Home Evaluation of elastomeric heat shielding materials as insulators for solid propellant rocket motors: A short review
Article Open Access

Evaluation of elastomeric heat shielding materials as insulators for solid propellant rocket motors: A short review

  • Javier Carlos Quagliano Amado EMAIL logo , Pablo Germán Ross , Natália Beck Sanches , Juliano Ribeiro Aguiar Pinto and Jorge Carlos Narciso Dutra
Published/Copyright: December 5, 2020

Abstract

This review addresses a comparison, based on the literature, among nitrile rubber (NBR), ethylene-propylene-diene-monomer rubber (EPDM), and polyurethane (PU) elastomeric heat shielding materials (EHSM). Currently, these are utilized for the insulation of rocket engines to prevent catastrophic breakdown if combustion gases from propellant reaches the motor case. The objective of this review is to evaluate the performance of PU–EHSM, NBR–EHSM, and EPDM–EHSM as insulators, the latter being the current state of the art in solid rocket motor (SRM) internal insulation. From our review, PU–EHSM emerged as an alternative to EPDM–EHSM because of their easier processability and compatibility with composite propellant. With the appropriate reinforcement and concentration in the rubber, they could replace EPDM in certain applications such as rocket motors filled with composite propellant. A critical assessment and future trends are included. Rubber composites novelties as EHSM employs specialty fillers, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, polyhedral oligosilsesquioxane (POSS), nanofibers, nanoparticles, and high-performance engineering polymers such as polyetherimide and polyphosphazenes.

1 Introduction

Thermal protection systems (TPS) are materials that shield the metallic or the composite casing of rocket engines by undergoing a process called ablation, which is the thermal decomposition under high temperature (pyrolysis) of the organic constituents that form the char layer. The ablated layer acts as a barrier against the high mass and heat transfer during the solid propellant combustion. The high temperatures present during SRM combustion have been found to very easily destroy even the strongest metallic alloys. If not appropriately protected, the case may experience extremely harsh conditions that lead to total destruction through explosion [1,2].

During the ablation process of a TPS, three main zones are formed (Figure 1):

  1. The charring zone: The first zone that is affected by the high temperature in the solid propellant combustion process giving rise to the char layer.

  2. The pyrolytic zone: Region between the charring zone and the virgin material, where the TPS decomposition and pyrolysis processes occur.

  3. The virgin TPS zone: Region that consist on unreacted TPS [3,4].

Figure 1 The three main regions formed during the ablation process [4].
Figure 1

The three main regions formed during the ablation process [4].

The char layer is formed in the charring zone and is the mainly responsible for the success of the ablative TPS. The stronger and stable the char layer is, the slower the consumption of TPS will be, which results in a low ablation rate. Microstructure origin of heat shielding of temperatures in the range of 2,000–3,000°C is mainly the formation of a thick layer of char, which insulates the underlying material from the hot gases coming from burning propellant [5,6].

The ablation rate determines the ablation performance of a TPS and indicates how resistant a TPS is when under the effect of a propellant combustion. The ablation rate expresses the recession or consumption of the TPS material during a given amount of time (Figure 2). According to ASTM E-285-08, this value is measured by the ratio between initial and final thickness and time during the ablation test [5,6].

Figure 2 Recession of TPS material under the ablation test [5].
Figure 2

Recession of TPS material under the ablation test [5].

The oxyacetylene torch test is the most simple and inexpensive ablation test, in which the TPS material is exposed to a flame of a torch provided by a mixture of acetylene and oxygen under controlled conditions (pressure, flow, and temperature) [6].

However, as the TPS materials have improved over the years adjusting to the new space programs, new equipment had to be developed to quantify the ablation rate of the novel TPS materials [3]. Arc-jet torches, electrodeless torches, and small-scale rockets are some examples of the ablation test equipment currently used. Table 1 presents the operating cost estimated for their utilization [3,7].

Table 1

Operating cost estimate for some ablation tests [3,7]

Test equipmentOperating cost estimate
Oxyacetylene ablation testLow cost
Small-scale rocket testMedium to high cost
Arc-jet torch and electrodeless testHigh cost

To minimize the costs measuring the ablation properties of TPS, since the 1950s several computational codes (programs) have been developed to simulate the pyrolysis and the ablation of a TPS material under hyperthermal environment conditions, pressure, mass, and heat flux. Table 2 presents some simulation programs used for the design and the analysis of TPS [7].

Table 2

Simulation programs for ablation properties

ProgramUserApplication
CMANASA, SNLDesign
FIAT 3DNASA, ARCAnalysis
FABLISA/ESA/FG EAnalysis
SCMA2JAXANot available

CMA: Aerotherm’s Charring Material Thermal Response and Ablation Program. NASA-SNL: NASA´s Sandia National Laboratory. FIAT 3D: Fully Implicit Ablation and Thermal Analysis Program. NASA´s Ames Research Center. FABL: Fluid Gravity Engineering Ablation code. ISA/ESA/FG E: Israel Space Agency/European Space Agency. SCMA2: Super Charring Material Ablation. JAXA: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.

According to the study by Natali et al. [7], all indicated simulation programs are aimed at the optimization of the studies and developments of TPS, so that the test laboratories can lower the operating costs.

2 Polymeric insulators for solid propellant rocket motors

The development of rocket motors has propelled studies assessing plastics as heat insulators since the 1960's [8]. Since then, the ablation mechanisms of elastomeric rocket motor thermal insulators have been established. Research in this field has increased significantly, and several excellent reviews have been published in recent years [7,9,10,11,12] from leading countries such as China, India, Iran, Italy, Russia, and the United States.

South American countries have also contributed to the development of materials in the field of rocket science [4,5,13,14,15,16]. By forming an inner lining on the inner surface of rocket motors, insulators prevent their exposure to the extremely high-temperature gases of the propellant during combustion and help the integrity of motor without failure during operation [17].

Polymeric ablatives, such as fiber-reinforced polymeric ablatives (both rigid and elastomeric), heat shielding materials (HSM), lightweight ceramic ablators, and nanostructured polymeric ablatives are materials that act as thermal insulators. The most promising materials for manufacturing HSM are elastomers, among them rubbers, foamed rubbers, and rubber-fabric or rubber-fiber composite materials [18]. Rubbers present a limited resistance to high temperatures (around 300–400°C). Therefore, they cannot endure severe environments such as those found in a rocket motor: very high temperature, pressure, and high-speed flow erosion. However, the incorporation of several fillers in the composition could enhance these properties [19].

The most important material properties required for ablative resistance are low density, low thermal conductivity, high temperature resistance, formation of a stable char, and high char shear strength [9,20,21] and also good erosion performance [22]. Thermal insulation must also bond to propellant and casing and inhibit propellant grain surfaces. Internal thermal insulations use elastomeric materials with various powders or fibers that are designed to enhance the material properties. From the thermal point of view, a material should have low thermal conductivity and high specific heat. For finding the best candidate materials and their combinations (elastomer plus mineral fillers and/or fibers), several models and theoretical developments are continuously under way [23,24].

Gajiwala and Hall [25] have proposed a universal insulation composition, which could be used on different parts of a particular rocket engine or artifact. The insulation material proposed was formulated on the basis of EPDM rubber and filled with silica and magnesium oxide and was able to protect against heat, erosion, and other extreme conditions experienced by the engine or artifact during use and operation. The enhanced composition was able to improve mechanical, physical, rheological, thermal, and ablative properties compared to conventional silica-filled EPDM-based insulations.

Organic elastomers suitable for use in insulators include ethylene propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) rubber, nitrile rubber (NBR), and polyurethane (PU) rubbers. Others are polybutadiene, polyisoprene, butadiene-styrene copolymer, and natural rubber. Although main advances originated in developed countries, South American-specific reports are available in the state of the art, particularly on EPDM [12,13,15,26,27,28,29].

This review does not include rigid heat shielding materials, which is a special area of study involving other types of materials particularly suited for low orbit and space vehicles, such phenolic resin, silicon oxides, and ceramics [30,31].

2.1 Main types of elastomeric heat shielding materials

Main types of elastomeric heat shielding materials (EHSMs) were classified into three different main categories: ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM), nitrile rubber based, and silicone based, as reviewed by leading authors in the field [7,9,10]. However, PU EHSM could be included in this classification, emerging as an alternative in the field of EHSM.

2.1.1 EPDM-based and nitrile-based heat shielding materials

Currently, EPDM represents one of the best matrices among elastomers used on solid rocket motor (SRM) liners [17]. Solid rocket motor is a rocket engine that uses solid propellant as fuel. Combustion produces gases that are expanded through a nozzle to generate thrust. EPDM/aramidic ablatives were reported as the state of the art in ablatives [9,12,32]. Sureshkumar et al. [33] have pointed out the excellent potential of EPDM as insulator regarding its ageing resistance, low-temperature flexibility, low erosion rate, and low specific gravity. EPDM typically starts to decompose at around 400°C [34]. It is preferred for military applications because of its outstanding ageing resistance characteristics.

As a secondary polymer to EPDM, hydroxy terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) has been successfully used as an adhesion-promoting polymer [35]. Aramid fibers (Kevlar or Twaron brand) or in the form of pulp is the most used fiber in EPDM-based SRM liners and has been successfully employed as a low density reinforcement [36,37]. Figure 3 shows the structural units of polymers cited.

Figure 3 EPDM chemical formula and Kevlar fibers used as an example of reinforcement.
Figure 3

EPDM chemical formula and Kevlar fibers used as an example of reinforcement.

Aramid fibers in the EPDM matrix increase the mechanical properties of rubbers, ensuring higher resistance to erosion and significantly enhanced ablative properties. This reinforcement prevents the virgin material from being exposed to the hot gases of the chamber, thus limiting degradation and allowing the use of the surface carbonized layer as a heat insulator [25]. Zirconium dioxide, a type of mineral oxide, has been tested for EPDM. Introduction of zirconium dioxide increases the coke residue by 4–30% and when associated with graphite improves the physicochemical parameters relative to the sample containing zirconium dioxide only, ensuring the formation of a looser carbon–mineral coke structure and enhances coking on the surface of dispersed particles [38]. Figure 4 shows EPDM filled with 20% silica after the oxyacetylene test, which have proved to be effective as EHSM in our conditions. At that concentration, clear silica residues can be seen surrounding burn-through orifice.

Figure 4 EPDM filled with 20% silica after the oxyacetylene torch test (samples shown from ref. 29).
Figure 4

EPDM filled with 20% silica after the oxyacetylene torch test (samples shown from ref. 29).

EHSM based on nitrile rubber (NBR) have also been studied although not as thoroughly as EPDM-based EHSM. NBR is a synthetic copolymer of acrylonitrile and butadiene. Figure 5 shows the structural units of NBR-based EHSM.

Figure 5 NBR EHSM and exemplary fillers utilized in them.
Figure 5

NBR EHSM and exemplary fillers utilized in them.

NBR often presents problematic processability, limited shelf life, high density (1–1.3 g/cm3), and poor high temperature properties. Nevertheless, the nitrile rubber is still used as an insulation liner for solid rocket motors (SRMs) [9], although not to the extent of the EPDM-based EHSM, according to the number of studies published. In some cases, NBR have displayed better than EPDM insulators: vulcanizates based on nitrile rubber with melamine fiber resulted in 15–20% lower thermal erosion rates than EPDM ones [39].

NBR-based EHSMs have good adhesion to solid rocket propellant. They have achieved ablation rates as low as 0.06 mm/s [40] although EPDM based can be as low as 0.015 mm/s. The incorporation of 15 phr of silica aerogel into NBR rubber has decreased the mass of insulator and its linear ablation rate by 15% and 29%, respectively. Silica aerogel has played an effective role in reduction of the back-face temperature of insulators [41]. Thermal stability of NBR-nanoclay composites and the char content at 500°C were calculated from TGA thermograms. The thermal stability of the composites has been enhanced with the addition of nanoclay. The char content of the nanocomposites at 500°C has increased with nanoclay content [42]. Moreover, the use of the coupling agent 3-(mercaptopropyl)trimethoxy silane for incorporating montmorrillonite nanoclay (MMT) in a MMT/NBR nanocomposite enhanced thermal resistance [43]. Linear ablation rates as low as 0.012 mm/s have been reported for organoclay/NBR nanocomposite HSM. Modeling of these ablative nanocomposites has been performed to determine the exact required thickness of the insulator and the temperature distribution across it at specific thermal conditions [44]. Figure 6 depicts NBR thermal protection of front and aft section of SRM after test on test bench.

Figure 6 NBR thermal protection: (a) front section and (b) aft section: after test on test bench. Source: Dr. Dutra’s laboratory.
Figure 6

NBR thermal protection: (a) front section and (b) aft section: after test on test bench. Source: Dr. Dutra’s laboratory.

2.1.2 Silicone-based heat shielding materials

Silicone-based EHSM are found in the state of the art of insulator formulations [9,11,45] specially for specific spacecraft applications, many times using costly additives such as the polyhedraloligosilsesquioxane (POSS) and carbon fibers. Silicones release an inorganic silica residue after exposure to elevated temperatures under oxygen atmosphere, which serves as an insulating layer to the polymer surface underneath, protecting it from the exposure to the external heat flux. However, the poor mechanical properties associated with silicones severely restrict their utility [46]. Regarding ablation performance, Wu et al. [47] have concluded that with a 1:1 blending ratio of silicone/EPDM, the linear ablation rate was 0.06 mm/s after 20 s of the oxy-acetylene ablation test compared to the much lower result of the EPDM insulation (0.215 mm/s). This result highlights the usefulness of silicone as additive in EHSM formulations. Gao and Liu [48] have proved the capability of silicone/benzoxazine resin as ablative material, with an ablation rate as low as 0.065 mm/s with a 20% resin formulation compared to 0.114 mm/s of the control sample.

To achieve an efficient silicone-based EHSM, fillers, fibers, vulcanizing agents, and flame retardant additives are to be incorporated to silicone rubbers.

2.1.3 Polyurethane-based heat shielding materials

Regarding polyurethane elastomeric heat shielding materials (PU–EHSMs), contributions in this specific area are scarce although the thermal stability of PU composites could be very high, as recently reviewed [12,49]. Figure 7 shows PU–EHSM and most common reinforcements utilized in them.

Figure 7 (a) PU–EHSM and most common reinforcements utilized in them. (b) PU–EHSM with titanium dioxide as reinforcement after the oxyacetylene test (ref. 57).
Figure 7

(a) PU–EHSM and most common reinforcements utilized in them. (b) PU–EHSM with titanium dioxide as reinforcement after the oxyacetylene test (ref. 57).

Among the few published reports, Benli [50] has determined the erosion rate and thermal conductivity of a HTPB-based PU elastomer with silica, alumina, zirconia, and carbon black as mineral fillers. The lowest ablation rate (0.324 mm/s) was achieved with 10% carbon black. As mentioned in his thesis dissertation, Lee [51] has utilized Desmopan® DP 6065A, a soft aromatic polyether-based thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (TPU) from Bayer to prepare a PU–EHSM. Three different nanomaterials (carbon nanofibers, multiwall carbon nanotubes, and nanoclays) behavior were studied in environments simulating motor firing conditions. Results have showed that of these three nanomaterials, nanoclay enhances the TPU ablative performance the most.

Li [52] has published a comparative research on thermal insulation of HTPB-based PU composites, filled with different types of silica aerogel (SA) and hollow silica microsphere particles. Due to the characteristics of the opened SA pores, mixed interfaces of SA and polymer composites were formed, which decreased the thermal insulation performance. Conversely, this phenomenon has not been observed in the PU composites filled with an undisclosed heat shielding material of closed-cell structure [53].

A HTPB-based PU reinforced with POSS and its ablation behavior has been studied [54]. Results demonstrated that POSS molecules present significant influence on the ablative resistance because they act as protective silica forming precursors under oxyacetylene condition. However, as stated earlier, currently, these additives are very costly.

HTPB-based PU insulators filled with polycarbodiimide and polysiloxane, which are reactive-type fillers, have been reported to protect the rocket motor from the high-temperature ablation. These modified PUs are a kind of organic–inorganic hybrid with higher modulus and thermal stability than original PU [55]. Lee [56], using matrix as a commercial soft PU, has reached the conclusion that Cloisite® 30B nanoclay displayed a better performance than multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and carbon nanofibers by preventing the specimen from dripping like the neat material. PU–EHSM based on HTPB/IPDI filled with 5% Cloisite® 30B nanoclay showed a 40% reduction in the ablation rate compared to the unfilled material [57].

Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites (TPUNs) were studied for ablative applications as alternatives to the other elastomeric matrix in EHSM. Mass loss, recession, and char thickness values were measured for PU formulations with 5 and 7.5% montmorillonite nanoclay (Cloisite® 30B) content. TPUN has shown the best results compared to the reference EPDM–Kevlar filled EHSM in recession and peak temperature measured, but not in mass loss in the oxyacetylene torch test [58].

Ho [59] proposed employing TPUN as EHSM to replace Kevlar-filled EPDM, the current state-of-the-art solid rocket motor internal insulation. Results have demonstrated that TPUNs developed primary polymer as internal insulation materials for solid rocket motor can be used as flame retardant materials for commercial usage as well. On another study, HTPB-based polyurethane was indicated as secondary polymer to enhance EPDM-based EHSM performance, decreasing compound viscosity and achieving high resilience with low compression set with a blend containing 2 phr of HTPB [35].

The thermal behavior of PU films based on polyoxyethyleneglycol and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) as heat insulating material has been evaluated by the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Results have showed that the incorporation of tin oxide doped with antimony into the waterborne PU could improve thermal stability dramatically. The maximal decomposition temperature for filled PU increased from 278 to around 300–310°C [60]. These results showed that special oxides could significantly improve heat insulation in PU.

A novel phosphorus and nitrogen-containing flame-retardant polyurethane prepolymer (FRPUP) has been successfully synthesized and characterized. It was found that FRPUP can greatly enhance the char residues of PU sealants. Indeed, a char residue of 7.2% was found compared to the 1.5% residue of the control [61]. A PU obtained from HTPB and 4,4′-methylene bis cyclohexyl isocyanate (H12MDI) and its nanocomposites with Cloisite 30B were tested as inhibitor material in composite propellants. The ablation rate and the density of the compositions containing Cloisite 30B were around 23% and 5% lower, respectively, compared to the base composition [62]. Schiariti and Bellomi [63] have registered a recent patent for an ablative inner coating layer for solid propulsion rocket engines made from a polymeric base, silica, vulcanizing agents, and plasticizers. This layer contains also aramid fiber and microspheres made of glass, quartz, and nanoclay. It is interesting that the author pointed out that the polymer basis of the composition could not only be traditional EPDM, NBR, or even SBR but also HTPB-based PU.

Considering the information available about PU–EHSM, it is possible that they could replace Kevlar®-filled EPDM for a number of reasons, primarily because PU–EHSM exhibit high ablation resistance and insulation characteristics with the appropriate reinforcement, combined with easy fabrication.

2.2 Bonding of EHSM to composite propellant

Proper bonding of EHSM to composite propellant is critical for solid rocket motor performance. Composite propellant is usually prepared with HTPB as a binder for oxidizer ammonium perchlorate particles and other ingredients. From this point of view, PU–EHSM is better as insulation materials because insulator and propellant are of the same chemical nature. Interfacial bonding of NBR and EPDM to HTPB/IPDI composite propellant revealed that both types of insulation layers considerably decreased bonding [64]. This can be expected, considering the different chemical nature of EPDM and NBR compared to the PU-cured propellant. However, these authors found that drying the insulation layer before spraying or brushing the liner can reduce the negative influence of the heat insulation layer on the bonding property at the interface. Also, to overcome the incompatibility issues, the use of an epoxy–polysulfide copolymer as adhesion promoter caused a significant improvement in the adhesion of EPDM terpolymer to polyurethane [65].

2.3 Fibers and fillers in EHSM

Proper mixing of fibers and fillers with rubber to deliver a good performance of thermal insulation composite is a key factor if nanofillers are to be used as EHSM. Proper wettability of filler and bond strength with rubber is a requisite for such diverse filler additives as a carbon fiber, aramid fiber, and a silica powder. It is also necessary that such additives be homogeneously dispersed throughout the insulation composite as it is being produced. Reinforcement to matrix fraction usually does not exceed 20%, as heat shielding property commence to be compromised. Proper wettability of filler with rubber matrix is a limit to increase the reinforcement fraction in composite.

Several simultaneous factors are involved, such as the mixing method, filler/fiber–matrix interaction, filler–filler interaction, fiber–fiber interaction, particle surface area, and its activity [66]. Since surface-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles is very high, the resulting interphase fills a large part of the volume of the composite and can become the principal factor in developing the properties of nanocomposite. Excellent properties of nanocomposites can be reached only through new processing techniques that are able to produce a complete and homogeneous dispersion of the fillers [67].

Milhomem [68] have tested several unfilled matrices (epoxy, polyester, polyurethane, and silicone) and verified that the ablation rate was in all cases too high for them to be used as EHSM alone. Ablation rates were in the same extent as those of some solid fuels used in hybrid propulsion. Hence, fillers have to be added to the matrices to obtain good ablative results. Microspheres as density reducer fillers have been used in EPDM-based EHSMs. The material containing 20 phr of microspheres evidenced the best tradeoff among all properties. Perlite has also been tested, but did not survive the manufacturing process used [69].

Fillers generally employed in EHSM are conventional mineral oxides (as powders) and carbon black [50]. However, in recent years, materials such as wollastonite [11], silicate microspheres [40,69], POSS [54], nanofibers [58], nanoclays [70], nanosilica, nanoalumina, and carbon nanotubes [71,72] have been utilized.

Closed structures such as hollow glass microspheres in PU have been found to be advantageous on increasing thermal insulation compared to PU/silica aerogel composites [73].

Regarding fibers, reinforcing elastomeric matrix systems with synthetic fibers have been proved to result in better ablation properties and enhancement in thermal insulation behavior [74]. Historically, asbestos was the fiber of choice for reinforcing many materials and elastomers in particular although it is currently banned for health and safety reasons. Therefore, other alternatives have been emerged such as Kevlar [75], novel polymers such as polyimides [76], polybenzoxazol, or polysulfonamide [77,78]. Melamine fiber has caused a significant reduction in the thermal erosion rate of the EHSM vulcanizates [39].

High levels of fibrous reinforcing (up to 50 wt% on the matrix) have been added to the neat EPDM matrix to properly adjust the mechanical properties of the elastomeric liner [37]. Fibers usually have a higher thermal conductivity compared to the neat matrix, but generally if fibers are oriented parallel to the matrix, thermal conductivity is less affected [79].

Relative to metrics for evaluating performance of EHSM, ablation rates should range from 0.09 to 0.20 mm/seg; densities should be low (1.05 to 1.10 mm/seg) to minimize the inert mass of the propulsion unit; low thermal conductivity should range from 4 to 5.10−4 cal/cm/°C and specific heat from 0.4 to 0.5 cal/g/°C. In addition, excellent bonding of the insulator with propellant and motor case over the entire range of working temperature is a requisite [80]. Singh and Sekhar [81] also state that the acceptable ablation rate should be less than 0.2 mm/seg.

In general, the performance of an EHSM is evaluated on the basis of several parameters: linear ablation rate, thermal conductivity, mass loss as a function of temperature (TGA analysis), char formation, and the microscopic analysis of burned samples. According to De et al. [82], the use of the TGA technique is very important for the development of a rubber-based thermal insulation for rocket engines.

Table 3 summarizes thermal and mechanical parameters for insulators based on NBR rubber, EPDM rubber, and PU, based on the main thermal parameters indicated in recent studies, as metrics for EHSM. Reports that disclosed the ablation rate were considered in the first place. In addition, Table 3 shows (when available) mechanical properties as an evaluation parameter. These are of equal importance as thermal resistance: when it comes to the overall performance of insulators for SRM, it is also necessary that EHSM resist vibration, physical stress to avoid brittleness, and cracking, especially during aging. Among the reviewed information, it was found that ablation rate ranged from 0.015 to 0.72 mm/s for EPDM insulators; from 0.13 to 0.69 mm/s for PU-based insulators; and from 0.06 to 0.23 mm/s for NBR-based insulators. Although these values result from different materials and testing conditions, they have indicated that the performance of NBR and PU-based EHSM is within the same range of EPDM-based EHSM, which are regarded as the state-of-the-art insulators, as pointed earlier.

Table 3

Comparison of main parameters for ablation performance of EPDM, NBR, and PU-based elastomeric heat shielding materials (EHSMs)

SampleAblation rate (mm/s)Thermal conductivity (W/m K)Tensile strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Thermal properties TGA*Ref.
EPDM matrix
0–50% phr KF/EPDM0.13–0.180.013–0.018 (calculated)2–13175–300464–474°C[9]
Control – MWCNT/EPDM0.078–0.0926.28–7.84385–483T10% 29% higher than control[83]
Aramid fiber-silica-ZnO/EPDM0.11/0.12TGA: 465°C[84]
15 phr Kevlar/EPDM0.03[85]
Virgin EPDM, no additives or compounding 0.29 to 0.72 (different erosion conditions)[86]
20% phr KP + 5% alumina + 5% silica + 40% dechhlorane + 20% Sb2O3/EPDM0.100.218.516500°C maximal weight loss[87]
Aramid fiber-PR-mineral oxide/EPDM4.1545Max. loss 350°C[88]
20% Wollastonite/EPDMMax. T OAT test 202°C/5 mm3.8195Max. weight loss 480–500°C[11]
Sepiolite/EPDM – silica/NR EPDM0.177/0.40 (control)1.2–1.515First transition 360–450°C[89]
30 phr KP/EPDM0.0150.1719.3511.7[90]
Kevlar/EPDM, composition not disclosed0.151170053.45% loss at 670 K[91]
25 phr CF/25 phr KP/EPDM0.198117.427% original mass*[91]
SiO2/EPDM0.2025.2350[25]
Polyurethane matrix
20–50 phr KF/EPDM0.363[92]
5% nanoclay/HTPB-PU0.42–0.69n.d.1.07//1.47700//650[57]
5% phr perlite/HTPB0.701.22130[16]
POSS-PU0.22–0.39T5% 260–285[93]
HTPB-based PU0.346PHHR 1,037 kW/m2[94]
23% POSS/HTPB-based PU0.298PHHR 632 kW/m2[94]
10% Cloisite 30B/TPUNData not disclosed, but as 13.5% more mass loss than Kevlar/EPDM0.2 (PU matrix)80% weight loss at 400°C[51]
5% Closite® 30B/TPU0.40450°C main loss (10°C/min); mass remaining 2–5%*[59]
16% Al2O3/HTPB-based PU0.130.301.877411[50]
5–15% nanoclay/Sb2O370–78%weight loss0.169–0.199 0.25–0.4382–488°C[64]
Nitrile rubber matrix
0% MMT/NBR//10% MMT/NBR0.087//0.0750.156//0.1512.58//2.54157//151TGA: max. weight loss between 411–474°C[95]
0% PR/NBR-50%/NBR0.235/0.095First loss 264.7/263.8°C[96]
Silica and carbon phenolic/HNBR<0.8521.036 to 1.0393.7 to 5.2300 to 450Max. weight loss 425 to 600°C[97]
Carbon + SiC/NBR0.52–1.6185–1250.4–0.47474°C[98]
Fumed silica-nanoclay-EG/HNBR0.063/0.047/0.067[99]
6 phr Kevlar fiber/NBR0.13715.4666.6[100]
5% SCF/NBR0.060.084.75226.15% loss at 300°C; 68.83% at 900°C[40]
SiO2/NBR0.2247.7–10300–450[18]

CF: carbon fiber. EPDM: ethylene propylene diene monomer. EG: expanded graphite SSF: short silica fiber. KP: Kevlar pulp. MWCNT: multiwalled carbon nanotubes. NR: natural rubber. SCF: short carbon fiber TPU: thermoplastic polyurethane. (—): not analyzed. *: remaining weight in percentage, phr: parts per hundred resin. OAT: oxy-acetylene torch test.

In his thesis dissertation, Lee [51] has reported that in polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) based on Desmopan and nanoclay Cloisite® 30B the gaseous barrier property of the nanoclay PNCs helped the PNC to enhance its ablative performance. In addition, he stated that thermal measurements showed that the thermal protection of the PNCs is comparable to that provided by the Kevlar/EPDM composite. Table 4 summarizes main advantages and disadvantages of EHSM.

Table 4

Main advantages and disadvantages of EHSM

Elastomeric heat shielding materialsMatrix or binder of EHSM
EPDM basedNitrile rubber basedPolyurethane basedSilicone based
AdvantagesFlexibility at low temperatures, low density, lowest ablation rates, good ageing resistanceLow ablation ratesLow ablation rates, with appropriate filler-better bonding/compatibility to composite propellant-easy fabricationSuitable for spacecraft applications, with appropriate filler
DisadvantagesMixing problems, premature vulcanizationDiminished resistance at high temperatures, higher density, limited shelf lifeShort range polyols and isocyanate combinations not always usefulPoor mechanical properties

EPDM–EHSM has flexibility at low temperatures, a low density, good ageing resistance, and the lowest range of ablation rates for EHSM studied. Conversely, they may present compatibility issues with propellant. Anyway, as said, EPDM can be formulated with particulate mineral filler such as silica, or even with finely divided silica plus a reinforcing fiber to render a very efficient EHSM. NBR–EHSM display ablation rates similar to EPDM–EHSM and produce high char during pyrolysis. However, diminished resistance at high temperatures, high density, and limited shelf life put them as a second choice. PU–EHSM can have ablation rates similar to EPDM and NBR–EHSM, with an appropriate filler or fiber. Their unique advantage respect to the others is their excellent compatibility with composite propellant, as polyurethane is normally used as a binder in composite propellant.

Respect to reinforcement materials, Kevlar fibers convey high thermal resistance to rubbers, converting them in excellent EHSMs. Other fibers such as carbon fibers, polyimide, polyetherimide, and polyphosphazene may behave as good as Kevlar. However, they are far more expensive. Conventional fillers for EHSM are fumed silica, expanded graphite, perlite, and organically modified layered silicates with a high aspect ratio, such as Cloisite brand. These reinforcements have in general a significant effect on increasing insulation properties, as pointed out in this review. Fumed silica has very low thermal conductivity, which can be explained by its high porosity and nanoscale porous structure. It is readily available at a low cost and can be easily formulated into rubbers. Expanded graphite is a platelet-like graphite that can host polymer chains intercalated between graphite plates. Although the addition of graphene in styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) has remarkably reduced the backface temperature elevation during the ablation testing of the ablatives [101], no reports on ablative behavior were found for other rubbers. Conversely, perlite and nanoclays are utilized because of offering good enough insulating properties at very low cost. POSS and carbon nanotubes are nano reinforcement that showed the best results; however, they are very expensive today and not used widespread in commercial systems.

3 Future trends

It was highlighted that the ablation of insulator materials depend not only on its inherent properties but also on extrinsic conditions such as thermal, chemical, and mechanical factors related to theoretical or practical environment variables [34]. In this sense, a detailed work by Zhu et al. [102] has indicated that the high degree of development of research on TPS is not only focused on materials but includes a thorough analysis of heat transfer coefficients and modeling. For example, to optimize thickness, a numerical calculation of the dynamic ablation of the EPDM-based insulation material in SRMs was carried out [103]. The degradation kinetics also influences performance: EPDM with carbon black as mineral filler were thoroughly characterized in this respect. It was found that the EPDM and the NBR rubber degradations represent a complex process, where there are conversion regions with a constant value of the apparent activation energy [104]. Overall, results showed that among the insulators for rocket motors there is an assortment of alternatives depending on the rocket size, configuration, time of flight, propellant, and case material. Clearly, material performance depends not only in its inherent physical–chemical properties but also on the utilization conditions of SRM.

New materials are continuously under development, particularly in composites of rubber materials with nanofibers and to a lesser extent with nanoparticles [105]. The use of graphite with rutile and modified fumed silica has been reported, with which properties can be modified in a wide range [106]. The use of various reinforcements together opens wider possibilities for obtaining efficient EHSM. Arabpol et al. [44] have used fumed silica, organoclay, and short carbon fibers in NBR, achieving ablation rates comparable to those obtained with EPDM or even lower. Carbon composites via a low-temperature carbonization of NBR elastomer compounds and highly filled with various carbon fillers and dispersed silicon carbide (SiC) were developed. These composites were intended for low-temperature carbonization of the elastomer compounds to generate a compact carbon structure with low thermal conductivity [107]. Although these composites still have limited application in rocket motor tubes, as they have displayed very low elongation at break, they constitute a promising lead for future research. Nanocomposites based on polyetherimide (ULTEM™ 1010) with nanoclay as filler and flame-retardant additives have displayed enhanced ablation and thermal properties, rendering ablation rates as low as 0.07 mm/s at a heat flux of 100 W/cm2 [108,109]. Other novel materials are polyphosphazenes [46,110], even though these materials are still expensive and not extensively available.

Combinations of standard materials are continuously being developed, such as aramid fiber reinforced silica aerogel composites (AF/aerogels), which have been shown to possess low density, remarkable flexibility, and excellent thermal insulation properties [52]. These encouraging results from the use and the combination of different additives justifies continued research in the field of insulators.

3.1 New challenges and opportunities with graphene

As mentioned earlier, missiles and solid rocket motors (SRMs) contain different flexible liners (PU, EPDM, NBR, NR, SBR, and silicone) or rigid (epoxy resin, phenolic among others) inside their combustion chambers. Reinforcements (silica, aramid fiber, carbon fiber, etc.) are necessary to achieve desired properties as thermal protections for the hot gases coming from the combustion of oxidizing agents (such as ammonium perchlorate (AP-NH4ClO4), ammonium nitrate (NA-NH4NO3), ammonium dinitramide (ADN), hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), and octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX)). The main objective of thermal protections is to protect the combustion chamber from the thermal and erosive effects of particles from the combustion of the highly energetic solid propellant. In this sense, nanomaterials such as graphene have emerged as a promising alternative [111,112]. Graphene is an attractive reinforcement due to its high mechanical strength, low density, high surface area, and chemical functionality. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene (rGO) have been incorporated into elastomeric and rigid compositions to increase their physical, thermal, and ablative properties [113,114]. They have also been incorporated in propellant not only to add physical properties but also to contribute to the rheological, thermal, and combustion parameters [115,116,117]. GO and rGO have high combustion enthalpy (32.8 kJ/g of carbon–oxygen reaction), high thermal, and electrical conductivity favoring the dissipation of electrostatic energy. They also act as a combustion catalyst or as a combustion catalyst support [116,117]. Graphene platelets have also been incorporated in EPDM matrix for improved fire retardancy and thermal conductivity [118].

Overall, revisiting knowledge constitutes a road mark for future developments on specialty polymers and nanocomposites. This short review aims to impulse research on high-temperature resistant composites made from commonly available materials [119,120]. For example, fumed silica is used as filler in EHSM and common additive in industry and presents the same level of thermal conductivity of super critically dried aerogels. If conveniently compacted, an exceptional high heat-resistant material could be obtained easily [121]. Overall, new opportunities are continuously under way [122], which greatly encourages keeping on with research.

4 Conclusion

From this short review, we could conclude that PU–EHSM is an emerging alternative to EPDM–EHSM because of their easier processability, reinforcement possibilities, and compatibility with composite propellant. At the same time, the fact that Kevlar/EPDM is still the classic insulator has been highlighted, considering numerous reports and previous extensive laboratory studies. One of its advantages is that EPDM exhibits the lowest density among elastomers, thus maximizing the payload of a SRM. Indeed, the lowest values reviewed for the ablation rate have been recorded for EPDM-based EHSM (0.015 mm/s), compared to 0.13 and 0.06 mm/s for NBR-based EHSM and PU–EHSM, respectively. Although the ablation rate is the key parameter for assessing thermal resistance of an insulator, it is important to notice that insulator properties also depend on other properties, such as ballistic configuration, and on the operating conditions of the rocket motor.

Nitrile rubber is still used as an insulation liner for solid SRM, although not to the extent of the EPDM-based EHSM, according to the comparative number of studies. Regardless of the recognized benefits of EPDM and NBR–EHSM, other insulators may also be convenient, such as PU–EHSM. For instance, it would not be necessary to utilize Kevlar/EPDM for short-range SRMs, in which the insulator endures the erosion effect of the hot gases and particles for only a very short period, usually measured in seconds. In these conditions, a PU–EHSM with appropriate filler could perform adequately, with the advantage of eliminating compatibility issues at the interface insulator-binder (as binders are mostly of polyurethanic nature in composite propellants). In this way, bonding problems at the interphase insulator-binder could be avoided. Moreover, PU–EHSM can be easily casted or sprayed onto the inner surface of SRM, which is an important advantage compared to NBR and EPDM-based EHSM, which has to be processed in a different way.

Another way of improving PU–EHSM performance in comparison to other type of EHSM is the inclusion of nanomaterials, such as nanofillers and nanofibers. Then critical properties that determine EHSM success are significantly improved and possibilities for PU use as EHSM are broaden.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Zhu Q, Zhang C, Weibin Y. The influence of permeability on the ablation process for an ablative material. Fractals. 2019;27(6):1950105. 10.1142/S0218348X19501056.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zhu W. Review on active thermal protection and its heat transfer for air breathing hypersonic vehicles. Chin J Aeronaut. 2018;31(10):1929–53. 10.1016/j.cja.2018.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kumar CV, Kandasubramanian B. Advances in ablative composites of carbon based materials: A review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019;58:22663–701. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04625.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pinto JR, Sanches NB, Diniz MF, Santos RS, Oliveira JI, Dutra RCL. Expanded perlite/cork fillers applied to aerospace insulation materials. An da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2018a;90:3197–206. 10.1590/0001-3765201820170964.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Pinto JR, Sanches NB, Santos RS, Oliveira JI, Dutra RCL. Development of asbestos-free and environment-friendly thermal protection for aerospace application. Mat Res. 2018b;21(6):1–9. e20170856. 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2017-0856.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Association for Standarization Test Methods. ASTM-E-285-08: Standard Test Method for Oxyacetylene Ablation Testing of Thermal Insulation Materials. Philadelphia: 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Natali M, Kenny J, Torre L. Science and technology of polymeric ablative materials for thermal protection systems and propulsion devices: A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2016;84:192–275.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hourt W. Plastics as heat insulators in rocket motors. Ind Eng Chem. 1960;52(9):761–3.10.1021/ie50609a024Search in Google Scholar

[9] Koo J, Mensah T. Novel polymer nanocomposite ablative technologies for thermal protection of propulsion and reentry systems for space applications. In: Mensah TO, Wang B, Bothun G, Winter J, editors. Nanotechnology commercialization: Manufacturing processes and products. Hoboken, USA: Virginia Davis John Wiley & Sons; 2018.10.1002/9781119371762.ch6Search in Google Scholar

[10] George K, Panda B, Biswal M, Nayak S, Mohanty S. Ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber-based heat shielding materials for solid rocket motor: Impact of Kevlar fiber reinforcement on the thermal and mechanical properties. Polym Adv Technol. 2020;1–11. 10.1002/pat.4857.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Natali M. Effect of Wollastonite on the ablation resistance ofEPDM based elastomeric heat shielding materials for solid rocket motors. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2016;130:47–57. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.05.019.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kesiya G, Panda V, Mohanty S, Nayak S. Recent developments in elastomeric heat shielding materials for solid rocket motor casing application for future perspective. Polym Adv Technol. 2017;1–14. 10.1002/pat.4101.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Cosentino Garcia M, Silva FC, da Silva G, Sciamareli J, da Costa Mattos E, Short A. Review about aerospace materials characterization -bonding agents and thermal insulation. Propellants Explo Pyrotech. 2020;45:1–11. 10.1002/prep.201900407.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Quagliano Amado JC. Thermal resistance properties of polyurethanes and its composites: A short review. J Res Updates Polym Sci. 2019;8:85–93.Search in Google Scholar

[15] López Rivilli P, Berrier L, Donalisio E. Development and fabrication of an elastomeric thermal protection with seal for solid rocket propellant. Córdoba, Argentina: IX CongresoArgentino de TecnologíaEspacial; April 26–28, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Pinto JR, Sanches NB, Santos RS, Oliveira JI, Dutra RCL. Expanded perlite/cork fillers applied to aerospace insulation materials. An da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2018;90(3):3197–206. 10.1590/0001-3765201820170964.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Bhuvaneswari C. Ethylene-propylene diene rubber as a futuristic elastomer for insulation of solid rocket motors. Def Sci J. 2016;56(3):309–20.10.14429/dsj.56.1894Search in Google Scholar

[18] Donskoy A. Silicon organic heat-shielding materials for aircraft external surfaces. In: Zaikov GE, editor. New approaches to polymer materials. vol. 5392, Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Publishers; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Natali M, Rallini M, Puglia D, Kenny J, Torre L. EPDM basedheatshieldingmaterialsfor solid rocket motors: A comparativestudy of differentfibrousreinforcements. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2013;98(11):2131–9. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Natali M, Kenny J, Torre L. Thermoset Nanocomposites as ablative materials for rocket and military applications. Structure, properties, and applications, thermosets. 2nd edn. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. p. 477–509.10.1016/B978-0-08-101021-1.00015-0Search in Google Scholar

[21] Bhowmick A. Current topics in elastomers research. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; 2008.10.1201/9781420007183Search in Google Scholar

[22] Satyaprasad P. Missile propulsion systems. Indian Inst Met Ser. 2017;1:305–30. 10.1007/978–81-10-2143-5_15.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dimitrienko Y. Effect of finite deformations on internal heat-mass transfer in elastomer ablating materials. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1997;40(3):699–709. 10.1016/0017-9310(96)00146-9.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kumar S, Mahulikar S. Selection of materials and design of multilayer lightweight passive thermal protection system. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2015;8(2):021003. 10.1115/1.4031737.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Gajiwala H, Hall S. Precursor compositions for an insulation, insulated rocket motors, and related methods, EP3375817 (A1). Plymouth, MN 55442 (US): Orbital ATK, Inc.; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Murakami LM. Off-line TLC-IR (UATR) characterization of additives in EPDM rubber. Polym Test. 2019;79(1–11):106042. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106042.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Da Maia JV. Influence of gas and treatment time on the surface modification of EPDM rubber treated at afterglow microwave plasmas. Appl Surface Sci. 2013;285(Part B):918–26. 101016/japsusc201309013.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sanches NB, Diniz MF, Alves LC, Dutra JCN, Cassu S, Azevedo MF, et al. Avaliação da aplicabilidade de técnicas FT-IR de reflexão (UATR) e de transmissão para a determinação do teor de acrilonitrila (AN) em NBR. Polímeros (São Carlos Impresso). 2018;18:249–55. 10.1590/S0104-14282008000300011.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Dutra JN. Surface modification of EPDM rubber by reactive argon-oxygen plasma process. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst. 2003;374:45–52. 10.1080/713738292.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Gladysz G, Chawla K. Voids in Materials. From unavoidable defects to Design Celullar Materials. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2015.10.1016/B978-0-444-56367-5.00006-3Search in Google Scholar

[31] Paglia L. Carbon-phenolic ablative materials for re-entry space vehicles: Plasma wind tunnel test and finite element modeling. Mater Des. 2016;90:1170–80. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.066.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Natali M, Puri I, Kenny JM, Torre L, Rallini M. Microstructure and ablation behavior of an affordable and reliable nanostructured phenolic impregnated carbon ablator (PICA). Polym Degrad Stabil. 2017;141:84–96. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.017.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sureshkumar M, Bhuvaneswari CM, Kakade SD, Gupta M. Studies on the properties of EPDM-CSE blend containing HTPB for case-bonded solid rocket motor insulation. Polym Adv Technol. 2008;19(2):144–50. 10.1002/pat.988.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Elwan I, Jabra R, Arafeh M. Preparation and ablation performance of lightweight phenolic composite material under oxyacetylene torch environment. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2008;10:e3118. 10.5028/jatm.v10.935.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Prasertsri S, Amnuay P, Sripan K, Nuinu P. Role of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene in changing properties of EPDM/ENR blends. Adv Mat Res. 2013;844:349–52. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.844.349.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Deuri A, Bhowmick A, Ghosh R, John B, Sriram T, De S. Thermal and ablative properties of rocket insulator compound based on EPDM. Polym Degrad Stabil. 1988;21(1):21–8.10.1016/0141-3910(88)90062-6Search in Google Scholar

[37] Allred LD. Asbestos free insulation development for the space shuttle solid propellant rocket motor (RSRM). 4th aerospace materials, processes and environmental technology. Huntsville, AL; United States; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Kablov V. Development and study of elastomer heat-shielding materials containing zirconium dioxide. Russ J Appl Chem. 2017b;90(3):401–5. 10.1134/s1070427217030120.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Rajeev R. Studies on thermal degradation of short melamine fibre reinforced EPDM, maleated EPDM and nitrile rubber composites. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2013;79(3):449–63. 10.1016/s0141-3910(02)00361-0.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Bassyouni M. Ablation and thermo-mechanical investigation of short carbon fiber impregnated elastomeric ablatives for ultrahigh temperature applications. Pol Degrad Stabil. 2014;110:195–202. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.08.032.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Bidgoli M, Arabgol F, Kokabi M. Ablation behavior of elastomeric insulator based on nitrile rubber containing silica or silica-clay aerogels. Iran Polym J. 2020;29:985–96. 10.1007/s13726-020-00855-zSearch in Google Scholar

[42] Balachandran M, Bhagawan SS. Mechanical, thermal and transport properties of nitrile rubber (NBR)–nanoclay composites. J Polym Res. 2012;19(2):9809. 10.1007/s10965-011-9809-xSearch in Google Scholar

[43] Kim J. Characteristics of nitrile–butadiene rubber layered silicate nanocomposites with silane coupling agent. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;89(10):2633–40.10.1002/app.12169Search in Google Scholar

[44] Arabgol F, Kokabi M, Bahramian AR. Ablation behavior of organoclay-NBR insulator: Modeling and experimental. Fire Mater. 2018;42(7):859–72.10.1002/fam.2641Search in Google Scholar

[45] Liu Y. Ablation and mechanical investigation of heat vulcanizing silicone rubber (HVSR) composite containing carbon fibers. J Polym Eng. 2017;37(5):521–8. 10.1515/polyeng-2016-0130.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Alex A, Bhuvaneswari S, Sreenivas N. Short silica fibre-reinforced polymethylsilsesquioxane–phenolic interpenetrating networks: Exploration for use as ablative thermal protection system in aerospace. Polym Bull. 2019;76:3941–56. 10.1007/s00289-018-2579-4.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Wu S. EPDM-based heat-shielding materials modified by hybrid elastomers of silicone or polyphosphazene. High Perform Polym. 2019;31(9–10):1112–21. 10.1177/0954008318824861.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Gao L, Liu L. Ablation behavior of silicone rubber-benzoxazine-based composites for ultra-high temperature applications silicone. Polymers. 2019;11(11):1844. 10.3390/polym11111844.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Xie F. Degradation and stabilization of polyurethane elastomers. Progr Polym Sci. 2019;90:211–68. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Benli S. Effect of fillers on thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane elastomer. J Appl Polym Sci. 1998;68:1057–65.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980516)68:7<1057::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar

[51] Lee J. Characterization of ablative properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites. Thesis. Austin, Texas, USA: The University of Texas at Austin; December 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Li Z. Flexible silica aerogel composites strengthened with aramid fibers and their thermal behavior. Mater Des. 2016;99:349–55. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.063.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Liu C, Kim J, Kwon Y. Comparative investigation on thermal insulation of polyurethane composites filled with silica aerogel and hollow silica microsphere. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16:1703–7.10.1166/jnn.2016.11985Search in Google Scholar

[54] Han Z, Xi Y, Kwon Y. Thermal stability and ablation behavior of modified polydimethylsiloxane-based polyurethane composites reinforced with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16(2):1928–33. 10.1166/jnn.2016.11986.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Yu F. Study on the ablation materials of modified polyurethane/polysiloxane. China: National Sun Yan-Tsen University; 2004. Thesis available at: https://etd.lis.nsysu.edu.tw//ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0817104-151504.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Lee J. Flammability study of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference; 2019. 10.2514/6.2009-2544.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Bocchio JA, Escobar MM, Quagliano Amado JC. Ablative properties of polyurethanes reinforced with organoclay. Polym Eng Sci. 2020;60:630–5. 10.1002/pen.25321.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Allcorn E, Natali M, Koo J. Ablation performance and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact. 2013;45:109–18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.017.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Ho W. Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites: Morphology, thermophysical, and flammability properties. J Nanomat. 2010;2010:583234. 11 p. 10.1155/2010/583234.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Dai Z. Synthesis and thermal properties of antimony doped tin oxide/waterborne polyurethane nanocomposite films as heat insulating materials. Polym Adv Technol. 2010;22(12):1905–11. 10.1002/pat.1690.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Ding H. Inherently flame-retardant flexible bio-based polyurethane sealant with phosphorus and nitrogen-containing polyurethane prepolymer. J Mat Sci. 2016;51(10):5008–18. 10.1007/s10853-016-9805-ySearch in Google Scholar

[62] Ghosh K. Light weight HTPB-clay nanocomposites (HCN) with enhanced ablation performance as inhibition materials for composite propellant. Def Technol. 2020. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.011, in press.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Schiariti D, Bellomi P. Inner coating layer for solid-propellant rocket engines, WO2019073436 (A1). Rome, Italy: AVIO S.P.A.; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Awad M, Nasser M. Effect of insulation layer composite and water adsorption on bonding performance. Heat Adv J Chem-Section A. 2020;3(3):370–7. 10.33945/SAMI/AJCA.2020.3.15.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Farajpour T, Abdollahi M. Improvement in adhesion between ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM)-based elastomer and polyurethane coating using epoxy–polysulfide copolymer as adhesion promoter. Polym Sci, Ser A. 2018;60(5):655–62. 10.1134/s0965545x18050048.Search in Google Scholar

[66] Boonstra B. Role of particulate fillers in elastomer reinforcement: A review. Polymer. 1979;20(6):1–704. 10.1016/0032-3861(79)90243-xSearch in Google Scholar

[67] Rallini M, Kenny JM. Nanofillers in polymers. Modif Polym Prop. 2017;3:47–86. 10.1016/b978-0-323-44353-1.00003-8.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Milhomem G. Experimental studies of heat insulation materials for hybrid propellant rocket motors. Experimental studies of heat insulation materials for hybrid propellant rocket motors. 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Curitiba, PR, Brazil: December 3–8, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Rallini M. Thermal and ablation properties of EPDM based heat shielding materials modified with density reducer fillers. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact. 2018;112:71–80. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.031.Search in Google Scholar

[70] Iqbal N. Ablation, thermal stability/transport and mechanical investigations of modified nanokaolinite impregnated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber composites. J Compos Mat. 2013;48(10):1221–31. 10.1177/0021998313484948.Search in Google Scholar

[71] Sanoj P, Kandasubramanian B. Hybrid carbon-carbon ablative composites for thermal protection in aerospace. J Compos. 2014;825607. 15 p. 10.1155/2014/825607.Search in Google Scholar

[72] Koo J, Mensah T. Novel polymer nanocomposite ablative technologies for thermal protection of propulsion and reentry systems for space applications. In: Mensah TO, Wang B, Bothun G, Winter J, editors. Nanotechnology commercialization: Manufacturing processes and products. Hoboken, USA: Virginia Davis John Wiley & Sons; 2018.10.1002/9781119371762.ch6Search in Google Scholar

[73] Liu C, Kim J, Kwon Y. Comparative investigation on thermal insulation of polyurethane composites filled with silica aerogel and hollow silica microsphere. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16:1703–7.10.1166/jnn.2016.11985Search in Google Scholar

[74] Bourbigot S, Flambard X. Heat resistance and flammability of high performance fibres: A review. Fire Mater. 2002;26(4–5):155–68. 10.1002/fam.799.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Jaramillo M, Koo JH, Natali M. Compressive char strength of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites. Polym Advan Technol. 2014;25(7):742–51. 10.1002/pat.3287.Search in Google Scholar

[76] Singh S. Development of polyimide–nanosilica filled EPDM based light rocket motor insulator compound: Influence of polyimide–nanosilica loading on thermal, ablation, and mechanical properties. Compos Part A. 2013;44:8–15.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.016Search in Google Scholar

[77] Jia X. Ablation and thermal properties of ethylene-propylene-diene elastomer composites reinforced with polysulfonamide short fibers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;113(1):283–9. 10.1002/app.29470.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Samatadze AI, Parakhin IV, Tumanov AS. Heat-protective properties of materials based on polyheteroarylenes. Polym Sci Ser D. 2016;9(2):243–7. 10.1134/s1995421216020192.Search in Google Scholar

[79] Patton R, Pittman CU, Wang L, Hill JR, Day A. Ablation, mechanical and thermal conductivity properties of vapor grown carbon fiber/phenolic matrix composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact. 2002;33(2):243–51. 10.1016/s1359-835x(01)00092-6.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Georges K. Recent developments in elastomeric heat shielding materials for solid rocket motor casing application for future perspective. Polym Adv Technol. 2018;29:18–21.10.1002/pat.4101Search in Google Scholar

[81] Singh H, Sekhar H. Solid rocket propellants: science and technology challenges. Thomas Graham House, Milton Road, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[82] De P, Choudhury N, Dutta K. Thermal analysis of rubber and rubbery materials. Shrewsbury: Rapra Technology; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[83] Guo M, Li L, Xi K, Liu L, Ji J. Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on thermal stability and ablation properties of EPDM insulation materials for solid rocket motors. Acta Astronautica. 2019;159:508–16. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.01.047.Search in Google Scholar

[84] Li L. Characteristics and formation mechanism of compact/porous structures in char layers of EPDM insulation materials. Carbon. 2018;127:498–509. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.091.Search in Google Scholar

[85] George K. Recent developments in elastomeric heat shielding materials for solid rocket motor casing application for future perspective. Polym Advan Technol. 2017;29(1):8–21. 10.1002/pat.4101.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Yang L. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer. Open Phys. 2017;15:344–53.10.1515/phys-2017-0038Search in Google Scholar

[87] El-Dakhakhny A. Effects of aramid fibers and colloidal particle fillers in composite ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber thermal insulators for rocket motor insulation. J Compos Mat. 2017;52(15):1989–95.10.1177/0021998317735682Search in Google Scholar

[88] Zhang Z. Study on thermal and mechanical properties of EPDM insulation. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Control System (MECS2016). 15–17 April 2016; Wuhan, China.10.1142/9789814740616_0015Search in Google Scholar

[89] Winya N, Hansupalak N. A comparison between the effects of sepiolite and silica on mechanical properties and thermal stability of NR/EPDM blend. MATEC Web Conf. 2016;69:04003. 10.1051/matecconf/20166904003.Search in Google Scholar

[90] Ahmed A, Hoa S. Thermal insulation by heat resistant polymers for solid rocket motor insulation. J Compos Mat. 2012;46(13):1549–59.10.1177/0021998311418850Search in Google Scholar

[91] Chu H, Sheu S, Chou S. Experimental study of ablative materials by oxyacetylene flame flow system. J Propul Power. 2011;27(5):1108–13. 10.2514/1.b34055.Search in Google Scholar

[92] Yezzi C, Moore C. Characterization of Kevlar/EPDM rubbers for use as rocket motor case insulators. 22nd Joint Propulsion Conference. Hunstville, Alabama, USA: June 16–18; 1986. 10.2514/6.1986-1489.Search in Google Scholar

[93] Han Z, Xi Y, Kwon Y. Thermal stability and ablation behavior of modified polydimethylsiloxane-based polyurethane composites reinforced with polyhedral oligomericSilsesquioxane. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16(2):1928–33. 10.1166/jnn.2016.11986.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[94] Kim H, Kim C, Kwon Y. Ablation and fire-retardant properties of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene-based polyurethane-g-polyhedral oligomericsilsesquioxane composites. High Perform Polym. 2015;27(6):749–57. 10.1177/0954008314559554.Search in Google Scholar

[95] Iqbal SS. Exfoliated sodium montmorillonite reinforced elastomeric nanocomposites: Ablation, thermal transport/decomposition/transitions and mechanical aspects. Int J Mater Mech Manuf. 2018;6(1):19–25. ISSN: 1793-819810.18178/ijmmm.2018.6.1.340.10.18178/ijmmm.2018.6.1.340Search in Google Scholar

[96] Nawaz R, Rashid N, Ali Z, Khan A, Nazir MS, Ul-Haq N. Effects on thermal and ablative properties of phenolic resin (Novolac) blended acrylonitrile butadiene rubber. Fiber Polym. 2018;19(6):1318–26. 10.1007/s12221-018-8075-5.Search in Google Scholar

[97] Farrukh S, Tahir NA, Hussain A, Ayoub M, Rafiq M, Khan MH. Fabrication and analysis of HNBR-silica/carbon phenolic ablative composites as an effective thermal protection system (TPS). IOP Conf Series: Mat Sci Eng. 2018;458:012015. 10.1088/1757-899x/458/1/012015.Search in Google Scholar

[98] Chukov D, Stepashkin A, Salimon AI, Kaloshkin SD. Highly filled elastomeric matrix composites: Structure and property evolution at low temperature carbonization. Mater Des. 2018;156:22–31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.034.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Guan Y. Study on ablative properties and mechanisms of hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber (HNBR) composites containing different fillers. Pol Degrad Stabil. 2011;96(5):808–17. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

[100] Zhao Y, Hu S, Lu W, An G, Wu Z, Wu D, et al. Nitrile butadiene rubber-based heat-shielding insulations for solid rocket motors. High Perform Polym. 2014;27(2):153–60. 10.1177/0954008314541819.Search in Google Scholar

[101] Iqbal SS, Sabir A, Islam A, Bukhari S, Yasir M, Bashir MA, et al. Effect of graphene for ablation study of advanced composite materials for aerospace applications. Key Eng Mater. 2018;778:118–25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.778.118.Search in Google Scholar

[102] Zhu Y, Peng W, Xu R, Giang P. Review on active thermal protection and its heat transfer for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles. Chin J Aeronaut. 2018;31(10):1929–53. 10.1016/j.cja.2018.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

[103] Xu Y. Dynamic simulation of insulation material ablation process in solid propellant rocket motor. J Aerosp Eng. 2015;28(5):04014118. 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000452.Search in Google Scholar

[104] Samaržija-Jovanović S. Ethylene–propylene–diene rubber-based nanoblends: Preparation. Charact Appl Springer Ser Polym Compos Mat. 2016;9:281–349. 10.1007/978-3-319-48720-5_9.Search in Google Scholar

[105] Maiti M, Bhattacharya M, Bhowmick A. Elastomer nanocomposites. Rubber Chem Technol. 2018;81(3):384–469. 10.5254/1.3548215.Search in Google Scholar

[106] Azizi S. Performance improvement of EPDM and EPDM/Silicone rubber composites using modified fumed silica, titanium dioxide and graphene additives. Polym Test. 2020;84:106281. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106281.Search in Google Scholar

[107] Chukov DI. Highly filled elastomeric matrix composites: Structure and property evolution at low temperature carbonization. Mater Des. 2018;156:22–31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.03.Search in Google Scholar

[108] Kim S. Evaluation of a modified fused filament fabrication material for use as thermal protection, SAMPE Conference Proceedings. Charlotte, NC: Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering – North America; May 20–23, 2019.10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1577Search in Google Scholar

[109] Ramgobin A. Thermal degradation and fire behavior of high performance polymers. Polym Rev. 2019;59(1):55–123. 10.1080/15583724.2018.1546736.Search in Google Scholar

[110] Zou W, Basharata M, Ullah SD, Zhang S, Abbas Y, Wei L, et al. Preparation and performances of novel polyphosphazene-based thermally conductive composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact. 2019;119:145–53. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.024.Search in Google Scholar

[111] Rui L, Wang J, Peng Shen J, Hua C, Yang GC. Preparation and characterization of insensitive HMX/graphene oxide composites. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2012;35:1–7. 10.1002/prep.201200199.Search in Google Scholar

[112] Iqbal SS, Sabir A, Islam A, Zain-ul-Abdeen Bukhari S, Yasir M, Bashir A, et al. Effect of graphene for ablation study of advanced composite materials for aerospace applications. Key Eng Mater. 2018;778:118–25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.778.118.Search in Google Scholar

[113] Chehroudi B. Nanotechnology and applied combustion: Use of nanostructured materials for light-activated distributed ignition of fuels with propulsion applications. Recent Pat Space Technol. 2011;1(2):107–22. 10.2174/1877611611101020107.Search in Google Scholar

[114] Dillier CAM, Demko AR, Sammet T, Thomas JC, Petersen EL, Grossman K, et al. Burning rate and ignition delay times of AP/HTPB-based solid rocket propellants containing graphen – Propulsion and energy forum. 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: July 25–27, 2016. 10.2514/6.2016-4690.Search in Google Scholar

[115] Zhang X, Zheng J, Fang H, Zhang Y, Bai S, Guansong H. Al2O3/graphene reinforced bio-inspired interlocking polyurethane composites with superior mechanical and thermal properties for solid propulsion fuel. Ciência e Tecnologia de Compósitos. 2018;167:42–52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.029.Search in Google Scholar

[116] Nasir K, Memon AW, McBainand SF, Son F. Graphene oxide/ammonium perchlorate composite material for use in solid propellants. J Propuls Power. 2016;32(3):682–6. 10.2514/1.b35815.Search in Google Scholar

[117] Pazat A, Barrès C, Bruno F, Janin C, Beyou E. Preparation and properties of elastomer composites containing “Graphene”-based fillers: A review. Polym Rev. 2018;58(3):403–43. 10.1080/15583724.2017.1403446.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Araby S, Su X, Meng Q, Kuan HC, Wang CH, Mouritz A, et al. Graphene platelets versus phosphorus compounds for elastomeric composites: Flame retardancy, mechanical performance and mechanisms. Nanotechnology. 2019;30(38):385703. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab2a3dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Pedreira S, Pinto JR, Campos E, da Costa Mattos E, Santos de Oliveira Junior M, Sampaio de Oliveira J, et al. Methodologies for characterization of aerospace polymers/energetic materials – a short review. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2016;8(1):18–25. 10.5028/jatm.v8i1.576.Search in Google Scholar

[120] Sanches NB, Diniz M, Mattos EC, Cassu SN, Dutra RCL. Infrared spectroscopy applied to materials used as thermal insulation and coatings. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2013;5:421–30. 10.5028/jatm.v5i4.265.Search in Google Scholar

[121] Feng J. Study of thermal stability of fumed silica based thermal insulating composites at high temperatures. Compos Part B Eng. 2011;42(7):1821–5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.023.Search in Google Scholar

[122] Vilela Salgado MC, Belderrain CMN, Devezas TC. Space propulsion: A survey study about current and future technologies. J Aerosp Technol Manag. 2018;10:e1118. 10.5028/jatm.v10.829.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-26
Revised: 2020-10-30
Accepted: 2020-11-03
Published Online: 2020-12-05

© 2020 Javier Carlos Quagliano Amado et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Electrochemical antioxidant screening and evaluation based on guanine and chitosan immobilized MoS2 nanosheet modified glassy carbon electrode (guanine/CS/MoS2/GCE)
  3. Kinetic models of the extraction of vanillic acid from pumpkin seeds
  4. On the maximum ABC index of bipartite graphs without pendent vertices
  5. Estimation of the total antioxidant potential in the meat samples using thin-layer chromatography
  6. Molecular dynamics simulation of sI methane hydrate under compression and tension
  7. Spatial distribution and potential ecological risk assessment of some trace elements in sediments and grey mangrove (Avicennia marina) along the Arabian Gulf coast, Saudi Arabia
  8. Amino-functionalized graphene oxide for Cr(VI), Cu(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal from industrial wastewater
  9. Chemical composition and in vitro activity of Origanum vulgare L., Satureja hortensis L., Thymus serpyllum L. and Thymus vulgaris L. essential oils towards oral isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata
  10. Effect of excess Fluoride consumption on Urine-Serum Fluorides, Dental state and Thyroid Hormones among children in “Talab Sarai” Punjab Pakistan
  11. Design, Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Isoxazole Tagged Indole Hybrid Compounds
  12. Comparison of kinetic and enzymatic properties of intracellular phosphoserine aminotransferases from alkaliphilic and neutralophilic bacteria
  13. Green Organic Solvent-Free Oxidation of Alkylarenes with tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide Catalyzed by Water-Soluble Copper Complex
  14. Ducrosia ismaelis Asch. essential oil: chemical composition profile and anticancer, antimicrobial and antioxidant potential assessment
  15. DFT calculations as an efficient tool for prediction of Raman and infra-red spectra and activities of newly synthesized cathinones
  16. Influence of Chemical Osmosis on Solute Transport and Fluid Velocity in Clay Soils
  17. A New fatty acid and some triterpenoids from propolis of Nkambe (North-West Region, Cameroon) and evaluation of the antiradical scavenging activity of their extracts
  18. Antiplasmodial Activity of Stigmastane Steroids from Dryobalanops oblongifolia Stem Bark
  19. Rapid identification of direct-acting pancreatic protectants from Cyclocarya paliurus leaves tea by the method of serum pharmacochemistry combined with target cell extraction
  20. Immobilization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa static biomass on eggshell powder for on-line preconcentration and determination of Cr (VI)
  21. Assessment of methyl 2-({[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)carbamoyl] sulfamoyl}methyl)benzoate through biotic and abiotic degradation modes
  22. Stability of natural polyphenol fisetin in eye drops Stability of fisetin in eye drops
  23. Production of a bioflocculant by using activated sludge and its application in Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution
  24. Molecular Properties of Carbon Crystal Cubic Structures
  25. Synthesis and characterization of calcium carbonate whisker from yellow phosphorus slag
  26. Study on the interaction between catechin and cholesterol by the density functional theory
  27. Analysis of some pharmaceuticals in the presence of their synthetic impurities by applying hybrid micelle liquid chromatography
  28. Two mixed-ligand coordination polymers based on 2,5-thiophenedicarboxylic acid and flexible N-donor ligands: the protective effect on periodontitis via reducing the release of IL-1β and TNF-α
  29. Incorporation of silver stearate nanoparticles in methacrylate polymeric monoliths for hemeprotein isolation
  30. Development of ultrasound-assisted dispersive solid-phase microextraction based on mesoporous carbon coated with silica@iron oxide nanocomposite for preconcentration of Te and Tl in natural water systems
  31. N,N′-Bis[2-hydroxynaphthylidene]/[2-methoxybenzylidene]amino]oxamides and their divalent manganese complexes: Isolation, spectral characterization, morphology, antibacterial and cytotoxicity against leukemia cells
  32. Determination of the content of selected trace elements in Polish commercial fruit juices and health risk assessment
  33. Diorganotin(iv) benzyldithiocarbamate complexes: synthesis, characterization, and thermal and cytotoxicity study
  34. Keratin 17 is induced in prurigo nodularis lesions
  35. Anticancer, antioxidant, and acute toxicity studies of a Saudi polyherbal formulation, PHF5
  36. LaCoO3 perovskite-type catalysts in syngas conversion
  37. Comparative studies of two vegetal extracts from Stokesia laevis and Geranium pratense: polyphenol profile, cytotoxic effect and antiproliferative activity
  38. Fragmentation pattern of certain isatin–indole antiproliferative conjugates with application to identify their in vitro metabolic profiles in rat liver microsomes by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
  39. Investigation of polyphenol profile, antioxidant activity and hepatoprotective potential of Aconogonon alpinum (All.) Schur roots
  40. Lead discovery of a guanidinyl tryptophan derivative on amyloid cascade inhibition
  41. Physicochemical evaluation of the fruit pulp of Opuntia spp growing in the Mediterranean area under hard climate conditions
  42. Electronic structural properties of amino/hydroxyl functionalized imidazolium-based bromide ionic liquids
  43. New Schiff bases of 2-(quinolin-8-yloxy)acetohydrazide and their Cu(ii), and Zn(ii) metal complexes: their in vitro antimicrobial potentials and in silico physicochemical and pharmacokinetics properties
  44. Treatment of adhesions after Achilles tendon injury using focused ultrasound with targeted bFGF plasmid-loaded cationic microbubbles
  45. Synthesis of orotic acid derivatives and their effects on stem cell proliferation
  46. Chirality of β2-agonists. An overview of pharmacological activity, stereoselective analysis, and synthesis
  47. Fe3O4@urea/HITh-SO3H as an efficient and reusable catalyst for the solvent-free synthesis of 7-aryl-8H-benzo[h]indeno[1,2-b]quinoline-8-one and indeno[2′,1′:5,6]pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives
  48. Adsorption kinetic characteristics of molybdenum in yellow-brown soil in response to pH and phosphate
  49. Enhancement of thermal properties of bio-based microcapsules intended for textile applications
  50. Exploring the effect of khat (Catha edulis) chewing on the pharmacokinetics of the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel in rats using the newly developed LC-MS/MS technique
  51. A green strategy for obtaining anthraquinones from Rheum tanguticum by subcritical water
  52. Cadmium (Cd) chloride affects the nutrient uptake and Cd-resistant bacterium reduces the adsorption of Cd in muskmelon plants
  53. Removal of H2S by vermicompost biofilter and analysis on bacterial community
  54. Structural cytotoxicity relationship of 2-phenoxy(thiomethyl)pyridotriazolopyrimidines: Quantum chemical calculations and statistical analysis
  55. A self-breaking supramolecular plugging system as lost circulation material in oilfield
  56. Synthesis, characterization, and pharmacological evaluation of thiourea derivatives
  57. Application of drug–metal ion interaction principle in conductometric determination of imatinib, sorafenib, gefitinib and bosutinib
  58. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan-grafted-polyorthoethylaniline biocomposite and utilization for dye removal from water
  59. Optimisation of urine sample preparation for shotgun proteomics
  60. DFT investigations on arylsulphonyl pyrazole derivatives as potential ligands of selected kinases
  61. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease using focused ultrasound with GDNF retrovirus-loaded microbubbles to open the blood–brain barrier
  62. New derivatives of a natural nordentatin
  63. Fluorescence biomarkers of malignant melanoma detectable in urine
  64. Study of the remediation effects of passivation materials on Pb-contaminated soil
  65. Saliva proteomic analysis reveals possible biomarkers of renal cell carcinoma
  66. Withania frutescens: Chemical characterization, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and healing activities
  67. Design, synthesis and pharmacological profile of (−)-verbenone hydrazones
  68. Synthesis of magnesium carbonate hydrate from natural talc
  69. Stability-indicating HPLC-DAD assay for simultaneous quantification of hydrocortisone 21 acetate, dexamethasone, and fluocinolone acetonide in cosmetics
  70. A novel lactose biosensor based on electrochemically synthesized 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene/thiophene (EDOT/Th) copolymer
  71. Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad: Chemical characterization, scavenging and cytotoxic activities
  72. Development and validation of a high performance liquid chromatography/diode array detection method for estrogen determination: Application to residual analysis in meat products
  73. PCSK9 concentrations in different stages of subclinical atherosclerosis and their relationship with inflammation
  74. Development of trace analysis for alkyl methanesulfonates in the delgocitinib drug substance using GC-FID and liquid–liquid extraction with ionic liquid
  75. Electrochemical evaluation of the antioxidant capacity of natural compounds on glassy carbon electrode modified with guanine-, polythionine-, and nitrogen-doped graphene
  76. A Dy(iii)–organic framework as a fluorescent probe for highly selective detection of picric acid and treatment activity on human lung cancer cells
  77. A Zn(ii)–organic cage with semirigid ligand for solvent-free cyanosilylation and inhibitory effect on ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion ability via regulating mi-RNA16 expression
  78. Polyphenol content and antioxidant activities of Prunus padus L. and Prunus serotina L. leaves: Electrochemical and spectrophotometric approach and their antimicrobial properties
  79. The combined use of GC, PDSC and FT-IR techniques to characterize fat extracted from commercial complete dry pet food for adult cats
  80. MALDI-TOF MS profiling in the discovery and identification of salivary proteomic patterns of temporomandibular joint disorders
  81. Concentrations of dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs in natural animal feed additives
  82. Structure and some physicochemical and functional properties of water treated under ammonia with low-temperature low-pressure glow plasma of low frequency
  83. Mesoscale nanoparticles encapsulated with emodin for targeting antifibrosis in animal models
  84. Amine-functionalized magnetic activated carbon as an adsorbent for preconcentration and determination of acidic drugs in environmental water samples using HPLC-DAD
  85. Antioxidant activity as a response to cadmium pollution in three durum wheat genotypes differing in salt-tolerance
  86. A promising naphthoquinone [8-hydroxy-2-(2-thienylcarbonyl)naphtho[2,3-b]thiophene-4,9-dione] exerts anti-colorectal cancer activity through ferroptosis and inhibition of MAPK signaling pathway based on RNA sequencing
  87. Synthesis and efficacy of herbicidal ionic liquids with chlorsulfuron as the anion
  88. Effect of isovalent substitution on the crystal structure and properties of two-slab indates BaLa2−xSmxIn2O7
  89. Synthesis, spectral and thermo-kinetics explorations of Schiff-base derived metal complexes
  90. An improved reduction method for phase stability testing in the single-phase region
  91. Comparative analysis of chemical composition of some commercially important fishes with an emphasis on various Malaysian diets
  92. Development of a solventless stir bar sorptive extraction/thermal desorption large volume injection capillary gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method for ultra-trace determination of pyrethroids pesticides in river and tap water samples
  93. A turbidity sensor development based on NL-PI observers: Experimental application to the control of a Sinaloa’s River Spirulina maxima cultivation
  94. Deep desulfurization of sintering flue gas in iron and steel works based on low-temperature oxidation
  95. Investigations of metallic elements and phenolics in Chinese medicinal plants
  96. Influence of site-classification approach on geochemical background values
  97. Effects of ageing on the surface characteristics and Cu(ii) adsorption behaviour of rice husk biochar in soil
  98. Adsorption and sugarcane-bagasse-derived activated carbon-based mitigation of 1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)phenyl]sulfonyl-3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) urea-contaminated soils
  99. Antimicrobial and antifungal activities of bifunctional cooper(ii) complexes with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, flufenamic, mefenamic and tolfenamic acids and 1,10-phenanthroline
  100. Application of selenium and silicon to alleviate short-term drought stress in French marigold (Tagetes patula L.) as a model plant species
  101. Screening and analysis of xanthine oxidase inhibitors in jute leaves and their protective effects against hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in cells
  102. Synthesis and physicochemical studies of a series of mixed-ligand transition metal complexes and their molecular docking investigations against Coronavirus main protease
  103. A study of in vitro metabolism and cytotoxicity of mephedrone and methoxetamine in human and pig liver models using GC/MS and LC/MS analyses
  104. A new phenyl alkyl ester and a new combretin triterpene derivative from Combretum fragrans F. Hoffm (Combretaceae) and antiproliferative activity
  105. Erratum
  106. Erratum to: A one-step incubation ELISA kit for rapid determination of dibutyl phthalate in water, beverage and liquor
  107. Review Articles
  108. Sinoporphyrin sodium, a novel sensitizer for photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy
  109. Natural products isolated from Casimiroa
  110. Plant description, phytochemical constituents and bioactivities of Syzygium genus: A review
  111. Evaluation of elastomeric heat shielding materials as insulators for solid propellant rocket motors: A short review
  112. Special Issue on Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2019
  113. An overview of Monascus fermentation processes for monacolin K production
  114. Study on online soft sensor method of total sugar content in chlorotetracycline fermentation tank
  115. Studies on the Anti-Gouty Arthritis and Anti-hyperuricemia Properties of Astilbin in Animal Models
  116. Effects of organic fertilizer on water use, photosynthetic characteristics, and fruit quality of pear jujube in northern Shaanxi
  117. Characteristics of the root exudate release system of typical plants in plateau lakeside wetland under phosphorus stress conditions
  118. Characterization of soil water by the means of hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratio at dry-wet season under different soil layers in the dry-hot valley of Jinsha River
  119. Composition and diurnal variation of floral scent emission in Rosa rugosa Thunb. and Tulipa gesneriana L.
  120. Preparation of a novel ginkgolide B niosomal composite drug
  121. The degradation, biodegradability and toxicity evaluation of sulfamethazine antibiotics by gamma radiation
  122. Special issue on Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Sustainable Management for the Exposure to Environmental Toxins
  123. Insight into the cadmium and zinc binding potential of humic acids derived from composts by EEM spectra combined with PARAFAC analysis
  124. Source apportionment of soil contamination based on multivariate receptor and robust geostatistics in a typical rural–urban area, Wuhan city, middle China
  125. Special Issue on 13th JCC 2018
  126. The Role of H2C2O4 and Na2CO3 as Precipitating Agents on The Physichochemical Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of Bismuth Oxide
  127. Preparation of magnetite-silica–cetyltrimethylammonium for phenol removal based on adsolubilization
  128. Topical Issue on Agriculture
  129. Size-dependent growth kinetics of struvite crystals in wastewater with calcium ions
  130. The effect of silica-calcite sedimentary rock contained in the chicken broiler diet on the overall quality of chicken muscles
  131. Physicochemical properties of selected herbicidal products containing nicosulfuron as an active ingredient
  132. Lycopene in tomatoes and tomato products
  133. Fluorescence in the assessment of the share of a key component in the mixing of feed
  134. Sulfur application alleviates chromium stress in maize and wheat
  135. Effectiveness of removal of sulphur compounds from the air after 3 years of biofiltration with a mixture of compost soil, peat, coconut fibre and oak bark
  136. Special Issue on the 4th Green Chemistry 2018
  137. Study and fire test of banana fibre reinforced composites with flame retardance properties
  138. Special Issue on the International conference CosCI 2018
  139. Disintegration, In vitro Dissolution, and Drug Release Kinetics Profiles of k-Carrageenan-based Nutraceutical Hard-shell Capsules Containing Salicylamide
  140. Synthesis of amorphous aluminosilicate from impure Indonesian kaolin
  141. Special Issue on the International Conf on Science, Applied Science, Teaching and Education 2019
  142. Functionalization of Congo red dye as a light harvester on solar cell
  143. The effect of nitrite food preservatives added to se’i meat on the expression of wild-type p53 protein
  144. Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity of scaffold porous composite collagen–hydroxyapatite based coral for bone regeneration
  145. Special Issue on the Joint Science Congress of Materials and Polymers (ISCMP 2019)
  146. Effect of natural boron mineral use on the essential oil ratio and components of Musk Sage (Salvia sclarea L.)
  147. A theoretical and experimental study of the adsorptive removal of hexavalent chromium ions using graphene oxide as an adsorbent
  148. A study on the bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in various dental ceramics: In vitro study
  149. Corrosion study of copper in aqueous sulfuric acid solution in the presence of (2E,5E)-2,5-dibenzylidenecyclopentanone and (2E,5E)-bis[(4-dimethylamino)benzylidene]cyclopentanone: Experimental and theoretical study
  150. Special Issue on Chemistry Today for Tomorrow 2019
  151. Diabetes mellitus type 2: Exploratory data analysis based on clinical reading
  152. Multivariate analysis for the classification of copper–lead and copper–zinc glasses
  153. Special Issue on Advances in Chemistry and Polymers
  154. The spatial and temporal distribution of cationic and anionic radicals in early embryo implantation
  155. Special Issue on 3rd IC3PE 2020
  156. Magnetic iron oxide/clay nanocomposites for adsorption and catalytic oxidation in water treatment applications
  157. Special Issue on IC3PE 2018/2019 Conference
  158. Exergy analysis of conventional and hydrothermal liquefaction–esterification processes of microalgae for biodiesel production
  159. Advancing biodiesel production from microalgae Spirulina sp. by a simultaneous extraction–transesterification process using palm oil as a co-solvent of methanol
  160. Topical Issue on Applications of Mathematics in Chemistry
  161. Omega and the related counting polynomials of some chemical structures
  162. M-polynomial and topological indices of zigzag edge coronoid fused by starphene
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2020-0182/html
Scroll to top button