Home Mathematics Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
Article Open Access

Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay

  • Xin Wu and Zhaohai Ma EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 15, 2022

Abstract

This article is concerned with the nonlinear stability of traveling waves of a delayed susceptible-infective-removed (SIR) epidemic model with nonlocal dispersal, which can be seen as a continuity work of Li et al. [Traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay and external supplies, Appl. Math. Comput. 247 (2014), 723–740]. We prove that the traveling wave solution is exponentially stable when the initial perturbation around the traveling wave is relatively small in a weighted norm. The time decay rate is also obtained by weighted-energy estimates.

MSC 2010: 35C07; 92D25; 35B35

1 Introduction

In this article, we investigate the exponential stability of traveling waves in the following nonlocal dispersal delayed susceptible-infective-removed (SIR) epidemic model:

(1.1) S ( x , t ) t = d S R J ( x y ) S ( y , t ) d y S ( x , t ) + Λ σ S ( x , t ) F ( S ( x , t ) , I ( x , t τ ) ) , I ( x , t ) t = d I R J ( x y ) I ( y , t ) d y I ( x , t ) + F ( S ( x , t ) , I ( x , t τ ) ) ( μ + γ ) I ( x , t ) , R ( x , t ) t = d R R J ( x y ) R ( y , t ) d y R ( x , t ) + γ I ( x , t ) ϱ R ( x , t ) ,

where d S , d I , d R , Λ , σ , μ , γ and ϱ are the positive constants. Here, S ( x , t ) , I ( x , t ) and R ( x , t ) stand for the densities of susceptible, infective, and removed individuals at position x and time t , respectively. The parameters d S , d I and d R describe the spatial motility of each class; the constant Λ > 0 represents the entering flux of the susceptible; γ > 0 is the recovery rate of the infective population; σ , μ , and ϱ are all positive parameters representing the death rates for all the susceptible, infective, and removed population, respectively; τ > 0 denotes the latent period of the disease. Moreover, J ( y ) denotes the probability distribution of rates of dispersal over distance y and R J ( x y ) v ( y , t ) d y v ( x , t ) can be interpreted as the net rate of increase due to dispersal of class v , where R J ( x y ) v ( y , t ) d y is the standard convolution with space invariable x and v can be either S , I or R . In practical use, there are various types of the incidence term F ( S , I ) . The common types include bilinear incidence β S I , standard incidence β S I S + I + R and saturated incidence β S I 1 + α I .

In this article, we focus on the case of saturated incidence, and therefore, we assume that F ( S , I ) = β S I 1 + α I . Observing that the first two equations of (1.1) form a closed system and the function R can be derived as long as both S and I are solved, from now on, we only consider the first two equations of (1.1). Mathematically, for convenience, letting

u ˜ 1 = σ Λ S , u ˜ 2 = σ Λ I , x ˜ = x , t ˜ = d I t , τ ˜ = d I τ , d ˜ = d S d I ,

α ˜ = Λ α σ , β ˜ = Λ β σ d I , σ ˜ = σ d I , μ ˜ = μ d I , γ ˜ = γ d I ,

scaling the spatial time variables, and absorbing the appropriate constant into u 1 and u 2 in ( 1.1 ) , we rewrite (1.1) in the following form (dropping the tildes on d , β and α for notational convenience).

(1.2) u 1 ( x , t ) t = d R J ( x y ) u 1 ( y , t ) d y u 1 ( x , t ) + σ σ u 1 ( x , t ) β u 1 ( x , t ) u 2 ( x , t τ ) 1 + α u 2 ( x , t τ ) , u 2 ( x , t ) t = R J ( x y ) u 2 ( y , t ) d y u 2 ( x , t ) + β u 1 ( x , t ) u 2 ( x , t τ ) 1 + α u 2 ( x , t τ ) ( μ + γ ) u 2 ( x , t ) .

Note that the infection-free equilibrium state (1, 0) always exists in system (1.2). Besides, when the basic reproduction number R 0 = β γ + μ > 1 , there also exists a positive endemic equilibrium state ( u 1 , u 2 ) , where

u 1 = α σ + ( μ + γ ) α σ + β and u 2 = σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] ( μ + γ ) ( α σ + β ) .

It is easy to see that ( 1 , 0 ) is unstable, and ( u 1 , u 2 ) is stable for the corresponding homogenous system for (1.2).

Throughout this article, we assume that ( 1.2 ) satisfies the initial conditions

(1.3) u 1 ( x , 0 ) = u 10 ( x ) , x R , u 2 ( x , s ) = u 20 ( x , s ) , ( x , s ) R × [ τ , 0 ] .

We make the following conditions which are needed in the sequel.

  1. J C 1 ( R ) , J ( x ) = J ( x ) 0 , R J ( x ) d x = 1 , and J is compactly supported.

The theory of traveling wave solutions of reaction-diffusion systems has attracted much attention due to its significant nature in biology, chemistry, epidemiology and physics. For system (1.1), the spatial dynamics of some special cases have been extensively studied. System (1.1) is a nonlocal version of the following SIR epidemic model:

(1.4) S ( x , t ) t = d S 2 S ( x , t ) x 2 + Λ σ S ( x , t ) β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) , I ( x , t ) t = d I 2 I ( x , t ) x 2 + β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) ( μ + γ ) I ( x , t ) , R ( x , t ) t = d R 2 R ( x , t ) x 2 + γ I ( x , t ) ϱ R ( x , t ) .

Yang et al. [1] derived the existence of a traveling wave connecting the disease-free steady state and the endemic steady state of (1.4) by the cross-iteration method and Schauder’s fixed point theorem. Later, by the upper-lower solution method and Schauder’s fixed point theorem, Li et al. [2] further obtained the existence and nonexistence of traveling waves of the subsystem

(1.5) S ( x , t ) t = d S 2 S ( x , t ) x 2 + Λ σ S ( x , t ) β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) , I ( x , t ) t = d I 2 I ( x , t ) x 2 + β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) ( μ + γ ) I ( x , t ) ,

also, the minimal wave speed is established. When the natural death rate for all the susceptible, infective, and removed population are the same constant, system (1.4) is rewritten as

(1.6) S ( x , t ) t = d S 2 S ( x , t ) x 2 + Λ μ S ( x , t ) β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) , I ( x , t ) t = d I 2 I ( x , t ) x 2 + β S ( x , t ) I ( x , t τ ) 1 + α I ( x , t τ ) ( μ + γ ) I ( x , t ) , R ( x , t ) t = d R 2 R ( x , t ) x 2 + γ I ( x , t ) μ R ( x , t ) .

Applying the Schauder fixed point theorem to construct a family of solutions for the truncated problems and via the limiting argument, Fu [3] obtained the noncritical waves and critical waves of system (1.6). For the nonlocal system (1.1), Li et al. [4] proved the existence, nonexistence, and minimal wave speed of traveling waves; moreover, they discussed how the latency of infection and the spatial movement of the infective individuals affect the minimal wave speed.

Among the basic problems in the theory of traveling wave solutions, the stability of traveling wave solutions is an extremely important subject. Let us draw the background on the progress of the study in this subject. By the spectral analysis, Sattinger [5] considered a reaction-diffusion system without delay and proved that the traveling wavefronts were stable to perturbations in some exponentially weighted L spaces. Using the semigroup estimates, Kapitula [6] also studied a reaction-diffusion system without delay and obtained that the traveling wavefronts are stable in polynomially weighted L spaces. By the elementary super- and subsolution comparison and squeezing methods developed by Chen [7] (see also Wang et al. [8,9] for this technique), Smith and Zhao [10] studied the global asymptotic stability, Liapunov stability, and uniqueness of traveling wave solutions for a bistable quasimonotone delayed reaction-diffusion bistable equation on R . For the monostable case, since the unstable equilibrium, the study of the stability of traveling waves is more difficult than the bistable case. The first study of this case was obtained by Mei et al. [11] by using the weighted-energy method. They investigated a time-delayed diffusive Nicholson’s blowflies equation and proved that, under a weighted L 2 norm, if the solution is sufficiently close to a traveling wavefront initially, it converges exponentially to the wavefront as t . By means of the weighted-energy method and the comparison principle, Lin and Mei [12] considered Nicholson’s blowflies equation with diffusion and found that the wavefront is time-asymptotically stable when the delay time is sufficiently small and the initial perturbation around the wavefront decays to zero exponentially in space as x , but it can be large in other locations. In [13], Huang et al. used the anti-weighted-energy method developed by Chern et al. [14], considered a nonlocal dispersion equation with time delay, and proved that all noncritical traveling waves (the wave speed is greater than the minimum speed), including those oscillatory waves, are time-exponentially stable when the initial perturbations around the waves are small. For the nonlocal version, by means of the weighted-energy method combined with the comparison principle, Lv and Wang [15] studied a nonlocal delayed reaction-diffusion equation and proved that traveling wavefronts are exponentially stable to perturbation in some exponentially weighted L spaces. Later, Yu et al. [16] extended this method to investigate the stability of invasion traveling waves for a competition system with nonlocal dispersals and proved that the invasion traveling waves are exponentially stable. For other related results on the stability of traveling wave solutions, one can refer to [17,18,19, 20,21,22, 23,24,25, 26,27].

Recently, Li et al. [28] investigated the delayed SIR epidemic model (1.4) and proved the exponential stability of traveling waves when the delay τ is less than some constant τ 0 by using the weighted-energy method and nonlinear Halanay’s inequality.

Encouraged by papers [11], [28], and [29], in this article, we will further consider the nonlocal dispersal delayed SIR epidemic model (1.1) by using the weighted energy method. But due to the effect of the nonlocal dispersal and the lack of quasi-monotonicity, we are not clear whether the weighted-energy method can also be used to solve the stability of traveling waves of this model. As a result, with the help of some technology, we successfully apply this method to prove that all noncritical traveling wave solutions with sufficiently large c 1 and arbitrarily large delays are exponentially stable. However, the shortcoming of this article is that we do not prove any nonlinear stability result for the slower waves with c > c min ( c can be arbitrarily close to c min ), where c min denotes critical wave speed, and particularly, the case for the critical traveling waves with c min . We leave this problem for further research.

The rest of this article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminary lemmas and state our main stability result. In Section 3, we reformulate system (1.2) into the corresponding perturbed system around a given traveling wave solution and state the stability theorem of the new perturbed system. In Section 4, we devote to establish the a priori estimates, which are the core of this article.

2 Preliminaries and main result

First, we introduce some notations throughout this article. Let C > 0 denote a generic constant and C i > 0 ( i = 1 , 2 , ) be a specific constant. I is an interval, typically I = R . Denote by L 2 ( I ) the space of square integrable functions defined on I and H k ( I ) ( k 0 ) the Sobolev space of the L 2 -function f ( x ) defined on the interval I whose derivatives d i d x i f ( i = 1 , 2 , , k ) also belong to L 2 ( I ) . L w 2 ( I ) denotes the weighted L 2 -space with a weight function w ( x ) > 0 , and its norm is defined by

f L w 2 = I w ( x ) f ( x ) 2 d x 1 2 .

Let H w k ( I ) be the weighted Sobolev space with the norm

f H w k = i = 0 k I w ( x ) d i d x i f ( x ) 2 d x 1 2 .

If T > 0 is a number and is a Banach space, we denote by C 0 ( [ 0 , T ] , ) the space of the -valued continuous function on [ 0 , T ] and by L 2 ( [ 0 , T ] , ) the space of the -valued L 2 -functions on [ 0 , T ] . The corresponding spaces of the -valued L 2 -functions on [ 0 , ) are defined similarly.

Throughout this article, we always assume that R 0 > 1 .

A traveling wave solution of (1.2) is a solution with the form

u 1 ( x , t ) = ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , u 2 ( x , t ) = ϕ 2 ( ξ ) , ξ = x + c t ,

where c > 0 is called the wave speed, and ( ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 ) C 0 ( R , R ) is called the profile function. Furthermore, ( ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 ) with c > 0 satisfies

(2.1) c ϕ 1 ( ξ ) = d R J ( ξ y ) [ ϕ 1 ( y ) ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ] d y + σ σ ϕ 1 ( ξ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) , c ϕ 2 ( ξ ) = R J ( ξ y ) [ ϕ 2 ( y ) ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ] d y + β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( μ + γ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ,

and the following asymptotic boundary conditions

(2.2) lim ξ ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) = ( 1 , 0 ) , lim ξ + ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) = ( u 1 , u 2 ) .

By using the upper-lower solutions and Schauder’s fixed point theorem, in [4], Li et al. proved the existence of traveling wave solutions of system (1.2).

Theorem 2.1

(Existence of traveling waves). Assume that (A1) holds. Then, there exists a constant c min > 0 such that for any c > c min or c = c min and R 0 > β α σ + 1 , system (1.2) has a nontrivial traveling wave solution Φ ( ξ ) = ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) , ξ = x + c t , which satisfies the asymptotic boundary conditions (2.2). However, for R 0 < 1 and c > 0 or R 0 > 1 and 0 < c < c min , there exists no traveling wave solution of system (1.2) with (2.2).

Remark 2.1

From the proof of Theorem 2.1, we can obtain that ϕ 1 ( ξ ) and ϕ 2 ( ξ ) are uniformly bounded for any ξ R . Also, we can verify that α σ α σ + β is a lower solution of ϕ 1 ( ξ ) and 1 α β μ + γ 1 is an upper solution of ϕ 2 ( ξ ) , i.e.,

α σ α σ + β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) 1 , max { e λ 1 ξ ( 1 M e χ ξ ) , 0 } ϕ 2 ( ξ ) 1 α β μ + γ 1 ,

where M and χ are suitable parameters.

In order to state our stability result, we need a technical assumption.

  1. (2.3) σ β 2 β σ ( 2 α + 1 ) ( μ + γ ) + ( 3 α σ + β ) ( μ + γ ) 2 < 0 , 2 α σ 2 β + σ β 2 + β σ ( μ + γ ) ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ ) 2 > 0 .

Remark 2.2

In fact, this condition is easy to meet. For example, we choose μ + γ = 1 and σ = 1 , then σ β 2 β σ ( 2 α + 1 ) ( μ + γ ) + ( 3 α σ + β ) ( μ + γ ) 2 = ( 2 β 3 ) α + β 2 < 0 and 2 α σ 2 β + σ β 2 + β σ ( μ + γ ) ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ ) 2 = ( 2 β 1 ) α + β 2 > 0 hold for arbitrary given β > 3 2 and α large enough. Later, we will see condition (A2) ensures that Lemma 4.1 holds.

Define two functions on η as follows:

f 1 ( η ) = 2 σ + d 2 + σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β d 0 e η y J ( y ) d y

and

f 2 ( η ) = 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 2 σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ 3 ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β 0 e η y J ( y ) d y .

According to (A2), it is easily checked

f 1 ( 0 ) = 2 σ + d 2 + σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β d 0 J ( y ) d y = 2 σ + σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β > 0

and

f 2 ( 0 ) = 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 2 σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ 3 ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β 0 J ( y ) d y = 2 μ + 2 γ σ [ β ( μ + γ ) ] μ + γ + α σ 3 ( μ + γ ) 2 ( α σ + β ) ( μ + γ + α σ ) β > 0 .

Therefore, by continuity, there exists η > 0 such that f 1 ( η ) > 0 and f 2 ( η ) > 0 . In addition, we also define other four functions on ξ as follows:

g 1 ( ξ ) = 2 σ + d 2 + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d 0 e η y J ( y ) d y , g 2 ( ξ ) = 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 2 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 0 e η y J ( y ) d y , g 3 ( ξ ) = g 1 ( ξ ) β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 ,

and

g 4 ( ξ ) = g 2 ( ξ ) β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 ,

where ( ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 ) is a traveling wave solution given in Theorem 2.1. Then, we have the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1

Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Then, there exists ξ > 0 such that for each ξ ξ , we have

(2.4) g i ( ξ ) f 1 ( η ) ε , i = 1 , 3 and g j ( ξ ) f 2 ( η ) ε , j = 2 , 4 ,

where ε < min f 1 ( η ) 2 , f 2 ( η ) 2 .

Proof

Applying the L. Hospital’s rule, we can easily prove

lim ξ + g i ( ξ ) = f 1 ( η ) > 0 , i = 1 , 3 , lim ξ + g j ( ξ ) = f 2 ( η ) > 0 , j = 2 , 4 ,

which imply that there exists ξ R + such that for all ξ ξ , (2.4) is obtained.□

We define a weighted function as

(2.5) w ( ξ ) = e η ( ξ ξ ) , ξ ξ , 1 , ξ > ξ .

Now, we present the corresponding stability theorem for the Cauchy problems (1.2) and (1.3) as follows.

Theorem 2.2

(Stability). Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. For any given traveling wave of (1.2) with the wave speed c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , where

c ¯ = K 2 + d R J ( y ) e η y d y + ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 2 σ η

and

c ˜ = K 1 + 3 K 2 + R J ( y ) e η y d y + ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 2 ( μ + γ ) η

and

K 1 sup ξ R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) , K 2 sup ξ R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 , M 1 sup ξ R ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , K 3 sup ξ R β ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 , K 4 sup ξ R 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 , M 2 sup ξ R ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ,

if the initial perturbations satisfy

u 10 ( x ) ϕ 1 ( x ) H w 1 ( R ) , x R , u 20 ( x , s ) ϕ 2 ( x + c s ) C 0 ( [ τ , 0 ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) L 2 ( [ τ , 0 ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) , ( x , s ) R × [ τ , 0 ] ,

where w ( x ) is the weighted function given in (2.5), there exist positive constants δ 0 and κ such that when

sup s [ τ , 0 ] ( u 2 ϕ 2 ) ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) + ( u 1 ϕ 1 ) ( 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) δ 0 ,

then the solution u ( x , t ) = ( u 1 ( x , t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) ) of the Cauchy problems (1.2) and (1.3) uniquely and globally exists in time and satisfies

u i ( x , t ) ϕ i ( x + c t ) C 0 ( [ 0 , + ) , H w 1 ( R ) ) L 2 ( [ 0 , + ) , H w 1 ( R ) ) , i = 1 , 2 .

Moreover, the solution u ( x , t ) = ( u 1 ( x , t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) ) converges to the traveling wave ( ϕ 1 ( x + c t ) , ϕ 2 ( x + c t ) ) exponentially in time t , i.e.,

sup x R u i ( x , t ) ϕ i ( x + c t ) = O ( 1 ) e κ t , i = 1 , 2

for all t 0 .

3 Reformulation of the problem

Let ( u 1 ( x , t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) ) be the solution of Cauchy problems (1.2) and (1.3), and ( ϕ 1 ( x + c t ) , ϕ 2 ( x + c t ) ) be a given traveling wave solution of (1.2). Let ξ = x + c t and

(3.1) U i ( ξ , t ) = u i ( x , t ) ϕ i ( ξ ) , i = 1 , 2 , U 1 ( ξ , 0 ) = u 10 ( x ) ϕ 1 ( x ) , x R , U 2 ( ξ , s ) = u 20 ( x , s ) ϕ 2 ( ξ ) , ( x , s ) R × [ τ , 0 ] .

Then, problems (1.2) and (1.3) can be reformulated as

(3.2) U 1 ( ξ , t ) t + c U 1 ( ξ , t ) ξ = d R J ( ξ y ) U 1 ( y , t ) d y U 1 ( ξ , t ) σ + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) R ( ξ c τ , t τ )

and

(3.3) U 2 ( ξ , t ) t + c U 2 ( ξ , t ) ξ = R J ( ξ y ) U 2 ( y , t ) d y U 2 ( ξ , t ) + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) ( μ + γ ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) + β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) + R ( ξ c τ , t τ )

with the initial condition

(3.4) U 1 ( ξ , 0 ) = U 10 ( ξ ) , U 2 ( ξ , s ) = U 20 ( ξ , s ) , ( ξ , s ) R × [ τ , 0 ] ,

where

R ( ξ c τ , t τ ) = β ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) + ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ) ( U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) + ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 1 + α ( U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) + ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) .

Let

Ω ( r τ , r + T ) = { ( U 1 , U 2 ) U 1 C 0 ( [ r , r + T ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) L 2 ( [ r , r + T ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) , U 2 C 0 ( [ r τ , r + T ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) L 2 ( [ r τ , r + T ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) }

endowed with the norm

N r ( T ) = max sup t [ r , r + T ] ( U 1 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 + U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 ) 1 2 , sup t [ r τ , r ] U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) ,

where τ 0 and T > 0 . When r = 0 , we denote N ( T ) = N 0 ( T ) .

Now, we state the stability result for the perturbed Cauchy problems (3.2)–(3.4), which automatically implies Theorem 2.2.

Theorem 3.1

(Stability). Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. For any given traveling wave of (1.2) with the wave speed c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , if the initial perturbations satisfies

U 10 ( ξ ) H w 1 ( R ) , x R , U 20 ( ξ , s ) C 0 ( [ τ , 0 ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) L 2 ( [ τ , 0 ] , H w 1 ( R ) ) , ( x , s ) R × [ τ , 0 ] ,

where w ( x ) is the weighted function given in (2.5) and c ¯ and c ˜ are as defined in Theorem 2.2, there exist positive constants δ 0 and κ such that when N ( 0 ) δ 0 , then the solution ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) of the Cauchy problems (3.2)–(3.4) uniquely and globally exists in Ω ( τ , + ) and satisfies

sup ξ R U i ( ξ , t ) C e κ t , t 0

for some positive constant C.

By using the continuity extension method [11,25], the global existence of ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) and its exponential decay estimate given in Theorem 3.1 directly follows from the local existence result and the a priori estimate given below.

Lemma 3.1

(Local existence). Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Consider the Cauchy problem with the initial time r 0

(3.5) U 1 ( ξ , t ) t + c U 1 ( ξ , t ) ξ = d R J ( ξ y ) U 1 ( y , t ) d y U 1 ( ξ , t ) σ + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) R ( ξ c τ , t τ ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) t + c U 2 ( ξ , t ) ξ = R J ( ξ y ) U 2 ( y , t ) d y U 2 ( ξ , t ) + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) ( μ + γ ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) + β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) + R ( ξ c τ , t τ ) , U 10 ( ξ ) = u 10 ( x , s ) ϕ 1 ( ξ ) = U 1 r ( ξ , 0 ) , U 20 ( ξ , s ) = u 20 ( x , s ) ϕ 2 ( ξ ) = U 2 r ( ξ , s ) , ( ξ , s ) R × [ r τ , r ] .

If U 1 r ( ξ , 0 ) , U 2 r ( ξ , s ) Ω ( r τ , r ) , and N r ( 0 ) δ 1 for a given positive constant δ 1 , then there exists a constant t 0 = t 0 ( δ 1 ) > 0 such that ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( r τ , r + t 0 ) and N r ( t 0 ) 2 ( 1 + τ ) N r ( 0 ) .

The proof of Lemma 3.1 can be given by the elementary energy method, see [11,25] for details and we omit it here. Now, we state the a priori estimate as follows:

Lemma 3.2

(A priori estimate). Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Let ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( τ , T 0 ) be a local solution of (3.2)–(3.4). Then, there exist positive constants δ 2 > 0 , κ > 0 , and C 0 > 1 independent of T 0 such that, when N ( T 0 ) δ 2 , it holds that

(3.6) i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 C 0 e 2 κ t i = 1 2 U i 0 ( 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 U 20 ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 d s .

The proof for the a priori estimate of the solution in the space Ω ( τ , T 0 ) plays a crucial role in this article and is discussed in the next section.

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Let δ 0 , κ and C 0 be constants given in Lemma 3.2 independent of T 0 . Set

(3.7) δ 0 = min δ 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) , δ 2 2 C 0 ( 1 + τ ) , δ 1 = max { C 0 ( 1 + τ ) N ( 0 ) , δ 2 } ,

and

(3.8) N ( 0 ) δ 0 < δ 2 δ 1 .

By Lemma 3.1, there exists a constant t 0 = t 0 ( δ 1 ) > 0 such that ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( τ , t 0 ) and

(3.9) N ( t 0 ) 2 ( 1 + τ ) N ( 0 ) 2 ( 1 + τ ) δ 0 δ 2 .

Applying Lemma 3.2 on the interval [ τ , t 0 ] , then for all t [ 0 , t 0 ] , we have

(3.10) sup 0 t t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 sup 0 t t 0 C 0 e 2 κ t i = 1 2 U i 0 ( 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 U 20 ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 d s 1 2 C 0 ( 1 + τ ) N ( 0 ) C 0 ( 1 + τ ) δ 0 δ 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) δ 1 .

Consider the Cauchy problem (3.5) with the initial time r = t 0 . Combining (3.7) with (3.10), we obtain

(3.11) N t 0 ( 0 ) = max sup t 0 τ t t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , i = 1 2 U i ( t 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 max sup τ t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 max { δ 0 , δ 1 } = δ 1 .

Combining Lemma 3.1 with (3.10), we have the same t 0 such that ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( τ , t 0 ) and

(3.12) N t 0 ( t 0 ) 2 ( 1 + τ ) N t 0 ( 0 ) 2 ( 1 + τ ) max sup t 0 τ t t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , i = 1 2 U i ( t 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) max sup τ t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) max δ 0 , δ 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) = δ 2 .

Consequently,

(3.13) N ( 2 t 0 ) max sup τ t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t 2 t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 max sup τ t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 , sup t 0 t 2 t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 max N ( 0 ) , δ 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) , δ 2 = δ 2 .

Applying Lemma 3.2 on the interval [ τ , 2 t 0 ] again, then for all t [ 0 , 2 t 0 ] , we obtain (3.6) and

(3.14) sup 0 t 2 t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 sup 0 t 2 t 0 C 0 i = 1 2 U i 0 ( 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 U 20 ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 d s 1 2 e κ t C 0 ( 1 + τ ) N ( 0 ) C 0 ( 1 + τ ) δ 0 δ 2 2 ( 1 + τ ) δ 1 .

Consider the Cauchy problem (3.5) with the initial time r = 2 t 0 , we obtain

N 2 t 0 ( 0 ) = max sup 2 t 0 τ t 2 t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , i = 1 2 U i ( 2 t 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 max sup τ t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t 2 t 0 U 2 ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) , sup 0 t 2 t 0 i = 1 2 U i ( t ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 1 2 .

Repeating this procedure, we can prove that the solution ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) of the Cauchy problems (3.2)–(3.4) uniquely and globally exists in Ω ( τ , + ) with the relation (3.6) for t [ 0 , + ) .□

4 A priori estimate

In this section, we are going to prove Lemma 3.2. We need the following important lemma.

Define

A w 1 ( ξ ) = c w w + 2 σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y , A w 2 ( ξ ) = c w w + 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y , A w 3 ( ξ ) = A w 1 ( ξ ) β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 , A w 4 ( ξ ) = A w 2 ( ξ ) β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 , B κ , w 1 ( ξ ) = A w 1 ( ξ ) 2 κ , B κ , w 2 ( ξ ) = A w 2 ( ξ ) 2 β ( e 2 κ τ 1 ) w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 2 κ , B κ , w 3 ( ξ ) = A w 3 ( ξ ) 2 κ , B κ , w 4 ( ξ ) = A w 4 ( ξ ) 2 β ( e 2 κ τ 1 ) w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 2 κ .

Lemma 4.1

(Key inequality). Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Let w ( ξ ) be the weighted function given by (2.5), then for any c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , there exist positive constants C i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) such that

(4.1) A w i ( ξ ) C i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .

Moreover, we have

(4.2) B κ , w i ( ξ ) C ˜ 0 ( κ ) = min 1 i 4 { C ˜ i ( κ ) }

for all ξ R and 0 < κ < κ 0 = min { κ 1 , κ 2 , κ 3 , κ 4 } , where κ i > 0 is the unique solution to the equation C ˜ i ( κ ) = 0 ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) and

C ˜ i ( κ ) = C i 2 κ ( i = 1 , 3 ) , C ˜ i ( κ ) = C i 2 K 2 ( e 2 κ τ 1 ) 2 κ ( i = 2 , 4 ) .

Proof

Since c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , we have

c η > K 2 + d R J ( y ) e η y d y + ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 2 σ

and

c η > K 1 + 3 K 2 + R J ( y ) e η y d y + ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 2 ( μ + γ ) .

First, we prove that A w 1 ( ξ ) C 1 holds.

Case 1. ξ ξ . From (2.5), we have w ( ξ ) = e η ( ξ ξ ) . Using the fact that w ( ξ ) is nonincreasing, we obtain

A w 1 ( ξ ) = c w w + 2 σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y c η + 2 σ + d β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d ξ ξ J ( y ) e η y d y d ξ ξ + J ( y ) e η ( ξ ξ ) d y c η + 2 σ + d β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d R J ( y ) ( e η y + 1 ) d y c η + 2 σ K 2 d R J ( y ) e η y d y ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 > 0 .

Case 2. ξ > ξ . In this case, w ( ξ ) = w ( ξ + c τ ) = 1 and w ( ξ ) = 0 . Thus, by Lemma 2.2, we have

A w 1 ( ξ ) = 2 σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y 2 σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d ξ ξ J ( y ) e η ( ξ + y ξ ) d y d ξ ξ + J ( y ) d y = 2 σ + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d ξ ξ J ( y ) ( e η ( ξ + y ξ ) 1 ) d y 2 σ + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d ξ ξ J ( y ) ( e η y 1 ) d y 2 σ + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 d 0 J ( y ) ( e η y 1 ) d y = g 1 ( ξ ) f 1 ( η ) 2 > 0 .

Let C 1 = min ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 , f 1 ( η ) 2 , then A w 1 ( ξ ) C 1 holds.

Next, we prove that A w 2 ( ξ ) C 2 holds.

Case 1. ξ ξ . It follows from w ( ξ ) = e η ( ξ ξ ) and the monotonicity of w ( ξ ) that

A w 2 ( ξ ) = c η + 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ξ ξ J ( y ) e η y d y ξ ξ + J ( y ) e η ( ξ ξ ) d y c η + 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 ( K 1 + 3 K 2 ) R J ( y ) ( e η y + 1 ) d y c η + 2 μ + 2 γ ( K 1 + 3 K 2 ) R J ( y ) e η y d y ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 > 0 .

Case 2. ξ > ξ . From (2.5), we have w ( ξ ) = w ( ξ + c τ 2 ) = 1 and w ( ξ ) = 0 . By Lemma 2.2, we obtain

A w 2 ( ξ ) = 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ξ ξ J ( y ) e η ( ξ + y ξ ) d y ξ ξ + J ( y ) d y = 2 μ + 2 γ β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ξ ξ J ( y ) ( e η ( ξ + y ξ ) 1 ) d y 2 μ + 2 γ β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 0 J ( y ) ( e η y 1 ) d y 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 2 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 0 e η y J ( y ) d y = g 2 ( ξ ) f 2 ( η ) 2 > 0 .

Let C 2 = min { ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 + K 3 M 1 , f 2 ( η ) 2 } , then A w 2 ( ξ ) C 2 holds.

The proofs of A w 3 ( ξ ) and A w 4 ( ξ ) are similar, and we only sketch the outline. When ξ ξ , we obtain

A w 3 ( ξ ) c η + 2 σ K 2 d R J ( y ) e η y d y β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 c η + 2 σ K 2 d R J ( y ) e η y d y ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 K 3 M 1 = C 5 > 0

and

A w 4 ( ξ ) c η + 2 μ + 2 γ ( K 1 + 3 K 2 ) R J ( y ) e η y d y β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 α β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 3 c η + 2 μ + 2 γ ( K 1 + 3 K 2 ) R J ( y ) e η y d y ( K 3 + K 4 ) M 2 K 3 M 1 = C 6 > 0 .

When ξ > ξ , we obtain

A w 3 ( ξ ) g 3 ( ξ ) f 1 ( η ) 2 > 0 and A w 4 ( ξ ) g 4 ( ξ ) f 2 ( η ) 2 > 0 .

Let C 3 = min C 5 , f 1 ( η ) 2 and C 4 = min C 6 , f 2 ( η ) 2 , then A w 3 ( ξ ) C 3 and A w 4 ( ξ ) C 4 hold.

We estimate B κ , w 2 ( ξ ) as

B κ , w 2 ( ξ ) = A w 2 ( ξ ) 2 β ( e 2 κ τ 1 ) w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 2 κ C 2 2 K 2 ( e 2 κ τ 1 ) 2 κ C ˜ 0 ( κ ) > 0

by selecting a constant κ sufficiently small such that 0 < κ < κ 2 , where κ 2 ( 0 , ) is the unique root of the equation C ˜ 2 ( κ ) = 0 . The others are similar.□

Next, we are going to derive the a priori estimate for U 1 ( ξ , t ) and U 2 ( ξ , t ) in the weighted Sobolev space H w 1 ( R ) .

Lemma 4.2

Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Let ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( τ , T 0 ) be a local solution of (3.2)–(3.4). Then, for any c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , there exists a positive constant C, such that

(4.3) i = 1 2 U i ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + i = 1 2 0 t e 2 κ ( t s ) U i ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s C e 2 κ t i = 1 2 U i 0 ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 U 20 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s , t 0 ,

provided N ( T 0 ) 1 , where the weighted function w ( ξ ) is defined by (2.5) and κ is given as in Lemma 4.1.

Proof

Multiplying (3.2) and (3.3) by e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) and e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) , respectively, we obtain

(4.4) 1 2 e 2 κ t w U 1 2 t + 1 2 c e 2 κ t w U 1 2 ξ + κ 1 2 c w w + σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ t w U 1 2 = d e 2 κ t w U 1 R J ( y ) U 1 ( ξ y , t ) d y β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) R ( ξ c τ , t τ )

and

(4.5) 1 2 e 2 κ t w U 2 2 t + 1 2 c e 2 κ t w U 2 2 ξ + κ 1 2 c w w + μ + γ + 1 e 2 κ t w U 2 2 = e 2 κ t w U 2 R J ( y ) U 2 ( ξ y , t ) d y + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , t ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) + β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , t τ ) + e 2 κ t w ( ξ ) U 2 ( ξ , t ) R ( ξ c τ , t τ ) .

Integrating (4.4) and (4.5) over R × [ 0 , t ] with respect to ξ and t , respectively, we have

(4.6) e 2 κ t U 1 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 σ + 2 d + 2 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s = U 1 ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + H 11 ( t ) + H 21 ( t ) + H 31 ( t )

and

(4.7) e 2 κ t U 2 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 μ + 2 γ + 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s = U 2 ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + H 12 ( t ) + H 22 ( t ) + H 32 ( t ) + H 4 ( t ) ,

where

H 1 i ( t ) = 2 d i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i ( ξ , s ) R J ( y ) U i ( ξ y , s ) d y d ξ d s , H 2 i ( t ) = 2 ( 1 ) i 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s , H 3 i ( t ) = 2 ( 1 ) i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i ( ξ , s ) R ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s , H 4 ( t ) = 2 0 t R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s

and d i = d , i = 1 , and d i = 1 , i = 2 . By the Cauchy inequality x y ε x 2 + y 2 4 ε and ε = 1 2 , we obtain

(4.8) H 1 i ( t ) 2 d i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i ( ξ , s ) R J ( y ) U i ( ξ y , s ) d y d ξ d s d i 0 t R R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) J ( y ) [ U i 2 ( ξ , s ) + U i 2 ( ξ y , s ) ] d y d ξ d s = d i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + d i 0 t R R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) J ( y ) U i 2 ( ξ y , s ) d y d ξ d s = d i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + d i 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y d ξ d s ,

(4.9) H 2 i ( t ) 2 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) [ U i 2 ( ξ , s ) + U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ] d ξ d s 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s = 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + τ t τ e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s 0 t R β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + τ 0 e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 20 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + 0 t e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s ,

and

(4.10) H 4 ( t ) 2 0 t R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s 0 t R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + 0 t R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s .

Substituting (4.8)–(4.10) into (4.6) and (4.7), respectively, we can obtain

(4.11) e 2 κ t U 1 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 σ + d + 2 β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) d R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s 0 t e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s U 1 ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 20 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + H 31 ( t )

and

(4.12) e 2 κ t U 2 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 0 t R β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ τ β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s U 2 ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 20 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + H 32 ( t ) .

From (4.11) and (4.12), we obtain

(4.13) e 2 κ t U 1 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + e 2 κ t U 2 ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 σ + d + β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) d R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + 0 t R 2 κ c w w + 2 μ + 2 γ + 1 R J ( y ) w ( ξ + y ) w ( ξ ) d y β ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) β ϕ 1 ( ξ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 2 2 e 2 κ τ β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) w ( ξ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s i = 1 2 U i ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 2 τ 0 e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 20 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s + H 31 ( t ) + H 32 ( t ) ,

i.e.,

(4.14) i = 1 2 e 2 κ t U i ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + i = 1 2 0 t R B μ , w i ( ξ ) e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U i 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s i = 1 2 U i ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 2 τ 0 e 2 κ ( s + τ ) R β ϕ 1 ( ξ + c τ ) ( 1 + α ϕ 2 ( ξ ) ) 2 w ( ξ + c τ ) U 20 2 ( ξ , s ) d ξ d s H 31 ( t ) + H 32 ( t ) ,

where B μ , w i ( ξ ) are given in the beginning of this section. For the nonlinearity R ( ξ c τ , s τ ) , using Taylor’s formula, we have

R ( ξ c τ , s τ ) = F ( U 1 ( ξ , s ) + ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) + ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) F ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) 1 F ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) U 1 ( ξ , s ) 2 F ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) , ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) β ( 1 + α ( ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) + θ 1 U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ) ) 2 U 1 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) α β ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) + θ 1 U 1 ( ξ , s ) ) ( 1 + α ( ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) + θ 1 U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ) ) 3 U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) L 1 U 1 ( ξ , s U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) + L 2 U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ,

where θ 1 ( 0 , 1 ) and

L 1 = sup ξ R β ( 1 + α ( ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) + θ 1 U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ) ) 2 , L 2 = sup ξ R α β ( ϕ 1 ( ξ ) + θ 1 U 1 ( ξ , s ) ) ( 1 + α ( ϕ 2 ( ξ c τ ) + θ 1 U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ) ) 3 .

Using the Sobolev’s embedding theorem H 1 ( R ) C ( R ) and the embedding inequality H w 1 ( R ) H 1 ( R ) since w ( ξ ) 1 , we can immediately obtain

(4.15) sup ξ R U i ( ξ , s ) C 7 U i ( s ) H 1 ( R ) C 8 U i ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) C 8 N ( T 0 ) .

Then, we have

(4.16) H 31 ( t ) 2 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 1 ( ξ , s ) R ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s 2 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) [ L 1 U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) + L 2 U 1 ( ξ , s ) U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ] d ξ d s C N ( T 0 ) 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) [ U 1 2 ( ξ , s ) + U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ] d ξ d s C N ( T 0 ) i = 1 2 0 t e 2 κ s U i ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s + τ 0 e 2 κ s U 20 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s

and

H 32 ( t ) 2 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) U 2 ( ξ , s ) R ( ξ c τ , s τ ) d ξ d s 2 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) [ L 1 U 1 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ , s ) U 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) + L 2 U 2 ( ξ , s ) U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ] d ξ d s

(4.17) C N ( T 0 ) 0 t R e 2 κ s w ( ξ ) [ U 2 2 ( ξ , s ) + U 2 2 ( ξ c τ , s τ ) ] d ξ d s C N ( T 0 ) 0 t e 2 κ s U 2 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s + τ 0 e 2 κ s U 20 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s .

According to Lemma 4.1 and substituting (4.16) and (4.17) into (4.14), we obtain

(4.18) i = 1 2 e 2 κ t U i ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + 0 t [ C ˜ 0 ( κ ) C 9 N ( T 0 ) ] e 2 κ s U 1 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s + 0 t [ C ˜ 0 ( κ ) C 10 N ( T 0 ) ] e 2 κ s U 2 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s C i = 1 2 U i ( 0 ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 e 2 κ s U 20 ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s .

Letting 0 < N ( T 0 ) < min C ˜ 0 ( κ ) C 9 , C ˜ 0 ( κ ) C 10 , we immediately obtain (4.3).□

Similar to that in Lemma 4.2, we derive the estimates for U 1 ξ ( ξ , t ) and U 2 ξ ( ξ , t ) .

Lemma 4.3

Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Let ( U 1 ( ξ , t ) , U 2 ( ξ , t ) ) Ω ( τ , T 0 ) be a local solution of (3.2)–(3.4). Then, for any c > max { c min , c ¯ , c ˜ } , there exists a positive constant C, such that

(4.19) i = 1 2 U i ξ ( t ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 + i = 1 2 0 t e 2 κ ( t s ) U i ξ ( s ) L w 2 ( R ) 2 d s C e 2 κ t i = 1 2 U i 0 ( 0 ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 + τ 0 U 20 ( s ) H w 1 ( R ) 2 d s , t 0 ,

provided N ( T 0 ) 1 , where the weighted function w ( ξ ) is defined by (2.5) and κ is given as in Lemma 4.1.

Thus, the a priori estimate Lemma 3.2 immediately obtained from Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3.



Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the invaluable suggestions made by anonymous referees.

  1. Funding information: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12001502), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 20202BABL211003), and the Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Education Department (Grant No. GJJ180354).

  2. Author contributions: This is to declare that all authors have contributed equally and significantly to the contents of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state not conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The authors declare that all data and materials in this article are available and veritable.

References

[1] J. Yang, S. Y. Liang, and Y. Zhang, Travelling waves of a delayed SIR epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate and spatial diffusion, PLoS One 6 (2011), no. 6, e21128, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021128. Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Y. Li, W. T. Li, and G. Lin, Traveling waves of a delayed diffusive SIR epidemic model, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14 (2015), no. 3, 1001–1022, https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1001. Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. C. Fu, Traveling waves for a diffusive SIR model with delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 435 (2016), no. 1, 20–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.09.069. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Li, W.-T. Li, and F.-Y. Yang, Traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay and external supplies, Appl. Math. Comput. 247 (2014), 723–740, http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.072. Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. H. Sattinger, On the stability of waves of nonlinear parabolic systems, Adv. Math. 22 (1976), no. 3, 312–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(76)90098-0. Search in Google Scholar

[6] T. Kapitula, On the stability of traveling waves in weighted L∞ spaces, J. Differential Equations 112 (1994), no. 1, 179–215, https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1994.1100. Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. F. Chen, Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of traveling waves in nonlocal evolution equations, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2 (1997), no. 1, 125–160. 10.57262/ade/1366809230Search in Google Scholar

[8] Z. C. Wang, W. T. Li, and S. G. Ruan, Existence and stability of traveling wavefronts in reaction advection diffusion equations with nonlocal delay, J. Differential Equations 238 (2007), no. 1, 153–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2007.03.025. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Z. C. Wang, W. T. Li, and S. G. Ruan, Traveling fronts in monostable equations with nonlocal delayed effects, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 20 (2008), 573–607, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-008-9103-8. Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. L. Smith and X. Q. Zhao, Global asymptotic stability of traveling waves in delayed reaction-diffusion equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 31 (2000), no. 3, 514–534, https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141098346785. Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Mei, J. W. H. So, M. Y. Li, and S. S. P. Shen, Asymptotic stability of traveling waves for Nicholson’s blowflies equation with diffusion, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 134 (2004), no. 3, 579–594, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500003358. Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. K. Lin and M. Mei, On traveling wavefronts of Nicholson’s blowflies equation with diffusion, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 140 (2010), no. 1, 135–152, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210508000784. Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Huang, M. Mei, K. J. Zhang. and Q. F. Zhang, Asymptotic stability of non-monotone traveling waves for time-delayed nonlocal dispersion equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36 (2016), no. 3, 1331–1353, https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2016.36.1331. Search in Google Scholar

[14] I. L. Chern, M. Mei, X. F. Yang, and Q. F. Zhang, Stability of non-monotone critical traveling waves for reaction-diffusion equations with time-delay, J. Differential Equations 259 (2015), no. 4, 1503–1541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.03.003. Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. Lv and M. X. Wang, Nonlinear stability of traveling wavefronts for nonlocal delayed reaction-diffusion equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 385 (2012), no. 2, 1094–1106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.07.033. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Z. X. Yu, F. Xu, and W. G. Zhang, Stability of invasion traveling waves for a competition system with nonlocal dispersals, Appl. Anal. 96 (2017), no. 7, 1107–1125, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2016.1178242. Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. J. Guo and Z. Johannes, Stability of traveling wavefronts in discrete reaction-diffusion equations with nonlocal delay effects, Nonlinearity 28 (2015), no. 2, 463–492, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/28/2/463. Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. K. Lin, C. T. Lin, Y. P. Lin, and M. Mei, Exponential stability of nonmonotone traveling waves for Nicholson’s blowflies equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (2014), no. 2, 1053–1084, https://doi.org/10.1137/120904391. Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Y. Lv and M. X. Wang, Stability of traveling wave solutions to delayed evolution equation, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 21 (2015), 173–187, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-014-9234-7. Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Matsumura and M. Mei, Nonlinear stability of viscous shock profile for a non-convex system of viscoelasticity, Osaka J. Math. 34 (1997), no. 3, 589–603. Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Mei, C.-K. Lin, C.-T. Lin, and J. W.-H. So, Traveling wavefronts for time-delayed reaction-diffusion equation: (II) Nonlocal nonlinearity, J. Differential Equations 247 (2009), no. 2, 511–529, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2008.12.020. Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Mei, C.-K. Lin, C.-T. Lin, and J. W.-H. So, Wavefronts for time-delayed reaction-diffusion equation: (I) Local nonlinearity, J. Differential Equations 247 (2009), no. 2, 495–510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2008.12.026. 10.1016/j.jde.2008.12.026Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. Mei, C. Ou, and X.-Q. Zhao, Global stability of monostable traveling waves for nonlocal time-delayed reaction-diffusion equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 42 (2010), no. 6, 2762–2790, https://doi.org/10.1137/090776342. Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. Mei, C. Ou, and X.-Q. Zhao, Erratum: Global stability of monostable traveling waves for nonlocal time-delayed reaction-diffusion equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44 (2012), no. 1, 538–540, https://doi.org/10.1137/110850633. Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Mei and J. W.-H. So, Stability of strong traveling waves for a non-local time-delayed reaction-diffusion equation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 138 (2008), no. 3, 551–568, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210506000333. Search in Google Scholar

[26] X. Wang and G. Lv, Global stability of traveling wavefronts for non-local diffusion equations with delay, Izv. Math. 78 (2014), no. 2, 251–267, https://doi.org/10.1070/IM2014v078n02ABEH002687. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Y.-R. Yang, W.-T. Li, and S.-L. Wu, Exponential stability of traveling fronts in a diffusion epidemic system with delay, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 12 (2011), no. 2, 1223–1234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.09.017. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Y. Li, W.-T. Li, and Y.-R. Yang, Stability of traveling waves of a diffusive susceptible-infective-removed (SIR) epidemic model, J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), no. 4, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4947106. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y.-R. Yang, W.-T. Li, and S.-L. Wu, Stability of traveling waves in a monostable delayed system without quasi-monotonicity, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 14 (2013), no. 3, 1511–1526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.10.015. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Z.-X. Yu and M. Mei, Uniqueness and stability of traveling waves for cellular neural networks with multiple delays, J. Differential Equations 260 (2016), no. 1, 241–267, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.08.037. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-27
Revised: 2022-06-27
Accepted: 2022-09-14
Published Online: 2022-11-15

© 2022 Xin Wu and Zhaohai Ma, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0508/html
Scroll to top button