Startseite Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model
Artikel Open Access

Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model

  • Ali Eid EMAIL logo , Mohamed M. Khader und Ahmed M. Megahed
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. März 2024

Abstract

This study investigates the complex dynamics of a viscoelastic fluid subjected to magneto-hydrodynamics over a stretching sheet, incorporating the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. This model is especially advantageous for explaining heat transfer in materials possessing significant thermal conductivity, where the conventional Fourier’s law might not be precise. The investigation revolves around evaluating how the thermal relaxation time affects the boundary layer and how both thermal radiation and viscous dissipation influence the thermal field. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to understanding the intricate behavior of such fluids in the presence of magnetic fields and non-Fourier heat conduction. The primary objective is to analyze the impact of viscoelasticity, magnetohydrodynamics, and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux on the flow and heat transfer characteristics over the stretching sheet. The research methodology involves the application of mathematical models and numerical techniques, particularly the use of the shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the sixth-order approximation and spectral collocation technique. The major conclusion of the study underscores the significant influence of viscoelasticity, magnetic field, and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux on the transport properties of the fluid, providing valuable insights for applications in various engineering and industrial contexts. Certain notable results arising from the current issue indicate that heat transfer is more pronounced for the viscoelastic factor and magnetic parameter, whereas the thermal relaxation parameter exhibits the opposite trend. In addition, the inclusion of the Cattaneo–Christov term enhances our comprehension of thermal behavior.

Nomenclature

a

constant ( s 1 )

B 0

strength of magnetic field ( T )

c p

specific heat ( J kg K )

Cf x

coefficient of skin friction

Ec

coefficient of viscous dissipation (Eckert number)

f

nondimensional stream function

k 0

elastic parameter ( m 2 )

k *

absorption coefficient ( m 1 )

M

magnetic parameter

Nu x

coefficient of heat transfer

Pr

Prandtl number

q r

radiative heat flux ( W s 2 )

R

radiation parameter

Re

the local Reynolds number

T

temperature of the viscoelastic fluid (K)

T

viscoelastic temperature away the sheet (K)

T w

temperature of the viscoelastic fluid beside the sheet (K)

U w

velocity of fluid due to stretching processes ( m s 1 )

u

the x -component of the velocity vector ( m s 1 )

v

the y -component of the velocity vector ( m s 1 )

x , y

Cartesian coordinates (m)

Greek symbols

μ

viscosity of viscoelastic fluid ( kg m 1 s 1 )

η

similarity coefficient

ρ

density of viscoelastic fluid ( kg m 3 )

κ

thermal conductivity of viscoelastic fluid ( W K 1 m 1 )

λ

the duration required for the heat flux to attain a state of equilibrium (s)

ν

kinematic viscosity ( m 2 s )

σ

electrical conductivity ( s m 1 )

σ *

Stefan-Boltzmann constant ( J s 1 m 2 K 4 )

Λ

viscoelastic parameter

γ

thermal relaxation parameter

θ

nondimensional temperature

Superscripts

w

condition along the sheet

differentiation with respect to η

condition at the ambient

1 Introduction

In contemporary times, non-Newtonian fluids have become notably important in various industrial applications. Many synthetic fluids, as well as certain naturally occurring ones, display complex rheological properties, with viscoelasticity emerging as a significant fluid attribute. Over the last six decades, computational rheology, utilizing computational fluid dynamics to study fluids with non-Newtonian rheology, has matured into a well-established field. This area of study not only enhances our understanding of various physical phenomena but also provides valuable insights for engineering design purposes. Computational rheology involves conducting flow simulations using fluids characterized by non-Newtonian models, which are more intricate than the broadly defined Newtonian fluids. Given the complex nature of the constitutive equations, specialized techniques are necessary to tackle the inherent numerical challenges, even when the simulations are focused on fluid mechanics aspects [1]. Viscoelastic fluids represent a specific instance of the model proposed by Rivlin and Ericksen [2]. It possesses a diverse array of practical applications in various real-world contexts, encompassing fields such as computing, medicine, the polymer industry, engineering, and the automotive sector. Distinct from typical Newtonian fluids, these specialized substances referred to as viscoelastic fluids showcase an extra property of elasticity alongside their viscosity, enabling them to both retain and release shear energy. The previous studies [36] encompass a handful of studies concerning models for viscoelastic fluids with non-Newtonian behavior.

Heat transfer entails the exchange of thermal energy between two or more objects or systems. The process of heat transfer takes place when there is a temperature disparity either between different bodies or within distinct sections of a single body. This mechanism finds extensive use in technological and industrial contexts, such as cooling electronic devices, managing nuclear reactor temperatures, power generation, and various other applications [7]. Heat transfer occurs through various distinct mechanisms. The highly successful heat conduction model introduced by Fourier [8] and the mass diffusion model put forth by Fick [9] have garnered considerable interest due to their interchangeable characteristics and the omission of inconsistencies that arise in different scenarios within these theories. However, a significant drawback of these models is that they result in a parabolic energy equation, implying that any initial disturbance would be immediately felt by the system being analyzed. This phenomenon is commonly mentioned in the literature as the paradox of heat conduction. To address this constraint, Cattaneo [10] amended this principle by introducing an additional term involving relaxation time. Subsequently, Christov [11] enhanced the Cattaneo model by substituting the conventional derivative with Oldroyd’s upper-convected derivative. He formulated a unified energy equation for the governing issue, leading to the creation of the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. The importance of the Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model played a pivotal role in instigating more fundamental researches within this particular field of study [12,13].

Extensive research has been conducted on ordinary and partial differential equations (ODEs and PDEs, respectively) due to their extensive applicability across various domains, including fluid mechanics, viscoelasticity, biology, physics, and engineering. Because of the prevalence of ODEs and PDEs in these fields, a substantial amount of research has been dedicated to comprehending their properties, developing efficient solution methods, and unraveling their implications for diverse phenomena and systems. Consequently, considerable focus has been directed toward obtaining solutions for physically significant ODEs [14]. The utilization of the spectral collocation method (SCM) employing sixth-kind shifted Chebyshev polynomials ( CP 6 s ) [15] was applied to quantitatively address the nonlinear ODEs governing the physical scenario. This research stands out as the pioneering instance of numerically solving the provided model using the proposed novel numerical approach.

Building upon previous investigations, many researchers have effectively employed diverse numerical methodologies in this specific field. One such technique is the SCM, which stands as a versatile approximate analytical approach for deriving approximate solutions to differential equations. The SCM presents several merits in tackling such issues, as the Chebyshev coefficients of the solution can be easily computed using any accessible numerical software, resulting in superior computational efficiency. Chebyshev polynomials, recognized orthogonal polynomials defined within the interval [ 1 , 1 ] , are commonly utilized due to their advantageous characteristics in approximating functions. Furthermore, this approach is distinguished by its remarkable precision, rendering it a dependable numerical method. With its capacity to ensure precise calculations and dependable results, the technique guarantees swift convergence rates and straightforward application in a variety of problem contexts, spanning finite and infinite domains, as demonstrated in previous works [1619]. It exhibits rapid convergence, enabling accurate solutions to be attained with minimal terms, effectively conserving computational resources and time. Furthermore, its numerical stability mitigates the risk of errors, even when grappling with intricate or demanding issues. In addition, the method’s flexibility permits its utilization not only in differential equations but also in optimization problems, establishing its value across a wide array of domains. This method has been extensively utilized in different problems [2023] and has played a significant role in conducting crucial research owing to these benefits.

The thermal radiation, viscous dissipation, and magnetic field have garnered considerable interest within the realm of thermal non-Newtonian fluids. Researchers and scholars have focused their attention on these phenomena, recognizing their importance in understanding the complex behavior of such fluids. The aim of incorporating these innovative aspects into the study of viscoelastic fluids is to enhance the precision in representing the transport properties of the fluid. The inclusion of the Cattaneo and Christov heat flux phenomenon becomes crucial in this context, especially when dealing with a surface that is subject to linear stretching. These considerations contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate thermal characteristics of viscoelastic fluids, thereby improving the accuracy of models used to describe their behavior. Furthermore, the application of the sixth-order shifted Chebyshev polynomials approximation and the utilization of the spectral collocation technique represent innovative elements in this investigation as an effective numerical approach. This numerical technique is utilized to visually demonstrate the influence of these characteristics using table and graphs.

2 Problem modeling

We examine the consistent two-dimensional movements of non-Newtonian viscoelastic fluids over a linearly extending surface. The Cartesian coordinate system is utilized in a manner where the x -axis aligns with the stretching surface, while the y -axis is perpendicular to it (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               Description of the proposed viscoelastic model.
Figure 1

Description of the proposed viscoelastic model.

We are examining flow models that pertain to both second-grade fluids and elastico-viscous fluids. Let ( u , v ) denote the components of velocity in the ( x , y ) directions, respectively. Let’s represent the linear velocity along the x -direction as U w ( x ) = a x , where the constant a signifies the stretching velocity of the surface. The analysis incorporates the phenomenon of viscous dissipation, which holds considerable importance in fluid dynamics, thermal sciences, and various engineering domains. The significance of viscous dissipation lies in its ability to enhance precise and comprehensive assessments, thereby contributing to improved design, optimization, and innovation in diverse applications. In addition, the study delves into heat transfer mechanisms, exploring thermal radiation and employing the Cattaneo–Christov theory for heat flux. Given these assumptions, the governing equations relevant to the boundary layer can be articulated as follows [24]:

(1) u x + v y = 0 ,

(2) u u x + v u y = ν 2 u y 2 k 0 u 3 u x y 2 u y 2 u x y + u x 2 u y 2 + v 3 u y 3 σ B 0 2 ρ u ,

(3) u T x + v T y = κ ρ c p 2 T y 2 + 1 ρ c p μ u y 2 k 0 ρ u 2 u x y u y 2 u y 2 v y + v 2 u y 2 u y 1 ρ c p q r y λ u u x T x + v v y T y + u 2 2 T x 2 + v 2 2 T y 2 + 2 u v 2 T x y + u v x T y + v u y T x ,

where ν = μ ρ represents the kinematic viscosity, μ stands for dynamic viscosity, ρ denotes the density of the viscoelastic fluid, c p represents specific heat, and k 0 is the elastic parameter. In this context, a positive value of k 0 indicates an elastico-viscous fluid, while a negative k 0 corresponds to a second-grade fluid. A k 0 value of zero is associated with a Newtonian fluid. T is the viscoelastic temperature, κ is the thermal conductivity coefficient, and λ stands for the time it takes for the heat flux to reach a state of relaxation. In addition, it is important to note that when λ equals zero, Eq. (3) simplifies to the conventional Fourier’s law of heat conduction. B 0 is the strength of the proposed magnetic field, and σ is the electric conductivity. Moreover, q r represents the radiative heat flux, and its magnitude depends on the temperature as described by the subsequent relationship [25]:

(4) q r = 4 σ * 3 k * T 4 y .

Clearly that the formula for q r involves constants: the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (symbolized as σ * ) and the absorption coefficient (denoted as k * ). These attributes hold considerable influence over the radiative heat flux and its interactions with the system. In addition, we make the assumption that the temperature disparity within the flow of the viscoelastic fluid enables us to express the term T 4 through a linear combination of temperatures. By employing Taylor’s series and focusing solely on terms of minimal order, we reach the subsequent formulation [26]:

(5) T 4 3 T 4 4 T 3 T 1 .

The boundary conditions under consideration are as follows:

(6) u = U w ( x ) = a x , v = 0 , T = T w , at y = 0 ,

(7) u 0 , u y 0 , T T , as y ,

where T w is the sheet temperature and T is the ambient temperature. In this context, it is necessary to validate that the movement is solely a result of the wall being stretched and the absence of any velocity in the free stream, as indicated by the condition u 0 as y . The utilization of the following similarity transformations, expressed in relation to the functions f and θ , along with the introduction of the similarity variable η is expounded upon in the subsequent manner to solve the governing equations [27]:

(8) η = y a ν , θ ( η ) = T T T w T , u = a x f ( η ) , v = a ν f ( η ) .

It is evident that the expressions for u and v as presented in Eq. (8) fulfill the conditions set forth in Eq. (1). Now, Eqs. (2) and (3) are converted into the subsequent formats by using Eq. (8):

(9) f f 2 + f f Λ ( 2 f f f 2 f f ( 4 ) ) M f = 0 ,

(10) 1 + R Pr θ + f θ γ ( f f θ + f 2 θ ) + Ec f [ ( 1 3 Λ f ) f + Λ f f ] = 0 .

Likewise, the adjusted boundary conditions can be detailed in the following manner:

(11) f ( 0 ) = 0 , f ( 0 ) = 1 , θ ( 0 ) = 1 ,

(12) f 0 , f 0 , θ 0 , as η .

It is evident that our physical system is entirely controlled by the viscoelastic parameter Λ = a k 0 ρ μ , the magnetic number M = σ B 0 2 a ρ , the thermal relaxation parameter γ = a λ , the Eckert number Ec = U w 2 c p ( T w T ) , the thermal radiation parameter R = 16 σ * T 3 3 κ k * and the Prandtl number Pr = μ c p κ . Once more, the prior framework adequately captures the actions of the non-Newtonian viscoelastic fluid Λ , defined by the existence of the viscoelastic parameter. Moreover, the omission of this parameter ( Λ = 0 ) allows us to streamline our proposed system into a Newtonian model.

3 Industrial and engineering measures

The crucial role of the local skin-friction coefficient C f x Re x 1 2 and the local Nusselt number Nu x Re x 1 2 lies in their ability to forecast fluid flow patterns and heat transfer rates, rendering them essential in diverse engineering and industrial contexts. Hence, it is crucial to finalize our investigation by examining how the governing parameters affect both of these measures. These measures can be presented in a dimensionless format in the subsequent manner:

C f x Re x 1 2 = ( ( 1 3 Λ f ( 0 ) ) f ( 0 ) + Λ f ( 0 ) f ( 0 ) ) , Nu x Re x 1 2 = θ ( 0 ) ,

where Re x = U w x ν is the local Reynolds number.

4 Procedure of solution using SCM

4.1 Some properties of the CP 6 s and approximate the solution

In this subsection, we are going to present some of the main definitions and properties of the shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the sixth kind ( CP 6 s) to suit their use in solving the problem presented here for study in the domain [ 0 , ] .

The CP 6 s, T k ( z ) are orthogonal polynomials on [ 1 , 1 ] under the following formula [28,29]:

1 1 w ( z ) T i ( z ) T j ( z ) d z = λ i δ i j ,

where the weight function w ( z ) = z 2 1 z 2 , but the factor λ i and the Kronecker delta δ i j are defined by

(13) λ i = π 2 2 i + 3 1 , i even; i + 3 i + 1 , i odd. δ i j = 1 , i = j ; 0 , i j .

The polynomials T k ( z ) can be generated by using the following recurrence relation:

T k ( z ) = z T k 1 ( z ) ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) + k ( k + 1 ) + 1 4 k ( k + 1 ) T k 2 ( z ) , T 0 ( z ) = 1 , T 1 ( z ) = z , k = 2 , 3 , .

The shifted CP 6 s on [ 0 , ] , > 0 can be defined with the help of the linear transformation z = ( 2 ) η 1 as T k ( η ) = T k ( ( 2 ) η 1 ) [30]. We can construct these polynomials { T k ( η ) } k = 0 by the following recursive formula:

T k ( η ) = ( ( 2 ) η 1 ) T k 1 ( η ) ( 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) + k ( k + 1 ) + 1 4 k ( k + 1 ) T k 2 ( η ) , k = 2 , 3 , .

where T 0 ( η ) = 1 , T 1 ( η ) = ( 2 ) η 1 . These polynomials hold the following orthogonality relation:

0 ( 2 η ) 2 η η 2 T i ( η ) T j ( η ) d η = 0.25 4 λ i δ i j ,

where λ i and δ i j are defined in (12). The analytic formula of T k ( η ) is given by [30,31]:

(14) T k ( η ) = i = 0 k c i , k η i ,

where

c i , k = 2 2 i k i ( 2 i + 1 ) ! × r = i + 1 2 k 2 ( 1 ) 0.5 k + r + i ( 2 r + i + 1 ) ! ( 2 r i ) ! , if k even , r = i 2 k 1 2 2 ( 1 ) 0.5 ( k + 1 ) + r + i ( r + 1 ) ( 2 r + i + 2 ) ! ( k + 1 ) ( 2 r i + 1 ) ! , if k odd .

The function ψ ( η ) L 2 [ 0 , ] may be defined as an infinite series sum as follows:

(15) ψ ( η ) = = 0 ζ T ( η ) .

We take the first ( m + 1 ) -terms of (15) to obtain the following approximation form:

(16) ψ m ( η ) = = 0 m ζ T ( η ) .

The approximate formula of the derivative for the approximated function ψ m ( η ) may be defined as in the following theorem.

Theorem 1

Let ψ ( η ) be approximated by CP 6 s as (16) n > 0 , then:

(17) ψ m ( n ) ( η ) i = n m k = n i ζ i χ i , k , n η k n ,

where c i , k is defined in (14), but χ i , k , n is given by:

(18) χ i , k , n = Γ ( k + 1 ) Γ ( k + 1 n ) c i , k .

Proof

Since the differentiation is a linear operation, we have:

(19) ψ m ( n ) ( η ) = i = 0 m ζ i D ( n ) ( T i ( η ) ) .

Now, we have:

(20) D ( n ) T i ( η ) = 0 , i = 0 , 1 , , n 1 .

Also, for i = n , n + 1 , , m , we can obtain

(21) D ( n ) ( T i ( η ) ) = k = n i c i , k D ( n ) η k = k = n i c i , k Γ ( k + 1 ) Γ ( k + 1 n ) η k n .

A combination of Eqs. (19)–(21) leads to the desired result.□

The following theorem is devoted to investigating some details about the error of the approximation by using the CP 6 s.

Theorem 2

Consider the approximation ψ m ( η ) of the function ψ ( η ) , which is defined in (21). Then the truncation error ε m = ψ ( η ) ψ m ( η ) is estimated as follows:

ε m 2 m .

Proof

For the proof, one can be referred to [21].□

4.2 Approximate the solution with a numerical scheme

We will implement the SCM to solve the systems (9) and (10) numerically. We approximate f ( η ) and θ ( η ) by f m ( η ) and θ m ( η ) , respectively, as follows:

(22) f m ( η ) = = 0 m a T ( η ) , θ m ( η ) = = 0 m b T ( η ) .

By using Eqs. (9), (10), and (22) and the formula (17), we can obtain:

(23) f m ( 3 ) ( η ) ( f m ( 1 ) ( η ) ) 2 + f m ( η ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) Λ ( 2 f m ( 1 ) ( η ) f m ( 3 ) ( η ) ( f m ( 2 ) ( η ) ) f m ( η ) f m ( 4 ) ( η ) ) M f m ( 1 ) ( η ) = 0 ,

(24) 1 + R Pr θ m ( 2 ) ( η ) + f m ( η ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η ) γ ( f m ( η ) f m ( 1 ) ( η ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η ) + ( f m ( η ) ) 2 θ m ( 2 ) ( η ) ) + Ec f m ( 2 ) ( η ) [ ( 1 3 Λ f m ( 1 ) ( η ) ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) + Λ f m ( η ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) ] = 0 .

The previous Eqs. (23) and (24) will be collocated at m of nodes η p as follows:

(25) f m ( 3 ) ( η p ) ( f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) ) 2 + f m ( η p ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) Λ ( 2 f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) f m ( 3 ) ( η p ) ( f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ) f m ( η p ) f m ( 4 ) ( η p ) ) M f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) = 0 ,

(26) 1 + R Pr θ m ( 2 ) ( η p ) + f m ( η p ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η p ) γ ( f m ( η p ) f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η p ) + ( f m ( η p ) ) 2 θ m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ) + Ec f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) [ ( 1 3 Λ f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) + Λ f m ( η p ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ] = 0 .

In addition, the boundary conditions (11) and (12) can be expressed by substituting from Eq. (22) in Eqs. (11) and (12) to find the following equations:

(27) = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) a = 0 , = 0 m a T ( 0 ) = 1 , = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) b = 1 ,

(28) = 0 m a T ( η ) = 0 , = 0 m a T ( η ) = 0 , = 0 m 2 b = 0 .

Eqs. (25)–(28) construct a system of 2 ( m + 1 ) algebraic equations. With the help of the following cost functions, the previous system defined can be expressed as a constrained optimization problem as follows:

(29) CF 1 = p = 0 m f m ( 3 ) ( η p ) ( f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) ) 2 + f m ( η p ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) Λ ( 2 f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) f m ( 3 ) ( η p ) ( f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ) f m ( η p ) f m ( 4 ) ( η p ) ) M f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) ,

(30) CF 2 = p = 0 m 1 + R Pr θ m ( 2 ) ( η p ) + f m ( η p ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η p ) γ ( f m ( η p ) f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η p ) + ( f m ( η p ) ) 2 θ m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ) + Ec f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) [ ( 1 3 Λ f m ( 1 ) ( η p ) ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) + Λ f m ( η p ) f m ( 2 ) ( η p ) ] ,

with the constraints (Cons):

(31) Cons = = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) a + = 0 m a T ( 0 ) 1 + = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) b 1 + = 0 m a T ( η ) + = 0 m a T ( η ) + = 0 m 2 b .

The constrained optimization problem (29)–(31) can be solved by using the Penalty Leap Frog procedure [32] for the coefficients a , b , = 0 , 1 , , m . This in turn leads us to formulate the approximate solution by substitution in the form (22).

Here, to achieve a complete numerical study with simulation, we define the following residual error functions REF f ( η ) and REF θ ( η ) , for f ( η ) and θ ( η ) , respectively, as follows:

(32) REF f ( m , η ) = f m ( 3 ) ( η ) ( f m ( 1 ) ( η ) ) 2 + f m ( η ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) Λ ( 2 f m ( 1 ) ( η ) f m ( 3 ) ( η ) ( f m ( 2 ) ( η ) ) f m ( η ) f m ( 4 ) ( η ) ) M f m ( 1 ) ( η ) ,

(33) REF θ ( m , η ) = 1 + R Pr θ m ( 2 ) ( η ) + f m ( η ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η ) γ ( f m ( η ) f m ( 1 ) ( η ) θ m ( 1 ) ( η ) + ( f m ( η ) ) 2 θ m ( 2 ) ( η ) ) + Ec f m ( 2 ) ( η ) [ ( 1 3 Λ f m ( 1 ) ( η ) ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) + Λ f m ( η ) f m ( 2 ) ( η ) ] .

5 Discussion on results

Here, we discuss the results of the Eqs. (9) and (10) of a system of coupled nonlinear ODEs were computed numerically using the given method with the help of the Mathematica software version 11. This section pertains to the changes observed in velocity and temperature profiles as specific values of significant parameters are chosen. These parameters encompass the viscoelastic parameter Λ , magnetic number M , thermal relaxation parameter γ , thermal radiation parameter R , Eckert number Ec, and Prandtl number Pr. In this context, we are examining fluids with positive values of the elastico-viscous parameter ( Λ > 0 ). This objective is fulfilled by means of Figures 25. Figure 2 illustrates how the velocity f ( η ) and temperature θ ( η ) fields are influenced by changes in the viscoelastic parameter Λ . Raising the viscoelastic parameter leads to heightened interfacial forces exerted on the fluid. Consequently, the fluid’s velocity profile might be impacted, potentially resulting in a decline as the viscoelastic parameter values increase. Furthermore, the temperature distribution and the thickness of the thermal boundary layer experience augmentation as this parameter is increased. The decrease in velocity as the viscoelastic parameter increases can be physically explained by the intensified intermolecular interactions and elevated internal friction within the fluid. These factors contribute to an enhanced resistance to the flow of the fluid.

Figure 2 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           f
                           ′
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        f^{\prime} \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           Λ
                        
                        \Lambda 
                     
                   and (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           Λ
                        
                        \Lambda 
                     
                  .
Figure 2

(a) f ( η ) for various Λ and (b) θ ( η ) for various Λ .

Figure 3 demonstrates the influence of the magnetic parameter on both f ( η ) and θ ( η ) , which can potentially cause a decrease in the velocity profile, particularly near the magnetic source. This occurs because the magnetic field has the ability to impede fluid movement, diminishing its kinetic energy and subsequently leading to a decline in the velocity field. Furthermore, the temperature profile displays an escalated trend as the magnetic parameter values increase. In a physical sense, when the magnetic parameter increases, the strength of the magnetic field becomes stronger, which in turn creates more opposition to the fluid’s movement. This heightened resistance contributes to a greater dissipation of energy as heat, ultimately leading to elevated temperatures within the fluid. Moreover, an in-depth understanding of the influence of the magnetic field on the heat transfer mechanism can be substantiated by comprehensively reviewing relevant research studies in this domain [3337].

Figure 3 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           f
                           ′
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        f^{\prime} \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                   and (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  .
Figure 3

(a) f ( η ) for various M and (b) θ ( η ) for various M .

Figure 4(a) investigates the influence of variations in the thermal radiation parameter R on the temperature profile θ ( η ) of a viscoelastic fluid. This figure demonstrates that as the thermal radiation parameter increases, the temperature experiences a swift rise, causing the curve to become more pronounced. Consequently, due to this particular behavior of the thermal radiation parameter, the thermal boundary layer thickness expands. Figure 4(b) depicts the impact of the thermal relaxation parameter γ . A higher thermal relaxation parameter indicates that the fluid’s response to temperature changes is gradual. Consequently, as the thermal relaxation parameter increases, there is a decrease in the temperature profile. This effect also leads to a reduction in the thickness of the thermal boundary layer. It is important to note that when the thermal relaxation parameter γ equals zero, it results in the simplification of the heat flux expression to the conventional Fourier’s law. Physically, the reduction in temperature with an elevation in the thermal relaxation parameter can be ascribed to the extended duration required for the material to achieve thermal equilibrium. With an increase in the thermal relaxation parameter, the material demonstrates a sluggish response to temperature changes, resulting in an overall decrease in temperature.

Figure 4 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           R
                        
                        R
                     
                   and (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various 
                     
                        
                        
                           γ
                        
                        \gamma 
                     
                  .
Figure 4

(a) θ ( η ) for various R and (b) θ ( η ) for various γ .

Conversely, Figure 5(a) examines the impact of the Eckert number Ec on temperature expansion θ ( η ) . The observable trend is that the temperature profile rises with an increase in Eckert number values. This phenomenon arises from the conversion of the fluid’s kinetic energy into thermal energy through viscous dissipation, resulting in a steeper temperature gradient. In the examination of heat transfer, the Prandtl number holds significant importance, especially within the realm of convective heat transfer. Fluids with elevated Prandtl numbers, like honey or oil, possess greater momentum diffusivity compared to thermal diffusivity. This characteristic implies that these fluids are more resistant to the transfer of heat than to the transfer of momentum. Consequently, in Figure 5(b), the temperature profile θ ( η ) experiences a decrease as the Prandtl number Pr values increase. The physical explanation for the decrease in temperature with an increase in the Prandtl number lies in the intensified thermal diffusion relative to momentum diffusion. As the Prandtl number increases, heat is conducted more efficiently compared to the momentum transfer, leading to a decrease in overall temperature.

Figure 5 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various Ec and (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              (
                              
                                 η
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   for various Pr.
Figure 5

(a) θ ( η ) for various Ec and (b) θ ( η ) for various Pr.

Table 1 presents a visual representation of how the skin friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number alter in response to changes in the governing parameters. This table showcases the relationship between these coefficients and the factors that exert control over them, providing a comprehensive overview of their variations. This table demonstrates that as the magnetic parameter values are heightened, they wield an influence over the fluid dynamics in the vicinity of the stretching sheet. Consequently, this alteration in magnetic parameter values leads to a reduction in the local Nusselt number, accompanied by an elevation in the skin friction coefficient. Furthermore, the augmentation of viscoelastic parameter values has a discernible impact on the behavior of the viscoelastic fluid adjacent to the sheet’s surface. This outcome manifests in a reduction of the skin friction coefficient and a concurrent escalation in the coefficient governing the rate of heat transport. Similarly, the tabulated data illustrates that the local Nusselt number exhibits higher values when considering the Prandtl number and the thermal relaxation parameter, whereas contrasting trends are observed for the thermal radiation parameter and the Eckert number.

Table 1

Values of Re x 1 2 Nu x and Re x 1 2 C f x for various values of Λ , M , R , γ , Ec, and Pr

Λ M R γ Ec Pr Re x 1 2 C f x Re x 1 2 Nu x
0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 1.22475 0.693361
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.829815
0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.16850 0.930349
0.2 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.32087 0.906245
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.829815
0.2 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.47407 0.76485
0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 1.05559
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.82982
0.2 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.69331
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.79748
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.82982
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.88328
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 3.0 0.40374 0.93427
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 3.0 0.40374 0.67315
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 1.0 3.0 0.40374 0.41203
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.40374 0.40193
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.40374 0.82982
0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 7.0 0.40374 1.35334

6 Concluding remarks

To sum up, the investigation of viscoelastic fluids considering factors like viscous dissipation and the magnetohydrodynamics effects with the inclusion of Cattaneo and Christov heat flux presents a intricate and demanding challenge within the field of fluid mechanics. The Cattaneo and Christov heat flux model addresses the nonlocal nature of heat transfer, which becomes significant at diminutive length scales and elevated thermal gradients. Incorporating the effect of viscous dissipation into the heat equation allows for the conversion of mechanical energy into heat caused by the viscosity of the fluid. Frequently, viscous dissipation can manifest as a significant source of heat generation and may play a crucial role in the overall heat transfer process. The key findings from this research are outlined as follows:

  1. The presence of magnetic fields can bring about increased organization in the fluid near the surface, resulting in a more streamlined flow pattern and a higher skin friction coefficient.

  2. Enhancing the thermal relaxation parameter and the Prandtl number results in decreased temperature distribution and thinner thermal boundary layers. In contrast, raising the thermal radiation parameter and the Eckert number leads to increased temperature distribution and thicker thermal boundary layers.

  3. Elevating both the Eckert number and the thermal radiation parameter can also result in a reduction of the heat transfer rate.

  4. Raising the viscoelastic parameter value can lead to a higher fluid property density, resulting in a consequent decrease in the skin friction coefficient.

  5. Potential future research directions emerging from this study could include the investigation of hybrid viscoelastic nanofluids under diverse thermal property conditions, representing a significant focal point. Also, we will try to present a more study of convergence of the proposed method, as well as control the efficiency and accuracy. Finally, the stochastic numerical computing approaches will use as promising alternative for solving such problems.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research through the project number IFP-IMSIU-2023106. The authors also appreciate the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) for supporting and supervising this project.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization: A.E. and M.M.K.; methodology: M.M.K. and A.M.M.; software: M.M.K. and A.M.M.; validation: A.E. and M.M.K.; formal analysis: A.E. and M.M.K.; investigation: M.M.K. and A.M.M.; resources: A.E. and M.M.K.; data curation: M.M.K. and A.M.M.; writing-original draft preparation: A.E. and M.M.K.; writing–review and editing: M.M.K. and A.M.M.; visualization: A.E. and M.M.K.; supervision: A.E. and M.M.K.; project administration: A.E. and M.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Rajagopal KR, Na TY, Gupta AS. Flow of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Rheol Acta. 1984;23:213–5. 10.1007/BF01332078Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Rivlin RS, Ericksen JL. Stress-deformation relations for isotropic materials. in: Collected Papers of RS Rivlin. vol. I and II. 1997. p. 911–1013. 10.1007/978-1-4612-2416-7_61Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Farooq M, Khan MI, Waqas M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. MHD stagnation point flow of viscoelastic nanofluid with non-linear radiation effects. J Mol Liq. 2016;221:1097–103. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.077Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Hayat T, Waqas M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A. Mixed convection flow of viscoelastic nanofluid by a cylinder with variable thermal conductivity and heat source/sink. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2016;26:214–34. 10.1108/HFF-02-2015-0053Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Megahed AM. Slip flow and variable properties of viscoelastic fluid past a stretching surface embedded in a porous medium with heat generation. J Central South Univ. 2016;23:991–9. 10.1007/s11771-016-3147-4Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Macha M, Kishan N. Boundary layer flow of viscoelastic nanofluid over a wedge in the presence of buoyancy force effects. Comput Thermal Sci Int J. 2017;9:257–67. 10.1615/ComputThermalScien.2017016742Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Sheikholeslami M, Ellahi R. Three dimensional mesoscopic simulation of magnetic field effect on natural convection of nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2015;89:799–808. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.110Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Fourier JBJ. Analytical theory of heat. Firmin Didot. 1822;1:499–508.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Fick A. Ueber diffusion. Ann Phys. 1855;170:59–86. 10.1002/andp.18551700105Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Cattaneo C. Sulla conduzione del calore. Atti Semin Mat Fis Univ Modena Reggio Emilia. 1948;3:83–101. Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Christov CI. On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell-Cattaneo model of finite-speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun. 2009;36:481–6. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Muhammad Y, Masood K, Awais A, Mahnoor S. Flow of Oldroyd-B nanofluid in non-inertial frame inspired by Cattaneo-Christov theory. Waves Random Complex Media. 2023;5:1–12. 10.1080/17455030.2023.2172626Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Muhammad Y, Masood K. Dynamics of unsteady axisymmetric of Oldroyd-B material with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions subject to Cattaneo-Christov heat transfer. Alexandria Eng J. 2023;74(1):665–74. 10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.065Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Khader MM. Numerical study for unsteady Casson fluid flow with heat flux using a spectral collocation method. Indian J Phys. 2021;96:777–86. 10.1007/s12648-021-02025-0Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Abdelghany EM, Abd-Elhameed WM, Moatimid GM, Youssri YH, Atta AG. A Tau approach for solving time-fractional heat equation based on the shifted sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials. Symmetry. 2023;15:1–16. 10.3390/sym15030594Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Boyd JP. Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods, 2nd Ed. New York, USA: Dover; 2000. Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Saad KM, Khader MM, Gomez-Aguilar JF, Dumitru B. Numerical solutions of the fractional Fisheras type equations with Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative by using spectral collocation methods. Chaos. 2019;29:1–5. 10.1063/1.5086771Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Khader MM, Saad KM. A numerical approach for solving the problem of biological invasion (fractional Fisher equation) using Chebyshev spectral collocation method. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2018;110:169–77. 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.03.018Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Khader MM, Babatin MM. Numerical treatment for solving fractional SIRC model and influenza A. Comput Appl Math. 2014;33(3):543–56. 10.1007/s40314-013-0079-6Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Atta AG, Moatimid GM, Youssri YH. Generalized Fibonacci operational collocation approach for fractional initial value problems. Int J Appl Comput Math. 2019;5:1–9. 10.1007/s40819-018-0597-4Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Atta AG, Abd-Elhameed WM, Moatimid GM, Youssri YH. Advanced shifted sixth-kind Chebyshev tau approach for solving linear one-dimensional hyperbolic telegraph type problems. Math Sci. 2023;23:415–29. 10.1007/s40096-022-00460-6Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Abd-Elhameed WM, Ali A, Youssri YH. Newfangled linearization formula of certain nonsymmetric Jacobi polynomials: numerical treatment of nonlinear Fisheras equation. J Funct Spaces. 2023;2023:6833404. 10.1155/2023/6833404Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Youssri YH. A new operational matrix of Caputo fractional derivatives of Fermat polynomials: An application for solving the Bagley-Torvik equation. Adv Differ Equ. 2017;2017:73. 10.1186/s13662-017-1123-4Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Han S, Zheng L, Li, C, Zhang X. Coupled flow and heat transfer in viscoelastic fluid with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model. Appl Math Lett. 2014;38:87–93. 10.1016/j.aml.2014.07.013Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Bardos C, Golse F, Perthame B. The Rosseland approximation for the radiative transfer equations. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1987;40(6):691–721. 10.1002/cpa.3160400603Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Megahed AM. Variable viscosity and slip velocity effects on the flow and heat transfer of a power-law fluid over a non-linearly stretching surface with heat flux and thermal radiation. Rheologica Acta. 2012;51:841–74. 10.1007/s00397-012-0644-8Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Abbas W, Megahed AM. Powell-Eyring fluid flow over a stratified sheet through porous medium with thermal radiation and viscous dissipation. AIMS Math. 2021;6:13464–79. 10.3934/math.2021780Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Snyder MA. Chebyshev methods in numerical approximation. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1966. Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Mason JC, Handscomb DC. Chebyshev polynomials. New York, NY, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall, CRC; 2003. 10.1201/9781420036114Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Abd-Elhameed WM, Youssri YH. Sixth-kind Chebyshev spectral approach for solving fractional differential equation. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2019;20:191–203. 10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0118Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Atta A, Abd-Elhameed WM, Moatimid G, Youssri YH. A fast Galerkin approach for solving the fractional Rayleigh-Stokes problem via sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials. Mathematics. 2022;10:1843. 10.3390/math10111843Suche in Google Scholar

[32] El-Hawary HM, Salim MS, Hussien HS. Ultraspherical integral method for optimal control problems governed by ordinary differential equations. J Glob Optim. 2003;25:283–303. 10.1023/A:1022463810376Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Taqi AMS, Nadeem A, Wasfi S. Comparative study of Casson hybrid nanofluid models with induced magnetic radiative flow over a vertical permeable exponentially stretching sheet. AIMS Math. 2022;7(12):20545–64. 10.3934/math.20221126Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Nadeem A, Nadeem S, Khan MN. Numerical analysis of unsteady magnetized micropolar fluid flow over a curved surface. J Thermal Anal Calorimetry. 2022;147:6449–59. 10.1007/s10973-021-10913-0Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Saeed EA, Muhammad AZR, Faiza G, Zuhaib AK, Ammara M, Muhammad S. Numerical computing paradigm for investigation of micropolar nanofluid flow between parallel plates system with impact of electrical MHD and hall current. Arabian J Sci Eng. 2021;46:645–62. 10.1007/s13369-020-04736-8Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Imran HQ, Muhammad A, Saeed EA, Muhammad NA, Muhammad AZR, Sayer OA, et al. Influence of radially magnetic field properties in a peristaltic flow with internal heat generation: Numerical treatment. Case Studies Thermal Eng. 2021;26:101019. 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101019Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Saeed EA, Muhammad A, Robicca S, Muhammad AZR. Novel design of intelligent Bayesian networks to study the impact of magnetic field and Joule heating in hybrid nanomaterial flow with applications in medications for blood circulation. Tribology Int. 2023;189:108914. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108914Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-10-24
Revised: 2024-01-24
Accepted: 2024-02-27
Published Online: 2024-03-30

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the channel of panel-type radiator with semi-detached inclined trapezoidal wing vortex generators
  3. Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid
  4. High-speed mid-infrared Mach–Zehnder electro-optical modulators in lithium niobate thin film on sapphire
  5. Numerical analysis of dengue transmission model using Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative
  6. Mononuclear nanofluids undergoing convective heating across a stretching sheet and undergoing MHD flow in three dimensions: Potential industrial applications
  7. Heat transfer characteristics of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles scattered in sodium alginate-based non-Newtonian nanofluid over a stretching/shrinking horizontal plane surface
  8. The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis
  9. Growth, characterization, and anti-bacterial activity of l-methionine supplemented with sulphamic acid single crystals
  10. A numerical analysis of the blood-based Casson hybrid nanofluid flow past a convectively heated surface embedded in a porous medium
  11. Optoelectronic–thermomagnetic effect of a microelongated non-local rotating semiconductor heated by pulsed laser with varying thermal conductivity
  12. Thermal proficiency of magnetized and radiative cross-ternary hybrid nanofluid flow induced by a vertical cylinder
  13. Enhanced heat transfer and fluid motion in 3D nanofluid with anisotropic slip and magnetic field
  14. Numerical analysis of thermophoretic particle deposition on 3D Casson nanofluid: Artificial neural networks-based Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm
  15. Analyzing fuzzy fractional Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holm equations with the Atangana–Baleanu operator
  16. Bayesian estimation of equipment reliability with normal-type life distribution based on multiple batch tests
  17. Chaotic control problem of BEC system based on Hartree–Fock mean field theory
  18. Optimized framework numerical solution for swirling hybrid nanofluid flow with silver/gold nanoparticles on a stretching cylinder with heat source/sink and reactive agents
  19. Stability analysis and numerical results for some schemes discretising 2D nonconstant coefficient advection–diffusion equations
  20. Convective flow of a magnetohydrodynamic second-grade fluid past a stretching surface with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model
  21. Analysis of the heat transfer enhancement in water-based micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow over a vertical flat surface
  22. Microscopic seepage simulation of gas and water in shale pores and slits based on VOF
  23. Model of conversion of flow from confined to unconfined aquifers with stochastic approach
  24. Study of fractional variable-order lymphatic filariasis infection model
  25. Soliton, quasi-soliton, and their interaction solutions of a nonlinear (2 + 1)-dimensional ZK–mZK–BBM equation for gravity waves
  26. Application of conserved quantities using the formal Lagrangian of a nonlinear integro partial differential equation through optimal system of one-dimensional subalgebras in physics and engineering
  27. Nonlinear fractional-order differential equations: New closed-form traveling-wave solutions
  28. Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model
  29. Some transforms, Riemann–Liouville fractional operators, and applications of newly extended M–L (p, s, k) function
  30. Magnetohydrodynamic water-based hybrid nanofluid flow comprising diamond and copper nanoparticles on a stretching sheet with slips constraints
  31. Super-resolution reconstruction method of the optical synthetic aperture image using generative adversarial network
  32. A two-stage framework for predicting the remaining useful life of bearings
  33. Influence of variable fluid properties on mixed convective Darcy–Forchheimer flow relation over a surface with Soret and Dufour spectacle
  34. Inclined surface mixed convection flow of viscous fluid with porous medium and Soret effects
  35. Exact solutions to vorticity of the fractional nonuniform Poiseuille flows
  36. In silico modified UV spectrophotometric approaches to resolve overlapped spectra for quality control of rosuvastatin and teneligliptin formulation
  37. Numerical simulations for fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled Korteweg–de Vries systems
  38. Substituent effect on the electronic and optical properties of newly designed pyrrole derivatives using density functional theory
  39. A comparative analysis of shielding effectiveness in glass and concrete containers
  40. Numerical analysis of the MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet through a Darcy porous medium: Modeling and simulation
  41. Analytical and numerical investigation for viscoelastic fluid with heat transfer analysis during rollover-web coating phenomena
  42. Influence of variable viscosity on existing sheet thickness in the calendering of non-isothermal viscoelastic materials
  43. Analysis of nonlinear fractional-order Fisher equation using two reliable techniques
  44. Comparison of plan quality and robustness using VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer
  45. Radiative nanofluid flow over a slender stretching Riga plate under the impact of exponential heat source/sink
  46. Numerical investigation of acoustic streaming vortices in cylindrical tube arrays
  47. Numerical study of blood-based MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity and cross-diffusion
  48. Fractional view analytical analysis of generalized regularized long wave equation
  49. Dynamic simulation of non-Newtonian boundary layer flow: An enhanced exponential time integrator approach with spatially and temporally variable heat sources
  50. Inclined magnetized infinite shear rate viscosity of non-Newtonian tetra hybrid nanofluid in stenosed artery with non-uniform heat sink/source
  51. Estimation of monotone α-quantile of past lifetime function with application
  52. Numerical simulation for the slip impacts on the radiative nanofluid flow over a stretched surface with nonuniform heat generation and viscous dissipation
  53. Study of fractional telegraph equation via Shehu homotopy perturbation method
  54. An investigation into the impact of thermal radiation and chemical reactions on the flow through porous media of a Casson hybrid nanofluid including unstable mixed convection with stretched sheet in the presence of thermophoresis and Brownian motion
  55. Establishing breather and N-soliton solutions for conformable Klein–Gordon equation
  56. An electro-optic half subtractor from a silicon-based hybrid surface plasmon polariton waveguide
  57. CFD analysis of particle shape and Reynolds number on heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid in heated tube
  58. Abundant exact traveling wave solutions and modulation instability analysis to the generalized Hirota–Satsuma–Ito equation
  59. A short report on a probability-based interpretation of quantum mechanics
  60. Study on cavitation and pulsation characteristics of a novel rotor-radial groove hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
  61. Optimizing heat transport in a permeable cavity with an isothermal solid block: Influence of nanoparticles volume fraction and wall velocity ratio
  62. Linear instability of the vertical throughflow in a porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid with variable gravity effect
  63. Thermal analysis of generalized Cattaneo–Christov theories in Burgers nanofluid in the presence of thermo-diffusion effects and variable thermal conductivity
  64. A new benchmark for camouflaged object detection: RGB-D camouflaged object detection dataset
  65. Effect of electron temperature and concentration on production of hydroxyl radical and nitric oxide in atmospheric pressure low-temperature helium plasma jet: Swarm analysis and global model investigation
  66. Double diffusion convection of Maxwell–Cattaneo fluids in a vertical slot
  67. Thermal analysis of extended surfaces using deep neural networks
  68. Steady-state thermodynamic process in multilayered heterogeneous cylinder
  69. Multiresponse optimisation and process capability analysis of chemical vapour jet machining for the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer: Unveiling the morphology
  70. Modeling monkeypox virus transmission: Stability analysis and comparison of analytical techniques
  71. Fourier spectral method for the fractional-in-space coupled Whitham–Broer–Kaup equations on unbounded domain
  72. The chaotic behavior and traveling wave solutions of the conformable extended Korteweg–de-Vries model
  73. Research on optimization of combustor liner structure based on arc-shaped slot hole
  74. Construction of M-shaped solitons for a modified regularized long-wave equation via Hirota's bilinear method
  75. Effectiveness of microwave ablation using two simultaneous antennas for liver malignancy treatment
  76. Discussion on optical solitons, sensitivity and qualitative analysis to a fractional model of ion sound and Langmuir waves with Atangana Baleanu derivatives
  77. Reliability of two-dimensional steady magnetized Jeffery fluid over shrinking sheet with chemical effect
  78. Generalized model of thermoelasticity associated with fractional time-derivative operators and its applications to non-simple elastic materials
  79. Migration of two rigid spheres translating within an infinite couple stress fluid under the impact of magnetic field
  80. A comparative investigation of neutron and gamma radiation interaction properties of zircaloy-2 and zircaloy-4 with consideration of mechanical properties
  81. New optical stochastic solutions for the Schrödinger equation with multiplicative Wiener process/random variable coefficients using two different methods
  82. Physical aspects of quantile residual lifetime sequence
  83. Synthesis, structure, IV characteristics, and optical properties of chromium oxide thin films for optoelectronic applications
  84. Smart mathematically filtered UV spectroscopic methods for quality assurance of rosuvastatin and valsartan from formulation
  85. A novel investigation into time-fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations within Aboodh transform
  86. Homotopic dynamic solution of hydrodynamic nonlinear natural convection containing superhydrophobicity and isothermally heated parallel plate with hybrid nanoparticles
  87. A novel tetra hybrid bio-nanofluid model with stenosed artery
  88. Propagation of traveling wave solution of the strain wave equation in microcrystalline materials
  89. Innovative analysis to the time-fractional q-deformed tanh-Gordon equation via modified double Laplace transform method
  90. A new investigation of the extended Sakovich equation for abundant soliton solution in industrial engineering via two efficient techniques
  91. New soliton solutions of the conformable time fractional Drinfel'd–Sokolov–Wilson equation based on the complete discriminant system method
  92. Irradiation of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses by a 365 nm UV lamp
  93. Inflation and the principle of equivalence
  94. The use of a supercontinuum light source for the characterization of passive fiber optic components
  95. Optical solitons to the fractional Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar equation with time-dependent coefficients
  96. A promising photocathode for green hydrogen generation from sanitation water without external sacrificing agent: silver-silver oxide/poly(1H-pyrrole) dendritic nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole film
  97. Photon balance in the fiber laser model
  98. Propagation of optical spatial solitons in nematic liquid crystals with quadruple power law of nonlinearity appears in fluid mechanics
  99. Theoretical investigation and sensitivity analysis of non-Newtonian fluid during roll coating process by response surface methodology
  100. Utilizing slip conditions on transport phenomena of heat energy with dust and tiny nanoparticles over a wedge
  101. Bismuthyl chloride/poly(m-toluidine) nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole: Photocathode for green hydrogen generation
  102. Infrared thermography based fault diagnosis of diesel engines using convolutional neural network and image enhancement
  103. On some solitary wave solutions of the Estevez--Mansfield--Clarkson equation with conformable fractional derivatives in time
  104. Impact of permeability and fluid parameters in couple stress media on rotating eccentric spheres
  105. Review Article
  106. Transformer-based intelligent fault diagnosis methods of mechanical equipment: A survey
  107. Special Issue on Predicting pattern alterations in nature - Part II
  108. A comparative study of Bagley–Torvik equation under nonsingular kernel derivatives using Weeks method
  109. On the existence and numerical simulation of Cholera epidemic model
  110. Numerical solutions of generalized Atangana–Baleanu time-fractional FitzHugh–Nagumo equation using cubic B-spline functions
  111. Dynamic properties of the multimalware attacks in wireless sensor networks: Fractional derivative analysis of wireless sensor networks
  112. Prediction of COVID-19 spread with models in different patterns: A case study of Russia
  113. Study of chronic myeloid leukemia with T-cell under fractal-fractional order model
  114. Accumulation process in the environment for a generalized mass transport system
  115. Analysis of a generalized proportional fractional stochastic differential equation incorporating Carathéodory's approximation and applications
  116. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part II
  117. Numerical study on flow and heat transfer performance of a spiral-wound heat exchanger for natural gas
  118. Study of ultrasonic influence on heat transfer and resistance performance of round tube with twisted belt
  119. Numerical study on bionic airfoil fins used in printed circuit plate heat exchanger
  120. Improving heat transfer efficiency via optimization and sensitivity assessment in hybrid nanofluid flow with variable magnetism using the Yamada–Ota model
  121. Special Issue on Nanofluids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications
  122. Exact solutions of a class of generalized nanofluidic models
  123. Stability enhancement of Al2O3, ZnO, and TiO2 binary nanofluids for heat transfer applications
  124. Thermal transport energy performance on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids and their implementation in concentrated solar aircraft wings
  125. Studying nonlinear vibration analysis of nanoelectro-mechanical resonators via analytical computational method
  126. Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate
  127. Two-phase numerical simulation of thermal and solutal transport exploration of a non-Newtonian nanomaterial flow past a stretching surface with chemical reaction
  128. Natural convection and flow patterns of Cu–water nanofluids in hexagonal cavity: A novel thermal case study
  129. Solitonic solutions and study of nonlinear wave dynamics in a Murnaghan hyperelastic circular pipe
  130. Comparative study of couple stress fluid flow using OHAM and NIM
  131. Utilization of OHAM to investigate entropy generation with a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity model in hybrid nanofluid using the radiation phenomenon
  132. Slip effects on magnetized radiatively hybridized ferrofluid flow with acute magnetic force over shrinking/stretching surface
  133. Significance of 3D rectangular closed domain filled with charged particles and nanoparticles engaging finite element methodology
  134. Robustness and dynamical features of fractional difference spacecraft model with Mittag–Leffler stability
  135. Characterizing magnetohydrodynamic effects on developed nanofluid flow in an obstructed vertical duct under constant pressure gradient
  136. Study on dynamic and static tensile and puncture-resistant mechanical properties of impregnated STF multi-dimensional structure Kevlar fiber reinforced composites
  137. Thermosolutal Marangoni convective flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids with elastic deformation and heat source
  138. Investigation of convective heat transport in a Carreau hybrid nanofluid between two stretchable rotatory disks
  139. Single-channel cooling system design by using perforated porous insert and modeling with POD for double conductive panel
  140. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part I
  141. Pulsed excitation of a quantum oscillator: A model accounting for damping
  142. Review of recent analytical advances in the spectroscopy of hydrogenic lines in plasmas
  143. Heavy mesons mass spectroscopy under a spin-dependent Cornell potential within the framework of the spinless Salpeter equation
  144. Coherent manipulation of bright and dark solitons of reflection and transmission pulses through sodium atomic medium
  145. Effect of the gravitational field strength on the rate of chemical reactions
  146. The kinetic relativity theory – hiding in plain sight
  147. Special Issue on Advanced Energy Materials - Part III
  148. Eco-friendly graphitic carbon nitride–poly(1H pyrrole) nanocomposite: A photocathode for green hydrogen production, paving the way for commercial applications
Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2024-0001/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen