature-based experiences.

Geotourism has the potential to serve as a catalyst for sustainable development in small communities such as the Municipality of Plav. Despite its exceptional natural resources, Plav has experienced a noticeable decline in tourist arrivals over recent years. According to available data, the number of registered arrivals dropped from 1,074 tourists in 2018 to just 636 in 2023, suggesting either reduced visitor interest or inadequate registration systems. Similarly, the number of overnight stays declined from 12,634 to 10,821, resulting in decreased tourism expenditure and limited economic benefit for the local population. The majority of these visits are attributed to the diaspora, further highlighting the limited appeal of Plav to a wider tourist market.

The observed decline in officially registered tourist arrivals and overnight stays in the Municipality of Plav between 2018 and 2023 may not solely reflect a true decrease in visitation but rather point to underlying issues related to unregistered tourism activities and informal accommodation practices, commonly referred to as grey tourism. In many small and remote communities, including Plav, visitors, particularly members of the diaspora and domestic tourists, frequently stay in private homes, family-owned cabins, or unregistered rural lodgings that operate outside formal tourism channels and reporting systems. As a result, their presence is not reflected in official statistics, leading to a statistical underestimation of actual visitation rates. Additionally, the absence of a functional system for mandatory registration, combined with insufficient enforcement and limited institutional oversight, contributes to data gaps and the loss of potential tax revenue and economic benefits for the local community. This informal tourism model restricts the ability of local authorities to plan effectively, allocate resources, and invest in infrastructure or destination promotion. It also hinders efforts to position Plav as a competitive and sustainable geotourism destination, since reliable data is essential for attracting funding, partnerships, and broader market visibility. Addressing this issue requires coordinated efforts to formalize tourism services, raise awareness among local hosts, and implement regulatory mechanisms and incentives that support transparent and inclusive community-based tourism development.

In this context, geotourism emerges as a strategic avenue for reversing this negative trend. Plav is endowed with outstanding geoheritage, particularly in the form of glacial lakes – Plav, Hridsko, Visitor, and Abdijino – which are unique in Montenegro but have yet to be systematically evaluated in terms of tourism and nature protection. Applying the M-GAM methodology could provide a comprehensive and objective assessment of their scientific and touristic value, laying the groundwork for effective management, promotion, and conservation. The development of thematic georoutes, accompanied by interpretative signage and educational materials, could attract a new visitor demographic such as those interested in science, nature, and active recreation. In recent years, georoutes have gained increasing popularity across Europe and internationally as innovative tools for promoting geoheritage. They allow visitors to explore landscapes through a combination of physical activity, scientific interpretation, and cultural storytelling. Their appeal lies in the ability to connect multiple geosites into coherent and educationally rich experiences, often supported by digital applications, QR codes, and local guide services, making them particularly attractive to environmentally conscious and experience-driven travelers.

Beyond infrastructure development, a major challenge lies in the lack of trained personnel. Most local service providers do not speak foreign languages, and licensed tourist and mountain guides are scarce. Targeted training programs for the local population are essential to improving service quality and increasing employment. Promotion of geotourism potentials must align with sustainable development principles, including the protection of sensitive lake ecosystems and mountain landscapes.

Furthermore, the creation of both digital and printed promotional materials tailored to different visitor profiles is necessary to present Plav as a destination rich in geoheritage. Priority should be given to targeting educational tourists, environmentally conscious travelers, hiking and outdoor recreation enthusiasts, student groups, and amateur geoscience and biology learners, as these segments increasingly seek meaningful, nature-based experiences that combine exploration, learning, and sustainability. To effectively engage these target groups, collaboration with academic and research institutions from the fields of geosciences, biology, environmental protection, and tourism is essential. Such interdisciplinary partnerships can support the scientific valorization and popularization of local geosites and biodiversity hotspots through field education, ecological monitoring, joint research, and interpretative programming. The area’s rich glacial landscapes, endemic plant species, and diverse habitats provide ideal conditions for the integration of geo- and biodiversity-based tourism, enhancing both educational and conservation values. These efforts can also contribute to positioning Plav as a potential educational and field-study hub in the wider Balkan region. Given the ongoing decline in formally registered tourist arrivals and the local economy’s dependence on diaspora visits, geotourism represents a viable pathway to access new visitor markets and to build a distinct, sustainable tourism identity. By promoting the importance of both geoheritage actively involving the local community in its protection and interpretation, a foundation can be established for inclusive, long-term local development.

Geotourism does not rely on mass visitation, but rather on quality experiences – making it a development model well-suited to Plav’s capacities. Through a combination of scientific evaluation, local knowledge, and natural beauty, Plav holds significant potential to reverse the current tourism decline. Instead of stagnation, a strategically guided geotourism approach may lead to increased visitation, extended stays, and strengthened local economic resilience. Through a combination of scientific evaluation, local knowledge, and natural beauty, Plav holds significant potential to reverse the current tourism decline. However, this potential can only be fully realized through serious investment in promotion and the development of appropriate tourism infrastructure, which are far more crucial for attracting and retaining visitors than scientific value alone. While geoheritage provides a strong foundation, it is the visibility, accessibility, and overall quality of the visitor experience that ultimately shape tourism success. Well-designed infrastructures, such as marked geotrails, visitor centers, interpretative signage, and quality accommodation, combined with effective promotional strategies including digital media, travel platforms, and community-led initiatives, are essential for transforming Plav into a recognized and competitive destination within the nature-based and educational tourism market.

For future research, it is recommended to integrate advanced spatial analysis through geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to enhance the mapping, evaluation, and management of glacial lakes as geoheritage sites. GIS would allow detailed spatial analysis of lake basin morphology, hydrological parameters, accessibility, and tourism infrastructure, while MCDA would facilitate the prioritization of development and conservation actions based on ecological sensitivity, aesthetic value, scientific significance, and geotourism potential.

In the previous period, an evaluation of the glacial lake geosites in Montenegro was carried out using the newly developed G-GAM methodology, introduced by Marković et al. [51]. The main feature of this methodology is the emphasized role of expert evaluation, with special attention given to the significance of each sub-indicator in the assessment process. For the purpose of calculating the Im G-GAM index, glacial values are assessed by experts in the fields of glaciology, glacial geoheritage, and glacial geomorphology. Within this study, the most significant glacial lakes of Montenegro were assessed, among which Plav Lake stands out as the largest glacial lake in the Balkans. According to the results of the G-GAM analysis, Plav Lake is strongly positioned as a tourist-attractive geosite (TV = 250.17), while its scientific–glacial value is somewhat lower (GV = 213.09). Nevertheless, it is classified in the same category (F33) as Crno Lake and Biogradsko Lake, which confirms its potential for geotourism development, particularly through improved promotion, interpretation, and protection measures [51].

A similar approach to lake assessment was applied by Somma et al. [52] in their study of Faro and Ganzirri lakes (Italy). These geosites, although of different genesis (tectonic–coastal lagoons), represent significant geoheritage examples due to their scientific rarity, cultural–natural linkages, and landscape attractiveness. They demonstrate a strong potential for geoeducation and geotourism but require careful planning to avoid degradation. Particularly, noteworthy is their potential future nomination as UNESCO natural heritage sites, which would further strengthen their status and level of protection. In comparison, Plav Lakes carry greater value as glacial models, while the Italian lakes are significant in the context of tectonic–coastal processes. Despite their different origins, both cases provide unique scientific insights and open opportunities for the development of diverse forms of geotourism.

Furthermore, Golfinopoulos et al. [53], within the framework of the Chelmos–Vouraikos UNESCO Global Geopark (Greece), presented Tsivlos Lake as a significant geosite. This lake, although of younger origin (formed after a landslide in 1913), already possesses a high degree of protection (Natura 2000, UNESCO) and developed tourism infrastructure, including georoutes, educational facilities, and strong promotion. With more than 75,000 visitors annually, Tsivlos has achieved international recognition and is fully integrated into the broader tourism system of Greece.

In contrast, the results of the assessment of Plav Lakes (Plav, Visitor, Hrid, and Ambijino) using the MGAM methodology indicate that this area possesses exceptional predispositions for geotourism development but is still not systematically valorized nor included in international protection frameworks. Although of different genesis, the Plav Lakes are characterized by outstanding aesthetic and landscape value, being situated within the Prokletije mountain range – one of the most impressive mountain systems of the Balkans. Their scientific significance lies in the opportunities for studying Quaternary glacial processes, which give them local, regional, and international importance.

A comparison between the Plav Lakes and Tsivlos clearly shows that the main difference lies in the level of research, institutional protection, and tourism integration. While Tsivlos is already established within the UNESCO system and represents an internationally recognized tourist attraction, the Plav Lakes remain in the background, lacking an adequate protection framework and developed infrastructure.

In conclusion, the Plav Lakes possess the potential to become the core of geotourism in Montenegro, similar to the role Tsivlos plays in Greece. Realizing this potential requires the systematic introduction of protection measures, the construction of tourism and educational infrastructure, and integration into international networks, including UNESCO geoparks. In this way, the valorization of the Plav Lakes would not only serve the purpose of scientific and tourism affirmation but would also contribute to the sustainable development of the local community and Montenegro as a whole.

3.1 Limitations of the study

Although the applied M-GAM model provides a useful framework for integrating expert evaluations and visitor perceptions, this approach carries certain methodological limitations. First of all, multi-criteria analyses of this type inevitably contain a degree of subjectivity, as they rely on assessments made by respondents and researchers that depend on their individual experiences, value judgments, and expectations. This subjectivity is further reinforced by the fact that some criteria are strongly correlated with one another, leading to overlaps and potential double counting of the same characteristics. For instance, within the MV group, SIMV9 (current condition) is closely related to SIMV10 (protection level), as sites under a higher protection regime are generally better preserved, while in the AV group, SIAV1 (accessibility) is strongly linked to SIAV5 (vicinity of important road network), since proximity to major roads almost automatically improves accessibility. Such correlations reduce the precision of the evaluation and make it more difficult to draw reliable conclusions about the relative importance of individual geosites. In addition, these models frequently neglect measurable parameters that could contribute to a more objective validation of the results, which may limit their practical applicability in sustainable development planning. Despite these limitations, such multi-criteria approaches remain valuable as they provide a structured framework for systematically comparing geosites and highlighting their geotourism potential.

4 Conclusion

This study emphasizes the untapped potential of geotourism as a strategic development model for the municipality of Plav, centered around its exceptional glacial lake geoheritage. The lakes – Plav, Hridsko, Visitorsko, and Abdijino – possess high scientific, aesthetic, and educational value, offering diverse opportunities for the creation of thematic geotourism routes and educational programs. However, despite their natural appeal, these geosites remain largely underrecognized and underdeveloped from a geotourism perspective. Key barriers include limited infrastructure, poor accessibility for some sites, lack of interpretative content, and insufficient engagement of the local population in tourism services. To address these issues, the implementation of geotourism must focus on sustainable and low-impact visitation, supported by targeted training for local guides, the development of interpretive signage, multilingual promotional materials, and partnerships with academic institutions. The application of GIS and multi-criteria analysis can further aid in identifying priorities for conservation and development.

The research brings several primary scientific contributions and novelties for the municipality of Plav, as well as for the initial development of geotourism in Montenegro. First of all, the MGAM methodology is presented as an innovative approach to the evaluation of geosites in the area of Plav. By applying this method, it has been possible to gain a more precise and comprehensive understanding of geosite values, taking into account scientific, aesthetic, touristic, and educational aspects. Another important contribution of this article relates to the results of the MGAM analysis, which provide clear guidelines for the strategic planning of geotourism development in Plav, the identification of priority geosites, and the creation of sustainable tourism products.

A particular significance of this research lies in the fact that it represents the initial phase of scientific studies on glacial lakes in the municipality of Plav. Until now, these lakes have mainly been recognized through their landscape and aesthetic value, while this study has made the first step toward their systematic evaluation from the perspective of geotourism. This opens the way for further interdisciplinary research, which can contribute not only to the development of a scientific database on geoheritage but also to the creation of sustainable tourism offers that will position Plav as a recognizable geotourism destination in Montenegro and the wider region.

The practical value of the results of this research lies in their direct applicability in tourism planning and development in the municipality of Plav. The MGAM methodology, through a clear ranking and evaluation of glacial lakes and other geosites, provides the basis for identifying the most attractive and promising locations for the development of a geotourism offer. In this way, the local government and tourism organizations can direct resources toward improving access roads, building educational infrastructure (information boards, trails, viewpoints), and creating interpretive content that will bring visitors closer to the natural and geological values of the area.

For the municipality of Plav, these results provide a strategic foundation for differentiation in the tourism market – instead of relying only on traditional forms of tourism, Plav can develop a new type of tourism, namely geotourism, which promotes its unique glacial lakes and mountain landscapes. At the same time, this encourages sustainable development, as the emphasis is placed on the preservation of natural resources and their presentation through education, visitation, and experience, rather than through mass exploitation. In the long run, such an approach can generate new economic benefits for the local population through the development of accommodation facilities, guided tours, local products, and cultural events connected to natural heritage.

Ultimately, geotourism in Plav can enhance visitor experiences, promote community-based tourism, protect sensitive ecosystems, and establish Plav as a leading destination for nature-based and educational travel in Montenegro.

  1. Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization, E.B. and F.V.; methodology, M.Mi., F.V., and E.B.; formal analysis, F.V., E.F., and M.G.; investigation, E.B., F.V., and M.G.; writing – original draft preparation, F.V., E.B., and M.Mi.; writing – review and editing, F.V. and M.Mi.; visualization, E.B. and F.V.; supervision, F.V. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Betard F, Hoblea F, Portal C. Les geopatrimoines, de nouvelles ressources territoriales au service du developpement local. Ann De Geographie. 2017;5:523–43.10.3917/ag.717.0523Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hoblea F, Portal C, Sellier D, Ambert M. Geomorphosites: une nouvelle chronique de la revue dynamiques environnementales sous l’egide de la Commission du patrimoine geomorphologique du CNFG, dynamiques environnementales. J Int Geosci L’Environ. 2018;39–40:330–2.10.4000/dynenviron.584Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Reynard E, Brilha J. Geoheritage: assessment, protection, and management. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017.10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00030-7Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Gray M. Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoconservation for society. Int J Geoherit Park. 2019;7(4):226–36. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Petrović MD, Lukić D, Radovanović MM, Blešić I, Gajić T, Demirović Bajrami D, et al. How can tufa deposits contribute to the geotourism offer? The outcomes from the first UNESCO global geopark in Serbia. Land. 2023;12:285. 10.3390/land12020285.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Zafeiropoulos G, Drinia H, Antonarakou A, Zouros N. From geoheritage to geoeducation, geoethics and geotourism: a critical evaluation of the greek region. Geosciences. 2021;11(9):381. 10.3390/geosciences11090381.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Peppoloni S, Di Capua G. Geoethics: . Manifesto for an ethics of responsibility towards the earth. Cham: Springer; 2022. 10.1007/978-3- 030-98044-3.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Dowling RK, Newsome D. Geotourism’s issues and challenges. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D, editors. Geotourism. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006. p. 242–54. 10.1016/B978-0-7506-6215-4.50021-X.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Hose TA. Geotourism. London: Routledge; 2005. p. 221–41.10.1016/B978-0-7506-6215-4.50020-8Suche in Google Scholar

[10] https://www.undp.org.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Petrović AS. A reconstruction of the pleistocene glacial maximum in the Žijovo range (Prokletije Mountains, Montenegro). Acta Geogr Slovenica. 2014;54(2):255–69.10.3986/AGS54202Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Hughes PD, Woodward JC, Van Calsteren PC, Thomas LE. The glacial history of the Dinaric Alps, Montenegro. Quat Sci Rev. 2011;30(23–24):3393–412. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.08.016.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Ólafsdóttir R, Tverijonaite E. Geotourism: a systematic literature review. Geosciences. 2018;8(7):234. 10.3390/geosciences8070234.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Mamoon A. Place attachment and tourist experience in the context of desert tourism–the case of Wadi Rum. Czech J Tour. 2016;5(1):35–52.10.1515/cjot-2016-0003Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Brilha JB. Património geológico e geoconservação: A conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Viseu: Palimage Editores; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Cendrero A. El patrimonio geológico: ideas para su protección, conservación y utilización. El patrimonio geológico. Bases para su valoración, protección, conservación y utilización. Madrid: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transportes y Medio Ambiente; 1996. p. 17–27.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Coratza P, Giusti C. Methodological proposal for the assessment of scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quat, Ital J Quat Sci. 2005;18(1):307–13.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Pereira P, Pereira DI, Alves MIC. Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helvetica. 2007;62:159–68.10.5194/gh-62-159-2007Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Reynard E. The assessment of geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G, editors. Geomorphosites. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 2009. p. 63–71.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Pereira P, Pereira DI. Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphol Relief, Processus, Environ. 2010;2:215–22. 10.4000/geomo Vujičić MD.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Vasiljević DA, Marković SB, Hose TA, Lukić T, Hadžić O, Janićević S. Preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM) and its application on Fruška Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta Geogr Slovenica. 2011;51(2):361–76. 10.3986/AGS51303.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Reynard E, Panizza M. Geomorphosites: definition, assessment and mapping. Géomorphologie. 2005;11(3):177–80. 10.4000/geomorphologie.337.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Carrión Mero P, Herrera Franco G, Briones J, Caldevilla P, Domínguez-Cuesta MJ, Berrezueta E. Geotourism and local development based on geological and mining sites utilization, Zaruma-Portovelo, Ecuador. Geosciences. 2018;8(6):205.10.3390/geosciences8060205Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Herrera-Franco G, Carrión-Mero P, Alvarado N, Morante-Carballo F, Maldonado A, Caldevilla P, et al. Geosites and georesources to foster geotourism in communities: case study of the santa elena peninsula geopark project in Ecuador. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4484. 10.3390/su12114484.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Suzuki D, Takagi H. Evaluation of geosite for sustainable planning and management in geotourism. Geoheritage. 2018;10:123–35. 10.1007/s12371-017-0225-4.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Brilha J. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage. 2016;8(2):119–34. 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Różycka M, Migoń P. Customer-oriented evaluation of geoheritage – on the example of volcanic geosites in the West Sudetes, SW Poland. Geoheritage. 2018;10(1):23–37. 10.1007/s12371-017-0217-4.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Tomić N, Božić S. A modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) and its application on the Lazar Canyon area (Serbia). Int J Environ Res. 2014;8(4):1041–52.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Zorlu K, Dede V. Assessment of glacial geoheritage by multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in the Yalnızçam Mountains, Northeastern Türkiye. Int J Geoheritage Park. 2023;11(1):100–17. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Marjanović M, Milenković J, Lukić M, Tomić N, Antić A, Marković R, et al. Geomorphological and hydrological heritage of Mt. Stara Planina in SE Serbia: From river protection initiative to potential geotouristic destination. Open Geosci. 2022;14(1):275–93. 10.1515/geo-2022-0340.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Marković SB, Schaetzl RJ, Sprafke T, Heller F, Smalley IJ, Buggle B, et al. The geoheritage value of chernozem soils (Black Soils) and their equivalents from the thick loess sections in the Vojvodina Region, Northern Serbia. Geoheritage. 2025;17:19. 10.1007/s12371-024-01057-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Antić A, Tomić N, Marković S. Karst geoheritage and geotourism potential in the Pek River lower basin (eastern Serbia). Geogr Pannonica. 2019;23(1):32–46.10.5937/gp23-20463Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Božić S, Tomić N. Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: Comparative analysis from two perspectives–general geotourists and pure geotourists. Open Geosci. 2015;7(1):531–46.10.1515/geo-2015-0040Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Tomić N, Marković SB, Antić A, Tešić D. Exploring the potential for geotourism development in the Danube region of Serbia. Int J Geoheritage Park. 2020;8(2):123–39.10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Marjanović M, Tomić N, Radivojević AR, Marković SB. Assessing the geotourism potential of the Niš city area (Southeast Serbia). Geoheritage. 2021;13(3):1–18.10.1007/s12371-021-00597-1Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Ivanović M, Lukić T, Milentijević N, Bojović V, Valjarević A. Assessment of geosites as a basis for geotourism development: A case study of the Toplica District, Serbia. Open Geosci. 2023;15(1):20220589.10.1515/geo-2022-0589Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Brđanin E, Milanović M, Malinović-Milićević S, Tomić N, Vujović F, Ćulafić G. Geosite assessment as the first step for the development of canyoning activities in North Montenegro. Open Geosci. 2024;16(1):20220698. 10.1515/geo-2022-0698.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Antić A, Tomić N, Marković SB. Applying the show cave assessment model (SCAM) on cave tourism destinations in Serbia. Int J Geoheritage Park. 2022;10(4):616–34.10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Marjanović M, Marković R, Šarić K, Radivojević AR, Antić A, Raičević Đ, et al. Geotouristic approach to the elements of geocultural heritage by using UGAM model: UNESCO world heritage site felix romuliana (Zaječar, Serbia). Geoheritage. 2024;16(2):35.10.1007/s12371-024-00940-2Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Antić A, Luetscher M, Perret A, Ferrando A, Reynard E. Cave tourism in Switzerland: The assessment and implications for subterranean geoheritage sustainability. Moravian Geogr Rep Sciendo. 2025;33(1):22–39. 10.2478/mgr-2025-0003.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Antić A, Scapozza C, Ferrando A, Reynard E. The application of the show mine assessment model on underground mining heritage and mine tourism in Switzerland. Extr Ind Soc. 2025;24:101730. 10.1016/j.exis.2025.101730.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Tourist Organization of Plav. Hydrological Route Plav. 2025.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Markišić H. Plavsko-gusinjski kraj, prirodne rijetkosti i legende o njima (The Plav-Gusinje Region, natural rarities and the legends surrounding them). „Priroda i baština“ Rožaje. 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Bakić R. Gornje Polimlje, priroda, stanovništvo i naselja (Upper Polimlje: nature, population, and settlements). Filozofski fakultet Nikšić. Nikšić: Institut za geografiju; 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Feratović E. Revitalizacija i zaštita Plavskog jezera – diplomski rad (Revitalization and Protection of Lake Plav – Bachelor’s Thesis). Nikšić: University of Montenegro, Faculty of Philosophy Niksic, Department of Geography; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Feratović E. Revitalizacija Plavskog jezera kroz postulate ekološke etike – master rad (Revitalization of Lake Plav through the Principles of Environmental Ethics – Master’s Thesis). Beograd: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Geography; 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Stanković S. Planinska jezera Crne Gore (Mountain Lakes of Montenegro). Posebna izdanja, odeljenje prirodnih nauka, Društvo za nauku i umjetnost Crne Gore. 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Stanković S. Jezera Balkanskog poluostrva – limnološka monografija (Lakes of the Balkan Peninsula - Limnological monograph). 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Radojičić B. Montenegro Geographical Encyclopedic Lexicon. Filozofski fakultet Nikšić. Nikšić: Institut za geografiju; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Opština P. Strateški plan razvoja opštine Plav 2025–2032. Plav: Opština Plav; 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Marković SB, Woodward JC, Marjanović M, Antić A, Hughes PD, Spalević V, et al. An integrated glacial geosite assessment framework and its application in Montenegro: Inventory, evaluation, and prospects for geotourism. Int J Geoheritage Park. 2025;13(3):424–39. 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.02.008.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Somma R, Spoto SE, Giacobbe S. Geological and structural framework, inventory, and quantitative assessment of geodiversity: the case study of the lake faro and Lake Ganzirri Global Geosites (Italy). Geosciences. 2024;14(9):236. 10.3390/geosciences14090236.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Golfinopoulos V, Papadopoulou P, Koumoutsou E, Zouros N, Fassoulas C, Zelilidis A, et al. Quantitative assessment of the geosites of chelmos-vouraikos UNESCO Global Geopark (Greece). Geosciences. 2022;12(2):63. 10.3390/geosciences12020063.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-05-31
Revised: 2025-09-18
Accepted: 2025-09-22
Published Online: 2025-10-21

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Seismic response and damage model analysis of rocky slopes with weak interlayers
  3. Multi-scenario simulation and eco-environmental effect analysis of “Production–Living–Ecological space” based on PLUS model: A case study of Anyang City
  4. Remote sensing estimation of chlorophyll content in rape leaves in Weibei dryland region of China
  5. GIS-based frequency ratio and Shannon entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in Kundah Taluk, Nilgiris District, India
  6. Natural gas origin and accumulation of the Changxing–Feixianguan Formation in the Puguang area, China
  7. Spatial variations of shear-wave velocity anomaly derived from Love wave ambient noise seismic tomography along Lembang Fault (West Java, Indonesia)
  8. Evaluation of cumulative rainfall and rainfall event–duration threshold based on triggering and non-triggering rainfalls: Northern Thailand case
  9. Pixel and region-oriented classification of Sentinel-2 imagery to assess LULC dynamics and their climate impact in Nowshera, Pakistan
  10. The use of radar-optical remote sensing data and geographic information system–analytical hierarchy process–multicriteria decision analysis techniques for revealing groundwater recharge prospective zones in arid-semi arid lands
  11. Effect of pore throats on the reservoir quality of tight sandstone: A case study of the Yanchang Formation in the Zhidan area, Ordos Basin
  12. Hydroelectric simulation of the phreatic water response of mining cracked soil based on microbial solidification
  13. Spatial-temporal evolution of habitat quality in tropical monsoon climate region based on “pattern–process–quality” – a case study of Cambodia
  14. Early Permian to Middle Triassic Formation petroleum potentials of Sydney Basin, Australia: A geochemical analysis
  15. Micro-mechanism analysis of Zhongchuan loess liquefaction disaster induced by Jishishan M6.2 earthquake in 2023
  16. Prediction method of S-wave velocities in tight sandstone reservoirs – a case study of CO2 geological storage area in Ordos Basin
  17. Ecological restoration in valley area of semiarid region damaged by shallow buried coal seam mining
  18. Hydrocarbon-generating characteristics of Xujiahe coal-bearing source rocks in the continuous sedimentary environment of the Southwest Sichuan
  19. Hazard analysis of future surface displacements on active faults based on the recurrence interval of strong earthquakes
  20. Structural characterization of the Zalm district, West Saudi Arabia, using aeromagnetic data: An approach for gold mineral exploration
  21. Research on the variation in the Shields curve of silt initiation
  22. Reuse of agricultural drainage water and wastewater for crop irrigation in southeastern Algeria
  23. Assessing the effectiveness of utilizing low-cost inertial measurement unit sensors for producing as-built plans
  24. Analysis of the formation process of a natural fertilizer in the loess area
  25. Machine learning methods for landslide mapping studies: A comparative study of SVM and RF algorithms in the Oued Aoulai watershed (Morocco)
  26. Chemical dissolution and the source of salt efflorescence in weathering of sandstone cultural relics
  27. Molecular simulation of methane adsorption capacity in transitional shale – a case study of Longtan Formation shale in Southern Sichuan Basin, SW China
  28. Evolution characteristics of extreme maximum temperature events in Central China and adaptation strategies under different future warming scenarios
  29. Estimating Bowen ratio in local environment based on satellite imagery
  30. 3D fusion modeling of multi-scale geological structures based on subdivision-NURBS surfaces and stratigraphic sequence formalization
  31. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms in Google Earth Engine for urban land use dynamics in rapidly urbanizing South Asian cities
  32. Study on the mechanism of plant root influence on soil properties in expansive soil areas
  33. Simulation of seismic hazard parameters and earthquakes source mechanisms along the Red Sea rift, western Saudi Arabia
  34. Tectonics vs sedimentation in foredeep basins: A tale from the Oligo-Miocene Monte Falterona Formation (Northern Apennines, Italy)
  35. Investigation of landslide areas in Tokat-Almus road between Bakımlı-Almus by the PS-InSAR method (Türkiye)
  36. Predicting coastal variations in non-storm conditions with machine learning
  37. Cross-dimensional adaptivity research on a 3D earth observation data cube model
  38. Geochronology and geochemistry of late Paleozoic volcanic rocks in eastern Inner Mongolia and their geological significance
  39. Spatial and temporal evolution of land use and habitat quality in arid regions – a case of Northwest China
  40. Ground-penetrating radar imaging of subsurface karst features controlling water leakage across Wadi Namar dam, south Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  41. Rayleigh wave dispersion inversion via modified sine cosine algorithm: Application to Hangzhou, China passive surface wave data
  42. Fractal insights into permeability control by pore structure in tight sandstone reservoirs, Heshui area, Ordos Basin
  43. Debris flow hazard characteristic and mitigation in Yusitong Gully, Hengduan Mountainous Region
  44. Research on community characteristics of vegetation restoration in hilly power engineering based on multi temporal remote sensing technology
  45. Identification of radial drainage networks based on topographic and geometric features
  46. Trace elements and melt inclusion in zircon within the Qunji porphyry Cu deposit: Application to the metallogenic potential of the reduced magma-hydrothermal system
  47. Pore, fracture characteristics and diagenetic evolution of medium-maturity marine shales from the Silurian Longmaxi Formation, NE Sichuan Basin, China
  48. Study of the earthquakes source parameters, site response, and path attenuation using P and S-waves spectral inversion, Aswan region, south Egypt
  49. Source of contamination and assessment of potential health risks of potentially toxic metal(loid)s in agricultural soil from Al Lith, Saudi Arabia
  50. Regional spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of rural construction areas in the Nanxi River Basin via GIS
  51. An efficient network for object detection in scale-imbalanced remote sensing images
  52. Effect of microscopic pore–throat structure heterogeneity on waterflooding seepage characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs
  53. Environmental health risk assessment of Zn, Cd, Pb, Fe, and Co in coastal sediments of the southeastern Gulf of Aqaba
  54. A modified Hoek–Brown model considering softening effects and its applications
  55. Evaluation of engineering properties of soil for sustainable urban development
  56. The spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of sustainable development in China’s provincial areas
  57. Application of a mixed additive and multiplicative random error model to generate DTM products from LiDAR data
  58. Gold vein mineralogy and oxygen isotopes of Wadi Abu Khusheiba, Jordan
  59. Prediction of surface deformation time series in closed mines based on LSTM and optimization algorithms
  60. 2D–3D Geological features collaborative identification of surrounding rock structural planes in hydraulic adit based on OC-AINet
  61. Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of Chl-a in Chinese lakes between 1986 and 2023
  62. Land use classification through fusion of remote sensing images and multi-source data
  63. Nexus between renewable energy, technological innovation, and carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia
  64. Analysis of the spillover effects of green organic transformation on sustainable development in ethnic regions’ agriculture and animal husbandry
  65. Factors impacting spatial distribution of black and odorous water bodies in Hebei
  66. Large-scale shaking table tests on the liquefaction and deformation responses of an ultra-deep overburden
  67. Impacts of climate change and sea-level rise on the coastal geological environment of Quang Nam province, Vietnam
  68. Reservoir characterization and exploration potential of shale reservoir near denudation area: A case study of Ordovician–Silurian marine shale, China
  69. Seismic prediction of Permian volcanic rock reservoirs in Southwest Sichuan Basin
  70. Application of CBERS-04 IRS data to land surface temperature inversion: A case study based on Minqin arid area
  71. Geological characteristics and prospecting direction of Sanjiaoding gold mine in Saishiteng area
  72. Research on the deformation prediction model of surrounding rock based on SSA-VMD-GRU
  73. Geochronology, geochemical characteristics, and tectonic significance of the granites, Menghewula, Southern Great Xing’an range
  74. Hazard classification of active faults in Yunnan base on probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
  75. Characteristics analysis of hydrate reservoirs with different geological structures developed by vertical well depressurization
  76. Estimating the travel distance of channelized rock avalanches using genetic programming method
  77. Landscape preferences of hikers in Three Parallel Rivers Region and its adjacent regions by content analysis of user-generated photography
  78. New age constraints of the LGM onset in the Bohemian Forest – Central Europe
  79. Characteristics of geological evolution based on the multifractal singularity theory: A case study of Heyu granite and Mesozoic tectonics
  80. Soil water content and longitudinal microbiota distribution in disturbed areas of tower foundations of power transmission and transformation projects
  81. Oil accumulation process of the Kongdian reservoir in the deep subsag zone of the Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China
  82. Investigation of velocity profile in rock–ice avalanche by particle image velocimetry measurement
  83. Optimizing 3D seismic survey geometries using ray tracing and illumination modeling: A case study from Penobscot field
  84. Sedimentology of the Phra That and Pha Daeng Formations: A preliminary evaluation of geological CO2 storage potential in the Lampang Basin, Thailand
  85. Improved classification algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing images based on the hybrid spectral network model
  86. Map analysis of soil erodibility rates and gully erosion sites in Anambra State, South Eastern Nigeria
  87. Identification and driving mechanism of land use conflict in China’s South-North transition zone: A case study of Huaihe River Basin
  88. Evaluation of the impact of land-use change on earthquake risk distribution in different periods: An empirical analysis from Sichuan Province
  89. A test site case study on the long-term behavior of geotextile tubes
  90. An experimental investigation into carbon dioxide flooding and rock dissolution in low-permeability reservoirs of the South China Sea
  91. Detection and semi-quantitative analysis of naphthenic acids in coal and gangue from mining areas in China
  92. Comparative effects of olivine and sand on KOH-treated clayey soil
  93. YOLO-MC: An algorithm for early forest fire recognition based on drone image
  94. Earthquake building damage classification based on full suite of Sentinel-1 features
  95. Potential landslide detection and influencing factors analysis in the upper Yellow River based on SBAS-InSAR technology
  96. Assessing green area changes in Najran City, Saudi Arabia (2013–2022) using hybrid deep learning techniques
  97. An advanced approach integrating methods to estimate hydraulic conductivity of different soil types supported by a machine learning model
  98. Hybrid methods for land use and land cover classification using remote sensing and combined spectral feature extraction: A case study of Najran City, KSA
  99. Streamlining digital elevation model construction from historical aerial photographs: The impact of reference elevation data on spatial accuracy
  100. Analysis of urban expansion patterns in the Yangtze River Delta based on the fusion impervious surfaces dataset
  101. A metaverse-based visual analysis approach for 3D reservoir models
  102. Late Quaternary record of 100 ka depositional cycles on the Larache shelf (NW Morocco)
  103. Integrated well-seismic analysis of sedimentary facies distribution: A case study from the Mesoproterozoic, Ordos Basin, China
  104. Study on the spatial equilibrium of cultural and tourism resources in Macao, China
  105. Urban road surface condition detecting and integrating based on the mobile sensing framework with multi-modal sensors
  106. Application of improved sine cosine algorithm with chaotic mapping and novel updating methods for joint inversion of resistivity and surface wave data
  107. The synergistic use of AHP and GIS to assess factors driving forest fire potential in a peat swamp forest in Thailand
  108. Dynamic response analysis and comprehensive evaluation of cement-improved aeolian sand roadbed
  109. Rock control on evolution of Khorat Cuesta, Khorat UNESCO Geopark, Northeastern Thailand
  110. Gradient response mechanism of carbon storage: Spatiotemporal analysis of economic-ecological dimensions based on hybrid machine learning
  111. Comparison of several seismic active earth pressure calculation methods for retaining structures
  112. Mantle dynamics and petrogenesis of Gomer basalts in the Northwestern Ethiopia: A geochemical perspective
  113. Study on ground deformation monitoring in Xiong’an New Area from 2021 to 2023 based on DS-InSAR
  114. Paleoenvironmental characteristics of continental shale and its significance to organic matter enrichment: Taking the fifth member of Xujiahe Formation in Tianfu area of Sichuan Basin as an example
  115. Equipping the integral approach with generalized least squares to reconstruct relict channel profile and its usage in the Shanxi Rift, northern China
  116. InSAR-driven landslide hazard assessment along highways in hilly regions: A case-based validation approach
  117. Attribution analysis of multi-temporal scale surface streamflow changes in the Ganjiang River based on a multi-temporal Budyko framework
  118. Review Articles
  119. Humic substances influence on the distribution of dissolved iron in seawater: A review of electrochemical methods and other techniques
  120. Applications of physics-informed neural networks in geosciences: From basic seismology to comprehensive environmental studies
  121. Ore-controlling structures of granite-related uranium deposits in South China: A review
  122. Shallow geological structure features in Balikpapan Bay East Kalimantan Province – Indonesia
  123. A review on the tectonic affinity of microcontinents and evolution of the Proto-Tethys Ocean in Northeastern Tibet
  124. Special Issue: Natural Resources and Environmental Risks: Towards a Sustainable Future - Part II
  125. Depopulation in the Visok micro-region: Toward demographic and economic revitalization
  126. Special Issue: Geospatial and Environmental Dynamics - Part II
  127. Advancing urban sustainability: Applying GIS technologies to assess SDG indicators – a case study of Podgorica (Montenegro)
  128. Spatiotemporal and trend analysis of common cancers in men in Central Serbia (1999–2021)
  129. Minerals for the green agenda, implications, stalemates, and alternatives
  130. Spatiotemporal water quality analysis of Vrana Lake, Croatia
  131. Functional transformation of settlements in coal exploitation zones: A case study of the municipality of Stanari in Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  132. Hypertension in AP Vojvodina (Northern Serbia): A spatio-temporal analysis of patients at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina
  133. Regional patterns in cause-specific mortality in Montenegro, 1991–2019
  134. Spatio-temporal analysis of flood events using GIS and remote sensing-based approach in the Ukrina River Basin, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  135. Flash flood susceptibility mapping using LiDAR-Derived DEM and machine learning algorithms: Ljuboviđa case study, Serbia
  136. Geocultural heritage as a basis for geotourism development: Banjska Monastery, Zvečan (Serbia)
  137. Assessment of groundwater potential zones using GIS and AHP techniques – A case study of the zone of influence of Kolubara Mining Basin
  138. Impact of the agri-geographical transformation of rural settlements on the geospatial dynamics of soil erosion intensity in municipalities of Central Serbia
  139. Where faith meets geomorphology: The cultural and religious significance of geodiversity explored through geospatial technologies
  140. Applications of local climate zone classification in European cities: A review of in situ and mobile monitoring methods in urban climate studies
  141. Complex multivariate water quality impact assessment on Krivaja River
  142. Ionization hotspots near waterfalls in Eastern Serbia’s Stara Planina Mountain
  143. Shift in landscape use strategies during the transition from the Bronze age to Iron age in Northwest Serbia
  144. Assessing the geotourism potential of glacial lakes in Plav, Montenegro: A multi-criteria assessment by using the M-GAM model
  145. Flash flood potential index at national scale: Susceptibility assessment within catchments
Heruntergeladen am 26.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2025-0907/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen