Home Mathematics Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
Article Open Access

Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials

  • Taekyun Kim , Dae San Kim EMAIL logo , Hyunseok Lee and Jongkyum Kwon EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 11, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of representing any polynomial in terms of the degenerate Daehee polynomials and more generally of the higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials. We derive explicit formulas with the help of umbral calculus and illustrate our results with some examples.

MSC 2010: 05A19; 05A40; 11B68; 11B83

1 Introduction and preliminaries

The aim of this paper is to derive formulas (see Theorem 3.1) expressing any polynomial in terms of the degenerate Daehee polynomials (see (1.12)) with the help of umbral calculus and to illustrate our results with some examples (see Chapter 6). This can be generalized to the higher-order degenerate Bernoulli polynomials (see (1.13)). Indeed, we deduce formulas (see Theorems 4.1) for representing any polynomial in terms of the higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials again by using umbral calculus. Letting λ 0 , we obtain formulas (see Remarks 3.2 and 4.2) for expressing any polynomial in terms of the Daehee polynomials (see (1.10)) and of the higher-order Daehee polynomials (see (1.11)). These formulas are also illustrated in Chapter 5. The contribution of this paper is the derivation of such formulas that, we think, have many potential applications.

Let p ( x ) C [ x ] , with deg p ( x ) = n . Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k B k ( x ) , where B k ( x ) are the Bernoulli polynomials (see (1.3)). Then, it is known (see [1]) that

(1.1) a k = 1 k ! 0 1 p ( k ) ( x ) d x , for k = 0 , 1 , , n .

The following identity (see [1,2]) is obtained by applying the formula in (1.1) to the polynomial p ( x ) = k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) B k ( x ) B n k ( x ) and after slight modification:

(1.2) k = 1 n 1 1 2 k ( 2 n 2 k ) B 2 k ( x ) B 2 n 2 k ( x ) + 2 2 n 1 B 1 ( x ) B 2 n 1 ( x )

= 1 n k = 1 n 1 2 k 2 n 2 k B 2 k B 2 n 2 k ( x ) + 1 n H 2 n 1 B 2 n ( x ) + 2 2 n 1 B 1 ( x ) B 2 n 1 ,

where n 2 and H n = 1 + 1 2 + + 1 n .

Letting x = 0 and x = 1 2 in (1.2), respectively, give a slight variant of Miki’s identity and the Faber-Pandharipande-Zagier (FPZ) identity. Here, it should be emphasized that the other proofs of Miki’s (see [3,4,5]) and FPZ identities (see [6,7]) are quite involved, while our proofs of Miki’s and FPZ identities follow from the simple formula in (1.1) involving only derivatives and integrals of the given polynomials.

Analogous formulas to (1.1) can be obtained for the representations by Euler, Frobenius-Euler, ordered Bell and Genocchi polynomials. Many interesting identities have been derived by using these formulas (see [1,8,9, 10,11,12, 13,14] and references therein). The list in the references is far from being exhaustive. However, the interested reader can easily find more related papers in the literature. Also, we should mention here that there are other ways of obtaining the same result as the one in (1.2). One of them is to use Fourier series expansion of the function obtained by extending by periodicity 1 of the polynomial function restricted to the interval [ 0 , 1 ) (see [2,15,16]).

The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section 1, we recall some necessary facts that are needed throughout this paper. In Section 2, we go over umbral calculus briefly. In Section 3, we derive formulas expressing any polynomial in terms of the degenerate Daehee polynomials. In Section 4, we derive formulas representing any polynomial in terms of the higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials. In Section 5, we illustrate our results with examples of representation by the Daehee polynomials. In Section 6, we illustrate our results with examples of representation by the degenerate Daehee polynomials. Finally, we conclude our paper in Section 7.

The Bernoulli polynomials B n ( x ) are defined by

(1.3) t e t 1 e x t = n = 0 B n ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , B n = B n ( 0 ) are called the Bernoulli numbers. We observe that B n ( x ) = j = 0 n n j B n j x j , d d x B n ( x ) = n B n 1 ( x ) , and B n ( x + 1 ) B n ( x ) = n x n 1 . The first few terms of B n are given by:

B 0 = 1 , B 1 = 1 2 , B 2 = 1 6 , B 4 = 1 30 , B 6 = 1 42 , B 8 = 1 30 , B 10 = 5 66 , B 12 = 691 2730 , ; B 2 k + 1 = 0 , ( k 1 ) .

More generally, for any nonnegative integer r , the Bernoulli polynomials B n ( r ) ( x ) of order r are given by

(1.4) t e t 1 r e x t = n = 0 B n ( r ) ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , B n ( r ) = B n ( r ) ( 0 ) are called the Bernoulli numbers of order r . We observe that B n ( r ) ( x ) = j = 0 n n j B n j ( r ) x j , d d x B n ( r ) ( x ) = n B n 1 ( r ) ( x ) , B n ( r ) ( x + 1 ) B n ( r ) ( x ) = n B n 1 ( r 1 ) ( x ) .

The Euler polynomials E n ( x ) are defined by

(1.5) 2 e t + 1 e x t = n = 0 E n ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , E n = E n ( 0 ) are called the Euler numbers. We observe that E n ( x ) = j = 0 n n j E n j x j , d d x E n ( x ) = n E n 1 ( x ) , E n ( x + 1 ) + E n ( x ) = 2 x n . The first few terms of E n are given by:

E 0 = 1 , E 1 = 1 2 , E 3 = 1 4 , E 5 = 1 2 , E 7 = 17 8 , E 9 = 31 2 , ; E 2 k = 0 , ( k 1 ) .

The Genocchi polynomials G n ( x ) are defined by

(1.6) 2 t e t + 1 e x t = n = 0 G n ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , G n = G n ( 0 ) are called the Genocchi numbers. We observe that G n ( x ) = j = 0 n n j G n j x j , d d x G n ( x ) = n G n 1 ( x ) , G n ( x + 1 ) + G n ( x ) = 2 n x n 1 , and deg G n ( x ) = n 1 , for n 1 . The first few terms of G n are given by:

G 0 = 0 , G 1 = 1 , G 2 = 1 , G 4 = 1 , G 6 = 3 , G 8 = 17 , G 10 = 155 G 12 = 2073 , ; G 2 k + 1 = 0 , ( k 1 ) .

For any nonzero real number λ , the degenerate exponentials are given by

(1.7) e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! , e λ ( t ) = e λ 1 ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ = n = 0 ( 1 ) n , λ t n n ! .

Here, we recall that the λ -falling factorials are given by

(1.8) ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , ( n 1 ) .

Especially, ( x ) n = ( x ) n , 1 are called the falling factorials and hence given by

(1.9) ( x ) 0 = 1 , ( x ) n = x ( x 1 ) ( x n + 1 ) , ( n 1 ) .

The compositional inverse of e λ ( t ) is called the degenerate logarithm and given by

log λ ( t ) = 1 λ ( t λ 1 ) ,

which satisfies e λ ( log λ ( t ) ) = log λ ( e λ ( t ) ) = t .

Note here that lim λ 0 e λ x ( t ) = e x t , lim λ 0 log λ ( t ) = log ( t ) .

Recall that the Daehee polynomials D n ( x ) are given by

(1.10) log ( 1 + t ) t ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 D n ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , D n = D n ( 0 ) are the Daehee numbers.

More generally, for any nonnegative integer r , the Daehee polynomials D n ( r ) ( x ) of order r are given by

(1.11) log ( 1 + t ) t r ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 D n ( r ) ( x ) t n n ! .

When x = 0 , D n ( r ) = D n ( r ) ( 0 ) are the Daehee numbers of order r .

The degenerate Daehee polynomials D n , λ ( x ) are defined by

(1.12) log λ ( 1 + t ) t ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 D n , λ ( x ) t n n ! ,

which are degenerate versions of the Daehee polynomials in (1.10). For x = 0 , D n , λ = D n , λ ( 0 ) are called the degenerate Daehee numbers and introduced in [7] (see also [14]).

More generally, for any nonnegative integer r , the degenerate Daehee polynomials D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) of order r are defined by

(1.13) log λ ( 1 + t ) t r ( 1 + t ) x = n = 0 D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) t n n ! ,

which are degenerate versions of the Daehe polynomials of order r in (1.11). We remark that D n , λ ( x ) D n ( x ) , and D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) D n ( r ) ( x ) , as λ tends to 0.

We recall some notations and facts about forward differences. Let f be any complex-valued function of the real variable x . Then, for any real number a , the forward difference Δ a is given by

(1.14) Δ a f ( x ) = f ( x + a ) f ( x ) .

If a = 1 , then we let

(1.15) Δ f ( x ) = Δ 1 f ( x ) = f ( x + 1 ) f ( x ) .

In general, the n th oder forward differences are given by

(1.16) Δ a n f ( x ) = i = 0 n n i ( 1 ) n i f ( x + i a ) .

For a = 1 , we have

(1.17) Δ n f ( x ) = i = 0 n n i ( 1 ) n i f ( x + i ) .

Finally, we recall that the Stirling numbers of the second kind S 2 ( n , k ) can be given by means of

(1.18) 1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k = n = k S 2 ( n , k ) t n n ! .

2 Review of umbral calculus

Here, we will briefly go over very basic facts about umbral calculus. For more details on this, we recommend the reader to refer to [3, 20, 22]. Let C be the field of complex numbers. Then, denotes the algebra of formal power series in t over C , given by

= f ( t ) = k = 0 a k t k k ! a k C ,

and P = C [ x ] indicates the algebra of polynomials in x with coefficients in C .

Let P be the vector space of all linear functionals on P . If L p ( x ) denotes the action of the linear functional L on the polynomial p ( x ) , then the vector space operations on P are defined by

L + M p ( x ) = L p ( x ) + M p ( x ) , c L p ( x ) = c L p ( x ) ,

where c is a complex number.

For f ( t ) with f ( t ) = k = 0 a k t k k ! , we define the linear functional on P by

(2.1) f ( t ) x k = a k .

From (2.1), we note that

t k x n = n ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) ,

where δ n , k is the Kronecker’s symbol.

Some remarkable linear functionals are as follows:

(2.2) e y t p ( x ) = p ( y ) , e y t 1 p ( x ) = p ( y ) p ( 0 ) , e y t 1 t p ( x ) = 0 y p ( u ) d u .

Let

(2.3) f L ( t ) = k = 0 L x k t k k ! .

Then, by (2.1) and (2.3), we obtain

f L ( t ) x n = L x n .

That is, f L ( t ) = L . In addition, the map L f L ( t ) is a vector space isomorphism from P onto .

Henceforth, denotes both the algebra of formal power series in t and the vector space of all linear functionals on P . is called the umbral algebra and the umbral calculus is the study of umbral algebra. For each nonnegative integer k , the differential operator t k on P is defined by

(2.4) t k x n = ( n ) k x n k , if k n , 0 , if k > n .

Extending (2.4) linearly, any power series

f ( t ) = k = 0 a k k ! t k

gives the differential operator on P defined by

(2.5) f ( t ) x n = k = 0 n n k a k x n k , ( n 0 ) .

It should be observed that, for any formal power series f ( t ) and any polynomial p ( x ) , we have

(2.6) f ( t ) p ( x ) = 1 f ( t ) p ( x ) = f ( t ) p ( x ) x = 0 .

Here, we note that an element f ( t ) of is a formal power series, a linear functional, and a differential operator. Some notable differential operators are as follows:

(2.7) e y t p ( x ) = p ( x + y ) , ( e y t 1 ) p ( x ) = p ( x + y ) p ( x ) = Δ y p ( x ) , e y t 1 t p ( x ) = x x + y p ( u ) d u .

The order o ( f ( t ) ) of the power series f ( t ) ( 0 ) is the smallest integer for which a k does not vanish. If o ( f ( t ) ) = 0 , then f ( t ) is called an invertible series. If o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 , then f ( t ) is called a delta series.

For f ( t ) , g ( t ) with o ( f ( t ) ) = 1 and o ( g ( t ) ) = 0 , there exists a unique sequence s n ( x ) (deg s n ( x ) = n ) of polynomials such that

(2.8) g ( t ) f ( t ) k s n ( x ) = n ! δ n , k , ( n , k 0 ) .

The sequence s n ( x ) is said to be the Sheffer sequence for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , which is denoted by s n ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) . We observe from (2.8) that

(2.9) s n ( x ) = 1 g ( t ) p n ( x ) ,

where p n ( x ) = g ( t ) s n ( x ) ( 1 , f ( t ) ) .

In particular, if s n ( x ) ( g ( t ) , t ) , then p n ( x ) = x n , and hence,

(2.10) s n ( x ) = 1 g ( t ) x n .

It is well known that s n ( x ) ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) if and only if

(2.11) 1 g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) e x f ¯ ( t ) = k = 0 s k ( x ) k ! t k ,

for all x C , where f ¯ ( t ) is the compositional inverse of f ( t ) such that f ¯ ( f ( t ) ) = f ( f ¯ ( t ) ) = t .

Equations (2.12)–(2.14) are equivalent to the fact that s n ( x ) is Sheffer for ( g ( t ) , f ( t ) ) , for some invertible g ( t ) :

(2.12) f ( t ) s n ( x ) = n s n 1 ( x ) , ( n 0 ) ,

(2.13) s n ( x + y ) = j = 0 n n j s j ( x ) p n j ( y ) ,

with p n ( x ) = g ( t ) s n ( x ) ,

(2.14) s n ( x ) = j = 0 n 1 j ! g ( f ¯ ( t ) ) 1 f ¯ ( t ) j x n x j .

Let p n ( x ) , q n ( x ) = k = 0 n q n , k x k be sequences of polynomials. Then, the umbral composition of q n ( x ) with p n ( x ) is defined to be the sequence

(2.15) q n ( p ( x ) ) = k = 0 n q n , k p k ( x ) .

3 Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials

Our interest here is to derive formulas expressing any polynomial in terms of the degenerate Daehee polynomials.

From (1.7), (1.9), and (1.11), we first observe that

(3.1) D n , λ ( x ) g ( t ) = λ f ( t ) e λ t 1 = λ ( e t 1 ) e λ t 1 , f ( t ) = e t 1 ,

(3.2) ( x ) n ( 1 , f ( t ) = e t 1 ) .

From (1.15), (2.7), (2.8), (2.12), (3.1), and (3.2), we note that

(3.3) f ( t ) D n , λ ( x ) = n D n 1 , λ ( x ) = ( e t 1 ) D n , λ ( x ) = Δ D n , λ ( x ) ,

(3.4) f ( t ) ( x ) n = n ( x ) n 1 ,

(3.5) g ( t ) D n , λ ( x ) = ( x ) n .

Now, we assume that p ( x ) C [ x ] has degree n , and write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( x ) . Then, from (3.5), we have

(3.6) g ( t ) p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k g ( t ) D k , λ ( x ) = k = 0 n a k ( x ) k .

For k 0 , from (3.4) and (3.6), we obtain

(3.7) f ( t ) k g ( t ) p ( x ) = f ( t ) k l = 0 n a l ( x ) l , λ = l = k n l ( l 1 ) ( l k + 1 ) a l ( x ) l k , λ .

Letting x = 0 in (3.7), we finally obtain

(3.8) a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! g ( t ) f ( t ) k p ( x ) , ( k 0 ) .

Now, we want to find more explicit expressions for (3.8). As λ t e λ t 1 e x t = n = 0 λ n B n x λ t n n ! , we see from (2.10) that λ n B n x λ = λ t e λ t 1 x n . To proceed further, we let p ( x ) = i = 0 n b i x i .

From (2.7), (2.15), and (3.1), noting that g ( t ) = e t 1 t λ t e λ t 1 , we have

(3.9) g ( t ) p ( x ) = e t 1 t λ t e λ t 1 p ( x ) = e t 1 t i = 0 n b i λ t e λ t 1 x i = e t 1 t i = 0 n b i λ i B i x λ = e t 1 t p λ B x λ = x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u ,

where p λ B x λ denotes the umbral composition of p ( x ) with λ i B i x λ , that is, it is given by p λ B x λ = i = 0 n b i λ i B i x λ .

We note from (3.5) and (3.9), in passing, that the following holds:

( x ) n = g ( t ) D n , λ ( x ) = x x + 1 D n , λ λ B u λ d u .

From (2.7) and (3.9), we deduce

(3.10) a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! Δ k x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 .

By making use of (1.17) and (3.10), an alternative expression of (3.10) is given by

(3.11) a k = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i i i + 1 p λ B u λ d u .

We obtain yet another expression from (1.18), (3.8), and (3.9), which is given by

(3.12) a k = 1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 = l = k S 2 ( l , k ) t l l ! x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 ,

where we need to note that x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u has degree n .

Finally, from (3.10)–(3.12), and (3.8), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1

Let p ( x ) C [ x ] , with deg p ( x ) = n . Then, we have p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( x ) , where

a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! Δ k x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i i i + 1 p λ B u λ d u = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l x x + 1 p λ B u λ d u x = 0 , for k = 0 , 1 , , n ,

where g ( t ) = λ ( e t 1 ) e λ t 1 , f ( t ) = e t 1 , and p λ B x λ denotes the umbral composition of p ( x ) with λ i B i x λ .

Remark 3.2

Let p ( x ) C [ x ] , with deg p ( x ) = n . Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( x ) . As λ tends to 0, g ( t ) e t 1 t , and p λ B x λ p ( x ) . Thus, we obtain the following result.

a k = 1 k ! Δ k x x + 1 p ( u ) d u x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i i i + 1 p ( u ) d u = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l x x + 1 p ( u ) d u x = 0 , for k = 0 , 1 , , n .

4 Representations by higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials

Our interest here is to derive formulas expressing any polynomial in terms of the higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials.

With g ( t ) = λ f ( t ) e λ t 1 = λ ( e t 1 ) e λ t 1 , f ( t ) = e t 1 , from (1.11), we note that

(4.1) D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) ( g ( t ) r , f ( t ) ) ,

(4.2) ( x ) n ( 1 , f ( t ) ) .

From (1.15), (2.7), (2.8), (2.12), (4.1), and (4.2), we note that

(4.3) f ( t ) D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) = n D n 1 , λ ( r ) ( x ) = ( e t 1 ) D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) = Δ D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) ,

(4.4) f ( t ) ( x ) n = n ( x ) n 1 ,

(4.5) g ( t ) r D n , λ ( r ) ( x ) = ( x ) n .

Now, we assume that p ( x ) C [ x ] has degree n , and write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) . Then, from (4.5), we have

(4.6) g ( t ) r p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k g ( t ) r D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) = k = 0 n a k ( x ) k .

For k 0 , from (4.4), we obtain

(4.7) f ( t ) k g ( t ) r p ( x ) = f ( t ) k l = 0 n a l ( x ) l = l = k n l ( l 1 ) ( l k + 1 ) a l ( x ) l k .

Letting x = 0 in (4.7), we finally obtain

(4.8) a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) r p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! g ( t ) r f ( t ) k p ( x ) , ( k 0 ) .

This also follows from the observation g ( t ) r f ( t ) k D l , λ ( r ) ( x ) = l ! δ l , k .

Now, we want to find more explicit expressions for (4.8). As λ t e λ t 1 r e x t = n = 0 λ n B n ( r ) x λ t n n ! , we see from (2.10) that λ n B n ( r ) x λ = λ t e λ t 1 r x n . To proceed further, we let p ( x ) = i = 0 n b i x i .

From (2.7), (2.15), and (4.1), noting that g ( t ) = e t 1 t λ t e λ t 1 , we have

(4.9) g ( t ) r p ( x ) = e t 1 t r λ t e λ t 1 r p ( x ) = e t 1 t r i = 0 n b i λ t e λ t 1 r x i = e t 1 t r i = 0 n b i λ i B i ( r ) x λ = e t 1 t r p λ B ( r ) x λ = I r p λ B ( r ) x λ ,

where p λ B ( r ) x λ denotes the umbral composition of p ( x ) with λ i B i ( r ) x λ , that is, it is given by p λ B ( r ) x λ = i = 0 n b i λ i B i ( r ) x λ , and I denotes the linear integral operator given by q ( x ) x x + 1 q ( x ) d x .

We note from (4.5) and (4.9), in passing, that the following holds:

( x ) n = g ( t ) r D n , λ ( x ) = I r D n , λ λ B ( r ) x λ .

From (2.7) and (4.9), we deduce

(4.10) a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) r p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! Δ k I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0 .

By making use of (1.17) and (4.10), an alternative expression of (3.10) is given by

(4.11) a k = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = i .

We obtain yet another expression from (1.18), (4.8), and (4.9), which is given by

(4.12) a k = 1 k ! ( e t 1 ) k I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0

= l = k S 2 ( l , k ) t l l ! I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0 = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0 ,

where we need to observe that I r p λ B ( r ) x λ has degree n .

Finally, from (4.10)–(4.12) and (4.8), we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 4.1

Let p ( x ) C [ x ] , with deg p ( x ) = n . Then, we have p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) , where

a k = 1 k ! f ( t ) k g ( t ) r p ( x ) x = 0 = 1 k ! Δ k I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = i = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = 0 , for k = 0 , 1 , , n ,

where g ( t ) = λ ( e t 1 ) e λ t 1 , f ( t ) = e t 1 , p λ B ( r ) x λ indicates the umbral composition of p ( x ) with λ i B i ( r ) x λ , and I denotes the linear integral operator given by q ( x ) x x + 1 q ( x ) d x .

We observe that I r p λ B ( r ) x λ x = i = i i + 1 I r 1 p λ B ( r ) x λ d x .

Remark 4.2

Let p ( x ) C [ x ] , with deg p ( x ) = n . Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( r ) ( x ) . As λ tends to 0, g ( t ) e t 1 t , and p λ B ( r ) x λ p ( x ) . Thus, we obtain the following result.

a k = 1 k ! Δ k ( I r p ( x ) ) x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i I r p ( x ) x = i = l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! d d x l ( I r p ( x ) ) x = 0 , for k = 0 , 1 , , n .

We note that I r p ( x ) x = i = i i + 1 I r 1 p ( x ) d x .

5 Examples on representation by Daehee polynomials

Here, we illustrate our formulas in Remarks 3.2 and 4.2 with some examples.

(a) Let p ( x ) = B n ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( x ) . Then, as B n ( x + 1 ) B n ( x ) = n x n 1 , x x + 1 B n ( u ) d u = x n , from Remark 3.2, we have

(5.1) a k = 1 k ! Δ k x n x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k k i ( 1 ) k i i n = S 2 ( n , k ) ,

which are well known.

Thus, we obtain the following identity:

B n ( x ) = k = 0 n S 2 ( n , k ) D k ( x ) .

Next, we let p ( x ) = B n ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( r ) ( x ) . Then, we first observe that

(5.2) I r B n ( x ) = 1 ( n + r ) r i = 0 r r i ( 1 ) r i B n + r ( x + i ) .

Now, by making use of Remark 4.2, we obtain

(5.3) a k = 1 k ! ( n + r ) r i = 0 r r i ( 1 ) r i Δ k B n + r ( x + i ) x = 0 = 1 ( n + r ) r l = k n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i r i n + r l S 2 ( l , k ) B n + r l ( i ) .

Thus, we have the following:

B n ( x ) = 1 ( n + r ) r k = 0 n 1 k ! i = 0 r r i ( 1 ) r i Δ k B n + r ( x + i ) x = 0 D k ( r ) ( x ) = 1 ( n + r ) r k = 0 n l = k n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i r i n + r l S 2 ( l , k ) B n + r l ( i ) D k ( r ) ( x ) .

(b) Here, we consider p ( x ) = k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) B k ( x ) B n k ( x ) , ( n 2 ) . For this, we first recall from [12] that

(5.4) p ( x ) = 2 n m = 0 n 2 1 n m n m B n m B m ( x ) + 2 n H n 1 B n ( x ) ,

where H n = 1 + 1 2 + + 1 n is the harmonic number and a slight modification of (5.4) gives the identity in (1.2). Let p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( x ) . Then, we have

(5.5) a k = 2 n m = 0 n 2 1 n m n m B n m l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) m l δ m , l + 2 n H n 1 l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) n l δ n , l = 2 n m = k n 2 1 n m n m B n m S 2 ( m , k ) + 2 n H n 1 S 2 ( n , k ) ,

where we understand that the sum in (5.5) is zero for k = n 1 or n . Thus, we obtain the following identity:

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) B k ( x ) B n k ( x ) = 2 n k = 0 n m = k n 2 1 n m n m B n m S 2 ( m , k ) + H n 1 S 2 ( n , k ) D k ( x ) .

(c) In [12], it is shown that the following identity holds for n 2 :

(5.6) k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) E k ( x ) E n k ( x ) = 4 n m = 0 n n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 B m ( x ) ,

where H n = 1 + 1 2 + + 1 n is the harmonic number.

Write k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) E k ( x ) E n k ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( x ) .

By proceeding similarly to (b), we see that

(5.7) a k = 4 n m = 0 n n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) m l δ m , l = 4 n m = k n n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 S 2 ( m , k ) .

Thus, (5.7) implies the next identity:

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) E k ( x ) E n k ( x ) = 4 n k = 0 n m = k n n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 S 2 ( m , k ) D k ( x ) .

(d) In [16], it is proved that the following identity is valid for n 2 :

(5.8) k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) G k ( x ) G n k ( x ) = 4 n m = 0 n 2 n m G n m n m B m ( x ) .

Again, by proceeding analogously to (b), we can show that

(5.9) a k = 4 n l = k n 2 S 2 ( l , k ) m l m = 0 n 2 n m G n m n m δ m , l = 4 n m = k n 2 n m S 2 ( m , k ) G n m n m .

Therefore, we obtain the following identity:

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) G k ( x ) G n k ( x ) = 4 n k = 0 n 2 m = k n 2 n m S 2 ( m , k ) G n m n m D k ( x ) .

(e) Nielsen [2,19] also represented products of two Euler polynomials in terms of Bernoulli polynomials as follows:

(5.10) E m ( x ) E n ( x ) = 2 r = 1 m m r E r B m + n r + 1 ( x ) m + n r + 1 2 s = 1 n n s E s B m + n s + 1 ( x ) m + n s + 1 + 2 ( 1 ) n + 1 m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! E m + n + 1 .

In the same way as (b), we can show that

(5.11) a k = 2 ( 1 ) n + 1 m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! E m + n + 1 δ k , 0 2 r = 1 m m r E r m + n r + 1 S 2 ( m + n r + 1 , k ) 2 s = 1 n n s E s m + n s + 1 S 2 ( m + n s + 1 , k ) .

Thus, we arrive at the next identity:

E m ( x ) E n ( x ) = 2 ( 1 ) n + 1 m ! n ! ( m + n + 1 ) ! E m + n + 1 2 k = 1 m + n r = 1 m m r E r m + n r + 1 S 2 ( m + n r + 1 , k ) D k ( x ) 2 k = 1 m + n s = 1 n n s E s m + n s + 1 S 2 ( m + n s + 1 , k ) D k ( x ) .

6 Examples on representation by degenerate Daehee polynomials

Here, we illustrate our formulas in Theorems 3.1 and 4.1.

(a) Let p ( x ) = B n ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( x ) . Then, as B n ( x ) = j = 0 n n j B n j x j , we have

(6.1) x x + 1 B n λ B u λ d u = j = 0 n n j B n j λ j + 1 1 j + 1 B j + 1 ( x + 1 λ ) B j + 1 x λ .

Thus, for 1 l n ,

(6.2) d d x l x x + 1 B n λ B u λ d u = j = 0 n n j B n j λ j d d x l 1 B j x + 1 λ B j x λ = j = l n n j B n j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 x + 1 λ B j l + 1 x λ .

Now, from Theorem 3.1, (6.1), and (6.2), we obtain

(6.3) a k = 1 k ! j = 0 n n j λ j + 1 j + 1 B n j Δ k B j + 1 x + 1 λ B j + 1 x λ x = 0 = 1 k ! i = 0 k j = 0 n ( 1 ) k i k i n j λ j + 1 j + 1 B n j B j + 1 i + 1 λ B j + 1 i λ = l = k n j = l n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B n j B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 ,

where we understand that ( j ) 1 = 1 j + 1 .

Hence, from (6.3), we obtain the following identity:

B n ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 k ! j = 0 n n j λ j + 1 j + 1 B n j Δ k B j + 1 x + 1 λ B j + 1 x λ x = 0 D k , λ ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 k ! i = 0 n j = 0 n ( 1 ) k i k i n j λ j + 1 j + 1 B n j B j + 1 i + 1 λ B j + 1 i λ D k , λ ( x ) = k = 0 n l = k n j = l n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B n j B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 D k , λ ( x ) .

Next, we let p ( x ) = B n ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) . Then, we first observe that

(6.4) I r B n λ B ( r ) x λ = I r j = 0 n n j B n j λ j B j ( r ) x λ = j = 0 n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i n j r i λ j + r ( j + r ) r B n j B j + r ( r ) x + i λ .

So, for l with j + r l , we obtain

(6.5) d d x l I r B n λ B ( r ) x λ = j = 0 n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i n j r i λ j + r ( j + r ) r B n j d d x l B j + r ( r ) x + i λ = j = 0 n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i n j r i λ j + r l ( j + r ) r B n j ( j + r ) l B j + r l ( r ) x + i λ .

Thus, from Theorem 4.1, (6.4), and (6.5), we have

B n ( x ) = k = 0 n 1 k ! j = 0 n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i n j r i λ j + r ( j + r ) r B n j Δ k B j + r ( r ) x + i λ x = 0 D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) = k = 0 n l = k n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! j = max { 0 , l r } n i = 0 r ( 1 ) r i n j r i λ j + r l ( j + r ) r B n j ( j + r ) l B j + r l ( r ) i λ D k , λ ( r ) ( x ) .

(b) Let p ( x ) = k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) B k ( x ) B n k ( x ) , for n 2 . As we stated earlier, it was shown in [12] that

(6.6) p ( x ) = 2 n m = 0 n 2 1 n m n m B n m B m ( x ) + 2 n H n 1 B n ( x ) ,

where H n = 1 + 1 2 + + 1 n is the Harmonic number.

Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n a k D k ( x ) . Then, from Theorem 4.1 and (6.6), we have

(6.7) a k = 2 n l = k n 2 m = l n 2 j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! 1 n m n m m j B n m B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 + 2 n H n 1 l = k n j = l n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n j B n j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 .

Thus, from (6.7), we obtain

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) B k ( x ) B n k ( x ) = 2 n k = 0 n l = k n 2 m = l n 2 j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! 1 n m n m m j B n m B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 + H n 1 l = k n j = l n S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n j B n j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 D k , λ ( x ) ,

where we understand that the triple sum in the parentheses is zero for k = n 1 or k = n , and ( j ) 1 = 1 j + 1 .

(c) Let p ( x ) = k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) E k ( x ) E n k ( x ) , for n 2 . Then, as we saw earlier, it was proved in [12] that

(6.8) p ( x ) = 4 n m = 0 n n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 B m ( x ) .

Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n 2 a k D k , λ ( x ) . Then, from Theorem 4.1 and (6.8), we can show that

(6.9) a k = 4 n l = k n m = l n j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 m j B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 ,

where we understand that ( j ) 1 = 1 j + 1 .

Hence, from (6.9), we have

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) E k ( x ) E n k ( x ) = 4 n k = 0 n l = k n m = l n j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n m ( H n 1 H n m ) n m + 1 E n m + 1 m j B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 D k , λ ( x ) .

(d) Here, we consider p ( x ) = k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) G k ( x ) G n k ( x ) , for n 2 . As we mentioned earlier, it was shown in [16] that

(6.10) p ( x ) = 4 n m = 0 n 2 n m G n m n m B m ( x ) .

Write p ( x ) = k = 0 n 2 a k D k , λ ( x ) . Then, from Theorem 4.1 and (6.10), we obtain that

(6.11) a k = 4 n l = k n 2 m = l n 2 j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n m G n m n m m j B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 ,

where we understand that ( j ) 1 = 1 j + 1 .

Thus, from (6.11), we obtain

k = 1 n 1 1 k ( n k ) G k ( x ) G n k ( x ) = 4 n k = 0 n 2 l = k n 2 m = l n 2 j = l m S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! n m G n m n m m j B m j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 D k , λ ( x ) .

(e) As we mentioned earlier, it was shown (see [17,18]) that, for positive integers m and n , with m + n 2 , we have

(6.12) B m ( x ) B n ( x ) = r m 2 r n + n 2 r m B 2 r B m + n 2 r ( x ) m + n 2 r + ( 1 ) m + 1 B m + n m + n m .

Then, from Theorem 4.1 and (6.12), we can show that

(6.13) a k = ( 1 ) m + 1 B m + n m + n m δ k , 0 + r l = k m + n j = l m + n 2 r S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! m 2 r n + n 2 r m × B 2 r m + n 2 r m + n 2 r j B m + n 2 r j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 .

Thus, form (6.13), we obtain

B m ( x ) B n ( x ) = ( 1 ) m + 1 B m + n m + n m + k = 0 m + n r l = k m + n 2 r j = l m + n 2 r S 2 ( l , k ) 1 l ! m 2 r n + n 2 r m × B 2 r m + n 2 r m + n 2 r j B m + n 2 r j λ j l + 1 ( j ) l 1 B j l + 1 1 λ B j l + 1 D k , λ ( x ) ,

where ( j ) 1 = 1 j + 1 .

7 Conclusion

In this paper, we were interested in representing any polynomial in terms of the degenerate Daehee polynomials and of the higher-order degenerate Daehee polynomials. We were able to derive formulas for such representations with the help of umbral calculus. We showed that, by letting λ tends to zero, they give formulas for representations by the Daehee polynomials and by the higher-order Daehee polynomials. Further, we illustrated the formulas with some examples.

As we mentioned in Section 1, both Faber-Pandharipande-Zagier (FPZ) identity and a variant of Miki’s identity follow from the one identity (see (1.2)) that can be derived from the formula (see (1.1)) involving only derivatives and integrals of the given polynomial, while all the other proofs are quite involved. We recall here that the FPZ identity was a conjectural relation between Hodge integrals in Gromov-Witten’s theory. It should be stressed that our method is very useful and powerful, even though it is elementary.

It is one of our future research projects to continue to find formulas representing polynomials in terms of some specific special polynomials and to apply those in discovering some interesting identities.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jangjeon Institute for Mathematical Science for the support of this research.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (No. 2020R1F1A1A01071564).

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1] D. S. Kim, T. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and Y.-H. Kim, Some identities for the product of two Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, Adv. Differential Equations 2012 (2012), 95. 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-95Search in Google Scholar

[2] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, G.-W. Jang, and J. Kwon, Fourier series of sums of products of Genocchi functions and their applications, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10 (2017), 1683–1694. 10.22436/jnsa.010.04.31Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. M. Gessel, On Mikias identities for Bernoulli numbers, J. Number Theory 110 (2005), no. 1, 75–82. 10.1016/j.jnt.2003.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Miki, A relation between Bernoulli numbers, J. Number Theory 10 (1978), no. 3, 297–302. 10.1016/0022-314X(78)90026-4Search in Google Scholar

[5] K. Shiratani and S. Yokoyama, An application of p-adic convolutions, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A 36 (1982), no. 1, 73–83. 10.2206/kyushumfs.36.73Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, Bernoulli number identities from quantum field theory and topological string theory, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 7 (2013), no. 2, 225–249. 10.4310/CNTP.2013.v7.n2.a1Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. Faber and R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and Gromov-Witten theory, Invent. Math. 139 (2000), no. 1, 173–199. 10.1007/s002229900028Search in Google Scholar

[8] L.-C. Jang, W. Kim, H.-I. Kwon, and T. Kim, On degenerate Daehee polynomials and numbers of the third kind, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 364 (2020), 112343. 10.1016/j.cam.2019.112343Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, Bernoulli basis and the product of several Bernoulli polynomials, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2012 (2012), 463659. 10.1155/2012/463659Search in Google Scholar

[10] D. S. Kim and T. Kim, A note on higher-order Bernoulli polynomials, J. Inequal. Appl. 2013 (2013), 111. 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-111Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Kim and D. S. Kim, On λ-Bell polynomials associated with umbral calculus, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 24 (2017), no. 1, 69–78. 10.1134/S1061920817010058Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. S. Kim, T. Kim, D. V. Dolgy, and S.-H. Rim, Higher-order Bernoulli, Euler and Hermite polynomials, Adv. Differential Equations 2013 (2013), 103. 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-103Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. S. Kim, T. Kim, and T. Mansour, Euler basis and the product of several Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 24 (2014), no. 4, 535–547. Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, H. Y. Kim, and J. Kwon, Some results on degenerate Daehee and Bernoulli numbers and polynomials, Adv. Differential Equations 2020 (2020), 311. 10.1186/s13662-020-02778-8Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, G.-W. Jang, and J. Kwon, Series of sums of products of higher-order Bernoulli functions, J. Inequal. Appl. 2017 (2017), 221. 10.1186/s13660-017-1494-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] T. Kim, D. S. Kim, G.-W. Jang, and J. Kwon, Fourier series of sums of products of higher-order Euler functions, J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 27 (2019), no. 2, 345–360. Search in Google Scholar

[17] N. Nielsen, Traité élémentaire des nombres de Bernoulli, Paris, 1923. Search in Google Scholar

[18] L. Carlitz, The product of two Eulerian polynomials, Math. Mag. 36 (1963), no. 1, 37–41. 10.1080/0025570X.1963.11975384Search in Google Scholar

[19] L. Carlitz, Degenerate Stirling, Bernoulli and Eulerian numbers, Util. Math. 15 (1979), 51–88. Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. Dere and Y. Simsek, Applications of umbral algebra to some special polynomials, Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 22 (2012), no. 3, 433–438. Search in Google Scholar

[21] S. Roman, The umbral calculus, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 111, Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], New York, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Y. Simsek, Special numbers and polynomials including their generating functions in umbral analysis methods, Axioms 7 (2018), no. 2, 22. 10.3390/axioms7020022Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-23
Accepted: 2022-01-11
Published Online: 2022-04-11

© 2022 Taekyun Kim et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0013/html
Scroll to top button