Startseite Mathematik A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
Artikel Open Access

A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN

  • Weichun Bu , Tianqing An und Jiabin Zuo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. April 2022

Abstract

In this article, we study a class of Kirchhoff-type equation driven by the variable s(x, ⋅)-order fractional p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-Laplacian. With the help of three different critical point theories, we obtain the existence and multiplicity of solutions in an appropriate space of functions. The main difficulties and innovations are the Kirchhoff functions with double Laplace operators in the whole space ℝN. Moreover, the approach is variational, but we do not impose any Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition for the nonlinear term.

MSC 2010: 35J60; 35J67; 35A15; 47F10

1 Introduction

In this article, we study the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the following Kirchhoff-type equation:

(1.1) i = 1 2 M i R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) d x d y ( Δ ) p i ( x , ) s ( x , ) η + i = 1 2 η p ¯ i ( x ) 2 η = λ f ( x , η ) ,

for all x R N . M i ( i = 1 , 2 ) are continuous Kirchhoff-type functions in R N , λ is a real positive parameter, and the nonlinearity f is a Carathéodory function, whose hypothesis will be introduced later. ( Δ ) p i ( x , ) s ( x , ) are called fractional p i ( x , ) -Laplacian with variable s ( x , ) -order, given p i ( x , ) : R 2 N ( 1 , + ) ( i = 1 , 2 ) and s ( x , ) : R 2 N ( 0 , 1 ) with N > s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) for all ( x , y ) R N × R N , which can be defined as follows:

(1.2) ( Δ ) p i ( x , ) s ( x , ) η ( x ) P.V. R N η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) 2 ( η ( x ) η ( y ) ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) d y ,

for all x in R N , η C 0 ( R N ) and P.V. stands for the Cauchy principal value. Especially, when s ( x , ) s and p i ( x , ) p i , ( Δ ) p i ( x , ) s ( x , ) in (1.1) reduces to the fractional p -Laplace operator ( Δ ) p s , e.g., see [1] involving the fractional p -Laplacian problem without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz (A-R) condition and see [2] on the fractional p & q -Laplacian problem with critical Sobolev-hardy exponents.

Throughout this article, we assume that p i ( x , y ) ( i = 1 , 2 ) and s ( x , y ) are continuous functions and the hypotheses we impose on p i ( x , y ) and s ( x , y ) are as follows:

  1. p i ( x , y ) are symmetric functions, i.e., p i ( x , y ) = p i ( y , x ) , 1 < p i inf ( x , y ) R N × R N p i ( x , y ) p i + sup ( x , y ) R N × R N p i ( x , y ) < + . We denote p max ( x , y ) = max { p 1 ( x , y ) , p 2 ( x , y ) } , p min ( x , y ) = min { p 1 ( x , y ) , p 2 ( x , y ) } , and p i ¯ ( x ) = p i ( x , x ) .

  2. s ( x , y ) is a symmetric function, i.e., s ( x , y ) = s ( y , x ) , 0 < s inf ( x , y ) R N × R N s ( x , y ) s + sup ( x , y ) R N × R N s ( x , y ) < 1 , and s ¯ ( x ) = s ( x , x ) .

Kirchhoff in [3] introduced the following model, which came to be known as the Kirchhof-type equation:

(1.3) ρ 2 η ( x ) t 2 p 0 h + E 2 L 0 L η ( x ) t 2 d x 2 η ( x ) x 2 = 0 ,

where parameters ρ , p 0 , h , E , and L , with some specific physical meaning, are real positive constants. Particularly, Equation (1.3) is nonlocal fractional problem that contains a nonlocal coefficient p 0 h + E 2 L 0 L η ( x ) t 2 d x and can be used to model some physical systems in concrete real-world application, such as anomalous diffusion, ultra-relativistic of quantum mechanics, and water waves. Since then the literature on Kirchhof-type equations and Kirchhoff-type systems are quite large, and here we just list a few, e.g., see [4,5, 6,7] for further details.

We assume that M i : R 0 + R + ( i = 1 , 2 ) are continuous functions, which the following conditions are satisfied:

  1. There are some positive constants ϑ i [ 1 , p s ( x , ) / p max + ) ( i = 1 , 2 ) and ϑ = max { ϑ 1 , ϑ 2 } such that

    t M i ( t ) ϑ i M ˜ i ( t ) , for any t R 0 + , where M ˜ i ( t ) = 0 t M i ( τ ) d τ .

  2. There are some positive constants m i = m i ( τ ) > 0 ( i = 1 , 2 ) for all τ > 0 such that

    M i ( t ) m i , for any t > τ .

  3. M i ( t ) is a decreasing function.

The evolution of the Laplace operator has been progressively deepened and has taken many forms so far. Many mathematical scholars have been devoted to the integer Laplace operators, fractional Laplace operators, and variable-order fractional Laplace operators. For some important results of these operators, we recommend the readers to refer to previous studies in [8,9,10, 11,12,13, 14,15,16, 17,18,19] and literature cited therein.

In the framework of variable exponents involving fractional p ( x , ) -Laplace operator with variable s ( x , ) -order, there have been some papers on this topic involving both with and without a Kirchhoff coefficient, for instance, see [20,21,22, 23,24,25]. Especially, an embedding theorem for variable exponential Sobolev spaces was first proved in [26]. In addition, with the help of variational methods, Zuo et al. in [27] studied a class of fractional p ( x , ) -Kirchhoff-type problem with the presence of a single Laplace operator in the whole space R N .

Problem (1.1) comes from the following system:

(1.4) η t = div [ D η η ] + c ( x , η ) ,

where D η = η p 2 + η q 2 . System (1.4) had a wide range of applications in the field of physics and related sciences and had been paid much attention, for example, see [28,29,30, 31,32].

Since both p & q -Laplacian that is not homogeneous are involved, it is more difficult to get the corresponding estimates to compare to the case p = q > 1 ; therefore, we do need more careful analysis. The case on the whole space R N was studied in [33], and He and Li used the constraint minimization to study the subcritical growth problem:

div η p 2 η div η q 2 v + m η p 2 η + n η q 2 η = f ( x , η ( x ) ) , x R N , η ( x ) W 1 , p ( R N ) W 1 , q ( R N ) ,

where m , n > 0 , N 3 , and 1 < q < p < N , f ( x , η ) / η p 1 tend to a positive constant l as v .

Chaves et al. in [34] analyzed the existence of weak solution in D 1 , p ( R N ) D 1 , q ( R N ) for the equation involving weight functions as follows:

(1.5) Δ p η Δ q η + a ( x ) η p 2 η + b ( x ) η q 2 η = f ( x , η ) , x R N , η ( x ) W 1 , p ( R N ) W 1 , q ( R N ) ,

where 1 < q < p < q N q N q , p < N . They proved that problem (1.5) possessed at least one weak solution even if the nonlinear term f did not satisfy the (A-R) condition.

There are few papers to consider the p ( x , ) & q ( x , ) -Laplacian problem. The case is on the bounded domain Ω , and Zuo et al. in [35] investigated a kind of the Choquard-type problems without a Kirchhoff coefficient:

(1.6) ( Δ ) p ( x , ) s ( x , ) η + ( Δ ) q ( x , ) s ( x , ) η = λ η β ( x ) 2 η + Ω G ( y , η ( y ) ) x y μ ( x , y ) d y g ( x , η ( x ) ) + k ( x ) , x Ω , η ( x ) = 0 , x R N Ω ,

where the operators ( Δ ) p ( x , ) s ( x , ) & ( Δ ) q ( x , ) s ( x , ) are two fractional Laplace operators with variable order s ( x , ) : R 2 N ( 0 , 1 ) and different variable exponents p ( x , ) , q ( x , ) : R 2 N ( 1 , ) . The results of problem (1.6) are different from the single fractional Laplace operator.

While combining the p ( x , ) & q ( x , ) -Laplacian with Kirchhoff coefficients, Zhang in [36] devoted to the study of the following equations:

(1.7) i = 1 2 M i Ω × Ω η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + s p i ( x , y ) d x d y ( Δ p i ( x ) ) s η = f ( x , η ) , x Ω , η = 0 , x R N Ω ,

where M i ( i = 1 , 2 ) is a model of Kirchhoff coefficient on the bounded domain Ω . and ( Δ p i ( x ) ) s is fractional Laplace operators with a constant order. On the basis of variational method and critical point theory, he proved the existence of solutions for problems (1.7) in an appropriate space of functions.

In the famous paper [37], Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz introduced the well-known (A-R) condition on the nonlinearity, that is, there exist some positive constants μ 0 such that

0 < μ 0 F ( x , η ) f ( x , η ) η , for all ( x , η ) R N × R ,

where F ( x , η ) = 0 η f ( x , t ) d t . As is known, the (A-R) condition plays a very important role in the application of the variational method, which is widely used to guarantee that the Palais-Smale sequences are bounded and the function I λ has a mountain pass geometry. However, some interesting nonlinearities do not satisfy the (A-R) condition, and an example of such a function (see [38]) is expressed as follows:

f ( η ) = η p 0 2 η p 0 1 p 0 η r 0 2 η , η 1 , η p 0 2 η log 1 p 0 + η , η > 1 ,

where 1 < p 0 < r 0 < p = N p 0 N p 0 . Indeed, this function does not satisfy

F ( x , η ) d 1 η μ 0 d 2 , for all ( x , η ) R N × R ,

where d 1 , d 2 > 0 . Hence, many researchers pay attention to find the new reasonable conditions instead of the (A-R) condition, see [24,39] and the references therein.

As far as we know, there is no result for Kirchhoff-type equation involving double fractional p 1 ( x , ) & p 2 ( x , ) -Laplace operators with a variable s ( x , ) -order without the (A-R) condition in the whole space R N . Therefore, motivated by the previous and aforementioned cited works, we will investigate the existence and multiplicity of solutions for this kind of equation, which is different from the work of [15,34,35] that the equations of these problems involve the fractional p -Laplace operator with a constant order or do not contain Kirchhoff terms, and more general than (1.7), which authors considered a local version of the fractional operator, that is, with an integral set in Ω and not in the whole space R N . Our study extends previous results in some ways.

Throughout this article, C j ( j = 1 , 2 , , N ) denote distinct positive constants, and i = 1 and 2. For any real-valued function H defined on a domain D , we denote:

C + ( D ) { H C ( D , R ) : 1 < H inf D H H H + sup D H < + } .

The function a i : R N R are continuous functions, which satisfy the following conditions:

  1. a , a i L h ( x ) ( R N ) such that a ( x ) , a i ( x ) 0 , where h C + ( R N ) .

  2. a , a i C ( R N × R ) such that a ( x ) , a i ( x ) 0 for all x R N and a , a i 0 .

The nonlinearity f : R N × R R is a Carathéodory function, satisfying:

  1. Let p i , q C + ( D ) and 1 < p max + < q q ( x ) q + < ϑ < p s ( x ) , and there exist a 1 ( x ) and a 2 ( x ) , given by ( A 1 ) such that

    f ( x , t ) a 1 ( x ) + a 2 ( x ) t q ( x ) 1 for all ( x , t ) R N × R .

  2. lim t F ( x , t ) t ϑ p max + = + , uniformly for all x R N , where F ( x , t ) = 0 t f ( x , s ) d s > 0 .

  3. There exists β ( x ) L ( R N ) + such that lim sup t 0 p max + F ( x , t ) t p max + β ( x ) , uniformly for all x R N .

  4. There exists a constant τ 1 such that τ ϱ ( x , t ) ϱ ( x , ι t ) for all ( x , t ) R N × R and ι [ 0 , 1 ] , where ϱ ( x , t ) f ( x , t ) t p max + F ( x , t ) ;

  5. f ( x , t ) = f ( x , t ) for all ( x , t ) R N × R .

The paper is organized into five sections. Aside from Sections 1, 2 presents the main results, Section 3 presents some preliminary notions and results about fractional Lebesgue spaces and Sobolev spaces, Section 4 proves the compactness condition of Cerami sequence and Theorems 2.12.3, and Section 5 presents a conclusion.

2 The main results

We need to present the corresponding definition and variational framework before stating our main results.

Definition 1

We say that η X is a weak solution of problem (1.1), if

i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η ) ) × δ p i ( η ) , φ + i = 1 2 R η p ¯ i ( x ) 2 η φ d x = λ R f ( x , η ) φ d x ,

for any φ X , where X will be introduced in Section 2 and

δ p i ( η ) = R 2 η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) d x d y , δ p i ( η ) , φ = R 2 η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) 2 ( η ( x ) η ( y ) ) ( φ ( x ) φ ( y ) ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) d x d y .

The problem (1.1) has a variational form with the function I λ : X R , defined as follows:

(2.1) I λ ( η ) i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ R F ( x , η ) d x ,

for all η X and M i ˜ given in ( 1 ) . Moreover, the function I λ is well defined on the Sobolev spaces X and belongs to the class C 1 ( X , R ) , which the argument is similar to [21], and

(2.2) I λ ( η ) , φ i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η ) ) × δ p i ( η ) , φ + i = 1 2 R η p ¯ i ( x ) 2 η φ d x λ R f ( x , η ) φ d x ,

for any η , φ X . Thus, under our assumptions, the existence and multiplicity of solutions for problem (1.1) is equivalent to the existence of critical points for the function I λ .

Now, we are ready to state three results of this paper.

Theorem 2.1

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 )–( 3 ), ( A 1 )–( A 2 ), and ( 1 )–( 4 ) are satisfied. Then, for any λ > 0 , the problem (1.1) admits at least one nontrivial solution η 0 in X .

Theorem 2.2

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 )–( 3 ), ( A 1 )–( A 2 ), and ( 1 )–( 4 ) are satisfied. Then, there exists λ > 0 , for any λ ( 0 , λ ) , such that problem (1.1) possesses at least two distinct nontrivial solutions η 1 , η 2 in X .

Theorem 2.3

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 )–( 3 ), ( A 1 )–( A 2 ), and ( 1 )–( 5 ) are satisfied. Then, for any λ > 0 , the problem (1.1) has infinitely many nontrivial solutions in X .

Remark 2.1

The main idea to overcome these difficulties lies on the p 1 ( x , ) & p 1 ( x , ) -Laplace operators developed in [27,36], recently. Under the weaker conditions for the nonlinear term, the existence of at least one nontrivial solution (Theorem 2.1) was proved by applying the mountain pass theorem [40], and then, we obtain at least two distinct solutions (Theorem 2.2) and infinitely many solutions (Theorem 2.3) by using the generalized abstract critical point theorem [41] and fountain theorem [40], respectively.

Remark 2.2

Our work is different from the previous papers [2,15,33,35] in the sense because of Kirchhoff terms and the presence of the more complicated p 1 ( x , ) & p 1 ( x , ) -Laplace operators, which makes our analysis more complicated. The work of this paper is to be of great importance in the development of the p 1 ( x , ) & p 1 ( x , ) -Laplace operators theory.

3 Preliminary results

3.1 Variable exponents Lebesgue spaces

In this section, we briefly review some basic knowledge, lemmas, and propositions of generalized variable exponents Lebesgue spaces.

Let ϑ ( x ) C + ( R N ) , and we define the variable exponents Lebesgue spaces as follows:

L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) η : η is a measurable and R N η ϑ ( x ) d x < ,

provided with the Luxemburg norm

η ϑ ( x ) inf χ > 0 : R N η χ ϑ ( x ) d x 1 .

Then, ( L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , ϑ ( x ) ) is a separable and reflexive Banach spaces, which is called generalized Lebesgue spaces, see [17,42].

Lemma 3.1

(See [42]) Let ϑ ( x ) be the conjugate exponent of ϑ ˜ ( x ) C + ( R N ) , that is, 1 ϑ ( x ) + 1 ϑ ˜ ( x ) = 1 , for all x R N . Suppose that η L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) and u L ϑ ˜ ( x ) ( R N ) , then

R N η u d x 1 ϑ + 1 ϑ ˜ η ϑ ( x ) u ϑ ˜ ( x ) 2 η ϑ ( x ) u ϑ ˜ ( x ) .

Proposition 3.1

(See [43]) The modular of L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , which is the mapping ρ ϑ ( x ) : L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) R , is defined by

ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η ) R N η ϑ ( x ) d x .

Suppose that η n , η L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , then the following properties hold

  1. η ϑ ( x ) > 1 η ϑ ( x ) ϑ ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η ) η ϑ ( x ) ϑ + ,

  2. η ϑ ( x ) < 1 η ϑ ( x ) ϑ + ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η ) η ϑ ( x ) ϑ ,

  3. η ϑ ( x ) < 1 (resp. = 1 , > 1 ) ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η ) < 1 ( resp. = 1 , > 1 ) ,

  4. η n ϑ ( x ) 0 ( resp. + ) ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η n ) 0 ( resp. + ) ,

  5. lim n η n η ϑ ( x ) = 0 lim n ρ ϑ ( x ) ( η n η ) = 0 .

Lemma 3.2

(See [44]) Suppose that η ϑ ( x ) L β 1 ( x ) / ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , where ϑ ( x ) , β 1 ( x ) C + ( R N ) , and ϑ ( x ) β 1 ( x ) for all x R N , then η L β 1 ( x ) ( R N ) , and there exists a number ϑ ¯ [ ϑ , ϑ + ] such that

η ϑ ( x ) β 1 ( x ) / ϑ ( x ) = ( η β 1 ( x ) ) ϑ ¯ .

3.2 Variable-order fractional Sobolev spaces

From now on, we recall some important lemmas and properties about fractional Sobolev spaces with variable s ( x , ) -order.

Let p ( x , ) C + ( R 2 N ) and define the Gagliardo seminorm by

[ η ] s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) inf χ > 0 : R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p ( x , y ) χ p ( x , y ) x y N + p ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y < 1 ,

and we consider the following variable s ( x , ) -order fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents

W = W s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) ( R N ) { η L p ¯ ( ) ( R N ) : η is a measurable and [ η ] s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) < } ,

endowed with the norm

η W η p ¯ ( ) + [ η ] s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) .

Then, ( W , W ) is a separable and reflexive Banach spaces, see [26].

Proposition 3.2

(See [20,44]) Define the modular function ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) : W R by

ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η ) = R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + p ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N η p ¯ ( x ) d x .

Suppose that η n , η W , then the following properties hold

  1. η W < 1 ( resp. = 1 , > 1 ) ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η ) < 1 ( resp. = 1 , > 1 ) ,

  2. η W < 1 η W p + ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η ) η W p ,

  3. η W > 1 η W p ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η ) η W p + ,

  4. lim n η n W = 0 ( resp. + ) lim n ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η n ) = 0 ( resp. + ) ,

  5. lim n η n η W = 0 lim n ρ p ( x , ) s ( x , ) ( η n η ) = 0 .

Lemma 3.3

(See [26]) Assume that s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) fulfill ( S ) , ( P ) with N > p ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) for any ( x , y ) Ω ¯ × Ω ¯ . Set ϑ ( x ) C + ( Ω ¯ ) fulfill

1 < ϑ = min x Ω ¯ ϑ ( x ) ϑ ( x ) < p s ( x , ) ( x ) = N p ¯ ( x ) N p ¯ ( x ) s ¯ ( x ) , for any x Ω ¯ ,

where p ¯ ( x ) = p ( x , x ) and s ¯ ( x ) = s ( x , x ) . Then, there exists C ϑ = C ϑ ( N , s , p , ϑ , Ω ) > 0 such that

η ϑ ( ) C ϑ η W ,

for any η W . Moreover, the embedding W L ϑ ( ) ( Ω ) is compact.

Lemma 3.4

(See [26]) Assume that s ( x , ) , p ( x , ) fulfill ( S ) , ( P ) with N > p ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) for any ( x , y ) R N × R N , and suppose that h C + ( R N ) is a uniformly continuous such that p ¯ ( x ) h ( x ) < p s ( x ) for x R N . Then, the embedding X L h ( ) ( R N ) is continuous.

3.3 L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) spaces

We assume that ϑ ( x ) C + ( R N ) and a ( x ) satisfying ( A 2 ) , and consider the following spaces

L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) η : R N R is a measurable and R N a ( x ) η ( x ) ϑ ( x ) d x < ,

with the norm

η L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) = η ϑ , a ( x ) inf γ > 0 : R N a ( x ) η ( x ) γ ϑ ( x ) d x 1 .

Obviously, ( L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , ϑ , a ( x ) ) is a uniformly convex Banach spaces and hence reflexive (see [27,43]). As the following lemma states, the norm η ϑ , a ( x ) is connected to a semimodular ϱ ϑ , a ( x ) = R N a ( x ) η ( x ) ϑ ( x ) d x .

Lemma 3.5

(See [45]) Suppose that η n L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , then the following result holds

lim n η n ϑ , a ( x ) = 0 lim n ϱ ϑ , a ( x ) ( η n ) = 0 .

Lemma 3.6

(See [27]) Let s ( x , ) and p ( x , ) satisfy ( S ) , ( P ) . Let ϑ ( x ) C + ( R N ) with 1 < ϑ ϑ ( x ) ϑ + < p s ( x ) for all x R N . Suppose that ( A 1 ) holds with h fulfilling

p ¯ ( x ) ψ ( x ) = h ( x ) ϑ ( x ) h ( x ) 1 p s ( x ) for all x R N .

Then, the embedding W L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) is continuous. Furthermore, if ψ + < p s ( x ) for all x R N , and then W L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) is compact.

Lemma 3.7

(See [27]) Let s ( x , ) and p ( x , ) satisfy ( S ) , ( P ) . Suppose that ϑ ( x ) C + ( R N ) and ( A 1 ) hold. Then, for any η W , there exist two positive constants ϑ ¯ [ ϑ , ϑ + ] and C ϑ , a ( x ) such that

ϱ ϑ , a ( x ) ( η ) C ϑ , a ( x ) η ϑ ¯ .

Later on, we consider the following spaces:

X i η W = W s ( x , ) , p i ( x , ) ( R N ) : R N η ( x ) p ¯ i ( x ) d x < ,

and this space endowed with the norm

η X i inf γ > 0 : ρ p i ( x , ) η γ 1 ,

where the function ρ p i ( x , ) : X i R defined by

ρ p i ( x , ) ( η ) = R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N η p ¯ i ( x ) d x .

Obviously, the Banach spaces ( X i , X i ) is uniformly convex and hence reflexive. Similar to Proposition 3.2, we obtain the following lemma.

Proposition 3.3

Suppose that η n , η X i , then the following properties hold

  1. η X i < 1 ( resp. = 1 , > 1 ) ρ p i ( x , ) ( η ) < 1 ( r e s p . = 1 , > 1 ) ,

  2. η X i < 1 η X i p i + ρ p i ( x , ) ( η ) η X i p i ,

  3. η X i > 1 η X i p i ρ p i ( x , ) ( η ) η X i p i + ,

  4. lim n η n X i = 0 ( resp. + ) lim n ρ p i ( x , ) ( η n ) = 0 ( resp. + ) ,

  5. lim n η n η X i = 0 lim n ρ p i ( x , ) ( η n η ) = 0 .

Let X = X 1 X 2 , which is a separable and reflexive Banach space endowed with the norm

η X = η X 1 + η X 2 .

To simplify the presentation, we will denote the norm of X by instead of X . X denotes the dual space of X .

We note that the embedding X L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) is no longer compact, which makes it difficult to verify the Cerami condition. The following embedding result provides a new tool to overcome this difficulty.

Lemma 3.8

Let s ( x , ) and p ( x , ) satisfy ( S ) , ( P ) . Let ϑ ( x ) C + ( R N ) with 1 < ϑ ϑ ( x ) ϑ + < p s ( x ) for all x R N . Suppose that ( A 1 ) holds with h fulfilling

p ¯ ( x ) ψ ( x ) = h ( x ) ϑ ( x ) h ( x ) 1 p s ( x ) for all x R N .

Then, the embedding X L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) is continuous. Furthermore, if ψ + < p s ( x ) for all x R N , and then, X L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) is compact.

Proof

For any ψ ( x ) C + ( R N ) satisfies ψ + < p s ( x ) for all x R N , and form Lemma 3.6, we obtain that X 1 L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) and X 2 L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , and therefore, we get X L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , where the imbedding is continuous and compact.□

The function ( η ) : X R is defined as follows:

( η ) = p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) + p 2 ( x , ) ( η ) ,

where

p i ( x , ) ( η ) = R 2 N 1 p i ( x , y ) η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η ( x ) p ¯ i ( x ) d x .

Proposition 3.4

Let s ( x , ) and p i ( x , ) satisfy S and P . We consider the following function p i ( x , ) : X i X i , with X i the dual space of X i , such that

p i ( x , ) ( η ) , ϕ = R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) 2 ( η ( x ) η ( y ) ) ( ϕ ( x ) ϕ ( y ) ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N η ( x ) p ¯ i ( x ) 2 η ( x ) ϕ ( x ) d x ,

for any η , ϕ X i . Then:

  1. p i ( x , ) is a bounded and strictly monotone operator;

  2. p i ( x , ) is a mapping of type ( S + ) , that is, if η n η in X i and limsup n p i ( x , ) ( η n ) p i ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η 0 , then η n η in X i ;

  3. p i ( x , ) : X i X i is a homeomorphism.

Proof

The proof of this proposition can be given arguing similar to Lemma 2.6 in [44] and Lemma 4.2 in [46] by combining with Lemma 3.6, which we omit here.□

Similar to Proposition 3.4, we have the following result.

Proposition 3.5

Let s ( x , ) and p i ( x , ) satisfy S and P . Then:

  1. is a bounded and strictly monotone operator;

  2. is a mapping of type ( S + ) , that is, if η n η in X and limsup n ( η n ) ( η ) , η n η 0 , then η n η in X ;

  3. : X X is a homeomorphism.

Proof

Here, the proof is similar to [36], and we give a brief proof process for completeness.

  1. Obviously, is continuous and bounded. According to Proposition 3.4, since p i ( x , ) is a strictly monotone operator, = p 1 ( x , ) + p 2 ( x , ) is strictly a monotone operator. Consequently, is a bounded and strictly a monotone operator.

  2. From (i) and if η n η in X and limsup n ( η n ) ( η ) , η n η 0 , as a consequence,

    lim n p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) + p 2 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 2 ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η = 0 ,

and it follows that as n

(3.1) p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η 0

(3.2) and p 2 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 2 ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η 0 .

Since η n η in L p ¯ 1 ( x ) ( R N ) , which implies that

u n p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 u n u p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 u in L p ¯ 1 ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) 1 ( R N ) ,

and according to the Hölder’s inequality, we obtain

(3.3) R N [ η n ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 η n ( x ) η ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 η ( x ) ] ( η n η ) d x 0 as n .

To simplify the presentation, we define the following functions:

(3.4) ξ n ( x , y ) η n ( x ) η n ( y ) , ξ ( x , y ) η ( x ) η ( y ) , V n ( x ) η n ( x ) η ( x ) .

It follows that V n ( x ) V n ( y ) = ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) . Combining with (3.1) and (3.4) and as n , we deduce that

(3.5) p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η = p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , V n = R 2 N η n ( x ) η n ( y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ( η n ( x ) η n ( y ) ) ( V n ( x ) V n ( y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ( η ( x ) η ( y ) ) ( V n ( x ) V n ( y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N [ η n ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 η n ( x ) η ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) 2 η ( x ) ] ( V n ( x ) V n ( y ) ) d x = R 2 N [ ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ] ( V n ( x ) V n ( y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + o ( 1 ) .

From the well-known Simon inequality, when p 1 ( x , y ) 2 and as n , we have the following estimate:

(3.6) R 2 N ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y C 1 R 2 N [ ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ] ( ξ n ( x , y ) ξ n ( x , y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + o ( 1 ) C 1 R 2 N [ ξ n ( x ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ] ( V n ( x ) V n ( y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + o ( 1 ) = C 2 p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , V n = C 2 p 1 ( x , ) ( η n ) p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , η n η .

Taking into account (3.1), (3.3), (3.5), and (3.6), we obtain

(3.7) ρ p 1 ( x , ) ( η n η ) 0 as n .

When 1 < p 1 ( x , y ) < 2 and n , we have the following estimate:

(3.8) R 2 N ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y C 3 R 2 N 1 x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) [ ( ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ) × ( ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) ) + o ( 1 ) ] p 1 ( x , y ) 2 [ ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) + ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) ] 2 p 1 ( x , y ) 2 d x d y C 4 R 2 N ( ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) ( ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) ) + o ( 1 ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 × ξ n ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) 2 p 1 ( x , y ) 2 + ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) 2 p 1 ( x , y ) 2 d x d y .

To simplify the presentation, we define the functions f 1 , f 2 , f 3 , : R N × R N R N as follows:

f 1 ( ξ n ( x ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 ξ ( x , y ) ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) ( ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) )

and

f 2 ξ n ( x ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) , f 3 ξ ( x ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) .

Then, from (3.8), Hölder inequality, the Proposition 3.3, we derive that

(3.9) R 2 N ξ n ( x , y ) ξ ( x , y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y C 5 R 2 N ( f 1 + o ( 1 ) ) p 1 ( x , y ) 2 f 2 2 p 1 ( x , y ) 2 + f 3 2 p 1 ( x , y ) 2 d x d y C 5 ( f 1 + o ( 1 ) ) L 1 ( R 2 N ) p 1 2 + ( f 1 + o ( 1 ) ) L 1 ( R 2 N ) p 1 + 2 f 2 L 1 ( R 2 N ) 2 p 1 2 + f 2 L 1 ( R 2 N ) 2 p 1 + 2 + f 3 L 1 ( R 2 N ) 2 p 1 2 + f 3 L 1 ( R 2 N ) 2 p 1 + 2 .

Since η n and η are bounded in X 1 , from Proposition 3.3, f 2 L 1 ( R 2 N ) and f 3 L 1 ( R 2 N ) are bounded. Therefore, combining with (3.1), (3.3), (3.5), and (3.9), we have

(3.10) ρ p 1 ( x , ) ( η n η ) 0 as n .

Consequently, (3.7), (3.10), and Proposition 3.3 imply that

η n η X 1 0 as n .

Similarly,

η n η X 2 0 as n .

So, we get that

η n η 0 as n ,

that is, if η n η in X and limsup n ( η n ) ( η ) , η n η 0 , then η n η in X .

(iii) Since ( η ) is strictly a monotone operator in X , ( η ) is an injection. From Proposition 3.3, we obtain

( η ) , η η = p 1 ( x , ) ( η ) , η + p 2 ( x , ) ( η ) , η η = R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p 1 ( x , y ) x y N + p 1 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N η ( x ) p ¯ 1 ( x ) d x η + R 2 N η ( x ) η ( y ) p 2 ( x , y ) x y N + p 2 ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R N η ( x ) p ¯ 2 ( x ) d x η = min { η X 1 p 1 , η X 1 p 1 + } + min { η X 2 p 2 , η X 2 p 2 + } η .

It means that

lim η ( η ) , η η = .

Therefore, ( η ) is coercive operator, thanks to the Minty-Browder theorem (see [47], Theorem 26A), ( η ) is a surjection. Due to its monotonicity, ( η ) is an injection. So, ( ( η ) ) 1 exists. Consequently, the continuity of ( ( η ) ) 1 is sufficient to ensure that ( η ) is a homeomorphism.

If { g n } n N X , then g n g in X . we assume that there are η n , η X such that

η n = ( ( η ) ) 1 ( g n ) , and η = ( ( η ) ) 1 ( g ) .

In view of the coercivity of ( η ) , we conclude that { η n } n N is bounded in X . Then, up to subsequence η n η in X , which implies

lim n ( η n ) ( η ) , η n η = lim n g n g , η n η = 0 .

Since is of ( S + ) -type operator, we have η n η in X .□

4 The proof of the main results

4.1 Compactness condition

Let X be a Banach space and I λ C 1 ( X , R ) . We review that { η n } n N X is a Cerami sequence, if

(4.1) I λ ( η n ) c , ( 1 + η n ) I λ ( η n ) 0 in X as n ,

and we say that a function I λ satisfies the Cerami condition at the level c R , and I λ has a strongly convergent subsequence in X .

Remark 4.1

As being known, the Cerami condition is weaker than the Palais-Smale compactness condition. Thus, if a function, I λ satisfies both Cerami condition and mountain pass geometry, abstract critical point theory, and fountain theorem, then I λ has a critical point in X .

Lemma 4.1

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 )–( 3 ), ( A 1 )–( A 2 ), ( 2 ) , and ( 4 ) are satisfied. Then, for any λ > 0 , the sequence { η n } n N is bounded in X .

Proof

Let λ > 0 , and { η n } n N X is a Cerami sequence (4.1) associated with I λ , which implies

(4.2) I λ ( η n ) c ,

for some positive constant c , which does not depend on n , and

(4.3) ( 1 + η n ) I λ ( η n ) 0 in X as n .

In view of (4.3), there exists κ n 0 such that

(4.4) I λ ( η n ) , ξ κ n ξ 1 + η n , for all ξ X and n N .

By choosing ξ = η n , we obtain

(4.5) I λ ( η n ) , η n i = 1 2 m i δ p i ( η n ) , η n i = 1 2 R η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ R f ( x , η n ) η n d x κ n η n 1 + η n κ n C 6 .

From now on, we show that the sequence { η n } n N is bounded in X by contrary arguments. Assume that

(4.6) η n , as n .

We define a new sequence { ω n } n N to be denoted by ω n = η n / η n , then { ω n } n N X and ω n = 1 . By Lemma 3.8, there exists a subsequence, without loss of generality, still denoted by { ω n } n N , such that

(4.7) ω n ω weakly in X , ω n ω strongly in L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , ω n ω a.e. in R N

for ϑ ( x ) ( 1 , p s ( x ) ) and ω 0 .

If ω 0 , the set Ω + { x R N : ω ( x ) > 0 } has positive Lebesgue measure and η n ( x ) + for all x Ω + . Therefore, on the basis of the hypothesis ( 2 ) , we deduce that

(4.8) limsup n F ( x , η n ) η n ϑ p max + = limsup n F ( x , η n ) ω n ϑ p max + η n ϑ p max + = , in Ω + .

From Fatou’s lemma, we obtain

(4.9) limsup n R N F ( x , η n ) η n ϑ p max + d x = limsup n R N F ( x , η n ) ω n ϑ p max + η n ϑ p max + d x = , in Ω + .

As a consequence of (4.2), we have

(4.10) R F ( x , η n ) 1 λ i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) + 1 λ i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + C 7 λ .

and then, it follows by the condition ( 1 ) that

(4.11) R F ( x , η n ) η n ϑ p max + 1 λ η n ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) δ p i ϑ i ( η n ) + 1 λ η n ϑ p max + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + C 7 λ η n ϑ p max + .

Hence,

(4.12) limsup n R N F ( x , η n ) η n ϑ p max + d x max { 1 , M ˜ 1 ( 1 ) , M ˜ 2 ( 1 ) } λ p min ,

and this contradicts (4.9).

We suppose that ω is the null function and again arrive at a contradiction. Since I λ ( t η n ) is continuous function in t [ 0 , 1 ] , we define the sequence t n [ 0 , 1 ] by

(4.13) I λ ( t n η n ) max 0 t 1 I λ ( t η n ) .

Without loss of generality, we assume that p 2 ( x , ) < p 1 ( x , ) , and there exists a positive sequence v n ( 2 μ ) 1 / p 2 ω n = ( 2 μ ) 1 / p 2 η n η n , where μ > 1 2 p 1 + p 2 + p 2 p 1 + p 2 . On the basis of the continuity of the Nemytskii operator, we have that F ( x , v n ) 0 in L 1 ( R N ) due to v n 0 in L ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) as n . Therefore,

(4.14) lim n R N F ( x , v n ) = 0 .

According to η n as n , there exists n 0 large enough such that ( 2 μ ) 1 / p 2 η n ( 0 , 1 ) for all n n 0 . Thus, from (4.14) and the conditions ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) , we obtain

(4.15) I λ ( t n η n ) I λ ( v n ) i = 1 2 m i ϑ i ( δ p i ( v n ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) v n p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ R F ( x , v n ) d x min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } ϑ p max + i = 1 2 R 2 N v n ( x ) v n ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p i ( x , y ) d x d y + R v n p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ R F ( x , v n ) d x min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } ϑ p max + ( 2 μ ) p 1 / p 2 p 1 + ω n X 1 p 1 + + 2 μ p 2 + ω n X 2 p 2 + λ R F ( x , v n ) d x μ min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } 2 p 1 + 2 ϑ ( p max + ) 2 ( ω n X 1 + ω n X 2 ) p 1 + λ R F ( x , v n ) d x = μ min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } 2 p 1 + 2 ϑ ( p max + ) 2 λ R F ( x , v n ) d x ,

where we have used that ω n X 2 ω n X 1 + ω n X 2 = ω n = 1 and also that ( a + b ) p 2 p 1 ( a p + b p ) for a > 0 and b > 0 . From (4.14), we take n 1 n 0 such that

(4.16) lim n R N F ( x , v n ) < μ min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } 2 p 1 + 1 ϑ ( p max + ) 2 , for all n n 1 .

which joint with (4.15), we obtain

(4.17) I λ ( t n η n ) > μ min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } 2 p 1 + 1 ϑ ( p max + ) 2 , for all n n 1 .

Due to μ being arbitrary, we have the following conclusion:

(4.18) I λ ( t n η n ) = , for all n n 1 .

Since 0 t n η n η n and the hypothesis ( 4 ) yields

(4.19) R N ϱ ( x , t n η n ) d x R N τ ϱ ( x , η n ) d x , for all n n 1 .

By passing to new subsequence, if necessary, we can assume that 0 < t n < 1 for all n n 2 n 1 . Indeed, (4.18) combined with (4.2) implies that t n 1 and the fact that I λ ( 0 ) = 0 implies that t n 0 . Thus,

(4.20) 0 = t n d d t I λ ( t η n ) t = t n = I λ ( t n η n ) , t n η n = i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) × δ p i ( t n η n ) , t n η n + i = 1 2 R t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ R f ( x , t n η n ) t n η n d x .

Hence, for all sufficiently large n , we have

(4.21) 1 τ I λ ( t n η n ) 1 τ i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) + 1 τ i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ τ R F ( x , t n η n ) d x 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) × δ p i ( t n η n ) , t n η n 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 R t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ τ p max + R f ( x , t n η n ) t n η n d x + o ( 1 ) = 1 τ i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) + 1 τ i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) × δ p i ( t n η n ) , t n η n 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 R t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ τ R 1 p max + f ( x , t n η n ) t n η n F ( x , t n η n ) d x + o ( 1 ) .

By combining with (4.19) and the hypothesis ( 4 ) , we obtain

(4.22) R f ( x , t n η n ) t n η n d x = R p max + F ( x , t n η n ) d x + R ϱ ( x , t n η n ) d x R p max + F ( x , t n η n ) d x + R τ ϱ ( x , η n ) d x ,

which joint with (4.21) and the condition ( 3 ) , we obtain

(4.23) 1 τ I λ ( t n η n ) 1 τ i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) + 1 τ i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ p max + R ϱ ( x , η n ) d x 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( t n η n ) ) × δ p i ( t n η n ) , t n η n 1 τ p max + i = 1 2 R t n η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + o ( 1 ) i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ p max + R ϱ ( x , η n ) d x 1 p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) × δ p i ( η n ) , η n 1 p max + i = 1 2 R η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + o ( 1 ) i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + λ R 1 p max + f ( x , η n ) η n F ( x , η n ) d x 1 p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) × δ p i ( η n ) , η n 1 p max + i = 1 2 R η n p ¯ i ( x ) d x + o ( 1 ) C 8 ,

as n , which contradicts (4.18). Therefore, we conclude that the sequence { η n } n N is bounded in X .□

Lemma 4.2

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 2 )–( 3 ), ( A 1 )–( A 2 ), and ( 1 ) are satisfied. If the sequence { η n } n N X is a Cerami sequence of I λ at the level c R , then, for any λ > 0 , { η n } n N has a strong convergent subsequence.

Proof

We assume that { η n } n N X be a Cerami sequence. From Lemma 4.1, the sequence η n is bounded in X . It follows from Lemma 3.8, combined with the reflexivity of X , that there exists a subsequence, which is still expressed as { η n } n N , such that

(4.24) η n η weakly in X , η n η strongly in L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) , η n η a.e. in R N ,

for ϑ ( x ) ( 1 , p s ( x ) ) . Since η n is bounded in X and I λ ( η n ) 0 , we derive that

I λ ( η n ) , η n η 0 , as n ,

and it follows that

(4.25) o n ( 1 ) = I λ ( η n ) , η n η = i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) × δ p i ( η n ) , η n η + i = 1 2 R η n p ¯ i ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x λ R f ( x , η n ) ( η n η ) d x .

Indeed, by using the fact that η n η strongly in L a ( x ) ϑ ( x ) ( R N ) together with Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 3.8, we obtain

(4.26) lim n R η n p ¯ i ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x = 0 .

According to the hypothesis ( A i ) and using the hypothesis ( 1 ) , we infer that

(4.27) R f ( x , η n ) ( η n η ) d x R a 1 ( x ) ( η n η ) d x + R a 2 ( x ) η n q ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x

and

(4.28) R a 2 ( x ) η n q ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x 2 q + 1 R a 2 ( x ) η n η q ( x ) d x + R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x .

By (4.24), Hölder inequality, and Lemma 3.5, we have

(4.29) lim n R a 1 ( x ) ( η n η ) d x = 0 , lim n R a 2 ( x ) η n η q ( x ) d x = 0 , lim n R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) 1 ( η n η ) d x = 0 ,

which joint with (4.27), we obtain

(4.30) lim n R f ( x , η n ) ( η n η ) d x = 0 .

Therefore, from (4.25), (4.26), and (4.30), we deduce that

(4.31) lim n I λ ( η n ) , η n η = lim n i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) × δ p i ( η n ) , η n η = 0 .

Since { η n } n N is bounded in X , passing to a subsequence, we suppose that

R 2 η n ( x ) η n ( y ) p ( x , y ) p ( x , y ) x y N + s ( x , y ) p ( x , y ) d x d y t 0 0 as n .

  1. If t 0 = 0 , then η n strongly converges to η = 0 in X .

  2. If t 0 > 0 , since the function M i is continuous, we have

    (4.32) lim n i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) = M i ( t 0 ) 0 .

Therefore, from the hypothesis ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) , for n large enough, there exist C 9 , C 10 > 0 such that

(4.33) 0 < C 9 M i ( δ p i ( η n ) ) C 10 ,

which joint with (4.31), we obtain

(4.34) i = 1 2 lim n δ p i ( η n ) , η n η = lim n δ p 1 ( η n ) , η n η + lim n δ p 2 ( η n ) , η n η = lim n δ p 1 ( η n ) + δ p 2 ( η n ) , η n η = lim n ( η n ) , η n η = 0 .

Thus, according to (4.34) and Proposition 3.5, we finally achieve the strong convergence of η n v as n in X . I λ satisfies the Cerami condition for all c R .□

4.2 Proof of Theorem 2.1

In what follows, we prove Theorem 2.1 by applying the mountain pass theorem, see [40].

Lemma 4.3

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , ( 1 ) , and ( 3 ) are satisfied. Then, there exist positive constants ρ 0 and α 0 = α 0 ( ρ 0 ) such that for all λ > 0 we have the function I λ α 0 ( ρ 0 ) for all η X with η = ρ 0 .

Proof

From the hypotheses ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) , for any ε > 0 , we can verify that there exists C ε > 0 such that

(4.35) F ( x , t ) 1 p max + ( β ( x ) + ε ) t p max + + C ε t q ( x ) , for all ( x , t ) R N × R .

Let λ > 0 and η < 1 , and then, by using the conditions ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , and (4.35), for any η X , we deduce that

(4.36) I λ ( η ) 1 ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η ) ) × δ p i ( η ) , η + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ ( l + ε ) p max + R η p max + d x λ C ε R η q ( x ) d x M min ϑ p max + i = 1 2 Ω × Ω η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ ( l + ε ) p max + R η p max + d x λ C ε R η q ( x ) d x M min ϑ p max + ( η X 1 p 1 + + η X 2 p 2 + ) λ ( l + ε ) p max + R η p max + d x λ C ε R η q ( x ) d x ,

where M min = min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } and l = β ( x ) L ( R N ) + . According to Lemma 3.8, there exist C 11 and C 12 such that

(4.37) I λ ( η ) M min ϑ p max + ( η X 1 p 1 + + η X 2 p 2 + ) λ ( l + ε ) p max + C 11 η p max + λ C ε C 12 η q .

without loss of generality, we suppose that η X 1 p 1 + η 2 η X 2 p 2 + , and it follows that

(4.38) I λ ( η ) M min 2 p max + ϑ p max + η p 1 + λ ( l + ε ) p max + C 11 η p max + λ C ε C 12 η q .

Since q > p max + > p 1 + and choosing ρ 0 , min 1 , 1 / C ϑ , [ M min / 2 p max + λ C 11 ϑ ( l + ε ) ] 1 p max + p 1 + , we obtain

(4.39) I λ ( η ) M min 2 p max + + 1 ϑ p max + ρ X 1 p 1 + λ C ε C 12 ρ q .

Let us take

(4.40) 0 < ρ 0 < min 1 , 1 / C ϑ , [ M min / 2 p max + λ C 11 ϑ ( l + ε ) ] 1 p max + p 1 + , [ M min / 2 p max + + 1 λ C 12 ϑ p max + C ε ] 1 q p 1 + ,

combining with (4.39) implies that

(4.41) I λ ( η ) ρ 0 q M min 2 p max + + 2 ϑ p max + = α ( ρ 0 ) .

Consequently, there exists a constant α 0 = α 0 ( ρ 0 ) > 0 such that the function I λ ( η ) α 0 for all η X with η = ρ 0 .□

Lemma 4.4

Assume that ( S ) , ( P ) , ( 1 )–( 2 ), and ( 1 )–( 4 ) are satisfied. Then, for all λ > 0 , there exists η 0 X with η 0 > ρ 0 , where ρ 0 is given in Lemma 4.3, such that I ( η 0 ) < 0 for all t > 1 sufficient large.

Proof

Let λ > 0 , and it follows from the hypothesis ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) that for a positive constant M :

(4.42) M > i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( p i ) ϑ i φ 0 X i ϑ i p i + + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i φ 0 X i p i + λ R φ 0 ϑ p max + d x 1 ,

and there exists a corresponding positive constant C M such that

(4.43) F ( x , t ) M t ϑ p max + C M , uniformly for all x R N .

By using the condition ( 1 ) , we have

(4.44) M i ˜ ( t ) M i ˜ ( 1 ) t ϑ , for any t 1 .

Let us take φ 0 X { 0 } , from (4.42)–(4.44), we obtain

(4.45) I λ ( t φ 0 ) i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( δ p i ( t φ 0 ) ) ϑ i + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i R t φ 0 p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ M R t φ 0 ϑ p max + d x + λ C M R d x t ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( δ p i ( φ 0 ) ) ϑ i + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i R φ 0 p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ M R φ 0 ϑ p max + d x + λ C M R d x t ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( p i ) ϑ i φ 0 X i ϑ i p i + + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i φ 0 X i p i + λ M R φ 0 ϑ p max + d x + λ C M R d x .

By choosing M large enough, we deduce that I ( t φ 0 ) as t . In consequence, there exists η 0 t φ 0 X such that η 0 > ρ 0 and I ( η 0 ) < 0 for all t > 1 sufficient large.□

Proof of Theorem 2.1

Let X be a real Banach space, according to Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, and therefore, there exists a Cerami subsequence { η n } n N X , such that η n η 0 in X as n , and the function I λ fulfills Cerami condition for any λ > 0 . Moreover, I λ ( 0 ) = 0 is obvious, from Lemmas 4.3 and 4.4, we know that all conditions of the mountain pass theorem are fulfilled. It follows that I λ has at least one critical point η 0 such that I λ ( η 0 ) α 0 ( ρ 0 ) > 0 , namely, problem (1.1) has at least one nontrivial weak solution in X .□

4.3 Proof of Theorem 2.2

The function I λ , which is relevant to problem (1.1), is rewritten in the following form:

(4.46) I λ ( η ) U ( η ) λ V ( η ) ,

where

(4.47) U ( η ) = i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x , V ( η ) = R F ( x , η ) d x .

In this section, we prove Theorem 2.2 by using the following abstract critical point theorem, see [41].

Theorem 4.1

Let X be a real Banach space and consider two locally Lipschitz continuous functions U , V : X R . Assume that U is bounded from below and U ( 0 ) = V ( 0 ) = 0 . Set ζ > 0 be fixed, and it is supposed that for each

(4.48) λ λ 0 ( 0 , ζ ( sup η U 1 ( , ζ ) V ( η ) ) 1 ) ,

the function I λ = U λ V fulfills the Cerami condition for any λ λ 0 and is unbounded from below. Then, for any λ λ 0 , the function I λ has two distinct critical points.

Proof of Theorem 2.2

Obviously, U ( 0 ) = V ( 0 ) = 0 and U is bounded from below.

According to an argument similar to Lemma 4.4 of Theorem 2.1. Let η X { 0 } , from the hypotheses ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , ( 1 ) , and enough large t > 1 , we have

(4.49) I λ ( t η ) = i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( t η ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) t η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ R F ( x , t η ) d x t ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( p i ) ϑ i η X i ϑ i p i + + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i η p i + λ M R η ϑ p max + d x + λ C M R d x ,

by choosing M > i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( p i ) ϑ i η X i ϑ i p i + + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i η X i p i + λ R η ϑ p max + d x 1 and M is large enough, we deduce that I ( t η ) as t . As a consequence, I λ = U λ V is unbounded from below.

In view of the hypothesis ( 1 ) and Lemma 3.7, it follows that

(4.50) V ( η ) = R F ( x , η ) d x R a 1 ( x ) η d x + 1 q R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) d x

C 15 max { η , η q + , η q } C 15 max { η X 1 + η X 2 , 2 q + 1 ( η X 1 q + + η X 2 q + ) , 2 q 1 ( η X 1 q + η X 2 q ) } ,

where we have used that ( a + b ) p 2 p 1 ( a p + b p ) for a > 0 and b > 0 .

On the other hand, using (4.2) and the conditions ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) , Proposition 3.3, we deduce that

(4.51) U ( η ) = i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( δ p i ( η ) ) + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x , 1 ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η ) ) × δ p i ( η ) , η + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x M min ϑ p max + i = 1 2 Ω × Ω η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R η p ¯ i ( x ) d x = M min ϑ p max + ( η X 1 p 1 ( x , ) + η X 2 p 2 ( x , ) ) ,

where M min = min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } . Without the loss of generality, we suppose that η X 1 p 1 ( x , ) η 2 η X 2 p 2 ( x , ) > 1 . Let us take ζ = 1 , it follows for each η U 1 ( , 1 ) that

(4.52) η X 1 max ϑ p max + 2 M min U ( η ) 1 p 1 + , ϑ p max + 2 M min U ( η ) 1 p 1 max ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 1 + , ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 1 ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 1 .

Similar to the aforementioned discussion, considering η X 2 p 2 ( x , ) η 2 η X 1 p 1 ( x , ) > 1 , we have

(4.53) η X 2 max ϑ p max + 2 M min U ( η ) 1 p 2 + , ϑ p max + 2 M min U ( η ) 1 p 2 max ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 2 + , ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 2 ϑ p max + 2 M min 1 p 2 .

Let us denote

(4.54) λ = 2 q + 1 C 15 ϑ p max + 2 M min q + p 1 + ϑ p max + 2 M min q + p 2 1 ,

which joint with (4.50), we have

(4.55) sup η U 1 ( , 1 ) V ( η ) 2 q + 1 C 15 ϑ p max + 2 M min q + p 1 + ϑ p max + 2 M min q + p 2 = 1 λ < 1 λ .

According to Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, there exists a Cerami subsequence { η n } n N X , such that η n η 1 in X as n , and the function I λ fulfills the Cerami condition. Moreover, all conditions of Theorem 4.1 are satisfied. Therefore, for any λ ( 0 , λ ) λ 0 , problem (1.1) possesses at least two distinct nontrivial solutions η 1 , η 2 in X .□

4.4 Proof of Theorem 2.3

The space X is a separable and reflexive real Banach space, and there exist { e j } X and { e j } X such that

X = span { e j : j = 1 , 2 , } ¯ , X = span { e j : j = 1 , 2 , } ¯

and

e j , e i = 1 , i = j , 0 , i j .

Let X j = span { e j : j = 1 , 2 , } and define

A k = i = 1 k X i = span { e j : j = 1 , 2 , , k } , B k = i = k X i ¯ = span { e j : j = k + 1 , k + 2 , } ¯ .

Theorem 4.2

(Fountain theorem, see [40]) Let X be a real Banach space and an even function I λ C 1 ( X , R ) satisfies the Cerami condition for every c > 0 , and that there is k 0 > 0 , such that for every k k 0 , there exists ρ k > r k > 0 , so that the following properties hold:

  1. a k = max { I λ ( η ) : η A k , η = ρ k } 0 ;

  2. b k = inf { I λ ( η ) : η B k , η = r k } + as k .

Then, I λ has a sequence of critical points η k such that I λ ( η k ) + .

Lemma 4.5

(See [27]) Assume that ( A 1 ) and ( A 2 ) are satisfied. Let ζ ( x ) C + ( R N ) , ζ ( x ) < p s ( x ) , for any x R N and denote

β k = sup u B k , u X = 1 η ζ , a ( x ) ,

and then, lim k β k = 0 .

To prove Theorem 2.3, we will utilize the fountain theorem, we first need to prove two lemmas.

Lemma 4.6

Under the conditions of Theorem 2.3, there exists r k > 0 such that

inf u B k , u = r k I λ ( η ) > + .

Proof

According to the hypothesis ( 1 ) , we can verify that there exists C 21 , C 22 such that

(4.56) F ( x , t ) C 21 a 1 ( x ) t + C 22 a 2 ( x ) t q ( x ) , for all ( x , t ) R N × R .

Set λ > 0 and η > 1 for any η B k . Then, using the conditions ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) and Lemma 3.8, we deduce that

(4.57) I λ ( η ) 1 ϑ p max + i = 1 2 M i ( δ p i ( η ) ) × δ p i ( η ) , η + i = 1 2 R 1 p ¯ i ( x ) η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ C 21 R a 4 ( x ) η d x λ C 22 R a 3 ( x ) η q ( x ) d x M min ϑ p max + i = 1 2 Ω × Ω η ( x ) η ( y ) p i ( x , y ) x y N + p i ( x , y ) s ( x , y ) d x d y + R η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ C 21 R a 1 ( x ) η d x λ C 22 R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) d x M min ϑ p max + ( η X 1 p 1 + η X 2 p 2 ) λ C 23 η λ C 24 β k q + η q + M min 2 p max + 1 ϑ p max + η p min λ C 23 η λ C 24 β k q + η q + ,

where M min = min { 1 , m 1 , m 2 } , where β k is defined as in Lemma 4.5. Choosing

r k = ( M min ) 1 q + p min ( 2 p max + 1 θ p max + λ C 24 β k q + ) 1 q + p min .

It is easy to see that r k + as k + , thanks to Lemma 4.5 and the fact that p min < p max + < q + . Thus, by the choice of r k Z k with u = r k such that ρ k > r k > 0 , we obtain

B k = inf u B k , u = r k I ( u ) M min 2 p max + ϑ p max + r k p min λ C 23 r k + ,

as k + .□

Lemma 4.7

Under the conditions of Theorem 2.3, then there exists ρ k > 0 such that

max u A k , u = ρ k I λ ( η ) 0 .

Proof

Let λ > 0 and it follows from the hypotheses ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) that there exist corresponding positive constants C 16 , C 17 , C 18 such that

(4.58) F ( x , t ) C 16 t ϑ p max + C 17 a 1 ( x ) t C 18 a 2 ( x ) t q ( x ) , uniformly for all x R N .

For any η A k with η = 1 . Combining with ( 1 ) and (4.58), we obtain

(4.59) I λ ( t η ) i = 1 2 M ˜ i ( 1 ) ( δ p i ( t η ) ) ϑ i + i = 1 2 1 p ¯ i R t η p ¯ i ( x ) d x λ C 16 R t η ϑ p max + d x + λ C 17 R a 1 ( x ) t η d x + λ C 18 R a 2 ( x ) t η q ( x ) d x 2 max { 1 , M ˜ 1 ( 1 ) , M ˜ 2 ( 1 ) } p min η ϑ p max + λ C 16 R η ϑ p max + d x t ϑ p max + + λ C 17 t R a 1 ( x ) η d x + λ C 18 t q + R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) d x .

Since all norms are equivalent on the finite dimensional Banach space A k , there exist some constants C 19 , C 20 , C 21 , and C 21 such that

max { 1 , M ˜ 1 ( 1 ) , M ˜ 2 ( 1 ) } p min η ϑ p max + C 19 4 λ C 16 R η ϑ p max + d x ,

R η ϑ p max + d x C 20 η , R a 1 ( x ) η d x C 21 η , R a 2 ( x ) η q ( x ) d x C 22 η ,

which combine with (4.59), we have

(4.60) I λ ( t η ) C 19 C 20 2 λ C 16 t ϑ p max + + λ C 17 C 21 t + λ C 18 C 22 t q + .

Since ϑ p max + > q + , we obtain that I λ ( t η ) as t + . Therefore, there exists t 0 > r k > 0 large enough such that I λ ( t 0 η ) 0 , and thus, let us take ρ k = t 0 , and we conclude that

a k = max u A k , u = ρ k I ( η ) 0 .

Proof of Theorem 2.3

Let X be a real Banach space, from Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2; therefore, there exists a Cerami subsequence { η n } n N X , such that η n η 1 in X as n , and the function I λ fulfills the Cerami condition. Moreover, Lemmas 4.6, 4.7, and I λ ( 0 ) = 0 imply that I satisfies all conditions of Theorem 4.2. Consequently, for any λ > 0 , problem (1.1) has infinitely many nontrivial weak solutions in X .□

5 Conclusion

In this article, we study a kind of Kirchhoff-type problem in the whole space R N . Under some reasonable assumptions of f and with the help of variational and critical point theory, we get at least one nontrivial solution, two distinct nontrivial solutions, and infinitely many nontrivial solutions in an appropriate space of functions without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition. Several recent results of the pieces of literature are extended and improved.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX21-0454), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B220203001), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180500), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1508100), the Special Soft Science Project of Technological Innovation in Hubei Province (2019ADC146), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (11701595).

  1. Author contributions: Each of the authors contributed to each part of this study equally, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Jiabin Zuo is a guest editor of Open Mathematics and was not involved in the review process of this article.

  3. Data availability statement: Data sharing does not apply to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] M. Xiang and B. Zhang, Degenerate Kirchhoff problems involving the fractional p-Laplacian without the (AR) condition, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 60 (2015), 1277–1287. 10.1080/17476933.2015.1005612Suche in Google Scholar

[2] V. Ambrosio and T. Isernia, On a fractional p&q laplacian problem with critical sobolev-hardy exponents, Mediterr. J. Math. 15 (2018), 219, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-018-1259-9.10.1007/s00009-018-1259-9Suche in Google Scholar

[3] G. Kirchhoff, Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik, Band 1: Mechanik, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1883. Suche in Google Scholar

[4] G. Bisci and L. Vilasi, On a fractional degenerate Kirchhoff-type problem, Commun. Contemp. Math. 19 (2017), 1550088. 10.1142/S0219199715500881Suche in Google Scholar

[5] C. Ledesma, Multiplicity result for non-homogeneous fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equations in RN, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 7 (2018), 247–257. 10.1515/anona-2015-0096Suche in Google Scholar

[6] X. Fan and Q. Zhang, Existence of solutions for p(x)-Laplacian Dirichlet problem, Nonliear Anal. 52 (2003), 1843–1852. 10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00150-5Suche in Google Scholar

[7] N. Nyamoradi and N. Chung, Existence of solutions to nonlocal Kirchhoff equations of elliptic type via genus theory, Electron. J. Differential Equations. 86 (2014), 1–12. 10.12775/TMNA.2015.061Suche in Google Scholar

[8] C. Lorenzo and T. Hartley, Initialized fractional calculus, Int. J. Appl. Math. 3 (2000), 249–265. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] C. Lorenzo and T. Hartley, Variable order and distributed order fractional operators, Nonlinear Dyn. 29 (2002), 57–98. 10.1023/A:1016586905654Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. Ruiz-Medina, V. Anh, and J. Angulo, Fractional generalized random fields of variable order, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 22 (2004), 775–799. 10.1081/SAP-120030456Suche in Google Scholar

[11] S. Samko and B. Ross, Integration and differentiation to a variable fractional order, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 1 (1993), 277–300. 10.1080/10652469308819027Suche in Google Scholar

[12] S. Samko, Fractional integration and differentiation of variable order, Anal. Math. 21 (1995), 213–236. 10.1007/BF01911126Suche in Google Scholar

[13] L. Wang and B. Zhang, Infinitely many solutions for Kirchhoff-type variable-order fractional Laplacian problems involving variable exponents, Appl. Anal. 2019 (2019), 1–18. 10.1080/00036811.2019.1688790Suche in Google Scholar

[14] M. Xiang, B. Zhang, and D. Yang, Multiplicity results for variable-order fractional Laplacian equations with variable growth, Nonlinear Anal. 178 (2019), 190–204. 10.1016/j.na.2018.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

[15] N. Chung and H. Toan, On a class of fractional Laplacian problems with variable exponents and indefinite weights, Collect. Math. 71 (2020), 223–237. 10.1007/s13348-019-00254-5Suche in Google Scholar

[16] D. Edmunds and J. Rákosník, Sobolev embeddings with variable exponent, Studia Math. 143 (2000), 267–293. 10.4064/sm-143-3-267-293Suche in Google Scholar

[17] X. Fan and D. Zhao, On the spaces Lp(x) and Wk,p(x), J. Math. Anal. Appl. 263 (2001), 424–446. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7617Suche in Google Scholar

[18] J. Giacomoni, S. Tiwari, and G. Warnault, Quasilinear parabolic problem with p(x)-Laplacian: existence, uniqueness of weak solutions and stabilization, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 2016 (2016), 22–30. 10.1007/s00030-016-0380-3Suche in Google Scholar

[19] U. Kaufmann, J. Rossi, and R. Vidal, Fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents and fractional p(x)-Laplacians, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 76 (2017), 1–10. 10.14232/ejqtde.2017.1.76Suche in Google Scholar

[20] R. Biswas and S. Tiwari, Multiplicity and uniform estimate for a class of variable order fractional p(x)-Laplacian problems with concave-convex nonlinearities, (2018). Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12960. Suche in Google Scholar

[21] R. Biswas and S. Tiwari, On a class of Kirchhoff-Choquard equations involving variable-order fractional p(⋅)-Laplacian and without Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz type condition, (2020). Available from: http://arXiv.org/abs/arXiv:2005.09221. Suche in Google Scholar

[22] S. Bahrouni and H. Ounaies, Strauss and Lions type theorems for the fractional sobolev spaces with variable exponent and applications to nonlocal Kirchhoff-Choquard problem, Mediterr. J. Math. 18 (2021), 1–22. 10.1007/s00009-020-01661-wSuche in Google Scholar

[23] Y. Cheng, B. Ge, and R. Agarwal, Variable-order fractional sobolev spaces and nonlinear elliptic equations with variable exponents, J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), 071507. 10.1063/5.0004341Suche in Google Scholar

[24] J. Zuo, T. An, and A. Fiscella, A critical Kirchhoff-type problem driven by a p(⋅)-fractional Laplace operator with variable s(x,⋅)-order, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), 1017–1085. 10.1002/mma.6813Suche in Google Scholar

[25] W. Bu, T. An, G. Ye, and C. Jiao, Existence results for p1(x,⋅) and p2(x,⋅) fractional Choquard-Kirchhoff type equations with variable s(x,⋅)-order, Mathematics 9 (2021), 1973. 10.3390/math9161973Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R. Biswas and S. Tiwari, Variable order nonlocal Choquard problem with variable exponents, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2020 (2020), 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2020.1751136. Suche in Google Scholar

[27] J. Zuo, L. Yang, and S. Liang, A variable-order fractional p(⋅)-Kirchhoff type problemin RN, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 (2021), 3872–3889. 10.1002/mma.6995Suche in Google Scholar

[28] L. Cherfils and V. Il’yasov, On the stationary solutions of generalized reaction difusion equations with p&q-Laplacian, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 4 (2004), 9–22. 10.3934/cpaa.2005.4.9Suche in Google Scholar

[29] G. Figueiredo, Existence of positive solutions for a class of p&q elliptic problems with critical growth in RN, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 378 (2011), 507–518. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.02.017Suche in Google Scholar

[30] G. Li and X. Liang, The existence of nontrivial solutions to nonlinear elliptic equation of p and q-Laplacian type on RN, Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009), 2316–2334. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.066Suche in Google Scholar

[31] G. Li and Z. Guo, Multiple solutions for the p&q-Laplacian problem with critical exponent, Acta Math. Sci. 29 (2009), 903–918. 10.1016/S0252-9602(09)60077-1Suche in Google Scholar

[32] M. Wu and Z. Yang, A class of p and q-Laplacian type equation with potentials eigenvalue problem in RN, Bound. Value. Probl. 1 (2009), 1–19. 10.1155/2009/185319Suche in Google Scholar

[33] C. He and G. Li, The existence of a nontrivial solution to the p&q-Laplacian problem with nonlinearity asymptotic to up−1 at infinity in RN, Nonlinear Anal. 68 (2008), 1100–1119. 10.1016/j.na.2006.12.008Suche in Google Scholar

[34] M. F. Chaves, G. Ercole, and O. H. Miyagaki, Existence of a nontrivial solution for the (p,q)-Laplacian in RN without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition, Nonlinear Anal. 114 (2015), 133–141. 10.1016/j.na.2014.11.010Suche in Google Scholar

[35] J. Zuo, A. Fiscella, and A. Bahrouni, Existence and multiplicity results for p(⋅) & q(⋅) fractional Choquard problems with variable order, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 67 (2022), 500–516. 10.1080/17476933.2020.1835878Suche in Google Scholar

[36] J. Zhang, Existence results for a kirchhoff-type equations involving the fractional p1(x)&p2(x)-laplace operator, Collect. Math. 4 (2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13348-021-00318-5. Suche in Google Scholar

[37] A. Ambrosetti and P. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical points theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal. 14 (1973), 349–381. 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7Suche in Google Scholar

[38] D. Mugnai and N. S. Papageorgiou, Wang’s multiplicity result for superlinear (p,q)-equations without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 4919–4937. 10.1090/S0002-9947-2013-06124-7Suche in Google Scholar

[39] S. Liu, On superlinear problems without the Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz condition, Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), 788–795. 10.1016/j.na.2010.04.016Suche in Google Scholar

[40] W. Willem, Minimax Theorems. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc, Boston, MA, 1996. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4146-1Suche in Google Scholar

[41] J. Lee, J. M. Kim, and Y. H. Kim, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Kirchhoff-Schrödinger type equations involving p(x)-Laplacian on the entire space RN, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 45 (2019), 620–649. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2018.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

[42] O. Kovácik and J. Rákosník, On spaces Lp(x) and W1,p(x), Czechoslovak Math. J. 41 (1991), 592–618. 10.21136/CMJ.1991.102493Suche in Google Scholar

[43] L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. Hästö, and M. Ruzicka, Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2017, 2011. 10.1007/978-3-642-18363-8Suche in Google Scholar

[44] E. Azroul, A. Benkirane, and M. Shimi, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for fractional p(x,⋅)-Kirchhoff-type problems in RN, Appl. Anal. 2019 (2019), 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2019.1673373. Suche in Google Scholar

[45] M. Wei and C. Tang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for p(x)-Kirchhoff type problem in RN, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 36 (2013), 767–781. Suche in Google Scholar

[46] A. Bahrouni and V. Rǎdulescu, On a new fractional Sobolev space and applications to nonlocal variational problems with variable exponent, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S. 11 (2018), 379–389. 10.3934/dcdss.2018021Suche in Google Scholar

[47] E. Zeidler, Nonlinear function analysis and applications, In: Nonlinear Monotone Operators, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990. Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-15
Accepted: 2022-03-05
Published Online: 2022-04-13

© 2022 Weichun Bu et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. A random von Neumann theorem for uniformly distributed sequences of partitions
  3. Note on structural properties of graphs
  4. Mean-field formulation for mean-variance asset-liability management with cash flow under an uncertain exit time
  5. The family of random attractors for nonautonomous stochastic higher-order Kirchhoff equations with variable coefficients
  6. The intersection graph of graded submodules of a graded module
  7. Isoperimetric and Brunn-Minkowski inequalities for the (p, q)-mixed geominimal surface areas
  8. On second-order fuzzy discrete population model
  9. On certain functional equation in prime rings
  10. General complex Lp projection bodies and complex Lp mixed projection bodies
  11. Some results on the total proper k-connection number
  12. The stability with general decay rate of hybrid stochastic fractional differential equations driven by Lévy noise with impulsive effects
  13. Well posedness of magnetohydrodynamic equations in 3D mixed-norm Lebesgue space
  14. Strong convergence of a self-adaptive inertial Tseng's extragradient method for pseudomonotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
  15. Generic uniqueness of saddle point for two-person zero-sum differential games
  16. Relational representations of algebraic lattices and their applications
  17. Explicit construction of mock modular forms from weakly holomorphic Hecke eigenforms
  18. The equivalent condition of G-asymptotic tracking property and G-Lipschitz tracking property
  19. Arithmetic convolution sums derived from eta quotients related to divisors of 6
  20. Dynamical behaviors of a k-order fuzzy difference equation
  21. The transfer ideal under the action of orthogonal group in modular case
  22. The multinomial convolution sum of a generalized divisor function
  23. Extensions of Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequalities with two independent variables
  24. Unicity of meromorphic functions concerning differences and small functions
  25. Solutions to problems about potentially Ks,t-bigraphic pair
  26. Monotonicity of solutions for fractional p-equations with a gradient term
  27. Data smoothing with applications to edge detection
  28. An ℋ-tensor-based criteria for testing the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms
  29. Characterizations of *-antiderivable mappings on operator algebras
  30. Initial-boundary value problem of fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on half line with nonlinear boundary values
  31. On a more accurate half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving hyperbolic functions
  32. On split twisted inner derivation triple systems with no restrictions on their 0-root spaces
  33. Geometry of conformal η-Ricci solitons and conformal η-Ricci almost solitons on paracontact geometry
  34. Bifurcation and chaos in a discrete predator-prey system of Leslie type with Michaelis-Menten prey harvesting
  35. A posteriori error estimates of characteristic mixed finite elements for convection-diffusion control problems
  36. Dynamical analysis of a Lotka Volterra commensalism model with additive Allee effect
  37. An efficient finite element method based on dimension reduction scheme for a fourth-order Steklov eigenvalue problem
  38. Connectivity with respect to α-discrete closure operators
  39. Khasminskii-type theorem for a class of stochastic functional differential equations
  40. On some new Hermite-Hadamard and Ostrowski type inequalities for s-convex functions in (p, q)-calculus with applications
  41. New properties for the Ramanujan R-function
  42. Shooting method in the application of boundary value problems for differential equations with sign-changing weight function
  43. Ground state solution for some new Kirchhoff-type equations with Hartree-type nonlinearities and critical or supercritical growth
  44. Existence and uniqueness of solutions for the stochastic Volterra-Levin equation with variable delays
  45. Ambrosetti-Prodi-type results for a class of difference equations with nonlinearities indefinite in sign
  46. Research of cooperation strategy of government-enterprise digital transformation based on differential game
  47. Malmquist-type theorems on some complex differential-difference equations
  48. Disjoint diskcyclicity of weighted shifts
  49. Construction of special soliton solutions to the stochastic Riccati equation
  50. Remarks on the generalized interpolative contractions and some fixed-point theorems with application
  51. Analysis of a deteriorating system with delayed repair and unreliable repair equipment
  52. On the critical fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-Poisson equations with electromagnetic fields
  53. The exact solutions of generalized Davey-Stewartson equations with arbitrary power nonlinearities using the dynamical system and the first integral methods
  54. Regularity of models associated with Markov jump processes
  55. Multiplicity solutions for a class of p-Laplacian fractional differential equations via variational methods
  56. Minimal period problem for second-order Hamiltonian systems with asymptotically linear nonlinearities
  57. Convergence rate of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method under Hölderian local error bound
  58. Non-binary quantum codes from constacyclic codes over 𝔽q[u1, u2,…,uk]/⟨ui3 = ui, uiuj = ujui
  59. On the general position number of two classes of graphs
  60. A posteriori regularization method for the two-dimensional inverse heat conduction problem
  61. Orbital stability and Zhukovskiǐ quasi-stability in impulsive dynamical systems
  62. Approximations related to the complete p-elliptic integrals
  63. A note on commutators of strongly singular Calderón-Zygmund operators
  64. Generalized Munn rings
  65. Double domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
  66. Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the norm minimum problem on digraphs
  67. On the p-integrable trajectories of the nonlinear control system described by the Urysohn-type integral equation
  68. Robust estimation for varying coefficient partially functional linear regression models based on exponential squared loss function
  69. Hessian equations of Krylov type on compact Hermitian manifolds
  70. Class fields generated by coordinates of elliptic curves
  71. The lattice of (2, 1)-congruences on a left restriction semigroup
  72. A numerical solution of problem for essentially loaded differential equations with an integro-multipoint condition
  73. On stochastic accelerated gradient with convergence rate
  74. Displacement structure of the DMP inverse
  75. Dependence of eigenvalues of Sturm-Liouville problems on time scales with eigenparameter-dependent boundary conditions
  76. Existence of positive solutions of discrete third-order three-point BVP with sign-changing Green's function
  77. Some new fixed point theorems for nonexpansive-type mappings in geodesic spaces
  78. Generalized 4-connectivity of hierarchical star networks
  79. Spectra and reticulation of semihoops
  80. Stein-Weiss inequality for local mixed radial-angular Morrey spaces
  81. Eigenvalues of transition weight matrix for a family of weighted networks
  82. A modified Tikhonov regularization for unknown source in space fractional diffusion equation
  83. Modular forms of half-integral weight on Γ0(4) with few nonvanishing coefficients modulo
  84. Some estimates for commutators of bilinear pseudo-differential operators
  85. Extension of isometries in real Hilbert spaces
  86. Existence of positive periodic solutions for first-order nonlinear differential equations with multiple time-varying delays
  87. B-Fredholm elements in primitive C*-algebras
  88. Unique solvability for an inverse problem of a nonlinear parabolic PDE with nonlocal integral overdetermination condition
  89. An algebraic semigroup method for discovering maximal frequent itemsets
  90. Class-preserving Coleman automorphisms of some classes of finite groups
  91. Exponential stability of traveling waves for a nonlocal dispersal SIR model with delay
  92. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Dirichlet problems with nonlinear impulses
  93. The transitivity of primary conjugacy in regular ω-semigroups
  94. Stability estimation of some Markov controlled processes
  95. On nonnil-coherent modules and nonnil-Noetherian modules
  96. N-Tuples of weighted noncommutative Orlicz space and some geometrical properties
  97. The dimension-free estimate for the truncated maximal operator
  98. A human error risk priority number calculation methodology using fuzzy and TOPSIS grey
  99. Compact mappings and s-mappings at subsets
  100. The structural properties of the Gompertz-two-parameter-Lindley distribution and associated inference
  101. A monotone iteration for a nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with indefinite weight and Neumann boundary conditions
  102. Delta waves of the isentropic relativistic Euler system coupled with an advection equation for Chaplygin gas
  103. Multiplicity and minimality of periodic solutions to fourth-order super-quadratic difference systems
  104. On the reciprocal sum of the fourth power of Fibonacci numbers
  105. Averaging principle for two-time-scale stochastic differential equations with correlated noise
  106. Phragmén-Lindelöf alternative results and structural stability for Brinkman fluid in porous media in a semi-infinite cylinder
  107. Study on r-truncated degenerate Stirling numbers of the second kind
  108. On 7-valent symmetric graphs of order 2pq and 11-valent symmetric graphs of order 4pq
  109. Some new characterizations of finite p-nilpotent groups
  110. A Billingsley type theorem for Bowen topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems
  111. F4 and PSp (8, ℂ)-Higgs pairs understood as fixed points of the moduli space of E6-Higgs bundles over a compact Riemann surface
  112. On modules related to McCoy modules
  113. On generalized extragradient implicit method for systems of variational inequalities with constraints of variational inclusion and fixed point problems
  114. Solvability for a nonlocal dispersal model governed by time and space integrals
  115. Finite groups whose maximal subgroups of even order are MSN-groups
  116. Symmetric results of a Hénon-type elliptic system with coupled linear part
  117. On the connection between Sp-almost periodic functions defined on time scales and ℝ
  118. On a class of Harada rings
  119. On regular subgroup functors of finite groups
  120. Fast iterative solutions of Riccati and Lyapunov equations
  121. Weak measure expansivity of C2 dynamics
  122. Admissible congruences on type B semigroups
  123. Generalized fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions for co-ordinated convex interval-valued functions
  124. Inverse eigenvalue problems for rank one perturbations of the Sturm-Liouville operator
  125. Data transmission mechanism of vehicle networking based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  126. Dual uniformities in function spaces over uniform continuity
  127. Review Article
  128. On Hahn-Banach theorem and some of its applications
  129. Rapid Communication
  130. Discussion of foundation of mathematics and quantum theory
  131. Special Issue on Boundary Value Problems and their Applications on Biosciences and Engineering (Part II)
  132. A study of minimax shrinkage estimators dominating the James-Stein estimator under the balanced loss function
  133. Representations by degenerate Daehee polynomials
  134. Multilevel MC method for weak approximation of stochastic differential equation with the exact coupling scheme
  135. Multiple periodic solutions for discrete boundary value problem involving the mean curvature operator
  136. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications (Part II)
  137. Coupled measure of noncompactness and functional integral equations
  138. Existence results for neutral evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and delay via fractional operator
  139. Global weak solution of 3D-NSE with exponential damping
  140. Special Issue on Fractional Problems with Variable-Order or Variable Exponents (Part I)
  141. Ground state solutions of nonlinear Schrödinger equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian and potential wells
  142. A class of p1(x, ⋅) & p2(x, ⋅)-fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with variable s(x, ⋅)-order and without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition in ℝN
  143. Jensen-type inequalities for m-convex functions
  144. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear Analysis (Part III)
  145. The influence of the noise on the exact solutions of a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
  146. Basic inequalities for statistical submanifolds in Golden-like statistical manifolds
  147. Global existence and blow up of the solution for nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient nonlinear source term
  148. Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in a diffusive predator-prey model with hunting cooperation
  149. Efficient fixed-point iteration for generalized nonexpansive mappings and its stability in Banach spaces
Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2022-0028/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen