Home Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate
Article Open Access

Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate

  • Khadija Rafique EMAIL logo , Zafar Mahmood EMAIL logo , Adnan , Umar Khan , Bilal Ali , Fuad A. Awwad and Emad A. A. Ismail
Published/Copyright: May 7, 2024

Abstract

Casson fluids containing carbon nanotubes of various lengths and radii on a moving permeable plate reduce friction and improve equipment efficiency. They improve plate flow dynamics to improve heat transfer, particularly in electronic cooling and heat exchangers. The core objective of this study is to investigate the heat transmission mechanism and identify the prerequisites for achieving high cooling speeds within a two-dimensional, stable, axisymmetric boundary layer. This study considers a sodium alginate-based nanofluid containing single/multi-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs/MWCNTs) and Casson nanofluid flow on a permeable moving plate with varying length, radius, and nonlinear thermal radiation effects. The plate has the capacity to move either parallel to or perpendicular to the free stream. The governing partial differential equations for the boundary layer, which are interconnected, are transformed into standard differential equations. These equations are then numerically solved using the Runge–Kutta fourth-order scheme incorporated in the shooting method. This research analyses and graphically displays the effects of factors including mass suction, nanoparticle volume fraction, Casson parameter, thermal radiation, and temperature ratio. Additionally, a comparison is made between the present result and the previous finding, which presented in a tabular format. The coefficient of skin friction decreases in correlation with an increase in Casson fluid parameters and Prandtl number. Heat transfer rate decreases with a variation in viscosity parameter, while it is increasing with an increase in Prandtl number. In addition, this study demonstrates that heat transfer rate for MWCNT is significantly higher than that of SWCNT nanoparticles. Thermal radiation and temperature ratio reduce the heat transfer rate, whereas nanoparticle volume fraction and Casson parameter enhance it over a shrinking surface.

Nomenclature

x , y

Cartesian coordinates

a , b

constants

u , v

velocity component along the x- and y-axis ( m s 1 )

u e

free stream velocity ( m s 1 )

( ρ C p )

fluid’s heat capacitance ( J K 1 m 3 )

C f

skin friction

q w

heat flux

M

magnetic parameter

C p

specific heat capacitance ( J kg 1 K 1 )

Nu x

Nusselt number

k *

thermal conductivity ( W m 1 K 1 )

θ

dimensionless temperature

η

similarity variables

Pr

Prandtl number

q w

surface heat flux

λ

shrinking parameter

β

Casson parameter

Re x

local Reynold number

θ w

temperature ratio parameter

Rd

radiation parameter

t

time ( s )

T

temperature ( K )

T w

constant surface temperature ( K )

K CNT

thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube

ρ CNT

density of carbon nanotubes

T

ambient temperature ( K )

u w

mass suction velocity ( m s 1 )

S > 0

suction

S < 0

infection

v w

surface velocity ( m s 1 )

ν

kinematic viscosity ( m 2 s 1 )

ρ

density ( kg m 3 )

ϕ

nanoparticle volume fraction ( % )

τ w x

heat capacity ratio

Ω

viscosity parameter

Subscripts

f

base fluid

nf

nanofluid

Acronyms

ODEs

ordinary differential equations

RKF

Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg

1 Introduction

Non-Newtonian fluids have generated a significant amount of interest because of the several technological and industrial domains in which they have the potential to provide applications. They are used, for instance, in the production of polymers, pharmaceuticals made from syrups, and crude oil from petroleum derivatives. In a work that was carried out by Hamid and colleagues [1], the effects of Casson nanofluid on a surface that is malleable were investigated. Jamshed and colleagues [2] conducted another study that specifically observed into the effects of Casson nanofluid flow. The work of Gomathi and De [3] looked into how hall currents and ion slip affect the flow of a mixed Casson Williamson nanofluid with viscous dissipation across a porous media. The work of Poulomi and Ekambaram [4] looked at the bioconvective Casson nanofluid flow in the direction of the stagnation point using a non-Darcy porous medium that had buoyancy effects and heat radiation. Vinodkumar Reddy et al. [5] examined the convective maximum hydrodynamic drag (MHD) stagnation point flow of a Casson nanofluid across a porous medium undergoing a chemical reaction with a heat source and Joule heating. A study conducted by Awan and colleagues [6] examined how MHD and the Darcy–Forchheimer law impact the behavior of a Casson–Sutterby nanofluid in an extended circular cylinder. Abbas et al. [7] used computational models to examine the flow of a hybrid nanofluid including MHD nonlinear radiation and Casson at a vertical stretching sheet. Lanjwani et al. [8] conducted an investigation on triple Casson nanofluid solutions on a sheet that underwent exponential vertical stretching and contraction. Cross-diffusion and heat source effects were investigated by Reddy and Lakshminarayana in relation to three-dimensional MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow across a stretched surface using chemical reactions [9]. Several authors have also contributed to the understanding of Casson fluid in various flow scenarios, as indicated by previous studies [1014]. Nanofluids are used in a variety of industrial and nanotechnology-based activities, including the cooling systems of electronic gadgets, nuclear reactors, and other operations. Moreover, magnetic nanofluids prove beneficial in a wide range of uses, such as cancer therapy, facilitating wound recovery, clearing blocked arteries, and enhancing magnetic resonance imaging procedures, among others. As mentioned by Maleki et al. [15], pseudoplastic nanofluid influences the permeable stretching sheet when heat generation and viscous dissipation are present. Alazwari et al. [16] conducted an examination of the nanofluid’s non-Newtonian fluid flow on stretched sheets. A few writers have studied nanofluids under exponential stretching recently [17].

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) exhibit a cylindrical shape, with diameters typically falling within the range of 0.5–1.5 nm. These nanotubes, also referred to as graphene sheets, are highly acknowledged for their exceptional nanoparticle properties, primarily owing to their tubular structure that comprises carbon atoms. These nanotubes consist of a solitary layer of graphene constituents, where every atom is situated in a singular position. CNTs, including multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), surpass other nanoparticles and nanotubes in terms of mechanical and thermal properties, exhibiting superiority that is six times greater. The utilization of CNTs offers substantial benefits such as biomedical applications, wastewater treatment, and petrochemical facilities. Xue [18] conducted research that encompassed both experimental and theoretical studies of CNTs. Shahzad et al. [19] enhanced the heat transfer rate in solar collectors by using the Oldroyd-B model hybrid nanofluid along with a kerosene oil flow incorporating CNTs. In their study [20], Shamshuddin and colleagues investigated the dynamics of MWCNT and single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) using Joule heating and thermal radiation. Considering thermo-diffusion and chemical reactions, Kiran Kumar et al. [21] studied the effect of thermal radiation on the convective heat and mass transfer flow of water–SWCNT and MWCNT nanofluids in a cylindrical annulus. Hayat et al. [22] investigated the flow behavior of water-based CNTs carbon using the Darcy–Forchheimer model, specifically focusing on a convectively heated rotating disk. Their results revealed that as percentage of CNTs in the fluid volume increases, the fluid’s velocity limitation also increases. The Yamada–Ota model provides an explanation for flow dynamics in multiphase systems in fluid mechanics. The field of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can provide more accurate predictions of turbulent multiphase flows that include dispersed particles or droplets in a continuous fluid. Dispersed phase particles or droplets affect flow dynamics; hence, the Yamada–Ota model includes auxiliary equations. These equations include drag forces, turbulence dispersion, and interfacial momentum transfer between the dispersed and continuous phases. Several authors have also contributed to the understanding of fluid in various flow scenarios by considering the Yamada–Ota model [23,24].

Thermal radiation involves the release of heat energy from a surface as electromagnetic waves, propagating in all directions. This mechanism serves as the sole method of heat transfer in a vacuum and plays a significant role in generating high temperatures. In engineering and physics, thermal radiation is of paramount importance in heat transfer and fluid flow analyses involving diverse liquids. Moreover, the impact of thermal radiation holds great significance in space technology, particularly for devices operating under extremely high-temperature conditions. Recent studies have focused on examining the influence of thermal radiation. Imtiaz et al. [25] published a study examining Williamson fluid with suspended particles flow over a stretched surface while accounting for the nonlinear influence of heat radiation. The calculation of the power-law flow of nanofluids is dependent on temperature and occurs over a wide range of stretching. The Riga sheet was developed by Abbas et al. [26]. Mulinti and Lakshminarayana [27] explored how thermal radiation and viscous dissipation affect the MHD of a fluid moving over a porous stretched sheet with increasing chemical interactions. In their investigation, Khan et al. [28] looked at the effects of nonlinear radiation on the MHD flow of Carreau nanofluid across a surface that had been heated convectively. Additionally, Rehman et al. [29] focused on studying the combined impacts of thermal stratification and radiation on the flow of tangent hyperbolic fluid around a flat surface and a cylindrical surface. The study by Vinodkumar Reddy and Lakshminarayana [30] looked at how radiation affects the flow of a magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid over a stretched sheet in a porous medium. In a separate numerical enquiry by Mushtaq et al. [31], the flow of nanofluids driven by solar energy was examined, with special consideration given to the effects of nonlinear thermal radiation. Rehman and Eltayeb [32] examined the characteristics of hydromagnetic nanofluids flowing over a nonlinear stretched surface, considering convective boundary conditions and thermal radiation. Sheikholeslami et al. [33] did their own research project in which they looked into how thermal radiation affects the flow of MHD nanofluids between two plates that are moving horizontally while magnetic fields are present. Turkyilmazoglu and Pop [34] focused on the investigation of mass and heat transport properties of nanofluids as they flow over a vertically infinite flat plate subjected to heating.

Sakiadis [35] was first to scrutinize the boundary layer’s behavior on a continuously solid surface. He noted a striking difference between the behavior of the respected surface and boundary layer of a fluid traveling over a flat, stable, smooth surface as studied by Blasius [36]. In a similar vein, Tsou et al. [37] conducted an experimental and theoretical investigation. Their study yielded a notable finding that observed laminar velocity field aligned precisely with analytical predictions, thus confirming their agreement. Tsai and Hsu [38] investigated the thermal transfer characteristics in a non-Newtonian fluid. Their research revealed that the power law index, denoted as “n,” and the generalized Prandtl number significantly influenced both the flow and heat fields. When thermal radiation occurs, Cortell Bataller [39] looked at how the Prandtl number affects the lowering of a plate’s thermal border thickness within the framework of classical Blasius flow. Haile and Shankar [40] emphasized the importance of chemical processes, viscosity dispersion, and heat radiation throughout their work. In their investigation, various factors including viscous dissipation and thermal radiation were found to elevate temperature profile, while the Prandtl number and velocity parameter exhibited significant decreases. Additionally, when compared to the other characteristics that were evaluated, the thermophoresis parameter had a significantly different impact on the concentration profile than the other parameters. Awan et al. [41] carried out a theoretical examination of unstable oblique stagnation point-based Jeffrey nanofluid flow by making use of an oscillating stretching sheet.

The demand for smaller electronic components and devices is expected to continue to climb, which will result in an increased demand for fluids that have improved heat conductivity. Engineers and researchers created a special fluid known as nanofluid to address this issue. Nanofluid is made up of particles that are so minute that they can be measured in micromillimeters. These particles are distributed throughout the typical mediums that are used for heat transfer. It is anticipated that the higher thermal conductivity of nanofluids will surpass that of normal fluids, which will result in an improvement in the efficiency with which heat is effectively transmitted. Because of this, the efficiency of heat transport would increase. When solid nanoparticles were combined with a base fluid, the term “nanofluid” was initially developed to characterize the combination of these nanoparticles. Choi should be credited as the only creator of the word. Following the initial hypothesis, subsequent studies demonstrated that nanoparticles have the capacity to improve heat conductivity, hence providing support for the theory. Researchers have conducted an exhaustive investigation to explore the characteristics and possessions of nanofluids in a variety of different environments. The stagnation point flow, parallel rotating plates, microchannels, and cylindrical geometries are all included in these settings. A great number of experiments have been carried out to bring attention to the novel characteristics of nanofluids and to study the possible applications that could be associated with these fluids. Numerous researchers have conducted research on the topic of nanofluids, as shown by previous studies [4244].

To accurately assess the positive effect an influence has had on the flow, one must consider all of the many factors influencing the flow. The suction phenomenon, which is crucial for the boundary-layer management, has been the subject of much investigation. Dipping friction in external flows and minimizing energy loss in channels are two instances of the phenomena. Minimizing energy loss in channels is another illustration of this. Both issues will be discussed in greater detail later. As an illustration of an efficient method to impede or postpone the separation of the boundary layer, this serves as an example. When trying to induce a suction effect, surface modification is necessary. Openings such as holes, gaps, porous patches, or perforations can be incorporated into the structure to accomplish this goal. The integration of these channels makes it possible to extract the boundary-layer component that has the slowest flow rate and is in the closest vicinity to the wall. One of the consequences of this is that it improves the uniformity and stability of the velocity profile within the boundary layer, which ultimately leads to a reduction in the chance of the boundary-layer separation. In a study by Alqahtani et al. [45], the results show that controlling the boundary-layer well depends on both the sticking together of nanoparticles and the changing of viscosity. Preventing boundary-layer separation as quickly as possible is frequently essential for generating higher lift coefficients and reducing the amount of drag that an aircraft experiences. Utilizing the Galerkin finite element approach, Al-Kouz et al. [46] investigated heat transfer and entropy formation in a CNT hybrid magnetic nanofluid flow inside a trapezoidal wavy enclosure that included porous media. Researchers of exceptional caliber, such as Masad et al. [47], Rosali et al. [48], and Pandey and Kumar [49], have investigated the influence that suction has on a wide variety of surface types and fluid properties. Research into non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs and flow across a permeable surface is an activity that involves several disciplines and has far-reaching effects. There are several disciplines that may benefit from it, including engineering, physics, biology, and materials science. This study provides significant contributions to the understanding of fluid behavior in complex systems, thereby facilitating the development of technologies that exhibit enhanced performance and efficiency. Changing viscosity in Casson fluids with CNTs of a certain length and radius flowing through a moveable permeable plate is an interesting topic for scientific investigation. More research in this area could help us better comprehend complicated fluid dynamics. For a wide variety of engineering uses, it will also improve the accuracy of prediction models and the efficiency of related technologies. Studying the impact of CNT length and radius on fluid viscosity can provide valuable insights. These findings may improve nanofluid-based systems, particularly heat exchangers, biomedical devices, and nanofluidic devices, where design and performance are paramount. Many important scientific and engineering fields are interested in studying Casson fluids, which are made up of CNTs of a certain length and radius moving across a permeable moving plate. It is vital to underline numerous crucial variables to emphasize the significance of this research. Casson viscosity and yield stress are two of the most important factors that play a significant part in determining the non-Newtonian features that Casson fluids exhibit. The insertion of CNTs of a particular length and radius can change the rheological properties of the fluid, which will therefore influence the flow and deformation features of the fluid. Within the context of applications that need precise control of fluid behavior, it becomes very necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of these modifications. When it comes to applications that are associated with heat transmission, it is vital to examine the impact of radiative effects in the context of Casson fluids that contain CNTs. Even though CNTs are well known for their thermal conductivity, the simple existence of these particles has the potential to influence the heat transfer capabilities of the fluid. This comprehension is necessary for the development of technologies and applications in a wide range of domains, such as the science of materials, nanotechnology, heat transfer, and fluid dynamics, among others. To best of authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have been carried out on flow of Casson nanofluid, which contains SWCNTs and MWCNTs, over a permeable moving sheet while considering the effects of nonlinear radiation, varying Prandtl number, and variable viscosity. The authors chose the moving plate arrangement despite substantial research on non-Newtonian fluids in a variety of geometries due to the expanding industrial application of non-Newtonian fluids. MHD generators, gas turbines, and plastic sheet extrusion all significantly depend on flow of such fluids over a permeable moving sheet. The shooting method and Runge–Kutta fourth-order (RK-IV) were coupled to find the problem’s numerical solution. The key questions of the current study are as follows:

  • How the thermal performance of working fluid can be improved?

  • How does a viscosity that changes as a function of temperature affect the relationship between velocity and temperature profile?

  • How will velocity and temperature profile behave with impact of varying Prandtl number?

  • How radiation and variable Prandtl number parameter influence the heat transfer rate?

2 Problem statement

In this work, the analysis of the stable and axisymmetric boundary layer of a Casson nanofluid is the primary focus of attention. The nanofluid under consideration contains CNTs with both single and multiple walls. This flow takes place in a uniform free stream that is designated by u e and happens over a permeable plate. It is presumed that the nanofluid is in a state of thermal equilibrium and that it is adhering to conditions that prevent it from sliding. The fluid motion is confined to the region where x and y with the axis aligned parallel to the surface of the plate and the y -axis perpendicular to it. The temperature of the plate, T , is maintained at a constant value of T w , while the surrounding fluid’s temperature is denoted as T . The velocity of shrinking plate is u w . Additionally, the study considers the influence of suction, denoted as S , as depicted in Figure 1. The chosen base fluid for the nanoparticles is sodium alginate. Furthermore, the impact of variable viscosity, variable Prandtl number, and nonlinear thermal radiation is also considered. It is assumed that nanoparticles possess a uniform spherical shape and size. The thermophysical properties of the suspended nanofluid containing CNTs (SWCNTs and MWCNTs) are provided in Table 1.

Figure 1 
               Overview of the issue conceptually.
Figure 1

Overview of the issue conceptually.

Table 1

Thermophysical characteristics for various CNTS using base fluid [23,24]

Properties MWCNT SWCNT Sodium alginate ( SA )
ρ ( kg / m 3 ) 1,600 2,600 989
k ( W / m K ) 3,000 6,600 0.6376
C p ( J / kg K ) 796 425 4,175

By referencing the previous readings [50,51], we have developed the steady-flow-governing equations for the given problem geometry:

(1) u x + v y = 0 ,

(2) u u x + v u y = u e u e x + 1 ρ nf 1 + 1 β y μ nf ( T ) u y ,

(3) u T x + v T y = k CNT ( ρ C p ) CNT 2 T y 2 1 ( ρ C p ) CNT q r y .

Additionally, the symbols u and v are used to denote the velocity components along x- and y -axis, respectively. To provide a description of the radiative heat flow within the energy equation, the Roseland approximation is used. The formula for the term “thermal radiation” has been proposed by Rafique et al. [52].

(4) q r = 16 σ * T 3 3 k * T y .

The coefficient of mean absorption is denoted by k * , and the Stefan–Boltzmann constant is denoted by σ * in this context. By adding Eqs. (4) and (3), the energy equation can be generalized as follows:

(5) u T x + v T y = k CNT ( ρ C p ) CNT 2 T y 2 + 1 ( ρ C p ) CNT 16 σ * 3 k * y T 3 T y .

Subsequently, pertaining to the subsequent set of boundary conditions (BCs), see reference [50]:

u = u w = ax , v = V w = u e ν f 2 x 1 2 S , T = T w , at y = 0 ,

(6) u u e = bx , T T , as y .

The temperature of the nanofluid containing CNT is meant by T , temperature-dependent variable viscosity is μ nf ( T ) = μ nf ( T ) [ 1 + ξ ( T w T ) ] , where ξ is the positive constant, ρ CNT stands for density, k CNT is thermal conductivity and the heat capacity ( ρ C p ) CNT .

Moreover, S the non-dimensional parameter and suction is ( S > 0 ) or injection ( S < 0 ) .

ϕ is the volume fraction of CNT nanoparticles in Table 1. ρ f stands for the density of sodium alginate, and k f represents its thermal conductivity. This study examined the thermal characteristics of CNTs using the Yamada–Ota thermal conductivity model (Table 2).

Table 2

Thermophysical properties of suspended nanofluid made of CNTs (see [23,24])

Density ρ cnt = ( 1 ϕ ) ρ f + ϕ ρ s
Viscosity μ nf ( T ) = μ f ( T ) ( 1 ϕ ) 2.5
Heat capacity ( ρ C p ) cnt = ( 1 ϕ ) ( ρ C p ) f + ϕ ( ρ C p ) s
Thermal conductivity (Yamada–Ota model) k nf k f = 1 + k f k s L R ϕ 0.2 + 1 k f k s ϕ L R ϕ 0.2 + 2 ϕ k s k s k f ln k s + k f 2 k s 1 ϕ + 2 ϕ k f k s k f ln k s + k f 2 k s

A stream function ψ was devised to resolve the boundary-layer equations (see refs. [50,51]), where u = ψ y and v = ψ x , in order to find a solution that is comparable to the one in Eqs. (1), (2), and (5), which led to the exact satisfaction of (1). We are able to obtain the variations in similarity (see refs. [50,51]):

(7) ψ = ( 2 u e ν f ) 1 2 f ( η ) , T = T [ 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ( η ) ] , θ w = T w T , η = y u e 2 ν f x 1 2 .

The modified versions of the momentum and energy equations are obtained as follows by inserting Eq. (7) into Eqs. (2) and (5):

(8) 1 ( 1 ϕ ) 2.5 1 + 1 β [ ( 1 + Ω Ω θ ) f Ω θ f ] + ff f 2 + 1 = 0 ,

(9) k CNT k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ) 3 θ + Pr f ( T ) ( ρ C p ) CNT ( ρ C p ) f f θ = 0 .

Transformation of BCs (6) into

(10) f ( 0 ) = S , f ( 0 ) = λ , θ ( 0 ) = 1 , f ( η ) 1 , θ ( η ) 0 , as η .

2.1 Variable Prandtl number

As Prandtl number depends on viscosity, so for variable viscosity, the variable Prandtl number is defined as a result of the variations in viscosity throughout the boundary layer. Pr f ( T ) = μ nf ( T ) C p k f = Ω θ Ω μ nf ( T ) C p k f , so, we obtain Pr f = Pr f ( T ) 1 θ Ω k f μ nf ( T ) C p . So applying this in Eq. (10), we obtain

(11) k CNT k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ) 3 θ + Pr f ( T ) 1 θ Ω k f μ nf ( T ) C p ( ρ C p ) CNT ( ρ C p ) f f θ = 0 ,

where β is the Casson parameter, S is the mass suction, λ is the shrinking parameter, Rd is the radiation, and θ w is the temperature ratio parameter.

The local Nusselt number (represented as Nu x ,) and the skin friction coefficient (represented as C f x ) are the two physical parameters that are the subject of the investigation. Here is how these quantities are defined:

(12) C f x = τ w x ρ f U 2 , N u x = x q w k f ( T w T ) ,

where τ w x represents the x-axis shear stress and q w represents the heat flux. The following terms may be defined as

(13) τ w x = μ nf ( T ) 1 + 1 β u y z = 0 , q w = k CNT T z z = 0 + ( q r ) y = 0 .

By solving Eqs. (7), (12), and (13), we obtain the following results:

(14) Re x 1 / 2 C f x = μ nf Ω θ Ω 1 + 1 β f ( 0 ) , Re x 1 / 2 Nu x = k CNT k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ( 0 ) ) 3 θ ( 0 ) ,

where Re x = u e x υ f denote the local Reynolds number.

3 Solution methodology with code validation

It is very important to use the RK-IV method along with similarity transformations to solve differential equations for many good reasons: when you use RK-IV along with similarity transformations, you can solve differential equations. This lets you see the basic physical rules that control the system. It is possible for researchers to obtain substantial insights into the behavior of a system by gaining knowledge of how the solution undergoes evolution across time or space. The Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg (RKF) method is used for computer solving of linked nonlinear differential equations. Equations (8) and (11), as well as boundary conditions (10), are solved using RKF with shooting technique. The system is divided using a shooting approach into a series of initial value problem, which are then solved by applying the RKF method. A numerical solution with a maximum value of η max = 15 is obtained using a step size of η = 0.001 , to guarantee convergence and accuracy up to the fifth decimal place.

(15) m 1 = f , m 2 = f , m 3 = f , n 1 = θ , n 2 = θ .

By Eq. (14),

(16) m 1 = f , m 3 = m 4 = f , n 1 = θ , n 2 = θ = n 3 .

The conclusions drawn from Eqs. (15) and (16) are as follows:

(17) m 1 = m 2 , m 2 = m 3 , m 4 = f , n 2 = n 3 = θ .

Eq. (17) gives the values of f and θ as follows:

(18) m 4 = ( 1 ϕ ) 2.5 1 ( 1 + Ω Ω n 1 ) 1 + 1 β × [ Ω n 2 m 3 m 1 2 + 1 ] ,

(19) n 3 = Pr f ( T ) 1 n 1 Ω k f μ nf ( T ) C p × ( ρ C p ) CNT ( ρ C p ) f k CNT k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ) 3 [ m 1 n 2 ] ,

(20) m 1 = S , m 2 = λ , n = 1 , m 2 1 , n 0 .

A computational software program called Mathematica is used to perform the numerical simulations and graphical analyses.

The findings reported in Table 3 align well with the solution obtained by Tadesse et al. [53] for a typical fluid example. We assure you that the approach used to address our issue is precise and reliable.

Table 3

Calculating Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x for various values of the shrinking parameter, using Pr = 1 for ϕ = Rd = θ w = S = Ω = 0 = 0 (regular fluid)

R e x 1 / 2 C f x R e x 1 / 2 Nu x
λ Present Tadesse et al. [53] Present Tadesse et al. [53]
0.25 1.40224 1.402241 0.66857 0.668573
0.5 1.49567 1.495670 0.50145 0.501448
0.75 1.48930 1.489298 0.29378 0.293763
1.0 1.32882 1.328817 0 0

4 Results and discussion

This study investigates the steady two-dimensional axisymmetric boundary layer of a Casson nanofluid containing CNTs with single and multiple walls. The nanofluid flows in a uniformly free stream across a permeable plate. Applying suitable similarity transformations converts the controlling system of partial differential equations into a collection of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). This system of ODEs is then solved analytically to obtain velocity and temperature distributions. The influence of SWCNTs and MWCNTs is examined graphically for various parameters, including volume fraction ϕ , mass suction S , stretching parameter λ , Casson parameter β , temperature ratio parameter θ w , and thermal radiation parameter Rd .

The range of parameters are as follows: 1.0 λ 0.0 (shrinking), 0.0 Rd 1.0 (radiation), 1.0 θ w 2.0 (temperature ratio), 1.0 S 2.5 (mass suction), 0.5 β 3.0 (Casson), 0.5 Ω 3.0 (variable viscosity), and 2.0 Pr 10.0 (Prandtl number). The range of these parameters has been selected in a manner that ensures the satisfaction of boundary conditions.

Figure 2(a) and (b) presents the impact of β on velocity f' ( η ) and temperature θ ( η ) profiles of CNTs, specifically SWCNTs and MWCNTs. Upon examining Figure 2(a) and (b), it is evident that the velocity profile shows a positive correlation with greater values of β , but the temperature profile has a negative correlation. The graph illustrates that as the values of β increase, the fluid velocity f' ( η ) increases and the temperature θ ( η ) decreases. This can be attributed to the stronger viscous force experienced by the flow, resulting in a reduction of the momentum layer and an expansion of the thermal layer. MWCNTs shows better results in this case for velocity profile.

Figure 2 
               (a) and (b) Influence of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           1.0
                           ,
                           1.5
                           ,
                           2.0
                        
                        \beta =0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           f'
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        {f\text{'}}\left(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                   profile.
Figure 2

(a) and (b) Influence of β = 0.5 , 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 on f' ( η ) and θ ( η ) profile.

Figure 3(a) and (b) illustrates the stimulus of the Prandtl parameter ( Pr ) on the velocity f' ( η ) and temperature θ ( η ) profiles, respectively. It is noted that with expanding values of Prandtl parameter, the velocity profile of CNTs (SWCNTs and MWCNTs) increases, whereas temperature profile decreases. When it comes to the moving plate, a greater Pr indicates that momentum diffusivity is more relevant than thermal diffusivity. Because of this imbalance, the transmission of momentum is more effective than the transfer of heat from one fluid medium to another. In this way, the fluid can more readily surpass its yield stress, resulting in an improvement in flow behavior and velocity profile. An increase in the Pr suggests that momentum diffusivity is more important than thermal diffusivity. Because of this discrepancy, temperature gradients diffuse less effectively than momentum gradients, resulting in a lower temperature profile.

Figure 3 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Pr
                           =
                           3.0
                           ,
                           6.45
                           ,
                           8.0
                           ,
                           10.0
                        
                        \Pr =3.0,6.45,8.0,10.0
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           f'
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        {f\text{'}}\left(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                  .
Figure 3

(a) and (b) Impact of Pr = 3.0 , 6.45 , 8.0 , 10.0 on f' ( η ) and θ ( η ) .

Figure 4(a) and (b) demonstrates the consequence of the volume fraction ϕ on the velocity f' ( η ) and temperature θ ( η ) profiles of CNT’s suspended nanofluid. Notably, the viscosity of the liquid is enhanced as the volume percentages of nanoparticles rise. Figure 4(a) shows that the fluid velocity decreases due to higher viscous forces. Additionally, Figure 4(a) shows that velocity distributions decrease as the ϕ of CNT’s nanoparticles increase, which is due to the thickening of the momentum boundary layer. The increase in volume fractions of CNT’s nanoparticles results in a denser behavior of the suspended nanofluid, leading to an augmented thermal boundary-layer thickness. Consequently, higher volume fractions enhance the thermal characteristics of the CNT’s suspended nanofluid, as indicated in Figure 4(b). The temperature of the fluid is directly related to the width of the thermal boundary layer. By introducing appropriate nanoparticles, there is a notable elevation in temperature of base fluid due to the high thermal conductivity and low temperature gradient exhibited by CNTs in comparison with the base fluid. Notably, the temperature of multi-walled nanoparticles is lower than that of single-walled nanoparticles, which can be attributed to the lower density of MWCNTs.

Figure 4 
               (a) and (b) Influence of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ϕ
                           =
                           0.01
                           ,
                           0.03
                           ,
                           0.05
                           ,
                           0.07
                        
                        \phi =0.01,0.03,0.05,0.07
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           f'
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        {f\text{'}}\left(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                  .
Figure 4

(a) and (b) Influence of ϕ = 0.01 , 0.03 , 0.05 , 0.07 on f' ( η ) and θ ( η ) .

Figure 5(a) displays the distribution of the f ( η ) with veneration to the suction parameter ( S ). The results indicate that an upsurge in S consequences in a corresponding upsurge in f ( η ) within the velocity profile of the solution. Furthermore, there exists a direct relationship between the increase in S and the flow resistance measured by f ( η ) . In Figure 5(b), temperature profile of CNTs is shown for different suction values. The graph illustrates a decreasing pattern in temperature profile as suction parameter increases. Because of the increase in the suction parameter, the fluid travels more quickly and exceeds the threshold for its yield stress. The rising velocity profile demonstrates that there is more flow because of this event has increased flow. An upsurge in the S parameter leads to a reduction in the temperature θ ( η ) profile. The temperature profile decreases as more fluid is evacuated from the plate region. As a result, the shortened residence time for heat exchange between the fluid and the plate causes a drop in the temperature gradient, which subsequently alters the θ ( η ) profile.

Figure 5 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           S
                           =
                           1.0
                           ,
                           1.5
                           ,
                           2.0
                           ,
                           2.5
                        
                        S=1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           f'
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        {f\text{'}}\left(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                  .
Figure 5

(a) and (b) Impact of S = 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 , 2.5 on f' ( η ) and θ ( η ) .

Figure 6(a) and (b) examines the impact of the parameter Ω on velocity and temperature θ ( η ) distribution. The graph demonstrates that velocity profile is decreasing, while temperature for both CNTs is showing an increasing behavior. Adding CNTs to the nanofluid may have additional effects on the velocity profile owing to the distinctive characteristics of CNTs. In this scenario, however, the primary effect of the viscosity parameter may be greater than that of other components, resulting in a decreased velocity profile. Changing the viscosity parameter usually leads to a rise in the θ ( η ) profile. Increased viscosity leads to increased fluid resistance, causing a rise in internal friction within the unit. Increasing the level of friction inside the system dissipates more energy as heat, leading to a rise in the θ ( η ) profile.

Figure 6 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Ω
                           =
                           ‒
                           0.5
                           ,
                           0
                           ,
                           ‒
                           1.0
                           ,
                           ‒
                           1.5
                           ,
                           ‒
                           2.0
                        
                        \Omega =&#x2012;0.5,0,&#x2012;1.0,&#x2012;1.5,&#x2012;2.0
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           f'
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        {f\text{'}}\left(\eta )
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                  .
Figure 6

(a) and (b) Impact of Ω = 0.5 , 0 , 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 on f' ( η ) and θ ( η ) .

Figure 7(a) and (b) examines the impact of the parameters Rd and θ w on temperature distribution. The graph proves that advanced values of Rd and θ w lead to an increase in temperature for both CNTs. As the R d parameter upsurges, the heat transfer process inside the fluid becomes more intense, resulting in a greater exchange of thermal energy between the fluid and the environment in which it is located. This leads to a rise in the temperature profile, and because of the situation, the temperature profile rises. A higher temperature ratio indicates a larger temperature difference between the fluid and its surroundings. The heightened temperature gradient speeds up thermal energy transmission, enabling the fluid to absorb more heat from its surroundings. The fluid’s temperature gradient increases.

Figure 7 
               (a, b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Rd
                           =
                           0.1
                           ,
                           0.3
                           ,
                           0.5
                           ,
                           0.7
                        
                        {\rm{Rd}}=0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 θ
                              
                              
                                 w
                              
                           
                           =
                           1.1
                           ,
                           1.2
                           ,
                           1.3
                           ,
                           1.4
                        
                        {\theta }_{{\rm{w}}}=1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           (
                           η
                           )
                        
                        \theta \left(\eta )
                     
                  .
Figure 7

(a, b) Impact of Rd = 0.1 , 0.3 , 0.5 , 0.7 and θ w = 1.1 , 1.2 , 1.3 , 1.4 on θ ( η ) .

Figure 8 depicts the influence of Casson parameter β and shrinking parameter λ on skin friction Re x 1 / 2 C f x . The findings reveal that Re x 1 / 2 C f x decreases as value of β and λ upsurges. A component known as yield stress is incorporated into the Casson model. This word indicates the minimal stress that is required to commence flow. There is a direct correlation between an increased Casson parameter and an increase in yield stress. This increased yield stress indicates that a bigger force is required for the commencement of flow, which ultimately results in a lesser amount of skin friction. It is possible to establish a connection between the shrinked parameter in nanofluids and the alignment or orientation of nanoparticles within the fluid. The alignment of nanoparticles can result in an increase in viscosity and a reduction in flow of fluid. With an increase in shrinked parameter, this alignment effect becomes more pronounced, which contributes to a decrease in amount of skin friction.

Figure 8 
               Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           1.0
                           ,
                           1.5
                           ,
                           2.0
                           ,
                           2.5
                        
                        \beta =0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}{C}_{{\rm{f}}x}
                     
                  .
Figure 8

Impact of β = 0.5 , 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 , 2.5 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 C f x .

Figure 9(a) and (b) presents the impact of suction parameter S on skin friction Re x 1 / 2 C f x , and Nusselt number Re x 1 / 2 Nu x with the values indicating an apparent increase in Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x compared to its actual value. It is important to note this discrepancy. The inclusion of the suction component decelerates the motion of CNTs, leading to an increased velocity difference alongside of permeable moving plate. This introduces an unexpected velocity gradient due to the suction effect. Consequently, near-wall fluid motions responsible for heat transfer are initiated, and the buoyant forces induced by influence of strong viscosity are attenuated. Suction induces the formation of an unforeseen velocity gradient.

Figure 9 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           S
                           =
                           1.0
                           ,
                           1.5
                           ,
                           2.0
                           ,
                           2.5
                        
                        S=1.0,1.5,2.0,2.5
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}{C}_{{\rm{f}}x}
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 9

(a) and (b) Impact of S = 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 , 2.5 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 10(a) and (b) presents the impact of variable viscosity parameter Ω with λ on skin friction Re x 1 / 2 C f x , and Nusselt number Re x 1 / 2 Nu x with the values indicating an apparent increase in skin friction and a decrease in Nusselt number compared to its actual value. Changing the viscosity parameter of the Casson nanofluid increases its resistance to flow, resulting in heightened frictional forces acting on the fluid along the surface of the moving plate. This disorder causes the skin to become more susceptible to friction. The Nusselt number tells us about the convective heat transfer rate and how thick the thermal barrier layer is. As its viscosity and factors decrease, the fluid’s flow resistance increases. This makes the temperature boundary layer thicker. Because this thicker border layer makes it harder for heat to move through convection, the Nusselt number goes down.

Figure 10 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Ω
                           =
                           ‒
                           0.5
                           ,
                           ‒
                           1.0
                           ,
                           ‒
                           1.5
                           ,
                           ‒
                           2.0
                           ,
                           ‒
                           2.5
                        
                        \Omega =&#x2012;0.5,&#x2012;1.0,&#x2012;1.5,&#x2012;2.0,&#x2012;2.5
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}{C}_{{\rm{f}}x}
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 10

(a) and (b) Impact of Ω = 0.5 , 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 , 2.5 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 11(a) and (b) presents the impact of parameter ϕ with λ on skin friction Re x 1 / 2 C f x , and Nusselt number Re x 1 / 2 Nu x with the values indicating an apparent increase in Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x compared to its actual value. A larger volume fraction number implies a greater concentration of nanoparticles in the nanofluid, leading to an increased number of nanoparticles in the nanofluid. Increasing the fluid’s viscosity results in an increase in the frictional forces that the fluid encounters along the surface of the moving plate. As a result, skin friction increases. Nanoparticles have a noteworthy surface area-to-volume ratio in comparison with other particles. At the same time, as there is an increase in volume percentage of nanoparticles, there is a corresponding increase in the surface area that is available for heat exchange. Because of this augmented surface area, the fluid can transport heat more efficiently to its surroundings, which eventually leads to an upsurge in Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 11 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           ϕ
                           =
                           0.02
                           ,
                           0.04
                           ,
                           0.06
                           ,
                           0.08
                           ,
                           0.1
                        
                        \phi =0.02,0.04,0.06,0.08,0.1
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}{C}_{{\rm{f}}x}
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 11

(a) and (b) Impact of ϕ = 0.02 , 0.04 , 0.06 , 0.08 , 0.1 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 12(a) and (b) examines the impact of the Prandtl parameter Pr with λ on skin friction and Nusselt number. Skin friction is decreasing, while Nusselt number is increasing, as shown in Figure 12(a) and (b). Increases in the Prandtl value are associated with an increase in thermal diffusivity in comparison with momentum diffusivity. As a result, the fluid is more effective at transmitting heat than it is at transferring momentum, which helps to reduce viscous effects and skin friction. Increasing the Prandtl parameter significantly raises the thermal diffusivity of the fluid compared to its viscosity. Reducing the thickness of the thermal boundary layer improves convective heat transfer. The Nusselt number increases.

Figure 12 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Pr
                           =
                           2.0
                           ,
                           4.0
                           ,
                           6.0
                           ,
                           8.0
                           ,
                           10.0
                        
                        \Pr =2.0,4.0,6.0,8.0,10.0
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 C
                              
                              
                                 f
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{1/2}{C}_{{\rm{f}}x}
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 12

(a) and (b) Impact of Pr = 2.0 , 4.0 , 6.0 , 8.0 , 10.0 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 C f x and Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 13(a) and (b) shows the effect of radiation parameter Rd and θ w with λ on Re x 1 / 2 Nu x . Heat transfer rate is decreasing for both variations. With an upsurge in the radiation parameter, it has been observed that the impact of radiation heat transfer becomes more pronounced. The efficiency of thermal radiation in enabling heat transfer through convection is often lower when compared to the efficiency of other mechanisms such as conduction and convection. There is a possibility that the presence of radiation will reduce the overall convective heat transfer, which will ultimately lead to a reduction in the Nusselt number. The occurrence of this scenario will take place if radiation has a noteworthy impact on the process of heat transfer. An increased temperature ratio and a stretched parameter may alter fluid flow dynamics and thermal properties. An increased temperature ratio may enhance convective heat transfer, while a stretched parameter can affect fluid flow patterns and thermal boundary-layer thickness. These factors influence the Nusselt number through their varying amplitude and direction.

Figure 13 
               (a) and (b) Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           Rd
                           =
                           0.1
                           ,
                           0.3
                           ,
                           0.5
                           ,
                           0.7
                           ,
                           0.9
                        
                        {\rm{Rd}}=0.1,0.3,0.5,0.7,0.9
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 θ
                              
                              
                                 w
                              
                           
                           =
                           1.1
                           ,
                           1.2
                           ,
                           1.3
                           ,
                           1.4
                           ,
                           1.5
                        
                        {\theta }_{{\rm{w}}}=1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5
                     
                   with 
                     
                        
                        
                           λ
                        
                        \lambda 
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 13

(a) and (b) Impact of Rd = 0.1 , 0.3 , 0.5 , 0.7 , 0.9 with λ and θ w = 1.1 , 1.2 , 1.3 , 1.4 , 1.5 with λ on Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

Figure 14 shows the influence of β on Re x 1 / 2 Nu x for both SWCNTs and MWCNTs. Heat transfer rate is increasing with an increase in Casson parameter, and it shows that result for MWCNTs is much better than SWCNTs. A yield stress term is included in the Casson model, which represents the lowest stress required to initiate fluid flow. The yield stress increases in tandem with an increase in the Casson parameter. The increased yield stress promotes a more steady and regulated flow, which enhances the properties of heat transfer. One factor that improves heat transfer is the fluid’s capacity to flow effectively even when there is a yield stress.

Figure 14 
               Impact of 
                     
                        
                        
                           β
                           =
                           0.5
                           ,
                           1.0
                           ,
                           1.5
                           ,
                           2.0
                        
                        \beta =0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0
                     
                   on 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Re
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                              
                                 
                                    ‒
                                    1
                                 
                                 /
                                 
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           
                              
                                 Nu
                              
                              
                                 x
                              
                           
                        
                        {\mathrm{Re}}_{x}^{&#x2012;1/2}{{\rm{Nu}}}_{x}
                     
                  .
Figure 14

Impact of β = 0.5 , 1.0 , 1.5 , 2.0 on Re x 1 / 2 Nu x .

5 Conclusion

The main aim of this research is to examine the impact of ϕ , β , λ , S , Rd , Pr , Ω , and θ w on velocity, temperature, skin friction, and heat transfer. The methodology and results have been thoroughly discussed, yielding several key findings. RK-IV with shooting method is used to solve the differential equations. The key findings of the current study are as follows:

  • Higher values of Casson parameter β enhance the fluid velocity while decelerating the temperature field.

  • The velocity of CNT’s suspended nanofluid (both SWCNTs and MWCNTs) decreases with increasing shrinking parameter λ , while temperature profiles increase.

  • Additionally, an increase in solid volume fraction ϕ leads to higher temperatures.

  • Moreover, larger mass suction S enhances velocity and reduces temperature.

  • The findings reveal that the skin friction coefficient Re x 1 / 2 C f x rises as the values of β and λ increase along with ϕ .

  • The results indicate that the Nusselt number Re x 1 / 2 Nu x increases with higher values of ϕ , β , λ , and S .

  • The skin friction Re x 1 / 2 C f x reduces, while the Nusselt number Re x 1 / 2 Nu x upsurges with an increase in Prandtl number.

  • The rate of heat transfer and the quantity of skin friction are both affected by changes in the viscosity parameter.

  • The Nusselt number decreases with increasing values of Rd and θ w .

To handle the nonlinear equations that dictate the behavior of Casson fluids that contain CNTs above a permeable moving plate, it is possible to develop advanced numerical approaches or computational tools. It is possible that this endeavor will involve the application of finite element methods, finite volume methods, or other alternative methodologies within the field of CFD. Investigate the ways in which the dynamics of fluids, heat transport, and rheological behavior are affected by the features that are inherent to CNTs, such as their length and radius. Investigate the potential implications that different types of nanoparticles or hybrid nanomaterials could have on the system. This study should investigate more than just simple models of thermal radiation. It should also include variables that change based on temperature and how radiative heat transfer affects the overall properties of fluid flow and heat transfer.

Acknowledgments

Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSPD2024R1060), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  1. Funding information: The study was funded by Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSPD2024R1060), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

  2. Author contributions: K. R., Z.M., and A: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, validation, and writing – original draft. U.K.: writing – original draft, data curation, investigation, visualization, supervision, and validation. B.A.: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, and resources. F.A.A. and E.A.A.I: validation, investigation, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, project administration, funding acquisition, and software. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Hamid M, Usman M, Khan ZH, Ahmad R, Wang W. Dual solutions and stability analysis of flow and heat transfer of Casson fluid over a stretching sheet. Phys Lett A. 2019 Jul;383(20):2400–8.10.1016/j.physleta.2019.04.050Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jamshed W, Uma Devi SS, Goodarzi M, Prakash M, Sooppy Nisar K, Zakarya M, et al. Evaluating the unsteady Casson nanofluid over a stretching sheet with solar thermal radiation: An optimal case study. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2021 Aug;26:101160.10.1016/j.csite.2021.101160Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gomathi N, De P. Impact of hall currents and ion slip on mixed convective casson williamson nanofluid flow with viscous dissipation through porous medium. Nanosci Technol Int J. 2024;15.10.1615/NanoSciTechnolIntJ.2023047611Search in Google Scholar

[4] Poulomi D, Ekambaram S. Bioconvective Casson nanofluid flow toward stagnation point in non‐Darcy porous medium with buoyancy effects, chemical reaction, and thermal radiation. Heat Transfer. Wiley Online Library [Internet]; 2023. [cited 2024 Feb 22]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/htj.22753.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Vinodkumar Reddy M, Vajravelu K, Lakshminarayana P, Sucharitha G. Heat source and Joule heating effects on convective MHD stagnation point flow of Casson nanofluid through a porous medium with chemical reaction. Numer Heat Transf Part B Fundam. 2024 Mar;85(3):286–304.10.1080/10407790.2023.2233694Search in Google Scholar

[6] Awan AU, Ahammad NA, Shatanawi W, Allahyani SA, Tag-ElDin EM, Abbas N, et al. Significance of magnetic field and Darcy–Forchheimer law on dynamics of Casson-Sutterby nanofluid subject to a stretching circular cylinder. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022 Dec;139:106399.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106399Search in Google Scholar

[7] Abbas N, Shatanawi W, Abodayeh K. Computational analysis of MHD nonlinear radiation casson hybrid nanofluid flow at vertical stretching sheet. Symmetry. 2022 Jul;14(7):1494.10.3390/sym14071494Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lanjwani HB, Saleem S, Chandio MS, Anwar MI, Abbas N. Stability analysis of triple solutions of Casson nanofluid past on a vertical exponentially stretching/shrinking sheet. Adv Mech Eng. 2021 Nov;13(11):16878140211059679.10.1177/16878140211059679Search in Google Scholar

[9] Reddy MV, Lakshminarayana P. Cross-diffusion and heat source effects on a three-dimensional MHD flow of Maxwell nanofluid over a stretching surface with chemical reaction. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2021 Jul;230(5):1371–9.10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00037-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] Maleki H, Safaei MR, Alrashed AAAA, Kasaeian A. Flow and heat transfer in non-Newtonian nanofluids over porous surfaces. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019 Feb;135(3):1655–66.10.1007/s10973-018-7277-9Search in Google Scholar

[11] Amjad M, Zehra I, Nadeem S, Abbas N, Saleem A, Issakhov A. Influence of Lorentz force and induced magnetic field effects on casson micropolar nanofluid flow over a permeable curved stretching/shrinking surface under the stagnation region. Surf Interfaces. 2020 Dec;21:100766.10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100766Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kasim ARM, Arifin NS, Ariffin NAN, Salleh MZ, Anwar MI. Mathematical model of simultaneous flow between casson fluid and dust particle over a vertical stretching sheet. Int J Integr Eng. 2020 Feb;12(3):253–60.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Adnan, Ashraf W. Thermal efficiency in hybrid (Al2 O3-CuO/H2O) and ternary hybrid nanofluids (Al2 O3-CuO-Cu/H2O) by considering the novel effects of imposed magnetic field and convective heat condition. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022 Jul;1–16.10.1080/17455030.2022.2092233Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ahmed N, Adnan, Khan U, Mohyud-Din ST. Influence of thermal radiation and viscous dissipation on squeezed flow of water between Riga plates saturated with carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp. 2017 Jun;522:389–98.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.083Search in Google Scholar

[15] Maleki H, Safaei MR, Togun H, Dahari M. Heat transfer and fluid flow of pseudo-plastic nanofluid over a moving permeable plate with viscous dissipation and heat absorption/generation. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019 Feb;135(3):1643–54.10.1007/s10973-018-7559-2Search in Google Scholar

[16] Alazwari MA, Abu-Hamdeh NH, Goodarzi M. Entropy optimization of first-grade viscoelastic nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet by using classical Keller-box scheme. Mathematics. 2021 Jan;9(20):2563.10.3390/math9202563Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mahmood Z, Khan U. Mixed convective flow of nanofluid across exponential surface: A numerical assessment of the impact of Darcy-Forchheimer and nanoparticle aggregation. Numer Heat Transf Part Appl. 2023 Nov;1–26.10.1080/10407782.2023.2288265Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xue QZ. Model for thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Phys B Condens Matter. 2005 Nov;368(1):302–7.10.1016/j.physb.2005.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[19] Shahzad F, Jamshed W, Eid MR, Ibrahim RW, Safdar R, Nisar KS, et al. Thermal amelioration in heat transfer rate using Oldroyd-B model hybrid nanofluid by CNTs-based kerosene oil flow in solar collectors applications. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–31.10.1080/17455030.2022.2157511Search in Google Scholar

[20] Shamshuddin MD, Animasaun IL, Salawu SO, Rao PS. Dynamics of ethylene glycol conveying MWCNTs and ethylene glycol conveying SWCNTs: Significant joule heating and thermal radiation. Numer Heat Transf Part Appl. 2023;1–20.10.1080/10407782.2023.2195130Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kiran Kumar T, Srinivasa Rao P, Shamshuddin Md. Effect of thermal radiation on nonDarcy hydromagnetic convective heat and mass transfer flow of a water–SWCNT’s and MWCNT’s nanofluids in a cylindrical annulus with thermo-diffusion and chemical reaction. Int J Mod Phys B. 2024 Jan;38(1):2450011.10.1142/S0217979224500115Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hayat T, Haider F, Muhammad T, Ahmad B. Darcy–Forchheimer flow of carbon nanotubes due to a convectively heated rotating disk with homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019 Sep;137(6):1939–49.10.1007/s10973-019-08110-1Search in Google Scholar

[23] Rafique K, Mahmood Z, Khan U, Eldin SM, Alzubaidi AM. Mathematical analysis of radius and length of CNTs on flow of nanofluid over surface with variable viscosity and joule heating. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17673. [cited 2024 Mar 27]. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(23)04881-8.pdf.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17673Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Mahmood Z, Rafique K, Adnan, Khan U, Muhammad T, Hassan AM. MHD unsteady flow of carbon nanotubes over nonlinear radiative surface with anisotropic slip conditions: computational analysis of irreversibility for Yamada-Ota model. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2024 Dec;18(1):2309139.10.1080/19942060.2024.2309139Search in Google Scholar

[25] Imtiaz M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B. Convective flow of carbon nanotubes between rotating stretchable disks with thermal radiation effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016 Oct;101:948–57.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.114Search in Google Scholar

[26] Abbas N, Rehman KU, Shatanawi W, Abodayeh K. Mathematical model of temperature-dependent flow of power-law nanofluid over a variable stretching Riga sheet. Waves Random Complex Media. 2022;1–18.10.1080/17455030.2022.2111029Search in Google Scholar

[27] Mulinti VR, Lakshminarayana P. Influence of thermal radiation and viscous dissipation on MHD flow of UCM fluid over a porous stretching sheet with higher order chemical reaction. Spec Top Amp Rev Porous Media Int J. 2021;12.10.1615/SpecialTopicsRevPorousMedia.2020033950Search in Google Scholar

[28] Khan M, Hashim, Hussain M, Azam M. Magnetohydrodynamic flow of Carreau fluid over a convectively heated surface in the presence of non-linear radiation. J Magn Magn Mater. 2016 Aug;412:63–8.10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.077Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rehman KU, Malik AA, Malik MY, Ul Saba N. Mutual effects of thermal radiations and thermal stratification on tangent hyperbolic fluid flow yields by both cylindrical and flat surfaces. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2017 Sep;10:244–54.10.1016/j.csite.2017.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] Vinodkumar Reddy M, Lakshminarayana P. Higher order chemical reaction and radiation effects on magnetohydrodynamic flow of a Maxwell nanofluid with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model over a stretching sheet in a porous medium. J Fluids Eng. 2022;144(4):041204.10.1115/1.4053250Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mushtaq A, Mustafa M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Nonlinear radiative heat transfer in the flow of nanofluid due to solar energy: A numerical study. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014 Jul;45(4):1176–83.10.1016/j.jtice.2013.11.008Search in Google Scholar

[32] Rahman MM, Eltayeb IA. Radiative heat transfer in a hydromagnetic nanofluid past a non-linear stretching surface with convective boundary condition. Meccanica. 2013 Apr;48(3):601–15.10.1007/s11012-012-9618-2Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sheikholeslami M, Domiri Ganji D, Younus Javed M, Ellahi R. Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015 Jan;374:36–43.10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[34] Turkyilmazoglu M, Pop I. Heat and mass transfer of unsteady natural convection flow of some nanofluids past a vertical infinite flat plate with radiation effect. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013 Apr;59:167–71.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.009Search in Google Scholar

[35] Sakiadis BC. Boundary-layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: II. The boundary layer on a continuous flat surface. AIChE J. 1961;7(2):221–5.10.1002/aic.690070211Search in Google Scholar

[36] Blasius H. Grenzschichten in Flüssigkeiten mit kleiner Reibung. Leipzig: Druck von B.G. Teubner; 1907. p. 46.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Tsou FK, Sparrow EM, Goldstein RJ. Flow and heat transfer in the boundary layer on a continuous moving surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1967 Feb;10(2):219–35.10.1016/0017-9310(67)90100-7Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tsai SY, Hsu TH. Thermal transport of a continuous moving plate in a non-Newtonian fluid. Comput Math Appl. 1995 Mar;29(6):99–108.10.1016/0898-1221(95)00011-MSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Cortell Bataller R. Radiation effects in the Blasius flow. Appl Math Comput. 2008 Apr;198(1):333–8.10.1016/j.amc.2007.08.037Search in Google Scholar

[40] Haile E, Shankar B. Boundary-layer flow of nanofluids over a moving surface in the presence of thermal radiation, viscous dissipation and chemical reaction. Appl Appl Math Int J AAM. 2015 Dec;10(2):21. https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/aam/vol10/iss2/21.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Awan AU, Abid S, Abbas N. Theoretical study of unsteady oblique stagnation point based Jeffrey nanofluid flow over an oscillatory stretching sheet. Adv Mech Eng. 2020 Nov;12(11):1687814020971881.10.1177/1687814020971881Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bani-Fwaz MZ, Mahmood Z, Bilal M, EI-Zahhar AA, Khan I, Niazai S. Computational investigation of thermal process in radiated nanofluid modulation influenced by nanoparticles (Al2O3) and molecular (H2O) diameters. J Comput Des Eng. 2024;11(2):22–36.10.1093/jcde/qwae011Search in Google Scholar

[43] Mahmood Z, Rafique K, Khan U, Jubiar S, Awwad FA, Ismail EA. Investigation of entropy generation in the existence of heat generation and nanoparticle clustering on porous Riga plate during nanofluid flow. Mater Today Commun. 2024;38:108165.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108165Search in Google Scholar

[44] Khan U, Rafique K, Mahmood Z. Significance of unsteady rotating flow of nanofluid with nanoparticles aggregation and impacts of slip conditions and variable viscosity. Numer Heat Transf Part Appl. 2024 Jan;1–28.10.1080/10407782.2023.2299294Search in Google Scholar

[45] Alqahtani A, Rafique K, Mahmood Z, Al-Sinan B, Khan U, Hassan A. MHD rotating flow over a stretching surface: The role of viscosity and aggregation of nanoparticles. Heliyon. 2023 Oct;9:e21107.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21107Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[46] Al-Kouz W, Abderrahmane A, Shamshuddin MD, Younis O, Mohammed S, Bég OA, et al. Heat transfer and entropy generation analysis of water-Fe3O4/CNT hybrid magnetic nanofluid flow in a trapezoidal wavy enclosure containing porous media with the Galerkin finite element method. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021 Nov;136(11):1184.10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02192-3Search in Google Scholar

[47] Masad JA, Nayfeh AH. Effects of suction and wall shaping on the fundamental parametric resonance in boundary layers. Phys Fluids Fluid Dyn. 1992 May;4(5):963–74.10.1063/1.858277Search in Google Scholar

[48] Rosali H, Ishak A, Pop I. Micropolar fluid flow towards a stretching/shrinking sheet in a porous medium with suction. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2012 Jul;39(6):826–9.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[49] Pandey AK, Kumar M. Effect of viscous dissipation and suction/injection on MHD nanofluid flow over a wedge with porous medium and slip. Alex Eng J. 2016 Dec;55(4):3115–23.10.1016/j.aej.2016.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[50] Aladdin NAL, Bachok N. Boundary layer flow and heat transfer of Al2O3-TiO2/water hybrid nanofluid over a permeable moving plate. Symmetry. 2020 Jun;12(7):1064.10.3390/sym12071064Search in Google Scholar

[51] Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I. Boundary layer flow over a moving surface in a nanofluid with suction or injection. Acta Mech Sin. 2012 Feb;28(1):34–40.10.1007/s10409-012-0014-xSearch in Google Scholar

[52] Rafique K, Mahmood Z, Alqahtani A, Elsiddieg A, Khan U, Debani W, et al. Impacts of thermal radiation with nanoparticle aggregation and variable viscosity on unsteady bidirectional rotating stagnation point flow of nanofluid. Mater Today Commun. 2023 Jul;36:106735.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106735Search in Google Scholar

[53] Tadesse FB, Makinde OD, Enyadene LG. Hydromagnetic stagnation point flow of a magnetite ferrofluid past a convectively heated permeable stretching/shrinking sheet in a Darcy–Forchheimer porous medium. Sādhanā. 2021 Sep;46(3):115.10.1007/s12046-021-01643-ySearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-26
Revised: 2024-02-29
Accepted: 2024-03-20
Published Online: 2024-05-07

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the channel of panel-type radiator with semi-detached inclined trapezoidal wing vortex generators
  3. Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid
  4. High-speed mid-infrared Mach–Zehnder electro-optical modulators in lithium niobate thin film on sapphire
  5. Numerical analysis of dengue transmission model using Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative
  6. Mononuclear nanofluids undergoing convective heating across a stretching sheet and undergoing MHD flow in three dimensions: Potential industrial applications
  7. Heat transfer characteristics of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles scattered in sodium alginate-based non-Newtonian nanofluid over a stretching/shrinking horizontal plane surface
  8. The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis
  9. Growth, characterization, and anti-bacterial activity of l-methionine supplemented with sulphamic acid single crystals
  10. A numerical analysis of the blood-based Casson hybrid nanofluid flow past a convectively heated surface embedded in a porous medium
  11. Optoelectronic–thermomagnetic effect of a microelongated non-local rotating semiconductor heated by pulsed laser with varying thermal conductivity
  12. Thermal proficiency of magnetized and radiative cross-ternary hybrid nanofluid flow induced by a vertical cylinder
  13. Enhanced heat transfer and fluid motion in 3D nanofluid with anisotropic slip and magnetic field
  14. Numerical analysis of thermophoretic particle deposition on 3D Casson nanofluid: Artificial neural networks-based Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm
  15. Analyzing fuzzy fractional Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holm equations with the Atangana–Baleanu operator
  16. Bayesian estimation of equipment reliability with normal-type life distribution based on multiple batch tests
  17. Chaotic control problem of BEC system based on Hartree–Fock mean field theory
  18. Optimized framework numerical solution for swirling hybrid nanofluid flow with silver/gold nanoparticles on a stretching cylinder with heat source/sink and reactive agents
  19. Stability analysis and numerical results for some schemes discretising 2D nonconstant coefficient advection–diffusion equations
  20. Convective flow of a magnetohydrodynamic second-grade fluid past a stretching surface with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model
  21. Analysis of the heat transfer enhancement in water-based micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow over a vertical flat surface
  22. Microscopic seepage simulation of gas and water in shale pores and slits based on VOF
  23. Model of conversion of flow from confined to unconfined aquifers with stochastic approach
  24. Study of fractional variable-order lymphatic filariasis infection model
  25. Soliton, quasi-soliton, and their interaction solutions of a nonlinear (2 + 1)-dimensional ZK–mZK–BBM equation for gravity waves
  26. Application of conserved quantities using the formal Lagrangian of a nonlinear integro partial differential equation through optimal system of one-dimensional subalgebras in physics and engineering
  27. Nonlinear fractional-order differential equations: New closed-form traveling-wave solutions
  28. Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model
  29. Some transforms, Riemann–Liouville fractional operators, and applications of newly extended M–L (p, s, k) function
  30. Magnetohydrodynamic water-based hybrid nanofluid flow comprising diamond and copper nanoparticles on a stretching sheet with slips constraints
  31. Super-resolution reconstruction method of the optical synthetic aperture image using generative adversarial network
  32. A two-stage framework for predicting the remaining useful life of bearings
  33. Influence of variable fluid properties on mixed convective Darcy–Forchheimer flow relation over a surface with Soret and Dufour spectacle
  34. Inclined surface mixed convection flow of viscous fluid with porous medium and Soret effects
  35. Exact solutions to vorticity of the fractional nonuniform Poiseuille flows
  36. In silico modified UV spectrophotometric approaches to resolve overlapped spectra for quality control of rosuvastatin and teneligliptin formulation
  37. Numerical simulations for fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled Korteweg–de Vries systems
  38. Substituent effect on the electronic and optical properties of newly designed pyrrole derivatives using density functional theory
  39. A comparative analysis of shielding effectiveness in glass and concrete containers
  40. Numerical analysis of the MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet through a Darcy porous medium: Modeling and simulation
  41. Analytical and numerical investigation for viscoelastic fluid with heat transfer analysis during rollover-web coating phenomena
  42. Influence of variable viscosity on existing sheet thickness in the calendering of non-isothermal viscoelastic materials
  43. Analysis of nonlinear fractional-order Fisher equation using two reliable techniques
  44. Comparison of plan quality and robustness using VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer
  45. Radiative nanofluid flow over a slender stretching Riga plate under the impact of exponential heat source/sink
  46. Numerical investigation of acoustic streaming vortices in cylindrical tube arrays
  47. Numerical study of blood-based MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity and cross-diffusion
  48. Fractional view analytical analysis of generalized regularized long wave equation
  49. Dynamic simulation of non-Newtonian boundary layer flow: An enhanced exponential time integrator approach with spatially and temporally variable heat sources
  50. Inclined magnetized infinite shear rate viscosity of non-Newtonian tetra hybrid nanofluid in stenosed artery with non-uniform heat sink/source
  51. Estimation of monotone α-quantile of past lifetime function with application
  52. Numerical simulation for the slip impacts on the radiative nanofluid flow over a stretched surface with nonuniform heat generation and viscous dissipation
  53. Study of fractional telegraph equation via Shehu homotopy perturbation method
  54. An investigation into the impact of thermal radiation and chemical reactions on the flow through porous media of a Casson hybrid nanofluid including unstable mixed convection with stretched sheet in the presence of thermophoresis and Brownian motion
  55. Establishing breather and N-soliton solutions for conformable Klein–Gordon equation
  56. An electro-optic half subtractor from a silicon-based hybrid surface plasmon polariton waveguide
  57. CFD analysis of particle shape and Reynolds number on heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid in heated tube
  58. Abundant exact traveling wave solutions and modulation instability analysis to the generalized Hirota–Satsuma–Ito equation
  59. A short report on a probability-based interpretation of quantum mechanics
  60. Study on cavitation and pulsation characteristics of a novel rotor-radial groove hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
  61. Optimizing heat transport in a permeable cavity with an isothermal solid block: Influence of nanoparticles volume fraction and wall velocity ratio
  62. Linear instability of the vertical throughflow in a porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid with variable gravity effect
  63. Thermal analysis of generalized Cattaneo–Christov theories in Burgers nanofluid in the presence of thermo-diffusion effects and variable thermal conductivity
  64. A new benchmark for camouflaged object detection: RGB-D camouflaged object detection dataset
  65. Effect of electron temperature and concentration on production of hydroxyl radical and nitric oxide in atmospheric pressure low-temperature helium plasma jet: Swarm analysis and global model investigation
  66. Double diffusion convection of Maxwell–Cattaneo fluids in a vertical slot
  67. Thermal analysis of extended surfaces using deep neural networks
  68. Steady-state thermodynamic process in multilayered heterogeneous cylinder
  69. Multiresponse optimisation and process capability analysis of chemical vapour jet machining for the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer: Unveiling the morphology
  70. Modeling monkeypox virus transmission: Stability analysis and comparison of analytical techniques
  71. Fourier spectral method for the fractional-in-space coupled Whitham–Broer–Kaup equations on unbounded domain
  72. The chaotic behavior and traveling wave solutions of the conformable extended Korteweg–de-Vries model
  73. Research on optimization of combustor liner structure based on arc-shaped slot hole
  74. Construction of M-shaped solitons for a modified regularized long-wave equation via Hirota's bilinear method
  75. Effectiveness of microwave ablation using two simultaneous antennas for liver malignancy treatment
  76. Discussion on optical solitons, sensitivity and qualitative analysis to a fractional model of ion sound and Langmuir waves with Atangana Baleanu derivatives
  77. Reliability of two-dimensional steady magnetized Jeffery fluid over shrinking sheet with chemical effect
  78. Generalized model of thermoelasticity associated with fractional time-derivative operators and its applications to non-simple elastic materials
  79. Migration of two rigid spheres translating within an infinite couple stress fluid under the impact of magnetic field
  80. A comparative investigation of neutron and gamma radiation interaction properties of zircaloy-2 and zircaloy-4 with consideration of mechanical properties
  81. New optical stochastic solutions for the Schrödinger equation with multiplicative Wiener process/random variable coefficients using two different methods
  82. Physical aspects of quantile residual lifetime sequence
  83. Synthesis, structure, IV characteristics, and optical properties of chromium oxide thin films for optoelectronic applications
  84. Smart mathematically filtered UV spectroscopic methods for quality assurance of rosuvastatin and valsartan from formulation
  85. A novel investigation into time-fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations within Aboodh transform
  86. Homotopic dynamic solution of hydrodynamic nonlinear natural convection containing superhydrophobicity and isothermally heated parallel plate with hybrid nanoparticles
  87. A novel tetra hybrid bio-nanofluid model with stenosed artery
  88. Propagation of traveling wave solution of the strain wave equation in microcrystalline materials
  89. Innovative analysis to the time-fractional q-deformed tanh-Gordon equation via modified double Laplace transform method
  90. A new investigation of the extended Sakovich equation for abundant soliton solution in industrial engineering via two efficient techniques
  91. New soliton solutions of the conformable time fractional Drinfel'd–Sokolov–Wilson equation based on the complete discriminant system method
  92. Irradiation of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses by a 365 nm UV lamp
  93. Inflation and the principle of equivalence
  94. The use of a supercontinuum light source for the characterization of passive fiber optic components
  95. Optical solitons to the fractional Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar equation with time-dependent coefficients
  96. A promising photocathode for green hydrogen generation from sanitation water without external sacrificing agent: silver-silver oxide/poly(1H-pyrrole) dendritic nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole film
  97. Photon balance in the fiber laser model
  98. Propagation of optical spatial solitons in nematic liquid crystals with quadruple power law of nonlinearity appears in fluid mechanics
  99. Theoretical investigation and sensitivity analysis of non-Newtonian fluid during roll coating process by response surface methodology
  100. Utilizing slip conditions on transport phenomena of heat energy with dust and tiny nanoparticles over a wedge
  101. Bismuthyl chloride/poly(m-toluidine) nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole: Photocathode for green hydrogen generation
  102. Infrared thermography based fault diagnosis of diesel engines using convolutional neural network and image enhancement
  103. On some solitary wave solutions of the Estevez--Mansfield--Clarkson equation with conformable fractional derivatives in time
  104. Impact of permeability and fluid parameters in couple stress media on rotating eccentric spheres
  105. Review Article
  106. Transformer-based intelligent fault diagnosis methods of mechanical equipment: A survey
  107. Special Issue on Predicting pattern alterations in nature - Part II
  108. A comparative study of Bagley–Torvik equation under nonsingular kernel derivatives using Weeks method
  109. On the existence and numerical simulation of Cholera epidemic model
  110. Numerical solutions of generalized Atangana–Baleanu time-fractional FitzHugh–Nagumo equation using cubic B-spline functions
  111. Dynamic properties of the multimalware attacks in wireless sensor networks: Fractional derivative analysis of wireless sensor networks
  112. Prediction of COVID-19 spread with models in different patterns: A case study of Russia
  113. Study of chronic myeloid leukemia with T-cell under fractal-fractional order model
  114. Accumulation process in the environment for a generalized mass transport system
  115. Analysis of a generalized proportional fractional stochastic differential equation incorporating Carathéodory's approximation and applications
  116. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part II
  117. Numerical study on flow and heat transfer performance of a spiral-wound heat exchanger for natural gas
  118. Study of ultrasonic influence on heat transfer and resistance performance of round tube with twisted belt
  119. Numerical study on bionic airfoil fins used in printed circuit plate heat exchanger
  120. Improving heat transfer efficiency via optimization and sensitivity assessment in hybrid nanofluid flow with variable magnetism using the Yamada–Ota model
  121. Special Issue on Nanofluids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications
  122. Exact solutions of a class of generalized nanofluidic models
  123. Stability enhancement of Al2O3, ZnO, and TiO2 binary nanofluids for heat transfer applications
  124. Thermal transport energy performance on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids and their implementation in concentrated solar aircraft wings
  125. Studying nonlinear vibration analysis of nanoelectro-mechanical resonators via analytical computational method
  126. Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate
  127. Two-phase numerical simulation of thermal and solutal transport exploration of a non-Newtonian nanomaterial flow past a stretching surface with chemical reaction
  128. Natural convection and flow patterns of Cu–water nanofluids in hexagonal cavity: A novel thermal case study
  129. Solitonic solutions and study of nonlinear wave dynamics in a Murnaghan hyperelastic circular pipe
  130. Comparative study of couple stress fluid flow using OHAM and NIM
  131. Utilization of OHAM to investigate entropy generation with a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity model in hybrid nanofluid using the radiation phenomenon
  132. Slip effects on magnetized radiatively hybridized ferrofluid flow with acute magnetic force over shrinking/stretching surface
  133. Significance of 3D rectangular closed domain filled with charged particles and nanoparticles engaging finite element methodology
  134. Robustness and dynamical features of fractional difference spacecraft model with Mittag–Leffler stability
  135. Characterizing magnetohydrodynamic effects on developed nanofluid flow in an obstructed vertical duct under constant pressure gradient
  136. Study on dynamic and static tensile and puncture-resistant mechanical properties of impregnated STF multi-dimensional structure Kevlar fiber reinforced composites
  137. Thermosolutal Marangoni convective flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids with elastic deformation and heat source
  138. Investigation of convective heat transport in a Carreau hybrid nanofluid between two stretchable rotatory disks
  139. Single-channel cooling system design by using perforated porous insert and modeling with POD for double conductive panel
  140. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part I
  141. Pulsed excitation of a quantum oscillator: A model accounting for damping
  142. Review of recent analytical advances in the spectroscopy of hydrogenic lines in plasmas
  143. Heavy mesons mass spectroscopy under a spin-dependent Cornell potential within the framework of the spinless Salpeter equation
  144. Coherent manipulation of bright and dark solitons of reflection and transmission pulses through sodium atomic medium
  145. Effect of the gravitational field strength on the rate of chemical reactions
  146. The kinetic relativity theory – hiding in plain sight
  147. Special Issue on Advanced Energy Materials - Part III
  148. Eco-friendly graphitic carbon nitride–poly(1H pyrrole) nanocomposite: A photocathode for green hydrogen production, paving the way for commercial applications
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2024-0013/html
Scroll to top button