Home Mathematics Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
Article Open Access

Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals

  • Genhong Zhong , Xiaoyan Ma EMAIL logo and Fei Wang
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present some monotonicity properties for certain functions involving the complete p-elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds, by showing the monotonicity and concavity-convexity properties of certain combinations defined in terms of K p , E p and the inverse hyperbolic tangent arth p , which is of importance in the computation of the generalized pi and in the elementary proof of Ramanujan’s cubic transformation. By these results, several well-known results for the classical complete elliptic integrals including its bounds and logarithmic inequalities are remarkably improved.

MSC 2010: 33C75; 33E05; 33F05

1 Introduction

Throughout this paper, we denote the set of positive integers (the inverse hyperbolic tangent) by N ( arth , respectively), and let r p + r p = 1 for each r [ 0 , 1 ] and p ( 1 , ) . For r ( 0 , 1 ) , the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds are defined as follows:

(1.1) K = K ( r ) = 0 π / 2 ( 1 r 2 sin 2 t ) 1 / 2 d t , K = K ( r ) = K ( r ) , K ( 0 ) = π / 2 , K ( 1 ) = , and

(1.2) E = E ( r ) = 0 π / 2 ( 1 r 2 sin 2 t ) 1 / 2 d t , E = E ( r ) = E ( r ) , E ( 0 ) = π / 2 , E ( 1 ) = 1 ,

respectively, which are the particular cases of the Gaussian hypergeometric function:

(1.3) F ( a , b , c , x ) = F 1 2 ( a , b ; c ; x ) = n = 0 ( a ) n ( b ) n ( c ) n n ! x n ( x < 1 )

for a , b , c C with c 0 , 1 , 2 , , where ( a ) n = a ( a + 1 ) ( a + 2 ) ( a + n 1 ) for n N , and ( a ) 0 = 1 for a 0 . As a matter of fact, it is well known that

(1.4) K ( r ) = π 2 F 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; r 2 and E ( r ) = π 2 F 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; r 2

[1, 17.3.9–17.3.10]. For the properties of the complete elliptic integrals, the readers can refer to [2,3,4, 5,6,7, 8,9,10, 11,12,13, 14,15,16, 17,18,19, 20,21] and the bibliographies therein.

As far as the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds are concerned, there are kinds of bounds for them in terms of the inverse hyperbolic tangent function [1, 15.1.4], that is,

(1.5) arth r r = F 1 2 , 1 ; 3 2 ; r 2 = n = 0 1 2 n + 1 r 2 n .

In 1992, Anderson et al. mentioned such bound, and they presented the double inequality [7, Theorem 3.10]

(1.6) arth r r 1 / 2 < 2 π K ( r ) < arth r r

for r ( 0 , 1 ) . This was improved by Alzer and Qiu in [4, Theorem 18] as

(1.7) arth r r α 1 < 2 π K ( r ) < arth r r β 1

for r ( 0 , 1 ) with the best possible constants α 1 = 3 / 4 and β 1 = 1 . In [15, Theorem 1.2], Wang et al. obtained the double inequality

(1.8) π 2 3 π 16 r ( 1 r 2 ) arth r r < E ( r ) < π 2 π 2 1 r ( 1 r 2 ) arth r r

holds for all r ( 0 , 1 ) .

In 2014, Takeuchi [22] introduced a form of the generalized complete elliptic integrals as an application of generalized trigonometric functions. The complete p-elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds are, respectively, defined as follows: for p ( 1 , ) and r [ 0 , 1 ) ,

(1.9) K p = K p ( r ) = 0 π p / 2 d θ ( 1 r p sin p p θ ) 1 1 / p = π p 2 F 1 p , 1 1 p ; 1 ; r p , K p ( 0 ) = π p 2 , K p ( 1 ) =

and

(1.10) E p = E p ( r ) = 0 π p / 2 ( 1 r p sin p p θ ) 1 / p d θ = π p 2 F 1 p , 1 p ; 1 ; r p , E p ( 0 ) = π p 2 , E p ( 1 ) = 1 ,

where sin p θ is the generalized sine function, defined by the inverse function of

arcsin p ( θ ) = 0 θ 1 ( 1 t p ) 1 / p d t , 0 θ 1 , π p 2 = arcsin p ( 1 ) = 0 1 1 ( 1 t p ) 1 / p d t = π / p sin ( π / p ) .

In [23], it was obtained that, for p ( 1 , ) ,

(1.11) arth p r r < K p ( r ) < π p 2 arth p r r ,

where

(1.12) arth p r r = F 1 p , 1 ; 1 p + 1 ; r p = n = 0 1 p n + 1 r p n

is the generalized inverse hyperbolic tangent function.

Recently, Wang and Qi [24, Theorem 1.3] obtained the bounds

(1.13) π p , q 2 arth q r r ( 1 α 3 r q ) < K p , q ( r ) < π p , q 2 arth q r r ( 1 β 3 r q )

for r ( 0 , 1 ) , p , q ( 1 , ) with the best weights α 3 = 1 2 / π p , q and β 3 = 1 / [ p q ( q + 1 ) ] , where

π p , q = 2 0 1 1 ( 1 t q ) 1 / p d t .

When p = q , K p , q ( r ) = K ( r ) , arth q ( r ) = arth p r , π p , q = π p . And as we know, for p = 2 , these functions reduce to well-known special cases K p ( r ) = K ( r ) , E p ( r ) = E ( r ) , arth p ( r ) = arth r , π p = π , and numerous properties of the complete p-elliptic integrals have been obtained (cf. [22,23,24, 25,26,27, 28,29]) and bibliographies therein.

Inspired by the inequalities (1.7), (1.8), (1.11), and (1.13), the topic of studying the properties of the complete p-elliptic integrals is to approximate K p ( r ) and E p ( r ) by means of the function r ( arth p r ) / r .

The main purpose of this paper is to present several new monotonicity properties of the complete p-elliptic integrals. By obtained results, some approximations of K p ( r ) and E p ( r ) by certain combinations in terms of arth p ( r ) / r and polynomials are derived.

2 Preliminaries and proofs

In the sequel, we sometimes omit the variable r of the generalized and complete elliptic integrals when there is no confusion, and always let arth p denote the generalized inverse hyperbolic tangent.

In order to prove our main results stated in Section 3, let us recall the following well-known formulas [22, Proposition 2.1]: For r ( 0 , 1 ) , p ( 1 , ) ,

(2.1) d K p d r = E p ( r ) r p K p ( r ) r r p , d E p d r = E p ( r ) K p ( r ) r ,

(2.2) d d r ( K p E p ) = r p 1 E p ( r ) r p ,

(2.3) d arth p d r = 1 1 r p = 1 r p ,

which will be frequently applied later.

Now we present several lemmas in this section.

Lemma 2.1

(See [8, Theorem 1.25]) Let < a < b < , f , g : [ a , b ] R be continuous on [ a , b ] and be differentiable on ( a , b ) such that g ( x ) 0 on ( a , b ) . Then both the functions [ f ( x ) f ( a ) ] / [ g ( x ) g ( a ) ] and [ f ( x ) f ( b ) ] / [ g ( x ) g ( b ) ] are (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on ( a , b ) if f ( x ) / g ( x ) is (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on ( a , b ) .

Lemma 2.2

(See [16, Theorem 2.1]) Suppose that the power series f ( x ) = n = 0 a n x n and g ( x ) = n = 0 b n x n have the radius of convergence r > 0 with b n > 0 for all n { 0 , 1 , 2 , } . Let h ( x ) = f ( x ) / g ( x ) and H f , g = ( f / g ) g f , then the following statements are true:

  1. If the nonconstant sequence { a n / b n } n = 0 is increasing (decreasing), then h ( x ) is strictly increasing (decreasing) on ( 0 , r ) ;

  2. If the nonconstant sequence { a n / b n } is increasing (decreasing) for 0 < n n 0 and decreasing (increasing) for n > n 0 , then the function h is strictly increasing (decreasing) on ( 0 , r ) if and only if H f , g ( r ) ( ) 0 . While if H f , g ( r ) < ( > ) 0 , then exists δ ( 0 , r ) such that h ( x ) is strictly increasing (decreasing) on ( 0 , δ ) and strictly decreasing (increasing) on ( δ , r ) .

Our first lemma presents several properties of the generalized inverse hyperbolic tangent function arth p .

Lemma 2.3

  1. For p > 1 , the function g 1 ( r ) [ r r p arth p r ] / r p + 1 is strictly increasing and convex from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( p / ( p + 1 ) , 1 ) .

  2. For p > ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 , the function g 2 ( r ) [ 1 + ( p 2 ) r p ] g 1 ( r ) is increasing and convex from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( p / ( p + 1 ) , p 1 ) .

  3. For p ( ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 , 1 + 2 ) , the function g 3 ( r ) [ r + ( p 1 ) r p arth p r ] / ( r r ) is strictly increasing and convex from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( p , ) .

  4. For p ( ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 , 1 + 2 ) , the function g 4 ( r ) ( r r p arth p r ) / [ r ( arth p r r ) ] is strictly increasing from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( p , ) .

Proof

  1. By (1.12), g 1 ( r ) can be written as follows:

    (2.4) g 1 ( r ) = 1 r p ( arth p r / r ) r p = p n = 0 r p n ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) ,

    yielding the monotonicity and convexity for g 1 and the limiting value g 1 ( 0 + ) = p / ( p + 1 ) . Clearly, g 1 ( 1 ) = 1 .

  2. Clearly, g 2 ( 0 ) = p / ( p + 1 ) , g 2 ( 1 ) = p 1 . By (2.4), g 2 can be written as follows:

    (2.5) g 2 ( r ) = p n = 0 r p n ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) + ( p 2 ) n = 0 r p ( n + 1 ) ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) = p p + 1 + p n = 0 p ( p 1 ) n + ( 2 p 2 3 p 1 ) ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) ( p n + 2 p + n ) r p ( n + 1 ) = p p + 1 + p n = 0 f ( n , p ) ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) ( p n + 2 p + n ) r p ( n + 1 ) ,

    where f ( n , p ) = p ( p 1 ) n + ( 2 p 2 3 p 1 ) = ( n + 2 ) p 2 ( n + 3 ) p 1 . It is easy to see that f ( n , p ) is strictly increasing with respect to p . Then f ( n , p ) > f ( n , ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 ) = [ ( 7 + 17 ) n ] / 8 0 . Hence, the monotonicity and convexity properties of g 2 follow from (2.5).

  3. The limiting values of g 3 are clear. By (2.3) and by differentiation, we obtain

    (2.6) g 3 ( r ) = [ p p ( p 1 ) r p 1 arth p r ] r r [ r + ( p 1 ) r p arth p r ] ( 1 2 r p ) / r ( p 1 ) ( r r ) 2 = r [ p r p 1 + 2 r p ] ( p 1 ) r p arth p r [ ( p 2 ) r p + 1 ] r 2 r ( p + 1 ) = ( p 1 ) ( r r p arth p r ) + ( 2 p ) r p [ r + ( p 1 ) r p arth p r ] r 2 r ( p + 1 ) = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) r r p arth p r r p + 1 ( p 1 ) + ( 2 p ) r p 1 + p r p arth p r r r p arth p r

    = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) r r p arth p r r p + 1 ( p 1 ) + ( 2 p ) r p 1 p + p r r r p arth p r = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) r r p arth p r r p + 1 ( p 1 ) + ( 2 p ) ( 1 p ) r p + p r p + 1 r r p arth p r = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) { ( p 1 ) [ 1 + ( p 2 ) r p ] g 1 ( r ) + p ( 2 p ) } = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) [ ( p 1 ) g 2 ( r ) + p ( 2 p ) ] = r p 1 r ( p + 1 ) G 1 ( r ) ,

    where G 1 ( r ) = ( p 1 ) g 2 ( r ) + p ( 2 p ) . Hence, by the part (2), G 1 is increasing on (0,1) for p > ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 . On the other hand, it is easy to verify that

    G 1 ( 0 ) = p ( p 2 + 2 p + 1 ) p + 1 > 0

    for p ( ( 3 + 17 ) / 4 , 1 + 2 ) . Consequently, by (2.6), g 3 is strictly increasing on ( 0 , 1 ) with g 3 ( 0 ) = 0 , and hence, the monotonicity and convexity properties of g 3 follow from part (2).

  4. Let G 2 ( r ) = r / r r ( p 1 ) arth p r and G 3 ( r ) = arth p r r . Then G 2 ( 0 ) = G 3 ( 0 ) = 0 , g 4 ( r ) = G 2 ( r ) / G 3 ( r ) and

    (2.7) G 2 ( r ) / G 3 ( r ) = g 3 ( r ) .

Hence, the monotonicity of g 4 follows from Lemma 2.1 and part (3). Applying l’Hôpital’s rule and (2.7), g 4 ( 0 + ) = p and g 4 ( 1 ) = .□

Lemma 2.4

Given p [ 2 , ) , the function h ( r ) E p / [ r ( p 1 ) K p ] + ( p 2 ) r is strictly increasing and convex from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( p 1 , ) .

Proof

Clearly, h ( 0 ) = p 1 and h ( 1 ) = . Differentiation gives

(2.8) h ( r ) = r ( p 1 ) ( E p K p ) K p r E p E p r p K p r r ( p 1 ) r p 1 r K p [ r ( p 1 ) K p ] 2 ( p 2 ) r r p 1 = r r p 1 E p r p K p ( p 1 ) ( K p E p ) r p r p E p + E p r p K p r p K p + ( p 2 ) r p K p E p = r r p 1 E p r p K p [ ( p 1 ) H 1 ( r ) ] ,

where

H 1 ( r ) = ( K p E p ) r p r p E p + E p r p K p r p K p + ( p 2 ) r p K p E p .

By [23, Lemma 3.4(2),(3),(5)], for p 2 , we see that H 1 ( r ) is decreasing from (0,1) onto ( 0 , p 1 ) . Hence, it follows from (2.8) that h is the product of three positive and increasing functions. This yields the monotonicity and convexity properties of h .□

Lemma 2.5

The function j ( x ) = 1 / sin x 1 / x 1 / π is increasing from ( 0 , π ) onto ( 1 / π , ) , and exists x 0 = 1.451765874910260 ( 0 , π ) for j ( x 0 ) = 0 .

Proof

By the Taylor expansion of x / sin x ([30, Equality (2.15)]), we obtain

(2.9) j ( x ) = k = 1 2 2 k 2 ( 2 k ) ! B 2 k x 2 k 1 1 / π = 1 6 x + k = 2 2 2 k 2 ( 2 k ) ! B 2 k x 2 k 1 1 / π ,

where B n ( n N 0 , N 0 = N { 0 } ) are the Bernoulli numbers, defined by

t e t 1 = n = 0 B n t n n ! , t < 2 π .

By differentiation,

j ( x ) = 1 6 + k = 2 2 2 k 2 ( 2 k ) ! B 2 k ( 2 k 1 ) x 2 k 2 .

It is easy to see that for all x ( 0 , π ) , j ( x ) > 0 . Consequently, j ( x ) is increasing on ( 0 , π ) . It follows from (2.9) that the limits j ( 0 ) = 1 / π and j ( π ) = . By the mathematical software Maple, we compute that j ( x 0 ) = 0 .□

3 Main results

In this section, we reveal some monotonicity properties of K p ( r ) and E p ( r ) , and some of which remarkably improve the related well-known results for them such as [4, Theorem 18] and [15, Theorem 1.2].

Theorem 3.1

  1. For r ( 0 , 1 ) , p [ 2 , 1 + 2 ] , the function

    f 1 ( r ) log ( 2 K p ( r ) / π p ) log ( arth p r / r )

    is strictly increasing from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( 1 1 / p 2 , 1 ) . In particular, for all r ( 0 , 1 ) , p [ 2 , 1 + 2 ] , the double inequality

    (3.1) π p 2 arth p r r α 1 < K p ( r ) < π p 2 arth p r r β 1

    holds with the best possible constants α 1 = 1 1 / p 2 and β 1 = 1 .

  2. For r ( 0 , 1 ) , p ( 1 , ) , the function

    f 2 ( r ) = r ( 2 K p ( r ) / π p 1 ) arth p r r

    is strictly decreasing from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( 2 / π p , 1 1 / p 2 ) . In particular, for all r ( 0 , 1 ) , p ( 1 , ) , the double inequality

    (3.2) 1 α 2 + α 2 arth p r r < 2 π p K p < 1 β 2 + β 2 arth p r r

    holds with the best possible constants α 2 = 2 / π p and β 2 = 1 1 / p 2 .

Proof

(1) Let

F 1 ( r ) = log 2 K p π p , F 2 ( r ) = log arth p r r , F 3 ( r ) = K p arth p r r E p , F 4 ( r ) = 1 r p arth p r r K p .

Then F 1 ( 0 + ) = F 2 ( 0 + ) = F 3 ( 0 + ) = F 4 ( 0 + ) = 0 , f 1 ( r ) = F 1 ( r ) / F 2 ( r ) , and by differentiation,

(3.3) F 1 ( r ) F 2 ( r ) = 1 r K p E p arth p r ( r r p arth p r ) K p = 1 F 3 ( r ) F 4 ( r ) ,

(3.4) F 3 ( r ) F 4 ( r ) = E p r p K p r r p + K p E p r 2 arth p r E p r r p arth p r r 2 r p × ( p r p + 2 r p ) arth p r 2 r r 2 K p + ( r r p arth p r ) E p r 2 r p 1 = [ ( arth p r r ) r p K p ] { ( r r p arth p r ) E p + [ ( p r p + 2 r p ) arth p r 2 r ] r p K p } 1 = p + r r p arth p r arth p r r E p r p K p + ( p r p + 2 r p p ) arth p r + ( p 2 ) r arth p r r 1 = p + r r p arth p r arth p r r E p r p K p + ( 2 p ) r p arth p r + ( p 2 ) r arth p r r 1 = [ p + g 4 ( r ) h ( r ) ] 1 ,

where g 4 and h are, respectively, defined as in Lemmas 2.3(4) and in 2.4. It follows from (3.4), Lemmas 2.3(4) and 2.4 that the function F 3 / F 4 is strictly decreasing on (0,1), and is F 3 / F 4 by Lemma 2.1. Consequently, it follows from (3.3) and Lemma 2.1 that f 1 is strictly increasing on (0,1).

By Lemma 2.1 (l’Hôpital’s rule), Lemma 2.3(4), Lemma 2.4, and by (3.3)–(3.4), we obtain the limiting values:

f 1 ( 0 + ) = 1 lim r 0 + 1 p + g 4 ( r ) h ( r ) = 1 1 p 2 and f 1 ( 1 ) = 1 lim r 1 1 p + g 4 ( r ) h ( r ) = 1 .

By the monotonicity of f 1 , the double inequality (3.1) holds with α 1 = 1 1 / p 2 and β 1 = 1 .

It is easy to see that for all r ( 0 , 1 ) and p [ 2 , 1 + 2 ] ,

K p ( r ) > π p 2 arth p r r α 1 α 1 inf r ( 0 , 1 ) f 1 ( r ) = f 1 ( 0 + ) = 1 1 / p 2

and

K p ( r ) < π p 2 arth p r r β 1 β 1 sup r ( 0 , 1 ) f 1 ( r ) = f 1 ( 1 ) = 1 .

Hence, the last assertion follows.

(2) Let F 5 ( r ) = 2 K p ( r ) / π p 1 , F 6 ( r ) = arth p r / r 1 . By using (1.9) and (1.12), we obtain

(3.5) f 2 ( r ) = F 5 ( r ) F 6 ( r ) = n = 1 1 p , n 1 1 p , n ( n ! ) 2 r n p n = 1 1 p n + 1 r n p = n = 1 a n r n p n = 1 b n r n p ,

where

a n = 1 p , n 1 1 p , n ( n ! ) 2 , and b n = 1 p n + 1 .

Let c n = a n / b n , then

c n + 1 c n = 1 1 p 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 < 1 .

We conclude from (3.5) that f 2 is strictly decreasing on (0,1).

It easy to see that F 5 ( 0 ) = 0 and F 6 ( 0 + ) = 0 . Applying (2.1), we have

F 5 ( r ) F 6 ( r ) = 2 π p r ( E p r p K p ) r r p arth p r = 2 π p ( E p r p K p ) / r p ( r r p arth p r ) / r p + 1 = 2 π p F 7 ( r ) g 1 ( r ) ,

where F 7 ( r ) = [ E p r p K p ] / r p , g 1 ( r ) is in Lemma 2.3(1). By l’Hôpital’s rule, Lemma 2.3(1), and [23, Lemma 3.4 (3)], we obtain the limiting values

f 2 ( 0 + ) = lim r 0 + F 5 ( r ) F 6 ( r ) = 2 π p lim r 0 + F 7 ( r ) g 1 ( r ) = 1 1 p 2 and f 2 ( 1 ) = lim r 1 F 5 ( r ) F 6 ( r ) = 2 π p lim r 1 F 7 ( r ) g 1 ( r ) = 2 π p .

Theorem 3.2

For p ( 1 , ) , let

p 0 = 1 6 ( 135 + 6 249 ) 1 / 3 + 7 2 ( 135 + 6 249 ) 1 / 3 + 1 2 2.092193586

be the unique solution to the equation 2 p 3 3 p 2 2 p 1 = 0 and p = 2.16398023116776 be the unique solution to the equation 1 / p + 1 π / [ p sin ( π / p ) ] = 0 , and the function f 3 is defined on ( 0 , 1 ) by

f 3 ( r ) r ( π p / 2 E p ( r ) ) r r p arth p r .

Then the following statements are true:

  1. If p ( 1 , p 0 ] , then f 3 is strictly decreasing from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( π p / 2 1 , [ ( p + 1 ) π p ] / ( 2 p 3 ) ) . In particular, for all r ( 0 , 1 ) , p ( 1 , p 0 ] , the double inequality

    (3.6) π p 2 α 3 + α 3 r p arth p r r < E p ( r ) < π p 2 β 3 + β 3 r p arth p r r

    holds with the best possible constants α 3 = [ ( p + 1 ) π p ] / ( 2 p 3 ) and β 3 = π p / 2 1 .

  2. If p ( p 0 , p ) , then there exists unique r 0 ( 0 , 1 ) such that f 3 ( r ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , r 0 ) , and strictly decreasing on ( r 0 , 1 ) . Consequently, for r ( 0 , 1 ) , one has

    (3.7) E p ( r ) < π p 2 min π p 2 1 , ( p + 1 ) π p 2 p 3 1 r p arth p r r .

  3. If p ( p , ) , then f 3 is strictly increasing from (0,1) onto ( [ ( p + 1 ) / π p ] / ( 2 p 3 ) , π p / 2 1 ) , and the reverse inequality of (3.6) holds for all r ( 0 , 1 ) .

Proof

Clearly, f 3 ( 1 ) = π p / 2 1 . Let F 8 ( r ) = r [ π p / 2 E p ( r ) ] , F 9 ( r ) = r r p arth p r . By using the series expansion (1.10) and (1.12), we obtain

(3.8) f 3 ( r ) = F 8 ( r ) F 9 ( r ) = π p / 2 E p ( r ) 1 r p arth p r / r = π p 2 n = 1 ( 1 / p , n ) ( 1 / p , n ) ( n ! ) 2 r n p 1 n = 0 1 p n + 1 r n p + n = 0 1 p n + 1 r ( 1 + n ) p = π p 2 p n = 1 ( 1 / p , n ) ( 1 1 / p , n ) ( n ! ) 2 ( p n 1 ) r n p n = 1 1 ( p n p + 1 ) ( p n + 1 ) r n p = π p 2 p n = 1 A n r n p n = 1 B n r n p = π p 2 p n = 0 A n + 1 r n p n = 0 B n + 1 r n p ,

where

A n = ( 1 / p , n ) ( 1 1 / p , n ) ( n ! ) 2 ( p n 1 ) , and B n = 1 ( p n p + 1 ) ( p n + 1 ) .

By (3.8), we obtain

(3.9) f 3 ( 0 + ) = lim r 0 + f 3 ( r ) = π p 2 p A 1 B 1 = ( p + 1 ) π p 2 p 3 .

Let C n = A n / B n , then

(3.10) C n + 1 C n 1 = p ( p 2 2 p 1 ) n + ( p 3 p 2 p 1 ) p 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 ( p n p + 1 ) = p J 1 ( p ) n + J 2 ( p ) p 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 ( p n p + 1 ) = J ( p , n ) p 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 ( p n p + 1 ) ,

where

J ( p , n ) = p ( p 2 2 p 1 ) n + ( p 3 p 2 p 1 ) , J 1 ( p ) = p 2 2 p 1 , J 2 ( p ) = p 3 p 2 p 1 .

Case 1. p ( 1 , p 0 ) .

p J 1 ( p ) = p ( p 2 2 p 1 ) = p ( p + 2 1 ) [ p ( 1 + 2 ) ] .

Clearly, p J 1 ( p ) < 0 for p < p 0 < 1 + 2 , we obtain

(3.11) J ( p , n ) < J ( p , 1 ) = p J 1 ( p ) + J 2 ( p ) = 2 p 3 3 p 2 2 p 1 .

By differentiation,

J ( p , 1 ) = 6 ( p 2 p 1 / 3 ) = 6 p 3 + 21 6 p 3 21 6 ,

then J ( p , 1 ) is strictly decreasing from ( 1 , ( 3 + 21 ) / 6 ) onto ( 4.28211277 , 4 ) and strictly increasing from ( ( 3 + 21 ) / 6 , p 0 ) onto ( 4.28211277 , 0 ) , then J ( p , 1 ) < 0 . From (3.10) and (3.11), we obtain that C n + 1 / C n < 1 for n 1 , and thereby C n is strictly decreasing with respect to n . With an application of Lemma 2.2(1) and (3.8), the monotonicity of f 3 on ( 0 , 1 ) in this case is expressed as follows.

Case 2. p ( p 0 , ) .

By using (2.1) and (2.3), we obtain

(3.12) F 8 ( r ) F 9 ( r ) = ( π p / 2 E p ) + ( K p E p ) p r p 1 arth p r ,

and thus,

(3.13) H F 8 , F 9 ( r ) = F 8 F 9 F 9 F 8 = ( π p / 2 E p ) + ( K p E p ) p r p 1 arth p r [ r r p arth p r ] r π p 2 E P = r 2 ( π p / 2 2 E p ) p arth p r + r p r K p arth p r r r p arth p r r p + 1 r π p 2 E P = r 2 ( π p / 2 2 E p ) p arth p r + r p r K p arth p r g 1 ( r ) + r E P π p 2 .

It is not difficult to verify that

lim r 1 r K p ( r ) arth p r = 1 ,

and thus

(3.14) H F 8 , F 9 ( 1 ) = lim r 1 H F 8 , F 9 ( r ) = 1 p + 1 π p 2 = 1 p + 1 π p sin ( π / p ) = π p j π p ,

where j is in Lemma 2.5.

Then there exists unique zero point p = 2.16398023116776 ( 1 , ) such that H F 8 , F 9 ( 1 ) = 0 , H F 8 , F 9 ( 1 ) < 0 for ( p 0 , p ) and H F 8 , F 9 ( 1 ) > 0 for ( p , ) .

(i). p ( p 0 , p ) .

Then (3.10) implies that there exists n 0 > 1 such that sequence A n / B n is increasing for 1 n n 0 and decreasing for n > n 0 , for the limiting value of H F 8 , F 9 ( r ) at 1. It follows from (3.14) and Lemma 2.2(2) that H F 8 , F 9 ( 1 ) < 0 for p ( p 0 , p ) , so f 3 ( r ) is piecewise monotone on (0,1), and therefore, the inequality (3.7) follows from

f 3 ( r ) > min π p 2 1 , ( p + 1 ) π p 2 p 3 .

(ii). p ( p , )

Applying Lemma 2.2 (2) and (3.14), f 3 ( r ) is strictly increasing from ( 0 , 1 ) onto ( [ ( p + 1 ) π p ] / ( 2 p 3 ) , π p / 2 1 ) if and only if p p , yielding the third assertion.□

Remark 3.3

  1. When p = 2 , the inequality (3.1) in Theorem 3.1 reduces to the inequality (1.7).

  2. By using (1.12), we clearly see that

    (3.15) arth p r r = 1 + n = 1 r p n p n + 1 > 1 ,

    (3.16) r p arth p r r = ( 1 r p ) n = 0 r p n p n + 1 = 1 + n = 1 r p n p n + 1 n = 0 r p ( n + 1 ) p n + 1 = 1 p n = 0 r p ( n + 1 ) ( p n + 1 ) ( p n + p + 1 ) < 1 .

    The inequality (3.15) implies that the upper bound for K p ( r ) given in (3.2) is better than that given in (1.11) for all r ( 0 , 1 ) . It is clear that 2 / π p ( = [ p sin ( π / p ) ] / π ) is increasing from ( 1 , ) onto ( 0 , 1 ) . This yields 1 2 / π p > 0 for p ( 1 , ) . Therefore, the lower bound for K p ( r ) given in (3.2) is better than that given in (1.13) for q = p by the inequality (3.16).

  3. When p = 2 , inequality (3.6) in Theorem 3.2 reduces to inequality (1.8).

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and their fruitful comments and suggestions.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the research project for Keyi College of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (KY2021004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11671360), the Project for Combination of Education and Research Training at Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (Grant No. S027120206), and the project for technology innovation team of Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, Dover, New York, 1965. 10.1063/1.3047921Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Askey, Handbooks of special functions, in: A Century of Mathematics in America, Part III, P. Duren, ed., American Mathematical Society Rhode Island, Dover, New York, 1988, pp. 369–391. Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy, Special Functions (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Alzer and S. L. Qiu, Monotonicity theorems and inequalities for the complete elliptic integrals, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 172 (2004), no. 2, 289–312. 10.1016/j.cam.2004.02.009Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. D. Anderson, S. L. Qiu, M. K. Vamanamurthy, and M. Vuorinen, Generalized elliptic integrals and modular equations, Pacific J. Math. 192 (2000), no. 1, 1–37. 10.2140/pjm.2000.192.1Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. D. Anderson, M. K. Vamanamurthy, and M. Vuorinen, Functional inequalities for complete elliptic integrals and their ratios, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21 (1990), no. 2, 536–549. 10.1137/0521029Search in Google Scholar

[7] G. D. Anderson, M. K. Vamanamurthy, and M. Vuorinen, Functional inequalities for hypergeometric functions and complete elliptic integrals, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 23 (1992), no. 2, 512–524. 10.1137/0523025Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. D. Anderson, M. K. Vamanamurthy, and M. Vourinen, Conformal Invarinants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Y. M. Chu, M. K. Wang, S. L. Qiu, and Y. P. Jiang, Bounds for completeelliptic integrals of the second kind with applications, Comput. Math. Appl. 63 (2012), no. 7, 1177–1184. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.038Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. L. Qiu, X. Y. Ma, and Y. M. Chu, Sharp Landen transformation inequalities for hypergeometric functions, with applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 474 (2019), no. 2, 1306–1337. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.02.018Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. L. Qiu and M. K. Vamanamurthy, Sharp estimates for complete elliptic integrals, SIAMJ. Math. Anal. 27 (1996), no. 3, 823–834. 10.1137/0527044Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. K. Wang, H. H. Chu, Y. M. Li, and Y. M. Chu, Answers to three conjectures on convexity of three functions involving complete elliptic integrals of the first kind, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 14 (2020), no. 1, 255–271. 10.2298/AADM190924020WSearch in Google Scholar

[13] M. K. Wang, Y. M. Chu, Y. M. Li, and M. K. Zhang, Asymptotic expansion and bounds for complete elliptic integrals, Math. Inequal. Appl. 23 (2020), no. 3, 821–841. 10.7153/mia-2020-23-67Search in Google Scholar

[14] F. Wang, B. N. Guo, and F. Qi, Monotonicity and inequalities related to complete elliptic integrals of the second kind, AIMS Math. 5 (2020), no. 3, 2732–2742. 10.3934/math.2020176Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. K. Wang, S. L. Qiu, Y. M. Chu, and Y. P. Jiang, Generalized Hersch-Pfluger distortion function and complete elliptic integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 385 (2012), no. 1, 221–229. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.06.039Search in Google Scholar

[16] Z. H. Yang, Y. M. Chu, and M. K. Wang, Monotonicity criterion for the quotient of power series with applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 428 (2015), no. 1, 587–604. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.03.043Search in Google Scholar

[17] Z. H. Yang, W. M. Qian, and Y. M. Chu, Monotonicity properties and bounds involving the complete elliptic integrals of the first kind, Math. Inequal. Appl. 21 (2018), no. 4, 1185–1199. 10.7153/mia-2018-21-82Search in Google Scholar

[18] Z. H. Yang, W. M. Qian, W. Zhang, and Y. M. Chu, Notes on the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, Math. Inequal. Appl. 23 (2020), no. 1, 77–93. 10.7153/mia-2020-23-07Search in Google Scholar

[19] M. A. Ragusa, Local Hölder regularity for solutions of elliptic systems, Duke Math. J. 113 (2002), no. 2, 385–397. 10.1215/S0012-7094-02-11327-1Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. F. Tian and Z. H. Yang, Several absolutely monotonic functions related to the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, Results Math. 77 (2022), no. 3, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-022-01641-4. Search in Google Scholar

[21] L. Zhu, Concise high precision approximation for the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, AIMS Math. 6 (2021), no. 10, 10881–10889. 10.3934/math.2021632Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Takeuchi, A new form of the generalized complete elliptic integrals, Kodai Math. J. 39 (2016), no. 1, 202–226. 10.2996/kmj/1458651700Search in Google Scholar

[23] X. H. Zhang, Monotonicity and functional inequalities for the complete p-elliptic integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 453 (2017), no. 2, 942–953. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.04.025Search in Google Scholar

[24] F. Wang and F. Qi, Monotonicity and sharp inequalities related to complete (p,q)-elliptic integrals of the first kind, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 358 (2020), no. 8, 961–970. 10.5802/crmath.119Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Baricz, Turán type inequalities for generalized complete elliptic integrals, Math. Z. 256 (2007), no. 4, 895–911. 10.1007/s00209-007-0111-xSearch in Google Scholar

[26] B. A. Bhayo and M. Vuorinen, On generalized complete elliptic integrals and modular functions, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 55 (2012), no. 3, 591–611. 10.1017/S0013091511000356Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. R. Huang, S. L. Qiu, and X. Y. Ma, Monotonicity properties and inequalities for the generalized elliptic integral of the first kind, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 469 (2019), no. 1, 95–116. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.08.061Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. K. Wang, Z. Y. He, Y. M. Chu, Sharp power mean inequalities for the generalized elliptic integral of the first kind, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 20 (2020), no. 1, 111–124. 10.1007/s40315-020-00298-wSearch in Google Scholar

[29] T. H. Zhao, M. K. Wang, and Y. M. Chu, A sharp double inequality involving generalized complete elliptic integral of the first kind, AIMS Math. 5 (2020), no. 5, 4512–4528. 10.3934/math.2020290Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. L. Li, An identity related to Jordan’s inequality, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2006 (2006), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/IJMMS/2006/76782. 10.1155/IJMMS/2006/76782Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-25
Revised: 2022-03-26
Accepted: 2022-08-09
Published Online: 2022-09-26

© 2022 Genhong Zhong et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0493/html
Scroll to top button