Startseite Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
Artikel Open Access

Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations

  • Li Ma EMAIL logo , Ru Wang und Liangqing Yan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. August 2022

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the existence and uniqueness theorems for stochastic functional differential equations with Markovian switching and jump, where the linear growth condition is replaced by more general Khasminskii-type conditions in terms of a pair of Lyapunov-type functions.

MSC 2010: 60H101; 60F99

1 Introduction

In general, in order for a stochastic differential equation to have a unique global solution for any given initial data, the coefficients of the equation are generally required to satisfy the linear growth condition (see, e.g., [1]) or a non-Lipschitz condition and linear growth condition (see, e.g., [2,3,4]), so the linear growth condition plays an important role in avoiding explosion in the finite time. However, many important equations in practice do not satisfy the linear growth condition, such as stochastic Lotka-Volterra systems (see, e.g., [5]). So it is necessary to establish more general existence-and-uniqueness theorems. There are many results of the solution of a stochastic functional differential equation (SFDE) without jumps. Xuerong and Rassias (see, e.g., [6]) examined the global solutions of SFDE under a more general condition, which has been introduced by Khasminskii. By this idea, Yi et al. (see, e.g., [7]) considered existence-and-uniqueness theorems of global solutions to SFDE. Qi et al. (see, e.g., [8]) established the existence-and-uniqueness theorems of global solutions to SFDE under local Lipschitz condition and Khasminskii-type conditions. Minghui et al. (see, e.g., [9]) established existence-and-uniqueness theorems for SFDE where the linear growth condition is replaced by more general Khasminskii-type conditions in terms of a pair of Lyapunov-type functions. Then, Fuke (see, e.g., [10]) considered the existence-and-uniqueness theorems of global solutions to neutral SFDE with the local Lipschitz condition but without the linear growth condition. Later, Fuke established the Khasminskii-type theorems for SFDE with finite delay. Quanxin (see, e.g., [11]) found the pth moment exponential stability of impulsive SFDEs with Markovian switching. Recently, Quanxin and his cooperators (see, e.g., [12]) studied the Razumikhin stability theorem for a class of impulsive stochastic delay differential systems.

For SFDE with jumps, Wei et al. (see, e.g., [13]) found the existence and uniqueness of solutions to a general neutral SFDE with infinite delay and Lévy jumps in the phase space C g under the local Carathêodory-type conditions and gave the exponential estimation and almost surely asymptotic estimation of solutions. By using the Razumikhin method and Lyapunov functions, Quanxin (see, e.g., [14]) obtained several Razumikhin-type theorems to prove the pth moment exponential stability of the suggested system and further discussed the pth moment exponential stability of stochastic delay differential equations with Lévy noise and Markov switching.

For a class of nonlinear stochastic differential delay equations with Poisson jump and time-dependent delay, Haidan and Quanxin (see, e.g., [15]) proved that the considered stochastic system has a unique global solution and investigated the pth moment exponential stability and the almost surely exponential stability of solutions under the local Lipschitz condition and a new nonlinear growth condition, which are weaker than those in the previous literature, by virtue of the Lyapunov function and the semi-martingale convergence theorem.

In this paper, we consider the existence-and-uniqueness theorems of global solutions to neutral SFDE with Markovian switching and Lévy jumps and establish the Khasmiskii-type theorem in the spirit of Minghui et al. (see, e.g., [9]). The main difficulty comes from the neutral term and the Lévy jumps term. After placing some assumptions on the neutral term and jump term, we obtained the existence and uniqueness of the solution by elementary inequality, the Gronwall inequality, the Burkh o ¨ lder-Davis-Gundy inequality, and the Itô formula.

This paper is organized as follows. We will establish the Khasminiskii-type existence-and-uniqueness theorems for neutral SFDEs with Markovian switching and Lévy jumps in Section 2. We will proceed to consider a special class of neutral SFDEs with Markovian switching and Lévy jumps, namely, neutral stochastic differential delay equations with variable delays in Section 3. An example is given in Section 4 to illustrate our results throughout the paper.

2 The Khasminskii-type theorem for SFDEs with Markovian switching and jumps

Throughout this paper, unless otherwise specified, we use the following notations. Let x be the Euclidean norm of a vector x R n . Let R + be the family of nonnegative real numbers. If A is a matrix, its trace norm is denoted by A = trace ( A T A ) . Let τ > 0 . Let C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) be the family of continuous functions from [ τ , 0 ] to R n with supremum norm φ = sup τ θ 0 φ ( θ ) , which is a Banach space. Let ( Ω , , { t } t 0 , P ) be a complete probability space with a filtration { t } t 0 satisfying the usual conditions (i.e., it is increasing and right continuous while 0 contains all P-null sets). Let p 1 and L t p ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) be the family of t -measurable C ( [ τ , 0 ] , R n ) -valued random variables ϕ such that E ϕ p < . Let W ( t ) = ( W 1 ( t ) , , W m ( t ) ) T be an m-dimensional Brownian motion defined on the probability space. Let p ¯ = { p ¯ ( t ) , t 0 } be a stationary and R n -valued Poisson point process. Then, for A ( R n { 0 } ) , here ( R n { 0 } ) denotes the Borel σ -field on R n { 0 } , and we define the Poisson counting measure N associated with p ¯ by

N ( ( 0 , t ] × A ) = 0 < s t I A ( p ¯ ( s ) ) .

For simplicity, we denote N ( t , A ) = N ( ( 0 , t ] × A ) . It is well known that there exists a σ -finite measure π , such that

E [ N ( t , A ) ] = π ( A ) t , P ( N ( t , A ) = n ) = exp ( π ( A ) t ) ( π ( A ) t ) n n ! .

This measure π is called the Lévy measure. Moreover, by Doob-Meyer’s decomposition theorem, there exists a unique { t } t 0 -adapted martingale N ˜ ( t , A ) and a unique { t } t 0 -adapted natural increasing process N ˆ ( t , A ) such that

N ( t , A ) = N ˜ ( t , A ) + N ˆ ( t , A ) , t > 0 .

Here, N ˜ ( t , A ) is called the compensated Lévy jumps and N ˆ ( t , A ) = π ( A ) t is called the compensator.

Let r ( t ) , t 0 , be a right-continuous Markovian chain on the probability space taking values in a finite state space S = { 1 , 2 , , N } with generator Γ = ( r i j ) N × N given by

P { r ( t + Δ ) = j r ( t ) = i } = γ i j Δ + o ( Δ ) , if i j ; 1 + γ i j Δ + o ( Δ ) , if i = j .

Here, Δ > 0 and γ i j 0 , i j , is the transition rate of the Markovian chain from i to j , while γ i i = i j γ i j . We assume that the Markovian chain, Brownian motion, and Lévy jumps are independent. For Z ( R n { 0 } ) , π ( Z ) < , consider a nonlinear neutral SFDE with Markovian switching and Lévy jump,

(1) d [ x ( t ) G ( x t , r ( t ) ) ] = f ( x t , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) ) d t + g ( x t , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) ) d W ( t ) + Z h ( x t , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) N ( d t , d v ) ,

with the initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) . Here, G : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × S R n , f : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S R n , g : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S R n × m , h : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S × Z R n , and for θ [ τ , 0 ] , x t ( θ ) = x ( t + θ ) . Now we denote by C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) the family of all continuous nonnegative function V ( t , x ) defined on [ τ , ) × R n , such that they are continuously twice differentiable in x and once in t . Given V C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) , define the function L V : R + × C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) R by

L V ( t , φ ) = V t ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) + V x ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) f ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) + 1 2 trace [ g T ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) V x x ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) g ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) ] + Z [ V ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) + h ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) ) V ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) ] π ( d v ) ,

where

V t ( t , x ) = V ( t , x ) t , V x ( t , x ) = V ( t , x ) x 1 , , V ( t , x ) x n , V x x ( t , x ) = 2 V ( t , x ) x i x j n × n .

Assumption 2.1

(Local Lipschitz condition) For any integer m 1 , there exists a positive constant k m , such that

f ( φ , x , t , i ) f ( ϕ , y , t , i ) 2 g ( φ , x , t , i ) g ( ϕ , y , t , i ) 2 Z h ( φ , x , t , i , v ) h ( ϕ , y , t , i , v ) 2 π ( d v ) k m ( φ ϕ 2 + x y 2 ) ,

for any φ , ϕ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , x , y R n with φ ϕ x y m , i S and any t R + .

Assumption 2.2

(Contraction condition) For any p 1 , there exists a constant κ ( 0 , 1 2 ) such that for all φ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , i S ,

E ( G ( φ , i ) p ) κ p sup τ θ 0 E ( φ ( θ ) p ) .

Assumption 2.3

(Khasminskii-type condition) Let p 1 . There are two functions V C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) and U C ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) , a probability measure μ ( ) on [ τ , 0 ] as well as a positive constant K , two positive constants c 1 , c 2 , such that for any ( t , x ) R + × R n ,

(2) c 1 x p V ( t , x ) c 2 x p ,

and for any ( t , φ ) R + × C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) ,

(3) L V ( t , φ ) K [ 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) ] U ( t , φ ( 0 ) ) + τ 0 U ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) d μ ( θ ) .

Assumption 2.4

For the function V stated in Assumption 2.3 and constant K , we have

V x ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) g ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) K ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) ) ,

Z [ V ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) + h ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) ) V ( t , φ ( 0 ) G ( φ , r ( t ) ) ) ] 2 π ( d v ) K 2 ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) ) 2

for all ( t , φ ) R + × C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) .

Theorem 2.1

Under Assumptions 2.12.4, for any given initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , there is a unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (1) on t [ τ , ) . Moreover, for any T 0 , the solution has the property that

E sup τ t T V ( t , x ( t ) ) C 4 e C 3 T ,

where

C 1 = E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( ξ , r ( 0 ) ) ) + τ 0 U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s , C 2 = 2 E ξ p + 2 p C 1 c 1 + 1 2 p κ p c 2 + 2 p K c 1 + 2 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 2 ( 1 2 p κ p ) T , C 3 = 2 p k c 1 + 2 2 p + 5 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 2 p κ p ) , C 4 = C 2 c 2 .

Proof

Similar to [16] Theorem 3.15, there is a unique maximal local solution x ( t ) on t [ τ , σ ) , where σ is the explosion time. To show that x ( t ) is actually global, we need to show σ = , a.s. Let k 0 > 0 be sufficiently large for ξ < k 0 . For each integer k k 0 , define the stopping time

σ k = inf { τ t < σ : x ( t ) k } ,

where, as usual, inf = . Clearly, σ k is nondecreasing and lim k σ k = σ σ . This proof can be completed if σ = a.s.. By the Itô formula ([17], Lemma 4.4.6),

(4) V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x t , r ( t ) ) ) = V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x 0 , r ( 0 ) ) ) + 0 t L V ( s , x s ) d s + 0 t [ V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) ] d W ( s ) + 0 t Z [ V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ] N ˜ ( d s , d v ) .

By (3), we have

(5) V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x t , r ( t ) ) ) V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x 0 , r ( 0 ) ) ) + K 0 t ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) ) d s 0 t U ( s , x ( s ) ) d + 0 t τ 0 U ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) d μ ( θ ) d s

+ 0 t [ V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) ] d W ( s ) + 0 t Z [ V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ] N ˜ ( d s , d v ) .

By the Fubini theorem, we have

(6) 0 t τ 0 U ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) d μ ( θ ) d s = τ 0 0 t U ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) d s d μ ( θ ) τ 0 τ t U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s d μ ( θ ) τ t U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

Substituting (6) into (5) yields

V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x t , r ( t ) ) ) C ¯ + K 0 t ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) ) d s + 0 t V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) d W ( s ) + 0 t Z [ V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ] N ˜ ( d s , d v ) ,

where C ¯ = V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x 0 , r ( 0 ) ) ) + τ 0 U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s . This implies that for any k k 0 , t < T , where T is an arbitrary positive constant,

V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) ) C ¯ + K 0 t σ k ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) ) d s + 0 t σ k V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) d W ( s ) + 0 t σ k Z [ V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ] N ˜ ( d s , d v ) .

Taking upper bound and expectation on the above inequality, we obtain

(7) E sup 0 t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) ) C ¯ + K sup 0 t T 0 t σ k ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s + θ , x ( s + θ ) ) ) d s + E sup 0 t T 0 t I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) d W ( s ) + E sup 0 t T 0 t I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) Z [ V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ] N ˜ ( d s , d v ) .

By the Burkhölder-Davis-Gundy inequality ([5], Theorem 1.7.3) and Assumption 2.4,

(8) E sup 0 t T 0 t I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) d W ( s ) 32 E 0 T I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) V x ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) g ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) 2 d s 1 2 32 K E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s σ k + θ , x ( s σ k + θ ) ) ] 2 d s 1 2 32 K E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] 2 d s 1 2 32 K E [ 1 + sup τ t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] d s 1 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p + 1 c 2 E ( 1 + sup τ t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ) + 2 p + 4 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] d s .

By Assumption 2.4, similar to (8) and [5], Theorem 1.7.3,

(9) E sup 0 t T 0 t I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) Z ( V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) ) N ˜ ( d s , d v ) 32 E 0 T I [ 0 , σ k ] ( s ) Z V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) + h ( x s , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) , v ) ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x s , r ( s ) ) ) 2 π ( d v ) d s 1 2 32 K E 0 T ( 1 + sup τ θ 0 V ( s σ k + θ , x ( s σ k + θ ) ) 2 ) d s 1 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p + 1 c 2 E ( 1 + sup τ t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ) + 2 p + 4 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] d s .

Substituting (8) and (9) into (7),

(10) E sup 0 t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) ) C 1 + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] d s + c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p c 2 E ( 1 + sup τ t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ) ,

where C 1 = E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( ξ , r ( 0 ) ) ) + τ 0 U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

Recall elementary inequality a + b p 2 p 1 ( a p + b p ) for any p 1 , a R n , b R n , so a p 1 2 p 1 a + b p b p . Note the relationship between sup and inf, so by Fatou’s lemma, (2), and Assumptions 2.22.3, we have

(11) E sup 0 t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) ) c 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) p c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p + E sup 0 t T G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) p = c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p E inf 0 t T G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) p c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p inf 0 t T E G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) p c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p sup 0 t T E G ( x t σ k , r ( t σ k ) ) p c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p κ p sup 0 t T sup τ θ 0 E x ( t σ k + θ ) p c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p κ p E sup 0 t T sup τ θ 0 x ( t σ k + θ ) p = c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p κ p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p ,

and

(12) E 0 T [ 1 + sup τ t s V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) ] d s E 0 T [ 1 + c 2 sup τ t s x ( t σ k ) p ] d s .

Substituting (11) and (12) into (10) gives

(13) c 1 1 2 p 1 E sup 0 t T x ( t σ k ) p κ p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 1 + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T [ 1 + c 2 sup τ t s x ( t σ k ) p ] d s + c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p c 2 + c 1 1 2 p κ p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p .

By (13), we have

(14) c 1 1 2 p 1 κ p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 1 + c 1 2 p 1 E ξ p + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) T + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T sup τ t s x ( t σ k ) p d s + c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p c 2 + c 1 1 2 p κ p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p .

So,

c 1 2 p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 1 + c 1 2 p 1 E ξ p + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) T + c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) 2 p c 2 + K + 2 p + 5 c 2 2 K 2 c 1 ( 1 2 p κ p ) E 0 T sup τ t s x ( t σ k ) p d s .

That is,

E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 2 + C 3 0 T E sup τ t s x ( t σ k ) p d s ,

where

C 2 = 2 E ( ξ p ) + 2 p C 1 c 1 + 1 2 p κ p c 2 + 2 p K c 1 + 2 2 p + 5 c 2 K 2 c 1 2 ( 1 2 p κ p ) T , C 3 = 2 p K c 1 + 2 2 p + 5 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 2 p κ p ) .

By the Gronwall inequality ([18] Lemma 2), we therefore obtain

(15) E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 2 e C 3 T .

So

k p P ( σ k t ) E x ( t σ k ) p E sup τ t T x ( t σ k ) p C 2 e C 3 T .

Let k + , then lim k + P ( σ k t ) = 0 , and hence, P ( σ t ) = 0 and P ( σ > t ) = 1 . Since T t > τ and T is arbitrary, we must have that σ = a.s. By (2) and (15), we have

(16) E sup τ t T V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) C 2 c 2 e C 3 T .

Letting k in (16) yields

(17) E sup τ t T V ( t , x ( t ) ) C 2 c 2 e C 3 T .

The proof is therefore completed.□

Remark 2.1

From (15), we see that the p th moment will grow at most exponentially with exponent C 3 . That is,

limsup t 1 t log E x ( t ) p C 3 .

Here, C 3 = 2 p k c 1 + 2 2 p + 5 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 2 p κ p ) .

The next theorem shows that the p th exponential estimations implies the almost surely asymptotic estimations, and we give an upper bound for the sample Lyapunov exponent.

Theorem 2.2

Under Assumptions 2.12.4, for any given initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , we have

(18) limsup t 1 t log x ( t ) 2 k c 1 + 2 8 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 4 κ 2 ) a.s.

That is, the sample Lyapunov exponent of the solution should not be greater than 2 k c 1 + 2 8 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 4 κ 2 ) .

Proof

For each n = 1 , 2 , , it follows from (15) (taking p = 2 ) that

E sup n 1 t n x ( t ) 2 β n e γ n ,

where β n = 2 E ξ 2 + 4 C 1 c 1 + 1 4 κ 2 c 2 + 4 K c 1 + 2 9 c 2 K 2 c 1 2 ( 1 4 κ 2 ) n , and γ = 4 k c 1 + 2 9 K 2 c 2 2 c 1 2 ( 1 4 κ 2 ) . Hence, for any ε > 0 , by the Chebyshev inequality, it follows that

P { ω : sup n 1 t n x ( t ) 2 > e ( γ + ε ) n } β n e ε n .

Since n β n e ε n 2 E ξ 2 + 4 C 1 c 1 + 1 4 κ 2 c 2 + 4 K c 1 + 2 9 c 2 K 2 c 1 2 ( 1 4 κ 2 ) n n e ε n < , by the Borel-Cantelli Lemma, we deduce that there exists an integer n 0 such that

sup n 1 t n x ( t ) 2 e ( γ + ε ) n , a.s. n n 0 .

Thus, for almost all ω Ω , if n 1 t n and n n 0 , then

(19) 1 t log x ( t ) = 1 2 t log x ( t ) 2 ( γ + ε ) n 2 ( n 1 ) a.s .

Taking the limsup in (19) leads to an almost surely exponential estimate, that is,

limsup t 1 t log x ( t ) γ + ε 2 a.s.

The required assertion (18) follows because ε > 0 is arbitrary.□

3 Neutral SDDEs with variable delays

We now turn to considering neutral stochastic differential delay equations (SDDEs) with Markovian switching and Lévy jumps where the delays are time-dependent variables. That is, we consider the following equation.

(20) d [ x ( t ) G ¯ ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ] = f ¯ ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) ) d t + g ¯ ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) ) d W ( t ) + Z h ¯ ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , x ( t ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) N ( d t , d v ) ,

on t 0 with the initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , where δ : R + [ 0 , τ ] , G ¯ : R n × S R n , f ¯ : R n × R n × R + × S R n , g ¯ : R n × R n × R + × S R n × m , and h ¯ : R n × R n × R + × S × Z R n are all Borel measurable. [7,9] have established the Khasminskii-type theorems for SDDEs with constant delay. But these results could not be applied to the SDDEs where the delay is time-variable. If we define f : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S R n , g : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S R n × m , h : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × R n × R + × S × Z R n , and G : C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) × S R n by

G ( φ , r ( t ) ) = G ¯ ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) , f ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) = f ¯ ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) , g ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) = g ¯ ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) , h ( φ , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) = h ¯ ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) , v ) ,

then we can apply the theory established in the previous sections to this neutral SDDE with Markovian switching. Let us proceed in this way to see what we can obtain. First, we can transfer Assumption 2.1 into the following one.

Assumption 3.1

For each integer m 1 , there is a positive constant k m such that

(21) f ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) f ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i ) 2 g ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) g ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i ) 2 Z h ¯ ( y , x , t , i , v ) h ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i , v ) 2 π ( d v ) k m ( y y ¯ 2 + x x ¯ 2 ) ,

for those y , x , y ¯ , x ¯ R n with y x y ¯ x ¯ m and any t R + .

The following assumption is corresponding to Assumption 2.2.

Assumption 3.2

(Contraction condition) For any p 1 , there exists a constant κ ( 0 , 1 2 ) such that for all φ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , i S ,

E G ¯ ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , i ) p κ p [ E φ ( 0 ) p + E φ ( δ ( t ) ) p ] .

Comparing with Assumption 2.3, we can obtain the following. For V C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) , the operator L V : R + × C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) R takes the form as follows:

L V ( t , φ ) = V ( φ ( δ ( t ) ) , φ ( 0 ) , t , r ( t ) ) ,

where V : R n × R n × R + × S R is defined by

V ( y , x , t , i ) = V t ( t , x G ¯ ( y , i ) ) + V x ( t , x G ¯ ( y , i ) ) f ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) + 1 2 trace [ g ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) T V x x ( t , x G ¯ ( y , i ) ) g ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) ] + Z [ V ( t , x G ¯ ( y , i ) ) + h ¯ ( y , x , t , i , v ) V ( t , x G ¯ ( y , i ) ) ] π ( d v ) .

And clearly, (3) should become

(22) L V ( t , φ ) K [ 1 + V ( t , φ ( 0 ) ) + V ( t δ ( t ) , φ ( δ ( t ) ) ) ] U ( t , φ ( 0 ) ) + τ 0 U ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) d μ ( θ ) ,

with

τ 0 U ( t + θ , φ ( θ ) ) d μ ( θ ) = U ( t δ ( t ) , φ ( δ ( t ) ) ) .

This implies that μ ( ) should be a point probability measure at δ ( t ) , which means μ ( ) is a t -dependent probability measure. However, the theory established in the previous section requires essentially that it is t -independent. This forces the function U 0 in order for the previous theory to be applicable. So the condition corresponding to (3) is as follows.

Assumption 3.3

There is a function V C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) and a positive constant K such that V obeys (2) and for all ( x , y , t , i ) R n × R n × R + × S ,

(23) V ( y , x , t , i ) K [ 1 + V ( t , x ) + V ( t δ ( t ) , y ) ] .

The condition corresponding to Assumption 2.4 is as follows.

Assumption 3.4

For the function V stated in Assumption 3.2 and constant K , we have

(24) V x ( t , x G ( y , i ) ) g ( y , x , t , i ) K [ 1 + V ( t , x ) + V ( t δ ( t ) , y ) ] ,

(25) Z [ V ( t , x G ( y , i ) + h ( y , x , t , i , v ) ) V ( t , x G ( y , i ) ) ] π ( d v ) 2 K 2 [ 1 + V ( t , x ) + V ( t δ ( t ) , y ) ] ,

for all ( t , φ ) R + × C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) .

By Theorem 2.1, we can obtain the following result.

Theorem 3.1

Under Assumptions 3.13.4, we obtain that for any initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , there is a unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (20) on t [ τ , ) .

Assumption 3.5

For any t 0 , assume that δ ( t ) is differentiable and obeys

(26) d δ ( t ) d t δ ¯ < 1 ,

where δ ¯ is a constant. Assume also that there is a function V C 1 , 2 ( [ τ , ) × R n ; R + ) and a positive constant K such that V obeys (2) and for all ( x , y , t , i ) R n × R n × R + × S ,

(27) V ( y , x , t , i ) K [ 1 + V ( t , x ) + V ( t δ ( t ) , y ) ] U ( t , x ) + ( 1 δ ¯ ) U ( t δ ( t ) , y ) .

Now we could give an alternative Khasminskii-type theorem for the neutral SDDE (20) by removing Assumption 3.4 as follows.

Theorem 3.2

Under Assumptions 3.1, 3.2, and 3.5. For any initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , there is a unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (3.1) on t [ τ , ) .

Proof

For any initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , under Assumption 3.1 (the local Lipschitz condition), by the standard truncation technique, there is a unique maximal local solution x ( t ) to equation (20) on t [ τ , σ ) , where σ is the explosion time. The following proof is similar to Theorem 2.1, so here we just give the key steps. In the following, we will follow the notations of the proof of Theorem 2.1. Define

h ˜ k ( t ) = E ( x ( t σ k ) G ( x ( t σ k δ ( t ) σ k ) , r ( t σ k ) ) p ) , H ˜ k ( t ) = sup 0 s t h ˜ k ( s ) , h k ( t ) = E ( x ( t σ k ) p ) , H k ( t ) = sup τ s t h k ( s ) .

Recall the elementary inequality: for p 1 , x , y R n , k ( 0 , 1 ) , then

x + y p ( 1 k ) 1 p x p + k 1 p y p .

For t 0 , by Assumption 3.2,

E x ( t ) p ( 1 κ ) 1 p E x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) p + κ 1 p E G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) p ( 1 κ ) 1 p E x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) p + κ E x ( t ) p + κ E x ( t δ ( t ) ) p ( 1 κ ) 1 p E x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) p + 2 κ sup τ s t E x ( s ) p .

Replacing t by t σ k gives h k ( t ) ( 1 κ ) 1 p h ˜ k ( t ) + 2 κ H k ( t ) on t 0 . So

H k ( t ) sup τ s 0 E ξ ( s ) p + sup 0 s t h k ( s ) E ξ p + ( 1 κ ) 1 p H ˜ k ( t ) + 2 κ H k ( t ) .

Hence,

(28) H k ( t ) E ξ p 1 2 κ + H ˜ k ( t ) ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) , on t 0 .

By the Itô formula and Assumption 3.5, we can show for any sufficiently large k and any t 0 ,

c 1 h ˜ k ( t ) E V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x ( t σ k δ ( t ) σ k ) , r ( t σ k ) ) ) E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + K 0 t [ 1 + 2 sup τ u s E V ( u σ k , x ( u σ k ) ) ] d s + E 0 t σ k [ U ( s , x ( s ) ) + ( 1 δ ¯ ) U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) ] d s E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + K 0 t [ 1 + 2 c 2 H k ( s ) ] d s + E 0 t σ k [ U ( s , x ( s ) ) + ( 1 δ ¯ ) U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) ] d s .

But

0 t σ k ( 1 δ ¯ ) U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s δ ( 0 ) t σ k δ ( t σ k ) U ( u , x ( u ) ) d u τ t σ k U ( u , x ( u ) ) d u .

Recall C 1 = E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + τ 0 U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s , so

c 1 h ˜ k ( t ) C 1 + K 0 t [ 1 + 2 c 2 H k ( s ) ] d s .

Hence,

(29) c 1 H ˜ k ( t ) C 1 + K t + 2 c 2 K 0 t H k ( s ) d s .

Plugging (29) into (28),

H k ( t ) E ( ξ p ) 1 2 κ + C 1 + K t c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) + 2 c 2 K 0 t H k ( s ) d s c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) , for t 0 .

By Assumption 3.5 and the Gronwall inequality, we have

sup τ s t E V ( s σ k , x ( s σ k ) ) c 2 M ( t ) exp 2 C 2 K t c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) ,

where M ( t ) = E ( ξ p ) 1 2 κ + C 1 + K t c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) . Noting x ( σ k ) k , so we obtain that

c 1 k p P ( σ k t ) c 1 E x ( t σ k ) p E V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) ) c 2 M ( t ) exp 2 C 2 K t c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) .

Letting k ,

lim k P ( σ k t ) lim k c 2 M ( t ) c 1 k p exp 2 C 2 K t c 1 ( 1 κ ) p 1 ( 1 2 κ ) = 0 .

So σ = a.s., the proof is finished.□

Next, we present some useful asymptotic moment estimations for the solution of the neutral SDDE (20) by the following theorem.

Theorem 3.3

Let Assumptions 3.1, 3.2, and 3.5hold, but (27) is replaced by

(30) V ( y , x , t , i ) α 1 α 2 V ( t , x ) + α 3 V ( t δ ( t ) , y ) U ( t , x ) + α U ( t δ ( t ) , y ) ,

where α 1 0 , α 2 ( 1 δ ¯ ) > α 3 0 and 1 δ ¯ > α 0 . Then for any given initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , the unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (3.1) has the properties that

(31) limsup t E V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ) ( C + α 1 ε ) e ,

and

(32) limsup t 1 t 0 t E U ( t , x ( t ) ) d t α 1 ( 1 δ ¯ ) 1 δ ¯ α ,

where

C = E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 3 e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ 0 e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ 0 e ε s U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s ,

ε = ε 1 ε 2 , while ε 1 > 0 and ε 2 > 0 are the unique roots to the following equations:

(33) α 2 = α 3 e ε 1 τ 1 δ ¯

and

(34) 1 = α e ε 2 τ 1 δ ¯ ,

respectively. Moreover, if α 1 = 0 , then

(35) limsup t 1 t log E V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ) 0 ,

and

(36) 0 E U ( t , x ( t ) ) d t < .

Proof

Clearly, (30) is stronger than (23). So, for any given initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , there is a unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (20) on [ τ , ) . By the Itô formula and (30), for any sufficiently large k and any t 0 , we can obtain

(37) E ( e ε ( t σ k ) V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x ( t σ k δ ( t ) σ k ) , r ( t σ k ) ) ) ) V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) = E 0 t σ k e ε s [ ε V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) + V ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , x ( s ) , s , r ( s ) ) ] d s E 0 t σ k e ε s [ ε V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) + α 1 α 2 V ( s , x ( s ) ) + α 3 V ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) U ( s , x ( s ) ) + α U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) ] d s = ε E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) d s + α 1 E 0 t σ k e ε s d s α 2 E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α 3 E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s E 0 t σ k e ε s U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α E 0 t σ k e ε s U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s .

We have

(38) 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s e ε τ 0 t σ k e ε ( s δ ( s ) ) V ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s e ε τ 1 δ ¯ δ ( 0 ) t σ k δ ( t σ k ) e ε u V ( u , x ( u ) ) d u e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ t σ k e ε u V ( u , x ( u ) ) d u .

Similarly,

(39) 0 t σ k e ε s U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) d s e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ t σ k e ε u U ( u , x ( u ) ) d u .

Substituting (38) and (39) into (37), we can obtain

E ( e ε ( t σ k ) V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x ( t σ k δ ( t ) σ k ) , r ( t σ k ) ) ) ) C + α 1 e ε t ε α 2 α 3 e ε τ 1 δ ¯ E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s 1 α e ε τ 1 δ ¯ E 0 t σ k e ε s U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + ε E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) d s ,

where

C = E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 3 e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ 0 e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α e ε τ 1 δ ¯ τ 0 e ε s U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

However, for ε = ε 1 ε 2 , by (33) and (34), we can obtain

α 2 α 3 e ε τ 1 δ ¯ 0 and 1 α e ε τ 1 δ ¯ 0 .

So we have

E ( e ε ( t σ k ) V ( t σ k , x ( t σ k ) G ( x ( t σ k δ ( t ) σ k ) , r ( t σ k ) ) ) ) C + α 1 e ε t ε + ε E 0 t σ k e ε s V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) d s .

When k , for any t 0 , we have

(40) E V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ) C e ε t + α 1 ε + ε E 0 t e ε ( s t ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) d s C + α 1 ε + ε E 0 t e ε ( s t ) V ( s , x ( s ) G ( x ( s δ ( s ) ) , r ( s ) ) ) d s .

So by the Gronwall’s inequality,

(41) E V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ) [ C + α 1 ε ] e 1 e ε t .

Let t . Then the assertion (31) was proved.

To show assertion (32), by the Itô formula and (30), we have

(42) 0 E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 1 t + E 0 t [ α 2 V ( s , x ( s ) ) + α 3 V ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) ] d s + E 0 t [ U ( s , x ( s ) ) + α U ( s δ ( s ) , x ( s δ ( s ) ) ) ] d s

E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 1 t α 2 E 0 t V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α 3 1 δ ¯ E τ t V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s E 0 t U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α 1 δ ¯ τ t E U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 1 t + α 3 1 δ ¯ τ 0 E V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α 1 δ ¯ τ 0 E U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s 1 α 1 δ ¯ 0 t E U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

Dividing both sides by t and then letting t , we obtain assertion (32).

It is not difficult to show that if α 1 = 0 , for any t 0 , then (41) becomes

E V ( t , x ( t ) G ( x ( t δ ( t ) ) , r ( t ) ) ) C e 1 e ε t ,

and so assertion (35) follows. Moreover, for all t 0 from (42), we have

0 t E U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s 1 δ ¯ 1 δ ¯ α E V ( 0 , x ( 0 ) G ( x ( δ ( 0 ) ) , r ( 0 ) ) ) + α 3 1 δ ¯ α τ 0 E V ( s , x ( s ) ) d s + α 1 δ ¯ α τ 0 E U ( s , x ( s ) ) d s .

Let t , we obtain assertion (36). The proof is therefore completed.□

4 Examples

Consider the following stochastic differential equation,

(43) d [ x ( t ) 0.1 x ( t δ ( t ) ) ] = x ( t ) [ a + b x ( t δ ( t ) ) x ( t ) 2 ] d t + c x ( t ) x ( t δ ( t ) ) d W ( t ) + Z β x ( t ) x ( t δ ( t ) ) v N ( d t , d v )

on all t 0 with initial data { x ( t ) : τ t 0 } C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R ) , where W ( t ) is an one dimensional Brownian motion and b and c are all positive constants. Compare (43) with (20), and let G ¯ ( y , i ) = 0.1 y , f ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) = x ( a + b y x 2 ) , g ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) = c x y , h ¯ ( y , x , t , i , v ) = β x y v , V ( t , x ) = x 2 , and U ( t , x ) = x 4 for ( t , x ) R + × R . In the following, we will verify the conditions of Theorems 3.2 and 3.3. By the elementary inequality u ± w 2 2 u 2 + 2 w 2 , we can show that for any positive constant N , if x x ¯ y y ¯ N , then

f ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) f ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i ) 2 = x ( a + b y x 2 ) x ¯ ( a + b y ¯ x ¯ 2 ) 2 = b x y b x ¯ y ¯ ( x 3 x ¯ 3 ) + a ( x x ¯ ) 2 = b ( x y x ¯ y + x ¯ y x ¯ y ¯ ) ( x x ¯ ) ( x + x ¯ + x x ¯ ) + a ( x x ¯ ) 2 3 b [ ( x x ¯ ) y + x ¯ ( y y ¯ ) ] 2 + 9 ( x 2 + x ¯ 2 + x x ¯ 2 ) x x ¯ 2 + 3 a 2 x x ¯ 2 6 ( b N ) 2 ( x x ¯ 2 + y y ¯ 2 ) + ( 18 N 2 + 9 N 4 + 3 a 2 ) x x ¯ 2 max ( 6 b 2 N 2 , 18 N 2 + 9 N 4 + 3 a 2 ) ( x x ¯ 2 + y y ¯ 2 ) , g ¯ ( y , x , t , i ) g ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i ) 2 = c x y c x ¯ y ¯ 2 = c x y c x ¯ y + c x ¯ y c x ¯ y ¯ 2 2 c 2 N 2 ( x x ¯ 2 + y y ¯ 2 ) .

We assume that Z v π ( d v ) < and Z v 2 π ( d v ) < , then

Z h ¯ ( y , x , t , i , v ) h ¯ ( y ¯ , x ¯ , t , i , v ) 2 π ( d v ) = Z β x y v β y ¯ x ¯ v 2 π ( d v ) = β 2 x y x ¯ y + x ¯ y x ¯ y ¯ 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) = β 2 ( x x ¯ y + y y ¯ x ¯ ) 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 β 2 N 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) ( x x ¯ 2 + y y ¯ 2 ) .

Hence, Assumption 3.1 holds true. Obviously, Assumption 3.2 holds true too. Next,

L V ( y , x , t , i ) = 2 ( x 0.1 y ) x ( a + b y x 2 ) + ( c x y ) 2 + β 2 Z [ ( x 0.1 y + x y v ) 2 ( x 0.1 y ) 2 ] π ( d v ) = 2 a x 2 + 2 b x 2 y 2 x 4 0.2 a x y 0.2 b x y 2 + 0.2 x 3 y + ( c x y ) 2 + β 2 Z ( 2 x 2 y 0.2 x y 2 ) v π ( d v ) + β 2 Z ( x y v ) 2 π ( d v ) = 2 a x 2 + 2 x 2 y b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 x 4 0.2 a x y + 0.2 x 3 y 0.2 x y 2 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) + ( x y ) 2 c 2 + β 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 a x 2 + 2 x 2 y b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 1.9 x 4 0.2 a x y 0.2 x y 2 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) + ( x y ) 2 0.1 + c 2 + β 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 a x 2 + 0.4 x 4 + 2.5 y 2 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 1.9 x 4 + 0.1 a 2 x 2 + 0.1 y 2 + 0.02 x 2 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 + 0.5 y 4 + 0.5 x 4 + 0.5 y 4 0.1 + c 2 + β 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 = 2 a + 0.1 a 2 + 0.02 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 x 2 + 2.5 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 + 0.1 y 2 x 4 + 0.5 + 0.5 0.1 + c 2 + β 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 y 4 .

Assume δ ( ) obeys (26) and let 0.5 + 0.5 0.1 + c 2 + β 2 Z v 2 π ( d v ) 2 < 1 δ ¯ , then by Theorem 3.2, for any initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) , there is a unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (43) on t [ τ , ) . If we further assume that

2 a + 0.1 a 2 + 0.02 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 < 0

and

2 a + 0.1 a 2 + 0.02 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 ( δ ¯ 1 ) > 2.5 b + β 2 Z v π ( d v ) 2 + 0.1 ,

then by Theorem 3.3, we obtain that for any given initial data x 0 = ξ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R ) , the unique global solution x ( t ) to equation (43) has the properties that

limsup t 1 t log E ( x ( t ) 0.1 x ( t δ ( t ) ) ) 2 0

and

0 E x 4 ( t ) d t < .

5 Conclusion

In this paper, first, we obtained the existence and uniqueness theorems for SFDEs with Markovian switching, jump term, and neutral term under local Lipschitz condition and Khasminskii-type condition. Second, we considered the neutral stochastic differential delay equation with variable delays and proved similar results under some new conditions. Finally, we provided one example and verified whether the coefficients satisfied assumptions of Theorem 3.1, and so the equation had a unique global solution.

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for their comments which helped improve the presentation of this paper.

  1. Funding information: This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11861029), Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 120RC589), and the specific research fund of The Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province (Grant No. YSPTZX202215).

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] M. Xuerong, A note on the LaSalle-type theorems for stochastic differential delay equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 268 (2002), 125–142. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7803Suche in Google Scholar

[2] N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe, Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes, Amsterdam, North Holland, 1981. Suche in Google Scholar

[3] M. Xuerong, Exponential Stability of Stochastic Differential Equations, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] I. I. Gikhman and A. V. Skorokhod, Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, 1972. 10.1007/978-3-642-88264-7Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Xuerong, Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications, 2nd Edition, Horwood Publishing, Chichester, 2007. Suche in Google Scholar

[6] M. Xuerong and M. J. Rassias, Khasminskii-type theorems for stochastic differential delay equations, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 23 (2005), 1045–1069. 10.1080/07362990500118637Suche in Google Scholar

[7] S. Yi, L. Qi, and M. Xuerong, The improved LaSalle-type theorems for stochastic functional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 318 (2006), 134–154. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.026Suche in Google Scholar

[8] L. Qi, M. Xuerong, and S. Yi, Generalised theory on asymptotic stability and boundedness of stochastic functional differential equations, Automatica 47 (2011), 2071–2081. 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.015Suche in Google Scholar

[9] S. Minghui, H. Liangjian, M. Xuerong, and Z. Liguo, Khasminskii-type theorems for stochastic functional differential equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 18 (2013), no. 6, 1697–1714. 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1697Suche in Google Scholar

[10] W. Fuke, Khasminskii-type theorems for neutral stochastic functional differential equations, Math. Appl. (Wuhan) 21 (2008), no. 4, 794–799. Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Z. Quanxin, pth Moment exponential stability of impulsive stochastic functional differential equations with Markovian switching, J. Franklin Inst. 351 (2004), no. 7, 3965–3986. 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

[12] H. Wei, Z. Quanxin, and H. R. Karimi, Some improved Razumikhin stability criteria for impulsive stochastic delay differential systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 64 (2019), no. 12, 5207–5213. 10.1109/TAC.2019.2911182Suche in Google Scholar

[13] M. Wei, H. Liangjian, and M. Xuerong, Neutral stochastic functional differential equations with Lévy jumps under the local Lipschitz condition, Adv. Differ. Equ. 24 (2017), 1–22. 10.1186/s13662-017-1102-9Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Z. Quanxin, Razumikhin-type theorem for stochastic functional differential equations with Lévy noise and Markov switching, Int. J. Control 90 (2017), no. 8, 1703–1712. 10.1080/00207179.2016.1219069Suche in Google Scholar

[15] L. Haidan and Z. Quanxin, The pth moment exponential stability and almost surely exponential stability of stochastic differential delay equations with Poisson jump, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 471 (2019), 197–210. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.10.072Suche in Google Scholar

[16] M. Xuerong and Y. Chenggui, Stochastic Differential Equations with Markovian Switching, Imperial College Press, London, 2006. Suche in Google Scholar

[17] D. Applebaum, Lévy processes and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd Edition, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, New York, 2009. 10.1017/CBO9780511809781Suche in Google Scholar

[18] W. Fuke and H. Shigeng, Khasminskii-type theorems for stochastic functional differential equations with infinite delay, Stat. Probab. Lett. 81 (2011), 1690–1694. 10.1016/j.spl.2011.05.005Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-16
Revised: 2022-04-04
Accepted: 2022-05-16
Published Online: 2022-08-25

© 2022 Li Ma et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Heruntergeladen am 6.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0059/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen