Startseite Mathematik Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
Artikel Open Access

Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications

  • Shuzhen Luo und Xiaoquan Xu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. April 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we define the concepts of strongly regular relation, finitely strongly regular relation, and generalized finitely strongly regular relation, and get the relational representations of strongly algebraic, hyperalgebraic, and quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices. The main results are as follows: (1) a binary relation ρ : X Y is strongly regular if and only if the complete lattice ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice; (2) a binary relation ρ : X Y is finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if the finite extension of ρ is strongly regular; and (3) a binary relation ρ : X Y is generalized finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) equipped with the interval topology is a Priestley space.

MSC 2010: 06B35; 54H10; 06A11

1 Introduction

The regularity of binary relations was first characterized by Zareckiǐ. In [1], he proved the following remarkable result: a binary relation ρ on a set X is regular if and only if the complete lattice ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is completely distributive, where Φ ρ ( X ) = { ρ ( A ) : A X } , ρ ( A ) = { y X : a A with ( a , y ) ρ } . Further criteria for regularity were given by Markowsky [2] and Schein [3] (see also [4] and [5]). Motivated by the fundamental works of Zareckiǐ on regular relations, in [6,7,8], Xu and Liu successfully generalized the regular relation to finitely regular relation and generalized finitely regular relation, got the relational representations of hypercontinuous lattices and quasi-hypercontinuous lattices, and proved that a binary relation ρ is finitely regular if and only if the complete lattice ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hypercontinuous lattice and ρ is generalized finitely regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hypercontinuous lattice if and only if the interval topology on ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is T 2 . Moreover, the discussion about the relation representation theory of lattices has also attracted a considerable deal of attention (see [9,10, 11,12,13, 14,15,16, 17,18]).

As a common generalization of continuous lattices, algebraic lattices play a very important role in domain theory. The so-called strongly algebraic [19], hyperalgebraic [20,21], and quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices [21,22] are among the most successful such generalizations, which now have been familiar objects as algebraic lattices in domain theory. However, the relation representations of them are still lacking. The aim of this paper is to introduce and investigate some binary relations in order to establish the theory of relation representations of algebraic lattices.

In this paper, we define the concepts of strongly regular relation, finitely strongly regular relation, and generalized finitely strongly regular relation, and get the relational representations of strongly algebraic, hyperalgebraic, and quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices. Meanwhile, several equivalent characterizations of them are obtained. Let ( X , δ , ) be a partially ordered topological space. ( X , δ , ) is called totally order-disconnected if whenever x y there is a clopen upper set U such that x U and y U . A compact totally order-disconnected space is called a Priestley space. The interest in these spaces is mainly due to the celebrated Priestley duality [23,24]. We also discuss this Priestley property about complete lattices with respect to the interval topology. In this paper, the main results are as follows: (1) a binary relation ρ : X Y is strongly regular if and only if the complete lattice ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice; (2) a binary relation ρ : X Y is finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if the finite extension of ρ is strongly regular; and (3) a binary relation ρ : X Y is generalized finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) equipped with the interval topology is a Priestley space.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we recall some basic concepts needed in this paper; for other nonexplicitly stated elementary notions please refer to [6,20].

Let P be a poset with a partial order . For all x , y P , A P , let x = { y P : x y } and A = a A a ; x and A are defined dually. A is called the upper set if A = A and the lower set defined dually. The least upper bound of A in P is written as A or sup A ; similarly, the greatest lower bound of A is written as A or inf A . Define an order o p by x o p y y x , and write P o p as short for ( P , o p ) , called the order dual of P . A poset L is called the complete lattice if for any subset A L , A and A exist in L . For two complete lattices L 1 and L 2 , the symbol L 1 L 2 means that L 1 is order isomorphic to L 2 .

For a poset P , x P , A P . P \ A = { x P : x A } . The topology generated by the collection of sets P x (as a subbase) is called the upper topology and is denoted by υ ( P ) ; the lower topology ω ( P ) on P is defined dually. The topology θ ( P ) = υ ( P ) ω ( P ) is called the interval topology on P , i.e., the interval topology is the coarsest common refinement of the upper topology υ ( P ) and the lower topology ω ( P ) . For any set X , let X ( < ω ) = { F X : F is nonempty and finite } . Set denotes the class of all sets. The class of all complete lattices is denoted by Com .

Let ( X , δ ) be a topology space and A X . The interior of A in ( X , δ ) is denoted by int δ A . A subset U of X is called δ -clopen if U is open and closed in ( X , δ ) . The notation ( X , δ , ) is used to denote a set X endowed with a topology δ and a partially order . The space ( X , δ , ) is called totally order-disconnected, if given x , y X with x y , there exists a δ -clopen upper set U such that x U and y U . A compact totally order-disconnected space is called a Priestley space.

For two sets X and Y , we call ρ : X Y a binary relation if ρ X × Y . When X = Y , ρ is usually called a binary relation on X . Let ( X ) denote the set of all binary relations between X and Y , and Rel = X Set ( X ) .

Definition 2.1

[6] Let ρ : X Y , τ : Y Z be two binary relations. Define

  1. τ ρ = { ( x , z ) : y Y , ( x , y ) ρ , ( y , z ) τ } . The relation τ ρ : X Z is called the composition of ρ and τ .

  2. ρ 1 = { ( y , x ) Y × X : ( x , y ) ρ } .

  3. ρ ( A ) = { y Y : x A with ( x , y ) ρ } . We call it the image of A under a binary relation ρ . Instead of ρ ( { x } ) , we write ρ ( x ) for short.

  4. Φ ρ ( X ) = { ρ ( A ) : A X } .

Clearly, ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a complete lattice, in which the join operation is the set union operator , since i I ρ ( A i ) = i I ρ ( A i ) = ρ ( i I A i ) for any A i X . But the meet operation in ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is not the set union operation in general. For instance, let X = { x 1 , x 2 } and Y = { y 1 , y 2 , y 3 } . Define a binary relation ρ : X Y as follows: ρ ( x 1 ) = { y 1 , y 2 } and ρ ( x 2 ) = { y 2 , y 3 } . Then ρ ( x 1 ) ρ ( x 2 ) = { y 1 , y 2 } { y 2 , y 3 } = { y 2 } . But { y 2 } Φ ρ ( X ) since for any C X , ρ ( C ) { y 2 } . Thus, { y 2 } is not the infimum of ρ ( x 1 ) and ρ ( x 2 ) in ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) . In fact, it is easy to see that ρ ( x 1 ) ρ ( x 2 ) = in ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

Definition 2.2

[6] Suppose p is a property about a complete lattice and s is a property about a binary relation. Let S = { ρ Rel : ρ has the property s } and P = { L Com : L has the property p } . We call the relation of s type is a representation of the complete lattices of p type, if the following two conditions are satisfied:

  1. ρ X × Y , ρ S ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) P ;

  2. L P , ρ : X Y S such that L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

In order to make sense of the s type relational representation of p type lattices, the properties p and s need to be explicitly defined.

Definition 2.3

[1] A binary relation ρ : X Y is called regular, if there is a binary relation σ : Y X such that ρ = ρ σ ρ .

In [1], Zareckiǐ gave the regular relation representation of completely distributive lattices. Furthermore, an intrinsic characterization of regular relations was obtained as follows.

Theorem 2.4

[6] For a binary relation ρ : X X , the following two conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ is regular;

  2. ( x , y ) ρ , u , v X such that

    1. ( x , v ) ρ , ( u , y ) ρ ;

    2. For all s , t X , if ( s , v ) ρ , ( u , t ) ρ , then ( s , t ) ρ .

Definition 2.5

[6] For a binary relation ρ : X Y , define a relation ρ ( < ω ) : X ( < ω ) Y ( < ω ) , called the finite extension of ρ , by

( F , G ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , ( F , G ) ρ ( < ω ) G ρ ( F ) .

For a complete lattice L , x , y L . Define on L by x y for any subset A L , y A implies x a for some a A . Raney [14] proved that a complete lattice L is a completely distributive iff x = { y L : y x } .

Definition 2.6

[19] A complete lattice L is called strongly algebraic, if x L , x = { y L : y y x } .

Definition 2.7

[20, 22] Let L be a complete lattice and x , y L . We define y x if and only if x int υ ( L ) y . L is called hyperalgebraic, if for any x L , x = { y L : y y x } .

In [22], Yang proved that a complete lattice L is hyperalgebraic if and only if for any x L and U υ ( L ) with x U , there exists u L such that x int υ ( L ) u = u U . As the generalization of hyperalgebraic lattices, Yang also gave the notion of quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices.

Definition 2.8

[22] Let L be a complete lattice. L is called quasi-hyperalgebraic, if for any x L and U υ ( L ) with x U , there exists F L ( < ω ) such that x int υ ( L ) F = F U .

3 Strongly regular relation

In this section, we define a concept of strongly regular relation and get the strongly regular relation representation of strongly algebraic lattices. Meanwhile, we also obtain some equivalent characterizations of strongly regular relation.

Definition 3.1

A binary relation ρ : X Y is called strongly regular, if there is a binary relation σ ρ 1 : Y X such that ρ = ρ σ ρ .

By the definition of strongly regular relation, it is easy to obtain the following conclusion.

Remark 3.2

  1. If a binary relation ρ : X Y is strongly regular, then ρ is regular.

  2. If ρ : X Y is strongly regular, then ρ 1 : Y X is also.

  3. Let X , Y be two sets and f a function from X to Y . Then f is strongly regular. In fact, define a binary relation τ : Y X as ( y , x ) τ y = f ( x ) . Then τ f 1 and f τ f = f .

  4. Let X be a set and P ( X ) a power set of X . Then the binary relation : X P ( X ) , x A is strongly regular. In fact, define a binary relation σ : P ( X ) X as ( A , x ) σ A = { x } . Then σ 1 and σ = .

Lemma 3.3

Let ρ : X Y be a binary relation and M Φ ρ ( X ) . Then for any y M , y N Φ ρ ( X ) N M . Furthermore, if z z N Φ ρ ( X ) N , then z N Φ ρ ( X ) N z N Φ ρ ( X ) N .

Proof

Let y M and M i I ρ ( A i ) . Then i I such that y ρ ( A i ) , which implies y N Φ ρ ( X ) N ρ ( A i ) . Thus, y N Φ ρ ( X ) N M . Therefore, if z z N Φ ρ ( X ) N , then z N Φ ρ ( X ) N z N Φ ρ ( X ) N .□

Now we give the strongly regular relation representation of strongly algebraic lattices.

Theorem 3.4

For a binary relation ρ : X Y , the following three conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ is strongly regular.

  2. ( x , y ) X × Y with ( x , y ) ρ , ( u , v ) X × Y such that

    1. ( u , v ) ρ ;

    2. ( x , v ) ρ , ( u , y ) ρ ;

    3. ( s , t ) X × Y , if ( s , v ) ρ and ( u , t ) ρ , then ( s , t ) ρ .

  3. ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice, i.e., A X , ρ ( A ) = { G Φ ρ ( X ) : G G ρ ( A ) } .

  4. M Φ ρ ( X ) , y M , z M such that z z N Φ ρ ( X ) N , y z N Φ ρ ( X ) N .

  5. M Φ ρ ( X ) , M = v M v N Φ ρ ( X ) N , and y M , z M such that z z N Φ ρ ( X ) N , y z N Φ ρ ( X ) N .

Proof

(1) (2) Let ρ be a strongly regular relation. Then there exists σ ρ 1 such that ρ = ρ σ ρ . ( x , y ) X × Y with ( x , y ) ρ , ( v , u ) Y × X such that ( x , v ) ρ , ( v , u ) σ ρ 1 , ( u , y ) ρ , so conditions (i) and (ii) hold. ( s , t ) X × Y , if ( s , v ) ρ and ( u , t ) ρ , by ( v , u ) σ and ρ = ρ σ ρ , we have ( s , t ) ρ .

(2) (3) N = ρ ( A ) Φ ρ ( X ) , y N , x A such that ( x , y ) ρ . By (2), there is a ( u , v ) X × Y such that

  1. ( u , v ) ρ ;

  2. ( x , v ) ρ , ( u , y ) ρ ;

  3. ( s , t ) X × Y , if ( s , v ) ρ and ( u , t ) ρ , then ( s , t ) ρ .

Thus, y ρ ( u ) ρ ( x ) . In fact, t ρ ( u ) , since ( x , v ) ρ , ( u , t ) ρ and (iii), we have that ( x , t ) ρ , i.e., t ρ ( x ) .

Now we only need to show ρ ( u ) ρ ( u ) . Let ρ ( u ) i I ρ ( A i ) . Then i I such that v ρ ( A i ) since ( u , v ) ρ , which implies that there exists x i A i such that v ρ ( x i ) , i.e., ( x i , v ) ρ . For any t ρ ( u ) , i.e., ( u , t ) ρ , by (iii) ( x i , t ) ρ , that is, t ρ ( x i ) , so ρ ( u ) ρ ( x i ) ρ ( A i ) . Hence, ρ ( u ) ρ ( u ) . Therefore, ρ ( A ) = { G Φ ρ ( X ) : G G ρ ( A ) } .

(3) (4) Let M = ρ ( A ) Φ ρ ( X ) and y M . Since ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice, G Φ ρ ( X ) such that y G G M . Let G = ρ ( B ) = b B ρ ( b ) . By the definition of , b B such that G = ρ ( b ) and ρ ( b ) ( Φ ρ ( X ) \ ρ ( b ) ) = { H Φ ρ ( X ) : ρ ( b ) H } . Thus, z ρ ( b ) \ ( Φ ρ ( X ) \ ρ ( b ) ) .

Now we show that ρ ( b ) = z N Φ ρ ( X ) N . Let N Φ ρ ( X ) with z N . Assume that ρ ( b ) N , then N Φ ρ ( X ) \ ρ ( b ) . Thus, z N ( Φ ρ ( X ) \ ρ ( b ) ) , which contradicts z ( Φ ρ ( X ) \ ρ ( b ) ) . Thus, ρ ( b ) N , which implies ρ ( b ) z N Φ ρ ( X ) N . The converse inclusion is always true, since z G = ρ ( b ) . Hence, M = v M v N Φ ρ ( X ) N , and for any y M , there is a z M such that z z N Φ ρ ( X ) N , y z N Φ ρ ( X ) N .

(4) (5) Obviously.

(5) (1) Define a relation σ : Y X by

( y , x ) σ y ρ ( x ) = y N Φ ρ ( X ) N .

Obviously σ ρ 1 .

Next we will prove that ρ = ρ σ ρ . ( x , y ) ρ , y ρ ( x ) , by (5), ρ ( x ) = v M v N Φ ρ ( X ) N , and z ρ ( x ) such that z , y z N Φ ρ ( X ) N . By Lemma 3.3, z N Φ ρ ( X ) N z N Φ ρ ( X ) N . Let z N Φ ρ ( X ) N = ρ ( C ) = c C ρ ( c ) . Then c C such that z N Φ ρ ( X ) N = ρ ( c ) . Thus, z ρ ( c ) = z N Φ ρ ( X ) N . Follows from the definition of σ , it is that ( z , c ) σ . Note that ( x , z ) ρ and ( c , y ) ρ , we have that ( x , y ) ρ σ ρ . Hence, ρ ρ σ ρ . ( x , y ) ρ σ ρ , then ( p , q ) X × Y such that ( x , q ) ρ , ( q , p ) σ and ( p , y ) ρ . Since ( q , p ) σ , q ρ ( p ) = q N Φ ρ ( X ) N . Thus, y ρ ( p ) = q N Φ ρ ( X ) N ρ ( x ) , i.e., ( x , y ) ρ . Therefore, ρ is strongly regular.□

Theorem 3.5

Let L be a complete lattice. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. L is a strongly algebraic lattice, i.e., x L , x = { z L : z z x } .

  2. There is a strongly regular relation ρ : X X such that L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

  3. The relation on L is strongly regular, i.e., x , y L with x y , u , v L such that

    1. u v ;

    2. u y , x v ;

    3. s , t L , if u t , s v , then s t .

  4. x , y L with x y , u , v L such that

    1. u v ;

    2. u y , x v ;

    3. z L , u z or z v .

  5. x , y L with x y , u , v L such that

    1. x v , y u ;

    2. v u = L , v u = .

Proof

(1) (2) Let X = L . Define a binary relation ρ : X X , ( x , y ) ρ y y x and a relation σ : X X , ( u , v ) σ u v and v = u . Obviously, σ ρ 1 . We claim that ρ = ρ σ ρ . In fact, for any ( x , y ) ρ , i.e., y y x . Since L is strongly algebraic, z L such that y y z z x . By the definition of ρ and σ , we have ( x , z ) ρ , ( z , z ) σ , and ( z , y ) ρ . Hence, ( x , y ) ρ σ ρ . For any ( x , y ) ρ σ ρ , u L such that ( x , u ) ρ , ( u , u ) σ , and ( u , y ) ρ . Then y y u u x , which implies y y x . So ( x , y ) ρ . All the above show that ρ = ρ σ ρ , i.e., ρ is strongly regular.

Now we only need to verify L ( Φ ρ ( X ) ) . ρ ( A ) Φ ρ ( X ) , ρ ( A ) = { y L : a A , ( a , y ) ρ } = { y L : a A , y y a } = a A { y L : y y a } = { y L : y y A } . Define two functions f : L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) , f ( x ) = ρ ( x ) = { y L : y y x } and g : ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) L , g ( ρ ( A ) ) = ρ ( A ) = A . Since L is strongly algebraic, it is easy to see that f g = i d Φ ρ ( X ) and g f = i d L . Hence, L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

(2) (1) By Theorem 3.4.

(1) (3) x , y L with x y . Since L is a strongly algebraic lattice, there is a u L such that u u x with u y . Let v = sup ( L \ u ) . Then it is easy to see that u v , u y , and x v . s , t L , if u t , s v , then t L \ u . Thus, t v which implies s t (otherwise, s v , a contradiction). This proof shows that is strongly regular.

(3) (4) x , y L with x y . By (4), u , v L such that

  1. u v ;

  2. u y , x v ;

  3. s , t L , if u t , s v , then s t .

z L , let s = t = z . Then u z or z v . Thus, condition (5) holds.

(4) (5) (1) see [25].□

From the above theorem, we can obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 3.6

Let L be a complete lattice. If L is strongly algebraic, then L o p is strongly algebraic.

4 Finitely strongly regular relation

In this section, we define a concept of finitely strongly regular relation and obtain the finitely strongly regular relation representation of hyperalgebraic lattices, prove that ρ is finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if the finite extension ρ ( < ω ) of ρ is strongly regular.

Definition 4.1

A binary relation ρ : X Y is called finitely strongly regular, if ( x , y ) X × Y with ( x , y ) ρ , { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } X ( < ω ) and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } Y ( < ω ) such that

  1. { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } ρ ( { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } ) ;

  2. y ρ ( { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } ) , and ( x , v j ) ρ ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , t Y , if t ρ ( { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } ) , ( s j , v j ) ρ ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that ( s k , t ) ρ .

Remark 4.2

  1. It is easy to observe that if the relation ρ is strongly regular, then ρ is finitely strongly regular.

  2. Condition (iii) of Definition 4.1 is equivalent to the following condition:

    ( iii ) S X ( < ω ) , t Y , if t ρ ( { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } ) , { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } ρ ( S ) , then t ρ ( S ) .

  3. Let ρ : X Y be a binary relation satisfying conditions (i) and (iii) of Definition 4.1. Then for any S X ,

    { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } ρ ( S ) ρ ( { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } ) ρ ( S ) .

Let U = { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } , V = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } . Then U X ( < ω ) , V Y ( < ω ) . By Definition 4.1, it is easy to obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 4.3

Let ρ : X Y be a binary relation. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ : X Y is finitely strongly regular.

  2. ( x , y ) X × Y with ( x , y ) ρ , ( U , V ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) such that

    1. V ρ ( U ) ;

    2. y ρ ( U ) , V ρ ( x ) ;

    3. S X ( < ω ) , t Y , if t ρ ( U ) , V ρ ( S ) , then t ρ ( S ) .

Now we give the finitely strongly regular relation representation of hyperalgebraic lattices.

Theorem 4.4

For a binary relation ρ : X Y , then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ is finitely strongly regular.

  2. The finite extension ρ ( < ω ) of ρ : X ( < ω ) Y ( < ω ) is strongly regular.

  3. ( F , G ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , G ρ ( F ) ( U , V ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) such that

    1. V ρ ( U ) ;

    2. G ρ ( U ) , V ρ ( F ) ;

    3. ( S , T ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , if V ρ ( S ) and T ρ ( U ) , then T ρ ( S ) .

  4. ( { F ρ ( F ) ( < ω ) : X ( < ω ) } , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice.

  5. ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice.

Proof

(1) (2) Define a relation δ : Y ( < ω ) X ( < ω ) by

( G , F ) δ G ρ ( F ) , and ( S , T ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , if G ρ ( S ) , F ρ 1 ( T ) , then T ρ ( S ) .

Then

  1. δ ( ρ ( < ω ) ) 1 .

  2. ρ ( < ω ) δ ρ ( < ω ) ρ ( < ω ) .

For any ( H , W ) ρ ( < ω ) δ ρ ( < ω ) , there exists ( G , F ) Y ( < ω ) × X ( < ω ) such that ( H , G ) ρ ( < ω ) , ( G , F ) δ , and ( F , W ) ρ ( < ω ) , that is, G ρ ( H ) , ( G , F ) δ , and W ρ ( F ) . w W , let S = H and T = { w } . Then G ρ ( S ) and F ρ 1 ( T ) . Then T ρ ( S ) since ( G , F ) δ . Hence, w ρ ( S ) , it follows that W ρ ( H ) , i.e., ( H , W ) ρ ( < ω ) .
  1. ρ ( < ω ) ρ ( < ω ) δ ρ ( < ω ) .

For any ( H , W ) ρ ( < ω ) and w W , h ( w ) H such that ( h ( w ) , w ) ρ . Since ρ is finitely strongly regular, by Lemma 4.3, U ( w ) X ( < ω ) and V ( w ) Y ( < ω ) satisfy the following conditions:
  1. V ( w ) ρ ( U ( w ) ) ;

  2. w ρ ( U ( w ) ) , V ( w ) ρ ( h ( w ) ) ;

  3. S X ( < ω ) , t Y , if t ρ ( U ( w ) ) , V ( w ) ρ ( S ) , then t ρ ( S ) .

Let F = w W U ( w ) , G = w W V ( w ) . Then ( F , G ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , G ρ ( F ) , G w W ρ ( h w ) ρ ( H ) , and W ρ ( F ) . By Definition 2.5, ( H , G ) ρ ( < ω ) and ( F , W ) ρ ( < ω ) . Now we have to verify ( G , F ) δ . Clearly, ( G , F ) ρ ( < ω ) . ( S , T ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , if G ρ ( S ) , F ρ 1 ( T ) , then there exist w 0 W and t 0 T such that t 0 ρ ( U ( w 0 ) ) , and w W , V ( w ) ρ ( S ) . Thus, V ( w 0 ) ρ ( S ) . By 3 , t 0 ρ ( S ) , which implies T ρ ( S ) . Thus, ( G , F ) δ . Hence, ( H , W ) ρ ( < ω ) δ ρ ( < ω ) .

By (a), (b), and (c), we have that δ ( ρ ( < ω ) ) 1 and ρ ( < ω ) = ρ ( < ω ) δ ρ ( < ω ) , i.e., ρ ( < ω ) is strongly regular.

(2) (3) By Theorem 3.4 and Definition 2.5.

(2) (4) Let σ = ρ ( < ω ) . Then by Theorem 3.4, σ is strongly regular ( Φ σ ( X ( < ω ) ) , ) = ( { F ρ ( < ω ) ( F ) : X ( < ω ) } , ) = ( { F ρ ( F ) ( < ω ) : X ( < ω ) } , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice.

(3) (5) Let L = ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) . For any M = ρ ( A ) L , y M , there is a x A such that y ρ ( x ) , by (3), there exists ( U , V ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) such that

  1. V ρ ( U ) ;

  2. y ρ ( U ) , V ρ ( x ) ;

  3. ( S , T ) X ( < ω ) × Y ( < ω ) , if V ρ ( S ) and T ρ ( U ) , then T ρ ( S ) .

Let V = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } and N j = { N L : v j N } ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ( N j may be an empty set). Now we have to verify ρ ( U ) ρ ( U ) M . Since V ρ ( x ) ρ ( A ) = M and V ρ ( U ) , we have M L \ { N 1 , N 2 , , N m } and ρ ( U ) L \ { N 1 , N 2 , , N m } . N = ρ ( B ) L \ { N 1 , N 2 , , N m } , V N = ρ ( B ) . Let S = B , T = ρ ( U ) , by the condition (iii), ρ ( U ) ρ ( S ) = ρ ( B ) = N . Thus, N ρ ( U ) . This proves that ρ ( U ) L \ { N 1 , N 2 , , N m } ρ ( U ) . Thus, M int υ ( L ) ρ ( U ) = ρ ( U ) with y ρ ( U ) . Hence, M = { G L : G G M } = { G L : G G M } , i.e., L = ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice.

(5) (1) Let L = ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) . ( x , y ) ρ , i.e., y ρ ( x ) , since L is a hyperalgebraic lattice, there is a N = ρ ( A ) L such that y N N ρ ( x ) . Since N N , M 1 , M 2 , , M m L ( < ω ) such that y ρ ( x ) N = L \ { M 1 , M 2 , , M m } . j { 1 , 2 , , m } , by N M j , v j N but v j M j . It follows that there is a u j A such that v j ρ ( u j ) . Also, since y ρ ( A ) , u A such that y ρ ( u ) .

Let U = { u , u 1 , u 2 , , u m } X ( < ω ) , V = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } Y ( < ω ) . Then it is easy to see that ( U , V ) satisfies the following conditions:

  1. V ρ ( U ) ;

  2. y ρ ( U ) , V ρ ( x ) .

Now we check that ( U , V ) satisfies condition (c) of Lemma 4.3. S X ( < ω ) , t Y , if V ρ ( S ) , t ρ ( U ) , then j { 1 , 2 , , m } , s j S such that v j ρ ( s j ) . Let S 0 = { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } . Then S 0 S and ρ ( S 0 ) = j = 1 m ρ ( s j ) L \ { M 1 , M 2 , , M m } = N . Note that U A , thus ρ ( U ) ρ ( A ) = N ρ ( S 0 ) . Since t ρ ( U ) , k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that t ρ ( s k ) ρ ( S 0 ) ρ ( S ) . Therefore, ρ is finitely strongly regular.□

Theorem 4.5

Let L be a complete lattice. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. L is a hyperalgebraic lattice, i.e., x L , x = { y L : y y x } .

  2. x , y L with x y , u L , and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) such that

    1. u v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    2. u y , x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } L ( < ω ) and t L , if u t , s j v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that s k t .

  3. x , y L with x y , u L , and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) such that

    1. u v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    2. u y , x v i ( i = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    3. z L , u z or z v k for some k { 1 , 2 , , m } .

  4. x , y L with x y , u L , and F L ( < ω ) such that

    1. x F , y u ;

    2. F u = L , F u = .

  5. x , y L with x y , u L such that x int υ ( L ) u = u L \ y .

  6. x , y L with x y , υ ( L ) -closed subset C and u L such that

    1. x C , y u ;

    2. C u = L , C u = .

  7. The relation on L is finitely strongly regular.

  8. The finite extension ( < ω ) of : L ( < ω ) L ( < ω ) is strongly regular.

  9. ( { F ( L \ F ) ( < ω ) : L ( < ω ) } , ) is a strongly algebraic lattice.

  10. There is a finitely strongly regular relation ρ : X X such that L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

Proof

( 1 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 ) See Lemma 2.2 of [22].

(1) (2) x , y L with x y . Since L is a hyperalgebraic lattice, there exists u L such that u u x with u y . By the definition of , we have that x int υ ( L ) u = u L \ y . Hence, there exists a finite set F = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L such that u L \ F int υ ( L ) u , which implies x L \ F = u L \ y . So u v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , u y , and x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) .

Now we only need to show that u and F = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } satisfy condition (iii) of (2). Let { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } L ( < ω ) and t L with u t , s j v j for all j = 1 , 2 , , m . Assume that for any j { 1 , 2 , , m } , s j t , then t L \ F ; otherwise, there exists a j 0 { 1 , 2 , , m } such that t v j 0 , and then s j 0 v j 0 , a contradiction. This implies t L \ F u , a contradiction. Hence, there exists k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that s k t .

(2) (3) We only need to show condition (iii) of (3). z L . Let t = z and s j = z ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . By condition (iii) of (2), u t = z or z v k for some k { 1 , 2 , , m } .

(3) (1) x L , if y L with x y , by (3), u L and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) such that

  1. u v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  2. u y , x v i ( i = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  3. z L , u z , or z v k for some k { 1 , 2 , , m } .

Let F = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) . Then it is easy to see that x u = L \ F . Thus, u u x and u y . Hence, x = { y L : y y x } , i.e., L is a hyperalgebraic lattice.

(5) (6) Let C = L \ int υ ( L ) u . Then C is υ ( L ) -closed and satisfies condition (6) with u .

(6) (5) x , y L with x y , by (6), υ ( L ) -closed subset C and u L such that

  1. x C , y u ;

  2. C u = L , C u = .

By condition (b), u = L \ C υ ( L ) , and it follows from condition (a) that x L \ C = int υ ( L ) u = u L \ y .

(2) (7) x , y L with x y , by (2), there exist u L and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) such that

  1. u v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  2. u y , x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } L ( < ω ) and t L , if u t , s j v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that s k t .

Let u i = u ( i = 1 , 2 , n ) . Then it is easy to see that { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } and { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } satisfy condition (7).

(7) (8) (9) By Theorem 4.4.

(7) (10) Let X = L and ρ = : X X . Then L ( Φ ( X ) , ) .

(10) (1) Using Theorem 4.4.□

5 Generalized finitely strongly regular relation

In this section, we define a concept of generalized finitely strongly regular relation and get the generalized finitely strongly regular representation of quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices, prove that ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice if and only if ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) with respect to the interval topology is a Priestley space. Meanwhile, some equivalent characterizations of quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices are obtained.

Definition 5.1

A binary relation ρ : X Y is called generalized finitely strongly regular, if ( x , y ) ρ , there exist { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { v i j : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m } Y ( < ω ) such that

  1. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( F i ) ;

  2. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y ρ ( F i ) , and ξ j = 1 m { 1 , 2 , , n } such that { ( x , v ξ ( 1 ) 1 ) , ( x , v ξ ( 2 ) 2 ) , , ( x , v ξ ( m ) m ) } ρ ;

  3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , and φ j = 1 m { 1 , 2 , , n } , if t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and { ( s 1 , v φ ( 1 ) 1 ) , ( s 2 , v φ ( 2 ) 2 ) , , ( s m , v φ ( m ) m ) } ρ , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ .

Obviously, the condition ξ j = 1 m { 1 , 2 , , n } such that { ( x , v ξ ( 1 ) 1 ) , ( x , v ξ ( 2 ) 2 ) , , ( x , v ξ ( m ) m ) } ρ is equivalent to x ρ 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) for any j { 1 , 2 , , m } . So we obtain the following equivalent characterizations of generalized finitely strongly regular relations.

Proposition 5.2

Let ρ : X Y be a binary relation. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular.

  2. ( x , y ) ρ , there exist { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { v i j : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m } Y ( < ω ) such that

    1. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( F i ) ;

    2. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y ρ ( F i ) , and k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ρ ( F k ) ρ ( x ) ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , if t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j ρ 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ .

  3. ( x , y ) ρ , there exist { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { v i j : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m } Y ( < ω ) such that

    1. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( F i ) ;

    2. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y ρ ( F i ) , and k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that { v k 1 , v k 2 , , v k m } ρ ( x ) ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , if t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j ρ 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ .

  4. ( x , y ) ρ , there exist { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { G 1 , G 2 , , G m } ( Y ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) such that

    1. ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , ρ ( F i ) G j ;

    2. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y ρ ( F i ) , and x ρ 1 ( G j ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , if t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j ρ 1 ( G j ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ .

Proof

(1) (2) We only need to prove condition (b). Assume that for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } , ρ ( F i ) ρ ( x ) , then there is a t i ρ ( F i ) \ ρ ( x ) . By condition (ii) of Definition 5.1, ξ j = 1 m { 1 , 2 , , n } such that { ( x , v ξ ( 1 ) 1 ) , ( x , v ξ ( 2 ) 2 ) , , ( x , v ξ ( m ) m ) } ρ . Let s 1 = s 2 = = s m = x . From condition (iii) of Definition 5.1, it is follows that l { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( x , t l ) ρ , i.e., t l ρ ( x ) , contradicting to the assumption that t i ρ ( x ) for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } . Hence, condition (2) holds.

(2) (3) Obviously.

(3) (4) j { 1 , 2 , , m } , let G j = { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } . Then v i j ρ ( F i ) G j . Thus, condition (a) of (4) holds. It follows from condition (b) of (3) that x ρ 1 ( v k j ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . Hence, condition (4) holds.

( 4 ) ( 1 ) By condition (a) of (4), ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , ρ ( F i ) G j . Then v i j ρ ( F i ) G j , i.e, i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( F i ) . Meanwhile, j { 1 , 2 , , m } , let t 1 = v 1 j ρ ( F 1 ) , t 2 = v 2 j ρ ( F 2 ) , , t n = v n j ρ ( F n ) . By condition (b) of (4), x ρ 1 ( G j ) { j = 1 , 2 , , m } . Let s 1 = s 2 = = s m = x . Then by condition (c) of (4), ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ , that is, x ρ 1 ( t l ) = ρ 1 ( v l j ) ρ 1 ( v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j ) . Hence, condition (ii) of Definition 5.1 holds.

Finally, we verify condition (iii) of Definition 5.1. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , if t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j ρ 1 { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . Note that v i j G j , we have that { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } G j . Hence, s j ρ 1 ( G j ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . By condition (c) of (4), ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ . Therefore, ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular.□

Now we give the generalized finitely strongly regular relation representation of quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices.

Theorem 5.3

For a binary relation ρ : X Y , the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular.

  2. ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice.

  3. ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) equipped with the interval topology is a Priestley space.

  4. ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) equipped with the interval topology is totally order-disconnected.

Proof

Let L = ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

(1) (2) ρ ( A ) L , U υ ( L ) , if ρ ( A ) U , then { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A n ) } L ( < ω ) such that ρ ( A ) L \ { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A n ) } U , that is, i { 1 , 2 , , n } , ρ ( A ) ρ ( A i ) . It follows that there exist x i A and y i Y such that ( x i , y i ) ρ , y i ρ ( A i ) . Since ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular, by Proposition 5.2 (4), { F i 1 , F i 2 , , F i n ( i ) } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) , { G i 1 , G i 2 , , G i m ( i ) } ( Y ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) such that

  1. ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } × { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } , ρ ( F i k ) G i l ;

  2. k { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } , y i ρ ( F i k ) , and x i ρ 1 ( G i l ) ( l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) ) ;

  3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m ( i ) } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n ( i ) } Y ( < ω ) , if t k ρ ( F i k ) ( k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) ) and s l ρ 1 ( G i l ) ( l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) ) , then ( g , h ) { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } × { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } such that ( s g , t h ) ρ .

i { 1 , 2 , , n } , l { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } , let N i l = { M L : G i l M = } ( N i l may be an empty set). Then for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } , we have the following results:

1 ρ ( A ) L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } . l { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } , since x i A and x i ρ 1 ( G i l ) , ρ ( A ) G i l . Hence, ρ ( A ) N i l , that is, ρ ( A ) L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } .

2 L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } . Assumed that there exists ρ ( B ) L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } such that ρ ( B ) { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } , then for each k { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } , choose t k ρ ( F i k ) \ ρ ( B ) . l { 1 , 2 , m ( i ) } , by the definition of N i l and ρ ( B ) L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } , we have that G i l ρ ( B ) . Thus, there exist w l G i l ρ ( B ) and s l B such that ( s l , w l ) ρ , i.e., s l ρ 1 ( G i l ) . By the above condition (c), ( g , h ) { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } × { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } such that ( s g , t h ) ρ . Hence, t h ρ ( s g ) ρ ( B ) , which contradicts t h ρ ( B ) . Therefore, L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } .

3 { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } . For any ρ ( C ) { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } , there exists a h { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } such that ρ ( F i h ) ρ ( C ) . By condition (c) of above, l { 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } , ρ ( F i h ) G i l ρ ( C ) G i l . By the definition of N i l , ρ ( C ) L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } ,

4 { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } L \ ρ ( A i ) . ρ ( D ) { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } , k 0 { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } such that ρ ( F i k 0 ) ρ ( D ) . By condition (b) of above, y i ρ ( F i k 0 ) ρ ( D ) . Note that y i ρ ( A i ) , so ρ ( D ) L \ ρ ( A i ) . Hence, { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } L ρ ( A i ) .

From the above 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 , it follows that ρ ( A ) i = 1 n ( L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , m ( i ) } ) = i = 1 n { ρ ( F i k ) : k = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } i = 1 n ( L \ ρ ( A i ) )  =  L \ { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A k ) } U .

Let = { i = 1 n ρ ( F i φ ( i ) ) = ρ ( i = 1 n ρ ( F i φ ( i ) ) ) : φ i = 1 n { 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } } and V = i = 1 n ( L \ { N i l : l = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } ) = L \ { N i l : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; l = 1 , 2 , , n ( i ) } . Then L ( < ω ) , V υ ( L ) and ρ ( A ) V = U . Hence, ρ ( A ) int υ ( L ) = U . Therefore, L = ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice.

( 2 ) ( 3 ) See Theorem 2.1 of [22].

( 3 ) ( 4 ) Obviously.

(4) (1) ( x , y ) ρ , i.e., y ρ ( x ) , let M y = { N L : y N } ( M y may be an empty set). Then ρ ( x ) M y . Since θ ( L ) is totally order-disconnected, there exist { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A m ) } , { ρ ( B 1 ) , ρ ( B 2 ) , , ρ ( B n ) } L ( < ω ) such that ρ ( x ) L \ { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A m ) } = { ρ ( B 1 ) , ρ ( B 2 ) , , ρ ( B n ) } L \ M y . Hence, ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , ρ ( B i ) ρ ( A j ) , which implies v i j ρ ( B i ) \ ρ ( A j ) . i { 1 , 2 , , n } , since { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( B i ) , there exists F i B i ( < ω ) such that { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ρ ( F i ) . Hence, condition (a) of Proposition 5.2(2) holds.

Now we show condition (b) of Proposition 5.2 (2). Since ρ ( x ) { ρ ( B 1 ) , ρ ( B 2 ) , , ρ ( B n ) } , k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ρ ( B k ) ρ ( x ) . Thus, ρ ( F k ) ρ ( x ) . i { 1 , 2 , , n } , j { 1 , 2 , , m } , from v i j ρ ( F i ) and v i j ρ ( A j ) , it follows that ρ ( F i ) ρ ( A j ) . Hence, ρ ( F i ) L \ { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A m ) } = { ρ ( B 1 ) , ρ ( B 2 ) , , ρ ( B n ) } L \ M y . By the definition of M y , y ρ ( F i ) for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } .

Finally, we show condition (c) of Proposition 5.2 (2). { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } X ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , let t i ρ ( F i ) ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j ρ 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . Then j { 1 , 2 , , m } , { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ρ ( s j ) { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ρ ( { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } ) . Note that for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } , j { 1 , 2 , , m } , v i j ρ ( A j ) , so ρ ( { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } ) L \ { ρ ( A 1 ) , ρ ( A 2 ) , , ρ ( A m ) } = { ρ ( B 1 ) , ρ ( B 2 ) , , ρ ( B n ) } . Hence, l { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ρ ( B l ) ρ ( { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } ) , which implies t l ρ ( F l ) ρ ( B l ) ρ ( { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } ) . Therefore, k { 1 , 2 , , m } such that ( s k , t l ) ρ .

By Proposition 5.2, ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular.□

Lemma 5.4

Let L be a complete lattice and F L ( < ω ) . If int υ ( L ) F = F , then G L ( < ω ) such that F = L \ G .

Proof

Since int υ ( L ) F = F and F is a finite set, there exists { G j : j = 1 , 2 , , m } L ( < ω ) such that F = j = 1 m ( L \ G j ) . Let G = { φ ( { 1 , 2 , , m } ) : φ j = 1 m G j } . Then j = 1 m ( L \ G j ) = L \ j = 1 m G j = L \ G . Hence, F = L \ G .□

The following theorem gives some equivalent characterizations of complete lattices that are Priestley spaces with respect to the interval topology.

Theorem 5.5

Let L be a complete lattice. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. L is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice, i.e., x L , U υ ( L ) with x U , F L ( < ω ) such that x int υ ( L ) F = F U .

  2. ( υ ( L ) , ) is a hyperalgebraic lattice.

  3. ( x , y ) L with x y , { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } , { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) satisfying the following conditions:

    1. ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , u i v j ;

    2. u i y ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) , x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } L ( < ω ) , if u i t j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) , s i v j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that s k t l .

  4. ( x , y ) L with x y , { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } , { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) satisfying the following conditions:

    1. ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , u i v j ;

    2. u i y ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) , x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

    3. z L , u k z for some k { 1 , 2 , , n } or z v l for some l { 1 , 2 , , m } .

  5. x , y L with x y , F , G L ( < ω ) such that

    1. x G , y F ;

    2. G F = L and G F = .

  6. x , y L with x y , υ ( L ) -closed subset C and F L ( < ω ) such that

    1. x C , y F ;

    2. C F = L and C F = .

  7. x , y L with x y , F L ( < ω ) such that x int υ ( L ) F = F L \ y .

  8. x , y L with x y , G L ( < ω ) and ω ( L ) -closed subset B such that

    1. x G , y B ;

    2. G B = L and G B = .

  9. x , y L with x y , G L ( < ω ) such that y int ω ( L ) G = G L \ x .

  10. x , y L with x y , υ ( L ) -closed subset C and ω ( L ) -closed subset B such that

    1. x C , y B ;

    2. C B = L and C B = .

  11. The relation on L is generalized finitely strongly regular, i.e., ( x , y ) L with x y , { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { v i j : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m } Y ( < ω ) such that

    1. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } ( F i ) = u F i ( L \ u ) = L \ u F i u ;

    2. i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y ( F i ) = L \ u F i u , and k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that ( F k ) ( x ) = L \ x ;

    3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } Y ( < ω ) , if t i ( F j ) ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) and s i 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that s k t l .

  12. ( L , θ ( L ) ) is a Priestley space.

  13. There is a generalized finitely strongly regular relation ρ : X X such that L ( Φ ρ ( X ) , ) .

Proof

( 1 ) ( 2 ) , ( 1 ) ( 12 ) see [22].

(1) (3) x , y L with x y , that is, x L \ y υ ( L ) . Since L is quasi-hyperalgebraic, there exists F = { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } L ( < ω ) such that x int υ ( L ) F = F L \ y . Since F L ( < ω ) and int υ ( L ) F = F , by Lemma 5.4, G = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) such that F = L \ G . Hence, x L \ G = F L \ y .

Now we show that F = { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } and G = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } satisfy condition (3). Obviously, ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , u i v j , u i y and x v j . { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } L ( < ω ) , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } L ( < ω ) , if u i t j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) , s i v j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) , then we have t i F ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) and s j G ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . Thus, for any j { 1 , 2 , , m } , s j L \ G . Assume that ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , s j t i , then t i L \ G = F , which contradicts t i F ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) . Hence, ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that s k t l .

(3) (4) We only need to verify condition (iii) of (4). z L , let s j = z = t i ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m ) . By (3)(iii), it is easy to see that condition (iii) of (4) holds.

(4) (5) Let F = { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } and G = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } . Then F , G L ( < ω ) . From (4), we can obtain that F , G satisfy condition (5).

(5) (6) Let C = G . Then G is υ ( L ) -closed, and satisfies condition (6) with F .

(6) (7) Obviously.

(7) (8) x , y with x y , by (7), F L ( < ω ) such that x int υ ( L ) F = F L \ y . Let B = F . Then B is ω ( L ) -closed. Since F L ( < ω ) and int υ ( L ) F = F , by Lemma 5.4, G L ( < ω ) such that F = L \ G . Hence, B = F and G satisfy condition (8).

(8) (9) Trivial.

(9) (10) Let C = G , B = L \ G . Then C is υ ( L ) -closed and B is ω ( L ) -closed satisfying condition (10).

(10) (1) x L , U υ ( L ) with x U , { y 1 , y 2 , , y n } L ( < ω ) such that x L \ { y 1 , y 2 , , y n } U . Then x y i for any i { 1 , 2 , , n } . By (10), υ ( L ) -closed subset C i and ω ( L ) -closed set B i such that x L \ C i = B i L \ y i . Then i = 1 n ( L \ C i ) = L \ i = 1 n C i = i = 1 n B i i = 1 n ( L \ y i ) = L \ { y 1 , y 2 , , y n } U . Since B i is a θ ( L ) -clopen upper set, there exist { G 1 , G 2 , , G n } L ( < ω ) such that B i = G i for all i { 1 , 2 , n } . Let F = { i = 1 n a i : a i G i } . Then F L ( < ω ) and x F = i = 1 n B i = L \ i = 1 n C i υ ( L ) . Hence, x int υ ( L ) F = F L \ { y 1 , y 2 , , y n } U . Therefore, L is a quasi-hyperalgebraic lattice.

(3) (11) x , y L with x y , by (3), { u 1 , u 2 , , u n } , { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L ( < ω ) satisfying

  1. ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , u i v j ;

  2. u i y ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) , x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) ;

  3. { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } , { t 1 , t 2 , , t n } L ( < ω ) , if u i t j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) , s i v j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) , then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that s k t l .

i { 1 , 2 , , n } , j { 1 , 2 , , m } , let F i = { u i } , v 1 j = v 2 j = = v n j = v j . By (i), i { 1 , 2 , , n } , { v i 1 , v i 2 , , v i m } = { v 1 , v 2 , , v m } L \ u i = ( F i ) . Now we verify condition (b) of (11). By (ii), i { 1 , 2 , , n } , y L \ u i = ( F i ) . Let s 1 = s 2 = = s m = x , t 1 = t 2 = = t n = x . Then ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } , s k t l . Note that s j = x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) , by (iii), k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that u k t k = x , that is, ( F k ) = L \ u k L \ x = ( x ) . Obviously, condition (c) of (11) holds. Therefore, condition (11) holds.

(11) (3) x , y L with x y , by (11), { F 1 , F 2 , , F n } ( X ( < ω ) ) ( < ω ) and { v i j : i = 1 , 2 , , n ; j = 1 , 2 , , m } Y ( < ω ) satisfying conditions (a),(b) and (c). Let u i = F i , v j = i = 1 n v i j . Then it is easy to see that ( i , j ) { 1 , 2 , , n } × { 1 , 2 , , m } , u i v j , and u i y ( i = 1 , 2 , , n ) . By (b), k { 1 , 2 , , n } such that u k x . Thus, x v j ( j = 1 , 2 , , m ) (otherwise, u k v j 0 for some j 0 { 1 , 2 , , m } , a contradiction). Finally, we show that condition (iii) of (3). { s 1 , s 2 , , s m } , { t 1 , t 2 , t n } L ( < ω ) , if u i t j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) , s i v j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) . Then t j ( F i ) = L \ u i ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , n } ) and s i 1 ( { v 1 j , v 2 j , , v n j } ) = L \ i = 1 n v i j = L \ v j ( i , j { 1 , 2 , , m } ) . By (c), ( k , l ) { 1 , 2 , , m } × { 1 , 2 , , n } such that s k t l . Therefore, condition (3) holds.

(11) (13) Let X = L and ρ = on L . Then L ( Φ ( X ) , ) . By Theorem 5.3, ρ is generalized finitely strongly regular.

(13) (1) Using Theorem 5.3.□

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their very careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments.

  1. Funding information: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 12071199, 11661057 and 12161043), and the Foundation of Education Department of Jiangxi Province (No. GJJ200838).

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] A. Zareckiǐ, The semigroup of binary relations, Mat. Sb. 61 (1963), 291–305. Suche in Google Scholar

[2] G. Markowsky, Idempotents and product representations with applications to the semigroup of binary relations, Semigroup Forum 5 (1972), 95–119. 10.1007/BF02572880Suche in Google Scholar

[3] B. M. Schein, Regular elements of the semigroup of all binary relations, Semigroup Forum 13 (1976), 95–102. 10.1007/BF02194925Suche in Google Scholar

[4] H. J. Bandelt, Regularity and complete distributivity, Semigroup Forum 19 (1980), 123–126. 10.1007/BF02572509Suche in Google Scholar

[5] H. J. Bandelt, On regularity classes of binary relations, in: Universal Algebra and Applications, vol. 9, Banach Center Publications, PWN, Warsaw, 1982, pp. 329–333. 10.4064/-9-1-329-333Suche in Google Scholar

[6] X. Q. Xu and Y. M. Liu, Relational representations of hypercontinuous lattices, in: Domain Theory, Logic, and Computation, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2003, pp. 65–74. 10.1007/978-94-017-1291-0_3Suche in Google Scholar

[7] X. Q. Xu and Y. M. Liu, Regular relations and completely regular spaces, Chinese Ann. Math. 29A (2008), 819–828. Suche in Google Scholar

[8] X. Q. Xu and M. K. Luo, Regular relations and normal spaces, Acta Math. Sinica (Chinese Ser.) 52 (2009), 393–402. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] G. H. Jiang and L. S. Xu, Conjugative relations and applications, Semigroup Forum 1 (2010), 85–91. 10.1007/s00233-009-9185-6Suche in Google Scholar

[10] G. H. Jiang, L. S. Xu, C. Cai, and G. W. Han, Normal relations on sets and applications, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 6 (2011), 721–726. Suche in Google Scholar

[11] G. H. Jiang and L. S. Xu, Dually normal relations on sets, Semigroup Forum 85 (2012), 75–80. 10.1007/s00233-011-9364-0Suche in Google Scholar

[12] M. Vinčić and D. A. Romano, Finitely bi-quasiregular relations, Sarajevo J. Math. 10 (2014), 21–26. 10.5644/SJM.10.1.03Suche in Google Scholar

[13] M. Vinčić and D. A. Romano, Finitely bi-normal relations, Gulf J. Math. 3 (2015), 101–105. 10.56947/gjom.v3i3.151Suche in Google Scholar

[14] G. N. Raney, A subdirect-union representation for completely distributive complete lattices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953), 518–522. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1953-0058568-4Suche in Google Scholar

[15] D. A. Romano, Finitely bi-conjugative relations, Rom. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 (2016), 134–138. Suche in Google Scholar

[16] D. A. Romano, Finitely dual quasi-normal relations, MAT-KOL XXIII (2017), 21–25. Suche in Google Scholar

[17] D. A. Romano, Some specific classes of relations: a review, MAT-KOL XXIV (2018), 19–22. Suche in Google Scholar

[18] S. Z. Luo and X. Q. Xu, Split Hausdorff internal topologies on posets, Open Math. 17 (2019), 1756–1763. 10.1515/math-2019-0136Suche in Google Scholar

[19] X. Q. Xu, Strongly algebraic lattices and conditions of mininal mapping preserving infs, Chinese Ann. Math. 15B (1994), 105–114. Suche in Google Scholar

[20] G. Gierz, K. H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J. D. Lawson, M. Mislove, and D. Scott, Continuous Lattices and Domains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. 10.1017/CBO9780511542725Suche in Google Scholar

[21] X. Q. Xu, Relational Representations of Complete Lattices and Their Applications, PhD thesis, Sichuan University, 2004. Suche in Google Scholar

[22] J. B. Yang and M. K. Luo, Priestley spaces,quasi-hyperalgebraic lattices and Smyth powerdomains, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 22 (2006), 951–958. 10.1007/s10114-005-0737-8Suche in Google Scholar

[23] H. A. Priestley, Representation of distributive lattices by means of ordered Stone spaces, Bull. London Math. Soc. 2 (1970), 186–190. 10.1112/blms/2.2.186Suche in Google Scholar

[24] H. A. Priestley, Ordered topological spaces and the represesentation of distributive lattices, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 24 (1972), 507–530. 10.1112/plms/s3-24.3.507Suche in Google Scholar

[25] J. B. Yang and M. K. Luo, Z-quasialgebraic domain, J. Shanghai Univ. Nat. Sci. 42 (2005), 234–239. Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-15
Revised: 2021-12-08
Accepted: 2022-01-15
Published Online: 2022-04-13

© 2022 Shuzhen Luo and Xiaoquan Xu, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Heruntergeladen am 30.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0010/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen