Home The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis
Article Open Access

The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis

  • Humaira Yasmin EMAIL logo , Showkat Ahmad Lone , Ali M. Mahnashi , Waleed Hamali , Zehba Raizah and Anwar Saeed EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 6, 2024

Abstract

A metallic alloy is a combination of two or more elements, often called a compound or a solution. Steel is largely composed of carbon, a nonmetal, but alloys are often made up of metals. In this article, the authors have explored the electrically conducting water-based viscous nanofluids flow past a rotating disk surface. The nanofluids flow is composed of titanium and aluminum alloys where water is used as a base fluid. Two important cases, namely the stretching case and the shrinking case, were investigated to analyze the flow behaviors due to the different embedding factors. The impacts of viscous Joule heating, thermophoresis, Brownian motion, activation energy, nonlinear thermal radiation, and chemical reaction are investigated here. By employing an appropriate set of variables for shifting the leading equations to dimension-free form. The mathematical model is solved numerically by incorporating the bvp4c MATLAB scheme. Current work is validated with previous studies. The outcomes showed that the radial velocity increases when the disk surface stretches and reduces when the disk surface shrinks. On the other hand, the Azimuthal velocity increases when the disk surface shrinks and reduces when disk surface stretches. Both the radial and Azimuthal velocities are the diminishing functions of the magnetic factor, whereas temperature is the growing function of magnetic factor. In addition, the temperature is more influenced by the magnetic factor in the case of nonlinear radiation. The higher magnetic factor increases skin friction. In addition, the stretching case experiences more surface drag than the shrinking case. It is found that nanofluid flow containing titanium alloy has perceived the greater impacts of the embedded factors compared to the nanofluid flow containing aluminum alloy.

Nomenclature

u , v , w

components of flow

r , φ , z

coordinates

B 0

strength of the magnetic field

Ω

angular velocity

u w = ar

stretching velocity

S

stretching/shrinking factor

v w = r Ω

rotational velocity

T

temperature

T f

reference temperature

C

concentration

C f

reference concentration

a

constant

ρ

density

μ

viscosity

σ , k

electrical and thermal conductivities

p

pressure

C p

specific heat

D B

Brownian diffusivity coefficient

D T

thermophoretic coefficient

k r

reaction coefficient

E a

coefficient of activation energy

n

power index

h f , h c

heat and mass transfer coefficients

ϕ

nanoparticle volume fraction

M

magnetic factor

Pr

Prandtl number

ω

temperature difference factor

Bi T , Bi C

thermal and concentration Biot numbers

K r

chemical reaction factor

Nt

thermophoretic factor

Rd

thermal radiation factor

Nb

Brownian motion factor

E

activation energy factor

Sc

Schmidt number

θ w

temperature ratio factor

1 Introduction

It is difficult to achieve high competence in thermal-mass fluidity while working with ordinary fluids that have subpar thermophysical properties. The introduction of the idea of nanofluids brought the issue to some actuality. A fluid that has been infused with quite conductive nanoparticles is known as a nanofluid. In contrast to larger particles, these nanoparticles are easily suspended in the base fluid for long enough duration. The prodigious effort of nanofluid was presented by Choi [1]. Due to the magnificent heat performances, the nanofluid is accepted as a dominant source of energy and has many applications in modern thermal technological and industrial developments. Wen and Ding [2] examined the electrostatic stability processes and the use of a high-shear mixing homogenizer to distribute titanium nanoparticles in pure water. In order to investigate the performance of nanofluids in terms of thermal transference under the conditions of natural convection, these nanofluids are discovered to be extremely stable. Lin and Ghaffari [3] explored heat transmission phenomena of power-law fluid within two extending disks separated by a fixed distance and rotate coaxially. They discovered that rotation improves the velocity components. Wang et al. [4] summarized the fundamental ideas of slip conditions including their definition and categories. An analysis was conducted by Tyler et al. [5] to determine how nanoparticles, specifically nanodiamonds, affect heat transfer in fluids and polymer solids. Techniques are discussed for dispersing nanoparticles in liquids and solids. Heat transfer properties of liquid suspensions are qualitatively compared using a custom thermal transport test setup that measures particle size distributions and fluid viscosities. Using a flash lamp technique, the thermal conductivity of polymer samples is measured to ensure nanoparticle dispersion. A hybrid nanofluid is another creation with enhanced thermal properties than traditional base fluids and nanofluids. Nanoparticles are mixed into a base fluid to form this mixture. In the composition of nanofluids or hybrid nanofluids, metal carbide, metal nitride, metals, metal oxides, and other carbon-based compounds are the most often employed nanoparticles. Sajid and Ali [6] presented an inclusive review of the hybrid nanofluids’ thermal conductivity by overviewing the theoretical and experimental studies on the hybrid nanofluids. They discussed various dynamics affecting thermal conductivity, including nanoparticle type, temperature, variability of pH, and sonication time. The hybrid nanofluid slip flow was inspected by Wahid et al. [7] over a permeable sheet that was stretching/shrinking exponentially over time. The application of alumina and copper in a hybrid system using H 2 O as base fluid is examined and proved that volume fractions on copper nanoparticles can increase both the dragging force and Nusselt number. Yasir and Khan [8] addressed the blood-based hybrid nanofluid flow containing Cu and Ag nanoparticles past a stretching surface using porous media. Their results show that the hybrid nanofluid flow has better performance in terms of heat transfer when compared to blood fluid. Babu et al. [9] investigated the slip flow of a nanofluid past a nonlinear stretching surface. They observed that the rate of heat transfer is higher on the nonlinear stretching surface when compared to linear stretching surface. Yasir et al. [10] presented the stability analysis of a hybrid nanofluid flow over a shrinking/stretching curved surface with nonlinear thermal radiation and heat source and found that the rate of heat transfer increases with the higher thermal radiation factor. Kumaraswamy Naidu et al. [11] examined the sodium alginate-based nanofluid flow containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles over a thermally convective extending surface. They found that the higher thermal Biot number heightens the rate of heat transfer. Harish Babu and Satya Narayana [12] investigated the Jeffrey nanofluid flow due to rotating stretching surface. Yasir et al. [13] addressed the heat transfer analysis of hybrid nanofluid flows over a stretching/shrinking surface. They found that the skin friction increases and velocity distribution reduces with the higher magnetic factor. Some other relevant studies can be seen in refs [1416].

In order to illustrate the impression of Brownian motion and thermophoretic diffusion, different investigators have used the prominent Buongiorno model. Pakravan and Yaghoubi [17] considered the nanoparticle passage of a natural convective thermal transfer of nanofluids. Sheikholeslami and Ganji [18] investigated the heat transmission characteristics of a three-dimensional flow on a rotating sheet with the effects of magnetic field, thermophoresis, and Brownian motion factors. They observed that the magnetic and rotating factors have a direct relation with the skin friction. Also, the Reynolds number has a similar relation with the Nusselt number. Goudarzi et al. [19] addressed the Brownian motion of the water-based hybrid nanofluid comprising Ag and MgO nanoparticles in an enclosure. They showed that there is 11% increment in Nusselt number due to the increasing thermophoresis diffusion of both Ag and MgO nanoparticles. Abdelmalek et al. [20] discussed the bioconvection magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow over an extending sheet with the features of thermal absorption/generation and activation energy by considering the velocity slips and convective conditions. Abdelmalek et al. [21] analyzed the 3D flow of cross-liquid with chemical reaction. Dawar et al. [22] examined hybrid nanofluid flow on a convectively heated curved surface with variable internal heating and Brownian motion. They found that the hybrid nanofluid case experienced more effects from the embedded factor when compared to the nanofluid case.

The importance of rotating disk induced flows in a variety of real-world applications, including aerospace engineering, and food processing technologies, rotational air cleaners, centrifugal pumps, rotor-stator systems, gas turbine engineering, chemical industries, chemical engineering, and turbomachinery. A steady rotating flow of liquid close to a spinning disk was proposed by Kármán [23]. An approximate integral approach was used in the study by Kármán [23] to obtain analytical solutions. Miklavčič [24] identified a few errors in Von Kármán analysis and produced precise numerical estimates for the principal equations. Stuart [25] investigated the Von Kármán flow over a revolving disk of infinite radius with uniform suction and found that the radial component of the flow decreases with the increasing suction factor. Ackroyd [26] studied the laminar flow of fluid past a gyrating disc with suction and injection cases by using series solution with exponents as negative. This method is proven to consistently yield highly accurate solutions for all suction scenarios and for low injection values at the disk surface, demonstrating excellent precision. Shah et al. [27] examined fluid flow on a rotating disk with Hall current. Alreshidi et al. [28] deliberated on the impacts of Brownian motion and thermophoresis on magnetized nanofluid flow with Joule heating and slip conditions due to porous spinning disk. Jyothi et al. [29] considered the effect of activated energy on fluid flow over a revolving disk. Qayyum et al. [30] examined the heat transmission of a dissipative flow of fluid amid two revolving disks. Later on, numerous studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] have been conducted by researchers to investigate different types of flow by considering different physical conditions.

Nanometer-sized metal particles or non-metals and metalloids form the alloy. There are many different types of alloys, but the best ones are brass, steel, phosphor bronze, solder, and gold. In addition to their use in biomedicine, alloys are employed in a wide range of engineering uses like advanced powder technology, fuel cells, surgical implantation, aerospace science technology, drug delivery systems, hip joint replacement processes, nuclear reactors, and various biological treatments. For corrosion protection, nanoparticle coatings of aluminum ( AA7075 ) and titanium ( Ti 6 Al 4 V ) alloy nanoparticles are applied to chemical processing equipment, transpiration cooling, wire, fiber, and heat exchangers. Due to the high susceptibility of metallic alloy nanoparticles to magnetic fields, interactions of flows with magnetic fields can alter the physical as well as thermal features of nanofluids, thereby regulating their flow and thermal transference. Hybrid nanofluids, combining titanium alloy and aluminum alloy nanoparticles, offer intriguing possibilities, especially in applications involving rotating disk surfaces. These applications include heat transfer enhancement, tribological applications, cooling systems in electronics, energy conversion systems, material processing and manufacturing, aerospace and automotive applications, and thermal management in renewable energy systems. Being inspired by the above applications of alloys, the authors are interested in investigating the alloys of aluminum ( AA7075 ) and titanium ( Ti 6 Al 4 V ) over a rotating disk surface. To make novel this study, the following questions, which are not yet addressed, are to be addressed in the present investigation:

  • In which scenario (stretching or shrinking), do the radial and azimuthal velocities exhibit higher values?

  • In which scenario (stretching or shrinking), a magnetic field has diverse impact on the Azimuthal velocity, radial velocity, and drag force at the surface of the rotating disk?

  • In which case (i.e., linear or nonlinear), the thermal radiation has maximum impact on the temperature of the nanofluids flow?

Which water-based nanofluid flow (i.e., Ti 6 Al 4 V nanofluid or AA7075 nanofluid) is greatly influenced by the embedded factors?

Thus, to address the above research questions, the authors have taken the water-based nanofluids flow over an angularly rotating disk surface. Two types of alloys called aluminum alloy and titanium alloy are mixed with water to form the water-based nanofluids flow. Initially, a mathematical framework was proposed in the form of PDEs as presented in Section 2. The numerical solution of the mathematical design is done by using bvp4c MATLAB scheme, which is shown in Section 3. The authentication of the current flow problem and discussion of results are presented in Section 4. The final remarks are concluded in Section 5.

2 Model formulation

Consider a laminar flow of a viscous nanofluid on a rotating disk. The angular velocity of the disk surface is denoted by Ω , which rotates along z - axis. The components of velocity ( u , v , w ) are analyzed, respectively, in r - , φ - , and z - directions. The flow is influenced by the strength of the magnetic field B 0 , which is normal to the flow direction. The rotating disk stretches along a radial direction with velocity u ( r , 0 ) = Su w , where u w = ar is the stretching velocity, S > 0 denotes the stretching scenario, and S < 0 denotes the contracting scenario. In addition, the disk rotates with velocity v ( r , 0 ) = v w (in anticlockwise direction) with velocity v w = r Ω such that Ω 0 . C w , C f , and C denote the surface, fluid, and free-stream concentrations, respectively. In addition, T w , T f , and T depict the surface, fluid, and free-stream temperatures, respectively. A geometrical representation is shown in Figure 1. Moreover, the flow assumptions are as follows:

  1. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion

  2. Chemical reaction and activation energy

  3. Viscous dissipation

  4. Nonlinear thermal radiation

  5. Joule heating

  6. Convective conditions

Figure 1 
               Flow geometry of the problem.
Figure 1

Flow geometry of the problem.

Thus, the leading equations are defined as follows [38,40,41]:

(1) u r + u r + w z = 0 ,

(2) ρ nf w u z v 2 r + u u r = p r + μ nf 2 u r 2 + 2 u z 2 + 1 r u r u r 2 σ nf B 0 2 u ,

(3) ρ nf u v r + w v z + u v r = μ nf 2 v r 2 + 2 v z 2 v r 2 + 1 r u r σ nf B 0 2 v ,

(4) ρ nf w w z + u w r = p z + μ nf 2 w r 2 + w r 1 r + 2 w z 2 ,

(5) ( ρ C p ) nf u T r + w T z = k nf 2 T r 2 + 2 T z 2 + 1 r T r + 16 σ T 3 3 k T 2 T z 2 + 3 T z 2 + ( ρ C p ) np D B C r T r + C z T z + D T T T z 2 + T r 2 + σ nf B 0 2 ( u 2 + v 2 ) + μ nf u z + v z ,

(6) u C r + w C z = D B 1 r C r + 2 C r 2 + 2 C z 2 + D T T T r 1 r + 2 T r 2 + 2 T z 2 k r T T n e E a K T ( C C ) .

The boundary limitations are

(7) u = u w , v = v w , w = 0 , k nf T z = h f ( T f T ) , D B C z = h c ( C f C ) at z = 0 , u 0 , T T , v 0 , C C as z .

The thermophysical features of nanofluid are characterized as follows:

(8) μ nf μ f = 1 ( 1 ϕ ) 2.5 , ρ nf = ρ f ( 1 ϕ ) + ϕ ρ np , ( ρ C p ) nf = ( ρ C p ) f ( 1 ϕ ) + ϕ ( ρ C p ) np , σ nf = σ np + 2 σ f 2 ( σ f σ np ) ϕ σ np + 2 σ f + ( σ f σ np ) ϕ σ f , k nf = k np + 2 k f 2 ( k f k np ) ϕ k np + 2 k f + ( k f k np ) ϕ k f , .

Table 1 shows the thermophysical features of the base fluid and nanoparticles.

Table 1

Thermophysical features of the base fluid and nanoparticles [42,43]

Properties H 2 O AA7075 Ti 6 Al 4 V
σ 0.005 26.77 × 106 5.8 × 105
k 0.613 173 7.2
C p 4,179 960 0.56
ρ 997.1 2,810 4,420

The similarity variables are defined as follows [23,40,44]:

(9) u = Ω r f ( η ) , v = r Ω h ( η ) , w = Ω ν f g ( η ) , ψ ( η ) = C C C f C , θ ( η ) = T T T f T , η = Ω ν f z .

Using Eq. (9) in Eqs. (1)–(7), we have

(10) g + 2 f = 0 ,

(11) μ nf / μ f ρ nf / ρ f f + h 2 f 2 g f σ nf / σ f ρ nf / ρ f M f = 0 ,

(12) μ nf / μ f ρ nf / ρ f h 2 f h g h σ nf / σ f ρ nf / ρ f M h = 0 ,

(13) k nf k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ) 3 θ + Rd ( θ w 1 ) ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ) 2 θ 2 + σ nf σ f M EcPr ( f 2 + h 2 ) + μ nf μ f M ( ( f 2 + h 2 ) ) Pr ( ρ C p ) hnf ( ρ C p ) f g θ + Pr Nt θ 2 + Pr Nb θ ψ = 0 ,

(14) ψ + Nt Nb θ Sc g ψ K r Sc ( 1 + σ θ ) e E ( 1 + σ θ ) ψ = 0 ,

(15) f ( 0 ) = S , h ( 0 ) = 1 , g ( 0 ) = 0 , k nf k f θ ( 0 ) = Bi T ( 1 θ ( 0 ) ) , ψ ( 0 ) = Bi C ( 1 ψ ( 0 ) ) , f ( ) = 0 , h ( ) = 0 , θ ( ) = 0 , ψ ( ) = 0 .

The main factors are described as follows:

(16) M = σ f B 0 2 ρ f Ω , Pr = ν f ( ρ C p ) f k f , ω = T f T T , Bi T = h f k f ν f Ω , Rd = 16 σ T 3 3 k k f , K r = k r Ω , Sc = ν f D B , Nt = ( ρ C p ) np D T ( T f T ) ( ρ C p ) f T ν f , Nb = ( ρ C p ) np D B ( C w C ) ( ρ C p ) f ν f , Bi C = h m D B ν f Ω , E = E a K T , θ w = T f T , .

Skin friction coefficient and Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are described mathematically as follows [45]:

(17) C fr = τ wr 2 + τ wz 2 ρ f ( Ω r ) 2 , Nu r = r q w k f ( T f T ) , Sh r = r q m D B ( C f C ) ,

where

(18) τ wr = μ nf u z + w r z = 0 , τ wz = μ nf 1 r w φ + v z z = 0 , q w = r k f 1 + 16 σ 3 k k f T z z = 0 , q m = r D B C z z = 0 .

Thus, the above equation is reduced as follows:

(19) Re r C f = μ nf μ f f 2 ( 0 ) + h 2 ( 0 ) , 1 Re r Nu = k nf k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) θ ( 0 ) ) 3 θ ( 0 ) , 1 Re r Sh = ψ ( 0 ) ,

where Re r Ω r 2 ν f is the local Reynolds number.

3 Numerical solution

The shooting method is used in the current model to carry out the numerical analysis [46,47,48,49]. The bvp4c MATLAB scheme is used to investigate the first-order system of equations. This approach has the benefits of solving nonlinear system of equations with small effect, allows us to define the error tolerance on our own, can solve those systems that are challenging by using analytical methods, and provides solutions faster than other methods. To apply this technique, let us assume that

(20) g = ξ ( 1 ) , g = ξ ( 1 ) f = ξ ( 2 ) , f = ξ ( 3 ) , f = ξ ( 3 ) h = ξ ( 4 ) , h = ξ ( 5 ) , h = ξ ( 5 ) θ = ξ ( 6 ) , θ = ξ ( 7 ) , θ = ξ ( 7 ) ψ = ξ ( 8 ) , ψ = ξ ( 9 ) , ψ = ξ ( 9 ) .

Then, the modeled ODEs can be written as follows:

(21) ξ ( 1 ) = 2 ξ ( 2 ) ,

(22) ξ ( 3 ) = ( ξ ( 4 ) ) 2 ( ξ ( 3 ) ) 2 ξ ( 1 ) ξ ( 3 ) σ nf / σ f ρ nf / ρ f M ξ ( 2 ) μ nf / μ f ρ nf / ρ f ,

(23) ξ ( 5 ) = 2 ξ ( 2 ) ξ ( 4 ) ξ ( 1 ) ξ ( 5 ) σ nf / σ f ρ nf / ρ f M ξ ( 4 ) μ nf / μ f ρ nf / ρ f ,

(24) ξ ( 7 ) = Rd ( θ w 1 ) ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) ξ ( 6 ) ) 2 ( ξ ( 7 ) ) 2 + σ nf σ f MEcPr ( ( ξ ( 2 ) ) 2 + ( ξ ( 4 ) ) 2 ) + μ nf μ f M ( ( ( ξ ( 3 ) ) 2 + ( ξ ( 5 ) ) 2 ) ) Pr ( ρ C p ) hnf ( ρ C p ) f ξ ( 5 ) ξ ( 7 ) + PrNt ( ξ ( 7 ) ) 2 + Pr Nb ξ ( 7 ) ξ ( 9 ) k nf k f + Rd ( 1 + ( θ w 1 ) ξ ( 6 ) ) 3 ,

(25) ξ Nt Nb ξ ( 7 ) Sc ξ ( 4 ) ξ ( 9 ) K r Sc ( 1 + σ ξ ( 6 ) ) e E ( 1 + σ ξ ( 6 ) ) ξ ( 8 ) ,

(26) ξ Initial ( 2 ) = S , ξ Initial ( 4 ) = 1 , ξ Initial ( 1 ) = 0 , k nf k f ξ Initial ( 7 ) = Bi T ( 1 ξ Initial ( 6 ) ) , ξ Initial ( 9 ) = Bi C ( 1 ξ Initial ( 8 ) ) , ξ Boundary ( 2 ) = 0 , ξ Boundary ( 4 ) = 0 , ξ Boundary ( 6 ) = 0 , ξ Boundary ( 8 ) = 0 .

4 Discussion of results

In this section, we have presented the physical discussion of the flow profiles. The nanofluids flow ( Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid and AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid) over a disk surface that rotates angularly is considered here. Two important cases, namely the stretching case and the shrinking case, were investigated to analyze the flow behaviors due to the different embedding factors. Figures 28 and Tables 35 are displayed in this regard. Figure 2(a) displays the impact of stretching/shrinking ( S ) on radial velocity profile ( f ( ζ ) ). Here, the results of S are shown for two different cases of the disk: (i) when the disk stretches ( S > 0 ) and (ii) when the disk shrinks ( S < 0 ). For S > 0 , f ( ζ ) increases, and for S < 0 , f ( ζ ) reduces. These effects are obvious due to the physical phenomena of the surface. In addition, the effect of S is greater for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid for both S > 0 and S < 0 . Figure 2(b) displays the impression of stretching/shrinking ( S ) on Azimuthal velocity profile ( h ( ζ ) ). Here, the results of S are shown for two different cases of the disk: (i) when the disk stretches ( S > 0 ) and (ii) when the disk shrinks ( S < 0 ). For S < 0 , h ( ζ ) increases, and for S > 0 , h ( ζ ) reduces. In addition, it is concluded that when the disk shrinks, h ( ζ ) increases, and when the disk stretches, h ( ζ ) reduces as shown in Figure 3(a). In addition, AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid has maximum velocity for both the shrinking and stretching disks when compared to Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid. Figures 3(b) and 4(b) show consequences of magnetic factor ( M ) on f ( ζ ) , h ( ζ ) , and temperature ( θ ( ζ ) ) panels. Both f ( ζ ) and h ( ζ ) reduce with greater M while θ ( ζ ) reduces. Physically, the greater M produces the contrasting force to the flow because of the Lorentz force. The Lorentz force is impeding force performing in contradiction of the flow particles motion. As we increase M , the greater Lorentz forces produce that declines velocity of fluid. Therefore, both f ( ζ ) and h ( ζ ) reduce with higher M . In addition, M increases when the disk stretches. Furthermore, this effect is greater for AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid when compared to Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid. On the other hand, the greater Lorentz force produces higher thermal transference rate at the surface of disk and results in augmentation of thermal distribution. Therefore, the greater M augments θ ( ζ ) . In addition, an important phenomenon is discussed here (linear and nonlinear thermal radiation). θ w = 1 shows the linear and θ w > 1 shows the nonlinear thermal radiation. θ w is ratio of reference temperature ( T f ) to free-stream temperature ( T ). So by definition, θ w > 1 shows the more significance impact than θ w = 1 . This is only possible for reference temperature to be greater than as it is at free-stream. The higher the reference temperature, the greater the heat generated in the flow system. The more heat in the flow system definitely shows the higher temperature. This phenomenon is shown Figure 5(a). Figure 5(b) expresses the impression of thermal Biot number ( Bi T ) on θ ( ζ ) . The results show that the increasing Bi T increases θ ( ζ ) . Actually, the increasing Bi T increases the coefficient of heat transfer. The increasing coefficient of heat transfer has direct relation with Bi T . So by this fact, the increasing Bi T heightens the thermal transference rate, which consequently increases the temperature distribution. In addition, the impression of Bi T is maximum for the nonlinear thermal radiation case. Also, the higher impact of Bi T is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figure 6(a) shows the impact of activation energy parameter ( E ) on concentration distribution ( ψ ( ζ ) ). The higher E heightens the concentration boundary layers, which results in an augmenting impact on ψ ( ζ ) . In addition, the greater impact is found for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figure 6(b) expresses the result of chemical reactivity factor ( K r ) on ψ ( ζ ) . The increasing K r reduces ψ ( ζ ) . Actually, the increasing K r diminishes the molecular diffusivity of the nanofluids flow, which results in reduction in the concentration layers at boundary. Therefore, the increasing K r declines ψ ( ζ ) . In addition, the greater impact of K r is observed for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figure 6(a) exhibits the result of Sc on ψ ( ζ ) . The higher Sc reduces ψ ( ζ ) . This is due to the reason that the escalating Sc diminishes the molecular diffusivities of the nanofluids flow, which affects the solutal boundary layer thicknesses to decreases. The reduction in the thicknesses of the boundary layers results in a declining impact of the concentration distribution. Therefore, the higher Sc reduces ψ ( ζ ) . When compared the two different nanofluids, the maximum impact is found for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid than AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figure 7(a) expresses the impression of concentration Biot number ( Bi C ) on ψ ( ζ ) . The results show that the increasing Bi C increases ψ ( ζ ) . The reason is that the increasing Bi C increases the coefficient of mass transfer. The increasing coefficient of mass transfer has direct relation with Bi C . So by this fact, the increasing Bi C heightens the mass transfer rate and boundary layer of the concentration profile, which consequently increases the concentration distribution. In addition, the higher impact of Bi C is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figures 7(b) and 8(a) show the impact of Nt on θ ( ζ ) and ψ ( ζ ) , respectively. The higher Nt augments both θ ( ζ ) and ψ ( ζ ) . Actually, the higher Nt strengthens the thermophoretic force, which forces the particles of the nanofluids to move toward the hot region from colder one. This movement of the nanofluid particles enhances the thermal boundary layer and temperature of the nanofluids. Thus, the growing Nt heightens θ ( ζ ) . In addition, the impression of Nt is maximum for the nonlinear thermal radiation case. Also, the higher impact of Nt is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. On the other hand, the concentration boundary layer thicknesses also enhance with increasing Nt , which results in an enhanced impact on the concentration distribution, as shown in Figure 8(b). In addition, the higher impact of Nt is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Figure 8(a) and (b) shows the impact of Nb on θ ( ζ ) and ψ ( ζ ) , respectively. From these figures, we see that the increasing Nb increases θ ( ζ ) but reduces ψ ( ζ ) . The fact is that the higher Nb increases Brownian motion of the nanofluids particles, which leads to an increase in the temperature and the thermal boundary layers, resulting in augmenting behavior in θ ( ζ ) . Furthermore, the impact of Nb is maximum for the nonlinear thermal radiation case. Also, the higher impact of Nb is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. On the other hand, the increasing Nb reduces the mass transfer rate and so are the concentration boundary layers. Thus, the higher Nb reduces ψ ( ζ ) . In addition, the greater effect of Nb is perceived for Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid when compared to AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Table 2 expresses the assessment of current analysis with published results of the previous studies. Here, close relations between the present and published results are found, which validate the present analysis. Table 3 displays the impressions of M and S on Re r C f . The higher magnetic factor augments Re r C f . The reason is that the higher M enhances the Lorentz force, which always opposes the motion of the fluid particles. Thus, the enhancing Lorentz force increases the drag force at the surface. Therefore, Re r C f increases with greater M . In addition, the effect of M on Re r C f is higher when S > 0 . Also, Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid has maximum surface drag than the AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. The impact of S on Re r C f is also shown in Table 3. This is obvious that the higher stretching rate will increase the surface drag force, but this effect is opposite for the case of shrinking sheet. Similar impacts are perceived here. In addition, Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid has maximum surface drag than the AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Table 4 show the impacts of Rd , Nb , Nt , and Bi T on local Nusselt number ( 1 Re r Nu ). It is observed that 1 Re r Nu increases with higher values of Rd and Bi T and reduces with higher values of Nt and Nb . The increasing Rd means that extra heat generates in the flow system, which obviously increases 1 Re r Nu . Similarly, the increasing Bi T increases the coefficient of heat transfer, which results in an increase in the rate of heat transfer. Thus, 1 Re r Nu increases with higher Bi T . On the other hand, 1 Re r Nu reduces with higher values of Nt and Nb . This indicates that the distribution of nanoparticles in the flow regime may benefit from the Brownian motion process. Moreover, low Nt and Nb values may contribute to temper the flow regime. In addition, Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid has maximum heat transfer rate than the AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid. Table 5 expresses the impression of Sc , Nb , Nt , and Bi C on 1 Re r Sh . It is perceived that the greater values of Sc , Nt , and Bi C heightens 1 Re r Sh , while the greater values of Nb diminishes 1 Re r Sh . In addition, Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O nanofluid has maximum mass transfer rate than the AA7075 H 2 O nanofluid.

Figure 2 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           f
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        f(\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           S
                        
                        S
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           h
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        h(\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           S
                        
                        S
                     
                  .
Figure 2

(a) f ( ζ ) vs S . (b) h ( ζ ) vs S .

Figure 3 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           f
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        f(\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           h
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        h(\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  .
Figure 3

(a) f ( ζ ) vs M . (b) h ( ζ ) vs M .

Figure 4 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \theta (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           M
                        
                        M
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \theta (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Bi
                              
                              
                                 T
                              
                           
                        
                        {\text{Bi}}_{\text{T}}
                     
                  .
Figure 4

(a) θ ( ζ ) vs M . (b) θ ( ζ ) vs Bi T .

Figure 5 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           E
                        
                        E
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 K
                              
                              
                                 r
                              
                           
                        
                        {K}_{\text{r}}
                     
                  .
Figure 5

(a) ψ ( ζ ) vs E . (b) ψ ( ζ ) vs K r .

Figure 6 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           Sc
                        
                        \text{Sc}
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 Bi
                              
                              
                                 C
                              
                           
                        
                        {\text{Bi}}_{\text{C}}
                     
                  .
Figure 6

(a) ψ ( ζ ) vs Sc . (b) ψ ( ζ ) vs Bi C .

Figure 7 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \theta (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           Nt
                        
                        \text{Nt}
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           Nt
                        
                        \text{Nt}
                     
                  .
Figure 7

(a) θ ( ζ ) vs Nt . (b) ψ ( ζ ) vs Nt .

Figure 8 
               (a) 
                     
                        
                        
                           θ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \theta (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           Nb
                        
                        \text{Nb}
                     
                  . (b) 
                     
                        
                        
                           ψ
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    ζ
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                        
                        \psi (\zeta )
                     
                   
                  vs 
                  
                     
                        
                        
                           Nb
                        
                        \text{Nb}
                     
                  .
Figure 8

(a) θ ( ζ ) vs Nb . (b) ψ ( ζ ) vs Nb .

Table 2

Validation of the present results with previous studies when Pr = 6.2 , S = 0.0 , and ϕ = 0.0

Outcomes f ( 0 ) h ( 0 ) g ( 0 ) θ ( 0 )
Present 51.03537103 × 10‒2 61.58881969 × 10‒2 0.8882966310 93.38779486 × 10‒2
Kelson and Desseaux [50] 51.0233 × 10‒2 61.5922 × 10‒2 88.4474 × 10‒2
Bachok et al. [34] 51.02 × 10‒2 61.59 × 10‒2 93.37 × 10‒2
Turkyilmazoglu [51] 51.023262 × 10‒2 61.592201 × 10‒2 88.447411 × 10‒2 93.387794 × 10‒2
Abbas et al. [52] 50.9175 × 10‒2 61.5375 × 10‒2 88.2042 × 10‒2 93.1855 × 10‒2
Table 3

Impacts of M and S on Re r C f

M S AA7075 H 2 O Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O
1.50 0.1 1.749404207 1.773694765
1.75 0.1 1.863047936 1.884131577
2.00 0.1 1.971631862 1.990188495
1.50 −0.1 1.637009762 1.649974856
1.75 −0.1 1.755704601 1.765142631
2.00 −0.1 1.869070098 1.875921695
1.75 0.1 1.863047936 1.884131577
1.75 0.2 1.943502204 1.970664495
1.75 0.3 2.042922023 2.076507283
1.75 −0.1 1.755704601 1.765142630
1.75 −0.2 1.725669558 1.729275744
1.75 −0.3 1.708472324 1.706096980
Table 4

Impacts of Rd , Nb , Nt , and Bi T on 1 Re r Nu

Rd Nb Nt Bi T AA7075 H 2 O Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O
1.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.2939523146 0.3055227847
1.5 0.3884742454 0.4038005311
2.0 0.4793603598 0.4975608549
2.0 0.4 0.4614944500 0.4787616300
0.6 0.4257151773 0.4411786784
0.8 0.3900292450 0.4037818812
0.3 0.2 0.4609330164 0.4777864491
0.4 0.4239745672 0.4382766749
0.6 0.3870670571 0.3990251843
0.6 0.6 0.4129920515 0.4245642843
0.7 0.4334330116 0.4445941612
0.8 0.4499411309 0.4607029209
Table 5

Impacts of Sc , Nb , Nt , and Bi C on 1 Re r Sh

Sc Nb Nt Bi C AA7075 H 2 O Ti 6 Al 4 V H 2 O
1.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1440435747 0.1454743799
1.5 0.1695438946 0.1716908589
2.0 0.1912788432 0.1938364811
2.0 0.4 0.1916562020 0.1943887531
0.6 0.1915873040 0.1945021543
0.8 0.1911107593 0.1941242023
0.3 0.2 0.1919489729 0.1939343527
0.4 0.1986035019 0.1996018768
0.6 0.2124578424 0.2126565364
0.6 0.6 0.2278976716 0.2283818719
0.7 0.2403584756 0.2411006010
0.8 0.2506248389 0.2515980012

5 Conclusion

The electrically conducting viscous nanofluids flow over an angularly gyrating disk is explored in this investigation. Two different types of nanoparticles, namely titanium alloys ( Ti 6 Al 4 V ) and aluminum alloys ( AA7075 ). were investigated, whereas water ( H 2 O ) is used as a base fluid. Two important cases, namely the stretching case and the shrinking case, were investigated to analyze the flow behaviors due to the different embedding factors. The impacts of viscous Joule heating, thermophoresis, nonlinear thermal radiation, Brownian motion, activation energy, and chemical reaction are investigated here. At the end of this investigation, the following key points are illustrated:

  • The radial flow increases when the surface of the disk stretches and reduces when the disk surface shrinks. On the other hand, the Azimuthal velocity increases when the disk surface shrinks and reduces when the disk surface stretches.

  • Both the radial and Azimuthal flows are the diminishing functions of the magnetic factor, whereas temperature is the escalating function of the magnetic factor. In addition, the temperature is more influenced by the magnetic factor in the case of nonlinear thermal radiation.

  • Escalation in thermal Biot number, Brownian motion, and thermophoresis factors result in a rising thermal panel. Furthermore, in a nonlinear thermal radiation scenario, the magnetic factor has a greater influence on temperature.

  • High concentration Biot number, activation energy, and thermophoresis factors heighten concentration panels, while high, Brownian motion, Schmidt number, and chemical reactivity factors reduce them.

  • Skin friction is increased by a higher magnetic factor. In addition, the higher surface drag is experienced in the elongating scenario in comparison to the contracting scenario.

  • The local Nusselt number is an escalating function of thermal radiation and thermal Biot number.

  • It is found that the nanofluid flow containing titanium alloys has perceived the greater impacts of the embedded factors when compared to the nanofluid flow containing aluminum alloys.

6 Future recommendations

The existing problem can be modified by using mass flux and zero mass flux conditions to investigate the rate of mass transfer at the surface of the rotating disk. The same model can be extended for hybrid nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys by using different types of regular fluids.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5532).

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, the Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (Grant No. 5532).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Choi SUS. Nanofluids: from vision to reality through research. J Heat Transf. 2009;131:033106.10.1115/1.3056479Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wen D, Ding Y. Formulation of nanofluids for natural convective heat transfer applications. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2005;26:855–64.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2005.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lin P, Ghaffari A. Steady flow and heat transfer of the power-law fluid between two stretchable rotating disks with non-uniform heat source/sink. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;146:1735–49.10.1007/s10973-020-10142-xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Wang R, Chai J, Luo B, Liu X, Zhang J, Wu M, et al. A review on slip boundary conditions at the nanoscale: recent development and applications. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2021;12:1237–51.10.3762/bjnano.12.91Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Tyler T, Shenderova O, Cunningham G, Walsh J, Drobnik J, McGuire G. Thermal transport properties of diamond-based nanofluids and nanocomposites. Diam Relat Mater. 2006;15:2078–81.10.1016/j.diamond.2006.08.007Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sajid MU, Ali HM. Thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids: a critical review. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:211–34.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wahid NS, Arifin NM, Khashi’ie NS, Pop I. Hybrid nanofluid slip flow over an exponentially stretching/shrinking permeable sheet with heat generation. Mathematics. 2020;9:30.10.3390/math9010030Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yasir M, Khan M. Comparative analysis for radiative flow of Cu–Ag/blood and Cu/blood nanofluid through porous medium. J Pet Sci Eng. 2022;215:110650.10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110650Search in Google Scholar

[9] Babu DH, Reddy SH, Naidu KK, Narayana PVS, Venkateswarlu B. Numerical investigation for entropy‐based magneto nanofluid flow over non‐linear stretching surface with slip and convective boundary conditions. ZAMM‐J Appl Math Mech Für Angew Math Und Mech. 2023;103(10):e202300006.10.1002/zamm.202300006Search in Google Scholar

[10] Yasir M, Khan M, Sarfraz M, Abuzaid D, Ullah MZ. Exploration of the dynamics of ethylene glycol conveying copper and titania nanoparticles on a stretchable/shrinkable curved object: Stability analysis. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;137:106225.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106225Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kumaraswamy Naidu K, Harish Babu D, Satya Narayana PV. Bioconvection in magneto hydrodynamics Casson nanoliquid (Fe3O4-sodium alginate) with gyrotactic microorganisms over an exponential stretching sheet. J Nanofluids. 2021;10:327–38.10.1166/jon.2021.1789Search in Google Scholar

[12] Harish Babu D, Satya Narayana PV. Melting heat transfer and radiation effects on Jeffrey fluid flow over a continuously moving surface with a parallel free stream. J Appl Comput Mech. 2019;5:468–76.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yasir M, Sarfraz M, Khan M, Alzahrani AK, Ullah MZ. Estimation of dual branch solutions for Homann flow of hybrid nanofluid towards biaxial shrinking surface. J Pet Sci Eng. 2022;218:110990.10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110990Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sarfraz M, Khan M, Yasir M. Dynamics of water conveying iron oxide and graphene nanoparticles subject to stretching/spiraling surface: An asymptotic approach. Ain Shams Eng J. 2023;14:102021.10.1016/j.asej.2022.102021Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yasir M, Khan M, Alqahtani AS, Malik MY. Mass transpiration effect on rotating flow of radiative hybrid nanofluid due to shrinking surface with irregular heat source/sink. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2023;44:2214–157. 10.1016/j.csite.2023.102870 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Yasir M, Khan M, Alqahtani AS, Malik MY. Numerical study of axisymmetric hybrid nanofluid MgO-Ag/H2O flow with non-uniform heat source/sink. Alex Eng J. 2023;75:439–6.10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.062Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pakravan HA, Yaghoubi M. Analysis of nanoparticles migration on natural convective heat transfer of nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 2013;68:79–93. 10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2012.12.012.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD. Three dimensional heat and mass transfer in a rotating system using nanofluid. Powder Technol. 2014;253:789–96. 10.1016/J.POWTEC.2013.12.042.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Goudarzi S, Shekaramiz M, Omidvar A, Golab E, Karimipour A, Karimipour A. Nanoparticles migration due to thermophoresis and Brownian motion and its impact on Ag-MgO/Water hybrid nanofluid natural convection. Powder Technol. 2020;375:493–503. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.115.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Abdelmalek Z, Khan SU, Waqas H, Riaz A, Khan IA, Tlili I. A mathematical model for bioconvection flow of Williamson nanofluid over a stretching cylinder featuring variable thermal conductivity, activation energy and second-order slip. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;144:205–17. 10.1007/s10973-020-09450-z.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Abdelmalek Z, Mahanthesh B, Md Basir MF, Imtiaz M, Mackolil J, Khan NS, et al. Mixed radiated magneto Casson fluid flow with Arrhenius activation energy and Newtonian heating effects: Flow and sensitivity analysis. Alex Eng J. 2020;59:3991–4011. 10.1016/J.AEJ.2020.07.006.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Dawar A, Said NM, Islam S, Shah Z, Mahmuod SR, Wakif A. A semi-analytical passive strategy to examine a magnetized heterogeneous mixture having sodium alginate liquid with alumina and copper nanomaterials near a convectively heated surface of a stretching curved geometry. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;139:106452.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106452Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kármán TV. Über laminare und turbulente Reibung. ZAMM - J Appl Math Mech/Zeitschrift Für Angew Math Und Mech. 1921;1:233–52. 10.1002/ZAMM.19210010401.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Miklavčič M, Wang CY. The flow due to a rough rotating disk. Z Für Angew Math Und Phys ZAMP. 2004;55:235–46.10.1007/s00033-003-2096-6Search in Google Scholar

[25] Stuart JT. On the effects of uniform suction on the steady flow due to a rotating disk. Q J Mech Appl Math. 1954;7:446–57.10.1093/qjmam/7.4.446Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ackroyd JAD. On the steady flow produced by a rotating disc with either surface suction or injection. J Eng Math. 1978;12:207–20.10.1007/BF00036459Search in Google Scholar

[27] Shah Z, Gul T, Khan AM, Ali I, Islam S, Husain F. Effects of hall current on steady three dimensional non-newtonian nanofluid in a rotating frame with Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects. J Eng Technol. 2017;6:e296.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Alreshidi NA, Shah Z, Dawar A, Kumam P, Shutaywi M, Watthayu W. Brownian motion and thermophoresis effects on MHD three dimensional nanofluid flow with slip conditions and Joule dissipation due to porous rotating disk. Molecules. 2020;25:729. 10.3390/molecules25030729.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Jyothi AM, Naveen Kumar R, Punith Gowda RJ, Veeranna Y, Prasannakumara BC. Impact of activation energy and gyrotactic microorganisms on flow of Casson hybrid nanofluid over a rotating moving disk. Heat Transf. 2021;50:5380–99.10.1002/htj.22129Search in Google Scholar

[30] Qayyum S, Khan MI, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Tamoor M. Entropy generation in dissipative flow of Williamson fluid between two rotating disks. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;127:933–42.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.034Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bödewadt VUT. Die drehströmung über festem grunde. ZAMM‐Journal Appl Math Mech Für Angew Math Und Mech. 1940;20:241–53.10.1002/zamm.19400200502Search in Google Scholar

[32] Ariel PD. On computation of MHD flow near a rotating disk. ZAMM‐Journal Appl Math Mech Für Angew Math Und Mech Appl Math Mech. 2002;82:235–46.10.1002/1521-4001(200204)82:4<235::AID-ZAMM235>3.0.CO;2-LSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Attia HA. Steady flow over a rotating disk in porous medium with heat transfer. Nonlinear Anal Model Control. 2009;14:21–6.10.15388/NA.2009.14.1.14527Search in Google Scholar

[34] Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I. Flow and heat transfer over a rotating porous disk in a nanofluid. Phys B Condens Matter. 2011;406:1767–72.10.1016/j.physb.2011.02.024Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hayat T, Rashid M, Imtiaz M, Alsaedi A. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of Cu-water nanofluid due to a rotating disk with partial slip. AIP Adv. 2015;5:67169.10.1063/1.4923380Search in Google Scholar

[36] Griffiths PT. Flow of a generalised Newtonian fluid due to a rotating disk. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech. 2015;221:9–17. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Turkyilmazoglu M. Three dimensional MHD stagnation flow due to a stretchable rotating disk. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2012;55:6959–65.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.05.089Search in Google Scholar

[38] Turkyilmazoglu M. MHD fluid flow and heat transfer due to a stretching rotating disk. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;51:195–201.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.08.016Search in Google Scholar

[39] Mustafa M, Khan JA, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. On Bödewadt flow and heat transfer of nanofluids over a stretching stationary disk. J Mol Liq. 2015;211:119–25.10.1016/j.molliq.2015.06.065Search in Google Scholar

[40] Khan U, Bilal S, Zaib A, Makinde OD, Wakif A. Numerical simulation of a nonlinear coupled differential system describing a convective flow of Casson gold–blood nanofluid through a stretched rotating rigid disk in the presence of Lorentz forces and nonlinear thermal radiation. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2020. 10.1002/NUM.22620.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Mustafa I, Javed T, Ghaffari A. Heat transfer in MHD stagnation point flow of a ferrofluid over a stretchable rotating disk. J Mol Liq. 2016;219:526–32.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.046Search in Google Scholar

[42] Žitňanský M, Čaplovič L. Effect of the thermomechanical treatment on the structure of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;157:643–9.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.151Search in Google Scholar

[43] Jackson MJ, Kopac J, Balazic M, Bombac D, Brojan M, Kosel F. Titanium and titanium alloy applications in medicine. Surg Tools. Med Devices. 2016;475–517.10.1007/978-3-319-33489-9_15Search in Google Scholar

[44] Ragupathi P, Muhammad T, Islam S, Wakif A. Application of Arrhenius kinetics on MHD radiative Von Kármán Casson nanofluid flow occurring in a Darcy-Forchheimer porous medium in the presence of an adjustable heat source. Phys Scr. 2021;96:125228. 10.1088/1402-4896/AC297C.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Hafeez A, Khan M, Ahmed J. Stagnation point flow of radiative Oldroyd-B nanofluid over a rotating disk. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2020;191:105342.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105342Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Dawar A, Islam S, Shah Z, Mahmuod SR. A passive control of Casson hybrid nanofluid flow over a curved surface with alumina and copper nanomaterials: A study on sodium alginate-based fluid. J Mol Liq. 2023;382:122018.10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122018Search in Google Scholar

[47] Khan I, Rahman AU, Lone SA, Dawar A, Islam S. Numerical investigation of the chemically reactive magnetohydrodynamic blood-gold nanofluid flow between two rotating disks. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023;148:11903–15.10.1007/s10973-023-12481-xSearch in Google Scholar

[48] Ayub A, Sabir Z, Altamirano GC, Sadat R, Ali MR. Characteristics of melting heat transport of blood with time-dependent cross-nanofluid model using Keller–Box and BVP4C method. Eng Comput. 2022;38:3705–19.10.1007/s00366-021-01406-7Search in Google Scholar

[49] Dey D, Chutia B. Two‐phase fluid motion through porous medium with volume fraction: An application of MATLAB bvp4c solver technique. Heat Transf. 2022;51:1778–89.10.1002/htj.22374Search in Google Scholar

[50] Kelson N, Desseaux A. Note on porous rotating disk flow. ANZIAM J. 2000;42:C837–55.10.21914/anziamj.v42i0.624Search in Google Scholar

[51] Turkyilmazoglu M. Nanofluid flow and heat transfer due to a rotating disk. Comput Fluids. 2014;94:139–46. 10.1016/J.COMPFLUID.2014.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Abbas Z, Naveed M, Tabassum R, Ahmad I. Influence of Hall and Joule heating on a magnetic nanofluid (Fe3O4) flow on a rotating disk with generalized slip condition. Heat Transf. 2021;50:7271–90.10.1002/htj.22228Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-10-27
Revised: 2023-12-10
Accepted: 2024-01-05
Published Online: 2024-02-06

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer in the channel of panel-type radiator with semi-detached inclined trapezoidal wing vortex generators
  3. Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in the colloidal investigation of Casson fluid
  4. High-speed mid-infrared Mach–Zehnder electro-optical modulators in lithium niobate thin film on sapphire
  5. Numerical analysis of dengue transmission model using Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative
  6. Mononuclear nanofluids undergoing convective heating across a stretching sheet and undergoing MHD flow in three dimensions: Potential industrial applications
  7. Heat transfer characteristics of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles scattered in sodium alginate-based non-Newtonian nanofluid over a stretching/shrinking horizontal plane surface
  8. The electrically conducting water-based nanofluid flow containing titanium and aluminum alloys over a rotating disk surface with nonlinear thermal radiation: A numerical analysis
  9. Growth, characterization, and anti-bacterial activity of l-methionine supplemented with sulphamic acid single crystals
  10. A numerical analysis of the blood-based Casson hybrid nanofluid flow past a convectively heated surface embedded in a porous medium
  11. Optoelectronic–thermomagnetic effect of a microelongated non-local rotating semiconductor heated by pulsed laser with varying thermal conductivity
  12. Thermal proficiency of magnetized and radiative cross-ternary hybrid nanofluid flow induced by a vertical cylinder
  13. Enhanced heat transfer and fluid motion in 3D nanofluid with anisotropic slip and magnetic field
  14. Numerical analysis of thermophoretic particle deposition on 3D Casson nanofluid: Artificial neural networks-based Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm
  15. Analyzing fuzzy fractional Degasperis–Procesi and Camassa–Holm equations with the Atangana–Baleanu operator
  16. Bayesian estimation of equipment reliability with normal-type life distribution based on multiple batch tests
  17. Chaotic control problem of BEC system based on Hartree–Fock mean field theory
  18. Optimized framework numerical solution for swirling hybrid nanofluid flow with silver/gold nanoparticles on a stretching cylinder with heat source/sink and reactive agents
  19. Stability analysis and numerical results for some schemes discretising 2D nonconstant coefficient advection–diffusion equations
  20. Convective flow of a magnetohydrodynamic second-grade fluid past a stretching surface with Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux model
  21. Analysis of the heat transfer enhancement in water-based micropolar hybrid nanofluid flow over a vertical flat surface
  22. Microscopic seepage simulation of gas and water in shale pores and slits based on VOF
  23. Model of conversion of flow from confined to unconfined aquifers with stochastic approach
  24. Study of fractional variable-order lymphatic filariasis infection model
  25. Soliton, quasi-soliton, and their interaction solutions of a nonlinear (2 + 1)-dimensional ZK–mZK–BBM equation for gravity waves
  26. Application of conserved quantities using the formal Lagrangian of a nonlinear integro partial differential equation through optimal system of one-dimensional subalgebras in physics and engineering
  27. Nonlinear fractional-order differential equations: New closed-form traveling-wave solutions
  28. Sixth-kind Chebyshev polynomials technique to numerically treat the dissipative viscoelastic fluid flow in the rheology of Cattaneo–Christov model
  29. Some transforms, Riemann–Liouville fractional operators, and applications of newly extended M–L (p, s, k) function
  30. Magnetohydrodynamic water-based hybrid nanofluid flow comprising diamond and copper nanoparticles on a stretching sheet with slips constraints
  31. Super-resolution reconstruction method of the optical synthetic aperture image using generative adversarial network
  32. A two-stage framework for predicting the remaining useful life of bearings
  33. Influence of variable fluid properties on mixed convective Darcy–Forchheimer flow relation over a surface with Soret and Dufour spectacle
  34. Inclined surface mixed convection flow of viscous fluid with porous medium and Soret effects
  35. Exact solutions to vorticity of the fractional nonuniform Poiseuille flows
  36. In silico modified UV spectrophotometric approaches to resolve overlapped spectra for quality control of rosuvastatin and teneligliptin formulation
  37. Numerical simulations for fractional Hirota–Satsuma coupled Korteweg–de Vries systems
  38. Substituent effect on the electronic and optical properties of newly designed pyrrole derivatives using density functional theory
  39. A comparative analysis of shielding effectiveness in glass and concrete containers
  40. Numerical analysis of the MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet through a Darcy porous medium: Modeling and simulation
  41. Analytical and numerical investigation for viscoelastic fluid with heat transfer analysis during rollover-web coating phenomena
  42. Influence of variable viscosity on existing sheet thickness in the calendering of non-isothermal viscoelastic materials
  43. Analysis of nonlinear fractional-order Fisher equation using two reliable techniques
  44. Comparison of plan quality and robustness using VMAT and IMRT for breast cancer
  45. Radiative nanofluid flow over a slender stretching Riga plate under the impact of exponential heat source/sink
  46. Numerical investigation of acoustic streaming vortices in cylindrical tube arrays
  47. Numerical study of blood-based MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity and cross-diffusion
  48. Fractional view analytical analysis of generalized regularized long wave equation
  49. Dynamic simulation of non-Newtonian boundary layer flow: An enhanced exponential time integrator approach with spatially and temporally variable heat sources
  50. Inclined magnetized infinite shear rate viscosity of non-Newtonian tetra hybrid nanofluid in stenosed artery with non-uniform heat sink/source
  51. Estimation of monotone α-quantile of past lifetime function with application
  52. Numerical simulation for the slip impacts on the radiative nanofluid flow over a stretched surface with nonuniform heat generation and viscous dissipation
  53. Study of fractional telegraph equation via Shehu homotopy perturbation method
  54. An investigation into the impact of thermal radiation and chemical reactions on the flow through porous media of a Casson hybrid nanofluid including unstable mixed convection with stretched sheet in the presence of thermophoresis and Brownian motion
  55. Establishing breather and N-soliton solutions for conformable Klein–Gordon equation
  56. An electro-optic half subtractor from a silicon-based hybrid surface plasmon polariton waveguide
  57. CFD analysis of particle shape and Reynolds number on heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid in heated tube
  58. Abundant exact traveling wave solutions and modulation instability analysis to the generalized Hirota–Satsuma–Ito equation
  59. A short report on a probability-based interpretation of quantum mechanics
  60. Study on cavitation and pulsation characteristics of a novel rotor-radial groove hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
  61. Optimizing heat transport in a permeable cavity with an isothermal solid block: Influence of nanoparticles volume fraction and wall velocity ratio
  62. Linear instability of the vertical throughflow in a porous layer saturated by a power-law fluid with variable gravity effect
  63. Thermal analysis of generalized Cattaneo–Christov theories in Burgers nanofluid in the presence of thermo-diffusion effects and variable thermal conductivity
  64. A new benchmark for camouflaged object detection: RGB-D camouflaged object detection dataset
  65. Effect of electron temperature and concentration on production of hydroxyl radical and nitric oxide in atmospheric pressure low-temperature helium plasma jet: Swarm analysis and global model investigation
  66. Double diffusion convection of Maxwell–Cattaneo fluids in a vertical slot
  67. Thermal analysis of extended surfaces using deep neural networks
  68. Steady-state thermodynamic process in multilayered heterogeneous cylinder
  69. Multiresponse optimisation and process capability analysis of chemical vapour jet machining for the acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer: Unveiling the morphology
  70. Modeling monkeypox virus transmission: Stability analysis and comparison of analytical techniques
  71. Fourier spectral method for the fractional-in-space coupled Whitham–Broer–Kaup equations on unbounded domain
  72. The chaotic behavior and traveling wave solutions of the conformable extended Korteweg–de-Vries model
  73. Research on optimization of combustor liner structure based on arc-shaped slot hole
  74. Construction of M-shaped solitons for a modified regularized long-wave equation via Hirota's bilinear method
  75. Effectiveness of microwave ablation using two simultaneous antennas for liver malignancy treatment
  76. Discussion on optical solitons, sensitivity and qualitative analysis to a fractional model of ion sound and Langmuir waves with Atangana Baleanu derivatives
  77. Reliability of two-dimensional steady magnetized Jeffery fluid over shrinking sheet with chemical effect
  78. Generalized model of thermoelasticity associated with fractional time-derivative operators and its applications to non-simple elastic materials
  79. Migration of two rigid spheres translating within an infinite couple stress fluid under the impact of magnetic field
  80. A comparative investigation of neutron and gamma radiation interaction properties of zircaloy-2 and zircaloy-4 with consideration of mechanical properties
  81. New optical stochastic solutions for the Schrödinger equation with multiplicative Wiener process/random variable coefficients using two different methods
  82. Physical aspects of quantile residual lifetime sequence
  83. Synthesis, structure, IV characteristics, and optical properties of chromium oxide thin films for optoelectronic applications
  84. Smart mathematically filtered UV spectroscopic methods for quality assurance of rosuvastatin and valsartan from formulation
  85. A novel investigation into time-fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations within Aboodh transform
  86. Homotopic dynamic solution of hydrodynamic nonlinear natural convection containing superhydrophobicity and isothermally heated parallel plate with hybrid nanoparticles
  87. A novel tetra hybrid bio-nanofluid model with stenosed artery
  88. Propagation of traveling wave solution of the strain wave equation in microcrystalline materials
  89. Innovative analysis to the time-fractional q-deformed tanh-Gordon equation via modified double Laplace transform method
  90. A new investigation of the extended Sakovich equation for abundant soliton solution in industrial engineering via two efficient techniques
  91. New soliton solutions of the conformable time fractional Drinfel'd–Sokolov–Wilson equation based on the complete discriminant system method
  92. Irradiation of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses by a 365 nm UV lamp
  93. Inflation and the principle of equivalence
  94. The use of a supercontinuum light source for the characterization of passive fiber optic components
  95. Optical solitons to the fractional Kundu–Mukherjee–Naskar equation with time-dependent coefficients
  96. A promising photocathode for green hydrogen generation from sanitation water without external sacrificing agent: silver-silver oxide/poly(1H-pyrrole) dendritic nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole film
  97. Photon balance in the fiber laser model
  98. Propagation of optical spatial solitons in nematic liquid crystals with quadruple power law of nonlinearity appears in fluid mechanics
  99. Theoretical investigation and sensitivity analysis of non-Newtonian fluid during roll coating process by response surface methodology
  100. Utilizing slip conditions on transport phenomena of heat energy with dust and tiny nanoparticles over a wedge
  101. Bismuthyl chloride/poly(m-toluidine) nanocomposite seeded on poly-1H pyrrole: Photocathode for green hydrogen generation
  102. Infrared thermography based fault diagnosis of diesel engines using convolutional neural network and image enhancement
  103. On some solitary wave solutions of the Estevez--Mansfield--Clarkson equation with conformable fractional derivatives in time
  104. Impact of permeability and fluid parameters in couple stress media on rotating eccentric spheres
  105. Review Article
  106. Transformer-based intelligent fault diagnosis methods of mechanical equipment: A survey
  107. Special Issue on Predicting pattern alterations in nature - Part II
  108. A comparative study of Bagley–Torvik equation under nonsingular kernel derivatives using Weeks method
  109. On the existence and numerical simulation of Cholera epidemic model
  110. Numerical solutions of generalized Atangana–Baleanu time-fractional FitzHugh–Nagumo equation using cubic B-spline functions
  111. Dynamic properties of the multimalware attacks in wireless sensor networks: Fractional derivative analysis of wireless sensor networks
  112. Prediction of COVID-19 spread with models in different patterns: A case study of Russia
  113. Study of chronic myeloid leukemia with T-cell under fractal-fractional order model
  114. Accumulation process in the environment for a generalized mass transport system
  115. Analysis of a generalized proportional fractional stochastic differential equation incorporating Carathéodory's approximation and applications
  116. Special Issue on Nanomaterial utilization and structural optimization - Part II
  117. Numerical study on flow and heat transfer performance of a spiral-wound heat exchanger for natural gas
  118. Study of ultrasonic influence on heat transfer and resistance performance of round tube with twisted belt
  119. Numerical study on bionic airfoil fins used in printed circuit plate heat exchanger
  120. Improving heat transfer efficiency via optimization and sensitivity assessment in hybrid nanofluid flow with variable magnetism using the Yamada–Ota model
  121. Special Issue on Nanofluids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications
  122. Exact solutions of a class of generalized nanofluidic models
  123. Stability enhancement of Al2O3, ZnO, and TiO2 binary nanofluids for heat transfer applications
  124. Thermal transport energy performance on tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids and their implementation in concentrated solar aircraft wings
  125. Studying nonlinear vibration analysis of nanoelectro-mechanical resonators via analytical computational method
  126. Numerical analysis of non-linear radiative Casson fluids containing CNTs having length and radius over permeable moving plate
  127. Two-phase numerical simulation of thermal and solutal transport exploration of a non-Newtonian nanomaterial flow past a stretching surface with chemical reaction
  128. Natural convection and flow patterns of Cu–water nanofluids in hexagonal cavity: A novel thermal case study
  129. Solitonic solutions and study of nonlinear wave dynamics in a Murnaghan hyperelastic circular pipe
  130. Comparative study of couple stress fluid flow using OHAM and NIM
  131. Utilization of OHAM to investigate entropy generation with a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity model in hybrid nanofluid using the radiation phenomenon
  132. Slip effects on magnetized radiatively hybridized ferrofluid flow with acute magnetic force over shrinking/stretching surface
  133. Significance of 3D rectangular closed domain filled with charged particles and nanoparticles engaging finite element methodology
  134. Robustness and dynamical features of fractional difference spacecraft model with Mittag–Leffler stability
  135. Characterizing magnetohydrodynamic effects on developed nanofluid flow in an obstructed vertical duct under constant pressure gradient
  136. Study on dynamic and static tensile and puncture-resistant mechanical properties of impregnated STF multi-dimensional structure Kevlar fiber reinforced composites
  137. Thermosolutal Marangoni convective flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluids with elastic deformation and heat source
  138. Investigation of convective heat transport in a Carreau hybrid nanofluid between two stretchable rotatory disks
  139. Single-channel cooling system design by using perforated porous insert and modeling with POD for double conductive panel
  140. Special Issue on Fundamental Physics from Atoms to Cosmos - Part I
  141. Pulsed excitation of a quantum oscillator: A model accounting for damping
  142. Review of recent analytical advances in the spectroscopy of hydrogenic lines in plasmas
  143. Heavy mesons mass spectroscopy under a spin-dependent Cornell potential within the framework of the spinless Salpeter equation
  144. Coherent manipulation of bright and dark solitons of reflection and transmission pulses through sodium atomic medium
  145. Effect of the gravitational field strength on the rate of chemical reactions
  146. The kinetic relativity theory – hiding in plain sight
  147. Special Issue on Advanced Energy Materials - Part III
  148. Eco-friendly graphitic carbon nitride–poly(1H pyrrole) nanocomposite: A photocathode for green hydrogen production, paving the way for commercial applications
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2023-0184/html
Scroll to top button