Changes of immune cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by radiofrequency ablation and hepatectomy, a pilot study

Zusheng Yu; Guowei Li; Hang Yu; Tetsuya Asakawa

doi:10.1515/biol-2021-0105

Article Open Access

Changes of immune cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by radiofrequency ablation and hepatectomy, a pilot study

Zusheng Yu , Guowei Li , Hang Yu and Tetsuya Asakawa

Published/Copyright: September 18, 2021

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Open Life Sciences Volume 16 Issue 1

Abstract

In this pilot study, we compared the dynamic changes of circulating immune cells between patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatectomy. Seventy-three patients were enrolled in this study. Flow cytometry assay was performed to determine the immune cells in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before treatment and on days 7, 14, and 28 after treatment. We found that in the RFA group, the circulating cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ cells, the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and natural killer (NK) cells continued to increase, and the circulating CD8+ cells continued to decrease after the treatment. In contrast, in the surgery group, the circulating CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio decreased over the first seven postoperative days and then began to increase, and CD8+ cells decreased on the first 7 postoperative days and began to increase thereafter. The changes of immune cells in tumor tissues consisted of an increase in the number of CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, CD3+ cells, and NK cells immediately after RFA. Our results show that postoperative immune function continued to improve after RFA, but after surgery, it decreased in the first week and started to improve thereafter. These findings are important for clinicians when selecting the appropriate therapy for HCC.

Keywords: small HCC; RFA; hepatectomy; immune cells; PBMCs

1 Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the liver. According to data in 2018, it is in the top six most frequent cancers and the fourth cause of tumor-related deaths [1]. HCC is not rare in China because of the high prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. It has been estimated that the HBV infection prevalence is approximately 6–10% in the north of China and over 10% in the south of China [2]. In China, HCC is ranked fourth on the list of diagnosed cancers and the fourth cause of tumor-related deaths [3]. It is considered a global public health concern. Unfortunately, although hepatectomy with liver transplantation (HLC) is the potentially effective treatment for HCC, less than 20% of patients with HCC have the possibility of undergoing HLC [4]. Many locoregional therapies for HCC, particularly small HCC (SHCC) therapies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and microwave coagulation ablation, have been developed. It is well documented that RFA is a safe and effective therapy for SHCC [5, 6]. Chen et al. recently reported that, in patients treated by RFA, progression-free survival time and 5-year survival rate are 25.0 ± 22.7 months (median: 17.0 months) and 28.5%, respectively [6]. However, the underlying mechanisms associated with the treatment by RFA are not fully understood. Some authors consider necrosis and apoptosis to be the underlying mechanisms [7]. The biological behavior of HCC is remarkably affected by the tumor immune micro-environment [8]. T lymphocytes play a crucial role in the development and progression of HCC, and cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T helper (Th) cells play a central role in orchestrating host immune responses. Th1 cells produce cytokines such as interferon-γ to trigger antimicrobial and antitumor cytotoxic responses, whereas other Th cells suppress T cell immunity in physiological and pathological conditions [9]. It is known that CD8+ T cells play a cytotoxic role in antitumor immune reactions by releasing granules such as perforin and granzymes [10]. CD8+ T cells are associated with tumor progression. Natural killer (NK) cells are potent effectors of the innate immune system, form the first line of defense against malignancies, and are associated with high clinical survival and low recurrence rate [11]. Understanding the immunological mechanisms of RFA is necessary for the better application of RFA. However, there are limited studies on this subject matter. Sugimoto et al. compared postoperative immune responses between patients who underwent RFA and patients who underwent irreversible electroporation. They found no significant changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), namely, T cells, CD4+ cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells at preoperation, postoperation, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 4 [12]. We hypothesized that, over a period longer than postoperative day 4, the observed changes in immune cells might increase.

In this study, we compared the changes of circulating immune cells between patients who underwent RFA and patients who underwent conventional hepatectomy. We observed changes of PBMCs over a longer postoperative period of 4 weeks. We also observed changes of immune cells in tumor tissues before and immediately after RFA. We aimed to determine the changes of immune cells that are due to RFA to enable a better understanding of the underlying immunological mechanisms associated with RFA.

2 Methods

2.1 Patients

A total of 73 patients with SHCC treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2016 were enrolled in this study. All the patients were pathologically diagnosed with SHCC based on prior liver biopsy. Patients with autoimmune diseases, patients undergoing immunosuppressant treatment or chemotherapy, patients with other systemic diseases including hematological and inflammatory diseases, and patients with poor compliance were excluded from this study. This study was rigorously designed, and the study protocol was explained to the patients and their relatives in detail.

Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the ethics committee of the First People’s Hospital of Fuyang Hangzhou (approval number: 2020-003).

2.2 Experimental design

Fasting peripheral venous blood samples (10 mL) were collected from all enrolled patients at 7 am on the following time points: 1 day before treatment and at 7, 14, and 28 days after treatment. The blood samples were placed in heparin anticoagulant tubes and immediately sent for the subsequent experiments. A variant of percutaneous needle biopsy described by Hasegawa et al. [13] was used to obtain tumor tissues from patients who underwent RFA before and immediately after RFA.

Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month after treatment. Computed tomography and Ultrasonic B (EUB7500, Hitachi, Japan) scans were used to assess the operative state of each patient, and the Child–Pugh scale was used to evaluate liver function.

2.3 Treatments

A total of 38 patients underwent surgical resection (the surgery group). The surgical procedures were selected according to the criteria described in the previous study [14]. In brief, the state of ascites, serum total bilirubin level, and the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min was assessed. During nonanatomic resection, liver parenchymal transection was performed 1–2 cm from the tumor surface. During anatomic resection, the following points were comprehensively considered: resection area, approach to the portal triad, and approaches to expose landmark vessels.

Thirty-five patients underwent RFA (the RFA group) according to the method described by Livraghi et al. [15]. RFA was performed under the guidance of color Doppler ultrasonography (EUB7500, Hitachi, Japan) at a probe frequency of 3.5–4.0 MHz. Retractable radiofrequency (RF) electrodes were connected to a 500 kHz RF generator (100 W, MSIS-1500, Medsphere, USA). The patient position was based on tumor location as detected on imaging examination. The electrodes were inserted according to the number, location, and size of the tumor under the guidance of Doppler ultrasonography. RFA was performed until the tumor was completely hyperechoic. RFA parameters were determined according to the state of each patient, and the duration of RFA was 8–12 min per course.

2.4 Flow cytometry assay for immune cells in PBMCs

The morphological experiments were performed as per the methods described in earlier studies [16, 17]. In brief, PBMCs were isolated by a Ficoll density gradient (TBD sciences, China). After suspension in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the PBMCs were counted using an automated cell viability analyzer (Vi-cellTMXR, Beckman Coulter). We then incubated the PBMCs with anti-CD3-FITC (11-0039), anti-CD4-PE-Cy7(25-0049), anti-CD8-APC (17-0088) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and anti-CD56-PE-Cy7 (25-0567, eBioscience, USA) for 30 min at 4°C. The appropriate isotype mAbs were used as controls. The percentage of positively stained cells was determined using a flow cytometer (LSR-II, BD Biosciences) equipped with BD FACSDiva software. For the analysis, at least 1 × 10⁴ lymphocytes were acquired.

2.5 Immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissues

Paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections of 4 μm in thickness obtained from each patient were submitted for immunohistochemical staining. The samples were dewaxed and subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval with a preheated epitope retrieval solution (10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was then blocked. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with one of the following primary mAbs: mouse anti-CD3, rabbit anti-CD8, mouse anti-CD56 (working solution; Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Beijing, China), or rabbit anti-CD4 (1:100; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). After incubation with horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at 37°C and development with diaminobenzidine, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Negative control staining was performed with PBS instead of primary antibody. Images of 10 random areas of intratumoral regions were captured under 400× high power field (HPF; Olympus, Japan) ocular lens.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (V 19.00, IBM, IL, USA). The two-way analysis of variance was used for the comparison of quantitative data between the two groups. Mann–Whitney test was used for comparison of independent samples. Comparison of ratios was performed using the chi-square test. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients

The clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the RFA and surgery groups.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients

	RFA (n = 35)	Surgery (n = 38)
Age (years), median (IQR)	54 (51–64)	53 (49–63)
Gender (M/F)	23/12	24/14
Diagnosis	HCC21/SHC14	HCC29/SHC9
History of cirrhosis	18	26
Child–Pugh score	A13/B5	A24/B2
Tumor diameter (cm), median (IQR)	2.3 (2.1–3.8)	2.4 (2.2–4.1)

RFA: radiofrequency ablation; IQR: interquartile range.

RFA and surgery were satisfactorily performed. The types of liver resection are presented in Table 2. There was no incidence of surgical complications or postoperative death in any enrolled patient. Data of 1 month follow-up after treatment showed that there was no recurrence in any of the two groups. No significant artery lesion area enhancement was found in the RFA group. Tumor regional blood flows disappeared in 30 patients, and vascular resistance index decreased in five patients.

Table 2

Types of liver resection

	n (%)
Right hepatectomy	5 (13.2)
Left hepatectomy (segments II, III, IV)	7 (18.4)
Left lateral lobectomy (segments II, III)	5 (13.2)
Segment IV	1 (2.6)
Segment V	4 (10.5)
Atypical resection	16 (42.1)

3.2 Changes of circulating immune cells after RFA and surgery

The dynamic changes of circulating immune cells after RFA and surgery are shown in Figure 1. The number of CD4+ cells continued to increase in the RFA group. In contrast, in the surgery group, the number of CD4+ cells decreased in the first 7 postoperative days and then started to increase but did not reach the preoperative level. No significant difference was found at baseline, but after treatment, the number of CD4+ cells in the RFA group was higher than that in the surgery group (p < 0.01, Figure 1a). The number of CD8+ cells continued to decrease in the RFA group. In contrast, the number of CD8+ cells in the surgery group decreased in the first 7 postoperative days and then started to increase but did not reach the preoperative level. No significant difference was found at baseline, but the number of CD8+ cells in the RFA group was found to be higher on days 7 and 28 after treatment (Figure 1b). We calculated the CD4+/CD8+ ratio and found no difference at baseline, but we found that the ratio was higher in the RFA group than in the surgery group on days 7, 14, and 28 after treatment (Figure 1b). In the RFA group, the number of CD3+ cells was found to have kept on increasing on days 7 and 14 after treatment, whereas on day 28 after treatment, a slight reduction was found in the number of CD3+ cells, but it was still higher than the baseline value. In the surgery group, the number of CD3+ cells continued to decrease over the 28 postoperative days. No difference was found at baseline and on day 7 after treatment, but the number of CD3+ cells in the RFA group was higher than that in the surgery group on days 14 and 28 after treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 1d). The number of NK cells in both groups continued to increase, but the surgery group had a sharper curve than the RFA group (p < 0.01, Figure 1e)

Figure 1

Circulating immune cells in the RFA and surgery groups. (a) CD4+ cells, (b) CD8+ cells, (c) CD4+/CD8+ ratio, (d) CD3+ cells, (e) NK cells. Percentage of cells that stained positively for the antibodies of interest were calculated. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; * means p < 0.05; ** means p < 0.01 (RFA versus surgery). RFA: radiofrequency ablation, CD: cluster of differentiation, NK: natural killer, SEM: standard error of the mean.

3.3 Changes of immune cells in tumor tissues before and immediately after RFA

The result of the immunohistochemical assay of lymphocytes in the tumor tissues before and immediately after RFA is shown in Figure 2. We found that there were no morphological changes before and after treatment, but we found a change in the cellular density (Figure 2). There were statistically significant increments in the number of CD4+ cells (Figure 2c), CD8+ cells (Figure 2f), CD3+ cells (Figure 2i), and NK cells (Figure 2l) after RFA (p < 0.001).

Figure 2

Immunohistochemical assay of immune cells in tumor tissues before and immediately after RFA. Before RFA: (a) CD4+ cells, (d) CD8+ cells, (g) CD3+ cells, and (j) NK cells. Immediately after RFA: (b) CD4+ cells, (e) CD8+ cells, (h) CD3+ cells, and (k) NK cells. Quantitative data: (c) CD4+ cells, (f) CD8+ cells, (i) CD3+ cells, and (l) NK cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. The brown cells are positive cells. Bar = 100 μm. RFA: radiofrequency ablation, CD: cluster of differentiation, NK: natural killer, SEM: standard error of the mean.

4 Discussion

In this pilot study, we compared the changes of immune cells between the RFA and surgery groups at 7, 14, and 28 days after treatment. The changes of immune cells in tumor tissues immediately after RFA were also assessed. We found that RFA significantly increased circulating CD4+ cells, CD4+/CD8+, CD3+ cells, and NK cells compared to the preoperative levels, and cell levels were significantly higher in the RFA group than in the surgery group. Data of the immunohistochemical assay of tumor tissues showed a significant increase in the number of immune cells immediately after RFA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the number of circulating immune cells between patients who underwent RFA and patients who underwent conventional surgery and report changes of immune cells in tumor tissues after RFA. The results seem to imply that HCC patients treated with RFA might have less impact on the immunologic function in comparison with conventional surgery. These findings might be useful for the clinicians to make a decision on the selection of a better treatment for the HCC patients in terms of their actual conditions. We reckon that our findings will contribute to a better understanding of the immunological mechanisms associated with RFA.

The immune system is suppressed and immune function is impaired in patients with HCC, and this condition results in a state of tumor immune escape [18]. The immune system dysfunction in SHCC is based on cellular immunity. The changes of T cells subsets may be regarded as biomarkers of in vivo antitumor ability and immune system dysfunction [19]. It was reported that the characteristic changes of immune cells in SHCC include reduction in the number of CD4+ cells, reduction in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and increase in the number of CD8+ cells. Our data on PBMCs show that RFA significantly increases the number of circulating CD4+ cells (Figure 1a), and CD4+ levels in the RFA group were higher than those in the surgery group. Data on CD8+ cells show an opposite trend as RFA was found to significantly reduce the number of CD8+ cells (Figure 1b). It is noteworthy that, in the RFA group, the number of CD8+ cells maintained a downward trend over the observation period (28 days), but in the surgery group, the number of CD8+ cells decreased in the first 7 postoperative days and then began to increase thereafter. RFA significantly increased the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (Figure 1c). The upward trend of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was maintained in the RFA group over 28 days, but in the surgery group, the ratio decreased in the first 7 days and then began to increase. During the onset of the tumor, both CD4+ and CD8+ cells are enriched at the tumor site. The roles of CD4+ cells are complicated and unclear. It has been documented that CD4+ cells are more plastic and play dual roles, namely antitumor or pro-tumor [20]. Yang et al. reported that the number of CD4+ cells significantly increased in the surrounding area of HCC tumor [21]. Fu et al. also found that the circulating CD4+ cells were significantly increased with the progression of HCC [22], which is in agreement with our data in both RFA and surgery groups. However, they also increased CD4+ cells that might be associated with high mortality and reduced the survival time in patients with HCC [22]. On the other hand, the roles of CD8+ cells seem to be simpler. It is known that CD8+ cells are the main drivers of the immune response in the tumor microenvironment [23]. It is a simple killer at the tumor site [20]. Abundant accumulation of CD4+ cells may result in a reduced infiltration of CD8+ cells in the HCC state [22]. Meanwhile, our results of immunohistochemistry at the tumor tissues found that both CD4+ and CD8+ cells significantly increased after RFA (Figure 2). Due to the complicated roles of CD4+ cells and interactions between CD4+ and CD8+ cells. We speculated that the numbers of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ cells are not only affected by the proliferation of these cells but also affected by the exhaustion of these cells. The reduction of circulating CD8+ cells might be a result of exhausted CD8+ cells, most of which are accumulated at the tumor site. The ratio of CD4+/CD8+ might be a better index to comprehensively understand the interaction between CD4+ and CD8+ cells, which plays a key role in the maintenance of the cellular immune balance. A previous study found that the circulating CD4+/CD8+ ratio is significantly lower in patients with HCC [24]. Despite our data indicated that the RFA group had a higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio; however, whether the higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio represents the better outcome requires further investigation. The changes of CD3+ cells showed completely opposite trends between the RFA and surgery groups (Figure 1d). The trend of NK cells was similar in both groups, but the NK cell level was higher in the surgery group than in the RFA group (Figure 1f). Since NK cells are associated with strong immune function, our data suggest that both RFA and surgery improve postoperative immune function in patients with SHCC. Our data on circulating immune cells show that RFA significantly improves immune function in patients with SHCC. To explain our findings, we propose the following underlying mechanisms: (1) immune inhibitors are released by tumor cells, which are inactivated by RFA, thereby reducing the level of immune inhibitors; (2) RFA may expose the surface of tumor cells or change the tumor antigens and subsequently activate cellular immune reaction against HCC; (3) RFA is reported to synthesize heat-shock proteins (HSPs) and particularly increase the release of HSP70. The release of HSPs may upregulate the expression of tumor-specific antigens, which contribute to immune system activation. Moreover, the discrepancy between the RFA and surgery groups indicates that these two treatment methods affect the immune system of patients differently. Hepatectomy is a relatively major surgery associated with high invasion and surgical injury. Many factors remarkably affect the immune system and may transiently suppress it. These factors include surgical processes, surgical injury, anesthesia, and postoperative response to surgical stress [25]. Our results show that, in the surgery group, the immune system was on a downward trend in the first 7 days after hepatectomy. Thereafter, the immune system began to recover, and clinicians should take note of these changes in the immune function.

There are several limitations to this study. First, we simply characterized the T cells as CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells. However, T cells are classified into many subsets, which were characterized as “effector” T cells, “memory” T cells, and “regulatory” T cells. In addition, other immune cells apart from T and NK cells such as tumor-associated macrophages also critically influence the immune response in a tumor microenvironment. However, the present study did not investigate these functional subsets. Investigation of the subset should be included in our future investigations. Second, we did not conduct a long-term follow-up to observe the outcomes including the recurrence rates in each group, since it is well known that the recurrence rates (particularly local recurrences) are higher in the RFA group. Despite our data seem to indicate that the RFA group had a better immune function after treatment, the recurrence rate cannot be ignored during the selection of the therapies between RFA and surgery against HCC.

Our data on the immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissues show that the number of CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, CD3+ cells, and NK cells increased immediately after RFA (Figure 2). The levels of CD4+ cells, CD3+ cells, and NK cells showed similar trends compared to those of PBMCs; however, the level of CD8+ cells showed a trend opposite to that of PBMCs. These data show that the changes of immune cells in tumor tissues are not completely consistent with those in the peripheral circulation. The pathological meaning of these changes requires further investigation.

5 Conclusion

In this study, we compared the changes of circulating immune cells between patients who underwent RFA and patients who underwent conventional hepatectomy. We also observed changes of immune cells in tumor tissues immediately after RFA. We found different trends in the RFA and surgery groups. In the RFA group, immune function after treatment kept on improving, whereas in the surgery group, postoperative immune function decreased over the first week and began to improve thereafter. Clinicians need to pay attention to these changes when they attempt to select a better treatment for patients with HCC. The data on tumor tissues were not completely consistent with that on PBMCs, and further investigation on the physiological meaning of these changes is required.

tel: +86-571-6315-7112, fax: +86-571-6334-9039

tel: +86-755-8398-2275, fax: +86-755-8398-0805

Funding information: This work was supported grants from the Scientific Project of Fuyang Hangzhou (20163501Y107). This work was also supported grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists, Type B, No. 20791025 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C, General, No. 24592157, 15k10358, 18K08991, and 21k09148).
Author contributions: Z.Y. and T.A. designed the study; Z.Y., G.L., H.Y., and T.A. performed the experiments; Z.Y. ran the statistics; Z.Y. and T.A. wrote the draft; all authors reviewed and approved the final version; T.A. supervised the study.
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.10.3322/caac.21492Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Zhu ZX, Huang JW, Liao MH, Zeng Y. Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: radiofrequency ablation versus liver resection. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(12):1075–80.10.1093/jjco/hyw134Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32.10.3322/caac.21338Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Poulou LS, Botsa E, Thanou I, Ziakas PD, Thanos L. Percutaneous microwave ablation vs radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(8):1054–63.10.4254/wjh.v7.i8.1054Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Chong CCN, Lee KF, Cheung SYS, Chu CCM, Fong AKW, Wong J, et al. Prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial of Microwave versus RadioFrequency Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (McRFA trial). HPB (Oxf). 2020;22(8):1121–7.10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Chen J, Lin Z, Lin Q, Lin R, Yan Y, Chen J. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatic dome under MR-guidance: clinical safety and efficacy. Int J Hyperth. 2020;37(1):192–201.10.1080/02656736.2020.1728397Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Chen X, Ren Z, Zhu T, Zhang X, Peng Z, Xie H, et al. Electric ablation with irreversible electroporation (IRE) in vital hepatic structures and follow-up investigation. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16233.10.1038/srep16233Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Jochems C, Schlom J. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells and prognosis: the potential link between conventional cancer therapy and immunity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2011;236(5):567–79.10.1258/ebm.2011.011007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(4):263–74.10.1038/nrc1586Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Hiraoka N. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular biology. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010;15(6):544–51.10.1007/s10147-010-0130-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Park S, Kim K, Jang JH, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Kang ES, et al. KIR alloreactivity based on the receptor-ligand model is associated with improved clinical outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: result of single center prospective study. Hum Immunol. 2015;76(9):636–43.10.1016/j.humimm.2015.09.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Sugimoto K, Kakimi K, Takeuchi H, Fujieda N, Saito K, Sato E, et al. Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation: comparison of systemic immune responses in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(6):845–53.e6.10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Hasegawa T, Kondo C, Sato Y, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Kato M, et al. Diagnostic ability of percutaneous needle biopsy immediately after radiofrequency ablation for malignant lung tumors: an initial experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(8):1187–92.10.1007/s00270-016-1324-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):252–9.10.1097/01.sla.0000171307.37401.dbSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Ierace T, Solbiati L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology. 2000;214(3):761–8.10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr02761Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Shi M, Zhang B, Tang ZR, Lei ZY, Wang HF, Feng YY, et al. Autologous cytokine-induced killer cell therapy in clinical trial phase I is safe in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(8):1146–51.10.3748/wjg.v10.i8.1146Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Zerbini A, Pilli M, Laccabue D, Pelosi G, Molinari A, Negri E, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma stimulates autologous NK-cell response. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(5):1931–42.10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Nagao M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, Aomatsu Y, Ko S, et al. The impact of interferon gamma receptor expression on the mechanism of escape from host immune surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2000;32(3):491–500.10.1053/jhep.2000.16470Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Pinato DJ, Stebbing J, Ishizuka M, Khan SA, Wasan HS, North BV, et al. A novel and validated prognostic index in hepatocellular carcinoma: the inflammation based index (IBI). J Hepatol. 2012;57(5):1013–20.10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Hadrup S, Donia M, Thor Straten P. Effector CD4 and CD8 T cells and their role in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. 2013;6(2):123–33.10.1007/s12307-012-0127-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Yang XH, Yamagiwa S, Ichida T, Matsuda Y, Sugahara S, Watanabe H, et al. Increase of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells in the liver of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2006;45(2):254–62.10.1016/j.jhep.2006.01.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Fu J, Xu D, Liu Z, Shi M, Zhao P, Fu B, et al. Increased regulatory T cells correlate with CD8 T-cell impairment and poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2328–39.10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.102Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Fu C, Jiang A. Dendritic Cells and CD8 T Cell Immunity in Tumor Microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3059.10.3389/fimmu.2018.03059Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Liao J, Xiao J, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Wang C. Effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization on cellular immune function and regulatory T cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(4):6065–71.10.3892/mmr.2015.4171Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Cata JP, Bauer M, Sokari T, Ramirez MF, Mason D, Plautz G, et al. Effects of surgery, general anesthesia, and perioperative epidural analgesia on the immune function of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25(4):255–62.10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.12.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-04-25

Revised: 2021-07-18

Accepted: 2021-08-10

Published Online: 2021-09-18

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2021-0105

Keywords for this article

small HCC; RFA; hepatectomy; immune cells; PBMCs

Creative Commons

BY 4.0