Home Mathematics Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
Article Open Access

Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays

  • Shoubo Jin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 29, 2022

Abstract

The Picard iteration method is used to study the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays. Several sufficient conditions are specified to ensure that the equation has a unique solution. First, the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation is transformed into an integral equation. Then, to obtain the solution of the integral equation, the successive approximation sequences are constructed, and the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation are derived by the convergence of the sequences. Finally, two examples are given to demonstrate the validity of the theoretical results.

MSC 2010: 34K50; 60H10

1 Introduction

As stochastic modeling is used in the fields such as physics, economics, chemistry, and scholars have paid more and more attention to stochastic differential equations. Therefore, the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the equation have become a hot topic in recent years. The Volterra equation is a significant differential equation, which has been applied to the circulating fuel nuclear reactor, the neural networks, the population projection and others. In 1928, Volterra [1] first proposed the Volterra equation, i.e.,

(1) x ( t ) = t L t p ( s t ) f ( x , s ) d s ,

and Levin [2] obtained the asymptotical stability of (1). Burton investigated the stability of equation (1) by the contraction mapping principle in [3]. Zhao and Yuan [4] considered 3/2-stability of a generalized Volterra-Levin equation. The discrete Volterra equation describing the evolutionary process of the population was recently investigated in [5].

To analyze the Volterra equation, Levin [2] used the limited condition that is pretty hard to be checked in practical application, lim x 0 x f ( x ) d x = , and the author also required that the function p ( t ) has good properties, such as d p d t 0 , d 2 p d t 2 0 and d 3 p ( t ) d t 3 0 for any t ( 0 , + ) . Although the conditions of f ( x ) were simplified by averages in [3], there were still more requirements for the function f ( x ) . In this paper, the constrains of f ( x ) and p ( t ) will be weaken in the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays.

Let { Ω , , P } be a complete probability space equipped with some filtration { t } t 0 satisfying the usual conditions, that the filtration is right continuous and { 0 } contains all P-null sets. Let { W ( t ) , t 0 } denote a standard Brownian motion defined on { Ω , , P } . We investigate the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equations with variable delays, i.e.,

(2) d x ( t ) = t L t p ( s t ) f ( x ( s α ( s ) ) ) d s d t + g ( x ( t β ( t ) ) ) d W ( t ) , t [ 0 , T ] , x ( s ) = φ ( s ) C ( [ L τ , 0 ] ; R ) .

where f ( x ) and g ( x ) are known functions satisfying certain conditions, the constant L > 0 , p ( s ) C ( [ L , T ] ; R ) , and R = ( , + ) , α ( t ) and β ( t ) are the variable delays, satisfying α ( t ) , β ( t ) [ 0 , τ ] .

Scholars have become increasingly interested in the stochastic Volterra-Levin equations. The equation has been applied to many special research fields, such as the population model of spatial heterogeneity [6], the predator-prey model [7], and the nonautonomous competitive model [8]. After reviewing and sorting out the literature, it is found that most scholars currently use the principle of contraction mapping to explore the equation. For example, Luo [9] analyzed the exponential stability of the classical stochastic Volterra-Levin equations. Zhao et al. [10] investigated the mean square asymptotic stability of the generalized stochastic Volterra-Levin equations, which improved the results in [9]. Li and Xu [11] demonstrated the existence and global attractiveness of periodic solutions for impulsive stochastic Volterra-Levin equations. In this paper, the Picard iteration method is directly used to prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the stochastic Volterra-Levin equations with variable delays, which can give a more intuitive approximate solution. Recently, for the case without delay, Jaber [12] proved the weak existence and uniqueness of affine stochastic Volterra equations. Dung [13] revealed Itô differential representation of the stochastic Volterra integral equations. For the case of constant delay, Guo and Zhu [14] used this approximate method to prove the existence of solutions of stochastic Volterra-Levin equations. Some delay Volterra integral problems on a half-line were analyzed in [15]. The qualitative properties of solutions of nonlinear Volterra equations without random disturbance were investigated in [16]. However, there are only a few results of the stochastic Volterra equations with variable delay.

Generally, a time delay is inevitable and variable in practical application, and the future state of an existing system depends not only on the current state of the systems but also on the past [17,18,19]. When the function f ( x ) = x in equation (2), Benhadri and Zeghdoudi [20] applied the variable delays to the Volterra-Levin equation with Poisson jump and obtained the mean square stability by the fixed-point theory. The authors in [5] discussed the linear discrete Volterra equation with infinite delay when the function g ( x ) = 0 , which means there are not any random noises. In this paper, we will investigate the Volterra-Levin equation with the variable delays and the standard Brownian motion in more general conditions. Moreover, the Picard successive approximation method is used to prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution in some sufficient conditions. Compared with [2] and [3], these conditions are easier to be verified.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some necessary conditions and lemmas are established. In Section 3, the existence and uniqueness of solutions are proved. In Section 4, two examples are given to demonstrate the validity of the main results.

2 Assumptions and lemmas

To obtain the existence and uniqueness of the solutions for equation (2), the following assumptions are given in this paper.

  1. lim x 0 f ( x ) x = β > 0 .

  2. g ( 0 ) = f ( 0 ) = 0 , and there exists a constant μ > 0 , such that f ( x ) x > μ .

  3. L 0 p ( s ) d s = m > 0 , L 0 p ( s ) s d s = m 1 > 0 and max L s 0 p ( s ) = m 2 .

  4. There is a positive constant K > 0 , such that f ( x ) f ( y ) g ( x ) g ( y ) K x y for all x , y R .

  5. 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 m 1 2 + 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ T ) K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 1 2 K 2 + 9 10 e m K T < 1 .

Remark 2.1

Assumptions H 1 H 3 are some common conditions for studying the Volterra-Levin equations. For instance, Luo [9] discussed the exponential stability for classical stochastic Volterra-Levin equations on Assumptions H 1 H 3 . Zhao et al. [10] studied the mean square asymptotic stability of a class of generalized nonlinear stochastic Volterra-Levin equations on similar assumptions. Assumption H 4 is the Lipschitz condition, which is the core condition for ensuring the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the initial value problem.

Now, we transform (2) into the following form by using the properties of integrals.

Lemma 2.1

Assuming that H 1 H 3 are established, equation (2) can be transformed into

(3) x ( t ) = e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u φ ( 0 ) L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s + 0 t [ x ( v ) x ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v + L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) .

Proof

Let a ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) ) x ( t ) x ( t ) 0 β x ( t ) = 0 , it is obtained that a ( t ) C ( [ τ , T ] ; R + ) from Assumptions H 1 and H 2 . Using

(4) t L t p ( s t ) f ( x ( s α ( s ) ) ) d s = L 0 p ( s ) f ( x ( s + t α ( s + t ) ) ) d s = d d t L 0 p ( s ) 0 t + s f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s = d d t L 0 p ( s ) t t + s f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s + m f ( x ( t α ( t ) ) ) = d d t L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s + m a ( t α ( t ) ) x ( t α ( t ) ) ,

Equation (2) can be transformed into

(5) d x ( t ) = m a ( t α ( t ) ) x ( t α ( t ) ) d t + d L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s + g ( x ( t β ( t ) ) ) d W ( t ) .

The two sides of the aforementioned equation are multiplied by e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u , and then integral from 0 to t , using the distribution integral method and the following formula:

(6) d x ( t ) e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u = e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d x ( t ) + m a ( t α ( t ) ) x ( t ) e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d t .

It obtains

(7) x ( t ) e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u x ( 0 ) e s 0 m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u = 0 t [ x ( v ) x ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) e s v m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v + e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s e s 0 m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( t α ( t ) ) L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d t + 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x ( t β ( t ) ) ) d W ( t ) .

Two sides of the aforementioned equality are multiplied by e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u , and using

(8) e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 0 t e s v m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x ( v β ( v ) ) ) d W ( v ) = 0 t e t s m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) .

We can obtain equation (3).□

Remark 2.2

The method of transforming the stochastic differential equation into the integral equation, has been widely used. When the function g ( x ) is independent of the variable x , Luo studied the exponential stability for a class of stochastic Volterra-Levin equations by using the method in [9]. Zhao et al. investigated the mean square asymptotic of the generalized nonlinear stochastic Volterra-Levin equations [10]. Based on the semigroup of operators, Yang et al. transformed the heat conduction equation into the fractional Volterra integral equation in [21]. In this lemma, due to the appearance of variable delays, we need to deal with it more precisely.

3 Existence and uniqueness

Picard iteration is the most commonly used method in the proof of the existence of solutions to the stochastic equations [20,21, 22,23]. In this paper, the existence and uniqueness of solutions for equation (2) are proved by the Picard iteration method. An important characteristic of this method is that it is constructive, and the bounds on the difference between iterates and the solutions are easily available. Such bounds are not only useful for the approximation of solutions but also necessary in the study of qualitative properties of solutions.

Now, let’s briefly summarize this idea of the Picard iteration method. To obtain the solution for a class of integral equation y ( t ) = y 0 + 0 t f ( τ , y ( τ ) ) d τ , Picard successive approximation sequences are constructed as follows.

y m + 1 ( t ) = y 0 + 0 t f ( τ , y m ( τ ) ) d τ .

If the sequences { y m ( t ) } converge uniformly to a continuous function y ( t ) in some interval J , then we may past to the limit in both sides of the aforementioned equation to obtain

y ( t ) = lim m y m + 1 ( t ) = y 0 + lim m 0 t f ( τ , y m ( τ ) ) d τ = y 0 + 0 t f ( τ , y ( τ ) ) d τ .

So that y ( t ) is the desired solution.

Theorem 3.1

Suppose that assumptions H 1 H 5 hold, then equation (2) has a unique solution in [ 0 , T ] .

Proof

The Picard iteration method is used in the proof of this theorem, and using Lemma 2.1, we construct the Picard iteration sequences.

(9) x 0 0 = φ ( s ) , x 0 ( t ) = φ ( 0 ) , ( 0 t T ) , x 0 n = φ ( s ) , n 1 , x n ( t ) = I 0 n 1 ( t ) + I 1 n 1 ( t ) + I 2 n 1 ( t ) + I 3 n 1 ( t ) + I 4 n 1 ( t ) ,

where

I 0 n 1 ( t ) = e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u φ ( 0 ) L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s , I 1 n 1 ( t ) = 0 t [ x n 1 ( v ) x n 1 ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v , I 2 n 1 ( t ) = L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s , I 3 n 1 ( t ) = 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v , I 4 n 1 ( t ) = 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x n 1 ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) .

(1) We first verify the mean square boundness of x n ( t ) ( n 0 ) , so we only need to prove E sup 0 t T x n ( t ) 2 is bounded.

It is obvious that E x 0 ( t ) 2 = E φ ( 0 ) 2 < + for n = 0 . Suppose E x n 1 ( t ) 2 is bounded, we begin to prove E x n ( t ) 2 is bounded. Using the formula (9), it obtains E x n ( t ) 2 5 i = 0 4 E I i n 1 ( t ) 2 .

Using Assumptions H 2 and H 4 , it obtains

(10) E [ sup 0 t T I 0 n 1 ( t ) 2 ] = E sup 0 t T e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u φ ( 0 ) L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 2 2 E φ ( 0 ) 2 + 2 E L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 2 2 E φ ( 0 ) 2 + 2 K 2 m 1 2 E [ sup L τ t 0 φ ( t ) 2 ] < +

and

(11) E [ sup 0 t T I 1 n 1 ( t ) 2 ] = E sup 0 t T 0 t [ x n 1 ( v ) x n 1 ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 2 E sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 0 t m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 = 2 E sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 1 e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 2 2 ( 1 e m K T ) 2 E [ sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] < + .

Further, by using Hölder inequality, we obtain

(12) E [ sup 0 t T I 2 n 1 ( t ) 2 ] K 2 E sup 0 t T L 0 p ( s ) t + s t x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s 2 K 2 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T L 0 t + s t x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s 2 K 2 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T L 0 t L t x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s 2 K 2 L 4 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E [ sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] K 2 L 4 m 2 2 [ sup L τ s < 0 E φ ( s ) 2 + sup 0 t T E x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] < +

and

(13) E sup 0 t T I 3 n 1 ( t ) 2 K 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s d v 2 K 2 L 2 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) v L v x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 K 2 L 2 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) d v × 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) v L v x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u 2 d v K 2 L 2 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T 1 e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u × 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) v L v x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u 2 d v

K 2 L 3 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) v L v x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) 2 d u d v K 2 L 4 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) d v K 2 L 4 max s [ L , 0 ] p ( s ) 2 E sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 1 e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u K 2 L 4 m 2 2 [ sup L τ s < 0 E φ ( s ) 2 + sup 0 t T E x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] < + .

From Assumptions H 1 and H 4 , we know

(14) E sup 0 t T I 4 n 1 ( t ) 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x n 1 ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) 2 K 2 sup 0 t T E 0 t e 2 s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u x n 1 ( s β ( s ) ) 2 d s K 2 sup 0 t T E 1 e 2 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u sup L τ t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 K 2 E [ sup L τ s 0 φ ( s ) 2 + sup 0 t T x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] < + .

So,

(15) E [ sup L τ t T x n ( t ) 2 ] E [ sup L τ t 0 φ ( s ) 2 ] + E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) 2 ] 10 E φ ( 0 ) 2 + ( 1 + 10 K 2 m 1 2 ) E [ sup L τ s 0 φ ( s ) 2 ] + [ 10 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 5 K 2 + 10 ( 1 e m K T ) ] ( E sup L τ s 0 φ ( s ) 2 + E sup 0 s T x n 1 ( t ) 2 ) < + .

(2) Verifying the mean square continuity of x n ( t )

Suppose t 1 > 0 and r is sufficiently small, we obtain the properties as follows.

E x n ( t 1 + r ) x n ( t 1 ) 2 5 i = 0 4 E I i n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I i n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 .

By Itô integration, we have

(16) E I 0 n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I 0 n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 e t 1 t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 1 2 E φ ( 0 ) L 0 p ( s ) s 0 f ( φ ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 2 0 ( r 0 ) ,

(17) E I 1 n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I 1 n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 2 e t 1 t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 1 2 E 0 t 1 [ x n 1 ( v ) x n 1 ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) d v 2 + 2 E t 1 t 1 + r [ x n 1 ( v ) x n 1 ( v α ( v ) ) ] m a ( v α ( v ) ) d v 2 0 ( r 0 ) ,

(18) E I 2 n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I 2 n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 2 E L 0 p ( s ) t 1 + s t 1 + r + s f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 2 + 2 m 2 E t 1 t 1 + r f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u 2 0 ( r 0 ) ,

(19) E I 3 n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I 3 n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 2 ( e t 1 t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 1 ) 2 E 0 t 1 L 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v 2 + 2 E t 1 t 1 + r m a ( v α ( v ) ) τ 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v 2 0 ( r 0 ) ,

and

(20) E I 4 n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I 4 n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 2 e t 1 t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 1 2 E 0 t 1 e s t 1 m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x n 1 ( s α ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) + 2 E t 1 t 1 + r e s t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x n 1 ( s α ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) 2 2 e t 1 t 1 + r m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u 1 2 E 0 t 1 e 2 s t 1 m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g 2 ( x n 1 ( s α ( s ) ) ) d s + 2 m 2 E t 1 t 1 + r e 2 s t 1 + r a 2 ( u α ( u ) ) d u g 2 ( x n 1 ( s α ( s ) ) ) d s 0 ( r 0 ) .

So E x n ( t 1 + r ) x n ( t 1 ) 2 5 i = 0 4 E I i n 1 ( t 1 + r ) I i n 1 ( t 1 ) 2 0 , the mean square continuity of x n ( t ) is verified.

(3) This part proves the convergence of sequences { x n ( t ) } n 0 .

By using the similar method of Step (1), we have

E sup 0 t T x n + 1 ( t ) x n ( t ) 2 5 E sup 0 t T 0 t ( x n ( v ) x n 1 ( v ) ) m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 + 5 E sup 0 t T 0 t ( x n ( v α ( v ) ) x n 1 ( v α ( v ) ) ) m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T L 0 p ( s ) t + s t x n ( u α ( u ) ) x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T × 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v x n ( u α ( u ) ) x n 1 ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s d v 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u x n ( s β ( s ) ) x n 1 ( s β ( s ) ) d W ( s ) 2

(21) 10 E sup L τ t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 + 5 K 2 E L 0 p ( s ) s d s E sup L τ t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) d v L 0 p ( s ) s d s sup t L τ x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e 2 s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u x n ( s β ( s ) ) x n 1 ( s β ( s ) ) 2 d s 10 K μ ( 1 e m μ T ) E sup L τ t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 + 5 K 2 L 0 p ( s ) s d s 2 E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 ] + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T 1 e 0 t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u L 0 p ( s ) s d s sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 + 5 K 2 E sup 0 t T 0 t e 2 m μ ( t s ) d s sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 L 0 p ( s ) s d s 2 + sup 0 t T 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ t ) × E sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 m 1 2 + 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ T ) E sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 δ E sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x n 1 ( t ) 2 .

δ = 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 m 1 2 + 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ T ) , so

E sup 0 t T x n + 1 ( t ) x n ( t ) 2 M δ n .

By Chebyshev inequality, we obtain

P { sup 0 t T x n + 1 ( t ) x n ( t ) 2 δ n / 4 } M δ n δ n / 2 = M δ n 2 .

From Assumption H 5 , we have δ < 1 . By Borel-Cantelli lemma, it follows that there exists a positive integer n 0 = n 0 ( w ) for almost all w Ω , satisfying

sup 0 t T x n + 1 ( t ) x n ( t ) δ n / 4 ,

for any n n 0 .

Next we show that x n ( t ) are uniformly convergent on [ L τ , + ] . Since x n ( t ) = x 0 ( t ) + i = 1 n [ x i ( t ) x i 1 ( t ) ] can be regarded as the partial sum of function series x 0 ( t ) + i = 1 [ x i ( t ) x i 1 ( t ) ] , as well as sup 0 t T x i ( t ) x i 1 ( t ) δ ( i 1 ) / 4 ( i = 1 , 2 , ) , it follows that x n ( t ) are uniformly convergent on [ L τ , + ] by using the convergence of constant series i = 1 δ ( i 1 ) / 4 and Weierstrass’ discriminance.

Let x ( t ) be the sum function, it obtains the function sequences { x n ( t ) } n 0 converge uniformly to x ( t ) on [ L τ , + ) . Considering x n ( t ) are continuous and F t compatible, we obtain the sum fucntion x ( t ) that is also continuous and F t compatible. Using inequality (15), { x n ( t ) } n 0 are the Cauchy sequences in L 2 , so

E x n ( t ) x ( t ) 2 0 ( n ) .

On the other hand, by inequality (15), we have

(22) E [ sup L τ t T x ( t ) 2 ] 10 E φ ( 0 ) 2 + ( 10 K 2 m 1 2 + 2 ) E [ sup L τ s 0 φ ( s ) 2 ] 10 e m K T 10 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 5 K 2 9 .

So by Assumption H 5 , it obtains E [ sup L τ t T x ( t ) 2 ] < + .

(4) This part proves that x ( t ) is a solution for equation (2)

After simple calculation, we have

(23) E 0 t ( x n ( v ) x ( v ) ) m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x ( t ) 2 ] ( 1 e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u ) 2 0 ( n )

and

(24) E 0 t ( x n ( v α ( v ) ) x ( v α ( v ) ) ) m a ( v α ( v ) ) e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u d v 2 0 ( n ) .

Using Hölder inequality, it follows

(25) E L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x n ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s L 0 p ( s ) t + s t f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s 2 K 2 E L 0 p ( s ) t + s t x n ( u α ( u ) ) x ( u α ( u ) ) d u d s 2 K 2 L 0 p 2 ( s ) d s E L 0 s t + s t x n ( u α ( u ) ) x ( u α ( u ) ) 2 d u d s K 2 L 3 3 L 0 p 2 ( s ) d s E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x ( t ) 2 ] 0 .

By the similar method of Step (3), it obtains

(26) E 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x n ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v 0 t e v t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) d u d s d v 2 K 2 L 0 p ( s ) s d s 2 E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x ( t ) 2 ] 0 ( n )

and

(27) E 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x n ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) 0 t e s t m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u g ( x ( s β ( s ) ) ) d W ( s ) 2 K 2 2 m μ E [ sup 0 t T x n ( t ) x ( t ) 2 ] 0 ( n ) .

Taking the limit on both sides on equation (9), it obtains x ( t ) satisfies equation (2), so x ( t ) is a solution of the stochastic differential equation.

(5) This part proves the uniqueness.

Let ς n = T inf { t [ 0 , T ] ; x ( t ) n } be the stopping time. Supposing x ( t ) and y ( t ) are the solutions to the stochastic differential equation with the same initial value. Obviously, it obtains ς n T for n . Let r n = r ς n , By the similar method of Step (1), we have

(28) E sup 0 r t x ( r n ) y ( r n ) 2 8 ( 1 e m K T ) E [ sup 0 s t n x ( s ) y ( s ) 2 ] + 4 E sup 0 r t L 0 p ( s ) r n + s r n ( f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) f ( y ( u α ( u ) ) ) ) d u d s 2 + 4 E sup 0 r t × 0 r n e v r n m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u m a ( v α ( v ) ) L 0 p ( s ) v + s v ( f ( x ( u α ( u ) ) ) f ( y ( u α ( u ) ) ) ) d u d s d v 2 + 4 E sup 0 r t 0 r n e s r n m a ( u α ( u ) ) d u ( g ( x ( s β ( s ) ) ) g ( y ( s β ( s ) ) ) ) d W ( s ) 2 [ 8 ( 1 e m K T ) + 8 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 4 K 2 ] E [ sup 0 s t n x ( s ) y ( s ) 2 ] .

For n , it obtains E sup 0 r t x ( r ) y ( r ) 2 [ 8 ( 1 e m μ T ) + 8 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 4 K 2 ] E sup 0 s t x ( s ) y ( s ) 2 , so

(29) E sup 0 t T x ( t ) y ( t ) 2 [ 8 ( 1 e m μ T ) + 8 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 4 K 2 ] E sup 0 t T x ( t ) y ( t ) 2 .

By Assumption H 5 , it obtains

7 8 + K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + K 2 2 e m K T < 9 10 + K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + K 2 2 e m K T < 1 ,

so we have 8 ( 1 e m K T ) + 8 K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 4 K 2 < 1 by some simple calculations, and it follows E sup 0 t T x ( t ) y ( t ) 2 = 0 . Hence, x ( t ) = y ( t ) for 0 t T , the uniqueness of the solution to the stochastic differential equation is proved.□

Remark 3.1

In the past, the contraction mapping principle has been the main method to prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation. However, Theorem 3.1 is proved by the Picard iteration method, which is more intuitive and easier to understand than the other methods. The preconditions in Theorem 3.1 are simpler than those in [2] and [3]. More importantly, the Picard iteration method is applied to the case of variable delay, which can increase the application scope of related problems, especially for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation.

4 Examples

Next, we give two examples to illustrate the application of Theorem 1.

Example 4.1

Considering equation (2) with f ( x ) = g ( x ) = x 10 , α ( t ) = β ( t ) = 1 10 π arccot ( t ) , p ( s ) = s 2 and L = 1 , it becomes

(30) d x ( t ) = t 1 t ( s t ) 2 x ( s α ( s ) ) 10 d s d t + x ( t β ( t ) ) 10 d W ( t ) .

Then there exists a unique solution x ( t ) for any 0 t T , where T = 60 ln 400 401 .

Proof

By calculation, we have

  1. lim x 0 f ( x ) x = 1 10 = β .

  2. f ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) = 0 , there exists μ = 1 20 , such that f ( x ) x = 1 10 > μ .

  3. m = 1 0 s 2 d s = 1 3 , m 1 = 1 0 s 3 d s = 1 4 and m 2 = max 1 s 0 s 2 = 1 .

  4. There is a positive constant K = 1 5 , such that f ( x ) f ( y ) g ( x ) g ( y ) = 1 10 x y K x y for all x , y R .

  5. If T = 60 ln 400 401 , then 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 m 1 2 + 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ T ) 0.77 < 1 and K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 1 2 K 2 + 9 10 e m K T 0.989 < 1 .□

So equation (30) satisfies Assumptions H 1 H 5 , it follows from Theorem 1 that the equation has a unique solution in [ 0 , T ] .

Example 4.2

Considering equation (2) with f ( x ) = x 10 , g ( x ) = x 6 , p ( s ) = 1 , L = 1 , α ( t ) = 1 7 π arccot ( t ) , and β ( t ) = 1 8 π arccot ( t ) , it becomes

(31) d x ( t ) = t 1 t x ( s α ( s ) ) 10 d s d t + x ( t β ( t ) ) 6 d W ( t ) .

Then there exists a unique solution x ( t ) for any 0 t T , where T = 20 ln 800 801 .

Proof

By calculation, we have

  1. lim x 0 f ( x ) x = 1 10 = β .

  2. f ( 0 ) = g ( 0 ) = 0 , there exists μ = 1 20 , such that f ( x ) x = 1 10 > μ .

  3. m = 1 0 1 d s = 1 , m 1 = 1 0 s d s = 1 2 , and m 2 = max 1 s 0 1 = 1 .

  4. There is a positive constant K = 1 5 , such that f ( x ) f ( y ) g ( x ) g ( y ) 1 5 x y for all x , y R .

  5. If T = 20 ln 800 801 , then 5 K 2 2 μ K ( 1 e m μ T ) + 2 m 1 2 + 1 2 m μ ( 1 e 2 m μ T ) 0.77 < 1 and K 2 L 4 m 2 2 + 1 2 K 2 + 9 10 e m K T 0.965 < 1 .

So equation (31) satisfies Assumptions H 1 H 5 , it follows from Theorem 1 that the equation has a unique solutions in [ 0 , T ] .□

5 Conclusion

This work studies the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays. The Picard iteration approach is utilized as the major technique to obtain the results. The simpler sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions are constructed as the study’s key conclusions. Finally, two examples are given to illustrate the validity of the theorem.

Acknowledgments

The author appreciates the valuable comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers, which improve the clarity of the paper.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of Anhui Provincial Department of Education (Nos. KJ2020A0735, KJ2021ZD0136, and SK2021A0695), the Research Fund of Suzhou University (Nos. 2021fzjj14 and szxy2021zckc22), and the Research Center of Dynamical Systems and Control of Suzhou University (No. 2021XJPT40).

  2. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

References

[1] V. Volterra, Sur la théorie mathématique des phénomès héréditaires, J. Math. Pures Appl. 7 (1928), no. 9, 249–298, https://doi.org/10.1051/978-2-7598-2085-6.c027. Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. J. Levin, The asymptotic behavior of the solution of a Volterra equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963), 435–451, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1963-0152852-8. Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. A. Burton, Stability by fixed point theory for functional differential equations, Dover Publications, Inc. New York, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. L. Zhao and S. L. Yuan, 3/2-stability conditions for a class of Volterra-Levin equations, Nonlinear Anal. 94 (2014), 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2013.08.006. Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Feher, L. Marton, and M. Pituk, Asymptotically ordinary linear Volterra difference equations with infinite delay, Appl. Math. Comput. 386 (2020), 1–11, https://doi.org/0.1016/j.amc.2020.125499. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. N. Raffoul, Qualitative Behaviour of Volterra Difference Equations, Sringer, Cham, 2018. 10.1007/978-3-319-97190-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. Z. Zeng, L. Y. Liu, and W. Y. Xie, Existence and uniqueness of the positive steady solution for a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with a crowding term, Acta Math. Sci. 40B (2020), no. 6, 1961–1980, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-020-0622-7. Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. P. Jiang, Q. M. Zhang, H. Tasawar, and A. Alsaedi, Periodic solution for a stochastic nonautonomous competitive Lotka-Volterra model in a polluted environment, Phys. A 471 (2017), 276–287, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.008. 10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. W. Luo, Fixed points and exponential stability for stochastic Volterra-Levin equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234 (2010), 934–940, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.02.013. Search in Google Scholar

[10] D. L. Zhao, S. L. Yuan, and T. S. Zhang, Improved stability conditions for a class of stochastic Volterra-Levin equations, Appl. Math. Comput. 231 (2014), 39–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.01.022. Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. S. Li and D. Y. Xu, Existence and global attractvity of periodic solution for implusive stochastic Volterra-Levin equations, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 46 (2012), 1–12, https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2012.1.46. Search in Google Scholar

[12] E. A. Jaber, Weak existence and uniqueness for affine stochastic Volterra equations with L1-kernels, Bernoulli 27 (2021), no. 3, 1583–1615, https://doi.org/10.3150/20-BEJ1284. Search in Google Scholar

[13] N. T. Dung, Itô Differential representation of singular stochastic Volterra integral equations, Acta Math. Sci. 40 (2020), no. 6, 1989–2000, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-020-0624-5. Search in Google Scholar

[14] L. F. Guo and Q. X. Zhu, Existence, uniqueness and stability of stochastic Volterra-Levin equation, J. Ningbo Univ. 24 (2011), no. 4, 56–59, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5132.2011.04.012. Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. M. A. Metwali and K. Cichon, On solutions of some delay Volterra integral problems on a half-line, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 26 (2021), no. 4, 661–677, https://doi.org/88/namc.2021.26.24149. Search in Google Scholar

[16] C. Tunc and O. Tunc, A note on the qualitative analysis of Volterra integro-differential equations, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 13 (2019), no. 1, 490–496, https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2019.1596629. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Q. Guo, X. R. Mao, and R. X. Yue, Almost sure exponential stability of stochastic differential delay equtions, SIAM J. Control Optim. 54 (2016), no. 4, 1919–1933, https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1019465. Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. L. Song and Q. X. Zhu, Stability of linear stochatic delay differential equations with infinite Markovian switchings, Internat. J. Robust Nonlinear Contro 28 (2018), no. 1, 825–837, https://doi.org//10.1002/rnc.3905. Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. B. Bao and J. D. Guo, Existence of solutions for fractional stochastic implusive neutral functional differential equations with infinite delay, Adv. Differ. Equ. 66 (2017), no. 1, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1106-5. Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Benhadri and H. Zeghdoudi, Mean square asymptotic stability in nonlinear stochastic neutral Volterra-Levin equations with Poisson jumps and variable delays, Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. 58 (2018), no. 2, 157–176, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7169/facm/1657. 10.7169/facm/1657Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. M. Yang, C. Zhang, H. Jafari, C. Cattani, and Y. Jiao, Picard successive approximation method for solving differential equations arising in fractal heat transfer with local fractional derivative, Abstr. Appl. Anal. 5 (2014), 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/395710. Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. D. Proinov, Unified convergence analysis for Picard iteration in n-dimensional vector space, Calcolo 55 (2018), no. 1, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10092-018-0251-x. Search in Google Scholar

[23] V. Berinde, Picard iteration converges faster than Mann iteration for a class of quasi-contractive operators, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2 (2004), 97–105, https://doi.org/10.1155/S1687182004311058. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-21
Revised: 2022-04-28
Accepted: 2022-05-11
Published Online: 2022-08-29

© 2022 Shoubo Jin, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0056/html
Scroll to top button