Home Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid
Article Open Access

Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid

  • Saima Noor EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 22, 2024

Abstract

With particular attention to the effects of an electromagnetically induced resistive force on homogeneous–heterogeneous processes and the related homogeneous heat effects, the Casson fluid flow towards a stretching sheet at the magnetohydrodynamic stagnation point is investigated in detail. In this situation, the Laplace approach helps decipher the subtleties of the first-order kinetics governing the fluid’s motion. Notably, the fluid dynamics are largely determined by the homogeneous behaviour expected in the surrounding environment, forming a strong correlation between catalyst temperature on the wall and surface activity. Using conventional differential systems, our analysis gains a great deal from the modified Laplace decomposition method, which allows non-linear systems to be computed and examined. In order to improve understanding, numerical findings are included, and graphs are skillfully used to examine the subtleties of different factors. The in-depth examination also includes the complicated patterns of concentration and temperature, providing insightful information on the intricate interactions between forces and effects in this dynamic system.

Nomenclature

D a

diffusion coefficient of A

D b

diffusion coefficient of B

B 0

magnetic field

u

free-flowing velocity

T

fluid temperature

Ω p

heat capacity

λ

fluid relaxation time

α

thermal diffusivity

Δ H h

uniform heat response

δ A

coefficient of stoichiometry

ρ

fluid density

Ω p

heat capacity

k T

thermal conductivity

T

ambient fluid temperature

Ω

ambient fluid concentration

a , b

positive constant

u , v

velocity components in the x and y directions

A , B

reactants

k 1 , k 2

reactions constants

Pr

Prandtl number

Sc

Schmidt number

γ

homogeneous parameter

1 Introduction

Flow experiments pertaining to non-linear materials are crucial in applied science and engineering. Many rheological models have been proposed to investigate the flow and heat transmission features. One of these materials is Casson fluid [1]. This model is widely used for various materials, including blood, chocolate, and honey. This model and some suspension flows have a close relationship. There is yield stress in this model. When tangential stress is less than the elastic limit, Casson fluid acts as if it were solid, and when stress exceeds yield stress, it begins to deform. Mehta et al. [2] investigated the Casson fluid behaviour under stress limit in a homogenous porous material enclosed by a tube was conducted. Hayat et al. [3] investigated the importance of Casson fluid flowing in a wavy channel with heat transmission and chemical reaction. The mixed convection effects were researched by Yasmin and Nisar [4] in Casson nano liquid with the chemical reaction. Another study [5] examines the non-Newtonian Casson fluid time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) boundary layer flow along an infinite vertical plate under ramping temperature and concentration conditions. The work tackles situations in which uniform wall temperature assumptions may not be sufficient in real-world settings such as electronic circuits, nuclear events, and materials processes.

Numerous chemically reactive systems, such as burning, biological structures, and catalysis, include homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions. Particularly puzzling is the relationship between homogeneous and heterogeneous processes. Without a catalyst, a reaction cannot occur; several reactions might not happen or develop slowly. Additionally, chemical reactions are employed in the production of ceramics, dispersion and fog formation, hydrometallurgical processes, food processing, and polymers.

This study covers a wide range of heat transfer and fluid dynamics scenarios. Jayavel et al. [6] use a viscoelastic hybrid nano fluid containing magnesium oxide (MgO) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles to study the combined effects of electric and Coriolis forces on heat transfer and rotating boundary layer flow. An empirical model is used to determine thermal conductivity. Akram et al. [7] emphasize using a modified Buongiorno model to peristaltically control electro-osmotic pumping of Ag–Au water-based hybrid nanofluids in a porous medium. In [8], gold nanoparticles are highlighted, and potential applications in the treatment of disease are explored through the introduction of a mathematical model for the two-dimensional motion of a pair stress nano fluid in an asymmetric microchannel. Latha et al. [9] explore the complex interplay in stagnation flow across the Hiemenz plane between MHD non-Newtonian fluid flow and thermal transfer. This research investigates the impact of a transverse static magnetic field on a ternary hybrid nanofluid coating through both theoretical and numerical analysis. When taken as a whole, these studies offer thorough insights into various fluidic and thermal conditions with possible uses in numerous sectors. Additionally, the MHD flow phenomena are important for both industry and physiology. As a result, the thermal performance enhancement of nanofluid with MHD was analyzed by Nawaz et al. [10]. Tain et al. [11] investigate radiation-induced two-dimensional unstable MHD boundary layer flow features. Hayat et al. [12] analyze the cumulative effects of heat radiation, convective conditions, and chemical reactions in flow caused by curved surfaces. Mahanthesh et al. [13] studied Soret and Dufour’s effects in a three-dimensional MHD flow. An investigation of fluid flow with liquefaction and chemical change is conducted by Hayat et al. [14]. Flow caused by the elongated surface is used in many scientific processes, such as creating paper and fibres from polymer expulsion, drawing copper wires, and die forging and expulsion. A stretched sheet of metal that acts as a heat conductor was investigated by Cortell [15]. Aspects of heat transmission in magneto nanofluid flow across a stretchy, non-linear surface were addressed by Saleem et al. [16]. Hayat et al. [17] also analyzed heat generation/saturation, mixed convection, and double stratification in a thixotropic fluid flow state. Yasmeen et al. [18] described a magnetic dipole to control ferrofluid flow caused by a surface with a non-linear stretch. MHD nanomaterial flow and heat transmission across a stretchy radioactive surface were investigated by Sheikholeslami et al. [19]. Different aspects of MHD natural convection have been studied by many researchers. The Darcy–Forchheimer flow of a magneto-couple stress fluid across an inclined exponentially stretching sheet is theoretically simulated in [20]. For non-Newtonian features, it uses the Stokes pair stress model to investigate two thermal boundary conditions. The goal of the study is to provide a succinct understanding of the relationships between heat transfer, magneto-couple stress, and fluid flow for real-world uses. The flow and heat transmission properties of magneto-nanofluids over a curved stretched surface are studied numerically [21]. Because of their exceptional electrical and thermal conductivity, nanofluids have a lot of potential uses in industry and engineering. The study uses a convective boundary condition on the curved surface and accounts for the effects of viscous dissipation. The Keller-box approach [22] is used to get numerical solutions, which reveal two distinct solutions for opposing flows and one unique solution for aiding flows. Insights into the intricate interactions between stretching, permeability, and outside pressures on the fluid dynamics and thermal behaviour close to the stretched vertical permeable sheet are provided by the analysis, which focuses on comprehending the flow and heat transfer characteristics. Analysis of steady two-dimensional stagnation-point flow of an incompressible viscous fluid shows in relation to a flat deformable sheet stretched in its own plane at a velocity proportional to the distance from the stagnation point. Based on the link between the stretching velocity and the free stream velocity, the analysis reveals the production of both an inverted boundary layer and a boundary layer. The investigation also looks at the temperature distribution within the boundary layer and calculates the surface heat flux, which provides information about the fluid’s thermal behaviour close to the deformable sheet [23]. Dong et al. [24] investigate the impact of magnetic fields on the sedimentation process of non-magnetic particles in ferrofluids. Sun et al. [25] focus on the rheological behaviour of shear-thickening fluids using carbon fibre and silica nanocomposites. Zheng et al. [26] delve into turbulent skin-friction drag reduction using annular dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. Additionally, Yin et al. [27] present a threat assessment methodology for aerial targets, employing an improved GRA-TOPSIS approach and three-way decisions in mathematical biosciences and engineering.

Scientists have developed many analytical and numerical techniques to address the inherent non-linearity present in a broad range of physical processes. The Laplace transform is frequently an efficient way to deal with linear systems, especially ones that are susceptible to periodic or discontinuous driving inputs. However, the complexity resulting from non-linearity makes the Laplace transform insufficient for dealing with non-linear equations. A number of strategies have been proposed recently to deal with these non-linear characteristics, including the Adomian decomposition method [28], which later led to the development of the Laplace decomposition algorithm, which was first presented by Khuri [29] and then further developed by Zheng [26]. This study aims to clarify the complex interaction between homogeneous and heterogeneous processes in the field of MHD by analyzing the dynamics of Casson fluid over a stretched surface. The Casson fluid because of its non-Newtonian properties provides a more accurate depiction of specific fluid behaviours. The use of Casson fluid allows for a detailed examination of the resulting phenomena. Our analysis specifically focuses on the impacts on velocity, distribution of temperature, composition of materials, drag forces, and rates of heat transfer. The governing partial differential equations that describe these occurrences are converted into a set of ordinary differential equations using suitable mathematical transformations. The objective of this research endeavour is to uncover fundamental knowledge about the complexities of MHD Casson fluid flow. This will lead to a more profound comprehension of the related physical phenomena and offer significant implications for practical uses.

2 Geometry of the flow problem

MHD steady flow is considered under the chemical reaction of Casson fluid. Compared to the magnetic field being applied, there is no consideration for the magnetic field induction. Furthermore, there is no electric field. The velocity of the sheet is extended in the direction of the x-axis ( u w = a x ) . The reaction in the isothermal cubic autocatalytic is assumed as follows [28]:

(1) A + 2 B 3 B , rate = k 1 Ω a Ω b 2 .

The overall system’s temperature is constant. Isothermal reaction on a reactant surface is represented by

(2) A B , rate = k 2 Ω a .

where ( A ) and ( B ) stand for the autocatalysis of chemical processes. ( Ω a ) and ( Ω b ) represent reaction concentrations, respectively, and the constants involved in the reaction are represented by ( k 1 ) and ( k 2 ) . The reactant ( B ) is expected to be present, has a constant concentration, and is absent from the outer/external flow to satisfy physical necessities. Also assumed that reactant ( A ) concentration has a constant value ( Ω a ) . the relationship (1) shows that the reaction rate at the boundary layer’s external edge is zero. Under the preceding presumption, thehe boundary layer equations, along with boundary conditions, are as follows (Figure 1):

(3) u x + v y = 0 ,

(4) u u x + v u y = u e d u e d x + v 1 + 1 β 2 u y 2 + σ B 0 2 ρ ( u e u ) ,

(5) u T x + v T y = α 2 T x 2 + 2 T y 2 + Δ H h δ A k 1 Ω a Ω b 2 ρ Ω p ,

(6) u Ω a x + v Ω a y = D A 2 Ω a x 2 + 2 Ω a y 2 k 1 Ω a Ω b 2 ,

(7) u Ω b x + v Ω b y = D B 2 Ω b x 2 + 2 Ω b y 2 + k 1 Ω a Ω b 2 ,

(8) u = u w = a x , v = 0 , k T T y = k 2 Ω a Δ H s δ A , D A Ω a y = D B Ω b y = k 2 Ω a , y = 0 ,

(9) u = u a x , v 0 , T T , Ω a Ω , Ω b 0 , y .

Figure 1 
               A schematic flow diagram.
Figure 1

A schematic flow diagram.

Here, the velocity components are represented by u and v in the direction of x and y, respectively. Casson parameter is represented by ( β ) , free-flowing velocity ( u ) , period for fluid relaxation ( λ ) , magnetic field strength ( B ) , temperature ( T ) , thermal diffusivity ( α ) , uniform heat response ( Δ H h ) , and coefficient of stoichiometry ( δ A ) for species miscellaneous reactions are all factors that must be considered. Constant for dimensions are ( a ) and ( b ) . ( ρ ) fluid density, ( Ω p ) heat capacity, ( k T ) thermal conductivity, ( T ) ambient fluid temperature, and ( Ω ) ambient fluid concentration. ( D a ) and ( D b ) diffusion coefficients of two species, ( A ) and ( B ) . For brevity, we define

η = a v y , ϕ = a v x f ( η ) , θ ( η ) = T T Δ T , g ( η ) = Ω a Ω , h ( η ) = Ω b Ω ,

(10) u = ϕ y = a x f ( η ) , v = ϕ x = a v f ( η ) , Δ T = T w T ,

Eqs. (4)–(7) take the form when the incompressibility requirement is frequently satisfied

(11) 1 + 1 β f + f f f 2 M 2 ( f A ) + A 2 = 0 ,

(12) 1 Pr θ + f θ + γ g h 2 = 0 ,

(13) 1 Sc g + f g K g h 2 = 0 ,

(14) D Sc h + f h + K g h 2 = 0 ,

with boundary conditions,

(15) f ( 0 ) = 0 , f ( 0 ) = 1 , f ( ) = A ,

(16) θ ( 0 ) = K T g ( 0 ) , θ ( ) = 0 ,

(17) g ( 0 ) = D h ( 0 ) = K s g ( 0 ) , g ( ) = 1 , h ( ) = 0 .

Here, Casson parameter is represented by ( β ) , where M σ β 0 2 ρ a is a Prandtl number, a parameter of the magnetism. The parameter for homogeneous reaction heat is γ = k 1 Δ H h δ A 1 ρ Ω p Ω 3 a Δ T where Schmidt number is Sc = v D A , K = k 1 Ω 2 a stand for the homogeneous strength of reaction parameter, the ratio of diffusivity is D = D B D A , A = b / a represents ratio component, K T = k s Ω k T Δ T Δ H S δ A a v 1 2 represents thermal conductivity in a homogenous reaction, and K S = k s D A a v 1 2 represents heterogeneous reaction component strength. We made the assumption that, ( A ) and ( B ) were comparable; ( D a ) and ( D b ) are then equal to unity.

(18) g ( η ) + h ( η ) = 1 .

3 Methodology

To explain the enhanced Laplace decomposition method’s solution technique, we examine the traditional method of solving initial-value issues for non-linear, third-order, non-homogeneous ordinary differential equations, which is provided [30,31]

(19) f + b 1 ( η ) f + b 2 ( η ) f + b 3 ( η ) f = g ( η ) ,

(20) f ( 0 ) = α , f ( 0 ) = β , f ( 0 ) = γ .

We relate the Laplace transform on both sides of Eq. (19), while rendering to Laplace decomposition method [24,26]

(21) s 3 L [ f ] s 2 α s β γ + L [ b 1 ( η ) f ] + L [ b 2 ( η ) f ] + L [ b 3 ( η ) f ] = L [ g ( η ) ] .

Using the differentiation property of the Laplace transform, we obtain

(22) L [ f ] = α s + β s 2 + γ s 3 + 1 s 3 L [ g ( η ) ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( η ) f + b 2 ( η ) f + b 3 ( η ) f ] .

The proposed approach acknowledges the result of the procedure

(23) f = n = 0 f n .

The non-linear terms can be expressed as follows:

(24) g ( η ) = n = 0 A n ,

where ( A n ) are Adomian polynomials of f 0 , f 1 , f 2 , f 3 , , f n which can be defined as

(25) A n = 1 n ! d m d λ n N i = 0 λ i f i z ¯ = 0 , n = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ,

Applying Eqs. (23) and (24) in Eq. (22), we get

(26) L n = 0 f n = α s + β s 2 + γ s 3 + 1 s 3 L n = 0 A n 1 s 3 L b 1 ( η ) n = 0 f n N + b 2 ( η ) n = 0 f n + b 3 ( η ) n = 0 f n .

After calculating on both sides of Eq. (26), and we get

(27) L [ f 0 ] = α s + β s 2 + γ s 3 ,

(28) L [ f 1 ] = 1 s 3 L [ A 0 ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( η ) f 0 '' + b 2 ( η ) f 0 + b 3 ( η ) f 0 ] ,

(29) L [ f 2 ] = 1 s 3 L [ A 1 ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( η ) f 1 N + b 2 ( η ) f 1 + b 3 ( η ) f 1 ]

In the recursive relation

(30) L [ f m + 1 ] = 1 s 3 L [ A m ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( x ) f m + b 2 ( x ) f m + b 3 ( x ) f m ] , m 0 .

When we use the inverse Laplace transform, we obtain

(31) f 0 ( x ) = H ( x ) ,

(32) f n + 1 ( η ) = L 1 1 s 3 L [ A n ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( η ) f n + b 2 ( x ) f n + b 3 ( η ) f n ] , n = 0,1,2,3 ,

One term that arises from source terms and incorporates the initial circumstances is represented by the variable H ( η ) . The modified Laplace decomposition method (MLDM) [28] suggests that H ( η ) defined above in (31) can be decomposed as H 0 ( η ) and H 1 ( η ) like as

(33) H ( η ) = H 0 ( η ) + H 1 ( η ) .

The first explanation is authoritative because noisy oscillation is consistently produced throughout repeated iterations when the prime is present in Eq. (30) as the initial response. We suggest the following change as an alternative to the iterative procedure provided by Eqs. (30) and (31):

(34) f 0 ( η ) = H 0 ( η ) ,

(35) f 1 ( η ) = H 1 ( η ) + L 1 1 η L [ A 0 ] 1 s 3 L [ b 1 ( η ) f 0 + b 2 ( η ) f 0 + b 3 ( η ) f 0 ] ,

(36) f n + 1 ( η ) = L 1 1 s L [ A n ] 1 s L [ b 1 ( η ) f n * + b 2 ( η ) f n + b 3 ( η ) f 0 ] , n 1 .

After applying the aforementioned expansions, the modified Adomian polynomials ( A n ) are organized to take the following form from the simple analytic non-linearity, leading to the conclusion that the MLDM was significantly dependent on H 0 ( η ) and H 1 ( η ) optimal values:

(37) A 0 = 1 0 ! d 0 d λ 0 N i = 0 0 λ i f i = N ( f 0 ) ,

(38) A 1 = 1 1 ! d 1 d λ 1 N i = 0 1 λ i f i = 1 1 ! d 1 d λ 1 [ N ( λ 0 f 0 + λ 1 f 1 ) ] = [ N ' ( λ 0 f 0 + λ 1 f 1 ) ] ( f 1 ) = f 1 N ( f 0 ) ,

(39) A 2 = 1 2 ! d 2 d λ 2 N i = 0 2 λ i f i = 1 2 ! d 2 d λ 2 [ N ( λ 0 f 0 + λ 1 f 1 + λ 2 f 2 ) ] , = 1 2 ! d d λ [ N ( λ 0 f 0 + λ 1 f 1 + λ 2 f 2 ) ( f 1 + 2 λ f 2 ) ] , = 1 2 ! [ N ( λ 0 f 0 + λ 1 f 1 + λ 2 f 2 ) ( 2 f 2 ) ] ,

(40) A 3 = f 3 N ' ( f 0 ) + f 1 f 2 N ( u 0 ) + 1 3 ! f 1 3 N ( u 0 ) ,

where N = f n + 1 ( η ) , and similarly, we have found other polynomials

4 Results and discussions

Many important parameters influence the flow, temperature, and chemical composition of the fluid. In Figures 2–8, the temperature transfer rate and heat transfer rate are shown to be dependent on the ratio of the Casson fluid parameter and the Prandtl number, as well as the magnetic parameter and Prandtl number for homogeneous reactions.

Figure 2 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 A
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (A)
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       u
                                    
                                    
                                       f
                                    
                                 
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        ({u}_{f})
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           γ
                           =
                           0.7
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Pr}=0.8,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =0.7,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 2

Variation of ( A ) on ( u f ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , γ = 0.7 , Sc = 0.4 .

Figure 3 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 M
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (M)
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       u
                                    
                                    
                                       f
                                    
                                 
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        ({u}_{f})
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           A
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           γ
                           =
                           0.7
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =A=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\Pr =0.8,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =0.7,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 3

Variation of ( M ) on ( u f ) for different values of β = A = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , γ = 0.7 , Sc = 0.4 .

Figure 4 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           (
                           Pr
                           )
                        
                        \left(\Pr )
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 θ
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (\theta )
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           γ
                           =
                           0.7
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Pr}=0.8,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =0.7,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 4

Variation of ( Pr ) on ( θ ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , γ = 0.7 , Sc = 0.4 .

Figure 5 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 γ
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (\gamma )
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 θ
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (\theta )
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           A
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Pr}=0.8,\hspace{.25em}A=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 5

Variation of ( γ ) on ( θ ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , A = 0.2 , Sc = 0.4 .

Figure 6 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 Sc
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (\text{Sc})
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 g
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (g)
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           A
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           γ
                           =
                           0.7
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\Pr =0.8,\hspace{.25em}A=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\gamma =0.7
                     
                  .
Figure 6

Variation of ( Sc ) on ( g ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , A = 0.2 , γ = 0.7 .

Figure 7 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 K
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (K)
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 g
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (g)
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           A
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\Pr =0.8,\hspace{.25em}A=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 7

Variation of ( K ) on ( g ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , A = 0.2 , Sc = 0.4 .

Figure 8 
               Variation of 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       K
                                    
                                    
                                       s
                                    
                                 
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        ({K}_{s})
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 h
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (h)
                     
                   for different values of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           M
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Pr
                           =
                           0.8
                           ,
                           
                           A
                           =
                           0.2
                           ,
                           
                           Sc
                           =
                           0.4
                        
                        \beta =M=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\Pr =0.8,\hspace{.25em}A=0.2,\hspace{.25em}\text{Sc}=0.4
                     
                  .
Figure 8

Variation of ( K s ) on ( h ) for different values of β = M = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , A = 0.2 , Sc = 0.4 .

Looking more closely at Figure 2, we can observe that the velocity profile shows a concave-down form for ( A > 1 ) , indicating that stagnation velocity exceeds stretching velocity. On the other hand, the velocity profile concave-ups when ( A < 1 ) , indicating that stretching velocity outweighs stagnation velocity. These discoveries provide important new information about the fluid dynamics related to various values of parameter ( A ) . The physical interpretation of the results is further enhanced by the concavity of the velocity profile, which offers a concrete knowledge of the interaction between stretching and stagnation velocities.

Figure 3 depicts the effect of a magnetic parameter on a velocity field. It turns out that a higher ( M ) estimation slows down the flow, resulting in a lower momentum layer in the flow domain. This behaviour suggests that the interaction of a magnetic field with fluid results in the formation of a Lorentz force, a constraining force that slows the fluid’s speed. Figure 4 depicts how the Prandtl number Pr affects the temperature field. As the Prandtl number (Pr) increases, the thermal boundary layer decreases. As a result, the heat transfer rate decreases, lowering the fluid temperature, to investigate how the temperature field is affected by the homogeneous reaction heat parameter. Figure 5 depicts a conceptual sketch of the dynamic interaction between the homogeneous reaction heat parameter and the temperature field. The graph shows that as the homogeneous reaction heat parameter increases, the temperature field grows proportionally. From a physical perspective, this implies that the system’s thermal behaviour is directly influenced by the strength or rate of the homogeneous response. An increased temperature field is associated with a greater homogenous reaction heat parameter, suggesting that the reaction heat has a significant effect on the overall thermal profile. Figure 6 depicts the effect of (Sc) on the concentration profile. By raising the values of (Sc), the concentration profile is improved. It is because the rate of momentum diffusivity rises, which guarantees an improvement in concentration. Concentration distributions are affected by ( K ) and ( K s ) are shown in Figures 7 and 8. It should be noted that the two parameters of the concentration field behave differently. It is obvious that as the heterogeneous reaction parameter grows, the boundary layer thickness decreases. Table 1 presents a thorough examination of the effects of physical characteristics of drag force and heat transfer rate for a subset of values. Table 2 indicates that series solutions suggest convergence at the 20th order of approximations. A comparison of the current results with previous numerical solutions is shown in Table 3. The results show remarkable consistency, suggesting a high degree of agreement across the options presented.

Table 1

Numerical values of drag force ( 1 + 1 / β ) f ( 0 ) and heat transfer rate θ ' ( 0 ) for different values of β , γ , Pr , Sc , M , and ( A )

( β ) ( γ ) ( Pr ) ( Sc ) ( M ) ( A ) ( 1 + 1 / β ) f ' ' ( 0 ) θ ' ( 0 )
0.5 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.48778 0.398315
0.8 1.28164 0.400273
1.5 1.09619 0.401999
2.0 1.03747 0.403041
1.0 0.0 1.30452 0.383969
0.2 1.20549 0.400992
0.4 1.00575 0.423584
0.6 0.72445 0.445054
0.3 1.14878 0.329744
0.7 1.19948 0.392272
1.2 1.22077 0.425225
2.0 1.23461 0.450830
0.0 1.23236 0.452028
0.3 1.21874 0.426086
0.7 1.20115 0.392809
1.0 1.18836 0.368778
0.0 1.29840 0.394821
0.5 1.18313 0.402408
1.0 1.07574 0.408860
1.5 0.974474 0.414442
0.2 1.24049 0.152594
0.5 1.21712 0.318102
1.0 1.19186 0.498457
1.5 1.17567 0.614761
Table 2

Convergence of MLADM for different orders of approximations, when β = 1.0 , γ = 0.2 , Pr = 0.8 , Sc = 0.6 , M = 0.4 , A = 0.5

Order f ( 0 ) θ ' ( 0 )
1 0.618824 0.389381
5 0.602249 0.401168
10 0.602764 0.400977
15 0.602742 0.400994
20 0.602744 0.400992
25 0.602744 0.400992
30 0.602744 0.400992
Table 3

Comparison for values of f ( 0 ) with Ishak et al. [22] and Mahapatra and Gupta [23] for different values of ( A ) when β

( A ) Ref. [22] Ref. [23] MLADM results
0.01 −0.9980 −0.998024
0.10 −0.9694 −0.9694 −0.969386
0.20 −0.9181 −0.9181 −0.918107
0.50 −0.6673 −0.9181 −0.667263
2.00 2.0175 2.0175 2.01756
3.00 4.7294 4.7294 4.72963

5 Conclusions

To summarize, this study not only clarifies the existing model’s understanding of temperature dynamics, but it also presents opportunities for future research and practical applications. It is essential to continuously explore these possibilities in order to increase our understanding of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions within the colloidal framework of Casson fluid and its broader ramifications.

The following is a main summary of the current analysis:

  1. As the magnetic parameter increases, the velocity field increases.

  2. For higher values of (Pr), the temperature profile decreases.

  3. First-order kinetics governs the homogenous reactions in the domain fluid and the isothermal cubic autocatalytic kinetics.

  4. It is established that chemical reactions include a combination of heat and mass exchange.

In the future, there is a significant opportunity for additional investigation and improvement of this model. Subsequent inquiries may explore the intricate impacts of supplementary variables, such as ( A , M , Pr , γ , Sc , K , K s ) , in order to attain a more thorough comprehension of the fundamental mechanisms. This work has significant consequences that go beyond theoretical comprehension, opening up opportunities for practical implementation in specific disciplines or industries. For example, analysis of colloidal stability in industries such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, development and enhancement of controlled release systems through design and optimization, nanoparticle functionalization for specific purposes, manipulation of rheological characteristics for sectors such as coatings and lubricants, biomedical research focused on studying interactions within fluid environments that do not follow Newton laws of motion, applications in the field of environmental science, such as ways for cleaning up pollutants in fluid settings that do not follow Newton’s laws of motion.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the support of the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. 5382].

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. 5382].

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Casson N. A flow equation for pigment oil suspensions of the printing ink type. Rheology of Disperse Systems, Pergamonpress. New York; 1959. p. 84–104.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Dash RK, Mehta KN, Jayaraman G. Effect of yield stress on the flow of a Casson fluid in a homogeneous porous medium bounded by a circular tube. Appl Sci Res. 1996;57:133–49.10.1007/BF02529440Search in Google Scholar

[3] Hayat T, Yasmin H, Alyami M. Soret and Dufour effects in peristaltic transport of physiological fluids with chemical reaction: A mathematical analysis. Comp Fluids. 2014;89:242–53.10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.038Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yasmin H, Nisar Z. Mathematical analysis of mixed convective peristaltic flow for chemically reactive Casson nanofluid. Mathematics. 2023;11:2673.10.3390/math11122673Search in Google Scholar

[5] Das S, Banu AS, Jana RN. Delineating impacts of non-uniform wall temperature and concentration on time-dependent radiation-convection of Casson fluid under magnetic field and chemical reaction. World J Eng. 2021;18(5):780–95.10.1108/WJE-11-2020-0607Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jayavel P, Tripathi D, Anwar Beg O, Tiwari AK, Kumar R. Thermo‐electrokinetic rotating non‐Newtonian hybrid nanofluid flow from an accelerating vertical surface. Heat Transf. 2022 Mar;51(2):1746–77.10.1002/htj.22373Search in Google Scholar

[7] Akram J, Akbar NS, Tripathi D. A theoretical investigation on the heat transfer ability of water-based hybrid (Ag–Au) nanofluids and Ag nanofluids flow driven by electroosmotic pumping through a microchannel. Arab J Sci Eng. 2021 Mar;46:2911–27.10.1007/s13369-020-05265-0Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sridhar V, Ramesh K, Tripathi D, Vivekanand V. Analysis of thermal radiation, Joule heating, and viscous dissipation effects on blood‐gold couple stress nanofluid flow driven by electroosmosis. Heat Transf. 2022 Jul;51(5):4080–101.10.1002/htj.22490Search in Google Scholar

[9] Latha KB, Reddy MG, Tripathi D, Bég OA, Kuharat S, Ahmad H, et al. Computation of stagnation coating flow of electro-conductive ternary Williamson hybrid GO-AU-Co3O4/EO nanofluid with a Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model and magnetic induction. Sci Rep. 2023 Jul;13(1):10972.10.1038/s41598-023-37197-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Nawaz M, Nazir U, Saleem S, Alharbi SO. An enhancement of thermal performance of ethylene glycol by nano and hybrid nanoparticles. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl. 2020;551:124527.10.1016/j.physa.2020.124527Search in Google Scholar

[11] Tian XY, Li BW, Zhang JK. The effects of radiation optical properties on the unsteady 2D boundary layer MHD flow and heat transfer over a stretching plate. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;105:109–23.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.09.060Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hayat T, Rashid M, Imtiaz M, Alsaedi A. MHD convective flow due to a curved surface with thermal radiation and chemical reaction. J Mol Liq. 2017;225:482–9.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.096Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Gorla RSR. Non-linear radiative heat transfer in MHD three-dimensional flow of water based nanofluid over a non-linearly stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. J Nigerian Math Socie. 2016;35(1):178–98.10.1016/j.jnnms.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions and melting heat transfer effects in the MHD flow by a stretching surface with variable thickness. J Mol Liq. 2016;223:960–8.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.019Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cortell R. Flow and heat transfer in a moving fluid over a moving flat surface. Theor Comput Fluid Dynam. 2007;21:435–46.10.1007/s00162-007-0056-zSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Saleem S, Al-Qarni MM, Nadeem S, Sandeep N. Convective heat and mass transfer in magneto Jeffrey fluid flow on a rotating cone with heat source and chemical reaction. Commun Theor Phys. 2018;70:534. 10.1088/0253-6102/70/5/534.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hayat T, Waqas M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Analysis of thixotropic nanomaterial in a doubly stratified medium considering magnetic field effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;102:1123–9.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.06.090Search in Google Scholar

[18] Yasmeen T, Hayat T, Khan MI, Imtiaz M, Alsaedi A. Ferrofluid flow by a stretched surface in the presence of magnetic dipole and homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. J Mol Liq. 2016;223:1000–5.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.028Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD, Javed MY, Ellahi R. Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;374:36–43.10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[20] Das S, Ali A, Jana RN. Darcy–Forchheimer flow of a magneto-radiated couple stress fluid over an inclined exponentially stretching surface with Ohmic dissipation. World J Eng. 2021;18(2):345–60.10.1108/WJE-07-2020-0258Search in Google Scholar

[21] Das S, Ali A, Jana RN. Numerically framing the impact of magnetic field on nanofluid flow over a curved stretching surface with convective heating. World J Eng. 2021;18(6):938–47.10.1108/WJE-11-2020-0587Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ishak A, Nazar R, Arifin NM, Pop I. Mixed convection of the stagnation-point flow towards a stretching vertical permeable sheet. Malays J Math Sci. 2007;1(2):217–26.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mahapatra TR, Gupta AS. Heat transfer in stagnation-point flow towards a stretching sheet. Heat Mass Transf. 2002 Jun;38(6):517–21.10.1007/s002310100215Search in Google Scholar

[24] Dong Z, Li X, Yamaguchi H, Yu P. Magnetic field effect on the sedimentation process of two non-magnetic particles inside a ferrofluid. J Magn Magn Mater. 2024;589:171501. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171501.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sun L, Liang T, Zhang C, Chen J. The rheological performance of shear-thickening fluids based on carbon fiber and silica nanocomposite. Phys Fluids. 2023;35(3):32002. 10.1063/5.0138294.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zheng B, Lin D, Qi S, Hu Y, Jin Y, Chen Q, et al. Turbulent skin-friction drag reduction by annular dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator. Phys Fluids. 2023;35(12):125129. 10.1063/5.0172381.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Yin Y, Zhang R, Su Q. Threat assessment of aerial targets based on improved GRA-TOPSIS method and three-way decisions. Math Biosci Eng. 2023;20(7):13250–66. 10.3934/mbe.2023591.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Adomian G. Solving frontier problems of physics: The decomposition method. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publication; 1994.10.1007/978-94-015-8289-6Search in Google Scholar

[29] Khuri SA. A Laplace decomposition algorithm applied to a class of nonlinear differential equations. J Appl Math. 2001;1(4):141–55.10.1155/S1110757X01000183Search in Google Scholar

[30] Yusufoglu E. Numerical solution of Duffing equation by the Laplace decomposition algorithm. Appl Math Comput. 2006;177:572–80.10.1016/j.amc.2005.07.072Search in Google Scholar

[31] Merkin JH. Amodel for isothermal homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in boundarylayer flow. Math Comput Model. 1996;24:125–36.10.1016/0895-7177(96)00145-8Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-10-31
Revised: 2023-12-13
Accepted: 2023-12-18
Published Online: 2024-01-22

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the channel of panel-type radiator with semi-detached inclined trapezoidal wing vortex generators
  3. Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid
  4. High-speed mid-infrared Mach–Zehnder electro-optical modulators in lithium niobate thin film on sapphire
  5. Numerical analysis of dengue transmission model using Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative
  6. Mononuclear nanofluids undergoing convective heating across a stretching sheet and undergoing MHD flow in three dimensions: Potential industrial applications
  7. Heat transfer characteristics of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles scattered in sodium alginate-based non-Newtonian nanofluid over a stretching/shrinking horizontal plane surface
  8. The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis
  9. Growth, characterization, and anti-bacterial activity of l-methionine supplemented with sulphamic acid single crystals
  10. A numerical analysis of the blood-based Casson hybrid nanofluid flow past a convectively heated surface embedded in a porous medium
  11. Optoelectronic–thermomagnetic effect of a microelongated non-local rotating semiconductor heated by pulsed laser with varying thermal conductivity
  12. Thermal proficiency of magnetized and radiative cross-ternary hybrid nanofluid flow induced by a vertical cylinder
  13. Enhanced heat transfer and fluid motion in 3D nanofluid with anisotropic slip and magnetic field
  14. Numerical analysis of thermophoretic particle deposition on 3D Casson nanofluid: Artificial neural networks-based Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm
  15. Analyzing fuzzy fractional Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holm equations with the Atangana–Baleanu operator
  16. Bayesian estimation of equipment reliability with normal-type life distribution based on multiple batch tests
  17. Chaotic control problem of BEC system based on Hartree–Fock mean field theory
  18. Optimized framework numerical solution for swirling hybrid nanofluid flow with silver/gold nanoparticles on a stretching cylinder with heat source/sink and reactive agents
  19. Stability analysis and numerical results for some schemes discretising 2D nonconstant coefficient advection–diffusion equations
  20. Convective flow of a magnetohydrodynamic second-grade fluid past a stretching surface with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model
  21. Analysis of the heat transfer enhancement in water-based micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow over a vertical flat surface
  22. Microscopic seepage simulation of gas and water in shale pores and slits based on VOF
  23. Model of conversion of flow from confined to unconfined aquifers with stochastic approach
  24. Study of fractional variable-order lymphatic filariasis infection model
  25. Soliton, quasi-soliton, and their interaction solutions of a nonlinear (2 + 1)-dimensional ZK–mZK–BBM equation for gravity waves
  26. Application of conserved quantities using the formal Lagrangian of a nonlinear integro partial differential equation through optimal system of one-dimensional subalgebras in physics and engineering
  27. Nonlinear fractional-order differential equations: New closed-form traveling-wave solutions
  28. Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model
  29. Some transforms, Riemann–Liouville fractional operators, and applications of newly extended M–L (p, s, k) function
  30. Magnetohydrodynamic water-based hybrid nanofluid flow comprising diamond and copper nanoparticles on a stretching sheet with slips constraints
  31. Super-resolution reconstruction method of the optical synthetic aperture image using generative adversarial network
  32. A two-stage framework for predicting the remaining useful life of bearings
  33. Influence of variable fluid properties on mixed convective Darcy–Forchheimer flow relation over a surface with Soret and Dufour spectacle
  34. Inclined surface mixed convection flow of viscous fluid with porous medium and Soret effects
  35. Exact solutions to vorticity of the fractional nonuniform Poiseuille flows
  36. In silico modified UV spectrophotometric approaches to resolve overlapped spectra for quality control of rosuvastatin and teneligliptin formulation
  37. Numerical simulations for fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled Korteweg–de Vries systems
  38. Substituent effect on the electronic and optical properties of newly designed pyrrole derivatives using density functional theory
  39. A comparative analysis of shielding effectiveness in glass and concrete containers
  40. Numerical analysis of the MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet through a Darcy porous medium: Modeling and simulation
  41. Analytical and numerical investigation for viscoelastic fluid with heat transfer analysis during rollover-web coating phenomena
  42. Influence of variable viscosity on existing sheet thickness in the calendering of non-isothermal viscoelastic materials
  43. Analysis of nonlinear fractional-order Fisher equation using two reliable techniques
  44. Comparison of plan quality and robustness using VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer
  45. Radiative nanofluid flow over a slender stretching Riga plate under the impact of exponential heat source/sink
  46. Numerical investigation of acoustic streaming vortices in cylindrical tube arrays
  47. Numerical study of blood-based MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity and cross-diffusion
  48. Fractional view analytical analysis of generalized regularized long wave equation
  49. Dynamic simulation of non-Newtonian boundary layer flow: An enhanced exponential time integrator approach with spatially and temporally variable heat sources
  50. Inclined magnetized infinite shear rate viscosity of non-Newtonian tetra hybrid nanofluid in stenosed artery with non-uniform heat sink/source
  51. Estimation of monotone α-quantile of past lifetime function with application
  52. Numerical simulation for the slip impacts on the radiative nanofluid flow over a stretched surface with nonuniform heat generation and viscous dissipation
  53. Study of fractional telegraph equation via Shehu homotopy perturbation method
  54. An investigation into the impact of thermal radiation and chemical reactions on the flow through porous media of a Casson hybrid nanofluid including unstable mixed convection with stretched sheet in the presence of thermophoresis and Brownian motion
  55. Establishing breather and N-soliton solutions for conformable Klein–Gordon equation
  56. An electro-optic half subtractor from a silicon-based hybrid surface plasmon polariton waveguide
  57. CFD analysis of particle shape and Reynolds number on heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid in heated tube
  58. Abundant exact traveling wave solutions and modulation instability analysis to the generalized Hirota–Satsuma–Ito equation
  59. A short report on a probability-based interpretation of quantum mechanics
  60. Study on cavitation and pulsation characteristics of a novel rotor-radial groove hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
  61. Optimizing heat transport in a permeable cavity with an isothermal solid block: Influence of nanoparticles volume fraction and wall velocity ratio
  62. Linear instability of the vertical throughflow in a porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid with variable gravity effect
  63. Thermal analysis of generalized Cattaneo–Christov theories in Burgers nanofluid in the presence of thermo-diffusion effects and variable thermal conductivity
  64. A new benchmark for camouflaged object detection: RGB-D camouflaged object detection dataset
  65. Effect of electron temperature and concentration on production of hydroxyl radical and nitric oxide in atmospheric pressure low-temperature helium plasma jet: Swarm analysis and global model investigation
  66. Double diffusion convection of Maxwell–Cattaneo fluids in a vertical slot
  67. Thermal analysis of extended surfaces using deep neural networks
  68. Steady-state thermodynamic process in multilayered heterogeneous cylinder
  69. Multiresponse optimisation and process capability analysis of chemical vapour jet machining for the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer: Unveiling the morphology
  70. Modeling monkeypox virus transmission: Stability analysis and comparison of analytical techniques
  71. Fourier spectral method for the fractional-in-space coupled Whitham–Broer–Kaup equations on unbounded domain
  72. The chaotic behavior and traveling wave solutions of the conformable extended Korteweg–de-Vries model
  73. Research on optimization of combustor liner structure based on arc-shaped slot hole
  74. Construction of M-shaped solitons for a modified regularized long-wave equation via Hirota's bilinear method
  75. Effectiveness of microwave ablation using two simultaneous antennas for liver malignancy treatment
  76. Discussion on optical solitons, sensitivity and qualitative analysis to a fractional model of ion sound and Langmuir waves with Atangana Baleanu derivatives
  77. Reliability of two-dimensional steady magnetized Jeffery fluid over shrinking sheet with chemical effect
  78. Generalized model of thermoelasticity associated with fractional time-derivative operators and its applications to non-simple elastic materials
  79. Migration of two rigid spheres translating within an infinite couple stress fluid under the impact of magnetic field
  80. A comparative investigation of neutron and gamma radiation interaction properties of zircaloy-2 and zircaloy-4 with consideration of mechanical properties
  81. New optical stochastic solutions for the Schrödinger equation with multiplicative Wiener process/random variable coefficients using two different methods
  82. Physical aspects of quantile residual lifetime sequence
  83. Synthesis, structure, IV characteristics, and optical properties of chromium oxide thin films for optoelectronic applications
  84. Smart mathematically filtered UV spectroscopic methods for quality assurance of rosuvastatin and valsartan from formulation
  85. A novel investigation into time-fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations within Aboodh transform
  86. Homotopic dynamic solution of hydrodynamic nonlinear natural convection containing superhydrophobicity and isothermally heated parallel plate with hybrid nanoparticles
  87. A novel tetra hybrid bio-nanofluid model with stenosed artery
  88. Propagation of traveling wave solution of the strain wave equation in microcrystalline materials
  89. Innovative analysis to the time-fractional q-deformed tanh-Gordon equation via modified double Laplace transform method
  90. A new investigation of the extended Sakovich equation for abundant soliton solution in industrial engineering via two efficient techniques
  91. New soliton solutions of the conformable time fractional Drinfel'd–Sokolov–Wilson equation based on the complete discriminant system method
  92. Irradiation of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses by a 365 nm UV lamp
  93. Inflation and the principle of equivalence
  94. The use of a supercontinuum light source for the characterization of passive fiber optic components
  95. Optical solitons to the fractional Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar equation with time-dependent coefficients
  96. A promising photocathode for green hydrogen generation from sanitation water without external sacrificing agent: silver-silver oxide/poly(1H-pyrrole) dendritic nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole film
  97. Photon balance in the fiber laser model
  98. Propagation of optical spatial solitons in nematic liquid crystals with quadruple power law of nonlinearity appears in fluid mechanics
  99. Theoretical investigation and sensitivity analysis of non-Newtonian fluid during roll coating process by response surface methodology
  100. Utilizing slip conditions on transport phenomena of heat energy with dust and tiny nanoparticles over a wedge
  101. Bismuthyl chloride/poly(m-toluidine) nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole: Photocathode for green hydrogen generation
  102. Infrared thermography based fault diagnosis of diesel engines using convolutional neural network and image enhancement
  103. On some solitary wave solutions of the Estevez--Mansfield--Clarkson equation with conformable fractional derivatives in time
  104. Impact of permeability and fluid parameters in couple stress media on rotating eccentric spheres
  105. Review Article
  106. Transformer-based intelligent fault diagnosis methods of mechanical equipment: A survey
  107. Special Issue on Predicting pattern alterations in nature - Part II
  108. A comparative study of Bagley–Torvik equation under nonsingular kernel derivatives using Weeks method
  109. On the existence and numerical simulation of Cholera epidemic model
  110. Numerical solutions of generalized Atangana–Baleanu time-fractional FitzHugh–Nagumo equation using cubic B-spline functions
  111. Dynamic properties of the multimalware attacks in wireless sensor networks: Fractional derivative analysis of wireless sensor networks
  112. Prediction of COVID-19 spread with models in different patterns: A case study of Russia
  113. Study of chronic myeloid leukemia with T-cell under fractal-fractional order model
  114. Accumulation process in the environment for a generalized mass transport system
  115. Analysis of a generalized proportional fractional stochastic differential equation incorporating Carathéodory's approximation and applications
  116. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part II
  117. Numerical study on flow and heat transfer performance of a spiral-wound heat exchanger for natural gas
  118. Study of ultrasonic influence on heat transfer and resistance performance of round tube with twisted belt
  119. Numerical study on bionic airfoil fins used in printed circuit plate heat exchanger
  120. Improving heat transfer efficiency via optimization and sensitivity assessment in hybrid nanofluid flow with variable magnetism using the Yamada–Ota model
  121. Special Issue on Nanofluids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications
  122. Exact solutions of a class of generalized nanofluidic models
  123. Stability enhancement of Al2O3, ZnO, and TiO2 binary nanofluids for heat transfer applications
  124. Thermal transport energy performance on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids and their implementation in concentrated solar aircraft wings
  125. Studying nonlinear vibration analysis of nanoelectro-mechanical resonators via analytical computational method
  126. Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate
  127. Two-phase numerical simulation of thermal and solutal transport exploration of a non-Newtonian nanomaterial flow past a stretching surface with chemical reaction
  128. Natural convection and flow patterns of Cu–water nanofluids in hexagonal cavity: A novel thermal case study
  129. Solitonic solutions and study of nonlinear wave dynamics in a Murnaghan hyperelastic circular pipe
  130. Comparative study of couple stress fluid flow using OHAM and NIM
  131. Utilization of OHAM to investigate entropy generation with a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity model in hybrid nanofluid using the radiation phenomenon
  132. Slip effects on magnetized radiatively hybridized ferrofluid flow with acute magnetic force over shrinking/stretching surface
  133. Significance of 3D rectangular closed domain filled with charged particles and nanoparticles engaging finite element methodology
  134. Robustness and dynamical features of fractional difference spacecraft model with Mittag–Leffler stability
  135. Characterizing magnetohydrodynamic effects on developed nanofluid flow in an obstructed vertical duct under constant pressure gradient
  136. Study on dynamic and static tensile and puncture-resistant mechanical properties of impregnated STF multi-dimensional structure Kevlar fiber reinforced composites
  137. Thermosolutal Marangoni convective flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids with elastic deformation and heat source
  138. Investigation of convective heat transport in a Carreau hybrid nanofluid between two stretchable rotatory disks
  139. Single-channel cooling system design by using perforated porous insert and modeling with POD for double conductive panel
  140. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part I
  141. Pulsed excitation of a quantum oscillator: A model accounting for damping
  142. Review of recent analytical advances in the spectroscopy of hydrogenic lines in plasmas
  143. Heavy mesons mass spectroscopy under a spin-dependent Cornell potential within the framework of the spinless Salpeter equation
  144. Coherent manipulation of bright and dark solitons of reflection and transmission pulses through sodium atomic medium
  145. Effect of the gravitational field strength on the rate of chemical reactions
  146. The kinetic relativity theory – hiding in plain sight
  147. Special Issue on Advanced Energy Materials - Part III
  148. Eco-friendly graphitic carbon nitride–poly(1H pyrrole) nanocomposite: A photocathode for green hydrogen production, paving the way for commercial applications
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2023-0174/html
Scroll to top button