Startseite The actual state of the geodetic and cartographic resources and legislation in Poland
Artikel Open Access

The actual state of the geodetic and cartographic resources and legislation in Poland

  • Adam Doskocz EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. März 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Official data, including national geodetic and cartographic resources, are integrated in a spatial reference system. This study outlines national resources in Poland as an important part of the spatial information infrastructure in the European Community. They also provide reference data, including: geodetic control networks, base map, and topographic maps, for other resources of spatial data infrastructure. The study presents changes in the methods of sharing geo-data and technical standards for their collecting in the last few years, and additionally also presents some aspects of progressing geodetic and cartographic resources and legislation in Poland. It was noted that modern national geoportal or regional and district resources and progress, especially in the form of their standardization of presentation, enable to promote the use of spatial data in Poland and their popularization among the international community.

1 Introduction

This study presents the actual state of the resources and current legislation for surveying and other procedures of building databases of National spatial data infrastructure (NSDI) in Poland. The national databases are recorded in the State geodetic and cartographic resource portal, called as “Portal PZGiK” in Polish nomenclature [1]. Portal PZGiK is provided by the Head office of geodesy and cartography (Polish abbrev. GUGiK).

Polish state geodetic and cartographic resources co-create datasets and databases of spatial data infrastructure (SDI) [2]. For the past few years, data are created and stored for the entire country, as part of large projects co-financed by the European Union. As a result of these projects, the following data are stored for the entire country: the national registry of base geodetic, gravimetric and magnetic control networks; land and buildings registry (it will be a real estate cadaster in the future); geodetic registry of utilities; national registry of boundaries and areas of the territorial division units; national registry of geographic names; registry of localities, streets, and addresses; registry of prices and values of real estate properties; topographic objects and general geographic objects; detailed geodetic control networks; aerial and satellite images; and orthophoto maps and digital terrain models. Databases of topographic objects are useful in creating standard cartographic products on 1:500–1:5,000 scales and will be developed and managed for urban and compact built-up areas as well as rural areas intended for development. All resources include metadata describing them and the services they perform in accordance with the Act on spatial information infrastructure [2].

The national geodetic and cartographic resources in Poland were created in recent decades using different coordinate systems and methods of data acquisition.

All data are currently integrated and harmonized in the national spatial reference system [3]. The national geodetic and cartographic resources are an important part of the spatial information infrastructure in the European Community (INSPIRE) [4]. They are also reference data to other SDI resources, whose main geodetic elements include basic and detailed geodetic control networks, base maps, land and buildings registries, geodetic registries of utilities, and topographic maps [5].

2 Methods

This work presents the progress in the last few years in the methods of producing digital map data and technical standards for field surveys, and in addition, also presents some aspects of building geodetic and cartographic resources and legislation in Poland.

The national geodetic and cartographic resource in Poland is divided into three groups of centers of geodetic and cartographic documentation: the central resource, regional resources, and district resources. This is in accordance with the administrative structure of Poland in 1999, which involve [6]: 16 voivodeships, 308 powiats (districts), and 65 cities with powiat status and 2,489 gminas (including 11 gminas of the capital city of Warsaw). There are conventional structures of the resources and on-line access to geo-datasets and geo-portals (Table 1).

Table 1

Analysis of the national geodetic and cartographic resource in Poland

Conventional division of the national geodetic and cartographic resources
Central resource (1 center) Regional (voivodeship) resources (16 centers) District resources (378 centers)
Organizational units maintaining the resources
Head surveyor of the country Marshalls of Voivodeships District chief officials
Access to geo-datasets and geo-portals
Head office of geodesy and cartography (GUGiK), https://www.gov.pl/web/gugik-en/geoportal-inspire GEOPORTAL of Lower Silesian Voivodeship, https://geoportal.dolnyslask.pl/cat GUGiK’s list with the register of spatial datasets and services provided in districts, https://integracja.gugik.gov.pl/eziudp/index.php? showall
GEOPORTAL of Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, http://geoportal.infoteren.pl
GEOPORTAL of Lublin Voivodeship, https://gis.lubelskie.pl/portal
GEOPORTAL of Lubusz Voivodeship, http://www.rsipwl.lubuskie.pl
GEOPORTAL of Łódź Voivodeship, https://www.geoportal.lodzkie.pl
GEOPORTAL of Lesser Poland Voivodeship, https://miip.geomalopolska.pl
GEOPORTAL of Masovian Voivodeship, https://msip.wrotamazowsza.pl
GEOPORTAL of Opole Voivodeship, https://mapy.opolskie.pl
GEOPORTAL of Subcarpathian Voivodeship, https://mapy.wodgik.rzeszow.pl
GEOPORTAL of Podlaskie Voivodeship, https://portale.wrotapodlasia.pl/wodgik/#legend
GEOPORTAL of Pomeranian Voivodeship, https://pomorskie.eu/mapy-gis
GEOPORTAL of Silesian Voivodeship, https://geoportal.orsip.pl/aplikacje
GEOPORTAL of Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, https://portale.e-swietokrzyskie.pl/SDI2020_GUGIK
GEOPORTAL of Warmian–Masurian Voivodeship, https://atlas.warmia.mazury.pl
GEOPORTAL of Wielkopolska Voivodeship, https://www.umww.pl/rodzaje-map
GEOPORTAL of West Pomeranian Voivodeship, https://sip-mapa.wzp.pl/egis

Main topics of methodology of the research presented in this work are related to analyzing the current status of the geodetic and cartographic resources and changes in legislation. Nowadays almost all data sources are in electronic form. So, in this work, the Polish regional and district datasets (portals) and national geoportal are highlighted. Furthermore, actual information about reference systems and frames, base geodetic control networks, spatial data infrastructure, large-scale map data, and technical standards of their acquisition are also presented. International projects in the field of spatial information, including standardization works, are also discussed.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 National spatial reference system and reference frames

Polish joining the European Terrestrial Reference System and Frame was carried out by measuring 11 points by GPS in 1992 in the EUREF-POL92 campaign. In 1994–1995, another 360 points were measured for the POLREF network, which were then used as reference points for converting points of the state networks to the ETRF89. Today, according to the Polish regulations on the national spatial reference system, apart from the PL-ETRF2000 system, the PL-ETRF89 system is an applicable geodetic reference frame. The national spatial reference system in Poland consists of geodetic horizontal and vertical reference frames, coordinate systems, and projections [3]. The central point of access to the Polish part of infrastructure for spatial information in the European Community [4] is the service geoportal [5].

In the service geoportal, we can find information about the actual state of reference frames and networks. The horizontal reference frames designated as PL-ETRF2000 and PL-ETRF89 are the mathematical and physical implementation of the European Terrestrial Reference System ETRS89. The system currently in force is PL-ETRF2000 with the implementation of epoch 2011.00. The result of physical implementation of PL-ETRF2000 is the European Permanent Network (EPN) with precisely designated coordinates and changes in these coordinates with time. The transfer into the territory of Poland and maintenance of the PL-ETRF2000 geodetic reference frame is supported by the EUPOS Active Geodetic Network (ASG-EUPOS) [7]. With the current status of legislation in Poland, from 2 October 2022, fees for using the ASG-EUPOS system services have been abolished [8]. As a result, almost the entire country already covers six correction systems. In addition to ASG-EUPOS, there are also five non-governmental networks: Leica SmartNet [9], RTKNet [10], TPI NETpro [11], VRSNet [12], and NadowskiNET [13]. Progress in correction systems enables real time GNSS positioning based on data from up to 500 reference stations. The development of GNSS systems has contributed to a significant increase in the accuracy and reliability of positioning. It significantly shortened the initialization time of the mobile receiver (rover) and made it possible to perform measurements in places with difficult access to satellite signals, in the so-called city canyons (e.g., in the vicinity of tall buildings or trees).

Today geo-data has been developing in the following plane rectangular coordinate systems [3], marked by symbols: PL-LAEA, PL-LCC, PL-UTM, PL-1992, and PL-2000 (Table 2).

Table 2

Plane rectangular coordinate systems currently used in Poland

Coordinate system Projection Ellipsoid and axial meridian Application
PL-LAEA Azimuthal equal-area of the Lambert projection GRS80 ellipsoid For spatial analysis and reporting at the European level
PL-LCC Conformal (equiangular) conic of the Lambert projection GRS80 ellipsoid For maps on 1:500,000 and smaller scales
PL-UTM Transverse Mercator projection GRS80, three-zone system (a width of 6° each) with 15°, 21°, and 27° meridians axial For standard cartography works on scales from 1:10,000 to 1:250,000 (issue of marine maps and other maps dedicated to national security and defense)
PL-1992 Gauss-Krüger projection GRS80, one-zone system with 19° meridian axial For topographic maps
PL-2000 Gauss-Krüger projection GRS80, four-zone system (a width of 3° each) with 15°, 18°, 21°, and 24° meridians axial For large-scale maps

Polish vertical reference frames are marked by symbols PL-KRON86-NH and PL-EVRF2007-NH. The vertical reference frame PL-EVRF2007-NH is associated with the tide-gauge in Amsterdam and should only be used in new projects realized from 1 January, 2014. The vertical reference frame PL-KRON86-NH is associated with the tide-gauge in Kronstadt and can be used until the implementation of the PL-EVRF2007-NH frame throughout the country until 31 December, 2023. This is due to the changing regulations that amend the regulation on the state system of spatial references [14].

Consequently, actual spatial (vertical) products of the digital elevation model (DEM) and the digital surface model (DSM), in the service of geoportal, will ultimately be presented in new layers: NMT-PL-EVRF2007-NH and NMPT-PL-EVRF2007-NH. There are more interesting tools for updating and publishing spatial datasets in geoportal: LIDAR measurement data, surface visibility, visibility along the line, terrain profile, landmass volume to plane, and volume of embarkment/excavation.

3.2 Geodetic control network

As is known, the main geodetic control network consists of points of the horizontal and the vertical networks. The coordinates of the horizontal base geodetic control network points mainly are determined by GNSS surveying and the heights of the points are usually determined by geometric precise leveling.

The base fundamental geodetic horizontal control network are stations of the ASG-EUPOS reference network, which belong to the network of permanent EPN stations. The points of the base fundamental geodetic horizontal control network meet the criteria established by the subcommittee EUREF and provide an average density of 1 point per 20,000 km2. The average error of the point’s position should not exceed 0.01 m and the error of the point’s height should not be greater than 0.02 m.

The role of the receiving segment (ground control) of the ASG-EUPOS system is to collect the observational data from GNSS satellites and transfer them in real time to the calculation center. The segment consists of GNSS reference stations evenly distributed over Poland and neighboring countries [7]. According to the EUPOS standard, during the construction of the receiving segment, the following assumptions were made:

  1. the mean distance between stations is 70 km,

  2. the existing EPN and IGS stations have been incorporated into the network of reference stations,

  3. coordinates of the stations will be determined in the ETRS89 system and national systems,

  4. only precise dual-frequency GNSS receivers have been used in the reference stations,

  5. the locations of the reference stations were chosen to ensure convenient conditions for GNSS satellite observations.

Next to the ASG-EUPOS system, where the total number of stations incorporated into the system is approximately 130, there are roughly 400 Polish commercial reference stations. Reference stations are mostly located on public administration buildings of the province and district levels, research institutes, and education buildings. Real-time services and post-processing services are provided in all reference systems (Table 3).

Table 3

Services and type of measurements provided by the Polish reference networks

Type of survey method Path of data transmission Estimated precision of measurements
Kinematic (RTK/RTN) Real-time services internet GSM (GPRS) 0.03 m (horizontally)
0.05 m (vertically)
Kinematic (DGPS) 0.25–3.00 m
Static Post-processing services internet 0.01–0.10 m
Static and kinematic

Corrections from reference networks are available on a specified TCP/IP address and port where before receiving data it is necessary to enter a username and password. When the system recognizes the user, it will enable the requested corrections. In the case of network corrections with a username and password, a receiver must send an approximate position in NMEA format to calculate corrections valid for this area (where NMEA is an acronym for the National Marine Electronics Association in United States of America).

3.3 SDI

Polish (national) SDI, according to the Act on Spatial information infrastructure [2], is established, maintained and developed by 12 leading bodies. Each leading body coordinates the work and assures the implementation within the scope of a specified theme related to the 34 themes of the SDI.

The Surveyor General of Poland plays a key role in the implementation process of the Polish NSDI. The implementation body of the Surveyor General is the Head office of geodesy and cartography that prepares and submits the government programs regarding the execution of tasks in the field of NSDI. 15 of the 34 themes specified by the directive on INSPIRE are implemented by the Head office of geodesy and cartography.

Another important player is the Ministry of Environment being the active leader of the implementation measures with regard to environmental data themes. In the Ministry of Environment, 14 themes are coordinated by 10 other central offices.

Considerable financial resources are mostly spent on the construction and development of a geoportal [5], and the development of modern sets (databases) of large-scale map data (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
                  View of main information about the NSDI in Poland [5].
Figure 1

View of main information about the NSDI in Poland [5].

In the context of creating and sharing geo-data (resources), the role of the “Portal PZGiK” system (mentioned in Section 1) is important. Portal PZGiK is a specific record of resources (resource materials), and includes [15] the name of the resource material; inventory identifier of the resource material; the date of acceptance of the material into the resource; identification of the application for surveying works or the contract designation; spatial location of the area to which the resource material relates; information about data format of the resource material; and information about the creator and information on access to the resource material. In the case of excluding geo-data from the resources, information about the archival category of the resource material; the signature and date of the protocol of excluding the materials from the resources; the date of excluding the material from the resources and the date of transferring the material to the national archives, or the date shredding of the non-archival materials are recorded.

Geo-data stored in Portal PZGiK are described in the metadata profile by identifier in accordance with the applicable regulations. A registration identifier is assigned to the materials accepted into the resources, and then these materials are provided with an official clause. The resource material registration identifier consists of four parts (separated by dots), of which the first is the letter C – in the case of the central geodetic and cartographic resource (central resource), W – in the case of the voivodeship geodetic and cartographic resources (regional/voivodship resources), P – in the case of a district geodetic and cartographic resources (district/powiat resources); the second is the abbreviation PL – in the case of the central geodetic and cartographic resources, TERYT database identifier of the territorial division unit of the country (voivodship, powiat or municipal), competent for the authority keeping the record of materials – in the case of voivodeship and powiat geodetic and cartographic resources; the third is a four-digit number representing the year the material was accepted into the resources; and the fourth is the next natural number in a given calendar year.

3.4 Large-scale map data

Large-scale map data are stored in theme databases and are obligatory components of the national spatial information system. Along with other spatial data, they together co-create three thematic groups of the Polish spatial information infrastructure [2]. The large-scale base map in Poland has been created from several data sources [1,15]:

  1. a real estate cadaster database EGiB,

  2. the GESUT geodetic database of utilities,

  3. the PRG national database of boundaries and areas of territorial division,

  4. the BDPOG national database of base (first order) geodetic control networks,

  5. the BDSOG district’s databases of detailed (second order) geodetic control networks,

  6. the BDOT500 sets of topographical objects which ensure the creation of databases in the standard 1:500–1:5,000 cartographic scales.

In a modern digital form, typical large-scale cartographic products are created by compiling collected sets of data or databases. This approach facilitates the collection, maintenance, distribution, and use of the SDI. By reducing duplication, facilitating integration, and also respecting user needs, integration of data can result in savings [16,17].

We know that there are many methods of producing large-scale map data [18], which lead to different qualities of databases or maps. Accuracy and estimation of accuracy of the geo-databases guarantee that national geodetic and cartographic resources meet the relevant quality standards [19,20]. Moreover, it is essential to ensure the transparency of relations between the map producers and users and for developing trust in SDI through accuracy [21,22].

We have some new legislation for the theme of the large-scale cartographic products base (base map), called “mapa zasadnicza” in Polish [16]. In the new technical standard was characterized the database of topographic objects (Polish abbrev. BDOT500). The BDOT500 database collects information on buildings not listed in the a real estate cadaster database as well as construction objects permanently connected with the building; structures; fences; communication; land development; sports and recreation; waters; and landforms.

The attributes common to all objects of the BDOT500 database are method of obtaining information about the object, date of admission to the national geodetic and cartographic resources, and number of the technical reports with an identification of the application for surveying works or the contract designation.

The following methods of obtaining information about the localization of objects of BDOT500 database are distinguished: direct measurement in relation to the reference network (O is used for letter’s mark); vectorization (D is used for letter’s mark); photogrammetric measurement (F is used for letter’s mark); direct measurement with reference to objects, which are characterizing details with good identification in the field (M is used for letter’s mark); another method of obtaining (I is used for letter’s mark); and undefined method of acquisition (X is used for letter’s mark). Moreover, with each object of the BDOT500 database can be associated information that defines the heights of characteristic points located on the elements of these objects.

In case of the geodetic database of utilities (Polish abbrev. GESUT), practically each object must be associated with information that defines the heights of characteristic points located on the elements of these objects [23]. The heights of the characteristic points of GESUT database objects are defined in the vertical reference frame PL-EVRF2007-NH. Whereas, the location of GESUT objects is determined in the PL-2000 plane rectangular coordinate system.

The geometric representation of GESUT objects, depending on their types, can be a point, a broken line, a set of lines (multiline), a polygon (multiangle), or a set of points (multipoint). The dimensions of the sections of GESUT objects (diameter, horizontal, and vertical dimensions) are given in millimeters.

In addition to the abovementioned methods of obtaining information about the location of objects (in the BDOT500 database), in case of the GESUT database, three additional methods are distinguished: measurement with a wire detector (A is used for letter’s mark); data obtained from the administrator of the utility (B is used for letter’s mark); and documentation prepared on the so-called coordination meeting (K is used for letter’s mark). The previously developed district’s GESUT databases and the national GESUT database will be adjusted as per the applicable Regulation [23] by 31 December, 2022.

Next important geo-dataset is a real estate cadaster database (Polish abbrev. EGiB). Information with the methods of obtaining information about the localization of objects of the EGiB database also has great importance. In the light of the applicable regulations [21,24], the attribute related to the source of data about the location of the border point is of key importance by specifying the point position error, which is of fundamental importance for the correctness and reliability of the database.

In defining the cadastral parcel their boundary points, in accordance with new specification must be characterized attribute the way of obtaining data about the border point (Polish abbrev. SPD).

The boundary point takes the value of the SPD attribute as “per specification” in the case of geodetic field measurements preceded by demarcation of real estate or resumption of boundary signs and designation of boundary points; geodetic photogrammetric measurements of border points, the location of which has been previously determined, as well as photogrammetric measurements of boundary marks visible on aerial photos or on an orthophoto map as a result of their signaling before taking photos; division of real estate or merger and division of real estate, and by approved land consolidation or replacement projects. The boundary point takes the value of the SPD attribute as “unspecified” in all other cases.

However, in case of information on the compliance with the accuracy standards of the boundary point (attribute with the Polish abbrev. ISD), ISD attribute takes the value as “satisfied” when specifying the location of the point in relation to the points of the horizontal reference network, with an accuracy of not less than 0.10 m. The boundary point takes the value of the ISD attribute as “not satisfied” in all other cases.

Exchange and sharing of geo-data (where EGiB, GESUT, and BDOT500 databases are of major importance) take place in electronic form using the services network and web portals (geoportals) with the use of the files in GML format. These files have been generated from ISO TC/211 UML class diagrams and which the Head Surveyor of the Country publishes as XML Schema Definition (XSD) application schemas in the interoperability repository [25].

Sharing of geo-data takes place in reference to the regulations issued on the computerization of activities entities performing public tasks [26].

3.5 International geospatial initiatives and INSPIRE

In author’s opinion, the important issues for the NSDI are data sources, information about services, and new publication of them. Because the NSDI is strongly dependent on pre-existing infrastructures, it is necessary to present some characteristics of these infrastructures in some other regions and countries.

Initiation for Global SDI was provided by GSDI association [27]. The global association was the networking organization of academic and research institutions, government agencies, commercial geomatics companies, and national and regional associations.

The GSDI Association in 2018 was wound up as a legal entity and was used as a financial resource to support the United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM) [28]. UN-GGIM aims to address global challenges regarding the use of geospatial information, including the development agendas, and to serve as a body for global policymaking in the field of geospatial information management. The main purpose of UN-GGIM is to support the works of the global geospatial information stakeholders and assist in the coordination of relevant activities between the organizations. The current members of UN-GGIM are Geoscience and remote sensing society, International association of geodesy, International cartographic association, International federation of surveyors, and International geographical union.

International map industry association, International society for digital earth, International society of photogrammetry and remote sensing, International union of geodesy and geophysics, and the International hydrographic office and the urban and regional information systems association are observing members.

The multi-national geospatial societies organization includes representatives from all continents, which are integrated in the regional board for Africa, Asia and Pacific, South America, North America, and Europe.

In Europe, a major recent development has been the entering into force of the INSPIRE directive in May 2007, establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in Europe to support community environmental policies, and policies or activities which may have an impact on the environment. INSPIRE is based on the infrastructures for spatial information established and operated by the 28 Member States of the European Union (until 2019, the United Kingdom data displayed are from before Brexit).

The INSPIRE directive requires the commission to establish a community geo-portal and the Member States shall provide access to their infrastructures through the geo-portal as well as through any access points they themselves decide to operate. For territory of Member States of European Union to provide discovery and view services according to the INSPIRE Regulation on Network Services, a release of the INSPIRE geoportal was published for enhancing access to European spatial data [29]. The INSPIRE geoportal provides the means to search for spatial datasets and spatial data services of the officially registered discovery services of EU countries and some EFTA countries [30].

There is important the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) of the United States of America, because US NSDI is a pioneering venture in the world-scale and is provided by the Federal geographic data committee (FGDC). FGDC is an interagency committee that promotes the coordinated development, use, sharing, and dissemination of geospatial data on a national basis [31].

In 2020, US geospatial platform (GeoPlatform, [32]), operating under the authority of the Geospatial Data Act of 2018, transformed to establish its primary role which will be to discover geospatial data assets with special emphasis as the authorized source for all the official National geospatial data assets (NGDAs). The GeoPlatform provides streamlined access to NGDAs, across data themes as guided by the FGDC, and reduces data duplication.

Big datasets are produced with the support of the geological survey from US (USGS). The USGS is the science agency for the US Department of the Interior and is important for partners and customers for its natural science expertise and its vast earth and biological data holdings [33].

On the other hand, the Open geospatial consortium (OGC) plays an important role in the business sector. The OGC is an international consortium of more than 500 businesses, government agencies, research organizations, and universities driven to make geospatial (location) information and services in FAIR strategy – “Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable” [34].

The OGC activity for spatial data and their processing since 1994, what is evidence of the unique value which are collegial and efficient networking and standards producing organization. International and government organizations cooperate with the OGC both to advance the standards and to learn about them.

The leading standardization organization is the International organization for standardization (ISO). The ISO is an independent, non-governmental international organization with a membership of 167 national standard bodies.

The ISO Technical Committee 211 (ISO/TC211) has developed the ISO 19100 family of standards, named “Geographic information/Geomatics.” There is a catalogue of standards provided by the Committee ISO/TC 211 [35].

3.6 Normalization and technical standards for geo-data in Poland

In Poland, the organizational structure of the geo-data (spatial information infrastructure) was established by the transposition of the INSPIRE directive into Polish Law. Within the infrastructure, initiatives may be implemented creating regional, local, and thematic geo-portals on the condition of ensuring that they are inter-operational and in compliance with the Polish and INSPIRE implementing rules [17].

In accordance with the update of the geodetic and cartographic law [1], many of the geodetic and cartographic resources are available free of charge and without any restrictions on use [36]. Some geo-data are currently available for download as follows: digital elevation model (Polish abbrev. NMT); digital surface model (Polish abbrev. NMPT); LIDAR data; 3D building models; Orthophoto maps; data of geodetic control network points (Polish abbrev BDPOG and BDSOG); database of topographic objects; database of general geographical objects; national registry of boundaries (Polish abbrev. PRG), and national registry of geographic names.

In addition, through the integration services in most cases, data may be downloaded separately. There is land and building register database (EGiB) which allows its users to generate a land and building register map for any area of the country [37].

The utilities network databases (GESUT) contain information about the existing and designed utility lines and related infrastructure [38].

In the case of other data (topographic features) are collected in proper in BDOT500 database, which acquired its for make up a full composition of base map [39].

Much of the geo-data are shared from the Polish National Geoportal of SDI by the “Data download” section. Mostly NSDI data are distributed in Web map service (WMS) standard which complies with the specification of OGC standard. WMS standard (in version 1.3.0) and International Standard ISO 19128 are the same documents. This standard is applicable to pictorial presentation (renderings) of maps in a graphical format in accordance with the International organization for standardization and the Open geospatial consortium specifications [40,41].

As we know, the basic standardization document is a standard (the normative document), i.e., a non-legal act, but a document adopted by consensus and approved by an authorized organizational body [42].

In terms of “Geographic information,” we have ISO [43], regional standardization (CEN, European Committee for Standardization [44]) and national standardization (for example: German – Deutsches Institut für Normung, DIN [45] and Polish – Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, PKN [46]).

The normative documents are a valuable source of definition of specialist terms and therefore they deserve attention services of the German institute for standardization (DIN).

There are DIN-TERM [47] database for the terms and definitions from standards, draft standards, and specifications in the following languages: German, English, French, and Polish and the information portal developed by the German–Chinese Joint Committee of Industry and Trade [48].

In Poland, the Technical Committee No. 297 for geographic information operates as part of the work of the standardization committee (PKN). It covers all issues related to the modeling and design of data resources in spatial information systems and geo-data flow between different users and systems.

Modern knowledge in this area is included in more ISO standards of the 19100 series, adopted as European standards, as well as in the nation’s standardization documents. For example, in the years 2014–2020, Head office of geodesy and cartography in Poland implemented the POWER project [49]. POWER task was carried out by providing an information and knowledge about geo-data for public administration and for people interested in the geographic information. In addition, from 2011, the e-Guide was available, including entries from Polish (PKN) normative documents [50].

In the world today, there are three groups of data sources for acquisition of geo-data. Geo-data can be produced by different techniques:

  1. field surveying by using total station and GNSS for direct measurement from terrain surfaces and with the use of geo-radar and other apparatus for the measurement of underground features.

  2. photogrammetry by using photogrammetric images and point clouds and photogrammetric instruments and applications.

  3. cartographic digitization by using existing maps and survey notes.

In Poland, geo-data are produced by various methods [18], and in accordance with the Regulation [51] standards were set out for geodetic works involving the technology of positioning of topographic points (especially for the large-scale map data) using field measurements, photogrammetric surveying, and map digitizing (so-called cartographic surveying).

Field measurements and other methods of data acquisition should ensure adequate accuracy of geo-data points. The horizontal positioning were divided into three groups of accuracy:

  1. the 1st accuracy group, with an error not greater than 0.10 m (i.e. the so-called “well-defined” points, inter alia: marks of boundary points, marks of control network points, buildings and engineering structures, including elements of utilities available for direct survey);

  2. the 2nd accuracy group, with an error not greater than 0.30 m (inter alia: ground buildings and construction devices in the form of embankments, excavations, dikes, levees, ditches, canals, artificial lakes, hidden elements of public utilities and land development components, particularly parks, lawns, playgrounds and recreation, single trees, and sports fields);

  3. the 3rd accuracy group, with an error not greater than 0.50 m (inter alia: contours of agricultural land and soil pits for the needs of soil classification, rivers, and lakes with natural boundary lines, forestry fields on forest areas, and national parks).

In case of elevation (height) surveying, accuracy should not be less than: 0.02 m – for pipes and sewage devices; 0.05 m – for objects and equipment of building and marked pickets in the field; 0.10 m – for earthworks, flexible or electromagnetically measured underground utilities network, and unmarked pickets in the field.

In accordance with new legislation (paragraph 3. in [51]), measurements for the large-scale map geo-data are made using the methods, techniques, and technologies that ensure the above accuracies and the fulfilment of the conditions for performing the surveying works (jobs). The choice of the “right way” used for meeting the conditions for taking measurements and ensuring the required accuracy rests with the head of geodetic jobs.

4 Conclusion

Currently distribution of geo-data are opening [36], and not only is it about open access to GIS data, but major changes have recently occurred in the provision of even cadastral data [52,53].

Countries improve the management of good governance approach and contribute to the development of regional and global SDIs by creating national SDI. In Poland, elements of the national geodetic and cartographic resources are key information to build SDI in accordance with the relevant principles defined by the European Commission [54].

This work concerns the main geodetic elements of Polish SDI (i.e., base geodetic control networks, the base map, land and buildings register, geodetic register of utilities, and the topographic data), including methods of producing geo-data and technical standards for field measurements and other methods of data acquisition. Polish regional and district datasets (portals) and national geoportal, as well as international initiatives in the field of spatial information including standardization works, were also discussed in this work. Because today, it is important for building national SDI concepts to ensure the interoperability of their components for a variety of hardware–software platforms, for example, along with creating land administration system in “Fit For Purpose” strategy [55].

It should be noted that modern geodetic and cartographic resources and progress in legislation, in particular normalization work on the GML format, promote the use of spatial data in Poland and enable their popularization among the international community.

Acknowledgments

Author received no specific funding for this article and has declared that no competing interest exists.

  1. Funding information: This research was funded by the Department of Geodesy, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland, statutory research no. 29.610.001-110.

  2. Conflict of interest: Author states no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Act of Polish Parliament, Prawo geodezyjne i kartograficzne (The Geodetic and Cartographic Law). Journal of Laws on 2022, item 1846, Warsaw; 1989 (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Act of Polish Parliament, O infrastrukturze informacji przestrzennej (Spatial Information Infrastructure). Journal of Laws on 2010, item 489, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Regulation of Council of Ministers, W sprawie państwowego systemu odniesień przestrzennych (Regarding the National Spatial Reference System). Journal of Laws on 2012, item 1247, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Directive of European Parliament and of the Council, Establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Official Journal of the European Union L108 (50), Directive No. 2007/2/EC, Strasbourg; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] National Infrastructure of Spatial Data in Poland;2022. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html? gpmap = gp0&locale = en.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Administrative division of Poland; 2022. https://stat.gov.pl/en/regional-statistics/classification-of-territorial-units/administrative-division-of-poland/.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Multifunctional precise satellite positioning system ASG-EUPOS in Poland; 2022. http://www.asgeupos.pl.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Act of Polish Parliament, O usprawnieniu procesu inwestycyjnego Centralnego Portu Komunikacyjnego (On improving the investment process of the Central Communication Port). Journal of Laws on 2022, item 1846, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[9] HxGN SmartNet from Leica offers GNSS correction service in Poland; 2022. https://hxgnsmartnet.com/coverage/.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] RtkNet from Art-Geo offers GNSS correction service in Poland; 2022. https://gnss68.wixsite.com/art-geo/rtknet/.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] TPI NETpro from TPI offers GNSS correction service in Poland; 2022. https://tpinet.pl/opis-systemu/.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] VRSnet from VRSNet.pl offers GNSS correction service in Poland; 2022. http://vrsnet.pl/mapa_zasiegu.html.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] NadowskiNET from Instrumenty Geodezyjne T. Nadowski offers GNSS correction service in Poland; 2022. http://nadowski.pl/nadowski-net/opis-systemu/.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Regulation of Council of Ministers, Zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie państwowego systemu odniesień przestrzennych (Amending the ordinance on the state spatial reference system). Journal of Laws on 2019, item 2494, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Regulation of the Ministry of Development, Labor and Technology, W sprawie organizacji i trybu prowadzenia państwowego zasobu geodezyjnego i kartograficznego (Regarding the organization and management of the national geodetic and cartographic resources). Journal of Laws on 2021, item 820, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Regulation of the Ministry of Development, Labor and Technology, W sprawie bazy danych obiektów topograficznych oraz mapy zasadniczej (Regarding the database of topographic objects and base map). Journal of Laws on 2021, item 1385, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Bielecka E, Zwirowicz-Rutkowska A. Organizational aspects of spatial information infrastructure in Poland. Geod. Cartography. 2013;62(1):85–95.10.2478/geocart-2013-0006Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Doskocz A. The current state of the creation and modernization of national geodetic and cartographic resources in Poland. Open Geosci. 2016;8:579–92.10.1515/geo-2016-0059Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Dąbrowski W, Doskocz A. Estimation of accuracy of the large-scale digital topographic map data. In: Cygas D, Froehner KD, editors. Proceedings Paper of 7th International Conference on Environmental Engineering. Vol. 1–3. Vilnius; 2008. 1293–9.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Xavier EMA, Ariza-López FJ, Ureña-Cámara MA. WEB service for positional quality assessment: the WPS tier. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2015;II-3/W5. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W5-257-2015.10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W5-257-2015Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Harvey F. Improving SDI local relevance: Developing trust through accuracy. 10th International Conference for Spatial Data Infrastructure “GSDI-10”. St. Augustine; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Bressan G. Assessing the positional accuracy of perceptual landscape data: A study from Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. Trans GIS. 2021;25:642–71.10.1111/tgis.12752Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Regulation of the Ministry of Development, Labor and Technology, W sprawie geodezyjnej ewidencji sieci uzbrojenia terenu (Regarding the geodetic database of utilities). Journal of Laws on 2021, item 1374, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Regulation of the Ministry of Development, Labor and Technology, W sprawie ewidencji gruntów i budynków (Regarding the real estate cadaster]. Journal of Laws on 2021, item 1390, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Repository for interoperability with published application schemas; 2022. https://www.gov.pl/web/gugik/schematy-aplikacyjne-opublikowane-w-repozytorium-interoperacyjnosci.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Act of Polish Parliament, O informatyzacji działalności podmiotów realizujących zadania publiczne (Computerization of activities entities performing public tasks). Journal of Laws on 2020, item 346, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Association;2018. http://gsdiassociation.org.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management; 2022. https://ggim.un.org.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] INSPIRE Geoportal of Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community; 2022. http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Kleomenis K, Stathopoulos N, Tsatsaris A, Chalkias C. A survey of the Geoinformatics use for census purposes and the INSPIRE maturity within Statistical Institutes of EU and EFTA countries. Ann GIS. 2019;25(2):167–78.10.1080/19475683.2019.1595724Suche in Google Scholar

[31] U.S. NSDI from Federal Geographic Data Committee; 2018. https://www.fgdc.gov/dataandservices/.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] U.S. GeoPlatform provided by the member agencies of the Federal Geographic Data Committee; 2020. https://www.geoplatform.gov.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] The United States Geological Survey (USGS); 2022. https://www.usgs.gov/products.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC); 2022. https://www.ogc.org.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Standards by ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics; 2022. https://www.iso.org/committee/54904/x/catalogue/.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Izdebski W, Zwirowicz-Rutkowska A, Nowak da Costa J. Open data in spatial data infrastructure: the practices and experiences of Poland. Int J Digit Earth. 2021;14:1547–60. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2021.1952323.10.1080/17538947.2021.1952323Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Information page for the EGiB service; 2022 (in Polish and in English). https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/dane-ewidencyjne.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Information page for the GESUT service; 2022 (in Polish and in English). https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/uzbrojenie-terenu.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Information page for the BDOT500 service; 2022 (in Polish and in English). https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/baza-danych-obiektow-topograficznych-bdot500.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Information about WMS service from ISO the worldwide web; 2022. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:19128:ed-1:v1:en.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Information about WMS service from OGC the worldwide web; 2022. https://www.ogc.org/standards/wms.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Jaskowska M. Publiczne systemy informacyjne i źródła danych: przewodnik (Public information systems and data sources: a reference guide). Kraków: Jagiellonian Library; 2020. (in Polish with English metadata). https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/152126.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] International Organization for Standardization: homepage; 2022. https://www.iso.org.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] European Committee for Standardization: homepage; 2022. https://www.cencenelec.eu.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] German Institute for Standardization: homepage; 2022. https://www.din.de/en.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Polish Committee for Standardization: homepage; 2022. https://www.pkn.pl/en.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] DIN-TERMinology Portal: homepage; 2022. https://www.din.de/en/services/din-term/datenkategorien.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Germany-China Standards Information Portal: homepage; 2022. http://cn-e.standards-portal.de/.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] POWER project in Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography in Poland; 2021 (in Polish). http://power.gugik.gov.pl.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] e-Guide to Polish Standards in the field of geographic information; 2021 (in Polish). http://e-przewodnik.gugik.gov.pl.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Regulation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, W sprawie standardów technicznych wykonywania geodezyjnych pomiarów sytuacyjnych i wysokościowych oraz opracowywania i przekazywania wyników tych pomiarów do państwowego zasobu geodezyjnego i kartograficznego (Regarding the technical standards perform geodetic altitude and situational measurements and compilation and transmission of the results of these measurements to the national geodetic and cartographic resource). Journal of Laws on 2020, item 1429, Warsaw (in Polish).Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Bielecka E, Dukaczewski D, Janczar E. Spatial Data Infrastructure in Poland – lessons learnt from so far achievements. Geodesy and Cartography. Warsaw. 2018;67(1):3–20.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Trystuła A, Dudzińska M, Źróbek R. Evaluation of the Completeness of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Context of Cadastral Data Sharing. Land. 2020;9:272. 10.3390/land9080272.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Klimach A, Dawidowicz A, Źróbek R. The Polish land administration system supporting good governance. Land Use Policy. 2018;79:547–55.10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.003Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Dawidowicz A, Zysk E, Źróbek R. A Methodological Evaluation of the Polish Land Administration System Using the Fit‑For‑Purpose Approach. Geomat Env Eng. 2020;14(2):31–47.10.7494/geom.2020.14.2.31Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-28
Revised: 2022-12-28
Accepted: 2023-01-01
Published Online: 2023-03-03

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Diagenesis and evolution of deep tight reservoirs: A case study of the fourth member of Shahejie Formation (cg: 50.4-42 Ma) in Bozhong Sag
  3. Petrography and mineralogy of the Oligocene flysch in Ionian Zone, Albania: Implications for the evolution of sediment provenance and paleoenvironment
  4. Biostratigraphy of the Late Campanian–Maastrichtian of the Duwi Basin, Red Sea, Egypt
  5. Structural deformation and its implication for hydrocarbon accumulation in the Wuxia fault belt, northwestern Junggar basin, China
  6. Carbonate texture identification using multi-layer perceptron neural network
  7. Metallogenic model of the Hongqiling Cu–Ni sulfide intrusions, Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Insight from long-period magnetotellurics
  8. Assessments of recent Global Geopotential Models based on GPS/levelling and gravity data along coastal zones of Egypt
  9. Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
  10. Uncertainty assessment of 3D geological models based on spatial diffusion and merging model
  11. Evaluation of dynamic behavior of varved clays from the Warsaw ice-dammed lake, Poland
  12. Impact of AMSU-A and MHS radiances assimilation on Typhoon Megi (2016) forecasting
  13. Contribution to the building of a weather information service for solar panel cleaning operations at Diass plant (Senegal, Western Sahel)
  14. Measuring spatiotemporal accessibility to healthcare with multimodal transport modes in the dynamic traffic environment
  15. Mathematical model for conversion of groundwater flow from confined to unconfined aquifers with power law processes
  16. NSP variation on SWAT with high-resolution data: A case study
  17. Reconstruction of paleoglacial equilibrium-line altitudes during the Last Glacial Maximum in the Diancang Massif, Northwest Yunnan Province, China
  18. A prediction model for Xiangyang Neolithic sites based on a random forest algorithm
  19. Determining the long-term impact area of coastal thermal discharge based on a harmonic model of sea surface temperature
  20. Origin of block accumulations based on the near-surface geophysics
  21. Investigating the limestone quarries as geoheritage sites: Case of Mardin ancient quarry
  22. Population genetics and pedigree geography of Trionychia japonica in the four mountains of Henan Province and the Taihang Mountains
  23. Performance audit evaluation of marine development projects based on SPA and BP neural network model
  24. Study on the Early Cretaceous fluvial-desert sedimentary paleogeography in the Northwest of Ordos Basin
  25. Detecting window line using an improved stacked hourglass network based on new real-world building façade dataset
  26. Automated identification and mapping of geological folds in cross sections
  27. Silicate and carbonate mixed shelf formation and its controlling factors, a case study from the Cambrian Canglangpu formation in Sichuan basin, China
  28. Ground penetrating radar and magnetic gradient distribution approach for subsurface investigation of solution pipes in post-glacial settings
  29. Research on pore structures of fine-grained carbonate reservoirs and their influence on waterflood development
  30. Risk assessment of rain-induced debris flow in the lower reaches of Yajiang River based on GIS and CF coupling models
  31. Multifractal analysis of temporal and spatial characteristics of earthquakes in Eurasian seismic belt
  32. Surface deformation and damage of 2022 (M 6.8) Luding earthquake in China and its tectonic implications
  33. Differential analysis of landscape patterns of land cover products in tropical marine climate zones – A case study in Malaysia
  34. DEM-based analysis of tectonic geomorphologic characteristics and tectonic activity intensity of the Dabanghe River Basin in South China Karst
  35. Distribution, pollution levels, and health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater in the main pepper production area of China
  36. Study on soil quality effect of reconstructing by Pisha sandstone and sand soil
  37. Understanding the characteristics of loess strata and quaternary climate changes in Luochuan, Shaanxi Province, China, through core analysis
  38. Dynamic variation of groundwater level and its influencing factors in typical oasis irrigated areas in Northwest China
  39. Creating digital maps for geotechnical characteristics of soil based on GIS technology and remote sensing
  40. Changes in the course of constant loading consolidation in soil with modeled granulometric composition contaminated with petroleum substances
  41. Correlation between the deformation of mineral crystal structures and fault activity: A case study of the Yingxiu-Beichuan fault and the Milin fault
  42. Cognitive characteristics of the Qiang religious culture and its influencing factors in Southwest China
  43. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics analysis of infrastructure iron stock in China based on nighttime light data
  44. Interpretation of aeromagnetic and remote sensing data of Auchi and Idah sheets of the Benin-arm Anambra basin: Implication of mineral resources
  45. Building element recognition with MTL-AINet considering view perspectives
  46. Characteristics of the present crustal deformation in the Tibetan Plateau and its relationship with strong earthquakes
  47. Influence of fractures in tight sandstone oil reservoir on hydrocarbon accumulation: A case study of Yanchang Formation in southeastern Ordos Basin
  48. Nutrient assessment and land reclamation in the Loess hills and Gulch region in the context of gully control
  49. Handling imbalanced data in supervised machine learning for lithological mapping using remote sensing and airborne geophysical data
  50. Spatial variation of soil nutrients and evaluation of cultivated land quality based on field scale
  51. Lignin analysis of sediments from around 2,000 to 1,000 years ago (Jiulong River estuary, southeast China)
  52. Assessing OpenStreetMap roads fitness-for-use for disaster risk assessment in developing countries: The case of Burundi
  53. Transforming text into knowledge graph: Extracting and structuring information from spatial development plans
  54. A symmetrical exponential model of soil temperature in temperate steppe regions of China
  55. A landslide susceptibility assessment method based on auto-encoder improved deep belief network
  56. Numerical simulation analysis of ecological monitoring of small reservoir dam based on maximum entropy algorithm
  57. Morphometry of the cold-climate Bory Stobrawskie Dune Field (SW Poland): Evidence for multi-phase Lateglacial aeolian activity within the European Sand Belt
  58. Adopting a new approach for finding missing people using GIS techniques: A case study in Saudi Arabia’s desert area
  59. Geological earthquake simulations generated by kinematic heterogeneous energy-based method: Self-arrested ruptures and asperity criterion
  60. Semi-automated classification of layered rock slopes using digital elevation model and geological map
  61. Geochemical characteristics of arc fractionated I-type granitoids of eastern Tak Batholith, Thailand
  62. Lithology classification of igneous rocks using C-band and L-band dual-polarization SAR data
  63. Analysis of artificial intelligence approaches to predict the wall deflection induced by deep excavation
  64. Evaluation of the current in situ stress in the middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Longnüsi area of the central Sichuan Basin, China
  65. Utilizing microresistivity image logs to recognize conglomeratic channel architectural elements of Baikouquan Formation in slope of Mahu Sag
  66. Resistivity cutoff of low-resistivity and low-contrast pays in sandstone reservoirs from conventional well logs: A case of Paleogene Enping Formation in A-Oilfield, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China Sea
  67. Examining the evacuation routes of the sister village program by using the ant colony optimization algorithm
  68. Spatial objects classification using machine learning and spatial walk algorithm
  69. Study on the stabilization mechanism of aeolian sandy soil formation by adding a natural soft rock
  70. Bump feature detection of the road surface based on the Bi-LSTM
  71. The origin and evolution of the ore-forming fluids at the Manondo-Choma gold prospect, Kirk range, southern Malawi
  72. A retrieval model of surface geochemistry composition based on remotely sensed data
  73. Exploring the spatial dynamics of cultural facilities based on multi-source data: A case study of Nanjing’s art institutions
  74. Study of pore-throat structure characteristics and fluid mobility of Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin
  75. Study of fracturing fluid re-discharge based on percolation experiments and sampling tests – An example of Fuling shale gas Jiangdong block, China
  76. Impacts of marine cloud brightening scheme on climatic extremes in the Tibetan Plateau
  77. Ecological protection on the West Coast of Taiwan Strait under economic zone construction: A case study of land use in Yueqing
  78. The time-dependent deformation and damage constitutive model of rock based on dynamic disturbance tests
  79. Evaluation of spatial form of rural ecological landscape and vulnerability of water ecological environment based on analytic hierarchy process
  80. Fingerprint of magma mixture in the leucogranites: Spectroscopic and petrochemical approach, Kalebalta-Central Anatolia, Türkiye
  81. Principles of self-calibration and visual effects for digital camera distortion
  82. UAV-based doline mapping in Brazilian karst: A cave heritage protection reconnaissance
  83. Evaluation and low carbon ecological urban–rural planning and construction based on energy planning mechanism
  84. Modified non-local means: A novel denoising approach to process gravity field data
  85. A novel travel route planning method based on an ant colony optimization algorithm
  86. Effect of time-variant NDVI on landside susceptibility: A case study in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam
  87. Regional tectonic uplift indicated by geomorphological parameters in the Bahe River Basin, central China
  88. Computer information technology-based green excavation of tunnels in complex strata and technical decision of deformation control
  89. Spatial evolution of coastal environmental enterprises: An exploration of driving factors in Jiangsu Province
  90. A comparative assessment and geospatial simulation of three hydrological models in urban basins
  91. Aquaculture industry under the blue transformation in Jiangsu, China: Structure evolution and spatial agglomeration
  92. Quantitative and qualitative interpretation of community partitions by map overlaying and calculating the distribution of related geographical features
  93. Numerical investigation of gravity-grouted soil-nail pullout capacity in sand
  94. Analysis of heavy pollution weather in Shenyang City and numerical simulation of main pollutants
  95. Road cut slope stability analysis for static and dynamic (pseudo-static analysis) loading conditions
  96. Forest biomass assessment combining field inventorying and remote sensing data
  97. Late Jurassic Haobugao granites from the southern Great Xing’an Range, NE China: Implications for postcollision extension of the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean
  98. Petrogenesis of the Sukadana Basalt based on petrology and whole rock geochemistry, Lampung, Indonesia: Geodynamic significances
  99. Numerical study on the group wall effect of nodular diaphragm wall foundation in high-rise buildings
  100. Water resources utilization and tourism environment assessment based on water footprint
  101. Geochemical evaluation of the carbonaceous shale associated with the Permian Mikambeni Formation of the Tuli Basin for potential gas generation, South Africa
  102. Detection and characterization of lineaments using gravity data in the south-west Cameroon zone: Hydrogeological implications
  103. Study on spatial pattern of tourism landscape resources in county cities of Yangtze River Economic Belt
  104. The effect of weathering on drillability of dolomites
  105. Noise masking of near-surface scattering (heterogeneities) on subsurface seismic reflectivity
  106. Query optimization-oriented lateral expansion method of distributed geological borehole database
  107. Petrogenesis of the Morobe Granodiorite and their shoshonitic mafic microgranular enclaves in Maramuni arc, Papua New Guinea
  108. Environmental health risk assessment of urban water sources based on fuzzy set theory
  109. Spatial distribution of urban basic education resources in Shanghai: Accessibility and supply-demand matching evaluation
  110. Spatiotemporal changes in land use and residential satisfaction in the Huai River-Gaoyou Lake Rim area
  111. Walkaway vertical seismic profiling first-arrival traveltime tomography with velocity structure constraints
  112. Study on the evaluation system and risk factor traceability of receiving water body
  113. Predicting copper-polymetallic deposits in Kalatag using the weight of evidence model and novel data sources
  114. Temporal dynamics of green urban areas in Romania. A comparison between spatial and statistical data
  115. Passenger flow forecast of tourist attraction based on MACBL in LBS big data environment
  116. Varying particle size selectivity of soil erosion along a cultivated catena
  117. Relationship between annual soil erosion and surface runoff in Wadi Hanifa sub-basins
  118. Influence of nappe structure on the Carboniferous volcanic reservoir in the middle of the Hongche Fault Zone, Junggar Basin, China
  119. Dynamic analysis of MSE wall subjected to surface vibration loading
  120. Pre-collisional architecture of the European distal margin: Inferences from the high-pressure continental units of central Corsica (France)
  121. The interrelation of natural diversity with tourism in Kosovo
  122. Assessment of geosites as a basis for geotourism development: A case study of the Toplica District, Serbia
  123. IG-YOLOv5-based underwater biological recognition and detection for marine protection
  124. Monitoring drought dynamics using remote sensing-based combined drought index in Ergene Basin, Türkiye
  125. Review Articles
  126. The actual state of the geodetic and cartographic resources and legislation in Poland
  127. Evaluation studies of the new mining projects
  128. Comparison and significance of grain size parameters of the Menyuan loess calculated using different methods
  129. Scientometric analysis of flood forecasting for Asia region and discussion on machine learning methods
  130. Rainfall-induced transportation embankment failure: A review
  131. Rapid Communication
  132. Branch fault discovered in Tangshan fault zone on the Kaiping-Guye boundary, North China
  133. Technical Note
  134. Introducing an intelligent multi-level retrieval method for mineral resource potential evaluation result data
  135. Erratum
  136. Erratum to “Forest cover assessment using remote-sensing techniques in Crete Island, Greece”
  137. Addendum
  138. The relationship between heat flow and seismicity in global tectonically active zones
  139. Commentary
  140. Improved entropy weight methods and their comparisons in evaluating the high-quality development of Qinghai, China
  141. Special Issue: Geoethics 2022 - Part II
  142. Loess and geotourism potential of the Braničevo District (NE Serbia): From overexploitation to paleoclimate interpretation
Heruntergeladen am 22.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/geo-2022-0458/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen